OSM changeset discussions of Warin61

Changeset	#	Tmstmp UTC	Contributor	Comment
167673708 by lephan @ 2025-06-16 03:01	1	2025-06-28 01:48	Warin61	Hi Is the pub now closed?
71975066 by mario7436 @ 2019-07-07 07:15	1	2025-06-24 03:22	Warin61	Hi, The 'Bruce Ridge MTB Trails' relation 5341192 looks to me like a collection of mtb routes? And each of these routes now have their own relation? In short I think the relation 5341192 can be deleted .. as each individual route is now mapped and a route relation should be a single route...
14523007 by Conquest @ 2013-01-04 08:19	1	2025-05-21 03:51	Warin61	The government documents don't look to form a route from one place to another but rather to document bicycle infrastructure e.g. bike lanes? Some linkage is shown between the bike lanes. Are the routes all sign posted with the same 'name'?
59796573 by Warin61 @ 2018-06-13 04:38	1	2020-09-16 10:49	TheSwavu ♦544	Hi, Can you remember what you were trying to do here? It looks like you've duplicated some of the tagging from the ways/relations on random boundary nodes. Can I just delete them?
	2	2020-09-19 06:20	Warin61	I was trying to indicate that the landuse is forestry ... rather than simply trees as is assumed by some from the tag landuse=forest. I did this on nodes (not ways) with the tag landuse=forestry. There are 2 NSW Forestry Corporation areas that are not tree production areas, one is a sawmill the ot...
	3	2020-09-19 23:48	TheSwavu ♦544	That doesn't really explain why you've copied the tagging of this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7138489 and put it on this node on the boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4778458694 and this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/586307...
	4	2025-05-20 05:11	aharvey ♦1,694	The duplicate tags on the way nodes still exist. There are multipolygon/boundary relations with landuse=forest, which then contain a single node on one of the ways with landuse=forestry with a matching name. In JOSM, I first used overpass to download operator="Forestry Corporation of NSW&quo...
	5	2025-05-20 07:40	Warin61	The idea is to to avoid the multiple meanings of the tag landuse=forest (as explained in the page Forest) by using the tag landuse=forestry. I never got around to duplicating the relations but used nodes to get an idea of the number. With the increasing pressure to stop all logging and transfer Stat...
	6	2025-05-20 09:55	aharvey ♦1,694	I didn't realise the tagging was a mess, I thought we had landuse=forest for land managed for forestry and natural=wood to say the area is covered in trees, but alas it seems the tagging is still problematic. Given https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=forestry could we not just tag t...
	7	2025-05-20 11:52	Warin61	The tagging in NSW looks ok. I am not so certain in other parts. Duplicate tagging is done in various forms in OSM ... seasonal and intermittent for instance. I did nodes so I could be certain of finding them again, they would be 'better' as duplicate relations but then some would say ...
164404229 by Warin61 @ 2025-04-02 06:41	1	2025-05-19 04:38	radiotrefoil ♦109	Hi, I feel like the access=no tag on way/22731635 is ambiguous given that foot=designated. Just confirming, it is accessible by foot? I understand there is a gate at the western entrance to Ingar Road that can be bypassed on foot but restricts access to cars.
	2	2025-05-19 06:12	Warin61	Access for HGVs, buses, taxies etc etc... Are these all to be stated? The access=no means no access unless there is a following dedicated tag .. such as in this case foot=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=private (to allow NP service vehicles) ...
	3	2025-05-19 06:42	aharvey ♦1,694	HGV, busses, taxis are all covered under `motor_vehicle`. There's not much left outside of motor_vehicle, foot, and bicycle. I understand your point that you're applying a default of no then applying the exceptions, but why should that be access=no vs access=yes. Unlike a military base ...
	4	2025-05-20 07:53	Warin61	I don't think public access by motor vehicle is allowed... locked gates at access points would indicate that?
	5	2025-05-20 08:12	radiotrefoil ♦109	I think `motor_vehicle=private` `foot=designated` `bicycle=designated` is sufficient, considering `motor_vehicle=private` encompasses the only significant access restriction
77402881 by Nait Young @ 2019-11-22 01:43	1	2025-04-27 11:01	Warin61	Hi, Is this route signposted? Most of the route looks to be on paved roads with no cycling infrastructure.
153051148 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-06-23 02:57	1	2025-04-02 06:36	Warin61	Hi, The tracks in the Blue Mts National Park would allow access to parks maintenance and fire vehicles. So might be better tagged access=no, motorvehicle=private, and some foot=yes, bicycle=yes.
151181808 by adster546 @ 2024-05-11 11:30	1	2025-03-31 01:22	Warin61	Hi I have moved the ConocoPhillips Australia office across the road to a building with the same name. Node 2353502584.
164103412 by Warin61 @ 2025-03-26 02:52	1	2025-03-26 02:54	Warin61	Opps.. Failed to edit comment and source. Source bing. Comment Changeset: 164103412 Australia, WA, South Dwellingup. Add more mining hall roads and a conveyor belt.
163631436 by Warin61 @ 2025-03-15 00:16	1	2025-03-22 09:49	tastrax ♦1,144	Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 X...
	2	2025-03-25 09:26	Warin61	Ops .. forgot the + ... thanks.
151745596 by Treadly @ 2024-05-23 22:46	1	2025-03-08 03:29	Warin61	Hi, Are these 2 camp sites part of the Yarri camp site for the Munda Biddi?
	2	2025-03-08 04:36	Treadly ♦3	Yes, they are sites for tents. Not huts. Have you been there to inspect them personally?
	3	2025-03-09 08:46	Warin61	Not been there yet, hopefully Sept this year. I usually check OSM areas that I look to visit so I can improve the map as much as possible before a visit. Then take notes during the visit. I am trying to get some consistency across the Munda Biddi campsites. Basicity I think the tourism=campsite ...
	4	2025-03-09 09:15	Treadly ♦3	I think you are being far too pedantic. The bush and trail surfaces vary greatly over the length of the Mundabiddi and trying to make them "consistent" will means that some are right and some will be wrong. The nature of the trail and site is not consistent so each should be labelled accor...
20249753 by Little Brother @ 2014-01-28 16:30	1	2025-03-06 01:01	Warin61	Thanks for this, much better than those intersecting areas.
134207257 by steerage250 @ 2023-03-28 07:44	1	2025-03-05 04:04	Warin61	Hi, Strictly speaking campsites (and other facilities like toilets etc) are not 'alternatives'. Probably best in a new relation .. 'facilities'?? Anyway I'm looking at doing this in Sept, so tidying up the near camp grounds and will probably look at supermarkets and gen...
	2	2025-03-05 04:39	steerage250 ♦14	Yeah sure, "alternate" was better than under the main relation, but maybe "facilities" would be another improvement
158258620 by gunnar1m @ 2024-10-23 15:07	1	2024-10-31 03:15	Warin61	Ghan route repaired - gap in ways (Alice Springs) route not adjacent to platform.. (Darwin)
158327734 by lucka-me @ 2024-10-25 09:09	1	2024-10-26 23:00	Warin61	Why? Consider the following? 1) OSm maps the coast line at the high tide level 2) local councils control the land/sea between the high tide to low tide levels (ref Local Government Act 1993)
	2	2024-10-27 03:26	lucka-me ♦6	Thank you for pointing them out. I noticed the boundaries and coastlines are crossed, so I thought they might should be merged like how it's mapped in some other countries / regions.
	3	2024-10-27 05:57	Warin61	The rules are not only country dependant but, in at least some cases' state dependant. Further there are exceptions smaller area exception - for example a beach may have the local council boundary extend out to sea to manage sand banks.
158383264 by lucka-me @ 2024-10-26 16:09	1	2024-10-26 23:02	Warin61	I think you should contact locall mappers before doing these kind of changes.
158362583 by TheSwavu @ 2024-10-26 06:16	1	2024-10-26 06:49	Warin61	Think you may want to have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158327734???
	2	2024-10-26 07:28	TheSwavu ♦544	It doesn't look like that one broke anything. I did end up having to manually fix some of them in the end.
158192928 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-10-22 02:34	1	2024-10-23 00:18	Warin61	Cease!!!! I do not believe these are 'unincorporated areas'! NSW lists only 2, TWO, 'unincorporated areas. The 'National Report' states "data in this report that relates to local government may not be directly comparable to that for local governing bodies.&qu...
	2	2024-10-23 00:25	Warin61	The maps avalible (see here https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/territories-regions-cities/local-government/publications/national-reports) do not have the resolution that you have been using ... so what maps are you using - please provide one link to one of the maps.
	3	2024-10-23 01:29	billybobbyjoe ♦5	Anywhere not defined by DCS as a local government area is an unincorporated area. The National Report national map provides the names of the different groupings of unincorporated areas (South Coast, Central Coast, Mid-North Coast and Northern Rivers). DCS boundaries indicate where specifically in th...
	4	2024-10-23 01:31	billybobbyjoe ♦5	I'm using SixMaps, an application for displaying DCS data. I go up the coast and identify the islands not defined in LGAs, thus making them unincorporated areas.
	5	2024-10-23 02:43	aharvey ♦1,694	Either way I think a change of this scale is worth discussion first, especially when there may be different opinions within the community. I'm fine with a revert, followed by a discussion, best to do that on talk-au or https://community.openstreetmap.org/ not here. > this data is free ...
	6	2024-10-23 07:41	Warin61	SIX maps are a no no... Use the DCS Base Map that should be available in your editor ... possibly under 'imagery' 'map'... Note this does not identify 'unincorporated areas' ... ------------------- Do these areas you have identified have a local population? If n...
	7	2024-10-24 04:31	Warin61	Part revert to restore non crossing of ways.
158193822 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-10-22 03:43	1	2024-10-23 23:40	Warin61	Reverted. a) No one lives on Bird Isl. so no one can elect a local government. b) it is controlled by NPWS..
158125086 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-10-20 11:54	1	2024-10-21 06:45	Warin61	Wrong? There are only 2 areas in NSW that are 'unincorporated'. https://pastvtr.elections.nsw.gov.au/LGE2017/lge-unincorporated.htm This changeset also broke the relation 5729534 the suburb of Sydney...
	2	2024-10-21 07:09	Warin61	And relation 5657443 .. there could be others... Should this changeset be reverted?
	3	2024-10-21 07:18	Warin61	The boundary relation 5657443 from the way 1016554163 looks to be in error using the DCS Base Map ... the error looks to be made by this changeset.
	4	2024-10-21 08:02	Warin61	I have downloaded some of this changeset, it did time out... JOSM validator reports 10 errors and 131 warnings. There are a number of 1 member relations that could be removed and the tags placed on the way... KISS.
	5	2024-10-22 01:43	billybobbyjoe ♦5	Hi Warin, these boundaries are correct per the latest DCS and Local Government National Report data. I fixed the errors you pointed out, feel free to let me know of any more or fix them yourself. I couldn't find any 1 member relations?
	6	2024-10-23 23:23	Warin61	Pyrmont Bay Park ... an unincorporated area? Just NO! It is controlled by Sydney City Council!!!! Similarly for other things in this area... they are not "unincorporated areas" in any way...
157846342 by ChonkerStonker @ 2024-10-13 17:51	1	2024-10-14 23:29	Warin61	relation 18159674 has only outers..looks like many of them should be inners.
	2	2024-10-15 20:36	Warin61	See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=114.67982&lat=-25.63163&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2C...
157562176 by bob3bob3 @ 2024-10-07 01:57	1	2024-10-08 00:33	Warin61	Hi Why a multipolygon for the Lismore Garden Centre??? It brakes the 'rules' fr a multipolygon - shared segment .. I have transferred the tags to a single node. The 2 ways I have made on into a building the other a nursery
157493791 by computerOwl @ 2024-10-05 10:24	1	2024-10-05 23:57	Warin61	Hi Placing individual trees into an area marked as a tree area does not make sense. I have deleted the individual trees. Mapping a row of trees as a tree area ... well OSM have a tag 'tree_row' for that... I have simplified ways here too ... over 1,500 deletions...
	2	2024-10-06 01:06	computerOwl ♦23	Hi there, I don't see a problem with placing individual trees into a tree area. If you don't want that, then why is there an option for it? -computerHawk
	3	2024-10-06 07:50	Warin61	The guide is "one feature = one 0SM entry" By putting a tree node inside a tree area it is effectually mapped twice.
157279602 by aharvey @ 2024-09-30 05:31	1	2024-10-01 00:31	Warin61	Hi, Would it not be 'better' (what ever that means) to join between the natural features to form a closed relation??? At the moment this relation throws errors ..
	2	2024-10-01 05:33	aharvey ♦1,694	Yeah absolutely. I was going to do that, but as a first draft found it easier to just sketch out the rough location first. Improvements welcome.
	3	2024-10-01 09:51	TheSwavu ♦544	Hi, I've looked at the GNB description. It seems to be a little vague about where the southern boundary. What do you think about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319834762 as a candidate?
157118089 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-26 09:39	1	2024-09-27 00:49	Warin61	The pool ways have far too much resolution! They have been simplified with an automatic tool - maximum error of 0.5 meters.
	2	2024-09-28 20:36	computerOwl ♦23	Hi there Warin61, So what if the pools high resolution? I don't see a problem in that -computerOwl
	3	2024-09-29 07:19	Warin61	Issues; Data bloat Who needs more accuracy than 0.5 metres? Consider most people would be unable to resolve 0.5 metres...
	4	2024-09-29 21:11	computerOwl ♦23	True- but holding down space and just putting your curser around complex shares like pools which have like 100 different circles in them, is much easier. I understand where your coming from, and next time I won't go so... overkill.
	5	2024-09-30 09:32	Warin61	Done it myself - trees in the blue mountains... That automated tool put me in my place. Usually the tool is run with a 5 meter acceptable accuracy .. I run it with 0.5 meter as that to me retains more of the actual shape.
156940942 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-22 08:46	1	2024-09-23 01:23	Warin61	Hi Way 1317342610 self intercepts.. Looks like it has been 'squared' when it is not a square. Suggest mapping the grey roof area alone as the house, the rest are garages, carports and service buildings...
	2	2024-09-23 05:28	fortera_au ♦1,063	A lot of these buildings don't look like they've been squared, and there's also a lot of extra bits that aren't the house, verandahs aren't part of the building, but can be added separately with appropriate tagging too. --- Published u...
	3	2024-09-28 07:02	computerOwl ♦23	Hi there, I don't see an issue if it intercepts. You canchange it if it really bothers you Warin61. fortera_au, I never knew that. From now on, I won't make that mistake.
	4	2024-09-28 08:34	Warin61	When an area, such as a building, has the way cross itself ... what part is the area for the building? Is the small bit that is formed by the crossing part of the building or not? This is not a personal problem for me but one of data confusion. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Self_intersec...
	5	2024-09-28 09:23	computerOwl ♦23	Ok, in future edits, I will make sure this does not happen.
	6	2024-09-29 07:21	Warin61	Umm .. we all make errors and the future is hopefully a long time. Keep mapping and don't be scared of making errors.
151559601 by Warin61 @ 2024-05-20 04:38	1	2024-09-27 10:14	TheSwavu ♦544	Hi, This changeset deleted the bounded locality of Stirling Ranges National Park. Is there a reason you did this?
	2	2024-09-28 08:39	Warin61	There were two relation for the park.. pick one and one only? One feature = one OSM entry. I picked the one that looked to have the most detail.
157113794 by Poshy163 @ 2024-09-26 07:46	1	2024-09-27 01:04	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! I have restored Node: 2548179394 back to where it was. This is used by administrative boundaries (suburbs etc) and is sourced from government data. Not the end of the world... Keep mapping, have fun.
	2	2024-09-27 01:43	fortera_au ♦1,063	Hey, driveways shouldn't really be attached to buildings, and I usually wouldn't map any that aren't a decent length, they're not actually a road. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157113794
	3	2024-09-27 07:24	Warin61	@ fortera_au Driveways can terminate at garages i.e. a building. You might like to mention which driveway the comment is directed at?
	4	2024-09-27 07:57	fortera_au ♦1,063	I've rarely seen them drawn when it's just enough room for a car or two, and confirming they're actually going into a garage isn't the easiest with aerial imagery. If there's areas where each one is mapped, I'd love to see how it's been done there, but I've ne...
96917824 by pyram @ 2021-01-04 15:12	1	2024-09-26 03:50	Warin61	Hi Way 891936930 crosses itself.
	2	2024-09-29 10:02	pyram ♦502	Nothing to do: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891936930 (fixed by VLD293)
156987615 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-23 10:08	1	2024-09-24 01:21	Warin61	Hi Way 1317550766 crosses itself.
156941421 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-22 09:01	1	2024-09-23 01:23	Warin61	Hi Way 1317344351 (building house) self intercepts. Part of it looks like a separate garage.
	2	2024-09-23 05:27	fortera_au ♦1,063	Hey, I'd recommend pressing Q in iD/JOSM to square off buildings, a lot of these have non-90 degree angles which are pretty rare for houses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156941421
156896440 by Snail126 @ 2024-09-21 05:56	1	2024-09-21 23:37	Warin61	Hi, The multipolygone relation is not correct - shared segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.25924&lat=-35.29263&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersec...
	2	2024-09-22 03:35	nevw ♦1,974	I changed the multipolygon to simple polygons. Other problems not addressed.
156855665 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-20 08:32	1	2024-09-21 02:05	Warin61	Hi Way 1316872614 self intersects..
156800341 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-19 03:50	1	2024-09-20 03:01	Warin61	Hi, Way 1316561107 (grass) is not correct, it intersects itself .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12449&lat=-35.29970&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cinter...
156632198 by AntiCompositeNumber @ 2024-09-15 02:31	1	2024-09-16 17:20	watmildon ♦243	Really nice work! Even got the comms tower!
	2	2024-09-17 23:16	Warin61	Pity it brakes the rules for a multipolygon relation ... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.85584&lat=-32.28382&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cin...
	3	2024-09-18 04:06	AntiCompositeNumber ♦30	That was the best I could do in Go Map!, now fixed.
130550647 by ConsEbt @ 2022-12-27 10:52	1	2024-09-15 22:45	Warin61	Hi, The DCS Imagery now shows detail for things here. However another mapper looks to be using Esri imagery that is 'different' from others .. which imagery is more upto date???
156649707 by Malina854987 @ 2024-09-15 14:18 Active block	1	2024-09-15 22:43	Warin61	Some mapped buildings at mona vale hospital don't appear in bing imagery nor DCS imagery .. Source??? Esri???
156349905 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-09-08 12:31	1	2024-09-15 03:04	Warin61	Relation 14309095 Canberra Xplorer train route errors.. Stop or platform at end of relation Stop position in wrong order There could be others...
	2	2024-09-17 12:16	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	should be fixed now, not sure how this edit affected the stop order
156596219 by computerOwl @ 2024-09-14 04:53	1	2024-09-14 23:13	Warin61	Hi, Building way 1315454534 has an error - it intersects itself. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.16100&lat=-33.71926&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cinters...
54906059 by Beanonymous @ 2017-12-25 12:21	1	2024-09-12 00:19	Warin61	Hi, A 'football filed' should be tagged leisure=pitch, sport=rugby or soccer or australian_football ... the name tag should never be used t describe something.
156466674 by Beanonymous @ 2024-09-11 06:09	1	2024-09-12 00:16	Warin61	Hi Relation 18029993 (construction) is technically incorrect. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.55537&lat=-38.17419&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersect...
156297594 by GuardedBear @ 2024-09-07 03:44	1	2024-09-07 23:49	Warin61	NO! Use of Six Maps brakes their copyright! Use DCS Base Map instead! ----------------- The JOSM validator would have issued a warning on way 1311765931 - 'self crossing way' these should be fixed before upload.
	2	2024-09-08 02:25	GuardedBear ♦2	Didn't see a validation error upon upload (they normally popup and I fix them), but fixed it now nevertheless. I've been using DCS Base Map for tracing/aligning buildings, and then SIX Maps for confirming the address for each building (since I was told that's the canonical source f...
	3	2024-09-08 08:24	Warin61	DCS has 3 entries for OSM; Imagery - that is what you are using for building footprints, hte base map does not show them. Topographical .. good for large things - like the big power lines as it shows the voltages . Base Map - shows the addresses. Note: Six Maps is commercial .. and they will ...
	4	2024-09-08 10:52	GuardedBear ♦2	Thanks, I didn't know about the addresses on the base map. I'll make sure to use that in future.
129802956 by Harsimranjit Kaur @ 2022-12-07 01:29	1	2024-09-07 23:48	Warin61	Conflicts... between tags maxspeed=x and existing maxspeed:forward=y and maxspeed:backwards=z.
119000490 by QC3 Construction @ 2022-03-28 01:47	1	2022-03-28 09:17	nevw ♦1,974	Your depiction of the sports Field bears little resemblance to satellite imagery. The previous mapper have and oval/circle shape around each of the pitches which seems closer to reality. Another bounded by all the grassed area maybe a reasonable addition.
	2	2022-03-30 07:14	QC3 Construction ♦9	Satalite image is old and i know the place very well.
	3	2022-03-30 07:34	nevw ♦1,974	Hi that’s for replying. Local knowledge is best so your mapping is valued highly. The latest satellite imagery is likely to be Maxar and you can switch to use it in iD. It is of lower resolution though so often switching between Bing and Maxar works well.
	4	2022-03-30 11:09	Warin61	The cricket playing area now has no resemblance to the official cricket area ... must be some new form of cricket? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cricket_field_parts.svg "A circular cricket field is considered as the perfect field but generally a cricket pitch is slightly oval. I...
	5	2022-03-31 07:12	Warin61	Should I remap back to a circle, or will you QC3 Construction?
	6	2022-04-15 07:51	Warin61	Re set the single cricket pitch back to a circle - used bing. Maxar is usually the latest imagery OSM has available now, that simply shows grass .. possibly out of cricket season.
	7	2024-09-05 07:18	QC3 Construction ♦9	not a cricket pitch mate
	8	2024-09-05 08:21	Warin61	Bing still shows a cricket pitch .. other imagery shows nothing. 2 years ago the change you made still had a cricket pitch here. As we are coming out of winter perhaps St Marks Anglican Community School will once again have a cricket pitch here... assuming it has not been made into something else?...
142179639 by Lockstar @ 2023-10-05 09:09	1	2024-08-28 01:17	Warin61	layer=-1 implies these footways are below the roads they cross... Wrong.
	2	2024-09-02 11:44	Lockstar ♦26	I've worked out what happened here. Where footways cross through or under buildings, OSM prompts a response (above or below) and setting the layer. Ways need to be split so only the section under/within the building is layer=-1
	3	2024-09-03 08:55	Warin61	The convention is layer=0 is 'ground level' .. The foot path would be ground level? So the building would be layer=1 - above ground???
155536818 by Jack Boschert @ 2024-08-21 04:26	1	2024-08-21 05:18	Warin61	Hi, Relation 17953279 (marsh) has problems ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.99086&lat=-37.64228&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersect...
	2	2024-08-29 00:45	Warin61	How about fixing this???
	3	2024-08-29 03:40	Jack Boschert ♦6	All done, thanks
139273216 by arctic-rocinante @ 2023-07-31 21:55	1	2024-08-28 01:07	Warin61	Bridges are usually layer=1 so they go over a water way...
	2	2024-08-28 01:54	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Whoops, I hadn’t realised that. Thanks for fixing!
155827030 by fwonp @ 2024-08-27 11:35	1	2024-08-28 00:51	Warin61	Hi, Why do you have duplicated segments? This is the third one I have come accross of yours... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.02114&lat=-33.73112&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment...
155694739 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-08-24 12:51	1	2024-08-25 23:28	Warin61	Parking relation deleted. Parking tags on ways... KISS
78020394 by wasgij @ 2019-12-06 00:39	1	2020-01-11 23:51	Warin61	Hi, What information does the route=power relation give? Would not the lines give you that information? And what is ref=KTS-SBY1? And where does it come from+
	2	2024-08-06 05:25	tonyf1 ♦471	KTS-SBY1 is a 66kV line from Keilor Terminal Station to Sunbury Zone Substation, one of two, the other KTS-SBY2. I suppose it has a similar role as a highway as a relation of road sections. I think the name is marked on the poles but I haven't checked yet. You say "where does it come from&...
	3	2024-08-06 09:34	Warin61	Have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal
	4	2024-08-08 22:44	tonyf1 ♦471	Thanks Warin for pointing this proposal out. We havent heard from wasgij in 4 years so are unlikely to get a reply now. Can you be more specific on what you are questioning?
	5	2024-08-09 09:09	Warin61	Not a 'power line' person but I came across this 'route' .. was interested but could not reconcile my concept of 'route' with power lines. The KTS SBY are abbreviations ... be nice to know if there were some way of confirming the ref values given. But this is a dist...
	6	2024-08-17 00:44	tonyf1 ♦471	Not sure what you are questioning about 'route' but Ive looked at the ref values around Belgrave Zone Substation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159814853 ref=BGE. BGE is fed by 2 66kV feeders from East Rowville Terminal Station, ERTS and Ferntree Gully Zone Substation FGY. The lines are...
	7	2024-08-17 10:32	Warin61	Routes entered by this changeset; https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6969948 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6969949 The proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal goes into why 'route=power' is not a good idea.
148959795 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-03-21 12:10	1	2024-06-14 11:34	Warin61	Hi, The complete line is not operational, the bit that is non operational should be tagged as under construction...
	2	2024-08-17 04:30	Warin61	No communication - yet altered back to operational 2 months ago .. while still not operational.. Poor behavior.
155100942 by Taya_S @ 2024-08-11 12:49	1	2024-08-12 04:02	Warin61	Hi, Have you read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=bay?uselang=en ???
	2	2024-08-12 05:32	Taya_S ♦978	Yes
	3	2024-08-12 10:20	Warin61	Would you care to explain whey the bay node has been deleted and moved to a relation? I note the accepted practice in OSM is to have the bay represented by a node..
	4	2024-08-12 11:18	Taya_S ♦978	Over 25% of bays are mapped as areas, so that statement is wrong. Just to give you 2 examples in Australia alone: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9425816 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9426166
	5	2024-08-13 07:07	Warin61	Quotes from OSM wiki on bay.. Bays are frequently mapped as nodes, and rarely as areas. Large bays can be mapped as areas but the resulting multipolygon relations will often be extremely large and complex so mapping with nodes is preferable End quotes... Some 56,450 mapped as nodes .. som...
155128042 by Warin61 @ 2024-08-12 04:07	1	2024-08-12 05:39	Taya_S ♦978	Its not really appreciated that you immediatly reverted this entire changeset. This is a simple broken relation fix that you could have also either fixed yourself or alerted me about.
	2	2024-08-12 10:18	Warin61	1) I have not examined the changeset so cannot say what else it may have damaged. 2) The accepted practice is to have bays as nodes. The changeset remove the node and replaced it with a relation .. a relation that excludes various islands that maybe incudes in the bay... The reversion simply r...
137649481 by Stephen Males @ 2023-06-22 14:04	1	2024-08-11 01:31	Warin61	Hi, The Watreloo Rd bicycle route ... there does not appear to be any signs (a display of the name on a public notice along the route) . Further some of the 'cycleway' is incorrect in that there is no bicycle permission evident in some parts... Following personal survey by bicycle I h...
124505564 by Maradona11 @ 2022-08-05 05:46	1	2024-08-07 00:53	Warin61	I have remove some of the bicycle=designated as there is no on the ground indication. Possibly a gov map may make the claim but that may not have been implemented...
154506663 by plan9fromsubi @ 2024-07-28 06:13	1	2024-08-01 02:15	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. This particular relation is not required .. further the ways should be combined into one way and even combined with way 1304201064 ... as both tree areas are adjacent with one another.. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas...
154583780 by PurpleMoo @ 2024-07-29 23:27	1	2024-07-31 00:46	Warin61	Hi Welcome to OSM. You are very valuable as a local contributor getting stuff 'us' remote contributors cannot see. However there are 2 errors from this changeset that I have corrected. It is ok, we all make errors, more frequently when we start out. So; The library building is not pa...
154327754 by {~Bob~}10+00 @ 2024-07-24 00:13	1	2024-07-24 03:22	Warin61	The name tag is for the name only .. not descriptions. e.g. name=barn already correctly tagged building-barn. Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
154327950 by {~Bob~}10+00 @ 2024-07-24 00:34	1	2024-07-24 03:18	Warin61	What are you trying to do??? These ways should not be named!
154327861 by {~Bob~}10+00 @ 2024-07-24 00:24	1	2024-07-24 03:15	Warin61	Why??? This makes no difference, none. Why do it? The way should not be named!
154290474 by {~Bob~}10+00 @ 2024-07-23 06:33	1	2024-07-23 23:39	Warin61	Hi, You change the role of a way in a multipolygon relation from 'outer' to 'inner' ... make no sense as it is the outside edge of the trees. The comment 'boundary line reversed ' is also puzzling as the direction of a boundary line makes no difference to anything?...
154179266 by AU_SPM @ 2024-07-20 13:19	1	2024-07-21 01:02	Warin61	Hi, OSM multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. I have deleted the relation and made a simple way with the tags .. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112469850
	2	2024-07-22 00:19	AU_SPM ♦3	Thanks for that @Warin61, much appreciated. Cheers, AU_SPM
89609359 by 99of9 @ 2020-08-19 06:03	1	2024-07-20 06:59	Warin61	Hi Were the M2 crosses Devlins Ck.. the M2 made a bridge here .. there is no culvert nor tunnel .. but a bridge. This is knowledge from before the M2 was constructed.
153624480 by BaileyNelly @ 2024-07-06 13:42	1	2024-07-07 00:46	nevw ♦1,974	Hi, can you give some more information on why you have added a park named 'abandon' to part of Port Pirie and added no access tags to Vera Street. The park has also been added to the Upper Spencer Gulf Marine Park.
	2	2024-07-07 01:15	Warin61	I have removed this 'park' from the Marine Park. The 'park' appears to contain some houses... The 'park' does need some explanation.. does not appear on the Regional Council webpages.
	3	2024-07-07 01:33	nevw ♦1,974	The houses appear to being removed from the area and looking on the Port Pirie Development Plan, it may be part of coastal conservation plans.
	4	2024-07-07 05:31	nevw ♦1,974	This explains the removal of the houses in the area in 2023. https://www.pirie.sa.gov.au/noticeboard/latest-news/closure-of-roads-north-of-frederick-road-in-port-pirie-west
	5	2024-07-07 05:36	nevw ♦1,974	An ABC article from 2022 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-02/port-pirie-lead-smelter-abandoned-homes-demolished-contaminated/101724554
	6	2024-07-07 07:35	Warin61	Don't think it would be a 'park' then, Could be boundary=hazard, hazard=contamination and even contamination=lead ...
	7	2024-07-08 01:49	nevw ♦1,974	Thanks for the feedback BaileyNelly. I have added tags in line with Warin's suggestion plus a few more which are inline with the osm wiki. I didn't add the fence as I couldn't see it on the imagery to be able to place it but I have added access=no to the area.
	8	2024-07-08 01:52	nevw ♦1,974	I also added the ABC article website as it explains the situation well.
	9	2024-07-08 01:59	nevw ♦1,974	I also realigned the streets to Esri imagery as it is more accurately aligned than Bing
	10	2024-07-08 06:47	Warin61	Thanks BaileyNelly and nevw.
153545580 by ChonkerStonker @ 2024-07-04 12:45	1	2024-07-07 01:38	Warin61	Relation 17803642 is wrong in several ways... building= one thing or the other not hospital;roof.. Multipoygon outer ways cannot share segments!!! --------------------- corrections... Way 17803642 building=roof, layer=1 Way 276984375 building=hospital, name=Normanby House This simp...
153580488 by hillster @ 2024-07-05 09:51	1	2024-07-07 01:29	Warin61	Hi, The multipolygon relation for the picnic site does not meet the 'multipolygon rules'. I have deleted the relation. Made the south western area into the camping area, and thee north eastern area into the picnic area. See what you think?
	2	2024-07-07 08:01	hillster ♦1	thanks, i was going to clean it up when i visit the northern side in the car when its not so wet. i walked to the southern side and found the way cut by the creek and was unable to gps fix everything on the northern side
153575308 by Harry1257 @ 2024-07-05 07:26	1	2024-07-06 02:11	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! For information... multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. Relation 17806381 has been deleted. What were the outer ways are now tagged building=retail. The bing imagery looks to have an offset to the OSM mapped roads by 5 metres..
153354631 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-06-30 05:02	1	2024-07-02 00:50	Warin61	Why remove the platforms??? Recognized roles are 'stop' not 'stop_on_demand', 'stop_entry_only' and 'stop_exit_only' - all rejected by QA tools... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=148.82043&lat=-33.21512&zoom=9&...
	2	2024-07-02 08:49	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	hmm, this seems to a major flaw with that QA tool. It also seems to reject route=light_rail which is just as widely used as these relation roles. Based on https://github.com/geofabrik/osmi_pubtrans3/pull/10 it seems like this QA tool has been abandoned, and basic fixes like this are not being accept...
	3	2024-07-03 08:50	Warin61	These and not part of PTv2 'stop_on_demand', 'stop_entry_only' etc. Useful - yes. But not part of the original PTv2. These additions should make it a new version...
	4	2024-07-03 08:52	Warin61	The different tool looks to be metro only .. that would not cover the Gahn, India Pacific etc.
153357699 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-06-30 07:35	1	2024-07-02 00:45	Warin61	Why have the platforms been removed from the relation 16305120 ??? The relation role 'stop_on_demand' does not seam to exist? It is being rejected by the QA tools.
	2	2024-07-02 01:17	Warin61	Arr found it. Unfortunately not compatible with PTv2 .. raised on the wiki suggested using PTv3 and keeping PTv2 for the present.
153390309 by AU_SPM @ 2024-07-01 01:11	1	2024-07-02 00:31	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygons outer ways cannot share segments .. so the relation is faulty. The DCS Base Map is another source for the legal boundaries of things. For instance the road side footpath is not part of the park but part of the road infrastructure .. comes out of a different accounting pocket. ...
153351828 by Fizzie-DWG @ 2024-06-30 00:36	1	2024-06-30 04:43	Warin61	Hi, Not certain what is going on... but there are a number of issues with both the coast line and the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area relation 10156269 - self crossing ways e.g. Way: 20670282 and relation not closed. Is this a reverter fault???
	2	2024-06-30 05:40	Fizzie-DWG ♦31,875	Yeah, it could be, sorry, Warin? We had to delete a heap of beach names that had been imported from a bad source & that may have damaged things?
	3	2024-06-30 07:13	Warin61	Ok .. I hjave locally reverted this changeset .. and that looks like it confirms that this changeset is the cause of the issue.. I have fixed up 2 problems down in Vic. that may also be caused by these reversions. Is the name of the beaches the only issue? Might be better off using a differen...
	4	2024-06-30 23:12	Fizzie-DWG ♦31,875	Thanks for fixing them, Warin. Yep, beach names were the issue. PM also sent.
	5	2024-07-01 03:41	nevw ♦1,974	Hi, I have begun repairing the osmi areas along the Qld coast following the beach revert.
	6	2024-07-01 04:45	Fizzie-DWG ♦31,875	Thanks, Nev.
	7	2024-07-01 06:11	nevw ♦1,974	Qld coast repairs now complete.
	8	2024-07-01 06:20	Fizzie-DWG ♦31,875	Awesome!
153140364 by xillo @ 2024-06-25 05:58	1	2024-06-26 00:57	Warin61	Hi, In Austrlai we associate an address with a building, not the entrance way. In the case of Node: 12008941940 this appears to be the entrance to a vehicle garage, not the residence. The address for Node: 12008889339 is incorrect, see the DCS Base Map! The buildings appear to be offset and...
149974442 by Warin61 @ 2024-04-14 02:03	1	2024-06-25 01:58	kimo ♦26	Yes, this residential area is real. The Bing and Esri aerial imagery show active residential development so expect the area to continue expanding. Is there a specific part of the residential area that concerns you?
	2	2024-06-25 07:51	Warin61	2 month later? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148866385 .. the mapper did not respond, the listed source did not support the entry. Is this now residential, not planned nor under construction>?
152897706 by LudirousGib @ 2024-06-19 13:31	1	2024-06-20 01:00	Warin61	Reverted. A source for admin boundaries that is easy to use is the DCS Base Map. Please don't damage a boundary such that it is not useable, fix it yes but damage no.
152744081 by billybobbyjoe @ 2024-06-16 03:51	1	2024-06-17 00:47	Warin61	Hi Welcome to OSM Concerning relation 17722831 -farmland; If this has an address then the address tags should be on the relation, not on a node as a member of the relation. As the address is within a building I have left that there - deliveries would then be directed to that building. I have re...
	2	2024-06-17 05:04	billybobbyjoe ♦5	Hey Warin, I've done this for all the farms in this area. Do you want me to change it so the address applies to the farm itself or the farm's main building?
	3	2024-06-17 05:07	billybobbyjoe ♦5	I assumed it would be done the way I did it because when searching the address it could bring up the farm AS WELL as the main building, although not strictly tagging the building with the address.
	4	2024-06-17 07:21	Warin61	Where the address should be is 'contentious' within OSM. Some think it should be where the post goes - a 'letter box'... However it should only be on one feature, that is the OSM guide. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses The role 'address' in a ...
152356988 by Lotte S @ 2024-06-07 04:45	1	2024-06-09 01:03	Warin61	Welcome to OSM! The relation of the Barr Smith reading room is wrong; multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... I take it the two member ways have different levels??? Tag each way as builing part with the correct levels .. and then... The Way: Barr Smith Library (678979212) looks to be ...
	2	2024-06-16 01:06	Warin61	Ok, I have attempted to detail this library... The building base is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292752686 - this carries the tags for the library. It should have the highest level tagged on it.. I think arr yes .. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part I think I have it...
152502920 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-10 15:21	1	2024-06-12 01:24	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152512310 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-10 19:02	1	2024-06-12 01:23	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152513032 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-10 19:21	1	2024-06-12 01:23	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152513606 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-10 19:39	1	2024-06-12 01:16	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152545622 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-11 14:11	1	2024-06-12 01:16	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152548689 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-11 15:22	1	2024-06-12 01:15	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152550633 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-11 16:12	1	2024-06-12 01:11	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152565222 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-12 00:08	1	2024-06-12 00:52	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted. Past edits using nearmap are about to be reverted too. Future changesets too...
152505334 by Purin128 @ 2024-06-10 16:16	1	2024-06-12 00:49	Warin61	Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps Reverted.
152488183 by Lockstar @ 2024-06-10 09:28	1	2024-06-11 01:45	Warin61	Hi, How about this? When you enter a new bus route, untill it complies, or as near as you can get it, with public transport version 2 you leave the tag for public transport version 2 out of it? That way the QA tools won't pick it up and it won't annoy me...
	2	2024-06-11 05:00	Lockstar ♦26	OK - agreed. I'll leave the v2 tag off new routes until I'm completely finished and satisfied it's compliant. Sometimes there's a time gap from when I start entering to when I finish, unfortunately. Cheers.
	3	2024-06-11 07:07	Warin61	Me too with the time gap. I've done a tree area in WA that is wrong - imagery shows the old fire damage so I've map that .. need to change it to a more realistic area as trees have regrown... been a week or 2..
152474332 by Warin61 @ 2024-06-10 00:13	1	2024-06-10 03:18	TheSwavu ♦544	Sorry Warin, I had to revert this changeset to successfully revert the other ones. You'll need to redo your other fixes again. Apologies.
	2	2024-06-10 07:39	Warin61	No worries! And no need to apologise.
152328345 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-06-06 11:53	1	2024-06-08 02:48	Warin61	Multipolygon outer ways cannot share the same segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.20230&lat=-33.85839&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cin...
	2	2024-06-10 05:54	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	sorry, it's fixed now
	3	2024-06-10 07:38	Warin61	No need to apologise! Thanks for fixing it. Been past it a few times never bothered to map it. Not going to this years Vivid either .. went last year and it was jam packed. I'll go next year, might have improved pedestrian traffic by them..
	4	2024-06-11 10:50	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	haha it was just as jam packed this time... maybe the new metro line will help next year
152401132 by elipoloos @ 2024-06-08 06:52	1	2024-06-10 00:59	Warin61	Reverted. The island already has 2 admin relations...
152442537 by elipoloos @ 2024-06-09 07:53	1	2024-06-10 00:38	Warin61	Source? Relations not closed 17693188 17693197 17693193 17693192 Possibly more ....
	2	2024-06-10 02:12	TheSwavu ♦544	Several other problems: 1. These are not real bounded localities 2. Admin level 6 and 9 are a maintained import from PSMA https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries If you want to change how this is done please open a topic on the OSM community forum and outlin...
140204817 by Mavvie @ 2023-08-22 00:49	1	2024-06-10 00:28	Warin61	Double tagging... The campgounds are already tagged in a relation. I have removed the relation, placing those tags on to the individual campgrounds.
152416058 by elipoloos @ 2024-06-08 14:02	1	2024-06-09 03:30	TheSwavu ♦544	There are several issues with this: 1. It has broken the boundary of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/296933 2. admin_level 6 is for local government areas. By definition unincorporated areas are not LGAs. 3. Much of your "unincorporated" areas are in LGAs according to the N...
	2	2024-06-09 23:45	Warin61	Also breaks the relation for the Sydney Harbor National Park. And what source has been used???
	3	2024-06-09 23:49	Warin61	And the unincorporated relation is broken at the Macquarie Lighthouse...
	4	2024-06-10 00:15	Warin61	I have repaired the Syd. Harbor National Park using the DCS Base Map.
	5	2024-06-10 03:03	TheSwavu ♦544	This is not an unincorporated area. The Sydney Harbour Federation Trust is a Commonwealth body that manages the NSW land the Commonwealth own around Sydney Harbour. The land itself is in the various LGAs. To fix this I am going to have to revert four of your changesets. Would you please stop e...
152360356 by KNAPPO @ 2024-06-07 06:44	1	2024-06-09 01:36	Warin61	Car parking down not extend to the pedestrian crossings... I have detailed the car parking in this area.
152366839 by Lockstar @ 2024-06-07 09:34	1	2024-06-08 03:03	Warin61	Still broken. 21 The Entrance North to Gosford, Way members unordered or missing
151150884 by adster546 @ 2024-05-10 14:53	1	2024-06-06 01:07	Warin61	The 'fix' applied to Way: 274800080 has the road go over the top of a building. The truth is it goes along side the building! Either move the road or move the buildings! From the location of the local roads it looks to me like the buildings should be moved to the bing imagery location.....
151582443 by Purin128 @ 2024-05-20 14:04	1	2024-06-04 05:15	Warin61	Hi, Stop positions must be on a train line way .. and be part of, connected to, that way. Node 8382297622 Keon Park is not on a train line... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8382297622
149684085 by Lockstar @ 2024-04-07 09:35	1	2024-06-04 00:16	Warin61	Bus route 259 - Macquarie Park... I have re-sequenced the ways I have added public_transport=platform to some 18 bus stops .. looks to be a common error There are a number of these faulty bus routes.. this one has not been touched for some 2 months. This one may now be fixed.
151985311 by Dominic_Burns @ 2024-05-29 11:53	1	2024-06-01 23:29	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Please make your changeset comments more descriptive... I see no 766 thing here .. Bus 612 and Box Hill Station yes... but no 766. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
	2	2024-06-01 23:37	Dominic_Burns ♦2	Hi, the 766 runs from Box Hill to Burwood along Whitehorse Road, Elgar Road, Mont Albert Road, Union Road, Riversdale Road, Through Road, Thomas Street, and Warrigal Road. I have followed the OSM Wiki, which says to separate the route into the two directions. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik...
	3	2024-06-02 07:36	Warin61	Ok, So "update bus route 766 and separate into 2 relations for each direction" could be a better changeset comment.. I think..
151803005 by Daninho Soares @ 2024-05-25 09:55	1	2024-05-26 00:51	Warin61	Hi The relation 562702 has no closed outer and needs to be fixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/562702#map=14/-3.9604/141.3128 Note both outer ways have been modified by you...
151800257 by Yashraj Shelke @ 2024-05-25 08:42	1	2024-05-26 00:36	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! A relation is not required for a simple building, this has been deleted and the building mapping corrected. . see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286513534 Most buildings are 'square' meaning they have 90 degree corners. You can 'square' a selected ...
8301357 by Treadly @ 2011-05-31 13:00	1	2024-05-23 05:01	Warin61	This 'Nature Reserve' ???? Previously tagged 'Wellington National Park'... Ummm is it a "nature reserve' (that would be tagged leisure=nature_reserve" ??? The 'name' appears to be a generic descriptive ...
	2	2024-05-23 05:12	Warin61	I have altered this as suggested above... howevere it look like it maybe a duplication of a later entry for Westralia Conservation Park ... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12949956
	3	2024-05-23 05:39	Treadly ♦3	Why are you changing anything? Do you live in the area? Leave it alone, don't interfere with peoples work.
	4	2024-05-23 06:54	Warin61	There are a lot of over lapping tree areas here. ... These individual tree ways make it very difficult to add detail in these trees area. I am trying to improve the mapping along the bib track before I go. ------------------ This entry is from 13 years ago, at this time OSM has access to m...
151661764 by Loch-Boch @ 2024-05-22 08:03	1	2024-05-22 22:58	Warin61	Bradfield is; Viewable on the DCS Base Map. Downloadable from the PSMA data which is where most admin boundaries in OSM come from... and are much easier to enter into OSM from that source. See the OSM wiki for the Australian Data Catalog
	2	2024-05-22 23:04	Warin61	Arr .. I see the PSMA data is not up to date. But the DCS Base Map is correct and shows more detail than you have entered...
147755948 by Amin Fozdar @ 2024-02-22 02:47	1	2024-05-20 04:40	Warin61	Hi, Not a good idea to add the tree tag to a National Park... Not all the National Park is covered by trees leading some mappers to make holes where there are not tree .. thus making holes in the National Park At d=some place the trees may extend beyond the National Park .. mappers then extend t...
108584066 by radiotrefoil @ 2021-07-26 01:13	1	2024-05-19 08:54	Warin61	Hi Considering how long these 'proposals' have now existed and existed into the past .. I don't think these will come to pass in our life times.. not something worth mapping?
	2	2024-05-19 09:00	radiotrefoil ♦109	Agreed, probably best to remove them now that I have learned more about the proposed tag
124754371 by jMapsAu @ 2022-08-11 02:36	1	2024-05-18 00:27	Warin61	Redundancies... When maxspeed:forward is the same as maxspeed:backwards use maxspeed .. the forwards/backwards is redundant and contributes to data bloat.
	2	2024-05-21 06:40	jMapsAu ♦9	Ah good catch Warin61 Was processing a lot of these manually so likely missed a few that were the same for both directions.
151453226 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-05-17 12:52	1	2024-05-18 00:19	Warin61	Hi, The track at central is tagged 'construction' ... as such scheduled trains cannot run on it.
	2	2024-05-18 01:55	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	sorry, I didn't realise the validator was that strict... I've moved it to a different platform for now, will revert in a few weeks when the track opens
88292947 by mrpulley @ 2020-07-21 11:49	1	2020-07-22 03:11	aharvey ♦1,694	wow big changeset, but looks great!
	2	2024-05-16 01:44	Warin61	The Great North Walk is a route. The signs you see are route markers .. not names of the tracks...
	3	2024-05-16 09:40	mrpulley ♦170	It's been almost four years since I surveyed this, but I recall seeing some wooden name signs (as well as the red/white hiking markers). Is the Great North Walk the name of the track and the name of the route? (similar to how road routes can also be the name of the roads)
	4	2024-05-16 10:34	Warin61	Hi, Local to me most IIRC paths existed before the Great North Walk was created. They had no name boards back then. Some of the paths had names and are named correctly now where I can both remember them and verified with another source. My take; The wooden boards with the route name are simpl...
151138409 by Lockstar @ 2024-05-10 10:33	1	2024-05-11 01:25	Warin61	When you created 2 one way streets for Polding St you forgot to to delete the existing 2 way Polding St... what a mess. Polding St is used for 2 admin boundaries..
	2	2024-05-11 23:52	Lockstar ♦26	No, I didn't - but another user created edits at the same time resulting in the mess. It's fixed now.
	3	2024-05-12 12:22	Warin61	OK... I think? I did not explain the "what a mess" thing .. comes from an old add "Oh. Mr Hart, what a mess" .. Finally looked it up on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTEOW4RaQbw
150155241 by Robuster @ 2024-04-18 05:01	1	2024-04-23 01:32	Warin61	Hi, The inners added to relation 313532410 are outside the outer ... were they meant to be part of another relation???
	2	2024-04-23 07:31	Robuster ♦4	Hi Warin61, I am in the still in the process of fixing the campus, and about to return to the campus to fix.
	3	2024-04-24 07:09	Warin61	Good luck. :)
	4	2024-05-12 01:31	Warin61	I have removed the incorrect inners from relation 313532410. It looks like Way: 491992978 should be made into a relation and the3 gardens included as inners in the relation... I leave that to you...
81554427 by Davideous @ 2020-02-27 15:45	1	2024-05-11 02:10	Warin61	Nor is it solely cricket. The cricket is Way: 1043595772 The AFl is Way: 27807290 This separates the two sports into something like there boundaries...
66181779 by eneerhut @ 2019-01-10 03:44	1	2024-05-11 01:58	Warin61	Hi, sport=free_flying:shop=yes does not compute... sport=free_flying computes... shop should be a separate tag shop= something...
	2	2024-05-11 02:44	eneerhut ♦14	Agreed Warin. Thanks. Removed it as I am not sure what happened there.
79465318 by mario7436 @ 2020-01-12 01:33	1	2024-05-08 07:34	Warin61	Hi, Node 5190607820, public_transport=stop_position should be on a way - where the bus stops. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position Note that if there is a 'bus stop' then stop position is redundant and can be deleted. The road that leads to ...
150662481 by Deccasbass @ 2024-04-29 12:55	1	2024-04-29 23:51	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! A 'residential area' would not extend into the middle of a river? Placing 'Fairburn Ward' as an inner in the relation for City of Money Valley that would excluded it from the city of mooney valley .. I take it that is not what was intended and have und...
147560617 by ahunterg95 @ 2024-02-17 08:35	1	2024-04-29 09:38	Warin61	Hi, What is the source of this information? The stated imagery does not show a helipad let alone a name..
	2	2024-04-29 10:48	ahunterg95 ♦5	Hi Warin, I had been wondering where the base of Forrest Air Helicopters was for quite some time. Information is very limited, but inaccurate flight tracking data led me to the general area and manual surveying of the satellite imagery eventually led me to the discovery of the large hangar. The con...
150623300 by rawbinnyson @ 2024-04-28 15:09	1	2024-04-29 06:35	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! The farmland is not a 'boundary relation' but a multipoygon relation. Use the OSM wiki for information .. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
150569174 by elipoloos @ 2024-04-27 08:31	1	2024-04-28 00:16	Warin61	Hi, A couple of issues with Tabrabucca Farmstay 17449614 multipolygon relation; tourism=chalet is a single building.. not a farm... multipolygon relations roles are either 'inner' or 'outer' not 'member'... The 'chalet' Way: 1276733648 appears to be th...
127630426 by DarkHeartOfTheWood @ 2022-10-16 17:57	1	2024-04-27 01:29	Warin61	Hi, In the world there is one other 'sheep dog trail' area - mapped as 'leisure=pitch sport=sheep_trials' ... I know there are more areas used for these activities and seek a common tagging scheme for them... I think the sport key is appropriate as it is a competition... ...
75329854 by ConsEbt @ 2019-10-05 23:23	1	2024-04-27 01:09	Warin61	Hi, Node: Larry Adler 6854406242 ... sport=sky ... means what???
	2	2024-04-27 21:44	ConsEbt ♦27	Probably skiers. That shop was selling skiing equipment.
150430421 by Gillifrey @ 2024-04-24 08:02	1	2024-04-25 23:20	Warin61	Hi, The multipolygon relation for the shopping center is a duplication of an existing way... I have deleted it. I have placed the shopping centre tags on the landuse=retail as that also covers the car parking. I have then deleted the shopping centre tags on the building way ... See how t...
	2	2024-04-25 23:46	Gillifrey ♦5	Yeah, the multipolygon relation is the one part of my change that I wasn't entirely sure of. I figured there was probably a better way of doing it — your change makes more sense. Thanks!
150104294 by Qwajo OSM @ 2024-04-16 21:57	1	2024-04-24 05:34	Warin61	Hi, There is an error on way 1271141845. The JOSM validator would have told you 'crossing ways'. You can find more HOT errors on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.10960&lat=-3.52776&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Cs...
146355083 by breno-au @ 2024-01-17 09:36	1	2024-04-24 02:14	Warin61	Hi, via_ferrata is not a 'sport' but a path of some length. It does have problems... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dvia_ferrata And I'd tagged with access=private or access=customers...
150315036 by sb9576 @ 2024-04-21 18:56	1	2024-04-23 01:51	Warin61	Hi, The multipolygon relation 17498626 Jirdarup Bushland Precinct brakes 'the rules' ... The outer ways cannot share segments. This 'only' has a name ... so there is no 'main tag' like park/reserve so it will never render... So .. what is it?
	2	2024-04-23 02:20	sb9576 ♦19	It is just a named locality at the moment. Not sure the council really knows what it’ll be yet, but at least they’ve been trying for a few years now to turn it into something amenable. Right now a name and hope is all there is 😀. I’ve been driving past it for most of my life thi...
147841057 by whatqm @ 2024-02-24 04:25	1	2024-04-22 05:27	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Within OSM afl is called australian_football. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q6816 The 'Oval' is not a 'name' but a 'description' .... Hope that helps?
	2	2024-04-22 05:40	whatqm ♦2	In Australian schools the field where people play sports and spend lunch is called an oval
	3	2024-04-22 07:24	Warin61	And a field where sports are played (any where) are also called 'ovals' .. A plant, single trunked growing over 2 meters is called a 'tree' ... From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name Do not use name=* if: The feature is known by a generic term or description...
150026241 by Humphrey B @ 2024-04-15 09:09	1	2024-04-22 06:04	Warin61	Hi, The tag 'sport=*' does not make sense. I have detailed the sport=field_hockey from bing imagery. The tag 'leisure=court' is not valid .. replaced with leisure=pitch. Hope that helps?
71063304 by mcilvena @ 2019-06-09 05:22	1	2024-04-15 00:20	Warin61	The relation 9671460 ... Why? Keep it simple... I have deleted the relation, combined the member ways into one way and tagged that way as residential.
	2	2024-04-15 00:24	Warin61	Note: Another mapper broke this relation which is what attracted my attention to it. If it is mapped in a simple way it is easier for others to understand and therefore less likely to be broken.
148866385 by Astinech @ 2024-03-19 15:12	1	2024-03-20 01:49	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.32336&lat=-38.23221&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersectio...
	2	2024-04-14 01:56	Warin61	No response. Nil.
149945804 by MDe @ 2024-04-13 10:51	1	2024-04-14 01:55	Warin61	Hi, I have changed the relation to a type = site. This enables the individual buildings to be better tagged ... for example not all the roofs are flat.
	2	2024-04-14 12:29	MDe ♦11	👍 LGTM
123609318 by CrazyKim117 @ 2022-07-14 13:00	1	2024-04-14 01:54	Warin61	Hi, I have changed the relation for the 'glasshouses' to a type = site. This enables the individual buildings to be better tagged - not all the roofs are flat for example.
142960074 by Jivesas @ 2023-10-22 09:45	1	2024-04-11 03:11	Warin61	Hi Large parts of the tree areas mapped here don't have trees. It would be better to map them are multipolygon relations so that the holes in the tree areas can be added...
	2	2024-04-11 06:54	Jivesas ♦4	Hi, it's been a while! I reckon I already did that for the area that seems to me to not be wood. If you speak about the area that have been burn by forestfire, I still put them as wood
	3	2024-04-11 10:11	Warin61	The 'Big Desert Wilderness Park' ... has areas of sand... "area of sandstone ridges, sand dunes, mallee scrub and heath." See https://www.wimmeramalleetourism.com.au/big-desert-wilderness-park/ Note that 'scrub' can be views as 'trees' in satellite imager...
149592962 by Rakesh Jays @ 2024-04-05 00:45	1	2024-04-05 12:29	Warin61	Hi, Most buildings are 'square' their corners from right angles. Some of your mapped building have very strange shapes - please take more care with your mapping. Do you have a task co ordinator? If so seek their assistance.
149472881 by Satyasai2024 @ 2024-04-02 10:24	1	2024-04-05 12:25	Warin61	HI, Most buildings are 'square' - their corners from right angles. Pressing the 'Q' key will square up your buildings while they are selected. Hope that helps.
149582206 by Navneeth Nair @ 2024-04-04 18:10	1	2024-04-05 12:18	Warin61	HI, Most buildings are 'square' - using right angles for their corners. Use the 'Q' key to square buildings when they are selected, this will improve your mapping. Hope that helps.
149538212 by ClemenceEpicentre @ 2024-04-03 18:17	1	2024-04-05 12:11	Warin61	Advice? If you cannot clearly see it, don't map it. Most buildings are 'square' - using right angled corners. Use the 'Q' key to square up what you have mapped while the feature is seleted. Hope that helps.
149567209 by Tomaussie_17 @ 2024-04-04 12:06	1	2024-04-05 00:11	Warin61	Hi, Some problems with relation 17427562 - Central Creek Linear Reserve / grass First the relation inner way touches an outer way .. that brakes 'the rules' for multipolygon relations. And then why use a relation at all? Simply tag the outer ways with grass and be done. Then th...
	2	2024-04-05 02:24	Tomaussie_17 ♦7	Hi Warin! Thank you so much for catching me on this. As you can probably tell I'm not too crash hot when it comes to multipolygons. I hope that I've fixed it now with this newer edit however let me know if this isn't the case. I made it a relation as map share vic classifies al...
149341621 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-30 08:39	1	2024-04-01 23:13	Warin61	Residential relation 7656605 now only has inners... broken.
	2	2024-04-02 00:01	Lockstar ♦26	Fixed - thanks
149258035 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-28 09:19	1	2024-03-30 00:09	Warin61	This has removed all but 2 of the outer ways on the residential multipolygon relation 7656605 .... now broken. I have reduced Wentworth Leagues Club - and added Ringrose Park - operated by the council...
	2	2024-03-30 08:38	Lockstar ♦26	Noted thanks - reviewed and edited res area boundaries
148195236 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-04 08:42	1	2024-03-28 23:26	Warin61	Hi, I think you have forgotten this broken bus route relation 13332390...
135523115 by Warin61 @ 2023-04-30 03:59	1	2024-03-21 16:29	os-emmer ♦337	Hello Warin61, you added a building that is overlapping with another building. Can you maybe have a look and help fixing that? Thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4162192
	2	2024-03-23 07:58	Warin61	Thanks.. how did I miss that?
	3	2024-03-23 14:49	os-emmer ♦337	Thanks for the fix. Stuff like this happens, so don't worry :)
148942405 by Caleb NHVR @ 2024-03-21 04:48	1	2024-03-22 01:39	Warin61	Hi, Roundabouts should be tagged "junction=roundabout' then the tag 'oneway=yes' is redundant. This helps routers recognize that there is a roundabout.
	2	2024-03-22 02:07	Caleb NHVR ♦10	Thanks Warin, I've amended the tags for these recently added roundabouts
148715951 by Thomas_Baxter @ 2024-03-16 04:06	1	2024-03-16 23:53	Warin61	Hi The residential relation 17351391 outer ways share segments. This is an error. I have combined the 2 outer ways into one, added the tags to that outer way and then deleted the relation. This is simpler than the relation.
146167821 by misternavigator @ 2024-01-12 06:24	1	2024-01-13 23:16	Ewen Hill ♦407	Hi Spellsaidwrong, Thanks for mapping this as public transport routes are really important to a lot of downstream users. With your edit, you appear to have added a new standalone relation not connected to the road network where it is best practice to add the relation to the actual road elements. I c...
	2	2024-02-29 23:13	Warin61	Unfortunately, with no answer as to the question of copyright clearance and mistakes in other changesets, I am inclined to revert this and other changesets using this source. Can we have some response???
	3	2024-03-11 04:52	Warin61	Looks like a 'no'. I have deleted the added ways that have no tags - and added the existing ways that are tagged as road in there place. I have deleted the duplicated bus stops .. and retagged 'stop_position' as 'platform'. I have placed the bus stops at the front o...
148450136 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-10 07:41	1	2024-03-10 22:32	Warin61	When do you plan on repairing the broken PTv2 bus relations you have broken? There are 8 presently ... https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.19485&lat=-33.63775&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cpt...
	2	2024-03-13 21:14	Lockstar ♦26	Most of these should be fixed now. As I've said before, these breaks are often a result of works in progress. Unfortunately sometimes in repairing one route, I end up breaking another and have to return to fix. Thanks for pointing them out. I'll keep checking the OSM inspector to find ...
148368073 by gromzx @ 2024-03-08 05:07	1	2024-03-09 00:34	Warin61	Hi, The park multipolygon relation ... has an error. The outer ways cannot share segments. I have deleted the relation and tagged both ways as leisure=park.
148285193 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-06 09:48	1	2024-03-07 21:28	Warin61	Partially reverted to restore residential relation 7609253
	2	2024-03-09 00:26	Warin61	Those warnings that id gives you .. are possible problems that you should look at fixing before you upload the data ... e.g. "warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part" is a park relation that has been broken by this changeset. Sometimes the warnings are wrong.. in this case...
142944317 by Lockstar @ 2023-10-22 00:28	1	2024-03-07 21:28	Warin61	Partially reverted to restore residential relation 7609253
148321002 by Lockstar @ 2024-03-07 02:25	1	2024-03-07 21:28	Warin61	The removal of way 532084501 brakes the residential relation ... Probably the removal of the other 3 ways also brakes the residential relation... Partially reverted to restore residential relation 7609253
128512511 by Treadly @ 2022-11-05 09:08	1	2024-03-04 05:13	Warin61	natural=wood on a node??? Is this a single tree - then used natural=tree...
148137586 by elipoloos @ 2024-03-02 16:02	1	2024-03-02 22:29	Warin61	Relation 17296397 is NOT an island. Deleted. This area is already mapped with wetlands, rivers etc... Please do not harm work already done by others.
147915858 by Robuster @ 2024-02-26 04:31	1	2024-03-02 00:06	Warin61	Hi Muiltipolygon relation 17269480 (garden) does not meet the 'rules' - duplicated segment. As this only has outers .. why does it need to be a relation at all??? I have placed the relevant tags on the outer ways, and then deleted the relation... Job done.
146168164 by misternavigator @ 2024-01-12 06:39	1	2024-02-29 23:11	Warin61	The question as to the copyright status of the source of this and other changesets has not been answered - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146167821 The answer should be provided with some haste. This route is not compliant with PTv2 requirements. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/u...
146136394 by misternavigator @ 2024-01-11 10:10	1	2024-02-29 22:52	Warin61	This and another change set has resulted in duplication of bus stops ... 3 of them at each location so far. Please use, when available, already existing OSM features rather than recreating them.
147962387 by capatau @ 2024-02-27 08:35	1	2024-02-28 23:56	Warin61	A relation is not required for the school - just tag the outer way. The tag 'building=yes' says the whole site is one building .. not the case. The DCS Base Map gives better boundaries for objects like schools, parks etc. I have changed this, see what you think.
147761064 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-22 07:50	1	2024-02-28 07:45	Warin61	Hi, You have quite a few bus relations that don't meet PTv2 requirements. Before you enter more of them, how about fixing the ones you have entered? Hopefully learning how to get them correct before uploading them to OSM? See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lo...
147759169 by MapAnalyser465 @ 2024-02-22 06:40	1	2024-02-22 22:28	Warin61	????? This looks to have made open roads back to construction ... see Way: Sydney Gateway (39749554) And possibly deleted roads in existence?
	2	2024-02-23 21:53	Warin61	Repaired bus route terminal transfer to your ways .. I have noted that imagery does not support these changes (as yet).
146136683 by misternavigator @ 2024-01-11 10:19	1	2024-02-23 02:29	Warin61	Hi, highway=stop_position must be on the way where the bus/train stops. highway=bus_stop is adjacent to the way - where the passengers wait to get on - thus not on the way. The correct tag to use with highway=bus_stop is public_transport=platform.
141279453 by _Sasha_ @ 2023-09-14 23:33	1	2024-02-20 22:57	Warin61	Hi, 'highway=bus_stop' are not 'public_transport=stop_position' as they are not on the road way but along side it where passengers wait. What they are is 'public_transport=platform'. I have corrected this one.
147644677 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-19 10:58	1	2024-02-19 22:14	Warin61	This 'de ordered' the ways of relation 10627407 bus route 633 to Pennant Hills. Leave you to fix this one?
	2	2024-02-21 01:54	Lockstar ♦26	This should be fixed now - hopefully
75135764 by Misa_zumba @ 2019-10-01 08:24	1	2024-02-16 23:14	Warin61	The area here is desert.... water is mostly intermittent.
147289353 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-10 11:43	1	2024-02-11 00:30	Warin61	Bus stops added to PTv2 must have tags "public_transport=platform" and "bus=yes"... those added to bus route 290 'Epping - City' don't have these tag - thus fail PTv2. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.23855&lat=-33.76979...
	2	2024-02-16 22:38	Warin61	Bus stop added to end of bus route relation 'Epping - City (King Street Wharf) via Macquarie Centre & Pacific Highway (4174340, v100)' It should be added somewhere at the front - sequence with the other bus stops.
147388677 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-12 23:57	1	2024-02-16 22:26	Warin61	bus stop is at end of relation - should be somewhere up the front with the other bus stops..
147317846 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-11 07:57	1	2024-02-16 22:23	Warin61	Bus stop error ... empty role .. and it is a duplicate of already entered stop ... suggest that it is no sequential...
147469443 by Macca70 @ 2024-02-14 22:57	1	2024-02-16 00:05	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! This changeset removed some 'wetland' areas sourced for the DCS Base Map. They may be better tagged as 'intermittent=yes' ... possibly only 'wet' during floods? What do you think? Past mappers may probably only be using the data from that Base M...
	2	2024-02-16 00:22	Macca70 ♦1	Hi Warin61, thanks for the welcome. The edits were based on a recent flood event, second biggest on record, the areas removed were not impacted by flood waters and remained dry. I will keep the option for tagging as intermittent in mind for other edits thanks.
147313481 by TheSwavu @ 2024-02-11 01:49	1	2024-02-14 04:30	Warin61	Some of these are not PTv2 compliant... Relations 15631643, 3552678, 3386431, 15631643, 5985178, 3738476, 2509188 and 3552679 ... not PTv2 compliant. 5 relations with gaps.. I have attempted some corrections... however someone has made some changes during my changes - so I have taken ...
147210968 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-08 10:24	1	2024-02-09 00:45	Warin61	Bus route 166 (to) Frenches Forest. What I have done.... Placed the ways into the correct sequence, they run from start to finish. Stops placed into the correct sequence - from start to finish. All stops placed at the beginning of the relation. If you don't know how to do this .. fi...
	2	2024-02-09 01:13	Lockstar ♦26	Yes - I will and I do edit/check these in JOSM - just don't always get to them in one sitting and have to come back to it. In this case you beat me to it. Most of these routes are missing heaps of stops and even the route ways are incorrect and need fixing in some cases
147128820 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-06 10:27	1	2024-02-08 00:00	Warin61	Moved bus stop in relation for 166 route to correct position in the relation. In PTv2 ALL bus stops are placed before the ways. All of them. None of them go after the ways.
147046310 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-04 09:47	1	2024-02-05 22:45	Warin61	Out of sequence bus stops without roles in the route relation removed from the relation. Step 1) place them in sequential order step 2 ) add the role 'platform' in the relation.
	2	2024-02-05 22:54	Warin61	A 'bus stop' is beside the road. A bus 'stop_position' is on the road - where the bus actually stops. For PTv2 a "bus stop" must be tagged as "public_transport=platform" Node: Santa Maria del Monte, The Boulevarde (2877493994) changed back to &quo...
	3	2024-02-06 01:58	Lockstar ♦26	Thanks - most of these missed ones are existing bus stops with outdated tags that I've missed in my updates. I'll try to make sure I catch and fix all these for any further updates done.
	4	2024-02-06 09:57	Warin61	Existing bus stops already in OSM probably meet the PTv1 requirements. For PTv2 you have to add tags "public_transport=platform" and probably "bus=yes". The real headache is getting the dam things in sequential order. Good luck.
147040364 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-04 03:56	1	2024-02-04 22:32	Warin61	Fix? Broke residential land use relation 1245766644 ??????????????? Are you going to repair this? Or will you leave it like relation 2792531?
	2	2024-02-04 23:45	Lockstar ♦26	Fixed. The land use areas in this town are a shambles. I spent hours yesterday updating some them. This one slipped through the cracks.
147009773 by Clarkington @ 2024-02-03 07:15	1	2024-02-04 09:48	Warin61	Hi, Some of this farmland shows remnant scrub, best to exclude that from te farmland?
144783896 by PedBike @ 2023-12-05 09:22	1	2024-02-04 04:17	Warin61	Hi, OSM values, with some exceptions, are lower case , not 'MTB'. If you look on the OSM wiki there is sport=cycling and then detail is added using cycling=mtb. I have done that to this area.
146937754 by RSota @ 2024-02-01 09:29	1	2024-02-04 03:56	Warin61	Hi, For the Newquay Promenade relation. 3 of the 'inners' added touch the outer way - that is an error. I have removed those inners. If the promenade dose not include that areas then the outer way needs to be modified - more wok but them is 'the rules'. Let me know if I can he...
	2	2024-02-04 12:25	RSota ♦7	Hi Warin61, no worries thanks, I wasn't aware that wasn't allowed but it makes sense. I'll modify the outer way and reinstate those buildings/outdoor area.
147007012 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-03 03:37	1	2024-02-03 22:40	Warin61	The one member residential relation is not a replacement for the residential relation that was altered to the point of making no contribution (no outer way as it has been deleted) as it does not cover the area south of Stringybark Reserve One member relations should be removed with the tags simpl...
140297967 by Starkles @ 2023-08-24 00:38	1	2024-02-03 01:27	Warin61	The sign a the top is legal access=no ... While people might break the law OSM should not encourage it???
146897585 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-31 10:17	1	2024-02-01 00:10	Warin61	The bus stops added to route 549 are; Not in sequential order Have no relationship role
	2	2024-02-03 00:03	Warin61	Bus stops out of sequence and without roles removed from relation.
146981992 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-02 11:49	1	2024-02-03 00:00	Warin61	Out of sequence bus stops without roles removed from relation 3766951. Ways have been re-sequenced.
146987654 by D_i_m @ 2024-02-02 14:26	1	2024-02-02 23:53	Warin61	Hi, I think you have tried to make a hole in a tree area. What you have made is a 'self crossing way, or a 'dplicate segment'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.05925&lat=-42.14655&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_nod...
146850025 by Warin61 @ 2024-01-30 06:54	1	2024-01-31 20:02	HaPe-CZ ♦91	Why are you devastating the maps? A parking space is not a taxiway for planes !!! Deliberately damaging the work of many editors.
	2	2024-02-01 09:37	Warin61	??? Eh? No motor vehicle parking spaces were changed to areoways. Your changes may be well intentioned but.. think about it! The intention was to change ways with areoway=parking_position to areoways=apron. A parking position should be a stationary spot? Not the way to the stationary spot. ...
	3	2024-02-01 10:03	HaPe-CZ ♦91	see help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dparking_position aeroway=parking_position out of terminal on appron, aeroway=gate is inside building terminal or not? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dgate Wow :o ... "These 'gates' are the plane parki...
	4	2024-02-01 10:33	Warin61	See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10178481999 amongst others. Thank you for moving some of the 'gates' inside the terminal buildings. also see for more on taxiway taxilanes... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Taxilane I have raised the 'parking_positi...
	5	2024-02-01 11:26	HaPe-CZ ♦91	https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1017848199 ... it is not a my work !!! go and FIRST READ HELP, it si bad point of other editor. Please use your head, think logically before you destroy something. You're using arguments based on the wrong tags of a previous edit.
	6	2024-02-02 10:31	Warin61	I did not say it was 'your work'. What do you think of the 'taxilane' tag? It does distinguish between one control area and another control area...
	7	2024-02-03 13:53	HaPe-CZ ♦91	1) "At many airports, aeroway=taxiway is also used within apron areas, however". Unless the apron is divided into several smaller ones, but here the aprons are divided and the taxiway passes between them. In other words. If one huge and complete apron is drawn then the taxiway will pass th...
146927629 by Lockstar @ 2024-02-01 02:22	1	2024-02-01 21:29	Warin61	Relation 3766951 has stop in wrong order. I have removed the stop from the relation.
146560953 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-01-22 16:28	1	2024-01-30 06:52	Warin61	When you make a multipolygon relation the members do not have to be new blank ways - you can use existing ways no matter what tags they use; An existing building can be used as an inner in the relation A lake could be used as an inner .. or even an outer. and many other things.. they can all be u...
	2	2024-01-31 08:36	HaPe-CZ ♦91	Hi, yes, that's right. But it causes other problems. Sometimes the edge of the object is not drawn but only the fill colors, sometimes the inserted object is not separated properly, etc. For example, ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243799275 ... here the object is inserted directly, and...
	3	2024-02-01 09:57	Warin61	That is a rendering issue. The example you gave looks to be correctly rendered. The 'edge' of a park does not appear to be drawn - just the 'fill' .. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388948281. A 'national park' is tagged as a boundary and is drawn as a line a...
	4	2024-02-01 10:23	HaPe-CZ ♦91	My God, that was just an example. The objects are indeed rendered differently (probably a bug in the inerpreter). The pedestrian zone area nonsensically overlays buildings and other areas. That's why the cutout in its area. It's pointless to divide the area into several smaller areas and d...
	5	2024-02-01 10:42	Warin61	We map and tag in OSM. The renders draw the way they want to, they can exclude some things etc. We map and tag according to the 'rules' what the renders do is up to them ... The 'green areas' are used by pedestrians, so they are part of the pedestrian are as are the roof are...
	6	2024-02-01 11:32	HaPe-CZ ♦91	Pedestrians don't walk on the grass here but around :D, hence the grass as a visible area. Rendering is just solved by cutting out the area and inserting an object into it. This is common knowledge, and a good editor knows it, another editor doesn't understand it and wonders. That's ...
	7	2024-02-01 11:35	HaPe-CZ ♦91	After your hit, half of the roofs and lawns will remain invisible on the map, half will be displayed. What's right? All rooftops and lawns exist. But according to your map, only some of them exist. Isn't that stupid?
146896571 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-31 09:51	1	2024-02-01 00:18	Warin61	Node 11572336916 deleted. This appears to be a duplication of existing Node: Stand F, Epping Station, Beecroft Rd (1170757338)
141973354 by Lockstar @ 2023-10-01 04:47	1	2024-01-31 11:13	Warin61	A 'platform' is beside the road/rail track... A 'stop position' is on the road/rail track... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport#Stop_position "on the way" meaning on the road/tail line... 'platform' where passengers wait...
146817570 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-29 11:34	1	2024-01-30 10:37	Warin61	Hi, When you add a bus stop - such as node 11563923368 it should be tagged highway=bus_stop (for rendering) and for PTv2 public_transport=platform, bus=yes. Not doing this throws errors.
146843901 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-01-30 01:51	1	2024-01-30 10:22	Warin61	PTv2 requires; 'stops' to be before the train tracks and 'stops' to be in sequence. You should fix this simple error so you know what to do for next time.
	2	2024-01-30 10:44	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	sorry, fixed now. seems to be caused by another bug in iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4978
99742404 by RichieRRR @ 2021-02-22 11:37	1	2024-01-30 06:14	Warin61	3 year and still have crossing buildings...
125412795 by RichieRRR @ 2022-08-26 15:36	1	2024-01-30 05:52	Warin61	The path Way: 1089492851... it cross the rail way line ... mist be either under ground or on a bridge... It also crosses a retaining wall...
146814464 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-29 10:12	1	2024-01-30 01:14	Warin61	Bus route 199 is not compliant with PTv2 - reset to PTv1
	2	2024-01-30 02:20	Lockstar ♦26	Noted
	3	2024-02-01 10:07	TheSwavu ♦544	Hi, Are you sure you can't turn right into and out of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95266539 from North Rocks Road? Thanks.
	4	2024-02-01 10:22	Lockstar ♦26	Connection missed - now fixed
146742567 by ryivhnn @ 2024-01-27 12:41	1	2024-01-30 01:01	Warin61	Hi,Please use the lifestyle prefix for demolished... see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay
	2	2024-01-30 01:33	ryivhnn ♦7	Thank you for fixing it and for the link! I really should have figured there would be a demolished tag.
146801040 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-29 02:27	1	2024-01-29 11:40	Warin61	Relation \t3423234 - bus route 549 from Parramatta still has ways out of sequence. I have not checked the stops. Relation 3423235 546 from Parramatta is of for ways in sequence.
146732313 by AGrinsley @ 2024-01-27 05:15	1	2024-01-27 23:21	Warin61	The relation only has inners... Suggest delete the relation! Note: state, country and suburb add information can be obtained by renders from already entered data. There is no need to include it on everything.
	2	2024-01-29 08:24	Warin61	Relation deleted.
118898419 by kurisubrooks @ 2022-03-25 08:49	1	2024-01-29 08:23	Warin61	Hi, The OSM guide is 'one feature=one OSM entry" So the single 'social facility' is one entry on the property boundary - the individual buildings within the boundary do not get the same tags. Next addr:street is for the name of the street not the complete address including...
146732049 by AGrinsley @ 2024-01-27 04:52	1	2024-01-29 08:05	Warin61	Hi Realtionships should not carry the same tags as the members ... So building=apartments on the ways should not appear within the relation ... This error has been corrected.
146767837 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-28 06:52	1	2024-01-29 01:22	Warin61	Relation 3423235 - 546 bus route is once again broken. The only mapper making the changes that broke the route is you. Will you please fix it so you can learn how not to brake these Public Transport version 2 routes??? See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.0...
	2	2024-01-29 01:24	Warin61	The same comment applies to bus route 3423234 bus route 549...
	3	2024-01-29 09:12	Lockstar ♦26	I thought I'd fixed this but apparently not. Checked and uploaded repairs - should be good now. Thanks.
146775056 by shenki @ 2024-01-28 11:47	1	2024-01-29 00:42	Warin61	Hi Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
146730079 by HobartUser @ 2024-01-27 01:47	1	2024-01-29 00:23	Warin61	Hi, The multipolygon relation is not 'correct'. The role 'inner' cannot touch a role 'outer'. To me it looks like the red roof is one building ... then the other structure is ??? For the moment I have used the same tags on both, building=school, building:levels=2 ...
	2	2024-02-05 07:12	HobartUser ♦1	Thank you very much for fixing that, yes it did look a bit funny. I have updated the tags, the smaller roof is something like an amphitheater stage
146731774 by AGrinsley @ 2024-01-27 04:28	1	2024-01-27 23:38	Warin61	Same comment on this relation. Hints: Your probably reading this via some email message ... so You can view the changeset on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146731774 That gives you all the ways, relations and nodes that were entered or changed .. so you can see then there. Then yo...
	2	2024-01-29 06:14	AGrinsley ♦1	Thanks for the heads up, I belive I've "fixed" the relation issues with: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146805978 Relations are a weird one but I think I understand them a bit better now.
146731937 by AGrinsley @ 2024-01-27 04:43	1	2024-01-27 23:18	Warin61	The relation excludes the buildings from the nursing home... Why?
144359808 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2023-11-23 09:15	1	2024-01-27 23:14	Warin61	One member relations are redundant. Clark Island relation has been deleted for the above reason.
	2	2024-01-28 07:05	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	thanks
146653968 by Tom Britton @ 2024-01-25 02:08	1	2024-01-26 21:36	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. Relation 17077151 has been deleted. What were the outers for this deleted relation have been tagged as buildings as per the deleted relation.
146583429 by HaPe-CZ @ 2024-01-23 09:14	1	2024-01-24 00:52	Warin61	Hi The ref=PER is the code for the airport, not individual parking areas, buildings nor anything else. Assess = yes is the default and is layer=0 .. adding them is simply data bloat. 5 parking area relations have been deleted as duplications. There are at least some 16 ways with the sam...
	2	2024-01-24 08:39	HaPe-CZ ♦91	Hi, ref=PER ... is the label written by the previous editor, I just copied it (didn't delete it). layer=0 ... the same thing again. The original area of the car park was extremely large. unsuitable for subsequent partial modifications, therefore 5 smaller. "There are at least some 16...
	3	2024-01-25 10:49	Warin61	I can find no parking area with the tag ref=PER other than the ones you created. Have they been deleted? Ther are 2 of these left.. Relation: 17066857 Edited at: 2024-01-22T19:48:15Z In changeset: 146567294 And Relation: 17066856 Data Set: 5965853e Edited at: 2024-01-22T19:48:1...
	4	2024-01-25 13:00	HaPe-CZ ♦91	I found only 1 time ref=PER, I deleted it.
146589172 by ❤️‍🔥 @ 2024-01-23 11:36	1	2024-01-24 04:43	Warin61	Gaps or unordered ways on Canberra Express route - See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.19704&lat=-33.89722&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_va...
	2	2024-01-24 04:48	Warin61	Opps - Canberra Explorer
	3	2024-01-24 05:35	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	sorry... i don't have a clue how to fix that efficiently but I'll take a look. I can understand why the ways might be out of order, but based on a visual inspection of https://osm.org/relation/14309095 and https://osm.org/relation/2666822, i don't see any gaps...
	4	2024-01-24 23:15	Warin61	From the link I gave says "Errorneous ways rel_id \t2666822 from \tSydney to \tCanberra ref \t631-636 name \tCanberra Xplorer route \ttrain way_id \t1242188200 node_id \t1577647710 error \tgap" Examining the sequence of ways in JOSM they are not is sequence between way 2850...
	5	2024-01-30 04:59	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	It seems like this is a known problem with iD - see https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8578 and https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8415 I've fixed a number of validation errors including the Canberra Explorer. But I don't understand some of the validator warnings like &q...
	6	2024-01-30 05:11	❤️‍🔥 ♦363	also not sure about "Unknown route type" - apparently all the light rail routes are invalid because of this unhelpful warning
146516818 by ryivhnn @ 2024-01-21 15:17	1	2024-01-22 22:40	Warin61	HI, Hint - to make the building corners 'square' press the letter 'Q' while the building is selected.
	2	2024-01-23 03:09	ryivhnn ♦7	Thanks for the tip! I'll try that and to also slow down as I have been using the square corners thing from the right click menu but might not be hitting it as much as I think I am.
146424973 by Lockstar @ 2024-01-19 00:51	1	2024-01-19 03:54	Warin61	Hi Note This route was in Public Transport version 2 meaning; ways are in order of travel - start to finish stops are in order - start to finish. I have done the ways, but the stops need to be done too.
	2	2024-01-19 05:29	Lockstar ♦26	Noted - thanks - will review and repair
146360467 by Chris melbs @ 2024-01-17 11:47	1	2024-01-19 00:20	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. Relation 17039943 has been deleted - tags placed on one of the ways .. the other way looks like a garage to me and I have simply tagged that as building=yes.
146210108 by elipoloos @ 2024-01-13 11:05	1	2024-01-15 00:22	Warin61	Hi, Multipolygon outer ways are not allowed to share segments. I have deleted relation 17020314 - garden school and simply places the relevant tags on the ways. That is simpler and does the job.
	2	2024-01-16 21:14	fortera_au ♦1,063	Hi elipoloos, ways 1239370889 and 1239370887 appear to be overlapping, if these are two buildings they should be mapped individually and have no overlap. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146210108
141449357 by B22789 @ 2023-09-19 04:41	1	2024-01-14 04:23	Warin61	Sport = soccer.. Changed to building grandstand and added pitches .. as per Ersi .. See what you think..
146081451 by Bruce P @ 2024-01-09 21:30	1	2024-01-14 03:40	Warin61	Hi, I have separated the individual courts. I have also added buildings, and then placed the club on one of the buildings together with club=sport, sport=netball. I think that is a little better..
145856634 by Warin61 @ 2024-01-03 22:02	1	2024-01-05 05:38	boulton_zak ♦1	Hello Warin61, I think it is quite obvious that you have never visited this reserve as your edits are incorrect and it is clear that they were based purely on government data and aerial imagery. Government data and aerial imagery can be outdated or inaccurate so it is best not to edit places unle...
	2	2024-01-05 05:50	Warin61	The government date is official. It includes legal easements. My experience is that the government date is reliable. Boundaries cannot be accurately obtained for imagery or casual observation. More? Even Parks Vic who run the park and must know the boundaries so don't go messing with others...
	3	2024-01-07 09:52	TheSwavu ♦544	Hi Folks, Well this is an interesting one. I eventually found the gazettal and based on VicMap Property most of allotment 2086 (https://production-detailed-report-pdf.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/Allot-2086-Parish-Of-Frankston-(ID216301107)-Detailed-Property-Report.pdf) is missing in the ParkR...
	4	2024-01-07 10:16	TheSwavu ♦544	I just noticed that the Esri imagery has the new SES building on it at low zoom.
	5	2024-01-08 09:03	Warin61	HI, The planning zones report https://production-planning-report-pdf.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/Allot-2086-Parish-Of-Frankston-(ID216301107)-Vicplan-Planning-Property-Report.pdf suggest that some of the area is under local government control while some is 'Public park and recreation/con...
	6	2024-01-08 09:14	Warin61	Lot 40N does not appear to be part of the gazetted area for The Pines park .. Above .. I was wrong in attributing it to local gove.. PUZ7 = 'Public use - other public use' whatever that means (probably equivalent to 'miscellaneous' !).
	7	2024-01-08 09:23	Warin61	Ok... 40N not part of the original gazette, but the property report puts it with some of the original gazetted areas. So that is 'good', the property report/planning property report are dated from when I accessed it ... meaning it is upto date' as far as they know.
	8	2024-01-08 10:23	TheSwavu ♦544	40N is the street number not the lot number. The legal boundaries are based on allotments not the street address.
145466677 by Iain Douglas @ 2023-12-24 12:09	1	2024-01-06 10:36	Warin61	Hi, There are 2 'Dead Horse Gap'. One signed on the road is as close as that gets to the true gap, I think of it as a tourist sign. The other is the true gap .. as recognised by the Geographic Naming Board. I have rest the second back to where it was.
145820819 by boulton_zak @ 2024-01-03 02:47	1	2024-01-04 06:54	Warin61	HI, The Federal Government through the Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) sets the boundary for this Reserve to exclude the tree are you claim as part of the Reserve. What evidence do you have that suggest the government has it wrong??? The way 123641736 entered here wit...
145522346 by boulton_zak @ 2023-12-26 08:03	1	2023-12-30 23:10	Warin61	Hi, There should be no need to edit 'Pines Flora & Fauna Reserve' as that comes from government data. Assumes that no one has altered it from when it was first entered. Try to leave these government entered data alone. I have tried to detail the trees in this area using bing. As it...
120926376 by Reims Moderne @ 2022-05-13 09:44	1	2022-05-13 10:50	Ale_Zena_IT ♦173	Hello, your changeset goes form Kenia to Sverige. Please, try to keep them much much smaller to help the community for a whealthy activities monitoring. I was checking activities in Somalia and came across your changeset. Cheers Alessandro
	2	2022-05-13 22:11	avinet_ua Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
	3	2023-12-26 21:42	Warin61	Part reverted in Australia, mapped area is of one farm.
69291345 by vicpeakbagger @ 2019-04-17 01:21	1	2023-12-21 20:33	Warin61	Hi, I have added data in this area directly from the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales... This removes the name from the peak you have named 'South Rams Head' which has no name on the DCS Topo map nor on the DCS Base Map nor according to the NSW GNB. For the official So...
143245354 by Ydgfb @ 2023-10-28 07:09	1	2023-12-18 23:56	Warin61	Hi, I find it better to map the fields more individually. The fields don't conform to north to south nor east west lines. The relation 16607085 should include all the water ways as inners. Some of the landuse=farmyard are actually alnduse=residential.
	2	2023-12-19 02:21	Ydgfb ♦10	Hi there. Could you please elaborate on the difference between the residential landuse and the farmyard landuse? I haven't been able to find this sort of nuance elsewhere so I would appreciate it if you would help me understand. Thanks.
	3	2023-12-19 09:45	Warin61	From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Farmyard Landuse=farmyard: Area of land with farm buildings (farmstead, sheeds, stables) / barnyard Landuse=residential: An area of land having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings.
145098018 by John Bek @ 2023-12-14 06:20	1	2023-12-15 07:01	Warin61	Hi, What does the 682 bus do? Do a circuit around the car park?
	2	2023-12-16 22:27	John Bek ♦20	The 682 has been doing that for at least a year now
	3	2023-12-16 22:29	John Bek ♦20	https://transportnsw.info/routes/details/blue-mountains-buses-network/686/64686
	4	2023-12-17 10:47	Warin61	Ok, I've made the changes to the 686 route. It is about the only thing they can do. I have moved the bus stop over to the car park too
145103820 by Lockstar @ 2023-12-14 09:32	1	2023-12-15 07:10	Warin61	Moving the roundabout in the relations 3449530 and 3449531 bus route 909 end of the relation breaks the PTv2 rules - ways must be in sequential order. I have repair these.
144930897 by Lockstar @ 2023-12-09 11:00	1	2023-12-10 20:16	Warin61	Those 'warnings' such as 'mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part' should be fixed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.92213&lat=-33.87505&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cdupli...
	2	2023-12-12 20:55	Warin61	No response ... deleted.
	3	2023-12-13 01:13	Lockstar ♦26	Noted - thanks
144906698 by Chris Denomy @ 2023-12-08 14:47	1	2023-12-10 20:22	Warin61	Relation fairway 14412992 deleted. When you change a relation so that it has no outer members that means it does not form any function, delete them. If you do not mean to make them nonfuctional then you need to work on them... Once again I have deleted this relation...
	2	2023-12-10 20:24	Warin61	There are a number of these that need fixing ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.14079&lat=-36.22283&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecti...
143864889 by deStGermain @ 2023-11-10 13:58	1	2023-12-10 02:48	Warin61	In general roundabout do not have a name, and they are tagged 'junction=roundabout'. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout I have fixed this one.
144907083 by Chris Denomy @ 2023-12-08 14:57	1	2023-12-09 23:07	Warin61	Relation 14418120 fairway deleted as it now has only one member with the role inner. Fairway gone. The 'green is now part of the fairway...
131532099 by TheSwavu @ 2023-01-21 07:25	1	2023-12-07 05:39	Warin61	Hi, The DCS Base map suggest that Horseshoe Rd and others are not private and not tracks. Horseshoe Rd goes to a number of properties and is probably council controlled.
144810018 by TobyOrr @ 2023-12-05 23:59	1	2023-12-06 21:47	Warin61	Hi Relation 16782872 is not closed. Why not use the DCS Base Map as a source for this? I would think that is far better than imagery alone to determine these features.
	2	2023-12-07 22:42	TobyOrr ♦16	Thanks for the feedback about the relation not closed. The DCS Base Map is reasonable but not perfect. I think I can do better using satellite imagery - especially as we have access to a number of imagery sources. I have visited a small part of Yanga National Park but the wettest parts are not acc...
144778795 by Lockstar @ 2023-12-05 06:07	1	2023-12-06 21:43	Warin61	Relation 16786435 is in error. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.56291&lat=-28.87185&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cr...
144683226 by JoaoMMartins @ 2023-12-02 07:38	1	2023-12-03 22:32	Warin61	Bus route relation 8552384 has been restore to a past version - it contains the complete route and missing details - ref, name to...
	2	2023-12-03 23:07	JoaoMMartins ♦2	@Warin61 thanks for that and sorry, most likely an issue with shared points outside the editing area when deleting polygons
144161505 by Lockstar @ 2023-11-18 04:12	1	2023-12-03 22:31	Warin61	This has removed the route number and other details .... reverted.
144680236 by Warin61 @ 2023-12-02 02:46	1	2023-12-03 06:33	Vadmium ♦14	I think I intended this to interpolate the unit numbers (1/41–3/41), since the street numbers are the same. Do you think that’s too confusing or ambiguous?
	2	2023-12-03 08:49	Warin61	I think the addr:interpolation is only for the house number, nothing to do with the unit number.
135969416 by Vadmium @ 2023-05-11 09:54	1	2023-12-02 02:50	Warin61	Hi Way 1171531881 addr:interpolation=even includes an odd number...
	2	2023-12-02 04:16	Vadmium ♦14	Fixed 1171531881 and also w1171531865
135929544 by Vadmium @ 2023-05-10 10:23	1	2023-12-02 02:48	Warin61	Hi Way 1171111175 addr:interpolation runs between the same numbers ... does not make sense...
	2	2023-12-02 04:23	Vadmium ♦14	Thanks, I fixed it
136324738 by Vadmium @ 2023-05-20 06:54	1	2023-12-02 02:43	Warin61	Hi Beach St number 119 looks wrong? Even numbers along this side of the St???
	2	2023-12-02 03:53	Vadmium ♦14	Fixed, another copy–paste error
6491003 by Neil Penman @ 2010-11-30 00:05	1	2023-12-02 02:38	Warin61	Hi, Addresses look strange for Fraser St, 2 to 23 along one side while the other runs 1 to 28 ???
	2	2023-12-02 02:46	Neil Penman ♦1	Yes that does look odd. Unfortunately I don't live in that area any more so I can't go and check it.
142179615 by Vadmium @ 2023-10-05 09:08	1	2023-12-02 02:11	Warin61	Hi, Way 1213250878 has addr:interpolation=even yet contains one odd addr????
	2	2023-12-02 02:42	Vadmium ♦14	Thanks, I fixed it. Looks like it was a copy and paste error of mine.
144024486 by Adrien Ri @ 2023-11-14 19:55	1	2023-11-16 00:27	Warin61	Relation 16698618 and 16698619 are wrong. The outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=136.76799&lat=-12.19510&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multi...
	2	2023-11-30 23:04	Warin61	No attempt to fix the issue. Relation deleted.
140278620 by sudface @ 2023-08-23 14:10	1	2023-11-30 05:43	Warin61	For 'closed' use the tag 'access=no'. 'highway=construction' is for things being made.
	2	2023-11-30 05:50	Warin61	I note that other closed tracks are not tagged.
	3	2023-11-30 11:14	sudface ♦6	Right, makes sense. I marked these as construction because they've been "closed for repairs" for over 2 years.
143813615 by Lockstar @ 2023-11-09 09:28	1	2023-11-26 01:33	Warin61	Hi, Foot paths are at 'ground level' .. so layer=0 ... not layer=-1. Setting them at layer=-1 leads to conflicts with under ground tunnels for roads and train lines...
143956838 by BushTel @ 2023-11-13 06:20	1	2023-11-19 01:50	Warin61	Hi This adds a house number but without a street name. Without the street name it may make 'navigation' difficult.
	2	2023-11-21 00:18	BushTel ♦2	Thanks for the feedback but unfortunately Warruwi doesn't have any street names.
	3	2023-11-21 07:12	Warin61	The is this really a 'house number' or is it a 'lot number'? Might be better to use addr:full?
114708208 by aklopau_kontur @ 2021-12-08 15:31	1	2023-11-14 23:21	Warin61	Hi What is the source of this population?
143929798 by MapAnalyser465 @ 2023-11-12 11:33	1	2023-11-12 21:59	Warin61	I take it there is no longer any way to go from Qantus Drive east bound to O'Riordan Street as you have removed the right turn lanes and there is a turn restriction in place. This means the bus route T-Bus Terminal Transfer can no longer run... ????????
	2	2023-11-12 22:00	Warin61	O'Riordan Street south bound ... just to clarify
	3	2023-11-12 22:02	Warin61	Arr... it becomes Sir Reginald Ansett Drive once through the intersection.
	4	2023-11-12 22:19	Warin61	... I see ... update to new road ... Esri imagery would be the imagery to use. I have fixed the buss route and separated the joining roads so they can be used in route relations..
143818440 by Ydgfb @ 2023-11-09 11:34	1	2023-11-12 02:27	Warin61	Hi, Nodes 10233008384 and 10233008383 restored to previous position. Parking was otherwise out of kilter.
141418393 by Via-velo @ 2023-09-18 10:51	1	2023-10-07 05:11	Warin61	Hi Relation \t16379431 - fairway, now only has one member with the role 'inner'. That makes no sense, you should look at this to fix it.
	2	2023-11-06 23:25	Warin61	Deleted relation...
	3	2023-11-12 01:00	Warin61	Relations 14496632, v3 14496634, v3 14496635, v3 14496636, v3 14496637, v3 14496638, v3 14496639, v3 deleted. All one member role inner...
143841914 by MJFC @ 2023-11-09 23:14	1	2023-11-12 00:36	Warin61	Hi Way 1222365541 is wrong. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12122&lat=-35.24394&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cri...
	2	2023-11-14 03:11	MJFC ♦3	Thank you, updated
143391912 by InfernoOSM @ 2023-10-30 23:26	1	2023-11-06 23:31	Warin61	Hi, Construction relation 16622825 deleted as the outer ways shared segments. Retagged ways with 'landuse=construction' - this is simpler and easier to edit in future.
141709696 by Snail126 @ 2023-09-25 02:45	1	2023-11-03 00:04	Warin61	Hi, Ritches IGA relation is wrong. Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96378&lat=-35.52714&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multip...
142120213 by Warin61 @ 2023-10-03 22:38	1	2023-10-26 03:34	Sam Wilson ♦33	Oops, I've just recreated a Wray Avenue relation (16562551), didn't realise you'd deleted one (11500168). Although I'm not quite sure what your comment means: do you mean that it was not the right type? Or that there shouldn't be a relation?
	2	2023-10-26 08:17	Warin61	What is the purpose of the relation? To group things together that carry the same street name?... but his relation only has streets .. not addresses in it. It also contains parts of a roundabout .. The addresses along the street already contain the street information .. The relation looks to me...
	3	2023-10-26 08:52	Sam Wilson ♦33	The addresses can be added to the street relation (many places do that), but there's also info that's not redundant, i.e. the wikidata ID can be kept in the relation and need not be added to every road segment.
136523354 by tastrax @ 2023-05-25 03:17	1	2023-10-23 07:16	Warin61	Hi There is an error on way 822372606 addr:street=cton Drive ? A fair way from Action Drive...
	2	2023-10-23 10:10	tastrax ♦1,144	Its Acton Drive - typo fixed - Feel free to confirm on LIST data,
	3	2023-10-23 10:12	tastrax ♦1,144	Nice house actually - https://www.realestate.com.au/property/274-acton-dr-acton-park-tas-7170/
141302742 by HomerT51 @ 2023-09-15 13:06	1	2023-10-10 05:38	Warin61	Hi Relation 16333552 (farmland) is not closed... so it is in error. Further it looks like it contains areas that are not farmland. In any case this needs looking at. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.93064&lat=-33.00035&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standar...
	2	2023-10-22 23:19	Warin61	reverted
66820858 by Brisbane Address Import @ 2019-02-01 03:35	1	2023-10-22 02:54	Warin61	Hi The import has Ramsay Road, yet OSM has the road named Ramsay Street... There are a number of similar discrepancies. I am inclined to trust the road names as they are displayed on maps. What say you?
88333614 by joel7 @ 2020-07-22 08:06	1	2023-10-22 02:49	Warin61	Hi, Here there is addr:street=Turubul Crescent ... but the road is named Turubul Court ... which is it?
34295972 by Hoylen Sue @ 2015-09-28 04:32	1	2023-10-22 02:19	Warin61	Hi Here is Ospray Lane while addr:street has Osprey Lane.. Which is it?
	2	2023-10-22 04:14	Hoylen Sue ♦3	Osprey is the correct spelling. Thanks for finding that: I've now fixed it.
142124451 by Hoylen Sue @ 2023-10-04 04:04	1	2023-10-19 02:15	Warin61	The name on the road is "Macarthur Avenue" Note the capitalization should be the same on the addr:street value so they are an exact match. I assume the road name is correct as that is what is displayed on most maps.
	2	2023-10-19 06:54	Hoylen Sue ♦3	That is a good question. "MacArthur" is used too. For example, in Google maps, TransLink (South East Queensland's public transport authority) and Northshore Brisbane (the developer of the area). Unfortunately, the physical street signs and the Brisbane City Council's official CSV...
	3	2023-10-19 08:28	Warin61	The same problem with all caps exists on the DCS Base Map for NSW too. I am not local so cannot do anything that way. Street signs too mostly all caps so they too are usually of no help. The lower case entry dates from some 14 years ago. That is a long time for the capitalization to be corrected...
	4	2023-10-19 08:59	Hoylen Sue ♦3	I'm planning to visit the (State) Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying in the near future. So I'll ask them if they know where we can find the correct version. I suspect someone accidentally/deliberately started using the lowercase decades ago, and some people copied it while other pe...
	5	2023-10-20 07:42	Warin61	I'm a JOSM user. I can search and download for anything with the tag name=Macarthur Avenue. Similarly I can search and download any addr:street=Macarthur. I don't know if Id has the same capablity?
142689560 by freedomjosh @ 2023-10-17 01:52	1	2023-10-18 23:25	Warin61	Hi, There is a problem with building way 1216150277. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.65942&lat=-34.90813&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cin...
	2	2023-10-18 23:51	freedomjosh ♦3	Fixed thanks I don't exactly know how addr:street works with different clients, but the main reason I map is I found it frustrating with navigation how there are never street numbers and for really long roads you are forced to use another proprietary map if you don't have 20min to aim f...
	3	2023-10-19 08:32	Warin61	Yep, really frustrating. I started years ago adding just road names where OSM was missing them. In Vic. & NSW we now have gov. data for both road names and house numbers... so much quicker.
137168096 by Vadmium @ 2023-06-10 11:09	1	2023-10-19 03:01	Warin61	Hi, way 1180947989 - addr:interpolation has both even and odd addr numbers .. that does not work for either even or odd values in addr:interpolation... Hummm .. Can I leave you to look at this for correction?
	2	2023-10-19 03:16	Vadmium ♦14	Thankyou, that range was totally wrong. I have fixed it.
142654487 by Warin61 @ 2023-10-16 09:22	1	2023-10-16 10:04	cleary ♦56	Hello again Warin We recently exchanged thoughts about spelling of Toolebuc/Tooleybuc. I think we were both of the view that the NSW and Qld placenames were spelled differently. I know I was a bit confused but I think Tooleybuc with a "y" is the NSW spelling while Toolebuc without "...
	2	2023-10-16 10:49	Warin61	Bugger, I just changed them with this changeset :( Ok .. I'll change all these to ummm Toolebuc .. fingers crossed... I'll have to go looking for Tooleybuc NSW and see if those are correct ...
	3	2023-10-16 21:23	cleary ♦56	It was my carelessness/inconsistency in spelling that started this problem. Thanks for your work in getting it right.
	4	2023-10-17 07:02	Warin61	I have picked up some of my own. I think I have all of them now. The NSW ones look to be correct already.
133928601 by int03 @ 2023-03-21 08:13	1	2023-10-16 23:47	Warin61	Reverted
133928831 by int03 @ 2023-03-21 08:21	1	2023-10-16 23:43	Warin61	Reverted. Name corrected using DCS Base Map... Use what OSM has available .. not copyright stuff.
133963313 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:35	1	2023-10-16 23:39	Warin61	Reverted
133963360 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:40	1	2023-10-16 23:37	Warin61	Reverted
133963376 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:42	1	2023-10-16 23:36	Warin61	Reverted
133963382 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:43	1	2023-10-16 23:35	Warin61	Reverted
133963395 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:44	1	2023-10-16 23:34	Warin61	Reverted
133963426 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:46	1	2023-10-16 23:32	Warin61	Reverted.
135493533 by int03 @ 2023-04-29 07:35	1	2023-10-16 23:21	Warin61	the name tag is for names ONLY.. not geographic descriptions.. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
142017276 by TheSwavu @ 2023-10-02 01:56	1	2023-10-16 11:07	Warin61	HI, Looks to me that the ABS data copyright is not useable in OSM ... See https://www.abs.gov.au/website-privacy-copyright-and-disclaimer#copyright-and-creative-commons
141718026 by Crypty @ 2023-09-25 07:54	1	2023-10-16 02:05	Warin61	Hi, Thanks for adding these addressed .. but abbreviations should be expanded, in particular the addr:street should match the road name used in OSM including any capitalization. So Letitia st should be Letitia Street. That way the data matches when someone searches for it.
142606207 by oz291 @ 2023-10-15 08:09	1	2023-10-15 21:35	Warin61	The sydney boundary is not something that should be changed to suit imagery. Further the changes have resulted in the boundary relation being broken - no longer forming a continuous boundary. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.66528&lat=-34.02771&zoom=14&b...
22916618 by Didz @ 2014-06-13 21:07	1	2023-10-10 06:05	Warin61	Hi, Long time ago but these 'house numbers' would they not be 'addr:unit' sharing the same street and 'house number' for the Westminster Retirement Village ???
	2	2023-10-13 17:45	Didz ♦8	Yes these should be unit numbers. The information was from a newly installed sign out the front which has since been replaced and can be seen online. https://unitingsa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/12A6554.jpg I have been doing updates to Grange recently particularly to addresses and new subd...
	3	2023-10-14 07:20	Warin61	Very good, thanks.
134047302 by int03 @ 2023-03-24 03:52	1	2023-10-12 01:05	Warin61	Copyright violation. Reverted.
134047327 by int03 @ 2023-03-24 03:54	1	2023-10-12 01:05	Warin61	Reverted.
134324415 by int03 @ 2023-03-31 01:48	1	2023-10-12 00:55	Warin61	Reverted - copyright. You are attracting attention due to copyright issues.
133963405 by int03 @ 2023-03-22 04:45	1	2023-10-12 00:37	Warin61	Copyright notice on the bottom right corner of the web page referred to ... "All contents Copyright " .... Do you have permission to copy this??? Not listed on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales
32133047 by cleary @ 2015-06-22 08:27	1	2023-10-11 01:14	Warin61	Hi, Conflict of road names here Toolebuc Road on the road itself and Tooleybuc Road on the farm addresses... A google search has Tooleybuc for Queensland and Toolebuc for NSW... sigh. Translations from Aborigine I assume. Change these all to Tooleybuc ???
	2	2023-10-11 06:57	cleary ♦56	Yes, it seems I confused the NSW and QLD spellings. " Tooleybuc" with a "y" seems to be correct for Queensland. Thanks for picking this up. Please go ahead and correct my errors if you are willing to do so. Alternatively I will look but it will be a few days before I can get to i...
	3	2023-10-11 07:00	cleary ♦56	No No No. I'm still confused. Queensland spelling is without the "y", isn't it? You are thinking more clearly than I am. Please fix my errors.
	4	2023-10-11 09:29	Warin61	Don't blame you for the confusion. If we had sanskrit or cyrillic we'd know know to spell things. I'll fix it when I get back to it. I'm slowly working through an 'error' file from rendering an Australian map, Address errors were 3.3 Mb .. now down to 2.7 Mb most of...
	5	2023-10-11 09:52	cleary ♦56	Thanks.
142309194 by Chris Sherlock @ 2023-10-08 15:06	1	2023-10-09 01:22	Warin61	Why make a relation for gladesville road??? The western section is not a classification of tertiary... The relevant tags were on the individual ways ... --------------- Hint The DCS Imagery has better accuracy .. bing tends to be more upto date .. but may have offsets.
	2	2023-10-09 08:10	Chris Sherlock ♦1	Isn’t it all one road, however?
	3	2023-10-09 08:11	Chris Sherlock ♦1	How do you represent an entire length of a road that changes from one road type to another? Apologies, I’m new to this.
	4	2023-10-10 03:43	Warin61	The road gets split where it changes speed limit, classification, surface and/or turn restrictions apply. Many roads are split into many segments. In this case there are 4 segments ... one is a bridge, one is a turn restriction and the other two are different classifications. Consider Ryde Rd .....
140584298 by arctic-rocinante @ 2023-08-30 11:46	1	2023-10-07 23:28	Warin61	addr:postcode without a street, house number ... The postcodes have been deleted entered by you in this vicinity. As have country, state etc ... These can be had by the data base users looking for 'is in' searches so don't bother adding data bloat.
	2	2023-10-07 23:53	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Interesting, seems to be a problem with Organic Maps (the app I used for these edits). I just performed a test by adding a website to a cafe, and sure enough Organic Maps added a postcode in the same changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11121077143 I’ll raise a bug for it on th...
	3	2023-10-08 00:39	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Opened an issue here: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/6260 Feel free to add additional context there if I've missed anything 👍
137474839 by arctic-rocinante @ 2023-06-18 11:24	1	2023-10-07 00:59	Warin61	Umm I don't think trees have addresses...
	2	2023-10-07 03:12	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Oops, thanks for spotting this. Not done intentionally - I must’ve duplicated an existing tree without noticing it had an address tag. I’ll have a look over them and clean it up later today or tomorrow 👍
	3	2023-10-07 08:05	Warin61	I think I got them all ... 63 done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142252468 At least the ones you entered.. have check for any others .. found 93 others .. Spanish? mapper... corrected...
	4	2023-10-07 10:02	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Yep looks like you got them all, thanks!
115072388 by Awo @ 2021-12-17 21:16	1	2023-10-07 08:00	Warin61	Trees don't have addresses...
142170648 by Maurino84 @ 2023-10-05 04:40	1	2023-10-07 05:28	Warin61	2 relations for the bridge deleted. One old way made into the bridge and made into a simple closed way. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge for correct bridge tagging.
141843029 by Snail126 @ 2023-09-28 01:24	1	2023-10-07 04:57	Warin61	Hi Relation 16389568 deleted. building=yes;roof needed to be separated into one OSM entry for building=yes (I changed this to retail) and a separate building=roof with layer=1. The guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry'.
65063621 by BowralMapper @ 2018-12-01 03:45	1	2022-04-12 05:03	Warin61	Hi, You have quite a few ways in Moss Vale without tags ... See https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=17&lat=-34.54993&lon=150.38182&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C70%2C120%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
	2	2023-10-06 00:00	Warin61	addr:housenumber are valid witha - for a range of numbers. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers Warnings .. are not necessarily errors that need correction.
118805272 by JoeG @ 2022-03-23 07:03	1	2022-03-23 22:46	Warin61	Planned? A politicians promise ... been made before ... 8 years ago ... and some decades before that too. How are the car parks going?
	2	2022-03-24 01:40	JoeG ♦34	I haven't fully understood lifecycle prefixes, so happy to take your advice on whether it should be planned. I mapped it so that there is a reference point around which to map other landscape features, in light of the new $5.4B election promise (while recognising approval processes still have ...
	3	2022-03-25 07:28	Warin61	The Bradfield Scheme has been around for many decades... real engineering evaluations have rejected it... Politically it sounds good, probably wins votes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed "This is frequently used to describe projects that are abandoned, planned to start in ...
	4	2022-03-25 07:55	JoeG ♦34	Looks like there's an inconsistency in the wiki because the lifecycle page lists both proposed and planned as "Planned, with a high likelihood of being constructed" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
	5	2022-03-25 08:01	JoeG ♦34	Note that this is definitely not the Bradfield scheme. The proposed height of the dam is too low for that, and some are upset about it. Note that I don't plan to map any other proposed features (e.g. the extent of the dam and location of agricultural areas). This is the minimum needed but also ...
	6	2023-10-05 00:58	Warin61	This is no longer 'planned'. Scrapped in the government budget of October 2022... some say it was an election promise...
142121792 by mattcossey @ 2023-10-04 00:46	1	2023-10-04 23:42	Warin61	Reverted. The park boundary is from government data .. not bing imagery.... The change caused clark island to be entered twice into the park relation.
123916356 by Beager @ 2022-07-22 02:12	1	2023-10-03 23:58	Warin61	Hi, Way 1080422619 tagged interpolation=even but runs from and to odd numbers. Should this not be interpolation=odd???
	2	2023-10-04 00:34	Beager ♦10	Fixed
137433221 by Vadmium @ 2023-06-17 02:21	1	2023-10-03 23:54	Warin61	Hi Way: 1182617468 is incorrect ... goes from '40' (this is a duplicate of previous node addr) to '40' .. ummm
	2	2023-10-04 04:11	Vadmium ♦14	Thankyou, I have fixed it up. Obviously a bad copy and paste from the previous address row.
104152902 by mario7436 @ 2021-05-05 03:10	1	2023-10-03 03:13	Warin61	Err no? NewAction South has the street address of Marcus Clarke Street... Kendal Ave could be some other street in this vicinity???
73137843 by daviewales @ 2019-08-08 06:45	1	2023-09-25 02:14	Warin61	number of these addresses do not match the road names in OSM as they have the suffix "East" added. The DCS base map also does not show these "East" suffixes ... Comment?
	2	2023-09-26 23:45	nevw ♦1,974	Hi, I can fix these if you like.
	3	2023-09-26 23:52	nevw ♦1,974	I have gone ahead and corrected these https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141794983 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141794983
	4	2023-09-27 08:20	Warin61	I too can 'fix' them. However there are a number address issues. I'm thinking about some resolution. I have raised one issue on the tagging list and I think a solution would also suit some of these address issues too.
	5	2023-09-27 19:13	nevw ♦1,974	Yes, there is a need for new addr or postal tagging for community groups like gated communities but I expect this changeset was some sort of cut and paste error.
	6	2023-09-28 08:28	Warin61	It could be an error on the LPI/DCS data base ... Mowbray Road West for example in OSM is Mowbray Road I have added the Mowbray Road West as an alternative and changed the relevant addresses in OSM to match and used addr_postal:street for the Mowbray Road West ...
	7	2023-09-28 11:10	daviewales ♦3	Good catch! This was from this import project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Australia_NSW_Property_and_Address_Import Most information and the full history of uploaded and reviewed address files is in the GitLab repository: https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-addres...
	8	2023-09-29 10:27	Warin61	"There is always one more bug" The good thing is that with the greater amount of data that cross references to other data there is more chance that any bugs will be found and sorted.
140572365 by seartroy @ 2023-08-30 07:04	1	2023-09-29 01:12	Warin61	Hi, All caps in the street and suburb is wrong. I have corrected it on the single error.
137470800 by John Bek @ 2023-06-18 08:56	1	2023-09-26 01:02	Warin61	Restored bus stop for node 4861436772 ... cable car east end.
141490128 by MHammad_KhalidTfNSW @ 2023-09-20 01:17	1	2023-09-20 23:31	Warin61	Test? If you want to 'test' there is a sandbox 'development server', use it - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
141489740 by MHammad_KhalidTfNSW @ 2023-09-20 00:49	1	2023-09-20 23:31	Warin61	The name tag is for real names only. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Suggest you do more reading on the OSM wiki.
110373681 by aharvey @ 2021-08-28 10:00	1	2023-09-16 05:11	Warin61	Hi, The DCS base map divides 'Mowbray Road' into 'Mowbray Road West' and 'Mowbray Road', the addresses along the road agree with the west naming. Ok to sufix the name with West as appropriate?
	2	2023-09-18 02:53	aharvey ♦1,694	It probably is officially West, but all the street signage I can see doesn't mention West, so if following on the ground signage we would omit it. So I'm not sure...
	3	2023-09-18 08:23	Warin61	The building numbers support it all being one road - no duplications that I can see on a casual look. Humm ... I think alt_name may have to do. If the road signage gets changed ??? I used to drive along here some moons ago to get to and from work, only knew it as Mowbray Rd. .
140404341 by dangaz @ 2023-08-26 10:00	1	2023-09-16 07:56	Warin61	The playground is best left as a separate entry. Leisure=playground:pitch does not 'make sense' in OSM terms. The OSM guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry'. I have attempted to detail the area. There may be toilets and a bubbler here that are not mapped.
	2	2023-09-16 12:52	dangaz ♦1	Fair no problem, I only had it like this as the park itself is 'Mount Evelyn Skate Park and Playground' as one entity, it does work better as individual segments though. I will put the carpark back in though.
	3	2023-09-17 08:12	Warin61	Possibly a site relation with that name with each feature are a member? Or a landuse=recreation_ground with that name? More than one way to skin a cat.
141330018 by Warin61 @ 2023-09-16 07:53	1	2023-09-16 08:09	Warin61	Forgot Imagery source = bing
141247975 by TheSwavu @ 2023-09-14 09:21	1	2023-09-15 00:13	Warin61	Part reverted to restore Meryla State Forest boundary.
141013534 by Mudgey @ 2023-09-09 07:51	1	2023-09-11 03:43	Warin61	Hi, This has broken the bus route Singleton to Maitland ... Sections of hwy are not tagged oneway as I would think they would be with the new section open... There may be other problems here too... oh .. looking at the warnings there are other problems here ... disconnected hwy 4 off , ...
	2	2023-09-13 00:44	Warin61	I have partially reverted this changeset to restore the bus route.
141053682 by Alarik82 @ 2023-09-10 09:22	1	2023-09-10 23:18	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Some hints? Relation 16309539 - multipolygon (shop) makes no sense. First a multipolygon relation must make a closed area. Next the tag shop=yes does not convey much information. I have deleted this. Relation 16309540 'Centre Pharmacy' ... That does...
122399358 by SueAnnon @ 2022-06-15 06:13	1	2023-09-10 03:21	Warin61	Hi, Is this another 'gated community'??? These keep cropping up .. I expect the QA tools think these are 'locational' rather than 'postal'...
140434632 by green_leek @ 2023-08-27 03:04	1	2023-08-31 00:58	Warin61	HI, The bus stops are in the wrong order for relation16246834 \tStrathfield Connector Blue route (Cave Rd - Wallis Ave).
	2	2023-09-08 01:05	Warin61	I have placed a few in order .. but deleted many as I cannot be bothered to correct all of them.
140916992 by Warin61 @ 2023-09-07 00:21	1	2023-09-07 04:38	jMapsAu ♦9	Removal of maxspeed tags removes this data from the Max Speed view of Open Railway Map. What validator errors were you seeing @Warin61?
	2	2023-09-07 08:45	Warin61	A) oneway=yes with maxspeed:forward or maxspeed:backward .. that is not logical B) maxspeed:forward equals maxspeed:backward, just use maxspeed instead. There maybe more of these logical types of errors..
124660584 by jMapsAu @ 2022-08-08 23:06	1	2023-09-07 00:17	Warin61	There are warning messages about these max speed tags. As these are unable to be checked I will delete them.
	2	2023-09-07 04:34	jMapsAu ♦9	@Warin61 Can you elaborate on what errors you're seeing? Better to fix these than remove them.
88609634 by French_au @ 2020-07-28 09:18	1	2023-09-06 02:12	Warin61	Hi, The OSM guide is "one feature = one OSM entry" The Intercontinental Hotel had 2 entries - one as a node the other as a relation. I have removed the node entry while placing the additional tags on the relation.
140563460 by roseability @ 2023-08-30 00:29	1	2023-09-06 02:01	Warin61	Hi, I have altered this. Relation outer ways cannot touch .. so a relation does not work here. The church building now has the tags that were on the relation - service times syntax corrected. The other building simply tagged building=yes. Think that should do?
	2	2023-09-08 01:53	roseability ♦1	Yes, thanks!
140080535 by らくがき @ 2023-08-19 04:40	1	2023-08-30 01:20	Warin61	Hi, addr:street should have the same capitalization as the associated highway, in this case "Guinea Street" not "Guinea street"
140467276 by caddiemapper @ 2023-08-27 20:27	1	2023-08-28 23:21	Warin61	Hi Relation 16248772 has a number of issues: tagged as both sand and grass??? Chose one, Looks like grass to me, so landuse=grass and remove the sand and other grass taggs. The outer way crosses and inner... that is an error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.00120&...
122488411 by SueAnnon @ 2022-06-17 04:11	1	2023-08-26 05:36	Warin61	Hi Some of these address don't match the adjacent road names ???
	2	2023-08-28 03:40	SueAnnon ♦1	We have this site addresses as 123 Mark Road - not in the individual Streets
	3	2023-08-28 03:45	Joseph Crowell ♦8	This is a gated community. Typically addresses in gated communities don't match the address where they're at, but the address at the gate, which is Mark Road.
	4	2023-08-28 04:35	Joseph Crowell ♦8	It was showing up because Mark Road East was miss named. Corrected here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140474861#map=15/-26.7931/153.1105
	5	2023-08-28 08:17	Warin61	It is 'showing up' when people try to make a map from it - detected address to road name differences. Might be a good idea to put a comment on these about it being a gated community with a common address?
	6	2023-08-28 09:53	Joseph Crowell ♦8	It takes a few days for OSM Inspector and other software to update with any fixes. Rest assured it is fixed. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=153.09506&lat=-27.54829&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=street_not_found%2Cplace_not_found Here a...
84515776 by laneoneform @ 2020-05-02 10:50	1	2023-08-28 00:46	Warin61	Hi, The university building numbers look like ref=* numbers - not address numbers.
90551771 by AndrewTheNintendrone @ 2020-09-08 00:46	1	2023-08-28 00:38	Warin61	Hi, Along with the house number the address also would require the street name - addr:street=???
103407252 by Andy_T_56 @ 2021-04-22 11:12	1	2023-08-27 04:48	Warin61	Hi, This changed a road name from Myrtle Creek Road to Cluan Tiers Road. There are a number of buildings carrying the address of Myrtle Creek Road at the south eastern section of this road. Possibly the road should be split into 2??? If so, where?
	2	2023-08-28 07:39	Andy_T_56 ♦10	Quite Right. I have updated the road names and status. Some of Myrtle Creek Road is private access. I have split at the last house before the road goes into forestry area.
66630977 by Brisbane Address Import @ 2019-01-25 12:56	1	2023-08-27 04:03	Warin61	HI There are addresses along "Pine Mountain Close" that have addr:street=Mcgahan Street .. that looks to be a conflict??? And OSM names the street "McGahan Street" I have placed a note on the address concerned.
140397267 by green_leek @ 2023-08-26 05:53	1	2023-08-26 23:43	Warin61	Hi Under 'Public Transport version 2' routes ... the stops must be in the correct order from 'start' to 'finish' .. the same order as the ways are. As such the introduction of the stop/platform 'Parramatta North Carpark' is not in the correct order. I ...
140398443 by roseability @ 2023-08-26 06:54	1	2023-08-26 23:35	Warin61	Hi, Way 1202238830 for building house is 'not very good' ... First the JOSM validator would have given you a warning that 2 nodes were duplicates of each other. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.62249&lat=-33.44073&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20...
66380092 by Brisbane Address Import @ 2019-01-17 01:28	1	2023-08-26 05:40	Warin61	Abbreviations should not have been used e.g "Mt Crosby Road" should have been "Mount Crosby Road"...
140347068 by green_leek @ 2023-08-25 00:53	1	2023-08-26 00:44	Warin61	Bus route M92 to Sutherland set back to Public Transport version 1 as it does not comply with version 2 requirements.
138763896 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-07-20 12:57	1	2023-07-21 00:49	Warin61	Hi, The 2 relations ... not correct. They should be one relation containing both ways, one way with the role 'outer' for the outside, the other with the role 'inner' for the island. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16112688#map=19/-38.14722/144.27968
	2	2023-08-25 23:53	Warin61	Not interested? Deleted both relations...
140378056 by InfernoOSM @ 2023-08-25 15:27	1	2023-08-25 23:43	Warin61	Hi, The footway (way 1202026342 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202026342#map=18/-37.86047/144.74936) is wrong... in that it crosses it self. While a human can understand it a computer makes hard work of it. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.74859&lat=-37.8597...
140302430 by melb_guy @ 2023-08-24 05:02	1	2023-08-25 23:29	Warin61	Hi, The relation roles should be reversed... And 'area=yes' on the relation ways is incorrect. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.65886&lat=-38.06945&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cdu...
130272321 by Alistair_P @ 2022-12-20 05:05	1	2023-08-25 04:04	Warin61	The '2022 Walking Trail Route 1' (13456569, v13) has 'operator=PFM' ... What does PFM stand for???
	2	2023-08-25 05:27	nevw ♦1,974	I expect the operator is Programmed Facility Management https://programmed.com.au/success-story/rottnest-island-wa/
	3	2024-12-28 23:22	Sam Wilson ♦33	Is this actually a separate trail to Ngank Yira Bidi (relation 6838122)? It looks incomplete, and follows pretty much the same path as that one. There's no mention of a 2022 trail on the website: https://www.rottnestisland.com/visit/getting-around/by-foot
140348143 by Warin61 @ 2023-08-25 02:00	1	2023-08-25 02:02	Warin61	Opps - sources are PSMA for boundary DCS Imagery for oneway
140116928 by TheSwavu @ 2023-08-20 04:32	1	2023-08-20 23:01	Warin61	Opps... Brush Island nature reserve broken... way 67176498 formed it and this changeset has broken it into two .. but not placed the second way into the relation 8278760.
139987024 by Tntnnbltn @ 2023-08-16 22:03	1	2023-08-17 23:58	Warin61	Hi Multipolygon inner ways cannot touch the outer way ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.94432&lat=-32.08965&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%...
139999854 by theranmann @ 2023-08-17 08:18	1	2023-08-17 23:42	Warin61	Hi, Relation 16213405 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.58627&lat=-28.79220&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segm...
63443159 by headap @ 2018-10-12 06:44	1	2023-08-17 06:46	Warin61	Hi, When you add a road name .. the 'street', 'road', 'highway' etc sections have the leading character capitalized ... e.g. 'Street', 'Road', 'Highway' etc.
114144972 by dhx1 @ 2021-11-23 15:18	1	2023-08-16 08:25	Warin61	Hi This gate you have placed on Leakes Road near the railway crossing ... so this road cannot be used across the rail way crossing??? Yet the imagery looks to have vehicles using it... old imagery? If the crossing no longer exists then that section of road should be removed...
113846124 by David Dean @ 2021-11-16 10:58	1	2023-08-09 00:26	Warin61	Hi The tags on these barriers of foot=no, bicycle=no means that bicycles and walkers cannot proceed, they have no access ... but other things do - motor vehicles, horse riders are ok. Is that what you intended???
	2	2023-08-15 01:22	David Dean ♦40	Hey Warin61, I'm not sure which particular barriers you are referring to, but if you can point them out, I'd be happy to check on site if needed to ensure they are tagged correctly.
	3	2023-08-15 06:47	Warin61	Hi, They are the barrier=log .. nodes 956995125 956995577 956996223 957004693 9197109340 9197109357 9256185267 9256185268 9256185270 9256185271 9263434819 9309827347 9309827355 9309827358
	4	2023-08-15 23:24	David Dean ♦40	ah, right - the fallen logs. I have tagged them as I thought they were passable at the time, at least wrt to bicycles and feet. Perhaps it would make sense to have tagged them access=no and add foot=yes for the few that could have been climbed over. No doubt many of them have been cleared by now. I&...
139803161 by Tntnnbltn @ 2023-08-12 21:27	1	2023-08-13 23:45	Warin61	Hi The relation 16193886 has some members simply tagged with area=yes, these tags have been removed as they convey no information, there ways already enclose an area.
	2	2023-08-15 00:28	Warin61	The Rossiter Pavilion ... why not use the outer way of this building as the inner in the pedestrian area .. rather than used all the building parts???
	3	2023-08-15 02:10	Tntnnbltn ♦4	The building outline includes all elements of the building parts, including some which are off the ground and have footpath running underneath them (e.g. the northeast and southwest corners of the building to the west. The building parts used for the inner represent the actual boundaries of the path...
139743238 by koof67 @ 2023-08-11 10:00	1	2023-08-11 23:23	Warin61	Hi, This changeset was partially reverted to restore administration boundaries for Pitt Town and Pitt Town Bottoms.
113181153 by David Dean @ 2021-10-31 07:05	1	2023-08-09 00:39	Warin61	Hi The Armidal State Forest is managed by the Forestry Corporation, it is a plantation to produce timber. While it serves a secondary purpose of recreation, as do many State Forests, it's primary function is to produce timber... The boundaries are available on the DCS Base Map ...
	2	2023-08-09 00:55	Warin61	I have reset this to a State Forest - landuse=forest and corrected the boundaries.
115501925 by らくがき @ 2021-12-29 06:49	1	2023-08-08 00:51	Warin61	Hi, Which road is this gate on? If it is no the 'Goodarragardar Power Line Rd' .. does the 'Stokes Hut Trail' join on the western or eastern end of the gate?
139540279 by koof67 @ 2023-08-07 02:16	1	2023-08-07 23:32	Warin61	Hi, Relation 16170158 is not closed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.31137&lat=-35.45474&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments...
122647143 by Stephen Males @ 2022-06-21 05:25	1	2023-08-07 03:57	Warin61	Hi, The lift gate on node 9835140984 looks to be a left over from the past? I have deleted it but moved the tagging to 2 nodes 11092784856 and 11092784857 on the service road - these could be a height restriction warning thingy thou???
	2	2023-08-07 04:52	Stephen Males ♦10	Hi there, I have ridden through there a number of times over the last 12 months, and there are indeed two boom gates to stop through traffic. I assume the only ones would could get through are deliveries for dock, cyclists, pedestrians and emergency vehicles, but i don't recall a sign saying t...
87602837 by CloCkWeRX @ 2020-07-06 12:52	1	2023-08-05 06:07	Warin61	Hi, node 429521996 tagged as barrier .. OSM is not clear if this apples to both service roads or one only. I'd think it should be moved to where it looks like the fence is ?
139042450 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-07-26 15:04	1	2023-07-28 03:14	Warin61	Hi, Relation 16130683 only have one way and in other changeset of yours relation 16112688 also only has one way. In both relations the single member has the role 'inner' so they make no sense by themselves. These need to be fixed... I leave them for you to fix.
131372910 by Vorsath @ 2023-01-17 10:49	1	2023-07-25 00:34	Warin61	Hi The 'name' of "Mount Ommaney Centre Car Park" looks to me more like a description than the road name? The might be a 'direction sign' that says it, but is it the road name??? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
138884858 by xnopyt812 @ 2023-07-23 09:20	1	2023-07-24 08:33	Warin61	Hi, Pitches are the playing area. What are names as 'Park' and mapped here are 'landuse=recreation_ground'. I have made that change and added the pitches. Hope that helps.
	2	2023-07-24 22:40	xnopyt812 ♦1	Yes my bad I made a mistake in labelling the areas. I will go fix this later. Thank you
67655347 by LakatosVL @ 2019-02-28 15:36	1	2023-07-23 05:38	Warin61	Hi Roundabout flare roads have the same name as the roads they lead to. fixmes removed and name added....
138750534 by nrs19 @ 2023-07-20 08:04	1	2023-07-21 01:04	Warin61	Hi Relation 16111790 ... has no outer... ??? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16111790
138762905 by Jivesas @ 2023-07-20 12:33	1	2023-07-21 00:54	Warin61	Hi, Relation \t16112650... How do you know this is meadow? It could be used for crops? If you are not certain then 'farmland' is far less specific....
	2	2023-07-21 07:03	Jivesas ♦4	Well, it doesn't look cultivated, I feel like I'm seeing cattle tracks and when there's brush scattered over a field it looks like a meadow to me. Feel free to change the type if you like
111276765 by BushTel @ 2021-09-16 07:47	1	2023-07-19 01:21	Warin61	Hi, The line (way) tagged as material=rock will not 'work' and has been deleted. I'd draw an area with natural=bare_rock and that would 'work' in OSM. and tagged as natural=bear_
137229381 by GridHopper @ 2023-06-12 06:34	1	2023-06-12 23:40	Warin61	HI, This one I'll leave you to fix. The Chinese cemetery sector is part of the cemetery - so no relation is required. Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.32810&lat=-34.54313&zoom=18&baselayer=...
	2	2023-07-15 11:20	Warin61	Cannot be bothered to fix it? Me neither .. deleted.
138500385 by Ydgfb @ 2023-07-14 10:11	1	2023-07-14 23:38	Warin61	Hi Building way crosses itself. This is an error that the JOSM validator would have identified before you uploaded .. and should be fixed preferably by you so you learn from the error so as not to repeat it. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.84535&lat=-37.76451&...
138374086 by Lokxbxhhshajxj @ 2023-07-11 10:36	1	2023-07-12 02:31	Warin61	Hi, The changes to administration boundaries have been reverted. These boundaries come from government data and are not based on imagery. Please make changeset comments so other can see what was trying to be achieved.
137879560 by Kieran Shaw @ 2023-06-28 13:18	1	2023-07-09 01:24	Warin61	Hi, What 'help' ??? The changeset comment 'help' may imply that some help is needed???
138268261 by Kieran Shaw @ 2023-07-08 15:36	1	2023-07-09 01:22	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately there is a copyright notice on http://www.victorianrailways.net/about_wanted/about_wanted.html OSM is very strict on copyright so this changeset has been reverted. Sorry about that.
137897455 by Tom Brennan @ 2023-06-28 22:42	1	2023-06-29 00:37	Warin61	Hi, Some of these waterways are used as admin boundaries. Would it be better if the 2 features were entered as separate ways?
	2	2023-06-29 03:15	Tom Brennan ♦15	I'd say so. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to do this?
	3	2023-06-30 07:01	Warin61	The official gov data is 'PSMA' available on the OSM Australian Data page. Get that as the basis of replacing any creek boundaries. When you work on a creek .. download the OSM creek, then 'File' 'download along' -(I set it to 1m distance and not more than 1 km) an...
	4	2023-06-30 08:25	Tom Brennan ♦15	Thanks, I will see if I can work out a process. In the meantime, you identified that some boundaries had moved. What tool(s) did you use for that?
	5	2023-07-01 07:42	Warin61	When they 'move' they usually brake and show up on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.13628&lat=-33.74316&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cint...
	6	2024-12-17 23:16	aharvey ♦1,694	I just noticed that a bunch of these added were already existing, and now we have duplicates.
	7	2024-12-17 23:27	aharvey ♦1,694	I fixed what I could find in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160326846
125608830 by slice0 @ 2022-08-31 11:54 Active block	1	2023-06-29 03:16	Warin61	Hi The 'landuse=grass' is actually an AFL pitch. Corrected.
	2	2023-06-29 03:21	slice0 Active block	Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
	3	2023-06-29 08:03	Warin61	I have added the cricket. However the other sports are not obvious to me .. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090733814 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185627654 I prefer individual mapping as that shows the individual sports are present. Added netball - https://www.openstreetm...
137873391 by Jack Boschert @ 2023-06-28 10:49	1	2023-06-29 03:05	Warin61	Hi, There are OSM problems with that relation. See the QA tool https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.52990&lat=-34.65386&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersectio...
	2	2023-07-03 06:55	Jack Boschert ♦6	Hi Warin61, thanks for providing this clarification, I've just attempted to tidy my earlier edit by creating one outer area and assigning a place=neighbourhood tag to this feature. As this is an area in the earlier stages of construction let me know if there would be a more appropriate value. T...
137854417 by Tom Brennan @ 2023-06-27 22:19	1	2023-06-29 02:41	Warin61	Hi, The change to Wheeny Ck leads to changes to the following admin boundaries; Sydney Wheeny Ck Kurrajong Hills Kurrajong Heights Kurrajong Grose Vale
137810410 by koof67 @ 2023-06-26 22:06	1	2023-06-27 10:42	Warin61	Hi, This changeset was partially reverted to restore admin boundaries of Darwin Harbour, The Gardens and Larrakeya. These are sourced for Government data .. not imagery.
137767037 by GridHopper @ 2023-06-25 21:01	1	2023-06-27 04:38	Warin61	Hi, The property has the house number of 49 to 57, Wade St. That can be confirmed by looking at the DCS Base Map ... with some 'interpretation'. What is the source of house number 15??? And what street is it?
	2	2023-06-27 04:54	Warin61	I have deleted the relation - all the buildings are part of the landuse= religious ... The outer way 1184883535 already has landuse religious and address details. This also removes the house number 15.
137673584 by youknowme @ 2023-06-23 06:31	1	2023-06-24 00:10	Warin61	Errr ... 1) multipolygon relations cannot share outer way segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.22194&lat=-33.87452&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Ci...
136611941 by Ewen Hill @ 2023-05-27 06:20	1	2023-06-22 04:16	Warin61	Hi, Razed is used to stop people mapping things that no longer exist. If the objects are no longer on imagery then the razed objects can be deleted from OSM. "Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery. " https://...
137436404 by nrs19 @ 2023-06-17 06:28	1	2023-06-18 00:23	Warin61	Hi, There is an error in relation \t15985553. The outer way touches the inner way. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=137.66508&lat=-34.79486&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mult...
137267426 by ul2739 @ 2023-06-13 04:45	1	2023-06-17 01:44	Warin61	Hi, Why break the roundabout (way 170503250 is part of it) into segments??? Each segment has exactly the same tags... I have restored it back to one entry.
	2	2023-06-17 02:41	ul2739 ♦4	That was my mistake. Thanks for fixing it!
136937622 by Jivesas @ 2023-06-04 15:29	1	2023-06-14 06:56	Warin61	There are now some 5 relatons with errors in this area... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.03058&lat=-39.85133&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2C...
	2	2023-06-14 08:16	Jivesas ♦4	Hi Warin, thank you for following my work, as you see i just finish the entire island, only 5 errors seems a good ratio to me. Anyway, I already saw these errors with the tool you gave me weeks ago but I really don't know what is exactly wrong with these polygons. I try but don't know ho...
	3	2023-06-15 05:18	Warin61	You are going to have to; read the error given by that tool follow the previous example if relevant look on the OSM wiki page for multipolygon relations and fine the error. Takes time. But you learn more that way than being lead by me.
98232162 by RichieRRR @ 2021-01-27 13:15	1	2023-06-15 03:54	Warin61	Marmion Avenue: oneway=yes with lanes:forward=1 lanes:backward=1 That makes no sense. Needs fixing
137290815 by GridHopper @ 2023-06-13 15:07	1	2023-06-14 00:48	Warin61	Hi, The addition of state, postcode and suburb are all redundant information! Do not waste your time adding it. The information can be obtained by software from OSM data already loaded - admin boundaries and post code boundaries...
137305644 by GridHopper @ 2023-06-13 23:39	1	2023-06-14 00:45	Warin61	These are in Victoria.. the DCS stuff is NSW only. What is the source of this information?!
137221380 by GridHopper @ 2023-06-11 22:16	1	2023-06-12 23:31	Warin61	Hi The cemetery sectors are part of the cemetery. So these are not 'inners', making the relation having only one member .. so it can be mapped as a simple closed way.
100452277 by tom_mcat @ 2021-03-05 01:18	1	2023-06-12 04:32	Warin61	Hi, Adding 'maxspeed' while there are maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward ... makes no sense I am removing the maxspeed tag where there is this conflict.
134597934 by Barky2000 @ 2023-04-07 03:17	1	2023-06-11 23:45	Warin61	Hi, Try using the DCS Imagery - better resolution and better positional accuracy
95728885 by MichaelCollinson @ 2020-12-12 16:43	1	2023-06-11 01:45	Warin61	Hi, These areas are part of the Bago State Forest so they should be included. Tagging of 'State Forest' is done using 'landuse=forest'. Catch22 is that most renders use the same rendering for both natural=wood and landuse=forest.
136720671 by Caskade @ 2023-05-30 00:23	1	2023-06-06 23:02	Warin61	Hi, The relation changed does not cover that section of river. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14728907#map=15/-33.3051/115.7058 And see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653235#map=15/-33.2950/115.7249 If you want change the relation outer way to include sections of way 136532...
	2	2023-06-07 00:45	Caskade ♦1	Hey there, Thanks for the info, I'm a pretty casual editor (and somewhat self-taught). I didn't realise this was the case, thanks so much for this! :D
	3	2023-06-07 01:01	Caskade ♦1	I gave it a shot and I'm not really finding any progress whatsoever, and I'm not sure I want to learn a more complex editor. If you could change the relation, that'd be awesome. Sorry for the error.
	4	2023-06-07 07:44	Warin61	OK. I took Way: 13653242 and cut it in two where it crosses from one side of the river to the other. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653242 I took Way: 13653235 and cut it in two where it crosses from one side of the river to the other. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653235 \...
136999382 by Andrew Parker @ 2023-06-06 06:38	1	2023-06-06 22:50	Warin61	Hi Woowookarung Regional Park has 3 ways - one of them closed. 1 relation - with all the above ways. It is appropriately mapped by the single closed way. I have removed the others as redundant.
	2	2023-06-07 00:53	Andrew Parker ♦5	Thanks Warin. I tried to correct some incorrect changes that someone else made, but it got a bit messy!
	3	2023-06-07 07:31	Warin61	Yep. Not uncommon. I tidied what I saw - flagged on OSMInspector which usually picks up my errors.
136807485 by arctic-rocinante @ 2023-05-31 22:23	1	2023-06-02 01:30	Warin61	No. Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share the same segments. If they are 2 seperate buildings then they's usuall have 2 addresses e.g. 8a and 8b. However as they both have the same name (Duetto) I'd take them as the same building .. just with one section having a different hei...
	2	2023-06-02 10:30	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Agreed, thanks for the review. I've attempted to fix it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136862136
	3	2023-06-03 06:34	Warin61	Looks good to me.
136819416 by TheSwavu @ 2023-06-01 08:23	1	2023-06-02 05:47	Warin61	North Coast Line and Sydney XPT route relations corrected for sequential way order....
124801855 by jMapsAu @ 2022-08-12 06:06	1	2023-06-02 05:43	Warin61	The TOC Manual is STILL not correctly listed on the data base! I think it is time to remove the data from OSM. Additionally where maxspeed:backward and maxspeed:forward are the same maxspeed should be used.
136690394 by Jivesas @ 2023-05-29 09:49	1	2023-05-30 00:01	Warin61	Hi, Error in relation: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.87116&lat=-39.77136&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_clo...
	2	2023-06-01 00:14	Warin61	Deleted. So too have other faulty relations of yours in this area.
	3	2023-06-01 06:05	Jivesas ♦4	Explain please
	4	2023-06-01 07:08	Warin61	The relation was in error. The error has been repeated by you in other changesets. You will continue to make this same error until you recognise it. Do you now want to look at the error and fix it? By fixing it you may learn how to avoid repeating it?
	5	2023-06-01 07:13	Jivesas ♦4	Relation between what and what? Yeah if you don't explain i'll just repeat it Is it a multipolygon issue?
	6	2023-06-01 07:45	Warin61	If you had looked at the tool I referenced in the first post you would have seen it. For your information: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15916710/history 1) outer way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177206588#map=15/-39.7715/143.8731 has the same tags as the relation 2) Way https:...
	7	2023-06-01 07:52	Jivesas ♦4	Ok great now I see So you just deleted the relation is that right? Nice tool, didn't know about it, I'll check it now thanks
	8	2023-06-01 09:58	Warin61	I came arccos it in a similar manner. I still keep my eye on it to check for my errors.
124164202 by pza @ 2022-07-28 04:02	1	2022-07-28 04:50	pza ♦86	Note that there are certainly some valid building tag improvements undone by this revert that could be reinstated, but they need to be re-checked, as there are many incorrect ones in there as well.
	2	2023-06-01 09:17	Warin61	Ken Done gallery restored tag as tourism=gallery ... but removed it from the building and now is a simple node.
134755231 by smithy_dll @ 2023-04-11 03:27	1	2023-05-28 23:50	Warin61	Bing shows the Falcon St Offramp as a bus lane ..Not under construction... The DCS Base Map maybe more upto date. The Maxar imagery is more upto date.
	2	2023-05-29 09:32	smithy_dll ♦2	It was definitely under construction when I drove through a couple months ago. I found showing the construction zone this https://media.caapp.com.au/pdf/0r965h/83316a39-75eb-478b-9d70-3c22f9187e95/Cammeray%20%26%20Neutral%20Bay%20upcoming%20work%20notification%20%28December%202022%29.pdf
	3	2023-05-30 07:45	Warin61	Humm... the issue is that some bus routes use that buss off ramp ... presumably they go around the construction ... in that pdf it says "Access will be maintained via the Falcon Street and Miller Street off ramps." Maybe there are only taking the area between the bus off ramp and the ...
132233217 by jakecopp @ 2023-02-08 02:18	1	2023-05-28 23:39	Warin61	Hi, Regarding the fixme placed for a left turn from York St to Margret St... Margret St is one way preventing travel in that direction ..so a turn restriction would be redundant.
135218031 by sb9576 @ 2023-04-22 07:24	1	2023-05-28 01:43	Warin61	Hi, Relation \t15752535 is wrong. Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments.... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.71137&lat=-32.53851&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%...
	2	2023-05-28 02:52	Warin61	Ok. I think I have this relation corrected now. Note there was an offset from the roads in the same area - I have corrected that to be the same as the roads already mapped ...
134435383 by RichieRRR @ 2023-04-03 03:28	1	2023-04-15 01:30	Warin61	Relation 15675556 is in error - touching outer ways. Further they don't look like the claimed source - bing imagery
	2	2023-05-28 01:40	Warin61	No response at all... deleted. Ways are still there - tag them.
133908451 by damned truths @ 2023-03-20 17:22	1	2023-05-28 01:13	Warin61	Hi, Relation \t15623238, bus route 238: Taronga Zoo Wharf to Balmoral Beach is wrong. It has no bus stops - as least 2 are required for Public Transport Version 2 compliance, one at the start and one at the finish.
136567411 by BComplete @ 2023-05-26 05:22	1	2023-05-27 04:48	Warin61	Hi The relation 10603708 is for water not a 'meadow'. The 'meadow' also includes houses and trees. I have reverted this relation back to the previous water entry - 2 members only. This removes the meadow entry. Suggestion? Map smaller areas as individual meadows - use the ro...
134697309 by jbh10a @ 2023-04-09 17:17	1	2023-05-23 05:59	Warin61	Hi When adding stops/platforms to public transport version 2 routes they must go before the ways and be in sequential order. The ways too must be in sequential order.
135961932 by rkurzawa @ 2023-05-11 06:38	1	2023-05-11 23:26	Warin61	Hi, Tree relation 7612020 has been broken by the change in way Way: 528241712. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.92261&lat=-33.82944&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multip...
	2	2023-05-23 00:33	Warin61	Your not interested... fine
136082219 by tastrax @ 2023-05-14 11:58	1	2023-05-15 02:39	Warin61	Opps This changed the North Scottsdale Regional Reserve relation... Looks like the northern section of the Great Forester River is used by the reserve boundary...
	2	2023-05-15 06:04	tastrax ♦1,144	Ooops - hopefully its fixed now
135795445 by MrYeet555 @ 2023-05-07 01:21	1	2023-05-08 10:47	Warin61	Hi, I have made the Nation Bark boundaries conform to the government issued boundaries of 2020 - CAPAD. Please do not change these. The NSW Golf Club boundary had a gap .. I have closed that gap as best I could using the Nationa Park boundary and imagery. Note Coast line data in OSM is th...
	2	2023-05-13 09:00	MrYeet555 ♦1	Hi, I just saw your comment now and wanted to say sorry about that. Also, thank you for the extra info about coastlines and boundary references. It won't happen again.
	3	2023-05-14 07:48	Warin61	No need to apologise. And don't worry about making more mistakes - part of being human. Reason why I contact people is to let them know so they can disagree .... or take it onboard.
135809797 by Toddletoon @ 2023-05-07 12:43	1	2023-05-09 00:31	Warin61	Hi, The residential relation is wrong, there are 2 shared segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.99331&lat=-41.08312&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cint...
	2	2023-05-23 16:56	Toddletoon ♦8	Oops, I see it. I'll give it a quick fix. Cheers.
135798832 by openstreetbon22 @ 2023-05-07 06:36	1	2023-05-08 03:41	Warin61	Hi, The relation 15820539 is not correct ... Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon Bsicly there needs to be an outer area ... and then inner areas - All of these are simple closed ways .. then make the relation. https://wi...
	2	2023-05-08 07:21	openstreetbon22 ♦1	Excellent, thank you so much for your assistance and resources!
127415448 by Dhillon Farmstead @ 2022-10-12 13:07	1	2023-05-04 08:41	Warin61	Hi, The relation 14687606 tagged landuse=religious and building=yes? In OSM building=yes mean that the whole are is a building .. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building I think that you possibly mean that there are buildings here. In OSM that characteristic is not mapped, preference ...
133607742 by TobyOrr @ 2023-03-13 03:49	1	2023-04-24 23:54	Warin61	Hi, What the DCS Base Map shows is the river bank .... What the imagery shows is that the river is 'intermittent'. I don't think 'wetland' is what is here.
	2	2023-04-25 06:31	TobyOrr ♦16	Hello Warin61 I agree that the DCS NSW Base Map shows this area as water but that map is not always correct and, as I recall reading in a recent post on talk-au, we don't want OSM to be just a copy of the Base Map. When I looked at satellite imagery from various sources I could see little wa...
	3	2023-04-25 07:00	TobyOrr ♦16	Having posted the above, I realise that Coolyamba Creek is not actually a distributary of the Lachlan and carries just a limited volume of water from its own limited catchment area. Therefore its omission from the abovementioned publication is because it does not flow from the Lachlan. But this also...
	4	2023-04-25 07:42	Warin61	A 'wetland' in OSM is usually wet .. this one would be seldom wet... I think it is a riverbank .. with the tag intermittent=yes.
	5	2023-04-25 08:30	TobyOrr ♦16	I think we have different understandings for the use of the tag "wetland". It is my understanding that wetland does not need always to be wet - especially in the Australian content. Gwyder wetlands and Macquarie Marshes are both intermittent in nature, as are many other wetland areas. ...
	6	2023-04-25 09:45	Warin61	In that area of the world .. when it rains it all gets wet :) creeks, rivers, roads etc. Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland there is not much that matches what happens out here. I have mapped and area in SA as wetland .. but with the tag intermittent=yes. I' use tha...
	7	2023-04-26 00:48	TobyOrr ♦16	Hello again Warin61 Thanks for your thoughts. Since I have considered wetlands as being usually intermittent, I have not considered it necessary to add an intermittent tag. The intermittent nature of many wetland areas is probably the reason why the intermittent tag does not render on the map when ...
	8	2023-05-04 08:08	Warin61	I have found the DCS Base Map to be very usefull. And accurate to a great degree. If you think that an intermittent river bed is a wetland .. so be it.
135601006 by BidgeeWagga @ 2023-05-02 06:26	1	2023-05-02 23:46	Warin61	Hi, No need for a multipolygon as there are no inners and other than trees these share no common tags. I have deleted the relation, combined what were the other ways into singular ways and tag those as trees. This keeps thing simple.
120304603 by plesk @ 2022-04-28 12:44	1	2023-05-02 00:59	Warin61	Hi, The Way: 1055704283 and Way: 1055704284 you added as fire stations for 'Fire and Rescue' on the DCS base map are 'Rural Fire Service' .. And it looks like it is a RFB ..https://www.facebook.com/TumutRFS/
135570676 by Andy_T_56 @ 2023-05-01 12:01	1	2023-05-02 00:19	Warin61	Hi Way \t963500214 is in error. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.25781&lat=-42.79120&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2...
	2	2023-05-02 03:24	Andy_T_56 ♦10	Quite right. I have fixed this. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers, Andy
122346312 by rskedgell @ 2022-06-13 22:57	1	2023-05-01 01:38	Warin61	Hi, I'm rather confused by the multiple tags on this object. A water well. And a bubbler - projects a small jet of water upwards for drinking. If it has both of these it may be better to separate them .. the well as a way and the bubbler as a node???
	2	2023-05-01 02:17	rskedgell ♦1,467	It's probably better to revert to historic=building or use historic=yes
	3	2023-05-01 07:10	Warin61	Is it a current source of water?
56709041 by Ham-eater @ 2018-02-27 03:41	1	2023-04-25 08:07	Warin61	HI, How is this church a 'monument'??? Some would claim all religious buildings are monuments... If it is a church then it would have some religion associated with it.. Greek Orthodox?
135251849 by DeanBA @ 2023-04-23 07:56	1	2023-04-25 00:15	Warin61	Hi, This is the second time you have removed the outer way from the relation 10406083 (highway=service) I'll just delete the relation...
	2	2023-04-25 00:49	DeanBA ♦1	Hi Warin61, The reason that I have deleted the outer way is that it does not map correctly. If you return the outer way it just creates a large white blob over the whole station and all detail is hidden. Please reconsider before reverting this change...
	3	2023-04-25 07:44	Warin61	Why not delete the relation yourself then? Deleting the outerway destroys the relation .. and that then throws up errors on the QA tools that I see. So, repeating myself, I have deleted the relation...
135299232 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-04-24 12:06	1	2023-04-25 00:04	Warin61	Hi. The changest comment does not look like it relates to the actual changes? I have split the building relation in to 2 relations as they look like 2 separate buildings that touch. A single multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments and that was a fault with the single relation.
130144565 by boroli @ 2022-12-16 08:23	1	2023-04-05 23:56	Warin61	Hi, I have tagged this as access=private as it goes through private property. A new mapper deleted it because it goes through private property... So ... is it public or private?
	2	2023-04-06 01:08	GreplusLy5525Buenavista ♦1	Its my land, so I can confirm its private property. I don't want any track marked because trail apps just have the track marked, but don't list it as public/ private. I have had many walkers trespass on my property because of this trail marker. Can this please stay deleted.
	3	2023-04-06 08:40	Warin61	Sorry. This has come up many times before - including private roads that people use as a short cut.. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
	4	2023-04-06 08:58	Warin61	Thinking about this more.. On your property put up 'Private Property' signs. And then remove traces of the path. Once that is done you could separate your section of the path and mark it abandoned:highway=path. Don't re-tag it until you have removed those path traces or you'll ha...
	5	2023-04-22 19:50	boroli ♦2	Can you please clarify which part of the walking track is private? As the lower part near the creek seems to be in the Wilson Glen Park, and as such public. Also the track ends at a public car park next to the road. And when I was walking it, there were even old trail marks along the track. Thus, I...
	6	2023-04-23 07:43	Warin61	I would think the property boundaries of the DCS Base Map (Six Maps for nonOSM use) would be reasonably definitive. However it is not clear to me who would be 'responsible' for land between the park and those street properties. Possibly local council. I would be reluctant to tag most of it...
	7	2023-04-23 21:42	GreplusLy5525Buenavista ♦1	The Buena vista exit/entry is on my land, hence people can’t exit/enter without walking on my land. There is no public car park at the end of the track, just a small turning bay marked ‘no parking’ as the dead end road is quite narrow. Local council have recently been working in th...
	8	2023-04-24 07:18	Warin61	Between No 25 and 19 there looks to be access to nos 26 to 31, these may never be built? In imagery there is a start of a road between 19 and 25 .. This could be public. The path as mapped intrudes on to both 19 and 25, possibly the path could be changed to not intrude? @ boroli thoughts?
	9	2023-04-24 11:27	boroli ♦2	This is what GreplusLy5525Buenavista said is a small turning bay, while I thought it's a car park. Nevertheless, in both cases it's public bitumen until the cliff. I don't know who owns the land in parallel west of the cliff. If this is public, then yes potentially the track could b...
	10	2023-04-24 11:52	GreplusLy5525Buenavista ♦1	I own the land on the up to the cliff on the southern side, and perpendicular west. So unless people scale the cliff they will be walking on my land. I have had numerous walkers from the track on my land in recent months, even had some people in my backyard when they thought they could continue alon...
135058077 by Dhillon Farmstead @ 2023-04-18 12:40	1	2023-04-23 04:58	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM. The relation 15740081, landuse=religious, ... does not make sense... It has 2 ways .. both with the role 'inner' meaning they are inside an 'outer' and are excluded from the 'landuse=religious'... What I have done - On the outside way pl...
	2	2023-04-23 05:14	Dhillon Farmstead ♦1	Did you even know the difference between church building and other religious buildings. I'm not making an issue of this, but you may just correct the minor changes of the edits don't change the building types especially when it's a matter of religion. Have a good day....
	3	2023-04-23 07:32	Warin61	Hi, It was tagged as building=yes, now it is tagged as landuse=religious. Firstly landuse=religious is now tagged on the outer way encompassing the whole site - this is normal practice in OSM as everything inside that boundary is used to support a religion. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/...
124172295 by Chico @ 2022-07-28 08:09	1	2023-04-21 05:02	Warin61	Hi, Source 'page could not be found' ??? Way 220688912 - a sports pitch, you added sport = football ... AFL? Rugby? Soccer? Which 'football'?
134822140 by SLussier @ 2023-04-12 15:04	1	2023-04-15 01:27	Warin61	Hi, Way 1161718396 is on error... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.06417&lat=-33.55837&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%...
	2	2023-04-21 00:48	Warin61	No response - deleted.
118232553 by tamism @ 2022-03-08 11:29	1	2023-04-17 05:16	Warin61	Hi Way \t459973943 crosses it self. Needs to be fixed ... See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459973943
	2	2023-04-17 05:33	tamism ♦3	Strange mistake. Not sure how I did that. Must have shifted the station for whatever reason and forgot to clean up. Or maybe I shifted the tracks which were attached and overlapping the station boundaries. Either ways there are still ways and nodes (like streets) that are attached to the station tha...
	3	2023-04-20 02:19	Warin61	Arr.. think I have it now - someone added some nodes? And at least moved them .. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134960623
134960623 by cs09736 @ 2023-04-16 03:30	1	2023-04-20 02:14	Warin61	Hi, Way 459973943 crosses it self. Needs to be fixed ... See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459973943 I think this is caused by the addition of some extra nodes to this way...
	2	2023-04-20 02:18	Warin61	Hi, Way 459973943 crosses it self. Needs to be fixed ... See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459973943 I think you moved some nodes for this platform and that is causing this issue.
130887646 by theepicmapbro @ 2023-01-05 01:32	1	2023-04-17 07:10	Warin61	Hi, Fixme are "fixme=" something.. not amenity=fixme... Is this an 'Every Door' issue? Anyway .. node 10307752354 shop Bed Bath N Table would be better entered as shop=yes brand=Bed Bath N Table. If you wnat you could get into the shop detail by looking on th eOSM wiki htt...
126357140 by ortho_is_hot @ 2022-09-19 07:18	1	2023-04-17 06:52	Warin61	See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase for a street public library... if that is what node 10035839623 is.
	2	2023-04-19 12:21	ortho_is_hot ♦252	Thanks, you are correct, will update the node
134760896 by 4linta @ 2023-04-11 07:37	1	2023-04-13 07:43	Warin61	Hi, Way is part of relation 2816025 .. both are tagged for pedestrians... i.e. duplication. I have removed the duplication.
132860597 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-02-22 03:40	1	2023-03-03 00:06	Warin61	Same error in relation 15518947 as in your past changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131835596 You should fix these so as you don't continue to repeat the error.
	2	2023-04-10 01:04	Warin61	Relation \t15518947 deleted... Not so certain that this is water .. look at the mapbox imagery.
133359831 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-03-06 11:48	1	2023-03-16 03:47	Warin61	Relation 15571536 - water - has he roles 'inner' and 'outer' wrong. Please look at it and fix it.
	2	2023-03-23 21:36	Warin61	This relation is still incorrect! See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.66725&lat=-38.01783&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%...
	3	2023-03-24 01:15	Ethan Colley ♦6	how do you switch it
	4	2023-03-24 10:23	Warin61	I do not use Id! You will have to find it in the iD editor information. I use JOSM. I chose that as it is the more complex editor - able to do more things than iD .. thus I only learnt one editor not 2 or 3 or 4 .. just JOSM.
	5	2023-04-09 00:08	Warin61	I have deleted the relation. Make a new relation?
131835596 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-01-29 10:48	1	2023-02-11 03:17	Warin61	Hi, The roles 'inner' and 'outer' are mixed up in relation 15406000 - 'outer' should be the outside of the building .. Same thing in a different changeset of yours on relation 15405981 - water ... roles mixed up. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15405981...
	2	2023-03-16 03:44	Warin61	This error remains... The roles 'inner' and 'outer' are mixed up in relation 15406000
	3	2023-04-09 00:03	Warin61	Deleted relation. Bye.
10981230 by browny @ 2012-03-14 19:17	1	2023-03-27 04:58	Warin61	Hi, These relations named 'Loop 1', 'Loop 2', 'Loop 3' ... what are they??? Are there any web pages on them?
	2	2023-04-07 05:19	Warin61	Removed relations...
134533735 by adam0142 @ 2023-04-05 11:02	1	2023-04-06 00:48	Warin61	Hi, The Todd River .. why do you want that as a relation??? It only has one member ... so why make the way into a relation?
	2	2023-04-06 01:09	Warin61	I have restored the Todd Rv back to a simple way. I have removed the name 'Junction Waterhole' from the node 10311202231 - the name is attached to a way (better) and has additional tags to tell OSM what the name is applied to - water. Don't worry about making errors at this st...
134519403 by GreplusLy5525Buenavista @ 2023-04-05 03:13	1	2023-04-06 00:01	Warin61	Hi, I have restored the path and marked it access=private. It is better to contact the previous mapper and get their ideas on this kind of thing - particularly when it is recent. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130144565 Another hint ... the tree area and the residential area .. thos...
134456160 by mckitd @ 2023-04-03 13:49	1	2023-04-04 23:53	Warin61	Hi, "Pole 13 Camp" looks to be a group of buildings froming a 'campus'. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel#As_a_campus for a better way to map them. The track named "Fire Trail" well that is not a 'name' but a 'description...
134396805 by dans2320 @ 2023-04-01 22:24	1	2023-04-03 00:56	Warin61	Hi, Sixmaps is not usable in OSM due to copyright. Use the DCS Base Map, this is authorized for use in OSM.
124324306 by Warin61 @ 2022-08-01 04:14	1	2022-08-16 11:21	CloCkWeRX ♦343	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082798744 - completely circular cricket pitch does not agree with imagery or on the ground survey. Similar issues have been introduced with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082798746
	2	2022-08-17 08:24	Warin61	Using a circle is a simplification, the AFL pitch should be much larger. Using the AFL boundaries as the cricket boundary is incorrect. Rules? - thus for cricket A circular cricket field is considered as the perfect field but generally a cricket pitch is slightly oval. Its diameter varies betwe...
	3	2022-08-18 14:10	CloCkWeRX ♦343	What you have put as source: bing does not show this at all. The only sources I can find that show anything like this are: * ERSI - different geometry * Google maps, which also shows different geometry. What's on the ground? It's literally a giant mud puddle as several hundred c...
	4	2022-08-19 08:00	Warin61	Looking on bing I can see the cricket wear from wicket to wicket .. thus there is evidence of a cricket pitch. AFL is a winter game - so it is 'on the ground' now. AFL is a very large pitch usually taking all of the space available. Cricket is a summer game so it is not 'on the ...
	5	2022-09-06 10:05	CloCkWeRX ♦343	> Looking on bing I can see the cricket wear Bollocks. You can see a pitch. Making up a boundry based on rules which is not visible does not pass muster. > Cricket is a summer game so it is not 'on the ground now'. Again, if its not on the ground AND its not visible in im...
	6	2022-09-09 11:20	Warin61	If you care to look back at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246072179/history you will see the cricket pitch was mapped to the Australian rules football area... The Australian Rules Football were not mapped .. so the past mapper ignored the football ... but tagged cricket. Then look at the &#...
	7	2022-09-11 06:20	CloCkWeRX ♦343	> Perhaps not the the precision you desire Uh. There's "someone did an approximation" but there's also "despite imagery, mapped geometry that has not existed". Your edits are well into the latter territory. > I think that this is an improvement How can y...
	8	2022-09-11 07:45	Warin61	Observable from imagery: Cricket is played here, the wear between the wickets is clear. I and others in the past have mapped the rectangular wear into OSM. Most of us now recognise that this in not a good representation and it is a better representation to place a circle centred on the wear. ...
	9	2022-10-03 12:55	CloCkWeRX ♦343	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map "When in doubt, also consider the "on the ground rule": map the world as it can be observed by someone physically there." "Do not delete data unless you know (or have very strong reason to believe) that it is incorrect.&qu...
	10	2023-03-29 14:36	CloCkWeRX ♦343	It's been all of summer. Not once did anything like what you mapped get marked out on the ground. I'm removing this fantasy edit. I suggest you refrain from similar mapping - either survey it, use imagery, or put it in as a single point.
	11	2023-03-30 02:58	Warin61	The cricket is evident in present OSM accessible imagery. Previous mappers have entered it into OSM. It maybe better to tag is as "was:leisure=pitch was:sport=cricket" to stop others from re-entering the data.
133817254 by Keith @ 2023-03-18 10:35	1	2023-03-28 00:16	Warin61	Hi, Regarding the beach. The OSM coastline stops at the hi tide mark ... but the beach goes further out to sea. So I map further than the OSM coast line.. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4042219 The same with rocks etc.
134133854 by Keith @ 2023-03-26 12:12	1	2023-03-26 23:12	Warin61	The OSM coast line is not the National Park boundary. "The natural=coastline tag is used to mark the mean high water springs line along the coastline at the edge of the sea. " See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline The National Park boundary is created by t...
	2	2023-03-28 00:05	Warin61	I have restored the National Park Boundary .. so it is now unbroken and does not cross itself. The coast line should, I think, be a separate entity thus it can be altered using upto date imagery but leaving the government boundaries alone. What do you think?
134128547 by Keith @ 2023-03-26 09:23	1	2023-03-27 23:07	Warin61	Changeset has nothing to do with National Park nor coastline.
134119333 by Keith @ 2023-03-25 21:47	1	2023-03-25 22:31	Warin61	The coastline is not the national park boundary. In OSM the coastline is the hi water level...
	2	2023-03-25 22:57	Warin61	The National Park boundary look like it is the low water mark .. as far as I can see. Do you have other information? To restore the National Park boundary the following changesets may have been partially or fully reverted.. 134119333, 134118581, 134118130, 134118022, 134101476, 134118022, 1341...
134104419 by Keith @ 2023-03-25 13:45	1	2023-03-25 22:41	Warin61	The changeset comment dose not reflect what took place. Please use changeset comments that reflect the actual changes...
133784515 by Jivesas @ 2023-03-17 11:28	1	2023-03-24 22:51	Warin61	Name removed from tree relation. Forest in Australia is taken to be productive use e.g. using trees to produce lumber. The area looks to be natural=wood ... changed. bear rock relation deleted - better as simple ways.
106884938 by Nicxon Piaso @ 2021-06-24 08:33	1	2023-03-18 04:59	Warin61	Hi, The Mosque ... Way: 957793571 building:part=yes ... umm would that not be part of the roof? If so building:part=roof? And also the location would be in the center of the building?
133644697 by TheSwavu @ 2023-03-13 22:55	1	2023-03-16 22:27	Warin61	Simply changing the tag 'public_transport:version=1' to 'public_transport:version=2' is not enough to make these PTv2.
133700405 by Benjamin Ceravolo @ 2023-03-15 08:59	1	2023-03-16 04:19	Warin61	Hi, I have restored relation 7079456 add parts of this changeset to that relation. Try to work with the existing tree relations rather than making new ones.
	2	2023-03-16 06:08	Benjamin Ceravolo ♦8	Thanks for the feedback, I will keep that in mind in future.
133648870 by TheSwavu @ 2023-03-14 03:50	1	2023-03-15 22:45	Warin61	Adding the PTv2 tag to a relation does not make the relation compatible with PTv2 requirements.
133323187 by mitchef @ 2023-03-05 12:31	1	2023-03-14 22:59	Warin61	Hi, This route does not meet the requirements for a Public Transport Route version 2 ... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=144.76857&lat=-37.97780&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_way...
133656204 by Adityo @ 2023-03-14 08:44	1	2023-03-14 22:40	Warin61	Hi, This building has a problem.. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.06917&lat=-34.01403&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segment...
	2	2023-03-14 22:49	Adityo ♦14	done. thanks for finding that. My josm did not produce the warning before uploading so that warning occurs
133393797 by MurdochMaps @ 2023-03-07 08:53	1	2023-03-14 03:01	Warin61	You do need to work on those errors/warnings. In this area JOSM validator reports some 16 errors and 121 warnings... Errors (16) Duplicated ways (1) Highway duplicated nodes (10) Multipolygon is not closed (1) Multipolygon ring contains segment twice (3) Overlapping highways (1) Warnin...
	2	2023-03-14 03:44	MurdochMaps ♦2	Thanks Warin, how do I access the hyperlinks that link to each fault: error/ duplication/unclosed polygon/overlap/warning/crossing/missing tag........
	3	2023-03-14 08:55	Warin61	Don't know. One error visible here - site updates about every day and comes up with more slowly https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.83510&lat=-32.06858&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segmen...
133636467 by D_i_m @ 2023-03-13 18:17	1	2023-03-14 02:29	Warin61	Hi, The JOSM validator would have issued the warning message "crossing ways' ...There is only one, way 435781531. Would you please look at it and correct it?
	2	2023-03-14 07:18	D_i_m ♦5	Hi, I can't find the intersection of the ways that lead to the error. JSOM validator doesn't find anything on this fragment of map.
	3	2023-03-14 08:39	Warin61	Hi, Ar a node was deleted by you in changeset 133653203. This fixed the problem.
	4	2023-03-14 08:41	Warin61	YOU can see the problem for the next few hours on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.20206&lat=-42.53316&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_...
133433069 by Ydgfb @ 2023-03-08 09:35	1	2023-03-14 02:42	Warin61	Hi, Relation 15577991 does not make sense? natural=wood;heath err no. It is either heath or wood. And both members are 'outers' yet one is inside the other. Looks to me like way 1152292927 should be tagged natural=wood (as it was before this changeset) and then have the role 'inn...
	2	2023-03-15 08:00	Ydgfb ♦10	Hi I've gone ahead and fixed the relation, thanks for letting me know. Please let me know if it needs any more fixing. Thanks.
119331369 by tastrax @ 2022-04-05 07:57	1	2023-03-14 02:35	Warin61	Hi, Golf is a problem in OSM... Relation \t14005754 - "self intersects" where grass crosses the sand bunker Other 'golf problems' can be found on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.84688&lat=-39.89667&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard...
133608506 by TheSwavu @ 2023-03-13 04:42	1	2023-03-13 22:04	Warin61	Similar issue here Way are not in sequence order. For other errors see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.28155&lat=-33.84362&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_no...
133608638 by TheSwavu @ 2023-03-13 04:51	1	2023-03-13 22:00	Warin61	Hi, This does not meet the PTv2 rules... Does not start with the stops. Role 'stop' is not used for stops. Are the stops in sequenced order? Are way in sequence order?
133540065 by jbh10a @ 2023-03-11 04:57	1	2023-03-11 22:55	Warin61	This broke the train route relation 3165393 PTv2. Do you know how to fix it? The liverpool stops have no role. There should be only one liverpool stop for this route. The liverpool stop is not in sequential order...
	2	2023-03-11 22:58	Warin61	This broke train route relation 3165393 PTv2. The liverpool stop has no role.
	3	2023-03-12 23:42	Warin61	You have not responded to any changeset comment in the past 4 months. Are you getting these comments??? Please respond.
	4	2023-03-13 00:25	Warin61	Changeset reverted to restore the above 2 train routes. Looking at the past non response this is the easiest thing for me to do.
108384120 by Greg_Rose @ 2021-07-21 19:48	1	2023-03-12 02:41	Warin61	Note This rail route no longer exists... some bits of the rail line may exist, as would some stations. But the route is gone.
	2	2023-03-12 09:35	Greg_Rose ♦175	@Warin No doubt. The portions of the line where rails are still extant has been tagged 'railway=disused'. As the rail trail is created from the old right-of-way the tagging should be changed accordingly.
95479732 by PBMORTON @ 2020-12-08 10:41	1	2023-02-05 00:05	Warin61	Hi, The National Park looks like it incorporated parts of a state forests?? Does the National Park coexist with the state forest or has the state forest beed reduced by the National Park taking some of it away??? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686125986#map=15/-34.4407/116.2668
	2	2023-02-06 09:28	PBMORTON ♦1	I (PBMORTON) entered the national park boundary. It's correct as described in the CAPAD 2020 data (https://www.environment.gov.au/fed/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B4448CACD-9DA8-43D1-A48F-48149FD5FCFD%7D). I did not enter the Dordagup State Forest. Another user entered that and h...
	3	2023-02-06 23:32	nevw ♦1,974	This https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/bills.nsf/873B3076AB9C6B5148256EBC000D142D/$File/EM_Bill306-1.pdf mentions at clause 11 the excising of state forest land to expand Greater Dordagup National Park as per CAPAD data. This was some time ago. Pity we are not able use WA Landgate datase...
	4	2023-02-09 10:25	nevw ♦1,974	Hi, I’d like to excise the state forest boundaries from the Capad listed conservation areas in line with the parliamentary bill and later fix the state forest boundaries when access to the forestry boundaries becomes available. Is this ok with you?
	5	2023-02-09 23:04	PBMORTON ♦1	If you are suggesting to leave the Greater Dordagup National Park as is on OSM and edit Dordagup State Forest to remove the overlap I'm fine with that.
	6	2023-02-09 23:37	nevw ♦1,974	Yes, that is what I will do as the Capad is a quality dataset and recent.
	7	2023-02-11 04:27	nevw ♦1,974	This will take me quite a while to do.
	8	2023-02-11 10:02	Warin61	Take your time, they have been unloved for a while. And yes, I approve of removing State Forests from National Parks - when the NPs are more upto date than the State Forests.
	9	2023-03-06 04:41	nevw ♦1,974	I have done a few of these today in changesets 133345436, 133346786, 133347147, 133347623, 133347652 and 133347700. Will proceed irregularly.
	10	2023-03-10 06:22	nevw ♦1,974	I think this is completed now...let me know if I missed any.
	11	2023-03-10 10:22	Warin61	Thanks nev.
27833695 by cleary @ 2015-01-01 01:27	1	2023-03-08 01:57	Warin61	Hi, Way: 319796961 tagged natural=water, I have added intermittent=yes. However I question if the tag natural=water is all that 'good'? The DCS Base Map shows 'Land subject to inundation' and I think that here is a flood plain ?? Yes, I know OSM does not have a tag for that yet....
	2	2023-03-08 05:38	cleary ♦56	Hello Warin Looking back, I think the Bing imagery that I used must have shown the area completely covered in water with no sign that it was intermittent. Now however it is clear from various imagery sources that the area is not always covered with water, so I agree with adding the intermittent tag...
	3	2023-03-08 05:45	cleary ♦56	Sorry that was submitted before I finished editing it. The other thing I wanted to add is that I am not familiar with the "landform" tag. As I said, I am still learning. I have studied a lot of satellite imagery, I have visited many of areas I have mapped (where they are accessible to t...
	4	2023-03-08 09:56	Warin61	I'm using 'landform' tag like landcover and landuse. So for things like cliffs peaks .. The 'natural' tag is used for both land forms and land covers .. and is use for both natural things and man effected things.. so to me the tag 'natural' does not make much sense...
	5	2023-03-08 10:05	Warin61	Oh .. just found this https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/directory.pdf
	6	2023-03-09 05:15	cleary ♦56	Thanks for the feedback. I'll look further at the landform tag - I do recall that reservoirs used to be tagged as landuse but the majority view was to change to natural=water+water=reservoir. While water is a naturally occurring substance, it did seem to me that reservoirs were more appropriate...
4725896 by melb_guy @ 2010-05-17 06:15	1	2023-03-08 03:20	Warin61	Hi, Should not the Glen Valley Reserve also incorporate the Glen Valley Road Flood Retarding Basin. The reserve would be a more frequent use of the area??? I have retagged the basin as a landuse=basin, basin=detention.
132712848 by Filta @ 2023-02-18 12:26	1	2023-03-07 09:20	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM... I have made a minor improvement to the roundabout - way 414452307. By selecting it and pressing the keyboard letter 'O' it makes it a perfect circle. For 'square' buildings pressing the letter 'Q' will square them up.
100974943 by Keelan Birch @ 2021-03-14 01:22	1	2023-03-07 07:16	Warin61	Hi,Hiking routes are better mapped as relations - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking They then render well on https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=12.0/-30.0274/153.2387 - you can even get an elevation profile and gpx track.. These routes also show up on some ...
133194337 by Ethan Colley @ 2023-03-02 02:59	1	2023-03-03 00:10	Warin61	Other than imagery .. what evidence do you have that Way: 1150596619 is a wetland???
	2	2023-03-04 05:30	Ethan Colley ♦6	Gday Warin, the predominant source I use, if it's not imagery, is MapShare VIC
	3	2023-03-04 08:57	Warin61	I'm not seeing that as an allowed source in the Aust. Data Catalogue..??? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria
133184592 by Mattheezus @ 2023-03-01 19:08	1	2023-03-03 00:19	Warin61	Hi, The relation 12950672 has Way: 1085307271 tagged as an inner .. but that has no outer around it.. that is an error. I am not familiar with it so I'll leave you to fix it.
133155781 by MurdochMaps @ 2023-03-01 05:13	1	2023-03-01 22:27	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Thanks for the initial contribution. Looks like Maxar imagery is more upto date than Bing in this area. You certainly have taken the bull by the horns! A few hints? Keep it simple, Do small bits at a time - map the building by itself ... then separately map a footpath.. this ...
	2	2023-03-02 05:42	MurdochMaps ♦2	Thanks Warin, I'd hoped we could upload the changes from DWG format but MazeMaps told me that wasn't possible (after a month of suggesting otherwise), so I was just keen to get the changes up as soon as possible since the building is now open.
	3	2023-03-02 05:43	MurdochMaps ♦2	So I can select to draft up the changes using the alternative Maxar imagery as underlay?
	4	2023-03-02 08:25	Warin61	The changes you made with this changeset are already in OSM .. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133155781 On the left section, if you scroll down, are the individual elements .. eg. building, paths etc .. you can click on these to see them. OSM is very powerful and quick to get new...
133109349 by Maradona11 @ 2023-02-28 01:24	1	2023-03-01 22:44	Warin61	This has broken train route relations... only the 'up' routes.. Sydney XPT North West Xplorer 244 Hunter Line from Scone Hunter Line from Dungog The 'down' routes look good. All the above fixed.
	2	2023-03-19 22:20	Maradona11 ♦44	Sorry. Thank you Warin61.
132917227 by Lawrie Brown @ 2023-02-23 10:00	1	2023-02-26 23:59	Warin61	Hi Way: 1148772981 looks to me to be more landuse=commercial rather than landuse=residential???
132947305 by DWMO @ 2023-02-23 23:39	1	2023-02-26 04:24	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Some hints? Buildings are usually 'square' meaning their corners are right angles. When you make a 'square' building pressing the 'Q' key should 'square' up the building making it look better. Bing imagery if fairly good.. but DCS ima...
132964308 by kurisubrooks @ 2023-02-24 11:58	1	2023-02-24 23:52	Warin61	Hi, Error in relation \t15526451 Way: 1149122465 cross itself - duplicated nodes... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.82254&lat=-33.88005&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mult...
	2	2023-02-25 02:40	kurisubrooks ♦54	Hi Warin, thanks for spotting that one. Fixed in changeset 32991116.
132782477 by kurisubrooks @ 2023-02-20 09:57	1	2023-02-23 01:15	Warin61	Hi, This has broken the bus route relation 3331347 No 711
	2	2023-02-23 01:39	kurisubrooks ♦54	Hi Warin, Thanks for noticing this. We're currently discussing the removal of bus route relations in the Sydney area as the majority are unmaintained and have last been updated more than 3 years ago... This route was last updated 4 years ago by you actually. I'm looking at the relati...
	3	2023-02-23 07:45	Warin61	I have fixed it. For how it was broken the route ways were not in sequence. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/diary/45106 I keep an eye on 2 bus routes I entered. Because they may not have changed for some period of time does not mean they are 'unmaintained'.
	4	2023-02-23 11:09	kurisubrooks ♦54	Looking at your changeset, the broken sections were for a section that I had not made modifications to... Thank you regardless... Also, out of the hundreds of bus routes in Sydney, I'd like to thank you for maintaining 2 of them.
	5	2023-02-23 11:47	lyjjimmy ♦7	Given Westmead Hospital traffic arrangement has been modified for some time due to light rail construction, I doubt whether the stops and route segments are still current. At least a quick comparison with current route and stops from TfNSW (https://transportnsw.info/routes/details/sydney-buses-netwo...
	6	2023-02-23 13:12	kurisubrooks ♦54	Thanks for the heads up about the traffic conditions around Westmead. I've gone ahead and updated the traffic conditions around Westmead Hospital which includes the separation and duplication of Hawkesbury Road and part of Hainsworth Street. I've also added crossings and turn restrictio...
132746472 by CrazyKim117 @ 2023-02-19 12:47	1	2023-02-21 06:12	Warin61	Hi, The relationship 15509013 Vibrance Studios is wrong - the inner way touches the outer. It would have been better left as it was -a simple way. Do you want me to fix this?
	2	2023-02-21 07:05	CrazyKim117 ♦10	Thank you for bringing this to my attention. if you would like to make the changes yourself, please feel free to do so. Kim
132306834 by vicecity100 @ 2023-02-09 13:06	1	2023-02-20 05:17	Warin61	Hi The community garden would include the veg etc plots??? The "name' Vegitables, Fruit ... well those are descriptions... see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Keep mapping.
132720225 by Adityo @ 2023-02-18 16:05	1	2023-02-20 05:06	Warin61	Hi, There is a problem with one of these houses... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.08833&lat=-33.99812&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cinterse...
	2	2023-02-20 08:00	Adityo ♦14	Hi Warin61! Thanks for reaching me out. I will look for it and try to use DCS NSW Imagery as well if I found someplace that is unclear with Bing Imagery
44297691 by Zhent @ 2016-12-10 07:30	1	2023-02-10 22:46	Warin61	Hi, The 'Clover Hill Road' appears on the DCS Base Map. Yet the western ends are unnamed on the DCS Base Map but you have them named. Can you confirm that there are on the ground signs with the name? Present press reports call it 'Clover Hill Trail'... probably reflecting the...
	2	2023-02-15 09:38	Zhent ♦20	LPI Basemap has one of the forks named as Clover Hill Road. The only sign I can recall is at the Illawarra Highway offtake, I can't recall if it said road or trail.
	3	2023-02-16 10:00	Warin61	OK. I'll unname the track that the base map shows without a name. I'll add the press reported name as 'loc_name=Clover Hill Trail' .. and call it 'good enough' :)
132562992 by Ian Chennell @ 2023-02-15 04:28	1	2023-02-16 00:30	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! Muiltpolygons are one of the harder things to understand. The one you have made here is not correct. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15479996. The firest meber https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871161920 encompasses the whole lake the other ways simply duplicat...
	2	2023-02-16 01:16	Ian Chennell ♦1	Many thanks - I knew I hadn't got this lake boundary quite right, as I tried to combine two separate lake polygons into one... Easiest fix was to delete and redraw the lake as a single object.
131587019 by jMapsAu @ 2023-01-23 01:30	1	2023-02-15 03:10	Warin61	I note that it has been 6 months since the introduction of the 'permission to use' this data on the Australian Data Catalog. Yet the 'permission' document remains missing. Suggest you spend time getting that done....
	2	2023-02-15 14:35	jMapsAu ♦9	Suggestion noted Wiki account is still not elevated, so WIP but no ETA
96619579 by _Sasha_ @ 2020-12-29 18:04	1	2023-02-15 01:38	Warin61	Hi, Are you certain that this Rural Fire Brigade occupies both buildings?
96095172 by JBMD @ 2020-12-19 00:54	1	2023-02-14 04:46	Warin61	Hi, The DCS base map says that there are 2 Rural Fire Brigades here; Oak Flats and Wollongong Headquarters... But the DCS base map is confused - upto 4 Rural Fire Services here in this locality when zoomed out! So maybe these are in addition to your entries?????
	2	2023-02-14 06:58	JBMD ♦1	There's 3 brigades/services here: Oak flats RFB, Illawarra Support RFB, and Ilawarra fire control. Wollongong headquaters doesn't exist and I'll remove it. In addition Oak flats is W of the support brigade so I'll move that too
	3	2023-02-14 09:39	Warin61	Thanks. I add the extras after the above message .. I'll be checking the lot of NSW fire stations and brigades once I'm through doing this 'housekeeping' .. that will take a while. I'' make 2 lists of what OSM has and compare that with the official lists .. then I&#...
92982334 by cleary @ 2020-10-24 09:15	1	2022-08-11 04:31	TreeTracks ♦32	Hi Cleary, I wonder if you could check the paved surface tag on this way , and the adjoining ways to the north, from Fords Bridge to Ella Vale. It's tagged as paved but all the imagery I have available indicates its unpaved from the outskirts of Fords Bridge north. I think you added the surface...
	2	2022-08-11 06:53	cleary ♦56	Ian, I think you are correct. I remember driving the full length of the Dowling Track and parts of some roads adjoining it. The roads were paved for a few hundred metres right at the main intersection where the hotel is located in Fords Bridge but otherwise I think most were unpaved. A few sections ...
	3	2022-08-11 23:28	TreeTracks ♦32	Hi again, thanks for your quick reply. I'll fix it up his morning. Best wishes.
	4	2023-02-12 06:19	Warin61	Hi, Bing shows water in Green Creek, where as in the DCS Imagery it looks bone dry. As it flows into a 'creek' then it cannot be a river? The problem is assign it as either a river or a stream ... after rain .. during flooding it would be a lake :) I'd stick with the name 'Creek...
	5	2023-02-12 07:43	cleary ♦56	Hi Warin I don't think that the name necessarily limits how a waterway is mapped. Cooper Creek (aka Coopers Creek) near Windorah and King Creek near Bedourie in Queensland are better-known examples - definitely rivers despite their names. Also a river is not precluded from flowing into...
132301394 by streetmapper283 @ 2023-02-09 11:09	1	2023-02-10 00:27	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! There is a problem with relation 15452881 - meadow. It 'only' has inners - no outer way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15452881. Always best to keep it simple? If these 'inners' are actually the meadows then delete the relation and place tag...
	2	2023-02-11 01:51	streetmapper283 ♦2	I accidently created a second meadow multipolygon instead of adding those two areas to the meadow it was inside. Should be fixed in changeset 132388015
	3	2023-02-11 10:05	Warin61	Good oh.
80059464 by Fizzie-DWG @ 2020-01-25 05:17	1	2023-02-11 03:28	Warin61	Hi, These numbers you have added to th eend of the fire station names... they seem to be 'station numbers' and not part of the name? Possibly they would be better tagged as ref= x where x is the station number??? See https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/station_list/
	2	2023-02-11 04:52	Fizzie-DWG ♦31,875	Hey Warin, I'm named them all a while back working of the Oz Guidelines that were agreed to at the time: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Emergency_Services. If you want to change that layout, you better bring it back on AU first.
	3	2023-02-11 10:04	Warin61	Dam! I missed that - just went straight to the long table under it . mutter mutter... !
132199633 by CirnoBaka @ 2023-02-07 11:01	1	2023-02-08 00:08	Warin61	Hi, Thanks for adding this detail into OSM. However the area is also covered by Way: 135196663 .. so the rocks with be covered by tree symbols.. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135196663 Note that it is also tagged 'landuse=conservation' .. but I think it is more park than co...
	2	2023-02-08 07:00	CirnoBaka ♦13	I believe the intention of the conservation is the untagged park on the left side, the way definitively needs to be reworked. I would like to split it up into multiple areas which is why I've overlapped the rock for now, I plan to reshape the conservation way around it. I am familiar with th...
	3	2023-02-09 09:48	Warin61	The DCS base map has two 'park' names to the west ... it is not very good at separating them... but it does define the 'park' or what ever the area is .. and those boundaries can be taken as the legal boundaries. Rock, trees and grass don't indicate legal boundaries, so I�...
132070891 by CirnoBaka @ 2023-02-04 10:47	1	2023-02-07 23:54	Warin61	Hi, What are 'The Tanks'??? It is not clear from imagery .. and 'swimming pool' does not look appropriate? The relation .. has no outer way .. so that does not work. Think both ways should be 'outer' .. but the tags still do not explain what they are... Hum...
	2	2023-02-08 06:37	CirnoBaka ♦13	I've taken 'The Tanks' from the NSW basemap. Now that I think about it it does seem to be the name of the rocks, not the area. For the relations, I wasn't sure how to merge them to prevent duplicating tags between them as they are all called 'The Tanks'. I'll...
	3	2023-02-09 09:42	Warin61	Yer.. I'd not worry about a relation for the rock areas. Just map each rock area with the name=The Tanks .. and maybe a website link to https://barringtoncoast.com.au/directory/the-tanks ... I'd not be worried about the swimming aspect ... possibly dangerous at certain tides?
129453767 by WoodWoseWulf @ 2022-11-28 01:15	1	2023-02-04 07:44	Warin61	Hi, What kind of 'football' is played here?
	2	2023-02-04 07:57	WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163	Hiya Warin, I know that Rugby Union is played here, but it might be worth checking with bob3bob3 as they were responsible for adding that tag.
	3	2023-02-04 08:45	Warin61	Yer .. found rugby in the local press .. so I added that and cricket.. Thanks for the reply.
130358018 by Gratified7030 @ 2022-12-22 06:04	1	2022-12-30 02:13	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! One of the harder things to do are multipolygon relations. The relation 15033861 - parking - is not right .. the outer ways 'share segments'. In this instance I would not have a relation ... I'd simply have a single way around the whole thing... For the err...
	2	2023-01-12 05:47	Warin61	This error remains. Most people learn well from fixing their own errors. Let me know if you need help. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130358018
	3	2023-02-03 05:56	tastrax ♦1,144	Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX ...
	4	2023-02-04 08:39	Warin61	\\Hi, Note these are not personal criticisms but information about OSM tagging and mapping to help improve your mapping.
129151987 by AU_SPM @ 2022-11-20 11:06	1	2023-02-04 05:25	Warin61	The 'Catherine Field Baseball Park' ... looks to be named 'Les Tegal Oval' on the DCS Base map??? I have removed the name 'Catherine Field Park Cricket Nets' and corrected the sport tag to sport=cricket_nets'.
128391171 by AU_SPM @ 2022-11-02 12:54	1	2023-02-04 05:14	Warin61	Hi, The 'name' tag is for names only - not 'descriptions' such as tennis court etc.
122576586 by SydMD @ 2022-06-19 11:51	1	2023-02-04 04:24	Warin61	Hi, notes are used to alert other mappers to problems ... not to describe the feature. These 'notes' have all been changed to 'description'...
131862270 by streetmapper283 @ 2023-01-30 04:18	1	2023-02-02 23:10	Warin61	Hi This one changeset has heath and bear rock in the one location, it cannot be both ... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136351103#map=19/-35.60373/149.11648 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136351104 In another changeset that is also another conflict see https://www.openstreetmap.or...
131885195 by RichieRRR @ 2023-01-30 15:06	1	2023-02-01 22:41	Warin61	Hi, This edit has caused way \t877757159 (park) to cross itself... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.01023&lat=-31.97233&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cint...
131886000 by RichieRRR @ 2023-01-30 15:28	1	2023-02-01 22:37	Warin61	Hi Way 1136484941 is in error... you do repeat this error from time to time.. why? See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.86166&lat=-32.01328&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_mul...
131953429 by arctic-rocinante @ 2023-02-01 08:58	1	2023-02-01 22:20	Warin61	Hi, The name tag is for names only, not descriptions. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
	2	2023-02-02 01:55	arctic-rocinante ♦35	Good point, thanks for the feedback. I suppose the “school” part is implied by being within school grounds, and hopefully renderers will localise “cafeteria” to “canteen” in Australia. I’ll remove the names 👍
121958205 by GridHopper @ 2022-06-05 03:09	1	2023-02-01 03:46	Warin61	Hi, The DCS Base Map (should be available with your editor) has the present day boundaries ... they include the boundary for the road... take a look.
131664571 by kurisubrooks @ 2023-01-24 18:32	1	2023-01-29 00:49	Warin61	Hi, The relation 15360493 has "shared segments"... 2 inners cross one another.. a heath and a wet land .. is it really both??? Ways 1134878250 and 1134878253.
	2	2023-01-29 00:54	kurisubrooks ♦54	It definitely looks like both from above, it's a short wooded (but still wet) area. You can see on bing imagery. What do you think I should do in this case?
	3	2023-01-30 08:19	Warin61	The DCS base map says no wet land in this area at all. Additionally there are several areas that are not grass that are within the relation but not members... meaning there is some work to do on the relation.
131602509 by glugs_01 @ 2023-01-23 11:08	1	2023-01-29 23:35	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! There is an error with the relation created here. The outer ways cross one another and that is the 'error'. So ... why create the two ways? Is there something different between the two parts of the building? Next question? Why is there the tag 'layer=1...
90066313 by ScottWalkerAU @ 2020-08-28 07:57	1	2023-01-29 05:57	Warin61	Hi, Advice... The fire station building is not named .. it is the amenity (area) that carries the name.. Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dfire_station
131758892 by duyfken @ 2023-01-27 07:05	1	2023-01-29 01:04	Warin61	Hi, Some hints? A 'building=roof' would also be tagged as being higher that the road it covers so 'layer=1" could be an appropriate additional tag. A multipolygon's outer ways cannot share segments. So a 'roof' over an entrance is probably best left off th...
108660330 by radiotrefoil @ 2021-07-27 06:00	1	2023-01-25 02:53	Warin61	Hi, The Way: Valley Heights Rural Fire Brigade (966467520) ... looks wrong? The DCS Base Map has it on the northern side of the Great Western Hwy near the BP petrol station??
	2	2023-01-26 07:03	radiotrefoil ♦109	Yeah thanks, looks like that was a mistake that was on DCS at the time I mapped it. The old rfs on green parade closed in 2012 and the new one is near the petrol station. Will fix when I get home tonight.
	3	2023-01-28 10:45	Warin61	Yer, I have found 2 more that are not on the DCS Base Map .. one of witch is a movement of an old station. They'll have to wait for the DCS to update.
	4	2023-01-28 14:24	radiotrefoil ♦109	Thanks I'll keep a look out. They sure like to change premises a lot huh
85365343 by AussieMapGuy @ 2020-05-18 07:18	1	2023-01-28 03:17	Warin61	Hi, A 'green space' can be part of a fire station .. or some other thing.
79365626 by Fizzie-DWG @ 2020-01-09 05:58	1	2023-01-26 04:19	Warin61	Hi Maxar has a building here now. They got a new truck donated from Flemington Markets... so I have detailed it.
131717171 by Warin61 @ 2023-01-26 03:39	1	2023-01-26 03:42	Warin61	Doh! Detailing Big Hill Rural Fire Brigade!
108572669 by Osmosefixer2021 @ 2021-07-25 16:46	1	2023-01-26 01:48	Warin61	Hi, Thge OSM guide is One festure = One OSM entry. As such a building is one feature and a firestation is another feature. Here you have added 2 fire stations to 2 buildings that are the same fire station. The area has been tagged as a fire station, thus there are 3 fire station where one exits. ...
124015950 by Nrg800 @ 2022-07-24 16:13	1	2023-01-25 02:42	Warin61	Hi, Some hints? Building Way: Lane Cove Fire Station (1080968692) is not a fire station. It is an ambulance station. For OSM in NSW there is a 'DCS Base Map' that gives you that detail. This has been corrected. What is the source of the building name=IGA?? Would this not be a superm...
80010888 by Fizzie-DWG @ 2020-01-24 06:04	1	2023-01-24 06:38	Warin61	Station does not exist ... not listed of RFS website .. and looks like building gone on Maxar tagged as razed.
	2	2023-01-24 08:21	nevw ♦1,974	Could this article be related to this RFS site move? I don’t think the new station is mapped yet. https://www.newsofthearea.com.au/rfs-solitary-brigade-moves-into-new-home-79214
	3	2023-01-24 08:40	Warin61	New site ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761615318
	4	2023-01-24 11:55	nevw ♦1,974	Yes, that seems to be the new RFS location.
109599781 by Jayem444 @ 2021-08-13 02:43	1	2023-01-24 04:44	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM. The 'Gogeldrie Fire Brigade' tagged 'building=yes' .. well that implies that all the site is a building. I have fixed this and changed the name to 'Gogeldrie Rural Fire Brigade'. Keep mapping!
129986605 by Andrew Parker @ 2022-12-12 06:55	1	2022-12-13 01:35	Warin61	Hi, Yer .. that Park relation will not 'work'. First each member of the relation needs a 'role', 'inner' or 'outer'. Second ... the Way: 83407591 "landuse"="farmyard" is a problem as it presently causes the boundary of the Park ...
	2	2022-12-30 23:39	Warin61	Still broken. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.88180&lat=-37.59447&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ct...
	3	2023-01-19 23:12	Warin61	Still broken...
	4	2023-01-22 06:37	Andrew Parker ♦5	I have tried my best to correct the issue. Can you have a look and see if I have done it right?
	5	2023-01-22 07:34	Warin61	That would 'work' .. if the relation members had roles .. 'outers'. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14979222 Of the 3 listed ways only the first one has a role. ------------------- Using Vicmap Lite Public lands as a reference has some additional intrusions. Mig...
131513167 by Hb- @ 2023-01-20 15:36	1	2023-01-21 04:58	Warin61	What is the source of Platts Farms Pty Ltd???
	2	2023-01-21 18:48	Hb- ♦285	https://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/submission_-_review_of_bulk_water_prices_2006-2007_-_r_platts_-_website_document.pdf
	3	2023-01-22 02:27	Warin61	And that is copyright...
131216147 by Hb- @ 2023-01-13 07:05	1	2023-01-14 23:48	Hb- ♦285	Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131269617. Source of description of the way to the emergency meeting point is https://www.forestrycorporation.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/461492/Harvest-Plan-Bodalla-Cpt-3063.pdf The description was interpreted and let to the location...
	2	2023-01-15 00:38	Warin61	Have you obtained permission to use this copyright material???? https://www.forestrycorporation.com.au/about/copyright
	3	2023-01-15 12:23	Hb- ♦285	For the emergency meeting point the pdf-file gives the location S36°15'37" E149°57'47". This coordinate is copyright protected and not usable in OSM without permission. The new node set in this changeset is at S36°15'26.2" E149°58'09.5". This...
	4	2023-01-17 10:21	Warin61	The information is copyright...
	5	2023-01-17 14:21	Hb- ♦285	Nobody can "copyright" free information. For a limited time patents for making something on a certain way are possible. And the content of databases is protected.
	6	2023-01-19 07:32	Warin61	Where is this "free information" available from "freely"? Any information on these websites cannot be copied from them, if you have a non copyright source .. then state it. "OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or...
	7	2023-01-19 07:37	Warin61	Note .. Australian post codes ARE copyright!!! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Australia-wide ASGS Postal Areas and see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Free_The_Postcode#AU Similar things can be said about the other copyright breaches.
125460716 by Warin61 @ 2022-08-28 00:30	1	2023-01-17 05:51	WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163	Hi Warin, I'm trying to find more information about Shakeys Forest which appears on the DCS map (you also added it in this changeset) You wouldn't happen to know what org is responsible for it, or what it's purpose is, would you? If not, I'll add it to the list for a dri...
	2	2023-01-17 11:22	Warin61	I got it off the Base Map. A google got some hits ... https://oa.anu.edu.au/obituary/craft-joseph-25558 But no real information as to who runs it. Possibly the local council. But no luck with a search on Central Coast Council. It is a nice part of the world.
131266441 by Hb- @ 2023-01-14 14:10	1	2023-01-15 00:41	Warin61	What is the source of the postcode information?
	2	2023-01-15 09:34	Hb- ♦285	The postcode 2550 is valid for all addresses in Cobargo and Wandella. Source was the website of the Wandella Hall in January 2020: https://www.begavalley.nsw.gov.au/cp_themes/default/page.asp?p=DOC-HWA-11-05-76
	3	2023-01-17 10:19	Warin61	copyright https://begavalley.nsw.gov.au/council/copyright-and-disclaimer
131269617 by Hb- @ 2023-01-14 15:46	1	2023-01-14 23:45	Hb- ♦285	This corrects the data from changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131216147 and not from 131166587 as noted.
	2	2023-01-15 00:39	Warin61	NSW LPI is now NSW DPS...
68780081 by RobertoDeBagel @ 2019-04-02 07:20	1	2023-01-13 01:21	Warin61	Hi, Would not the "Wilderness Coast Walking Track" be a route? While signs may state 'Wilderness Coast Walking Track' that may simply indicate the route rather than a track name?
	2	2023-01-15 00:17	Warin61	Hi, Some of the racks have names different from "Wilderness Coast Walking Track" according to the DCS Base Map & Topo map. I have changed these. In order to keep the route information I have made a route relation. See https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=15282770&type=rela...
131209240 by Hb- @ 2023-01-13 00:36	1	2023-01-13 07:17	Warin61	You are not local so the source claim of 'local knowledge' does not hold up. So what is the source of this information? facebook,youtube?
	2	2023-01-13 22:46	Hb- ♦285	https://begavalley.nsw.gov.au/council/join-us-for-a-stroll-through-new-murrabrine-bridge-landscape-works
	3	2023-01-14 04:38	Warin61	https://begavalley.nsw.gov.au/council/copyright-and-disclaimer "Material on this website is subject to copyright and is intended for general use and information only. Users are permitted to print or download information and materials for personal use only and not for commercial or public use...
	4	2023-01-15 07:29	Hb- ♦285	No "material" but some information about the renewed bridge was collected from several sources: * Two 3.5 m wide car lanes and an additional cycle track, new design of intersection with Bega Street from https://begavalley.nsw.gov.au/community/cobargo-murrabrine-creek-bridge * Estimated ...
131166587 by Hb- @ 2023-01-12 01:04	1	2023-01-13 07:16	Warin61	WayWay: 1131062223 lists the source as 'homehound' ... that site is copyright...
	2	2023-01-14 23:43	Hb- ♦285	Removed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131266441
130999147 by Skip1305 @ 2023-01-07 23:29	1	2023-01-12 05:56	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! One of the harder things to do are multipolygon relations. The relation 15097195 - building - is not right .. the outer ways 'share segments'. In this instance I would not have a relation ... I'd simply have a single way around the whole thing... For the erro...
	2	2023-01-12 23:56	Skip1305 ♦1	Fixed. Thanks for the tip.
131004972 by Jason Haines @ 2023-01-08 08:06	1	2023-01-11 05:07	Warin61	Hi, I have closed the tree relation that was open. I have also made the tree way into a relation - so as to inculde holes and stop crossing of the tree areas. Probably worthwhile to combine ther 2 releations into one relation. Observation: At least some of this looks to be forestry to produce tim...
131054135 by crowe37 @ 2023-01-09 12:59	1	2023-01-11 03:40	Warin61	Hi, Way 662758608 has been restored, this is part of the relation for Anglesea Heath Alcoa Agreement Area and is required to close the area. It looks like both the Anglesea Heath Alcoa Agreement Area and the new entry of way 1128451034 share this area... ???
2444610 by MichaelCollinson @ 2009-09-11 10:41	1	2023-01-08 09:26	Warin61	HI, This is from a long tome ago.. but just in case you do any more of these.. 'x Homestead' is the name of the main residential building, while 'x Station' is the name for the farm..
	2	2023-01-08 21:52	MichaelCollinson ♦53	Good to know, thank you Warin
125466700 by AndrewS @ 2022-08-28 08:09	1	2022-12-21 09:50	Warin61	Hi, What is the source of the 'locality' node 9982966777 (De Grey Station) ??? Note 'Stations' are usually farms of some description - so they do have people there. 'Localities' in OSM terms have no people..
	2	2022-12-21 20:21	AndrewS ♦28	changed to farm. thanks.
	3	2022-12-22 07:16	Warin61	Thanks for this change to 'farm'. but what is the information source of the 'De Grey Station'???
	4	2023-01-08 03:33	AndrewS ♦28	I honestly don't recall. I was marking the De Grey river and disused mines in the vicinity so maybe the station was on a mine map I was using. There were also plenty of pre-existing De Grey clues in the vicinity, so probably just that.
	5	2023-01-08 09:11	Warin61	Pitty. If there was a source we could use ther are a great many homesteads that could be mapped.
129742623 by radiotrefoil @ 2022-12-05 13:39	1	2023-01-07 07:22	Warin61	Hi Removed some of the overlapping tree areas, 2 osm features. Any others?
130906191 by Derrick_86 @ 2023-01-05 13:05	1	2023-01-05 21:48	Warin61	Why do you have 3 things all saying 'Clayton North'??? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127497931 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127497929 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15088571 ????
	2	2023-01-06 02:29	Diacritic ♦271	This user has tried several times to add "Clayton North" as a suburb to the map. The node has now been added for the neighbourhood, but it appears this Derrick is trying to get boundaries to render for the neighbourhood. Derrick, thank you for adjusting your edits in light of my prev...
	3	2023-01-06 03:45	Derrick_86 ♦2	@diacritic sorry for the few errors i have done because i am new to this site. I was just wondering what changes you made because when i search Clayton North up on the maps it doesnt show anything about it not even neighbourhood. Just curious as to why this has happened. Derrick
	4	2023-01-06 05:29	Diacritic ♦271	Hi Derrick, No problem at all. Thanks for getting in touch. The search bar on the OSM website uses a tool called Nominatim. https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html Nominatim doesn't update every day, but once it has updated the neighbourhood node we've created should sh...
	5	2023-01-06 07:48	Warin61	@ Derrick_86 No need to be 'sorry' about it. We all do things when starting out - part of learning is making errors. But you must be aware that they are errors to learn from them. OSM is vast - there is a lot to learn, just learn the bits you are interested in and leave the other bits f...
	6	2023-01-06 07:52	Warin61	Oh.. you can look up peoples change sets ..click on their 'name' and you get https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Diacritic then look at the edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Diacritic/history and then you can look for the particular changeset your interested in https://www.open...
103131697 by afa5e @ 2021-04-18 10:43	1	2023-01-04 01:41	Warin61	Hi, The DCS Base Map has the 'legal boundaries' ... these differ from the fence lines in some cases. I have added the homestead from both the Base Map and Imagery.
93690232 by RichieRRR @ 2020-11-07 01:16	1	2020-11-08 00:50	Warin61	Not a question of 'may have', there are crossing buildings. Crossing buildings are identified by the JOSM validator before you download the data to OSM. A better practice is to save the data to your local PC without downloading it to OSM. Then correct it later. Once corrected then downlo...
	2	2023-01-01 07:10	Warin61	These are still here .. 2 years later... deleting them? https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.00740&lat=-31.97778&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cint...
130666154 by RichieRRR @ 2022-12-29 23:13	1	2023-01-01 07:08	Warin61	Building way 1125736148 has two extra nodes .... Node: 10294226998 and Node: 10294226997 - one on top of the other. They both should be deleted. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99340&lat=-31.98903&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplica...
130580456 by Warin61 @ 2022-12-28 03:13	1	2022-12-31 06:02	kurisubrooks ♦54	Hi Warin, why's the name of South Creek (both relation and several ways) been changed to "n"? Accidental?
	2	2022-12-31 06:03	kurisubrooks ♦54	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372110581 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584475117 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14508689
	3	2022-12-31 08:52	Warin61	Yes accidental - I needed a way to find duplications of the stream ... the way I did it was to rename one stream and then look for the others... I though I had it corrected.. I think I have it now ... sorry about that. Thanks for the catch!
	4	2022-12-31 08:53	kurisubrooks ♦54	Not a problem. Have a happy new year!
	5	2022-12-31 08:55	Warin61	Note - I don't think the relation should be there - it is a duplication of the tags on the ways... so I may well delete the relation .. eventually
	6	2022-12-31 08:58	kurisubrooks ♦54	Yeah probably not necessary
130681571 by M43QZ0DAJ6 @ 2022-12-30 11:04	1	2022-12-30 23:47	Warin61	Hi, The service road here to backs over itself ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.27729&lat=-37.84761&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cinter...
130681411 by M43QZ0DAJ6 @ 2022-12-30 11:01	1	2022-12-30 23:45	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM! The service road ... it is going back over itself called 'a duplicated segment' in OSM terms. It only needs to join itself at a point .. not go back to the starting place. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.15682&lat=-37.81377&zoom...
124286949 by jakecopp @ 2022-07-31 02:33	1	2022-08-02 06:59	Warin61	HI, If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124286949 and then click on each created way you'll find the ways that cross themselves .. eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082476612
	2	2022-12-29 04:52	Warin61	I have now separated way \t1082604070 into 3 ... and these are now separate ways .. they don't cross themselves... I note that 'street lamp' should be used on a node ... I have add a discussion point on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp#Ground_bas...
113888449 by ortho_is_hot @ 2021-11-17 09:34	1	2022-12-26 08:31	Warin61	Hi, "Bus Route 180X: Singleton Station to Maitland Station (Express Service)" is not a name but a description... something far shorter would attrack less 'attention' in the name tag? "Bus 180X Singleton to Maitland" .???
125435891 by Stephen Males @ 2022-08-27 09:46	1	2022-12-26 06:17	Warin61	Hi, The relation for 'South Creek' has many duplicated segments. I have removed these. In addition the relation looks like it is a duplication of the tags already on the ways ... so it is redundant?
130397014 by Warin61 @ 2022-12-23 00:31	1	2022-12-24 06:24	CirnoBaka ♦13	Should I revert anything from my previous commit or is this all that was broken?
	2	2022-12-24 08:57	Warin61	No, keep doing what your doing. <I'll get to the Admin . Boundary problem soon, it will leave in place things that now exist and move the boundaries to new ways/nodes.
130324914 by CirnoBaka @ 2022-12-21 10:15	1	2022-12-21 23:46	Warin61	Hi, The Wianamatta Creek ... has been mapped to the Administration boundary of the suburbs ... changing it to the actual creek destroys the Admin. Boundaries. Humm... I'll make a new entry for the Admin boundaries... easier all round, and it may reduce the work load long term....
	2	2022-12-22 01:06	CirnoBaka ♦13	Whoops, I didn't mean to submit the boundary change, I wasn't sure what was going on there. I am unsure how to revert just boundary position
	3	2022-12-22 07:11	Warin61	Some of them are tied to other features e,g, roads, waterways. Separating them is a pain but something I believe should be done.
	4	2022-12-23 00:37	Warin61	Hi, The creek may be better mapped using the DCS base map as that could be better than using imagery to pick the centre (low point) of the creek, certainly easier to map it from that source.
122836563 by SydMD @ 2022-06-25 12:57	1	2022-12-21 01:30	Warin61	Hi, Some of these phones are 'under ground' - as are the roads they are associtated with. In OSM this 'under ground' atribute is tagged using the key layer, you will find it on the associated roads and the phones should have the same value .. I thing that is mostly 'layer=-...
130272886 by MarkLD @ 2022-12-20 05:29	1	2022-12-21 00:03	Warin61	Hi, Looks to me like in modifying the river this has made the tree area cross itself ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.06308&lat=-33.93491&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_...
130205894 by Seargent @ 2022-12-18 09:15	1	2022-12-18 22:33	Warin61	Hi, Welcome to OSM ... one issue from this changeset ... Multipolygons outer ways should not share segments. So the parking relation is wrong. Why are the parking areas 2 separate ways anyway? The easy thing to do is to make them one simple closed way - no relation required.
	2	2022-12-18 22:38	Seargent ♦1	The 2 parking lots were seperate and slightly apart when I originally discovered it on OSM, when I know from both satellite imagery and from visiting that location on several locations that it should be continuous. I attempted to combine the 2 however I couldn't get the merge thing to be enable...
	3	2022-12-19 07:18	Warin61	Ok. Now it is one simple way. ( In JOSM that I use the command would be 'Combine' and that would need the two ways to be touching at one or two nodes, not overlapping one another), As a 1 member relation .. the tags can be placed on the way and the relation deleted.. I have done this a...