| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 165462964 by Ewen Hill @ 2025-04-26 12:16 | 1 | 2025-04-26 20:30 | nevw ♦1,974 | Hi Ewen, this area is alerted by osmi as a multipolygon in need of repair.https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.23612&lat=-34.50229&zoom=17 |
| 164679150 by Ewen Hill @ 2025-04-08 13:12 | 1 | 2025-04-11 22:33 | nevw ♦1,974 | Hi Ewen, esri detects a problem with the multipolygon herehttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.47714&lat=-34.51633&zoom=16 |
| 161728856 by Ewen Hill @ 2025-01-24 21:29 | 1 | 2025-02-04 00:46 | Leon K2 ♦2 | This feels wrong to me. I understand changing the access, but the road type hasn't suddenly changed because it's temporarily closed. |
| 2 | 2025-02-05 11:09 | Ewen Hill | Hi Leon - I think that makes perfect sense. I am going to update this tonight now that the exclusion zone has been dramatically reduced. Thanks for raising this | |
| 94927879 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-11-28 05:48 | 1 | 2024-02-28 19:33 | os-emmer ♦337 | Hi Ewen Hill,is this a station of the Queensland SES?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867737651 |
| 2 | 2024-02-29 09:22 | Ewen Hill | Hi os-emmer - I added it as per mapillary images showing it was "NPA volunteer emergency services" and assumed it was the SES for the "Northern Peninsula Area Regional Council," (NPA) - I am not certain about the semantics of if it is an actual SES station or not but this appear... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-01 17:45 | os-emmer ♦337 | Thanks for the response. That sound like we need help here from others. I opened a note:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4134461 | |
| 4 | 2024-06-01 22:51 | kennorris49 ♦1 | I'm parked just off Seisia ATM. What exactly do you need clarifying on the ground. Name? Function? Pls have patience, I'm new to this. | |
| 5 | 2024-06-02 01:23 | Ewen Hill | Hi kennorris49, Welcome and thank you so much for looking at this. Can you let us know what the full name of the emergency services building is and if it related to an organisation is please orany ideas on how to tag it. If you download either "Street Complete" or "Map Complete"... | |
| 6 | 2024-06-02 06:59 | kennorris49 ♦1 | By 'parked', I mean anchored off — as in, on a boat, so mapillary is perhaps not so easy.The building is a large shed with an attached lean-to covering a Rural Fire Service truck. The shed itself shows headquarters(?) for 'NPA Volunteer Emergency Services' namely: Austral... | |
| 7 | 2024-06-02 07:30 | kennorris49 ♦1 | Sorry, can't find either "Street Complete" or "Map Complete" to upload pics. | |
| 8 | 2024-09-11 06:17 | GeeMaps! ♦29 | Thanks, Ken, that was great help! | |
| 155831632 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-08-27 13:12 | 1 | 2024-09-01 07:24 | Alliegaytor ♦24 | I've fixed the relation order as well as remove the "forward" roles. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156041420 Does ID add "forward" roles to added ways on ptv2 routes, or did you manually add them? |
| 155366377 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-08-17 11:30 | 1 | 2024-08-22 13:38 | griffonboi ♦15 | Thanks for updating Ewen, I reckon way 45582523 is SG only though, there's another way 45583161 which is BG only that branches off from the main link |
| 153294261 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-06-28 13:43 | 1 | 2024-06-28 13:46 | griffonboi ♦15 | Wow what are the odds that we both decided to add the route at the same time |
| 2 | 2024-06-28 23:17 | Ewen Hill | Ha Ha !!!- all good - I thought I was going blind - I've removed the duplicated bus stops now | |
| 144889451 by Ewen Hill @ 2023-12-08 06:36 | 1 | 2024-06-17 12:55 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello, please a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11402592688 (4 objects in common). Did you mean the colour petrol? |
| 146982807 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-02-02 12:12 | 1 | 2024-03-12 01:58 | Caleb NHVR ♦10 | Hi Ewen,The roundabout you have added in this changeset [146982807] at the Western Port Highway / Hall Road intersection now appears to be a signalled/traffic light intersection.The changeset prior to yours [145520102] had added a signalled intersection in December 2023. The Esri World Image... |
| 2 | 2024-03-12 09:00 | Ewen Hill | Hi, this was a fix to an authoritative note from a trusted editor as per the source who stated that the roundabout was in place. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146982379 as the main changeset. I also used Strava heat map to check that the roundabout was in place from memory. I think ... | |
| 3 | 2024-03-12 09:08 | Ewen Hill | actually , the roundabout was replaced on 20-12-2023 with traffic lights - I will replace it shortly as best I can | |
| 147202837 by Ewen Hill @ 2024-02-08 06:28 | 1 | 2024-02-09 03:30 | nevw ♦1,974 | koof67 appears to have deleted all the wooded areas again in changeset 147205318 |
| 2 | 2024-02-09 03:34 | nevw ♦1,974 | ...as dissplayed in achavi https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=147205318 | |
| 3 | 2024-02-10 02:04 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Nevw for the news. I will be reverting this and sending a note to the DWG. | |
| 136611941 by Ewen Hill @ 2023-05-27 06:20 | 1 | 2023-06-22 04:16 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Razed is used to stop people mapping things that no longer exist. If the objects are no longer on imagery then the razed objects can be deleted from OSM. "Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery. "https://... |
| 136996215 by Ewen Hill @ 2023-06-06 04:49 | 1 | 2023-06-06 21:05 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Please refrain from "disaster tourism" mapping like this. The Ukrainian community is perfectly capable of recording destruction themselves where it is deemed useful. There's no need for people from other parts of the world to race to be the first to translate their TV news into Ukrain... |
| 2 | 2023-06-07 01:58 | Ewen Hill | Hi Woodpeck, I am somewhat disappointed by your comments. Does this include emergency HOTOSM tasks as well and can you provide a link to the distinction between both please? Happy to discuss offline. Regards | |
| 125177503 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-08-21 10:36 | 1 | 2023-04-10 17:07 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,I advice you to use survey:date=2022-08-20 in stead of surveyed=2022-08-20 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087863760Reegards,Marc |
| 133387122 by Ewen Hill @ 2023-03-07 04:23 | 1 | 2023-03-07 22:53 | Hufkratzer ♦747 | Hi,You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152319278leisure=horse_riding (riding centre), but it is obviously just an outdoor riding arena, which should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian according to the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding\... |
| 2 | 2023-03-08 08:24 | Ewen Hill | Hi, thank you for your input and details and I have fixed all three although I am not 100% sure about the last | |
| 3 | 2023-03-08 11:54 | Hufkratzer ♦747 | Looks good, thanks | |
| 121312137 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-05-22 10:18 | 1 | 2023-02-25 08:44 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Just to be a PIB Ewen the local council added some kerbing/islands to the Wilmington main street that now makes the side/service roads now invalid! The Mapillary imagery you used was probably 2019 before it was done? I'll be okay to fix these as I was there today. |
| 63918622 by Ewen Hill @ 2018-10-27 03:38 | 1 | 2023-02-16 09:53 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Hi Ewen, re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3404662288 I was there today. The area is signed as huge rest area. (A few days for Mapillary data) and part covered with newish gravel and some dumped rubbish/junk. Could not see siding. The school however has had a sign erected on CEH pointing east up... |
| 126264359 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-09-16 13:18 | 1 | 2022-12-23 02:16 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | thks Ewen, great to see you here!!! FYI Here in FP we are lucky enough to have had a data from the government so first before mapping we adjust imagery :) It was not a big shift so i let it here like this --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... |
| 2 | 2022-12-23 02:16 | Violaine_Do ♦190 | thks Ewen, great to see you here!!! FYI Here in FP we are lucky enough to have had a data from the government so first before mapping we adjust imagery :) It was not a big shift so i let it here like this --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... | |
| 129999384 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-12-12 13:31 | 1 | 2022-12-13 01:00 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Looks like an error? Way 1121223120, highway=service bridge=yes, layer=1 ... that is quite a long bridge crossing a main road.. Possibly a gas pipe line road? In which case I'd map it as a track.??? |
| 2 | 2022-12-13 02:46 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Warin, My mistake, I was downgrading all the CSG access roads and must have also selected the new pipeline I added. Thanks for spotting this. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-13 10:09 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | We all do those mistakes .. just different kinds to stop the boredom. :) | |
| 4 | 2022-12-13 21:33 | cleary ♦56 | Hello Ewen, I was surprised to see this road tagged as highway=service. I would have regarded it as highway=unclassified (as it had been tagged prior to your recent edit). I have mapped many similar roads and have always considered unclassified as the appropriate tag. I just checked the wiki at htt... | |
| 5 | 2022-12-13 21:36 | cleary ♦56 | I should have clarified that I was referring to Wains Road, Wieambilla.Sorry for that oversight. The road was the site of recent tragedy and OSM map is on ABC News website. | |
| 6 | 2022-12-14 00:45 | Ewen Hill | Hi Cleary - I hope you are well and this was not my greatest edit ever. I thought I had only had the CSG access points marked as service but must have selected a whole lot more by mistake. Will review this now and thanks for picking this up | |
| 7 | 2022-12-14 00:52 | cleary ♦56 | Ewen, thanks for prompt response and for reviewing this. | |
| 127244436 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-10-09 11:50 | 1 | 2022-10-09 12:14 | mosstreet ♦232 | goods=no hgv=no |
| 2 | 2022-10-09 12:19 | mosstreet ♦232 | ferry line Port Kavkaz Port Krym trucks buses cargo vans passengers pedestrians free no pay | |
| 127225015 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-10-08 23:19 | 1 | 2022-10-08 23:21 | Ewen Hill | Sources: Railhttps://twitter.com/DemeryUK/status/1578789556337643521?s=20&t=nfGoSCE_A1soVrbfQ8De1A Road:https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1578751246391185408?s=20&t=OKIz9q3XMvhNSeGutOrXHA |
| 2 | 2022-10-09 01:53 | ika-chan! ♦242 | Hopefully, Maxar will provide imagery showing the points where the contraflow transition points. | |
| 127183901 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-10-08 06:21 | 1 | 2022-10-08 08:47 | bugdog ♦3 | yes!!! |
| 2 | 2022-10-08 10:34 | sykul ♦58 | ;) | |
| 80525256 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-02-04 10:01 | 1 | 2022-07-02 03:35 | tamism ♦3 | Hi Ewen, is Poih5 Bolodun a typo? Cheers. |
| 2 | 2022-07-02 10:46 | Ewen Hill | Well spotted tamism - now fixed. Thanks for the dilligence | |
| 49783038 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-06-23 23:09 | 1 | 2022-06-02 06:34 | TreeTracks ♦32 | Hi Ewen, many thanks for all your work in NW Vic. Do you have any objections to upgrading the long Old Mail Road from a track to unclassified? The Vic Gov database calls it a minor road rather than a track, and its the main access route for all properties and parks in the area. Cheers Ian |
| 2 | 2022-06-02 07:41 | Ewen Hill | Of course there is no issue Ian. This was done a long time ago with lower quality satellite images and you are the doyen of dirt, sultan of surface and governor of gravel. Please make this and any other alteration | |
| 3 | 2022-06-02 08:53 | TreeTracks ♦32 | Merci, Monsieur Micromap ;) | |
| 99550150 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-02-18 21:51 | 1 | 2022-05-04 06:30 | tastrax ♦1,144 | Hi Ewen - I was about to update the landuse=grass to surface=grass on this golf course but are any parts of the course actually grass? Maybe the greens? Landuse is not actually required for the green render in carto but the correct surface would be nice. Cheers tastrax |
| 119709870 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-04-14 11:51 | 1 | 2022-04-15 00:25 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Opps Looks like this have broken relations 11763975, 11763975 and relation 13196725 in a previous changeset of yours... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.76181&lat=-36.47409&zoom=11 |
| 86615086 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-06-14 05:58 | 1 | 2022-04-11 22:44 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Hi Ewen. Just info. I have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/316602956 the SA/Vic Rest Area on Sturt Hwy as it is open (again?) No warning signs in evidence, Vehicles using, no bollards entry/exit (ones on side still there) Cheers |
| 116465873 by Ewen Hill @ 2022-01-22 13:37 | 1 | 2022-03-30 13:32 | radiotrefoil ♦109 | Thanks for your work here, good to see Maxar updated at last. If you're interested, I'm keeping track of developments in new renewable energy infrastructure in this OSM wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_AustraliaStill need to add solar farms to the art... |
| 112076518 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-10-04 12:57 | 1 | 2022-01-23 07:02 | breno-au ♦19 | Hi Ewen, I surveyed Jericho on the weekend, and will relocate the Diversion Tunnel to it's ground position. Cheers. |
| 111814486 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-09-28 11:34 | 1 | 2021-10-24 12:36 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Hi Ewen, there's a problem here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987684061/historywikidata=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haughtons_Flat_Diversion_Tunnelshould bewikipedia=en:Haughtons Flat Diversion Tunnel |
| 2 | 2021-10-25 08:49 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Ivan, this is now rectified | |
| 64194937 by Ewen Hill @ 2018-11-05 11:54 | 1 | 2021-08-13 08:04 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Just caught that you added individual ways to a route master... they should go into the route relations - not the master route. |
| 2 | 2021-10-12 10:50 | Ewen Hill | Apologies Warin - I just noticed your comment and yes, my mistake. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-13 09:05 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | No need for apologies... I too suffer from missing emails amongst the number that come daily. Really need to set up some filtering. And weed out the older messages too. | |
| 112261695 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-10-08 11:56 | 1 | 2021-10-13 00:28 | adamh ♦25 | To be honest I'm not sure why these railway lines are even mapped. There's no source information for the original geometry. The lines and the route of the lines is not evident in the real world, there's a great big shopping centre and carpark there.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... |
| 2 | 2021-10-13 00:38 | Ewen Hill | Hi Adam, Thanks for the note and I agree. Currently I am working through Victorian disused lines and then reducing them to abandoned initially as there are a large number (a lot of which I am guilty of six or so years ago). I was then going to work through some of these, line by line for more ac... | |
| 98505743 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-02-01 11:11 | 1 | 2021-03-21 01:58 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Check some of the houses on Dolphin Court— they have a peculiar name. Here's one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902633965 |
| 2 | 2021-03-21 09:56 | Ewen Hill | Thank you so much - It was just the two or three. | |
| 75653756 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-10-14 09:43 | 1 | 2021-03-03 22:48 | Benjamin Ceravolo ♦8 | Hi Ewen, I don't think that where Lonsdale street passes under the shopping center bridge on ways (734406093) and (734406095) should be marked as a building passage. I think it would be more accurate to what is on the ground by removing the tunnel=building_passage tag and potentially removing t... |
| 59714168 by Ewen Hill @ 2018-06-10 15:17 | 1 | 2021-02-19 03:15 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | HiFor the Ghan - under public transport V2 I don't think places where the train does not stop should be in the route relation.What should be in the relation are places it does stop... those are missing. The other thing is the direction .. the relation is only for one direction as trac... |
| 2 | 2021-02-19 11:48 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Warin61 - A lot busy with work atm but will look at it when time permits. | |
| 97692818 by Ewen Hill @ 2021-01-18 10:58 | 1 | 2021-01-18 17:04 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please add also the opening_hours not only the opening_days. |
| 86048221 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-06-01 13:10 | 1 | 2020-12-28 21:10 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/646350494: Did you really mean waterway=Glenrock Street instead name=Glenrock Street? |
| 92010509 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-10-05 23:53 | 1 | 2020-10-09 23:29 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Is there any particular reason why you don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731269504 is a wetland? |
| 2 | 2020-10-09 23:55 | Ewen Hill | I would call it a soak or an arid wetland however happy for you to change it to something else if you feel. I initially thought the fence around this was to prevent cattle getting in and bogged or it was a reserve but there is a cattle lot in there. I assume it might be for overnight use. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-09 23:56 | Ewen Hill | Sorry, just re-read your comment and agree with you. Will fix | |
| 84206271 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-04-27 14:56 | 1 | 2020-10-02 17:42 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | Hey, are these train relations for a passenger route? If not, these shouldn't be train relations. |
| 81222254 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-02-19 13:09 | 1 | 2020-04-04 07:18 | BrackoNe ♦106 | Hey Ewen!I'm trying to fix bridges across Australia, because it is misused tag lavel instead layer in combination with bridge tag.Anyway, when I wanted to upload changes, I have got a warning for the following way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773141316Warning is about barrier=guard... |
| 82326552 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-03-18 03:47 | 1 | 2020-03-27 03:39 | tastrax ♦1,144 | Hi Ewen,FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM. It was a 1300 number that should use... |
| 81847307 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-03-06 03:36 | 1 | 2020-03-09 21:32 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Relation 10790614 -farmland and scrub looks to have several problems? An outer that is inside an outer. Covers some water ... with scrub? And having both scrub and farmland as primary tags... rather confusing. |
| 67068921 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-02-10 11:09 | 1 | 2020-03-05 05:06 | mjog ♦2 | Hey, this splits Charlotte St up into tow different ways, so it shows up twice in e.g. a nominatim searches. Is there some way of re-combining the way to avoid that but also keep your changes here? |
| 75038668 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-09-28 12:08 | 1 | 2020-03-01 04:30 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Deleted this way. Covers farm land, residential areas, water, wetlands ... etc. |
| 2 | 2020-03-01 07:23 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Warin61 - Thanks - wasn't certain if it should go or be "devalued" The choice now appears obvious | |
| 81071237 by Ewen Hill @ 2020-02-16 13:37 | 1 | 2020-02-16 14:56 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Short hint: Don't use highway=driveway (it isn't visible on the map). Use highway=service and service=driveway instead. |
| 74532222 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-09-16 13:17 | 1 | 2019-11-15 23:20 | ma-rt-in ♦1,751 | Hi,where does the key cycleway = on_street come from? Has your used editor (iD) suggested this key to you?The above key is not documented in the wiki! Probably you mean cycleway = no, which means that there is no infrastructure for cyclists and therefore they have to drive on the road.Greeting... |
| 75942579 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-10-20 01:18 | 1 | 2019-10-26 13:32 | emvee ♦368 | Good change I think!See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack#Do_not_use_cycleway.3Dtrack_.2B_highway.3Dcycleway |
| 75331229 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-10-06 02:46 | 1 | 2019-10-08 08:10 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Relation for Little Vanderlin Island (10118134, v1) draws errors.. First the 2 outers share segments.Second the key natural should not have 2 values.So I have remove the key natural from the island relation and made 2 new relations - one for sand the other for scrub. I have correcte... |
| 2 | 2019-10-08 09:49 | Ewen Hill | Thanks @Warin61 - it's not rendering under "standard" atm but assume it will shortly | |
| 3 | 2019-10-08 22:55 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Humm.. Should be rendering by now?Oh, I failed to delete the natural=2 values. Done.And I have added the tag natural=coastline to the islands outerways. See how that goes. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-21 07:39 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | It was not very obvious in rendering. SO I took a look at the cover, the scrub does not go all the way to the eastern side so I made a gap.. there will now be a blank bit between it and the sea ... it should show up now. Looks good to me. | |
| 74346391 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-09-11 10:32 | 1 | 2019-09-11 16:26 | user_5359 ♦19,360 | Hello! Please notice the value all isn't defined for the key access. Use yes instead. |
| 73919193 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-08-30 12:00 | 1 | 2019-09-06 03:17 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,I don't thing grass land is right, little in that way to distinguish it from the surrounding countryside. It is a man_made=geoglyph. I don't know if that renders.. |
| 2 | 2019-09-06 03:35 | Ewen Hill | Warin, I have removed the Highway=track loose outline as the track is on native title and cannot be accessed. I replaced the track with the more detailed grassland as the surrounds are scrubby in nature however there is little difference as you suggest. The only access to this is via air and did not... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-07 10:03 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | man_made=geoglyph ... is a large design or motif (generally longer than 4 metres) produced on the ground and typically formed by clastic rocks or similarly durable elements of the landscape, such as stones, stone fragments, live trees, gravel, or earth. I think what we have here i... | |
| 73241080 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-08-11 13:00 | 1 | 2019-08-26 19:50 | Pierce ♦41 | Hi,I've just come across this relation which appears to be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3104327 |
| 2 | 2019-08-26 22:38 | Ewen Hill | Yes, that's not good - The smaller one that travels along the railway is an ABS area it appears. Happy for you to edit this or I can do this later this week. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 10:02 | Ewen Hill | The smaller area has been downgraded by removing the admin_level=10 and boundary as well as adding 2011 ABS to the name as I didn't want to delete it entirely. Also reduced Watchem as clearly no where near here. Hope this is sorted now | |
| 73009446 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-08-05 08:02 | 1 | 2019-08-17 02:59 | shinjiman ♦19 | This section of Beechboro Road North was removed by the Northlink WA project, and is that really exist anymore? |
| 2 | 2019-08-17 03:03 | shinjiman ♦19 | Here's the newsletter regarding to the closure of this section.https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/northlinkwa/Documents/Traffic%20update%20-%20Gnangara%20Road.pdf | |
| 3 | 2019-08-17 03:57 | Ewen Hill | Thanks for the update. I have removed the top end link roads and set this to service / no access and removed the track just to the west and removed the Northlink section Thanks for the heads up. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-17 03:58 | Ewen Hill | I also removed the SH 53 relation | |
| 73348406 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-08-14 13:04 | 1 | 2019-08-15 06:27 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,This has broken relation 2455511. It may have broken other admin relations too. |
| 2 | 2019-08-16 06:05 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Also relation 2455519. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-16 11:40 | Ewen Hill | Thanks for the tip. This was a short section of duplication on Grubb Road. Please feel free to test again. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-17 00:08 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | It comes up on OSMInspector. I use it daily to check my own work ... https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.51123&lat=-38.67350&zoom=6 | |
| 73028529 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-08-05 14:48 | 1 | 2019-08-14 10:35 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you check this node, something went wrong with the name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6684754094Jan |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 10:57 | Ewen Hill | Jan, All fixed - thanks for chasing this up | |
| 71300698 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-06-16 12:53 | 1 | 2019-06-18 06:03 | shinjiman ♦19 | This portion of Lord Street is being permanently removed per New Lord Street project.https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/home/current/Pages/newlordstreet.aspx |
| 2 | 2019-06-18 06:26 | Ewen Hill | Thanks @shinjiman - I left it as no access north of the youle-Dean Road Track but for routing purposes until Lord Street "on ramps" construction becomes available, I have kept Lord Street "Access All". I also reduced Lord Street status down now the bypass is navigable but feel fr... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-18 07:57 | shinjiman ♦19 | I've removed "Paved" surface so far to see that portion of the road is no longer accessible and will be being removed after. | |
| 66215633 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-01-11 04:37 | 1 | 2019-05-26 19:14 | trial ♦870 | Hi seen your comment, I guess you can tag it amenity=public_bookcase and probablyopening_hours=24/7. This has a proper rendering on openstreetmap.org |
| 2 | 2019-05-27 01:26 | Ewen Hill | Thanks and have updated the library to reflect your suggestions. Appreciate the feedback @Trial. Not something you see every day | |
| 3 | 2019-05-27 16:41 | trial ♦870 | You forgot to change the amenity tag. Updated: now the library icon has a small roof. I've 2 such tiny libraries in my town that's why I know how to tag them. | |
| 70443998 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-05-20 14:43 | 1 | 2019-05-20 14:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks for fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96156248#map=15/-34.9648/117.3660 .Just asking on the off chance - you didn't get the chance to see whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96153399 was open all the way into town? It was flooded when I was there (ages ago). |
| 2 | 2019-05-20 22:09 | Ewen Hill | Hi SomeoneElse, sorry, I used the road on the west of the river which now has a segregated bike lane next to the road for part of it to about the pub which I need to add.I disn't even see your path but I wasn't looking for it. Thanks for the note. | |
| 67480996 by Ewen Hill @ 2019-02-22 21:18 | 1 | 2019-02-24 03:07 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Err .. relation for the railway=station 9348855 has 4 members .. no roles .. does not make sense. I have deleted it. The tag railway=station is now on what was the outer way - Way: 672396971. The building in the middle is possibly a roof? And therefore layer=1? |
| 45213262 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-01-16 11:27 | 1 | 2019-01-18 09:13 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,The entire area is not a camp site.. possibly landuse=recreation_area? |
| 2 | 2019-01-18 09:40 | Ewen Hill | Whilst the "weekend" camp is small, it allows for massive jamborees and the landscape is more campsite than grassland or scrub.. due to the amont of real forest around it. Hope this assists. | |
| 54357826 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-12-05 09:16 | 1 | 2019-01-02 17:54 | Pierce ♦41 | Hi There,I've found a place you've put on the map "Darrium"? I can't seem to find any information about this place, is this legitimate? |
| 2 | 2019-01-03 08:47 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Pierce or picking this up. It took me a while looking at what had gone on and yes it is true. I believe it is in the PSMA location data. I made a quick mud map of Victoria however I think it is a late night typo however and should be Darriman. You can check the map here briefly with the name ... | |
| 26686341 by Ewen Hill @ 2014-11-10 12:12 | 1 | 2018-12-22 02:33 | Pierce ♦41 | Hi There, It looks like you've included some meta data within the restaurant name here. Is this place still closed from this date?I'd suggest that this would go into a more appropriate field next time. |
| 2 | 2018-12-22 02:42 | Ewen Hill | Apols - This was due to a fire on the premises back in 2014. Not certain ifand when it re-opened | |
| 61191728 by Ewen Hill @ 2018-07-30 11:27 | 1 | 2018-07-30 11:30 | Ewen Hill | Reverted changeset 61189932 |
| 34083897 by Ewen Hill @ 2015-09-17 13:25 | 1 | 2016-12-19 07:09 | mrpulley ♦170 | I was wondering about this way:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371182878It's marked as source = GPS tracksWhen I visited here in 2010, the first section of the Big Bend track had been realigned (see the ways marked 'Big Bend Walk'). I was wondering if the old track had be... |
| 2 | 2016-12-22 06:14 | nevw ♦1,974 | Strava users like the new track that doesn't cross the creek. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-28 02:17 | mrpulley ♦170 | Ewen, just checking to see if you saw my previous question. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-28 05:07 | Ewen Hill | Sorry - I missed this with emails going to an old email address. The fix was actually to fix a previous issue where I or others did not have the crossing. Strava showed a number of routes (prob due to old vs new, poor GPS and people doing their own route. So with the images available at that time an... | |
| 49044200 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-05-28 12:12 | 1 | 2018-04-28 04:33 | aharvey ♦1,701 | sport=cricket_nets has over 1000 usages https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=cricket_nets. Even though there is some debate about it's use, I think it's better to use that tag, and drop the descriptive name tag. |
| 2 | 2018-04-28 04:54 | Ewen Hill | Happy with that although it is hard to recognise what it is when displayed. Feel free to amend this | |
| 3 | 2018-04-28 05:16 | aharvey_imports ♦4 | Amended. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/844 would be the most appropriate fix rather than mapping for the renderer. | |
| 48407844 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-05-04 22:22 | 1 | 2017-05-06 01:40 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Error - duplicated node in way 491460496 - building. Is it id that makes these errors so easy to do? Or is it something you are doing? I'm a JOSM user so i don't know. These 'errors' appear on OSMinspector so you can find and fix your 'own' 'errors' ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:36 | Ewen Hill | ID doesn't validate all that well - if at all so what I do is a batch and wait for Osmose and keepright and then fix any issues. | |
| 46947269 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-03-18 03:39 | 1 | 2017-04-20 00:38 | paul1928 ♦12 | Hey Ewen. I've just moved Hillclimb back to the east side of Sherbrooke Creek as it doesn't cross over to the west. The Strava heatmaps aren't very useful in this valley as GPS reception is always bad and there's a path on both sides and the heatmap isn't accurate enough to ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:29 | Ewen Hill | Thanks Paul | |
| 52559607 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-10-02 10:16 | 1 | 2017-10-04 21:28 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Way: 528707198 is self intersecting. That then causes relation 7622059 to have an intersecting segment. You should separate the way into 2 ways - an inner and an outer. |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:25 | Ewen Hill | I beleive this is no longer an issue | |
| 53231203 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-10-25 09:56 | 1 | 2017-11-28 21:53 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,relation 7676161 (farmland) has had it only outer way removed - now consists only of inner ... should this relation be removed??? |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:22 | Ewen Hill | Sorry, just saw this. If you think it needs rectifying, please do. | |
| 24112717 by Ewen Hill @ 2014-07-13 04:40 | 1 | 2018-01-01 00:10 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,As the Buninyony line is mostly gone now I believe it should be moved to Open Historic Map. Once that is done, most of it should be removed from OSM as it is not present on the ground. Yet to achieve the movement of the data. Once I have gained that knowledge I think there are many more lin... |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:20 | Ewen Hill | Happy to have it set this one to abandoned (I didn't really understand the reason for it not showing 4 yrs ago). The Old Ghan is a separate issue | |
| 18760357 by Ewen Hill @ 2013-11-07 07:43 | 1 | 2018-01-21 21:18 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Is there actually anything left of this railway station left on the ground? |
| 2 | 2018-03-02 23:19 | Ewen Hill | Happy to have it set to abandoned (I didn't really understand the reason for it not showing 4 yrs ago) | |
| 52527767 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-10-01 06:23 | 1 | 2017-10-04 21:24 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | The relation 7618908... has an inner touch the outer at node 5140696134. This should not be done. Suggest that the node be removed from the outer way. |
| 2 | 2017-10-05 00:08 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Inner way only touches outer way a one point. This is a valid multipolygon, no need to edit. | |
| 52108439 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-09-17 04:14 | 1 | 2017-09-18 22:14 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,Relation 7580789 - farmland;... has 4 members with the role 'outer'. As 3 of these are within one there is no need for these 3. Has at least one member with the role inner that shares a segment with the role outer - this is not allowed. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rel... |
| 50703233 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-07-30 21:15 | 1 | 2017-07-30 21:20 | Ewen Hill | Description should have been "Using Strava Slide to add tracks and re-align roads around Brierfield" |
| 49609831 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-06-17 08:56 | 1 | 2017-06-20 08:35 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | HiDeleted Relation: 7338125 It had one member .. another relation .. with the same tags. redundant. |
| 40013650 by Ewen Hill @ 2016-06-14 09:53 | 1 | 2017-06-13 03:24 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | The name=* should not be used to describe something! Use description=* if you must. I refer to a couple of 'windmills' .. that should be tagged man_made=windpump. |
| 47934021 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-04-19 10:50 | 1 | 2017-04-19 22:55 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Your way 487677999 grassland crosses it self. It should b+e corrected. See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=151.04&lat=-33.8&zoom=11 |
| 46839325 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-03-14 12:20 | 1 | 2017-04-06 00:53 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Relation 7072610 has 2 ways with role outer. OSM indicated errors?One of these ways is inside the other. Both ways share segments with each other. Suggest remove the smaller way from the relation. If the smaller way is not part of the farm land then still remove it and rerun the relation outer... |
| 36005841 by Ewen Hill @ 2015-12-17 10:11 | 1 | 2017-03-26 02:43 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Relation 5748513 has no outer way .. one inner way .. but no outer boundary. |
| 2 | 2017-04-02 22:34 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Deleted. relation 5748513 .. no feed back. | |
| 47287723 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-03-30 10:20 | 1 | 2017-04-01 22:20 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Crossing ways generates errors... Way 7114395 - grassland crosses from inner to outer ways .. I have changed it to a relation 7127339. |
| 45425326 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-01-24 08:48 | 1 | 2017-04-01 01:17 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | This removed the from and too ways from the turn restriction relation 6896875.This removed the from way from the turn restriction relation 6896877.And possibly others at this intersection? |
| 37624328 by Ewen Hill @ 2016-03-05 10:15 | 1 | 2016-03-05 10:32 | Ewen Hill | That actually is the Alpine National Park uploaded from Data.vic apart from the top north due to size. |
| 2 | 2017-03-26 06:01 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | This Relationship 6026831 - multipolygon does not have any tags that will make it render ... I think it would be safe to delete, the outer way has been removed by someone else so restoring it will take some work .. and as it has no effect on the map probably not worth the effort? | |
| 47050181 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-03-21 20:20 | 1 | 2017-03-22 06:14 | Ozzorro ♦2 | I checked - The street is two-way everywhere, except that Northbound traffic is stopped from entering Hill Street, and has to do a U-turn. It's not signed 'no through road', which could well by why you ended up there. |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 06:20 | Ozzorro ♦2 | added 'turn restrictions' at Hill Street to reflect this. | |
| 47036001 by Ewen Hill @ 2017-03-21 10:29 | 1 | 2017-03-21 10:49 | manoharuss ♦252 | You just added building=yes tag to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/544731 |
| 40778710 by Ewen Hill @ 2016-07-16 12:24 | 1 | 2016-07-19 00:34 | Leon K ♦40 | These are completely inaccurate and break the work that I surveyed recently. They are not motorway ramps but normal at grade intersections. You've also removed the lanes leading onto the road. |
| 38612590 by Ewen Hill @ 2016-04-16 07:00 | 1 | 2016-06-26 13:34 | Leon K ♦40 | I don't remember the freeway having bridges over Smiths Lane. Will be out that way in a fortnight so will check but I have a feeling it's still connected as an access for surrounding properties. |
| 2 | 2016-06-27 01:00 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Google imagery says no...plus a bunch of other changes. So a survey would be good. | |
| 34098527 by Ewen Hill @ 2015-09-18 09:04 | 1 | 2016-05-07 00:14 | choess ♦11 | Ewen,Can you verify that Barngo Road crosses the upper Warrego on a pontoon or floating bridge? It seems like an unusual site for that.Thanks,-- Chris |
| 38579271 by Ewen Hill @ 2016-04-15 07:14 | 1 | 2016-04-15 21:38 | ndm ♦889 | You have connected roads together that don't join in reality -- ignoring the square between them. |
| 34530252 by Ewen Hill @ 2015-10-09 13:50 | 1 | 2015-12-04 14:08 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!What was meant with surface=gr ?gravel or ground both look plausible. |