Chris Fleming participated in the following changeset discussionsChris Fleming participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168150994 by jayaddison @ 2025-06-26 17:35 | 1 | 2025-06-29 21:57 | Chris Fleming | Thanks having a quick look as you pressed the "Review Requested" - Edit looks fine, agree website is slightly odd, but surrounding addresses with postcodes are EH9 1P; so this is almost certainly correct.(Also hello, I think we spoke at Geomob) |
| 2 | 2025-06-30 21:27 | jayaddison ♦1 | Thanks for the review!(and yep, I was there at Geomob - during various pub conversations about progress on A-roads and SotM EU) | |
| 168008885 by ross_drew @ 2025-06-23 15:18 | 1 | 2025-06-27 15:54 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for adding this. One thing I would look at is the name. There is no need to put the name as "Electrrical Sub Station" as this is duplicating the power= tagging. If you are local, then ideally have a look the substation, there is usually a Scottish Power information with the nam... |
| 168001324 by FFFbb @ 2025-06-23 12:25 | 1 | 2025-06-27 15:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for signing up and helping us to improve the map. I'm trying to work out what is happening here, I think that building name should be Elderpark Workspace ? then building=industrial (or possibly building=commercial)I'm also curious about the hospital node. Is this wha... |
| 167817518 by MYCOnline @ 2025-06-19 09:52 | 1 | 2025-06-20 19:48 | Chris Fleming | What is going on here, this seems to be completly the wrong location? |
| 167815280 by jfml @ 2025-06-19 08:59 | 1 | 2025-06-20 19:42 | Chris Fleming | It's curious East Coast Cured show the location, show an address of 109/C; The gaurage address isnb 109/C and siuspect this is now East Coast Cured. Putting the note on is the right thing to do.. Best option is for someone to survey here and get the correct details. Once we have this the pr... |
| 167716846 by Mw96 @ 2025-06-17 00:07 | 1 | 2025-06-18 11:31 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the edit - for general reference, there is no need to specify oneway=no; that is the default assumption. |
| 167694341 by zuzak @ 2025-06-16 13:21 | 1 | 2025-06-17 23:09 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, this looks good to me. I added a tide_guage to this as well as this part of the Clyde is tidal. Otherwise the tagging looks good to me. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monitoring:tide_gauge. CheersChris |
| 167669232 by Linfietst @ 2025-06-15 21:59 | 1 | 2025-06-17 22:52 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding the track. Edit looks great, I added some access tags to the tree trunck. The only other thing that I can see is that it would be good to know how the track crosses the stream and mark this properly. But no worries if you don't know.CheersChris |
| 167612217 by YourLocalBrit @ 2025-06-14 13:05 | 1 | 2025-06-17 22:24 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, edit looks fine. I wonder how many files of unpaved classified roads there are in the UK. |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 19:19 | YourLocalBrit ♦1 | I had a look and have found some C roads (Class III) are unpaved maintained and a very small stretch of the A848 (Class I) in Salen is unpaved for about 100 metres before it's ending at the pier.This is the only B Road (Class III) that is unpaved in the UK, some sources suggest it goes down ... | |
| 133621303 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2023-03-13 11:45 | 1 | 2024-10-10 08:53 | Chris Fleming | Just noticed that although you realigned the paths; and youer alignment does look better , you missed out some of the features around them, such as the hedges between paths, I will add these to my list to come back to. |
| 148857855 by murble @ 2024-03-19 12:10 | 1 | 2024-03-22 13:30 | Chris Fleming | It's mad, I was here this week and was just coming to make these changes! |
| 147366196 by gurglypipe @ 2024-02-12 12:57 | 1 | 2024-02-14 10:57 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! |
| 146844023 by ti-lo @ 2024-01-30 01:57 | 1 | 2024-01-30 18:04 | Chris Fleming | What are you usingas a source for this? |
| 2 | 2024-01-30 21:17 | ti-lo ♦84 | An aerial picture | |
| 146475044 by Henri Zan @ 2024-01-20 11:27 | 1 | 2024-01-23 22:37 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap; let me know if you have any questions. |
| 146451107 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-19 16:53 | 1 | 2024-01-23 13:33 | Chris Fleming | There is a destination:lanes that can be used for this. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Destinations_per_lanethere are also some examples on that page. Give me a shout if you have any questions. |
| 2 | 2024-01-26 08:55 | jamiescott95 ♦2 | I take it that for roundabouts to use:turn:lanes=left|through|rightwhere as if its a junction to use:Relations (1): Left Turn Only | |
| 146452107 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-19 17:26 | 1 | 2024-01-23 13:30 | Chris Fleming | Hi, for the lane count if there are 2 lanes here reading the wiki page on this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes Even if there aren't neccessarily 2 lanes maked on the ground this is okay provided this is the way the roundaboutn is used. |
| 146181132 by glawie @ 2024-01-12 13:25 | 1 | 2024-01-13 23:41 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, tghst looks good. |
| 146180995 by glawie @ 2024-01-12 13:20 | 1 | 2024-01-13 23:34 | Chris Fleming | Edit looks good to me. |
| 146165349 by MusicInMe @ 2024-01-12 04:03 | 1 | 2024-01-12 11:21 | Chris Fleming | Sounds good! FYI I removed the photo link to google. We can't use these as sources, but from the sound of things this is your business so all "local knowledge" |
| 146164721 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-12 03:30 | 1 | 2024-01-12 11:17 | Chris Fleming | Looks good - if there is a gate, this can be added as a point (node) in the correct position. |
| 146164928 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-12 03:41 | 1 | 2024-01-12 10:40 | Chris Fleming | That's great, if you don't 100% know the name it is better to leave empty and add in later. |
| 146164845 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-12 03:37 | 1 | 2024-01-12 10:39 | Chris Fleming | Perfect. If you can add websites and addresses, that is also useful. |
| 146164821 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-12 03:35 | 1 | 2024-01-12 10:37 | Chris Fleming | Thanks; these things are quite tricky I would probably go with shop=plant_hire ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dplant_hire ) But we also could be shop=tool_hire |
| 146164572 by jamiescott95 @ 2024-01-12 03:22 | 1 | 2024-01-12 10:32 | Chris Fleming | Hi Jamie. welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for adding these buildings.I think your main question is around the postcode on the road, we don't usually expect to see postcodes on roads. Better is to add it to the building that you know have that postcode.My other tip is to square the buil... |
| 146040685 by Railwayfan2005 @ 2024-01-08 19:07 | 1 | 2024-01-11 00:52 | Chris Fleming | HI- i see you requeste a review. From my quick look this all looks great, is there anything you are particularlyconcerned about? |
| 2 | 2024-01-11 20:42 | Railwayfan2005 ♦25 | Not really - but there's always a nagging doubt I've forgotten something - area=yes tags when converting linea featurs to polygons were my last omissiion somebody picked up on... | |
| 145924888 by rpepper @ 2024-01-05 14:38 | 1 | 2024-01-09 13:59 | Chris Fleming | Hi - welcome to OSM or at least your first Edit. I see you requested a review, which is why I stopping by to say hello.Overall the edit looks good, from the comment about the library you should see that the way we often map this kind of thing is to have the building mapped as what kind of thing ... |
| 145335508 by Dean Woodhouse @ 2023-12-20 15:08 | 1 | 2023-12-22 18:25 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Dean, great to know that there is someone local keeping an eye on things. |
| 140843138 by MapNav_Tom @ 2023-09-05 10:24 | 1 | 2023-09-06 22:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi Tom, The edit looks good to me. Did you have any particular questions? |
| 2 | 2023-09-21 11:02 | MapNav_Tom ♦1 | Hi Chris, glad it all looks OK. My main concern was that I had made a lot of changes that aligned polygons, closing sliver gaps between them but also changed their originally captured shapes. I was wanting a quick validation that this was acceptable practice. For me it makes the data easier to use a... | |
| 140818442 by SmithyScotland @ 2023-09-04 18:23 | 1 | 2023-09-06 22:44 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for this - normally for closed shops we mark the shop as disused rather than deleting it.Makes it easier to add a new shop back in, and is helpful in following the previous occupants. |
| 2 | 2023-09-07 09:40 | SmithyScotland ♦12 | Thanks for the tip. My understanding was the shop building was to be marked as vacant rather than the "Point of Interest". In this case the shop wasn't actually marked so I couldn't mark as vacant.So going forward I should mark the "point of Interest" as vacant? | |
| 140492981 by hannes_kannes @ 2023-08-28 12:31 | 1 | 2023-08-31 22:05 | Chris Fleming | Thank! |
| 140292376 by GaAsper @ 2023-08-23 20:27 | 1 | 2023-08-25 08:23 | Chris Fleming | HI, thanks for signing up and editing OpenStreetMap. As you requested a review I'm just having a look at your edit. Overall the edit is good. One thing to consider is sharing nodes between the rivers and areas such as the river and dam rather than leaving a gap, unless the gap does make se... |
| 2 | 2023-08-25 08:41 | GaAsper ♦1 | Thanks Chris, that gives confidence to go ahead with uploading my first ever map edit. I hadn't done anything to the dam yet, only tweaked a residential road, but will certainly have a look at the dam later. | |
| 3 | 2023-08-25 11:08 | Chris Fleming | lol! yes I didn't look closely enough. I think there is definitely some tidying up that can be done, especially if you have good local knowledge. | |
| 4 | 2023-08-25 12:44 | GaAsper ♦1 | Thanks Chris,Yes a lovely hobby project for wet Scottish days in! | |
| 140178161 by g7kse @ 2023-08-21 12:07 | 1 | 2023-08-21 15:15 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for clicking the review box! The edit looks good to me.Feel free to let me/us know if you have any questions. |
| 140059813 by dwlegg @ 2023-08-18 14:02 | 1 | 2023-08-18 21:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi, it's a really good question.If it's currently in use then landuse=animal_keeping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keepingand then a barrier/fence around it.If it's for ruins, then add a ruins tag to it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ru... |
| 128070216 by Chris Fleming @ 2022-10-26 08:04 | 1 | 2023-03-27 16:12 | jambamkin ♦81 | Hi Chris, Is this a shoe shop called 'office' that is not the chain store 'office'? |
| 2 | 2023-03-27 16:26 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - I was trying to do some mobile editing and totally screwed this up. Should be fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2023-04-02 18:41 | jambamkin ♦81 | Vespucci is a tricky beast :D | |
| 128295486 by glawie @ 2022-10-31 12:10 | 1 | 2022-10-31 14:32 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - Interesting to know what this is and the extended 16 months that it's going to take. In addition, I have set the paths as highway:construction and have also added the construction site to the map. |
| 2 | 2022-10-31 19:25 | glawie ♦1 | Brilliant, thanks! | |
| 127857868 by ticki_52 @ 2022-10-20 22:31 | 1 | 2022-10-25 17:19 | Chris Fleming | I'm not sure if the deletion of the trees here makes sense, you might be able to convince me of the change to natural=scrub - but I am curious why? |
| 2 | 2022-10-26 15:39 | ticki_52 ♦113 | Hi Chris, thanks for your message. The vegetation on Calton Hill is mostly "natural=grassland" or "natural=scrub". The latter consisting of shrubs and inextricable creepers. Occasionly ou will find a few small trees among the shrubs, but anyway this area is far from being "w... | |
| 109195369 by Pawcio @ 2021-08-05 10:53 | 1 | 2021-08-05 13:03 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | The bicycle tags were removed from the footway along the A702 because there is no evidence that cycling is allowed here. Has the situation changed recently? |
| 2 | 2021-08-06 16:12 | Pawcio ♦21 | If there were signs that this for cycling, I'd revert these useless (useability subtracting values) edits and restore the designated tag. There is no evidence that cycling is not allowed here. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-08 17:03 | Chris Fleming | Hi @Pawico; in part you are right. In Scotland cycling on paths is permitted by default.However, this is only the case for pavements if they are designated part of the core network or have signs indicating that cycling is permitted. I cycled down the top part of this yesterday and didn'... | |
| 4 | 2021-08-08 19:53 | Pawcio ♦21 | No, not only on the core network: https://www.outdooraccess-scotland.scot/practical-guide-all/cycling | |
| 5 | 2021-08-09 16:14 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | It's worth reading the following:https://archive2021.parliament.scot/ResearchBriefingsAndFactsheets/S4/SB_14-30.pdf (page 10)Cycling on a footway (pavement) is an offence under section 129(5) of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984. Section 6(d) of the Land Reform Act 2003 exempts any land where... | |
| 91151668 by Oliver 123396337471 @ 2020-09-19 14:24 | 1 | 2020-09-27 21:11 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for this your edit looks great. I was just passing over here a few weeks ago and this is a good reminder to add some of the missing paths.Let me know if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-10-05 10:09 | Oliver 123396337471 ♦1 | Hi,Thanks for adding paths on Brunstane Farm :)I'll let you know if I do, thanksOliver | |
| 90931480 by kitanohikari @ 2020-09-15 14:11 | 1 | 2020-09-15 22:31 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for adding this, can't believe it hadn't been added yet. |
| 2 | 2020-09-24 10:28 | kitanohikari ♦1 | Indeed. Strange one. I'll add the car park in due course and also work out exactly how the indicated tracks in from the road correspond to reality -- I think I might have put the Barn a bit too far in. | |
| 90940908 by Oliver 123396337471 @ 2020-09-15 18:07 | 1 | 2020-09-15 22:20 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits which all look great.Let me know if you have any questions!CheersChris |
| 90861712 by JonathanKevinCook1 @ 2020-09-14 11:06 | 1 | 2020-09-14 22:58 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OSM! I've had a quick look and these edits look good to me.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 90668797 by ducatus @ 2020-09-09 23:58 | 1 | 2020-09-11 22:28 | Chris Fleming | Hi just want to check this change, according to this - https://www.falkirkcommunitytrust.org/venues/callendar-park/ the previous spelling is correct? |
| 2 | 2020-09-14 09:02 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I've not heard back from you. I've done some investigation and I can't find any indication that the previous spelling was wrong so I'm going to set it back. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-14 11:09 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Thanks, I sent them a message as well a few days ago but no reply. | |
| 89366497 by Chris Fleming @ 2020-08-13 16:17 | 1 | 2020-08-13 21:33 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Is that the correct location? Because the canals website says the towpath has been closed between the A801 and Vellore Road. https://www.scottishcanals.co.uk/news/union-canal-closure-breach-at-muiravonside/ I was thinking it was around here from the pics: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2305388 |
| 2 | 2020-08-18 12:25 | Chris Fleming | Sorry yes, totally mixed up my east and west somehow. Sorting out now. | |
| 88744958 by Ian Macpherson @ 2020-07-30 17:05 | 1 | 2020-07-31 23:13 | Chris Fleming | Cheers; think the problem might have been due to lack of access tags on the track, what are you using for the route planning? |
| 2 | 2020-08-01 07:21 | Ian Macpherson ♦1 | Chris,I first found the problem in the Bosch eBike Connect APP.I had downloaded a GPX file from Cycle Friendly Kingussie and the Bosch system produced a comment that it was unable to match the route to known tracks even though they matched up on screen.I then tried Komoot and had the sam... | |
| 88490700 by Ian Macpherson @ 2020-07-25 09:46 | 1 | 2020-07-26 16:16 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the Edit, looks great to me. |
| 87757341 by christiank61 @ 2020-07-09 09:54 | 1 | 2020-07-09 13:52 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | There was a discussion about this when the relations were initially added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74330916 - don't think it should be tagged as an NCN |
| 2 | 2020-07-09 16:33 | christiank61 ♦10 | There is a description on https://www.cyclinguk.org/route/great-north-trail-full-route-cape-wrath with GPX-Tracks. So its a well known route. IMO nowadays this is a good as signs along a route. However, if someone removes the NCN I will not insist an will find my own solution with OpenAndroMaps IF... | |
| 3 | 2020-07-09 22:37 | ACS1986 ♦61 | Not sure what you're asking re: legality. I assume that CUK's route will be perfectly legal to cycle, but it might create legal issues for OSM if the data source isn't compatible with our licence. I will repeat the following points which others raised in the previous changeset:a) ... | |
| 4 | 2020-07-11 09:33 | Chris Fleming | This isn't so much a NCN route as a bunch of rights of way combined together to form a bunch of linked rights of way.So the NCN tagging elevates this to a level where non MTB users might end up attempting it.So it's fine to show and and display as a route, and I have no doubts abou... | |
| 5 | 2020-07-12 05:02 | christiank61 ♦10 | Thats OK for me | |
| 6 | 2020-07-12 10:49 | ACS1986 ♦61 | As there's a difference of opinions I've started a discussion on the uk mailing list in the hope of achieving some local community consensus.The messages on the list can be viewed (after a short delay) here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-July/date.htmlTo receiv... | |
| 83128909 by CulturedFern @ 2020-04-06 07:46 | 1 | 2020-04-07 16:43 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | You added access=no to this gate, can it still be access by bike/foot or is it closed to everyone?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27524883 |
| 2 | 2020-07-10 09:09 | Chris Fleming | Recently cycled through here, so will set access correctly. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-10 21:38 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | What meaning more the access=no, when it's only motor vehicles which are not allowed through? | |
| 86241675 by Kieran O'Neill @ 2020-06-05 11:20 | 1 | 2020-06-07 23:46 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking your time to sign up and help improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 85916007 by bathines @ 2020-05-29 03:29 | 1 | 2020-06-02 21:51 | Chris Fleming | HI, do you have any evidence of these been connected. This looks to me like 2 separate properties, each with it's own entrance? |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 06:28 | bathines ♦20 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into our edits. I have made this edit based on the aerial imagery, it is little ambiguous as it is partially covered by vegetation. Apologies, if it is contradicting with the ground reality. Please find the changeset (86114229) for the suggested modifications. ... | |
| 85917132 by sidhrk @ 2020-05-29 04:01 | 1 | 2020-06-02 21:43 | Chris Fleming | HI, do we have any evidence for this track or it's connectivity beyond the imagery? |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 09:56 | sidhrk ♦3 | Thanks for looking into my edits. After your inputs, I have rechecked my edits and found no potential evidence to validate the added road. Apologies, reverting the changeset as per the suggestion.I will make sure all my future edits will be backed up by proper resources.thanks for the correction, al... | |
| 85849178 by WillieWhite @ 2020-05-27 19:07 | 1 | 2020-06-02 20:58 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the edit, it looks great. |
| 84143448 by Little0smit @ 2020-04-26 13:57 | 1 | 2020-04-26 23:15 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking the time to sign up and help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83950967 by A11yb @ 2020-04-22 16:01 | 1 | 2020-04-26 23:05 | Chris Fleming | HI, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking the time to help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83945135 by MrStarter @ 2020-04-22 13:47 | 1 | 2020-04-26 23:03 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking time to help improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 84082616 by Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg @ 2020-04-24 21:32 | 1 | 2020-04-26 23:00 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for signing up and helping to improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 84151954 by CantrayJDW @ 2020-04-26 17:37 | 1 | 2020-04-26 22:44 | Chris Fleming | Weclome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map. It's great to see a local mapper helping to improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions?CheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-04-27 05:34 | CantrayJDW ♦3 | Thanks for the comment.I have a few questions:1) I have found the guidance mostly helpful, particularly for adding new information, e.g. in my case paths and tracks I know personally, and have gps data for. But I am less clear about access tags. I am tagging paths with bike and horse = no, if it... | |
| 82957929 by sunkarab @ 2020-04-02 06:15 | 1 | 2020-04-07 09:38 | Chris Fleming | I'm sorry but what is the evidence for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787035388 |
| 2 | 2020-04-09 03:08 | sunkarab ♦2 | Deleted road - Thanks for looking into edit. The road can be seen in the different imagery, but entry/exit seems to be covered by vegetation. Please find the changeset (82957929) for the suggested modifications, always happy to learn from the community | |
| 3 | 2020-04-16 21:56 | Chris Fleming | Thanks. | |
| 83653024 by Jennifer Wales @ 2020-04-16 13:55 | 1 | 2020-04-16 14:58 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking the time to signup and help improve the map.I see that you requested a review and this edit looks great. I can see a note about these building being demolished so thanks for doing this.Let me know if you have any more questions, and I look forw... |
| 83653187 by Ri_ck135 @ 2020-04-16 13:58 | 1 | 2020-04-16 14:54 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking the time to signup and help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83492954 by jammyjames60 @ 2020-04-13 18:49 | 1 | 2020-04-16 09:06 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome, to OpenStreetMap - thanks for taking the time to sign up and help improve the map.Adding the Welsh language name is fine, but it looks like you accidentally deleted the Gaelic name :(Don't worry I've restored this. Let me know if you have any more questions.Chee... |
| 83477011 by DMcGUIRE @ 2020-04-13 12:29 | 1 | 2020-04-16 08:59 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking the time to sign up and help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83397429 by cofo @ 2020-04-11 12:38 | 1 | 2020-04-16 08:57 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-04-16 18:46 | cofo ♦1 | Thanks for the note Chris. Will let you know if I hit a problem. Hopefully I'm doing the right thing so far!Colin | |
| 83468381 by seanxkelly @ 2020-04-13 10:13 | 1 | 2020-04-16 08:55 | Chris Fleming | Hi Sean, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking the time to sign up and help improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83478484 by Xelar_ @ 2020-04-13 12:59 | 1 | 2020-04-15 21:23 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 83119242 by Arpitha AM @ 2020-04-06 04:12 | 1 | 2020-04-06 21:25 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Is there actually a one way sign on this street as I can't see one from: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/GpEg9vQ4zhV0UiBTnrDEWw |
| 2 | 2020-04-08 05:34 | Arpitha AM ♦3 | We are using Aerial Imagery & Mapillary evidences along with local inputs to make the changes If you know for your sure that our input is wrong based on local presence then you may certainly revert the edit. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-09 13:26 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Thanks for the reply. Perhaps your edit is just a mistake, but it seems like you've got things round the wrong way. It's not up to other people to revert incorrect edits, it is your responsibility to make sure that your edit is correct. Can you link to the Mapillary evidence that you use... | |
| 4 | 2020-04-11 10:01 | Chris Fleming | Visited yesterday and this section of the is two way - this is clear from the road markings at the bottom of the road https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/chris2?lat=55.948964499999995&lng=-3.1853097999999997&z=17&feedItem=user-gG1f6osGs7f38gOYNiKexQ-activity-user-gG1f6osGs7f38gOYNiKexQ-p... | |
| 5 | 2020-04-15 13:02 | Arpitha AM ♦3 | We have also used our local inputs, though we have commented on the evidence usage as Satellite Imagery during the submission.Thank you for giving valuable suggestion/feedback. I'll pay closer attention to these things. | |
| 83060847 by Arjunsimha @ 2020-04-04 06:37 | 1 | 2020-04-09 11:10 | Chris Fleming | Hi in Scotland the default for all roads and paths is open access; therefore I don't believe that this is correct, unless you have more information? |
| 2 | 2020-04-09 16:52 | Arjunsimha ♦1 | i apologies from my end i am unaware of this update thanks for your comment. happy mapping ,,-ArjunSimha | |
| 83048603 by Jelle Muylle @ 2020-04-03 17:53 | 1 | 2020-04-07 10:38 | Chris Fleming | HI welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking the time to sign up and help us to improve the map. Let me know if you have any questions..CheersChris |
| 82975905 by mudunur @ 2020-04-02 11:22 | 1 | 2020-04-07 09:55 | Chris Fleming | HI - why do we think that this service road is one way, also it doesn't fully connect? |
| 2 | 2020-04-09 07:13 | ravsjith ♦18 | Hi Chris Fleming,Replying on behalf of Mudunur.thanks for your time in checking our edits. It was a mistake from our end. Reverting the changes as per the suggestion. Please find the changeset (83288832) for modifications. I'm always happy to learn from the community. Do let me know in cas... | |
| 82967177 by spavulur @ 2020-04-02 09:04 | 1 | 2020-04-07 09:46 | Chris Fleming | Hi, it looks to me like the road going all the way around isn't complete, in that it looks to me like there is something across the road on the bottom right? |
| 2 | 2020-04-08 07:12 | spavulur ♦7 | thanks for checking into our edits.the road created over there is little ambiguous as the imagery is covered by vegetation. Please find the changeset(83235113) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community | |
| 82814356 by spavulur @ 2020-03-30 09:17 | 1 | 2020-04-03 13:10 | Chris Fleming | This looks fine, apart from the access around the sheds, do you have any evidence that there is access along the bottom of the shed? |
| 2 | 2020-04-03 13:59 | spavulur ♦7 | Thanks for checking into our edits. this edit was made partially based on the Driver feedback and available resources. We are not sure of adding any access tags without proper evidence. Please go ahead make the required changes, It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improve our edits. always ... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-03 14:06 | Chris Fleming | Thanks overall this looks great, especially the long driveway. - it's only this part of the road that I'm concerned about: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785815482 - (and in particular the way it goes around the shed)And in Scotland we have general right to roam so not adding access... | |
| 82627113 by avxw @ 2020-03-25 20:19 | 1 | 2020-03-26 08:45 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 82186973 by nshz @ 2020-03-14 06:42 | 1 | 2020-03-15 14:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello nshz,Can you explain the tags that you introduced on the nodes in this change? It looks like you’ve undeleted very old nodes from the other side of the world.Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2020-03-15 14:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | لام nshz ،آیا می توانید برچسب های معرفی شده روی گره ها را در این تغییر توضیح دهید؟ به نظر می رسد گره های بسیار قدیمی را از طرف دیگر جهان حذف نکرده اید.با احترام،ان... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-16 16:33 | Chris Fleming | It looks to me like 2 nodes were "restored" (created) using old ID's then fixed up by removing in this changeset? | |
| 4 | 2020-03-16 17:42 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @Chris Fleming It seems that a bunch of people in Iran are using JOSM for a couple of different workflows. One is "normal" updates to OSM, and one uses different (non-OSM) node numbers and tags like "gamification" and "slug". Unfortunately they sometimes get confused.... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-17 23:25 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - Andy! | |
| 82165631 by IonaTheGreat @ 2020-03-13 13:35 | 1 | 2020-03-16 16:24 | Chris Fleming | It looks like GObannannas might be a soft play and The Bridge Cafe a cafe! I might be tempted in this situation to map each as a separate point(node) to represent both options? |
| 2 | 2020-03-16 21:26 | IonaTheGreat ♦4 | They're both the same business, really. I've been thinking on this too, might be best to keep the building as the Bridge Cafe and add a point/node within it for GObananas? | |
| 3 | 2020-03-16 22:04 | Chris Fleming | Perfect! | |
| 4 | 2020-03-16 23:23 | IonaTheGreat ♦4 | Any suggestions on what tags to use for the soft play? Thanks for all your help! | |
| 82166403 by IonaTheGreat @ 2020-03-13 13:51 | 1 | 2020-03-16 16:26 | Chris Fleming | building=yes is fine here.I might be tempted to add emergency=mountain_rescueCheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-03-16 21:24 | IonaTheGreat ♦4 | How would I go about doing that? It doesn't come up on the editor, do I need to use a different one for that? | |
| 3 | 2020-03-16 22:03 | Chris Fleming | It can be done in ID, it's just a question of scrolling down to "All tags" in the left hand side and here you can add emergency and mountain_rescue - a great way of adding stuff not quite common enough for a preset. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-16 23:20 | IonaTheGreat ♦4 | Excellent, thank you! | |
| 81930118 by IonaTheGreat @ 2020-03-08 18:17 | 1 | 2020-03-09 12:24 | Chris Fleming | Hi Iona - welcome to OSM! These edits all look great. Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-03-11 14:20 | IonaTheGreat ♦4 | Hi Chris, thank you! Sorry if I seemed to ignore your comments, only just seen them. I'm growing to love OSM, it's fiendishly complicated allowing for all sorts of features to be added but simultaneously simple enough to dive right in. :) | |
| 3 | 2020-03-14 16:09 | Chris Fleming | No problem, thanks for the feedback! I might pass it on the the developers of the Editor. Great to see all the extra details going into Oban! | |
| 82026174 by Barrold @ 2020-03-10 22:47 | 1 | 2020-03-11 01:04 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for helping to improve the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2020-03-12 15:45 | Barrold ♦1 | Thank you! So far I have been improving the map locally around me where there is a fair bit of construction and so on. If I have any issues I will reach out! | |
| 82021416 by Jakub Plachta @ 2020-03-10 19:38 | 1 | 2020-03-11 01:02 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking time to sign up for and account and help improve the map. I do have a question about this edit, is Abbey Gardens here really a footway, in OSM this implies no vehicular access?Also let me know if you have any questions?CheersChris |
| 82013430 by 321BDM @ 2020-03-10 15:09 | 1 | 2020-03-11 00:59 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking the time to sign up and helpimprove the map.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 81932322 by IonaTheGreat @ 2020-03-08 19:57 | 1 | 2020-03-10 09:55 | Chris Fleming | Looks good - one tip for building's in ID is to use the Q shortcut to square off buildings.CheersChris |
| 81931540 by IonaTheGreat @ 2020-03-08 19:21 | 1 | 2020-03-10 09:51 | Chris Fleming | Agree! |
| 81865709 by Donna24 @ 2020-03-06 11:33 | 1 | 2020-03-09 11:58 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Donna thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map.Let me know if you have any questions! |
| 81835345 by nylon_overboard @ 2020-03-05 18:51 | 1 | 2020-03-05 19:08 | nylon_overboard ♦2 | I misread the wiki, and shouldn’t have removed that it used to be a bookmaker. |
| 2 | 2020-03-06 09:59 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - I see that you corrected for the old use. This is normal convention and sometimes makes it easier when updating in the future. But not really a problem if that information is removed. I see that this isn't quite you're first edit, but welcome to OpenStreetMap and let me know i... | |
| 81793706 by Djmap4754 @ 2020-03-04 21:46 | 1 | 2020-03-05 00:17 | ndm ♦889 | If it's a track it should be "highway=track" not "name=track" |
| 2 | 2020-03-05 15:17 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for signing up and helping to improve the map. As ndm commented, is sounds like we could probably classify these better, either highway=service with the gravel surface - we would normally use this for access roads to houses/buildings.or as highway=track also wit... | |
| 81522240 by EletroFisK @ 2020-02-26 21:44 | 1 | 2020-02-27 10:24 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Begræns dig helst til max et land per changeset |
| 2 | 2020-02-27 10:43 | Chris Fleming | Agree! (Hello from Scotland!) google translate: Enig! (Hej fra Skotland!) | |
| 81520138 by abc26324 @ 2020-02-26 20:20 | 1 | 2020-02-27 10:05 | Chris Fleming | HI thanks, for improving the geometry of the forest! If possible, it would be great if you could provide a little more details in the changeset comment. |
| 81517281 by loserb00b @ 2020-02-26 18:33 | 1 | 2020-02-27 10:03 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OPenStreetMap, and thank you for helping to improve the map!Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 81513951 by ACJT @ 2020-02-26 17:01 | 1 | 2020-02-27 10:00 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap and helping to improve the map! Let me know if if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 81424610 by Gee Peaess @ 2020-02-24 21:48 | 1 | 2020-02-25 12:18 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for this. I'm not totally sure that this would have been an issue, so I've done a bit more of a cleanup on this roundabout and added the junction tag. Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 81423799 by Gee Peaess @ 2020-02-24 21:15 | 1 | 2020-02-24 21:59 | Chris Fleming | Thanks that looks good to me. |
| 81347575 by S MacKay @ 2020-02-22 14:54 | 1 | 2020-02-24 14:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for this; I'm wondering if we could tag this better? What are you trying to show here? |
| 81347413 by S MacKay @ 2020-02-22 14:45 | 1 | 2020-02-24 14:40 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap; thanks for signing up and helping us to improve the map.I';m wondering if this would be better mapped as menhir rather than a boundary stone? - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:megalith_type%3Dmenhir Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 81319451 by Clive P @ 2020-02-21 13:28 | 1 | 2020-02-24 13:47 | Chris Fleming | Welcome, to OpenStreetMap. Just wanted to say thank you for signing up and helping to improve the map. We can certainty do with more on the ground mappers in Aberdeen.I see that you requested a review and your edits looks great.Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 80813495 by elverde @ 2020-02-10 20:08 | 1 | 2020-02-11 15:13 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - thanks for taking the time to sign up and help improve the map!I can see that you're adding something called HSH Douglas; we can probably improve on the way it's mapped. But I was wondering what it is (building, business, shop etc)? Let me know if you ... |
| 80554631 by Panthro83 @ 2020-02-04 20:59 | 1 | 2020-02-05 11:46 | Chris Fleming | Great job, and sad to see Peckhams closed! |
| 80577311 by Orsay House @ 2020-02-05 08:59 | 1 | 2020-02-05 10:09 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenSteetMap - thanks for taking time to add to the map.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 80479241 by Neil Fergusson @ 2020-02-03 12:53 | 1 | 2020-02-03 14:37 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OSM! Some great investigation on this.Let me know if you ahve any questions on OSM.CheersChris |
| 80161272 by Hevski @ 2020-01-27 20:39 | 1 | 2020-01-29 13:33 | Chris Fleming | Let me know if you're planning a mapathon, we can let folks know on the OSMScotland twitter and mailing lists. Also let me know if we can help with anything? |
| 2 | 2020-01-29 15:02 | Hevski ♦1 | Hi Chris,That would be great thanks! This is my first mapathon, the eventbrite url is: https://missingmaps-glasgow-mapathon.eventbrite.com/ It isnt until April so if I need halp with anything I will be in touch, thanks so much! | |
| 79116401 by Chris Fleming @ 2020-01-02 14:11 | 1 | 2020-01-05 16:03 | jambamkin ♦81 | Hi Chris, I see you have added two nodes for the Grow Urban cafe. Is this the best solution? It kind of feels like a duplication. I went inside today and despite how it describes itself it feels more like a cafe that sells plants, rather than a plant shop that sells coffee. I suggest we keep the old... |
| 2 | 2020-01-11 14:20 | Chris Fleming | Cool - I couldn't really decide, and only passed from the outside. Very happy to switch over to cafe only. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-12 21:10 | jambamkin ♦81 | Thanks | |
| 79222984 by JamJar @ 2020-01-05 20:49 | 1 | 2020-01-07 11:16 | Chris Fleming | My feeling would be if this isn't in use any more and or won't be maintained visible on the ground then go ahead and remove. |
| 79219212 by JamJar @ 2020-01-05 18:09 | 1 | 2020-01-07 11:11 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I see that you requested a review. The mapping looks great! Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 77476469 by Allan JJ @ 2019-11-24 08:31 | 1 | 2019-11-25 16:31 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Alan. This looks great.I think the warning about crossing a ford will apply to almost all fords. |
| 2 | 2019-11-26 12:27 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | Access=no seems to have been left from the previous bridge, this should be removed as I am sure the ford is not legally closed.Cheers Phil | |
| 3 | 2019-11-26 12:35 | Allan JJ ♦1 | Thanks Phil. I see "Allowed access: All" when looking at the editor for the ford node (getting a car across it is going to be hopeless optimistic :-)) | |
| 4 | 2019-11-26 12:43 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | The way is tagged as a path, which implies that it is too narrow for a car so car routing is not an issue. No router should send a car along a path.You can however add foot=yes/bicycle=yes/horse=yes.Cheers Phil | |
| 5 | 2019-11-26 12:47 | Allan JJ ♦1 | Thanks - done now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=77476469#map=19/56.48103/-4.04241 . | |
| 76855753 by xspot @ 2019-11-09 22:16 | 1 | 2019-11-11 13:41 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for this, I see that you requested a review. Overall the shop and the tagging look great. It would be good to separate the shop for the car par park though.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2019-11-20 11:03 | xspot ♦3 | Hi Chris, Thanks for the review. I have added the parking lot around the shop in #77317905. Would highly appreciate a review of that as well. Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77317905 | |
| 3 | 2019-11-20 21:49 | Chris Fleming | Thanks that looks great! | |
| 77272862 by stuartgmilton @ 2019-11-19 11:52 | 1 | 2019-11-19 13:21 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OSM. Thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map.I see that you requested a review. Overall, your edits look great. The only improvement is where the path crosses the railway line. We would normally map this as a Bridge or a tunnel. (or a level crossing if appropriat... |
| 77231394 by cheeridrops @ 2019-11-18 14:03 | 1 | 2019-11-19 00:01 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for signing up to OSM, and requesting a review. The path looks great. however it looks like it should connect to the little spur off Dunkeld Court?Also let me know if you have any questions. |
| 77221873 by thadekam @ 2019-11-18 11:02 | 1 | 2019-11-18 23:34 | Chris Fleming | HI, welcome to OSM and thanks for requesting a review. I've had a look at the service roadyou've added and it's fine. The only improvement is to improve the curve around the corner (which I've done)Let me know if you have any questions about editing OSM, especially in Scotlan... |
| 2 | 2019-11-19 10:23 | thadekam ♦1 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for reviewing my edit and making the necessary changes. Will take this as learning for future editing. Please let me know if any additional information needs to be added.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,thadekam. | |
| 77112813 by PMononoke @ 2019-11-15 08:36 | 1 | 2019-11-18 13:23 | Chris Fleming | For now I would add the number of disabled parking spaces to the main car park as per: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3DparkingAdding the actual location as you have done may also be useful, though i'm not sure if anyone is using this at the moment. |
| 76983120 by Rushi Sohma @ 2019-11-12 21:52 | 1 | 2019-11-13 11:50 | Chris Fleming | I'm wondering if tagging this as a bollard with access tags as appropraite would be better? |
| 76982975 by Rushi Sohma @ 2019-11-12 21:46 | 1 | 2019-11-13 11:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for requesting a review again;l I have one small question about this small extension to the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744759797 - you've added it as Coach Road, but it appears to be part of Coach Close? |
| 76982804 by Rushi Sohma @ 2019-11-12 21:40 | 1 | 2019-11-13 11:45 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, for signing up and editing OSM. I see that you requested a review. My only comment is that it isn't allways neccessary to specifically tag all the access options. access=yes access:horse=no would be sufficient, here. let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to s... |
| 76979319 by themagicspanner @ 2019-11-12 19:43 | 1 | 2019-11-13 11:40 | Chris Fleming | HI - welcome to OpenStreetMap; I see that you requested a review of this edit. My main question, is about the tagging on the assumption that this a mtb tracks, or at least cycleable then I would suggest adding bicycle=designated or bicycle=yes - there are some good examples of how to do this at ... |
| 76835056 by MacLondon @ 2019-11-09 02:02 | 1 | 2019-11-11 23:10 | Chris Fleming | I'm not sure if these are actually directly connected? If I remember correctly, the car park is underneath, so at very least it would need to have level tags added? |
| 2 | 2019-11-12 13:11 | MacLondon ♦215 | Thanks. That does make sense taking the nearby steps into account. I've now amended this and also added layer=-1 to the car park road. | |
| 76844567 by rmacd @ 2019-11-09 13:40 | 1 | 2019-11-09 15:26 | Chris Fleming | Cheers; this looks good. I'm wondering if we should add a historic=yes as well as some kind of building tag. |
| 2 | 2019-11-09 15:37 | rmacd ♦2 | Thanks Chris - have updated now with a new changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76847218 | |
| 3 | 2019-11-11 17:11 | Chris Fleming | Looks great! I do like the relation linking them all together as well. | |
| 76865453 by jambamkin @ 2019-11-10 11:26 | 1 | 2019-11-11 14:34 | Chris Fleming | I've had a small play with this as well. I moved the entrance to the right place and I think this helped simplify things up. |
| 76842833 by 1980sRetro @ 2019-11-09 12:08 | 1 | 2019-11-09 13:42 | Chris Fleming | Hi - thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap; it's great to have people map the areas's they know well. I took out the residential area as it was already covered; but have added some of the terraces.Do they look okay? Let me know if you have any questions?CheersChris |
| 76469965 by Cafe 81 @ 2019-10-31 22:46 | 1 | 2019-11-04 12:39 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for adding yourselves. If you can,m the it would also be useful to add your address, as well as opening hour. Let me know if you have any questions, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. |
| 76108179 by osmoticpete @ 2019-10-23 14:13 | 1 | 2019-10-24 12:53 | Chris Fleming | HI, welcome to OSM. Thanks for requesting a review. You edit looks great, but let me know if you have any questions. |
| 75991279 by ffinnm @ 2019-10-21 11:12 | 1 | 2019-10-24 12:48 | Chris Fleming | HI thanks for making these Edits. I see that you requested a review of thew edits. In general the edits looks fine; my only comment is that it shouldn't be necessary to have to add access to footpaths, routers should assume that these are good, but no harm in confirming, Let me know if you hav... |
| 2 | 2019-11-11 14:05 | ffinnm ♦1 | Thanks Chris, I think I clicked 'review' by accident there! The routing plugin that I am using through QGIS currently only includes bridleways where foot=yes, but I have asked them to change this to include foot=designated, so I don't have t make these edits any more.Cheers,Fr... | |
| 75964033 by ClarkstonCorrect @ 2019-10-20 20:15 | 1 | 2019-10-24 12:38 | Chris Fleming | I'm curious as to why you've removed these. Remmber we map as we see things rather than for the renderer? |
| 74903677 by Наташа Гончарик @ 2019-09-25 11:15 | 1 | 2019-10-10 21:10 | Chris Fleming | Is this closed - not shown on the Edinburgh council roadworks page? http://edinburgh.cdmf.info/public/map/map.htmIf so what is the planned date of reopening? |
| 75141360 by srinatpa @ 2019-10-01 10:22 | 1 | 2019-10-01 10:33 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I can't see any evidence in the imagery of road marking indicating one way, if anything I can see cars facing both directions which would indicate that there isn't a one way system here? |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 10:12 | srinatpa ♦16 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into my edit.The directions to the lane are added on basis the lane markings that are visible aerially in earth watch. Didn't add it in source which is completely my mistake.So, added the source for the edit.Please revert the edit if it is not a one-way a... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-04 11:25 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, unfortunately I don't know what Earth Watch is. It feels dangerous adding details like this based on on aerial imagery that can't be verified by anyone else. I've added a note for someone to check this on the ground. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-04 11:34 | Chris Fleming | Just been googling around - found TRO that indicates theis has been one one way quite recently. So we're all good. Could you also check FORTH GARDENS and HILLVIEW in Oakley and see if the markings are visible on them. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-09 10:19 | srinatpa ♦16 | Hi Chris Fleming, Thanks for the confirmation on changeset 75222860 where I added directions to Lindsay’s Wynd Road. About Forth Gardens and Hill View roads, we added the directions as per EarthWatch aerial imagery where lane markings are visible and added source . Please confirm the chan... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-09 13:05 | Chris Fleming | Great thanks - I found the original council Traffic Redetermination Orders for these roads, and it sounds like these match up with the Imagery you have available. Thanks. | |
| 75416021 by DaveQ @ 2019-10-08 13:34 | 1 | 2019-10-09 10:30 | Chris Fleming | HI - thanks for the edit, If there is no longer water here then we should probably just delete the feature? |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 11:23 | DaveQ ♦1 | I am very new to what seems to be this wonderful resource. There used to be such a feature, but currently there is no visible vestige of it left on the ground. Do you keep historical features or not? NB: The footpath still exists. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 11:41 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - if it's gone then probably best to go ahead and delete it. Historical objects are kept in the database, so we can get them back if we do need to and it's possible to find them.Also let me know if you have any questions. | |
| 75380836 by Hilton Hotels @ 2019-10-07 14:44 | 1 | 2019-10-07 22:12 | Chris Fleming | Just checked the edit - looks great to me. Bye Bye long dead google plus link :) |
| 75306223 by JonKrato @ 2019-10-04 23:05 | 1 | 2019-10-07 22:07 | Chris Fleming | Cheers, thanks for hitting the review button. Looks spot on to me. |
| 75026566 by AndyFollis @ 2019-09-27 21:12 | 1 | 2019-09-30 09:23 | Chris Fleming | Hi Andy - thanks for fixing this. Normally we would use the on the ground rule based on names as signed rather than what's "officially documented" But given ytou l |
| 2 | 2019-09-30 09:24 | Chris Fleming | Meant to finish, given you live here - overrides that rule. Let me know if you have any question about OSM | |
| 74942318 by uttarann @ 2019-09-26 07:49 | 1 | 2019-09-26 10:26 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for requesting a review, the edit looks good to me. |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 10:59 | uttarann ♦5 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into edit.Please let me know if any information needs to be added..Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,uttarann. | |
| 74939633 by uttarann @ 2019-09-26 06:50 | 1 | 2019-09-26 10:15 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for your edit; and thank you for requesting a review. The edit looks great, but the additional way was missing the service type tag. I've gone ahead and added this. |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 10:59 | uttarann ♦5 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into edit.Please let me know if any information needs to be added..Always happy to learn from the community.Regards,uttarann. | |
| 71637563 by Colin Blackburn (BGS) @ 2019-06-26 13:28 | 1 | 2019-06-27 11:11 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Colin - it would be good to add the bike parking as well? |
| 2 | 2019-06-27 12:14 | Colin Blackburn (BGS) ♦3 | I'll add the two outdoor shelters next week once I am back at work. | |
| 71335371 by 1888 @ 2019-06-17 16:08 | 1 | 2019-06-18 12:08 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Let me know of you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 71323758 by LiamHarper @ 2019-06-17 10:03 | 1 | 2019-06-18 10:51 | Chris Fleming | HI Liam - one thing to look out for is the offset on the imagery. It looks to be like the Digiglobe Premium Layer has quite a big offset compares to GPS Tracks layer and other layers such as the Bing layer and OS OpenData Streetview. I ended up with offsets of -42,18 when looking at this which means... |
| 2 | 2019-06-18 16:35 | TheEditor101 ♦21 | Just to chime in, my general experience mapping around Aberdeen has been that Bing and Esri Clarity have the best alignment | |
| 3 | 2019-06-18 16:40 | LiamHarper ♦1 | Thanks, I appreciate the comments. I've found it very tricky to figure out the best imagery to use. Some nearby roads seemed to be aligned to one layer, so I tried to match those. Reckon I should undo these? I'm not sure how! | |
| 4 | 2019-06-18 16:57 | TheEditor101 ♦21 | A bit of misalignment isn't a huge deal as it's still useful to see the road layout.In general you'll want to check imagery against GPS traces (can be enabled under background settings panel of the iD editor). A good way to do this is find nearby roads and junctions with many trac... | |
| 5 | 2019-06-18 17:26 | TheEditor101 ♦21 | This area is a little tricky looking at it now.I see you've aligned Kingswells Causeway to the Esri World Imagery layer which actually aligns well with the A944.However, if you adjust the DigitalGlobe and Maxar Premium imagery to align with the A944, they put the Causeway further left.\... | |
| 71001176 by MichelleScotland @ 2019-06-06 19:13 | 1 | 2019-06-12 14:24 | Chris Fleming | JUut want to say thatnks for signing up and helping to improve OpenStreetMap, OSM works best when we have locals editing so this is great.Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 70903131 by freebeer @ 2019-06-03 23:17 | 1 | 2019-06-04 10:29 | Chris Fleming | Well spotted is it worth reverting the main changeset? |
| 2 | 2019-06-04 16:06 | freebeer ♦1,598 | in my opinion no -- i have reverted the clearly vandalistic changesets, found near miami, an exclusive island i can't remember, and two random us locations i didn't try to figure out.this is an armhair mapper working from a limited set of imageries, but who has an issue i am trying to ... | |
| 70672846 by Steve123456789x @ 2019-05-27 19:36 | 1 | 2019-05-27 21:49 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for signing up and fixing this!Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 70443341 by ClarkstonCorrect @ 2019-05-20 14:25 | 1 | 2019-05-21 13:45 | Chris Fleming | Just wondering what the reason fro the removal of the grass area in this changeset is? |
| 2 | 2019-05-21 21:16 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | It's actually farmland so I'll readd that later. | |
| 70438402 by dougie boy @ 2019-05-20 12:13 | 1 | 2019-05-21 13:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for signing up and editing OpenStreetMap. One comment, is that if you know the area, then it would be good to map actual building as remove the chalet from the hamlet itself. Let me know if yhou have any questions.CheersChris |
| 69544433 by j1scad @ 2019-04-24 23:22 | 1 | 2019-04-29 10:00 | Chris Fleming | Hi, what's your source for this? |
| 69079612 by AliFire @ 2019-04-10 11:51 | 1 | 2019-04-11 16:25 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, welcome to OSM. What is Tribe Porty? |
| 2 | 2019-04-12 10:12 | AliFire ♦1 | Hi, It's a co-working space for small businesses/freelancers. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-19 09:48 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - I've fixed up the websitre and added an office tag. Also a shoutout to Keith whom I used to work with! | |
| 69105462 by FerryBell @ 2019-04-11 07:40 | 1 | 2019-04-17 23:14 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits.I have a query about changing the railway from Fife Circle to Edinburgh-Aberdeen Lines. In many ways both would be correct But I think that FIfe circle line is the more common name for this part of line line, for example it's listed her... |
| 69065569 by HistoricRegeneratingCommunities @ 2019-04-10 01:30 | 1 | 2019-04-10 17:11 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for requesting reviews of your edits. I've had a look at them and for the moment I have some question, in the previous edit place=City was removed from Glasgow., this isn't the case so this has been restored.I'm more curious about the change ... |
| 2 | 2019-12-11 18:01 | HistoricRegeneratingCommunities ♦1 | Hi there Chris, I have been looking through the history of Cessnock. It is a standalone area and infrastructure. The shopping district at paisley road west next to the Underground is also Cessnock...with all of the stores, coffeee shops, restaurants and takeaways? Add on top of that the fact the Fe... | |
| 68817455 by NovaMosh @ 2019-04-03 00:00 | 1 | 2019-04-03 10:55 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for signing up and helping to improve the map!Let me know if you have any questions? |
| 68792035 by jfowkes @ 2019-04-02 12:38 | 1 | 2019-04-02 21:01 | Chris Fleming | Hi I've had a quick look and changing the end to a path is perfect. Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 68734565 by Beadsea @ 2019-03-31 20:12 | 1 | 2019-04-01 12:14 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I see that you requested a review of this change.Thanks, for taking the time to sign up to OpenStreetMap and help us improve the map.You edit itself is great!However, sometime rather than completely removing the closed branch we often just remove the name and amenity, keeping the poi... |
| 68627244 by ckerr15 @ 2019-03-28 14:06 | 1 | 2019-03-28 14:52 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I can see that you requested a review of your edit and I've given a quick check and the changes look great.Let me know if you have any more questions.CheersChris |
| 68597158 by JonKrato @ 2019-03-27 18:08 | 1 | 2019-03-27 23:17 | Chris Fleming | This building and car park is currently closed, due to the building being rebuilt. What is your source for these changes? Also the bus stop move is completly in the wrong direction. |
| 2 | 2019-03-28 16:58 | JonKrato ♦21 | Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Based on the open source information that I used (Bing and Mapbox Imagery), I was not aware that this building was under construction. My source is older than yours, so feel free make the proper changes needed. Also, I moved the node for the Lochside Cresen... | |
| 68499503 by nnoah @ 2019-03-25 09:52 | 1 | 2019-03-26 10:58 | Chris Fleming | reverted. |
| 68539307 by luka hallissey @ 2019-03-26 09:51 Active block | 1 | 2019-03-26 10:54 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I just want to check what is your source for these edits? |
| 68264555 by JonKrato @ 2019-03-18 16:36 | 1 | 2019-03-19 12:14 | Chris Fleming | Again my previous comments about areas apply here - also why remove fences mapped by local surveyors? |
| 2 | 2019-03-21 16:20 | JonKrato ♦21 | Thanks for reaching out. I moved location of fences so that they were not intersecting or blocking roads. I believe that area=yes combined with highway=* has been tagged incorrectly.Here is a passage from the Wiki. "Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredic... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-21 17:21 | Chris Fleming | So looking at the history, it looks like the fence ran up to (and shared a node) with the road, but didn't cross the road. So would be fine. It also looks like you completely removed the playground? What was this based on?Also a pipeline: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581021021/hist... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-21 19:26 | JonKrato ♦21 | I would like to reach a mutual solution to this issue, so I will do some more research and run some options by you. The highway=* and area=yes combo has been used on more than just service roads. It has been used on tertiary, residential, and unclassified roads. To my understanding the area=yes on a... | |
| 5 | 2019-03-22 11:05 | Chris Fleming | I note on that same page it says: . "Do not alter your mapping to accommodate such routers. " - this applies to road areas as much as Service. For now I suggest that we revert this set of changes and start again on them? Sticking to genuine issues and not removing vast amounts of mapping. ... | |
| 68370273 by Debrastorr @ 2019-03-21 11:49 | 1 | 2019-03-21 12:55 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - looks okay to me. There may have been a delay with the re-rendering. Dotted lines may be tracks/or paths or possibly access tags (private). There is a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LinesTab which has the key. |
| 2 | 2019-03-22 23:05 | TheEditor101 ♦21 | It's probably that the rendered tiles have been cached by your browser. See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bypass_your_cache | |
| 68269145 by VELOCITRACTOR @ 2019-03-18 18:47 | 1 | 2019-03-19 12:19 | Chris Fleming | I'm trying to fuigure out what you're trying to do here? this represents the paved area around the fountain within the park itself? |
| 2 | 2019-03-19 12:42 | VELOCITRACTOR ♦1 | this area is incorrectly marked as being outside of the park in a virtual reality game I play, so I tried to correct the tag | |
| 3 | 2019-03-19 13:12 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - that's a problem with the game; and not OpenStreetMap. I would ask Niantic to be a bit smarter rather than changing good data in OSM. But if you do see something wrong or that can be improved please do fix it up. | |
| 4 | 2019-03-19 19:53 | VELOCITRACTOR ♦1 | I can assure you that my changes are always with the best intentions of updating the map, I wonder here if "highway" really is the best tag to use?I genuinely thought that it was incorrect, would using a "square" tag be more appropriate to the land use? keen to learn more... | |
| 5 | 2019-03-20 12:26 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for getting back, we have a regular pub meet last night and had a chat about this yesterday evening. I think that on balance highway=pedestrian is still appropriate here. I wouldn't worry about the highway tag here. It just indicates a paved pedestrian area which is correct. https://wiki... | |
| 6 | 2019-03-20 16:53 | VELOCITRACTOR ♦1 | Yeah I'm fully aware of that thanks, we hold a meet there once a month for around 200 players, with their kids, dogs, wheelchairs etc, so its been a bit of a loss (the PP closing) as I say, there are three locations inside the Park that dont appear as such inside the game, and negatively ef... | |
| 7 | 2019-03-22 00:30 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | highway=pedestrian or footway areas are used hundreds of times in Scotland let alone the rest of the world - it is the established mapping practice to represent these types of areas. Not sure why your game wouldn't understand the data correctly.Changing it to leisure=park is not the answer ... | |
| 61671154 by smeòrach @ 2018-08-14 21:57 | 1 | 2019-03-19 11:43 | Chris Fleming | I've been wondering if this should be "Isle of Gigha" rather than just "Gigha"; what do you think? |
| 2 | 2019-03-19 13:12 | SK53 ♦864 | Gigha locally, never Isle of Gigha. it's a gaelicised norse name as are others in the area (e.g., Muasdale), with the "a" bit meaning island, so "Isle of" would be tautologous. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-19 13:24 | Chris Fleming | Thanks that makes sense - ages ago someone renamed the runway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207445395 - and I've been meaning to investigate further still - based on this I'll set the runaway back to just Gigha. | |
| 68154129 by JonKrato @ 2019-03-14 22:16 | 1 | 2019-03-19 11:19 | Chris Fleming | Hi - just wanted find out why you've removed details such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226551101 or layby area's such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199578352 - without putting back an alternative? |
| 2 | 2019-03-19 11:38 | SK53 ♦864 | highway=* with area=yes is a perfectly valid, and is very widely used on highway=service & highway=pedestrian. The fact that such areas: a) render in peculiar ways; and b) are hard for routing engines does not mean that they are errors. There are numerous other examples of areas which need to be... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-21 16:14 | JonKrato ♦21 | Here is a passage from the Wiki."Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredictable routing results and is only widely accepted and evaluated for highway=pedestrian"References:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:areahttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-21 17:04 | SK53 ♦864 | The wiki IS NOT the definitive guide to tag usage. It usually represents the opinions of a small number of people and may well be not representative of actual practice of mappers on the ground. highway=service with area=yes has 3000+ uses on OSM in the UK (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.u... | |
| 68153090 by JonKrato @ 2019-03-14 21:37 | 1 | 2019-03-19 10:53 | Chris Fleming | What's the logic of removing highway area's? |
| 2 | 2019-03-21 16:21 | JonKrato ♦21 | Thanks for reaching out. I believe that area=yes combined with highway=* has been tagged incorrectly.Here is a passage from the Wiki. "Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredictable routing results and is only widely accepted and evaluated for highway=pedes... | |
| 68059894 by Debrastorr @ 2019-03-12 12:14 | 1 | 2019-03-14 11:49 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - I'm just looking at this now. It looks like you managed to get the lights sorted? |
| 2 | 2019-03-14 12:28 | Debrastorr ♦1 | Thanks - I tried again. A bit roundabout but hey ... | |
| 67959572 by Tsagana @ 2019-03-09 13:41 | 1 | 2019-03-11 13:21 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I'm curious - is this change based on a local survey? |
| 2 | 2019-03-11 13:50 | Tsagana ♦1 | Hi! Yes, it isI was followed the route of 26 bus, when discovered that the name of this bus stop is Brunswick street | |
| 3 | 2019-03-11 14:07 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - thanks for taking the time to update this. I wonder about the name of the stop on the opposite side of the road. | |
| 4 | 2019-03-11 14:23 | Tsagana ♦1 | I wonder that somebody comments my change so quickly )) Unfortunately I ‘m not confident about the name of the stop on the opposite side, so I’ve changed the name just of this stop | |
| 67745699 by FrenchyF @ 2019-03-03 19:46 | 1 | 2019-03-08 21:36 | Chris Fleming | Cheers! |
| 67883121 by fraserf @ 2019-03-07 13:25 | 1 | 2019-03-08 12:54 | Chris Fleming | Nice One :) All looks good to me. |
| 67762078 by Lalingas @ 2019-03-04 10:46 | 1 | 2019-03-04 15:23 | Chris Fleming | Why did you delete this building? |
| 2 | 2019-03-05 16:23 | Lalingas ♦1 | I did it in order to add the individual houses | |
| 67457520 by AlexinAlnwick @ 2019-02-22 08:45 | 1 | 2019-02-22 13:03 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I've made some tweaks to the taggings, such as setting screwfix to a diy shop - this should ensure that these are shown on the map. Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 2 | 2019-02-24 08:24 | AlexinAlnwick ♦1 | I changed all the units in Hotspur Court - there should be 10 businesses there - why aren't they showing? | |
| 67353737 by Frempt @ 2019-02-19 13:52 | 1 | 2019-02-19 16:21 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - that's a brillian first edit. I've done a little refinement to improve things. I split the building up into 2, to match what was on the aerial images and then created separate points (nodes) for shop and post office. Hopefully these match what's present o... |
| 67313667 by AxlD @ 2019-02-18 12:33 | 1 | 2019-02-19 16:09 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for signing up and editing OpenStreetMap - although Arthurs Seat is a very very extinct volcano. I believe that peak is the better classifcation.Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 67344206 by Vera Kozlova @ 2019-02-19 08:49 | 1 | 2019-02-19 16:01 | Chris Fleming | Deleting these is not helpful - better to move them back into the correct place. |
| 66854847 by alextee @ 2019-02-02 12:39 | 1 | 2019-02-11 12:07 | Chris Fleming | Curious about the naming of the store. We normally go with the naming of the store based on the signage, which is usually "The Co-Operative" - I don't think the store names usually include the address? |
| 2 | 2019-02-11 13:03 | alextee ♦1 | https://finder.coop.co.uk/food/store/PH7-4DE/town-greenit says here "View all Co-op Food stores" and I'm pretty sure I've seen it referred to as Co-op food elsewhere too | |
| 66747757 by BanchoryJohn @ 2019-01-29 18:49 | 1 | 2019-02-05 21:36 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I just wanted to drop a quick note to say Welcome to OSM!It's great to add and improve these paths.I see that you requested a review on some of your edits. I've had a loom through and they all look great.Also let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 66744957 by jambamkin @ 2019-01-29 17:16 | 1 | 2019-01-29 18:08 | Bytemark ♦50 | Seems OK to me. |
| 2 | 2019-02-04 12:49 | Chris Fleming | I agree, this looks good to me. My understanding is that Riverbanks should be continuous as you have mapped. | |
| 66636152 by KB19 @ 2019-01-25 16:05 | 1 | 2019-02-04 11:38 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for signing up for an account and improving the map. I see that you requested a review. I don't know this road specifically, but the changes all all look great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 66612242 by hofoen @ 2019-01-24 19:43 | 1 | 2019-02-01 14:24 | Chris Fleming | What is the building that you added heritage=yes to? If it's a listed building you must have more details about it? |
| 2 | 2019-02-01 19:20 | hofoen ♦55 | Yes. Added now. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-01 23:18 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - that looks great. | |
| 66578323 by hofoen @ 2019-01-23 18:22 | 1 | 2019-02-01 14:16 | Chris Fleming | what were you doing here? it looks like you removed the locality tags from: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1835346510 then added the node into the road? WHY? |
| 2 | 2019-02-01 19:10 | hofoen ♦55 | The tags are moved to the bridge, where they are belong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54158048 . The node is recycled within the road. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-01 23:16 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - sorry I completely missed this. That is an improvement. | |
| 66682783 by Road5914 @ 2019-01-27 17:28 | 1 | 2019-02-01 14:35 | Chris Fleming | Hi, what is your source of data for these changes? |
| 66615197 by NiallD @ 2019-01-24 22:15 | 1 | 2019-02-01 14:25 | Chris Fleming | Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for sorting this out. The edit looks great.Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 66569455 by Vera Kozlova @ 2019-01-23 13:17 | 1 | 2019-02-01 13:13 | Chris Fleming | HI, thanks for fixing this up. Edit looks great. |
| 66404290 by jambamkin @ 2019-01-17 18:22 | 1 | 2019-01-28 13:48 | Chris Fleming | I'm wondering if the team name can be removed? Also is it worth considering the stand and the pitch together - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dstadium |
| 2 | 2019-01-29 17:37 | jambamkin ♦81 | Thanks Chris, I left the name of the ground and removed the name of the team (#66745366), I think it could be re-added as a node. I don't think stadium is the right tag as it certainly does not have substantial seating. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-23 19:19 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | I've updated this by adding separate objects/info for the pitch and ground.For places that are too small to be stadiums, I've been using sports_centre or recreation_ground where appropriate. | |
| 65411507 by smeòrach @ 2018-12-12 14:43 | 1 | 2018-12-21 14:35 | Chris Fleming | Why split into east and west - I don't think I've ever seen any signage splitting east and west? and note coucil website doesn't differentiate. |
| 2 | 2018-12-24 01:09 | smeòrach ♦32 | Hi, I'd seen from a council source that they were differentiated east and west. But when I checked the signage it didn't differentiate so I'll change it back. | |
| 65199077 by inanonder @ 2018-12-05 11:49 | 1 | 2018-12-06 23:03 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.Just wondering why you've change the website for the market, when the new one doesn't work?Also is the Hawico store definitely closed? |
| 2 | 2018-12-21 11:03 | Chris Fleming | I was wondering the same things, the Hawico website shows the shop as still open.In addition when shops close, we normally keep the node with the address details and change name to old_name and shop to disused:shop until someone new moves in.Also Grassmarket market as a name for the market f... | |
| 65245778 by ontheotherhand @ 2018-12-06 17:14 | 1 | 2018-12-15 19:33 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for the Edit, I don't have any problem with the change from international format numbers. |
| 65057902 by pr0xibus @ 2018-11-30 21:00 | 1 | 2018-12-06 11:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Great mapping, let me kinow if you have any questions? |
| 64902578 by WolfberryMedia @ 2018-11-26 15:49 | 1 | 2018-11-28 11:27 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - thank you for taking the time to sign up and add your business. I've make a small addition change to an "office" so that the name should show up.If you have a chance, there is lots more that you could do, for example adding more details near you. To s... |
| 64898243 by Callidus Design Ltd Consulting Engineers @ 2018-11-26 13:31 | 1 | 2018-11-28 11:10 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OSM, thanks for taking the time to add your details. I've added an office tag so you shyould show up on the map.Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 64822028 by smeòrach @ 2018-11-23 13:46 | 1 | 2018-11-23 15:24 | Chris Fleming | What's the actual license for this data? - I can't see anything specifing the license? |
| 59791191 by smeòrach @ 2018-06-12 20:55 | 1 | 2018-11-19 16:12 | Chris Fleming | Missed this at the time - what source did you use for these boundaries, I've never been able to find a data source that we can use for these? |
| 2 | 2018-11-23 13:01 | smeòrach ♦32 | Hi sorry I just saw this. Data is from Scottish Government Spatial Data Infrastructure. https://data.gov.uk/dataset/1d488abe-f8e8-4ff0-b7b7-9c976b9bce64/community-council-boundaries-scotland | |
| 3 | 2018-11-23 13:02 | smeòrach ♦32 | I'll add it as a source to all the community council boundaries. Should have done that before. | |
| 64260147 by smeòrach @ 2018-11-07 12:07 | 1 | 2018-11-08 00:32 | Chris Fleming | Clovie? really I'm not convinced by some of the loc_names? |
| 64261122 by smeòrach @ 2018-11-07 12:42 | 1 | 2018-11-08 00:24 | Chris Fleming | Should Carrick Knowe Golf Course and Allotments be inside of Carrick Knowe? |
| 64013194 by Chris Fleming @ 2018-10-30 14:13 | 1 | 2018-10-30 17:14 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Oops - poor node 1 never gets a rest for long! |
| 2 | 2018-10-31 10:21 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | For info, I've just moved it back. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6024957451 seems to be the "correct" new node. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-31 11:36 | smaprs ♦378 | Sacrilege for node 1! But since it was for adding bike station, indulgenced. | |
| 4 | 2018-11-01 09:45 | Chris Fleming | Yes - sorry about that! I had been concerned that I had messed up but at the time couldn't see the changeset listed in my history. | |
| 63513540 by WoodLeisure @ 2018-10-14 16:26 | 1 | 2018-10-21 12:10 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks, for signing up and editing the Park, I see that you have requested a review, and the data looks great. Only thing that might be useful is to add a tents=no (or yes if appropriate). Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 63490370 by gsnedders @ 2018-10-13 17:15 | 1 | 2018-10-21 12:01 | Chris Fleming | Cheers - edits all look great to me. Agree it's quite an art to lining up gps traces with imagery - but looks like a good job.Chris |
| 63127694 by with YOU @ 2018-10-02 15:12 | 1 | 2018-10-03 10:50 | eric_ ♦55 | Hi,Thanks for your contribution. Is your office part of the Castle Rock Housing Association? If yes, I'll move the point you created inside the building.Thanks. Eric |
| 2 | 2018-10-04 14:16 | with YOU ♦1 | No it isn't, it is located in the Hays Business Centre. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-10 18:06 | eric_ ♦55 | Thanks for your answer. So the opposite building. Any preference about your location in the building? North, South, East, West. Just let me know and I'll improve the location. | |
| 4 | 2018-10-19 13:51 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - for getting back, it would be great if we could improve the location of this. Is the Hays Business Center opposite from the Castle Rock? | |
| 5 | 2018-10-31 16:53 | eric_ ♦55 | I moved it inside the Hays Business Centre. Probably not the correct location but at least, it is now part of the building. | |
| 63450767 by movenpickhotels @ 2018-10-12 10:48 | 1 | 2018-10-18 09:33 | Chris Fleming | I just wanted to say hello, and welcome to OpenStrteetMap - it's really great to have businesses sign up and maintain there owqn data.Please let me know if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap or editing OpenStreetMap. CheersChris |
| 63076172 by Omega501 @ 2018-09-30 21:12 | 1 | 2018-10-08 13:26 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for signing up. Overall the edit looks great. I have only one question, is the area that you've marked as a park, a kids play area? If so would the larger green area be the park and the smaller square a playground?CheersChris |
| 62844725 by jamesks @ 2018-09-23 09:21 | 1 | 2018-09-29 21:28 | Chris Fleming | Hi we had various discussions to avoid using Just Eat in the name of the bike hire operator, to avoid having to change them when the sponsor changes. Wondering if there is any advantage to having them as Just Eat Cycles? |
| 2 | 2018-10-24 12:00 | jamesks ♦23 | Sorry, I was not included in these discussion. That is the name of the business, and what people will see on the ground, which is the first priority of OSM mapping. Many businesses change name over the years, and we just adapt the map to suit. | |
| 62871305 by Bttuffley @ 2018-09-24 08:08 | 1 | 2018-09-29 11:00 | Chris Fleming | Do you have any more details for these? |
| 2 | 2018-10-02 21:14 | lakedistrict ♦307 | Given the lack of details and that fact that they don't seem to correspond with anything on bing imagery, I think that this changeset can be reverted. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-23 20:44 | lakedistrict ♦307 | Reverted in 63810814 | |
| 62577619 by rogorido @ 2018-09-14 09:55 | 1 | 2018-09-19 21:48 | Chris Fleming | Why did you remove the address? |
| 62262341 by jojoyal @ 2018-09-04 01:05 | 1 | 2018-09-04 08:56 | Chris Fleming | You added it, you deleted it, what is going on? |
| 2 | 2018-09-05 11:25 | gseethar ♦67 | The segment was incorrectly added and jojoyal@ was asked to remove it after expert validation of his edit. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-05 12:43 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Ganesh, in general I keep an eye on edits in Scotland and especially Edinburgh - I've seen a lot of service roads added that have been added now getting removed around Scotland. Ideally I would like to understand a bit more about how they were identified to be added and what sources were... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-05 13:11 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Chris, We use driver activity as a source to identify missing roads. Once a potential missing road has been identified we use OSM resources to confirm if a road exists. We make an edit only if there is proof available. However in some cases the editors misinterpret the evidence. We ensure that ... | |
| 5 | 2018-09-10 20:21 | Chris Fleming | Thanks great to know - so these are cases where their probably are service roads going around the building (from imagery) but if you don't have drivers traces to verify this with then you won't add the roads, thank you for yhe detailed response. | |
| 62306277 by Auld Tam @ 2018-09-05 10:15 | 1 | 2018-09-06 12:55 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Is see that you requested a review of these edits, and I just wanted to let you know that they look great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 62327788 by terri molloy @ 2018-09-06 02:00 | 1 | 2018-09-06 10:05 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap; I have a small question about the 2 hotels you've added in Scotland, neither are in locations I would expect to see hotels and I was just wondering if you have any details such as the names for them? |
| 62291847 by Mike Parfitt @ 2018-09-04 20:53 | 1 | 2018-09-04 22:00 | Chris Fleming | I'm not totally sure if this has been totally succesfull. It looks to me like the mapbox satellite layer has an offset compared to the OS locator and the GPS traces that needs to be taken into account? |
| 2 | 2018-09-05 19:01 | Mike Parfitt ♦12 | Hi Chris, there is about a 10 foot difference between the Bing and Mapbox images in the areas around the "Hazelden" junction and the bridge across Earn water below it. Are you referring to something more extreme than this ? If so, where ? I have looked at the GPS traces, which show even... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-05 22:26 | Chris Fleming | No problem - It's not a major concern as the difference is quite small. More just a general note that in this case I think that the original alignment was fine against the GPS and OS locator layers. Therefore I'm not sure the re-alignment was neccessary.In general the center point of s... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-06 07:50 | Mike Parfitt ♦12 | I have noted the same clouds in satellite images from different providers and had to use Digitalglobe set to map a Tesco that the others didn't show. The realignment of the Hazeldon junction was prompted when my satnav didn't correctly show the lane seperation on the exit/entry slips, the... | |
| 62233361 by payelgh @ 2018-09-03 02:32 | 1 | 2018-09-03 20:49 | Chris Fleming | What is going on, you added and road and then later delete is? |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 15:08 | payelgh ♦15 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the changeset. Same like the previous changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62231993) Due to some miscommunication I deleted the road segments that were created. Going forward we will make sure that these kind of errors won’t occur.Regards,Pay... | |
| 62232273 by baindran @ 2018-09-03 00:58 | 1 | 2018-09-03 20:48 | Chris Fleming | What is going on here? |
| 2 | 2019-07-10 08:38 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. The segment was added first and deleted later because it was created over physical median.yaswap on behalf of baindran(inactive user) | |
| 62231993 by talukdm @ 2018-09-03 00:22 | 1 | 2018-09-03 20:46 | Chris Fleming | What's going on here, you created a road and then delted it a few days later. I want to be able to trust these Amazon Logistics edits but I can't really figure out what sources of data you are using or why thigns like adding a road and then deleting it later happen? |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 15:08 | talukdm ♦4 | Hi Chris Fleming,Apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for commenting on the changeset. In first place the road segment was drawn over the building which is wrong. In review process the segment should’ve been aligned properly instead of deleting. It’s a clear mistake. Thanks for... | |
| 62230736 by ramedlaW @ 2018-09-02 22:21 | 1 | 2018-09-03 20:31 | Chris Fleming | Hi - Thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap! I see that requested a review of this edit. I've had a look, and the new restuarant looks great.My only comment which is fairly minor, is that ideally we would poisition the point in the middle of the building.Also if you are familiar with th... |
| 62183201 by FrenchyF @ 2018-08-31 19:51 | 1 | 2018-08-31 21:48 | Chris Fleming | I've tried to put the turn restriction back in place - it should allow a left to Liberton Braw which then allows the turn into Blackford Gen road but not continuing further down Liberton Brae. Will check once the routers have updated.... |
| 2 | 2019-02-04 12:15 | FrenchyF ♦17 | I just checked this, and routing wasn't allowing Kirk Brae -> Blackford Glen Road. I think I've fixed it now. | |
| 62144185 by moollac @ 2018-08-30 15:34 | 1 | 2018-08-30 16:04 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Is that the actual name of the street? |
| 2 | 2018-08-30 16:20 | moollac ♦1 | Yes, and it’s not a street. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-30 16:22 | moollac ♦1 | Reach out to Falkirk council, Bonnybridge for confirmation. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-30 16:55 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | When did the name change? Is there a new street sign?Just seems a bit unlikely to be Callum Crescent given Royal Mail don't have that address in their postcode finder. | |
| 5 | 2018-08-30 17:13 | moollac ♦1 | Changed late 2017. There is a new street sign, come round and have a look. | |
| 6 | 2018-08-31 11:13 | Chris Fleming | Hi Moollac - welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for taking the time to sign up and make and edit. And appologies for all the questions, we like to try and confirm edits for new users especially for things like road name changes. Especially in this case, where it seems odd that if this change ha... | |
| 61919352 by stadiaarcadia @ 2018-08-23 12:04 | 1 | 2018-08-27 08:49 | Chris Fleming | General question, - Is Stadium really part of the name. I've always heard it refereed to as Dens Park? |
| 2 | 2018-08-27 17:58 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | The full official name is Dens Park Stadium indeed. Most people probably call it just Dens Park. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-27 18:00 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | Kilmac Stadium is the official sponsored name now. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-27 18:30 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | I've changed the name back to Dens Park, I've changed it into this: "Dens Park (Kilmac Stadium)". Is it okay this way? | |
| 5 | 2018-08-27 22:22 | Chris Fleming | Cheers :) | |
| 61857541 by PStacey @ 2018-08-21 13:58 | 1 | 2018-08-23 12:30 | Chris Fleming | Brillian, thanks for this. I'm wondering if we need to looka t the the main name for the Island. At the moment it's down as "Gigha", but from what you've said "Isle of Gigha" is more correct? |
| 61724044 by smeòrach @ 2018-08-16 18:07 | 1 | 2018-08-16 20:32 | eric_ ♦55 | Hi meadowgreen. According to the official website (https://www.edinburghmuseums.org.uk/venue/scott-monument) and Wikipedia as well, the name is "Scott Monument" without the "the". Could you please consider to review your edit and at the same time removed my previous wikipedia:en ... |
| 2 | 2018-08-17 22:30 | Chris Fleming | I think that I agree with _eric - Canmore also gives the name as "Scott Monument" https://canmore.org.uk/site/74114/edinburgh-princes-street-scott-monument | |
| 3 | 2018-08-19 12:20 | smeòrach ♦32 | Hi, I changed the name to "The Scott Monument" because the plaque on the front of it has a "the" before it. But if the official website lists it otherwise then thats fair enough. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-20 21:10 | Chris Fleming | That's more interesting! Normally we go with the "on the ground rule" We have the Edinburgh OSM social tomorrow night (Guildford Arms from 7:30) so might check it out on the way over. | |
| 5 | 2018-08-21 02:45 | smeòrach ♦32 | Cool! Also, everyone I know from Edinburgh uses the "The" when they talk about it, never referred to without it. | |
| 6 | 2018-08-21 10:42 | Chris Fleming | I think this is in the same category as the Eiffel Tower, the Statue of Liberty or the United Kingdom, where "the" is used although it's not part of the name.This page, seems to have a good description of the use of "the", https://www.ef.co.uk/english-resources/english-g... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-22 10:49 | Chris Fleming | The official plaque and all the signs say "Scotll Moument" The sign in the enterance reads "Welcome to the Scott Moument" - no real evidence of the name being anything other than "Scott Monument" - see https://photos.app.goo.gl/WDfoPb6x8dyaxytg6 | |
| 8 | 2018-08-23 03:06 | eric_ ♦55 | Following this discussion, I updated this POI -- see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61907140 | |
| 60706224 by McBoaby @ 2018-07-14 07:23 | 1 | 2018-07-24 12:18 | Chris Fleming | HI, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for taking time to edit. I do have a question about the change to Park. Normally Park would refer to open land, so unless the trees have been cutr down, then woods is probably a better tag. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark Let me... |
| 2 | 2018-08-21 12:33 | Chris Fleming | HI, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for taking time to edit. I do have a question about the change to Park. Normally Park would refer to open land, so unless the trees have been cutr down, then woods is probably a better tag. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark Let me... | |
| 61286689 by sskalyan @ 2018-08-02 07:17 | 1 | 2018-08-21 08:55 | Chris Fleming | exactly what are these relations such as - Relation: 109742 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/109742 meant to be? |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 07:52 | sskalyan ♦67 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into the edit. The turn restriction that was added here was an IMPLICIT restriction. But at that time we are not aware of adding implicit=yes in the tags. The mentioned relation was reverted by another user. Thanks for reviewing the edit.Apologies for delay ... | |
| 61837061 by Eoin @ 2018-08-20 21:39 | 1 | 2018-08-20 22:34 | Chris Fleming | Agree, sounds to me like this road can now be deleted.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2018-08-20 22:38 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Yes if it's no longer there I'd suggest deleting it. | |
| 61594374 by Nathan Hemby @ 2018-08-12 16:59 | 1 | 2018-08-12 17:23 | Leo Slager ♦3,187 | Met een changeset van Berlijn tot Edinburgh staat een ding wel vast:Je bestrijkt een veel te groot gebied in 1 changeset. TIP: beperk je tot een gebied van hooguit enkele kilometers groot, dan uploaden en een nieuwe changeset beginnen. aub |
| 2 | 2018-08-13 10:10 | Chris Fleming | That you for taking the time to add these. I do have a question about the Sandeman's Europe information point, I am wondering if there is anything permament here or is it just the start point for these tours? | |
| 3 | 2018-08-20 10:20 | Chris Fleming | Not heard anything back - I walked past here and couldn't obviously see anything on the ground to verify this? | |
| 61623830 by tms13 @ 2018-08-13 11:48 | 1 | 2018-08-13 14:29 | Chris Fleming | I think it';s worth having a discussion about how we tag these unsigned road references - their is a discussion on talk-gb: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021690.html --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/cha... |
| 2 | 2018-08-15 21:00 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I think you need to have a discussion about these. I know we've had this discussion in the pub, and still I believe that as the tags aren't verifiable on the ground they shouldn't be mapped using the Primary ref tag. Dave F's proposal to move these to the highway_authority_r... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-20 19:35 | tms13 ♦77 | Thanks - now joining the list to find out what's going on and how it can be fixed. | |
| 61236928 by GöranU @ 2018-07-31 17:40 | 1 | 2018-08-09 21:20 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for the edit, it looks great - I see that you requested a review. My only suggestion is to put the restaurant as an addition point inside the hotel outline. This way the building is shown as a hotel and the restuarant as an additional icon. |
| 2 | 2018-08-13 18:24 | GöranU ♦2 | Thanks for taking a look. I was uncertain about how to do when it was both a hotel and a restaurant; that'w why I thought a second look wouldn't hurt. Now I know what to do next time. :-)Thanks for improving my edit! | |
| 3 | 2018-08-14 10:16 | Chris Fleming | No problem - I'm assuming that you've been on holiday to Scotland? Hope you had a good trip and come back again to do some more mapping! | |
| 4 | 2018-08-14 13:16 | GöranU ♦2 | Yes, we visited Scotland during the first half of July, and had a good time. We used OpenStreetmap extensively for navigation. To be a good community member, I try to add details/make corrections for the benefit of those who come after. :-) | |
| 61628549 by SamW196 @ 2018-08-13 14:12 | 1 | 2018-08-13 22:51 | Chris Fleming | Cheers Sam - thanks for spotting the vandalism and signing up for an account to fix this! |
| 61626653 by Lpads @ 2018-08-13 13:13 | 1 | 2018-08-13 14:34 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap and editing the map.We don't always map Airbnb as they are not usually signposted and therefore can't easily be verified on the ground. In this case, however it would be great to get some more details at very least such as the full address and... |
| 61506982 by IanfaeAiberdeen @ 2018-08-09 16:35 | 1 | 2018-08-10 09:37 | Chris Fleming | Does this cycleway connect up withn The Parkway at the end, if so it's worth joping it up so that the routers will use it. |
| 2 | 2018-08-10 15:42 | IanfaeAiberdeen ♦1 | Yes, I was a bit vague about exactly where it joined up. There are actually two links from the Parkway - the one I put in yesterday goes to a pedestrian crossing and I am about to add the other one, which connects to Laurel Lane close to its junction with the Parkway. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-11 07:32 | Chris Fleming | Brilliant, thanks! | |
| 61535542 by rfadam @ 2018-08-10 12:39 | 1 | 2018-08-11 07:25 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I see that you requested a review of this edit. Overall the edit looks great, I have a few small pointers to improve things further.One simpolething to help improve buildings is to square the corners of buildings, this is simple achieved using the S key on the building.The other details... |
| 61528128 by Eubielicious @ 2018-08-10 09:30 | 1 | 2018-08-10 13:41 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for making the edit, I see that you requested a review and overall the change looks great. Their are a few things that aren't necessarily obvious that will improve things.The first is very simple, it's nice to square off the building, this is simply a case of selecting the b... |
| 61348031 by Kelly Hsieh wl @ 2018-08-04 07:46 | 1 | 2018-08-09 22:39 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for the edit; I was wondering if you have any more details on this restuarant such as the address/opening hours or website? |
| 61285027 by Qwave @ 2018-08-02 06:24 | 1 | 2018-08-09 21:51 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks ofr the edit. I see that you requested a review of your edit which looks great.CheersChris |
| 61275207 by AKB65 @ 2018-08-01 20:12 | 1 | 2018-08-09 21:46 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I'm not local, but looking at the name "Memorial at Sanaigmore", just says where it is. I'm wondering if we should call this "Exmouth Memorial" as on this webpage? https://www.islayinfo.com/islay-walk-sanaigmore-bay.html |
| 61260713 by arkangel69 @ 2018-08-01 11:45 | 1 | 2018-08-09 21:34 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - Thanks for taking the time to sihn up and make an edit. I see that you requested a review and I've had a look and your edit looks perfect; and I'm looking forward to seeing more.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 61237056 by GöranU @ 2018-07-31 17:45 | 1 | 2018-08-09 21:29 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks again, I've gone with the same idea here. Separating the hotel and restaurant. |
| 58676633 by xcb @ 2018-05-04 11:38 | 1 | 2018-08-08 13:46 | Chris Fleming | What exactly are these? |
| 61218376 by Tiago Vieira @ 2018-07-31 07:24 | 1 | 2018-08-08 13:45 | Chris Fleming | What is this? |
| 61074110 by sskalyan @ 2018-07-26 04:18 | 1 | 2018-07-26 07:43 | FraserKp ♦17 | Why? Has the car park been demolished? Deleting it because it was drawn in 2007 doesn't sound like a good reason... |
| 2 | 2018-07-26 09:47 | vssms ♦12 | Hi FraserKp,Thanks for bringing this up. We've corrected the data according to the latest imagery. | |
| 3 | 2018-07-27 00:56 | Chris Fleming | Except the latest imagery isn't up to date, I mapped this service lane from a GPs trace that I collected, when the new supermarket was built. | |
| 4 | 2018-08-08 09:58 | Chris Fleming | vssms - I will revert this change. Please don't destroy other peoples work, based on out of date imagery. | |
| 5 | 2019-07-02 09:03 | sskalyan ♦67 | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into my edit, I have modified the direction at entry/exit based on digiglobe imagery.Apologies for delay in response.Thanks,Kalyan. | |
| 60870267 by jambamkin @ 2018-07-19 12:28 | 1 | 2018-07-25 11:24 | Chris Fleming | Looks good so far, agree there is still probably lots of details that can be removed. (keep meaning to go up and have a look myself as well!) |
| 60826735 by mjn235 @ 2018-07-18 08:37 | 1 | 2018-07-25 11:02 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.Thanks for signing up and taking time to edit. I'm just having a look at your edits as you requested a review, and they the look great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 60814423 by Nyamo_ @ 2018-07-17 21:56 | 1 | 2018-07-25 10:44 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I've been having a look over your edits and they all look great! Especially the work on Lochside Academy. My only comment would be that if you have the whole named area enclosed such as by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196300072 - the you might want to ad... |
| 60717428 by Sanphil @ 2018-07-14 18:21 | 1 | 2018-07-24 12:35 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for taking time to add the campsite, I was wondering if yo uhad any more details such as the name and address of the campsite?Also let me know if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap.CheersChris |
| 60664930 by crommr @ 2018-07-12 20:45 | 1 | 2018-07-24 10:25 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I can see that you requested a review of this edit. Sorry about the delay. I've made a small additional change, which is setting the shop to disused:shop - that way we can keep the node and update it with any new tenant when they move in.Let me know if you have any questions, cheersC... |
| 2 | 2018-07-24 12:51 | crommr ♦1 | Hi Chris,thanks for the review. | |
| 60657308 by Bluejeans2004 @ 2018-07-12 15:20 | 1 | 2018-07-24 10:15 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap - Thanks for signing up and taking the time to edit!I do have a curious question about your edit. It seems unusual that there would be an odd numbered address amongst all the even numbered property? and I just wanted to double to check that this is correct?Also le... |
| 58569962 by TerminalSump @ 2018-04-30 22:10 | 1 | 2018-05-08 11:20 | Chris Fleming | HI thanks for the edit - I see that you requested a review. The edit looks fine to me, initially I was concerned that you had moved the peak from the previous position that look to align with historic maps. But looking at contour lines and the path - the updated location makes sense. I'm just w... |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 11:54 | TerminalSump ♦1 | Hi Chris, I walked to the 'old summit' position and it was not there - so clearly wrong, hence the update. thanks Tim | |
| 3 | 2018-05-08 13:47 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! | |
| 58402949 by Stevenjohn1 @ 2018-04-25 09:57 | 1 | 2018-05-02 11:38 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for signing up - I see that you requested an review and can confirm that your edit looks great. Sometime we tag churches as building=church - but it's not strictly necessary. Also if you are familure with the building, adding the address and postcode is useful.Let me know if you ... |
| 58379218 by JonoEllis @ 2018-04-24 16:13 | 1 | 2018-05-02 10:56 | Chris Fleming | Perfect, thanks Jono. |
| 57915627 by fkalweit @ 2018-04-08 15:12 | 1 | 2018-04-25 11:09 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for adding this. I didn't know about ity. I've made a few improvements to the tagging but thanks for the info. |
| 57623114 by yaswap @ 2018-03-29 07:19 | 1 | 2018-03-29 15:56 | Chris Fleming | Hi - why did you remove this. I think this is actually present on the ground unless you have other information? |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:26 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-19 11:10 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - I think I had already reverted this change. But sounds like all bad edits and no responses. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-19 12:33 | Nakaner ♦3,145 | Hi Chris,I revert all changeset in Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia/Oceania by a group of mappers because their attempts to fix so-called routing "errors" often hided real errors or created new ones (e.g. connecting unconnected streets which are unconnected in reality). In addition, ... | |
| 57542787 by Dave Craig @ 2018-03-26 17:12 | 1 | 2018-03-29 16:19 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the edit. I have added the actual trackoutline. |
| 56671733 by yoi @ 2018-02-25 21:41 | 1 | 2018-03-08 15:12 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for asking for a review of this. Livingsteet doesn't quite seem right to me? IS this more of a service road? |
| 56646395 by Gailmk @ 2018-02-24 21:28 | 1 | 2018-03-08 15:04 | Chris Fleming | Hi Gail - thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap. I've split the Childminding service off from the road, into it's own point and set it as a childminders.It would be really useful if you could move it to the right place and add the address details? Let me know if you ahve any quest... |
| 55990697 by Tim Thomson @ 2018-02-02 09:57 | 1 | 2018-02-21 15:19 | Chris Fleming | Hi Tim, welcome to OSM, thanks for requesting a review, I've had a look at your edit and have added a conference center tag and set the name.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 56370062 by Jensen Ang @ 2018-02-15 01:43 | 1 | 2018-02-21 12:39 | Chris Fleming | HI just wondering what your source for the address change for here is? |
| 55992667 by Stuartc49 @ 2018-02-02 11:02 | 1 | 2018-02-20 12:34 | Chris Fleming | Hi Stuart,Thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap and editing, from you edit it looks like this is the office for the Taxi hire company, we would normally add this as a office, with the streetname, number and postcode. Would it be possible to get these added?CheersChris |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 13:36 | Stuartc49 ♦1 | 62 Westhouses RoadMayfieldDalkeithEH22 5QP | |
| 3 | 2018-02-20 14:29 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! | |
| 55465327 by Stenismair @ 2018-01-15 14:59 | 1 | 2018-01-26 21:17 | Chris Fleming | HI thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMap and adding these nodes. We don't normally add single appartments, but I have added some of the buildings Along Allanwater Gardens.I'm also curious about Burnside Way - we don't currently have this, but it did look like we are missing some ... |
| 55580459 by smeòrach @ 2018-01-19 14:57 | 1 | 2018-01-24 15:20 | Chris Fleming | Hi see that you requested a review. Thanks for the edits - the extra details are really good. |
| 55393656 by PathfinderNE @ 2018-01-12 21:52 | 1 | 2018-01-24 14:31 | Chris Fleming | HI, welcome to OpenStreetMap - I see that you requested a review of your changes. I've had a look across all you changes so far and they look excellent, the additional detail is great.My only comment, is that we don't necessarily need to name the roads "Park Internal Road". A... |
| 55338157 by vectorist @ 2018-01-11 00:10 | 1 | 2018-01-14 12:17 | Chris Fleming | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Tis edit looks fine to me. I can't specifically see a service road in this edit, but Can see that the parking is connected via service road, but overall this looks great. |
| 55136723 by Tillysow @ 2018-01-03 18:47 | 1 | 2018-01-06 08:56 | Chris Fleming | HI and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review of the edit and this looks great to me.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 55179451 by Colin-M @ 2018-01-05 08:00 | 1 | 2018-01-06 08:52 | Chris Fleming | Hi Colin, thanks for signing up to OpenStreetMao and making these changes, I think that the bridge and footway need to be tagged as highway=foorway and remove the rail tag! I'm also wondering what/where the bridge connects to on the other side?CheersChris |
| 55088026 by stevensmith37 @ 2018-01-01 22:41 | 1 | 2018-01-01 23:41 | Chris Fleming | Hi Happy New Year and welcome to OpenStreetMAp. I see that you requested a review of these changes, I've had a look at them and they look great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 55062757 by jmg000 @ 2017-12-31 17:18 | 1 | 2018-01-01 23:09 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Happy New Year and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you've requested a review; I've had a quick look at your edits and they look great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 55050717 by Keith William @ 2017-12-31 05:37 | 1 | 2018-01-01 22:27 | Chris Fleming | thanks looks brilliant.CheersChris |
| 55040779 by MazzaT @ 2017-12-30 17:55 | 1 | 2017-12-30 21:45 | Chris Fleming | thanks for signing up - and taking time to edit OpenStreetMap, I do have some questions about the roads named Treasure trail. Normally, we would suggest that if you need a map marked with a tresure trail, to work on a offline set of data, unless I've misunderstood. I can give you some pointers ... |
| 2 | 2017-12-31 16:56 | MazzaT ♦1 | I need lots of pointers!!!! After struggling for a couple of hours to ineffectually mapping out a route for a treasure trail around our town, I gave up! I essentially would like to draw a distinctive line around the actual route if possible. Thanks Mhairi | |
| 3 | 2017-12-31 18:55 | Chris Fleming | No problem - I would probably start by having a look at http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ - should be quite simple to put a marker on for your start and end point and draw a line for the suggested route. You can also choose from a variety of background styles. There are other ways of doing this, but... | |
| 55003882 by Dougsclan @ 2017-12-29 09:04 | 1 | 2017-12-30 07:51 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for the changes. I see that you requested a review and this change looks fine to me. I'm wondering if the name also needs to be removed from the sections to the West as well, or is the name okay for this section? |
| 2 | 2017-12-30 10:50 | Dougsclan ♦1 | ChrisBayview Road only applies to a short section of road in Cullen, Which is about 5 miles to the eastSo Bayview road should be removed from all of the A98 apart from the short section in CullenThe A98 does not have any other road name, that i am aware of. I have checked from Cullen westw... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-30 21:10 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - there was a section that was still names, so I've removed it. | |
| 54994385 by Keith William @ 2017-12-28 21:16 | 1 | 2017-12-28 22:59 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks, for the edits, I've had a quick look over some of your edits where you've requested a review and they generally look great. Hopever on this changeset and some of the others where you have added what look like footpaths, but there haven't been tagged as such. Therefore I... |
| 2 | 2017-12-29 05:20 | Keith William ♦2 | Dear Chris,Yes, I have indeed forgotten to tag my changes. I seems to have missed quite a lot of them, since I am still quite new to OSM. Let me fix them now.Cheers,Flora | |
| 3 | 2017-12-29 21:36 | Chris Fleming | No problem Flora, great to have another mapper in Aberdeen. | |
| 54965303 by Recumberic @ 2017-12-27 19:27 | 1 | 2017-12-27 21:28 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the edit, wondering if we should come up with some "standard" or tagging for narrow gaps in barriers etc? |
| 54959314 by >_Erminal-Temulator @ 2017-12-27 15:40 | 1 | 2017-12-27 21:06 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for the edit, but sector 4 seems like a very odd name? |
| 2 | 2017-12-27 21:17 | >_Erminal-Temulator ♦1 | You are correct.Let us never speak of Sector 4 again, brother. | |
| 54793135 by Keith William @ 2017-12-20 17:35 | 1 | 2017-12-26 10:03 | Chris Fleming | HI Keith, thanks for your edit. I see that you requested a review of this edit. I'm wondering if this would be better tagged as a buulding=yes to represent the building as well as shop=laundry - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3DlaundryPlease let me know if you have any questio... |
| 54758903 by Fawksie @ 2017-12-19 12:53 | 1 | 2017-12-26 09:41 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've requested a review and can report that this edit looks great.Please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 54687420 by accountalitics @ 2017-12-16 18:42 | 1 | 2017-12-16 21:38 | Chris Fleming | Hi - welcome to OpenStreetMap - I see that you have changed the address if the business? If so I think that we need to create a new node in the new location? |
| 54606569 by Bruce Bonus @ 2017-12-13 20:20 | 1 | 2017-12-14 01:04 | Chris Fleming | Hi - Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review and I've had a look at your edits and they all look great.Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 54599005 by bonemonger @ 2017-12-13 14:57 | 1 | 2017-12-13 15:18 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap - I have just one quick question about why you removed the name in this change?Also let mew know if you have any question about OpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 15:45 | bonemonger ♦1 | Hiya and thanks for the welcome!I’ve removed the name as the area it covers is incorrect, the current area includes Kelburn Country Centre which doesn’t belong to Clyde Muirshiel regional park. I’m getting a map of the land Kelburn owns so I can make that park it’s ow... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 15:50 | Chris Fleming | Sounds great. Thanks for getting back to me.Only thing to watch out for is the copyright if your're using 3rd party maps as sources. | |
| 54581872 by andymc1989 @ 2017-12-12 23:51 | 1 | 2017-12-13 13:52 | Chris Fleming | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap . I see that you requested a review and yoiur edit looks excellent. My only comments are to bear in mind that we can't use other sources such as the leaflet you linked to as direct sources, but I appreciate it is useful to point as a reason for you changes t... |
| 54524277 by smeòrach @ 2017-12-10 22:32 | 1 | 2017-12-12 13:12 | FraserKp ♦17 | This looks like fantastic data, but streetmap dot co dot uk doesn't have an OSM compatible license as far as I can tell so anything derived from that will have to come out again I suspect.... |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 12:15 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I just wanted to follow up FraserKp;'s question.It would be good to get clarity on the sources used for these Edits? As you know we can't risk using data from copyright sources. In general the OS Opendata StreetView and the NLS Historoic layers are great for confirming names. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-13 14:07 | smeòrach ♦32 | Hi, thanks for reminding me about copyright. I'll check OS maps over the next couple days to confirm place names. | |
| 54562247 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-12 10:20 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-12 11:56 | Chris Fleming | again - I don't believe this to be a park. This has been mapped as woods for nearly 7 years and has been edited as such by several people. Have all the trees been cut down and this turned into a park? |
| 2 | 2017-12-12 13:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello andrewmci,Whilst we're grateful for new mappers in OSM including those who seem to have come via Pokemon Go, please don't change existing features to "parks", whether they be gardens or areas of trees. In OSM there are many tags to choose from; always pick the most appro... | |
| 54562206 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-12 10:18 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-12 11:53 | Chris Fleming | Why park and not a forest? |
| 54562162 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-12 10:16 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-12 11:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi Andrew - we seem to be stuck in a loop. Pleas eanswer why do you belive these to be parks? |
| 54410537 by Katie's Kittens @ 2017-12-06 18:51 | 1 | 2017-12-11 13:54 | Chris Fleming | Hi Katie, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the edit.I see that you requested a review - and the edit looks great. My only tip is that when adding building it's possible to use the s key shortcut to "square" off the buildings which is a bit neater.Thanks, and let me kno... |
| 54406729 by oafamut @ 2017-12-06 16:45 | 1 | 2017-12-06 17:47 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, these parks you've added seem like someone's front garden to me - and are there really two lakes there on the ground? |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 13:46 | Chris Fleming | Hi - and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just wondering if you had seen the message above. Normally these look like gardens to me rather than Parks? | |
| 54280607 by CalBac @ 2017-12-02 20:14 | 1 | 2017-12-09 16:30 | Chris Fleming | Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap - I see that you requested a review of your edits. I've had a lok and the edits look great to me.But let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 54269148 by UndefinedLogic @ 2017-12-02 13:18 | 1 | 2017-12-08 23:07 | Chris Fleming | H, Welcome to OpenStreetMap - thank you for your edits.I see that you requested a review, I've had a quick look over and can't see any problems. Let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 54446220 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-08 00:26 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-08 00:30 | Chris Fleming | Please stop. This isn't a park. |
| 2 | 2017-12-08 00:39 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-08 00:52 | Chris Fleming | In this case because it's a private garden. I would expect some kind on public access. They would normally be maintained for recreational purposes. Does this make sense? | |
| 4 | 2017-12-08 12:02 | Chris Fleming | I would add that a park is somewhere you would make a trip to visit. And that this would differentiate if from other green spaces.A further factor - in this case is that many mappers have mapped thousands of Tenement Gardens in Edinburgh and consistently tagged them as gardens.Are you happ... | |
| 5 | 2017-12-08 12:39 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Andrew, Even if this was a park (which it isn't) then the question is why have you just changed this one garden to a park? Are the gardens either side not also parks or is there something special about this one?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=parkAlso, is the public bo... | |
| 54329112 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-04 13:23 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-04 14:47 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering why you've changed one section of Colinton Road to highway=primary? |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 16:08 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-04 17:05 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Thanks for changing it back.However I see you've added a number of parks as well - are these open to the public or are they private gardens?Also, does this bit of water really exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544538090 | |
| 4 | 2017-12-04 19:35 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2017-12-04 22:43 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Ok, but I don't think this can be classed as a park - it looks like someone's front garden: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544535842And why change this building to landuse=retail? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246235100/ | |
| 6 | 2017-12-04 23:05 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 7 | 2017-12-05 14:52 | Chris Fleming | I'm sure that the building shown as "Domestic Clean Cleaner" is residential flats? Also whyt can't I find any trace of a company called "Domestic Clean Clean" in edinburgh? | |
| 8 | 2017-12-05 15:00 | Chris Fleming | Also the grass area in front of number 35 Colington road is definitly a garden as far a I remember - This image shows a wall and nothing to indicate a "public" park https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tqp3eZlDZhIKUaA3nzBD0A | |
| 9 | 2017-12-05 16:41 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2017-12-05 16:44 | Chris Fleming | Great that's perfect. We often try and add other information such as website etc? | |
| 11 | 2017-12-07 23:56 | Chris Fleming | I stopped here on my way home. Will link to video shortly1. I checked through the fire exit at Napier. No lake not even a pond.2. In Fairacre Court: None of the buzzers indicated any businesses. All looked residential.3. Gate from the road is locked. This is a private area. Grass is not ... | |
| 12 | 2017-12-08 00:22 | Chris Fleming | https://youtu.be/Yt3dfXtSohA?t=2m48sthen https://youtu.be/pwI97D3DMKs | |
| 13 | 2017-12-08 00:31 | andrewmci Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 14 | 2017-12-08 00:34 | Chris Fleming | It's uploading and I went all the way around. There really isn't anything there. | |
| 15 | 2017-12-08 00:47 | Chris Fleming | Second video is up. https://youtu.be/pwI97D3DMKs Also where is the lake? | |
| 54446100 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-08 00:14 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-08 00:29 | Chris Fleming | HI Andrew - hopfully You saw my previous message that I couln't find any of these features mapped. See this video where I walk around Fairacre court: https://youtu.be/Yt3dfXtSohA?t=2m48sthen ttps://youtu.be/pwI97D3DMKs Where is the water feature, where is the shrine: https://youtu.... |
| 2 | 2017-12-08 00:29 | Chris Fleming | https://youtu.be/pwI97D3DMKs | |
| 54331777 by andrewmci @ 2017-12-04 14:44 Active block | 1 | 2017-12-05 14:55 | Chris Fleming | Are you sure. I had these mapped as private gardens? They are certainly private residences? |
| 54128366 by Connor Browning @ 2017-11-27 17:52 | 1 | 2017-11-29 22:59 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering why you added the motor_vehicle=no tag to just this section of road? |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 08:23 | Connor Browning ♦1 | Hi Ginaro,I added the tag as no Private Hire are allowed through this street, therefore I updated so our map system would not take the drivers through this route | |
| 3 | 2017-12-02 08:31 | Chris Fleming | Hi Connor and welcome to OpenStreetMap - just want to check what your evidence for this is? This side of Princes Street is Open to all vehicles up until Waverley Bridge or certinly was when I was last there 2 weeks ago? | |
| 4 | 2017-12-04 13:32 | Connor Browning ♦1 | Hi Chris, see site closure below. Taxi refers to Black Cabs, therefore no vehicle is allowed along the route.http://edinburgh.cdmf.info/public/map/map.htm;jsessionid=66FF6FDBEC431648A3EE0A7B74A6EAB5?lat=55.953172091099205&lng=-3.189064740358076&disruptionFilter.selectedTypes=ROADWORK | |
| 5 | 2017-12-04 13:45 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Connor - good spot. If I'm looking at the correct restriction: Road \tNORTH BRIDGE A7Location \tCity CentreAt Princes StreetTraffic management measures associated with Leith Street closure.No left turn into Princes Street except for buses, taxis and cycles.Running up ... | |
| 6 | 2017-12-04 14:32 | Connor Browning ♦1 | Looking at the link, it seems that only Taxi and bus are allowed to use the route. They have prohibited Private hire and standard vehicles from using the route | |
| 53734161 by juniorelvis @ 2017-11-13 09:14 | 1 | 2017-11-22 13:15 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I see that you requested a review of this edit. There probably is only one additional change I would made and that is to add a highway=construction for this to appear on the map.Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 53608546 by harrylisbon @ 2017-11-08 11:54 | 1 | 2017-11-20 14:38 | Chris Fleming | Hi, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I've just seen that you requested a review and I've had a look at your edits and they look great. New Area's like this is tricky especially when the imagery doesn't cover the full area. The only additional change that I've made is to rem... |
| 53897883 by rnewmark @ 2017-11-18 11:42 | 1 | 2017-11-18 12:11 | rnewmark ♦1 | I've only deleted one small section I see. I will delete the rest of the route at a later time, assuming no-one objects (I'm just new to this editing!) |
| 2 | 2017-11-19 12:14 | Chris Fleming | HI Mark, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for preceding with caution. I've had a look at this. Doing a google for this showed up: http://www.transitionblackisle.org/userfiles/file/million%20miles/community_cycle_links/150305-ccl-route-10.pdfSo I think this *is* an official cycle route. M... | |
| 3 | 2017-11-19 17:32 | rnewmark ♦1 | Thanks Chris. I tend to consider official cycle routes as something with signs, and proper cycle paths - not as a communities aspiration that a footpath becomes a route for bicycles (otherwise every footpath might be regarded as a cycle route!).But I'll do exactly as you suggest and change th... | |
| 4 | 2017-11-19 22:07 | Chris Fleming | Sounds like a plan, it looks like cycle.travel avoids this route, but as you say both the balanced and quiet route in cyclestreets use some of these tracks. As well as making sure the surface is correctly tagged, I think it would make sense to remove the lcn from the relation as well. | |
| 53820568 by Alistair MacLean @ 2017-11-15 21:30 | 1 | 2017-11-19 12:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi Alistair, I see that you requested a review of these edits, I wanted to drop you a quick note and let you know that the edits look great. Please let me know if you have any questions. |
| 53836112 by LaserMapperMan @ 2017-11-16 10:07 | 1 | 2017-11-19 12:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review for this edit. I've had a quick look at it and it looks great, there is only one more change that I would change, and that is from amenity=restaurant to disused:amenity=restaurant. |
| 53534911 by Nadiia @ 2017-11-05 17:48 | 1 | 2017-11-07 16:17 | Chris Fleming | Hi thanks for this, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edit looks great, but for future reference I've made some small changes, I've set it be a highway path and have also joined it up to Maryhill Road assuming this was your intention. Please let me know if you have any questions. Chee... |
| 53551442 by The Shog @ 2017-11-06 10:54 | 1 | 2017-11-06 11:49 | Hjart ♦4,116 | Several duplicate hotels here + an atm suspiciously located in the middle of a lake |
| 2 | 2017-11-06 17:21 | stev ♦13 | Looks bad to me too - can't find any reference to "Eagle and Beth's" in that location in London | |
| 3 | 2017-11-06 17:54 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding these Points of interest. One thing tol check for is that places aren't duplicates. Also I have a question about "Eagle and Beth's" what is this? | |
| 53507455 by Syfer Polski @ 2017-11-04 15:46 | 1 | 2017-11-05 00:06 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I see that you requested a review. I just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that comparing your edits to the aerial photography and they look great to me. Please let me know if you have any questions?CheersChris |
| 53433656 by ClarkstonCorrect @ 2017-11-01 19:58 | 1 | 2017-11-01 23:54 | Chris Fleming | Looks good - I don't recommend deleting the name node at the moment as the Standard OSM style only renders the name from the name. So fo now we have both. |
| 53125407 by dorian Pineapples @ 2017-10-21 11:18 | 1 | 2017-10-30 11:39 | Chris Fleming | HI I'm curious about this Hostel. Last time I went past here, this streeet was just residential flats with no hostels? Can I check what you source is? |
| 2 | 2017-10-30 18:50 | dorian Pineapples ♦2 | Small place inside an apartment block. I stayed there, my Korean wife booked it though. So is via a Korean Web site. If you can't read Korean. May have a problem booking. Odd times as well for check in, 5pm. Check out 10am. | |
| 3 | 2017-10-30 21:48 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for getting back to me, is it more like an Air B&B - where there aren't any signs on the outside? Locally we tend not to map these. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-30 21:53 | dorian Pineapples ♦2 | Hard for me to say. But it's definitely geared towards koreans and is a family home. So i guess it similar. | |
| 52831398 by Chris Fleming @ 2017-10-11 16:02 | 1 | 2017-10-16 09:30 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | Are you sure the postcodes on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161224522 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161224521 are correct? According to Code-Point Open, EH4 8AJ is located on Strathalmond Park about over 5km away. |
| 2 | 2017-10-30 15:06 | Chris Fleming | Yes, I've just checked my notes and have that postcode completely wrong. I've fixed it up now. | |
| 53344182 by pidginperfect @ 2017-10-29 15:02 | 1 | 2017-10-30 11:05 | Chris Fleming | I see that you requested a review. Setting the access to private works perfectly here to reflect that this is a private garden. My only comment is that your description field would possibly have worked better as a chageset comment.Let me know if you have any more questions.CheersChris |
| 53243972 by ega95jch @ 2017-10-25 19:13 | 1 | 2017-10-27 10:27 | Chris Fleming | HI, just wanted to drop a quick note as you have requested a review of this edit to let you know that this edit looks great. (and I'm not seriously considering a trip to visit this tree).Let me known if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap.CheersChris |
| 2 | 2017-10-27 12:56 | ega95jch ♦1 | Many thanks for that, Chris! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong!Looking forward to contributing more to this excellent project.CheersJohn | |
| 32260413 by Fisher58 @ 2015-06-28 11:08 | 1 | 2017-10-19 13:01 | Chris Fleming | sorry to bring up a question on such an old edit, but we have had a query on the name "Witchy Woods" Can I check what the source for this name is?CheersChris |
| 2 | 2017-10-19 14:54 | Fisher58 ♦1 | Hi Chris,have to be honest i don't know the source. I grew up here it's what all the local children called the path. Possibly due to it being dark and scary! | |
| 3 | 2017-10-19 22:30 | Chris Fleming | Excellent thanks for getting back to me. I'm asking because of this note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1169720#map=17/55.97376/-2.89773&layers=N It does sounds like it is a name that is use. CheersChris | |
| 4 | 2017-10-25 14:51 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for geeting back to me. I've also spoken to someone who lives locally and he doesn't know this path as Witchy Woods. So for the moment, I think I will move the name to loc_name - as it's not an official name and it sounds like there aren't any name signs. Hope this is okay... | |
| 53114647 by woodpeck_repair @ 2017-10-20 22:13 | 1 | 2017-10-20 23:49 | muralito ♦2,016 | I could provide some nodes that were deleted and were not advertising.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1118036691https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135199111https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5057146412/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5042809017/historyThe 4 seems va... |
| 2 | 2017-10-21 04:16 | naoliv ♦1,783 | It seems the same case from some nodes in Brazil.I wouldn't call them *wrong* but incomplete and/or with unnecessary information.(New) users sometimes misunderstand the "description" tag and are too much verbose when using it.Instead deleting, is it possible to create a list of ... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-21 05:55 | funnimonk ♦3 | please never do things like this again. you've basically deleted street names etc from the dataset. some of us rely on these things like names an geometries and now we have to restore them and you know how difficult that is!! to what end, all this deletion? couldn't you just change the des... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-21 08:23 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Hello, I'm sorry if I have accidentally deleted things that were not advertising. I'll look into the IDs specified by muralito and replace them. I have only deleted objects that were created by users who had a very small number of edits (usually, only one edit!) and who have added a long d... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-21 08:25 | Prince Kassad Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-21 08:54 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | is this a joke? all objects i checked are NOT SEO or even advertising! These descriptions were just descriptions. I think it is totally wrong to delete things, you even don''t understand in another language! You even deleted the hole building, that exists on satimagery!https://www.openst... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-21 09:05 | Владимир К ♦1,775 | in Moscow only 2 of 8 deleted objects have description! and another exxisting building was deleted | |
| 8 | 2017-10-21 09:49 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Hello Владимир К, Prince Kassad, indeed I have removed objects even if they *had* advertising in the past, and other mappers had removed the advertising in the mean time. That was unnecessary. I'll undelete the affected objects. Please refrain from reverting the full changeset because ... | |
| 9 | 2017-10-21 10:55 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted this and now re-created things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 - will you now take over and do this properly, removing advertising from where it doesn't belong, or do you expect others to do this? | |
| 10 | 2017-10-21 20:13 | muralito ♦2,016 | I just wanted to raise the flag that there are some false positives in the algorithm, so i asked for an improvement, I also understand if the algorithm is not disclosed as it can be used by advertisers for "tunning" their ads.In thousands of elements there are probably a lot of distinc... | |
| 11 | 2017-10-21 20:38 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Yes, it was not an algorithm that I was planning to run regularly, I just had identified long-description objects made by users who have contributed very little, and then went through the list manually, using a translating web site for anything other than English and German. Quite possible that I ac... | |
| 12 | 2017-10-21 22:36 | SimonvdP ♦18 | Did you even check your example?, removing part of a likely valid secondary road seems worse than leaving it there with the useless description on it, | |
| 13 | 2017-10-22 22:48 | Chris Fleming | This feels excessive to me - generally when I see these added, provided the information is accurate then I don't mind the "spammy description"; but there is also a case for removing. My worry with this changeset is that by completely removing the object we remove information that had... | |
| 14 | 2017-10-23 05:47 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | I think that any contribution made by a spammer should be entirely removed because it has not been made with OSM's interests at heart; most likely the coordinates are from a proprietary geocoder and the object will usually be placed with little regard to what's around it. So if the spammer... | |
| 15 | 2017-10-23 13:19 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - I think we are in Broad agreeement :) | |
| 16 | 2017-10-24 07:45 | GRUBERND ♦16 | i think deleting things by algorithm is the most wrong thing one can to do to the OSM database. especially at this scale. it's the same as an import: automated changes of HUGE amounts of data.things like these should always run through individual inspection on a case-by-case basis. cue map-... | |
| 17 | 2017-10-24 11:28 | muralito ♦2,016 | @GRUBERND, I would agree if you write that sentence considering that using an algorithm does not necessarily imply automation. | |
| 18 | 2017-10-24 11:33 | muralito ♦2,016 | @woodpeck (regarding your last comment)Often a spammer (or any other user) deletes an existing object (street, POI, etc.) and adds a new one with her data. Please consider those cases when deleting or redacting objects. | |
| 19 | 2017-10-24 18:55 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | I have started carefully removing the spam objects here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53216381 : Where a spammy description and contact information were added to a building but there was no shop/office/amenity tag (just name/phone/payment methods etc), I reduced the object to a mere buildi... | |
| 20 | 2017-10-24 20:55 | SafwatHalaby ♦622 | I think the algorithm is horrible. | |
| 21 | 2017-10-24 20:58 | SafwatHalaby ♦622 | For instance, this has a slightly "positive tone" but seems to be a 100% valid node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5109075827.I think your definition of a "spammy description" need to be narrowed. | |
| 22 | 2017-10-24 21:00 | SafwatHalaby ♦622 | Oh, I was reviewing via OSMCHA and I have a long backlog, and it seems that particular node was added back. Please ignore my comment if all the non spammy nodes were reverted. | |
| 53170562 by Cliff Edden @ 2017-10-23 07:54 | 1 | 2017-10-23 10:42 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for signing up and making this change, Cliff and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please let me know if you have any questions.CheersChris |
| 53014324 by The Highlander @ 2017-10-17 15:03 | 1 | 2017-10-18 15:47 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - I was just wondering what your information source for this viewpoint is?CheersChris |
| 52781244 by GerdP @ 2017-10-10 07:15 | 1 | 2017-10-12 16:40 | Chris Fleming | why remove the maxspeed? - also I'm not sure if an area is actually appropriate here. Think that a standard highway tag will be find here. |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 16:43 | GerdP ♦2,751 | I did not dare to remove the areas. The maxspeed tags are on the normal highway ways and not needed for areas.If you like, please delete the areas.I think they were created as an experiment. | |
| 52829247 by JackieS27 @ 2017-10-11 15:13 | 1 | 2017-10-11 15:20 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, notice you deleted a number of benches and other objects - did you mean to do this? |
| 2 | 2017-10-12 12:19 | Chris Fleming | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In case deleting these was as accident (very easy to do), I've restored there objects. Let me know if this is wrong, and let me know uif you have any questions.CheersChris | |
| 52614630 by graeme181449 @ 2017-10-04 05:41 | 1 | 2017-10-04 16:00 | Chris Fleming | Hi Graeme - thanmks for signing up to OSM. It would be really useful if you could add some more details. Ideallty I would suggest adding the outline of the building as well as the full postal address. Also I would add office=photographerPlease let me know if you have any more questions. |
| 52622337 by ClarkstonCorrect @ 2017-10-04 11:28 | 1 | 2017-10-04 14:14 | Chris Fleming | Hi - just wanted to check what your source/thinkomg for this is. I can't see the A91 on the Trunk Road list: https://www.transport.gov.scot/publication/official-list-of-trunk-roads/(also thanks for the excellent changeset comments) |
| 2 | 2017-10-04 14:26 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | Ok I realise now a91 is primary I used to think it was trunk :) | |
| 3 | 2017-10-04 15:35 | Chris Fleming | No problem - it may be the case that the A91 is signed with Green signs, in which case it may be appropriate to tag it as trunk. - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_A_and_B_roads#How_to_tag | |
| 4 | 2017-10-04 16:12 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | It is tagged with green signs at least at Menstrie. | |
| 52459934 by Chris Fleming @ 2017-09-28 22:38 | 1 | 2017-09-29 13:04 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Saw a picture on twitter with the bollards preventing car access so I've changed this to a cycleway |
| 2 | 2017-09-29 22:06 | Chris Fleming | thanks that's perfect. My source was on a cycling group on Facebook, | |
| 52127251 by DJ° @ 2017-09-17 20:48 | 1 | 2017-09-23 07:07 | Chris Fleming | HI I saw that you requested a review - just wanted to drop you a quick note to let you know that these edits look great. |
| 52102962 by chumpster @ 2017-09-16 19:13 | 1 | 2017-09-21 14:28 | Chris Fleming | Excellent, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the Edit! Let me know if you have any questions? |
| 52142089 by Chris Fleming @ 2017-09-18 11:40 | 1 | 2017-09-18 13:58 | FraserKp ♦17 | ah, thanks - didn't notice all the building here have the addresses duplicated when I removed AR2 |
| 2 | 2017-09-18 15:04 | Chris Fleming | No problem! - It does go against the normal principle of not duplicating data. But the address node at the "entrance" and then the "occupant" node does seem to work well especially in the center of town or for multiple occupants. PS. Do you know about missing maps followed by... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-18 20:30 | FraserKp ♦17 | Yes saw the social but can't make it this week, sorry. Have a good night. | |
| 52005326 by Alyrium @ 2017-09-13 12:37 | 1 | 2017-09-13 15:30 | Chris Fleming | HNi just wanted to say Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and that you for your edits. Let me know ifn you have any questions. I'm also wondering on this edit if it might make more sense to use a building tag rather than the landuse. (We tend to use landuse over larger areas such as Industial Es... |
| 51911427 by Bruce Kenneth Griffiths @ 2017-09-10 15:39 | 1 | 2017-09-12 10:57 | Chris Fleming | Hi Bruce - Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you requested a review and I've had a quick look over them and they look good.Thanks for Editing and let me know if you have any questions. |
| 51616656 by camlewwri @ 2017-08-31 14:02 | 1 | 2017-08-31 15:13 | Chris Fleming | So we had left this as a Trunk Road rather than as a Motorway as it won't be running under motorway restrictions until October? |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 21:19 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Agreed this should be changed back to trunk as I don't think it's officially a motorway on the ground, despite what the source website says? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-05 13:28 | Chris Fleming | I have set this back to Trunk. | |
| 51707890 by labyrintista @ 2017-09-04 05:54 | 1 | 2017-09-04 13:58 | Chris Fleming | HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the Edits. I see that you requested some feedback, and they look great to me. My only question/suggestion is if the Hinterland Shelter should be an amenity=shelter rather than a park? (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.65646/-3.58689) Let me kno... |
| 2 | 2017-09-13 14:23 | labyrintista ♦1 | Hi Chris, Thanks for your feedback. At the time of making the edit I didn't realise I could just type in the feature field. So have changed it to amenity at your suggestion. CheersAriane | |
| 51580711 by TJS @ 2017-08-30 13:59 | 1 | 2017-08-30 16:58 | Chris Fleming | oops possibly a bit overzealous, I'm going to double check things on the ground tomorrow, but I had based these roads being closed on: https://www.theforthbridges.org/plan-your-journey/road-user-guide/ |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 22:28 | TJS ♦4 | I could see evidence of traffic flow on this proposed 'closed' section earlier Today, however I think it is now closed as planned | |
| 17041400 by mcld @ 2013-07-21 21:08 | 1 | 2017-08-29 00:06 | Chris Fleming | Sorry this is going back a while. What source did you use for the road names, in particular Harmiston Walk? |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 07:51 | mcld ♦68 | Oh man, no idea I'm afraid. It will probably have been a local signpost or suchlike. I was wandering around the area. | |
| 51180381 by Gabriel Reynolds @ 2017-08-16 16:27 | 1 | 2017-08-17 11:01 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the changes. A changeset comment would be helpful to see what you've done. |
| 50909679 by afe0h3r0wh0ew @ 2017-08-07 08:42 | 1 | 2017-08-07 15:08 | Chris Fleming | Hi, just wanting to check what your source for this is? I'm pretty sure that this route does continue across here. There is evidence from the GPS trace information that this has been used. |
| 2 | 2017-08-07 16:47 | afe0h3r0wh0ew ♦1 | I was there personally recently trying to use the road. If the path ever existed, now it has been fully blocked by bushes with pointy leaves. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-07 16:52 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for getting back to me. Did you see if there was an alternative route up to Den's Cleugh - I've had a look at the Strava data and it looks like it's on the other side of the wall through the woods? | |
| 4 | 2017-08-07 16:56 | afe0h3r0wh0ew ♦1 | No, I didn't. The other side seemed to be private property with a gate in front. | |
| 50524359 by Dominique Job @ 2017-07-24 10:53 | 1 | 2017-07-24 16:07 | Chris Fleming | Curious about this changeset, what is your source? also the location of the Airport 1 stop doesn't look quite right to me, for a bus stop? |
| 49884431 by Bramble @ 2017-06-28 10:27 | 1 | 2017-06-28 11:37 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, just wondering why you moved all of these POIs? Same with the other two edits you made to Edinburgh recently. |
| 2 | 2017-06-28 11:41 | Bramble ♦2 | Hi, to see some road names better. I hope it didn't cause a problem? | |
| 3 | 2017-06-28 13:34 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | But you moved them towards the road, so how does help see the road names better? Unless you mean the footway - but these shops are below Victoria Terrace so were correctly placed. | |
| 4 | 2017-06-28 13:45 | Bramble ♦2 | OK, I've moved them back.. | |
| 5 | 2017-06-28 15:25 | Chris Fleming | Thanks, I'm guessing that you were trying to clear the view of Victoria Terrace which runs above these shops. FYI the normal convention we have in Edinburgh is for most POI's we put the POI nodes internal to the buildings with an address node inline with the building outline, and the actua... | |
| 49234753 by badpap @ 2017-06-04 07:05 | 1 | 2017-06-12 15:05 | Cebderby ♦299 | Only a few of these are roundabouts, and a couple of these you left set in the wrong direction for the country. I have fixed the worst of these. |
| 2 | 2017-06-12 16:19 | Chris Fleming | I don't think that the one on Big Brigs Way is actually a roundabout? What's the evidence? | |
| 49440641 by David Fiddes @ 2017-06-11 11:47 | 1 | 2017-06-11 21:18 | Chris Fleming | Good to see you mapping David. Hopefuly sophie won't add this back in, but if so then it might be worth keeping the node, setting it as felled tree (or similar) and making a node that the tree is felled. CheersChris |
| 2 | 2017-06-11 21:22 | David Fiddes ♦2 | Thanks for the tip Chris. Bing is both a blessing and a curse! | |
| 3 | 2017-06-12 13:12 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Might be worth leaving a comment on the changeset or sending a message to let her know :) | |
| 49309816 by e3k2 @ 2017-06-06 15:59 | 1 | 2017-06-07 10:08 | Chris Fleming | very temporary :)On a general note, welcome to OpenStreetMap - let me know if you have any questions. |
| 49084736 by ridixcr @ 2017-05-29 20:38 | 1 | 2017-05-30 13:11 | Chris Fleming | why did you remove the name of the artwork? |
| 2 | 2017-05-30 14:58 | ridixcr ♦87 | Hi Chris Fleming!Thank you very much for contributing with OSM, I removed it because it was a Profanity name, if you confirm that the valid name will proceed to reverse my changeset.Have a good day | |
| 3 | 2017-05-30 14:59 | ridixcr ♦87 | Thank you for informing me, I see that you added it already. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-30 15:36 | Chris Fleming | Thanks a few seconds on google would have been sufficient to determine that this is a genuine name: https://www.jupiterartland.org/artwork/suck (especially as the Editor who added the name is a experienced editor with may changesets) | |
| 48990332 by ninjamask @ 2017-05-26 05:30 | 1 | 2017-05-29 09:54 | Chris Fleming | wtf. ANy chance you could keep to smaller areas for you changeset, 6000 nodes deleted in a single changeset is just too much, |
| 2 | 2017-05-29 18:11 | ninjamask ♦17 | Im fixing double nodes from http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&overlays=duplicate_nodehttp://nenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=48990332 | |
| 48785287 by Nikola K @ 2017-05-18 09:27 | 1 | 2017-05-18 10:03 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Any reason why you removed highway=tertiary in this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3908325 |
| 2 | 2017-05-18 10:13 | Nikola K ♦3 | Sorry, it must have been a mistake, I did not mean to delete it. Could you please revert the changes? | |
| 3 | 2017-05-18 11:01 | Chris Fleming | I've fixed up the road. I appreciate the idea of George IV Bridge as an attraction. I'm just not really sure it needs an attraction tag? Wondering what the logic of adding this is?ThanksChris | |
| 48536038 by munkiepus @ 2017-05-09 16:03 | 1 | 2017-05-09 16:12 | munkiepus ♦6 | there is another business here now, i'll get the details soon and add it in |
| 2 | 2017-05-09 22:04 | Chris Fleming | Brilliant thanks - one thing to note is that normally when business's closed we try and keep the node and prefix it with disused - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: that way we can track the history of palces. | |
| 48516562 by piligab @ 2017-05-08 22:35 | 1 | 2017-05-09 16:32 | Chris Fleming | I think the layer of car park you deleted in this layer is just the ground floor of the car park rather than incorrect mapping. (possibly over zealous mapping) but I think correct? |
| 2 | 2017-05-09 17:48 | piligab ♦60 | Hi Chris:I'm sorry. I didn't see the layer tag, I thought there was a overlap.I will be more careful. I proceded to revert my changesetshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48538332Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-09 21:29 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! | |
| 48477017 by Eduardo Abella @ 2017-05-07 14:48 | 1 | 2017-05-07 14:59 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | Hi, welcome to OSM. There is no supermarket here. I have therefore removed it. |
| 2 | 2017-05-08 10:17 | Chris Fleming | Thanks trigpoint - think this was probably a "duplicate" of the store next to the Last Drop. | |
| 48013597 by yurasi @ 2017-04-21 19:30 | 1 | 2017-04-22 07:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi I just want to check what your sources for these changes are. There are lots of changes happening to the road over here and I *think* that the layout as mapped was correct? |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 21:24 | Chris Fleming | Just to be clear - I believe that you have now routed the road over a bridge that was demolished ignoring the old bridge. I'm rolling this change back before I forget to do so. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-34637731 | |
| 3 | 2017-04-23 15:37 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | There's actually fairly recent Mapillary imagery so I've updated this section, including fixing the unconnected cycleways and adding a bridge | |
| 4 | 2017-04-24 13:10 | yurasi ♦87 | Hi Chris Fleming and GinaroZ,I had made these changes according to the Bing imagery, but since Mapillary is more recent, thank you for updating the roads according to Mapillary. I will make sure to check all the sources to confirm before editing. Thanks again. :) | |
| 46643612 by Юкатан @ 2017-03-07 07:43 | 1 | 2017-03-07 10:15 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I messaged you yesterday. Please don't remove our individually mapped trees and replace them with rows are areas? |
| 46618328 by Юкатан @ 2017-03-06 09:47 | 1 | 2017-03-06 15:28 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I was just wondering what your source for this change is? |
| 46621660 by Юкатан @ 2017-03-06 11:56 | 1 | 2017-03-06 15:18 | Chris Fleming | Why have you removed the trees that were individually mapped and replaced them with a forest area? |
| 46594039 by sairfeet @ 2017-03-05 11:50 | 1 | 2017-03-05 23:36 | Chris Fleming | Great job - these has been a bit of a discussion on the mailing list about co-ordinating efforts to cover the 20mph zones, - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-scotland/2017-March/thread.html We are using the tasking mangager to comment/mark which areas have been updated or not. Most... |
| 46402324 by chris_debian @ 2017-02-25 20:29 | 1 | 2017-02-27 14:36 | Chris Fleming | How do you know this is a roundabout? I think it's just a road that ends with a circle? |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 20:17 | chris_debian ♦21 | Thanks, you are right. Not sure how I missed this. I'll remove the tag, when I get back to my PC.Thank you,Chris. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-27 21:40 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! | |
| 46041520 by tepm @ 2017-02-13 09:41 | 1 | 2017-02-24 12:44 | Chris Fleming | Hi I just wanted to welcome you to OpenStreetMap - I've been trying to find a way of validating this edit - But I just wanted to check how you know there is a pond here.As it's very unusual to see ponds in tenement gardens?Let me know if you have any questions. |
| 2 | 2017-02-27 09:45 | tepm ♦1 | Hi Chris! Sorry for the delay in my reply and thank you for the welcome. Ponds are pretty rare but my neighbour has been building one for a while (poorly!) and I thought it might be nice to add it for some local colour! I must confess I am not 100% if I marked the right bit, the google pics didn... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-27 15:16 | Chris Fleming | No problem with the delay at all Dan - it's great to have you on board! and thanks for the detailed reply about the pond - it's these extra details that make OSM great!No need for this to be on the aerial imagery a best guess from local knowledge is fine!I have to agree it is very ... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-27 15:25 | tepm ♦1 | :-) Thank you! I look forward to tramping through many bits of the country to get them better mapped in the future! | |
| 46304902 by Dan Morton @ 2017-02-22 12:07 | 1 | 2017-02-22 16:34 | Chris Fleming | Hi Dan, I would just like to start by welcoming you to OpenStreetMap - from your comment, it sounds like this is a private road, therefore should it be tagged as private rather than deleted?Thanks CHris |
| 2 | 2017-02-24 14:19 | Dan Morton ♦1 | Hi Chris,It's my private driveway that's shared with 2 of my neighbours, there's no reason for it to be mapped. No other driveways on the development are.ThanksDan | |
| 3 | 2017-02-24 14:21 | Dan Morton ♦1 | Also neither Google or Bing map it. | |
| 4 | 2017-02-24 21:39 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Dan - I will try and get over there and have a look. We try and be better than Google Maps. | |
| 5 | 2017-02-25 11:20 | drnoble ♦49 | I think I mapped this section originally, and at the time I didn't realise it was a private drive. As Chris says, we try and map the world as it exists on the ground, including access rights where these are known. It is quite easy to add that this is a private section.I appreciate your conc... | |
| 6 | 2017-02-27 10:09 | Dan Morton ♦1 | No worries, and on reflection there are pros to it being mapped and marked as private too....Will try and update the map as the development is finished around us. I have some site layouts that could be scanned and over laid to help | |
| 46071890 by Mike Baggaley @ 2017-02-14 08:28 | 1 | 2017-02-14 14:15 | Chris Fleming | Why - The name of the premises is Buckstone Terrace Post Office - so possibly move Post Office to brand? But don't delete the name entirely? |
| 2 | 2017-02-14 14:16 | Chris Fleming | Apologies just noticed that you fixed up the name. All good! | |
| 45584010 by Mr Ninjawesome @ 2017-01-28 07:17 | 1 | 2017-01-30 12:31 | Chris Fleming | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's allways great to see new users coming along and helping to improve the map.I do have a question regarding the addition of a park behind what looks like houses here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469624484I think thius should be tagged as a private ... |
| 45563653 by Richf117 @ 2017-01-27 15:28 | 1 | 2017-01-27 15:36 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering why you changed a hedge into a footpath, and adjusted the tags on the bridge at the jewel? Also, you seem to have removed the steps from the bridge over the railway. |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 15:36 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Sorry that should say *moved the steps | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 08:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi - I was wondering the same thing! | |
| 45549159 by Hayden Gray @ 2017-01-27 08:42 | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:47 | Chris Fleming | HI - I just wanted to say Welcome to OpenStreetMap, it's always great to see new users joining up and contributing. I do have a few small comments. The first is regarding use of landuse=residential - in Edinburgh we tend not to use this. Especially as we roll out more detailed building and ... |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 17:16 | sophiemccallum ♦7 | Thanks Chris and thanks Hayden for joining in the mapping. Just to let you know I am currently working on systematically updating all of the Carrick Knowe area so within the next week or two all the houses, walls, gardens etc will be mapped and then a detailed survey will be carried out to add a... | |
| 45522984 by Damian Schofield @ 2017-01-26 18:35 | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:15 | Chris Fleming | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap - it looks to me like you were trying to add the field next to the school. You added the square but then never gave it any tags. What should it be?Please let me know if you have any questions? |
| 45298914 by munkiepus @ 2017-01-19 14:34 | 1 | 2017-01-20 11:59 | Chris Fleming | I think this would be better as a neighbourhood rather than an area? |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 12:00 | Chris Fleming | Sorry I've just seen that you did that. Cheers! | |
| 3 | 2017-01-20 12:01 | munkiepus ♦6 | yeah sorry, noticed as soon as i'd saved it, all good now :) | |
| 45133756 by munkiepus @ 2017-01-13 13:51 | 1 | 2017-01-13 21:55 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Looks like the path is sorted, but just to let you I've removed the access tags you added to Roseburn Maltings |
| 2 | 2017-01-16 11:04 | Chris Fleming | Look great - I was going query the access tags. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-18 18:59 | munkiepus ♦6 | cool thanks, sorry didnt realise i'd updated the maltings too | |
| 44736989 by Smugleaf @ 2016-12-28 17:41 | 1 | 2016-12-28 17:49 | chillly ♦819 | Hi, Welcome to OSMIt is always a concern . when the first edit a new mapper makes is a deletion. Have all these trees really been cut down? |
| 2 | 2016-12-29 00:02 | Smugleaf ♦1 | Sorry for the concern! I live in the neighborhood and noticed the woodland area was way bigger than is should be so I removed it, in reality, it is but just a mere few bushes as apposed to a woodland area. I have made another edit correcting the first edit, leaving in the small bushed area on the ma... | |
| 3 | 2016-12-29 08:51 | Chris Fleming | Brilliant - thanks for getting back to us. This does look like it agrees with the aerial imagery a woody area separated by open ground and a tree lines path.Welcome to OSM, we have quite an active community in Edinburgh so let me know if you have any questions. | |
| 4 | 2016-12-29 10:57 | chillly ♦819 | Thanks for responding. I hope you add more local detail - your local knowledge is very precious. Enjoy 2017. | |
| 42360857 by SDMB @ 2016-09-22 22:00 | 1 | 2016-09-23 13:05 | Chris Fleming | HI - first of all, can I just say welcome to OpenStreetMap - it's really great to have you and thanks for the edit.I do have a few question, the first is that I just want to check what is the source of the Edits?Secondsly, I noticed that you removed the building on the North side of the... |
| 2 | 2017-02-02 07:28 | eric_ ♦55 | I finally had the chance to enter there last week and to take some pictures of all the buildings. It's now finally updated. | |
| 41982305 by Manu Madan @ 2016-09-07 15:51 | 1 | 2016-09-08 11:18 | Chris Fleming | Hi, thanks for adding this shelter to OpenStreetMap - I'm just trying to get a bit more context about what it is, for example is it a bus shelter or something else? |
| 41055809 by Olaf Schüsler @ 2016-07-27 07:52 | 1 | 2016-07-27 21:37 | Chris Fleming | So the Jamie's Italian website for Edinburgh says that it's on George Street. BUT the entrace/menuboard is on Rose Street. It may be possible to enter from the George Street side though. So in conclusion - I think that the address should remain on Rose Street, |
| 2 | 2016-07-28 11:03 | Olaf Schüsler ♦1 | I do agree with you that Rose street is a logical place for this restaurant, however, since the restaurant can obviously be entered from both sides and the website states that the address is George street, shouldn't that be the address to use? | |
| 40097710 by Chris Fleming @ 2016-06-17 15:45 | 1 | 2016-06-17 18:30 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | According to the wiki, amenity=shop is deprecated |
| 2 | 2016-06-23 20:23 | eric_ ♦55 | Agree with GinaroZ so I removed amenity=shop.The tagging shop=recycling doesn't exist but makes sense here. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-28 23:01 | Chris Fleming | Thanks! | |
| 40194753 by wille @ 2016-06-22 02:22 | 1 | 2016-06-22 16:16 | Chris Fleming | Do you know exactly where the Edinburgh one is. The address given currently has a branch of Sally hairdressers, which there website indicates is still open. Is it inside that properly or somewhere else nearby? |
| 2 | 2016-06-22 16:26 | wille ♦523 | I don't know exactly, but their address is 26 Howe Street. I think it is in a superior floor https://twitter.com/DeRoseNewTown/status/175511062869835776This photo shows that it is at the side of future property auctions https://www.instagram.com/p/1TfzeJOD2H/ | |
| 3 | 2016-06-22 16:33 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - I might put a note on the map for someone to confirm the exact location. There is a door currently labelled as 28 that I think goes to the upstairs properties. Also I'm not sure if amenity=school is the correct tagging, as school normally indicates formal 5 to 18 education. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-22 19:13 | wille ♦523 | we don't have a tag alternative to amenity=school to things like language courses, arts or another type of non formal education... :( | |
| 5 | 2016-06-22 21:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @wille it's been discussed on the mailing lists at least once:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-September/thread.html#14742There may be others - try doing a site search of site:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ for different sorts of school. | |
| 6 | 2016-06-23 20:57 | eric_ ♦55 | Why not creating a new tag here for this kind of school (even if there is a limited number of them at the moment), e.g. amenity=derose_school or derose_method_school, the same way that amenity=language_school has been created (see the urls above written by SomeoneElse).What do you think to use t... | |
| 7 | 2016-06-24 14:47 | wille ♦523 | Hi Eric,Thank you for your comment. It seems amenity=language_school and music_school are not yet approved, nor supported by the editors, so I prefer to wait for some approval of those kind of tags before propose a new one.In relation to the names, in the case of DeRose Method schools, we ca... | |
| 8 | 2016-06-28 22:59 | Chris Fleming | It's worth noting that approved tags do not hold absolute authority. We should tag things with the most appropriate tag, and then push for that tag to be accepted, as one of the considerations when "accepting" tags is the current usage of the tag... | |
| 9 | 2016-07-04 12:34 | eric_ ♦55 | Hi wille, thanks for your answer. I agree with what Chris wrote for several reasons: 1. all the approved tags aren't rendered by the default map renderer, 2. the OSM specifications are a kind of foundation to build the OSM database, the default map renderer isn't, 3. the current OSM specif... | |
| 10 | 2016-07-04 17:15 | wille ♦523 | Thanks, Eric and ChrisI'll propose a tag for informal education on the tagging list and ask them to speed up the approval. | |
| 40040615 by Chris Fleming @ 2016-06-15 15:05 | 1 | 2016-06-23 20:37 | eric_ ♦55 | The number at the gate is 27 and the one associated with the cemetery is 17. 17 seems to be the right one. Just let me know what to do Chris and I'll update it as I have to improve the place in order to merge the two cemeteries (one is a multipolygon named Old Calton Burial Ground and the other... |
| 2 | 2016-06-28 22:54 | Chris Fleming | I'm happy with that change. I only noticed the wall was tagged when I was closing some maps.me notes.... | |
| 40129677 by Lionel Lima @ 2016-06-19 07:31 | 1 | 2016-06-19 22:44 | Chris Fleming | https://www.nordicvisitor.com/contact-us/ indicates that the Nordic Visitor Centre is at 16 Young Street and not 22? |
| 2 | 2016-06-23 20:01 | eric_ ♦55 | They probably moved there as the other company at the 22 apparently moved (their website is no longer online). I changed the name into Nordic Visitor, kept the previous one as alt_name and as it isn't a shop, use office=travel_agent instead. As we have to survey Shandwick place soon, we'll... | |
| 39924108 by meteorquake @ 2016-06-10 07:42 | 1 | 2016-06-10 10:08 | Chris Fleming | There is the option of tagging, natural=ridge (not currently rendered) - also natural=bare_rock (but possibly not the whole of this area). Overall I can't see a big problem with using locality here. |
| 38953116 by samely @ 2016-04-28 14:48 | 1 | 2016-05-05 10:06 | Chris Fleming | I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground? |
| 2 | 2016-05-05 12:43 | samely ♦201 | Hey there! I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset. | |
| 38801216 by smeòrach @ 2016-04-22 22:03 | 1 | 2016-04-25 11:18 | Chris Fleming | I'm not sure that this makes sense. Removing the neighbourhood node and adding the Holy Corner - name to the node as part of the junction? Also there wasn't anything wrong with the Church Hill node? |
| 36908650 by smeòrach @ 2016-01-31 00:58 | 1 | 2016-04-18 10:48 | Chris Fleming | Hi I was wondering what your sources are for these changes, for example the Junction between Trinity Crescent and Lower Granton Road was redesigned and and remapped. But your changes have undone this. |
| 2 | 2016-04-19 15:24 | smeòrach ♦32 | Hi, I actually was the person who remapped that junction so I'm not sure why it has reverted! I will just fix it now | |
| 3 | 2016-04-19 15:41 | Chris Fleming | Don't change it. I reverted the changes made as this junction has changed and is no longer as shown in the arial imagery. | |
| 4 | 2016-04-19 15:42 | Chris Fleming | See this note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/534341 for discussion. | |
| 5 | 2016-04-19 15:43 | smeòrach ♦32 | ah sorry! | |
| 6 | 2016-04-19 21:15 | Chris Fleming | No problem :) All sorted now. | |
| 38697968 by smeòrach @ 2016-04-19 15:35 | 1 | 2016-04-19 20:35 | Chris Fleming | Just to follow up on my previous message, this junction no longer looks like this. Please do not made significant changes JUST based on Aerial Imagery. |
| 38575739 by DondoGu @ 2016-04-15 02:25 | 1 | 2016-04-17 11:14 | Chris Fleming | Hi again, I can't see the purpose of the area added? |
| 38575913 by DondoGu @ 2016-04-15 02:50 | 1 | 2016-04-17 10:55 | Chris Fleming | Looks like accidental drags. Edinburgh has been fixed in #38632288 but Glagow changes still need reverting. |
| 2 | 2016-04-17 11:13 | Chris Fleming | Undid the remaining changes in 38640356. It looks like you aciddentlally moved some nodes easy to do! Also I couldn't see the purpose of the area. So have removed ut.Let me know if you have any questions on using OpenStreetMap! | |
| 36788665 by smeòrach @ 2016-01-25 04:42 | 1 | 2016-01-25 11:48 | Chris Fleming | One of the changes in this changeset is taking Dean Village from a suburb to a village. The normal convertion for Villages that have been absorbed into the city is to have them as suburbs - see Village/Suburb definitions: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| 36653754 by Ropino @ 2016-01-18 11:09 | 1 | 2016-01-22 10:40 | Chris Fleming | Our normal convention in Edinburgh is to have addresses on nodes (see the rest of the street). Therefore I'm going to revert this changeset and fix the node typo manually. |
| 36233720 by ma-rt-in @ 2015-12-29 04:40 | 1 | 2015-12-29 21:04 | Chris Fleming | Thanks - looks great! |
| 36204008 by ma-rt-in @ 2015-12-27 19:27 | 1 | 2015-12-28 22:16 | Chris Fleming | I notice this changeset removes the overall landuse around the airport which adds in the grass, and includes the fence. But the work replacing the landuse area's isn't complete. Same thing for the fence. |
| 2 | 2015-12-29 04:36 | ma-rt-in ♦1,751 | Yes there is so right. Unfortunately I did not have enough time see everything ready. I will do so in the near future.- Google Translate - | |
| 35851998 by DJ° @ 2015-12-09 18:47 | 1 | 2015-12-10 00:40 | Chris Fleming | Hi other comment/question, it looks like you deleted and then recreated exactly what you had deleted? Normally we recommend just modifying the existing ways rather than deleting and recreating them. Also I notice that you have removed the landuse area. What is your reason for doing this? |
| 35849937 by DJ° @ 2015-12-09 16:52 | 1 | 2015-12-09 18:39 | Chris Fleming | Traffic restrictions, had already been put in place by setting access=no over the bridge. (although the rendering of this isn't great). Wondering if this is better than by using junctions? |
| 35381971 by crossmyloof @ 2015-11-17 16:34 | 1 | 2015-11-30 17:16 | Chris Fleming | We need to have a think about the changes made here, I think we had a discussion on Talk-GB a while ago about Capital=yes versus Capital=4 and decided to go with a consitant approach between Scotland/Wales where Capital=4 I also need to remind myself how the is_in tag should be used. |
| 2 | 2015-11-30 21:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Currently Edinburgh is set as "capital=2" which I don't believe that even Nicola Sturgeon would claim currently :)The changes can be seen here:http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=17898859Looks like it was 4 since early this year (which I think matches a discussion som... | |
| 3 | 2015-11-30 22:01 | Chris Fleming | I have changed this back to 4. Original discussion was at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap/55712 | |
| 35044892 by shortcolin @ 2015-11-02 22:19 | 1 | 2015-11-03 12:14 | Chris Fleming | Thanks Colin! |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 09:20 | R0bst3r ♦1,094 | Hi shortcolin, was it your intention to add "amenity:"=cafe to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2415446248? The key is unusual and https://www.brewdog.com/bars/uk/bottledog-edinburgh may not be a cafe. Found it using taginfo ... | |
| 34241010 by Prentice_ @ 2015-09-25 08:48 | 1 | 2015-10-08 10:23 | Chris Fleming | A general welcome to OpenStreetMap! This is a really great first Edit.I Just looking at the layout of the roads I don't suppose that this footpath also continues and connects onto Lothian Drive and/or Mayburn Road? Let me know if you have any question about OpenStreetMap.CheersChris |
| 31949921 by ctait @ 2015-06-13 19:45 | 1 | 2015-06-17 14:00 | Chris Fleming | Just wondering what the reason for "upgrading" these to town is. Neiher is very big and my reasearch indicates that Village is probably more appropriate? |
| 2 | 2015-06-17 14:38 | ctait ♦1 | The latest census data shows population of 5439 for East Calder and 2758 for West Calder and they are also both called towns on Wikipedia and in quite a few other places on the net. Additionally, my cousin who lives in Livingston refers to them as towns. I have also seen them referred to as village... | |
| 30873574 by John Findlay @ 2015-05-07 13:20 | 1 | 2015-05-25 10:22 | Chris Fleming | Hi, were these flats demolished?http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-24852067 |
| 30934436 by John Findlay @ 2015-05-09 11:41 | 1 | 2015-05-12 10:53 | Chris Fleming | Hi John, I would like to welcome you to OpenStreetMap and say that I've been very impressed by the quality of the changes you've been making.My only comment is that it would be really useful if you could fill in some changeset comments to give some context to what you're doing. My... |
| 31024226 by xnoddyx @ 2015-05-12 04:06 | 1 | 2015-05-12 10:11 | Chris Fleming | Hi, First of all I would like to say welcome to Openstreetmap. It's allways great to have new mappers. I just have a few small comments on some of the Edit's you have made, just as a quick look one of the things you have done is to delete exisiting paths/roads and create new paths/road... |
| 2 | 2015-05-13 13:40 | xnoddyx ♦1 | Thank You Chris.as to"delete exisiting paths/roads and create new paths/roads with different tags."e.g at Craigswood Sports Centre on my first edit there there was no paths or roads showing so I added them then come back and found that some had then had OS data added over them and t... | |
| 30943655 by Morningside resident @ 2015-05-09 17:39 | 1 | 2015-05-10 20:45 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for the note and edit, it's great to see new Editors. please let me know if you have any questions.One thing that I'm wondering, is that if this recycling point is permanently closed, then it's probably okay to delete the recycling point. |
| 30232944 by Mark Wielopolski @ 2015-04-15 10:57 | 1 | 2015-04-15 12:43 | Chris Fleming | Hi it would be useful to see a description of the changes made. I guessing this was the old location of Transgression Park?Also if the building still exists we would normally keep it and just remove the tags? |
| 29958306 by casparmenkman @ 2015-04-03 18:56 | 1 | 2015-04-03 20:44 | Chris Fleming | Hi, first can I say welcome to OpenStreetMap, it's always great to see new Editors.I was just wondering about this edit, I can see that you have added a brand new way, with a landuse of residential.Now I've not been past this way for a while, but my understanding is that this is s... |
| 2 | 2015-04-03 21:59 | casparmenkman ♦1 | Yes, I was trying to make a map that showed the future developments. But I thought I was making edits that only I could see as I am preparing a report on the area with the proposed developments. Tells you what I know, please feel free to edit as I did not know I was messing around with a other peopl... | |
| 3 | 2015-04-03 23:21 | Chris Fleming | No problem - it's good info to have in openstreetmap! My suggestion would be to tag appropriately, then use various tools to display this info. There are a few options, if you're interested. | |
| 29857321 by alistaircom @ 2015-03-30 18:10 | 1 | 2015-03-30 20:41 | Chris Fleming | Trying to work out the reason why the access=private tag was added to the Merchiston and Greenhill, Protected Area? - https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/236957644 |
| 2 | 2015-03-30 23:34 | alistaircom ♦1 | Sorry for the confusion, added the tag by accident! | |
| 3 | 2015-03-31 10:40 | Chris Fleming | Great, thanks for sorting. | |
| 29704348 by hanoj @ 2015-03-24 14:16 | 1 | 2015-03-26 12:52 | Chris Fleming | It's great to have these all added to the map. I'm wondering if they should be a node on the actual way that they're monitoring? |
| 2 | 2015-03-27 08:22 | hanoj ♦12 | Hi, good question, is a two part of machine.I map location of digital table (totem), there I see on photos. But I map not hidden inductive loops under asphalt. | |
| 29671008 by srividya_c @ 2015-03-23 05:57 | 1 | 2015-03-23 09:53 | Chris Fleming | Hi, I just want to check what the source is for this change? It does look to me like there is something here. Possibly a service road and/or a foot way connecting to Tantallon Gardens?But looking at the Old Ordinance Survey maps it doesn't look like a continuation of Dressilrigg Lane. |
| 2 | 2015-03-23 11:49 | srividya_c ♦57 | I didn't change anything to the Dressilrigg Lane. I just added a path near which I saw in the imagery. If that doesn't exit then you can delete it. | |
| 3 | 2015-03-23 22:50 | Chris Fleming | Thanks for letting me know. Agree that there is a path here. I'll drop the name and survey tag and change it to footway. I'll also add a note for someone local to see where the path goes. | |
| 4 | 2015-03-24 04:49 | srividya_c ♦57 | Thank you. Adding note wold do :) | |
| 5 | 2015-03-24 04:49 | srividya_c ♦57 | *would | |
| 29235748 by eric_ @ 2015-03-04 02:45 | 1 | 2015-03-12 10:09 | Chris Fleming | Have you reached a conclusion on a good way to do this?Other options might just be to have a single building relation convering all the individual parts of the building with a name, rather than a node? |
| 28614496 by Chris Fleming @ 2015-02-04 17:06 | 1 | 2015-02-05 07:31 | zool ♦50 | I chatted with Karine and got her business card recently, didn't know the shop was so new. Cheers for the edit |
| 2 | 2015-02-05 10:54 | Chris Fleming | lol - actual thing that made me go and check was this tweet: https://twitter.com/neilinglis/status/562915655507542016 | |
| 28457666 by zool @ 2015-01-28 05:06 | 1 | 2015-01-28 10:59 | Chris Fleming | There is one additional step that needs to be done, and that's removing the tags from the outer, so that just the relation is tagged.... |
| 28416126 by Grant More @ 2015-01-26 11:35 | 1 | 2015-01-26 13:13 | Chris Fleming | Hi, it looks like this changeset deleted the woodlands from Corstorphine Hill? |
| 2 | 2015-01-26 14:18 | Chris Fleming | I have restored the woods. | |
| 28120668 by drnoble @ 2015-01-13 20:16 | 1 | 2015-01-14 00:23 | Chris Fleming | You beat me to it! |
| 27946208 by CaptainZep @ 2015-01-06 01:20 | 1 | 2015-01-06 15:50 | Chris Fleming | Great spot. I'm wondering if there is a further edit that can/should be made to change the surrounding Brownfield landuse tag to something more appropriate such as commercial. |
| 27665158 by zool @ 2014-12-24 06:55 | 1 | 2015-01-06 15:42 | Chris Fleming | I think you're going to have to try MUCH harder to get into WorstofOSM :) |
| 27578878 by DJ° @ 2014-12-19 21:44 | 1 | 2014-12-30 15:17 | zool ♦50 | In this changeset, you appear to have deleted a short section of the A92 trunk road. Was this an accident, or have you verified that the road has really disappeared with a physical survey? If so, then how are the cars still able to get on and off the B912?In the likely event that this edit to OS... |
| 2 | 2014-12-31 00:21 | Chris Fleming | Agree that this looks slightly odd, I drove past here a couple of nights ago and didn't notice that the A92 was closed from here. I've also checked the Traffic Scotland website and that hasn't given any indication that the road is closed. So it would be great to confirm the source of ... | |
| 3 | 2015-01-05 18:05 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Given the absence of a reply here yet, I've undeleted the missing bits of the A92 and joined the roads (and bus routes) up. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27938477 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27938325 . |