OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

63532640 by Rick Wiles	1	2018-10-15 20:56:19 UTC	ndm	This has been reverted - these roads are not accessible to normal PSVs - see mapillary tracks, etc.

63418086 by GrooveBox	1	2018-10-11 18:32:28 UTC	ndm	I've connected these (and others) to roads where they stopped just before -- hope that's ok, otherwise routing won't work.

63148035 by jojoyal	1	2018-10-03 18:02:02 UTC	ndm	I've reverted most of this - see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=N8F3Xt1NiiKi7mcKBk5ACg&lat=51.449621449390236&lng=-2.5928839225609863&z=17
	2	2018-10-04 13:17:26 UTC	trigpoint	Also you must absolutely not be using streetview. It is a copyright source which we do not have permission to use.
	3	2018-10-04 14:17:52 UTC	gseethar	Hi ndm, Thanks for the update. As you have suggested, it is clearly visible in the Mapillary images and the Access should be “NO”. Also in the Mapillary Image it is shown that the Buses can use that road. Should we also change “MotorCycle =NO” for the segment? Please le...
	4	2018-10-04 14:22:18 UTC	gseethar	Hi trigpoint, The editor had used the “Bing Street Side” available in OSM and not the “Street View”. We do not use any Third party source to make our edits. Please let us know if you have any other suggestions. We will be happy to learn from the OSM community. Regards...

63071623 by Mateusz Konieczny	1	2018-09-30 19:44:53 UTC	ndm	Will be reverted - brand:wikipedia is not in the wiki.openstreetmap.org. Links in osmand, etc. will fail.
	2	2018-10-01 17:08:08 UTC	Mateusz Konieczny	Hopefully revert rate will be not higher than with other tagging for renderer. Good point about OSM website, I added "autolinking brand:wikipedia and other *:wikipedia tags on OSM website" to my (already way too long) TODO list.
	3	2018-10-01 22:06:42 UTC	ndm	It breaks all existing tools -- will ask DWG to take a look -- if it just added something like wikipedia:link = brand, then fine it's just "noise", those that care read it, those that don't can continue as usual.
	4	2018-10-02 06:59:36 UTC	SomeoneElse	I'd have thought that brand:wikipedia=en:IKEA was the correct tagging here, as that wikipedia entry isn't for this individual store but for the whole chain? The website (which points at the store locator page for this store) is of course OK.
	5	2018-10-02 09:50:59 UTC	Mateusz Konieczny	Note that this type of linking is not new - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links wikipedia, wikidata tags should used only if wikipedia article or wikidata entry is about this feature For example famous tree may have its own wikipedia article. Trees t...
	6	2018-10-02 09:56:30 UTC	Mateusz Konieczny	"It breaks all existing tools" - incorrect tagging to satisfy some tools is not accepted in OSM - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer Note also that false wikipedia/wikidata links break tools that expect that wikipedia tag to be used correctly.
	7	2018-10-02 18:37:38 UTC	ndm	Still not sure what Żabka has to do with IKEA -- but good to see that there is a hint about "brand:wikipedia" in the wiki now :-) Perhaps linking to the discussion on the imports list would be better in terms of a justification -- and more informative.
	8	2018-10-02 19:16:22 UTC	Mateusz Konieczny	"now" - it is there since a quite long time. "linking to the discussion on the imports list" - given that it is not an import (or even an automatic edit) I am unfortunately unable to provide such link.
	9	2018-10-02 20:35:36 UTC	ndm	Maybe this would be good to add: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/thread.html#78902
	10	2018-10-03 10:25:18 UTC	Mateusz Konieczny	Is there anything useful in that discussion? I try to ignore "Yuri Astrakhan vs mailing list" threads.

63088747 by JamesBew	1	2018-10-01 18:40:26 UTC	ndm	Where's the pitch gone? :-)
	2	2018-10-02 07:42:48 UTC	JamesBew	Nothing changed in that regard. It only seems to show at zoom particular zoom level.

62990515 by alibabzo	1	2018-09-28 21:01:06 UTC	ndm	Just wow!

62964901 by changurl	1	2018-09-27 08:21:23 UTC	ndm	This needs reverting as quickly as possible. You've added back the old road configuration. The construction area landuses should give a hint that things are changing.
	2	2018-09-27 09:01:21 UTC	changurl	Hi I have made the changes as per your recommendation. Thanks for the quick update. Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

62860152 by samguer	1	2018-09-23 21:39:27 UTC	ndm	That's what GPS is for :-)
	2	2018-09-24 17:06:40 UTC	samguer	Agreed, I wish I had some, OSM has the GPS traces layer but it is not clear enough to reflect the massive development, ton of buildings added. http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/services/Marketing/students/pdf/Accommodation%20information/Wallscourt_Park.pdf

62830640 by skgrange	1	2018-09-22 19:03:26 UTC	trigpoint	Hi, what is the source of this import? Cheers Phil
	2	2018-09-23 00:09:53 UTC	ndm	Bristol Temple Way isn't on Temple Way.
	3	2018-09-23 12:24:43 UTC	trigpoint	Seems to have been reverted by originator without comment or explaination
	4	2018-09-23 13:05:42 UTC	skgrange	Hello. The source of these data are the air quality documents submitted to the European Commission (here: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/aqd/d/envwyeohg/). I have dropped the points now after the question on Bristol's location which I need to ask others to confirm. I will reinsert once this has b...

62792610 by jdselby	1	2018-09-21 22:07:53 UTC	ndm	It would be great if you could have a longer changeset comment -- it's a pain to try to have to click on a single .
	2	2018-09-24 10:40:34 UTC	Polarbear-repair	revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241

62032818 by eadamk	1	2018-08-27 15:20:42 UTC	ndm	Is this a track?
	2	2018-09-06 17:01:28 UTC	samguer	Hello ndm, Yes, according the the intended use of "Unmaintained Track Road" as discussed in https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3038, and in, https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4092. This should be an unmaintained track road since it looks like this road leads to farm. Th...
	3	2018-09-06 22:53:43 UTC	ndm	Surely https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track is definitive: "This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; usually unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps." \...
	4	2018-09-17 17:10:19 UTC	samguer	ndm, I agree that "Track" suits this case very well, however I was referencing this discussion https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3038 where "unmaintained track road" is suppose to replace the "track" tag. Other similar roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1...
	5	2018-09-17 20:40:22 UTC	ndm	I've added a note for local mappers to check.

62568115 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-14 10:40:36 UTC	ndm	Is there a sign for this name? If it's "slang" maybe "loc_name" ?
	2	2018-09-14 10:55:17 UTC	ndm	Who knew - named after 1900 "The Bristol Magpie" newspaper -- still current name?
	3	2018-09-14 18:29:13 UTC	cryptickryptos	not sure if it's the current name, it could just be a part of the centre promenade now

62527504 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-14 10:41:33 UTC	ndm	Is there a sign for this name? If it's "slang" maybe "loc_name" ?
	2	2018-09-14 10:44:58 UTC	ndm	Ok, looks like it's official https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/32919/Queen+Square+Management+Plan+-+2013+-+2017+version.pdf

62568048 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-14 10:39:58 UTC	ndm	Is there a sign for this name?
	2	2018-09-14 18:24:40 UTC	cryptickryptos	there's no physical sign with the name, but there is a council published list of names of green spaces, open spaces and amenity areas. https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/32823/Parks%2Band%2Bgreen%2Bspaces%2Bcovered%2Bby%2Bbyelaws/

62277982 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-12 22:13:59 UTC	ndm	I found a sign :-) at the bottom of Saint Paul Street - https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/43734907025/in/dateposted-public/ Have updated the names to reflect this.

62366194 by Rick Wiles	1	2018-09-07 20:27:05 UTC	ndm	If you make changes you should survey it -- it's definitely not a guided busway. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/ndm?lat=51.43284018516579&lng=-2.633718510296717&z=17&pKey=RGxz6DzYj9cqHofQlWHpUA&focus=photo I'll revert this in due course.

62357283 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-06 23:40:29 UTC	ndm	DId you try DigitalWorld Premium Imagery -- really clear for new buildings round here.

62057092 by jojoyal	1	2018-08-28 22:10:24 UTC	ndm	I think this one needs reverting - you've deleted the parking that was surveyed on foot and dragged a building to an odd shape.
	2	2018-09-06 17:07:33 UTC	samguer	Hello ndm, The newly added service roads with gates is a more accurate representation than the parking aisles that were drawn over the parking spots were. However, in doing the edit in unintentionally altered one of the building polygons that were attached to the deleted parking lot as seen in ht...
	3	2018-09-06 23:10:59 UTC	ndm	So, I picked this reply while I was in town and had a quick investigate -- I've made a first change on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62357550 It's likely the area will need surveying in the near future due to "New Yard" development by http://www.cityandcountry.co.uk/developme...
	4	2018-09-17 17:19:43 UTC	samguer	ndm, thank you for the follow up, when the gates were added, the evidence used for adding them was street level imagery: old gate - (https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.447401~-2.592546&lvl=17&dir=104.101&style=x&v=2&sV=1) you can see some type of barrier if you move over a few fram...

56802379 by ndm	1	2018-09-03 10:17:58 UTC	spark	The highway=construction between the M5 junction and highwood lane looks odd, was this intended?
	2	2018-09-03 22:26:44 UTC	ndm	Yes. At the time it was added there was a general linear track with construction vehicles on it. Don't know what was being constructed -- needs a survey :-)

62258266 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-09-03 21:20:02 UTC	ndm	At the very least might need to think about changing the source:name tags? I guess the previous version is based on OS Locator (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=536651). Aside: I wonder if Cabot Circus development broke streets up a bit -- like "Passage Road&quo...

62090951 by bathis	1	2018-08-30 21:59:31 UTC	ndm	I've removed the private tag from the graveyard. Have the gates been surveyed or are they "assumed"? Sent to osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com but no response.

62102102 by ayushiso	1	2018-08-30 21:58:50 UTC	ndm	Think most of this one needs reverting: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62102102#map=17/51.49793/-2.54306 Looks like this is drawn using out of date imagery through a "construction" area -- http://www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/sectors/construction-and-commercial-property/06...

62101996 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-08-29 19:33:18 UTC	ndm	Someone's deleted the "tent" bit! You removed the fixme=approximate on the schools -- they were there as it wasn't clear which part of the whole was each school.
	2	2018-08-29 21:32:06 UTC	cryptickryptos	i removed the canopy since it isn't really a building. as for the schools, i removed the fixme tag since i have moved the node to the correct location. however i'm not sure how to draw the boundaries of elmfield secondary school since it is only located on the ground floor.
	3	2018-08-29 22:28:40 UTC	ndm	Well, quite a few boats are buildings -- so I don't see why a canopy can't be one :-) Good to clear up where schools really are -- signage was pretty useless.

62034836 by soumybha	1	2018-08-27 15:14:54 UTC	ndm	Is this a driveway?
	2	2018-08-27 15:21:44 UTC	soumybha	“ I work for Amazon Logistics. At Amazon Logistics, we’ve been utilizing OSM in some cases related to our delivery programs. In connection with those delivery programs, we have collected information that we think is valuable to the OSM community such as names and info about new roads tha...
	3	2018-08-27 16:21:21 UTC	trigpoint	Please answer the question here, changeset discussion should be open and visible to all. It is not acceptable to ask mappers to send changeset discussions to a non-osm email address. Cheers Phil
	4	2018-08-28 11:08:52 UTC	soumybha	i have given this as a service road because there are already built driveways leading to multiple houses from this service road. thank you
	5	2018-08-28 22:24:56 UTC	ndm	Nope definitely a drive, surveyed it on foot today.
	6	2018-08-29 10:50:24 UTC	soumybha	thanks for your quick response, i have also confirmed the fact with my supervisor and he also agrees with you..and i have seen that the change has already been made...thanks again for your valuable information

62034351 by xtaz	1	2018-08-27 15:18:37 UTC	ndm	DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the roads - might need to align the imagery first tho'

62041905 by mrfa	1	2018-08-27 15:15:23 UTC	ndm	Is this residential or service?
	2	2018-08-27 15:31:03 UTC	mrfa	modified the service road at galingale way as residential road

62016248 by messpert	1	2018-08-26 21:49:54 UTC	ndm	You seem to have dragged a stream about -- any chance you can do a partial revert? https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62016248
	2	2018-08-27 09:50:03 UTC	messpert	Do you mean Folly Brook athttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2931735704? I certainly didn't intend to touch that?
	3	2018-08-27 10:12:54 UTC	messpert	I think that I have done a partial revert, but it is the first time that I have used the reversion tool. Please comment if it is now OK. No idea how that happened although I do find that it easy to drag things by mistake in josm. Usually I notice before uploading. I was surprised that the M...
	4	2018-08-27 15:04:16 UTC	ndm	Folly Brook looks ok now thanks. FYI: JOSM has a filter window if you don't want to edit stuff like waterways or boundaries.

61695367 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-08-15 20:31:19 UTC	ndm	Have you tried the ESRI clarity layer -- it's got a lot better detail in Bristol -- not as up to date in areas with new builds tho'. Note this was the old Bing layer so a lot of stuff's already been added with that imagery offset.
	2	2018-08-16 21:37:22 UTC	cryptickryptos	thanks for the advice. i finished adding the rest of the houses in st judes and yeah, its definitely much better.
	3	2018-08-16 22:18:54 UTC	ndm	Glad it helped -- great to see some buildings in the gaps :-)

61637204 by chris_debian	1	2018-08-14 22:38:32 UTC	ndm	Looks like the whole of Corsham is now a church -- I think you tagged the wrong way -- easily done.

61552776 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-08-11 19:40:52 UTC	ndm	Please just don't use "-" it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

61552713 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-08-11 19:40:40 UTC	ndm	Please just don't use "-" it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

61552634 by cryptickryptos	1	2018-08-11 19:40:06 UTC	ndm	Please just don't use "." it's a real pain trying to select the link in "History" -- "buildings and roads" was at least easy to click on.

61443620 by stadiaarcadia	1	2018-08-07 19:04:07 UTC	ndm	The stadium is already named: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188698415 I'll revert the change of naming the pitch.

61382124 by alibabzo	1	2018-08-05 20:38:27 UTC	ndm	Is that garages / house missing next to Clevedon Road#1?
	2	2018-08-05 21:23:38 UTC	alibabzo	Garage, with path between it and the side of no. 1. I'll put off adding it until I go and find out how far the path goes
	3	2018-08-05 21:36:59 UTC	ndm	Great -- always good to see some gaps get filled in.

61375782 by alibabzo	1	2018-08-05 20:46:14 UTC	ndm	Ok, I liked my version better :-) From ESRI(Clarity) The Golden Lion looks like there should be some sort of beer garden? And area behind Joes Bakery looks more like a courtyard? May have to buy a pint and answer at least one of those questions soon :-)
	2	2018-08-05 21:18:37 UTC	alibabzo	Trust me on this one - I can just about see it from my window ;-)
	3	2018-08-05 21:30:05 UTC	ndm	Can't beat local knowledge -- may still have to get a beer tho'.

61325075 by abhap	1	2018-08-03 18:49:21 UTC	ndm	Split?

61175985 by G Hill	1	2018-07-31 21:41:51 UTC	ndm	Trying to understand how this improves things -- I can see the postal_code has been removed (which is on all Bristol roadsigns) -- and connectivity is probably different now.

61211696 by markzawi	1	2018-07-31 20:10:01 UTC	ndm	So this was mapped really carefully previously -- did you survey this on foot? There are no-entry signs at either end -- there is no other signage. So, that doesn't stop cyclists entering in the middle of the road from the footpath and exiting (potentially from either end) -- many regularly exit ont...
	2	2018-07-31 20:40:25 UTC	markzawi	Sorry, my mistake. I went back and changed the access to allow bikes and foot traffic. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61241530 Thank you, Mark

61127819 by southglos	1	2018-07-27 19:03:49 UTC	ndm	access:motor_vehicle=no? presume you can still walk down it?
	2	2018-07-27 19:13:06 UTC	southglos	It's a straight No Entry (with exceptions), rather than a no motor vehicles sign, so I think a simple access=no (with exceptions) captures it better. You can still walk down it - so I added foot=yes (although I missed the tiny section at the eastern end, which I'll fix now)

60734348 by Greyseal18	1	2018-07-22 23:36:43 UTC	c2r	Why have you renumbered this spur as the A41(M) - what's your source for this?
	2	2018-07-23 07:05:20 UTC	Greyseal18	That was meant to be the A46(M) as shown on Pathetic Motorways
	3	2018-07-23 19:20:46 UTC	ndm	If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor. Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted.
	4	2018-07-23 19:22:02 UTC	Greyseal18	But there not
	5	2018-07-23 23:12:14 UTC	c2r	This one clearly isn't signed as such. I'm not clear on whether OSM would rather show the roads as any orders create or as signed. If the former, then if it can be referenced from an open licence then this edit should stand. But if the latter, it should be reverted.
	6	2018-07-24 07:12:37 UTC	Greyseal18	If you go to the A14(M) near the A1(M) J14 that isn’t signed and is showing

60973457 by Greyseal18	1	2018-07-23 08:12:04 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hello, I'm pretty sure that this isn't signed as the A46(M), at least not from the south, and I drive past here pretty regularly. What makes you think that it is? Best Regards, Andy
	2	2018-07-23 08:14:24 UTC	Greyseal18	Pathetic Motorways and SABRE Wiki shows it as a unsigned motorway and if your going to revert this edit then I’m changing the A14(M) from the A1(M) J14 to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) because that is what it says on the signs
	3	2018-07-23 19:20:39 UTC	ndm	If all your edits are based on Pathetic Motorways (All media on this website is © Pathetic Motorways, except where noted that they are copyright of a contributor. Please do not copy without permission.) then I think they will all have to be reverted.
	4	2018-07-24 14:17:33 UTC	trigpoint	Adding some local knowledge here, this is not signed as A46(M), mpaaing it as such is misleading and this change should be reverted as soon as possible. Phil
	5	2018-07-24 14:19:38 UTC	Greyseal18	Ok I’ll also rename the A14(M) from the A1(M) to the A14 Spur to the A1(M) (as signposted)
	6	2018-07-28 08:44:25 UTC	SomeoneElse	Thanks

60552227 by Denys	1	2018-07-09 23:55:50 UTC	ndm	There's a footpath going through a couple of buildings now -- is that a corridor or building passage or a gap?
	2	2018-07-10 00:05:31 UTC	Denys	It is a passage between buildings, but it is covered by one of the buildings (5102). There is a car park behind fence on one side (from 5102 side) and a wall on the other. I am not sure how to tag it properly.
	3	2018-07-10 20:07:08 UTC	ndm	Never spotted it -- might have to investigate :-) I generally break the highway at the edge of the building and use "building passage" in JOSM -- which I think adds "tunnel=building_passage". But there might be better ways?

60413370 by Greyseal18	1	2018-07-04 21:48:15 UTC	ndm	Surveyed this tonight -- there's no evidence for the A4 before the junction -- there's only a sign that the A4 is down Anchor Road. I'm minded to revert this especially as there's a mix of A38 and A4 now -- what are you using as your data source. A changeset comment would have been helpful too :...
	2	2018-07-22 23:57:44 UTC	c2r	the user seems to be contributing random rubbish - i'd suggest reversion.
	3	2018-07-23 07:13:40 UTC	Greyseal18	really C2r your not like this on sabre

60414845 by Greyseal18	1	2018-07-04 17:52:01 UTC	ndm	Comments would be greatly appreciated.

60309694 by seanking2919	1	2018-07-01 08:26:41 UTC	ndm	This is an automated edit that hasn't been agreed I'll revert this in due course and any others that affect local sites. There's no attempt to keep information in old_name or disused: name. Sites with signage should still have name, but I'm assuming you haven't bothered to survey them.
	2	2018-07-03 10:37:59 UTC	SK53	Yes, please always discuss this with the relevant local community. In my area we have enough mappers that we like to actually re-survey locations of closed stores.
	3	2018-09-30 11:27:27 UTC	Borbus	This edit removed the name from Norwich Toys'R'Us. Have you surveyed it to confirm the sign has been removed? We have a note on the map because the sign is still on the building as far as I know.

60250113 by DaveF	1	2018-06-28 20:44:37 UTC	ndm	Something's broken the rendering -- Wiki says use "With leisure=track when tagging the track" ?

60227126 by Milliams	1	2018-06-28 00:11:01 UTC	ndm	Great to see some new houses being added -- even better to get housenumbers. If it's possible (and I know it's not always clear) could you add the street too -- makes it lot more useful for navigating. E.g. OsmAnd shows all housenumbers it "knows" when you pick a street, so it can route...

60073207 by DaveF	1	2018-06-23 17:02:22 UTC	ndm	I think that there are some strange new values for foot: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158410912 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49205083 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172439218 might be others?

59893145 by Milliams	1	2018-06-16 12:20:24 UTC	ndm	Is it a boat?
	2	2018-06-16 13:31:06 UTC	Milliams	Yes, it's a boat. I'll add some more detail to it.
	3	2018-06-16 14:28:07 UTC	ndm	Great (thought it might be a bad GPS location :-)

59875740 by BCC_Housing	1	2018-06-15 23:10:59 UTC	ndm	Is the road named? Should it really be residential not service?

59782554 by spark	1	2018-06-12 22:13:26 UTC	ndm	What was wrong with the original mapping? It's often more accurate to map a full roundabout -- even for a mini-roundabout -- especially if there are split roads or islands.
	2	2018-06-12 22:32:10 UTC	spark	It caught my eye originally because some of the split roads lacked name tags. This is a very simple mini roundabout with no split roads or proper islands, so I felt it was more accurately mapped like this.

59671522 by rjwillshear	1	2018-06-08 17:52:09 UTC	ndm	It's probably better in the future to add "access=private" or something similar, rather than deleting stuff.

59583986 by ndm	1	2018-06-06 09:35:57 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil You've split/duplicated the YMCA https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594364550 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39275886 Was this to add the shops as polygons on Broad St?.
	2	2018-06-06 20:43:32 UTC	ndm	Yep, but I didn't have good enough photos to confirm - have stuck the pieces back together.

59565716 by ndm	1	2018-06-05 14:00:07 UTC	DaveF	Isn't Sacco hair above Found? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De7sEgAXkAAwjHo.jpg
	2	2018-06-05 17:16:26 UTC	ndm	Don't know -- I had this https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/28717108048/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/ -- seems to show "Found" on the left (or at least a display window). Can swap it back if needs be.
	3	2018-06-05 17:25:07 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil It also shows Found on the right window. Video from Sacco's rear window: https://www.instagram.com/p/BiO0h7ZgXPM/
	4	2018-06-05 21:38:04 UTC	ndm	Cheers. Let me know if you think current version needs modifying.

59551303 by happychapy	1	2018-06-05 08:38:01 UTC	ndm	You could add the swing-set as "leisure=playground" and maybe the football area as a "pitch" Difficult to see from Bing satellite imagery -- it looks like there's a big set of allotments and a graveyard or cemetary nearby?

59551385 by happychapy	1	2018-06-05 08:26:43 UTC	ndm	The convention - is to put the name on the area of the school grounds - it's already there :-)

59551401 by happychapy	1	2018-06-05 08:25:09 UTC	ndm	Ideally this would be "office=estate_agent" and "name" would be the "real" name on the sign outside, e.g. Ocean, or whatever.

59210977 by Paul Richards	1	2018-05-23 21:35:58 UTC	ndm	A lot of the footpaths don't connect to the roads -- is that deliberate? If not, it'll mess up any routing programs.

59077737 by southglos	1	2018-05-18 22:53:19 UTC	ndm	Maybe adding source:name for armchair edits might be a good idea for all these new roads.

58874933 by LemonTea101	1	2018-05-11 19:05:29 UTC	ndm	Cheers for that - easily done :-)

58815420 by LemonTea101	1	2018-05-09 23:10:12 UTC	ndm	Something unintentional may have happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1163643888 -- or was it deliberate?

58828096 by SuborbitalPigeon	1	2018-05-09 22:47:13 UTC	ndm	Why spam? The Bristol POI you deleted looked pretty reasonable.
	2	2018-05-09 23:50:28 UTC	ndrw6	Why not simply remove or edit description tags? There is nothing to suggest these POIs were wrong. Can you bring them back?
	3	2018-05-10 08:45:16 UTC	SuborbitalPigeon	Feel free to revert if you want to, but you'll need to get rid of the advertising in the description tag and also add some other tags (like what the businesses actually are). But these are clearly spam bots, so I'd rather not trust any data they come up with is accurate.

58671146 by Rick Wiles	1	2018-05-05 07:40:27 UTC	ndm	Hi Rick, surveyed this last night - and did a quick update -- hope it hasn't broken anything for you. These are all single lane unclassified roads -- no bus lanes as such -- one section was wrongly marked as oneway. Also was missing a turn restriction.

58400715 by widugesay	1	2018-04-25 23:51:58 UTC	ndm	Not clear why you've marked a lot of these roads residential -- most of them are in the shopping centres and unclassified seems to be the more valid choice. "edits" is not a helpful changeset comment -- more detail would be appreciated.
	2	2018-05-03 22:13:45 UTC	ndm	Ok, I will revert in a few days if I don't hear from you.
	3	2018-05-05 06:58:06 UTC	ndm	Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58699037

58596981 by Mauls	1	2018-05-01 22:57:36 UTC	ndm	There's no changeset comment -- what was the motivation here? There's definitely a few questionable decisions. Was it surveyed on foot?
	2	2018-05-03 22:16:06 UTC	ndm	Ok, I will revert in a few days if I don't hear from you.
	3	2018-05-03 23:52:22 UTC	Mauls	Combination of site visit and adjusting node positioning using Bing. What do you believe is incorrect?
	4	2018-05-04 22:05:03 UTC	ndm	You obviously didn't visit Concorde :-) Many new "names" should be operator -- unless there's external signage. Brabazon Hangar is sufficiently well-known that it should keep the name -- especially as it's often discussed by that name, and not owned by British Aerospace either. R...

58400633 by widugesay	1	2018-04-25 23:51:48 UTC	ndm	Not clear why you've marked a lot of these roads residential -- most of them are in the shopping centres and unclassified seems to be the more valid choice. "edits" is not a helpful changeset comment -- more detail would be appreciated.
	2	2018-05-03 22:13:30 UTC	ndm	Ok, I will revert in a few days if I don't hear from you.

58606309 by VisImpChris	1	2018-05-02 21:18:54 UTC	ndm	name should really be what's signposted, rather than something descriptive

58582727 by VisImpChris	1	2018-05-01 23:01:26 UTC	ndm	Ideally you could connect the path to the road - otherwise routing won't work.

58595828 by Spideog	1	2018-05-01 22:58:38 UTC	ndm	Strange opening hours for an ATM?

58298532 by Cate91	1	2018-04-21 22:05:23 UTC	ndm	Maybe you could add highway=pedestrian too? If it's not inside the school then that might also need adjustment?
	2	2018-04-21 22:39:13 UTC	Cate91	Not sure if I know how to do that! No, it's not inside the school, it's directly in front of it.
	3	2018-04-21 23:08:52 UTC	ndm	No worries have tweaked the school area - hope it's ok.

58223496 by hanhamflooring	1	2018-04-19 19:37:17 UTC	ndm	Thanks for the update -- I'll merge the new information with the already mapped building "Hanham Flooring" Centre.

58193043 by EdLoach	1	2018-04-18 22:02:19 UTC	ndm	Was there clear external signage when you surveyed this?
	2	2018-04-19 09:08:04 UTC	EdLoach	I'm not sure why you are asking me - I just made the edit for the company that are based there as they only seemed to be able to leave a note. You should be asking them as the people who "did the survey".
	3	2018-04-19 19:22:08 UTC	ndm	A number of "spam" notes have been added to Bristol in the past. I would expect even if arm chair mapping it would be advisable to check mapilliary or other open sources -- otherwise you can't determine whether the "office" occupies the whole building, or is simply a mail add...
	4	2018-04-20 07:56:49 UTC	EdLoach	You have a point, but perfect can be the enemy of the good. We've gone from knowing of no businesses in the building to having one mapped. If it turns out there are more then we can add them later. Don't forget from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disclaimer "The maps are an iterative ongoi...

58152333 by xyzl	1	2018-04-16 22:35:52 UTC	ndm	There's another Wallscote Park locality place node here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1934227918#map=17/51.49785/-2.55455 Maybe it needs moving.
	2	2018-04-17 02:31:25 UTC	xyzl	I believe the university accommodation takes its name from somewhere else in the local area, so they may just have the same name. I might be wrong though.

58043554 by Miker1969	1	2018-04-12 19:56:50 UTC	ndm	This is already mapped as a landuse area.

57941106 by DaveF	1	2018-04-09 20:22:00 UTC	ndm	Something seems to have gone wrong here. It would be good if you can fix it. From what I can tell: 1). College Green is now paved. 2). Lord Mayor's Chapel seems to be askew with bike parking inside? 3). Pedestrian Zone (which is signposted as such -- but not necessarily obvious) now chan...
	2	2018-04-09 23:53:10 UTC	DaveF	Half my edits in one changeset didn't save to the database. I'll let it settle before editing. Point 3. It's a vehicle entrance to the hotel & adjacent businesses. There's a clear kerb definition with double yellows. When I went past there were parked up taxis. There are loading restriction si...
	3	2018-04-10 12:07:39 UTC	ndm	Signs are on 2 posts near the two junctions with Park Street. At the very least it should be designated=pedestrian. Vehicles are allowed in highway=pedestrian, hence the original tagging.
	4	2018-04-10 16:41:45 UTC	DaveF	I have to say I'm a bit confused by your logic. You want a locked gate that has almost certainly never been used & is highly unlikely to be used, as a service road. Yet want one that's in use 24/7 by motor vehicles as pedestrian. I think I've fixed College Green, but the rendering is V. slow f...
	5	2018-04-10 19:33:33 UTC	ndm	Looking a lot better now. My recollection is that there is signage for the area near the hotel that states it's a pedestrian area/zone. If so, then it'll need updating somehow. [[ I added a photo to the other unrelated changeset that hints that vehicle access should be possible to/from the gat...

57836707 by DaveF	1	2018-04-05 23:17:40 UTC	ndm	Please revert, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27389948628/in/dateposted-public/
	2	2018-04-05 23:25:30 UTC	DaveF	What that photo is missing is the lack of dropped kerb, the non existence of a vision splay due to the step out of the wall & the numerous trees. There is no road definition, it's all pavement. This is not an egress.
	3	2018-04-05 23:55:21 UTC	ndm	Paving is different for the service road than the rest of the pavement -- it can clearly be used to get cars in/out -- even if only in an emergency.

57736330 by Dan lacey	1	2018-04-02 13:13:34 UTC	ndm	You don't need to name every house "house".

57705239 by TerminalSump	1	2018-04-01 09:36:28 UTC	ndm	The school doesn't need naming -- it's already inside an "amenity=school" with the correct name -- as indicated on the wiki page.

57638893 by EgrettaGarzetta	1	2018-03-29 20:54:55 UTC	ndm	OpenStreetmap is about what is actually present -- you shouldn't change names that are from on-the-ground surveys. Plus, you would have to have a licence from YHA to use their copyrighted material on OpenStreetmap.
	2	2018-03-29 21:02:02 UTC	ndm	I suggest you discuss it on the talk-gb mailing list before making further YHA-related edits.
	3	2018-03-31 10:46:37 UTC	ndrw6	Personally I think ndm's interpretation of project quality standards and copyright laws is overly strict and should not be treated as an official opinion of the osm community. (neither should be mine) Indeed it is good to discuss larger contributions like this in public, and perhaps get yha invo...
	4	2018-03-31 11:17:58 UTC	SomeoneElse	As ndm says, the best place to discuss things like this with the wider GB community is https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb . Good luck!
	5	2018-03-31 17:52:57 UTC	ndm	https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first. Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of cha...

57681820 by Quentin Borlon	1	2018-03-31 08:52:14 UTC	ndm	Already mapped

57646779 by ndm	1	2018-03-29 21:38:33 UTC	DaveF	Hi The building is a part of the railway any more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Mills_railway_station#History
	2	2018-03-29 22:49:52 UTC	ndm	Still has Network Rail signage on it :-) https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27230255338/in/dateposted-public/

57379744 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2018-03-22 21:40:50 UTC	ndm	Can't use Google Streetview as it's not allowed as a source for OSM -- but an on-foot survey near the BSW 68028 railway bridge got the following photo - note the small blueish sign with white writing in the background https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/40066732525/in/dateposted-public/ W...
	2	2018-03-22 22:34:09 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm in that case how do we handle the fact that it's marked "dismount" in one direction only? I didn't take a photo but I looked for a sign from the other side and it wasn't there. For that matter how do we handle official bike routes with a "dismount" section? I see Cyclestree...
	3	2018-03-22 22:34:37 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm in that case how do we handle the fact that it's marked "dismount" in one direction only? I didn't take a photo but I looked for a sign from the other side and it wasn't there. For that matter how do we handle official bike routes with a "dismount" section? I see Cyclestree...
	4	2018-03-22 22:35:51 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	BTW I looked from the train this morning while slowed there and saw the back of the sign in your photo -- and again no sign on the east side. There's quite a good line of sight from the westbound track
	5	2018-03-23 00:19:44 UTC	ndm	I checked both ends -- you're right signage is only at one end. I will probably use "bicycle=dismount" -- no idea how Strava copes with that -- but feel free to log a bug with them if it's problematic.
	6	2018-03-23 19:15:26 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm I've set "bicycles=dismount" I didn't know that was an option, and it seems to be a good fit to the situation. I'll try to remember to keep an eye on Strava; I have no idea how often they update but I'll certainly report any bugs to them. Thanks

57255047 by ndm	1	2018-03-17 16:47:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node? The tag 'sheno' looks like a mistake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/485403860 Jan
	2	2018-03-17 20:20:32 UTC	ndm	shelter=no

57210015 by mario313	1	2018-03-15 13:16:51 UTC	DaveF	Hi Welcome to OSM These are all empty nodes. Could you clarify what you're trying to add?
	2	2018-03-16 00:16:24 UTC	ndm	Try https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ if you just want to draw a route on an existing map.

56426254 by ndm	1	2018-02-17 00:39:55 UTC	DaveF	Very disappointed you deleted my amendments to Cargo 1. If you look at the images on the business's websites you'll notice the Cider Shop & WokyKo are clearly 2 units wide (out of a total of 11). Using Bing imagery (the most up to date) you'll see it can't be that close to the centre line ...
	2	2018-02-17 09:51:28 UTC	ndm	Well, I was a bit disappointed too -- as I counted all the units very carefully on the ground. Anyway, I'm going past today -- so will have a look at how many units each shop really has -- I'll stick a couple of photos on flickr / mapilliary so we can all see. Have used latest Bing imagery for...
	3	2018-02-17 09:53:19 UTC	ndm	Anyway rest of the realignment was a distinct improvement -- glad you deleted all the construction lines :-)
	4	2018-02-17 19:14:59 UTC	ndm	Ok, you're right there are 11 front units, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/39424835715/in/dateposted-public/ Looking a bit closer I think that the front of yours is probably correct, but units are too large and back extends too far (back of mine is correct). Also first and last un...

56238907 by southglos	1	2018-02-10 20:06:11 UTC	ndm	Not convinced by this -- I've seen cyclists on the link to the South A38 in the last week -- will resurvey.
	2	2018-02-15 00:27:34 UTC	ndm	I had a look and I think it needs modifying: 1). remove access=no 2). Add short one-way segments to match two no-entry signs. Basicallty it becomes a glorified bike lane - which is ok if you enter at the middle / at the crossing.
	3	2018-02-15 00:31:30 UTC	southglos	Go with whatever you think describes it best; my main concern was that it was still tagged as primary_link when it clearly isn't any more.

56239962 by southglos	1	2018-02-10 20:05:00 UTC	ndm	Not sure about the Great Brier Leaze mods, will resurvey.
	2	2018-02-10 21:12:24 UTC	southglos	Hiya. Which bits? I did the loop from Coniston Road - photos on Mapillary if it helps: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.527178394656175&lng=-2.586732851343754&z=17&pKey=FfR3eSKtSQIgb3cVzTj7Mw&focus=photo
	3	2018-02-10 22:11:15 UTC	ndm	My recollection from walking it several times was that it was square at the housing estate end -- but I could be wrong -- the mapillary GPS loop of images looks pretty square. Needs surveying anyway to check any extra new/finished construction in the estate.
	4	2018-02-10 22:30:46 UTC	southglos	The old layout on the map had the 'exit' side in line with the traffic light junction and the two-way bit, and the 'entry' side coming off Highwood Road further northeast, and forming a rectangle. The Mapillary photo I linked to earlier shows the centre divider is in line with the traffic light jun...
	5	2018-02-15 00:23:11 UTC	ndm	Your layout better matches what is on the ground now. The 20mph limit is signed at the opposite end of the Highwood Road bus lane.
	6	2018-02-15 00:24:31 UTC	southglos	Cheers

56149920 by Stonemill2	1	2018-02-07 22:38:14 UTC	ndm	Grotto was already mapped - not really a building

56119737 by wider	1	2018-02-06 16:23:48 UTC	ndm	You've removed one perfectly reasonable name with what appears to be a vague description -- which is a shame -- especially as satnav's won't take the name into account when routing. I've added a note so that local mappers will hopefully come up with a solution that matches signage "on the groun...

55813974 by Ram-Z	1	2018-01-27 22:26:42 UTC	ndm	Hopefully, I've managed to add this back. Is there a duplicate, or a copy/paste function in iD you could use to get the bus stop on a separate node next time.
	2	2018-01-28 12:04:02 UTC	Ram-Z	Thanks. I didn't see anything like a duplicate node in the editor.
	3	2018-01-28 22:33:11 UTC	ndm	YMMV -- I think this should work: Highlight the node to copy and Ctrl+C, move to new position and Crtl+V. Then delete wrong tags from first nore.
	4	2018-01-28 22:33:37 UTC	ndm	nore -> node :-)

55668034 by Guy	1	2018-01-22 22:21:33 UTC	ndm	Not sure why this is an improvement? It's handy to have yogscast mapped as they run meetups in Bristol. The housename's already mapped. If you want to map the other building levels then please do so without disturbing what's already there.
	2	2018-01-22 22:36:48 UTC	Guy	Replaced - back to Yogscast. Not sure it should be prominent here as they are one tenant among many in the site and the building name is actually King William House not Yogscast. Surely we should map for what is on the ground rather than one (of several) tenants?
	3	2018-01-22 22:50:03 UTC	ndm	Must admit I wondered about that originally -- but then https://techspark.co/bristol-based-yogscast-share-how-to-reach-7b-views-on-youtube/ -- so that's why it has "level=4". I'll let someone else do the whole multi-level mapping for the other levels :-) If it's the building name, th...

55658804 by Benitoto	1	2018-01-22 19:01:58 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? The lane is clearly oneway on Bing -- it looks like an obvious ramp to the top of a multi-storey carpark. If you think it needs an on-the-ground survey, then just add a note to the map for local mappers, rather than removing tags.

55559309 by lonewolfcub	1	2018-01-18 20:29:24 UTC	ndm	Can't see why a war memorial and a building should be labelled "leisure=park" they are already inside it.

55225336 by DaveF	1	2018-01-07 11:50:00 UTC	ndm	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground Suggests leisure=recreation_ground should be removed?
	2	2018-01-07 14:11:24 UTC	DaveF	I disagree with this proposal. defining it as 'leisure' ties in with parks, pitches etc Note three of the 'See Also..' are leisure.

55191504 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2018-01-05 22:28:47 UTC	ndm	I've partially reverted this -- if it's now a house, then there's no need to delete the whole building.
	2	2018-01-05 22:32:03 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm I attempted to select just the post office but must have got it wrong

55054116 by WheelhouseMan	1	2017-12-31 11:24:07 UTC	ndm	Confused where this is supposed to be -- it's not on a pitch/pavilion?
	2	2017-12-31 12:05:53 UTC	WheelhouseMan	Many RFU clubs share facilities with other institutions, organisations and public facilities. OC's are based at Colston's School which is where the club's changing rooms, pitches and clubhouse are to be found. I placed the pin at the entrance to Colston's which is the objective location if visiting ...
	3	2018-01-03 16:53:24 UTC	SK53	This is a difficult one: if there are no signs for the Old Colstonian's RFC then it fails the on-the-ground test, and perhaps shouldn't be mapped at all. If there are visible signs (and they are more likely to be a notice board or similar near the changing rooms) then that is the correct location. ...
	4	2018-01-04 00:37:56 UTC	WheelhouseMan	I've removed all the detail from the pin. How do I delete the tag. It's not obvious.

54993490 by DaveF	1	2017-12-29 00:57:28 UTC	ndm	I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.
	2	2017-12-29 01:37:09 UTC	DaveF	I've left the name (with the 'disused:' prefix) so it's still searchable; which is useful when adding its replacement in OSM. 'Name' is still, unfortunately, rendered, even though 'shop' is prefixed with 'disused:', This gives the appearance as if it's still open on the 'standard' map, which is a...
	3	2017-12-29 10:47:54 UTC	ndm	The whole point was to keep the name rendered -- if it still has external signage. I note that http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: doesn't mention disused:name -- are you it's still searchable?

54994782 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-29 00:59:22 UTC	ndm	I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information. Can't remember if they've taken down the signs on this one.
	2	2018-01-05 19:57:17 UTC	bvrdg	Thanks. Agreed. (Sign is still up)

54799786 by ioangogo	1	2017-12-20 23:08:51 UTC	ndm	You've just deleted the copyshop and moved the "odd" yog towers inside the other building -- not sure how this has improved the correctness of the mapping.
	2	2017-12-22 13:18:47 UTC	ndm	Ok, I'll revert it this evening.

54761082 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-20 22:49:19 UTC	ndm	Depends :-) Could add amenity=cafe -- or just take rely on the precedence implicit in the name, i.e. "Beer + Coffee" rather than "Coffee + Beer".
	2	2017-12-21 09:07:51 UTC	bvrdg	I guess I was after a steer on whether 'best'/local practice (in general) prefers me to change something I'd have recorded differently (and let someone else change it back), when I add new details. Even if (like here) I can see 'both' sides. Or prefers me to respect/leave what exists (and so implici...
	3	2017-12-21 10:12:32 UTC	ndm	Changing values is ok -- even if it provokes a discussion :-) It's definitely better than just deleting the "wrong" one and trying to add a new corrected version.
	4	2017-12-21 10:24:45 UTC	bvrdg	Thanks :)

54761584 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-20 22:51:24 UTC	ndm	Probably shop=bakery would be better? Or add extra amenity=cafe too -- and hope data consumers can cope :-)
	2	2017-12-21 09:23:15 UTC	bvrdg	Thanks. Have changed it from Restaurant to Cafe. And added amenity=bakery. (But have no problem if someone disagrees/changes)

54772187 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-20 22:45:21 UTC	ndm	Pizzarova is already present -- and separate :-) Added in the Cargo2 extension when it was empty. Have surveyed on foot -- but currently in my backlog of stuff todo.
	2	2017-12-21 08:40:04 UTC	bvrdg	Thanks. I ran past again yesterday, and (this time) noted '7&8' are both Meatbox

54745484 by ndm	1	2017-12-19 00:02:22 UTC	ndm	Modified so buildings aren't grown incorrectly by including the front walls.

54709431 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-17 23:12:29 UTC	ndm	Should probably be a single building then?
	2	2017-12-17 23:20:59 UTC	bvrdg	Agreed. I didn't know/remember how to do that. Am going through learning materials again, at the moment
	3	2017-12-18 00:11:10 UTC	ndm	It's probably a pain in all editors -- I generally delete "middle" walls and then combine remaining ones. I'll stick a note on the main map as a reminder for later work.

54708498 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-17 23:06:31 UTC	ndm	What did it say when you surveyed it? Should other items such as phone no, twitter, etc. be removed -- or are they still current?
	2	2017-12-17 23:19:02 UTC	bvrdg	[Am unsure whether you're being rhetorical, but I don't know/remember proper OSM process - sorry. Should I change nothing, if I can't change it all?] Some press reviews included 'Cafe' in the cafe title (sometimes) and url is eastvillagecafe.co.uk. Their branding is just 'East Village'. I don't k...
	3	2017-12-18 00:07:36 UTC	ndm	The name on the outside of the shop should be the name in OSM. Leaving stale data is probably not a great idea -- I'd tend to delete it -- but some people just add "old_" to the start of the tag names.
	4	2017-12-18 09:38:38 UTC	bvrdg	Understood. Thanks

54709859 by bvrdg	1	2017-12-17 23:11:38 UTC	ndm	L-shape was mosty based on "rooflines" -- it's a pain trying to sort out buildings there :-)
	2	2017-12-17 23:27:12 UTC	bvrdg	:) Gallery inside isn't an 'L', but I don't know if there's a false wall. This building : Have been inside (downstairs & up) recently, but not sure of dimensions

54493801 by lonewolfcub	1	2017-12-09 19:48:41 UTC	ndm	Or just add "access=private"?

54380816 by ElliotD	1	2017-12-06 23:08:11 UTC	ndm	Great that you added the extra Aztec West park -- where did you get the name from? Pretty sure there's no signage.

53934518 by ndm	1	2017-12-06 09:31:18 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hi, are pedestrians and cycles allowed on any parts of this road? If so, can you change access=no to vehicle=no or motor_vehicle=no as appropriate? Thanks, Mike
	2	2017-12-06 22:50:58 UTC	ndm	If there were pedestrian access it would have a sidewalk tag.

54365036 by LeighChilcott	1	2017-12-05 20:03:06 UTC	ndm	I'm pretty sure this change is wrong -- I mapped it pretty carefully from a photo-survey.

54260551 by Koolie Aid	1	2017-12-02 10:49:17 UTC	ndm	Great, but this is already mapped.

54172834 by Lizzie Augarde	1	2017-11-29 21:35:57 UTC	ndm	I've moved the restaurant back to Kongs -- to keep the postcode, address and FHRS reference accurate. But I've removed the "Burger Theory" name to avoid confusion -- it is already mapped on Saint Stephens Street.

53873362 by Cai1	1	2017-11-17 13:57:35 UTC	DaveF	Hi if it's under construction use the landuse=construction tag
	2	2017-11-17 23:00:04 UTC	ndm	I've corrected the bad drag of a point on Taylor Gardens.

53873618 by Cai1	1	2017-11-17 22:56:36 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? Only Bing shows building as you've drawn them. I surveyed and drew some of the ones you deleted only about 6 months ago.
	2	2017-11-18 09:42:30 UTC	Cai1	Yes, the previous buildings were garages that were demolished last year.

53270575 by lossy	1	2017-10-26 19:13:02 UTC	ndm	I understand why you added the restrictions - but they should only be there if they are signed -- are you sure there's a sign there?
	2	2017-10-26 19:37:33 UTC	lossy	I am not sure if there is a sign but there is a traffic island making it impossible. How is best to map this? It is not very optimal at the moment. If approaching from the south on Gloucester road then it is not advisable to do a u-turn in the middle of the road to get to Overton road.
	3	2017-10-27 17:53:31 UTC	ndm	It doesn't have "junction=roundabout" -- if a router wants to recommend a violent turn, then it probably needs fixing, But common sense should also prevail when using a results from routing s/ware. I'll have a look at the signage in the future..
	4	2017-10-28 12:14:59 UTC	Cebderby	There won't be any no-U-turn signage in a situation like this because there's really nothing to U-turn around - it's more a less a normal 2 lane road with a narrow divide to prevent all right turns and aid pedestrian crossing. The ends of the one ways can have ahead-only restrictions as that is the ...

53273567 by lossy	1	2017-10-26 21:47:10 UTC	ndm	This is unnecessary "tagging for the router" - Strava need to fix their app. Other routers have no problems: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.50505%2C-2.61403%3B51.50292%2C-2.61347#map=18/51.50398/-2.61405
	2	2017-10-27 10:02:51 UTC	SK53	If the information is accurate then it is not 'tagging for the router', merely making access permissions explicit. Routers which implicitly route on service roads may cause other problems.

53194283 by morzo	1	2017-10-24 12:53:14 UTC	DaveF	Hi Morzo Welcome to OSM. Are you trying to map a building? Try https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
	2	2017-10-24 20:56:18 UTC	ndm	I've had a quick go at adding the building, etc. It might not be great, but hopefully close enough so you can fix it.
	3	2017-10-24 21:23:57 UTC	DaveF	Nice Update. As it's a place where people stay/sleep on multiple nights I'll add landuse=residential. I've not been through that development. Is all the rest commercial?

52873600 by ndm	1	2017-10-12 23:04:57 UTC	DaveF	This is a relocated pharmacy. The FHRS was for it's previous location. I'm in discussion with BANES about the inaccuracy of their database.
	2	2017-10-13 11:21:52 UTC	ndm	Sorry about that -- looked like a good match!

52756086 by BobC76	1	2017-10-09 12:15:33 UTC	ndm	You seem to be trying to change the map tagging to fix cycle routing - unless there's an obvious error or ommision this is considered bad practice. If routing software isn't working correctly please file a bug with its developers, rather than "tagging for the router".
	2	2017-10-09 16:34:23 UTC	DaveF	A bit blurred, but the bicycle symbol can just about be made out. http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/51.46386/-2.55220/esri Are there any bollards?
	3	2017-10-10 15:30:33 UTC	BobC76	Yes there are bollards - its not correctly designated as its not a "service road".
	4	2017-10-10 15:59:06 UTC	BobC76	See https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.463917,-2.5524246,3a,40y,93.04h,88.6t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqckQXvkboX4-xjOMY_EFAA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 and https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4637059,-2.5513873,3a,75y,344.59h,98.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQeeUdXCJoOfKs9LIfT9fFg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 for the other side....
	5	2017-10-10 16:21:03 UTC	DaveF	From GSV there's a traffic sign on that way. Do you know what is says? Is there access into the rear of the pub for deliveries etc? I'm a bit surprised routers avoid it. Which one are you using? Try putting bicycle=designated on it.
	6	2017-10-10 19:03:16 UTC	ndm	You can't use Google Streetview as a source for OSM https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps Other maps have their own copyright and shouldn't be copied. If it's useable for a brewery delivery, then it should probably remain as a service. If ...
	7	2017-10-10 19:32:02 UTC	DaveF	I don't think anyone's using GSV to map.
	8	2017-10-10 20:28:52 UTC	ndm	Uploaded photo from original 2016 mapping to flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/37364060580/in/dateposted-public/
	9	2017-10-11 08:38:42 UTC	BobC76	Firstly, thanks for all the help, I am new to OSM and suggesting improvements. I walk/cycle the path daily and so not using GSM for anything other than a reference image for those not familiar with the area itself to see what we're debating. I've additionally raised an issue with the routing softwar...
	10	2017-10-11 10:58:51 UTC	DaveF	Given it's location I'm surprised the sign is orientated in that direction. Could it have been swivelled around? From the information given If I were mapping it I'd tag is as: highway=cycleway bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no surface=asphalt (cycle routers use surface to dete...

52743722 by rc0	1	2017-10-08 23:15:49 UTC	ndm	Not a building either.

52522951 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 20:23:36 UTC	DaveF	Hi Welcome to OSM Do you know how vehicles get to the camp site?
	2	2017-10-01 21:54:45 UTC	ndm	Be careful are you sure that there's a licence to use data from KnowYourPlace in OSM. Even diigitizing and ortho-correcting old maps is likely to generate a new copyrighted product.
	3	2017-10-01 22:34:03 UTC	AndyReid56	Hi, The road access comes under the railway and there is a gate at the north end of the campsite, roughly a hundred meters north of the bend. The land North of the campsite is under separate ownership, and currently used as a landfill site. There is a planning dispute between the owner of the cam...
	4	2017-10-01 23:20:41 UTC	ndm	No worries, you've probably saved people taking a spurious shortcut now.
	5	2017-10-04 12:53:34 UTC	DaveF	Hi For the extent it's accessible by vehicles (up to the farm?) the path would better tagged be tagged as highway=service. If it's a designated PROW (with signs?) then this tag is appropriate for it's full length. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation. I've added the farm, the only ...

52523659 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:04 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?
	2	2017-10-01 22:02:13 UTC	AndyReid56	Not sure what happened here. I made that comment for an earlier edit, and it has turned up on every edit I made.
	3	2017-10-01 22:28:23 UTC	ndm	No worries; I marked them all so I could see it might not match in the future. At least it wasn't empty or one character long -- which can be really hard to select if I'm using firefox on a phone.

52523994 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:12 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523790 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:08 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523555 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:01 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523216 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:54:57 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52459779 by ndm	1	2017-09-29 09:22:15 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil I think you've used old imagery for the Lamplighters garden: http://tinyurl.com/y73kkgqj
	2	2017-09-29 19:30:22 UTC	ndm	Well obviously I can't use that link :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52487166 -- is based on more sober reflection and the Digital World Standard Imagery -- which is the only imagery with the overlooking flats in Cottonwick Close. May have to do another survey when it's lighter -- s...

52370157 by ndm	1	2017-09-26 10:30:41 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil Do you think these city based places for amendment? I'm struggling to see Aztec West as a village.
	2	2017-09-27 17:54:13 UTC	ndm	Well, have relabelled the commercial area instead -- but it has a church, doctors, cafes, etc., etc. so village prob' wasn't too far off.
	3	2017-09-27 18:27:23 UTC	DaveF	Sorry, I for got add the Overpass link: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s1d +Cadbury Heath. Personally I think they should be suburbs, what do you think?

52278200 by yurasi	1	2017-09-23 08:54:28 UTC	ndm	The name is already on the whole of the school grounds -- so I'll remove it from this single specific building. There's guidelines on mapping schools at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
	2	2017-09-25 00:36:52 UTC	yurasi	Oh, ok ndm. Thanks :)

52238628 by robw	1	2017-09-21 20:13:10 UTC	ndm	Is this really being built at the moment?
	2	2017-09-21 20:21:15 UTC	robw	Without going to have a look I can't confirm. But this is what seems to have been decided and it is supposed to start about now, so may still only be planned (as per my comment). Clearly it's not yet open so nothing is going to be using it for routing.
	3	2017-09-21 21:13:36 UTC	ndm	Assume you checked any plans would have had a suitable copyright for copying into OSM? Not sure about including potential planned items -- or I'd already have added Bristol Arena :-)
	4	2017-09-22 06:13:40 UTC	robw	Dont think is a real problem as for example the A14 huntigdon-cambridge upgrade was shown on OSM far before any work commenced on the ground.
	5	2017-09-22 08:25:30 UTC	Harald Hartmann	Also check the spelling of `consctruction` at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526438762

52237602 by Rick Wiles	1	2017-09-21 11:54:06 UTC	ndm	No change set comment! I'll revert this asap - there was a definite separation of the bus lane with an island - unless you've done a recent on site survey.

51943800 by hollium	1	2017-09-11 23:12:23 UTC	ndm	There's nothing wrong with stops not having infrastructure -- see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop Surely, having them on OSM makes it easier to locate them.
	2	2017-09-12 15:35:31 UTC	hollium	Hi, these particular stops were imported from Bristol City Council's naptan database and exist as virtual stops for data purposes (Traveline, timetabling) only. In reality, passengers can catch the specific service which uses this area by hailing at any point on the route, so having the specific poi...
	3	2017-09-12 18:00:31 UTC	ndm	OK, no worries. Guess it's more like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hail_and_ride

51943933 by hollium	1	2017-09-11 23:11:21 UTC	ndm	There's nothing wrong with stops not having infrastructure -- see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop Surely, having them on OSM makes it easier to locate them.

51847243 by cerisjones	1	2017-09-08 19:06:05 UTC	ndm	Just to check -- the link you reference cites "All Rights Reserved" and Crown Copyright -- do you have permission for OpenStreetmap to use information from that map?
	2	2017-09-11 15:13:15 UTC	cerisjones	You can visually use the information in order to work out the extent of North Somerset as our Unitary Authority boundary (in brown) denotes the extent of the A4174 which is known as Colliters Way. The road has a different name in Bristol City's area. Hope this helps. Thanks, Ceris

51511389 by Mike Baggaley	1	2017-08-28 20:56:02 UTC	ndm	The name on the board for the map is "Museum" why have you changed it? Is this some arm-chair mapping exercise?

51348515 by pole_climber	1	2017-08-22 19:20:42 UTC	ndm	Guessing there's a typo on "Pucklechurch Locacl" ?
	2	2017-08-23 10:12:11 UTC	pole_climber	Fixed. Also added address, opening times and rather than a generic store name added Premier Brand.
	3	2017-08-26 09:16:05 UTC	ndm	Brilliant!

51145148 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-08-15 23:08:28 UTC	ndm	Pretty sure it's not a secondary road into the school -- they'd soon run out of pupils

51075152 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-08-13 09:50:19 UTC	ndm	What's the change?

51068280 by Hannahgib69	1	2017-08-12 23:20:27 UTC	southglos	Hi There's a pillar box already mapped about 50m further up Windmill Lane. Is this new one a duplicate, or is the original mispositioned? Cheers
	2	2017-08-13 09:49:03 UTC	ndm	I had a look on Bing -- the new one seems to be in a garden -- and the old one seems to block driveways :-) Note: the old one has more tags than just post_box.

51074561 by Steve Mapping	1	2017-08-13 09:45:51 UTC	ndm	Good to see someone else mapping here -- wondered what "update" was? I added a "proposed:museum" tag somewhere over the hangar as it isn't opened yet -- probably doesn't show up in the renderer but might help to find it. I wonder if it might be good to add a general museum ...
	2	2017-08-13 14:14:07 UTC	Steve Mapping	I put heritage museum as they say industrial heritage museum on there web site. I did not mark the general site area as I am not sure of the area yet from out side the fence. should be opening soon. road to car park being put in at this time

50822942 by Joe Schwartz	1	2017-08-04 22:27:28 UTC	ndm	Cheers for correcting that -- not my intention to be humorous at all. Ta.

50680846 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-07-29 23:17:37 UTC	ndm	Thanks for the updates -- a changeset comment would have improved them -- and made them easier to understand.

50653091 by uberchump	1	2017-07-28 18:37:24 UTC	ndm	I think "name" is supposed to be an official name, ideally signposted -- this looks a bit more like a "description". Similarly, with some of the buildings too.

50599639 by Richard Hanmer	1	2017-07-26 21:27:04 UTC	ndm	Undeleted it. The random line is an address interpolation line -- it is a quick way to indicate a range of addresses.

50464000 by AlanStans	1	2017-07-21 22:49:34 UTC	ndm	Adding oneway to Avon Crescent seems odd -- sure it wasn't a week or so ago? And it has an exit in the opposite direction to the oneway.
	2	2017-07-22 06:45:13 UTC	AlanStans	It's definitely no entry from Cumberland road since they completed the road works by the create centre a couple of weeks ago. Will check later today if the whole thing is one way.
	3	2017-07-22 09:44:14 UTC	ndm	Cheers -- I had a quick look at some photos from there last week (because of the new "cyclelane") and I can see a van pointing in the "wrong" direction -- but infuriatingly no good set of shots from the rest of it.
	4	2017-07-22 16:19:56 UTC	DaveF	Hi Now oneway: https://travelwest.info/metrobus/metrobus-build/spike-island is this link now dug up?: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25683723 Is the cycle contraflow painted lines or a segregated lane? Is this new cycle path open? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476337752
	5	2017-07-22 17:28:14 UTC	ndm	Photos from last week - note direction of parked van - https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/
	6	2017-07-22 18:04:29 UTC	AlanStans	Drove along today. Only change is painting at the south end and a no entry except cycles Just painted bike lane north bound at the junction for short distance, rest of road seems to be still two way. Link at North end unchanged. I have edited road to show only one way just at the southern end...
	7	2017-07-22 18:06:32 UTC	AlanStans	Just noted cycle path for that bit exists, so should be good.
	8	2017-07-22 18:07:52 UTC	AlanStans	Meaning the cycle path at south end of AVon cresent to allow cycles in.
	9	2017-07-22 18:25:27 UTC	ndm	Cheers for that -- obviously an area to keep an eye on -- the Ashton Avenue Bridge is was open today too -- strangely no separate cycleway -- just a wideish pavement.
	10	2017-07-22 20:07:09 UTC	AlanStans	The bus route from Ashton Bridge to Cumberland road has also been built (hence my move of the railway platform - yet to be rebuilt) but I cant work out how to draw a bus only route!
	11	2017-07-22 20:42:36 UTC	DaveF	I've just added the route over Ashton Bridge. I've tweeted MetroBus to confirm that section's a guided busway: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509467560 I took the tags from Cambridge except I've kept is a construction for now: www.openstreetmap.org/way/93272889
	12	2017-07-28 16:13:58 UTC	DaveF	Metrobus confirm this section is to be guided, but unclear of the extent.

50057641 by Rowland	1	2017-07-21 06:24:05 UTC	BCNorwich	Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards
	2	2017-07-22 10:25:17 UTC	ndm	See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796 Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items.

50257850 by Rowland	1	2017-07-13 20:48:06 UTC	DaveF	Hi again The two landuse=industrial areas you've added appear to overlap existing areas & stretch into land own by other companies or is public land. If you have additional data could you add it to existing objects.
	2	2017-07-13 23:16:57 UTC	ndm	School would ideally use multipolygon. Nursing Home might not be a good match for a hospital -- there's a couple of different options documented in the wiki.
	3	2017-07-15 13:20:05 UTC	Rowland	Per the source, the pound for the port after per there OS openmap local data. Will take a look at the multi polygons.
	4	2017-07-15 21:31:47 UTC	DaveF	I'm unclear what you mean. I've looked at the OS Open Map - Local data for the area & see no boundary. Is there an on-line version of what you're using as data? Could you explain what 'Tayberry' is? Is it an editor or an importer?
	5	2017-07-19 09:34:14 UTC	SomeoneElse	I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507316742 is mistagged. It's tagged as a hospital, but the name suggests it's a nursing home. Have a look in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ for things like "nursing home" "care home" and "healthcare" and "social...
	6	2017-07-19 13:03:27 UTC	DaveF	Social facility is probably what's required: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
	7	2017-07-19 20:51:16 UTC	ndm	I've redrawn from Bing and tagged as amenity=nursing_home as per JOSM defaults for "Nursing Home".
	8	2017-07-19 20:55:11 UTC	ndm	I redrew Penny Brohn as well -- not sure about Bristol Port -- should at least be a relation? Probably needs extensive redrawing/reverting?
	9	2017-07-20 09:39:38 UTC	DaveF	In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to me The two main problems I have with the port is 1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area 2) it does tie in ...
	10	2017-07-20 12:11:27 UTC	DaveF	Correction: "it doesn't tie in "
	11	2017-07-20 19:20:36 UTC	ndm	I walked the bridleway ~2 months ago -- it's outside of the fenced industrial area. I note the original industrial area is still "underneath" the larger -- as is the foreshore, part of the coastline/inlets and a wildlife corridor I added a while ago.

50277571 by gregmnewman	1	2017-07-14 17:37:59 UTC	ndm	I think most of the royal_cyphers I've seen are uppercase -- but glad someone else is adding postbox refs -- and get Bristol a better percentage on http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/
	2	2017-07-14 18:55:18 UTC	gregmnewman	Will fix the couple i've added, I just selected from the dropdown, didnt think they looked right?

49928620 by ddd bbb	1	2017-06-29 20:51:49 UTC	DaveF	Hi By "too prominent" are you referring to how it renders on the standard map? If so, could you reinstate it please. If it exists it can be mapped. If you feel the rendering isn't to your liking you can discuss it in the relevant forum: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-ca...
	2	2017-06-29 22:12:49 UTC	SK53	Removing data is "mapping for the renderer": please don't do it. Someone took the time to transcribe the information from the plaque and enter it in OSM. This type of information is widely used elsewhere: for instance on the openplaques.org website. By removing it to make this area look th...
	3	2017-06-29 22:34:18 UTC	ddd bbb	Firstly, sorry! I want the area to represent how people navigate - is there a way of keeping it there without it being rendered/removing house numbers nearby? Can it be put back?
	4	2017-07-02 21:30:35 UTC	ndm	I've reverted this changeset -- and tweaked it a bit in a separate one.

49129190 by hollium	1	2017-05-31 18:04:08 UTC	ndm	Should Bellveue be Bellevue?
	2	2017-06-26 11:03:16 UTC	hollium	No. The Council renamed the bus stops to reflect the correct spelling of the road name. -HJ
	3	2017-06-26 20:15:16 UTC	ndm	Sounds good, but one looked like a typo, the other one matches the road.

49401905 by Syvanne Aloni	1	2017-06-09 22:12:04 UTC	ndm	Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now?
	2	2017-06-10 14:32:10 UTC	DaveF	Hi Syvanne Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_M...
	3	2017-06-12 10:44:38 UTC	Syvanne Aloni	Hi DaveF, Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this?
	4	2017-06-12 11:12:51 UTC	DaveF	Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks.
	5	2017-06-13 10:03:51 UTC	Syvanne Aloni	Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals...
	6	2017-06-13 13:17:44 UTC	DaveF	Hi Who did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features I've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of...
	7	2017-06-13 19:40:40 UTC	ndm	I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well b...
	8	2017-06-13 22:38:35 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ). Best Regards...

49401043 by Syvanne Aloni	1	2017-06-09 22:14:29 UTC	ndm	Not sure what adding a node with "hello" on it is for?

49150454 by Stefano Chies	1	2017-06-01 19:31:19 UTC	ndm	No courthouse here! Maps.me edits are public. I will delete this.

48805860 by ndm	1	2017-05-19 12:39:18 UTC	DaveF	Is it steps only to the North bank? Seems strange as it was meant to be a shared path.
	2	2017-05-19 22:39:02 UTC	ndm	Hopefully, I have some photos so I can disambiguate it -- I got keen yesterday to see how the GPS track looked compared to my original "by eye" sketch. More importantly I should have info on the south side to connect it to Finzel's reach and get better map routing -- and map a rather nice ...

48397599 by DaveF	1	2017-05-05 20:00:09 UTC	ndm	FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491363532 housenumber looks like a copy-paste (can't tell from the sofa whether it's a housename or a street).

48314851 by DaveF	1	2017-05-01 20:38:38 UTC	ndm	My bad, the photo I've got has 4 stands -- must have been a narrow angle. The Pintxo restaurant must be new its website only lists Cornwall -- "Bistro La Barrique" was definintely there on 4 April.
	2	2017-05-01 21:46:18 UTC	DaveF	Yes, it's just opened: http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/brand-new-tapas-and-sherry-bar-pintxo-de-bath-brings-the-taste-of-spain-to-barton-street/story-30303404-detail/story.html

48279339 by DaveF	1	2017-04-30 23:03:28 UTC	ndm	No need for FIXME: on photos here's no separating barrier between the cycleway(s) and the road on the High Street -- except at the ends. Working through a backlog of surveys -- will get to this in due course -- but thought it useful to flag up the one way promptly.

48186273 by osm update	1	2017-04-27 10:56:25 UTC	manoharuss	Hi osm update, This seems like automated edit to me with a custom script. Has this been discussed and documented? What is the source of this data? I have observed some issues with the edits. 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338794056/history is a node of a way on a remote area. I don't s...
	2	2017-04-27 12:03:12 UTC	althio	Hi, I agree with manoharuss on this changeset, dear user "osm update". It seems like you rely too heavily on nodes ids. I would also suggest you use better changeset comments. Moreover you could try to reduce the successive numbers of versions for only adding tags to one object. \...
	3	2017-04-27 13:31:29 UTC	osm update	Hi, the source is http://min-go.hr/, but I've made a mistake in my script. I'm reverting changes.
	4	2017-04-27 15:15:03 UTC	SomeoneElse	Apparantly an otherwise untagged node on a footpath near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339830304/history now sells LPG. Do I need to bring my own can? Regards, Andy (who as well as mapping footpaths moonlights for the Data Working Group)
	5	2017-04-27 19:09:52 UTC	ndm	Umm, http://min-go.hr seems to be based on Google Maps? Wouldn't that taint data from it?
	6	2017-04-28 07:17:57 UTC	osm update	No, it's not based on Google Maps. There are three json sources of information about gas stations and prices: - http://min-go.hr/cache/postajasve.json - http://min-go.hr/cache/vazeca-cijena.json - http://min-go.hr/api/web_api/web/obveznik
	7	2017-04-28 15:36:39 UTC	SomeoneElse	You have been blocked because you are continue to mechanically edit data without discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 made clear the process that you must follow if you want to do this. The data that you have modified since this changeset will be reverted. Please re-read htt...

47993027 by Toub	1	2017-04-21 22:57:07 UTC	ndm	Strange - when this was first added it had this name - then the original mapper removed it -- has a street name been added back now? Seems odd as there's already another Southampton Mews very close.
	2	2017-04-24 08:42:51 UTC	Toub	Oh, my bad! I have been there again this morning, and in fact this is not a street, but just a private residential parking. As I didn't see the inexistent street, I confused with the next street. Thanks for revealing my mistake! Now, should we just remove the street as in bing? https://...
	3	2017-04-24 23:15:58 UTC	ndm	I guess you could mark it as service. It might even be the name you added -- but it would depend on the addresses of the buildings near it. I just commented as I could see what happened previously.

48003728 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:51:41 UTC	ndm	Great you're closing a lot of notes -- but they are so spread out -- are you actually checking them with a survey?
	2	2017-04-22 11:24:50 UTC	azzap	Yes, these are all places I have visited.
	3	2017-04-22 19:38:14 UTC	ndm	Not many people got to UWE and UoB -- you're well-travelled.

48031445 by DaveF	1	2017-04-22 19:25:59 UTC	ndm	Dave, thde wiki says "Set a node Node or draw as an area Area along the building outline." -- I know that isn't how you map them in Bath, but that's how I've mapped the a lot of the ones in Bristol -- it would be good to keep this one consistent.
	2	2017-04-29 13:24:53 UTC	DaveF	I think the wiki page needs expanding. Similar to schools, Universities & hospitals, a boundary around all elements owned by the pub seems the more detailed/accurate way to map. I've posted to the tagging forum: "Mapping pubs as full areas" Mapping pubs as full areas
	3	2017-04-29 16:04:48 UTC	trigpoint	The biergarten tag is a little out of place. I suspect it is a pub beer garden. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en

48003577 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:49:13 UTC	ndm	Sorry, but this seems wrong - only walked this ~1 week ago and most of the old car park was still fenced off -- under construction?
	2	2017-04-22 11:47:33 UTC	azzap	Thanks you were right, i've corrected it now. The car park which was previously mapped no longer exists. This area is now fenced off and under construction.

48014501 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:39:04 UTC	ndm	Street is inside Building F?
	2	2017-04-22 11:56:13 UTC	azzap	I have modified F Block as it was mapped wrong, the Pedestrian street is in the right place.

47953705 by Jonny_no_5	1	2017-04-20 00:21:15 UTC	ndm	It was a good idea to join the nature reserve together where it was split by Bradley Stoke Way. Good to have some extra names for places as well. I liked the previous wood you deleted :-( I thought it was much clearer where trees actually are -- especially near Bailey's Court Road roundabout. I d...

47915221 by azzap	1	2017-04-18 21:46:06 UTC	ndm	Is it really a tunnel? There's a bridge over it.

47914951 by azzap	1	2017-04-18 21:41:50 UTC	ndm	Maybe the extra service=parking_aisle tag might be useful.

47874097 by azzap	1	2017-04-17 22:34:04 UTC	ndm	Don't think the a turn restriction will work without from/via/to?
	2	2017-04-19 20:27:19 UTC	DaveF	Is there a 'no_u_turn' sign? if not I don't think it should have a turn restriction.

47870661 by m4rkit	1	2017-04-17 22:33:34 UTC	ndm	Thought it was asphalt?
	2	2017-04-20 10:52:24 UTC	m4rkit	Pretty sure it's concrete. I cycle it often and there is bumps every 10m or so at the joins

47520174 by p3et	1	2017-04-06 23:00:27 UTC	ndm	Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice: "This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ...
	2	2017-04-08 10:00:08 UTC	p3et	Thanks for the hint. I'll ask them for permission.
	3	2017-04-08 12:56:07 UTC	trigpoint	The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if ...

47519444 by p3et	1	2017-04-06 23:00:20 UTC	ndm	Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice: "This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ...

47178068 by cdavila	1	2017-03-26 21:32:39 UTC	DaveF	Hi What is the source of knowledge for your numerous & widespread maxheight edits?
	2	2017-03-26 23:25:03 UTC	ndm	As above. Plus, 11'9'' is a perfectly acceptable maxheight -- there is no need to convert it (approiximately) to metres -- should only map what is signed.
	3	2017-03-27 14:31:06 UTC	cdavila	The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one. @ndm: you are right, but meters is the default va...
	4	2017-03-28 11:32:24 UTC	DaveF	Ah, I understand you now. I thought you were moving tags, but you're in fact interpreting them to add additional ones. Unsure if hgv=no on a way is required when there's a maxheight on the entrance, but does no harm, I suppose. Cheers.

46548006 by hollium	1	2017-03-03 21:06:12 UTC	ndm	Pretty sure that's not its name - walked past it yesterday
	2	2017-03-20 21:02:24 UTC	hollium	It's not called 'vacant' but not sure what else to call it - it's certainly not the sports café any more.
	3	2017-03-20 21:47:40 UTC	ndm	The signs on the outside say "Sports Cafe" -- it's tagged as disused:amenity=cafe.

46495017 by DaveF	1	2017-03-01 21:27:54 UTC	ndm	Cheers for that

46472775 by DaveF	1	2017-03-01 00:41:22 UTC	ndm	I use building POIs when I know a housename/number but don't know exactly where it is -- bad GPS / ropey photo. Obviously the ways drawn from Bing may/may not correspond to them. I do merge them when I get a good re-survey. I'll probably add a FIXME to the Bristol ones -- assuming this was a KR exer...
	2	2017-03-01 14:36:36 UTC	DaveF	Hi KR was flagging the duplicate building tags. building isn't required to get housenumber/name to render. I've readded the fixme tags. I'm unsure why I deleted them.U

46428305 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-26 23:39:31 UTC	ndm	If you're interested in speed limits -- maybe add maxspeed : "20 mph" to the highway -- presumably "Friendship Road". There's a speed limit map at http://product.itoworld.com/map/5?lon=-2.57477&lat=51.43518&zoom=15&fullscreen=true -- but it takes a while to update.

46133166 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2017-02-16 20:08:27 UTC	ndm	Has this been surveyed directly? The source URL you've quoted on "Sainsbury's Local" links to a Google map.
	2	2017-02-17 20:19:04 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	I've been there in person (with my GPS running). The source link was where I obtained the hours and phone number; noscript blocked the google map so I didn't know it was there until @ndm told me
	3	2017-02-17 22:47:38 UTC	ndm	Great.

46133082 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2017-02-16 20:12:20 UTC	ndm	Has this been surveyed directly -- if it exists but is disused it shouldn't be deleted, but simply changed to disused:amenity. Is the "Frome Valley Voice" a suitable source of copyright info for OpenStreetmap?
	2	2017-02-17 20:15:16 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	ndm the shell of the building has been turned into flats (personal observation -- I pass it every day). There's no trace of a pub any more. Not sure what copyright has to do with it -- I was citing it as a source of information not copying anything (maybe that's too much of a Wikipedia viewpoint)\...
	3	2017-02-17 22:47:03 UTC	ndm	Great. Was a bit confused -- when I upload from Josm I use source=survey for items I mapped from a visit/GPS & source=Bing for tracing outlines, etc.
	4	2017-02-20 13:03:46 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm I'll try to do that in the future -- as you can see I'm only an occasional contributor so don't necessarily have a feel for the done thing here

46055898 by Terrypugh	1	2017-02-13 20:55:22 UTC	ndm	It's a bit redundant to add a name that duplicates the tag -- but good to get it mapped.

45963639 by Yorvik Prestigitator	1	2017-02-11 14:00:26 UTC	ndm	Probably was postal_code?
	2	2017-02-11 15:33:02 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	might have meant to be, but BS10 is not even the post code for Ash Walk, the post code is BS10 6RW, maybe it was postal_district?
	3	2017-02-11 23:12:32 UTC	ndm	All Bristol roads are sgned with postal codes, e.g. BS10.
	4	2017-02-12 14:07:34 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	That might make sense, thanks for fixing this.

45944065 by DINEamics	1	2017-02-09 23:08:36 UTC	ndm	Not sure why you've deleted a landuse area in the UK. Was that intentional?
	2	2017-06-18 11:59:04 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49633609 where the changeset comment is: revert SEO edit

45838299 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-05 21:18:11 UTC	DaveF	Hi Dave Welcome back. OK there appears to be a couple of problems.This way isn't attached to airpor road:thttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472391353 For turn restrictions the best thing is to read this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction Specifically members. from>via&...
	2	2017-02-05 23:16:48 UTC	ndm	The "restriction" tag won't do what you want unfortunately. You can always add a note on the OSM webpage if you need a hand / drop an OSM mail. Good to see some South Bristol editing.
	3	2017-02-06 08:47:32 UTC	Dave Drury	Hi there NDM. I may have broken something here. IT would be great it you could help me to fix it. I was trying to ensure that it wasn't possible to turn right into Airport Road out of this junction as I was directed this way using a SatNav that takes data from OSM. However, thinking on it, it is...

45823845 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-05 23:06:29 UTC	ndm	I don't think area on it's own will show much?

45654614 by Welshie	1	2017-01-30 21:43:39 UTC	ndm	Interested in where you got open data from Bristol City Council on 20 mph limits with a good licence for OSM? Since this isn't from a survey, perhaps there should be a source:maxspeed tag as well?

45628300 by btswrr3	1	2017-01-29 21:58:42 UTC	ndm	This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check?
	2	2017-01-30 17:04:25 UTC	pitscheplatsch	In particular this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449579231 For more details see: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45628300
	3	2017-02-12 00:44:14 UTC	SomeoneElse	I've restored things back to something approaching normality (specifically the sports pitches and footways were OK, and I've reverted the school to the edubase geometry and added buildings). It was actually not this changeset, but another one by a different mapper, that "lost" the school ...

45434736 by Stefan Frick	1	2017-01-24 21:52:43 UTC	ndm	The way you've tagged with "water" is part of a multipolygon relation which has an inside and an outside, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250536. The relation is marked as "dock" which is probably closer to a floating harbour than "just water". I expect t...

45164183 by Mike Baggaley	1	2017-01-15 16:23:23 UTC	ndm	Not a description - it is a prominent name in addition to logos/branding. I have added a note that the name needs to be (re)surveyed. Could you please add such notes in the future; unless you've directly surveyed it.
	2	2017-01-15 23:59:59 UTC	Mike Baggaley	In hindsight, it would have been better if I had moved Post Office to the brand tag instead of just removing it. I will go back and set the brand tag. I believe the correct name should be <something> Post Office, not just Post Office on its own Cheers, Mike
	3	2017-01-16 00:22:06 UTC	ndm	I was finishing up an edit on this road -- and found a couple of relevant photos. Have updated the name.

45100512 by delineator	1	2017-01-15 16:07:49 UTC	ndm	Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

45193301 by ioangogo	1	2017-01-15 16:02:48 UTC	ndm	Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.
	2	2017-01-15 16:33:49 UTC	DaveF	Is the A38 - A370 part of the opening? Is it being classified as a trunk road?
	3	2017-01-15 16:37:52 UTC	DaveF	Why have you deleted the foot & cycle paths?

44241074 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-12-07 21:05:42 UTC	ndm	I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this?

44242482 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-12-07 20:56:06 UTC	ndm	Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this?
	2	2016-12-07 23:08:37 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Apologies if I have misinterpreted this junction. I was adding sidewalk=none to clarify why the road had no foot access. In looking at the junction, I did not think there was any kerb between the two directions of traffic, so considered that the correct mapping was to only have a single highway show...

43725167 by John Parfitt	1	2016-11-17 23:08:29 UTC	ndm	Great to see someone else adding stuff -- I tweaked your edit a tiny bit -- no point in calling a tree "Tree".

43725183 by Rickey Skizzles	1	2016-11-17 22:52:29 UTC	ndm	It's usually better to remodel buildings by splitting them, rather than deleting and creating two new ones -- a number of tags on the Greggs (not Gregs) have been lost.
	2	2016-11-17 23:03:12 UTC	ndm	No worries, added back the tags.

43731920 by Tim Rawling	1	2016-11-17 22:48:44 UTC	ndm	Are you sure about the changes to the junction near "The Cross Hands" -- especially which roads can turn to/from "Lawn Road". A quick check on Bing looks closer to the previous layout -- especially the now deleted traffic islands.

43714188 by ShakyBakey	1	2016-11-16 23:47:45 UTC	ndm	H M Prison (Bristol) is already mapped

42832506 by mescolar	1	2016-10-12 22:51:54 UTC	ndm	Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location

42739747 by UMC	1	2016-10-09 23:20:20 UTC	ndm	Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM?

42136443 by ndm	1	2016-09-14 12:03:24 UTC	DaveF	Is this recycling centre open to the public or just for the authority to sort household waste? would it benefit from a 'recycling_type=centre' tag?
	2	2016-09-14 19:09:54 UTC	ndm	Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a comp...
	3	2016-09-15 22:11:19 UTC	DaveF	Yes, i saw what was edited before you, but he tagged it as Bristol Waste Company & if you google it: http://www.bristolwastecompany.co.uk/ It appears it's recycling, nut unsure if it's for the public to drop stuff off. Note they use OSM in their small map.

41800048 by Berkovskyy	1	2016-08-30 19:48:12 UTC	ndm	Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign.
	2	2016-09-01 02:38:32 UTC	Berkovskyy	Yeah, I love Bristol pubs. As far as I remember the only place where "POT at WOT" name can be found is the pub sign. Most other walls, signs and labels have "Post Office Tavern" written on them. This is why I have changed the name to "Post Office Tavern" which I think ...

41717216 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-26 21:35:41 UTC	ndm	Are you sure this is correct? I thought that the whole point was that cyclists don't need to enter the roundabout -- check it out on Bing. A "Fixing roundabouts" changeset comment would've been really useful too. Cheers.
	2	2016-08-26 23:27:58 UTC	Mike Baggaley	I did use Bing to fix the roundabout, to separate the cycleway and road points where they meet the roundabout. The previous entry already touched the roundabout at the same point as the road. From Bing I would say you could draw that part of the roundabout several ways. The original violates the jun...
	3	2016-08-27 10:24:52 UTC	ndm	Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits.

41725553 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-27 10:10:08 UTC	ndm	Had to tweak it a tad -- both lanes were bus only.

41717138 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-26 21:38:54 UTC	ndm	Are you sure this is correct? Buses on separated bus lane can no longer enter the roundabout. A changeset comment would be good too. Thanks.
	2	2016-08-26 23:12:29 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hopefully now improved - I was confused as the bus routes were showing as down the right hand lane, not the left. I have also moved them to the left lane. Regards, Mike

41642619 by smb1001	1	2016-08-23 19:42:00 UTC	ndm	Are you sure that the preschool really takes up all that area?
	2	2016-08-24 08:37:55 UTC	smb1001	you're right -- I have gotten over-excited there. I've reverted it, thanks.

41512790 by Tim Rawling	1	2016-08-17 15:44:12 UTC	DaveF	Hi Tim I'm struggling to be convinced Mangotsfield is a village: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangotsfield The tags location is taken from: http://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=51.48596&lon=-2.49834
	2	2016-08-18 00:31:36 UTC	ndm	I'm more upset that my wikipedia link insn't on the new location :-(

41516672 by Megadyptes	1	2016-08-18 00:16:11 UTC	ndm	/the data source you're using isn't great I can see houses joined together that should be separate and separate buildings that should be joined together. You'll get better results tracing from Bing.

41491075 by Matt Chapman	1	2016-08-16 19:42:10 UTC	ndm	Hi Matt, rejigged your edit -- addresses won't get rendered visibly -- hope it's reasonable, if not let me know, or give it a tweak.

41464626 by serendipity	1	2016-08-15 22:55:42 UTC	ndm	Layer -1? Is it really disused -- are the rails visible?
	2	2016-08-16 07:53:52 UTC	serendipity	I was there recently (Aug 2016). There are no rails visible. Both ends are bricked up.

41223097 by Christian Ledermann	1	2016-08-03 23:09:58 UTC	ndm	I'm sure you're keen for feedback: The school (building) was already mapped and named -- this wasn't "fixed".leading to duplication? There was no need for the school area to be a multipolygon The school multipolygon was inaccurate and overlapped theresidential multipolygon and wou...

40968898 by Henreko	1	2016-07-23 19:01:29 UTC	ndm	Why did you mark the area as industrial -- it's being redeveloped which is why it was marked as construction, as a hint not to use aerial imagery to draw buildings.
	2	2016-07-23 22:12:29 UTC	Henreko	oh right, didn't notice that

40350206 by ndm	1	2016-06-28 18:42:39 UTC	ndm	Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing).

40131159 by Instantcars	1	2016-06-20 23:05:28 UTC	ndm	This looks like a duplicate, albeit with different postcode and minor differences. Maps.me won't show until a new data download becomes available -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits

39606886 by Ned600	1	2016-05-29 22:42:52 UTC	ndm	I've added back the footpath you deleted -- no worries.

39582072 by John Blake	1	2016-05-27 22:17:58 UTC	ndm	You seem to have accidentally moved a node on Church Road?
	2	2016-05-28 06:50:12 UTC	John Blake	Not to my knowledge. I added a mail box on the opposite side of High street, that's all.
	3	2016-05-28 13:41:57 UTC	ndm	FYI the moved node is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1003112566#map=18/51.45025/-2.52039 -- I'll move it back based on Bing if that's ok.

39605654 by uberchump	1	2016-05-27 22:20:24 UTC	ndm	I think you meant addr:housename not addr:housenumber and Depot not Depo?

39544699 by John Blake	1	2016-05-24 22:40:36 UTC	ndm	If it's Edward the 8th -- you could mark it with royal_cypher=EVIII. Easier to parse programmatically, than a description. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:royal_cypher

39069196 by Chris Tothill	1	2016-05-10 20:07:04 UTC	ndm	Has the "private road" sign been taken down? If not, then it should be marked as private.

38852367 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-04-25 21:23:26 UTC	ndm	Not clear how deleting the names from the driveway improves OpenStreetmap -- maybe replacing the & with a ; might have been better. Or adding a note for local mappers. Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.
	2	2016-04-25 22:35:11 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Apologies. These names are not the names of highways, they are the names of buildings.hence the deletion from the highway. There are others nearby that I moved the name to addr:housename, but must have omitted this one.

38852527 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-04-25 21:22:04 UTC	ndm	Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.

38579271 by Ewen Hill	1	2016-04-15 21:38:08 UTC	ndm	You have connected roads together that don't join in reality -- ignoring the square between them.

38348203 by Kerschtin	1	2016-04-06 18:44:59 UTC	ndm	This doesn't exist -- I will delete it.

38276411 by Colin Smale	1	2016-04-06 18:44:11 UTC	ndm	This looks wrong -- surely boundary should be "midway" between Steep Holm and Flat Holm (as it's Welsh).
	2	2016-04-06 18:55:02 UTC	Colin Smale	The admin boundaries and the e/w boundary are derived from official sources with lat/lon coordinates. It is certainly an anomaly, but I am pretty sure it is correct.

38331822 by Kerschtin	1	2016-04-05 22:45:46 UTC	ndm	Hope you don't mind -- I deleted the Barclays -- I think you might have confused it with the one on Queens Avenue?

38126459 by txlaparta	1	2016-03-28 22:58:35 UTC	ndm	Please dont load inaccurate polygons -- there are a number of duplicates here that are worse than the original data, e.g. don't have housenames, etc. Also, it would be great if you could use https://translate.google.com/ to get an english changeset comment.
	2	2016-03-28 22:59:03 UTC	ndm	Por favor, no carga polígonos inexactas - hay una serie de duplicados aquí que son peores que los datos originales, por ejemplo, no tienen housenames, etc. Además, sería estupendo si pudiera utilizar https://translate.google.com/ obtener una reacción de cambios Ing...

38091882 by DaveF	1	2016-03-27 11:18:49 UTC	ndm	Apologies for that -- I was trying to connect up the traffic lights tidily.

37850221 by tcdiosm	1	2016-03-15 19:00:02 UTC	ndm	http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway doesn't seem to be a valid URL? What rights do we have to use this source on OSM?
	2	2016-03-15 19:05:43 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	no idea about this edits or rights, but the correct url is probably http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway.html
	3	2016-03-16 17:03:23 UTC	tcdiosm	My apologies for not giving the full URL , I shall do so in future. I was hoping that contributors to OSM would be inquisitive enough to research this resource for themselves and read further; it is a minefield but useful. I have used the online map of local authorities as a resource to check the ...
	4	2016-03-16 17:22:20 UTC	SomeoneElse	(as a brief aside on "footpath" and "bridleway" tagging): I'd use "highway=footway" for something that looks like a footpath; "highway=bridleway" for something that looks like a bridleway (typically "has gates instead of stiles and horse poo on the groun...
	5	2016-03-16 17:38:45 UTC	tcdiosm	definitive information from the authority gives us the legal status. A horse rider would be in the wrong to use a footpath. Yes many tracks look wide enough for a 4x4 but that does not give them the right to use it. We must be careful to provide accurate information, landowners also have rights and...
	6	2016-03-16 17:44:49 UTC	SomeoneElse	@tcdiosm if you're replying to me, I'm confused :)
	7	2016-03-16 17:57:13 UTC	tcdiosm	sorry new to the Forum. Hope this will make it clearer. Footpath Public footpaths are public rights of way on foot. Bridleway Public bridleways are public rights of way on foot, or leading or riding a beast of burden (e.g. a horse). Cyclists may also use bridleways, but must give way to rid...
	8	2016-03-16 18:14:24 UTC	SomeoneElse	@tcdiosm The point that I was trying to make was that for example "highway=footway" does not indicate the legal status of access. It just means "used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians". There are permissive footways, and private ones. In order to indicate that something is ...
	9	2016-03-16 19:13:58 UTC	ndm	Dear tcdiosm, thanks for the details on sources, etc. -- I'm always interested when someone remarks that they're copying another map (doesn't help that I can never remember which Ordnance Survey products have which licence, etc). Have fun mapping, Neil

37758527 by southglos	1	2016-03-12 00:18:21 UTC	ndm	I only added Windsor Place a couple of days ago -- did I miss a 20 mph sign? Did you survey it? I've been assuming that there should only be a maxspeed if there's an sign, as it's not an explcit 20 mph zone.
	2	2016-03-12 11:40:14 UTC	southglos	Hi. It's an assumption, based on the fact that it's a residential road hanging off a 20mph road, within the Inner South Bristol 20mph zone. More info at http://www.bristol20mph.co.uk but as a summary: The 20mph pilot area at Inner South Bristol came into operation in 2010. Every road within the p...
	3	2016-03-12 22:12:36 UTC	ndm	I'd have less objection if it was signed as a 20 mph zone -- then you could make "safe" assumptions about the roads inside. However, it's probably ok.

14581473 by ndm	1	2016-03-05 19:39:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200232398/history has "boat=yes;no" on it. Presumably that's as a result of a previous merge (probably before you edited it) but do you know what is correct here?
	2	2016-03-06 22:01:26 UTC	ndm	I'm guessing it should be no, but that's looking at the adjacent river segments -- it's been ~3 years, probably due a survey?
	3	2016-03-06 22:06:08 UTC	SomeoneElse	Yes - makes sense to me. I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/524167 .

37491450 by ndm	1	2016-02-27 23:32:31 UTC	ndm	Changeset comment should be postboxes.

37148710 by helenwallis	1	2016-02-11 19:58:15 UTC	ndm	Seems to be a duplicate -- the building is already present with the company name.

36839773 by southglos	1	2016-01-28 00:36:35 UTC	ndm	Might also add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378568950 ? Think this is a recent addition.

36704703 by ImaxLighting Ltd	1	2016-01-21 01:08:44 UTC	ndm	Good to see a new contributor. Howabout "addr:place=Brislington", "addr:city=Bristol"? Not sure why there's a way and a node? Normally the same feature is supposed to only be mapped once.
	2	2016-01-22 09:21:02 UTC	ImaxLighting Ltd	Thank you, indeed one of my "101" mishaps. Thank you for the suggestion I shall fix it shortly Best Regards

36342067 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:53 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

36342182 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:41 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

36342335 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:30 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

25849135 by ndm	1	2015-12-10 10:34:10 UTC	SK53	Aztec West is not a village in any usual sense of the word. I think it would be better just to name the area of the Aztec West business park.
	2	2015-12-10 20:37:27 UTC	ndm	>1000 people, church, doctor, newsagent, 2 different coffee chains, Hotel, pub, ponds... Not entirely clear where Hempton Court, The Quadrant and the rest of the part split. Signage is "Aztec West" not "Aztec West business park". It's the same as "Cribbs Causeway...
	3	2015-12-10 21:33:56 UTC	SK53	Yes I know its called Aztec West, I have worked there over the years, but unless it's changed a lot it is not a residential area. Lots of industrial/business areas have churches: I can think of over 10 in Nottingham, but it doesnt make them villages.

26558508 by ndm	1	2015-11-22 21:49:51 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - some buildings here have been added as "building=y#" - I'm guessing that that should be building=yes? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311168535 is one example - the two to the south are too.
	2	2015-11-24 00:29:15 UTC	ndm	Well spotted -- definitely not intended -- will modify asap.

34997463 by ndm	1	2015-11-20 21:12:30 UTC	RobJN	Hi ndm, Thanks for resolving these one-ways. Please don't forget to mark any that you complete as "fixed" using the Traffic Flow Direction plugin so that others don't have to go over the same place. I've marked these fixed now :-) Cheers, Rob
	2	2015-11-21 20:14:00 UTC	ndm	For these I just used the website and JOSM (no plugin) -- couldn't see any way to mark it as done (even now I have the plugin installed).

35008867 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:39:15 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.
	2	2015-11-01 22:45:07 UTC	ndm	Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes.

35021225 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:36:26 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.
	2	2015-11-01 22:44:03 UTC	ndm	Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes.
	3	2015-11-02 00:12:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	... and (re the MGW) note that most UK weight limits are actually MGW limits. It's rare to see _actual_ wieght limits (though they do exist, over weak bridges etc.).

35009470 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:38:47 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.

35008212 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:30:19 UTC	ndm	So you removed my maxweight "not heavy" -- how do you consider one should map a road that's marked as "Unsuitable for heavy vehicles" -- a common UK sign? Obviously hgv:no doesn't work -- psv might be heavy.
	2	2015-11-02 08:34:14 UTC	karussell	Sorry, I've reverted and put the hgv:no on the list. That is indeed an ugly sign :) Please see my steps which leads to the removal action here: https://karussell.wordpress.com/2015/11/01/units-in-openstreetmap/

34861444 by Al-66	1	2015-10-25 23:39:00 UTC	ndm	There seems to be a tree in a building here -- looks odd?
	2	2015-10-26 10:29:11 UTC	Al-66	You are right! I don't know how I did that. I must have dragged it from somewhere else. How do I undo it?
	3	2015-10-26 21:32:07 UTC	ndm	No worries -- I deleted a whole A road once. Ok, reverted it using JOSM / Data -> Revert changeset

34860925 by Al-66	1	2015-10-25 23:35:12 UTC	ndm	This looks incorrect -- checking photos from last week there's only one lane in each direction -- are you counting cycle lanes?
	2	2015-10-26 10:35:02 UTC	Al-66	I didn't put in the roads, but I did change the direction, The north-going road was on the east side, and I knew that was wrong. If you have accurate information would you please put it right.

34741397 by sce8	1	2015-10-19 19:10:03 UTC	ndm	Looks like a strange edit at south end of Filton Avenue.
	2	2015-10-19 20:01:28 UTC	sce8	It was one I was doing as I was walking along with the intention of finishing it off when I got home, which I have just done.
	3	2015-10-19 23:09:30 UTC	ndm	Haven't tried editting and walking -- hard enough to get reasonable photos -- looks good now,

34721297 by sce8	1	2015-10-18 23:04:15 UTC	ndm	Tarvery Carvery?
	2	2015-10-19 05:58:02 UTC	sce8	Yep, spelling mistake and Josm was hanging, for some reason, at the time so I didn't notice.

34656040 by parks82	1	2015-10-15 21:54:56 UTC	ndm	Is it really called "Hardstanding"? Should it be something-like landuse: brownfield? Is it really called "Railway Land"? Should it be landuse: railway / operator: RailTrack

34368161 by RFaith	1	2015-10-01 23:06:11 UTC	ndm	45 mph seems an odd number for maxspeed -- most roadsigns seem to be either 40/50 mph?
	2	2015-10-02 08:11:39 UTC	RFaith	True - it isn't a posted limit, but a personal assessment of how safe it would be at different speeds on this road. 50 is too fast in many places, 40 too slow in others. Motorbikes could go faster but for the surface, which limits bikes. It is an attempt to average the speed you'd manage on this roa...
	3	2015-10-02 11:30:41 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hello RFaith, welcome to OpenStreetMap! For info, the "maxspeed" tag is used for the actual posted limit. Where there's an advisory (such as green signs for school areas) you can use "maxspeed:advisory" for those. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Related_key...
	4	2015-10-02 15:47:28 UTC	RFaith	Hi Andy - I had another look at it this morning and realised that one of the roads listed as Tertiary in in fact a single-track access road to farms that also just happens to lead almost directly to the A4, which might explain why satnavs are so enthusiastic about it as a viable alternative (driv...
	5	2015-11-20 11:42:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	Thanks for fixing (and sorry it took so long to reply!).

34147883 by beatrice jones	1	2015-09-21 21:27:10 UTC	ndm	Please revert this changeset -- the Ice Rink and Cinema were closed years ago. The O2 nightclub is still present -- I walked past it tonight. Also see http://www.o2academybristol.co.uk/

34123844 by Ben Makin	1	2015-09-19 22:49:28 UTC	ndm	Are you sure? I remember seeing the 41 sign along Farr's Lane which is why I added it. Will check when next in town.
	2	2015-09-21 17:35:04 UTC	Ben Makin	I went recently however they have temporarily moved the cycle route, my mistake, i shall fix the changes. The main change i made was adding the extension along the 33 (chocolate path) as when i cycled there i was expecting to see 33 signs but they were 41.

34126960 by beatrice jones	1	2015-09-19 22:45:48 UTC	ndm	This looks like another "fantasy edit" -- please change this back -- the name on the outside of the building is "Bath Road Studios" -- see http://www.bathroadstudios.co.uk I know more than one company have offices inside. If you wish to indicate that ITV have an office inside ...

33814626 by DaveF	1	2015-09-05 18:03:57 UTC	ndm	Not convinced a car park is a place of worship -- well maybe to top gear fans :-)

33472224 by mdt3k	1	2015-08-20 22:17:16 UTC	ndm	Good to see some more builings being added. Shop, pub and other way outllines still need "building=yes" otherwise they won't render.
	2	2015-08-21 09:06:57 UTC	DaveF	Hi I deleted the relations you created. They're not really required in this instance - ways can be overlaid, & it's difficult to to see things such as the playground if hidden in a relation.

32831079 by Max--	1	2015-07-23 22:50:00 UTC	ndm	Not very clear why the park and fence are now railway abandoned?

32674274 by abel801	1	2015-07-16 19:49:37 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? I think the road you've changed is one of two that are part of the entrance to an underground carpark? Better to add a note or a FIXME?
	2	2015-07-16 19:51:19 UTC	ndm	Note there's a FIXME on the apex that indicating that the road should "continue"
	3	2015-07-16 22:01:04 UTC	abel801	Thank you for your observation, I am sure what you suggest is true for that reason I reverted to the previous status.

32676424 by RichRico	1	2015-07-16 19:46:29 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? I think it's a bad idea to treat private roads as impossible -- often there's a direction indicator on the public highway -- but without clear satellite imagery it can't be completely mapped. Better to add a note or a FIXME.
	2	2015-07-17 08:41:38 UTC	SomeoneElse	All an "impossible" oneway entrance road normally means is that someone hasn't mapped the corresponding exit yet. It makes sense for a QA site to highlight this as something needing surveying, but you shouldn't just remove the data that caused the QA entry - it removes valid information f...
	3	2015-10-21 21:42:01 UTC	RichRico	Thanks for the note. You're right, could be much better is add notes, and keep the oneway tag,in this case I reverted my changeset: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32786706) and I added a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/400894

32472607 by Snake Sting	1	2015-07-07 22:35:45 UTC	ndm	This sounds like you are using data from other sources: Ordnance Survey / Google Earth -- OSM doesn't allow copying.

32412907 by Snake Sting	1	2015-07-04 21:57:44 UTC	ndm	You haven't added tags to 358540486 - so it's still incomplete

32155385 by inkena	1	2015-06-23 22:15:34 UTC	ndm	Cheers for adding the building tag back -- and have fun with more mapping

32147942 by inkena	1	2015-06-22 22:25:47 UTC	ndm	Why did you delete "building=yes" -- Cabot Tower is no longer being rendered. Changing it to building=tower I could understand :-)
	2	2015-06-23 08:17:09 UTC	inkena	Hi there! Thanks for your comment! Sorry about that - I changed it to "building=yes" again. I guess I need some more practice... ;-)

31848476 by portishead_runner	1	2015-06-10 00:43:09 UTC	ndm	You added a way without any tags -- would be a shame to lose any info.
	2	2015-06-10 08:27:06 UTC	portishead_runner	Sorry, just doing in a hurry. Public rights of way incorporating the Gordano Round route

31848439 by portishead_runner	1	2015-06-10 00:41:08 UTC	ndm	Noticed you added a long way here with no tags?

31814872 by Hilton Hotels	1	2015-06-08 19:35:03 UTC	ndm	OSM we should map the world as it is -- this is signed as the Hilton Bristol -- checked as I was driving past tonight. Or change the sign :-)

31745081 by brtknr	1	2015-06-05 23:41:11 UTC	ndm	Comment could be more descriptive -- looks more like a speed limit change and adding "foot=yes". I'm not sure about the "foot=yes" access tag. There's always "sidewalk = left/right/both" might be less "legal" -- unless it really is a designated footpath?

31696531 by Jay456	1	2015-06-03 19:51:57 UTC	ndm	I think it would better to remove the name -- it's confusing as the road's the Portway and even then it's not the whole length of the cycle track as you've marked it. I'll have a quick check on the w/end but I'm pretty sure that there's no signage indicating the cyclepath as Portway either?

31321755 by abel801	1	2015-05-20 23:28:21 UTC	ndm	The comment doesn't really make it clear what's been fixed -- not many tigers or deltas in Eastville.
	2	2015-05-21 22:05:08 UTC	abel801	I already changed the comment. Thank you for your observation.
	3	2015-05-22 19:09:47 UTC	abel801	This was a mistaken comment. The change is actually a fix to the footways that were not connected.

31215148 by knarfrank	1	2015-05-17 22:49:31 UTC	ndm	The previous name was as surveyed -- Wikipedia is not the standard -- please revert this. Note a quick search would have found https://www.flickr.com/photos/51321219@N02/9656442109/
	2	2015-05-18 08:12:10 UTC	knarfrank	Burton's Almshouses was destroyed, I'm pretty sure they were erected at the same time, hence the plaque.
	3	2015-05-18 08:15:07 UTC	knarfrank	http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v078/bg078119.pdf Apparently it was build ages before, i was told that they were built at the same time... hey ho.

30980257 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:00:21 UTC	ndm	Do these all have 20mph signs? I know a lot of cul-de-sacs don't.
	2	2015-05-11 23:41:55 UTC	ndm	Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match?
	3	2015-05-12 02:04:55 UTC	hormpanther9	All roads in North Bristol have limits on them. They are all 20mph, unless otherwise stated
	4	2015-05-12 20:52:18 UTC	ndm	No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to m...

30980008 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:12:15 UTC	ndm	I think the grit bin's accidentally been "snapped" to the junction?
	2	2015-05-11 23:46:32 UTC	ndm	My bad -- disregard the above
	3	2015-05-12 10:23:28 UTC	SomeoneElse	Actually, I'm guessing that it doesn't have a name (and if it does it isn't "Grit Bin"). A tag of "amenity=grit_bin" will allow any map that wants to render it to do so - there's no need to give it a name too if it doesn't have one. Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

30980076 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:32:56 UTC	ndm	I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking?

30980133 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:05:46 UTC	ndm	Not convinced this needs a name?
	2	2015-05-12 02:01:47 UTC	hormpanther9	Identifying benches is handy I think because some people like using benches, also it's handy if they are infirm
	3	2015-05-12 10:25:20 UTC	SomeoneElse	(as with the grit bins) "amenity=bench" says "this is a bench". There's no need to create a "name" for it too.

30980211 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:03:17 UTC	ndm	Not convinced that this needs a name? There's a German post http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Shmias/diary/34965 about a tree called Tree
	2	2015-05-12 02:03:28 UTC	hormpanther9	I don't understand. I tagged a grit bin here, because in winter people often look for grit bins

30753386 by DaveF	1	2015-05-03 23:21:46 UTC	ndm	Didn't have any signage visible from the road, but I guess its Gordano RFC not Gardano RFC?

29874109 by UniofBath	1	2015-03-31 19:57:39 UTC	ndm	Does OSM have permission to use the official OS map?
	2	2015-04-10 09:43:36 UTC	UniofBath	I think our usage is OK based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata.

28902788 by Rick Wiles	1	2015-02-17 23:23:18 UTC	ndm	Is this the right name?

28610548 by brtknr	1	2015-02-04 21:01:28 UTC	ndm	Not sure this needs the footways -- the inside of the Bearpit is already marked as pedestrian?
	2	2015-02-04 21:03:38 UTC	ndm	The scultpure's called Ursa -- I didn't mark it correctly when I added it -- will update.
	3	2015-02-04 21:20:02 UTC	brtknr	The reason why i added the footpath is because if you try and look for directions on OsmAnd app, it doesnt route you properly, adding footpath seems to solve the issue.
	4	2015-02-04 23:40:11 UTC	ndm	You should probably raise a bug with OsmAnd.
	5	2015-02-05 08:51:14 UTC	brtknr	It is not a bug, it is an incredibly difficult problem to navigate through a polygon. For consistency's sake, isn't it better if we have paths available to guide pedestrians rather than switching between polygons and lines to indicate paths?

28432320 by zmarties	1	2015-01-27 00:21:51 UTC	ndm	What's a sculpure? If I remember it rightly it's a vertical windmill/generator
	2	2015-01-27 20:02:58 UTC	zmarties	Sorry, typo for sculpture. Since the primary reason for this structure seems to be to look attractive, I think it's best mapped as that. (Windmill is certainly the wrong tag - that's for historic mills. Given the poor design, and the sheltered location, I don't think this is realistically for pow...

28369938 by Welshie	1	2015-01-24 12:01:56 UTC	ndm	Were these surveyed? Do they need a source:name OS_Locator? Maybe a source Bing as well?

28353922 by Toffer12	1	2015-01-23 19:15:53 UTC	ndm	Good to see some North Bristol updates I'd already added a swing gate on Highwood Lane where you added a gate so I merged them. I was also a bit confused about having swing gates on the administrative boundary near the airfield -- does that make sense?
	2	2015-01-24 09:42:52 UTC	Toffer12	Ah, fooey! That gate was supposed to have been placed on the road not the boundary! I'm surprised that Josm didn't come up with a validation warning. I'll have to add that to the software.

27976858 by Alexxrr	1	2015-01-07 22:53:30 UTC	ndm	Not entirely convinced this is a great improvement -- a lot has disappeared (missing "building=yes"). The "front-line" doesn't look very straight?
	2	2015-01-08 00:14:21 UTC	ndm	Ok, looks like Bing imagery has shifted since I sketched it -- I'll add the building tags and hopefully a few improvements :-)
	3	2015-01-08 09:28:28 UTC	Alexxrr	Hi I hope it's all right now. I just wanted to name the new pub Kongs, and ensure that it and the King William were correctly shown as extending through to Little King Street. I keep forgetting about ensuring I've set building=yes . I'll try remember that for future edits.

27922986 by al_t	1	2015-01-04 23:41:45 UTC	ndm	Any reason postal_code got deleted from Hotwell Road segments?
	2	2015-01-05 12:37:50 UTC	al_t	The postal_code value was just BS8, the outward code, so it seemed superfluous. To find if a segment is in a postal code area then I would use an is_in operation within a postal code boundary. There is a boundary=postal_code tag ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code ) a...
	3	2015-01-05 23:03:42 UTC	ndm	Roads in Bristol have postcodes they're on all the roadsigns -- should be easy to see when surveying -- don't worry I'll add back the lost information.

27288886 by ehm1806	1	2014-12-06 17:08:01 UTC	ndm	Has the construction finished? I'm surprised they've kept the "Bristol General Hospital" name -- I thought it was going to be appartments http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Luxury-flats-development-bringing-beauty-Bristol/story-21327175-detail/story.html
	2	2014-12-07 16:06:34 UTC	ehm1806	Hi, Thanks for your comment Actually I made a mistake and the development is called The General rather than Bristol General Hospital. http://www.cityandcountry.co.uk/developments/the-general-bristol/ I have now corrected it. They are apartments and they are still under construction ...
	3	2014-12-07 22:37:05 UTC	ndm	Great, that was quick -- I tend to add the construction area to remind myself that Bing might be out of date.

27285046 by Geomapper69	1	2014-12-06 11:00:19 UTC	ndm	Why did you move the camera -- it's not on the road it's on the eastern side checking downhill bus lane occupancy?