| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168472088 by Aussie Home Services @ 2025-07-04 07:03 | 1 | 2025-07-04 07:50 | nevw | Hi, which floor and unit number is your business located in at 383 Kent St? |
| 168427074 by watrails @ 2025-07-03 05:41 | 1 | 2025-07-03 23:51 | nevw | Hi, looks like you may have accidentally deleted parts of the natures reserve boundaries.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.13040&lat=-31.93987&zoom=19 |
| 2 | 2025-07-03 23:55 | nevw | You can see the deleted bits in red by zooming in on this https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168427074 | |
| 168440062 by BlumleinPear @ 2025-07-03 11:26 | 1 | 2025-07-03 23:02 | nevw | Hi, osmi detects a couple of self intersections.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.95839&lat=-26.70441&zoom=15 |
| 2 | 2025-07-03 23:45 | nevw | Also on this mp https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19317584The mp should only be tagged ...natural=wood and type=multipolygonThe inners have their own tags like you have with the ponds. area=yes is not required in the inners around the house blocks. | |
| 3 | 2025-07-04 02:03 | BlumleinPear ♦7 | G'day, thanks for the heads up. Fixed that. | |
| 168388187 by nlseven @ 2025-07-02 09:11 | 1 | 2025-07-02 11:55 | nevw | Hi, the building overlay is not sufficiently accurate to add to the osm without further refinement. It is expected that you zoom in close to the building footprint and adjust the corners to be a close copy of the building seen in the imagery. If they were more accurate we could import the data but w... |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 12:43 | aharvey ♦1,716 | Nev, these were already added prior to this changeset, nlseven just changed the building types, which looks fine. | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 15:00 | nevw | Ooops, my humblest apologies nlseven, keep up the good work. A big improvement is needed in the way I address quality control issues it seems. | |
| 168070473 by Bretty @ 2025-06-24 23:26 | 1 | 2025-06-25 13:07 | nevw | Hi, I think you have added the wrong housenumber here.I guess the numbers go from 52 to 62 for this group of residences and #54 seems to me to have been already mapped correctly. It appears to me that the one you added should be #58 ?If I am correct, can you add #’s 56-62 and also add addr... |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 09:13 | nevw | no response, mapped logical sequence of house numbers in street and needs confirmation. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-30 11:58 | Bretty ♦1 | Those changes look correct. Sorry but I missed your original comment. When I made my initial addition I was caught staring at the number 54 and messed up. Thank you. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-30 12:52 | nevw | Thanks, we got it right afterall. | |
| 168075960 by schrimple @ 2025-06-25 05:18 | 1 | 2025-06-26 02:56 | nevw | Hi, osmi detected these two invalid multipolygons. I deleted both and changed to simple polygons.Examples of invalid mp are here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 168113270 by Scott Samuels @ 2025-06-25 21:24 | 1 | 2025-06-26 00:05 | nevw | Hi, street names are not abbreviated in osm.Cct and av need to be written as Circuit and Avenue |
| 168081500 by Tassie turf taker @ 2025-06-25 08:00 | 1 | 2025-06-25 09:30 | nevw | Hi, I notice you have removed a section that crosses in to private property. Should the remaining section have access=private removed or have foot=yes and bicycle=yes so that they can link to other path segments.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access?uselang=en-GB |
| 2 | 2025-06-26 00:21 | aharvey ♦1,716 | Agree with nevw, better to use access=private. Though it's unclear to me from the imagery if this path does join up, so I've re-added the private driveway access in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168116099 marking it as access=private. | |
| 167988422 by Ctrl_Alt_DeFeat @ 2025-06-23 07:45 | 1 | 2025-06-23 08:35 | nevw | You have misplaced this closer to Adams St than Powers St.It would be better to add the details to the building instead of a fence next to a footway |
| 2 | 2025-06-24 05:36 | nevw | I have reverted this misplaced address | |
| 167806012 by lephan @ 2025-06-19 03:31 | 1 | 2025-06-20 03:49 | nevw | Hi, osmi detects a problem herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.16720&lat=-35.20780&zoom=16 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9592514 |
| 2 | 2025-06-22 08:00 | nevw | This area is not defined properlyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9592514I am unable to know the bounds in the bottom left corner to fix it.Can you fix the Gungahlin 792 boundary. | |
| 167806420 by nniro @ 2025-06-19 04:01 | 1 | 2025-06-19 05:49 | nevw | Hi, when mapping a house, draw the outline accurately of the house itself instead of the block. Pressing Q will square the sides. |
| 167784784 by JSR1781 @ 2025-06-18 14:17 | 1 | 2025-06-19 01:32 | nevw | Hi, the grass multipolygon has an inner touching the outer ring at the top right corner.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.73818&lat=-34.01152&zoom=19 |
| 167764462 by TheHolyCessna @ 2025-06-18 05:14 | 1 | 2025-06-18 11:48 | nevw | Hi, osmi areas detects there is a problem in the way you constructed the grass multipolygon.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.02305&lat=-34.63368&zoom=17Inner rings cannot touch the outer ring to be valid. See our wiki for multipolygon validity. |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 11:51 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon | |
| 167719931 by yazanarouri @ 2025-06-17 04:05 | 1 | 2025-06-17 04:35 | nevw | The name of the road is hyphenated in osm Southport-Nerang Roadhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579335036#map=19/-27.985538/153.339147 |
| 2 | 2025-06-17 07:30 | nevw | I reverted this change. | |
| 167719304 by Ozora Solar @ 2025-06-17 03:19 | 1 | 2025-06-17 04:46 | nevw | Hi, if you want to map the building that the company occupies, map the bounds of the one building instead of altering the landuse tags for the whole commercial landuse block.I have restored the landuse=commercial to the block.If the company occupies all the building you map then you can apply th... |
| 2 | 2025-06-17 04:49 | nevw | I added office=company to the node so that the info gets rendered on the map. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-17 04:52 | nevw | I also mapped the building and tagged as building=yes | |
| 167717440 by BRWNC @ 2025-06-17 01:00 | 1 | 2025-06-17 01:10 | nevw | Hi, the Calderwood boundary is already mapped in osm.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6076571#map=14/-34.56061/150.72797&layers=D |
| 2 | 2025-06-17 01:18 | nevw | I deleted your coarse landuse boundary as it already mapped correctly.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820233155#map=18/-34.572499/150.750857 | |
| 167716477 by AlienChex @ 2025-06-16 23:38 | 1 | 2025-06-17 01:03 | nevw | Hi, there has been recent discussion about changing roadway classifications on our community forum.https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/recent-road-hierarchy-retagging-nsw-sydney/131206/4 |
| 167671265 by Magentacoder @ 2025-06-16 00:08 | 1 | 2025-06-16 00:44 | nevw | Hi, Sadleir Street is the correct spelling. I have corrected it. |
| 167558109 by nevw @ 2025-06-13 04:41 | 1 | 2025-06-13 04:45 | nevw | Also added a few driveways to clarify property access. |
| 167453798 by linclres @ 2025-06-10 16:33 | 1 | 2025-06-10 19:51 | nevw | A building tag is only used to outline a building shape. The land is already tagged as landuse=residential but a polygon encompassing a larger area as well as landuse=greenfield for this block of land.If you want it to be displayed differently you could map a surrounding fence line if it is presen... |
| 167272805 by i_drove_this_road @ 2025-06-06 15:20 | 1 | 2025-06-06 19:41 | nevw | Hi, I noticed you have deleted the end of Milbank Avenue. Was this intended? |
| 2 | 2025-06-07 01:51 | nevw | …also I noticed other maps have this road named Millbank (with two ll’s) as in the nearby Millbank Reservoir. Can you confirm the correct spelling too, thanks? | |
| 3 | 2025-06-07 20:54 | nevw | Reverted duplicate parking and deletion of road section. Road name is correct. | |
| 166857281 by Oztakkprint @ 2025-05-28 07:27 | 1 | 2025-05-28 07:58 | nevw | Hi, you need to place the business at the office you operate from instead of out in a vacant paddock. Also include the addr:housenumber on Forestdale Road. |
| 2 | 2025-05-28 08:42 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Your ABN number suggests you are at 42 Showgrounds Road, Castle Hill - but where is the actual location of the business? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-28 23:04 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Also, a link to Google Drive likely isn't going to work for an image, you're best to link to an image on your website. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857281 | |
| 4 | 2025-06-04 00:29 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset that has not provided a correct physical location for their business. | |
| 167115909 by BS91 @ 2025-06-03 04:23 | 1 | 2025-06-03 07:16 | nevw | Hi, your comment is 'culvert' but you tagged as waterway=milestone.As a milestone seems unlikely, did you mean to draw a small section of the waterway below the road here, perhaps joining Tallebudgera Creek, and tag the section under the road as a culvert with...waterway=streamlayer=... |
| 167038852 by mikael333 @ 2025-06-01 08:08 | 1 | 2025-06-01 13:20 | nevw | I have reverted all your changests in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167050778 |
| 167035813 by mikael333 @ 2025-06-01 05:46 | 1 | 2025-06-01 11:42 | nevw | Hi, you are editing a public map not your own private map. All the edits to road class classification, etc in all your changesets are incorrect. Please read the guidelines on our wiki in relation to the highway classes as used in the osm.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Classificatio... |
| 167040695 by K M Aussie23 @ 2025-06-01 09:02 | 1 | 2025-06-01 11:37 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted this changeset which incorrectly turned a one-way part of a divided main road to two-way and shifted cycle lane to wrong side on this section. |
| 166721338 by nevw @ 2025-05-25 06:42 | 1 | 2025-05-29 16:45 | Ethan Grobin ♦12 | Why did you delete the roof over the netball court at mentone park in this changeset and delete 13 1-3 Southern Road? These all exist. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166721338 |
| 2 | 2025-05-29 18:52 | nevw | Apologies, it is visible on Esri imagery. I’ll fix soon by reverting part of the changeset. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-29 18:57 | Ethan Grobin ♦12 | I've already fixed it :) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-29 19:24 | nevw | Thanks Eatham | |
| 166574520 by Skykai @ 2025-05-21 15:29 | 1 | 2025-05-21 21:42 | nevw | Hi, what is the attraction near the end of Gould Drive? It appears to be located among trees between to farms and there is no exit from the end of Gould Drive by foot. Does the powerline cut line provide access? |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 09:56 | nevw | no response, deleted attraction | |
| 166638574 by SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM @ 2025-05-23 05:37 | 1 | 2025-05-23 06:21 | nevw | Hi, you could have left the address info at the old address and just deleted the NAA details.Have you entered a node with NAA details at the new address?You have accidentally shifted a highway=crossing node. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166638574I can fix this if you prefer. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 06:25 | SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM ♦1 | HI Sorry, first time using openstreet. If you could please fix it much appreciated. Thak you | |
| 3 | 2025-05-23 06:26 | SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM ♦1 | Sorry I havent entered NAA details for the new address | |
| 4 | 2025-05-23 08:35 | nevw | The old site building has been razed and roads constructed on old site so mapped roads and left address off.I entered the new NAA site details and fixed shifted node.Cheers...Keep on mapping | |
| 5 | 2025-05-26 01:22 | SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM ♦1 | Thanks a lot....much appreciated! | |
| 166627463 by Premium Glass & Aluminium @ 2025-05-22 19:29 | 1 | 2025-05-23 00:19 | nevw | Hi, you have located the business building on the footway in front of an industrial complex. You need to shift it to the actual physical building it occupies. |
| 166550059 by MJFC @ 2025-05-21 05:21 | 1 | 2025-05-22 03:48 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons cannot share sides.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.11601&lat=-35.25470&zoom=19https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 166545219 by VQArtStudio @ 2025-05-20 23:20 | 1 | 2025-05-20 23:37 | nevw | Looks good to me. |
| 166524614 by VQArtStudio @ 2025-05-20 13:15 | 1 | 2025-05-20 22:16 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I had to revert both your edits due to dragged nodes and addresses and also the retagging of landuse=retail to a building=retail as the area is not one building.Please re-add VQArtStudio and zoom in much closer so you don't accidentally select and move other nodes. |
| 2 | 2025-05-20 22:24 | nevw | Also, instead of re-tagging the 136-138 Rowe Street address add a new node for the studio at 33 West Parade for your studio. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-20 22:36 | VQArtStudio ♦1 | The studio is located in the same building as Rumble Fine Cafe (136 Rowe St), but while the cafe’s entrance faces 136 Rowe St, my studio’s entrance is on the opposite side, facing 33 West Parade. | |
| 4 | 2025-05-20 22:37 | VQArtStudio ♦1 | Could you advise how I should correctly list my address to reflect that I share the building with Rumble Fine Cafe, despite having separate entrances? Thank you for your guidance! | |
| 5 | 2025-05-20 23:06 | nevw | The building you're in is tagged 136-138 Rowe Street and and separate nodes are used for the businesses within that building.I think you need to add your node near the entrance you use and add all your tags to it, including. You could shift the building tag a bit in line with the other buildi... | |
| 6 | 2025-05-20 23:16 | nevw | I just re-aligned the building numbers which prabably shifted your building tag a bit out of your way. | |
| 166200354 by surveydad4 @ 2025-05-13 12:30 | 1 | 2025-05-13 21:21 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Hi, you've dragged the sidewalk/footpath way to go across the college. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166200354 |
| 2 | 2025-05-19 08:08 | nevw | I attempted to fix this area a bit but don't know extent of church.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166462513#map=19/-34.707780/138.707072 | |
| 166370063 by Boothy316 @ 2025-05-16 21:31 | 1 | 2025-05-17 01:45 | nevw | Hi, you have placed two defibrillators here, one on top of the other.Are there two here or should I delete one? |
| 166330250 by Roof & Plumbing Specialists @ 2025-05-16 03:56 | 1 | 2025-05-16 05:05 | nevw | Hi, this is not the correct way to add your business to osm and I have reverted it.Try this site for info for companies to add their site to osm https://www.geoapify.com/osm-for-local-marketing/ |
| 2 | 2025-05-16 05:10 | nevw | You need to add a new node at the physical location where your business is based instead of added the details to the suburb point. The above link with help. | |
| 166282477 by AussiePlz @ 2025-05-15 02:16 | 1 | 2025-05-15 05:30 | nevw | Hi, these appear to be fictitious. Can a person familiar with the area confirm this mapping. |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 22:25 | nevw | These edits have now been reverted | |
| 166256892 by AussiePlz @ 2025-05-14 13:23 | 1 | 2025-05-14 14:06 | nevw | I have reverted this suspected vandalism. |
| 166130762 by Supt_of_Printing @ 2025-05-12 02:06 | 1 | 2025-05-12 21:50 | nevw | Hi, this relation appears broken https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.20379&lat=-33.90528&zoom=18https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5700628#map=16/-33.90764/151.20832 |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 03:04 | Supt_of_Printing ♦40 | Hmm, not sure how that happened, but not sure how to fix it. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 03:08 | nevw | I think TheSwavu might have fixed ithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2916624#map=13/-33.90825/151.19187 | |
| 4 | 2025-05-13 03:17 | Supt_of_Printing ♦40 | Thanks | |
| 166027646 by topius @ 2025-05-09 13:08 | 1 | 2025-05-12 20:22 | nevw | Hi, the shops multipolygon is invalid because outers cannot share sides.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.18491&lat=-9.44648&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cint... |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 02:53 | nevw | I suggest a polygon drawn around perimeter for the mall.Multipolygons are not the same as multiple polygons joined together and have to be formed in a valid way as in the documentation.You could also map it all using the building:part method which would be a polygon around the perimeter and a po... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 07:07 | topius ♦58 | Thank you @nevw. I fixed it as you suggested. | |
| 165510013 by topius @ 2025-04-27 15:03 | 1 | 2025-05-12 20:33 | nevw | Similar herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.26539&lat=-4.33741&zoom=19 |
| 165431462 by topius @ 2025-04-25 15:53 | 1 | 2025-05-12 20:31 | nevw | Hi, another similar osmi error herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.81367&lat=-5.21722&zoom=19 |
| 165874367 by AndrewS @ 2025-05-06 05:51 | 1 | 2025-05-07 00:51 | nevw | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19069461#map=13/-31.84367/150.34610 appears to have a coup;e of inners that should be part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10116036#map=12/-31.7806/150.1435Osmi detects a role error https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.34867&a... |
| 2 | 2025-05-07 04:42 | AndrewS ♦28 | Thanks, I will fix. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-07 04:50 | AndrewS ♦28 | Yes, thanks, I suspect JOSM would be better for some of the stuff I do. I just could never get my head around it. | |
| 165825760 by Velo Mapper @ 2025-05-05 03:42 | 1 | 2025-05-05 21:47 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons cannot share sides. I have fixed by making simple polygons.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 165544784 by Fen Kapwa @ 2025-04-28 11:31 | 1 | 2025-04-28 13:16 | nevw | Hi, you have listed your business at 10 Wyndham Place and placed the address node away from any particular building.There are 8 units at number 10. Which unit is your business located at and can you locate the business over the building or where the guttering operations are maintained. Osm expects... |
| 2 | 2025-05-04 08:52 | nevw | no response, reverted business not mapped to a specific building location. Appears to be online only contact. | |
| 165494943 by TwoDads @ 2025-04-27 08:37 | 1 | 2025-04-27 12:03 | nevw | Hi, large residential areas have been deleted in this changeset.https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=165494943Is this intended? |
| 2 | 2025-04-28 08:55 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | There's also a set of overlapping buildings, looks like it might have been an attempt at using one of the building plugins that didn't quite work as intended. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165494943 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-29 09:46 | TwoDads ♦1 | Removing residential areas was intentional. I plan to reapply without pinning to roads and natural areas as per the wiki guidelines. The issue with the overlapping buildings appear to be arising from the fact that the ‘club’ encompasses the whole lot. I tried to include buildings within ... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-29 10:25 | nevw | Thanks for letting us know. Josm will reward your efforts many times over. | |
| 163802547 by wahyul_agraria @ 2025-03-19 06:26 | 1 | 2025-04-26 12:11 | nevw | Hi, this relation seems to have lost the it's outer and only has inners left.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6368238#map=15/-0.45987/132.32266&layers=DThe problem appears to be that you deleted all the outer boundaries.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163802547Was th... |
| 2 | 2025-04-29 05:00 | rblldnk ♦8 | Hi Wahyu,Apakah menambahkan house number harus menghapus relation? | |
| 3 | 2025-04-29 05:34 | nevw | No, I will recover all the deleted boundaries in the next few days. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-29 07:29 | nevw | I decided not to revert these areas because I don't understand the full extent of the changes and why they were made | |
| 5 | 2025-04-29 07:31 | wahyul_agraria ♦1 | Hi ratu, Mohon maaf saya tidak sengaja menghapusnya. Saat itu saya sedang mengedit penggunaan lahan area tersebut, dan terdapat peringatan saat validasi. Kedepan saya akan berhati hati menghapus sesuatu. SalamWahyu | |
| 165572931 by Giuliz @ 2025-04-29 04:06 | 1 | 2025-04-29 05:37 | nevw | Hi, do you know the name of the company or is there a business name on the centre? |
| 165569053 by Shaq City Mission @ 2025-04-28 23:46 | 1 | 2025-04-29 03:56 | nevw | Hi, you might like to add tags specifying what is accepted for recycling herehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling |
| 165550326 by imacardigandisaster @ 2025-04-28 13:49 | 1 | 2025-04-29 03:46 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons like this...https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19053061#map=19/-27.483575/153.012282 ...cannot share sideshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.01239&lat=-27.48351&zoom=19You can either draw 3 simple polygons or one simple polygon around the... |
| 165534070 by SirenTraining @ 2025-04-28 06:58 | 1 | 2025-04-28 08:02 | nevw | Hi, if you are adding a business listing to a multistory building you need to add all the details to a new node within the building outline unless you are the sole occupant of the whole building.I also noticed that this building was tagged as:addr:housenumber=2addr:street=Market Streetbuildi... |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 08:26 | aharvey ♦1,716 | No reply, I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165534070 | |
| 160204381 by vicmap_import @ 2024-12-12 11:42 | 1 | 2025-04-26 11:55 | nevw | Hi, there are two nodes on top of each other here with two addresses.330 Cochranes Road:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12415703847890 Traralgon Creek Road:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12415703846Can you assist in correcting if necessary, thanks. |
| 2 | 2025-04-26 21:57 | aharvey ♦1,716 | This is an artefact of the import, that different addresses may have the same location and these were imported as such.https://gitlab.com/alantgeo/vicmap2osm/#stage-8---imported-addresses-sharing-the-same-location-manual-reviewAs part of the post import I created a MapRoulette challenge for ... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-27 00:56 | nevw | Yes, I agree, 330 Cochranes Road seems more suitable.I'll delete 890 Traralgon Creek Road now.Thanks for info and help. | |
| 165462964 by Ewen Hill @ 2025-04-26 12:16 | 1 | 2025-04-26 20:30 | nevw | Hi Ewen, this area is alerted by osmi as a multipolygon in need of repair.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.23612&lat=-34.50229&zoom=17 |
| 165355133 by MagentaMH @ 2025-04-23 23:21 | 1 | 2025-04-24 05:18 | nevw | Hi, the Wyrrabalong National Park has it's boundary already mapped so the wooded areas you have editted don't need to have the park name. It appears that much of the wooded area is outside of the NP |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 05:19 | nevw | This is the Wyrrabalong National Park boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6055929 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-25 03:57 | nevw | I removed the name from the wooded areas. | |
| 165360974 by TensegritySportsClinics @ 2025-04-24 05:40 | 1 | 2025-04-24 08:15 | nevw | Hi, your business needs to be added to a separate node within the building instead of adding your details to the entire building. I have fixed this. |
| 165104325 by aussierider75 @ 2025-04-18 10:09 | 1 | 2025-04-21 22:09 | nevw | Hi, you might need to review multipolygon validity here.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.51550&lat=-38.26974&zoom=15https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon# |
| 165218815 by AndrewS @ 2025-04-21 04:15 | 1 | 2025-04-21 11:48 | nevw | Hi, did you add the inners to the wrong multipolygon herehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7371757#map=14/-33.40175/151.47919https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.47603&lat=-33.40407&zoom=16 |
| 2 | 2025-04-21 23:40 | AndrewS ♦28 | Looks like it. Thanks. I'll fix it now. | |
| 164988635 by shudem @ 2025-04-15 14:37 | 1 | 2025-04-16 01:53 | nevw | Stream flow though water bodies are mapped in osm |
| 163227883 by BM Council @ 2025-03-05 04:42 | 1 | 2025-03-26 01:03 | radiotrefoil ♦109 | Hi, I understand that there isn't an official dedicated road reserve for Waterfall Road. However OSM records the "ground truth" and a survey found that the Waterfall Road sign is still in place. Also, given that some houses are still addressed as such, I think it would be appropriate ... |
| 2 | 2025-04-14 07:56 | nevw | I have reinstated Waterfall Road in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164924947#map=14/-33.70837/150.41792 | |
| 164703171 by BM Council @ 2025-04-09 02:13 | 1 | 2025-04-11 23:27 | nevw | Hi, you seem to have road access to properties here. Private roads/tracks like these are able to be mapped in OSM. They don't need to be part of official road reserves. Just add private access tags. The wooded area multipolygons are also affected and I will fix these. |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 05:31 | nevw | The deleted road sections are in this areahttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.38782&lat=-33.71773&zoom=19 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-14 07:53 | nevw | Osm maps the roads and tracks as they exist on the ground and I have remapped this area to reflect that.I see with reference to the DCS NSW Base Map layer that is available to us in the editors that the road reserve and property boundaries may be in conflict with part of Frenchmens Road. You wil... | |
| 164891432 by becohbrecuwebpcbebhcbehfc @ 2025-04-13 12:09 | 1 | 2025-04-13 22:13 | nevw | I removed the building tag from the school boundary. The building tag is for mapping individual buildings. The school grounds are correctly tagged with amenity=school. |
| 164679150 by Ewen Hill @ 2025-04-08 13:12 | 1 | 2025-04-11 22:33 | nevw | Hi Ewen, esri detects a problem with the multipolygon herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.47714&lat=-34.51633&zoom=16 |
| 163650475 by tmpl trce @ 2025-03-15 13:19 | 1 | 2025-04-09 01:46 | lili_2022 ♦1 | Hey there, just wondering can you please tell me what NPA is? |
| 2 | 2025-04-09 05:22 | tmpl trce ♦1 | Hey sorry, NRA is just shorthand for non released access, it was a typo. NRA just generally refers to whenever some plan etc. gets hosted on a server but is unlisted and can only be therefore reached by tying in the URL and has no hyperlinks attached to it. NTLIS now shows the roads as existing as o... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-09 12:34 | nevw | The NTLIS is a copyrighted source and we do not have explicit permission to use their data for mapping in osm.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources | |
| 4 | 2025-04-09 12:52 | tmpl trce ♦1 | ive consulted this site before and have glossed over completely that it is indeed under copyright, 100% my fault. my thought was that their data had become open at some point in time which is obviously not the case. i will stop adding them as sources now and will divert to other sources now, thanks ... | |
| 164584696 by Ihor Barylo @ 2025-04-06 10:57 | 1 | 2025-04-06 12:58 | nevw | You appear to have deleted the connection of Actil Avenue to the eastbound side of Torrens Road. Was this intended? |
| 2 | 2025-04-06 13:02 | nevw | As shown here by the red line…https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164584696 | |
| 3 | 2025-04-06 21:59 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | From aerial imagery, that looks unintentional, plus the original traffic_signals value looks like it was correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164584696 | |
| 4 | 2025-04-08 07:25 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset because of uncertain validity of changes that may affect routing and no response from mapper | |
| 164413583 by Tadhg Henderson @ 2025-04-02 10:17 | 1 | 2025-04-03 21:55 | nevw | Hi, multipolygon relations cannot share sides.These are the ones affectedhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.83004&lat=-37.86905&zoom=18You can see examples of how multipolygons are constructed herehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonI sugge... |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 22:27 | nevw | Thanks for fixing | |
| 164416031 by AnthonyAus @ 2025-04-02 11:12 | 1 | 2025-04-02 11:59 | nevw | Hi, the area tag has been replaced by building=house tag |
| 164363210 by Kangaroo Courts @ 2025-04-01 08:33 | 1 | 2025-04-01 08:36 | NeisBot ♦2,245 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions co... |
| 2 | 2025-04-01 12:52 | nevw | I have adjusted tags and de-spammed the description | |
| 164232465 by Vster @ 2025-03-29 01:49 | 1 | 2025-03-29 11:47 | nevw | Hi, there is no need to enter the postcode as the see are all already mapped by there bounds. I have deleted it. |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 21:06 | Vster ♦1 | I was trying to indicate that the business Botanic Lab listed on the map is gone and replaced by another business. Unsure what your comment about postcodes refers to. Is there an FAQ about updating incorrect information you can point me to? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-29 21:53 | nevw | Your edit is correct. I deleted the postcode as these are already mapped by their boundaries but I should have checked when it was added before leaving the comment.This guide provides a lot of useful info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines | |
| 164236880 by OktayC @ 2025-03-29 07:24 | 1 | 2025-03-29 11:43 | nevw | Hi, you have only mapped two nodes instead of a trail. A trail would normally be a line showing the path or track that you have travelled. A gpx trace of it may be uploaded which you then trace along in an osm editor to map the line, then add the right tags to define what you have added and to descr... |
| 164141267 by Dinil Wisundara @ 2025-03-26 22:36 | 1 | 2025-03-27 05:18 | nevw | You have entered two defibrillators in the same place. Are there two of them? |
| 2 | 2025-03-27 05:23 | Dinil Wisundara ♦1 | No just one, im not sure why you see two entries i only entered once…. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-27 05:27 | nevw | Thanks, I’ll check again later. | |
| 4 | 2025-03-27 06:43 | nevw | Hi Dinil, I re-checked and there were two mapped so I deleted one. Also, if you are entering more of these, the phone format for Australia is +61 3 9902 6011 and I have fixed it.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_NumbersI see quite a few... | |
| 163732048 by priyanka 13 @ 2025-03-17 13:20 | 1 | 2025-03-24 00:49 | nevw | Please note that part of these two buildings do overlay the water. so I have redrawn them with more accurate DCS NSW imagery |
| 163814715 by Alafoss @ 2025-03-19 12:15 | 1 | 2025-03-23 21:57 | nevw | Hi, the wooded areas need more work.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.41238&lat=-37.92828&zoom=17It seems to me that this relation needs to be completed |
| 2 | 2025-03-23 22:06 | Alafoss ♦6 | Thanks for the hint, I'll fix it later today. Cheers | |
| 163972061 by BlumleinPear @ 2025-03-23 05:38 | 1 | 2025-03-23 21:47 | nevw | Hi, the Hastings Hotel has an invalid multipolygon. Outer rings in mp cannot share sides. You can map as two separate buildings or use the building:part method |
| 2 | 2025-03-24 02:26 | BlumleinPear ♦7 | Thanks, fixed. | |
| 163981873 by ScoutsWA @ 2025-03-23 11:18 | 1 | 2025-03-23 11:48 | nevw | Hi, the buildings need to be mapped with a little more care to align with the building footprints more closely. You can hit 'Q' with the building selected to square the shape too. |
| 2 | 2025-03-23 22:23 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | For the parking area, the highway=service way should continue through the parking area, not end at the edges of it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163981873 | |
| 163892611 by Pixelrasa @ 2025-03-21 07:42 Active block | 1 | 2025-03-21 11:49 | nevw | Your seo spam has been reverted. |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 04:49 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17432 | |
| 163553880 by Ukioye @ 2025-03-13 04:35 | 1 | 2025-03-13 06:15 | nevw | This is not the correct way to draw a route in osm and I will revert. You don't redraw another way over the existing mapped roads. To create a cycleway route relation you just add the existing road, track, cycleway, footway etc segments that have already been mapped by others along the route ... |
| 2 | 2025-03-13 06:25 | nevw | If these are personal cycle routes and not official it may be better to add to https://www.wikiloc.com/ or similar.You can add images and a description, etc.Here is an example of a hike on Wikiloc https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/mount-glorious-lepidozamia-road-toward-mt-daguilar-17912069... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-13 07:03 | Ukioye ♦2 | Hi NevW,These are personal bike routes..I select to edit the map whilst on https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=12/-29.0611/153.4060/cyclosmThey immediately redirect to OSM for the input of the route, but cyclosm is all based on personal bike tours - not cycleways per se.I will look up the links and J... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-13 07:50 | nevw | I am not familiar with CyclOSM but it takes you to OSM to edit the map so you would need to be familiar with the way it's done in OSM.The are Australian guidelines for our route networks.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Route_Networks\... | |
| 163471706 by Ukioye @ 2025-03-11 07:13 | 1 | 2025-03-11 07:53 | nevw | Hi, there is a specific way to add a cyle route to osm.Please read the following and amend you route accordingly.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 05:04 | nevw | I have reverted your changes so that you can start with a clean slate to add your cycle route. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-12 05:55 | Ukioye ♦2 | Thanks NevW,I am a raw but keen beginner. The Australian Cycle_routes wiki is great - thx again.It sounds odd...but during my editing I saw a cycle trail 'W2K_westside' which I had given to Bicycle Australia years ago. I may be doubling up.Will do another trail Ballina-Woodburn. If ... | |
| 162874209 by amabardwg @ 2025-02-24 02:30 | 1 | 2025-03-10 22:32 | nevw | Hi, you appear to have duplicated the waterway.One is named Arroyo Lerma Santiago and the other Arroyo Rio Lerma Santiago, Arroyo Rio Lerma Santiago is drawn in the wrong direction. Waterways are drawn in the downstream direction they flow.I was going to map it to the River Río Grande de ... |
| 163424692 by nevw @ 2025-03-10 04:05 | 1 | 2025-03-10 04:08 | nevw | Correction...close north of Birdsville should read close north of Betoota |
| 163384425 by nevw @ 2025-03-09 01:20 | 1 | 2025-03-09 01:22 | nevw | Also used Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Polygons (Regional) source |
| 162561149 by P15ta @ 2025-02-16 08:11 | 1 | 2025-02-27 23:31 | nevw | Hi, the multipolygon is invalid in osm as sides of rings cannot be shared.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 162953788 by 27Fletch4203 @ 2025-02-26 00:29 | 1 | 2025-02-26 12:06 | nevw | These road extensions appear not to exist either |
| 2 | 2025-02-26 21:33 | TheSwavu ♦544 | None of it's on the Sentinel-2 image from a week ago. I have removed it. | |
| 162913197 by 27Fletch4203 @ 2025-02-25 00:54 | 1 | 2025-02-25 04:11 | nevw | Is this a proposed road construction?No changes visible on imagery. |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 22:16 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Considering it's not visible on Bing imagery, and there's not any signs of construction along here on ESRI imagery, I highly doubt this road has been constructed yet, if it exists at all. Can't find any information on it online.The highway=residential/maxspeed=80 combination seems... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-25 22:33 | nevw | Nothing seen on latest Copernicus Browser image either. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-27 10:55 | InfernoOSM ♦15 | This is incorrect - The masterplan for the Werribee Township Regional Park (the area where the road goes through) is not yet complete, and even then it is unlikely that the road will be extended in this way. | |
| 162917161 by Karlym @ 2025-02-25 05:31 | 1 | 2025-02-25 05:44 | nevw | Hi, some of the roads have a source name tag. If you change the name you need to delete the old source tag or add the source you are using to that tag. You can add the new source to your changeset comment too or instead.What is your source for the name changes? |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 05:45 | nevw | Sorry, I see the source tag now. | |
| 162915242 by 27Fletch4203 @ 2025-02-25 03:26 | 1 | 2025-02-25 04:18 | nevw | You have missed renaming a section of the offramp as part remains as Fitzgeralds Road Offramp. |
| 162913918 by 27Fletch4203 @ 2025-02-25 01:58 | 1 | 2025-02-25 04:14 | nevw | Is the renaming correct. All residential and businesses still use Old Geelong Road as their address in the part you have renamed. |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 22:49 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | What's the source for this? There's also the service roads that haven't been renamed. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-27 10:56 | InfernoOSM ♦15 | Official sources say the name is 'Old Geelong Road' until the intersection with Rowland Road. This is incorrect. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-28 00:11 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Without a source backing it up, agree with reverting it. | |
| 5 | 2025-02-28 00:58 | InfernoOSM ♦15 | I have already done so. The vicroads database supports the name being Old Geelong Road. | |
| 162914554 by nevw @ 2025-02-25 02:43 | 1 | 2025-02-25 03:25 | nevw | The Landsborough Channel was not named correctly on the GA Surface Hydrology Lines dataset. I inquired and subsequently the Qld Spacial Help Centre determined ...The Thompson River confluence begins approximately 12 km north of Muttaburra (see survey plan PL44).At this point, it meets Land... |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 04:00 | nevw | These changes will be reflected on the Qld Globe soon and I guess eventually find their way into national datasets. | |
| 162882415 by Louhitar @ 2025-02-24 09:08 | 1 | 2025-02-24 11:55 | nevw | We don’t have gas stations in Australia.Should this be shop=fuel instead? |
| 162763421 by DeanBA @ 2025-02-21 03:33 | 1 | 2025-02-22 00:46 | nevw | You have deleted the outer scrub boundaryhttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162763421 leaving two inners that osmi spottedhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.31352&lat=-37.91011&zoom=17As the boundary was the 16th version it would be better to revert that par... |
| 162701761 by yourcardigandisaster @ 2025-02-19 13:43 | 1 | 2025-02-21 03:27 | nevw | Hismall osmi problem herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.93959&lat=-27.54632&zoom=17 |
| 162645490 by yourcardigandisaster @ 2025-02-18 05:32 | 1 | 2025-02-19 21:06 | nevw | HiThe https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.94037&lat=-27.54332&zoom=19 multipolygon cannot have outer role parts that share sides.(the semicircular part is sharing sides at the end of the main building)Easiest fix is to delete the overlapping or shared sections.Y... |
| 2 | 2025-02-19 21:15 | nevw | The semicircular part appears to have its roof line integrated into the rest of the building so having an outer encompassing the entire building with two inners would seem a good way to map it. | |
| 162302561 by TobyOrr @ 2025-02-09 06:09 | 1 | 2025-02-19 21:09 | nevw | Hi the complexity of the mapping has some errorshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.01255&lat=-34.32356&zoom=12 |
| 2 | 2025-02-19 21:33 | TobyOrr ♦16 | I've completed those edits. Hopefully OSM Inspector will no longer show errors. Interestingly, JOSM had not identified the errors and the area was rendering correctly - but better to get it right. Thanks for contacting me. | |
| 162640138 by Professional Drone Imagery Pty Ltd @ 2025-02-18 00:10 | 1 | 2025-02-18 01:48 | nevw | Hi, there were a few things to change in your edits which I have done.The residential street has been retagged with correct tags instead of a business name and address.the address tags have instead been added to the construction area and on a new node near the front of the property.The names y... |
| 2 | 2025-02-18 02:23 | Professional Drone Imagery Pty Ltd ♦1 | Thank you | |
| 162639771 by Peter-99999 @ 2025-02-17 23:45 | 1 | 2025-02-18 01:31 | nevw | Hi, I have shifted the 108 from the name of your driveway to a separate address node near the house |
| 32218701 by cleary @ 2015-06-26 05:48 | 1 | 2025-02-17 01:48 | nevw | Hi cleary, I noticed what appears to be an access gate but tagging is unclear.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3618906272#map=19/-23.401848/144.180508 |
| 2 | 2025-02-17 05:46 | cleary ♦56 | That was a careless error by me. I have now corrected it to barrier=cattle_grid. I do not recall any gates on that road and, looking at satellite imagery, it appears to be a cattle grid. Further, my abbreviation for cattle_grid was "ca" and I appear to have transposed the letters when I w... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-17 10:50 | nevw | Thanks mate….an impressive memory. | |
| 162379793 by Suvarna Mithun @ 2025-02-11 08:06 | 1 | 2025-02-11 12:55 | nevw | Hi, the source you used is copyrighted and I don’t believe osm has a specific waiver to use this data.https://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/terms-of-use/ |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 05:15 | Suvarna Mithun ♦2 | Hi,Simper Road appears consistently across Google, Esri and Main Roads travel map (which uses Google Maps).In Western Australia, Landgate are the owners of road naming. The official source can be viewed here: https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/locate/. Main Roads uses Landgate data. Because ... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 05:55 | nevw | I suppose it is fine to occasionally check the name on the Landgate site but as it is a copyrighted source you should not routinely use the info provided to update osm unless they have provided explicit permission to do so. There is a list of sources that can be used in osm herehttps://wiki.openst... | |
| 4 | 2025-04-15 06:23 | aharvey ♦1,716 | We can't use Landgate data, their data is copyright and not compatible with OSM's licensing requirements.We can use the Main Roads WA data which is CC BY and which we have a waiver for. We even have it as a background imagery layer in JOSM and overlay imagery layer in iD, all out of th... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-15 06:28 | aharvey ♦1,716 | There is a Bing Streetside image we can use here which although hard to read seems to say "Coyrecup North" so I'm tempted to therefore set this section as that per Bing Streetside, and per Main Roads WA. It was named 9 years ago so signage may be different now. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-13 03:56 | Suvarna Mithun ♦2 | Hi,I hope you are well.I'm seeking assistance regarding an issue we’ve encountered with road naming inconsistencies in OpenStreetMap (OSM). I work with the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) in Western Australia, and we use Mapbox as our mapping platform, which relie... | |
| 7 | 2025-05-13 05:31 | aharvey ♦1,716 | The Main Roads WA data such as https://catalogue.data.wa.gov.au/dataset/mrwa-road-network per the Australian Data Sources page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Western_Australia shows it may be used since it is CC BY 4.0 and Main Roads WA completed the OSMF LWG's C... | |
| 8 | 2025-05-13 05:38 | Suvarna Mithun ♦2 | Thank you for your response.Does this mean that OSM is already ingesting data from Main Roads?The reason being last time we had a discrepancy in road name - landgate, main roads and google had the correct name but OSM still had the old road name.Thanks | |
| 9 | 2025-05-13 06:06 | aharvey ♦1,716 | There's no automatic ingesting of data, it's up to mappers to decide what to incorporate. There have been coordinated efforts in the past by Microsoft's mapping team to resolve differences in road names between OSM and government datasets.I believe the resolution in those prior ca... | |
| 10 | 2025-05-13 06:07 | TheSwavu ♦544 | OSM is a volunteer based mapping project. Unless someone is interested enough in checking OSM against MWRA, then it's not going to be automatically ingested. | |
| 11 | 2025-05-13 06:37 | Suvarna Mithun ♦2 | Thank you both.Are there any mechanism in OSM wherein they compare the existing map against a source to check if they are outdated/incorrect without users reporting them. | |
| 12 | 2025-05-13 08:39 | aharvey ♦1,716 | Within the wider OSM ecosystem, there are tools people have built to try and compare and flag differences, but I note that you can't just assume that OSM is wrong and a particular government dataset is correct if there are differences, so each case should be addressed on a case by case basis.... | |
| 13 | 2025-05-13 10:40 | aharvey ♦1,716 | PS. You might want to drop into the OSM Hackathon tomorrow https://geogeeks.org/2025/0514_osm-hackathon-city-of-canning.html | |
| 162365698 by SurvDanny @ 2025-02-10 19:56 | 1 | 2025-02-10 23:24 | nevw | Hi, when mapping waterways, please map in the direction that the water is flowing, downhill toward the sea. |
| 2 | 2025-02-10 23:30 | nevw | I have remapped waterways here that were flowing upstream instead of downstream.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-19.04462/46.32891 | |
| 162332036 by timbrand92 @ 2025-02-09 23:51 | 1 | 2025-02-10 03:25 | nevw | Hi, beaumaris should begin with a capital in osm |
| 162228735 by itmeanswhatsinthebox @ 2025-02-07 01:56 | 1 | 2025-02-07 03:08 | nevw | Hi, this appears to incorrectly numbered and/or incorrectly located on the street. |
| 2 | 2025-02-07 03:40 | itmeanswhatsinthebox ♦1 | Sorry, fixed | |
| 162068367 by Guzzilemansv @ 2025-02-03 01:59 | 1 | 2025-02-03 03:01 | nevw | Hiyou appear to have misspelt the suburb nameaddr:suburb=PetesRidge should be Peats Ridge |
| 2 | 2025-02-03 08:39 | nevw | corrected to addr:suburb=Peats Ridge now | |
| 162069477 by Collol @ 2025-02-03 03:24 | 1 | 2025-02-03 07:27 | nevw | Hi, you have location as Abbet Park….should it Abbett Park with double t instead? |
| 2 | 2025-02-03 07:30 | Collol ♦1 | Yes, it should be Abbett Park two t’s | |
| 3 | 2025-02-03 07:32 | nevw | Are you able correct it using your app or shall I do it? | |
| 4 | 2025-02-03 07:45 | nevw | I’ll fix it as the tennis club name needs fixing too. Cheers. | |
| 5 | 2025-02-03 07:45 | Collol ♦1 | Updated to Scarborough Bowling Club | |
| 162043654 by Bandula Dharmadasa @ 2025-02-02 12:22 | 1 | 2025-02-02 19:23 | nevw | HiYour edit to the address is not necessary as the state, postcode and suburb are already mapped by area.Facebook does not use the osm address datahttps://community.openstreetmap.org/t/facebook-showing-wrong-map-location/114289 |
| 161878587 by melb_guy @ 2025-01-29 00:48 | 1 | 2025-01-29 11:33 | nevw | …needs more improvementhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.28643&lat=-37.79724&zoom=18 |
| 161778641 by BikeFriday64 @ 2025-01-26 12:46 | 1 | 2025-01-26 23:02 | nevw | This informal path can be mapped in osm even if it is an informal way across grass or ground to link to other ways. You can use use the informal=yes taghttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3DpathYou could also add a trail visibility tag.There seems to be a high probability that some... |
| 161779380 by BikeFriday64 @ 2025-01-26 13:05 | 1 | 2025-01-26 22:51 | nevw | There is no need to delete ways that are not accessible to you. Instead I have tagged as a no access service ways and mapped the gate. |
| 161620042 by aussierider75 @ 2025-01-22 01:13 | 1 | 2025-01-22 21:34 | nevw | Hi, there is a problem with the validity of the multipolygonhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.46365&lat=-37.88371&zoom=12https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygoninner rings can't touch and inner rings cannot share an outer boundary ring...h... |
| 2 | 2025-01-22 21:43 | nevw | better zoom linkhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.34724&lat=-37.84590&zoom=17 | |
| 3 | 2025-01-23 09:26 | nevw | Seems fixed now https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18586948#map=18/-37.845764/145.345369 | |
| 161624676 by Nri2025 @ 2025-01-22 06:35 | 1 | 2025-01-22 08:22 | nevw | Hi, you had two 5A's I changed this one to 5B and fiddled a bit with the tags and added the street using Esri imagery. |
| 2 | 2025-01-22 08:34 | nevw | Added apartment names I deleted in error | |
| 161508147 by Anferlo @ 2025-01-18 22:45 | 1 | 2025-01-19 05:18 | nevw | Yes, the Supacenta name is mapped on a landuse by this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402965762and on the building by this wayhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175168513#map=19/-33.902108/151.215422&layers=DThe landuse way is not a building so building=commercial and shop=mall s... |
| 2 | 2025-01-19 23:55 | nevw | I realigned building, landuse, adjusted a couple of tags, and deleted the duplicate name from the landuse.I left the name on the building as that was already there and I think in the correct form that osm uses now with the name followed by suburb. I also shifted the shop=mall tag to the building. ... | |
| 161332055 by Tech Dec @ 2025-01-14 04:54 | 1 | 2025-01-14 18:56 | nevw | Hi, the highlighted ring can’t share the border in a multipolygon |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 18:56 | nevw | https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.18658&lat=-27.69526&zoom=16 | |
| 3 | 2025-01-19 00:04 | Tech Dec ♦41 | Hey nevw. I can't see any issues in geofabrik. I checked each filter but there's nothing displaying.I realise now you've fixed it in changeset #161401170 thank you! Silly mistake on my part. I know not to do that in future. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-19 05:25 | nevw | Sorry, apologies for not leaving another comment. | |
| 161474750 by Rekeis199 @ 2025-01-17 23:54 | 1 | 2025-01-18 21:40 | nevw | Hi, this appears to be not located at the Tolmie Mexhanics Institute as tagged |
| 161475033 by Rekeis199 @ 2025-01-18 00:14 | 1 | 2025-01-18 03:55 | nevw | Hi, you have added two defibrillators here and they appear to be in the same building. Can you confirm the details are correct. |
| 161450260 by Zak Gould @ 2025-01-17 10:46 | 1 | 2025-01-17 12:27 | nevw | Hi, can you confirm that there two defibrillators here |
| 161439720 by TOCruns @ 2025-01-17 02:26 | 1 | 2025-01-17 05:57 | nevw | Hi, There is difference in the spelling of the name of the drive way you added and the road it connects to. Also we don’t use abbreviated road names…so Rd should be Road.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219965817#map=15/-38.60196/145.61522&layers=D |
| 161403608 by CloudemySEO @ 2025-01-16 05:26 | 1 | 2025-01-16 05:44 | nevw | Your SEO spam has been reverted from OSM |
| 161297393 by noah_blannin @ 2025-01-13 06:59 | 1 | 2025-01-13 07:39 | nevw | Hi, this looks like an unlikely place for a tap. Is the location correct? |
| 2 | 2025-01-14 13:40 | nevw | No response, tap deleted | |
| 161260681 by Robert Barbarich @ 2025-01-12 04:03 | 1 | 2025-01-12 11:13 | nevw | Hi Robert, you have added two defibrillators. Was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 11:30 | tastrax ♦1,145 | FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers . ... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-14 13:32 | nevw | No response, this one deleted | |
| 158764670 by aussierider75 @ 2024-11-05 05:18 | 1 | 2025-01-12 21:25 | nevw | Hi, I noticed this tag on a few of your editswebsite=https://hvp.com which does not seem to have any relevance.I assume these should instead be https://www.hvp.com.au/Sites here:https://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%2F*%0A%0A*%2F%0A%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F+gather+result... |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 21:30 | Matrose115 ♦2 | Yes, that’s correct, I entered the wrong address. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-12 21:33 | nevw | thanks...I'll fix them now. | |
| 161226844 by aussierider75 @ 2025-01-11 04:28 | 1 | 2025-01-12 03:42 | nevw | Hi, please don't joined boundaries to roadway centre lines |
| 2 | 2025-01-12 03:47 | Matrose115 ♦2 | @nevw. What? I don’t understand. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-12 04:47 | nevw | It was practice to join boundaries like parks to the roadway centrelines to make the map look prettier, but that practice is not preferred as the actual boundaries are located near the road verge and mapping this way no longer interferes with the roadway infrastructure.Also, regarding Kalorama Par... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-12 06:22 | nevw | Kalorama Parkhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662839803#map=15/-37.81948/145.37086 | |
| 161049025 by seancarmody @ 2025-01-06 09:13 | 1 | 2025-01-09 05:24 | aharvey ♦1,716 | sorry to be blunt but you've just dumped your way on top of the existing ways. Given this was already existing, you'll need to make any changes to the existing ways instead of a new one. I'll clean this up. |
| 2 | 2025-01-09 05:28 | aharvey ♦1,716 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161156261 I've deleted the duplicate you've add, but wasn't sure about the tags, please go ahead and update the tags and/or geometry of the existing ways as needed. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-09 05:33 | seancarmody ♦1 | No problems with bluntness! I will have a look at the changes you’ve made: I had started to suspect I’d gone about this the wrong way. Also, just stumbled onto the path/footway/cycleway debate. Do you have a view on that? | |
| 4 | 2025-01-09 06:22 | aharvey ♦1,716 | My view is that cycleway should be primarily built/designed/signposted for bicycles, footway should be primarily build/designed/signposted for walkers and path for anything not really built at all just people started walking/cycling there and the ground / track formed. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-09 20:59 | seancarmody ♦1 | Thanks - makes sense | |
| 6 | 2025-01-09 22:42 | nevw | +1 | |
| 161169168 by Jayrich @ 2025-01-09 13:00 | 1 | 2025-01-09 22:27 | nevw | I fixed the address tags |
| 161117328 by Pasguy13 @ 2025-01-08 02:35 | 1 | 2025-01-08 02:58 | nevw | This building is already tagged as being a restaurant by this node located within the building.There is need for a duplication.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1641724301#map=19/-33.796750/151.288287&layers=D |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 06:53 | nevw | Correction…There is no meed for duplication.If the restaurant occupies all the building you might as well copy all the node tags to the building and delete the node. | |
| 161074231 by —pj @ 2025-01-06 20:53 | 1 | 2025-01-07 11:55 | nevw | Hi, can you fix this part of your edit please.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393245389#map=19/-33.839161/151.237778 |
| 161090037 by Ajlbear @ 2025-01-07 10:34 | 1 | 2025-01-07 11:51 | nevw | You have mapped two defibrillators at the same spot.Is this intentional? |
| 160934596 by Keith2602 @ 2025-01-03 05:13 | 1 | 2025-01-03 08:00 | nevw | Hi, would motel be more suitable than hotel. Hotels in Australia are normally mostly for serving booze, with rooms or separate units for guests.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourism?uselang=en-GB |
| 2 | 2025-01-03 10:46 | Keith2602 ♦1 | More like B&B home stay. Not a motel nor hotel | |
| 3 | 2025-01-03 10:47 | Keith2602 ♦1 | See https://www.airbnb.com.au/rooms/8178738?viralityEntryPoint=1&s=76 | |
| 4 | 2025-01-03 11:40 | nevw | From the link I pasted above, maybe a guest_house is a good tag choice as the description mentions they are often called bed and breakfast b&bhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house | |
| 5 | 2025-01-06 00:52 | nevw | I changed this to a guest house and mapped the buildings.Thanks Keith. | |
| 160975099 by Xavier horwood @ 2025-01-04 06:50 | 1 | 2025-01-04 09:17 | nevw | Hi, should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348431859 be ICT instead of 1ICT ? |
| 2 | 2025-01-04 11:05 | Xavier horwood ♦1 | no 1ICT is correct https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.1ict_pty_ltd.c2569229b398ded6c4708a734a76f720.html | |
| 160156530 by GraziePrego @ 2024-12-11 07:37 | 1 | 2024-12-11 20:30 | nevw | Looks like some fixing up to be done stillhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.06091&lat=-37.83143&zoom=12 |
| 2 | 2024-12-12 21:54 | nevw | Select the ‘analyze on map’ tab to see where the gaps arehttp://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=15621556&noCache=true&_noCache=on | |
| 3 | 2024-12-12 22:19 | nevw | "probably needs cleaning up but I'm unsure how to do that "You do need to fix this and a good start would be to use an editor like Josm that has better capacity to edit and validate such relations. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-12 22:41 | nevw | If you find that you need help with this, let me know. | |
| 5 | 2024-12-14 22:52 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Hi nevw,I went to try and fix this one, but it turns out we don't have permission to use the data source (https://www.aec.gov.au/electorates/gis/licence.htm).Not sure how to resolve this one. | |
| 6 | 2024-12-15 00:25 | nevw | Victoria is the only state that has boundary=political mapped and all those are state boundaries and tagged political_division = au_vic_la.NT has Casuarina mapped and that appears in error along with the Kooyong boundary (political_division \tau_cth_HoR).I think it should be deleted if we don... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-18 03:46 | nevw | @GraziePrego do you want to try to get explicit permission from the source or use another source which we have permission to use so that we can add this to osm or shall we revert it? | |
| 8 | 2025-01-02 04:24 | nevw | No response from mapper regarding the adding of Kooyong boundary political division from invalid source and will revert these changesets soon. | |
| 9 | 2025-01-03 07:08 | nevw | I have reverted these now which added Kooyong boundary political division from an invalid source. | |
| 10 | 2025-01-03 22:20 | nevw | Deleted incomplete Division of Kooyong in Vic as no suitable source found yet. | |
| 160768887 by Edgiest1 @ 2024-12-29 21:40 | 1 | 2024-12-30 01:05 | nevw | Appears to be a bit edgy to map a house as a chalet and name it “Home”.Should you change the tagging to be more ordinary? |
| 160764813 by Greyhound_Piano @ 2024-12-29 19:15 | 1 | 2024-12-29 22:45 | nevw | Hi, the boundary of the park is already named therefore I’ll delete your edit. |
| 2 | 2024-12-29 22:52 | nevw | I left the playground playground and deleted the name as the boundary of the park is already named | |
| 160700596 by Radnoski @ 2024-12-28 05:24 | 1 | 2024-12-28 12:02 | nevw | May I ask why you have deliberately misspelt photography. |
| 2 | 2024-12-28 12:49 | Radnoski ♦1 | Just a typo. Now fixed. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-28 22:31 | nevw | OK, thanks for fixing. | |
| 160660714 by nevw @ 2024-12-27 03:43 | 1 | 2024-12-27 04:57 | JJIglesias ♦1,194 | Thanks for fixing the water loops at Bolivia waterways. Best Regards |
| 2 | 2024-12-27 09:11 | nevw | Thanks, your welcome…I left plenty in South America for others :) | |
| 160625039 by Calamari Kitchen & Bar @ 2024-12-26 06:47 | 1 | 2024-12-26 08:14 | nevw | Hi, can you fix the format of the opening hours thanks.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours |
| 160583657 by johnpeterdavies @ 2024-12-24 17:34 | 1 | 2024-12-26 01:13 | nevw | Hi, when adding streams always draw the line pointing downstream in the direction the water flows, which is normally into a bigger stream or river and onto the sea or an inland salt pan in dry country. |
| 2 | 2024-12-26 01:14 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway | |
| 3 | 2024-12-26 12:16 | johnpeterdavies ♦1 | Thanks for the input, I will do so for future edits. I'm just starting to contribute to OSM, but will aim to get very accurate maps for the areas like this in which I work regularly. | |
| 160619518 by Kim Jarkou @ 2024-12-25 23:40 | 1 | 2024-12-26 00:59 | nevw | Hi, names are not added to common things that don't have names like toilets and drinking fountains as the primary tag does that and is often helped by a suitable icon display. I have fixed your edits. |
| 160588163 by cmarriott @ 2024-12-24 21:24 | 1 | 2024-12-25 21:03 | nevw | Hi, osmi detects a self intersection when you draw it like thishttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.44164&lat=-33.44552&zoom=19 |
| 2 | 2024-12-25 21:06 | nevw | Or this viewhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346065387#map=19/-33.445528/151.441648 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-25 21:36 | cmarriott ♦1 | Oh that’s good to know! Thanks for the tip, @nevw - I’ll update it tomorrow 👌🏼 | |
| 160572111 by Three Rights Make a Left @ 2024-12-24 11:35 | 1 | 2024-12-24 12:45 | nevw | Hi, the part you have disconnected is not disconnected in the satellite view. The way you have tagged this section as being bridge is incorrect - you need to split the road at each end of the bridge and add the bridge tag only to that portion. Is this road on private property or public land. If it i... |
| 2 | 2024-12-24 15:46 | Three Rights Make a Left ♦1 | Hey, thank you for your feedback I have fixed the errors and added an intermittent stream. The road is public but the end portion where I have made the changes has not been maintained and a through road for years and people get directed down there as it appears quicker on maps. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-25 00:14 | nevw | Thanks, l would be surprised if vehicles take that shortcut with those tags. | |
| 160561463 by idlehand7 @ 2024-12-24 03:54 | 1 | 2024-12-24 12:27 | nevw | Hi, I had to revert this due to the way you mapped this.Can you tell us what SLC is and where is it located as I can't locate it on the map? Which default routing are you referring to? The service road is gated where it joins Soldiers Road and sign states private property and land is or leads... |
| 160510787 by snLee @ 2024-12-22 17:56 | 1 | 2024-12-24 03:18 | nevw | Hi, Please be careful to map the direction of waterways, including tributaries, in the direction they flow. That is always downhill to the main river and out the mouth.I have fixed these. |
| 160487619 by LocalMappr @ 2024-12-22 00:36 | 1 | 2024-12-22 02:51 | nevw | Hi, there were a few problems with the way you mapped this. I have fixed it to osm convention. Can you check if I have the house numbers correct and add the rest along the two streets if you wish. Navigation apps update their data much later than the osm standard layer and have their own method t... |
| 2 | 2024-12-22 04:30 | nevw | An alternative for house number 34, if I have mapped the numbers correctly, is to place it’s address node from the house to a separate node closer to the correct driveway to assist navigation apps find the correct driveway. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-22 08:21 | TheSwavu ♦544 | <cough>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160493243</cough> | |
| 4 | 2024-12-23 04:26 | nevw | Thanks for tidying up Lewin St @The Swavu@LocalMappr I have shifted the address tags for #34 to separate node in front of the house and this assists the navigators to use the correct driveway. | |
| 160489671 by computerOwl @ 2024-12-22 03:50 | 1 | 2024-12-22 10:25 | nevw | Hi, osmi noticed a few overlapping elements here that need adjusting.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.27831&lat=-33.70146&zoom=19 |
| 160420368 by ecmarinecntrct @ 2024-12-20 06:57 | 1 | 2024-12-20 09:06 | nevw | Hi, I reverted your edit that changed the street name to your business address.You should instead add a new point to the building you operate from and add the business tags to that.Or you can use these links to assist you do it correctly…https://www.barkweb.co.uk/blog/how-to-add-your-bu... |
| 2 | 2024-12-20 11:19 | nevw | I added your company to osm. Can you check it is all ok, thanks. | |
| 160342875 by AU_SPM @ 2024-12-18 10:05 | 1 | 2024-12-19 10:43 | nevw | The multipolygon for the toilet is too complex. Multipolygon rings cannot share sides. Please, make a simple structure or just use a single node. |
| 160273791 by The McMullens @ 2024-12-14 10:05 | 1 | 2024-12-14 12:10 | nevw | You have added two defibrillators here. Is that correct?Might be good to also add your house number to the location.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=defibrillatorI have used an alternative tag to allow second phone listing and corrected to phone format on one of the defibrilla... |
| 2 | 2024-12-14 12:35 | The McMullens ♦1 | Sorry, it's just the one aed.Do people normally give their house number with this? | |
| 3 | 2024-12-14 13:29 | nevw | I don’t know but as it is on a map I guess these street number is not needed. I notice on the wiki the location is used to direct users to the exact location and where to find it and I guess that is so the public can find it quickly in an emergency. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-14 13:31 | nevw | Are you able to delete the extra one or shall I do it? | |
| 5 | 2024-12-14 13:44 | nevw | I guess most aed are in public buildings and specific location details within the building are needed. Your aed is private so I assume for your and employees use. Phone contact is likely sufficient for assistance. | |
| 6 | 2024-12-19 05:15 | nevw | I remapped to have one aed. I'll leave to you to fix anything further. | |
| 160041259 by MapAbility @ 2024-12-07 22:14 | 1 | 2024-12-13 23:34 | nevw | Hi, are you able to correct this thankshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.12151&lat=-37.81902&zoom=18 |
| 2 | 2024-12-14 08:56 | MapAbility ♦15 | All done. | |
| 160067235 by Fabe56 @ 2024-12-08 19:02 | 1 | 2024-12-13 23:28 | nevw | Hi, are you able to construct this with a valid multipolygon?https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.97288&lat=-37.81449&zoom=19 |
| 159721256 by SharingTheBees @ 2024-11-28 22:17 | 1 | 2024-11-30 04:01 | nevw | Hi, I am curious why you have removed the addr:housenumber from some of the houses on Homer Street |
| 2 | 2024-12-11 08:18 | nevw | Any info on this? and if you are going to add the address back in. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-13 11:28 | nevw | The Vicmap Address Import should fix these so no need to add the ones you deleted back in I guess. | |
| 4 | 2024-12-13 21:20 | nevw | Err, or not | |
| 159860952 by Deuar @ 2024-12-02 22:16 | 1 | 2024-12-13 10:24 | nevw | Hi Deuar, do you monitor the osmi areas site for problems such as https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.93498&lat=-26.93566&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2... |
| 2 | 2024-12-13 10:26 | nevw | Maybe this link is better?https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.91856&lat=-26.92583&zoom=14 | |
| 160231784 by bfjdigital @ 2024-12-13 05:41 | 1 | 2024-12-13 07:23 | nevw | Hi, you added the business to the building address point.I separated the business tags from the building address point and then fixed the business tags. |
| 160173899 by Glorious Driving School @ 2024-12-11 15:40 | 1 | 2024-12-12 06:37 | nevw | Can you recheck the relation you have edited. It makes little sense to me. |
| 2 | 2024-12-12 13:17 | nevw | I reverted this | |
| 160026908 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-12-07 13:25 | 1 | 2024-12-08 11:07 | nevw | Hi can you check the mp thankshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.61484&lat=-23.40110&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not... |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 11:26 | nevw | Best to use Josm for such large features | |
| 3 | 2024-12-11 20:22 | nevw | Looks like Geofabik areas is working ok again | |
| 4 | 2024-12-12 04:04 | nevw | I added four wetland areas covered with vegetation as inners to the water multipolygon extending from Rockhampton barrage to the sea and Josm validator finds it ok. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160191988#map=14/-23.51048/150.68614 | |
| 5 | 2024-12-12 06:44 | nevw | The inners I added to the multipolygon should be tagged islets too I guess, instead of just wetland areas. I’ll do that in the next few days. | |
| 160072977 by ShayWackker @ 2024-12-08 23:05 | 1 | 2024-12-09 03:27 | nevw | Hi, Squires Loft is placed in the water - can you relocate it over the building it operates from. |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 03:30 | nevw | The red dot shows where it was locatedhttps://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=160072977 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-11 07:45 | nevw | no response, business shifted to previous position. | |
| 160110386 by shvogue @ 2024-12-09 23:16 | 1 | 2024-12-10 07:15 | nevw | Hi, you appear to have drawn a primary highway over top of a trunk highway.A duplication like this is seen as unexpected by me. What are you trying to achieve? |
| 2 | 2024-12-10 12:54 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset.Please tell what you were trying to do with this edit and we may be able to assist. | |
| 160061814 by ash0028 @ 2024-12-08 15:56 | 1 | 2024-12-09 03:59 | nevw | Hi, please map waterways in the direction the water flows - this is always downhill. I have corrected this changeset. |
| 160050673 by Ringbarkis @ 2024-12-08 10:01 | 1 | 2024-12-08 10:54 | nevw | Hi, the roundabout is already mapped tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548130634If you were wanting to map the boundary of the inside ring of concrete you could tag barrier=kerb/curb? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3DkerbOr if there was a garden on it you could map leis... |
| 159982292 by Antonio_Portiere @ 2024-12-06 06:56 Active block | 1 | 2024-12-07 04:33 | nevw | Hi, please draw waterways in the direction of flow, always downhill to eventually flow in to streams and river to meet the sea. |
| 159942666 by nevw @ 2024-12-05 06:03 | 1 | 2024-12-05 12:00 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Hi nevw, you have deleted existing streams while fixing a loop. This has, in turn, created new isolated waterways. Please have a second look at this. |
| 2 | 2024-12-06 02:58 | nevw | Ok, thanks. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-06 03:20 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979159I will redo the waterway loop soon | |
| 4 | 2024-12-06 03:32 | nevw | I have re-edited the area to fix the waterways that overlapped and looped, deleted two building duplications, deleted duplicated rail sections.See ...https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979263https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=159979263&zoom=8&lat=-26.81145&lon=151.... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-06 03:48 | nevw | I also fixed these https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979502https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=159979502&zoom=8&lat=-26.81145&lon=151.6152&layers=B000000TTTFTI | |
| 6 | 2024-12-06 03:58 | nevw | I also drew the waterway through the waterbody.I noticed that Josm validator picked up 71 untagged ways.They appear to be buildings but resolutions is not good. These were in near Nana Ama Saa I Street north of the railway and south of about the waterways.Are you able to tag those as I am doi... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-06 04:02 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Thanks for reviewing the edits. The paths around the bridge are not visible in the imagery. I think it's better to delete them. Including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965684286 | |
| 8 | 2024-12-06 04:07 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | I have created a Maproulette challenge (mpr.lt/c/48876) dealing with untagged ways in Ghana so they are going to get fixed soon. | |
| 9 | 2024-12-06 04:12 | nevw | Good to fix them.I have fixed a few more things including deleted the path/bridge referred to.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159979829 | |
| 10 | 2024-12-06 04:18 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Great! Thanks | |
| 159802568 by Deuar @ 2024-12-01 11:28 | 1 | 2024-12-02 23:37 | nevw | Hi, this is too complex to use a single multipolygon to contain all the landuse areas. I suggest using simple polygons instead and use multipolgons for areas where you have valid inners (I see you have a separate one like this) and where you want to share sides of adjoining polygons instead of dup... |
| 2 | 2024-12-03 12:01 | nevw | Osmi view https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.91220&lat=-26.87946&zoom=13 | |
| 3 | 2024-12-03 19:32 | Deuar ♦14 | Hmm, yeah, I'll go simplify this one. Seems to work fine in josm and carto, but I suppose some renderers could have trouble. | |
| 159683315 by P15ta @ 2024-11-28 02:12 | 1 | 2024-12-02 23:22 | nevw | H, outer rings can't join in multipolygons.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.75844&lat=-16.90288&zoom=19You can use simple polygons instead. |
| 158952671 by aussierider75 @ 2024-11-10 00:05 | 1 | 2024-11-25 09:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | What you mean by "playground=flying fox" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12327722519/history ?(I fixed main tag already) |
| 2 | 2024-11-25 10:53 | nevw | Often smaller playgrounds in Australia may one main feature and a flying fox is popular.They are also known as zip lines but when referring to playgrounds here is is called a flying fox. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-29 17:56 | nevw | I have changed this to zipwire as this is the preferred name in osm and commonly used in Australia | |
| 159681615 by BiTelematics @ 2024-11-28 00:02 | 1 | 2024-11-28 01:31 | nevw | Hi, why has highway=crossing and crossing=zebra been replaced by highway=motor_junction .The zebra crossing appears to be still present in imagery. |
| 2 | 2024-11-28 01:38 | nevw | at this position... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26359194 | |
| 3 | 2024-11-28 02:31 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615 | |
| 4 | 2024-11-28 02:31 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615 | |
| 5 | 2024-11-29 17:11 | nevw | no response. I have moved the highway=motorway_junction back to the road junction from the zebra crossing at this position... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26359194 | |
| 159726651 by Daninho Soares @ 2024-11-29 04:55 | 1 | 2024-11-29 08:33 | nevw | Hi, when mapping waterways please draw in the direction of the waterflow - always down hill |
| 159590872 by GETWHEEL @ 2024-11-25 21:36 | 1 | 2024-11-27 03:25 | nevw | Hi GetWheel, Jill Street, Burpengary is not mapped on OSM. I think Merewyn Street on the side adjacent to the Burpengary State School down to the corner needs to be renamed Jill Street.There appears to be no #2 Jill Street. The corner house is #21 and the first leeter box on Jill Street is #4. \... |
| 2 | 2024-11-27 03:28 | nevw | ...fix typoAlso is the Wheel Close street sign still there or is it removed as... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-27 05:57 | nevw | Website has GetWheel located at 1 Sacha St, Burpengary.Can you reply soon as I will delete this business listing tomorrow until the true situation is worked out. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-28 01:49 | nevw | I have removed the node at the old location until the correct new location is known | |
| 159570059 by Gorka115 @ 2024-11-25 11:52 | 1 | 2024-11-25 17:33 | Taya_S ♦978 | Again, these building outlines do not match the aerials at all. They're just rectangles. Please do not add low quality incorrect data. |
| 2 | 2024-11-26 01:39 | nevw | I don’t see any value in these edits. It gives a false impression that the building footprints have been mapped. In fact it would be easier to delete them than adjust each to correct shape. Expect all these just need to be reverted. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-15 18:40 | Taya_S ♦978 | Reverted low quality building edits.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161391757 | |
| 159555417 by computerOwl @ 2024-11-25 02:44 | 1 | 2024-11-25 21:12 | nevw | Hi, osmi has picked up these errors to fixhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337619917 |
| 2 | 2024-11-25 21:58 | computerOwl ♦23 | Hi there,I don’t see any errors in this. Could you please elaborate on what you mean?-computerOwl | |
| 3 | 2024-11-25 23:47 | nevw | Meant to post the osmi imagehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.14322&lat=-35.49184&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_cl... | |
| 4 | 2024-11-25 23:51 | nevw | osmi link not working for me.here is an image insteadhttps://pasteboard.co/zpjbg2AbWY7t.png | |
| 5 | 2024-11-25 23:55 | nevw | I can fix if you cannot zoom in enough in iD to fix | |
| 6 | 2024-11-26 00:53 | computerOwl ♦23 | Hi once again,A: I don't need a formal statement on why I need to use JOSM. Everyone has their own reasons. My reasons are that it's hard to master, hard to control, too advanced, and just overall has an ugly design. (No offence to any maintainers/makers of JOSM)B: I have fixed my ... | |
| 7 | 2024-11-26 01:33 | nevw | Thanks | |
| 159520896 by GMH Melbourne @ 2024-11-24 04:39 | 1 | 2024-11-25 01:50 | nevw | Hi, osmi identified this error.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.04892&lat=-37.82891&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_n... |
| 2 | 2024-11-25 06:32 | nevw | I reverted this changeset because part of Eastern Freeway motorway changed to cycleway and Kooyong political boundary broken. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-25 07:53 | nevw | I was unable to find where the relation was incorrect but this may help you when remapping your changeshttps://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=159520896 | |
| 159491962 by aussierider75 @ 2024-11-23 10:14 | 1 | 2024-11-25 01:45 | nevw | Hi, osmi finds this incompletehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.00854&lat=-36.83333&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_no... |
| 2 | 2024-11-25 06:08 | nevw | I have fixed it. | |
| 159481835 by nevw @ 2024-11-23 03:38 | 1 | 2024-11-23 11:03 | nevw | The parking multipolygon is probably valid as the ‘touching inner rings’ are valid under xml examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 11:07 | nevw | The parking mp referred to above…https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18317038#map=16/-35.29544/149.18675&layers=D | |
| 159228588 by Roaming-Oz @ 2024-11-17 03:41 | 1 | 2024-11-23 10:24 | Tom Brennan ♦15 | If there's no track, then it shouldn't really be mapped in OSM: see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Informal,_Invisible_Trails |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 10:43 | nevw | I think such routes could be entered with full details and gps trace in Wikiloc. That allows for a complete description and images for others. | |
| 159455357 by OrganizedMapper @ 2024-11-22 11:47 | 1 | 2024-11-22 12:25 | nevw | Hi, this appears to be in the wrong place as Ocean Street is across the highway to the se.Also the syntax for addr:state should be NSW instead of New South Wales, but you don't need to add state or postcodes because these are already mapped as areas. |
| 2 | 2024-11-22 13:42 | nevw | I see you shifted it to the correct location. I fixed the syntax. | |
| 159349437 by DamoIGO2024 @ 2024-11-20 03:14 | 1 | 2024-11-20 03:52 | nevw | Hi, this is clear to me. Have you split the road at that and other points as necessary and added 80kph speed tags to the relevant sections of the road and 110kph tags to the those sections? |
| 2 | 2024-11-20 03:53 | nevw | …typo….meant to say…it is unclear to me… | |
| 3 | 2024-11-21 02:49 | nevw | I have used your comment on the node referred to change the speed limit tags at that point. It is now 110kph on Woodie Woodie Road north of that node until the road name changes to Ripon Hills Road at the junction with Telfer Road. South of the node it is now 80kph and I extended this limit until it... | |
| 159309766 by Goergina Godfrey @ 2024-11-19 05:56 | 1 | 2024-11-19 08:35 | nevw | Hi, this building appears to exist on the latest imagery, Esri. Are you sure it needed to be deleted? |
| 2 | 2024-11-20 00:58 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset as the building exits on later imagery available in the editor and the building is included on the university web site. | |
| 159319538 by RichardBT @ 2024-11-19 11:11 | 1 | 2024-11-19 13:13 | nevw | Hi, I reverted this changeset because you connected a footway to a powerline.You need to add the footway again by zooming in much closer so that you connect it only to the footway. |
| 159278194 by ms_disstro @ 2024-11-18 11:00 | 1 | 2024-11-18 22:58 | nevw | Hi, you deleted part of the boundary relations for Mount Druitt andRooty at the junction of Duke Street andWoodstock Avenue.Hill https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159278194I have fixed both relations. |
| 2 | 2024-11-19 01:10 | ms_disstro ♦3 | Sorry about that. Thanks for the fixes. | |
| 159154111 by SammyK76 @ 2024-11-15 04:11 | 1 | 2024-11-16 12:38 | nevw | Hi, unsure why this was a multipolygon.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81559&lat=-31.91664&zoom=19It grouped two different addressed buildings together in a mp and was not constructed or tagged correctly so I deleted the mp. |
| 159156202 by RichieRRR @ 2024-11-15 06:20 | 1 | 2024-11-16 12:28 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons can't have duplicated sides like this https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.00706&lat=-31.98605&zoom=19I have fixed |
| 159115018 by ms_disstro @ 2024-11-14 04:36 | 1 | 2024-11-15 09:59 | nevw | Hi, you created an invalid wood multipolgon. Outer rings cannot join each other. I changed it to a simple polygon for the whole area as there appeared to be no differentiating tags to keep as three sections. If you still want them as separate areas then use three simple polygons which can share side... |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 02:30 | ms_disstro ♦3 | Hi, thanks for the correction. I will follow your advice and keep things simple from now on. | |
| 159035634 by Port Pacific Dental @ 2024-11-12 05:18 | 1 | 2024-11-12 05:48 | nevw | Please read the osm difference between a hospital and a clinichttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=hospitalI have changed to a clinic |
| 158917412 by jcbigears @ 2024-11-09 02:06 | 1 | 2024-11-10 07:34 | nevw | Multipolygons cannot have shared edges. fixed. |
| 158919467 by jcbigears @ 2024-11-09 05:14 | 1 | 2024-11-10 07:33 | nevw | Multipolygons cannot have shared edges. fixed |
| 158841122 by Sandswell @ 2024-11-07 05:20 | 1 | 2024-11-08 02:00 | nevw | Hi, you are creating invalid multipolygon relations. Our wiki has extensive documentation on multipolygon validity.Outer rings of mp cannot share sides. You should just use simple polygons for these type of buildings or use the building:part method where you would draw a polygon around the outsi... |
| 2 | 2024-11-08 02:05 | nevw | Osmi detects these mapping errorshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.23220&lat=-37.79508&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-08 23:06 | nevw | Another alternative is to construct them as TheSwavu has done, making a mp of each part and reusing the common section in each mp. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-09 11:20 | Sandswell ♦1 | Ah, I was actually trying to combine them into one, so I clicked merge. It seemed to do what I wanted; didn't realise I made an illegal polygon.Thanks for your help | |
| 158769551 by JosephTJames @ 2024-11-05 08:40 | 1 | 2024-11-05 09:44 | nevw | Name is not needed, addr:housenumber = 103 is sufficient |
| 158763050 by aaaabbb4 @ 2024-11-05 03:21 | 1 | 2024-11-05 04:10 | nevw | Hi, you appear to have added the business details to the entire building but PSQ Group as located by their website only occupy a portion of the building…. Level 2, 200 Adelaide Terrace, Perth.You should leave the outline of the building with only tags applicable to the building. The busin... |
| 2 | 2024-11-05 09:39 | nevw | Hi, I reverted your changeset because it is probably easiest for you to add a new node within the building boundary and add all the business tags to that. | |
| 158679558 by 22040316 @ 2024-11-02 22:39 | 1 | 2024-11-02 23:26 | nevw | Hi, you have dragged a node on Stephensons Place. Can you correct that and also remove the name=Residential Dwelling tag on all the houses.The name tag is reserved for things that really do have a name as described in our wiki.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 2 | 2024-11-02 23:45 | nevw | ….also the name=Footpath needs to be deleted. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-03 01:37 | nevw | I notice some of the building near the corner of Hayfield Road and Milloo Crescent have their right side cut off where aligned with edge of your data.Do you intend to return to each of these dumps of data and fix up such errors? | |
| 4 | 2024-11-03 03:33 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | That cut off makes it seem like this is some kind of import maybe? Can you confirm where the geojson mentioned as a source in the changeset comes from? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158679558 | |
| 5 | 2024-11-03 03:48 | Alliegaytor ♦26 | I'm pretty sure they are using this onegeojson: https://tasks.smartcitiestransport.com/api/v2/projects/71/tasks/?as_file=truefromhttps://tasks.smartcitiestransport.com/projects/71#descriptionI just checked and the buildings are cutoff exactly along the borders of "taskId=... | |
| 6 | 2024-11-03 21:41 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Yeah that definitely seems like it's being done wrong, and probably worthy of being reverted if it's not able to easily be fixed up. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158679558 | |
| 7 | 2024-11-04 01:49 | nevw | I have fixed up the data that @22040316 left for us to quality control.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158723106 | |
| 158684280 by 22040316 @ 2024-11-03 04:01 | 1 | 2024-11-03 06:14 | nevw | Hi 22040316I see you have moved on to mapping in a different country now.Can we expect you to fix the changesets as commented upon east of Melbourne? |
| 158611030 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 09:46 | 1 | 2024-11-01 09:57 | nevw | Hi, names used as a description are not used in osm. Names like School Access and Staff Access should not be added. See the osm access tags that are used instead. |
| 2 | 2024-11-01 22:56 | DylaniaCat ♦3 | ok | |
| 3 | 2024-11-01 22:57 | DylaniaCat ♦3 | my upload rate has reached its limit though | |
| 4 | 2024-11-01 23:23 | nevw | I can fix those easily, thanks. | |
| 5 | 2024-11-02 00:42 | nevw | All fixed now. Keep up the extensive updated to the map :) | |
| 158612081 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 10:18 | 1 | 2024-11-01 10:29 | nevw | name=House Construction is not required.Correct tags would be landuse=construction plus construction=residentialAlso do not join landuse area nodes to the roadway centrelines. The landuse only extends to the property line or the edge of the road, though sometimes exceptions occur when constructi... |
| 2 | 2024-11-01 10:31 | nevw | If you do want to add more information you can add freehand text in the description= tag | |
| 3 | 2024-11-03 08:19 | DylaniaCat ♦3 | ok ^^ | |
| 158612011 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 10:16 | 1 | 2024-11-01 10:21 | nevw | In this one name=Driveway is not required |
| 158609807 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 09:09 | 1 | 2024-11-01 09:17 | nevw | A public road should not have a tag name=Public Road.Public access is assumed but you can add access=yes if you want to be specific. |
| 2 | 2024-11-01 09:21 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:accesshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names | |
| 158609185 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 08:48 | 1 | 2024-11-01 09:13 | nevw | Hi, please don’t add the name= Private Road to all theseThe correct way is to add the tag access= private |
| 2 | 2024-11-01 21:55 | DylaniaCat ♦3 | Ok sorry I will change it. | |
| 158607367 by DylaniaCat @ 2024-11-01 07:25 | 1 | 2024-11-01 07:35 | nevw | Deleted this duplicate of a school already mapped here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201576917 |
| 158530479 by guyruns @ 2024-10-30 08:44 | 1 | 2024-10-30 09:20 | nevw | Hi, I notice you editing the streets in the Green Wattle Gardens and Sanctuary area.Are you able to add the missing street names within the Pacific Palms Home Village as most names are missing.Thered ones are missing names on this page ...http://qa.poole.ch/?zoom=17&lat=-27.16854&lon=1... |
| 2 | 2024-10-31 02:51 | guyruns ♦1 | Hey - I was just changing the streets to "Private" as it is a gated community. I did not edit the street names, nor do i know the names of the missing streets unfortunately. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-31 04:20 | nevw | Ok, thanks. | |
| 158529762 by wm76at @ 2024-10-30 08:24 | 1 | 2024-10-30 12:08 | nevw | Hi, the usual method to add an address is to draw the outline of the building, usually a house, and add the tag building=house.You appear to have added an address to a very small portion of the building on the property. If you prefer not to draw the property building you can add the address to a s... |
| 2 | 2024-10-31 02:01 | nevw | I have readdressed this building.I left your little bit as 133 Meeks Lane and addressed the Main building as 133 Meeks Road. | |
| 158535165 by Ali Farhatttt @ 2024-10-30 10:45 | 1 | 2024-10-30 12:11 | nevw | Hi, can you delete name=#tt_event from the buildings you have added it to. |
| 2 | 2024-10-31 02:00 | nevw | fixed | |
| 158436444 by Nectar Town Planning (Nicole) @ 2024-10-28 01:22 | 1 | 2024-10-28 03:35 | nevw | HiSee bridge:name option on the wikihttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridgeOften the road name is continued across the bridge with name=* and the named bridge carries the tag bridge:name |
| 158386943 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-10-26 17:57 | 1 | 2024-10-27 12:45 | nevw | I see your up to your old tricks again creating invalid multipolygons. Hope your attitude to fixing them by using simple polygons instead has improved. |
| 2 | 2024-10-27 22:56 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | If these are two separate houses in one building, there's ways to tag this correctly instead of making invalid multipolygons. You can tag them as building=house and house=semi-detatched, or building=semidetatched_house, probably worth checking to see which option is more widely used in Australi... | |
| 158324816 by db888 @ 2024-10-25 07:42 | 1 | 2024-10-25 10:48 | nevw | You have added a building but it follows the boundary of the property line instead of being an accurate depiction of the building shape. |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 12:47 | nevw | Reshaped | |
| 158190794 by tissue123abcd @ 2024-10-21 23:49 | 1 | 2024-10-22 02:00 | nevw | Hi, I added the parking and way tags as highway=service plus service=parking_aisle. I also added the driveways for the affected houses so that should resolve the issue. The navigation apps may take some time to update their data. |
| 2 | 2024-10-24 06:34 | nevw | OSR(car) is now using latest data and using the correct routehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-27.524301%2C153.077083%3B-27.525779%2C153.078784#map=18/-27.524737/153.077770 | |
| 3 | 2024-10-24 06:44 | nevw | ….just have to get 18 Cunard Street to use Cunard Street instead of the neighbours driveway at the rear 🫤 | |
| 4 | 2024-10-24 20:03 | nevw | Valhalla(car) now workshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=-27.524449%2C153.076126%3B-27.525552%2C153.078632#map=17/-27.525408/153.078191 | |
| 158163440 by ananyaaaaa @ 2024-10-21 10:33 | 1 | 2024-10-21 21:00 | nevw | Hi, why have you and five other new editors added DN Nagar names in the Fairfield and Annerley areas. |
| 2 | 2024-10-22 01:54 | nevw | I reverted this and other stuff added to the Fairfield and Annerley areas. | |
| 158115205 by Alexk25434 @ 2024-10-20 06:47 | 1 | 2024-10-20 10:20 | nevw | HI Alex, are you able to add the street name? |
| 2 | 2024-10-20 10:42 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Hi Alex, we can't use Google Maps as a source, this probably needs to be reverted and redacted --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158115205 | |
| 3 | 2024-10-20 11:19 | nevw | I did not notice that Alex used Google as a source to map this. I have remapped the entire area using Ersi imagery. I feel it should still all be reverted and redacted and after that we can remap using imagery available to us in the editors. | |
| 4 | 2024-10-20 11:47 | Alexk25434 ♦1 | hey guys sorry about this. It was my first time and i didnt really know what i was doing. I live in this estate. | |
| 5 | 2024-10-20 14:00 | nevw | We all make a few beginner mistakes. If it gets reverted and redacted it is easy enough to remap using the Ersi imagery available in the editors. Are you able to check the street name for us Alex? | |
| 158086872 by Kellyville Dentist @ 2024-10-19 11:53 | 1 | 2024-10-19 13:18 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted this because you have added your dentistry tags to Aldi business point. You will instead need to add the dentistry business to a new node where the dentist is located in the building.You tagged the dentistry edit as amenity=hospital and healthcare=hospital.I think it should b... |
| 2 | 2024-10-19 13:28 | nevw | Let me know if Aldi has vacated the building and a dentistry occupies the space. | |
| 158068680 by Chrisonadventures1 @ 2024-10-18 21:32 | 1 | 2024-10-19 05:20 | nevw | Does the service road come out of the tunnel to join Frankland Street? |
| 2 | 2024-10-19 05:24 | Chrisonadventures1 ♦1 | Yes. It does. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-19 06:12 | nevw | Ok, can you add a section of service road that is not in a tunnel to join the centreline of Frankland St thanks. | |
| 157950602 by Safrano @ 2024-10-16 07:13 | 1 | 2024-10-18 10:19 | nevw | Hithe waterways you added are loops with the water flowing upstream. Water in osm always flows downstream.You can check for loop errors on this page. https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=6.82/-3.696/141.245I have fixed your waterway loop errors. |
| 2 | 2024-10-18 10:22 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways"Those ways used should point in the direction of water flow" | |
| 157799508 by Aydoh8 @ 2024-10-12 14:53 | 1 | 2024-10-14 08:24 | nevw | Hi, any reason use a multipolygon for the grassed area? It is invalid as rings can't join each other and it looks like it should be drawn as a simple polygon. |
| 2 | 2024-10-16 23:47 | nevw | no response.There were two grassed areas that were created using unnecessary multipolgons. I believe the iD editor may create these if you use more than one continuous line to map the bounds of the area. I have remapped them as simple polygons. | |
| 157964226 by Amba Foods AUS @ 2024-10-16 13:17 | 1 | 2024-10-16 13:55 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted your edit because you dragged a road node across the map and the gate location and roadway is uncertain.Can you add you business details again please. |
| 2 | 2024-10-16 14:04 | nevw | I expect the dragged way was accidental.This depicts where it happed https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=157964226The reversion I carried corrected the map. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-16 14:29 | nevw | I’ll re-add the business to osm tomorrow. | |
| 4 | 2024-10-16 21:45 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | The business looks like it was tagged in the wrong place, streets don't match up and it was added on top of what looks like a substation at first glance. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157964226 | |
| 5 | 2024-10-16 23:30 | nevw | Yes, their web address places them within the Orbis Business Park which is a bit east of the Western Freeway. Amba Foods AUS can you zoom in much closer and accurately place the business over the address listed. There is no street level imagery that I am able to access to to do this. | |
| 157832896 by ChonkerStonker @ 2024-10-13 12:32 | 1 | 2024-10-15 23:41 | nevw | Hi, the BOM source is copyright. You need to get explicit permission to use the data from BOM. If you stumble upon a station in you travels you are free to add to osm using your personal survey as a source but not using a copyrighted source as your input. |
| 157876679 by TheRealHaroldMiller @ 2024-10-14 13:02 | 1 | 2024-10-15 01:57 | nevw | Hi, the suffix of addr:street names should not be abbreviated. I fixed your edits. |
| 157899789 by GlennTh @ 2024-10-15 00:03 | 1 | 2024-10-15 00:13 | nevw | There is another imagery provider - Esri - it has imagery showing the new building |
| 157878853 by Rymck @ 2024-10-14 13:45 | 1 | 2024-10-14 20:21 | nevw | Hi Rymck, welcome to osm. This is a footway but it is not a sidewalk.A side walk is close and parallel to a road.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk |
| 2 | 2024-10-15 00:30 | Rymck ♦1 | Thank you, I have removed the sidewalk tag. | |
| 157883485 by Esar Ali @ 2024-10-14 15:29 | 1 | 2024-10-14 20:10 | nevw | Hi Esar Ali, welcome to osm.There are multiple individual buildings within the Microsoft polygon. You are expected to critically view the MS offering and reshape to accurately and redraw if necessary to the outline of each individual buildings. |
| 157857739 by Tablenine @ 2024-10-14 03:26 | 1 | 2024-10-14 05:27 | nevw | Hi Tablenine, I noticed an improbable ‘place of worship’ tagged next door to your edit. Can you delete it if it is an incorrect entry.Also I notice the building in this area are tagged twice with their house number. Only one time is preferred and added to the building is probably prefe... |
| 2 | 2024-10-14 08:37 | nevw | Mapping a building and having a separate address node is fine as is having all the info added to the building. You are free to choose either method.But there shouldn't be a duplication of the address for each house. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-14 11:16 | Tablenine ♦2 | I do believe the place of worship is present at that location.Thank you for your advice on what to do about the house numbers!In subsequent edits I just placed the building with no address tags and left the address node.I will fix this edit and the duplicated house numbers in its vicinity. | |
| 4 | 2024-10-14 11:20 | Tablenine ♦2 | I have now deleted the nodes for houses which have their house number listed as a tag on the building. Was this the correct way to go about doing this? | |
| 5 | 2024-10-14 11:32 | nevw | Yes all seems ok now, thanks. | |
| 157111126 by Complete Dental - Dentist Coorparoo @ 2024-09-26 06:28 | 1 | 2024-09-26 10:31 | nevw | Is this a hospital or a clinic?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospitalhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic |
| 2 | 2024-10-04 10:56 | nevw | no response, changed to clinic, fixed opening hours | |
| 3 | 2024-10-14 09:15 | nevw | changed to dentist | |
| 157697270 by Pakenhamin @ 2024-10-10 04:31 | 1 | 2024-10-10 22:34 | nevw | Hi, is this a tagging error? |
| 2 | 2024-10-10 22:34 | nevw | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12240518661/history#map=19/-37.914268/145.056684 | |
| 3 | 2024-10-14 09:06 | nevw | I have fixed 5 instances of sport=bullfighting tag in Victoria. Finger trouble with app is likely culprit I guess | |
| 4 | 2024-11-01 11:00 | Pakenhamin ♦9 | That is true and it doesn't count the ones I catch myself before sending them in.Finger trouble with the app and not noticing the error is what lets them slip through. | |
| 157697348 by 83nf15h @ 2024-10-10 04:35 | 1 | 2024-10-10 04:56 | nevw | Hi, you have added a building=residential but imagery does not display one.Is there a building here? |
| 157658945 by Braybrook Physio @ 2024-10-09 07:34 | 1 | 2024-10-09 08:23 | nevw | Why have you mapped a physio in a car park? |
| 2 | 2024-10-09 08:26 | nevw | I apologise for my haste…later imagery shows a newly constructed building here. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-09 09:47 | nevw | I have mapped the three new buildings using Ersi imagery but the two buildings in the bottom right of the carpark seem to be still partially completed as does the carpark here. You may be able to complete that area if you are local to the area | |
| 4 | 2024-10-09 10:13 | Braybrook Physio ♦1 | Hi there Im not sure how to complete new building. The three building on left close to burke street is completed one year ago. Our physio clinic is the one in middle | |
| 5 | 2024-10-09 10:55 | nevw | Ok, I mapped that as one building as only a low zoom image showing the building is available. The two buildings and the carpark that appear incomplete are on the corner of Ballarat and Butlers roads. It's fine to leave further mapping until more suitable imagery becomes available in the editor.... | |
| 157650932 by Beyond 32 Dental - Pennant Hills Dentist @ 2024-10-09 02:03 | 1 | 2024-10-09 05:21 | nevw | Is this a hospital or a clinic?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospitalhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic |
| 157647447 by Milbz @ 2024-10-08 21:59 | 1 | 2024-10-08 22:31 | nevw | Hi, I removed the ‘Cubby house’ name tag from the small building on the property.The name tag is not used to describe things but is reserved for things that really do carry a name such as ‘Shirlow Avenue’. |
| 157609659 by NooBoY @ 2024-10-08 06:43 | 1 | 2024-10-08 07:01 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I fixed the phone format on both your edits.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers |
| 157564513 by TE3EJ @ 2024-10-07 04:49 | 1 | 2024-10-07 08:44 | nevw | Hi, I reverted this change because you accidentally dragged a road node across a few streets.Can you edit it again to make the changes you want. |
| 157061466 by ShaunKolo @ 2024-09-25 02:09 | 1 | 2024-09-25 08:14 | nevw | Hi ShaunKolo, incorrect gate tags were added hereSee our wiki for the gate tags…https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ms:Tag:barrier%3Dgate |
| 2 | 2024-09-25 08:18 | nevw | …err, english version https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate | |
| 3 | 2024-10-04 11:01 | nevw | no response, edited tags | |
| 156901623 by harrison pricewater @ 2024-09-21 08:52 | 1 | 2024-09-21 09:08 | nevw | Hi, does this company occupy all floors of the building? |
| 2 | 2024-09-21 09:33 | harrison pricewater ♦1 | no | |
| 3 | 2024-09-21 10:33 | nevw | You have added the business address to the whole building.If the business occupies a floor or unit within the building, you should add a node within the building outline and add the business tags to it instead of the building outline. Same goes for interstate offices. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-21 10:35 | nevw | The tag addr:floor or addr:unit may be applicable | |
| 5 | 2024-09-22 00:47 | nevw | I am shifting the business tags from the building to a separate node at this site...401 Collins Street, but noticed your web page has the Melbourne Main Office at 220 Collins St.https://heroshotphotography.com/contact/Which is correct please? | |
| 6 | 2024-09-25 11:53 | nevw | Because of the discrepancy between the business web site listed addresses and where you have mapped the business, I am inclined to delete this entry.Can you explain why this mapped address should remain thanks.Is it because not all of the businesses office locations are listed on their website? | |
| 7 | 2024-10-04 10:59 | nevw | no response, deleted | |
| 157028682 by iqctnaus @ 2024-09-24 08:51 | 1 | 2024-09-25 11:37 | nevw | I think you will find that because the coastline has followed all through these canals instead of being closed of near the coast, you will need to add a coastline to this island too. I think the outer role was correct but didn’t check closely.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&a... |
| 2 | 2024-09-25 13:16 | iqctnaus ♦2 | Thanks Nevw, I've looked at it again and changed it back to outer but theres quite a bit going on with the water in this particular section as it is also tagged as a water hazard for the golf course. Attempting to change it to a Coastline caused some issues with this water hazard that I couldn&... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-25 13:41 | nevw | Yes, I found it quite complex and couldn’t make much sense of why it was mapped as it is. Good luck sorting it out. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-25 14:31 | nevw | I added another water relation MP but it hasn't rendered the island as yet...https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18088652Maybe having these two separate water mp around the island causes the problem...do there need to two separate areas?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17260477... | |
| 5 | 2024-09-25 14:44 | iqctnaus ♦2 | I've removed the Water Hazards from the waterway to test if these are causing the issuehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157086983 | |
| 6 | 2024-09-25 14:53 | nevw | Not sure how soon the changes to rendering of multipolygons may take.See Tom Hughes reply to a community query…https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/slow-rendering-of-some-tiles-of-openstreetmap-standard/2188/4 | |
| 7 | 2024-09-29 01:53 | nevw | I added a coastline to Fairway Island to get it to render on the standard layer (and the Tracestrack Topo layer).Another three island within the coastline were also affected and already had a natural tag. I the changed them to single member multipolygons and added natural=coastline to the way so t... | |
| 8 | 2024-10-04 10:47 | nevw | Finally rendered the four islands I added a coastline to but only on zoom 15 so farhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17260479#map=15/-27.86193/153.36614 | |
| 157337552 by Dimension3 Systems @ 2024-10-01 12:35 | 1 | 2024-10-01 13:17 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted your edits as you have added the business to a suburban roadway that is obviously not at the address you have listed for the business. You should add a node within the city building you listed and add the tags to that.You may find it helpful to use a site like https://www.ono... |
| 157198594 by Rowan_AU @ 2024-09-28 08:14 | 1 | 2024-09-28 09:32 | nevw | Hi, you have placed this business on the footway. Can you place it over the part of the building it operates from thanks. |
| 2 | 2024-09-28 09:36 | nevw | Is the building named "The Mill Markets" on OSM the same site.If so, should I merge you info to the building and use the name you have provided instead? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-28 10:12 | Rowan_AU ♦3 | G'day nevw, yes, please merge with the existing info and change the name to the one I provided, thanks. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-28 10:17 | nevw | Thanks Rowan, I’ll do that tomorrow if time permits | |
| 157063486 by shamuoo1 @ 2024-09-25 04:54 | 1 | 2024-09-25 05:18 | nevw | Hi, when mapping Drummond Street you have overlapped a section of the highway. Are you able to delete the overlapping part thanks. It should join the highway at only one node. |
| 2 | 2024-09-25 08:02 | nevw | Thanks, looks good. | |
| 156976634 by Bright Dental Group - Dentist Glenmore Park @ 2024-09-23 05:03 | 1 | 2024-09-23 05:34 | nevw | Hi, instead of adding all the details to the shopping mall, you should add a new node or point within the building shape and add all the business details to it. Locate the business node close to where the dentist is located in the mall. |
| 2 | 2024-09-23 06:31 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Reverted changeset, business details added to whole mallhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156978748 | |
| 156893177 by Another_Mapper_ @ 2024-09-21 02:07 | 1 | 2024-09-21 10:49 | nevw | Hi, the multipolygons here are invalid.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.98697&lat=-37.92507&zoom=17https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 21:37 | nevw | fixed now. Multipolygons are more useful for getting rid of overlapping ways. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-23 01:00 | Another_Mapper_ ♦2 | Thanks for catching and fixing that nevw. I appreciate the hint! | |
| 156896440 by Snail126 @ 2024-09-21 05:56 | 1 | 2024-09-21 23:37 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Hi,The multipolygone relation is not correct - shared segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.25924&lat=-35.29263&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersec... |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 03:35 | nevw | I changed the multipolygon to simple polygons. Other problems not addressed. | |
| 156901373 by harrison pricewater @ 2024-09-21 08:45 | 1 | 2024-09-22 01:53 | nevw | This business listed appears to have been added to the wrong building and is deleted. Note that the business has been shifted to a node within the building next door from your other edit. |
| 156902333 by harrison pricewater @ 2024-09-21 09:10 | 1 | 2024-09-21 11:04 | nevw | Would shop=photo be suitable for the businesshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3DphotoAlthough the craft tag is correct, I don’t think the craft tags get rendered on most layers so an additional shop tag may display better. |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 01:41 | nevw | This business you have tagged as 15 Clarence St but have mapped at 50 Clarence St. The company website lists it at 50 Clarence St.https://heroshotphotography.com/contact/Which is correct? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 01:49 | nevw | I have changed it to 50 Clarence Street and added shop=photo | |
| 156709637 by timdn02 @ 2024-09-17 00:45 | 1 | 2024-09-18 12:39 | nevw | Hi, the museum is mapped as a multipolygon but it is done in a way that is invalid for a multipolygon in osm. Outer parts cannot join each other. We have a wiki on multipolygons that explains this.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonI suggest that you delete the multipo... |
| 2 | 2024-09-18 12:49 | nevw | I should add that osmi areas picked up the invalid multipolygonhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95314&lat=-27.25959&zoom=19If you really want to use a multipolygon for this you could have the two building parts in the multipolygon as role outer and remove the cen... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 00:36 | nevw | remapped using building part method | |
| 156767139 by Matthewla @ 2024-09-18 11:06 | 1 | 2024-09-18 11:59 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. Did you intend to have this mapped as a multipolygon?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18058167#map=19/-37.713027/145.113445 |
| 2 | 2024-09-22 00:35 | nevw | The simple buildinds that were changed to multipolygons and were likely created by iD due to your mapping method are deleted. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-22 00:35 | nevw | ...and mapped as simple polygons | |
| 66164459 by _mark @ 2019-01-09 14:36 | 1 | 2024-09-22 00:04 | nevw | Hi _markare you able to put the correct apartment names on both these buildings |
| 156800048 by bbq2 @ 2024-09-19 03:29 | 1 | 2024-09-19 05:05 | nevw | Hi, there is nothing to indicate a wilderness hut on imagery in this park. Was it added in mistake? |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 08:57 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Reverted in changeset 156856577 | |
| 156333239 by Bharat13 @ 2024-09-08 01:24 | 1 | 2024-09-08 05:45 | nevw | Hi, a playground node has been shifted from Forsyth Reserve to a building supply yard on Gates Rd further south. Should this changeset be reverted? |
| 2 | 2024-09-08 05:51 | GeeMaps! ♦30 | According to https://location.sa.gov.au/viewer/?map=hybrid&x=138.67691&y=-34.87646&z=12&uids=19 Huntfield Heights is only to the west of Main South Rd, with Onkaparinga Heights & Hackham to the east. Sorry, but I think you may to scrap all this & start again! | |
| 3 | 2024-09-16 08:56 | nevw | I have tried to fix all the remaining errors by @Bharat13 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156674843https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156674966https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156677475 | |
| 156634941 by aclel @ 2024-09-15 06:26 | 1 | 2024-09-15 07:02 | nevw | Seem to me that you may need to read about route relationshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route |
| 2 | 2024-09-15 07:06 | aclel ♦1 | I was playing around trying to get the route to show up on https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#In the help window on their site it says the following:type = route|superrouteroute = mtbconsidering the route has these tags, im not sure what's going on. any ideas? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-15 07:32 | nevw | Sorry I can be of help as I am unfamiliar with tagging route relations. You can get plenty of help by asking on our community pagehttps://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73 | |
| 4 | 2024-09-15 08:03 | nevw | If you find an interest in creating these types of relations, I expect you would find it more easily done using the Josm editor. | |
| 5 | 2024-09-15 08:10 | nevw | In Josm, I would create the relation first and then open that relation for editing. In the relation edit window you can add all the ways in the expected order and add the roles for the ways.I am not familiar with using the iD editor. | |
| 156576047 by managevehicle @ 2024-09-13 14:47 | 1 | 2024-09-13 21:44 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. You have added the tag amenity=cafe as a primary tag of the business. Should this be office=company or something more specific instead? |
| 2 | 2024-09-13 23:12 | nevw | I have changed/formatted the tags. | |
| 156523777 by Mera Mera @ 2024-09-12 11:31 | 1 | 2024-09-12 21:05 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I have reverted adding a business name and number to a public Telstra phone.Please add the business detail tags to the building you operate from instead. |
| 156507976 by DanielLou70 @ 2024-09-12 01:48 | 1 | 2024-09-12 05:13 | nevw | It would be appreciated if you could redraw both of these apartment buildings more accurately by zooming in much closer and also by providing the displayed name as I expect that the name Dalley’s House is incorrectly named |
| 156333149 by Bharat13 @ 2024-09-08 01:18 | 1 | 2024-09-08 01:51 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Hi, you've tagged the entirety of way 550377005 as Trittico Ristorante, this is the building for the whole shopping centre, Trittico Ristorante should just be a node inside the building's outline, if it's part of the building --- Published using... |
| 2 | 2024-09-08 04:19 | Bharat13 ♦1 | Sorry just realised that’s, thanks for bringing this up, will try to fix it. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-08 05:36 | GeeMaps! ♦30 | Hi. Sorry to be awkward, but you've also tagged an already mapped Doctor's surgery as a hospital, which it certainly won't be. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-08 05:36 | nevw | Hi, there are now two boundary relations named Huntfield Heights, one was previously Hackam and 4 buildings have been added to one of them which don't belong in suburb admin boundaries.Is it best to revert this changeset? | |
| 5 | 2024-09-08 05:57 | GeeMaps! ♦30 | Again, you've also mapped the park, & an address node beside it as 154 Main South Rd, in addition to the shops. It would appear that yes, the shops are correct as 154. | |
| 156162023 by Emu600 @ 2024-09-03 22:39 | 1 | 2024-09-03 22:42 | NeisBot ♦2,245 | Hi Emu600, welcome to OSM!Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:- 1 natural(s)- 1 landuse(')Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they o... |
| 2 | 2024-09-03 22:45 | Emu600 ♦1 | does this go on the worldwide OSM? I thought it was a private map of the area??? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-03 23:08 | Emu600 ♦1 | These deletions and all these changes were on purpose, but should not be updated into OSM as they were for a different purpose not the full international map. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-04 00:15 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | These were all done on the live map, I'll revert this changeset. | |
| 5 | 2024-09-04 00:16 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Reverted changeset per discussionhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156163383 | |
| 6 | 2024-09-04 00:38 | nevw | @Emu600Suitable alternatives for displaying personal maps online may be https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/https://leafletjs.com/ | |
| 156036318 by Meg Wilson @ 2024-09-01 01:12 | 1 | 2024-09-01 02:29 | nevw | Hi MegYou have accidentally dragged Mombri Street over Smythe Street…https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156036318#map=17/-33.836173/150.996318https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156036318Are you able to fix?Can you give more details on what the project area is and... |
| 2 | 2024-09-02 02:28 | nevw | no response, fixed road node and added website for an infrastructure project that appears to be related to the mapped area. | |
| 156038840 by pepsi_max2k @ 2024-09-01 05:00 | 1 | 2024-09-02 00:14 | nevw | Hithe construction multipolygons are an invalid construct. outer rings cannot join and two of the rings are duplicated.I will fix by not using a multipolygon. |
| 2 | 2024-09-02 00:40 | pepsi_max2k ♦1 | Thanks. Also note area isn’t exact (sat views are all old), but previous area has expanded a lot - construction from north of brennan Drive, starting before the entrance to hidden valley, south just covering the old bike lane, and all down Berryman road to the fire station. It’s technica... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-02 01:26 | nevw | Thanks, I left as three seperate areas as was mapped previously. You may need refresh your browser to see them. | |
| 155856677 by nevw @ 2024-08-28 02:08 | 1 | 2024-08-28 02:10 | nevw | Also left the Hinze Dam Numinbah Nature Refuge overlapping wooded areas for now. |
| 2 | 2024-08-28 06:06 | nevw | I think the mapping of the large wooded area with multiple inners forming their own inner ring within the mp and more inners within that ring triggering the osmi warning is a bit unfortunate but not an unreasonable way to map. I can’t think of a better way the complexity and feel the osmi err... | |
| 3 | 2024-08-28 06:10 | nevw | …not a false positive but more an acceptable and tolerable mapping error. | |
| 155191753 by Stuzz @ 2024-08-13 11:51 | 1 | 2024-08-16 06:50 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 X... |
| 2 | 2024-08-26 00:12 | Stuzz ♦2 | Thanks tastrax. Can you point to which addition I made which you corrected so I can see what I did and how it was incorrect? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-26 02:41 | nevw | I’m not tastrax, but noticed your query, it was this one George4x4https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6283756177/history | |
| 4 | 2024-08-26 05:27 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Correct nevw - mobile number for the 4x4 shop. | |
| 5 | 2024-08-26 08:36 | Stuzz ♦2 | OK, thanks everyone :) | |
| 155471953 by Deuar @ 2024-08-19 17:14 | 1 | 2024-08-20 07:36 | nevw | HiOsmi picks up some errors herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.21451&lat=-28.19207&zoom=16 |
| 2 | 2024-08-20 07:41 | nevw | I expect we are unable to use the spacial imagery to edit OSM that you have listed as the source. Please check here...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Queensland | |
| 3 | 2024-08-20 07:43 | nevw | ...corrected link to Qld data sources...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland | |
| 4 | 2024-08-21 11:15 | nevw | I expect the source you are using is…https://spatial-img.information.qld.gov.au/arcgis/rest/services/Basemaps/LatestStateProgram_AllUsers/ImageServerUnder the service description it states“Aerial imagery that is three years or older captured under SISP is made available for public... | |
| 5 | 2024-08-25 13:23 | Deuar ♦14 | Hi Nev, hmm, lawyers strike again. Still, those excellent Qld Gov data could be somewhat shaky as you say, with this CC-BY issue raising its head. I found some discussions, especiallyhttps://community.openstreetmap.org/t/possible-access-to-qld-govt-data/109349where user Fizzie41 is making a ... | |
| 6 | 2024-08-25 14:19 | nevw | Thanks PeterThere was another discussion about qtopo in 2019https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/thread.html#12890Seems very difficult to obtain permissions. | |
| 7 | 2024-08-25 14:42 | Deuar ♦14 | So it seems, and its often a communications stalemate.There was a salient comment in that thread:"So unfortunately we're in a stalemate, OSMF says we need a waiver, DNRMEsays they don't believe we need one. So we can't currently use DNRME's CCBY 4.0 open data within Op... | |
| 155631061 by GeeMaps! @ 2024-08-23 01:38 | 1 | 2024-08-24 09:06 | nevw | Hiosmi selects your edit as having a wrongly constructed multipolygon.Maybe it would be easier to not use a multipolygon for this.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.42775&lat=-28.06684&zoom=18 |
| 2 | 2024-08-24 09:08 | nevw | If you want to use a multipolgon you will need to draw it without any inner rings touching the outer ring ass you can see with others that are mapped nearby. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-24 22:54 | GeeMaps! ♦30 | Thanks Nev. I tried that but seemed that the bunker just above the green was causing issues, maybe because the fairway wasn't all the way around it? I'll have another play later. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-25 03:40 | GeeMaps! ♦30 | Deleted & redone so hope that's fixed it now? | |
| 155683751 by computerOwl @ 2024-08-24 08:30 | 1 | 2024-08-24 09:00 | nevw | Hi, it would be best to zoom in closer to be able to map these shapes more accurately and also press Q to square the corners |
| 155631287 by Nehehmeh11 @ 2024-08-23 01:55 | 1 | 2024-08-23 02:13 | nevw | Hi, the correct tag is building=house.A landuse tag is for a block or suburb or town and encloses all the residential properties for landuse=residential |
| 155553181 by Deuar @ 2024-08-21 11:39 | 1 | 2024-08-22 09:40 | nevw | Hi, you need to fix these osmi errors as you proceedhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.21390&lat=-28.20471&zoom=14 |
| 2 | 2024-08-23 02:43 | Deuar ♦14 | Hi Nev, thanks for your comments I'll try to look into the matter closer when I get back from work/weekend. Seems strange that they distinguish 3 years old imagery and newer ones. Might not be so easy to distinguish. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-25 13:03 | Deuar ♦14 | Fixed this, I think (some "inner" patches that were missed). Not 100% sure what the error that osmi is complaining about though in all cases. JOSM does not complain, and openstreetmap-carto seems to render fine. | |
| 155584946 by avtruck @ 2024-08-22 03:56 | 1 | 2024-08-22 06:27 | nevw | Should this be tagged shop=truck instead of shop=car?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtruck |
| 155452550 by Il Falco @ 2024-08-19 10:12 | 1 | 2024-08-19 10:25 | Il Falco ♦1 | Incorrectly made other changes to map. Only wanted to add Il Falco to the map. If someone knows how to reverse changes please do. |
| 2 | 2024-08-19 10:51 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted your edithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155454106 | |
| 3 | 2024-08-19 10:57 | nevw | You will need to add the Il Falco details again. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-19 11:51 | Il Falco ♦1 | Thank you! | |
| 155437894 by Star Sheetmetal - Steel Fabrication Melbourne @ 2024-08-18 23:47 | 1 | 2024-08-19 06:51 | nevw | Hi, you also need to add a primary tag to identify what you are adding to osm.I added man_made=works plus product=steel.Does this seem ok? |
| 155100161 by brookesy_au @ 2024-08-11 12:29 | 1 | 2024-08-11 13:00 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. I think you may have accidentally dragged the address node for 4 Tamara Close from it’s correct position.Can you check thanks. |
| 2 | 2024-08-13 12:45 | nevw | I have fixed this | |
| 3 | 2024-08-13 22:43 | brookesy_au ♦1 | Goodo 👍. Not sure what happen there. AFAIK, I only updated details for an adjacent property, but obviously got side-tracked and/or was not paying attention etc. Thanks for your assistance in addressing this issue. | |
| 155141511 by ganouri @ 2024-08-12 10:35 | 1 | 2024-08-12 11:37 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. The driveway should be tagged highway=service plus service=driveway. The address is added to another node located over the building at that address or you can draw the outline of the building and add the address to that building polygon…eg building=yes plus addr:housenumb... |
| 155126970 by WINKfit Gym @ 2024-08-12 02:28 | 1 | 2024-08-12 05:18 | nevw | I noticed that you have placed the Winktfit Gym business icon on top of the Autobros Wholesale Pty Ltd icon at this location. Is the Autobros Wholesale Pty Ltd business still present. If so, are you able to more carefully place the nodes to display both businesses? |
| 154728794 by 000Journey @ 2024-08-02 10:19 | 1 | 2024-08-02 13:36 | nevw | Hi, the hotel/motel appears to be already mapped and yours appear to be duplicates. |
| 154714724 by Bayani Mills @ 2024-08-02 00:42 | 1 | 2024-08-02 00:51 | nevw | HiThe phone was already tagged correctly.phone:AU key is only used for a 1300 or 1800 number.More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 06:06 | Bayani Mills ♦1 | Thank you! | |
| 3 | 2024-08-02 12:17 | nevw | A thankyou is nice but we expect you to correct the mistake instead | |
| 154715630 by Bayani Mills @ 2024-08-02 02:03 | 1 | 2024-08-02 03:34 | nevw | Hi Bayani, your changeset comment should inform other mappers in brief about what you have done in the changeset.See info here:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 154715147 by Bayani Mills @ 2024-08-02 01:21 | 1 | 2024-08-02 03:29 | nevw | Hi, this restaurant is mapped separately as an point within the building. I suggest you map the building sepately and add all the restaurant tags to the poi |
| 154713544 by Bayani Mills @ 2024-08-01 23:13 | 1 | 2024-08-02 00:30 | nevw | This is already mapped across the road |
| 107119767 by Bobb23 @ 2021-06-29 04:45 | 1 | 2021-07-01 09:37 | jonorossi ♦93 | You've created a beach at Deception Bay. You should familiarise yourself with the tagging guidelines for beaches, specifically the upper and lower limits which are mapped incorrectly.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beachAre you sure the beach is named "Deception Bay&q... |
| 2 | 2021-07-02 05:43 | nevw | ....also take into consideration that there is no sandy beach here. It is all mudflats and mangrove vegetation in parts. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-01 01:39 | nevw | I have removed this beach. | |
| 154637686 by truesocietyfitzroy @ 2024-07-31 08:46 | 1 | 2024-07-31 11:00 | nevw | Hi, I deleted the opening hours. Can you re-enter using an acceptable format as informed by our wikihttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours |
| 154131035 by David Jumaa @ 2024-07-19 07:41 | 1 | 2024-07-23 02:44 | nevw | Hi, there is an error in how you mapped the streams in this area.https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=18.08/-26.773139/152.8872Waterways need to be mapped in the direction of the water flow. You have part of one waterway flowing into a water body then along the edge and then out of the water body b... |
| 2 | 2024-07-24 02:46 | David Jumaa ♦1 | Got it thank you | |
| 154204103 by Haami @ 2024-07-21 05:54 | 1 | 2024-07-21 22:38 | nevw | Hi HaamiIs the source for the house numbers from your own survey? |
| 2 | 2024-07-22 07:27 | Haami ♦3 | Hi nevw,That's correct. I'll aim to add source=survey tags onto these address nodes over the next few weeks, once I'm confident the addresses are correct. Some addresses along Stodart Terrace are incorrect and inherit the street name adjacent to Stodart. I'll confirm these in f... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-22 10:40 | nevw | Thanks Haami, current preferred practice is to add source in the changeset comment instead of adding source tags to each item, so just add the source in the upload comment as you proceed.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source | |
| 154242282 by Vaderaj @ 2024-07-22 02:46 | 1 | 2024-07-22 04:26 | nevw | Hi, I expect house are each at addr:housenumber=52 and additionally need a addr:unit=1 or 2 or 3They also need addr:street=Beddoe Avenue I assume |
| 154206768 by VicoSen @ 2024-07-21 07:52 | 1 | 2024-07-21 09:08 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. Please don’t abbreviate street names in tags. I have fixed those used in addr:streetname |
| 2 | 2024-07-21 09:46 | VicoSen ♦1 | Oh so St should be Street? Gotcha, I'll keep that in mind, thanks. | |
| 154201123 by dariusr @ 2024-07-21 02:00 | 1 | 2024-07-21 02:31 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.Please use full street names. I have corrected addr:housenumber from Harrier to Harrier Court |
| 2 | 2024-07-21 02:32 | nevw | err… addr:street | |
| 3 | 2024-07-22 02:58 | dariusr ♦1 | Thanks for that! I've recently installed StreetComplete, so I'm just starting to get the hang of it. | |
| 151802742 by DipaleeShirsath@123 @ 2024-05-25 09:47 | 1 | 2024-07-18 07:23 | BR_pebble ♦97 | Hello DipaleeShirsath@123Thank you for mapping!I have added missing buildings -37.8328624, 144.9572215;-37.8329037, 144.9571887-37.8330219, 144.9570395;-37.8330907, 144.9567206;-37.8331087, 144.9566703;-37.833117, 144.956672;-37.8330934, 144.956783;-37.8332442, 144.9565664-37.833... |
| 2 | 2024-07-18 08:03 | nevw | Hi, these shapes don’t bear any resemblance to the buildings they are supposed to represent. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-20 09:26 | nevw | Imagery quite poor and on further inspection I can't do any better myself :/ | |
| 153941429 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-07-14 17:54 | 1 | 2024-07-17 04:04 | Dantine ♦6 | Hi, thanks very much for your work to improve the rail mapping. At this location, there is significant work that is being undertaken as part of the Cross River Rail construction project, and the Bing and other global imagery in this location is very much out of date. Can you please revert and restor... |
| 2 | 2024-07-19 06:51 | HaPe-CZ ♦91 | Hi. Outdated images are always a problem. Then there are collisions because the images don't have a creation date. I don't know how to undo it, there are a lot of changes. Wouldn't it be better to wait for new images or manually fix major changes? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-19 11:33 | nevw | I expect the Josm reverter can manage this task. I can revert this changeset if you are unfamiliar with using it. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-20 01:26 | nevw | @Dantine as you are local to the area and familiar with the current situation on the ground, you are best able to judge if the best option is to revert the changeset. This would then more easily allow further changes as the development progresses.Let me know if you want me to revert it. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-20 03:56 | nevw | @Dantine looks like you may have fixed it all up now. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-20 13:24 | Dantine ♦6 | Thanks team, I reverted in changeset 154175623 | |
| 154161465 by s2art @ 2024-07-19 22:51 | 1 | 2024-07-20 01:18 | nevw | Hi, it is one way on each side of the split where the concrete dividers where Chapman St meets Hampshire Rd. |
| 2 | 2024-07-20 02:45 | nevw | correct wording:Hi, it is one way on each side of the split at the concrete dividers where Chapman St meets Hampshire Rd as is case to other streets meeting Hampshire Rd near here.I have fixed now. | |
| 154078842 by AnielloN @ 2024-07-18 00:10 | 1 | 2024-07-18 01:37 | nevw | Hi, why have you tagged two schools from amenity=school to leisure=park |
| 154037376 by Willeth @ 2024-07-17 01:58 | 1 | 2024-07-17 04:11 | nevw | Hi, there is later Esri imagery to use and I have redrawn the house shape. Is this house a duplex with part as addr:housenumber=1addr:street=Silvereye Streetand another part fronting Thornbill Street with a different address or is the whole building 1 Silvereye Street. If there is another a... |
| 2 | 2024-07-17 06:19 | Willeth ♦1 | Yes, 1 Silvereye Street and 31 Thornbill Street. A duplex but each address is on different streets.I updated it as my address shows incorrect on every delivery app. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-17 07:01 | nevw | Thanks for replying so promptly Willeth.I will add two nodes within the building and add both addresses to separate nodes. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-17 07:29 | nevw | Navigation seems ok on GraphHopper already.https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=-34.47848%2C150.76499%3B-34.47777%2C150.76521#map=18/-34.47789/150.76370https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=-34.47848%2C150.76499%3B-34.47787... | |
| 5 | 2024-07-17 07:39 | Willeth ♦1 | Amazing thank you! | |
| 153834903 by BenSlavec @ 2024-07-12 02:12 | 1 | 2024-07-12 04:02 | nevw | Hi Ben, you removed the place=village tag from Dookie. I assume this was not intentional and do you want me to put it back? |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 23:43 | nevw | I have re-added this now | |
| 152488654 by vijiblitzz @ 2024-06-10 09:40 | 1 | 2024-07-12 23:36 | nevw | Hi, I notice a lot of loops in the PNG https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=7.7/-4.244/142.534These are almost all errors caused by mapping waterways as flowing upstream.Waterways always should be drawn to flow downstream.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterwayAre your teams able to ... |
| 153522847 by MiryamLeal @ 2024-07-03 23:33 | 1 | 2024-07-12 23:23 | nevw | Hi Miryam, I noticed these loops on the waterway map which indicates probable errorshttps://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=10.28/-7.5211/144.8036Waterways must flow downstream to the sea and I notice many of them flow upstream instead. |
| 2 | 2024-07-12 23:25 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway | |
| 153763576 by Sound Carpentry and Construction @ 2024-07-10 00:07 | 1 | 2024-07-10 01:39 | nevw | There is no business building located here.What are trying to add to the map? |
| 2 | 2024-07-10 01:41 | nevw | You need to place your business over the building you operate from. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-10 04:04 | Sound Carpentry and Construction ♦1 | My business operates in this area.I do not wish to dox myself now or in the future | |
| 4 | 2024-07-10 04:41 | nevw | OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If your online shopping store does not have a physical presence then it may not be added to OSM. If it does have a physical presence - for example, if there is an office somewhere - then you can place an office=company object where that office is. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-10 07:17 | Sound Carpentry and Construction ♦1 | I am following the instruction from btcmap.org to list my business as a bitcoin friendly company.My Business does have a physical location. But i do not wish to have the location freely available to the public. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-10 07:43 | nevw | Google maps is probably your best option for an online listing. I notice many businesses seem to be located in the general area of their client base. | |
| 7 | 2024-07-10 07:55 | nevw | You are welcome to discuss the subject on our community website. You may find there are more suitable options to better address your concerns than than I have suggested.https://community.openstreetmap.org/ | |
| 153699381 by KCAG @ 2024-07-08 11:29 | 1 | 2024-07-08 19:20 | nevw | Hi, an informal well used path can be viewed in Strava following the section you have deleted. We would prefer to map all informal paths and use appropriate tags to further define their characteristics.There has been extensive discussion within the Australian osm community regarding this and furth... |
| 2 | 2024-07-08 21:08 | KCAG ♦1 | Hi there,Thanks for the comment… there is an informal path however upon some recent surveying of that location, this area should technically not be accessed by the public so any map indicating this is incorrect, the Kennett River Nature Walk is only 250metres with 14 signs so we want to e... | |
| 153305466 by cory88 @ 2024-06-28 18:09 | 1 | 2024-07-08 10:14 | nevw | HiOsmi finds a problem to fix herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=152.97068&lat=-26.60730&zoom=17 |
| 153665471 by D3 Clinic @ 2024-07-07 14:50 | 1 | 2024-07-08 02:22 | nevw | Hi, you only guessed a couple of correct tags. I have fixed. |
| 153624480 by BaileyNelly @ 2024-07-06 13:42 | 1 | 2024-07-07 00:46 | nevw | Hi, can you give some more information on why you have added a park named 'abandon' to part of Port Pirie and added no access tags to Vera Street.The park has also been added to the Upper Spencer Gulf Marine Park. |
| 2 | 2024-07-07 01:15 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | I have removed this 'park' from the Marine Park. The 'park' appears to contain some houses... The 'park' does need some explanation.. does not appear on the Regional Council webpages. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-07 01:33 | nevw | The houses appear to being removed from the area and looking on the Port Pirie Development Plan, it may be part of coastal conservation plans. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-07 05:31 | nevw | This explains the removal of the houses in the area in 2023.https://www.pirie.sa.gov.au/noticeboard/latest-news/closure-of-roads-north-of-frederick-road-in-port-pirie-west | |
| 5 | 2024-07-07 05:36 | nevw | An ABC article from 2022https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-02/port-pirie-lead-smelter-abandoned-homes-demolished-contaminated/101724554 | |
| 6 | 2024-07-07 07:35 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Don't think it would be a 'park' then, Could be boundary=hazard, hazard=contamination and even contamination=lead ... | |
| 7 | 2024-07-08 01:49 | nevw | Thanks for the feedback BaileyNelly.I have added tags in line with Warin's suggestion plus a few more which are inline with the osm wiki. I didn't add the fence as I couldn't see it on the imagery to be able to place it but I have added access=no to the area. | |
| 8 | 2024-07-08 01:52 | nevw | I also added the ABC article website as it explains the situation well. | |
| 9 | 2024-07-08 01:59 | nevw | I also realigned the streets to Esri imagery as it is more accurately aligned than Bing | |
| 10 | 2024-07-08 06:47 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Thanks BaileyNelly and nevw. | |
| 153554627 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-07-04 16:06 | 1 | 2024-07-05 10:13 | nevw | Hi, multipolygon cannot share outer segments. I converted the building to a simple polygon. |
| 2 | 2024-07-05 18:31 | HaPe-CZ ♦91 | ignore you | |
| 3 | 2024-07-06 00:00 | nevw | Hi, the Queensland Department of National Park, Recreation, Sports and Racing ended in about 2015. Various changes to titles have occurred since then. Are you mapping locally and able to check the signage? | |
| 153481039 by Razax0 @ 2024-07-03 01:27 | 1 | 2024-07-05 13:02 | nevw | Hi, this is not what I would map as a residential street. It is one lane with pedestrians using it too. It has been previously tagged as a living street which seems fine to me, however if it is not signed as a living street, which I expect is the case, it should instead be tagged as a service road a... |
| 153583776 by RH59W824ZD @ 2024-07-05 11:11 | 1 | 2024-07-05 12:10 | nevw | No evidence of building or stated address here and is reverted |
| 153553895 by galacticism @ 2024-07-04 15:44 | 1 | 2024-07-05 10:25 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons outer rings cannot have touching sides. Also, any inner rings also cannot touch outer rings, although none are present here.Looking at the Bing and Esri imagery there appears to be open ground between the two buildings you have drawn in which case the two sections need not meet. |
| 153573260 by VF20NG0IUG @ 2024-07-05 06:09 | 1 | 2024-07-05 09:58 | nevw | Hi, I think Miltiadis Street name ends at the start of the part leading to the driveway for the industrial units.There is a gate at the beginning of the driveway around the industrial units.I have removed the name from the driveway. |
| 2 | 2024-07-05 09:59 | nevw | All of the units also carry the tag addr:street=Miltiadis Street | |
| 153580145 by nevw @ 2024-07-05 09:43 | 1 | 2024-07-05 09:46 | nevw | Hi, these buildings should all have addr:housenumber=159A and the unit number of each should be entered in addr:unit=x for each of the units.I have fixed this and added the driveway. |
| 151888387 by DipaleeShirsath@123 @ 2024-05-27 09:26 | 1 | 2024-07-02 14:29 | BR_pebble ♦97 | Hello DipaleeShirsath@123Thank you for mapping!I have added missing buildings -37.8328624, 144.9572215;-37.8329037, 144.9571887-37.8330219, 144.9570395;-37.8330907, 144.9567206;-37.8331087, 144.9566703;-37.833117, 144.956672;-37.8330934, 144.956783;-37.8332442, 144.9565664-37.833... |
| 2 | 2024-07-03 04:33 | nevw | Who is checking the quality of these mappers?Three buildings in a row have incorrect angular indents at the front. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-04 11:48 | BR_pebble ♦97 | Hi nevw, thank you for the feedback. I have already provided feedback to this user earlier and on behalf of him/her. I have made the corrections on the angular indents at the given location. FYI, i am performing quality check for this user. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-04 11:55 | nevw | Thanks for the positive action and feedback.Cheers. | |
| 153525873 by MrHahaMan @ 2024-07-04 03:49 | 1 | 2024-07-04 05:57 | nevw | Hi, I have reverted your addition of a building over a large residential area.Please only add things that exist in the teal world to openstreetmap.org and especially don’t damage the map for gaming. |
| 153502689 by M03HAKK12P @ 2024-07-03 13:29 | 1 | 2024-07-03 17:30 | nevw | Hi, the addr:street tag is for the physical location which is Mitti Street for all three buildings. Have you plotted the building unit footprints here? There appears to be no building at each location on satellite imagery. |
| 2 | 2024-07-03 17:38 | nevw | I think the buildings are just well hidden amongst the tree foliage. I have corrected the addr:street tags. | |
| 153480816 by Razax0 @ 2024-07-03 01:06 | 1 | 2024-07-03 05:16 | nevw | Hi, you are meant to accurately outline the house shape instead of placing a rectangle on each property.You need to reshape each one. |
| 153351828 by Fizzie-DWG @ 2024-06-30 00:36 | 1 | 2024-06-30 04:43 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Hi,Not certain what is going on... but there are a number of issues with both the coast line and the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area relation 10156269 - self crossing ways e.g. Way: 20670282 and relation not closed. Is this a reverter fault??? |
| 2 | 2024-06-30 05:40 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Yeah, it could be, sorry, Warin? We had to delete a heap of beach names that had been imported from a bad source & that may have damaged things? | |
| 3 | 2024-06-30 07:13 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Ok .. I hjave locally reverted this changeset .. and that looks like it confirms that this changeset is the cause of the issue.. I have fixed up 2 problems down in Vic. that may also be caused by these reversions. Is the name of the beaches the only issue? Might be better off using a differen... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-30 23:12 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Thanks for fixing them, Warin. Yep, beach names were the issue. PM also sent. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-01 03:41 | nevw | Hi, I have begun repairing the osmi areas along the Qld coast following the beach revert. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-01 04:45 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Thanks, Nev. | |
| 7 | 2024-07-01 06:11 | nevw | Qld coast repairs now complete. | |
| 8 | 2024-07-01 06:20 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Awesome! | |
| 153105063 by galacticism @ 2024-06-24 10:22 | 1 | 2024-06-30 01:54 | nevw | HiThere seems to be a problem to fix herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.90554&lat=-13.50026&zoom=8 |
| 2 | 2024-06-30 05:57 | nevw | Hi again, not sure if these problems were from your editing as there have been a vast number of reverts around the coastline to beaches due to a unsuitable source used.I haven’t had a look what the osmi errors involve either.This changeset comment may be related to the osmi errors…\... | |
| 153329477 by DareDevi1 @ 2024-06-29 12:08 | 1 | 2024-06-29 12:27 | nevw | Is the Magpie Trail relation correct?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2948297#map=14/-37.8179/145.4002It appears to be made of two crossing trails. |
| 2 | 2024-06-29 22:27 | nevw | I expect the Magpie Trail relation is ok. It seems to have 3 options to join or exit it at the northern end. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-29 22:30 | nevw | Regarding Yabung ...another curiosity is this section which also carries the Yabung namehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110690514#map=18/-37.81434/145.40071 and a small section that it joins https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80398218The highway tag has been removed so it may no longer be us... | |
| 152983508 by galacticism @ 2024-06-21 09:20 | 1 | 2024-06-22 00:26 | nevw | Hithe wetland has a problem at the Moresby River mouth where it meets Mourilyan Harbour.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.11474&lat=-17.64157&zoom=13The line across the mouth invalidates the multipolygon as the last water polygon of the Moresby River joins the wet... |
| 2 | 2024-06-24 10:24 | galacticism ♦1 | I've tried to correct this, can you let me know if it looks better now? | |
| 3 | 2024-06-24 23:51 | nevw | This is all fixed now.I don't see why Lily and Maizie Islands need to be single member multipolygons. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-26 07:45 | nevw | I'm also accepting of the Lily and Maizie Islands one member MPs. Reusing the same way in MPs to have one feature per mp. | |
| 153181254 by HilaryL @ 2024-06-26 02:29 | 1 | 2024-06-26 02:57 | nevw | Hi, the private driveway off Centennial Crescent should not have a name. |
| 2 | 2024-06-26 03:57 | nevw | You should draw the outlines of the buildings along the driveway and add address tags to those instead. See other examples in the area that have address tags added. | |
| 153097236 by Prosmiles @ 2024-06-24 07:23 | 1 | 2024-06-24 08:36 | nevw | HiI corrected the phone and opening hours format.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbershttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#SyntaxYour Sunday format can be off or closed whichever preferred. |
| 152874011 by BlumleinPear @ 2024-06-19 04:50 | 1 | 2024-06-22 10:55 | nevw | HiOsmi informs that the multipolgon needs correcting https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.15488&lat=-21.14709&zoom=17I haven’t looked closely at this but expect that polygons with outer role are touching and this makes the multipolygon invalid.You should use ... |
| 2 | 2024-06-22 11:14 | nevw | …could it be that the hospital was correctly mapped before this. In that case it might be easiest to revert your change. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-22 12:11 | nevw | There are sections on this osm wiki that give examples of valid and invalid multipolygonshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon | |
| 4 | 2024-06-22 12:53 | BlumleinPear ♦7 | I'll check it out. I don't think I changed the geometry (I'll check) I changed the individual polygons from all being named Mackay Base Hospital to Hospital buildings within the Hospital Grounds (Mackay Base Houspital). | |
| 152970420 by lukehimself @ 2024-06-20 23:47 | 1 | 2024-06-21 05:41 | nevw | HiI added highway=path + surface=concrete tags to the path so that it will render on the map |
| 2 | 2024-06-21 06:00 | nevw | The surface may be compacted gravel instead...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surfaceCan you you fix if necessary thanks.Also Vic has complex rules meaning pedestrian and cyclists may not both be able to use. I tagged as a path meaning that both can use. | |
| 152888533 by Angela Schelbach @ 2024-06-19 10:26 | 1 | 2024-06-19 11:17 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I reverted this edit because you appear to have shifted the culvert and stream unintentionally and am unsure what your intention was or how to fix it.Can you zoom in closer and have another try and maybe leave the stream as is.This displays your edits https://overpass-api.de... |
| 2 | 2024-06-19 11:31 | nevw | I had a closer look at the mapping as I am familiar with the area and saw the grassed easement area encroached the private property boundary so I went ahead and realigned it using the Esri imagery.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241446936If you clear the cache in your browser and check tomorro... | |
| 152582967 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-06-12 11:33 | 1 | 2024-06-12 22:48 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm. You have been adding invalid multipolygons. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.34933&lat=-24.86866&zoom=14There are examples of invalid types herehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonYou should use building:part relation ki... |
| 2 | 2024-06-15 04:13 | nevw | Have you decided how you are going to fix all these buildings? | |
| 3 | 2024-06-17 10:53 | nevw | I will try to fix these myself over the next few days. Building relations and building:part mapping is not very familiar to me so let me know if you think I have made errors. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-18 16:51 | HaPe-CZ ♦91 | Ahoj, nejsem tvůj pes aby si mi dával rozkazy. Vzkazy ani nečtu každý den a popravdě, ukaž jak umíš precizně editovat ty. Zde jsi nevytvořil ani jednu novou čáru, nový objekt. Tak se neptej jak se rozhodují jiní a jdi první s vzo... | |
| 152310730 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-06-06 03:24 | 1 | 2024-06-17 06:30 | nevw | Hi billybobbyjoeI note in this changeset as viewed in achavi https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=152310730that *version 23* of the Kings Park boundary seems to have been deleted.Also the 2022 CAPAD Reserve (Botanic Garden - Kings Park) boundary has also been deleted.Only a Kings Par... |
| 2 | 2024-06-17 09:02 | nevw | I overlooked this Kings Park boundaryhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12949347 which is sourced from Capad so maybe that is all that is required. | |
| 152748974 by Christopher_West_2805 @ 2024-06-16 07:55 | 1 | 2024-06-16 10:21 | nevw | Hi, can you explain more about the project with a start and end point poi and why you have added it to osm. |
| 2 | 2024-06-17 06:12 | nevw | Hi, I decided to delete this as I expect it was not meant to be be added to OSM public map and was instead some private markers.For marking meeting places, bush walking points, plotting your track to upload to gps or phone you can use something like https://www.alltrails.com/explore/map/new or use... | |
| 152785098 by victorianbusinspections @ 2024-06-17 05:10 | 1 | 2024-06-17 06:02 | nevw | Hi, I updated your business tags. OSM does not use category, key words. I fixed phone and hours format and de-spammed the description. The website and website:menu values were the same so I left only the website as this is a valid tag.I added a primary tag so the database is able to know what ... |
| 152656656 by Billy Run @ 2024-06-14 03:24 | 1 | 2024-06-15 08:24 | nevw | Hi BillyYou seem to have accidentally dragged a node here.Can you fix the error please.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710887736#map=16/-37.7885/145.1250 |
| 2 | 2024-06-16 00:15 | Billy Run ♦1 | Thanks for telling me, I can get that fixed tonight | |
| 152612488 by Linus2712 @ 2024-06-13 04:28 | 1 | 2024-06-13 05:12 | nevw | These sites are already mapped. |
| 2 | 2024-06-13 05:15 | nevw | I have reverted this changeset of duplicated mapping | |
| 152515921 by Leif Birch @ 2024-06-10 20:52 | 1 | 2024-06-11 11:23 | nevw | Please zoom in very close on all the junctions to see if they meet and are joined correctly.https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=152515921 |
| 2 | 2024-06-12 10:00 | archie ♦1,304 | Hej, det här är inga erkända taggar för vägar m m. Hur hade du tänkt dig detta? | |
| 152517584 by Leif Birch @ 2024-06-10 21:57 | 1 | 2024-06-11 11:21 | nevw | Hi, you need to check the junctions where ways meet. If you zoom in very close you can see some do not join or meet correctly.https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=152517584 |
| 2 | 2024-06-12 10:00 | archie ♦1,304 | Hej, det här är inga erkända taggar för vägar m m. Hur hade du tänkt dig detta? | |
| 152519314 by spritee @ 2024-06-10 23:43 | 1 | 2024-06-11 01:52 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.Consider adding leisure=pitch to all these instead of the shop. |
| 2 | 2024-06-11 01:55 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=free_flyingleisure=pitch can be added to a node or circle if bounds of the area are not known | |
| 3 | 2024-06-11 02:12 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Are these all signed with the name "Paraglider launch", or is that just a descriptive name that should be removed/moved to description? | |
| 4 | 2024-06-11 02:50 | spritee ♦1 | THanks, will fix the type (misleading label in osmand application) and add some unique names | |
| 152498490 by Grannymeg @ 2024-06-10 13:31 | 1 | 2024-06-10 21:48 | nevw | Hi, osmi finds an error in the area boundaries herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.88917&lat=-26.71837&zoom=12 |
| 2 | 2024-06-10 21:53 | nevw | Looks like you may have deleted some of the admin boundarieshttps://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=152498490 | |
| 3 | 2024-06-10 22:57 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Changeset reverted because it broke the boundaries of Balmoral Ridgehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152518589 | |
| 4 | 2024-06-10 23:23 | nevw | I deleted waterway=stream from section of admin boundary for Balmoral Ridge and North Maleny in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152518932 | |
| 5 | 2024-09-12 08:31 | Grannymeg ♦6 | Sorry I didn't realise I had done this. | |
| 152437769 by WVFD4IF8F4 @ 2024-06-09 03:31 | 1 | 2024-06-09 04:02 | nevw | Hi, welcome to the osm.You are expected to outline the building instead of the plot of land when adding a house. |
| 152362591 by UCU8A67H7X @ 2024-06-07 07:49 | 1 | 2024-06-07 08:04 | nevw | Street names should not be abbreviated in osm |
| 152326061 by GTLIMFLEOL @ 2024-06-06 11:03 | 1 | 2024-06-06 13:07 | nevw | Ducklo School Road on each side of this section you have renamed Ducklo Gulgera Road.Would you be able to survey what all sections of the road should be named? |
| 152019670 by iqctnaus @ 2024-05-30 07:40 | 1 | 2024-05-31 08:16 | nevw | Hi, multipolygons are invalid with outers joined this way.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.99843&lat=-27.64484&zoom=15https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonTry instead to use building parts...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:buil... |
| 2 | 2024-06-05 22:04 | nevw | I have fixed these | |
| 152217119 by Cookie-monsta @ 2024-06-03 20:55 | 1 | 2024-06-04 00:07 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I noticed the Rendezvous Grand Hotel Melbourne is mapped next to your entry of ‘crew hotel’ and would like to know if this is a duplication error?Should I go ahead and delete your entry? |
| 2 | 2024-06-05 21:25 | nevw | Hi Cookie-monsta,I have reverted this duplicate hotel entry in changesethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305474 | |
| 152223748 by khankhsl98 @ 2024-06-04 03:53 | 1 | 2024-06-04 04:24 | nevw | 5A Edward St. Fawkner VIC is about 12km drive from where you have entered the business location. A business is expected to place their location at the building they operate their business from. |
| 2 | 2024-06-04 11:17 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Looks completely spurious to me | |
| 3 | 2024-06-05 21:20 | nevw | No reponse from mapper.I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305312Please add your business at the location you operate from. | |
| 152223441 by khankhsl98 @ 2024-06-04 03:32 | 1 | 2024-06-04 18:44 | nevw | Hi, this appears to be incorrectly placed. 5A Edward St is further south along this road. |
| 2 | 2024-06-05 21:20 | nevw | No reponse from mapper.I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305312Please add your business at the location you operate from. | |
| 152223552 by khankhsl98 @ 2024-06-04 03:41 | 1 | 2024-06-04 11:39 | tastrax ♦1,145 | This is miles from the actual address - does the business actually operate from here? |
| 2 | 2024-06-05 21:20 | nevw | No reponse from mapper.I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305312Please add your business at the location you operate from. | |
| 152147347 by BlumleinPear @ 2024-06-02 07:18 | 1 | 2024-06-03 12:54 | nevw | HiOsmi finds an error herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.65821&lat=-26.18406&zoom=19It is an invalid multipolygon, try using building part method instead or use simple polygons instead of a multipolygon.There many links regarding multipolygon relations on the... |
| 152179714 by Mozzie19 @ 2024-06-02 23:55 | 1 | 2024-06-03 00:05 | Mozzie19 ♦1 | The correct address is 45-53 Kembla St, Wollongong NSW 2500 |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 00:53 | nevw | Hi Mozzie 19I fixed the address.Is the phone correct? Only 13xxxxxxxx numbers are listed on their website. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-03 06:22 | Mozzie19 ♦1 | Yepp, that's correct, they only list a central number | |
| 4 | 2024-06-03 06:33 | nevw | I view of that, which number should we list for this site? | |
| 5 | 2024-06-03 06:43 | nevw | I just phone the number and it is incorrect for the Red Cross Blood Donation Centre so I will change it to the 13….number | |
| 121002975 by vicpeakbagger @ 2022-05-15 08:06 | 1 | 2024-05-23 01:00 | Luen Warneke ♦21 | On the 22nd of May 2020, I received an email from Queensland Parks & Wildlife Service confirming the peak is named Mount Paluma. QPWS reference the peak in their planning strategies and statements. Should this changeset be reverted? |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 04:43 | nevw | I reverted this changeset based on land manager confirmation.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7535696583 | |
| 152102216 by MakWall77 @ 2024-06-01 00:28 | 1 | 2024-06-01 12:04 | nevw | Hi, can you move the business off the roadway and locate it over the correct building unit it is located at thanks.Unit 6, Botany Bay Industrial Estate2-12 Beauchamp Road |
| 2 | 2024-06-01 12:28 | nevw | ….actually, on further reflection after looking at online photos, it appears to be probably located quite close to the front entrance of unit 6, so no need to shift it. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-03 20:56 | MakWall77 ♦1 | thankyou for you feedback, Yes the location is misleading from an aerial picture, the business location is a two story factory complex and the pin is dropped to close to the entry point. This is in an attempt to provide navigation services better than what has been achieved in the past. appreciate t... | |
| 151558363 by Luen Warneke @ 2024-05-20 03:27 | 1 | 2024-05-30 12:41 | nevw | Hi Luenosmi found a duplicate segment somewhere here...https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.80028&lat=-19.14874&zoom=15Let me know if you can't find a problem. |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 02:38 | Luen Warneke ♦21 | I have made and edit and hopefully this is fixed in changeset # 152181592 | |
| 151955152 by Bulkiestpizza @ 2024-05-28 17:06 | 1 | 2024-05-28 21:29 | nevw | Welcome to osm.leisure=pitch is the correct tag.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3DpitchAlso we don’t add a descriptive name to things. |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 04:00 | nevw | See our wiki for further info…including “name is for name only” sectionhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names | |
| 151936383 by Dominic_Burns @ 2024-05-28 10:06 | 1 | 2024-05-28 11:09 | nevw | Hi, I would like to know how you were able to extend Back Creek as a culvert from Waringal Road to near the junction of Canterbury Road and Elgar Road |
| 2 | 2024-05-29 03:58 | Dominic_Burns ♦2 | http://www.friendsofbackcreek.org/"Back Creek rises as a spring on the slopes of the hill at the corner of Canterbury Rd and Elgar Rd in Box Hill" | |
| 3 | 2024-05-29 04:17 | nevw | Thanks for the info and your efforts to maintain the creek environs are admirable. | |
| 151925554 by GPWDJMHE7F @ 2024-05-28 05:17 | 1 | 2024-05-28 05:26 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.You have mapped the plot of land instead of the building. You are expected to accurately draw the outline of the house instead. |
| 2 | 2024-05-28 09:28 | nevw | I see you have done as well as can be expected in mapping the house with limited imagery. I also added your new neighbors house | |
| 151918658 by DIY Luxe Events @ 2024-05-27 21:17 | 1 | 2024-05-27 21:45 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I have reverted you changeset because you have dragged a couple of points on the map to incorrect positions.You also need to map your business over the building it operates from instead of the roadway. You need to add a primary tag to define what it is you are adding to the ... |
| 151875661 by OACS @ 2024-05-27 03:20 | 1 | 2024-05-27 06:51 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.There are a few problems with the terrace you had added.The building outlines on the property are expected to be traced instead of the shape of the land plot or building lot on which they sit.The addr:housenumber has an ‘ accent added after the number.The street name... |
| 2 | 2024-05-27 21:13 | nevw | Hi, I reverted this as it needs re-mapping onsite to fix. | |
| 151748859 by YEG1FPCI9I @ 2024-05-24 03:17 | 1 | 2024-05-24 05:47 | nevw | House outline not viewed by me using available imagery so mapped house as icon instead of use land plot shape. |
| 151702141 by dsmit2342q1 @ 2024-05-23 02:39 | 1 | 2024-05-23 09:08 | nevw | Hi, I noticed that cinnema should be Cinema.Is this cinema still in operation?On google street view it appears as a private business selling antenna and satellite dishes. We do not have permission to use Google to assist in editing osm so can’t make changes based on that.There is no Mapi... |
| 2 | 2024-05-24 00:33 | dsmit2342q1 ♦4 | yes i am a local it is closed ill add the historic tag now | |
| 3 | 2024-05-24 05:39 | nevw | I added disused=yes to the cinema.I mapped the building to make it easier to add a node for any business operating there. | |
| 151431226 by dsmit2342q1 @ 2024-05-17 00:15 | 1 | 2024-05-19 17:57 | nevw | Hi, what in Australia is colloquially referred to a dam is tagged in osm as natural=water plus water=reservoir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water |
| 2 | 2024-05-19 22:30 | nevw | The dam tag in osm is used to tag dam walls.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam | |
| 3 | 2024-05-23 00:10 | dsmit2342q1 ♦4 | ok ill fix | |
| 4 | 2024-05-23 01:32 | nevw | Thanks, I think I fixed it yesterday. Cheers | |
| 151652790 by SCibich @ 2024-05-22 01:28 | 1 | 2024-05-22 03:56 | nevw | Hi, the name tag is not for repeating the address which is already tagged. The name tag is for the name of the business. |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 03:59 | SCibich ♦1 | This is a site under development, I am not permitted to state the name of the business at this stage. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-22 04:15 | nevw | Thanks, I understand.I have reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11923904846The address should be reinstated as the name shortly. | |
| 151641101 by robbie420 @ 2024-05-21 17:55 | 1 | 2024-05-21 23:12 | nevw | Hi robbie420, please only map real things on the osm. I have deleted your edits. |
| 151431216 by dsmit2342q1 @ 2024-05-17 00:14 | 1 | 2024-05-19 18:10 | nevw | Hi, the correct osm tagging for a swimming pool is leisure=pool and a private pool would also have access=private.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool |
| 151431747 by dsmit2342q1 @ 2024-05-17 00:55 | 1 | 2024-05-19 17:58 | nevw | These are the correct tags for a swimming pool https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_poolYou may need to also add access tags if not a public pool |
| 151474225 by JD5407 @ 2024-05-17 23:06 | 1 | 2024-05-18 08:59 | nevw | Hi, the onramps were correctly mapped already. A separate way only extends to where there is a physical barrier separating them like a concrete barrier of fence and not to where they are only separated by painted lines.The lanes tag is used to define how many lanes are across the road:https://wi... |
| 2 | 2024-05-18 10:33 | nevw | For your convenience, I reverted this in changeset 151487052 | |
| 151431764 by dsmit2342q1 @ 2024-05-17 00:56 | 1 | 2024-05-18 09:06 | nevw | These are the correct tags for a swimming poolhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_poolYou may need to access tags if not a public pool |
| 151206904 by 0PIOVZP5IB @ 2024-05-12 01:20 | 1 | 2024-05-13 03:23 | nevw | There is later Esri imagery to map this properly. The address is not listed the the name tag in osm |
| 151242473 by TH39UGDOLR @ 2024-05-12 21:09 | 1 | 2024-05-13 03:20 | nevw | No evidence on satellite imagery or otherwise of a named lake here. |
| 151242377 by TH39UGDOLR @ 2024-05-12 21:05 | 1 | 2024-05-13 03:19 | nevw | Seems unlikely this very small lake is named as next to a building on private property |
| 151238176 by KZ5O5AS81K @ 2024-05-12 18:48 | 1 | 2024-05-12 23:16 | nevw | Available imagery shows a berthed vessel here instead of a building.Which is it? |
| 151046530 by Scottie0001 @ 2024-05-08 09:56 | 1 | 2024-05-11 05:24 | nevw | Hi, osmi finds a problem with this relationhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.11361&lat=-27.39522&zoom=19 |
| 151168890 by I1NOHX8V1N @ 2024-05-11 01:58 | 1 | 2024-05-11 02:36 | nevw | This Microsoft Map builder has split a section of residential road and renamed it to a nearby address. |
| 2 | 2024-05-11 02:49 | nevw | Also, the section of road renamed as “ inala place narrabeen” in nowhere near where mapped on Jubilee Avenue, Mona Vale | |
| 3 | 2024-05-11 02:54 | nevw | This vandalism has been reverted in changeset 151169451 | |
| 151128282 by damarionjuarez @ 2024-05-10 06:17 | 1 | 2024-05-10 13:18 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.Building:flats is not for listing the individual flats numbers (eg 1,2,3,etc) - it is for listing the number of flats (eg 30)Do these apartment buildings really have names as you have tagged or would the addr tags suffice. |
| 151033760 by KQISSB4PV5 @ 2024-05-08 01:45 | 1 | 2024-05-08 04:32 | nevw | no garage evident on satellite imagery |
| 2 | 2024-05-08 06:20 | akimapbuilder ♦126 | This is a non-existent building.I will revert it, thanks! | |
| 150904299 by WidgetWorldWatcher @ 2024-05-05 04:38 | 1 | 2024-05-05 06:11 | nevw | Hi, welcome to the OpenStreetMap.The osm is a map of the real world as it exists now and not a fantasy world.I think you have added fake Pokémon Go mapping.Are you able to remove your edits or should I revert them? |
| 2 | 2024-05-05 07:48 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | This is 100% Pokemon GO mapping. A recent update made a certain kind of Pokemon appear exclusively at beaches.The original mapper here needs to be aware that the map data in Pokemon GO is based on an old version of OSM and making bad edits like this will likely have no impact. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-06 03:40 | nevw | Thanks WoodWoseWulf for restoring the osm | |
| 150916711 by DaVeOz @ 2024-05-05 11:55 | 1 | 2024-05-05 12:45 | nevw | Hi, when mapping a building please map the outline of the building and not the land plot |
| 2 | 2024-05-05 13:00 | DaVeOz ♦1 | Got it, thanks! | |
| 150819136 by Vider2012 @ 2024-05-03 04:53 | 1 | 2024-05-03 05:10 | nevw | HiI noticed the phone, fax number format needs correcting.Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbers... |
| 150819096 by Reflections Holidays @ 2024-05-03 04:51 | 1 | 2024-05-03 04:59 | nevw | HiCan you check the phone format and case of name, brand, state, etc as I have had to correct several of the park edits |
| 150817510 by iqctnaus @ 2024-05-03 03:01 | 1 | 2024-05-03 04:19 | nevw | It is preferred that you don’t join the park boundary or other boundaries to the roadway centreline. |
| 150772190 by Tornack1 @ 2024-05-01 22:58 | 1 | 2024-05-02 00:55 | nevw | Hi, it is preferred that you don't use the roadway nodes when defining areas. |
| 150286056 by 85ZHEZ8R3F @ 2024-04-21 03:45 | 1 | 2024-04-21 06:58 | nevw | Is there a real building located here? |
| 2 | 2024-05-01 02:08 | nevw | no response, reverted | |
| 53771930 by piratenz @ 2017-11-14 13:36 | 1 | 2024-04-25 17:29 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14058803/history has waterway = creek that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you meant by waterway=creek? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=creek differ... |
| 2 | 2024-04-25 20:24 | nevw | Pullen Reach is a section of the Brisbane River. I can’t find documentation on how to map named waterway reaches and bends in osm. One method would be to split the ‘natural=water + water=river’ polygon along this stretch between the bends and add name=Pullen Reach to it. But as the... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-26 09:18 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | I would probably use place=locality locality=river_bend (second tag is case of ATYL - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL )Or invent a new tag place=river_bend and try to get people to support itOr ask on official forum ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ - login with OS... | |
| 4 | 2024-05-01 01:34 | nevw | I added Pullen Reach water area as a multipolygon. The bends are not named along this part of the river as far as I can ascertain so extended reach into the bends as if I was reaching in a sailing boat through the reach. I expect in many rivers the bend would be named (most often as a locality I ass... | |
| 150643381 by Dantine @ 2024-04-29 04:05 | 1 | 2024-04-30 05:32 | nevw | Hi osmi notes error herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.02912&lat=-27.46879&zoom=19Duplicate segment and role problem |
| 2 | 2024-05-01 00:39 | nevw | I fixed this now | |
| 149412576 by Jorisdiction @ 2024-04-01 01:02 | 1 | 2024-04-30 09:06 | nevw | I reverted this because it is already mapped.Please check before you add duplicate data |
| 149460779 by Jorisdiction @ 2024-04-02 04:24 | 1 | 2024-04-30 09:00 | nevw | This is already mapped, so your edit reverted |
| 150683652 by YRH1BH11OC @ 2024-04-29 22:42 | 1 | 2024-04-29 23:01 | nevw | There is no evidence on the satellite imagery you have used of a building here.Has it been constructed since the latest imagery?There is no need for name=Donga |
| 2 | 2024-04-29 23:05 | nevw | There is a house about 10 metres to the ne but it has a different shape than what you have added so I assume that building was not the intended item | |
| 3 | 2024-04-30 05:45 | nevw | I removed the name "Donga" and added the nearby house. Available imagery is old so accept you have mapped a new dwelling correctly. | |
| 150533888 by John Sinclair @ 2024-04-26 11:20 | 1 | 2024-04-27 20:33 | nevw | Hi Jon, osmi finds a problem herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.75519&lat=-27.68302&zoom=16https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16805271#map=14/-27.6858/152.7561I suppose the middle polygon should be removed from the wood multipolygon and be tagged landuse=co... |
| 2 | 2024-04-30 05:29 | nevw | Hi John, I fixed this now | |
| 150565392 by SchmittyD @ 2024-04-27 06:09 | 1 | 2024-04-27 08:02 | nevw | Name is not required for things that don’t really have a name |
| 150483938 by PKHJ2B437F @ 2024-04-25 09:04 | 1 | 2024-04-25 09:24 | nevw | Hi, you have mapped as unit B but the website lists Shop 2 72 STATION ST. SOMERVILLE VIC Can you check thanks |
| 150398082 by m1yii0td @ 2024-04-23 14:15 | 1 | 2024-04-23 21:10 | nevw | Try using Esri imagery instead as it is more recent, showing some building. |
| 150286619 by kimo @ 2024-04-21 04:37 | 1 | 2024-04-21 11:25 | nevw | Hi, there are two ways named 20the Avenue.Is this correct? |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 00:14 | kimo ♦26 | Probably not, but I don't have an appropriately licensed map to check. As I've added camp_pitch on way 862993302 I suspect this is correct. I don't know what way 27403069 should be called. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-22 01:26 | nevw | Ok, thanks. I'll send an email to National Parks. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-23 09:26 | nevw | Parks Victoria confirmed 20th Avenue is in the Shools Area as shown on their maps so have deleted the name on the track through the lodges area. | |
| 5 | 2024-04-23 23:27 | kimo ♦26 | Thanks for following this up. | |
| 150302595 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-21 13:29 | 1 | 2024-04-22 05:31 | nevw | You really need to zoom in closer and/or square the buildings. Using id, you can hit Q while the building is selected or right-click and use the 'square' icon |
| 150302573 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-21 13:28 | 1 | 2024-04-22 05:29 | nevw | This is already tagged as a wooded area and you adding 100's of individuals trees over the same area does not improve the map. |
| 150289966 by Norkmeister @ 2024-04-21 07:38 | 1 | 2024-04-21 11:33 | nevw | Hi, two of these paths still have the razed:highway tag.You need to delete those tags if you have physically verified that you are able to still use the ways. |
| 150293615 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-21 09:31 | 1 | 2024-04-21 11:20 | nevw | Hi, in this and closeby there are many buildings that have been duplicated by you in another changeset. The previous mapper has mapped them more accurately so probably best to delete your building outlines. |
| 2 | 2024-04-30 20:37 | michael60634 ♦43 | @nevw - I've reverted this changeset. | |
| 150194431 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-18 21:00 | 1 | 2024-04-18 21:01 | Noman Bin Hossain ♦4 | good |
| 2 | 2024-04-20 07:40 | nevw | Please zoom in closer to map the building shapes more accurately. When the building is selected you press Q or select the square icon to give the building right angular corners. I noticed one building with name=Norman. Please do not put personal details such as your name on osm. The name tag is mean... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-20 07:44 | nevw | I also noticed a source “streetlevel imagery”. Be aware that we are not permitted to use Google street level imagery but other sources are likely fine | |
| 4 | 2024-04-21 08:06 | nevw | Oops, misread name... is Nomans | |
| 150260266 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-20 12:06 | 1 | 2024-04-21 07:52 | nevw | Most, if not all, of the playgrounds you have mapped do not exist.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground |
| 2 | 2024-04-30 20:38 | michael60634 ♦43 | I've reverted this changeset as these playgrounds don't actually exist. | |
| 150239536 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-19 20:07 | 1 | 2024-04-21 07:42 | nevw | You have duplicated many buildings here. i.e. they were already mapped. |
| 150240395 by Noman Bin Hossain @ 2024-04-19 20:42 | 1 | 2024-04-19 20:44 | Noman Bin Hossain ♦4 | network slow but I will still working. |
| 2 | 2024-04-21 07:40 | nevw | You have duplicated many buildings here. i.e. they were already mapped. | |
| 150248710 by thebestguidedotcom @ 2024-04-20 06:17 | 1 | 2024-04-20 07:15 | nevw | Hi, we are not permitted to use Google as a source for editing the OpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2024-04-20 07:16 | nevw | Google does not permit this use under it’s terms and conditions | |
| 3 | 2024-04-20 07:28 | nevw | This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150250206Please remap using a permitted source like a survey in person | |
| 150065710 by kjaye @ 2024-04-16 05:04 | 1 | 2024-04-16 05:26 | nevw | There are a couple more sections of Connor Street at the eastern end that need updating toohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771415108#map=19/-28.65187/151.94024&layers=Dhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566678276#map=19/-28.65147/151.93899&layers=D |
| 150017524 by deStGermain @ 2024-04-15 05:01 | 1 | 2024-04-16 02:50 | nevw | there is a problem here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.56501&lat=-26.94716&zoom=19...MP outer ways conot touchIf you really want to draw as two pieces, try this way... with an outer and a part...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:buildinghttps://w... |
| 2 | 2024-04-16 05:09 | deStGermain ♦5 | Thanks, I don't know why I did that?! | |
| 150028581 by AIBTE @ 2024-04-15 10:03 | 1 | 2024-04-15 10:28 | nevw | Hi, Flavory appears to be mapped on the footway next to road crossing. Can you delete it and place it the building location or stand where it really exists, thanks. |
| 2 | 2024-04-15 10:35 | nevw | Via a web search it may be based at 6a Pirie Street which is in the building across the road from where you have placed it. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-15 12:16 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | I've restored this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150035252 since AIBTE just removed it in a future changeset instead of actually moving it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150028581 | |
| 150026613 by PlasMA141 @ 2024-04-15 09:17 | 1 | 2024-04-15 10:21 | nevw | I have reverted your changeset.You will need to re-learn the correct way to add details to the map |
| 149822305 by elipoloos @ 2024-04-10 14:15 | 1 | 2024-04-15 02:44 | nevw | Hi, I have disconnected the wood from the roadway centreline herehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149822305#map=17/-32.85279/149.78008by convention land cover and use does not extend to the roadway centreline...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_... |
| 2 | 2024-04-15 02:53 | nevw | Large mapped wooded areas often extend extend across highways for efficiency and expediency but when mapping the edges along highways we try to map the wooded edge to the trees edge along the side of the road. | |
| 149692156 by Bundoora Medical Centre Pharmacy @ 2024-04-07 13:20 | 1 | 2024-04-07 21:15 | nevw | Hi, regarding the addr tags…addr:street should not be abbreviated and should not include the number therefore becomes…addr:street=Ormond Boulevard.addr:street = 12 Ormond Blvd implies that the street number of your address is 12 but you have addr:housenumber=2.I expect it shoul... |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 08:34 | nevw | no response, fixed. | |
| 149724027 by fwonp @ 2024-04-08 08:43 | 1 | 2024-04-08 10:17 | nevw | leisure=swimming pool is the correct taghttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_poolBackyard swimming pools are not named, the correct tags for swimming pools are sufficient. Commercial swimming pools likely do carry a name. |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 08:15 | nevw | no response, last few fixed now. | |
| 149799195 by korumburra @ 2024-04-10 01:23 | 1 | 2024-04-10 05:59 | nevw | Hi, house owners names are not mapped on osm and the building shape should follow the outline of the roofline. You need to zoom in closer to map the building shape and press Q to square the corners. We who monitor others work are very fussy sometimes ☺️ |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 08:02 | nevw | no response, fix shape, tags, name | |
| 149840723 by FXXY0H4HRD @ 2024-04-10 22:12 | 1 | 2024-04-10 22:49 | nevw | You need to edit the shape you have added to follow the footprint of the house instead of the land plot. |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 08:01 | nevw | no response, fixed | |
| 149843143 by n_ng @ 2024-04-11 00:46 | 1 | 2024-04-11 01:05 | nevw | I don't think we can use data from this site due to copyright. I expect you may need to obtain explicit permission from the site or data owners to add it to osm.The terms of use are at the bottom of this pagehttps://networkmap.energy/ near the Copyright © 2017-2024 Rosetta Analytics Pt... |
| 2 | 2024-04-11 01:10 | n_ng ♦1 | I work for Rosetta Analytics and have permission to add it to osm.Please let me know the steps to have this included given the permission.The data is open access at the following link: https://renewables.networkmap.energy/ | |
| 3 | 2024-04-11 01:11 | nevw | If wish to apply for explicit permissionsee the link at this pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_1_-_Prerequisites which has this link to some templateshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Getting_permission | |
| 4 | 2024-04-11 01:16 | nevw | As I am not well informed about this subject it would probably be best to ask about the correct procedure on our Oceania Community page where there are others much more qualified to helphttps://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73 | |
| 5 | 2024-04-11 01:24 | n_ng ♦1 | Thank you for the information. We will ask in the page although in the meantime, I will continue to contribute our open access geo coded projects to the community as this is important for the sustainability initiatives. | |
| 148439447 by greyim @ 2024-03-09 20:42 | 1 | 2024-03-09 23:37 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Is Maxwell STT an old walking track or vehicle track (should be a path)? Maybe add operator=Sustainable Timbers Tasmania rather than in the name. |
| 2 | 2024-04-09 20:56 | greyim ♦20 | Strangely my edits have all been rolled back? but i cant see whodidit | |
| 3 | 2024-04-10 00:21 | nevw | I noticed that the red squares here depict some deletion https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=15&lat=-41.4346&lon=146.0051&layers=BTT&user=-nevw&age=1 | |
| 4 | 2024-04-10 00:29 | nevw | ...select age=eternity and you may seeIf you select the red square, it will show one user, then select the [F] link and it will filter by that user and there are many deletions | |
| 5 | 2024-04-10 21:47 | greyim ♦20 | Cheers Thanks.. only for some reason I cant see the deletions as yet | |
| 6 | 2024-04-10 22:45 | nevw | sorry, better links...https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132068062#map=11/-41.5362/145.9191https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=132068062..the red lines are the deletions on achivi | |
| 7 | 2024-04-10 23:12 | nevw | Here are a couple more of your tracks being deleted by the same user...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141138702https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141138847There has been a lot of discussion about about mappers, usually with some association with the land management, deleting ... | |
| 149757504 by osmboiii @ 2024-04-09 02:14 | 1 | 2024-04-09 02:40 | nevw | Hi, the srvice road should begin from Mount Street and continue through the carpark |
| 149688406 by John Joseph A Gatchalian @ 2024-04-07 11:41 | 1 | 2024-04-08 15:25 | nevw | Hi, you are not formatting the opening hours correctly.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en |
| 149724111 by fwonp @ 2024-04-08 08:45 | 1 | 2024-04-08 10:20 | nevw | Some of the buildings you have mapped are not done accurately and also you could usually press Q on selection of the building to square the corners, unless they have other than squared corners. |
| 149634217 by Jenna0208 @ 2024-04-05 21:59 | 1 | 2024-04-05 23:38 | nevw | Hi, welcome to the osm. It is unclear what you are adding to the map here seems not to be the usual manner in which info is added to the map. |
| 2 | 2024-04-05 23:45 | nevw | I am not familiar with mapping signs but these links may helphttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformationhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign | |
| 3 | 2024-04-05 23:52 | nevw | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguideposttourism=informationinformation=guidepostare required.leisure=park is wrong | |
| 4 | 2024-04-06 13:35 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | I reckon this should just be reverted. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634217 | |
| 5 | 2024-04-06 22:54 | nevw | I updated the tags to conform to wiki guidance to erase the splash of meaningless green text on osm.This can be further refined by using a destination relation which I will leave for others.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguideposthttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relat... | |
| 149416920 by elipoloos @ 2024-04-01 05:58 | 1 | 2024-04-01 14:40 | tekim ♦696 | You can't use Google Maps to "confirm" information or as a "supplemental" source. This edit still violates Google's terms of use, just removing Google Maps as a source doesn't make it "right" |
| 2 | 2024-04-04 04:02 | elipoloos ♦3 | As I said, in the strictest sense I did use Google and AllHomes as supplemental sources; however, and this is key, not a single edit would be any different had I not touched Google Maps or AllHomes ~at all~. I simply added them as a courtesy, and because I am a new editor I was unaware of Google and... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-04 19:24 | tekim ♦696 | Google Maps terms of use make no distinction between use in the "strict sense" and regular "use", nor does it indicate that using it as a "supplemental source" is ok. It doesn't matter if "not a single edit would be different" if you had not used Google ... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-05 06:40 | elipoloos ♦3 | Ok that makes sense I see. How do I go about fixing it then? Do I double check everything without Google? Because you could say I already did that, because I had more than one source for the addresses I used. Namely, the address data comes from SixMaps, but also from Bing Maps, which I used as a tri... | |
| 5 | 2024-04-05 10:54 | nevw | Bing Maps is also not suitable as a source for osm.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps | |
| 6 | 2024-04-05 12:21 | elipoloos ♦3 | well oh dang it :/ I need to learn how to check licensing clearly lmao. what now then? I delete 2 weeks of work? | |
| 7 | 2024-04-05 23:22 | nevw | I expect most of us have had to abandon very large editing sessions from time to time for various reasons, including getting hopelessly lost in the complexity of the data in some places.We also would have used some copyrighted sources whilst learning the rules, but they are unable to be used witho... | |
| 8 | 2024-04-06 08:12 | elipoloos ♦3 | thank you :) I'll email them then | |
| 149551541 by nevw @ 2024-04-04 04:20 | 1 | 2024-04-04 05:20 | nevw | This changeset followed this discussion on the community forum 'https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/watercourse-name-appears-incorrectly-mapped/111268/4 |
| 149502620 by Charlotte Gorman @ 2024-04-03 00:46 | 1 | 2024-04-03 01:07 | nevw | Hi, why have you chosen not to follow the house outline when mapping this?The usual method is to draw an accurate representation of the house outline using satellite imagery. |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 03:06 | nevw | fixed, please check | |
| 97306299 by Captainbill @ 2021-01-11 12:22 | 1 | 2024-04-02 23:02 | nevw | Hi, this section of fence is joined to the middle of the road for a couple of stretches.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894225650#map=15/-24.6479/145.9404I can't really identify the fence line on imagery but if I strain my eyes beyond reason there is a straight line visible near west of ... |
| 149389432 by elipoloos @ 2024-03-31 12:59 | 1 | 2024-03-31 13:31 | tekim ♦696 | Hello, Thanks for your edits to the map! Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use. We are only allowed to use sources that have a license/terms of use that are compatible with OSM, so you should check some of your other source... |
| 2 | 2024-03-31 13:31 | tekim ♦696 | Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowedhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149390712 | |
| 3 | 2024-03-31 14:31 | elipoloos ♦3 | Hi, I only added Google because I used it as a secondary source for address numbers, with all the same info being present on the other provided sources. Would it be possible to restore my work and just remove Google as a source? I have the next over 100 edits that aren't going through because o... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-31 20:28 | nevw | Also note that allhomes.com.au is owned by The Domain Group and is a copyrighted and not able to be used.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources for sources we have explicit permission to use. | |
| 149155079 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-03-26 01:14 | 1 | 2024-03-26 15:35 | nevw | Hi, I thing you may be triggering a few osmi errors. Please consider getting familiar with and using the Josm editor if you are intending to fix boundaries and multipolygons. |
| 2 | 2024-03-26 15:35 | nevw | …and the osmi errors…https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.37980&lat=-27.83807&zoom=14 | |
| 3 | 2024-03-26 15:42 | nevw | This blue indicated area is involved too…https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.32453&lat=-27.88732&zoom=13 | |
| 143152547 by TheSwavu @ 2023-10-26 09:15 | 1 | 2024-03-25 00:09 | Maradona11 ♦44 | Hi, can the restriction "straight on" be fixed. it is possible to turn left into Five Islands Rd at the intersection Springhill Rd and Five Island Rd when travelling Southbound Springwood Rd.Thank you |
| 2 | 2024-03-25 01:44 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Which one? | |
| 3 | 2024-03-25 05:00 | nevw | It must be this one I expect...https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16563434 | |
| 4 | 2024-04-18 10:26 | jxeeno ♦8 | I've removed the turn restriction in question as it doens't reflect ground truth and is causing issues for through routing from Springhill Road to Lake Avenue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150167690 | |
| 149074175 by extraverse @ 2024-03-24 03:49 | 1 | 2024-03-24 11:33 | nevw | Hi, the changeset comment is not really suitable for making a query of the mapping community.It is meant to just describe what you have mapped in the changeset you are uploading to help when others want to see the history of mapped objects or a brief summary of what was done in a particular change... |
| 2 | 2024-03-24 11:39 | nevw | If you decide to ask on the community page it would help to provide the osm url from your browser showing the particular area of concern so that others can see clearly what you concern refers to and be specific in your description. | |
| 149043716 by Sanchit Dang @ 2024-03-23 09:55 | 1 | 2024-03-23 11:50 | nevw | Hi, if you change to Ersi imagery you will see the house though the shape is not sharply depicted. |
| 2 | 2024-03-23 12:12 | nevw | You tagging is correct but for consistency your unit may be better tagged as addr:housenumber=3/25 to fit with the other mapped units. | |
| 148894491 by chiata @ 2024-03-20 06:45 | 1 | 2024-03-20 09:58 | nevw | EdAny reason that you have group these two together in the one tag instead of tagging separately as they were previously tagged. They seem to be seperate entities to me and would normally expect to be tagged seperately. |
| 2 | 2024-03-21 08:01 | nevw | This shows where the bench was originally mapped ...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148894491 I think this was done accidentally and I have reverted in this changesethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148947351 | |
| 130623533 by ojcmp @ 2022-12-29 00:51 | 1 | 2024-03-19 19:38 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10292371667what is here? hospital? doctor? Emergency evacuation point? Pharmacy? |
| 2 | 2024-03-19 23:05 | nevw | I added https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response | |
| 148801661 by Tech Dec @ 2024-03-18 07:21 | 1 | 2024-03-19 05:38 | nevw | Hi, osmi alerted on this edit...https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.08823&lat=-27.58705&zoom=18 |
| 148686694 by b0ssi @ 2024-03-15 12:44 | 1 | 2024-03-15 12:47 | b0ssi ♦19 | I've added the foundation structure that the existing buildings are sitting on but this results in buildings nested within the new building. What's the best or prescribed way of organizing this kind of scenario? |
| 2 | 2024-03-16 17:26 | nevw | You maybe are looking at 3d mapping:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings You could ask on the osm community page to find a wider audience. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-17 08:31 | b0ssi ♦19 | Thanks for the pointers! I've added tags to the parts of the building as well as an outline as specified on the page you reference but have left the changeset open to confirm it looks good before committing (148761003).I'm not sure if a changeset that hasn't been closed does rende... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-17 09:43 | nevw | I expect it does not render until changeset is finished/closed. I don’t do 3d mapping so can’t offer feedback but others reading this may. | |
| 5 | 2024-03-17 10:54 | b0ssi ♦19 | Yeah, slightly wrong assumption of how changesets work; I presumed they're open for review & discussion while open, then commit to the public once closed.I didn't really intend to go into 3D mapping for this change but mainly meant to address a map note regarding this building that... | |
| 6 | 2024-03-17 10:56 | b0ssi ♦19 | For reference: This is the map note that this change addresses and that I am referring to above: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3980711 | |
| 148574544 by S9XJY67LCX @ 2024-03-13 03:58 | 1 | 2024-03-13 04:20 | nevw | Why is this marked as a single industrial building. It appears to be two separate residential buildings instead. |
| 2 | 2024-03-13 09:01 | akimapbuilder ♦126 | Yes indeed. This should be two separate buildings, they don’t look industrial either. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-13 09:12 | nevw | Thanks for your usual prompt and diligent qc with the Map builder edits | |
| 148574394 by O5DRTL6HW8 @ 2024-03-13 03:49 | 1 | 2024-03-13 04:21 | nevw | Hi, you are expected to map the outline of the building before tagging and uploading to the osm as a house. |
| 2 | 2024-03-13 08:52 | akimapbuilder ♦126 | Hi!You are right, this is way off alignment of true building position visible on Esri imagery. | |
| 148253161 by Royal Reels @ 2024-03-05 14:27 | 1 | 2024-03-06 04:08 | nevw | I was unable to find the game machines in the casino entrance drive through. Please relocate on a separate node in the true location with the floor level included in the address. |
| 2 | 2024-03-06 04:21 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Can't the node be deleted - this appears to be just SEO | |
| 3 | 2024-03-06 07:16 | nevw | Hi Daniel-Harris (Royal Reels)I have reverted your edits now. These have been reverted due to incorrect placement and damage to previous mapped features. If you wish to remap the business details, you will need to add a new node placed at the location/s where the business operates using proper... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-06 07:24 | nevw | This is how the Crown Melbourne casino is mapped nowhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13306836/#map=18/-37.82333/144.95870 | |
| 148252062 by Royal Reels @ 2024-03-05 14:00 | 1 | 2024-03-06 04:07 | nevw | I was unable to find the game machines in the culvert. Please relocate on a separate node in the true location with the floor level included in the address. |
| 2 | 2024-03-06 04:22 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | This appears to be SEO and not something that qualifies as valid data and I am sure the casino has a website with these latest details. | |
| 148247041 by coralcreative @ 2024-03-05 11:55 | 1 | 2024-03-05 13:19 | nevw | I fixed the format of all your tags to ensure they are functional in osm |
| 148088352 by Old Man Freek @ 2024-03-01 09:46 | 1 | 2024-03-01 13:16 | nevw | Hi, I see you have resolved many. There are only 8 more left to do. Tks. |
| 148082838 by Old Man Freek @ 2024-03-01 06:49 | 1 | 2024-03-01 07:20 | nevw | Hi, the editor you have used has noted a few errors as listed in the boxes directly above this text.The main warning is "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway" of which there are 11 instances.Where one track/path/footway (called a type of highway in osm) crosses another you need to pu... |
| 148029973 by QOM0GXA1DS @ 2024-02-28 21:40 | 1 | 2024-02-28 22:23 | nevw | Neither of the lake you added are visble on Bing or Esri imagery and are reverted (deleted) |
| 147919320 by nevw @ 2024-02-26 07:32 | 1 | 2024-02-26 07:59 | nevw | ...also extended Bulloo River to end using Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Lines (Regional) and Esri World Imagery as sources. |
| 147885515 by Cam-I-Am @ 2024-02-25 10:58 | 1 | 2024-02-25 12:14 | nevw | Hi, street names are not abbreviated in osm. I will fix these. |
| 2 | 2024-02-25 22:09 | Cam-I-Am ♦2 | Hi @nevw, I didn't set the name on this street, it was already like that. But thank you, I will keep this in mind if I see other abbreviated street names! :) | |
| 3 | 2024-02-26 00:38 | nevw | Oh, I apologise for that @Cam-I-Am. I forgot to look at the history. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-26 02:17 | Cam-I-Am ♦2 | All good! :) | |
| 147753449 by maps ar good @ 2024-02-21 23:41 | 1 | 2024-02-22 05:13 | nevw | Adding tags that are unknown doesn’t add anything of value to the osm and I expect it is preferred not to add those. |
| 147684708 by Encrypted Services @ 2024-02-20 10:01 | 1 | 2024-02-20 13:19 | nevw | Hi, the website seems invalid for me. |
| 147680403 by Encrypted Services @ 2024-02-20 08:14 | 1 | 2024-02-20 09:37 | nevw | Please don’t place your business details over the motorway or in the school grounds. You are required to place the business details over the building you operate from.This edit also dragged an admin boundary for Greenacre and Strathfield and is reverted. |
| 147630622 by City of West Torrens @ 2024-02-19 02:00 | 1 | 2024-02-19 05:11 | nevw | Hi, I don’t think the tennis courts need to carry the name ‘Courts’. The name is for things that do have a proper name like this park or a street sign. The courts name here appears to be more of a description. I assume the courts carry other tags to describe what they are and thei... |
| 147474616 by deStGermain @ 2024-02-15 05:20 | 1 | 2024-02-17 12:02 | nevw | Hi, osmi found a self intersection error herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.74031&lat=-16.91319&zoom=19 |
| 2 | 2024-02-18 03:30 | nevw | This is now fixed | |
| 147509742 by GroutPro @ 2024-02-15 22:13 | 1 | 2024-02-16 00:02 | nevw | If you want to add the address 92 Bunker Road to the map it is not done by adding ref=92 to the roadway.You need to add a node or draw the outline of the house and then add the tags for the address to that. Check a house that has the house number mapped to see how it is done. |
| 147438172 by Hanryo @ 2024-02-14 07:38 | 1 | 2024-02-14 07:47 | nevw | I noticed that Bondi Link and Ocean keys Boulevard share the same node on the roundabout. They should join the roundabout on their own separate node with a small section the roundabout between the two nodes. Even if it looks like they join and depart at the same place, the small seperate section of ... |
| 147435936 by Hanryo @ 2024-02-14 06:22 | 1 | 2024-02-14 07:31 | nevw | Hi,Just a few things I noticed with your edit.Buildings in osm are mapped by accurately drawing the building footprint instead of the shape of the residential plot it sits on. The driveway is tagged layer=-1 and that places it below the road and the footpath … this tag should be deleted... |
| 2 | 2024-02-14 07:40 | Hanryo ♦1 | Corrected. Thankyou, @nevw | |
| 147392709 by Aloys1us @ 2024-02-13 05:13 | 1 | 2024-02-13 07:16 | nevw | You can't abuse the OpenStreetMap in this way to test your navigation.I have reverted your changeset.It might be better to discuss the problem at the OSM Community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73There has been a recent discussion about a Tesla routing pr... |
| 2 | 2024-02-13 07:18 | nevw | ...and the recent discussion linkhttps://community.openstreetmap.org/t/help-fixing-osm-map-in-sydney-australia/108977For your problem you should start a new topic of discussion under the osm Oceania community. | |
| 147353811 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-02-12 07:13 | 1 | 2024-02-12 07:38 | nevw | I already fixed the coastline earlier today |
| 147351716 by Total Tools @ 2024-02-12 05:26 | 1 | 2024-02-12 06:41 | nevw | I deleted The Good Guys |
| 147257622 by elipoloos @ 2024-02-09 13:39 | 1 | 2024-02-10 08:34 | nevw | There appears to be a couple of breaks in the coastline here…https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.38055&lat=-27.87655&zoom=15 |
| 2 | 2024-02-11 12:45 | nevw | I can help fixing this if you prefer. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-11 15:03 | elipoloos ♦3 | Yes actually that would be great :)I like mapping more locally, I'm so sure how the more global stuff works. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-12 00:43 | nevw | I think it's fixed now, cheers. | |
| 147312860 by Guillaume Faye-Bédrin @ 2024-02-11 00:52 | 1 | 2024-02-11 02:35 | nevw | The members of the relation for Clifton Beach should not carry the tags you added. These tags are only added to the multipolygon relation.If you intend to edit relations, I suggest you use the Josm editor instead so that you can at least get a better appreciation of the relation extent and how it ... |
| 2 | 2024-02-11 12:36 | nevw | I have reverted the changeset which will restore the admin boundary for Clifton Beach. The mp boundary ways are also shared by neighbouring admin boundaries and only carry a geometry source tag. | |
| 147246676 by snorch @ 2024-02-09 08:42 | 1 | 2024-02-09 09:17 | nevw | Can you tell me more about the animal breeding facility you have mapped here |
| 2 | 2024-02-10 02:57 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | There are a lot of cockatoos around this from time to time but it is a small garden naturestrip and nothing comes to mind last time I passed by. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-10 05:43 | nevw | @snorch I have reverted this changeset as I expect that an amenity of this nature is unlikely on a road verge near a footway | |
| 147202837 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-02-08 06:28 | 1 | 2024-02-09 03:30 | nevw | koof67 appears to have deleted all the wooded areas again in changeset 147205318 |
| 2 | 2024-02-09 03:34 | nevw | ...as dissplayed in achavi https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=147205318 | |
| 3 | 2024-02-10 02:04 | Ewen Hill ♦407 | Thanks Nevw for the news. I will be reverting this and sending a note to the DWG. | |
| 147216321 by 75TDSY7I76 @ 2024-02-08 12:40 | 1 | 2024-02-08 21:02 | nevw | Your changeset comment says '2 & 2A 2 Kidston Parade' but you have only added the building tag.You should also add the address details using addr:housenumber and addr:street and also if applicable addr:unitThe suburb and state are already mapped as areas separately so no need to ad... |
| 147200079 by nevw @ 2024-02-08 04:02 | 1 | 2024-02-08 06:21 | nevw | Correction…changeset comment should read ‘very coarse’ |
| 146932677 by ben487 @ 2024-02-01 06:44 | 1 | 2024-02-01 07:41 | nevw | You need to place Bob's Prestige Lawnmowing business over the building he operates from instead of over the lawn he mows.It it is his home then add office=company also to the point you place there. |
| 146655194 by Geonut42 @ 2024-01-25 03:27 | 1 | 2024-01-25 06:22 | nevw | Hi, you have drawn a sliver of a building on the western side of a track here but the only buildings seen in imagery are square and on the other side of the track. The name "Explosives buildings" appears to be more of a description.In osm the name is only used for things that do have a n... |
| 2 | 2024-01-31 22:14 | nevw | No response. Deleted as unable to resolve remotely. | |
| 146844846 by Aus Map @ 2024-01-30 02:50 | 1 | 2024-01-30 06:25 | nevw | Hi, you have added amenity=post_office to the Neil Mansel Transport point.I would have expected company=logistics or company=transport instead.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:company%3Dlogisticshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:company%3Dtransport |
| 2 | 2024-01-30 10:00 | nevw | Changed to company=transport | |
| 3 | 2024-01-30 10:15 | nevw | Corrected name, postcode, added suburb, phone | |
| 146697474 by AlfalfaHouse @ 2024-01-26 06:17 | 1 | 2024-01-26 07:31 | nevw | Hi, is there just any empty building here now. Or is your floor empty and others occupied or something else? |
| 2 | 2024-01-29 07:43 | nevw | If Alfalfa House retail shopfront has closed are the tags left on this building relevant anymore? | |
| 3 | 2024-01-29 07:47 | nevw | Is this only a wholesale outlet open on Sunday mornings | |
| 146722974 by Jaeger52 @ 2024-01-26 19:47 | 1 | 2024-01-28 09:37 | nevw | There is a problem here with a multipolygonhttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.42329&lat=-28.03490&zoom=14I couldn’t see what the problem is earlier.I’m not able check now, but it just occurred to me that you may have added this inner twice to the mp as ... |
| 2 | 2024-01-29 07:37 | nevw | The problem was as I suspected and fixed now. | |
| 146535965 by TS27 @ 2024-01-22 04:27 | 1 | 2024-01-22 08:08 | nevw | Hiyou have changed the name of the wooded area multipolygon to Mulgoa Nature Reserve.but the Mulgoa Nature Reserve has different bounds and is mapped already here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6322278#map=15/-33.7911/150.6627Probably easiest to revert this changeset and add the tags..... |
| 2 | 2024-01-25 06:43 | nevw | I have deleted the name and added tags from the wood multipolgon.The Mulgoa Nature Reserve seems ok. I didn't add the bicycle, motor_vehicle, motorcycle =no tags to the reserve as the access ways within as they seem to be tagged as needed, though I didn't check every one.Normal pract... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-25 06:56 | nevw | I added bicycle=no to all ways within Mulgoa Nature Reserve. | |
| 4 | 2024-01-28 23:01 | TS27 ♦1 | Hi Nevw,I added the no bicycles and motor vehicle tags to the entire reserve, as unfortunately a lot of the tracks that are being utilised are not official andhave actually been made illegally therefore are not availbale on OSM. They crisscross the entire park and are causing a lot of damage | |
| 5 | 2024-01-29 02:31 | nevw | A pity to see the little we have as protected areas being destroyed so relentlessly | |
| 6 | 2024-01-29 07:15 | nevw | I added motor_vehicle=no to all tracks within Mulgoa Nature Reserve | |
| 146628259 by Sam Arthur Allen @ 2024-01-24 12:43 | 1 | 2024-01-24 14:19 | nevw | Hi, you have used the place=locality for Kybong for a business.You should instead leave the Kybong locality node alone and add the business tags to a new separate node nearby. |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 03:50 | nevw | Thanks bringing Kybong back in to the picture | |
| 3 | 2024-01-28 11:56 | Sam Arthur Allen ♦1 | Hi NevW, and a huge thank you for the advice, lesson learnt. Amateur mistake on my part, at least I chose a minor edit to begin with that wasn't navigation critical. Also I noticed when zooming in and out on that area, the public rest area appears and disappears - is that a bug, or data taking ... | |
| 4 | 2024-01-28 12:21 | nevw | The osm database updates immediately but the rendering of the map takes time and zoom levels update at different times but should be fine in a couple of days. Sometimes you may need to refresh your screen or empty the cache in your browser. Some of the map styles only update weekly but the standard ... | |
| 146734363 by ChrisJur @ 2024-01-27 07:42 | 1 | 2024-01-27 10:56 | nevw | Hi, if you are not sure the Old Store Cafe is at this location or even if it exists still, there is no point in mapping it. It would be better to add a note at the location for other mappers to confirm or otherwise. The 2nd from bottom icon on the right side of the osm website will enable you to lea... |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 04:21 | nevw | HiI did some searching and it looks as if the Old Store Cafe is now for short term accomodation.I’ll change the osm to suit.https://www.riparide.com/listings/13311-the-old-general-store-stanley-rustic-village-charm-from-a-by-gone-erahttps://www.airbnb.com.au/rooms/71854078359097747... | |
| 146734232 by Creed5724 @ 2024-01-27 07:33 | 1 | 2024-01-27 10:47 | nevw | Hi, when mapping a house in the osm you need to draw the building footprint instead of the plot boundary. |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 04:59 | Creed5724 ♦1 | thanks, updated. removed area block and replaced with building footprint. | |
| 146692174 by PlasmaPod @ 2024-01-25 23:37 | 1 | 2024-01-26 03:24 | nevw | Please don't use the Qld Globe as a source for adding data to osm as we do not have permission to use ithttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources |
| 2 | 2024-01-26 09:12 | PlasmaPod ♦2 | No worries. The same information is also available at https://maps.ipswich.qld.gov.au/weave/planscheme.htmlwhich is covered by a CC licence | |
| 3 | 2024-01-26 10:12 | nevw | The creative commons 3 still needs explicit permission I believe as osm is not able to give attribution as expected by the licence and we are only able to attribute by listing on our web page and the explicit permission is for the data provider to be happy with that.You may find the Ipswich city c... | |
| 146621345 by fossilised @ 2024-01-24 09:39 | 1 | 2024-01-24 10:53 | nevw | Hiyour edits look fine to me though I think the tags on this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11545651175 serve no purpose and need deleting |
| 146499900 by Joris van der Geer @ 2024-01-21 04:15 | 1 | 2024-01-22 10:05 | nevw | Hi JorisThere appears to be agreement that centreline waterways are preferred to extended through waterbodies now. See this recent discussion…https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-river-lines-be-mapped-through-lakes-estuaries-gulfs-and-other-large-water-bodies/104438This has no... |
| 146397866 by benough @ 2024-01-18 10:01 | 1 | 2024-01-18 22:00 | nevw | HiI think you have accidentally shifted the Crowne Plaza poi from it's proper location to a building node further north.See in the achavi image the red dot in the bottom right has been moved to the corner of the building in green.Can you fix this thanks |
| 2 | 2024-01-21 09:03 | nevw | I reverted, then fixed the spelling error | |
| 146354157 by cobba @ 2024-01-17 09:14 | 1 | 2024-01-17 13:59 | nevw | Hi, you have missed a section of this road at the Clunes end that needs correction |
| 145910060 by rohan_martin @ 2024-01-05 08:04 | 1 | 2024-01-05 10:43 | nevw | Hi Rohan, I think you may have caused error in the boundary as depicted herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.06038&lat=-31.90927&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2C... |
| 2 | 2024-01-05 10:44 | nevw | Comment here if you want me to reverted it. | |
| 3 | 2024-01-05 10:45 | nevw | …excuse my typos. | |
| 4 | 2024-01-07 12:35 | nevw | Hi Rohan I see you have reverted the changes to the two protected areas in the area.I have been looking at the web site for Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park and it appears to cover part of both the nature reserve and the national park.If this is the case I think you could map the bike park boundary ... | |
| 5 | 2024-01-09 22:42 | nevw | Hi RohanI added the area that is used as the Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park as a recreational area. It overlaps a small part of the northwest corner of the Greenmount National Park and almost all of the adjacent reserve area. Feel free to adjust the boundary or delete/replace it as you are probabl... | |
| 6 | 2024-01-09 23:47 | rohan_martin ♦1 | Legend. That's exactly the change I was trying to complete, but after duplicating the reserve and removing a boundary I couldn't get it to line up a duplicate of the national park boundary in that area. I'll keep playing to get it figured out, but for now this is the end goal achieved... | |
| 7 | 2024-01-11 07:12 | nevw | Great to hear, this is the new Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238433895#map=16/-31.9068/116.0561 | |
| 145905985 by FrankN26 @ 2024-01-05 05:04 | 1 | 2024-01-05 10:21 | nevw | Hi, there are two post boxes mapped very close to each other here. Are you able to resolve which one is correct and adjust the position more accurately and delete the redundant one. |
| 2 | 2024-01-06 05:29 | nevw | Hi, your position was correct, so I merged the tags from both to the one you mapped in this changesethttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145944901 | |
| 145917810 by tomkellycalvert @ 2024-01-05 11:25 | 1 | 2024-01-05 23:50 | nevw | I have reverted this edit as the horse cemetery building is unlikely and unable to be verified. Your other addition of a ‘penis lake’ to the osm confirmed my doubts about the veracity of your edits.If you edit the osm map again please do so with a view of trying improve the quality of ... |
| 145918369 by tomkellycalvert @ 2024-01-05 11:40 | 1 | 2024-01-05 19:38 | nevw | I expect both your edits to the osm need reverting |
| 2 | 2024-01-05 23:45 | nevw | I have reverted this edit | |
| 145798123 by Ron Goldsmith @ 2024-01-02 13:28 | 1 | 2024-01-03 07:38 | nevw | HiIt would be more in line with osm practice to shift you business node off the roadway closer to where your business operates from. |
| 2 | 2024-01-03 07:40 | nevw | These links should help…https://www.barkweb.co.uk/blog/how-to-add-your-business-to-open-street-maphttps://www.onosm.org/https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMyBiz | |
| 145780599 by Shore Safe Locksmiths @ 2024-01-02 01:08 | 1 | 2024-01-02 05:04 | nevw | Hiyou need to add a node to where the house is that you operate from and add all your tags to that instead of adding your tags to the area tagged as residential. |
| 2 | 2024-01-03 03:07 | fortera_au ♦1,068 | Changeset reverted, please tag the specific house, not the landuse=residential area.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145821107 | |
| 145598942 by Budget SEO @ 2023-12-28 01:52 | 1 | 2023-12-29 05:07 | nevw | Hi, you have added address tags...183 Argyle St, Picton but the Candy store is located at Emmett St, Tahmoor on the map.If the shop has moved you need to move the shop on the map too.Just changing the tags makes this location wrong and the true candy store site wrong too. |
| 2 | 2024-01-01 17:50 | nevw | No response, removed candy store as moved to new location | |
| 3 | 2024-01-01 22:41 | Budget SEO ♦1 | please update store to Picton location, thanks | |
| 4 | 2024-01-02 00:57 | nevw | OSM gets mapped by volunteers so you have to volunteer to add the details to where you want them added yourself.These links should help…https://www.barkweb.co.uk/blog/how-to-add-your-business-to-open-street-maphttps://www.onosm.org/https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMyBiz | |
| 144952093 by PikOu Lpy @ 2023-12-10 01:03 | 1 | 2023-12-10 02:01 | nevw | Hi, one of the East Ocean sites has been mapped onto a railway line. Can you shift it to the site it operates from. |
| 2 | 2024-01-01 18:40 | nevw | No response, removed restaurant from rail line. Another by same name seems mapped ok. | |
| 145642070 by GPO MTN Sports @ 2023-12-29 01:00 | 1 | 2023-12-29 05:19 | nevw | HiMurray Jackson Drive does not appear on the map here.Is this a mistake? |
| 2 | 2023-12-29 21:40 | GPO MTN Sports ♦1 | Hi there and thanks for picking this up. Definitely a mistake. The road name changed a few years ago and my brain is stuck in the past! I will fix this up. Thanks | |
| 145610823 by KA36PRYKLY @ 2023-12-28 10:15 | 1 | 2023-12-29 05:12 | nevw | This peculiar shape offered to the osm database is not like the building seen in the satellite imagery. |
| 145610737 by KA36PRYKLY @ 2023-12-28 10:13 | 1 | 2023-12-29 05:11 | nevw | This doesn't look much like the building at this location. You are expected to adjust the random shape offered into a proper shape like the building at this location before uploading. |
| 145060716 by nevw @ 2023-12-13 05:23 | 1 | 2023-12-27 01:16 | ika-chan! ♦242 | Hello, please consider how the creeks cross railways and roads, because your edits are causing Osmose errors that can be fixed easily.Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge for rail and road bridges, and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert for creeks. |
| 2 | 2023-12-27 02:31 | nevw | Not sure what specific errors you are referring to but there is no tag to add to the waterway if it crosses a bridge as it is implied that bridges cross above waterways. Any culverts I add, I always add the layer tag (-1) to the waterway.As I am adding waterways from a dataset and satellite imager... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-27 07:34 | nevw | Ok, I have had a further look now and see by you edits that you wanted the bridges, culverts, etc mapped. Cheers | |
| 145350678 by 0T95QL46OX @ 2023-12-21 00:14 | 1 | 2023-12-21 02:14 | nevw | Hi, welcome to osm.I noticed the first couple of edits and feel you need a bit of help to do it correctly so that other editors don’t have to follow behind you to fix the building shapes.You are expected to edit/shift the building nodes to reflect the exact shape of the building. The micro... |
| 145314593 by 8X3N3BP335 @ 2023-12-20 03:58 | 1 | 2023-12-20 06:07 | nevw | Hi, Rondanella Drive appears to me to be a usual residential street with normal access to residential housing. Why is it tagged access=private? It is a gated community or similar? |
| 2 | 2023-12-20 06:18 | nevw | Upon further viewing area, it does seem likely to be a gated community segregated from other residential areas. | |
| 145314577 by 8X3N3BP335 @ 2023-12-20 03:57 | 1 | 2023-12-20 06:04 | nevw | Hi, this looks like a service road to me and not an unclassified roadhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway |
| 145312586 by KCQIXVNF83 @ 2023-12-20 01:36 | 1 | 2023-12-20 02:24 | nevw | Hi, the building tag is used to map the house footprint and not the land plot.The owners name is not used in osm and a name is only for houses that do have a name such as some heritage houses.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 2 | 2023-12-20 02:31 | nevw | You could add other useful information such as mapped here so that car navigation apps can locate your address https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693134235 | |
| 144858403 by Lockstar @ 2023-12-07 09:08 | 1 | 2023-12-13 01:11 | nevw | Hi, osmi has picked up an issue here that needs correcting.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.56149&lat=-28.87015&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cinte... |
| 2 | 2023-12-13 01:25 | Lockstar ♦26 | Fixed - thanks | |
| 101033067 by bob3bob3 @ 2021-03-15 08:17 | 1 | 2023-12-10 03:26 | nevw | HiI noticed a ford and a bridge next to each other herehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101033067#map=19/-27.19640/149.05023Are you able to confirm if the ford still exists or was it replaced by the bridge? |
| 2 | 2023-12-10 03:33 | nevw | There is another ford and bridge combo 1.5 km further north where Horse Creek crosses. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-10 03:47 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Judging my the Mapillary imagery I uploaded the ford is replaced by the bridge. The Horse Creek crossing has flood height markers at the bridge so it might be worth adding a flood_prone tag and removing the ford. | |
| 4 | 2023-12-10 04:23 | nevw | Ok, thanks for info...I will make the changes as suggested. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-10 05:07 | nevw | Updated now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144954441https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144954441I added flood_prone=yes from the flood prone sign to the stream crossing after the bridge, added culverts, etc in the Horse Creek area and removed the ford from both Horse Creek a... | |
| 144755173 by elipoloos @ 2023-12-04 13:23 | 1 | 2023-12-07 12:34 | nevw | HiOsmi picked up a problem herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.51689&lat=-23.33067&zoom=17 |
| 2 | 2023-12-08 11:58 | nevw | I fixed the multipolygon error | |
| 144819413 by m_p_13 @ 2023-12-06 08:48 | 1 | 2023-12-07 07:53 | nevw | Hi, this was named as a fire station.Should it also be tagged as amenity=fire_station |
| 2 | 2023-12-07 10:57 | m_p_13 ♦46 | The fire station has been moved to a new location since 2014/2015. In my opinion, name=old_fire_station or name=abandoned_fire_station can be used.Amenity=fire_station is no longer justified as the fire station is no longer here. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-07 11:37 | nevw | Ok, fine. There is a phone number listed…do you think this should also be deleted? | |
| 4 | 2023-12-07 11:41 | m_p_13 ♦46 | Yes, it should be removed. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-07 11:44 | nevw | This number is listed against 100 St Johns Rd, Cabramatta NSW 2166, Australia which is probably the current Fire Station.So I’ll delete the number.Tks, Nev | |
| 6 | 2023-12-07 11:48 | nevw | Fixed now. | |
| 7 | 2023-12-07 12:00 | nevw | Fire station is fully mapped at the current location https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764309959#map=19/-33.88880/150.92401&layers=D | |
| 144677677 by マリウス @ 2023-12-01 23:12 | 1 | 2023-12-02 01:06 | nevw | Hiyou have edited the address of this shop but the address you have added is several streets away.You need to move the business to the new location in addition to changing the address tags. |
| 2 | 2023-12-02 11:00 | マリウス ♦1 | Hi, bear with me here, as I didn't figure out how to do so in the client that I used to submit this update. I was assuming that it would update the GPS location based on the new address. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-02 11:57 | nevw | Ok, I’ll try to shift it to the correct location tomorrow. | |
| 4 | 2023-12-02 23:56 | nevw | Hi, I have relocated it as depicted herehttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144707364Should render on the map in a day or so | |
| 5 | 2024-05-20 08:25 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | converting the above link into a osm-changeset link.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144707364 | |
| 144621189 by NeilYellow @ 2023-11-30 11:12 | 1 | 2023-11-30 11:22 | nevw | Hi Neilfollowing on from previous comment, Olive street is correctly mapped as separate ways for the section where the concrete median separates it but should form one way where the concrete divide ends and paint only prevails. OSM can seem a bit technical at times :) |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 11:43 | nevw | This is only a short section and inconsequential so I would leave as is, but I did notice that one side of the road is tagged highway=secondary and should instead be same as the other side. | |
| 144612182 by NeilYellow @ 2023-11-30 06:04 | 1 | 2023-11-30 08:57 | nevw | Hi Neilas I view the Lexington Drive section from satellite imagery, it appears to be a solid painted line that divides the road. A solid painted line doesn't make it a divided road in an OSM sense. A divided road needs a physical barrier like a median strip or concrete barrier to be mapped s... |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 10:54 | NeilYellow ♦1 | Hi, yes there is a small concrete barrier down the centre of this part of Lexington Drive. It shows up in google street view if that helps. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-30 11:27 | nevw | Thanks, all is fine then.This section, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227719287 should be highway=unclassified instead of highway=service. | |
| 4 | 2023-12-01 00:20 | Gillifrey ♦5 | One additional tip: There are some outdated tags on Lexington Drive that should be cleaned up after the duplication.Tags with `:forward` or `:backward` in the key are left over from when the way was bidirectional. But now it's been split into separate ways with `oneway=yes`, tags like `lane... | |
| 144528815 by Tomkn27 @ 2023-11-28 01:31 | 1 | 2023-11-30 03:12 | nevw | Hiif there is a boundary marked by buoys in these waters you might like to map the buoys using the OpenSeaMap http://www.openseamap.org/index.php?id=openseamap&L=1If the exclusion area is gazetted it may be possible to map in a similar way to habitat protected area to the south.There is fu... |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 05:41 | Tomkn27 ♦1 | OK, thanks.I'll look into openseamap. | |
| 144568072 by Shaun_R @ 2023-11-28 23:16 | 1 | 2023-11-29 01:31 | nevw | Hijust checking why the house addresses were deleted for 3 Parker Drive and 14Gallagher Crescent. Houses for these addresses can be seen in satellite imagery still and assume they were mapped so that people could find their house. |
| 2 | 2023-11-29 04:50 | Shaun_R ♦1 | @nevw Thanks for your comment. It's not typical for OSM to have street numbers, and it's also not typical for OSM to show individual private residential homes as Building Points on the map either. Typically these are reserved for commercial buildings and places of interest. There's al... | |
| 3 | 2023-11-29 05:18 | nevw | not so, it just depends on the level of mapping for the area. For example; every building has an address in the Brisbane area due to the data being made available in a form suitable for osm and locally to me the house numbers have been mapped here.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-27.21779/15... | |
| 4 | 2023-11-29 05:37 | nevw | Thanks for replying so promptly. I have added them back in now. Cheers. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-04 21:16 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as ... | |
| 144498734 by elipoloos @ 2023-11-27 09:04 | 1 | 2023-11-29 02:15 | nevw | I have added tags that were on the tower as previously mapped to the building you added as an outline of the base.I think the building tag around the base is not very suitable. The other transmission towers are tagged as nodes and I feel this is a better way to map them.I have used the details b... |
| 144563156 by locavorebyron2481 @ 2023-11-28 19:56 | 1 | 2023-11-28 21:12 | nevw | HiYou may have shifted the Palace Cinemas to a different location by accidentally dragging it’s node and it is now located in a carpark. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144563156 |
| 2 | 2023-11-28 22:33 | nevw | After referring to cinema website, I have shifted the node to the correct location. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-04 21:23 | tastrax ♦1,145 | Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as ... | |
| 144033174 by misternavigator @ 2023-11-15 02:40 | 1 | 2023-11-15 06:35 | nevw | Hi, there are also road section extending north that need renaming. |
| 143721145 by ICT Software @ 2023-11-07 06:41 | 1 | 2023-11-07 08:28 | nevw | Mate, where has Diddilibah Road gone!https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.6423/153.0358 |
| 2 | 2023-11-07 08:39 | nevw | I added highway=tertiary to Diddillibah Road to allow it to render on the map and aligned with Esri imagery. | |
| 143692078 by Nuts Galore @ 2023-11-06 12:45 | 1 | 2023-11-06 18:40 | nevw | Hi, I added a primary tag, office=company, reformatted phone and despammed description. You might like to change to a more specific primary tag. |
| 143561146 by States College Australia @ 2023-11-03 07:28 | 1 | 2023-11-04 10:36 | nevw | I added a primary tag to your business edit so that osm can process what kind of thing you have added and render it on the map. You might like to change it to a more specific tag. |
| 143561461 by Marco Ventura @ 2023-11-03 07:40 | 1 | 2023-11-04 10:33 | nevw | I added shop=tattoo to you business edit so that osm can process what you have offered and render it on the map. |
| 143599768 by Steel Blue @ 2023-11-04 06:09 | 1 | 2023-11-04 10:20 | nevw | Hi, you have entered the Steel Blue site twice in different places along the same street. Can you decide where the business is located and leave the details on the one correct node.You accidentally removed the tag highway=residential from Irvine Street but I have fixed it. |
| 2 | 2023-11-04 10:31 | nevw | You need to add a primary tag so osm can properly process your business details and render in the map…is office=company ok or do you prefer a more specific tag? | |
| 143601442 by Laing Simmons Campsie @ 2023-11-04 07:34 | 1 | 2023-11-04 10:27 | nevw | I added a primary tag so that osm can process what it is you are entering in to the database |
| 143567920 by LucasMaps96 @ 2023-11-03 10:35 | 1 | 2023-11-03 11:12 | nevw | Hi, we don’t use abbreviations in street names in osm … for example, St should be entered as Street |
| 143390724 by leon_041 @ 2023-10-30 22:44 | 1 | 2023-10-30 23:25 | nevw | Hi, houses are mapped by the footprint they occupy instead of the land plot.I have fixed the tagging. You may wish to draw the building outlines accurately and put the address tags on the main building instead of the house node I added. |
| 2 | 2023-10-30 23:28 | nevw | When mappers want to show the property boundaries, it is more common to map the fencelines instead of the plot of land as I have done. | |
| 143088362 by SRMAdmin @ 2023-10-25 00:14 | 1 | 2023-10-25 03:34 | nevw | If the business has moved to a different address you need to shift the node with the business details to the new site. Just changing the number doesn't work....it makes it now wrong at both sites now. |
| 2 | 2023-10-27 12:30 | nevw | No response, poi removed from old site of moved business. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-29 22:48 | SRMAdmin ♦1 | Sorry for the mistake - I wasn't quite sure how it worked. Are you able to assist me? I can't seem to find the business at the new address. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-29 23:32 | nevw | In general Osm is a self help site.You will need to add a node at the new address and add in all the tags for the business.There is an address node already at the new site. You should add a new node next to it or in the centre of the building you operate from and add the business tags to it. If ... | |
| 143135349 by fmsjd @ 2023-10-25 21:34 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-26 09:51 | Alafoss ♦6 | Hi fmsjd,I kindly request an explanation for your highway classification changes (e.g. changing roads from primary to residential). Your changes seem rather random. I'd like to refer you to the OSM wiki where you'll find plenty of information about mapping highways correctly https://wi... |
| 2 | 2023-10-26 10:51 | nevw | I noticed you have dragged a node for a silo in the top right of this changesethttps://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=143135349 | |
| 3 | 2023-11-02 04:52 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15324 | |
| 4 | 2023-11-13 02:23 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | DWG revert:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953549 | |
| 143006723 by Tristo @ 2023-10-23 08:53 | 1 | 2023-10-25 03:39 | nevw | Hi, osmi spotted an error here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.96667&lat=-27.45076&zoom=17 |
| 2 | 2023-10-26 04:46 | nevw | I fixed this in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143142930I made the both the landuse=construction and the developed residential area into multipolygons and shared the same way between the two areas in the relations.I also took Sandy Brennan Park inner out of the developed ... | |
| 143138780 by nevw @ 2023-10-26 00:17 | 1 | 2023-10-26 00:19 | nevw | Correction: Bing imagery used as source. |
| 143107692 by wmxwu @ 2023-10-25 10:28 | 1 | 2023-10-25 11:37 | nevw | 283 Clarence Street as tagged in this changeset is not located on Pitt Street so why is this business tagged as being at 283 Clarence Street but is located on Pitt Street on the osm?If you update a business location you need to move all the details to the new location including the node. |
| 2 | 2023-10-25 11:51 | wmxwu ♦1 | Thanks nevw, I have moved the node to the new location as well now (see changeset #143111308). | |
| 3 | 2023-10-25 12:06 | nevw | Thanks | |
| 143108721 by DaZe4350 @ 2023-10-25 10:54 | 1 | 2023-10-25 11:48 | nevw | There are many times in this changeset where you have accidentally dragged nodes and this is typically done by new users using the iD editor. If you continue using this editor please be careful about clicking on and dragging nodes and check that the map looks ok before you upload.If you zoom in cl... |
| 2 | 2023-10-25 11:51 | nevw | Achivi link:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143108721 | |
| 3 | 2023-10-25 12:03 | nevw | Actually I think there us only one dragged node and all the other changes are just realignments of boundaries. Sorry… I was too hasty in my checks….keep up the good work 🫤 | |
| 143054606 by fmsjd @ 2023-10-24 09:07 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-24 09:27 | nevw | Hion St Bernard's College grounds you have added building=school. This tag is used for the individual school building footprints instead. amenity=school is sufficient for the boundary of school. |
| 2 | 2023-10-24 09:31 | nevw | At the bottom right of your edit area you will see you have dragged a couple of nodes. I have fixed these. It is a problem that is easily done while using the iD editor that you need to be careful with. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-24 09:38 | nevw | You can see the dragged nodes if you zoom in to the bottom right here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143054606Easily done....I have fixed these. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-25 10:41 | Alafoss ♦6 | Welcome to OSM fmsjd,I noticed you changed the highway classification from secondary to tertiary for e.g. Epsom Road , Fisher Parade (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9623977/history), Langs Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9625362/history) and Scotia Street. I wonder what the reasoning ... | |
| 5 | 2023-10-25 21:37 | fmsjd Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2023-11-13 02:23 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | DWG revert:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953549 | |
| 142698202 by KBB9 @ 2023-10-17 07:23 | 1 | 2023-10-17 07:44 | nevw | HiThis building appeared to be correctly mapped. Why have you deleted it? |
| 2 | 2023-10-22 02:51 | nevw | no response, reverted what appears to be a mistaken edit. | |
| 142910993 by Boof99 @ 2023-10-21 07:32 | 1 | 2023-10-21 12:27 | nevw | The building=house tag is used to outline the building footprint or roof area instead of the plot of land. |
| 142760847 by deStGermain @ 2023-10-18 12:17 | 1 | 2023-10-21 11:22 | nevw | HiI think you may have created a few self intersections in the Forest Lake Shopping Centrehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.96835&lat=-27.62535&zoom=18https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=142760847Let me know if you are having trouble fixing them. |
| 142602967 by KLB2410 @ 2023-10-15 06:11 | 1 | 2023-10-15 08:54 | nevw | Hithe address you have added to the business is not correct.50 Blaxland Road, Ryde is in a not near here. Did you instead mean to map a building footprint at 50 Blaxland Road, Ryde and add this business details there? Please delete the incorrect details added here and add them to 50 Blaxland Roa... |
| 2 | 2023-10-15 09:14 | KLB2410 ♦1 | thanks for your message. I have asked for help as I don't know how to work this site. Can YOU please map a building footprint at 50 Blaxland Road, Ryde 2112 and add this business details there? I am trying to help this business as they have moved to 50 Blaxland Road, Ryde 2112 and the current i... | |
| 3 | 2023-10-15 11:24 | nevw | Ok, I have a look tomorrow. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-15 23:13 | nevw | I have moved the variety shop to the new location and vacated from Rowe Street. Any others like this, let me know.The map rendering should update in a day or two. | |
| 5 | 2023-10-16 02:06 | KLB2410 ♦1 | Thank you so much. I’m just trying to help these people, and very grateful for your help. | |
| 6 | 2023-10-16 05:11 | nevw | Your welcome...it takes the whole community to maintain the osm | |
| 142602008 by JayTuut @ 2023-10-15 05:24 | 1 | 2023-10-15 08:42 | nevw | Building tag is for the building outline only. If you wish to mark the bounds of the property from satellite imagery, it is best done by mapping the fence lines. |
| 2 | 2023-10-15 09:45 | JayTuut ♦1 | Okay | |
| 142602419 by JayTuut @ 2023-10-15 05:47 | 1 | 2023-10-15 08:34 | nevw | Hi, the building tag is for outlining individual buildings instead of the land plot |
| 142558035 by deStGermain @ 2023-10-14 01:57 | 1 | 2023-10-14 11:07 | nevw | It is normally preferred that you don’t use the highway nodes to form boundaries for landuse. Leave them solely as road infrastucture. The land use does not extend to the roadway centrelines. Using roadway centreline nodes may be convenient and may the map look pretty but is not the preferred ... |
| 2 | 2023-10-14 11:14 | nevw | At version #17 for the landuse boundary so has probably been the way for for a long time and use to be a common or even preferred way to map landuse but it considered not to be the preferred method now by my reading of mapper discussions. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-15 00:08 | nevw | I added a segment to the roundabout on Winstanley Street to fix retail multipolygon that uses road segments for the landuse=retail boundary at Westfield Carindale, se Qld. Too much work to redraw without using roadway infrastructure. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-15 01:18 | nevw | I split the roundabout instead of adding a duplicate segment and this fixed the route relations through the area too. | |
| 142495301 by José-Luis Cruz @ 2023-10-12 19:52 | 1 | 2023-10-12 23:23 | nevw | HiYou appear to have turned this footway into a power line. |
| 2 | 2023-10-12 23:37 | nevw | The track is there for the power line maintenance crews to access the actual power line which is the straight line. The track is also used by hikers. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-13 12:21 | nevw | I have reverted the changes to restore the power line track | |
| 142367655 by Ziran Xia @ 2023-10-09 21:46 | 1 | 2023-10-10 09:39 | nevw | Hi,this changeset has been reverted as buildings are mapped in water areas and not reflected in satellite imagery. This site is expecting redevelopment so construction and lifecycle tags would be ok if plans are finalised. |
| 2 | 2023-10-10 09:44 | nevw | If you have finalised plans for the Long Bay Correctional Centre re-development or feel that reverting this changeset is unjustified then add a comment here. If what you have mapped is the final plan then we can help map it correctly. | |
| 142358263 by ENERGYNRG @ 2023-10-09 16:52 | 1 | 2023-10-09 20:31 | nevw | HiShop details are placed over the building they operate from instead of the roadway. I have shifted this one to the nearest building. Can you check if it is in the correct location. |
| 2 | 2024-01-04 05:05 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | DWG reverthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145864243 | |
| 142169894 by Sahana s @ 2023-10-05 04:00 | 1 | 2023-10-05 06:40 | nevw | Hi, I changed the tags to be cricket pitches for the three circular areas |
| 142083212 by lil hike @ 2023-10-03 06:48 | 1 | 2023-10-04 03:15 | nevw | Hican you reference your changes to the highway tag to this guidelineshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highwayhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/RoadsI don't do much main road mapping but I these seem odd Majestic Drive, Regal Court , Woodlake Avenu... |
| 141749667 by Jasonmor @ 2023-09-25 21:50 | 1 | 2023-10-02 23:55 | nevw | HiOsmi has picked up a problem with the mapping herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.69339&lat=-23.67894&zoom=11 |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 00:05 | Jason Morris ♦1 | Based my updates on map and golf app swingu hole locations. I cannot be sure where golf course and showground end. Plan to visit in future to confirm. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-03 02:16 | nevw | In regard to the multipolgon, the outer ring cannot touch the inner rings. This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331767600 has a line going into the centre.There are examples of valid and invalid mp listed here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon | |
| 141983590 by JIAJIA LI @ 2023-10-01 11:19 | 1 | 2023-10-01 12:02 | nevw | Hi, the building tag is expected to be used for mapping the outline of individual buildings instead of a rectangle defining the area containing a group of buildings. |
| 2 | 2023-10-02 11:55 | nevw | Hi, the details you added to the Long Bay Correctional Centre are mis-tagged and other parts seem to be tagged differently than is depicted by satellite imagery.I have reverted the changeset until I hear more info from you regarding the reason it was mapped in this manner. | |
| 142019494 by Brayco @ 2023-10-02 03:26 | 1 | 2023-10-02 11:50 | nevw | I added the building details back into OSM as I believe the building and it's address details still exist at 37 Spring Road, Springvale. |
| 73137843 by daviewales @ 2019-08-08 06:45 | 1 | 2023-09-25 02:14 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | number of these addresses do not match the road names in OSM as they have the suffix "East" added. The DCS base map also does not show these "East" suffixes ... Comment? |
| 2 | 2023-09-26 23:45 | nevw | Hi, I can fix these if you like. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-26 23:52 | nevw | I have gone ahead and corrected thesehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141794983https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141794983 | |
| 4 | 2023-09-27 08:20 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | I too can 'fix' them. However there are a number address issues. I'm thinking about some resolution. I have raised one issue on the tagging list and I think a solution would also suit some of these address issues too. | |
| 5 | 2023-09-27 19:13 | nevw | Yes, there is a need for new addr or postal tagging for community groups like gated communities but I expect this changeset was some sort of cut and paste error. | |
| 6 | 2023-09-28 08:28 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | It could be an error on the LPI/DCS data base ... Mowbray Road West for example in OSM is Mowbray Road I have added the Mowbray Road West as an alternative and changed the relevant addresses in OSM to match and used addr_postal:street for the Mowbray Road West ... | |
| 7 | 2023-09-28 11:10 | daviewales ♦3 | Good catch! This was from this import project:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Australia_NSW_Property_and_Address_ImportMost information and the full history of uploaded and reviewed address files is in the GitLab repository:https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-addres... | |
| 8 | 2023-09-29 10:27 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | "There is always one more bug" The good thing is that with the greater amount of data that cross references to other data there is more chance that any bugs will be found and sorted. | |
| 140451701 by RichieRRR @ 2023-08-27 13:28 | 1 | 2023-09-25 05:45 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Hi Richie. It appears that when you edited this path, you somehow tied it into the relation for the residential area? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550919262 Are you able to please fix it? |
| 2 | 2023-09-26 23:40 | nevw | @RichieRRR I can fix these easily enough.Shall I proceed? | |
| 3 | 2023-09-26 23:42 | nevw | Disregard...added to wrong changeset | |
| 141629123 by selfhosted @ 2023-09-23 05:36 | 1 | 2023-09-23 06:05 | nevw | The bakery is now mapped twice. |
| 2 | 2023-09-23 06:08 | selfhosted ♦1 | Oh'really? 🤔 Hmm I didn't see that in my dataset(s) from OSM data I recently downloaded. Interesting... I'll double check... If true, do I need to do anything with this update, or just cancel it or something? 🤔 | |
| 3 | 2023-09-23 06:09 | selfhosted ♦1 | Also where is the other node/entry for this? I'm having trouble finding it or I'd have suggested deleting this one 🤣 | |
| 4 | 2023-09-23 06:13 | selfhosted ♦1 | Ahh I think I found the other one! It has slightly different coordinates too 🤔 -- Which I can't really verify right now without going down to the local shops and taking some coordinates on something.I suggest we merge my edits into the existing node? My edits are more accurate/up-to-date... | |
| 5 | 2023-09-23 06:53 | selfhosted ♦1 | So I was just confirming with my wife, I know what's going on here. There used to be a Print Shop, but the Kenmore Village Bakery that was already existing took over the space of the Print Shop after it closed down.That explains the different GPS coordinates of the two nodes. Going to aband... | |
| 6 | 2023-09-23 07:31 | nevw | You have done well figuring this out 😀 | |
| 141492444 by fixative_xyz @ 2023-09-20 03:57 | 1 | 2023-09-20 06:40 | nevw | This building is located on Barkly St. do you need to shift all the details to another building on Paisley St? |
| 2 | 2023-09-20 22:39 | fixative_xyz ♦1 | As I stated in my edit, the shop moved to Paisley Street in 2022. It's on their Instagram if you scroll back to November 2022. The Barkly Street address is now a Vinnie's op shop. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-20 23:05 | nevw | In that case you need to sift the Cheaper Buy Miles relevant tags on to the building that they occupy on Paisley St and add Vinnie op shop tags to the site on Barkly St. | |
| 4 | 2023-09-20 23:10 | nevw | If you are not able to do this, select the correct building on Paisley St from openstreetmap and paste the url here and I will correct it remotely. | |
| 5 | 2023-09-22 08:43 | nevw | no further response: fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141593629 |