| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53141650 by wanderlustig | 1 | 2017-10-22 11:28:28 UTC | nevw | Should levers be written with an upper case L or is it a peculiar name that begins with a lower case l? |
| 2 | 2017-10-22 21:25:44 UTC | wanderlustig | I thought the notes added to those features made it clear that Ievers (presumably pronounced "EYE-vers") is correct. Please modify the notes accordingly If you can devise some more effective way of communicating this. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-23 02:47:32 UTC | nevw | Yes, these comments make it clear that it is a peculiar name that begins with a lower case l. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-23 02:54:12 UTC | nevw | Correction.... it begins with an I (an upper case 'eye') and not a lower case l ('ell'). | |
| 5 | 2017-10-23 05:30:59 UTC | aharvey | PS you could also add https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology | |
| 53028734 by Prashant Nanda | 1 | 2017-10-18 11:39:59 UTC | nevw | Your opening hours format is incorrect:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 52974828 by medaesthet | 1 | 2017-10-16 09:58:24 UTC | nevw | Your opening hours format is incorrect:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 52921848 by logic99 | 1 | 2017-10-14 13:19:40 UTC | nevw | You are welcome to map the driveways. If at a later stage you add footways you would have a node at each driveway they cross or add the sidewalk tag to the streets.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk |
| 2 | 2017-10-15 06:19:44 UTC | aharvey | If they lead to a private property I've marked them access=private when I've mapped, although strictly only past the front fence is private. | |
| 52849456 by Matthew Volpatti | 1 | 2017-10-12 09:46:50 UTC | nevw | addr:street should only be the street name and should not include the house numberuse addr:housenumber for that.Your Search engine optimization (SEO) edits with a new user for each business are tiresomely lacking in skill with abuse of the tagging system the norm. |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 09:51:33 UTC | nevw | ...apologies if a genuine first edit :) | |
| 52846033 by isuw182427 | 1 | 2017-10-12 02:40:09 UTC | nevw | Your opening hours format is incorrect:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 52787782 by contextitaining | 1 | 2017-10-11 01:10:08 UTC | nevw | Your opening hours format is incorrect:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 52791408 by MBE Australia | 1 | 2017-10-11 01:08:31 UTC | nevw | Your opening hours format is incorrect:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 47454678 by greyim | 1 | 2017-09-23 09:27:19 UTC | GerdP | Hi!Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484607462What did you try to map here? |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 23:31:43 UTC | nevw | Hi GerdI expect it is this stock routehttp://www.simoncubit.com.au/blog/ritters-track.I also note that this tag is proposedhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone?uselang=enMaybe highway=track|path|bridleway? would be ok in parts too with additional visibility tags with a ... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-24 06:06:47 UTC | GerdP | Thanks for the link.I agree regarding the highway tag. I think each stone cairn might be tagged as historic=milestone (used on a node).The landuse=farmland tag should be removed. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-25 01:23:09 UTC | greyim | Thanks GP historic=milestone seems good... unusually, there is no actual track, long since erased by time and weather | |
| 52263901 by Middle Beach Project | 1 | 2017-09-22 08:01:56 UTC | nevw | a very novel way of mapping |
| 52242947 by poolwaters | 1 | 2017-09-22 00:18:21 UTC | nevw | Hithe syntax for your opening hours needs amending.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 52224412 by Seosdy | 1 | 2017-09-21 09:04:36 UTC | nevw | As you are SEO experts, I thought for this and future business listings you may wish to know...I noticed a mi-spelt tag...Openig hours \t8:30am to 5:30pm...also hours format is not correct for OSMsee http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#ExamplesThe correct format for phone ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-22 06:23:25 UTC | Harald Hartmann | And SEO descriptions are unwanted, too! I could be, that someone could revert this entry. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-28 07:19:08 UTC | aharvey | This place probably got a 3rd party SEO company to do their SEO. The same place that's been going crazy adding incorrectly formatted opening_hours, phone and payment method tags... | |
| 52204685 by George Morgan | 1 | 2017-09-20 09:49:04 UTC | nevw | landuse=forest is meant for land used for forestry operations. If this is not the case you might like to refer to the wiki to use something more appropriate. |
| 2 | 2017-09-20 10:27:50 UTC | nevw | If not for forestry, maybe natural=wood would be suitable. | |
| 52008035 by thesorehead | 1 | 2017-09-13 23:47:41 UTC | nevw | Hiyou have the syntax a bit wrong for the opening hours.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples |
| 2 | 2017-09-14 03:21:50 UTC | thesorehead | The current text is: Tu-Sa 17:00-22:00; Su 17:00-21:30Which seems to match the key. (e.g. Mo-Sa 10:00-20:00; Tu 10:00-14:00).If you fiexed it, thank you. I will keep this in mind for future edits. Actually it occurs to me that it should also read "Mo off" | |
| 51924861 by Chunkit Ng | 1 | 2017-09-11 05:32:17 UTC | nevw | Would you care to elaborate why you deleted the poi with comment "delete useless Poi"I don't see any sign that you are improving the map with updated or improved mapping for the area. |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 06:19:39 UTC | CloCkWeRX | It seems like this should definitely be reverted; some of those appear to be useful internal POI. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-13 10:17:48 UTC | nevw | no response - reverted mass deletion of poi | |
| 51810176 by zatuim | 1 | 2017-09-07 12:58:07 UTC | nevw | Feel free to map whatever you think needs adding to the map. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 21:09:26 UTC | David Dean | Consider tagging the shelters as an area with building=roof, and the parking areas under the shelters as covered=yes.But in general, as long as your tagging makes it clear what you see on the ground it's good, and someone can change it to more accepted tagging if they want to, which they couldn'... | |
| 51683854 by MapAnalyser465 | 1 | 2017-09-04 06:14:42 UTC | Mikideez | Construction of the Western Distributor has not yet started, see http://westgatetunnelproject.vic.gov.au/wgt/ |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 10:00:07 UTC | MapAnalyser465 | My apologies Mikideez as the government website provided does state that the proposed Western distributor will begin major construction in early 2018. Just thought it might be okay to show proposed route on map a few months prior to actual construction. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 11:47:05 UTC | nevw | You should use highway=proposed together with proposed=motorwayhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3DproposedI agree that major proposed construction should be mapped if info is available that it is expected to proceed. (sorry to intrude) | |
| 51660640 by Marco Montecchi | 1 | 2017-09-02 12:26:25 UTC | nevw | Hi, you have added the restaurant to a node in the middle of the road, Can you shift it to the building that it occupies instead thanks. The roads are reserved for cars mostly. |
| 2 | 2017-09-02 12:38:25 UTC | nevw | I shifted it off the road centreline because maps.me editors rarely respond to requests. I will leave to you to put it on the correct building. | |
| 51564619 by zatuim | 1 | 2017-08-30 10:04:27 UTC | nevw | HiI think you will find that the DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is more recent and better aligned with gpx and Strava than Bing. I expect that the DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is quite close in this area and does not need aligning any further. |
| 51448559 by *kv007* | 1 | 2017-08-30 02:22:35 UTC | nevw | Hi *kv007*I noticed you added several addr: tags to Petrie Street. The addr tag is normally only used to provide address information for buildings and facilities.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 51503811 by nevw | 1 | 2017-08-29 12:24:55 UTC | aharvey | even if it translated, it's common in OSM not to add translations but only name:<lg> if the feature is known by that foreign language name. Although I'm not strongly one way or the other. |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 12:55:41 UTC | nevw | Yes, I agree.This one was a bit unusual and... name=Manly Wharf\twas changed to name=Manly Wharf 玛丽海滩So normally I would correct to... name=Manly Wharf\t and addname:zh=玛丽海滩But though it may be correct, Google translated to "Mary Beach" so I just left it as...... | |
| 51392772 by New Economy Network Australia | 1 | 2017-08-24 07:35:21 UTC | nevw | Hithe items you are mapping are not suitable for the OSM. They need to be physical features generally and have real geographical information. A poi with just a website and description or such info attached to an unrelated poi is considered spam. I think that such edits are likely ok to put on Goog... |
| 51359357 by New Economy Network Australia | 1 | 2017-08-23 02:49:04 UTC | nevw | Please don't add web site items to false poi. Use Google for such items. They are not suitable for the OSM. Reverted, |
| 51335385 by New Economy Network Australia | 1 | 2017-08-22 11:48:40 UTC | nevw | Please only add real physical items to the OSM that are verifiable on the ground. |
| 51321995 by New Economy Network Australia | 1 | 2017-08-22 04:01:22 UTC | nevw | Please only map physical items that are verifiable on the ground. The recent edits of web sites with a description is not suitable for adding to the OSM.If you want to advertise those please do so only on Google Maps. |
| 51203171 by jonorossi | 1 | 2017-08-18 23:47:35 UTC | Warin61 | The relationship inner way touches the outer way ... that is not allowed. Is the wood not part of the park? Yes.. That would mean that it is not an 'inner' in the relationship and the relationship becomes a one member relationship that can be replaced by putting the tags on the outer way. ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-19 07:09:44 UTC | jonorossi | Thanks Warin61, I spent a good 30mins reading the wiki because I wasn't sure I was doing things right but couldn't really find the info I was after, I then came across OSMI to see if it reported anything and I realised it is batch updated, so fixed some other local problems.Sorry I don't quite f... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-19 14:47:35 UTC | jonorossi | I've resolved the problem. I missed the sign naming the bushland Windemere Road Bushland Refuge, so have now separated the two areas.I'd still be interested to get a response for my previous question for next time. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-20 00:22:53 UTC | Warin61 | In a relation ;An outer way cannot touch nor cross any other way in the relation. An inner way can touch another inner way (sometimes OSMi reports this as an error .. but it is technically allowed). That help? If you can avoid using a relation - that makes things easier/simpler. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-20 10:28:26 UTC | jonorossi | Apoligies for not being clearer, I understand the inner way not touching the outer now, I saw this one reported in OSMi. I was confused earlier because you said "...by putting the tags on the outer way" for both, however natural=wood needs to be on the inner way. | |
| 6 | 2017-08-20 11:13:40 UTC | Warin61 | No need for apologies. Some, at least, is my fault! Much easier over a beer. What I meant was if the relationship is deleted leaving simple ways, then the remaining way/s get the relevant tags from the old relationship. If the wood is part of the park then it gets included in the park - it w... | |
| 7 | 2017-08-20 11:44:39 UTC | jonorossi | Cheers (with a virtual beer), I think I understand now. For example, you'd use an inner relationship if there was a residential area in the middle of a national park, since it wouldn't actually be national park. All those multiploygon nature reserves with relationships that were automatically import... | |
| 8 | 2017-08-21 13:21:15 UTC | nevw | There is a lot to learn about relations and after getting a good understanding of those, you will find most of the rest is much easier.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygonhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon/validityhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mul... | |
| 9 | 2017-08-21 14:02:23 UTC | jonorossi | Thanks nevw, I've seen your username on those complex multipolygons at Nerang Forest before. | |
| 10 | 2017-08-21 16:39:11 UTC | nevw | Yes, guilty :)Most are from CAPAD data and I prefer to add in the form they are gazetted. The parts where they share segments with nearby areas can be difficult to sort out. | |
| 51221360 by jonhildrew | 1 | 2017-08-18 07:24:01 UTC | nevw | Hi Jon, the OSM is not really suitable for mapping places where you saw some kangaroos. It may be suitable if they are always visible there and are in fact a bit of a local tourist attraction. |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 07:38:05 UTC | jonhildrew | No problem! I trust it's been deleted now. Saw something similar for koalas that was reliable and thought it might help others... but what you said makes sense. Will bear that in mind! | |
| 50787706 by Bromar | 1 | 2017-08-09 07:07:17 UTC | nevw | Hi BromarI expect that the building in WA that you have tagged as name=Home is where you live. This is a public map and such edits are not correct unless the building has a sign displaying it's name as "Home". Can you correct if necessary, thanks. |
| 50940186 by SunSeeker Studios | 1 | 2017-08-09 05:28:19 UTC | nevw | I reverted your changeset which placed SunSeeker Studios in the middle of Griffith Park. I am unable to relocate to correct position remotely so I will leave for you to fix. |
| 50226020 by Travo656 | 1 | 2017-07-13 05:44:15 UTC | nevw | Please don't try to make the map pretty by abusing the use of the highway tags.Those roads are now incorrectly tagged as trunk. I expect they most likely should be tertiary or secondary if not residential. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 05:47:35 UTC | nevw | But apart from that, keep up the editing to improve your town :) | |
| 3 | 2017-07-13 06:43:42 UTC | Travo656 | The roads changed are recognised by locals as 'trunk' roads or major roads, roads that have high volumes of traffic on them. Wasn't trying to make the map 'pretty' just more accurate. So I'm sorry if that is what it came across as. We don't really use the terms 'secondary or tertiary' in regards to ... | |
| 4 | 2017-07-13 06:57:41 UTC | nevw | Hi Travo656When mapping we normally use the info on the wiki as a guide e.g. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway but there are also country specific guidance for many tags for our country, including the roads and this is quite useful.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Taggi... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-05 18:05:54 UTC | freayd | Hi Travo656. Sorry mate but I reverted the ways you changed to highway=trunk. As nevw mentioned, the rules for choosing a highway value are described on the wiki under Australian Tagging Guidelines. In Proserpine, only the A1 is a trunk. Apart from that, keep up the good work! Cheers. | |
| 50196723 by nevw | 1 | 2017-07-12 12:46:56 UTC | CloCkWeRX | This is actually Beech Avenue according to http://maps.sa.gov.au/plb/ (that is powered by the same data as is on data.sa.gov.au; which we have explicit permission to use) |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 13:05:12 UTC | nevw | Well spotted. | |
| 50191475 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:51:13 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "Home in AEU" |
| 2 | 2017-07-12 09:00:53 UTC | CloCkWeRX | I've removed this for now as it seems very unlikely to be an actual confectionery store | |
| 3 | 2017-07-12 09:36:18 UTC | nevw | ThanksOk DaRa uses that pretty icon for most edits :/ | |
| 50219652 by ciaranellis3 | 1 | 2017-07-12 08:39:04 UTC | nevw | I fixed the tags and shifted the supermarket to correct location. Please zoom in further to the actual location before uploading edits. |
| 50194841 by Qwertii | 1 | 2017-07-11 08:17:16 UTC | Qwertii | Edit got sent twice. Anyone know how I can revert this? |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 08:53:33 UTC | nevw | I can use the revert in Josm to revert Changeset: 50194841 if you wish and then you can check if all is well later. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-11 09:34:53 UTC | nevw | Have reverted this Changeset: 50194841All seems ok now. You may want to check too. | |
| 50192428 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:35:47 UTC | nevw | Hiis this supermarket named "Sister work place".If not can you edit it to the correct name of the supermarket. |
| 2 | 2017-07-11 06:51:52 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "Sister work place" | |
| 47728063 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:49:02 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "My House" |
| 47148389 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:47:20 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "uncle's house" |
| 46358739 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:46:05 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "Uncle's House" |
| 46327305 by Ok DaRa | 1 | 2017-07-11 06:44:43 UTC | nevw | The OpenStreetMap is no suitable for listing personal details like "Daddy's Home" |
| 50176438 by onlinejewelleryco | 1 | 2017-07-11 01:17:11 UTC | nevw | I reverted your changeset which unintentionally moved streets, etc.I then added back to the map The Online Jewellery Company (OJCo).Can you you check it is all ok now. |
| 50164607 by Martini097 | 1 | 2017-07-10 11:34:05 UTC | nevw | World heritage area boundaries and national park boundaries are gazetted seperately and although often similar in most sections are normally left mapped as seperate entities. |
| 2 | 2017-07-10 12:25:47 UTC | Martini097 | Dont worry, it was only northern sections where the polygons mirrored each other exactly | |
| 50008422 by Smiles Dental Care | 1 | 2017-07-09 11:45:06 UTC | nevw | I relocated your edit to the correct building and added amenity=dentist.Please only add items to their exact location. |
| 49978114 by Smiles Dental Care | 1 | 2017-07-02 07:55:53 UTC | nevw | The node you have mapped is not located on Commerce Lane as stated in the address and there is no business called Engage Online in the Lane. There is no place on the OSM for business that do not have a physical location. |
| 2 | 2017-07-08 00:09:45 UTC | aharvey | I don't think it's a coincidence that their PO box number matches the number used for the Street Address "Postal Address: Po Box 52, Glenbrook, NSW 2773" especially given there is no 52 Commerce Lane. Looks like SEO spam. So +1 to remove. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-09 11:28:26 UTC | nevw | Deleted this edit as no evidence of this actually existing on the ground, appears to have only online presence and no response from mapper. | |
| 49977670 by Smiles Dental Care | 1 | 2017-07-02 07:45:05 UTC | nevw | Dermedica does not occupy the area you have outlined. It instead occupied a small unit in the building. |
| 2 | 2017-07-02 07:47:55 UTC | nevw | The Dermedica office in located on West Coast Highway, not on Brighton Street. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-09 11:20:48 UTC | nevw | I relocated your edit to the correct building.Please only add items to their exact location. | |
| 49942046 by Smiles Dental Care | 1 | 2017-07-02 07:13:49 UTC | nevw | HiI think you have put the dental practice on the wrong part of the street. It seems more likely to me to be across from Baynes St, unless you have recently moved. |
| 2 | 2017-07-09 11:06:15 UTC | nevw | I relocated your edit to the correct building.Please only add items to their exact location. | |
| 49958585 by Smiles Dental Care | 1 | 2017-07-02 07:57:18 UTC | nevw | You have located the node for this business in a carpark. Can you locate it correctly in only the location where it exists. |
| 2 | 2017-07-09 10:56:38 UTC | nevw | I relocated your edit to the correct building.Please only add items to their exact location. | |
| 49997854 by jamesbrah | 1 | 2017-07-03 06:02:54 UTC | nevw | Hiyou have misspelled as 'Servied' but I expect this is not the actual name of the park if it even has a name. See access tag comment on other changeset. |
| 49997868 by jamesbrah | 1 | 2017-07-03 05:56:53 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the Openstreetmap. Please don't use the name=* tag as a description. It is only for the actual name of the park if it has one. |
| 2 | 2017-07-03 05:59:47 UTC | nevw | If the park is not open to the public and you you wish tag as such, use the access=* keys instead, such as access=no or access=private. | |
| 49658095 by Ian TF | 1 | 2017-06-19 13:33:35 UTC | nevw | The tower does show on the Humanitarian Layer so perhaps it does not render on the Standard Layer.I haven't seen it but was wondering if man_made=mast was more appropriate for wifi thing.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:man_made |
| 49322883 by Malco! | 1 | 2017-06-07 14:03:44 UTC | nevw | Please don't delete things that exist from the osm. This cemetary likely has a strong local significance. Whether is dominates the map appearance or not is irrelevent and is simply a rendering issue. |
| 2 | 2017-06-08 01:39:43 UTC | nevw | I decided to add a bit more detail to the Blinman area based on satellite imagery. | |
| 49259727 by toxicantidote | 1 | 2017-06-05 09:24:55 UTC | nevw | These is no reason to delete these private roads which someone else has mapped. The information provided may serve the company staff and visitors quite well. You should instead add the tag access=no or access=private.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access |
| 2 | 2017-06-05 10:33:46 UTC | toxicantidote | Noted. The location of these roads was incorrect anyway following a 2015 redevelopment.I'll try and update these more appropriately. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-05 12:01:10 UTC | CloCkWeRX | Have tweaked this a little further, based on DigitalGlobe imagery | |
| 48991581 by TechTronix Webmaster | 1 | 2017-05-30 04:05:00 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the Openstreetmap.Your business listings needs a physical address to be on the OSM. Can you provide the address details and shift the nodes from the road to the correct location. I don't think there is a place for businesses operating behind a PO Box or web address on the OSM. |
| 2 | 2017-06-03 08:16:08 UTC | nevw | no reply, no physical address found, reverted. | |
| 3 | 2017-06-03 08:35:26 UTC | nevw | I would think Google maps is the ideal site to list your online businesses and would also offer more suitable exposure than the Openstreetmap. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-03 11:09:52 UTC | TechTronix Webmaster | All locations is a service area we cover, based from Seaspray Avenue For SEO Purposes it it to build links back to my website from your website | |
| 48685820 by Padawan69 | 1 | 2017-05-15 10:01:22 UTC | nevw | Hiwelcome to the osm. Could you check boundary of this park as it appears on satellite imagery to include the private yards of a few of the neighbours. |
| 48591902 by nevw | 1 | 2017-05-11 21:22:20 UTC | TheSwavu | I've reverted this and the original changeset.They had doodled onto the map some sort of random walk around the middle of Canberra. The ACT Honour Walk was already mapped. |
| 2 | 2017-05-12 02:17:15 UTC | nevw | Thanks | |
| 48311418 by Mike Geo | 1 | 2017-05-02 03:04:21 UTC | nevw | I added the tag man_made=pier to the Dockside Walk piers |
| 2 | 2017-05-02 16:03:19 UTC | Mike Geo | thanks | |
| 47893947 by SillyMe727 | 1 | 2017-04-18 08:40:21 UTC | nevw | Hi I noticed that the park is named "Dunstan Drive Park" but the street is named Dunstan Court.Are the names correct? |
| 2 | 2017-05-01 06:25:18 UTC | nevw | Renamed Dunstan Court to Dunstan Drive after survey. | |
| 48122287 by Drizzt31 | 1 | 2017-04-26 02:04:25 UTC | nevw | I think it would be more suitable to add foot=yes to the cycleways instead and likely to be used by more map and routing software than highway_1=footway |
| 48107495 by kimo | 1 | 2017-04-25 02:44:17 UTC | kimo | Description should be "update bike path surface". Can change descriptions be updated one submitted? |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 12:05:36 UTC | nevw | I don't believe so. | |
| 48083220 by deanleggo | 1 | 2017-04-24 10:26:30 UTC | nevw | Yes,Lathlain Place should be mapped as two one-way streets as they are separated by the central area. You could also outline the centre section and map as landuse=garden and map the footways on the garden area/pedestrian area and connect them to the road and to the footways on the adjacent land ar... |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 00:43:53 UTC | nevw | You have created a masterpiece here :) | |
| 47991597 by nevw | 1 | 2017-04-21 06:00:22 UTC | nevw | corr..source: LPI NSW imagery |
| 47991362 by nevw | 1 | 2017-04-21 05:59:57 UTC | nevw | corr..source: LPI NSW imagery |
| 47920904 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-04-19 07:56:34 UTC | nevw | HiYes I think I made an error in mapping that bit originally and haven't been back for quite some time.I re-mapped the road section as a concrete path instead and removed the Sandalwood Crescent name from the stub that joins Lemongrass Circuit.I will cycle out there tomorrow if weather is ok t... |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 03:47:28 UTC | nevw | Footway and addition of lift gate confirmed by survey today. | |
| 47894006 by SillyMe727 | 1 | 2017-04-18 09:15:48 UTC | nevw | HiI noticed you changed the tagging for the Moreton Bay Cycleway from highway=cycleway to highway=footway.The convention is to tag cycleways as highway=cycleway. The cycleway has cycleway signs along it's length. The tag foot=yes indicates that it is also for pedestrian use. Pedestrians can also... |
| 47606103 by GhoulishTea | 1 | 2017-04-16 08:08:29 UTC | nevw | Any good reason you have deleted all recent mapping. I have recorded all those paths personally by gps. They are not concrete paths as you may expect but are dirt paths.These are expected to be mapped. You should refrain from deleting other peoples mapping unless you know what you are doing.I in... |
| 47278401 by Brodie_Hattin | 1 | 2017-03-30 11:46:12 UTC | nevw | Landuse=forest is generally used for treed areas that are used for forestry operations.A better way to tag this would be to use natural=wood or landcover=trees |
| 47245197 by Troy Troy | 1 | 2017-03-29 10:44:33 UTC | nevw | I think you have named this incorrectly as Brogla Crescent. I expect it should be Brolga Crescent. |
| 2 | 2017-03-29 13:31:07 UTC | Troy Troy | sorry yes Brolga Crescent. | |
| 47245900 by Troy Troy | 1 | 2017-03-29 10:07:43 UTC | nevw | Can you check the spelling of Jackaranda Drive.The usual spelling is Jacaranda |
| 2 | 2017-03-29 12:13:56 UTC | Troy Troy | Jacaranda Drive sorry | |
| 3 | 2017-03-29 12:15:17 UTC | Troy Troy | speed of the road is 20 kmh both ways | |
| 17817290 by TheOldMiner | 1 | 2017-03-21 00:05:52 UTC | Warin61 | Hi againRelation: 2308145 tagged waterway=riverbank ... is not closed ... and looks to contain ways 172860359 and 172860350 that are both tagged (correctly I think) as wetlands. I think the wetlands need to be made into relationship ... so that the ways can be cut up so they can be shared betwee... |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 00:32:57 UTC | TheOldMiner | I agree with your comments. I made these additions back in 2013. My changesets appear to have been damaged around the areas of the wetlands. There are more problems all the way down to Mackay. I am not 100% why, as they were all mapped from bing using josm. There is another user fixing the problems... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-21 07:07:14 UTC | Warin61 | Finding out who did what .. err .. and then once found are they still around, and amenable to working on fixing it? Rather it were fixed .. as time and inclination allows. This is not my area of vast knowledge in either OSM nor familiarity with the land .. I have been through a few times but not s... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-23 06:03:12 UTC | nevw | I am likely to be 'the other user' but have been unable to fix any due to not being familiar with the area and limited ability to interpret the Bing imagery for the wetland areas so I have abandoned my efforts to fix. There is the following data that could likely assist but as far as I know we don't... | |
| 5 | 2017-03-23 10:07:03 UTC | TheOldMiner | No problems. I will revist the area virtually other the next few weeks. Let you know when I am done. To see if all the errors have be rectified. I had the same issues around Mackay a little while back. Maybe when they did that big rework of the map | |
| 6 | 2017-03-23 11:21:41 UTC | nevw | Thanks to TheOldMinerThese are the main areas http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.11749&lat=-20.12145&zoom=9 | |
| 47065566 by laurahd673 | 1 | 2017-03-23 05:41:23 UTC | nevw | Hi You have used +31 (Netherlands) for the country code in the phone number.Did you mean for this to be +61 (Australia) instead |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 05:42:38 UTC | nevw | Please ignore, I see you have corrected it. | |
| 47002326 by domhenry | 1 | 2017-03-20 06:41:43 UTC | nevw | Hi DomhenryJust curious to know how you get the height info for the buildings.Nevw |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 19:13:01 UTC | domhenry | The top 20 highest city buildings are in a Wiki page. Then with a bit of patience in Google almost all the city buildings have a number of levels - I used the level to height converter published by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. A few others a used Google Streetview to count the nu... | |
| 46968232 by john@emersleigh | 1 | 2017-03-19 00:33:39 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the Openstreetmap.orgYou need to read more of the tutorial and add the correct tags for your edit to display. |
| 46947849 by Shanegemhunter | 1 | 2017-03-19 00:30:55 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the Openstreetmap.orgYou have added a few shop=bookmaker to the map where none exist.Are you able to correct these edits in the 2 changesets you have uploaded? |
| 2 | 2017-04-03 05:05:37 UTC | CloCkWeRX | These are now removed | |
| 46736378 by nevw | 1 | 2017-03-10 16:53:03 UTC | Lee Drury | Sorry, new to this. I came back to redo them |
| 2 | 2017-03-11 06:04:14 UTC | nevw | My comment was for no one in particular, but thanks for tidying up. | |
| 46701086 by jamesleon | 1 | 2017-03-09 08:58:24 UTC | nevw | Your spam and inappropriate tags on Plenty Road have been deleted.If you want to add business details add all the tags to the building it occupies (not the road) and leave out the spam. |
| 2 | 2017-03-10 00:47:04 UTC | nevw | I have added all the company tags to the correct address point. I did not add to building as it appears several companies occupy the same building. | |
| 46587862 by sp4rkie | 1 | 2017-03-05 07:55:47 UTC | sp4rkie | comment is wrong (editor simply takes previous comment as default). I did not notice this in time.Don't know how to fix comment |
| 2 | 2017-03-06 11:31:27 UTC | nevw | As far as I know the comment is not able to be changed after uploading. Adding a comment to the changeset with the correct remarks is fine. I have had to do that occasionally. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-06 23:00:07 UTC | sp4rkie | ok, I then will try to *add* (not replace) a comment in the future. thanks for clarifying this. | |
| 46543097 by Sukhdeep Virk | 1 | 2017-03-03 10:30:39 UTC | nevw | Hi Sukhdeep, the name tag is meant to be the name of your shop. The big place across the street normally lays claim to Murdoch Uni.Perhaps you were wanting to enter your suburb name, etc. Please see these tags that you can add.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addrhttp://wiki.openstreet... |
| 46538570 by Schroeter91 | 1 | 2017-03-03 10:15:49 UTC | nevw | Hi TomWelcome to the Openstreetmap.House names are only entered if the house really has a name, like some old historic homesteads. You are welcome to add other details such as ...http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addrI have deleted the personal details of your name from the house as it ... |
| 46538973 by JackFaulkner | 1 | 2017-03-03 09:57:49 UTC | nevw | Hi Jackwelcome to Openstreetmap. We prefer that you don't enter personal details like your name on the houses you map, thanks.You are welcome to add other details such as ...http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 46539235 by Sonam Yangdon | 1 | 2017-03-03 09:53:59 UTC | nevw | Hi,welcome to the Openstreetmap.I re-tagged the residential area as landuse=residential. Street names are ok. |
| 46539266 by Kriti Chhabra | 1 | 2017-03-03 09:46:50 UTC | nevw | Hi Kritiwelcome to the Openstreetmap. Your name is not required on such a public map. You are welcome to add other details such as http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addrThanks |
| 46537789 by hannahwilliams100 | 1 | 2017-03-03 03:21:00 UTC | nevw | Hi HannahWelcome to the Openstreetmap.House name are only entered if the house really has a name, like some old historic homesteads. You are welcome to add other details such as ...http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 46537783 by uglyfleb | 1 | 2017-03-03 03:14:22 UTC | nevw | Hi uglyflebWelcome to the Openstreetmap.Names are only entered for houses if that is really the name of the house. Other details are welcome... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 46537765 by Robert Spiccia | 1 | 2017-03-03 03:03:48 UTC | nevw | Hi Robertwelcome to the Openstreetmap. The map is public and I deleted your name from the building. We don't enter personal details, but the house number and details like that are welcome.Names on houses are only entered if the house really has a name.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:a... |
| 46512676 by hayley_farrelly | 1 | 2017-03-02 09:56:06 UTC | nevw | The Openstreetmap is a public map so please don't put your friends names on the houses.Thanks |
| 46482657 by paulg | 1 | 2017-03-01 06:47:25 UTC | nevw | Are you sure it is correct to delete the path - there seem to be plenty of Strava users following it.http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK&map=17.09/152.95143/-27.47664 |
| 2 | 2017-03-01 06:57:04 UTC | paulg | It must be a very minor trail, the main trail certainly connects with the roadway. I'll fix up. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-01 07:00:33 UTC | nevw | Yes, after having a much better look at it, I agree with you and think it is too little used and a minor a minor shortcut that is not required on the map, especially in such as small area with main trails next to it. I feel you were right to delete it. | |
| 46465164 by Whereis_Neha | 1 | 2017-02-28 13:26:17 UTC | nevw | Hi Whereis_Nehaplease note that we don't use abbreviations in the openstreetmap for Street, Court, Crescent, Road, etc - use the full word instead.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 2 | 2017-03-01 05:35:50 UTC | Whereis_Neha | Noted. | |
| 46102787 by Eddie hanham | 1 | 2017-02-15 23:06:30 UTC | nevw | Your description tag in this changeset is considered to be advertising spam and is not permitted to be added to the Openstreetmap. |
| 45930172 by Heino112 | 1 | 2017-02-09 05:50:29 UTC | nevw | Please don't add fantasy game Pokemon paths and parks to the openstreetmap. It is only for real things. |
| 45873789 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-02-07 11:42:38 UTC | nevw | again same problem with Heathcote-Graytown National Park mp. |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 09:58:10 UTC | nevw | I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes. | |
| 45873755 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-02-07 11:39:44 UTC | nevw | This edit seems to have had same effect on the Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon relation. |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 09:57:45 UTC | nevw | I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes. | |
| 45873733 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-02-07 11:35:53 UTC | nevw | This edit also appears to have broken the same Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon relation. |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 09:57:09 UTC | nevw | I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes. | |
| 45873594 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-02-07 11:30:49 UTC | nevw | I think you may have broken the Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon with this edit. You appear to have tried to shift or delete a part of the boundary of the park to line up with a road or something.The park boundary came from http://parkweb.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/315679... |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 09:56:20 UTC | nevw | I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes. | |
| 45873437 by Whereis_Cruicky | 1 | 2017-02-07 11:52:37 UTC | nevw | I had to fix the Percy Isles National Park multipolygon boundary yesterday. I think you may have done an edit here too.I not sure if it is correct, but will be ok for now. |
| 45745708 by Sensocool | 1 | 2017-02-06 23:28:08 UTC | aharvey | I can't see this footway on the imagery you've used. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471477415Could you comment back here to let us know your source? |
| 2 | 2017-02-07 00:55:30 UTC | nevw | I deleted it. Missed this one when cleaning up the area previously. | |
| 45867844 by Lies van der Wouden | 1 | 2017-02-06 23:18:06 UTC | nevw | HiAre you able to move the cafe node you have added, from near the roadway, to over the building that the cafe is located in? Or is it a portable cafe on wheels and is properly located on the footway? |
| 45844692 by TheOldMiner | 1 | 2017-02-06 04:58:28 UTC | nevw | HiI notice PGS as a source around the canals.What does the abbreviation PGS represent? |
| 2 | 2017-02-06 05:15:54 UTC | TheOldMiner | The term PGS also known as prototype global shoreline. Read about it here: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prototype_Global_ShorelineMostly obsolete now. Preference is to use Bing aerial photography to plot correctly. Hope this helps. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-06 05:57:26 UTC | nevw | Thanks. | |
| 45816229 by Robkfps | 1 | 2017-02-05 01:52:02 UTC | nevw | Hi RobYou have placed the public campsite in the middle of the road.Are you able to locate is over the actual campsite that the public can use.I looked using the Openstreetmap editor with satellite imagery but was unable to locate it precisely, so left it on the road. If you do this it would b... |
| 45799164 by Dave Rave | 1 | 2017-02-04 10:54:54 UTC | nevw | Not sure, but I found this tag on the wiki for bridges, which seems to serve a similar purpose-bridge:support=* Position of the structures which support a bridge from beneathhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridgehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:support |
| 45795227 by Kayden12 | 1 | 2017-02-04 04:41:27 UTC | nevw | This is a public map. I deleted your friends house information and mapped the houses in the close vicinity. You are welcome to add other info to those but not personal stuff thanks.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr |
| 45789144 by Javier Castro Poch | 1 | 2017-02-03 22:00:05 UTC | nevw | Hiyou have placed this on a roadway. Are you able to move it over the correct building footprint it belongs to? |
| 45735009 by Chace Hua | 1 | 2017-02-02 07:39:04 UTC | nevw | Hi Chace HuaWelcome to the Openstreetmap.I can see by your editing that you are unaware that you are editing a public map.Do you wish to fix the edits yourself or do you wish me to revert your changesets? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 12:15:54 UTC | nevw | fixed these edits. | |
| 45696872 by Ballisticv | 1 | 2017-02-01 05:31:26 UTC | nevw | This edit is incorrect. You have changed place=locality to natural=water for Port Douglas. Do you want me to correct it or are you able to fix it? |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 05:36:35 UTC | nevw | Oops, wrong changeset....disregard. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-01 05:43:30 UTC | nevw | This one was the landuse=forest which I think may be better suited to natural=wood as the forest tag is for forestry managed treed areas. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-03 11:53:47 UTC | nevw | fixed | |
| 45682811 by Ballisticv | 1 | 2017-01-31 12:33:54 UTC | nevw | These edits are incorrect.You have changed a roadway to a footway and a house to a footway.The landuse=forest is meant to be used only for managed forestry areas. The previous mapper had this area as natural=wood and this is the correct tag I believe.You must only make real and correct edits t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:51:25 UTC | nevw | residential house mapped and two areas that were mapped as forestry changed to natural=wood. Roadway already fixed by Ballisticv.Thanks | |
| 45682698 by Ballisticv | 1 | 2017-01-31 12:25:50 UTC | nevw | The person who previously mapped this had the tag landuse=residential, which seems correct to me.You have deleted that and addedarea=yeshighway=footwaysurface=ground.I don't see any footway.Do you realise this is a public map.I think you need to put the tags back to the correct one... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:40:22 UTC | nevw | boundary of area changed back to landuse=residential | |
| 45667309 by ahrurvf | 1 | 2017-01-31 05:00:42 UTC | nevw | The leisure=park that you have mapped here appears to be a private residence with a fence and does not appear to be open to the public. We only map leisure=park if they are open to the general public to use.Has the lot been redeveloped into a park for the general public? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:31:23 UTC | nevw | fixed by ahrurvf.Thanks. | |
| 45615329 by Strawberi _ | 1 | 2017-01-29 11:06:59 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the editing world of the openstreetmap Strawberi_I see that this is you first edit and I am kindly offering you some friendly advice on how we expect the map to be edited - it is simply that you are free to map what you see on the ground and add these real things to the osm to improve t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:28:45 UTC | nevw | reverted | |
| 45613493 by Tatertron | 1 | 2017-01-29 10:53:42 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the public map that is the Openstreetmap, that millions of mappers are trying to improve.I notice that you have mistakenly degraded the map by changing the tags on Brighton Secondary College from amenity=school to leisure=park. I expect the school amenity is still at this site. Are yo... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:23:57 UTC | nevw | reverted to correctly tagged school | |
| 45613644 by Tatertron | 1 | 2017-01-29 10:42:45 UTC | nevw | Why have you changed the shape of Haverbrack Park from the correctly mapped work of any mapper to a circular shape?I notice that you are a new mapper, but do you realise that you are editing a public map.Do you wish me to fix this and map it how it should be mapped or would you prefer to do that... |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 11:19:07 UTC | nevw | reverted to original mapped shape | |
| 45766210 by sitak | 1 | 2017-02-03 07:52:56 UTC | nevw | Welcome to the Openstreetmap.I wish to help with this edit.Do you mean that house numbers 3 to 5 occupy this section of Clarke Street.If so, the correct name for the street is 'Clarke Street'. The street itself is not meant to hold the house numbers, so was correctly tagged before your edit.... |
| 45745726 by Sensocool | 1 | 2017-02-02 23:33:33 UTC | nevw | Hi SensocoolYou appear to have make changes to the Openstreetmap that are not apparent in the real world. As this is a public map that you are editing and used by people other than yourself, I intend to revert all your changes soon.Please add a comment here if you would like to fix your edits yo... |
| 45742326 by Hakim Lakioui | 1 | 2017-02-02 12:00:51 UTC | nevw | Hi HakimWelcome to the Openstreetmap.You have added a travel agency to the middle of a main road, a guest house to another road and another guest house to a car park.Can you edit these sites again and place them on the building they belong to or would you prefer that I revert your edits.Than... |
| 45741501 by CharlieOneHorse | 1 | 2017-02-02 11:42:36 UTC | nevw | Hi CharlieOneHorseplease don't feel the need to put a name one every edit.Only name items if there is a sign with that name on it. |
| 45729382 by Francesco Capaccioni | 1 | 2017-02-02 01:01:05 UTC | nevw | Welcome to OSM.I shifted these 2 sites off the roadway and footpaths onto the nearest building as seen on the satellite imagery. Probably helps to zoom in closer in your app to locate points of interest to map if able.Keep up the mapping,Bye |
| 45697144 by Ballisticv | 1 | 2017-02-01 05:37:52 UTC | nevw | This edit is incorrect. You have changed place=locality to natural=water for Port Douglas. Do you want me to correct it or are you able to fix it? |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 12:59:06 UTC | CloCkWeRX | Reverted this one for the moment | |
| 45700665 by Zamias | 1 | 2017-02-01 05:12:52 UTC | nevw | I notice you have deleted TentWorld and The Mower Superstore on the corner of Leitchs Road and South Pine Road.Have the closed down and moved?Or has this been done in error? |
| 2 | 2017-02-01 05:20:38 UTC | nevw | Just noticed that TentWorld and The Mower Superstore werer mapped on wrong corner.Should have been on Kremzow and Leitchs Road.Sorry, my mistake.Keep up the good work :) | |
| 45651998 by BootROM | 1 | 2017-01-31 04:47:27 UTC | nevw | I added traffic_calming=hump on Wellington Street just before Heddle Parade.I added it just to the north of the junction. Hope this is correct side of intersection. I notice a node there with no tag, so thought that might be the correct spot. |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 04:50:11 UTC | BootROM | Perfect, thank you. Am still new to this but hopefully I can help to fill in gaps for the new estates too. | |
| 45620329 by thatguyfromthatplace | 1 | 2017-01-30 00:27:42 UTC | nevw | HiI made a small adjustment to the path you edited. I deleted the section that ran on top of Symonds Street - just linking to the street by a node is sufficient, unless there is a path or footway off to the side of the road, in which case it would be next to the road instead of overlaying it.One... |
| 45611552 by Woodenheaded | 1 | 2017-01-29 08:03:24 UTC | nevw | Hi WoodenheadedI noticed you mapped an area as landuse=forest. This tag is generally reserved for wooded areas that are managed for harvesting of forestry timber.Do you think natural=wood would be a better tag to use.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforesthttps://wiki.op... |
| 45605857 by Belthazer | 1 | 2017-01-29 00:45:34 UTC | nevw | Hi BelthazerI think you accidentally dragged a playground node from Camelleri Road Park to the end of Sunrise Place.Tks |
| 2 | 2017-01-29 05:05:14 UTC | Belthazer | I'm so sorry, I'm new to this and must have done that by accident. Has it been fixed? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-29 05:10:05 UTC | Belthazer | I went to the point and fixed it | |
| 4 | 2017-01-29 05:28:37 UTC | nevw | Thanks.Nev | |
| 45547213 by Jodie Cameron | 1 | 2017-01-28 06:33:47 UTC | nevw | Please don't make up names for paths. They only get named if there is a sign or similar with that name. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 23:25:54 UTC | Jodie Cameron | Sorry, this is my first time using the Map, | |
| 3 | 2017-01-29 00:10:59 UTC | nevw | I also spent a bit of time making up a really good name for things I mapped at the beginning. :) | |
| 45582274 by rickybaker | 1 | 2017-01-28 07:35:06 UTC | nevw | All the pathways and boundary were already mapped here. You are not to map another layer of footways over the top of it if the map already has all the ways.This is a public map. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 08:14:18 UTC | rickybaker | Why are the listed as unmaintained track road rather than pedestrian foot paths/trails? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 08:35:04 UTC | nevw | I am not there to view in person but I think track is wrong looking at satellite imagery. A track is something that a 4-wheeled vehicle may use like a fire trail for example that makes 2 track marks.If they are tracks then that is how they have to be mapped and it is likely that they are not maint... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-28 10:32:04 UTC | rickybaker | They are walking trails that are not paved. I don't believe bikes are allowed in the park. Vehicles definitely can't drive on them | |
| 5 | 2017-01-28 10:35:06 UTC | nevw | ok then I would opt for...highway=path foot=yesbicycle=nosurface=ground (or dirt)Best wishes and keep mapping.Nev | |
| 45582322 by rickybaker | 1 | 2017-01-28 07:26:21 UTC | nevw | You are editing a public map. Don't map footways that don't exist. |
| 45543478 by Fiendop | 1 | 2017-01-28 05:48:54 UTC | nevw | Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted |
| 45550399 by Fiendop | 1 | 2017-01-28 05:47:17 UTC | nevw | Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted |
| 45550472 by Fiendop | 1 | 2017-01-28 05:46:51 UTC | nevw | Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted |
| 45541219 by satomigrim | 1 | 2017-01-27 05:53:04 UTC | nevw | I notice that you are changing many of the cycleways through your area to footways.You are to map them as cycleways if they have cycleway signs. Pedestrians can freely use the cycleways too.All the ones that are cycleways will need to be fixed. Please be more careful. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 10:47:27 UTC | satomigrim | Thanks for messaging me. As far as I'm aware these are all walking paths with designated seating, exercise stops and playgrounds all along. Bicycle use is permitted but pedestrians have priority per the signage. Most cycle-ways follow the painted lanes along the road now. I have adjusted the 'Allowe... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 10:54:34 UTC | nevw | On the OSM the 'cycle-ways that follow the painted lanes along the road' are called cyclelanes. Cycleways are different and have a cycle way sign (picture of a cycle) and almost always give pedestrians access and priority. I will be up there looking for signs later and re-map the cycleways, if nec... | |
| 4 | 2017-01-27 10:59:23 UTC | nevw | actually...the cyclelanes are of course cycleways as well . | |
| 45457926 by Hiimbraydon | 1 | 2017-01-26 02:19:34 UTC | ediyes | Hola,Por favor tenga cuidado al editar parques y no mover las calles existentes.Yo acabo de corregir el error. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 08:08:52 UTC | nevw | Hiimbraydon this was poorly mapped. You have joined edges to streets. It looks nothing like reality in satellite imagery. Name is unlikely to be correct. There appears to be residential housing and other large building infrastructure inside the boundary. Please take more care and zoom in very close ... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-27 10:46:57 UTC | nevw | Edited area as best as able remotely. | |
| 45528278 by Griffin Heydon | 1 | 2017-01-27 04:02:06 UTC | nevw | I have deleted your valalism to the public Openstreetmap.including ...the loop where I reinstated the original mapped residential way.sidewalk with odd tags where non exists.Da Grossmann footways crisscrossing building of Maitland Highschool.Please take more care in how you add edits in th... |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 04:20:56 UTC | nevw | Perhaps I was too harsh with the comments as you appear to be new to editing the Openstreetmap. We welcome your future edits. :) | |
| 45458286 by Hiimbraydon | 1 | 2017-01-26 08:33:47 UTC | nevw | Is this really a beach. it looks like a vacant block to me. You are editing a public map. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 12:57:51 UTC | nevw | reverted changeset. | |
| 45458629 by Hiimbraydon | 1 | 2017-01-26 08:37:01 UTC | nevw | This appears to be a residential area and you have mapped a river, pier, water??Has this much development occurred recently? This is a public map. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 12:21:52 UTC | CloCkWeRX | There's no river in Sunbury, I think its safe to say this can be reverted | |
| 3 | 2017-01-26 12:39:03 UTC | nevw | Deleted now | |
| 45420642 by Adhitya Dido | 1 | 2017-01-24 07:19:27 UTC | nevw | It is a public map. Please don't put people's names on the map. |
| 2 | 2017-01-24 07:20:48 UTC | Adhitya Dido | I am sorry I just used this for learning purpose only. I will delete the information soon. Thank you :) | |
| 3 | 2017-01-24 07:24:51 UTC | nevw | That's ok. I have already deleted it.Tks | |
| 45234490 by Swyseure | 1 | 2017-01-18 07:38:37 UTC | nevw | Is there is motel named "Home" here or are you referring to the Walpole Hotel accommodation or the Bayside Villas or has this been entered by mistake and you have added your own home location?I have mapped the Walpole Hotel and Bayside Villas. This is a public map. |
| 2 | 2017-01-23 10:53:21 UTC | nevw | no response, deleted "Home" node | |
| 45261923 by beardoggerisok | 1 | 2017-01-18 10:25:09 UTC | nevw | Hiyou seem to have added an unusual and un-tagged way to the openstreetmap.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466841587It is meant to be part of the map and what is it depicting? and should it have some tags or should it be deleted? |
| 2 | 2017-01-23 10:50:12 UTC | nevw | no response, deleted what was likely an uploaded gpx track. | |
| 44994527 by smithmatt261 | 1 | 2017-01-08 07:54:45 UTC | nevw | Hi smithmatt261welcome to openstreetmap.I noticed that you added name=133 to the motorway junction.I think it should probably be ref=133 instead.See the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junctionandhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Exit_Info |
| 2 | 2017-01-09 08:58:25 UTC | nevw | smithmatt261 has changed all these from name to ref now.Tks | |
| 44885929 by sb9576 | 1 | 2017-01-04 06:15:28 UTC | nevw | What is the reason for access=no on the Lightning Park Recreation Centre Exit and Reid Highway On Ramp |
| 2 | 2017-01-09 01:03:23 UTC | nevw | sb9576 has confirmed the access=no for these ways via a comment on a note I put in the area as follows:"These roads are blocked. I confirmed again on Thursday morning when I drove by. Barriers have been erected on the entry and exit (tagged as barriers in OSM), both of which read "NO ACC... | |
| 44799409 by Ashryn | 1 | 2016-12-31 07:23:55 UTC | nevw | Please only add things that exist in the real world to the OpenStreetMap and not fantasy game items. |
| 2 | 2017-01-05 06:37:19 UTC | nammala | With reference to the above comment, I am reverting the changeset.Regards,nammala | |
| 3 | 2017-01-05 08:22:04 UTC | nevw | Thanks, there are a few more in the area too.Overpass Turbo search: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kWNMany of Ashryn edits are fine and generally to map new footways, but the Pokemon stuff needs to be deleted. | |
| 4 | 2017-01-05 08:35:18 UTC | nevw | mammala, let me know if you want me to delete the other Pokemon ones. I will check the footways and join to roadways where it looks appropriate, though I am not local to this area, and will need to use satellite data. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-05 08:35:35 UTC | nammala | Thanks nevw for bringing this up. I have deleted the bad stuff on map. Please feel free to remove the bad data which is on the map. | |
| 6 | 2017-01-05 08:38:15 UTC | nevw | Ok, thanks, I will fix the other bits in next few days. | |
| 7 | 2017-01-05 09:28:20 UTC | nammala | Happy Mapping | |
| 34083897 by Ewen Hill | 1 | 2016-12-19 07:09:11 UTC | mrpulley | I was wondering about this way:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371182878It's marked as source = GPS tracksWhen I visited here in 2010, the first section of the Big Bend track had been realigned (see the ways marked 'Big Bend Walk'). I was wondering if the old track had been reopened, or... |
| 2 | 2016-12-22 06:14:28 UTC | nevw | Strava users like the new track that doesn't cross the creek. | |
| 44439970 by Gegiskhan | 1 | 2016-12-22 06:04:01 UTC | nevw | use ele=1380 to tag elevation and not the name tag |
| 44336261 by mad_bison | 1 | 2016-12-12 03:37:56 UTC | nevw | I think you have miss-named this site.I believe it is named Melaluka Bakery Cafe and is this site https://www.facebook.com/MelalukaBakeryCafe/It is spelt differently from the plant species Melaleuca too |
| 44223796 by JonWu@OSM | 1 | 2016-12-07 14:47:25 UTC | nevw | Is "Acc happened" the brand name of the fuel outlet or are you reporting an 'accident happened' here or something different? |
| 2 | 2016-12-11 07:02:41 UTC | nevw | No response - Acc happened. deletedCaltex service station added instead. | |
| 44254893 by Lachx210706 | 1 | 2016-12-08 11:10:56 UTC | nevw | Jessie may well be attractive, but this is not a personal map. I was unable to locate the tourist attraction myself, but if there is a genuine tourism attraction at that location and named Jessie then it should remain, otherwise any personal info should be deleted as it does not belong on a map avai... |
| 2 | 2016-12-11 07:01:33 UTC | nevw | no response - Jessie and Lachlan Lloyd and bench deleted. | |
| 43976742 by JonWu@OSM | 1 | 2016-12-07 15:01:10 UTC | nevw | Which is the correct name of the cafe?name \tMariners Cafename:en \tJohor start point |
| 44223864 by WhateverWhatever | 1 | 2016-12-07 06:41:57 UTC | nevw | Thanks for fixing the platforms up. I always had an uneasy feeling about editing this station and couldn't put my finger on what is was. Seems so obvious now .... only one platform. :)A few change-set comments would be appreciated too. |
| 40450668 by Mander | 1 | 2016-12-04 04:05:47 UTC | paul1928 | It's difficult to spot from the road due to the sharp drop-off, but the track is definitely there and clear to see. |
| 2 | 2016-12-04 06:37:07 UTC | nevw | This section should be added back in if present in any form, even if overgrown. It appears to be a connection between ways. There are plenty of tags to add that describe path visibility. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility | |
| 3 | 2016-12-05 02:15:22 UTC | nevw | highway=path was missing from way and has been re-added on local survey advice from paul1928. | |
| 44109677 by Batareikin | 1 | 2016-12-02 11:23:04 UTC | nevw | Hi Batareikindid you misspell this edit or should it be in Russian script....name \tTaragoname:ru \tТараго |
| 2 | 2016-12-02 13:46:56 UTC | Batareikin | It is all correctIt is Russian so it should be in Cyrillic script | |
| 44014136 by dannykath | 1 | 2016-11-29 04:18:13 UTC | nevw | HiThere is no way between Pinevale Place and Woodlight Street, except by the footway.The tool 'Connecting motorable roads using #to-fix' is not always correct and only a guide that there 'may' be a problem and on satellite imagery it looks like there may be a block too. The driveways do not joi... |
| 2 | 2016-11-29 14:03:47 UTC | dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny | |
| 3 | 2016-11-29 14:04:13 UTC | dannykath | Hey there! thanks for your correction!Best regards Danny | |
| 43864562 by Ossie2020 | 1 | 2016-11-23 07:41:32 UTC | nevw | I noticed you have renamed this peak from Mount Little to Toowoomba. Is this a mistake?The http://qtopo.dnrm.qld.gov.au/Mobile/ map has it marked as Mount Little. |
| 2 | 2016-11-26 14:26:53 UTC | nevw | Corrected name to Mount Little on advice from previous editor | |
| 43301838 by ridixcr | 1 | 2016-11-02 00:09:14 UTC | nevw | The change you have made using satellite info is incorrect. That part of Hercules Road ends in a short stub as previously mapped and has a lift gate to. Bear in mind that programs like #to-fix are only suggesting an error MAY be present, not that there is an error to correct. Mapbox and Bing are out... |
| 2 | 2016-11-02 15:36:54 UTC | ridixcr | Hi newv, Thank you for notifying me about this error and also rectifying it. The imageries are outdated in certain places, agreed. I will make sure to confirm or at least add a note in places of doubt.Thanks for your feedback. | |
| 43167000 by yurasi | 1 | 2016-10-25 21:37:04 UTC | nevw | yurasiThere is a small extension of the road here that you have deleted. I have reinstated it. It is not viewable on the satellite imagery yet as it has recently been developed. Please take care when using tools like To-fix: Unconnected highways. They are often not reporting errors in the map but ... |
| 2 | 2016-10-26 16:43:17 UTC | yurasi | Hi nevw.Thank you for letting me know about this error and rectifying it. I assumed that this highway ended here, as seen in the satellite imagery. I will make sure to check the edit history of any feature before making any changes to it. | |
| 42909719 by humin0129 | 1 | 2016-10-19 05:28:01 UTC | nevw | You are meant to enter the tags name=* in English in this country.If you want to add name=* in Chinese use name:zh=* instead. |
| 2 | 2016-10-19 23:28:12 UTC | CloCkWeRX | Lets revert the renames and move it to the right tags, I think! | |
| 3 | 2016-10-19 23:33:20 UTC | nevw | Agreed. | |
| 4 | 2016-10-19 23:49:54 UTC | CloCkWeRX | All sorted out; some merged with the better features, some removed. | |
| 40293030 by nevw | 1 | 2016-10-17 20:59:18 UTC | Warin61 | Relation (361693) is not closed.. |
| 2 | 2016-10-18 01:23:43 UTC | nevw | Thanks Warin61.I will fix it in next day or so. | |
| 3 | 2016-10-18 11:05:17 UTC | nevw | Relation now closed. | |
| 4 | 2016-10-23 04:25:12 UTC | Warin61 | Goodo.While adding new stuff is what motivates me, 'housekeeping' makes the map work better. I have a few of my own things to 'fix up' too. | |
| 42750593 by Medina Huzejrovic | 1 | 2016-10-10 13:08:28 UTC | nevw | You have mapped a Post Office here with the name HOME.Is there really a Post Office here called HOME?Is it instead your home?Please review this object and tag correctly thanks. |
| 2 | 2016-10-10 14:11:28 UTC | CloCkWeRX | Looking at Australia post, there's several offices on Sydney Rd; and the already mapped post office on Grantham Street. | |
| 41147031 by aaronsta | 1 | 2016-10-03 05:12:38 UTC | nevw | In this changeset you have added Serpentine Airport incorrectly to North Danalup. It was reported by Damon1 3 days ago. I deleted it.This appears to be the correct location for the Serpentine Airport http://airportguide.com/airport/info/YSENhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=-32.39... |
| 37811312 by nevw | 1 | 2016-09-12 23:50:36 UTC | Warin61 | The Styx River is not the boundary of the Styx River State Forest .. nor do I think it is the boundary of the Cunnawarra NP... I have separated it off the Styx River State Forest. Will 'look at' the NP boundary later. |
| 2 | 2016-09-17 09:01:09 UTC | nevw | Yes, looks ok. | |
| 41796677 by vincentwang | 1 | 2016-09-02 10:15:20 UTC | nevw | Hi VincentI notice you have entered 5 hostels on to the openstreetmap with name:zh=I was wondering if that was not the name of the motel but was instead the name of the operator, in which case the key operator= might be more suitable.The http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator page... |
| 40147307 by nevw | 1 | 2016-06-20 02:31:10 UTC | nevw | Changeset comment should have read: Fixed overlapping ways of Kinchega National Park. |
| 39920717 by nevw | 1 | 2016-06-10 01:46:16 UTC | nevw | New relation for Olney State Forest is 6301813 |
| 39919898 by nevw | 1 | 2016-06-09 23:35:26 UTC | nevw | This changeset was to delete overlapping ways. |
| 38164707 by nevw | 1 | 2016-03-30 22:43:14 UTC | TheSwavu | Hi, it would appear that this was broken at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38131822But your fix has now broken Glen Davis and Glen Alice still needs to go back into the correct location. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 05:05:50 UTC | TheSwavu | I reverted 38131822 at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38187799 | |
| 3 | 2016-03-31 06:17:47 UTC | nevw | Thanks, Wollemi National Park, Glen Davis and Glen Alice appear complete now. | |
| 37867512 by nevw | 1 | 2016-03-16 10:27:45 UTC | nevw | ...correction: Wallaroo NP was already mapped. I changed it to share the boundary with the SF on the east side.and added swamps in area. |
| 29084790 by nevw | 1 | 2015-02-25 06:00:54 UTC | nevw | Sourced road name changes from Morton Bay Regional Council |
| 28834070 by nevw | 1 | 2015-02-17 00:00:17 UTC | zool | dear Nev,One of my DWG colleagues had the following suggestion about footpath mapping: "In reality I suspect it's not really a separate footpath at all but just a roadside sidewalk, so I'd have thought that sidewalk=left/right/both on the road itself would be the best representation of ... |
| 2 | 2015-02-17 01:27:22 UTC | nevw | Thanks JoI will make my changesets smaller and save more often with more descriptive text. I do like this method "A different approach is to map each sidewalk as separate ways using highway=footway and an associated footway=sidewalk" as we have many streets without sidewalks, and some ... | |
| 3 | 2015-02-17 02:25:14 UTC | zool | I appreciate the response, Nev!In my personal capacity, i think "tagging for the router / tagging for the renderer" is a trend with long legs... | |
| 4 | 2015-02-17 02:31:22 UTC | nevw | :) | |