OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

52873600 by ndm	1	2017-10-12 23:04:57 UTC	DaveF	This is a relocated pharmacy. The FHRS was for it's previous location. I'm in discussion with BANES about the inaccuracy of their database.
	2	2017-10-13 11:21:52 UTC	ndm	Sorry about that -- looked like a good match!

52756086 by BobC76	1	2017-10-09 12:15:33 UTC	ndm	You seem to be trying to change the map tagging to fix cycle routing - unless there's an obvious error or ommision this is considered bad practice. If routing software isn't working correctly please file a bug with its developers, rather than "tagging for the router".
	2	2017-10-09 16:34:23 UTC	DaveF	A bit blurred, but the bicycle symbol can just about be made out. http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/51.46386/-2.55220/esri Are there any bollards?
	3	2017-10-10 15:30:33 UTC	BobC76	Yes there are bollards - its not correctly designated as its not a "service road".
	4	2017-10-10 15:59:06 UTC	BobC76	See https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.463917,-2.5524246,3a,40y,93.04h,88.6t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqckQXvkboX4-xjOMY_EFAA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 and https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4637059,-2.5513873,3a,75y,344.59h,98.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQeeUdXCJoOfKs9LIfT9fFg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 for the other side....
	5	2017-10-10 16:21:03 UTC	DaveF	From GSV there's a traffic sign on that way. Do you know what is says? Is there access into the rear of the pub for deliveries etc? I'm a bit surprised routers avoid it. Which one are you using? Try putting bicycle=designated on it.
	6	2017-10-10 19:03:16 UTC	ndm	You can't use Google Streetview as a source for OSM https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps Other maps have their own copyright and shouldn't be copied. If it's useable for a brewery delivery, then it should probably remain as a service. If ...
	7	2017-10-10 19:32:02 UTC	DaveF	I don't think anyone's using GSV to map.
	8	2017-10-10 20:28:52 UTC	ndm	Uploaded photo from original 2016 mapping to flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/37364060580/in/dateposted-public/
	9	2017-10-11 08:38:42 UTC	BobC76	Firstly, thanks for all the help, I am new to OSM and suggesting improvements. I walk/cycle the path daily and so not using GSM for anything other than a reference image for those not familiar with the area itself to see what we're debating. I've additionally raised an issue with the routing softwar...
	10	2017-10-11 10:58:51 UTC	DaveF	Given it's location I'm surprised the sign is orientated in that direction. Could it have been swivelled around? From the information given If I were mapping it I'd tag is as: highway=cycleway bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no surface=asphalt (cycle routers use surface to dete...

52743722 by rc0	1	2017-10-08 23:15:49 UTC	ndm	Not a building either.

52522951 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 20:23:36 UTC	DaveF	Hi Welcome to OSM Do you know how vehicles get to the camp site?
	2	2017-10-01 21:54:45 UTC	ndm	Be careful are you sure that there's a licence to use data from KnowYourPlace in OSM. Even diigitizing and ortho-correcting old maps is likely to generate a new copyrighted product.
	3	2017-10-01 22:34:03 UTC	AndyReid56	Hi, The road access comes under the railway and there is a gate at the north end of the campsite, roughly a hundred meters north of the bend. The land North of the campsite is under separate ownership, and currently used as a landfill site. There is a planning dispute between the owner of the cam...
	4	2017-10-01 23:20:41 UTC	ndm	No worries, you've probably saved people taking a spurious shortcut now.
	5	2017-10-04 12:53:34 UTC	DaveF	Hi For the extent it's accessible by vehicles (up to the farm?) the path would better tagged be tagged as highway=service. If it's a designated PROW (with signs?) then this tag is appropriate for it's full length. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation. I've added the farm, the only ...

52523659 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:04 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?
	2	2017-10-01 22:02:13 UTC	AndyReid56	Not sure what happened here. I made that comment for an earlier edit, and it has turned up on every edit I made.
	3	2017-10-01 22:28:23 UTC	ndm	No worries; I marked them all so I could see it might not match in the future. At least it wasn't empty or one character long -- which can be really hard to select if I'm using firefox on a phone.

52523994 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:12 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523790 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:08 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523555 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:55:01 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52523216 by AndyReid56	1	2017-10-01 21:54:57 UTC	ndm	Does the edit really match the comment?

52459779 by ndm	1	2017-09-29 09:22:15 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil I think you've used old imagery for the Lamplighters garden: http://tinyurl.com/y73kkgqj
	2	2017-09-29 19:30:22 UTC	ndm	Well obviously I can't use that link :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52487166 -- is based on more sober reflection and the Digital World Standard Imagery -- which is the only imagery with the overlooking flats in Cottonwick Close. May have to do another survey when it's lighter -- s...

52370157 by ndm	1	2017-09-26 10:30:41 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil Do you think these city based places for amendment? I'm struggling to see Aztec West as a village.
	2	2017-09-27 17:54:13 UTC	ndm	Well, have relabelled the commercial area instead -- but it has a church, doctors, cafes, etc., etc. so village prob' wasn't too far off.
	3	2017-09-27 18:27:23 UTC	DaveF	Sorry, I for got add the Overpass link: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s1d +Cadbury Heath. Personally I think they should be suburbs, what do you think?

52278200 by yurasi	1	2017-09-23 08:54:28 UTC	ndm	The name is already on the whole of the school grounds -- so I'll remove it from this single specific building. There's guidelines on mapping schools at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
	2	2017-09-25 00:36:52 UTC	yurasi	Oh, ok ndm. Thanks :)

52238628 by robw	1	2017-09-21 20:13:10 UTC	ndm	Is this really being built at the moment?
	2	2017-09-21 20:21:15 UTC	robw	Without going to have a look I can't confirm. But this is what seems to have been decided and it is supposed to start about now, so may still only be planned (as per my comment). Clearly it's not yet open so nothing is going to be using it for routing.
	3	2017-09-21 21:13:36 UTC	ndm	Assume you checked any plans would have had a suitable copyright for copying into OSM? Not sure about including potential planned items -- or I'd already have added Bristol Arena :-)
	4	2017-09-22 06:13:40 UTC	robw	Dont think is a real problem as for example the A14 huntigdon-cambridge upgrade was shown on OSM far before any work commenced on the ground.
	5	2017-09-22 08:25:30 UTC	Harald Hartmann	Also check the spelling of `consctruction` at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526438762

52237602 by Rick Wiles	1	2017-09-21 11:54:06 UTC	ndm	No change set comment! I'll revert this asap - there was a definite separation of the bus lane with an island - unless you've done a recent on site survey.

51943800 by hollium	1	2017-09-11 23:12:23 UTC	ndm	There's nothing wrong with stops not having infrastructure -- see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop Surely, having them on OSM makes it easier to locate them.
	2	2017-09-12 15:35:31 UTC	hollium	Hi, these particular stops were imported from Bristol City Council's naptan database and exist as virtual stops for data purposes (Traveline, timetabling) only. In reality, passengers can catch the specific service which uses this area by hailing at any point on the route, so having the specific poi...
	3	2017-09-12 18:00:31 UTC	ndm	OK, no worries. Guess it's more like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hail_and_ride

51943933 by hollium	1	2017-09-11 23:11:21 UTC	ndm	There's nothing wrong with stops not having infrastructure -- see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop Surely, having them on OSM makes it easier to locate them.

51847243 by cerisjones	1	2017-09-08 19:06:05 UTC	ndm	Just to check -- the link you reference cites "All Rights Reserved" and Crown Copyright -- do you have permission for OpenStreetmap to use information from that map?
	2	2017-09-11 15:13:15 UTC	cerisjones	You can visually use the information in order to work out the extent of North Somerset as our Unitary Authority boundary (in brown) denotes the extent of the A4174 which is known as Colliters Way. The road has a different name in Bristol City's area. Hope this helps. Thanks, Ceris

51511389 by Mike Baggaley	1	2017-08-28 20:56:02 UTC	ndm	The name on the board for the map is "Museum" why have you changed it? Is this some arm-chair mapping exercise?

51348515 by pole_climber	1	2017-08-22 19:20:42 UTC	ndm	Guessing there's a typo on "Pucklechurch Locacl" ?
	2	2017-08-23 10:12:11 UTC	pole_climber	Fixed. Also added address, opening times and rather than a generic store name added Premier Brand.
	3	2017-08-26 09:16:05 UTC	ndm	Brilliant!

51145148 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-08-15 23:08:28 UTC	ndm	Pretty sure it's not a secondary road into the school -- they'd soon run out of pupils

51075152 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-08-13 09:50:19 UTC	ndm	What's the change?

51068280 by Hannahgib69	1	2017-08-12 23:20:27 UTC	southglos	Hi There's a pillar box already mapped about 50m further up Windmill Lane. Is this new one a duplicate, or is the original mispositioned? Cheers
	2	2017-08-13 09:49:03 UTC	ndm	I had a look on Bing -- the new one seems to be in a garden -- and the old one seems to block driveways :-) Note: the old one has more tags than just post_box.

51074561 by Steve Mapping	1	2017-08-13 09:45:51 UTC	ndm	Good to see someone else mapping here -- wondered what "update" was? I added a "proposed:museum" tag somewhere over the hangar as it isn't opened yet -- probably doesn't show up in the renderer but might help to find it. I wonder if it might be good to add a general museum ...
	2	2017-08-13 14:14:07 UTC	Steve Mapping	I put heritage museum as they say industrial heritage museum on there web site. I did not mark the general site area as I am not sure of the area yet from out side the fence. should be opening soon. road to car park being put in at this time

50822942 by Joe Schwartz	1	2017-08-04 22:27:28 UTC	ndm	Cheers for correcting that -- not my intention to be humorous at all. Ta.

50680846 by Gabriel Reynolds	1	2017-07-29 23:17:37 UTC	ndm	Thanks for the updates -- a changeset comment would have improved them -- and made them easier to understand.

50653091 by uberchump	1	2017-07-28 18:37:24 UTC	ndm	I think "name" is supposed to be an official name, ideally signposted -- this looks a bit more like a "description". Similarly, with some of the buildings too.

50599639 by Richard Hanmer	1	2017-07-26 21:27:04 UTC	ndm	Undeleted it. The random line is an address interpolation line -- it is a quick way to indicate a range of addresses.

50464000 by AlanStans	1	2017-07-21 22:49:34 UTC	ndm	Adding oneway to Avon Crescent seems odd -- sure it wasn't a week or so ago? And it has an exit in the opposite direction to the oneway.
	2	2017-07-22 06:45:13 UTC	AlanStans	It's definitely no entry from Cumberland road since they completed the road works by the create centre a couple of weeks ago. Will check later today if the whole thing is one way.
	3	2017-07-22 09:44:14 UTC	ndm	Cheers -- I had a quick look at some photos from there last week (because of the new "cyclelane") and I can see a van pointing in the "wrong" direction -- but infuriatingly no good set of shots from the rest of it.
	4	2017-07-22 16:19:56 UTC	DaveF	Hi Now oneway: https://travelwest.info/metrobus/metrobus-build/spike-island is this link now dug up?: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25683723 Is the cycle contraflow painted lines or a segregated lane? Is this new cycle path open? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476337752
	5	2017-07-22 17:28:14 UTC	ndm	Photos from last week - note direction of parked van - https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/
	6	2017-07-22 18:04:29 UTC	AlanStans	Drove along today. Only change is painting at the south end and a no entry except cycles Just painted bike lane north bound at the junction for short distance, rest of road seems to be still two way. Link at North end unchanged. I have edited road to show only one way just at the southern end...
	7	2017-07-22 18:06:32 UTC	AlanStans	Just noted cycle path for that bit exists, so should be good.
	8	2017-07-22 18:07:52 UTC	AlanStans	Meaning the cycle path at south end of AVon cresent to allow cycles in.
	9	2017-07-22 18:25:27 UTC	ndm	Cheers for that -- obviously an area to keep an eye on -- the Ashton Avenue Bridge is was open today too -- strangely no separate cycleway -- just a wideish pavement.
	10	2017-07-22 20:07:09 UTC	AlanStans	The bus route from Ashton Bridge to Cumberland road has also been built (hence my move of the railway platform - yet to be rebuilt) but I cant work out how to draw a bus only route!
	11	2017-07-22 20:42:36 UTC	DaveF	I've just added the route over Ashton Bridge. I've tweeted MetroBus to confirm that section's a guided busway: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509467560 I took the tags from Cambridge except I've kept is a construction for now: www.openstreetmap.org/way/93272889
	12	2017-07-28 16:13:58 UTC	DaveF	Metrobus confirm this section is to be guided, but unclear of the extent.

50057641 by Rowland	1	2017-07-21 06:24:05 UTC	BCNorwich	Hello There, just wanted to point out that buildings with courtyards do not have to have self intersecting outlines. Regards
	2	2017-07-22 10:25:17 UTC	ndm	See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50257796 Looks to be semi-automated import of OSOpenMapLocal items.

50257850 by Rowland	1	2017-07-13 20:48:06 UTC	DaveF	Hi again The two landuse=industrial areas you've added appear to overlap existing areas & stretch into land own by other companies or is public land. If you have additional data could you add it to existing objects.
	2	2017-07-13 23:16:57 UTC	ndm	School would ideally use multipolygon. Nursing Home might not be a good match for a hospital -- there's a couple of different options documented in the wiki.
	3	2017-07-15 13:20:05 UTC	Rowland	Per the source, the pound for the port after per there OS openmap local data. Will take a look at the multi polygons.
	4	2017-07-15 21:31:47 UTC	DaveF	I'm unclear what you mean. I've looked at the OS Open Map - Local data for the area & see no boundary. Is there an on-line version of what you're using as data? Could you explain what 'Tayberry' is? Is it an editor or an importer?
	5	2017-07-19 09:34:14 UTC	SomeoneElse	I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507316742 is mistagged. It's tagged as a hospital, but the name suggests it's a nursing home. Have a look in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ for things like "nursing home" "care home" and "healthcare" and "social...
	6	2017-07-19 13:03:27 UTC	DaveF	Social facility is probably what's required: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
	7	2017-07-19 20:51:16 UTC	ndm	I've redrawn from Bing and tagged as amenity=nursing_home as per JOSM defaults for "Nursing Home".
	8	2017-07-19 20:55:11 UTC	ndm	I redrew Penny Brohn as well -- not sure about Bristol Port -- should at least be a relation? Probably needs extensive redrawing/reverting?
	9	2017-07-20 09:39:38 UTC	DaveF	In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to me The two main problems I have with the port is 1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area 2) it does tie in ...
	10	2017-07-20 12:11:27 UTC	DaveF	Correction: "it doesn't tie in "
	11	2017-07-20 19:20:36 UTC	ndm	I walked the bridleway ~2 months ago -- it's outside of the fenced industrial area. I note the original industrial area is still "underneath" the larger -- as is the foreshore, part of the coastline/inlets and a wildlife corridor I added a while ago.

50277571 by gregmnewman	1	2017-07-14 17:37:59 UTC	ndm	I think most of the royal_cyphers I've seen are uppercase -- but glad someone else is adding postbox refs -- and get Bristol a better percentage on http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/
	2	2017-07-14 18:55:18 UTC	gregmnewman	Will fix the couple i've added, I just selected from the dropdown, didnt think they looked right?

49928620 by ddd bbb	1	2017-06-29 20:51:49 UTC	DaveF	Hi By "too prominent" are you referring to how it renders on the standard map? If so, could you reinstate it please. If it exists it can be mapped. If you feel the rendering isn't to your liking you can discuss it in the relevant forum: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-ca...
	2	2017-06-29 22:12:49 UTC	SK53	Removing data is "mapping for the renderer": please don't do it. Someone took the time to transcribe the information from the plaque and enter it in OSM. This type of information is widely used elsewhere: for instance on the openplaques.org website. By removing it to make this area look th...
	3	2017-06-29 22:34:18 UTC	ddd bbb	Firstly, sorry! I want the area to represent how people navigate - is there a way of keeping it there without it being rendered/removing house numbers nearby? Can it be put back?
	4	2017-07-02 21:30:35 UTC	ndm	I've reverted this changeset -- and tweaked it a bit in a separate one.

49129190 by hollium	1	2017-05-31 18:04:08 UTC	ndm	Should Bellveue be Bellevue?
	2	2017-06-26 11:03:16 UTC	hollium	No. The Council renamed the bus stops to reflect the correct spelling of the road name. -HJ
	3	2017-06-26 20:15:16 UTC	ndm	Sounds good, but one looked like a typo, the other one matches the road.

49401905 by Syvanne Aloni	1	2017-06-09 22:12:04 UTC	ndm	Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now?
	2	2017-06-10 14:32:10 UTC	DaveF	Hi Syvanne Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_M...
	3	2017-06-12 10:44:38 UTC	Syvanne Aloni	Hi DaveF, Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this?
	4	2017-06-12 11:12:51 UTC	DaveF	Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks.
	5	2017-06-13 10:03:51 UTC	Syvanne Aloni	Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals...
	6	2017-06-13 13:17:44 UTC	DaveF	Hi Who did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features I've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of...
	7	2017-06-13 19:40:40 UTC	ndm	I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well b...
	8	2017-06-13 22:38:35 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ). Best Regards...

49401043 by Syvanne Aloni	1	2017-06-09 22:14:29 UTC	ndm	Not sure what adding a node with "hello" on it is for?

49150454 by Stefano Chies	1	2017-06-01 19:31:19 UTC	ndm	No courthouse here! Maps.me edits are public. I will delete this.

48805860 by ndm	1	2017-05-19 12:39:18 UTC	DaveF	Is it steps only to the North bank? Seems strange as it was meant to be a shared path.
	2	2017-05-19 22:39:02 UTC	ndm	Hopefully, I have some photos so I can disambiguate it -- I got keen yesterday to see how the GPS track looked compared to my original "by eye" sketch. More importantly I should have info on the south side to connect it to Finzel's reach and get better map routing -- and map a rather nice ...

48397599 by DaveF	1	2017-05-05 20:00:09 UTC	ndm	FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491363532 housenumber looks like a copy-paste (can't tell from the sofa whether it's a housename or a street).

48314851 by DaveF	1	2017-05-01 20:38:38 UTC	ndm	My bad, the photo I've got has 4 stands -- must have been a narrow angle. The Pintxo restaurant must be new its website only lists Cornwall -- "Bistro La Barrique" was definintely there on 4 April.
	2	2017-05-01 21:46:18 UTC	DaveF	Yes, it's just opened: http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/brand-new-tapas-and-sherry-bar-pintxo-de-bath-brings-the-taste-of-spain-to-barton-street/story-30303404-detail/story.html

48279339 by DaveF	1	2017-04-30 23:03:28 UTC	ndm	No need for FIXME: on photos here's no separating barrier between the cycleway(s) and the road on the High Street -- except at the ends. Working through a backlog of surveys -- will get to this in due course -- but thought it useful to flag up the one way promptly.

48186273 by osm update	1	2017-04-27 10:56:25 UTC	manoharuss	Hi osm update, This seems like automated edit to me with a custom script. Has this been discussed and documented? What is the source of this data? I have observed some issues with the edits. 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338794056/history is a node of a way on a remote area. I don't s...
	2	2017-04-27 12:03:12 UTC	althio	Hi, I agree with manoharuss on this changeset, dear user "osm update". It seems like you rely too heavily on nodes ids. I would also suggest you use better changeset comments. Moreover you could try to reduce the successive numbers of versions for only adding tags to one object. \...
	3	2017-04-27 13:31:29 UTC	osm update	Hi, the source is http://min-go.hr/, but I've made a mistake in my script. I'm reverting changes.
	4	2017-04-27 15:15:03 UTC	SomeoneElse	Apparantly an otherwise untagged node on a footpath near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339830304/history now sells LPG. Do I need to bring my own can? Regards, Andy (who as well as mapping footpaths moonlights for the Data Working Group)
	5	2017-04-27 19:09:52 UTC	ndm	Umm, http://min-go.hr seems to be based on Google Maps? Wouldn't that taint data from it?
	6	2017-04-28 07:17:57 UTC	osm update	No, it's not based on Google Maps. There are three json sources of information about gas stations and prices: - http://min-go.hr/cache/postajasve.json - http://min-go.hr/cache/vazeca-cijena.json - http://min-go.hr/api/web_api/web/obveznik
	7	2017-04-28 15:36:39 UTC	SomeoneElse	You have been blocked because you are continue to mechanically edit data without discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1331 made clear the process that you must follow if you want to do this. The data that you have modified since this changeset will be reverted. Please re-read htt...

47993027 by Toub	1	2017-04-21 22:57:07 UTC	ndm	Strange - when this was first added it had this name - then the original mapper removed it -- has a street name been added back now? Seems odd as there's already another Southampton Mews very close.
	2	2017-04-24 08:42:51 UTC	Toub	Oh, my bad! I have been there again this morning, and in fact this is not a street, but just a private residential parking. As I didn't see the inexistent street, I confused with the next street. Thanks for revealing my mistake! Now, should we just remove the street as in bing? https://...
	3	2017-04-24 23:15:58 UTC	ndm	I guess you could mark it as service. It might even be the name you added -- but it would depend on the addresses of the buildings near it. I just commented as I could see what happened previously.

48003728 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:51:41 UTC	ndm	Great you're closing a lot of notes -- but they are so spread out -- are you actually checking them with a survey?
	2	2017-04-22 11:24:50 UTC	azzap	Yes, these are all places I have visited.
	3	2017-04-22 19:38:14 UTC	ndm	Not many people got to UWE and UoB -- you're well-travelled.

48031445 by DaveF	1	2017-04-22 19:25:59 UTC	ndm	Dave, thde wiki says "Set a node Node or draw as an area Area along the building outline." -- I know that isn't how you map them in Bath, but that's how I've mapped the a lot of the ones in Bristol -- it would be good to keep this one consistent.
	2	2017-04-29 13:24:53 UTC	DaveF	I think the wiki page needs expanding. Similar to schools, Universities & hospitals, a boundary around all elements owned by the pub seems the more detailed/accurate way to map. I've posted to the tagging forum: "Mapping pubs as full areas" Mapping pubs as full areas
	3	2017-04-29 16:04:48 UTC	trigpoint	The biergarten tag is a little out of place. I suspect it is a pub beer garden. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en

48003577 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:49:13 UTC	ndm	Sorry, but this seems wrong - only walked this ~1 week ago and most of the old car park was still fenced off -- under construction?
	2	2017-04-22 11:47:33 UTC	azzap	Thanks you were right, i've corrected it now. The car park which was previously mapped no longer exists. This area is now fenced off and under construction.

48014501 by azzap	1	2017-04-21 22:39:04 UTC	ndm	Street is inside Building F?
	2	2017-04-22 11:56:13 UTC	azzap	I have modified F Block as it was mapped wrong, the Pedestrian street is in the right place.

47953705 by Jonny_no_5	1	2017-04-20 00:21:15 UTC	ndm	It was a good idea to join the nature reserve together where it was split by Bradley Stoke Way. Good to have some extra names for places as well. I liked the previous wood you deleted :-( I thought it was much clearer where trees actually are -- especially near Bailey's Court Road roundabout. I d...

47915221 by azzap	1	2017-04-18 21:46:06 UTC	ndm	Is it really a tunnel? There's a bridge over it.

47914951 by azzap	1	2017-04-18 21:41:50 UTC	ndm	Maybe the extra service=parking_aisle tag might be useful.

47874097 by azzap	1	2017-04-17 22:34:04 UTC	ndm	Don't think the a turn restriction will work without from/via/to?
	2	2017-04-19 20:27:19 UTC	DaveF	Is there a 'no_u_turn' sign? if not I don't think it should have a turn restriction.

47870661 by m4rkit	1	2017-04-17 22:33:34 UTC	ndm	Thought it was asphalt?
	2	2017-04-20 10:52:24 UTC	m4rkit	Pretty sure it's concrete. I cycle it often and there is bumps every 10m or so at the joins

47520174 by p3et	1	2017-04-06 23:00:27 UTC	ndm	Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice: "This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ...
	2	2017-04-08 10:00:08 UTC	p3et	Thanks for the hint. I'll ask them for permission.
	3	2017-04-08 12:56:07 UTC	trigpoint	The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if ...

47519444 by p3et	1	2017-04-06 23:00:20 UTC	ndm	Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice: "This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. ...

47178068 by cdavila	1	2017-03-26 21:32:39 UTC	DaveF	Hi What is the source of knowledge for your numerous & widespread maxheight edits?
	2	2017-03-26 23:25:03 UTC	ndm	As above. Plus, 11'9'' is a perfectly acceptable maxheight -- there is no need to convert it (approiximately) to metres -- should only map what is signed.
	3	2017-03-27 14:31:06 UTC	cdavila	The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one. @ndm: you are right, but meters is the default va...
	4	2017-03-28 11:32:24 UTC	DaveF	Ah, I understand you now. I thought you were moving tags, but you're in fact interpreting them to add additional ones. Unsure if hgv=no on a way is required when there's a maxheight on the entrance, but does no harm, I suppose. Cheers.

46548006 by hollium	1	2017-03-03 21:06:12 UTC	ndm	Pretty sure that's not its name - walked past it yesterday
	2	2017-03-20 21:02:24 UTC	hollium	It's not called 'vacant' but not sure what else to call it - it's certainly not the sports café any more.
	3	2017-03-20 21:47:40 UTC	ndm	The signs on the outside say "Sports Cafe" -- it's tagged as disused:amenity=cafe.

46495017 by DaveF	1	2017-03-01 21:27:54 UTC	ndm	Cheers for that

46472775 by DaveF	1	2017-03-01 00:41:22 UTC	ndm	I use building POIs when I know a housename/number but don't know exactly where it is -- bad GPS / ropey photo. Obviously the ways drawn from Bing may/may not correspond to them. I do merge them when I get a good re-survey. I'll probably add a FIXME to the Bristol ones -- assuming this was a KR exer...
	2	2017-03-01 14:36:36 UTC	DaveF	Hi KR was flagging the duplicate building tags. building isn't required to get housenumber/name to render. I've readded the fixme tags. I'm unsure why I deleted them.U

46428305 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-26 23:39:31 UTC	ndm	If you're interested in speed limits -- maybe add maxspeed : "20 mph" to the highway -- presumably "Friendship Road". There's a speed limit map at http://product.itoworld.com/map/5?lon=-2.57477&lat=51.43518&zoom=15&fullscreen=true -- but it takes a while to update.

46133166 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2017-02-16 20:08:27 UTC	ndm	Has this been surveyed directly? The source URL you've quoted on "Sainsbury's Local" links to a Google map.
	2	2017-02-17 20:19:04 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	I've been there in person (with my GPS running). The source link was where I obtained the hours and phone number; noscript blocked the google map so I didn't know it was there until @ndm told me
	3	2017-02-17 22:47:38 UTC	ndm	Great.

46133082 by ChrisHodgesUK	1	2017-02-16 20:12:20 UTC	ndm	Has this been surveyed directly -- if it exists but is disused it shouldn't be deleted, but simply changed to disused:amenity. Is the "Frome Valley Voice" a suitable source of copyright info for OpenStreetmap?
	2	2017-02-17 20:15:16 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	ndm the shell of the building has been turned into flats (personal observation -- I pass it every day). There's no trace of a pub any more. Not sure what copyright has to do with it -- I was citing it as a source of information not copying anything (maybe that's too much of a Wikipedia viewpoint)\...
	3	2017-02-17 22:47:03 UTC	ndm	Great. Was a bit confused -- when I upload from Josm I use source=survey for items I mapped from a visit/GPS & source=Bing for tracing outlines, etc.
	4	2017-02-20 13:03:46 UTC	ChrisHodgesUK	@ndm I'll try to do that in the future -- as you can see I'm only an occasional contributor so don't necessarily have a feel for the done thing here

46055898 by Terrypugh	1	2017-02-13 20:55:22 UTC	ndm	It's a bit redundant to add a name that duplicates the tag -- but good to get it mapped.

45963639 by Yorvik Prestigitator	1	2017-02-11 14:00:26 UTC	ndm	Probably was postal_code?
	2	2017-02-11 15:33:02 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	might have meant to be, but BS10 is not even the post code for Ash Walk, the post code is BS10 6RW, maybe it was postal_district?
	3	2017-02-11 23:12:32 UTC	ndm	All Bristol roads are sgned with postal codes, e.g. BS10.
	4	2017-02-12 14:07:34 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	That might make sense, thanks for fixing this.

45944065 by DINEamics	1	2017-02-09 23:08:36 UTC	ndm	Not sure why you've deleted a landuse area in the UK. Was that intentional?
	2	2017-06-18 11:59:04 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49633609 where the changeset comment is: revert SEO edit

45838299 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-05 21:18:11 UTC	DaveF	Hi Dave Welcome back. OK there appears to be a couple of problems.This way isn't attached to airpor road:thttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472391353 For turn restrictions the best thing is to read this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction Specifically members. from>via&...
	2	2017-02-05 23:16:48 UTC	ndm	The "restriction" tag won't do what you want unfortunately. You can always add a note on the OSM webpage if you need a hand / drop an OSM mail. Good to see some South Bristol editing.
	3	2017-02-06 08:47:32 UTC	Dave Drury	Hi there NDM. I may have broken something here. IT would be great it you could help me to fix it. I was trying to ensure that it wasn't possible to turn right into Airport Road out of this junction as I was directed this way using a SatNav that takes data from OSM. However, thinking on it, it is...

45823845 by Dave Drury	1	2017-02-05 23:06:29 UTC	ndm	I don't think area on it's own will show much?

45654614 by Welshie	1	2017-01-30 21:43:39 UTC	ndm	Interested in where you got open data from Bristol City Council on 20 mph limits with a good licence for OSM? Since this isn't from a survey, perhaps there should be a source:maxspeed tag as well?

45628300 by btswrr3	1	2017-01-29 21:58:42 UTC	ndm	This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check?
	2	2017-01-30 17:04:25 UTC	pitscheplatsch	In particular this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449579231 For more details see: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45628300
	3	2017-02-12 00:44:14 UTC	SomeoneElse	I've restored things back to something approaching normality (specifically the sports pitches and footways were OK, and I've reverted the school to the edubase geometry and added buildings). It was actually not this changeset, but another one by a different mapper, that "lost" the school ...

45434736 by Stefan Frick	1	2017-01-24 21:52:43 UTC	ndm	The way you've tagged with "water" is part of a multipolygon relation which has an inside and an outside, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250536. The relation is marked as "dock" which is probably closer to a floating harbour than "just water". I expect t...

45164183 by Mike Baggaley	1	2017-01-15 16:23:23 UTC	ndm	Not a description - it is a prominent name in addition to logos/branding. I have added a note that the name needs to be (re)surveyed. Could you please add such notes in the future; unless you've directly surveyed it.
	2	2017-01-15 23:59:59 UTC	Mike Baggaley	In hindsight, it would have been better if I had moved Post Office to the brand tag instead of just removing it. I will go back and set the brand tag. I believe the correct name should be <something> Post Office, not just Post Office on its own Cheers, Mike
	3	2017-01-16 00:22:06 UTC	ndm	I was finishing up an edit on this road -- and found a couple of relevant photos. Have updated the name.

45100512 by delineator	1	2017-01-15 16:07:49 UTC	ndm	Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

45193301 by ioangogo	1	2017-01-15 16:02:48 UTC	ndm	Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.
	2	2017-01-15 16:33:49 UTC	DaveF	Is the A38 - A370 part of the opening? Is it being classified as a trunk road?
	3	2017-01-15 16:37:52 UTC	DaveF	Why have you deleted the foot & cycle paths?

44241074 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-12-07 21:05:42 UTC	ndm	I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this?

44242482 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-12-07 20:56:06 UTC	ndm	Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this?
	2	2016-12-07 23:08:37 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Apologies if I have misinterpreted this junction. I was adding sidewalk=none to clarify why the road had no foot access. In looking at the junction, I did not think there was any kerb between the two directions of traffic, so considered that the correct mapping was to only have a single highway show...

43725167 by John Parfitt	1	2016-11-17 23:08:29 UTC	ndm	Great to see someone else adding stuff -- I tweaked your edit a tiny bit -- no point in calling a tree "Tree".

43725183 by Rickey Skizzles	1	2016-11-17 22:52:29 UTC	ndm	It's usually better to remodel buildings by splitting them, rather than deleting and creating two new ones -- a number of tags on the Greggs (not Gregs) have been lost.
	2	2016-11-17 23:03:12 UTC	ndm	No worries, added back the tags.

43731920 by Tim Rawling	1	2016-11-17 22:48:44 UTC	ndm	Are you sure about the changes to the junction near "The Cross Hands" -- especially which roads can turn to/from "Lawn Road". A quick check on Bing looks closer to the previous layout -- especially the now deleted traffic islands.

43714188 by ShakyBakey	1	2016-11-16 23:47:45 UTC	ndm	H M Prison (Bristol) is already mapped

42832506 by mescolar	1	2016-10-12 22:51:54 UTC	ndm	Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location

42739747 by UMC	1	2016-10-09 23:20:20 UTC	ndm	Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM?

42136443 by ndm	1	2016-09-14 12:03:24 UTC	DaveF	Is this recycling centre open to the public or just for the authority to sort household waste? would it benefit from a 'recycling_type=centre' tag?
	2	2016-09-14 19:09:54 UTC	ndm	Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a comp...
	3	2016-09-15 22:11:19 UTC	DaveF	Yes, i saw what was edited before you, but he tagged it as Bristol Waste Company & if you google it: http://www.bristolwastecompany.co.uk/ It appears it's recycling, nut unsure if it's for the public to drop stuff off. Note they use OSM in their small map.

41800048 by Berkovskyy	1	2016-08-30 19:48:12 UTC	ndm	Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign.
	2	2016-09-01 02:38:32 UTC	Berkovskyy	Yeah, I love Bristol pubs. As far as I remember the only place where "POT at WOT" name can be found is the pub sign. Most other walls, signs and labels have "Post Office Tavern" written on them. This is why I have changed the name to "Post Office Tavern" which I think ...

41717216 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-26 21:35:41 UTC	ndm	Are you sure this is correct? I thought that the whole point was that cyclists don't need to enter the roundabout -- check it out on Bing. A "Fixing roundabouts" changeset comment would've been really useful too. Cheers.
	2	2016-08-26 23:27:58 UTC	Mike Baggaley	I did use Bing to fix the roundabout, to separate the cycleway and road points where they meet the roundabout. The previous entry already touched the roundabout at the same point as the road. From Bing I would say you could draw that part of the roundabout several ways. The original violates the jun...
	3	2016-08-27 10:24:52 UTC	ndm	Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits.

41725553 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-27 10:10:08 UTC	ndm	Had to tweak it a tad -- both lanes were bus only.

41717138 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-08-26 21:38:54 UTC	ndm	Are you sure this is correct? Buses on separated bus lane can no longer enter the roundabout. A changeset comment would be good too. Thanks.
	2	2016-08-26 23:12:29 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hopefully now improved - I was confused as the bus routes were showing as down the right hand lane, not the left. I have also moved them to the left lane. Regards, Mike

41642619 by smb1001	1	2016-08-23 19:42:00 UTC	ndm	Are you sure that the preschool really takes up all that area?
	2	2016-08-24 08:37:55 UTC	smb1001	you're right -- I have gotten over-excited there. I've reverted it, thanks.

41512790 by Tim Rawling	1	2016-08-17 15:44:12 UTC	DaveF	Hi Tim I'm struggling to be convinced Mangotsfield is a village: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangotsfield The tags location is taken from: http://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=51.48596&lon=-2.49834
	2	2016-08-18 00:31:36 UTC	ndm	I'm more upset that my wikipedia link insn't on the new location :-(

41516672 by Megadyptes	1	2016-08-18 00:16:11 UTC	ndm	/the data source you're using isn't great I can see houses joined together that should be separate and separate buildings that should be joined together. You'll get better results tracing from Bing.

41491075 by Matt Chapman	1	2016-08-16 19:42:10 UTC	ndm	Hi Matt, rejigged your edit -- addresses won't get rendered visibly -- hope it's reasonable, if not let me know, or give it a tweak.

41464626 by serendipity	1	2016-08-15 22:55:42 UTC	ndm	Layer -1? Is it really disused -- are the rails visible?
	2	2016-08-16 07:53:52 UTC	serendipity	I was there recently (Aug 2016). There are no rails visible. Both ends are bricked up.

41223097 by Christian Ledermann	1	2016-08-03 23:09:58 UTC	ndm	I'm sure you're keen for feedback: The school (building) was already mapped and named -- this wasn't "fixed".leading to duplication? There was no need for the school area to be a multipolygon The school multipolygon was inaccurate and overlapped theresidential multipolygon and wou...

40968898 by Henreko	1	2016-07-23 19:01:29 UTC	ndm	Why did you mark the area as industrial -- it's being redeveloped which is why it was marked as construction, as a hint not to use aerial imagery to draw buildings.
	2	2016-07-23 22:12:29 UTC	Henreko	oh right, didn't notice that

40350206 by ndm	1	2016-06-28 18:42:39 UTC	ndm	Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing).

40131159 by Instantcars	1	2016-06-20 23:05:28 UTC	ndm	This looks like a duplicate, albeit with different postcode and minor differences. Maps.me won't show until a new data download becomes available -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits

39606886 by Ned600	1	2016-05-29 22:42:52 UTC	ndm	I've added back the footpath you deleted -- no worries.

39582072 by John Blake	1	2016-05-27 22:17:58 UTC	ndm	You seem to have accidentally moved a node on Church Road?
	2	2016-05-28 06:50:12 UTC	John Blake	Not to my knowledge. I added a mail box on the opposite side of High street, that's all.
	3	2016-05-28 13:41:57 UTC	ndm	FYI the moved node is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1003112566#map=18/51.45025/-2.52039 -- I'll move it back based on Bing if that's ok.

39605654 by uberchump	1	2016-05-27 22:20:24 UTC	ndm	I think you meant addr:housename not addr:housenumber and Depot not Depo?

39544699 by John Blake	1	2016-05-24 22:40:36 UTC	ndm	If it's Edward the 8th -- you could mark it with royal_cypher=EVIII. Easier to parse programmatically, than a description. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:royal_cypher

39069196 by Chris Tothill	1	2016-05-10 20:07:04 UTC	ndm	Has the "private road" sign been taken down? If not, then it should be marked as private.

38852367 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-04-25 21:23:26 UTC	ndm	Not clear how deleting the names from the driveway improves OpenStreetmap -- maybe replacing the & with a ; might have been better. Or adding a note for local mappers. Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.
	2	2016-04-25 22:35:11 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Apologies. These names are not the names of highways, they are the names of buildings.hence the deletion from the highway. There are others nearby that I moved the name to addr:housename, but must have omitted this one.

38852527 by Mike Baggaley	1	2016-04-25 21:22:04 UTC	ndm	Would be so much easier to tell what the changeset is meant to do if there was a comment.

38579271 by Ewen Hill	1	2016-04-15 21:38:08 UTC	ndm	You have connected roads together that don't join in reality -- ignoring the square between them.

38348203 by Kerschtin	1	2016-04-06 18:44:59 UTC	ndm	This doesn't exist -- I will delete it.

38276411 by The Maarssen Mapper	1	2016-04-06 18:44:11 UTC	ndm	This looks wrong -- surely boundary should be "midway" between Steep Holm and Flat Holm (as it's Welsh).
	2	2016-04-06 18:55:02 UTC	The Maarssen Mapper	The admin boundaries and the e/w boundary are derived from official sources with lat/lon coordinates. It is certainly an anomaly, but I am pretty sure it is correct.

38331822 by Kerschtin	1	2016-04-05 22:45:46 UTC	ndm	Hope you don't mind -- I deleted the Barclays -- I think you might have confused it with the one on Queens Avenue?

38126459 by txlaparta	1	2016-03-28 22:58:35 UTC	ndm	Please dont load inaccurate polygons -- there are a number of duplicates here that are worse than the original data, e.g. don't have housenames, etc. Also, it would be great if you could use https://translate.google.com/ to get an english changeset comment.
	2	2016-03-28 22:59:03 UTC	ndm	Por favor, no carga polígonos inexactas - hay una serie de duplicados aquí que son peores que los datos originales, por ejemplo, no tienen housenames, etc. Además, sería estupendo si pudiera utilizar https://translate.google.com/ obtener una reacción de cambios Ing...

38091882 by DaveF	1	2016-03-27 11:18:49 UTC	ndm	Apologies for that -- I was trying to connect up the traffic lights tidily.

37850221 by tcdiosm	1	2016-03-15 19:00:02 UTC	ndm	http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway doesn't seem to be a valid URL? What rights do we have to use this source on OSM?
	2	2016-03-15 19:05:43 UTC	Yorvik Prestigitator	no idea about this edits or rights, but the correct url is probably http://map.n-somerset.gov.uk/publicrightsofway.html
	3	2016-03-16 17:03:23 UTC	tcdiosm	My apologies for not giving the full URL , I shall do so in future. I was hoping that contributors to OSM would be inquisitive enough to research this resource for themselves and read further; it is a minefield but useful. I have used the online map of local authorities as a resource to check the ...
	4	2016-03-16 17:22:20 UTC	SomeoneElse	(as a brief aside on "footpath" and "bridleway" tagging): I'd use "highway=footway" for something that looks like a footpath; "highway=bridleway" for something that looks like a bridleway (typically "has gates instead of stiles and horse poo on the groun...
	5	2016-03-16 17:38:45 UTC	tcdiosm	definitive information from the authority gives us the legal status. A horse rider would be in the wrong to use a footpath. Yes many tracks look wide enough for a 4x4 but that does not give them the right to use it. We must be careful to provide accurate information, landowners also have rights and...
	6	2016-03-16 17:44:49 UTC	SomeoneElse	@tcdiosm if you're replying to me, I'm confused :)
	7	2016-03-16 17:57:13 UTC	tcdiosm	sorry new to the Forum. Hope this will make it clearer. Footpath Public footpaths are public rights of way on foot. Bridleway Public bridleways are public rights of way on foot, or leading or riding a beast of burden (e.g. a horse). Cyclists may also use bridleways, but must give way to rid...
	8	2016-03-16 18:14:24 UTC	SomeoneElse	@tcdiosm The point that I was trying to make was that for example "highway=footway" does not indicate the legal status of access. It just means "used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians". There are permissive footways, and private ones. In order to indicate that something is ...
	9	2016-03-16 19:13:58 UTC	ndm	Dear tcdiosm, thanks for the details on sources, etc. -- I'm always interested when someone remarks that they're copying another map (doesn't help that I can never remember which Ordnance Survey products have which licence, etc). Have fun mapping, Neil

37758527 by southglos	1	2016-03-12 00:18:21 UTC	ndm	I only added Windsor Place a couple of days ago -- did I miss a 20 mph sign? Did you survey it? I've been assuming that there should only be a maxspeed if there's an sign, as it's not an explcit 20 mph zone.
	2	2016-03-12 11:40:14 UTC	southglos	Hi. It's an assumption, based on the fact that it's a residential road hanging off a 20mph road, within the Inner South Bristol 20mph zone. More info at http://www.bristol20mph.co.uk but as a summary: The 20mph pilot area at Inner South Bristol came into operation in 2010. Every road within the p...
	3	2016-03-12 22:12:36 UTC	ndm	I'd have less objection if it was signed as a 20 mph zone -- then you could make "safe" assumptions about the roads inside. However, it's probably ok.

14581473 by ndm	1	2016-03-05 19:39:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200232398/history has "boat=yes;no" on it. Presumably that's as a result of a previous merge (probably before you edited it) but do you know what is correct here?
	2	2016-03-06 22:01:26 UTC	ndm	I'm guessing it should be no, but that's looking at the adjacent river segments -- it's been ~3 years, probably due a survey?
	3	2016-03-06 22:06:08 UTC	SomeoneElse	Yes - makes sense to me. I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/524167 .

37491450 by ndm	1	2016-02-27 23:32:31 UTC	ndm	Changeset comment should be postboxes.

37148710 by helenwallis	1	2016-02-11 19:58:15 UTC	ndm	Seems to be a duplicate -- the building is already present with the company name.

36839773 by southglos	1	2016-01-28 00:36:35 UTC	ndm	Might also add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378568950 ? Think this is a recent addition.

36704703 by ImaxLighting Ltd	1	2016-01-21 01:08:44 UTC	ndm	Good to see a new contributor. Howabout "addr:place=Brislington", "addr:city=Bristol"? Not sure why there's a way and a node? Normally the same feature is supposed to only be mapped once.
	2	2016-01-22 09:21:02 UTC	ImaxLighting Ltd	Thank you, indeed one of my "101" mishaps. Thank you for the suggestion I shall fix it shortly Best Regards

36342067 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:53 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

36342182 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:41 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

36342335 by mahahahaneapneap	1	2016-01-04 22:24:30 UTC	ndm	Is there a good description for this changeset?

25849135 by ndm	1	2015-12-10 10:34:10 UTC	SK53	Aztec West is not a village in any usual sense of the word. I think it would be better just to name the area of the Aztec West business park.
	2	2015-12-10 20:37:27 UTC	ndm	>1000 people, church, doctor, newsagent, 2 different coffee chains, Hotel, pub, ponds... Not entirely clear where Hempton Court, The Quadrant and the rest of the part split. Signage is "Aztec West" not "Aztec West business park". It's the same as "Cribbs Causeway...
	3	2015-12-10 21:33:56 UTC	SK53	Yes I know its called Aztec West, I have worked there over the years, but unless it's changed a lot it is not a residential area. Lots of industrial/business areas have churches: I can think of over 10 in Nottingham, but it doesnt make them villages.

26558508 by ndm	1	2015-11-22 21:49:51 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - some buildings here have been added as "building=y#" - I'm guessing that that should be building=yes? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311168535 is one example - the two to the south are too.
	2	2015-11-24 00:29:15 UTC	ndm	Well spotted -- definitely not intended -- will modify asap.

34997463 by ndm	1	2015-11-20 21:12:30 UTC	RobJN	Hi ndm, Thanks for resolving these one-ways. Please don't forget to mark any that you complete as "fixed" using the Traffic Flow Direction plugin so that others don't have to go over the same place. I've marked these fixed now :-) Cheers, Rob
	2	2015-11-21 20:14:00 UTC	ndm	For these I just used the website and JOSM (no plugin) -- couldn't see any way to mark it as done (even now I have the plugin installed).

35008867 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:39:15 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.
	2	2015-11-01 22:45:07 UTC	ndm	Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes.

35021225 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:36:26 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.
	2	2015-11-01 22:44:03 UTC	ndm	Ok looks like metrication may apply, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/222621/dg_191955.pdf lists it as tonnes.
	3	2015-11-02 00:12:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	... and (re the MGW) note that most UK weight limits are actually MGW limits. It's rare to see _actual_ wieght limits (though they do exist, over weak bridges etc.).

35009470 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:38:47 UTC	ndm	You've deleted the T -- this is a UK ton, not a metric ton.

35008212 by karussell	1	2015-11-01 22:30:19 UTC	ndm	So you removed my maxweight "not heavy" -- how do you consider one should map a road that's marked as "Unsuitable for heavy vehicles" -- a common UK sign? Obviously hgv:no doesn't work -- psv might be heavy.
	2	2015-11-02 08:34:14 UTC	karussell	Sorry, I've reverted and put the hgv:no on the list. That is indeed an ugly sign :) Please see my steps which leads to the removal action here: https://karussell.wordpress.com/2015/11/01/units-in-openstreetmap/

34861444 by Al-66	1	2015-10-25 23:39:00 UTC	ndm	There seems to be a tree in a building here -- looks odd?
	2	2015-10-26 10:29:11 UTC	Al-66	You are right! I don't know how I did that. I must have dragged it from somewhere else. How do I undo it?
	3	2015-10-26 21:32:07 UTC	ndm	No worries -- I deleted a whole A road once. Ok, reverted it using JOSM / Data -> Revert changeset

34860925 by Al-66	1	2015-10-25 23:35:12 UTC	ndm	This looks incorrect -- checking photos from last week there's only one lane in each direction -- are you counting cycle lanes?
	2	2015-10-26 10:35:02 UTC	Al-66	I didn't put in the roads, but I did change the direction, The north-going road was on the east side, and I knew that was wrong. If you have accurate information would you please put it right.

34741397 by sce8	1	2015-10-19 19:10:03 UTC	ndm	Looks like a strange edit at south end of Filton Avenue.
	2	2015-10-19 20:01:28 UTC	sce8	It was one I was doing as I was walking along with the intention of finishing it off when I got home, which I have just done.
	3	2015-10-19 23:09:30 UTC	ndm	Haven't tried editting and walking -- hard enough to get reasonable photos -- looks good now,

34721297 by sce8	1	2015-10-18 23:04:15 UTC	ndm	Tarvery Carvery?
	2	2015-10-19 05:58:02 UTC	sce8	Yep, spelling mistake and Josm was hanging, for some reason, at the time so I didn't notice.

34656040 by parks82	1	2015-10-15 21:54:56 UTC	ndm	Is it really called "Hardstanding"? Should it be something-like landuse: brownfield? Is it really called "Railway Land"? Should it be landuse: railway / operator: RailTrack

34368161 by RFaith	1	2015-10-01 23:06:11 UTC	ndm	45 mph seems an odd number for maxspeed -- most roadsigns seem to be either 40/50 mph?
	2	2015-10-02 08:11:39 UTC	RFaith	True - it isn't a posted limit, but a personal assessment of how safe it would be at different speeds on this road. 50 is too fast in many places, 40 too slow in others. Motorbikes could go faster but for the surface, which limits bikes. It is an attempt to average the speed you'd manage on this roa...
	3	2015-10-02 11:30:41 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hello RFaith, welcome to OpenStreetMap! For info, the "maxspeed" tag is used for the actual posted limit. Where there's an advisory (such as green signs for school areas) you can use "maxspeed:advisory" for those. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Related_key...
	4	2015-10-02 15:47:28 UTC	RFaith	Hi Andy - I had another look at it this morning and realised that one of the roads listed as Tertiary in in fact a single-track access road to farms that also just happens to lead almost directly to the A4, which might explain why satnavs are so enthusiastic about it as a viable alternative (driv...
	5	2015-11-20 11:42:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	Thanks for fixing (and sorry it took so long to reply!).

34147883 by beatrice jones	1	2015-09-21 21:27:10 UTC	ndm	Please revert this changeset -- the Ice Rink and Cinema were closed years ago. The O2 nightclub is still present -- I walked past it tonight. Also see http://www.o2academybristol.co.uk/

34123844 by Ben Makin	1	2015-09-19 22:49:28 UTC	ndm	Are you sure? I remember seeing the 41 sign along Farr's Lane which is why I added it. Will check when next in town.
	2	2015-09-21 17:35:04 UTC	Ben Makin	I went recently however they have temporarily moved the cycle route, my mistake, i shall fix the changes. The main change i made was adding the extension along the 33 (chocolate path) as when i cycled there i was expecting to see 33 signs but they were 41.

34126960 by beatrice jones	1	2015-09-19 22:45:48 UTC	ndm	This looks like another "fantasy edit" -- please change this back -- the name on the outside of the building is "Bath Road Studios" -- see http://www.bathroadstudios.co.uk I know more than one company have offices inside. If you wish to indicate that ITV have an office inside ...

33814626 by DaveF	1	2015-09-05 18:03:57 UTC	ndm	Not convinced a car park is a place of worship -- well maybe to top gear fans :-)

33472224 by mdt3k	1	2015-08-20 22:17:16 UTC	ndm	Good to see some more builings being added. Shop, pub and other way outllines still need "building=yes" otherwise they won't render.
	2	2015-08-21 09:06:57 UTC	DaveF	Hi I deleted the relations you created. They're not really required in this instance - ways can be overlaid, & it's difficult to to see things such as the playground if hidden in a relation.

32831079 by Max--	1	2015-07-23 22:50:00 UTC	ndm	Not very clear why the park and fence are now railway abandoned?

32674274 by abel801	1	2015-07-16 19:49:37 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? I think the road you've changed is one of two that are part of the entrance to an underground carpark? Better to add a note or a FIXME?
	2	2015-07-16 19:51:19 UTC	ndm	Note there's a FIXME on the apex that indicating that the road should "continue"
	3	2015-07-16 22:01:04 UTC	abel801	Thank you for your observation, I am sure what you suggest is true for that reason I reverted to the previous status.

32676424 by RichRico	1	2015-07-16 19:46:29 UTC	ndm	Did you survey this? I think it's a bad idea to treat private roads as impossible -- often there's a direction indicator on the public highway -- but without clear satellite imagery it can't be completely mapped. Better to add a note or a FIXME.
	2	2015-07-17 08:41:38 UTC	SomeoneElse	All an "impossible" oneway entrance road normally means is that someone hasn't mapped the corresponding exit yet. It makes sense for a QA site to highlight this as something needing surveying, but you shouldn't just remove the data that caused the QA entry - it removes valid information f...
	3	2015-10-21 21:42:01 UTC	RichRico	Thanks for the note. You're right, could be much better is add notes, and keep the oneway tag,in this case I reverted my changeset: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32786706) and I added a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/400894

32472607 by Snake Sting	1	2015-07-07 22:35:45 UTC	ndm	This sounds like you are using data from other sources: Ordnance Survey / Google Earth -- OSM doesn't allow copying.

32412907 by Snake Sting	1	2015-07-04 21:57:44 UTC	ndm	You haven't added tags to 358540486 - so it's still incomplete

32155385 by inkena	1	2015-06-23 22:15:34 UTC	ndm	Cheers for adding the building tag back -- and have fun with more mapping

32147942 by inkena	1	2015-06-22 22:25:47 UTC	ndm	Why did you delete "building=yes" -- Cabot Tower is no longer being rendered. Changing it to building=tower I could understand :-)
	2	2015-06-23 08:17:09 UTC	inkena	Hi there! Thanks for your comment! Sorry about that - I changed it to "building=yes" again. I guess I need some more practice... ;-)

31848476 by portishead_runner	1	2015-06-10 00:43:09 UTC	ndm	You added a way without any tags -- would be a shame to lose any info.
	2	2015-06-10 08:27:06 UTC	portishead_runner	Sorry, just doing in a hurry. Public rights of way incorporating the Gordano Round route

31848439 by portishead_runner	1	2015-06-10 00:41:08 UTC	ndm	Noticed you added a long way here with no tags?

31814872 by Hilton Hotels	1	2015-06-08 19:35:03 UTC	ndm	OSM we should map the world as it is -- this is signed as the Hilton Bristol -- checked as I was driving past tonight. Or change the sign :-)

31745081 by brtknr	1	2015-06-05 23:41:11 UTC	ndm	Comment could be more descriptive -- looks more like a speed limit change and adding "foot=yes". I'm not sure about the "foot=yes" access tag. There's always "sidewalk = left/right/both" might be less "legal" -- unless it really is a designated footpath?

31696531 by Jay456	1	2015-06-03 19:51:57 UTC	ndm	I think it would better to remove the name -- it's confusing as the road's the Portway and even then it's not the whole length of the cycle track as you've marked it. I'll have a quick check on the w/end but I'm pretty sure that there's no signage indicating the cyclepath as Portway either?

31321755 by abel801	1	2015-05-20 23:28:21 UTC	ndm	The comment doesn't really make it clear what's been fixed -- not many tigers or deltas in Eastville.
	2	2015-05-21 22:05:08 UTC	abel801	I already changed the comment. Thank you for your observation.
	3	2015-05-22 19:09:47 UTC	abel801	This was a mistaken comment. The change is actually a fix to the footways that were not connected.

31215148 by knarfrank	1	2015-05-17 22:49:31 UTC	ndm	The previous name was as surveyed -- Wikipedia is not the standard -- please revert this. Note a quick search would have found https://www.flickr.com/photos/51321219@N02/9656442109/
	2	2015-05-18 08:12:10 UTC	knarfrank	Burton's Almshouses was destroyed, I'm pretty sure they were erected at the same time, hence the plaque.
	3	2015-05-18 08:15:07 UTC	knarfrank	http://www2.glos.ac.uk/bgas/tbgas/v078/bg078119.pdf Apparently it was build ages before, i was told that they were built at the same time... hey ho.

30980257 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:00:21 UTC	ndm	Do these all have 20mph signs? I know a lot of cul-de-sacs don't.
	2	2015-05-11 23:41:55 UTC	ndm	Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match?
	3	2015-05-12 02:04:55 UTC	hormpanther9	All roads in North Bristol have limits on them. They are all 20mph, unless otherwise stated
	4	2015-05-12 20:52:18 UTC	ndm	No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to m...

30980008 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:12:15 UTC	ndm	I think the grit bin's accidentally been "snapped" to the junction?
	2	2015-05-11 23:46:32 UTC	ndm	My bad -- disregard the above
	3	2015-05-12 10:23:28 UTC	SomeoneElse	Actually, I'm guessing that it doesn't have a name (and if it does it isn't "Grit Bin"). A tag of "amenity=grit_bin" will allow any map that wants to render it to do so - there's no need to give it a name too if it doesn't have one. Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

30980076 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:32:56 UTC	ndm	I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking?

30980133 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:05:46 UTC	ndm	Not convinced this needs a name?
	2	2015-05-12 02:01:47 UTC	hormpanther9	Identifying benches is handy I think because some people like using benches, also it's handy if they are infirm
	3	2015-05-12 10:25:20 UTC	SomeoneElse	(as with the grit bins) "amenity=bench" says "this is a bench". There's no need to create a "name" for it too.

30980211 by hormpanther9	1	2015-05-11 23:03:17 UTC	ndm	Not convinced that this needs a name? There's a German post http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Shmias/diary/34965 about a tree called Tree
	2	2015-05-12 02:03:28 UTC	hormpanther9	I don't understand. I tagged a grit bin here, because in winter people often look for grit bins

30753386 by DaveF	1	2015-05-03 23:21:46 UTC	ndm	Didn't have any signage visible from the road, but I guess its Gordano RFC not Gardano RFC?

29874109 by UniofBath	1	2015-03-31 19:57:39 UTC	ndm	Does OSM have permission to use the official OS map?
	2	2015-04-10 09:43:36 UTC	UniofBath	I think our usage is OK based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata.

28902788 by Rick Wiles	1	2015-02-17 23:23:18 UTC	ndm	Is this the right name?

28610548 by brtknr	1	2015-02-04 21:01:28 UTC	ndm	Not sure this needs the footways -- the inside of the Bearpit is already marked as pedestrian?
	2	2015-02-04 21:03:38 UTC	ndm	The scultpure's called Ursa -- I didn't mark it correctly when I added it -- will update.
	3	2015-02-04 21:20:02 UTC	brtknr	The reason why i added the footpath is because if you try and look for directions on OsmAnd app, it doesnt route you properly, adding footpath seems to solve the issue.
	4	2015-02-04 23:40:11 UTC	ndm	You should probably raise a bug with OsmAnd.
	5	2015-02-05 08:51:14 UTC	brtknr	It is not a bug, it is an incredibly difficult problem to navigate through a polygon. For consistency's sake, isn't it better if we have paths available to guide pedestrians rather than switching between polygons and lines to indicate paths?

28432320 by zmarties	1	2015-01-27 00:21:51 UTC	ndm	What's a sculpure? If I remember it rightly it's a vertical windmill/generator
	2	2015-01-27 20:02:58 UTC	zmarties	Sorry, typo for sculpture. Since the primary reason for this structure seems to be to look attractive, I think it's best mapped as that. (Windmill is certainly the wrong tag - that's for historic mills. Given the poor design, and the sheltered location, I don't think this is realistically for pow...

28369938 by Welshie	1	2015-01-24 12:01:56 UTC	ndm	Were these surveyed? Do they need a source:name OS_Locator? Maybe a source Bing as well?

28353922 by Toffer12	1	2015-01-23 19:15:53 UTC	ndm	Good to see some North Bristol updates I'd already added a swing gate on Highwood Lane where you added a gate so I merged them. I was also a bit confused about having swing gates on the administrative boundary near the airfield -- does that make sense?
	2	2015-01-24 09:42:52 UTC	Toffer12	Ah, fooey! That gate was supposed to have been placed on the road not the boundary! I'm surprised that Josm didn't come up with a validation warning. I'll have to add that to the software.

27976858 by Alexxrr	1	2015-01-07 22:53:30 UTC	ndm	Not entirely convinced this is a great improvement -- a lot has disappeared (missing "building=yes"). The "front-line" doesn't look very straight?
	2	2015-01-08 00:14:21 UTC	ndm	Ok, looks like Bing imagery has shifted since I sketched it -- I'll add the building tags and hopefully a few improvements :-)
	3	2015-01-08 09:28:28 UTC	Alexxrr	Hi I hope it's all right now. I just wanted to name the new pub Kongs, and ensure that it and the King William were correctly shown as extending through to Little King Street. I keep forgetting about ensuring I've set building=yes . I'll try remember that for future edits.

27922986 by al_t	1	2015-01-04 23:41:45 UTC	ndm	Any reason postal_code got deleted from Hotwell Road segments?
	2	2015-01-05 12:37:50 UTC	al_t	The postal_code value was just BS8, the outward code, so it seemed superfluous. To find if a segment is in a postal code area then I would use an is_in operation within a postal code boundary. There is a boundary=postal_code tag ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpostal_code ) a...
	3	2015-01-05 23:03:42 UTC	ndm	Roads in Bristol have postcodes they're on all the roadsigns -- should be easy to see when surveying -- don't worry I'll add back the lost information.

27288886 by ehm1806	1	2014-12-06 17:08:01 UTC	ndm	Has the construction finished? I'm surprised they've kept the "Bristol General Hospital" name -- I thought it was going to be appartments http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Luxury-flats-development-bringing-beauty-Bristol/story-21327175-detail/story.html
	2	2014-12-07 16:06:34 UTC	ehm1806	Hi, Thanks for your comment Actually I made a mistake and the development is called The General rather than Bristol General Hospital. http://www.cityandcountry.co.uk/developments/the-general-bristol/ I have now corrected it. They are apartments and they are still under construction ...
	3	2014-12-07 22:37:05 UTC	ndm	Great, that was quick -- I tend to add the construction area to remind myself that Bing might be out of date.

27285046 by Geomapper69	1	2014-12-06 11:00:19 UTC	ndm	Why did you move the camera -- it's not on the road it's on the eastern side checking downhill bus lane occupancy?