| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51145148 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-15 23:08:28 UTC | ndm | Pretty sure it's not a secondary road into the school -- they'd soon run out of pupils |
| 51075152 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-13 09:50:19 UTC | ndm | What's the change? |
| 51068280 by Hannahgib69 | 1 | 2017-08-12 23:20:27 UTC | southglos | HiThere's a pillar box already mapped about 50m further up Windmill Lane. Is this new one a duplicate, or is the original mispositioned?Cheers |
| 2 | 2017-08-13 09:49:03 UTC | ndm | I had a look on Bing -- the new one seems to be in a garden -- and the old one seems to block driveways :-) Note: the old one has more tags than just post_box. | |
| 51074561 by Steve Mapping | 1 | 2017-08-13 09:45:51 UTC | ndm | Good to see someone else mapping here -- wondered what "update" was?I added a "proposed:museum" tag somewhere over the hangar as it isn't opened yet -- probably doesn't show up in the renderer but might help to find it.I wonder if it might be good to add a general museum ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-13 14:14:07 UTC | Steve Mapping | I put heritage museum as they say industrial heritage museum on there web site. I did not mark the general site area as I am not sure of the area yet from out side the fence. should be opening soon. road to car park being put in at this time | |
| 50822942 by Joe Schwartz | 1 | 2017-08-04 22:27:28 UTC | ndm | Cheers for correcting that -- not my intention to be humorous at all. Ta. |
| 50680846 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-07-29 23:17:37 UTC | ndm | Thanks for the updates -- a changeset comment would have improved them -- and made them easier to understand. |
| 50653091 by uberchump | 1 | 2017-07-28 18:37:24 UTC | ndm | I think "name" is supposed to be an official name, ideally signposted -- this looks a bit more like a "description". Similarly, with some of the buildings too. |
| 50599639 by Richard Hanmer | 1 | 2017-07-26 21:27:04 UTC | ndm | Undeleted it.The random line is an address interpolation line -- it is a quick way to indicate a range of addresses. |
| 50464000 by AlanStans | 1 | 2017-07-21 22:49:34 UTC | ndm | Adding oneway to Avon Crescent seems odd -- sure it wasn't a week or so ago? And it has an exit in the opposite direction to the oneway. |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 06:45:13 UTC | AlanStans | It's definitely no entry from Cumberland road since they completed the road works by the create centre a couple of weeks ago. Will check later today if the whole thing is one way. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-22 09:44:14 UTC | ndm | Cheers -- I had a quick look at some photos from there last week (because of the new "cyclelane") and I can see a van pointing in the "wrong" direction -- but infuriatingly no good set of shots from the rest of it. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-22 16:19:56 UTC | DaveF | HiNow oneway:https://travelwest.info/metrobus/metrobus-build/spike-islandis this link now dug up?:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25683723Is the cycle contraflow painted lines or a segregated lane?Is this new cycle path open?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476337752 | |
| 5 | 2017-07-22 17:28:14 UTC | ndm | Photos from last week - note direction of parked van - https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/ | |
| 6 | 2017-07-22 18:04:29 UTC | AlanStans | Drove along today. Only change is painting at the south end and a no entry except cycles Just painted bike lane north bound at the junction for short distance, rest of road seems to be still two way. Link at North end unchanged.I have edited road to show only one way just at the southern end... | |
| 7 | 2017-07-22 18:06:32 UTC | AlanStans | Just noted cycle path for that bit exists, so should be good. | |
| 8 | 2017-07-22 18:07:52 UTC | AlanStans | Meaning the cycle path at south end of AVon cresent to allow cycles in. | |
| 9 | 2017-07-22 18:25:27 UTC | ndm | Cheers for that -- obviously an area to keep an eye on -- the Ashton Avenue Bridge is was open today too -- strangely no separate cycleway -- just a wideish pavement. | |
| 10 | 2017-07-22 20:07:09 UTC | AlanStans | The bus route from Ashton Bridge to Cumberland road has also been built (hence my move of the railway platform - yet to be rebuilt) but I cant work out how to draw a bus only route! | |
| 11 | 2017-07-22 20:42:36 UTC | DaveF | I've just added the route over Ashton Bridge. I've tweeted MetroBus to confirm that section's a guided busway: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509467560I took the tags from Cambridge except I've kept is a construction for now:www.openstreetmap.org/way/93272889 | |
| 12 | 2017-07-28 16:13:58 UTC | DaveF | Metrobus confirm this section is to be guided, but unclear of the extent. | |
| 50057641 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-21 06:24:05 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards |
| 2 | 2017-07-22 10:25:17 UTC | ndm | See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items. | |
| 50257850 by Rowland | 1 | 2017-07-13 20:48:06 UTC | DaveF | Hi againThe two landuse=industrial areas you've added appear to overlap existing areas & stretch into land own by other companies or is public land. If you have additional data could you add it to existing objects. |
| 2 | 2017-07-13 23:16:57 UTC | ndm | School would ideally use multipolygon.Nursing Home might not be a good match for a hospital -- there's a couple of different options documented in the wiki. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-15 13:20:05 UTC | Rowland | Per the source, the pound for the port after per there OS openmap local data. Will take a look at the multi polygons. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-15 21:31:47 UTC | DaveF | I'm unclear what you mean. I've looked at the OS Open Map - Local data for the area & see no boundary. Is there an on-line version of what you're using as data?Could you explain what 'Tayberry' is? Is it an editor or an importer? | |
| 5 | 2017-07-19 09:34:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507316742 is mistagged. It's tagged as a hospital, but the name suggests it's a nursing home. Have a look in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ for things like "nursing home" "care home" and "healthcare" and "social... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-19 13:03:27 UTC | DaveF | Social facility is probably what's required: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility | |
| 7 | 2017-07-19 20:51:16 UTC | ndm | I've redrawn from Bing and tagged as amenity=nursing_home as per JOSM defaults for "Nursing Home". | |
| 8 | 2017-07-19 20:55:11 UTC | ndm | I redrew Penny Brohn as well -- not sure about Bristol Port -- should at least be a relation? Probably needs extensive redrawing/reverting? | |
| 9 | 2017-07-20 09:39:38 UTC | DaveF | In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to meThe two main problems I have with the port is 1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area2) it does tie in ... | |
| 10 | 2017-07-20 12:11:27 UTC | DaveF | Correction: "it *doesn't* tie in " | |
| 11 | 2017-07-20 19:20:36 UTC | ndm | I walked the bridleway ~2 months ago -- it's outside of the fenced industrial area. I note the original industrial area is still "underneath" the larger -- as is the foreshore, part of the coastline/inlets and a wildlife corridor I added a while ago. | |
| 50277571 by gregmnewman | 1 | 2017-07-14 17:37:59 UTC | ndm | I think most of the royal_cyphers I've seen are uppercase -- but glad someone else is adding postbox refs -- and get Bristol a better percentage on http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ |
| 2 | 2017-07-14 18:55:18 UTC | gregmnewman | Will fix the couple i've added, I just selected from the dropdown, didnt think they looked right? | |
| 49928620 by ddd bbb | 1 | 2017-06-29 20:51:49 UTC | DaveF | HiBy "too prominent" are you referring to how it renders on the standard map? If so, could you reinstate it please. If it exists it can be mapped. If you feel the rendering isn't to your liking you can discuss it in the relevant forum: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-ca... |
| 2 | 2017-06-29 22:12:49 UTC | SK53 | Removing data is "mapping for the renderer": please don't do it. Someone took the time to transcribe the information from the plaque and enter it in OSM. This type of information is widely used elsewhere: for instance on the openplaques.org website. By removing it to make this area look th... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-29 22:34:18 UTC | ddd bbb | Firstly, sorry! I want the area to represent how people navigate - is there a way of keeping it there without it being rendered/removing house numbers nearby? Can it be put back? | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 21:30:35 UTC | ndm | I've reverted this changeset -- and tweaked it a bit in a separate one. | |
| 49129190 by hollium | 1 | 2017-05-31 18:04:08 UTC | ndm | Should Bellveue be Bellevue? |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 11:03:16 UTC | hollium | No. The Council renamed the bus stops to reflect the correct spelling of the road name. -HJ | |
| 3 | 2017-06-26 20:15:16 UTC | ndm | Sounds good, but one looked like a typo, the other one matches the road. | |
| 49401905 by Syvanne Aloni | 1 | 2017-06-09 22:12:04 UTC | ndm | Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now? |
| 2 | 2017-06-10 14:32:10 UTC | DaveF | Hi Syvanne Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_M... | |
| 3 | 2017-06-12 10:44:38 UTC | Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF,Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this? | |
| 4 | 2017-06-12 11:12:51 UTC | DaveF | Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-13 10:03:51 UTC | Syvanne Aloni | Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals... | |
| 6 | 2017-06-13 13:17:44 UTC | DaveF | HiWho did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_featuresI've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of... | |
| 7 | 2017-06-13 19:40:40 UTC | ndm | I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well b... | |
| 8 | 2017-06-13 22:38:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ).Best Regards... | |
| 49401043 by Syvanne Aloni | 1 | 2017-06-09 22:14:29 UTC | ndm | Not sure what adding a node with "hello" on it is for? |
| 49150454 by Stefano Chies | 1 | 2017-06-01 19:31:19 UTC | ndm | No courthouse here!Maps.me edits are public.I will delete this. |
| 48805860 by ndm | 1 | 2017-05-19 12:39:18 UTC | DaveF | Is it steps only to the North bank? Seems strange as it was meant to be a shared path. |
| 2 | 2017-05-19 22:39:02 UTC | ndm | Hopefully, I have some photos so I can disambiguate it -- I got keen yesterday to see how the GPS track looked compared to my original "by eye" sketch. More importantly I should have info on the south side to connect it to Finzel's reach and get better map routing -- and map a rather nice ... | |
| 48397599 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-05-05 20:00:09 UTC | ndm | FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491363532 housenumber looks like a copy-paste (can't tell from the sofa whether it's a housename or a street). |
| 48314851 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-05-01 20:38:38 UTC | ndm | My bad, the photo I've got has 4 stands -- must have been a narrow angle.The Pintxo restaurant must be new its website only lists Cornwall -- "Bistro La Barrique" was definintely there on 4 April. |
| 2 | 2017-05-01 21:46:18 UTC | DaveF | Yes, it's just opened: http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/brand-new-tapas-and-sherry-bar-pintxo-de-bath-brings-the-taste-of-spain-to-barton-street/story-30303404-detail/story.html | |
| 48279339 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-04-30 23:03:28 UTC | ndm | No need for FIXME: on photos here's no separating barrier between the cycleway(s) and the road on the High Street -- except at the ends.Working through a backlog of surveys -- will get to this in due course -- but thought it useful to flag up the one way promptly. |
| 48186273 by osm update | 1 | 2017-04-27 10:56:25 UTC | manoharuss | Hi osm update,This seems like automated edit to me with a custom script. Has this been discussed and documented? What is the source of this data?I have observed some issues with the edits.1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338794056/history is a node of a way on a remote area. I don't s... |
| 2 | 2017-04-27 12:03:12 UTC | althio | Hi,I agree with manoharuss on this changeset, dear user "osm update".It seems like you rely too heavily on nodes ids.I would also suggest you use better changeset comments.Moreover you could try to reduce the successive numbers of versions for only adding tags to one object.\... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-27 13:31:29 UTC | osm update | Hi, the source is http://min-go.hr/, but I've made a mistake in my script. I'm reverting changes. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-27 15:15:03 UTC | SomeoneElse | Apparantly an otherwise untagged node on a footpath near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339830304/history now sells LPG. Do I need to bring my own can?Regards,Andy(who as well as mapping footpaths moonlights for the Data Working Group) | |
| 5 | 2017-04-27 19:09:52 UTC | ndm | Umm, http://min-go.hr seems to be based on Google Maps? Wouldn't that taint data from it? | |
| 6 | 2017-04-28 07:17:57 UTC | osm update | No, it's not based on Google Maps. There are three json sources of information about gas stations and prices:- http://min-go.hr/cache/postajasve.json- http://min-go.hr/cache/vazeca-cijena.json- http://min-go.hr/api/web_api/web/obveznik | |
| 7 | 2017-04-28 15:36:39 UTC | SomeoneElse | You have been blocked because you are continue to mechanically edit data without discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 made clear the process that you must follow if you want to do this. The data that you have modified since this changeset will be reverted. Please re-read htt... | |
| 47993027 by Toub | 1 | 2017-04-21 22:57:07 UTC | ndm | Strange - when this was first added it had this name - then the original mapper removed it -- has a street name been added back now? Seems odd as there's already another Southampton Mews very close. |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 08:42:51 UTC | Toub | Oh, my bad!I have been there again this morning, and in fact this is not a street, but just a private residential parking.As I didn't see the inexistent street, I confused with the next street.Thanks for revealing my mistake!Now, should we just remove the street as in bing?https://... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-24 23:15:58 UTC | ndm | I guess you could mark it as service. It might even be the name you added -- but it would depend on the addresses of the buildings near it.I just commented as I could see what happened previously. | |
| 48003728 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-21 22:51:41 UTC | ndm | Great you're closing a lot of notes -- but they are so spread out -- are you actually checking them with a survey? |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 11:24:50 UTC | azzap | Yes, these are all places I have visited. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 19:38:14 UTC | ndm | Not many people got to UWE and UoB -- you're well-travelled. | |
| 48031445 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-04-22 19:25:59 UTC | ndm | Dave, thde wiki says "Set a node Node or draw as an area Area along the building outline." -- I know that isn't how you map them in Bath, but that's how I've mapped the a lot of the ones in Bristol -- it would be good to keep this one consistent. |
| 2 | 2017-04-29 13:24:53 UTC | DaveF | I think the wiki page needs expanding. Similar to schools, Universities & hospitals, a boundary around all elements owned by the pub seems the more detailed/accurate way to map.I've posted to the tagging forum: "Mapping pubs as full areas"Mapping pubs as full areas | |
| 3 | 2017-04-29 16:04:48 UTC | trigpoint | The biergarten tag is a little out of place. I suspect it is a pub beer garden.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en | |
| 48003577 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-21 22:49:13 UTC | ndm | Sorry, but this seems wrong - only walked this ~1 week ago and most of the old car park was still fenced off -- under construction? |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 11:47:33 UTC | azzap | Thanks you were right, i've corrected it now. The car park which was previously mapped no longer exists. This area is now fenced off and under construction. | |
| 48014501 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-21 22:39:04 UTC | ndm | Street is inside Building F? |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 11:56:13 UTC | azzap | I have modified F Block as it was mapped wrong, the Pedestrian street is in the right place. | |
| 47953705 by Jonny_no_5 | 1 | 2017-04-20 00:21:15 UTC | ndm | It was a good idea to join the nature reserve together where it was split by Bradley Stoke Way. Good to have some extra names for places as well.I liked the previous wood you deleted :-( I thought it was much clearer where trees actually are -- especially near Bailey's Court Road roundabout. I d... |
| 47915221 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-18 21:46:06 UTC | ndm | Is it really a tunnel? There's a bridge over it. |
| 47914951 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-18 21:41:50 UTC | ndm | Maybe the extra service=parking_aisle tag might be useful. |
| 47874097 by azzap | 1 | 2017-04-17 22:34:04 UTC | ndm | Don't think the a turn restriction will work without from/via/to? |
| 2 | 2017-04-19 20:27:19 UTC | DaveF | Is there a 'no_u_turn' sign? if not I don't think it should have a turn restriction. | |
| 47870661 by m4rkit | 1 | 2017-04-17 22:33:34 UTC | ndm | Thought it was asphalt? |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 10:52:24 UTC | m4rkit | Pretty sure it's concrete. I cycle it often and there is bumps every 10m or so at the joins | |
| 47520174 by p3et | 1 | 2017-04-06 23:00:27 UTC | ndm | Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice:"This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 10:00:08 UTC | p3et | Thanks for the hint. I'll ask them for permission. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-08 12:56:07 UTC | trigpoint | The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if ... | |
| 47519444 by p3et | 1 | 2017-04-06 23:00:20 UTC | ndm | Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice:"This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ... |
| 47178068 by cdavila | 1 | 2017-03-26 21:32:39 UTC | DaveF | HiWhat is the source of knowledge for your numerous & widespread maxheight edits? |
| 2 | 2017-03-26 23:25:03 UTC | ndm | As above. Plus, 11'9'' is a perfectly acceptable maxheight -- there is no need to convert it (approiximately) to metres -- should only map what is signed. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-27 14:31:06 UTC | cdavila | The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one.@ndm: you are right, but meters is the default va... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-28 11:32:24 UTC | DaveF | Ah, I understand you now. I thought you were moving tags, but you're in fact interpreting them to add additional ones. Unsure if hgv=no on a way is required when there's a maxheight on the entrance, but does no harm, I suppose. Cheers. | |
| 46548006 by hollium | 1 | 2017-03-03 21:06:12 UTC | ndm | Pretty sure that's not its name - walked past it yesterday |
| 2 | 2017-03-20 21:02:24 UTC | hollium | It's not called 'vacant' but not sure what else to call it - it's certainly not the sports café any more. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-20 21:47:40 UTC | ndm | The signs on the outside say "Sports Cafe" -- it's tagged as disused:amenity=cafe. | |
| 46495017 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-03-01 21:27:54 UTC | ndm | Cheers for that |
| 46472775 by DaveF | 1 | 2017-03-01 00:41:22 UTC | ndm | I use building POIs when I know a housename/number but don't know exactly where it is -- bad GPS / ropey photo. Obviously the ways drawn from Bing may/may not correspond to them. I do merge them when I get a good re-survey. I'll probably add a FIXME to the Bristol ones -- assuming this was a KR exer... |
| 2 | 2017-03-01 14:36:36 UTC | DaveF | HiKR was flagging the duplicate building tags. building isn't required to get housenumber/name to render. I've readded the fixme tags. I'm unsure why I deleted them.U | |
| 46428305 by Dave Drury | 1 | 2017-02-26 23:39:31 UTC | ndm | If you're interested in speed limits -- maybe add maxspeed : "20 mph" to the highway -- presumably "Friendship Road". There's a speed limit map at http://product.itoworld.com/map/5?lon=-2.57477&lat=51.43518&zoom=15&fullscreen=true -- but it takes a while to update. |
| 46133166 by ChrisHodgesUK | 1 | 2017-02-16 20:08:27 UTC | ndm | Has this been surveyed directly? The source URL you've quoted on "Sainsbury's Local" links to a Google map. |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 20:19:04 UTC | ChrisHodgesUK | I've been there in person (with my GPS running). The source link was where I obtained the hours and phone number; noscript blocked the google map so I didn't know it was there until @ndm told me | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 22:47:38 UTC | ndm | Great. | |
| 46133082 by ChrisHodgesUK | 1 | 2017-02-16 20:12:20 UTC | ndm | Has this been surveyed directly -- if it exists but is disused it shouldn't be deleted, but simply changed to disused:amenity.Is the "Frome Valley Voice" a suitable source of copyright info for OpenStreetmap? |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 20:15:16 UTC | ChrisHodgesUK | ndm the shell of the building has been turned into flats (personal observation -- I pass it every day). There's no trace of a pub any more. Not sure what copyright has to do with it -- I was citing it as a source of information not copying anything (maybe that's too much of a Wikipedia viewpoint)\... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 22:47:03 UTC | ndm | Great. Was a bit confused -- when I upload from Josm I use source=survey for items I mapped from a visit/GPS & source=Bing for tracing outlines, etc. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-20 13:03:46 UTC | ChrisHodgesUK | @ndm I'll try to do that in the future -- as you can see I'm only an occasional contributor so don't necessarily have a feel for the done thing here | |
| 46055898 by Terrypugh | 1 | 2017-02-13 20:55:22 UTC | ndm | It's a bit redundant to add a name that duplicates the tag -- but good to get it mapped. |
| 45963639 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2017-02-11 14:00:26 UTC | ndm | Probably was postal_code? |
| 2 | 2017-02-11 15:33:02 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | might have meant to be, but BS10 is not even the post code for Ash Walk, the post code is BS10 6RW, maybe it was postal_district? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-11 23:12:32 UTC | ndm | All Bristol roads are sgned with postal codes, e.g. BS10. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-12 14:07:34 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | That might make sense, thanks for fixing this. | |
| 45944065 by DINEamics | 1 | 2017-02-09 23:08:36 UTC | ndm | Not sure why you've deleted a landuse area in the UK. Was that intentional? |
| 2 | 2017-06-18 11:59:04 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49633609 where the changeset comment is: revert SEO edit | |
| 45838299 by Dave Drury | 1 | 2017-02-05 21:18:11 UTC | DaveF | Hi DaveWelcome back.OK there appears to be a couple of problems.This way isn't attached to airpor road:thttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472391353For turn restrictions the best thing is to read this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restrictionSpecifically members. from>via&... |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 23:16:48 UTC | ndm | The "restriction" tag won't do what you want unfortunately. You can always add a note on the OSM webpage if you need a hand / drop an OSM mail. Good to see some South Bristol editing. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-06 08:47:32 UTC | Dave Drury | Hi there NDM. I may have broken something here. IT would be great it you could help me to fix it. I was trying to ensure that it wasn't possible to turn right into Airport Road out of this junction as I was directed this way using a SatNav that takes data from OSM. However, thinking on it, it is... | |
| 45823845 by Dave Drury | 1 | 2017-02-05 23:06:29 UTC | ndm | I don't think area on it's own will show much? |
| 45654614 by Welshie | 1 | 2017-01-30 21:43:39 UTC | ndm | Interested in where you got open data from Bristol City Council on 20 mph limits with a good licence for OSM? Since this isn't from a survey, perhaps there should be a source:maxspeed tag as well? |
| 45628300 by btswrr3 | 1 | 2017-01-29 21:58:42 UTC | ndm | This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check? |
| 2 | 2017-01-30 17:04:25 UTC | pitscheplatsch | In particular this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449579231For more details see: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45628300 | |
| 3 | 2017-02-12 00:44:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | I've restored things back to something approaching normality (specifically the sports pitches and footways were OK, and I've reverted the school to the edubase geometry and added buildings).It was actually not this changeset, but another one by a different mapper, that "lost" the school ... | |
| 45434736 by Stefan Frick | 1 | 2017-01-24 21:52:43 UTC | ndm | The way you've tagged with "water" is part of a multipolygon relation which has an inside and an outside, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250536. The relation is marked as "dock" which is probably closer to a floating harbour than "just water".I expect t... |
| 45164183 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2017-01-15 16:23:23 UTC | ndm | Not a description - it is a prominent name in addition to logos/branding. I have added a note that the name needs to be (re)surveyed. Could you please add such notes in the future; unless you've directly surveyed it. |
| 2 | 2017-01-15 23:59:59 UTC | Mike Baggaley | In hindsight, it would have been better if I had moved Post Office to the brand tag instead of just removing it. I will go back and set the brand tag. I believe the correct name should be <something> Post Office, not just Post Office on its ownCheers,Mike | |
| 3 | 2017-01-16 00:22:06 UTC | ndm | I was finishing up an edit on this road -- and found a couple of relevant photos. Have updated the name. | |
| 45100512 by delineator | 1 | 2017-01-15 16:07:49 UTC | ndm | Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap. |
| 45193301 by ioangogo | 1 | 2017-01-15 16:02:48 UTC | ndm | Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap. |
| 2 | 2017-01-15 16:33:49 UTC | DaveF | Is the A38 - A370 part of the opening?Is it being classified as a trunk road? | |
| 3 | 2017-01-15 16:37:52 UTC | DaveF | Why have you deleted the foot & cycle paths? | |
| 44241074 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-12-07 21:05:42 UTC | ndm | I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this? |
| 44242482 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-12-07 20:56:06 UTC | ndm | Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this? |
| 2 | 2016-12-07 23:08:37 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Apologies if I have misinterpreted this junction. I was adding sidewalk=none to clarify why the road had no foot access. In looking at the junction, I did not think there was any kerb between the two directions of traffic, so considered that the correct mapping was to only have a single highway show... | |
| 43725167 by John Parfitt | 1 | 2016-11-17 23:08:29 UTC | ndm | Great to see someone else adding stuff -- I tweaked your edit a tiny bit -- no point in calling a tree "Tree". |
| 43725183 by Rickey Skizzles | 1 | 2016-11-17 22:52:29 UTC | ndm | It's usually better to remodel buildings by splitting them, rather than deleting and creating two new ones -- a number of tags on the Greggs (not Gregs) have been lost. |
| 2 | 2016-11-17 23:03:12 UTC | ndm | No worries, added back the tags. | |
| 43731920 by Tim Rawling | 1 | 2016-11-17 22:48:44 UTC | ndm | Are you sure about the changes to the junction near "The Cross Hands" -- especially which roads can turn to/from "Lawn Road". A quick check on Bing looks closer to the previous layout -- especially the now deleted traffic islands. |
| 43714188 by ShakyBakey | 1 | 2016-11-16 23:47:45 UTC | ndm | H M Prison (Bristol) is already mapped |
| 42832506 by mescolar | 1 | 2016-10-12 22:51:54 UTC | ndm | Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location |
| 42739747 by UMC | 1 | 2016-10-09 23:20:20 UTC | ndm | Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM? |
| 42136443 by ndm | 1 | 2016-09-14 12:03:24 UTC | DaveF | Is this recycling centre open to the public or just for the authority to sort household waste?would it benefit from a 'recycling_type=centre' tag? |
| 2 | 2016-09-14 19:09:54 UTC | ndm | Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a comp... | |
| 3 | 2016-09-15 22:11:19 UTC | DaveF | Yes, i saw what was edited before you, but he tagged it as Bristol Waste Company & if you google it: http://www.bristolwastecompany.co.uk/It appears it's recycling, nut unsure if it's for the public to drop stuff off. Note they use OSM in their small map. | |
| 41800048 by Berkovskyy | 1 | 2016-08-30 19:48:12 UTC | ndm | Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign. |
| 2 | 2016-09-01 02:38:32 UTC | Berkovskyy | Yeah, I love Bristol pubs.As far as I remember the only place where "POT at WOT" name can be found is the pub sign. Most other walls, signs and labels have "Post Office Tavern" written on them. This is why I have changed the name to "Post Office Tavern" which I think ... | |
| 41717216 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-08-26 21:35:41 UTC | ndm | Are you sure this is correct? I thought that the whole point was that cyclists don't need to enter the roundabout -- check it out on Bing. A "Fixing roundabouts" changeset comment would've been really useful too. Cheers. |
| 2 | 2016-08-26 23:27:58 UTC | Mike Baggaley | I did use Bing to fix the roundabout, to separate the cycleway and road points where they meet the roundabout. The previous entry already touched the roundabout at the same point as the road. From Bing I would say you could draw that part of the roundabout several ways. The original violates the jun... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-27 10:24:52 UTC | ndm | Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits. | |
| 41725553 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-08-27 10:10:08 UTC | ndm | Had to tweak it a tad -- both lanes were bus only. |
| 41717138 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-08-26 21:38:54 UTC | ndm | Are you sure this is correct? Buses on separated bus lane can no longer enter the roundabout. A changeset comment would be good too. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2016-08-26 23:12:29 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hopefully now improved - I was confused as the bus routes were showing as down the right hand lane, not the left. I have also moved them to the left lane. Regards,Mike | |
| 41642619 by smb1001 | 1 | 2016-08-23 19:42:00 UTC | ndm | Are you sure that the preschool really takes up all that area? |
| 2 | 2016-08-24 08:37:55 UTC | smb1001 | you're right -- I have gotten over-excited there. I've reverted it, thanks. | |
| 41512790 by Tim Rawling | 1 | 2016-08-17 15:44:12 UTC | DaveF | Hi TimI'm struggling to be convinced Mangotsfield is a village: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MangotsfieldThe tags location is taken from: http://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=51.48596&lon=-2.49834 |
| 2 | 2016-08-18 00:31:36 UTC | ndm | I'm more upset that my wikipedia link insn't on the new location :-( | |
| 41516672 by Megadyptes | 1 | 2016-08-18 00:16:11 UTC | ndm | /the data source you're using isn't great I can see houses joined together that should be separate and separate buildings that should be joined together. You'll get better results tracing from Bing. |
| 41491075 by Matt Chapman | 1 | 2016-08-16 19:42:10 UTC | ndm | Hi Matt, rejigged your edit -- addresses won't get rendered visibly -- hope it's reasonable, if not let me know, or give it a tweak. |
| 41464626 by serendipity | 1 | 2016-08-15 22:55:42 UTC | ndm | Layer -1?Is it really disused -- are the rails visible? |
| 2 | 2016-08-16 07:53:52 UTC | serendipity | I was there recently (Aug 2016). There are no rails visible. Both ends are bricked up. | |
| 41223097 by Christian Ledermann | 1 | 2016-08-03 23:09:58 UTC | ndm | I'm sure you're keen for feedback:The school (building) was already mapped and named -- this wasn't "fixed".leading to duplication?There was no need for the school area to be a multipolygonThe school multipolygon was inaccurate and overlapped theresidential multipolygon and wou... |
| 40968898 by Henreko | 1 | 2016-07-23 19:01:29 UTC | ndm | Why did you mark the area as industrial -- it's being redeveloped which is why it was marked as construction, as a hint not to use aerial imagery to draw buildings. |
| 2 | 2016-07-23 22:12:29 UTC | Henreko | oh right, didn't notice that | |
| 40350206 by ndm | 1 | 2016-06-28 18:42:39 UTC | ndm | Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing). |
| 40131159 by Instantcars | 1 | 2016-06-20 23:05:28 UTC | ndm | This looks like a duplicate, albeit with different postcode and minor differences.Maps.me won't show until a new data download becomes available -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits |
| 39606886 by Ned600 | 1 | 2016-05-29 22:42:52 UTC | ndm | I've added back the footpath you deleted -- no worries. |
| 39582072 by John Blake | 1 | 2016-05-27 22:17:58 UTC | ndm | You seem to have accidentally moved a node on Church Road? |
| 2 | 2016-05-28 06:50:12 UTC | John Blake | Not to my knowledge. I added a mail box on the opposite side of High street, that's all. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-28 13:41:57 UTC | ndm | FYI the moved node is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1003112566#map=18/51.45025/-2.52039 -- I'll move it back based on Bing if that's ok. | |
| 39605654 by uberchump | 1 | 2016-05-27 22:20:24 UTC | ndm | I think you meant addr:housename not addr:housenumber and Depot not Depo? |
| 39544699 by John Blake | 1 | 2016-05-24 22:40:36 UTC | ndm | If it's Edward the 8th -- you could mark it with royal_cypher=EVIII. Easier to parse programmatically, than a description. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:royal_cypher |
| 39069196 by Chris Tothill | 1 | 2016-05-10 20:07:04 UTC | ndm | Has the "private road" sign been taken down? If not, then it should be marked as private. |
| 38852367 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-04-25 21:23:26 UTC | ndm | Not clear how deleting the names from the driveway improves OpenStreetmap -- maybe replacing the & with a ; might have been better. Or adding a note for local mappers.Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment. |
| 2 | 2016-04-25 22:35:11 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Apologies. These names are not the names of highways, they are the names of buildings.hence the deletion from the highway. There are others nearby that I moved the name to addr:housename, but must have omitted this one. | |
| 38852527 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2016-04-25 21:22:04 UTC | ndm | Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment. |
| 38579271 by Ewen Hill | 1 | 2016-04-15 21:38:08 UTC | ndm | You have connected roads together that don't join in reality -- ignoring the square between them. |
| 38348203 by Kerschtin | 1 | 2016-04-06 18:44:59 UTC | ndm | This doesn't exist -- I will delete it. |
| 38276411 by The Maarssen Mapper | 1 | 2016-04-06 18:44:11 UTC | ndm | This looks wrong -- surely boundary should be "midway" between Steep Holm and Flat Holm (as it's Welsh). |
| 2 | 2016-04-06 18:55:02 UTC | The Maarssen Mapper | The admin boundaries and the e/w boundary are derived from official sources with lat/lon coordinates. It is certainly an anomaly, but I am pretty sure it is correct. | |
| 38331822 by Kerschtin | 1 | 2016-04-05 22:45:46 UTC | ndm | Hope you don't mind -- I deleted the Barclays -- I think you might have confused it with the one on Queens Avenue? |
| 38126459 by txlaparta | 1 | 2016-03-28 22:58:35 UTC | ndm | Please dont load inaccurate polygons -- there are a number of duplicates here that are worse than the original data, e.g. don't have housenames, etc. Also, it would be great if you could use https://translate.google.com/ to get an english changeset comment. |
| 2 | 2016-03-28 22:59:03 UTC | ndm | Por favor, no carga polígonos inexactas - hay una serie de duplicados aquí que son peores que los datos originales, por ejemplo, no tienen housenames, etc. Además, sería estupendo si pudiera utilizar https://translate.google.com/ obtener una reacción de cambios Ing... | |
| 38091882 by DaveF | 1 | 2016-03-27 11:18:49 UTC | ndm | Apologies for that -- I was trying to connect up the traffic lights tidily. |
| 37850221 by tcdiosm | 1 | 2016-03-15 19:00:02 UTC | ndm | http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway doesn't seem to be a valid URL?What rights do we have to use this source on OSM? |
| 2 | 2016-03-15 19:05:43 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | no idea about this edits or rights, but the correct url is probably http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway.html | |
| 3 | 2016-03-16 17:03:23 UTC | tcdiosm | My apologies for not giving the full URL , I shall do so in future. I was hoping that contributors to OSM would be inquisitive enough to research this resource for themselves and read further; it is a minefield but useful.I have used the online map of local authorities as a resource to check the ... | |
| 4 | 2016-03-16 17:22:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | (as a brief aside on "footpath" and "bridleway" tagging):I'd use "highway=footway" for something that looks like a footpath; "highway=bridleway" for something that looks like a bridleway (typically "has gates instead of stiles and horse poo on the groun... | |
| 5 | 2016-03-16 17:38:45 UTC | tcdiosm | definitive information from the authority gives us the legal status. A horse rider would be in the wrong to use a footpath. Yes many tracks look wide enough for a 4x4 but that does not give them the right to use it. We must be careful to provide accurate information, landowners also have rights and... | |
| 6 | 2016-03-16 17:44:49 UTC | SomeoneElse | @tcdiosm if you're replying to me, I'm confused :) | |
| 7 | 2016-03-16 17:57:13 UTC | tcdiosm | sorry new to the Forum.Hope this will make it clearer.FootpathPublic footpaths are public rights of way on foot.BridlewayPublic bridleways are public rights of way on foot, or leading or riding a beast of burden (e.g. a horse). Cyclists may also use bridleways, but must give way to rid... | |
| 8 | 2016-03-16 18:14:24 UTC | SomeoneElse | @tcdiosm The point that I was trying to make was that for example "highway=footway" does not indicate the legal status of access. It just means "used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians". There are permissive footways, and private ones.In order to indicate that something is ... | |
| 9 | 2016-03-16 19:13:58 UTC | ndm | Dear tcdiosm, thanks for the details on sources, etc. -- I'm always interested when someone remarks that they're copying another map (doesn't help that I can never remember which Ordnance Survey products have which licence, etc).Have fun mapping,Neil | |
| 37758527 by southglos | 1 | 2016-03-12 00:18:21 UTC | ndm | I only added Windsor Place a couple of days ago -- did I miss a 20 mph sign? Did you survey it? I've been assuming that there should only be a maxspeed if there's an sign, as it's not an explcit 20 mph zone. |
| 2 | 2016-03-12 11:40:14 UTC | southglos | Hi. It's an assumption, based on the fact that it's a residential road hanging off a 20mph road, within the Inner South Bristol 20mph zone.More info at http://www.bristol20mph.co.uk but as a summary: The 20mph pilot area at Inner South Bristol came into operation in 2010. Every road within the p... | |
| 3 | 2016-03-12 22:12:36 UTC | ndm | I'd have less objection if it was signed as a 20 mph zone -- then you could make "safe" assumptions about the roads inside. However, it's probably ok. | |
| 14581473 by ndm | 1 | 2016-03-05 19:39:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200232398/history has "boat=yes;no" on it. Presumably that's as a result of a previous merge (probably before you edited it) but do you know what is correct here? |
| 2 | 2016-03-06 22:01:26 UTC | ndm | I'm guessing it should be no, but that's looking at the adjacent river segments -- it's been ~3 years, probably due a survey? | |
| 3 | 2016-03-06 22:06:08 UTC | SomeoneElse | Yes - makes sense to me. I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/524167 . | |
| 37491450 by ndm | 1 | 2016-02-27 23:32:31 UTC | ndm | Changeset comment should be postboxes. |
| 37148710 by helenwallis | 1 | 2016-02-11 19:58:15 UTC | ndm | Seems to be a duplicate -- the building is already present with the company name. |
| 36839773 by southglos | 1 | 2016-01-28 00:36:35 UTC | ndm | Might also add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378568950 ?Think this is a recent addition. |
| 36704703 by ImaxLighting Ltd | 1 | 2016-01-21 01:08:44 UTC | ndm | Good to see a new contributor.Howabout "addr:place=Brislington", "addr:city=Bristol"?Not sure why there's a way and a node? Normally the same feature is supposed to only be mapped once. |
| 2 | 2016-01-22 09:21:02 UTC | ImaxLighting Ltd | Thank you, indeed one of my "101" mishaps. Thank you for the suggestion I shall fix it shortly Best Regards | |
| 36342067 by mahahahaneapneap | 1 | 2016-01-04 22:24:53 UTC | ndm | Is there a good description for this changeset? |
| 36342182 by mahahahaneapneap | 1 | 2016-01-04 22:24:41 UTC | ndm | Is there a good description for this changeset? |
| 36342335 by mahahahaneapneap | 1 | 2016-01-04 22:24:30 UTC | ndm | Is there a good description for this changeset? |
| 25849135 by ndm | 1 | 2015-12-10 10:34:10 UTC | SK53 | Aztec West is not a village in any usual sense of the word. I think it would be better just to name the area of the Aztec West business park. |
| 2 | 2015-12-10 20:37:27 UTC | ndm | >1000 people, church, doctor, newsagent, 2 different coffee chains, Hotel, pub, ponds...Not entirely clear where Hempton Court, The Quadrant and the rest of the part split.Signage is "Aztec West" not "Aztec West business park".It's the same as "Cribbs Causeway... | |
| 3 | 2015-12-10 21:33:56 UTC | SK53 | Yes I know its called Aztec West, I have worked there over the years, but unless it's changed a lot it is not a residential area. Lots of industrial/business areas have churches: I can think of over 10 in Nottingham, but it doesnt make them villages. | |
| 26558508 by ndm | 1 | 2015-11-22 21:49:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi - some buildings here have been added as "building=y#" - I'm guessing that that should be building=yes?http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311168535 is one example - the two to the south are too. |
| 2 | 2015-11-24 00:29:15 UTC | ndm | Well spotted -- definitely not intended -- will modify asap. | |
| 34997463 by ndm | 1 | 2015-11-20 21:12:30 UTC | RobJN | Hi ndm,Thanks for resolving these one-ways. Please don't forget to mark any that you complete as "fixed" using the Traffic Flow Direction plugin so that others don't have to go over the same place. I've marked these fixed now :-)Cheers,Rob |
| 2 | 2015-11-21 20:14:00 UTC | ndm | For these I just used the website and JOSM (no plugin) -- couldn't see any way to mark it as done (even now I have the plugin installed). | |
| 35008867 by karussell | 1 | 2015-11-01 22:39:15 UTC | ndm | You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton. |
| 2 | 2015-11-01 22:45:07 UTC | ndm | Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes. | |
| 35021225 by karussell | 1 | 2015-11-01 22:36:26 UTC | ndm | You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton. |
| 2 | 2015-11-01 22:44:03 UTC | ndm | Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-02 00:12:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | ... and (re the MGW) note that most UK weight limits are actually MGW limits. It's rare to see _actual_ wieght limits (though they do exist, over weak bridges etc.). | |
| 35009470 by karussell | 1 | 2015-11-01 22:38:47 UTC | ndm | You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton. |
| 35008212 by karussell | 1 | 2015-11-01 22:30:19 UTC | ndm | So you removed my maxweight "not heavy" -- how do you consider one should map a road that's marked as "Unsuitable for heavy vehicles" -- a common UK sign? Obviously hgv:no doesn't work -- psv *might* be heavy. |
| 2 | 2015-11-02 08:34:14 UTC | karussell | Sorry, I've reverted and put the hgv:no on the list. That is indeed an ugly sign :)Please see my steps which leads to the removal action here:https://karussell.wordpress.com/2015/11/01/units-in-openstreetmap/ | |
| 34861444 by Al-66 | 1 | 2015-10-25 23:39:00 UTC | ndm | There seems to be a tree in a building here -- looks odd? |
| 2 | 2015-10-26 10:29:11 UTC | Al-66 | You are right! I don't know how I did that. I must have dragged it from somewhere else. How do I undo it? | |
| 3 | 2015-10-26 21:32:07 UTC | ndm | No worries -- I deleted a whole A road once. Ok, reverted it using JOSM / Data -> Revert changeset | |
| 34860925 by Al-66 | 1 | 2015-10-25 23:35:12 UTC | ndm | This looks incorrect -- checking photos from last week there's only one lane in each direction -- are you counting cycle lanes? |
| 2 | 2015-10-26 10:35:02 UTC | Al-66 | I didn't put in the roads, but I did change the direction, The north-going road was on the east side, and I knew that was wrong. If you have accurate information would you please put it right. | |
| 34741397 by sce8 | 1 | 2015-10-19 19:10:03 UTC | ndm | Looks like a strange edit at south end of Filton Avenue. |
| 2 | 2015-10-19 20:01:28 UTC | sce8 | It was one I was doing as I was walking along with the intention of finishing it off when I got home, which I have just done. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-19 23:09:30 UTC | ndm | Haven't tried editting and walking -- hard enough to get reasonable photos -- looks good now, | |
| 34721297 by sce8 | 1 | 2015-10-18 23:04:15 UTC | ndm | Tarvery Carvery? |
| 2 | 2015-10-19 05:58:02 UTC | sce8 | Yep, spelling mistake and Josm was hanging, for some reason, at the time so I didn't notice. | |
| 34656040 by parks82 | 1 | 2015-10-15 21:54:56 UTC | ndm | Is it really called "Hardstanding"? Should it be something-like landuse: brownfield?Is it really called "Railway Land"? Should it be landuse: railway / operator: RailTrack |
| 34368161 by RFaith | 1 | 2015-10-01 23:06:11 UTC | ndm | 45 mph seems an odd number for maxspeed -- most roadsigns seem to be either 40/50 mph? |
| 2 | 2015-10-02 08:11:39 UTC | RFaith | True - it isn't a posted limit, but a personal assessment of how safe it would be at different speeds on this road. 50 is too fast in many places, 40 too slow in others. Motorbikes could go faster but for the surface, which limits bikes. It is an attempt to average the speed you'd manage on this roa... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-02 11:30:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hello RFaith, welcome to OpenStreetMap!For info, the "maxspeed" tag is used for the actual posted limit. Where there's an advisory (such as green signs for school areas) you can use "maxspeed:advisory" for those. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Related_key... | |
| 4 | 2015-10-02 15:47:28 UTC | RFaith | Hi Andy -I had another look at it this morning and realised that one of the roads listed as Tertiary in in fact a single-track access road to farms that also just happens to lead almost directly to the A4, which might explain why satnavs are so enthusiastic about it as a viable alternative (driv... | |
| 5 | 2015-11-20 11:42:33 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks for fixing (and sorry it took so long to reply!). | |
| 34147883 by beatrice jones | 1 | 2015-09-21 21:27:10 UTC | ndm | Please revert this changeset -- the Ice Rink and Cinema were closed years ago. The O2 nightclub is still present -- I walked past it tonight. Also see http://www.o2academybristol.co.uk/ |
| 34123844 by Ben Makin | 1 | 2015-09-19 22:49:28 UTC | ndm | Are you sure? I remember seeing the 41 sign along Farr's Lane which is why I added it. Will check when next in town. |
| 2 | 2015-09-21 17:35:04 UTC | Ben Makin | I went recently however they have temporarily moved the cycle route, my mistake, i shall fix the changes. The main change i made was adding the extension along the 33 (chocolate path) as when i cycled there i was expecting to see 33 signs but they were 41. | |
| 34126960 by beatrice jones | 1 | 2015-09-19 22:45:48 UTC | ndm | This looks like another "fantasy edit" -- please change this back -- the name on the outside of the building is "Bath Road Studios" -- see http://www.bathroadstudios.co.ukI know more than one company have offices inside. If you wish to indicate that ITV have an office inside ... |
| 33814626 by DaveF | 1 | 2015-09-05 18:03:57 UTC | ndm | Not convinced a car park is a place of worship -- well maybe to top gear fans :-) |
| 33472224 by mdt3k | 1 | 2015-08-20 22:17:16 UTC | ndm | Good to see some more builings being added. Shop, pub and other way outllines still need "building=yes" otherwise they won't render. |
| 2 | 2015-08-21 09:06:57 UTC | DaveF | HiI deleted the relations you created. They're not really required in this instance - ways can be overlaid, & it's difficult to to see things such as the playground if hidden in a relation. | |
| 32831079 by Max-- | 1 | 2015-07-23 22:50:00 UTC | ndm | Not very clear why the park and fence are now railway abandoned? |
| 32674274 by abel801 | 1 | 2015-07-16 19:49:37 UTC | ndm | Did you survey this?I think the road you've changed is one of two that are part of the entrance to an underground carpark?Better to add a note or a FIXME? |
| 2 | 2015-07-16 19:51:19 UTC | ndm | Note there's a FIXME on the apex that indicating that the road should "continue" | |
| 3 | 2015-07-16 22:01:04 UTC | abel801 | Thank you for your observation, I am sure what you suggest is true for that reason I reverted to the previous status. | |
| 32676424 by RichRico | 1 | 2015-07-16 19:46:29 UTC | ndm | Did you survey this?I think it's a bad idea to treat private roads as impossible -- often there's a direction indicator on the public highway -- but without clear satellite imagery it can't be completely mapped. Better to add a note or a FIXME. |
| 2 | 2015-07-17 08:41:38 UTC | SomeoneElse | All an "impossible" oneway entrance road normally means is that someone hasn't mapped the corresponding exit yet. It makes sense for a QA site to highlight this as something needing surveying, but you shouldn't just remove the data that caused the QA entry - it removes valid information f... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-21 21:42:01 UTC | RichRico | Thanks for the note. You're right, could be much better is add notes, and keep the oneway tag,in this case I reverted my changeset: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32786706) and I added a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/400894 | |
| 32472607 by Snake Sting | 1 | 2015-07-07 22:35:45 UTC | ndm | This sounds like you are using data from other sources: Ordnance Survey / Google Earth -- OSM doesn't allow copying. |
| 32412907 by Snake Sting | 1 | 2015-07-04 21:57:44 UTC | ndm | You haven't added tags to 358540486 - so it's still incomplete |
| 32155385 by inkena | 1 | 2015-06-23 22:15:34 UTC | ndm | Cheers for adding the building tag back -- and have fun with more mapping |
| 32147942 by inkena | 1 | 2015-06-22 22:25:47 UTC | ndm | Why did you delete "building=yes" -- Cabot Tower is no longer being rendered.Changing it to building=tower I could understand :-) |
| 2 | 2015-06-23 08:17:09 UTC | inkena | Hi there! Thanks for your comment! Sorry about that - I changed it to "building=yes" again. I guess I need some more practice... ;-) | |
| 31848476 by portishead_runner | 1 | 2015-06-10 00:43:09 UTC | ndm | You added a way without any tags -- would be a shame to lose any info. |
| 2 | 2015-06-10 08:27:06 UTC | portishead_runner | Sorry, just doing in a hurry. Public rights of way incorporating the Gordano Round route | |
| 31848439 by portishead_runner | 1 | 2015-06-10 00:41:08 UTC | ndm | Noticed you added a long way here with no tags? |
| 31814872 by Hilton Hotels | 1 | 2015-06-08 19:35:03 UTC | ndm | OSM we should map the world as it is -- this is signed as the Hilton Bristol -- checked as I was driving past tonight. Or change the sign :-) |
| 31745081 by brtknr | 1 | 2015-06-05 23:41:11 UTC | ndm | Comment could be more descriptive -- looks more like a speed limit change and adding "foot=yes".I'm not sure about the "foot=yes" access tag. There's always "sidewalk = left/right/both" might be less "legal" -- unless it really is a designated footpath? |
| 31696531 by Jay456 | 1 | 2015-06-03 19:51:57 UTC | ndm | I think it would better to remove the name -- it's confusing as the road's the Portway and even then it's not the whole length of the cycle track as you've marked it.I'll have a quick check on the w/end but I'm pretty sure that there's no signage indicating the cyclepath as Portway either? |
| 31321755 by abel801 | 1 | 2015-05-20 23:28:21 UTC | ndm | The comment doesn't really make it clear what's been fixed -- not many tigers or deltas in Eastville. |
| 2 | 2015-05-21 22:05:08 UTC | abel801 | I already changed the comment.Thank you for your observation. | |
| 3 | 2015-05-22 19:09:47 UTC | abel801 | This was a mistaken comment. The change is actually a fix to the footways that were not connected. | |
| 31215148 by knarfrank | 1 | 2015-05-17 22:49:31 UTC | ndm | The previous name was as surveyed -- Wikipedia is not the standard -- please revert this.Note a quick search would have found https://www.flickr.com/photos/51321219@N02/9656442109/ |
| 2 | 2015-05-18 08:12:10 UTC | knarfrank | Burton's Almshouses was destroyed, I'm pretty sure they were erected at the same time, hence the plaque. | |
| 3 | 2015-05-18 08:15:07 UTC | knarfrank | http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v078/bg078119.pdfApparently it was build ages before, i was told that they were built at the same time... hey ho. | |
| 30980257 by hormpanther9 | 1 | 2015-05-11 23:00:21 UTC | ndm | Do these all have 20mph signs? I know a lot of cul-de-sacs don't. |
| 2 | 2015-05-11 23:41:55 UTC | ndm | Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match? | |
| 3 | 2015-05-12 02:04:55 UTC | hormpanther9 | All roads in North Bristol have limits on them. They are all 20mph, unless otherwise stated | |
| 4 | 2015-05-12 20:52:18 UTC | ndm | No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to m... | |
| 30980008 by hormpanther9 | 1 | 2015-05-11 23:12:15 UTC | ndm | I think the grit bin's accidentally been "snapped" to the junction? |
| 2 | 2015-05-11 23:46:32 UTC | ndm | My bad -- disregard the above | |
| 3 | 2015-05-12 10:23:28 UTC | SomeoneElse | Actually, I'm guessing that it doesn't have a name (and if it does it isn't "Grit Bin"). A tag of "amenity=grit_bin" will allow any map that wants to render it to do so - there's no need to give it a name too if it doesn't have one.Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap! | |
| 30980076 by hormpanther9 | 1 | 2015-05-11 23:32:56 UTC | ndm | I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking? |
| 30980133 by hormpanther9 | 1 | 2015-05-11 23:05:46 UTC | ndm | Not convinced this needs a name? |
| 2 | 2015-05-12 02:01:47 UTC | hormpanther9 | Identifying benches is handy I think because some people like using benches, also it's handy if they are infirm | |
| 3 | 2015-05-12 10:25:20 UTC | SomeoneElse | (as with the grit bins) "amenity=bench" says "this is a bench". There's no need to create a "name" for it too. | |
| 30980211 by hormpanther9 | 1 | 2015-05-11 23:03:17 UTC | ndm | Not convinced that this needs a name? There's a German post http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Shmias/diary/34965 about a tree called Tree |
| 2 | 2015-05-12 02:03:28 UTC | hormpanther9 | I don't understand. I tagged a grit bin here, because in winter people often look for grit bins | |
| 30753386 by DaveF | 1 | 2015-05-03 23:21:46 UTC | ndm | Didn't have any signage visible from the road, but I guess its Gordano RFC not Gardano RFC? |
| 29874109 by UniofBath | 1 | 2015-03-31 19:57:39 UTC | ndm | Does OSM have permission to use the official OS map? |
| 2 | 2015-04-10 09:43:36 UTC | UniofBath | I think our usage is OK based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata. | |
| 28902788 by Rick Wiles | 1 | 2015-02-17 23:23:18 UTC | ndm | Is this the right name? |
| 28610548 by brtknr | 1 | 2015-02-04 21:01:28 UTC | ndm | Not sure this needs the footways -- the inside of the Bearpit is already marked as pedestrian? |
| 2 | 2015-02-04 21:03:38 UTC | ndm | The scultpure's called Ursa -- I didn't mark it correctly when I added it -- will update. | |
| 3 | 2015-02-04 21:20:02 UTC | brtknr | The reason why i added the footpath is because if you try and look for directions on OsmAnd app, it doesnt route you properly, adding footpath seems to solve the issue. | |
| 4 | 2015-02-04 23:40:11 UTC | ndm | You should probably raise a bug with OsmAnd. | |
| 5 | 2015-02-05 08:51:14 UTC | brtknr | It is not a bug, it is an incredibly difficult problem to navigate through a polygon. For consistency's sake, isn't it better if we have paths available to guide pedestrians rather than switching between polygons and lines to indicate paths? | |
| 28432320 by zmarties | 1 | 2015-01-27 00:21:51 UTC | ndm | What's a sculpure? If I remember it rightly it's a vertical windmill/generator |
| 2 | 2015-01-27 20:02:58 UTC | zmarties | Sorry, typo for sculpture. Since the primary reason for this structure seems to be to look attractive, I think it's best mapped as that. (Windmill is certainly the wrong tag - that's for historic mills. Given the poor design, and the sheltered location, I don't think this is realistically for pow... | |
| 28369938 by Welshie | 1 | 2015-01-24 12:01:56 UTC | ndm | Were these surveyed? Do they need a source:name OS_Locator? Maybe a source Bing as well? |
| 28353922 by Toffer12 | 1 | 2015-01-23 19:15:53 UTC | ndm | Good to see some North Bristol updatesI'd already added a swing gate on Highwood Lane where you added a gate so I merged them.I was also a bit confused about having swing gates on the administrative boundary near the airfield -- does that make sense? |
| 2 | 2015-01-24 09:42:52 UTC | Toffer12 | Ah, fooey! That gate was supposed to have been placed on the road not the boundary! I'm surprised that Josm didn't come up with a validation warning. I'll have to add that to the software. | |
| 27976858 by Alexxrr | 1 | 2015-01-07 22:53:30 UTC | ndm | Not entirely convinced this is a great improvement -- a lot has disappeared (missing "building=yes"). The "front-line" doesn't look very straight? |
| 2 | 2015-01-08 00:14:21 UTC | ndm | Ok, looks like Bing imagery has shifted since I sketched it -- I'll add the building tags and hopefully a few improvements :-) | |
| 3 | 2015-01-08 09:28:28 UTC | Alexxrr | HiI hope it's all right now.I just wanted to name the new pub Kongs, and ensure that it and the King William were correctly shown as extending through to Little King Street.I keep forgetting about ensuring I've set building=yes . I'll try remember that for future edits. | |
| 27922986 by al_t | 1 | 2015-01-04 23:41:45 UTC | ndm | Any reason postal_code got deleted from Hotwell Road segments? |
| 2 | 2015-01-05 12:37:50 UTC | al_t | The postal_code value was just BS8, the outward code, so it seemed superfluous. To find if a segment is in a postal code area then I would use an is_in operation within a postal code boundary. There is a boundary=postal_code tag ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code ) a... | |
| 3 | 2015-01-05 23:03:42 UTC | ndm | Roads in Bristol have postcodes they're on all the roadsigns -- should be easy to see when surveying -- don't worry I'll add back the lost information. | |
| 27288886 by ehm1806 | 1 | 2014-12-06 17:08:01 UTC | ndm | Has the construction finished? I'm surprised they've kept the "Bristol General Hospital" name -- I thought it was going to be appartments http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Luxury-flats-development-bringing-beauty-Bristol/story-21327175-detail/story.html |
| 2 | 2014-12-07 16:06:34 UTC | ehm1806 | Hi, Thanks for your commentActually I made a mistake and the development is called The General rather than Bristol General Hospital. http://www.cityandcountry.co.uk/developments/the-general-bristol/I have now corrected it. They are apartments and they are still under construction ... | |
| 3 | 2014-12-07 22:37:05 UTC | ndm | Great, that was quick -- I tend to add the construction area to remind myself that Bing might be out of date. | |
| 27285046 by Geomapper69 | 1 | 2014-12-06 11:00:19 UTC | ndm | Why did you move the camera -- it's not on the road it's on the eastern side checking downhill bus lane occupancy? |