| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168387542 by bernardo60 @ 2025-07-02 08:55 | 1 | 2025-07-02 10:11 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hiya, thanks for checking this. The path is still a legal right of way (according to the Rights of Way overlay) so needs to be mapped, as it indicates a legal crossing of the river.I’ve re-added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168390611, but changed it to trail_visibility=no ... |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 12:08 | bernardo60 ♦62 | I see your point. However, I am afraid that navigation apps will still show there is a way - which is a nuisance for 99% of users. Is OSM not based on what you see on the ground? There is definitely no footpath. Maybe it can be tagged as "historical"? What is your take on this? | |
| 3 | 2025-07-02 12:37 | gurglypipe ♦872 | > OSM not based on what you see on the ground?Yes, but because of the rights of way laws in the UK defining RoWs as not necessarily the same as paths on the ground, the Definitive Map also has to be used to feed in to the OSM mapping.Navigation apps should factor in the trail_visibility=n... | |
| 4 | 2025-07-02 20:04 | bernardo60 ♦62 | Yes, I might do that, use the disused tag. Where the path should merge the road on the West side, there is a guard rail and a dense hedge, I cannot imagine that anybody has crawled through there for a long time. I also use STRAVA Heatmap overlay in OSM which provides a good indication of the popular... | |
| 5 | 2025-07-02 23:57 | lakedistrict | It was signposted when I surveyed it in March (fingerpost mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12673406691) | |
| 6 | 2025-07-03 09:13 | bernardo60 ♦62 | Thanks Lakedistrict! I saw that old wooden signpost on the East side of the river and there is definitely a path going down to the river bank where it ends. But nobody crosses the river here and the river bank on the other side is very overgrown. | |
| 167639585 by SmithyScotland @ 2025-06-15 07:59 | 1 | 2025-06-15 09:20 | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for this massive edit - that's lots of surveying! Just to check, I think The Old Laundry (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404073176) is is still operational - it still has a website with active programme (https://www.oldlaundrytheatre.co.uk/)Also you changed Heart of the La... |
| 2 | 2025-06-15 12:31 | SmithyScotland ♦13 | I couldn't find anything mentioning "The old laundry". Building seemed to be entirely Beatrix potter branded. All looked new so presumed it had recently expanded. Walked right round the area. Will take a looks at joules laterCheers :-) | |
| 3 | 2025-06-15 12:35 | SmithyScotland ♦13 | Yup joules has expended. The way I walked I didn't spot the bit round the corner. Did wonder about the odd shaped shop on my next lap. | |
| 166063512 by MattyOh @ 2025-05-10 10:48 | 1 | 2025-05-11 09:16 | lakedistrict | Hi, welcome to OSM. Which OS maps/datasets are you using, and have you surveyed any of these roads in person before changing their classifications? Not all OS maps have suitable licences, although OS do release some open data and many older maps are now out of copyright. I haven't checked all o... |
| 166089447 by DaveF @ 2025-05-10 23:44 | 1 | 2025-05-11 08:51 | lakedistrict | Hi, what's your source for Carlisle being operated by Scotrail? The National Rail website and Wikipedia both have Avanti as the operator, which seemed to be the case last time I was there. |
| 2 | 2025-05-12 16:19 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Thanks for spotting that & letting me know. I misinterpreted another wiki page. Should be fixed now. | |
| 163981781 by sardine6566 @ 2025-03-23 11:16 | 1 | 2025-03-23 23:08 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for all your recent StreetComplete mapping! Just wanted to double check whether you have to pay to park at the Maize Maze? Last time I was there the parking was free, but was for customers only and an admission charge was payable for the maze itself and playground, indoor soft play etc. |
| 2 | 2025-03-26 13:03 | sardine6566 ♦1 | Hi, a fair question! I suppose I conflated customers only and paid parking. M thought was if you couldn't just park there and walk off, then it isn't free parking. I'm happy to be told otherwise and change this however - if the StreetComplete options are Yes/No, am I best leaving a &#... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-02 10:13 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I agree with lakedistrict, and have changed it to access=customers fee=no in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164413291It’s unfortunate that choosing the right answer in StreetComplete for this quest involves knowing what the options it provides translate to in tagging terms.Yes... | |
| 163749101 by Ste_Nova @ 2025-03-17 20:19 | 1 | 2025-03-21 14:49 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent edits around the Lakes. Just looking at the slipway you have changed to a dock at Lakeside - although it is used as a dock (as in for maintenance and repairs, https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4922792), it is still physically a slipway on the ground and doesn't meet t... |
| 2 | 2025-03-24 22:14 | Ste_Nova ♦2 | Done | |
| 163596607 by fdpotato @ 2025-03-14 05:45 | 1 | 2025-03-16 23:29 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent edits. You have added a hotel area which includes an existing hotel, the Burn How Hotel. Is this now known as Burn How Garden Hotel, or are they separate hotels? Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2025-03-17 02:58 | fdpotato ♦1 | Yes, they are the same hotel, and Burn How Garden Hotel is the current name when I visited the hotel last year. | |
| 163520353 by Sint E7 @ 2025-03-12 10:11 | 1 | 2025-03-12 11:25 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for adding bus route relations around Barrow recently. Just wondered what your source is for the bus stop names you are changing, as some of the stops are now tagged with overly simplified names. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 11:51 | Sint E7 ♦31 | I've used the timetables from Stagecoach for bus 3 and the timetable from Blueworks Taxi (from 2023!) and in combination with Google Maps and Bustimes.org.In my eyes are both busroutes now correct displayed in OSM. If it aint, can you tell me what's wrong with them? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-12 12:15 | lakedistrict | Just looked like potentially useful info had been removed from some of the stop names, eg:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486586953 "Rampside Hall" -> "Hall" (not to be confused with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486587013, [Village] Hall)* https://www.openst... | |
| 160971120 by letsridebikes @ 2025-01-04 00:04 | 1 | 2025-01-05 22:18 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent and ongoing mapping in the Lakes. Based on the name you've added, would the holiday cottage be better tagged as building=barn with building:use=residential/chalet? This would better reflect the building's original purpose and architecture, if indeed it is a c... |
| 2 | 2025-01-05 22:38 | letsridebikes ♦58 | Excellent question (and excellent username!)Carter Ground is no longer a working farm, so I decided to verify the age of the buildings using Victorian OS mapping. See here: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/swipe/#zoom=18.0&lat=54.3212&lon=-3.1868&layers=6&right=osm\... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-05 23:26 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the reply and quick follow up edits :)Likewise great username - it's one I remember seeing a while ago when mapping in Reading! | |
| 160038778 by Simon Hobeck @ 2024-12-07 20:26 | 1 | 2024-12-08 14:30 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your mapping. Just wondering what level of checking you are doing and if you have surveyed/have local knowledge? For instance, you have changed cork to artificial grass in this changeset, which is incorrect and suggests you might not have checked previous changesets and comments o... |
| 2 | 2024-12-08 14:34 | lakedistrict | Actually, the slipway was tagged with a metal surface originally, and not timber: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968877478/history :) | |
| 3 | 2024-12-08 19:11 | Simon Hobeck ♦12 | Hi, thanks for your helpful comments.For this area marked as cork, I did check some photos of the area and I was trying to apply the best fitting value. I have been looking at the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface?uselang=en) but couldn't find any mention of Cork.Simi... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-08 22:08 | lakedistrict | Hi, thank you for replying and for researching/considering the changes you are making. The wiki page for the cork tag is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=cork although it doesn't seem to be linked from the surface values page. I've made some tweaks to the Castle courtyar... | |
| 159515464 by lakedistrict @ 2024-11-23 21:53 | 1 | 2024-11-23 22:56 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks! I had a brief look through the window of the Brown Cow and couldn’t see a yard, but I should have checked harder. |
| 2 | 2024-11-23 22:58 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I’ve tweaked the outdoor_seating for the Cornish Bakery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159516980 to try and distinguish between ‘fixed’ outdoor seating (like a beer garden or yard) and the more seasonal seating I think the Cornish Bakery has (in the street). Let me know... | |
| 3 | 2024-11-23 23:08 | lakedistrict | The doors through to the yard at the Brown Cow are on the right after the bar, which would be hard to see from the front.The updated tagging on Cornish looks fine, thanks :) | |
| 158799031 by gurglypipe @ 2024-11-05 23:45 | 1 | 2024-11-05 23:48 | lakedistrict | Might actually be better as a node as I think the pharmacy is only on the ground floor, with student flats above. |
| 2 | 2024-11-06 11:25 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good point, done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158813895 ta | |
| 158562750 by lakedistrict @ 2024-10-30 23:30 | 1 | 2024-10-30 23:41 | lakedistrict | 5000! 🎉 |
| 158406494 by Morecambrian @ 2024-10-27 10:30 | 1 | 2024-10-27 12:31 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your StreetComplete mapping in Morecambe. Just be careful to check the tactile paving quests - from experience the bus stops in Morecambe usually don't have true tactile paving, but just a smooth red/yellow paving stone to indicate where to board. Whilst a visual indicator, it�... |
| 2 | 2024-10-27 13:56 | Morecambrian ♦1 | These stops have block paving either side of the red flags which I thought may be classed as tactile. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-28 08:08 | lakedistrict | No worries, and thanks for the follow-up edit (changeset 158415934). :) | |
| 158181121 by Pete Owens @ 2024-10-21 17:44 | 1 | 2024-10-21 20:09 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing. highway=unclassified would also work here, perhaps more so given the commercial character of this street.For anyone else reviewing this, St Martin's Hill is incorrectly coloured as a main road on OS OpenMap. W&F Council record it as an unclassified road on their netwo... |
| 2 | 2024-10-21 20:27 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Is it part of the A5074? It’s still tagged with ref=A5074.If I’m reading the W&F network map correctly, it’s actually U5767, so should perhaps be tagged highway_authority_ref=U5767? | |
| 3 | 2024-10-21 21:08 | gurglypipe ♦872 | And the ref has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158186823 | |
| 158160411 by gurglypipe @ 2024-10-21 09:13 | 1 | 2024-10-21 20:03 | lakedistrict | I used service=drive-through on the click and collect lane at Sainsbury's, Morecambe. AIUI, staff load the shopping into a car boot without the driver leaving their car, so the wiki definition seems to work here.PS If you thought changeset 113968287 was "excessive", then you'... |
| 2 | 2024-10-21 20:56 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Makes sense, changed to service=drive-through in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158187613Thanks! :D | |
| 157967831 by RaccoonFederation @ 2024-10-16 14:35 | 1 | 2024-10-16 18:53 | lakedistrict | Thanks, yes this station is locked overnight: https://cumbriacrack.com/2022/08/17/chaos-as-train-passengers-locked-in-at-lake-district-station/ |
| 156890733 by Gyrwa @ 2024-09-20 23:11 | 1 | 2024-09-21 17:28 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your detailed edits and updates here. If the building was previously and purposely built as a hotel, then please use building=hotel and building:use=dormitory https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use |
| 156854308 by TheUKHighStreet @ 2024-09-20 07:56 | 1 | 2024-09-20 07:58 | lakedistrict | 👍 |
| 156687932 by Casey_boy @ 2024-09-16 13:13 | 1 | 2024-09-16 17:02 | lakedistrict | Hi, the fake grass has recently been removed and replaced with Corkeen surfacing. It is already included in the pedestrian area polygon, but if you wanted to micromap different areas for different surfaces, perhaps use surface=cork? (3 uses worldwide) |
| 2 | 2024-09-17 10:00 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Hi,Thanks. Yes, I noticed that when I visited this weekend (I quite enjoyed the bounciness!). I wasn't quite sure what to tag it as, which is why I went with the generic artificial turf but agree it's not quite right. I don't think it's cork though. I think it might be "we... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-17 10:04 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Or, if you're sure it is Corkeen, I think we may need something different than surface=cork as I think that would give data consumers a bit of a headache to distinguish from, e.g., a cork board. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-17 11:04 | lakedistrict | Hi, yes it is a bit bouncy! It's Corkeen according to https://planning.lancaster.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=S4KOKCIZH2Z00&activeTab=summaryI can't say that it's ever occurred to me to tag the surface material of notice boards! The three existing us... | |
| 5 | 2024-09-17 11:18 | Casey_boy ♦83 | I've changed to cork for now but will also post on the community forum to see if anyone has any good ideas! I've also added colour. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156725111 | |
| 156601838 by GizmoGremlin @ 2024-09-14 08:58 | 1 | 2024-09-14 09:44 | lakedistrict | Hi, in this changeset you've separated - and created a gap between - Caxton House and Orrest Cottage, yet the building are joined together in reality. Is there a reason you made this edit or were you trying to achieve something else? :) |
| 2 | 2024-09-14 10:55 | GizmoGremlin ♦2 | Apologies. I may have mistaken where the access is, but from street view believe there is some access through between some of the properties from church street. I am trying to work out where the access to 5 Caxton house shown on estate agents plans to church street goes. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-14 10:57 | GizmoGremlin ♦2 | I am not local and defer to on the ground knowledge, but street view seems to conflict with OSM as it is. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-14 11:00 | GizmoGremlin ♦2 | Indeed, I’ve got the gap in the wrong place. | |
| 5 | 2024-09-14 11:36 | GizmoGremlin ♦2 | I’m struggling to find a way to revert that change. If you happen to have the tools at hand to do that, please feel free. Otherwise I’ll try and correct it later, adding the gap in what I think would be the right place. | |
| 6 | 2024-09-14 12:16 | lakedistrict | Just seen your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156608934That looks more like it, thanks for fixing. | |
| 155153603 by Don Allertoni @ 2024-08-12 14:57 | 1 | 2024-08-12 19:47 | lakedistrict | It's a general recreation ground. Not sure if there's any cricket club based there atm, might just be Caton United using it. |
| 152502624 by Will Boyce @ 2024-06-10 15:15 | 1 | 2024-07-30 22:00 | lakedistrict | Hi, for future reference, please mark closed shops as disused (using the disused: prefix and old_name tag) rather than deleting them. That way, the history is preserved and it's much easier for local mappers to later update to a new use. If you scroll down to the all tags section in the editor,... |
| 154575258 by ec19066 @ 2024-07-29 18:24 | 1 | 2024-07-29 19:58 | lakedistrict | Hi, welcome to OSM. Cumbria is no longer a two tier county, following the creation of the two unitary authorities on 1 April 2023. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbria#Governance for details. As such, the previous tagging should be restored. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2024-08-12 19:36 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The previous tagging was restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154582901. | |
| 154254643 by Guyroscope @ 2024-07-22 10:05 | 1 | 2024-07-22 14:21 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent StreetComplete mapping in Saveley-in-Cartmel. Please note that only signed/commonly used names should use the name tag; reference numbers should use the ref tag. For C and U numbers, as they are usually unsigned in England, please use the official_ref tag. (see https://wik... |
| 154178727 by mike142sl @ 2024-07-20 13:07 | 1 | 2024-07-20 18:53 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hi, are you sure the surface of Elderberry Drive is loose gravel? That would be unusual for a residential road, and it looks like asphalt from aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2024-07-20 19:46 | mike142sl ♦1 | Hi, Due to a dispute between the developer and the council, the road hasn't been tarmaced. It was a toss up between gravel and unpaved and I went with the former as there isn't an incomplete option. Hopefully it won't be long before the tarmac is added and this can be completed. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-20 21:19 | lakedistrict | Hi, if it's a hardcore/sub-base sort of surface at present, the "compacted" option is probably a better fit. Fingers crossed the issues get resolved soon. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-20 22:08 | mike142sl ♦1 | Maybe, I'll change it tomorrow | |
| 5 | 2024-07-21 08:47 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks. Looking at the latest aerial imagery, it looks like number 3 might actually be two semi-detached houses rather than one detached house; it looks like there’s a fence across the back garden. Is it semis? | |
| 6 | 2024-07-21 09:26 | mike142sl ♦1 | No they are one, the numbering is bonkers as well with number 3 between 1 and 2? | |
| 7 | 2024-07-21 09:43 | gurglypipe ♦872 | haha, I’m assuming the numbering is something to do with grouping odds and evens | |
| 8 | 2024-07-22 21:39 | gurglypipe ♦872 | For anyone reading this later, the change to surface=compacted was made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154251177. Thanks! | |
| 9 | 2024-07-23 06:04 | mike142sl ♦1 | Yes, and if anyone becomes aware that the council has added the tarmac feel free to change the surface accordingly. | |
| 153623343 by Djminisite @ 2024-07-06 13:06 | 1 | 2024-07-08 19:53 | lakedistrict | Hi, please can you just check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33284352 - looks like some pub tagging has found its way onto a road! :) |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 22:42 | lakedistrict | I've fixed this in changeset 154034910 :) | |
| 153991509 by womer_uk @ 2024-07-15 22:25 | 1 | 2024-07-16 06:36 | lakedistrict | Hi, is it correct to include the club name in the stadium/ground name? The name tag should be for the name only. Perhaps the club could be recorded under a different tag. |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 18:08 | womer_uk ♦1 | Hi, the problem with just doing that is many grounds have a sponsor name on them, and these change virtually every couple of years so the ground is hard to find.So I've used the unsponsored name, (Hull City Football Stadium instead of MKM Stadium) and put the team that plays there in the titl... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-16 19:03 | gurglypipe ♦872 | You could have used alt_name or official_name or any one of the other name variant tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants) so that each ground could be tagged with *both* names rather than the one you were searching for. Other people may search for the sponsor name.The name ... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-17 00:26 | womer_uk ♦1 | I have removed the club names from the grounds I edited | |
| 153667726 by phodgkin @ 2024-07-07 15:46 | 1 | 2024-07-07 19:37 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent edits in this area. Please can you just check the postcodes you have added in this changeset (and possibly others) - it should be LA22, not LS22. Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2024-07-08 10:19 | phodgkin ♦61 | Fat finger mistake!Fixed. | |
| 153327267 by MapManMapManMapMapMapManMan @ 2024-06-29 11:03 | 1 | 2024-06-29 21:14 | lakedistrict | Looks good. Lancaster city centre will probably end up being micromapped with all the pavements added, so it will eventually all be joined up! You could just extend it to meet Peter Street for now, add footway=sidewalk, and delete the fixme :) |
| 141219419 by MapManMapManMapMapMapManMan @ 2023-09-13 16:19 | 1 | 2023-09-13 22:58 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your mapping in Lancaster.In this edit you've added a duplicate Cornerhouse and a duplicate Mini Market, both of which were already mapped, but easily done in StreetComplete. I've fixed these in changeset 141232490 :)(PS great username - fan of a certain YTer?!) |
| 2 | 2024-06-25 14:02 | MapManMapManMapMapMapManMan ♦5 | I'm only 10 months late lol (was just looking back at previous edits of mine!)Apologies for the inconvenience of the duplicate places, and yes, I certainly am a fan of Jay & Mark :) | |
| 3 | 2024-06-26 16:52 | lakedistrict | 👍 | |
| 153020727 by gurglypipe @ 2024-06-22 08:59 | 1 | 2024-06-22 16:23 | lakedistrict | 🏃♂️ |
| 152462665 by cjl6 @ 2024-06-09 16:26 | 1 | 2024-06-09 17:03 | lakedistrict | Hello, thanks for your recent edits around Rydal.This road should not be tagged as tertiary. It is just an access road for the Hall, church, houses and farmland, and not anything more important. Looking at the Council's highway network map, it is also not part of the public adopted highway ... |
| 2 | 2024-06-09 17:49 | cjl6 ♦3 | Thanks for this. It has been hanged back to a Service Road. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-09 19:01 | lakedistrict | 👍 | |
| 152387549 by NeoXant @ 2024-06-07 17:57 | 1 | 2024-06-07 18:32 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for adding lots of detail around Windermere recently. I'd say that the lower part of Thwaites Lane is best tagged as residential based on the wiki and local knowledge - there's houses facing it and addressed off it, and it's part of the public highway network. width/lan... |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 19:20 | NeoXant ♦1 | Hi.Would it be classed as residential even if it only serves as an access to driveways without any other traffic going through it?I live few steps from that road so I'm very local to the area I'm editing | |
| 3 | 2024-06-07 19:33 | lakedistrict | I'd say so, yes. Even the smallest cul-de-sac roads can be tagged as residential.Perhaps if it was private and didn't have a name, then service would be more appropriate. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-07 19:38 | NeoXant ♦1 | Ok then. I will change it then. Have a nice day. | |
| 5 | 2024-06-07 20:38 | lakedistrict | Cheers, you too 👍 | |
| 145660007 by benjo384 @ 2023-12-29 12:48 | 1 | 2023-12-31 08:44 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hi, thanks for your attention to detail on the Dales Way. I see you’ve added name=Dales Way to all the path segments on the route. This is not correct: the name is already tagged on them via a route relation, and that’s the correct way to tag these things.Otherwise, what happens if o... |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 19:31 | lakedistrict | @benjo384 Hi, you added the name Dales Way to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889014234. Have you walked the route and surveyed the waymarking signage? I ask because there is an unresolved map note on it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2366584) - does the waymarked route follow this path throu... | |
| 151799107 by Dezza @ 2024-05-25 08:08 | 1 | 2024-05-25 15:22 | lakedistrict | I used amenity=washing_machine on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11523754643 (and previously on the former one at Morrisons). The wiki page has a photo of one of these Revolution machines if the scroll down to the gallery section. I think there's one at the petrol station on Coastal Roa... |
| 2 | 2024-05-25 18:07 | Dezza ♦12 | Good call, thank you. I've updated it as suggested | |
| 151303908 by gurglypipe @ 2024-05-14 09:50 | 1 | 2024-05-14 17:13 | lakedistrict | Your hard work (and hashtagging) doesn't go completely unnoticed, thanks 👍 |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 17:18 | gurglypipe ♦872 | 🤣 Thanks 😅 | |
| 150412722 by gurglypipe @ 2024-04-23 19:33 | 1 | 2024-04-23 21:25 | lakedistrict | Thanks. I don't think The Range is part of this retail park; it has its own car park accessed from Duke Street and Abbey Road. The old address was probably correct, and it should also be excluded from the Hindpool Retail Park area. |
| 2 | 2024-04-23 21:43 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Ah, thanks for spotting that, I didn’t notice the car parks were independent. Hopefully fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150416802 :) | |
| 3 | 2024-04-23 21:47 | lakedistrict | Looks good :) | |
| 149693376 by washboo @ 2024-04-07 13:53 | 1 | 2024-04-20 13:06 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for all the details you have recently added. Town names are usually, and more correctly, mapped as nodes in the centre rather than on an outline (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=town?uselang=en-GB). To keep the local mapping consistent, please can you add the Dumfries p... |
| 148987801 by Ste_Nova @ 2024-03-21 21:53 | 1 | 2024-03-21 21:59 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for all your ongoing edits. To help other local mappers understand what has been changed and where, please provide more detailed changeset comments such as "added to details to garden centre, Ambleside". Happy mapping, and any queries just ask. :) |
| 147665935 by PeteQuiggin @ 2024-02-19 19:52 | 1 | 2024-02-19 20:59 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits to the map in Ulverston! Usually bicycle=no means that there is signage specifically prohibiting bicycles, but if there is no signage I'd tag it as bicycle=dismount in this instance. Shame they didn't construct the modal filter to allow for cycling! |
| 2 | 2024-02-21 20:32 | PeteQuiggin ♦1 | Thanks for your comment and sensible suggestion, 'lakedistrict'. I've now read the wiki on this (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount) and although it says 'no' is more commonly used by mappers in this situation, I agree with you that 'dismout'... | |
| 146831497 by cheese_melon @ 2024-01-29 17:32 | 1 | 2024-02-15 23:11 | lakedistrict | Please can you check what has happened with https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17099206? It seems to have flooded a number of fields. |
| 2 | 2024-02-17 17:54 | cheese_melon ♦3 | my apologies, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147581984 | |
| 146342848 by lakedistrict @ 2024-01-17 00:17 | 1 | 2024-01-17 00:18 | lakedistrict | Additional source: pol_branch_list_2023‑09‑27 |
| 146333318 by hvollstedt_EG @ 2024-01-16 18:00 | 1 | 2024-01-16 22:06 | lakedistrict | Hi, you have added data to the gift shop rather than the attraction itself. There is no admission fee for the shop and I'm not sure it's fully wheelchair accessible. Did you mean to edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404073177 ? |
| 2 | 2024-01-16 22:11 | hvollstedt_EG ♦4 | You are correct; my mistake. I seemed to have had an issue selecting the right feature. I will go ahead and make the appropriate changes - thanks! | |
| 3 | 2024-01-16 22:20 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the fast reply and new changeset! :) | |
| 145342087 by DaveF @ 2023-12-20 18:37 | 1 | 2023-12-20 18:52 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your recent edits to lifeboat stations. Just wondering why a multipolygon is needed here? |
| 2 | 2023-12-20 22:26 | DaveF ♦1,564 | HiBecause they're two buildings for the same Morecambe Lifeboat Station.https://rnli.org/find-my-nearest/lifeboat-stations/morecambe-lifeboat-stationDiscussion about my proposed edits (continues into Dec): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-November/030914.html | |
| 145048294 by Alice Baddeley @ 2023-12-12 18:07 | 1 | 2023-12-13 09:43 | lakedistrict | Hi, what is your source for this edit? It was only two years ago that the cobbles/setts were reinstated, and I haven't seen anything in the local media about the surface changing to tarmac again.2021 article: https://www.yourcumbria.org/News/2021/countycountysetttoreopenfrontstreetalston.as... |
| 2 | 2023-12-13 11:43 | Alice Baddeley ♦3 | Hi lakedistrict - thank you for pointing this out - after reviewing the change I realise the original source (Google Street view Jul 2021) is out of date. I've changed the surface back to Sett. Apologies for the error. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-13 11:56 | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for the quick reply and edit. Happy mapping. :) | |
| 142146343 by NTWindermerePaths @ 2023-10-04 13:40 | 1 | 2023-10-04 18:53 | lakedistrict | Thanks. Just in time for its TV appearance! :D |
| 140756045 by phodgkin @ 2023-09-03 12:16 | 1 | 2023-09-03 17:37 | lakedistrict | Hi, is there is reason the tourist info centres can't have both tags? They are used as gift shops just as much as they are used for tourist info. |
| 2 | 2023-09-04 08:06 | phodgkin ♦61 | It's difficult for data consumers if there are two primary tags. One is going to trump the other. But in retrospect that was perhaps a bit rash, since it might not be obvious which is the primary function: information office with some nick nacks or gift show with some information. If need both,... | |
| 59959512 by lakedistrict @ 2018-06-18 22:46 | 1 | 2023-08-23 21:39 | emvee ♦369 | Hi,We are searching for a new photo for bicycle_parking=streetpod and looking where streetpods are mapped I saw your name popping up for 8 of them in Newcastle upon Tyne partly via this changeset.See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/30,... |
| 2 | 2023-08-25 23:47 | lakedistrict | Hi, I've found the photo I took when I surveyed these, and I'll upload it along with a couple of other examples soon. I'll let you know, either here or on the discourse thread, when done. :) | |
| 3 | 2023-09-03 14:36 | emvee ♦369 | Thanks! | |
| 4 | 2024-01-17 13:14 | emvee ♦369 | The subject came up again ;-)https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/42 | |
| 133487094 by VLD300 @ 2023-03-09 17:02 | 1 | 2023-03-09 17:23 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hi, what made that name vandalism? That’s probably the name of the drop-off locker, as printed on it.The user who added the locker (lakedistrict) is a regular editor of OSM and is definitely not a vandal. |
| 2 | 2023-03-09 17:31 | lakedistrict | Yes, cam is the name of the locker. I've also seen the names tagged as references, but the lockers themselves declare them as their names (eg see https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7277791)Please don't just delete data and accuse local mappers of vandalism. | |
| 3 | 2023-03-09 17:37 | VLD300 ♦9 | Hello gurglypipe,Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I apologize for making an incorrect edit. I will go ahead and revert the change back to its original status. Thank you again for reaching out to me about this changeset. If you'd like to reach out further or have any question... | |
| 4 | 2023-03-09 17:37 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The wiki does say to tag using ref=cam rather than name=cam (and gives an explicit example for an Amazon locker): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker#Operating_options_/_FeaturesI suspect this is a refinement to the tagging guidelines since this locker was added. Chan... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-09 17:39 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks for your reply.I’ve de-conflicted the changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133488416, so now the locker is tagged with just ref=cam and no name=. | |
| 6 | 2023-03-09 20:36 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the quick response. Happy mapping. | |
| 124789674 by ShinyGoldfish @ 2022-08-11 19:19 | 1 | 2022-12-28 14:32 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits around Troutbeck earlier this year. What's your source for this road name? Only the northernmost part of the village road (at Town Head) is known as Townhead Brow. |
| 2 | 2023-01-29 17:26 | lakedistrict | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131848616 | |
| 129752299 by Pete Owens @ 2022-12-05 18:29 | 1 | 2022-12-05 21:48 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for adding additional tagging. From looking at the wiki, shouldn't this be crossing:markings=dots? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129752299 |
| 128165445 by magrej @ 2022-10-28 09:27 | 1 | 2022-10-29 18:29 | lakedistrict | Hi, are you sure that the changes made are correct? This WLC-operated passenger service uses the jetty at Ferry House, not the slipway (used exclusively by the Mallard car ferry) |
| 2 | 2022-10-31 07:35 | magrej ♦24 | Hello lakedistrict,Thanks for reaching out, I took a closer look and moved it back to the correct position.Best,magrej | |
| 128221040 by gurglypipe @ 2022-10-29 17:37 | 1 | 2022-10-29 18:07 | lakedistrict | More EV chargers in Ulverston! Don't think these were there when I last visited a few months ago. What's https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108012680 supposed to be? amenity=waste_transfer_station is usually where bin wagons get emptied. Bin area/stores are waste_disposal |
| 123475148 by IG987 @ 2022-07-11 13:13 | 1 | 2022-07-12 13:20 | JassKurn ♦154 | Hi, it looks like this is one of your first edits submitted to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for the input, but... there's a few problems with the data. You added loads of useful data, but many of the objects you mapped appear to be already mapped (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9880986226),... |
| 2 | 2022-07-26 22:37 | lakedistrict | Hi @IG987, in the areas I've checked, this edit has introduced a number of duplicates, and things that look like personal bookmarks rather than things that actually exist on the ground. @JassKurn you mention that there is some useful info in this changeset? I didn't notice any, so I su... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-26 23:41 | JassKurn ♦154 | @lakedistrict There is some useful data for artwork type objects, but overall the changeset is clearly a problem. Looking at it again it appears to have added a lot of data. I agree with now doing a revert. I can add the useful data local to me sometime in the future. | |
| 4 | 2022-07-26 23:55 | JassKurn ♦154 | I've reverted the changeset - The revert changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124116279 | |
| 123443108 by lakedistrict @ 2022-07-10 18:36 | 1 | 2022-07-10 18:39 | lakedistrict | (Imagery used was Bing imagery aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels) |
| 2 | 2022-07-10 18:41 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice work! | |
| 3 | 2022-07-10 18:54 | lakedistrict | Thanks :) | |
| 122034560 by rogerjames99 @ 2022-06-06 16:39 | 1 | 2022-06-06 20:33 | lakedistrict | Thanks for adding these! For future reference, local names can be put in the loc_name tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name (via the Tags section in the editor) |
| 120759810 by lakedistrict @ 2022-05-09 17:51 | 1 | 2022-05-09 19:50 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice one :D --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120759810 |
| 2 | 2022-05-09 21:51 | lakedistrict | Thanks :) | |
| 119942235 by confusedbuffalo @ 2022-04-20 08:54 | 1 | 2022-04-20 21:00 | lakedistrict | Thanks :) |
| 119503276 by LivingWithDragons @ 2022-04-09 12:58 | 1 | 2022-04-13 11:15 | DanGlover ♦42 | Hi LivingWithDragons...a query on post box LA1 6. Node 3930655564 has this in the wall on the southern side (RBS?) but your Changeset has created 9653752065 on the northern side at NatWest. Has the box moved, please?Thanks,Dan |
| 2 | 2022-04-19 22:11 | lakedistrict | Hi both, Looks like an error as I checked yesterday and its still on the former RBS building, not NatWest. I've deleted the duplicate :) | |
| 113077088 by confusedbuffalo @ 2021-10-28 10:55 | 1 | 2022-04-19 21:57 | lakedistrict | Would this info be better on the relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5982501), as it applies to the school as a whole (both the senior and prep school campuses) rather than just the senior school site? |
| 2 | 2022-04-20 08:54 | confusedbuffalo ♦332 | Yes, good point. I've put appropriate information on all three objects now | |
| 119456879 by Guyroscope @ 2022-04-08 07:37 | 1 | 2022-04-08 09:26 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Would it make sense to remove the BBQ site entirely? Have the National Trust removed it physically? |
| 2 | 2022-04-10 13:29 | lakedistrict | The fixed BBQ was removed some years ago. Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119535899 | |
| 117555970 by AllotmentCyclist @ 2022-02-18 09:49 | 1 | 2022-02-18 10:57 | lakedistrict | Hi, are you sure this is correct? Last time I visited it seemed to be a public road with no "private" signage, and it's recorded as part of the public highway network on https://cumbria.highway-iams.uk/Live/PBLC/PIP/?cg=networks I guess it does look a bit like a driveway though as it ... |
| 2 | 2022-02-18 11:08 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Agreed, I thought this was a public road. The Strava heatmap shows it as taking a lot of cycling traffic: https://www.strava.com/heatmap#15.73/-2.78517/54.22022/hot/ride.What’s your reasoning for this change, AllotmentCyclist? :) | |
| 3 | 2022-02-18 14:52 | AllotmentCyclist ♦14 | Thanks guys, I was there yesterday and when I turned into it saw a sign saying "Private". However I have now reviewed my video of it and realise it says "Private - No Parking" ! I have changed it back now. Sorry to waste your time and thanks for alerting me. | |
| 4 | 2022-02-18 17:45 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Aha, that makes sense. Thanks for sorting it! | |
| 85666843 by lakedistrict @ 2020-05-23 21:50 | 1 | 2021-12-23 19:31 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354080645historic=* is describing or characterising an object and not a date. It seems you have been trying to put a date or number in the historic key. Maybe you should use start_date?Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ahistoric and https:/... |
| 2 | 2021-12-24 14:47 | lakedistrict | Looks like this was added in an earlier changeset, and the mapper likely intended to use heritage=2 (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status#England) I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115338619 Merry Christmas! | |
| 3 | 2021-12-24 14:50 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Thank you! | |
| 114561098 by lakedistrict @ 2021-12-04 17:14 | 1 | 2021-12-05 10:02 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice work! |
| 2 | 2021-12-05 10:57 | lakedistrict | Thanks! 😄 | |
| 113869004 by fruitbat5577 @ 2021-11-16 20:47 | 1 | 2021-11-16 21:43 | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for your edits in the area. Tip: (ignore if you know this already!) If you change the existing from building=terrace to building=house before using the Terracer plugin, it ensures that the newly split buildings will be tagged as houses, rather than a terrace. Also useful to add the addr:s... |
| 2 | 2021-11-16 22:44 | fruitbat5577 ♦2 | I knew that, and my aim is that each changeset should be as complete as possible without containing unrelated changes. What I wasn't aware until I saw #113842131 was that building=terrace is for the whole terrace, not individual houses. I probably had too much confidence that the JOSM terracer ... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-18 09:44 | SK53 ♦864 | A request to both, if terracing a terrace & changing to building=house, please also add house=terraced as it preserves information otherwise lost (or awkward to determine). The house tag can be used for other types two, but at present iD supports these as explicit building types, so there is lit... | |
| 113175592 by Fred73000 @ 2021-10-30 22:04 | 1 | 2021-10-31 23:35 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hi. Do you have local knowledge of the changes you’ve made here to fix the warnings from ID? The tagging changes you’ve made to delete a bird hide, change a transformer and change a sundial don’t look correct to me. (I have local knowledge of this area.) |
| 2 | 2021-11-03 22:54 | lakedistrict | I agree with gurglypipe, the only useful change appears to be the fountain at Standen Park. Please revert the errors identified, or even the whole changeset if easier. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-06 18:07 | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,sorry for that.For the birds hide, I didn't understand how works this building : how a feeding place for birds can be a bird hide ? I think I have understand and I 've made a change compatible with ID.For the transformer, I improved what I have done the other day after I read wiki... | |
| 4 | 2021-11-06 23:48 | lakedistrict | Thanks for your fixes. The bird feeding area has a screen on its west side with gaps in so that people can see the birds whilst being 'hidden', like a bird hide. This 'bird hide' is not covered and is not a building. iD does sometimes complain about tagging, but that doesn't... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-13 17:13 | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,thanks for your explanations about the hide_bird.The name 'Sundial" was on the version #2, the version before my first changes, that explains why I put it back. I think it is better to have a name because nothing is drawn on the map for the clock, but do as you wish. I change th... | |
| 111455814 by Don Allertoni @ 2021-09-20 15:51 | 1 | 2021-09-20 23:39 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits. We have amenity=kindergarten (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten) on the boundary outline/grounds, and amenity=childcare (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=childcare) on the building itself. Which is more appropriate, as we probably only need to use one... |
| 110731948 by maper_t @ 2021-09-04 21:45 | 1 | 2021-09-05 19:19 | lakedistrict | Last time I checked all the road signs on the north bound section were white rather than green (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46964940) so can be considered "primary" rather than "trunk" in OSM, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom |
| 109325529 by Jessica Lily @ 2021-08-07 20:58 | 1 | 2021-08-07 21:00 | Jessica Lily ♦6 | JOSM warned about an empty role and role of member not matching with regard to the associatedStreet relationship between Main Street and the building with 37 Main Street Cafe.I can't quite figure out what the problem is or how to fix it though. |
| 2 | 2021-08-07 21:23 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits. The relation was unnecessary so I've deleted it. Hopefully that will stop JOSM complaining :) | |
| 107931574 by woollypigs @ 2021-07-13 19:43 | 1 | 2021-07-13 21:28 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits. The path does appear to be visible on Esri imagery (dated May 2020) and other undated satellite imagery sources. Perhaps a trail_visibility may be appropriate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility |
| 2 | 2021-07-14 07:15 | woollypigs ♦2 | Good thinking. Even without bramble this bit is hard to find or see. Many other paths, both sheep and human made, are easier to see/find. I think this section is not used as the other path (to the west) is more direct from below the hill to the top. | |
| 107729369 by PaulSingleton @ 2021-07-09 23:23 | 1 | 2021-07-10 15:08 | lakedistrict | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Arnside. For housenames, please enter this in the Housename field, under the Address section, rather than the generic Name section. Any questions feel free to send me a message through my profile. Happy mapping and hope to see more edits from you soon. :) |
| 103288120 by Humus015 @ 2021-04-20 17:52 | 1 | 2021-04-20 20:18 | lakedistrict | Hello, in this changeset you added 5 water points. Given the car park settings, water points seem unlikely. What did you intend to map? |
| 2 | 2021-04-20 21:34 | Humus015 ♦34 | Hi, while I walk, no option on mobile version of maps. Already fixed. They are ticket machine for parking. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-20 23:36 | lakedistrict | I thought they might be. Thanks for fixing so quickly. :-) | |
| 102992996 by Milhouse @ 2021-04-15 11:54 | 1 | 2021-04-17 17:50 | lakedistrict | Hi Milhouse, you've accidentally tagged the whole path as a kissing gate. Please can you fix it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262543320 |
| 2 | 2021-04-17 21:35 | Milhouse ♦26 | Ah sorry, I can often barely see my phone screen when using Vespucci - unfortunately I can't remember now where the gate was so I've deleted the tag from the way and I'll have to leave it to the next visitor to tag it. | |
| 93701072 by andrewilley @ 2020-11-07 10:01 | 1 | 2020-11-07 18:50 | lakedistrict | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Shap. There seems to be 2 different spellings: Ralfland (on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160505402) and Ralphland (on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867971679) - please can you confirm which is correct? Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2020-11-08 00:44 | andrewilley ♦1 | The correct spelling for both parts is "Ralfland View", possibly my mistake when I joined the road segments?The roads around there are really odd: House numbers 1-4 in Ralfland View actually face out onto the main A6, while 5-10 are on the residential road behind. And at number 10, the... | |
| 3 | 2020-11-09 21:39 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing :) | |
| 93685202 by Maxi_pp01 @ 2020-11-06 21:14 | 1 | 2020-11-07 19:11 | lakedistrict | Hi, A late welcome to OSM and thanks for all your mapping in Cumbria! Just one thing: when adding new paths, please make sure that they connect to existing paths so that they can be used for routing and navigation. In the iD editor you can drag the end of the path onto the other and they should snap... |
| 93433000 by Russell Hore @ 2020-11-02 17:27 | 1 | 2020-11-02 23:50 | lakedistrict | Hi, please can you make sure that any gates you add are connected to the path that goes through them? In the editor you can drag the gate onto the path and it should snap into place. Thanks :) |
| 93443626 by DaveF @ 2020-11-02 22:44 | 1 | 2020-11-02 22:54 | Firemix ♦17 | If everybody does the mechanical changesets he thinks of being useful OSM would quickly become a mess (and a battleground). |
| 2 | 2020-11-02 23:04 | DaveF ♦1,564 | In what way do you believe this changeset reduces the quality of the OSM database? | |
| 3 | 2020-11-02 23:45 | lakedistrict | Hi, please can you check the tags you have added to nodes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5688084971 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5688084972. This may need to be reverted if it's a widespread issue. Thanks :) | |
| 4 | 2020-11-03 16:32 | DaveF ♦1,564 | @lakedistrictThanks for noticing & pointing it out (Forgot to set the correct JOSM filter) It looks to be fixed now.@Firemix What was your previous user name? | |
| 93427676 by CycleStreets @ 2020-11-02 15:09 | 1 | 2020-11-02 16:14 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The Cross-Bay walk is, as I understand it, legally a byway open to all traffic, which means that bicycle=designated motor_vehicle=designated is the appropriate tagging, as those tags refer to the legal status of the byway, rather than any practical/feasibility considerations. If we’re looking ... |
| 2 | 2020-11-02 16:46 | lakedistrict | I'd agree with removing the highway=* tag. IMO the name "cross bay walk" is also the name of the event or activity (when the guided walks are led) rather than the name of the route itself. | |
| 3 | 2020-11-05 09:20 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93591577 | |
| 4 | 2020-11-05 12:25 | CycleStreets ♦27 | Thanks. However, *=designated remains, which seems an anomaly if access=discouraged and disused:highway are there. Do you agree with the removal of those?The wiki page for bicycle for instance says "explicitly designated for use by cyclists". The same certainly applies to cars and walk... | |
| 5 | 2020-11-05 12:29 | gurglypipe ♦872 | No, I don’t agree with the removal of those. For better or worse, there is a legal right of way for all traffic (pedestrians, bikes, cars, etc.) on this route, and the tagging for that is *=designated.It really is the case that this route is explicitly designated for use by cyclists (and o... | |
| 6 | 2020-11-05 12:49 | CycleStreets ♦27 | I suspect with the change to use disused:highway rather than highway, our routing engine and others wouldn't pick it up anyway. Indeed, disused:highway seems like a pretty good description of the reality here.But listing designated for every type of transport mode still seems rather odd to ... | |
| 7 | 2020-11-05 12:56 | gurglypipe ♦872 | > Do byways normally list every type of transport in this way, rather than just use the access to represent the same group?I did think so, since the access=* tag applies to every possible mode of transport (foot, bike, lunar buggy, hovercraft, …). Looking at the definition of a BOAT, a... | |
| 8 | 2020-11-05 13:05 | CycleStreets ♦27 | Thanks. Hopefully lunar buggy users won't mind too much :)I would still retain the discouraged tag also on access using the semicolon separator, given that it is both designated and officially actively discouraged (as the sign shows).access=discouraged;designated | |
| 9 | 2020-11-05 13:16 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Sure, feel free to make that change (bear in mind that the path is split into 4 or 5 segments). | |
| 10 | 2020-11-05 14:05 | CycleStreets ♦27 | Thanks; have made that change in:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93608120#map=12/54.1344/-2.8693 | |
| 11 | 2020-12-03 10:25 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Hi, I hadn't seen this discussion - feel free to drop me a message about any changes I make (so at least I'm notified). The route is a public right of way and deserves mapping. The decision for designated access tags for individual transport modes was based on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... | |
| 12 | 2020-12-03 12:16 | CycleStreets ♦27 | It is mapped. The access currently is discouraged;designated. It is discouraged (there is a sign saying so, given the significant hazard), and it is designated, being a public right of way.Could you comment here on what you propose to change before you do so? Or start a discussion on talk-gb. | |
| 13 | 2020-12-03 14:07 | Casey_boy ♦83 | I know, I was justifying why I mapped the PROW in the first place. "Could you comment here on what you propose to change before you do so? Or start a discussion on talk-gb." I find this somewhat ironic... but I'm not suggesting changing it. | |
| 14 | 2020-12-03 14:33 | CycleStreets ♦27 | I don't think anyone is suggesting removing it - it is as you say a PROW. | |
| 15 | 2023-08-08 07:12 | Taya_S ♦984 | Resurrecting this long dead discussion. Wouldn't it make more sense to map these types of highways that are not physically present as "highway=no"? The wiki page for it explicitly mentions UK public right of way cases like these https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=... | |
| 16 | 2023-08-08 09:54 | Casey_boy ♦83 | It was (and actually still is) tagged as disused:highway=path which is essentially the same as highway=no. However, in the latest edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138237627) it looks like highway=track has been added. Which to me seems incorrect. I've commented on the changeset and... | |
| 17 | 2023-08-08 10:55 | Taya_S ♦984 | Ah, good to know. No preference for either option, though maybe both highway:disused=* and highway=no could also work?I should note that there are also a bunch of relevant highways found over in these areas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138197701https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan... | |
| 18 | 2023-08-08 19:13 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Indeed, highway=track is incorrect (as per all the previous comments in this discussion) and should not have been added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138237627. Similarly with the access tagging changes in that changeset.The same is true of the other cross-bay routes around Morecamb... | |
| 19 | 2023-09-01 00:35 | gurglypipe ♦872 | OK, I’ve updated the access tagging on all the estuary bridleways/BOATs I know of (hopefully I haven’t missed any), and the changesets are: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140657034 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140657122 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... | |
| 92938130 by gurglypipe @ 2020-10-23 08:37 | 1 | 2020-10-23 11:23 | lakedistrict | Thanks(closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1532274) |
| 2 | 2020-10-23 11:37 | gurglypipe ♦872 | It’s been a long time coming!Note that I haven’t updated any of the temporary parking or construction compounds, as I don’t know the status of those. This was just an update from the media reports, rather than a survey :) | |
| 92560758 by mounicb @ 2020-10-16 06:39 | 1 | 2020-10-16 08:07 | lakedistrict | Hi, is there a reason why you removed the access tag? access=private was correct and matched that on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559785202 |
| 2 | 2020-10-19 02:41 | mounicb ♦8 | Thanks for checking into our edits. We have added the access tag based on the existing service road and removed it to ensure the flow of valid data into the osm. Thanks for confirming the access. Please find the changeset for the suggested modifications. Thanks for improvising our edits with the gr... | |
| 92549778 by bathines @ 2020-10-16 03:14 | 1 | 2020-10-16 08:01 | lakedistrict | Hi, unfortunately this changeset is wrong. There is only one barrier which was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264452143. Crag Walk is drivable all the way from Helm Road to the bollard linked above. Reverted in 92566848. |
| 2 | 2020-10-16 15:57 | bathines ♦20 | Hi, thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the barrier based on the internal driver feedback and OS open data. I have added the note so that the community would validate it with the ground reality. Thanks for the modification, it is good to see the community improvising our edits. Always h... | |
| 92031995 by jamenimm @ 2020-10-06 08:27 | 1 | 2020-10-06 13:16 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta is out of date in this area. Bing is the latest imagery available. Please can you amend your changeset, using Bing imagery? Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2020-10-07 05:19 | jamenimm ♦1 | Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have missed checking the latest imagery. Thanks for the suggestions. please find the changeset (92081566) for the suggested modifications I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to strictly follow it in my future edits. Always ... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-08 13:08 | lakedistrict | Not a problem, thank you for fixing so quickly :-) | |
| 90936443 by PalmerJ @ 2020-09-15 16:12 | 1 | 2020-10-03 16:21 | lakedistrict | Please note that anything you add to OSM is also visible to everyone else. In this edit you added a shop called "pile of abandoned camping gear left by irresponsible people" - this should have been recorded and reported elsewhere. Deleted in changeset 91908091 |
| 91577556 by Robert Whittaker @ 2020-09-27 10:25 | 1 | 2020-09-27 19:41 | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for your recent edits. Based on the store addresses, I think the URL you've added actually belongs to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319475977? This new branch inside The Range doesn't appear to be listed (yet) on Iceland's store finder. |
| 2 | 2020-09-27 21:50 | Robert Whittaker ♦273 | Thanks -- I think you're right. I've move the website as you suggested. (It seems that the outlets they have inside "The Range" stores don't appear as branches on the Iceland website. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-27 22:15 | lakedistrict | Thanks. | |
| 90897372 by RomeoNewton @ 2020-09-15 05:10 | 1 | 2020-09-15 16:09 | lakedistrict | Hi, welcome to OSM. In this edit you have added an artwork called gbj inside a holiday lodge/chalet. Did you mean to add this or something else? Please note that anything you add to OSM is visible for everyone else to see - only items that exist in real life should be added. Let me know if you need ... |
| 2 | 2020-09-16 15:50 | lakedistrict | Deleted in #90996375 | |
| 90246851 by 123cargo_user @ 2020-09-01 12:42 | 1 | 2020-09-01 13:31 | lakedistrict | Thank you for your edits. You have accidentally added tags to boundary relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819645588/history - please can you fix this? |
| 89598105 by Humus015 @ 2020-08-18 22:31 | 1 | 2020-08-19 17:21 | lakedistrict | Hello! When did you last visit Bowness? Costa was only closed for the first part of lockdown and has been open again for some time. The 'You and Me' restaurant is already correctly mapped on the other side of the road. These edits will be reverted. |
| 2 | 2020-08-19 22:33 | Humus015 ♦34 | Hi, I was there last sunday. I look well and I did not see any logo at all. Looks like all the side building became chinese resto. No space for a cafè. Anyway very strange. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-20 17:47 | lakedistrict | Hi, Costa is on the left of these images and 'You and Me' on the right, on opposite sides of the road: https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/104/track-info https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/106/track-info https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/119/track-info | |
| 89205226 by mario947 @ 2020-08-10 14:51 | 1 | 2020-08-10 18:32 | lakedistrict | Hi mario947, the existing wikidata tag (civil parish) was correct. The one you have changed it to is for the town, which was already tagged correctly on the town node. Let me know if you need help reverting this changeset :) |
| 2 | 2020-08-10 22:47 | Colin Smale ♦319 | I agree with lakedistrict, you need to change this back... | |
| 3 | 2020-08-16 22:23 | lakedistrict | No response, reverted in changeset 89484906 | |
| 4 | 2020-08-26 14:52 | mario947 ♦5 | Hi lakedistrict and Colin,Sorry for the late response.Actually I don't really agree on that. As you can see there is single Wikipedia article about both town and civil parish:"Windermere (/ˈwɪndərmɪər/) is a town and civil parish in the South Lakeland District of Cumbria, ... | |
| 5 | 2020-08-26 18:48 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi Mario,You cannot change the fact that the town and civil parish are two different entities. If the entries in Wikidata/Wikipedia are screwed up then it needs to be sorted out there instead of propagating the error into OSM. | |
| 6 | 2020-08-26 19:46 | mario947 ♦5 | Hi Colin, I'm not trying to change that fact. The only thing I was trying to do is to enrich OSM entity so such beautiful place as Windermereit could point to richer and more complete data than it does now.Wikipedia community decided that "Windermere" is "is a town and ... | |
| 87315734 by gurglypipe @ 2020-06-29 22:29 | 1 | 2020-06-30 17:27 | lakedistrict | Thanks - resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1900452 |
| 85340826 by Vivek Chaudhuri @ 2020-05-17 16:27 | 1 | 2020-05-17 18:34 | lakedistrict | Hello, in this edit you added a duplicate Garsdale station and a non-existent building - deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85344448 It would be helpful if you saved your edits in one country before editing another so that it's easier for local mappers to keep an eye on edits in... |
| 85249582 by alex(sage) @ 2020-05-15 09:10 | 1 | 2020-05-15 17:15 | lakedistrict | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I think the roads you've mapped near Wigton would be better mapped as tracks rather than unclassified roads. To change the tagging: in the editor click the road so that it glows red, then click Minor/Unclassified Road (change feature) in the top lef... |
| 2 | 2020-05-15 17:39 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Hihttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804171380This is not a building & there is already a railway station tag.Please ensure you have full knowledge of the items you're amending. Most new contributors start with a couple of items close to where they live | |
| 3 | 2020-05-15 18:29 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Could you please review/repair your edits around this railway station. You've misaligned track & added buildings/bridges where there are none.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.36164/0.75671 | |
| 83948773 by Artasen @ 2020-04-22 15:10 | 1 | 2020-04-22 17:03 | lakedistrict | Hi Artasen, thanks for these edits. The PROW reference number (eg 554 022#1) should be the value of the prow_ref tag, not 'Cumbria C.C. Definitive map' (see http://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/ for PROW refs) For any routes that are not visible on the ground, you could also use a trail_visibilit... |
| 83364957 by lakedistrict @ 2020-04-10 12:50 | 1 | 2020-04-10 20:28 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice one! |
| 2 | 2020-04-11 12:44 | lakedistrict | Thanks :) | |
| 82568332 by gurglypipe @ 2020-03-24 11:34 | 1 | 2020-03-24 16:14 | lakedistrict | Based on the ones I've surveyed in Kendal and Morecambe, the parcel postbox ref will be whatever ref the meter/business box had (check https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/LA/) with the suffix P (so LA1 201P and LA1 206P for these two) |
| 82282121 by MacLondon @ 2020-03-17 04:01 | 1 | 2020-03-17 18:06 | lakedistrict | Hi MacLondon, buses no longer stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7197208800 since the bus stop was moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5810049187. Please can you amend the relation? |
| 2 | 2020-03-17 19:21 | MacLondon ♦215 | Thanks. I've now adjusted the relation. | |
| 76557224 by lakedistrict @ 2019-11-03 17:21 | 1 | 2019-11-06 10:00 | Spearmint ♦5 | When I visited about 3 days ago, Neon sheep is just part of the Main Shop, you can enter either door and go freely between them |
| 2 | 2019-11-06 10:02 | Spearmint ♦5 | And to me it's why tagging a building with all the shop details is wrong, as now this building is actually two named shops, not just one!! | |
| 3 | 2019-11-06 22:13 | lakedistrict | Thanks for adding it. I'm going to remap this block soon as one big building and add all the shops as nodes to better represent what's actually there. | |
| 74498754 by Russell Hore @ 2019-09-15 15:07 | 1 | 2019-09-15 18:51 | lakedistrict | The Dales Way is already mapped as a relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/29302) so there's no need to name the individual parts of it. You can view walking route relations at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=54.36049&lon=-2.72976 |
| 73410391 by hvzsr @ 2019-08-16 11:11 | 1 | 2019-08-17 11:02 | lakedistrict | Hi, are you sure that some of the objects you deleted were duplicates? It is possible to have 2 gates or 2 trees next to each other :) |
| 2 | 2019-08-26 10:38 | hvzsr ♦9 | Hi lakedistrict, thanks for your comment. I am pretty sure they were duplicates because on zooming in, they were right on top of each other (i.e. they were in identical positions). If they were 2 gates or 2 trees, I would expect them to be close but not identical positions.If you think I am mist... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-26 11:59 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the reply. That's fine then, thanks for mapping in the Lake District :) | |
| 73337424 by fmribsteve @ 2019-08-14 08:30 | 1 | 2019-08-17 11:06 | lakedistrict | Hi fmribsteve, thanks for adding these details. Just one thing - the name tag is for the name only so please include all descriptions in the description tag. Most of these paths shouldn't have names. Thanks :)https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
| 2 | 2019-08-18 05:50 | fmribsteve ♦1 | Hi - thanks for the information - from the link you sent me, you are clearly correct ;-). However, the problem is that this path is in large parts non-existent and/or unusable. My concern was that adding comments on this to the "description" would not get noticed by people planning thei... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-18 05:53 | fmribsteve ♦1 | ps - I did see that this path is marked on OS - I don't know if that changes things. On the other hand, I think that one factor is is that the steepest parts of this path have been obliterated by rockfalls and so it seems valid that those parts really don't now exist. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-18 10:08 | lakedistrict | There is a trail visibility tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility) to mark paths as difficult to follow, but from what you say it would be probably best to just delete it. | |
| 71613898 by lakedistrict @ 2019-06-25 20:37 | 1 | 2019-06-25 22:40 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice. Feels like we’re getting somewhere with all this EV surveying you’ve done recently! |
| 2 | 2019-06-26 17:45 | lakedistrict | Thanks. You've done a fair amount too! :) | |
| 71379885 by Mauls @ 2019-06-18 20:35 | 1 | 2019-06-19 19:14 | lakedistrict | Hi Mauls, You've added a lot of old names with this changeset - what's your source? |
| 60650483 by lakedistrict @ 2018-07-12 12:23 | 1 | 2019-06-16 15:49 | Skidle ♦4 | Hi,there are 2 Kirk Stones tagged. The larger norther one is correct. What is the other smaller one marked next to the pub for? thanks |
| 2 | 2019-06-16 16:10 | lakedistrict | The large northern one drawn as an area should be the only Kirk Stone mapped. The one across the road from the pub is just some stone with a not:name tag. This changeset followed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60634926 | |
| 3 | 2019-06-17 06:19 | Skidle ♦4 | Ah yes, I see now. sorry! | |
| 70861117 by pwb @ 2019-06-02 16:58 | 1 | 2019-06-03 09:41 | lakedistrict | Hi, thanks for your edits in Windermere. You can square the corners of buildings by pressing the Q key in the editor which makes the buildings nice and neat. I've done this for you on Quarry Brow. Let me know if you have any questions :) |
| 70580170 by gurglypipe @ 2019-05-24 10:06 | 1 | 2019-05-24 10:26 | lakedistrict | I think amenity=bicycle_repair_station + service:bicycle:pump=yes is a more common tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station) and is that a multi chain tool on the post behind in the photo? 🚲 |
| 2 | 2019-05-24 10:35 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good suggestion; fixed in 70581115. I haven’t actually been to the station since seeing that blog post, so can’t yet confirm what other tools are available. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-31 14:53 | gurglypipe ♦872 | A huge selection of tools is available, and I’ve confirmed that the other bike racks currently in the map are still present on the ground.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70811921 | |
| 4 | 2019-05-31 14:57 | lakedistrict | Useful to know, thanks :) | |
| 70761146 by PantherStrix @ 2019-05-30 09:02 | 1 | 2019-05-30 09:17 | lakedistrict | Hi TheBlackMan, I'm not sure that cartons, paper cups and tetrapaks are the same as batteries, cardboard, glass bottles and plastic packaging? What source did you use to add the additional accepted items? "New keys" aren't necessarily wrong keys or typos. Thanks |
| 2 | 2019-05-30 13:04 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Yeah, this change looks wrong. Some of the changes, like clothing → clothes, might be fine; but the rest of it is wrong. The recycling containers I surveyed accepted (and did not accept) specific things. Paper cups and tetrapaks, for example, don’t generalise to paper and plastic packagin... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-31 01:10 | PantherStrix ♦93 | Hi lakedistrict and gurglypipe,I made some mistakes by changing. I just wanted to change clothing -> clothes but then mixed something up. Sorry, I corrected it. | |
| 4 | 2019-05-31 08:22 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks a lot!(For reference, TheBlackMan fixed this in changeset 70789776.) | |
| 68040413 by Grimwood @ 2019-03-11 22:15 | 1 | 2019-05-27 09:20 | BrackoNe ♦106 | alt_name\twinter gardensint_name\twinter gardensname\tWinter Gardensold_name\twinter gardensAll are the same!? Do we really need old_name which is the same as name, and do we need alt_name which is the same as name? |
| 2 | 2019-05-28 16:54 | lakedistrict | Probably not! Names fixed (and address/website added) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70704060 | |
| 70189460 by Pete Owens @ 2019-05-13 12:15 | 1 | 2019-05-13 13:24 | lakedistrict | Hi Pete, did you mean to delete this pavement? Perhaps changing the tagging would be better if it's not a proper cycleway. Let me know if you need any help putting it back. :) |
| 2 | 2019-05-13 18:20 | Pete Owens ♦55 | I removed the cycleway because there is no cycleway. | |
| 69961487 by eastender @ 2019-05-07 06:35 | 1 | 2019-05-08 15:02 | lakedistrict | Thanks eastender! :) |
| 69204050 by CYM1988 @ 2019-04-14 14:25 Active block | 1 | 2019-04-18 12:23 | lakedistrict | Hi, I think that Higher Heysham is the name of the suburb, not the name of this "peak". In fact it might not be a peak at all, just a spot height. Please check this and your other edits in this area where you have introduced peaks and names which look like duplicates or errors. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-04-24 09:12 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69518093 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some made-up peaks. See comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2991492 and previous blocks for background. | |
| 68096039 by gurglypipe @ 2019-03-13 11:29 | 1 | 2019-03-13 11:55 | lakedistrict | Rather than mapping each building as a separate social facility, it might be better to map the grounds instead (like schools and hospitals are mapped). The same would go for Appletree Close. |
| 2 | 2019-03-14 12:45 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I was updating the existing tagging, but you’re right; that would be a better way of doing things. Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68135631. | |
| 67991236 by chappers88 @ 2019-03-10 15:03 | 1 | 2019-03-10 21:41 | lakedistrict | Hi chappers88, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see that you requested a review so just letting you know that this changeset is spot on - park is the correct tag to use here. Any questions just ask. Hope to see more edits from you soon. :) |
| 67974919 by ashdpfsh @ 2019-03-09 23:48 | 1 | 2019-03-10 21:39 | lakedistrict | Yep, looking at the wiki that seems to be the correct tag. Thanks for the edit. |
| 67463730 by UTMC @ 2019-02-22 12:04 | 1 | 2019-03-04 13:34 | lakedistrict | Hi UTMC, what makes you think that it's a 'fake' name? I added the name based on the names on bus stops and it's what Metro radio call it on their traffic and travel reports. If you feel the name is 'uncommon' then by all means move it to alt_name but don't delete ... |
| 2 | 2019-03-04 13:52 | UTMC ♦1 | Sorry we used the wrong phrase to describe the changes.The name Jedburgh Road is not official and does not appear on the OS mapping https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/. It's can be slightly confusing. The road is often called North West Radial also, but this is not the official designa... | |
| 67692264 by CUB3D @ 2019-03-01 16:41 | 1 | 2019-03-04 13:19 | lakedistrict | Hi CUB3D, welcome to OSM and thanks for these edits - good to see someone keeping the map up to date around campus. Do you know if Shijo has replaced any of the other cafes/shops in the SU and which floor it's on? Thanks :) |
| 67723340 by Bus Mad Lad @ 2019-03-02 20:46 | 1 | 2019-03-04 13:09 | lakedistrict | In this changeset you've added a no right turn restriction from Basingstoke Road and a no u-turns restriction on Elgar Road South, both of which I don't think are signed on the ground. What's your source for these changesets? Thanks :) |
| 67718390 by Bus Mad Lad @ 2019-03-02 16:57 | 1 | 2019-03-04 13:06 | lakedistrict | Hi Bus Mad Lad, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. In this changeset you've changed oneway=yes to oneway=no on Bridge Street - although the previous tagging was already correct (one way except for buses, taxis and bikes). Did you mean to do this or is the road now 2 way for all vehicle t... |
| 67266512 by SomeoneElse @ 2019-02-17 00:18 | 1 | 2019-02-17 10:38 | lakedistrict | Rising Sun Arts Centre is already mapped just to the south but from memory your location looks better. I'll check this week and remove the duplicate. Also not sure if Zaks Cafe has reopened yet, it's been closed for years but was due to reopen soon. They were working on it in December but ... |
| 2 | 2019-02-17 10:59 | lakedistrict | From the aerial imagery, the terracing was wrong on Silver Street because the Platinum Apartments building had been missed out, which meant that Rising Sun was in the wrong place. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67276086 | |
| 3 | 2019-02-17 13:22 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Thanks - I think it might be bigger than just the south end - there's a rising sun emblem facing north on what's tagged as house 26. | |
| 4 | 2019-02-17 14:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Re Zaks - it was definitely still closed around 9:00 and after 18:00. | |
| 67175761 by ashdpfsh @ 2019-02-13 21:33 | 1 | 2019-02-13 23:19 | lakedistrict | Hi ashdpfsh, thanks for all your edits in Reading. In this changeset you've added "Covered pearls" and "chillum" but you haven't said what they are. Shops? Cafes? Just ask if you need any help with editing them. :) |
| 67052214 by Derick Rethans @ 2019-02-09 15:43 | 1 | 2019-02-09 22:58 | lakedistrict | Thanks, this closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1515469 |
| 67049186 by SiHollett @ 2019-02-09 13:26 | 1 | 2019-02-09 21:01 | lakedistrict | Thanks for adding this. Is there a way to tag AONBs differently to national parks? Also you might want to check this changeset for lines like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669337399 which look like they're unintentional. :) |
| 2 | 2019-02-09 21:03 | lakedistrict | Sorry! Ignore that last line - the relation's displaying properly now and it makes more sense. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-10 16:52 | SiHollett ♦12 | There's no sensible way to tag AONBs differently to National Parks and get them to show up - this is something that's been unresolved for years. | |
| 4 | 2019-02-11 18:39 | daganzdaanda ♦253 | Hi! With the latest release of the OSM Carto style, boundary=protected_area is being rendered now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kocio/diary/47491 According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area(see also the talk page) you should use protect_class=5 for ... | |
| 5 | 2019-02-11 19:06 | SiHollett ♦12 | I've made those changes, lets see how it works. Presumably, protect_class=5 would also apply to national parks (the Lake District also would get protect_class=98 as a World Heritage Site), should they also be tagged this way. | |
| 6 | 2019-02-15 12:02 | daganzdaanda ♦253 | Very strange that it does not show up. I see you changed the tagging at Chiltern Hills AONB https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7129946 and that's still rendered. Only difference that I could imagine has an influence is the area=yes tag -- maybe try adding this here? | |
| 7 | 2019-02-15 20:09 | SiHollett ♦12 | I've put area=yes in, and it is still not showing up several hours later. Very strange indeed. | |
| 8 | 2019-02-15 22:57 | daganzdaanda ♦253 | I found the problem: the boundary was not closed... I added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670817170 and it's already rendered a minute later! (also, area=yes is not necessary as long as the boundary tags are on a relation) | |
| 9 | 2019-02-16 09:53 | SiHollett ♦12 | thanks - that was a tiny little gap, no wonder it didn't work the times I checked to see if that was the issue! | |
| 66961025 by gurglypipe @ 2019-02-06 11:29 | 1 | 2019-02-06 12:13 | lakedistrict | Most likely a retention or balancing pond if it's on a new build housing estate (SuDS), but an infiltration pond is also possible although they're somewhat rarer in the UK. |
| 2 | 2019-02-06 12:22 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks. I’ve changed it to a retention pond for now (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66962092), but it needs resurveying once the housing estate is complete. I was thinking it might be an infiltration pond since when I surveyed, it was dry. But that is probably because the estate isn&r... | |
| 66744226 by gurglypipe @ 2019-01-29 16:47 | 1 | 2019-01-29 17:26 | lakedistrict | You could also add the amenity=coworking_space tag on the office=coworking node (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=coworking%20space?uselang=en-GB). I think there's a couple of these places in Kendal now which will need tagging too. |
| 2 | 2019-01-29 17:36 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good suggestion. Tweaked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66745539, thanks. Thinking about coworking made me think about makerspaces, so I added that too. There’s another one in Lancaster/Morecambe which I’ll add shortly too. I’ll do the Kendal coworking offices soon too,... | |
| 66296982 by oliver_oliver2000 @ 2019-01-14 10:34 | 1 | 2019-01-15 17:14 | lakedistrict | Thanks for all these edits around Reading. Are you sure that the Co-op has been renamed Cooprat? |
| 65326353 by ndrw6 @ 2018-12-09 22:04 | 1 | 2018-12-28 14:39 | lakedistrict | Did you mean to split John Lewis into 2 buildings in this chnageset? |
| 2 | 2018-12-28 14:40 | lakedistrict | changeset? | |
| 3 | 2018-12-31 19:32 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Sorry for late reply, I've been away.This changeset was based entirely on information from Code-Point Open and imagery. Parts of this building contained different postcodes. This method is prone to errors, especially when buildings have multiple addresses and boundaries are not clear. | |
| 4 | 2019-01-12 18:42 | lakedistrict | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66257438 | |
| 66028500 by gurglypipe @ 2019-01-04 17:23 | 1 | 2019-01-10 17:28 | lakedistrict | I think that all signal boxes are named and this one is called "Haltwhistle". I've renamed it as "Haltwhistle Signal Box" as this is what it's commonly referred to as. |
| 66120945 by Viki_travel_weak @ 2019-01-08 08:34 | 1 | 2019-01-08 10:22 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Looks like a building in the satellite imagery. Has it changed? |
| 2 | 2019-01-08 12:04 | lakedistrict | It is a building. I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66126193 (Please note that the building tag isn't only for houses!) | |
| 66043372 by lukys1 @ 2019-01-05 10:23 | 1 | 2019-01-05 11:03 | lakedistrict | Thanks! You could use copy and paste if the caravans are mostly the same size (and if you're not doing so already) :) |
| 65826873 by Bodian @ 2018-12-27 22:46 | 1 | 2018-12-28 14:17 | lakedistrict | Hi Bodain, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. You've changed some footpaths to cycleways which means that foot access isn't allowed unless foot=yes is added. In future edits it might be better to just add bicycle=yes (under Allowed Access in the editor) to the existing paths. Any qu... |
| 2 | 2018-12-28 17:00 | Bodian ♦5 | Oh - okay. Bit odd really, as I don't think there is a cycleway anywhere in Britain where foot access isn't also part of the cycleway. Cycle lanes on the road may not take walkers (but they aren't cycleways) - but where else would this be the case?I'll go back and edit them... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-28 18:44 | lakedistrict | You're right that cycleways usually allow foot access, but the OSM definition only implies cycle access. You can read the tag definitions by clicking the 'i' symbol in the editor or on the wiki: eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cyclewayYou can ignore the 'Al... | |
| 65263019 by stadiaarcadia @ 2018-12-07 09:41 | 1 | 2018-12-09 12:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello,Can you explain the changeset comment "Names added." here? What you appear to have done is change the name of a number of things from the correct "St James" to the grammatically incorrect "St. James" (with a full stop). FWIW National Rail's app actually h... |
| 2 | 2018-12-09 20:08 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | Hi Andy, St. James really is the official name, although St James also is used. Check out the official Newcastle United site: https://www.nufc.co.uk/stadium They also use St. and not St | |
| 3 | 2018-12-09 20:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Ha! So they do... | |
| 4 | 2018-12-09 22:21 | lakedistrict | Former local mapper here: "St. James' Park" is the name on the stadium signs and "St James" is the name on the metro station signs. I've fixed the station name in changeset 5326684 | |
| 65304568 by Mark Edmonds @ 2018-12-09 01:17 | 1 | 2018-12-09 22:09 | lakedistrict | Are you sure that the paths through Low Hag Wood are only permissive and not public footpaths? Mapthepaths shows them as being public footpaths and I'm fairly sure the sign at the N entrance says public footpath. By the way, designation=public_footpath or highway=footway should imply foot=yes s... |
| 2 | 2018-12-09 22:11 | lakedistrict | Oops! I realised that you corrected this in a later changeset! Thanks for your edits and happy mapping! :) | |
| 3 | 2018-12-10 14:42 | Mark Edmonds ♦6 | I'm glad you mentioned MapThePaths to me before - I find it's great for double checking yourself! I had thought all those paths were permissive, but when checking afterwards with MapThePaths to verify I found I was wrong so fixed my change :-)Yep I think you are right on the foot=yes t... | |
| 65155355 by Sherin A @ 2018-12-04 10:43 | 1 | 2018-12-04 11:22 | lakedistrict | Hi Sherin A, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your first edit. What exactly is Art Jam? You've just added a name in the middle of the road. Let me know what it is (art shop, theatre, cafe etc), what side of the road it should be on and any other details (website, address etc) and I'll fix it for... |
| 65061300 by DaveF @ 2018-12-01 00:19 | 1 | 2018-12-01 21:39 | lakedistrict | Hi Dave, the name as displayed on the station signs is actually 2 words, or at least it was when I did a photo survey from the train in June this year. Also the building you've tagged as a station building isn't really a station building as such, it's more just the staircase/lift buil... |
| 2 | 2018-12-01 22:20 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Hihttp://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3751863https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=metro+centrehttp://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Ebshttp://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/timesandfares/MCE/BLO/041218/1015/dephttp://naptan.app.dft.gov.uk/datarequest/helpPlease publish your evidence it's t... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-01 22:27 | lakedistrict | That Geograph photo is over 5 years old, the signs have since been changed: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Hf7jnz2gbKg/maxresdefault.jpg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground Perhaps one name could go in the alt_name tag. | |
| 4 | 2018-12-01 23:07 | DaveF ♦1,564 | That the was previously one word + all the other evidence suggests the signwriters messed up & still sways it to one word IMO. I'll put the two word version in the alt_ | |
| 65077350 by jimstn @ 2018-12-01 16:56 | 1 | 2018-12-01 21:55 | lakedistrict | Hi jimstn, thanks for this edit. I hope you don't mind but I've removed the layer tag from Stoddart House and tagged the road underneath it as a building passage (I should of done this when I mapped it earlier this year). I think that most of the building starts at ground level. If you eve... |
| 2 | 2018-12-01 22:47 | jimstn ♦10 | Thanks, that sounds like a better way of mapping it | |
| 3 | 2018-12-02 03:36 | Djminisite ♦40 | They've actually been built now, (I've even been in them), converted them to buildings and given them details :) (although I'm not sure on which building is which out of the 2 new ones) | |
| 65046281 by route4uuser @ 2018-11-30 14:26 | 1 | 2018-12-01 21:30 | lakedistrict | Hi r4uuser, thanks for your edit. In the future please add a changeset comment so that other mappers can easily see what changes have been made. |
| 65030319 by Mark Edmonds @ 2018-11-30 02:39 | 1 | 2018-11-30 10:23 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Are you copying data from an OS walking map? For tedious licensing reasons, that’s not allowed (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata for the list of OS data we *are* allowed to use in OpenStreetMap). If you copy data from OS walking maps, you risk all your edits bei... |
| 2 | 2018-11-30 11:34 | lostmike ♦65 | In addition the OSM maps are rarely accurate. In my experience they can be off by tens of metres. Mapping by walking and recording with a GPS is the only accurate way to map paths. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-30 11:37 | gurglypipe ♦872 | (Note: This changeset only changed the designation of the existing mapped path. Having been here myself many times, the path definitely exists on the ground, and existed in OSM prior to this edit.) | |
| 4 | 2018-11-30 11:38 | lakedistrict | Hi Mark, welcome to OSM. If you want to add public right of way designations you can use http://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/?lat=54.53573328463213&lon=-3.0351912060142023&zoom=1 . Please don't copy them from OS maps. You can also use any of the imagery/data layers in the iD editor (including... | |
| 5 | 2018-11-30 16:51 | Mark Edmonds ♦6 | Apologies, yes it was just a change of designation (based on what is shown on the Ordnance Survey mapping - which I may have wrongly assumed was the correct authority). There are 2 roughly parallel paths - one a public bridleway and one not. When I hike here I've never had to worry about which ... | |
| 64787933 by gurglypipe @ 2018-11-22 16:28 | 1 | 2018-11-23 12:08 | lakedistrict | Nice one. Perhaps information=office would be better on the tourist info centre? |
| 2 | 2018-11-23 17:30 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Sure. Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64828055. | |
| 64640284 by unnsyeda @ 2018-11-19 05:42 | 1 | 2018-11-19 14:37 | lakedistrict | Thanks! Are these roads part of Stephenson Terrace or do they have a different name? |
| 2 | 2018-11-20 14:05 | lakedistrict | OS OpenData StreetView has the name - it's Willow Green. Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64699406 | |
| 3 | 2019-07-03 05:56 | unnsyeda ♦13 | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. The road segments were added as per the latest imagery available in OSM. Thanks for adding the name.We apologize for delayed response.Regards,unnsyeda | |
| 64224705 by gurglypipe @ 2018-11-06 10:09 | 1 | 2018-11-08 11:02 | lakedistrict | Do you know how it is accessed at the E end, given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158651947 is tagged access=private? I'm guessing that foot and cycle access are allowed and that it's not a driveway but part of Kershaw Drive. |
| 2 | 2018-11-12 11:54 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good question, I’ll need to go and take a look at Kershaw Drive. Seems a bit odd that half of the loop is classed as private. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-16 10:34 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I drove round it this morning (Mapillary images are currently pending approval). I can’t see any ‘private’ restrictions — just looks like a normal (fancy) estate road to me, so I’ve retagged it as a non-private, residential road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/... | |
| 4 | 2018-11-16 10:51 | lakedistrict | Thanks for checking and correcting. :) | |
| 64491725 by gurglypipe @ 2018-11-14 16:38 | 1 | 2018-11-14 23:50 | lakedistrict | Thanks for these edits. Whilst you're mapping farms, it would be good to add the farm names too - they're normally on the OS OpenData StreetView layer. :) |
| 2 | 2018-11-14 23:57 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I’ve been putting the farm names on the farmhouse, as the house name. It seems a bit redundant to put them on the farmyard area too, but I could do. | |
| 64362210 by JayCBR @ 2018-11-10 21:18 | 1 | 2018-11-14 21:05 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello,You've changed the East Lancashire Road from a primary to a trunk at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627747425/history - are you sure that's correct? It's a while since I've been there but I didn't think it was a trunk (green signs) rather than primary (white sign... |
| 2 | 2018-11-14 21:56 | JayCBR ♦39 | every sign i ve seen is green, sabre has it as primary..and common sense, its a major road, i see no reason that section not to be primarybest regardsJ | |
| 3 | 2018-11-14 23:19 | lakedistrict | These Mapillary images were taken in July this year and both show green signs: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/VLPqbORH-pV3z7yyD1MBhQ and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-TqGlo7Kzu3Pq96d-QNGAg | |
| 4 | 2018-11-14 23:30 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Actually - my mistake - that's a different bit of the East Lancs Road to what I was thinking of (you haven't modified the bit I was thinking of at all) | |
| 5 | 2018-11-18 23:21 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | HI, in this change, New Bridge Street and part of Greengate have been changed from secondary to tertiary, but they also have ref B6182. If this is no longer the B6182, please remove the ref. If it is still the B6182, please revert the highway to secondary as per the UK tagging guidelines at https://... | |
| 64359453 by alpman @ 2018-11-10 18:54 | 1 | 2018-11-11 17:47 | lakedistrict | Hi alpman, thanks for your edits. Just wondering what barrier=wall wall=no means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642928272? |
| 2 | 2018-11-11 22:03 | alpman ♦3 | I'm not sure what it means. It was on a wall where I added a gate. It was last edited 10 months ago by Stonemill2. I split the wall and took off "wall=no" on the bit of wall that I saw and could see on Bing and left it on the other bit that you cannot see on Bing. I am planni... | |
| 64197054 by jgibney @ 2018-11-05 13:02 | 1 | 2018-11-08 11:09 | lakedistrict | Has Sports Direct in Reading closed down? You removed the name and shop tags - let me know if this was a mistake and you'd like them putting back. :) |
| 63995557 by AdventrrGrrl @ 2018-10-30 00:48 | 1 | 2018-10-30 23:28 | lakedistrict | Thanks for these updates (and welcome to OSM)! I've left Newcastle now so it's nice to see a new mapper adding details to the campus. If you need any help with editing or have any questions, then just give me a shout. :) |
| 64024114 by letsridebikes @ 2018-10-30 20:38 | 1 | 2018-10-30 23:08 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the updates. What sort of access does barrier=fence at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6025737440 have? foot/bicycle= etc |
| 2 | 2018-10-31 13:12 | letsridebikes ♦58 | It's a motorway-style crash barrier between the road and the woods below, with no break - you'd have to step over it. There's a narrow, steep dirt path unsuitable for anything but foot traffic, but as the crash barrier suggests, there's no pavement on this side of the road - as s... | |
| 63927280 by Stuart Ward @ 2018-10-27 12:48 | 1 | 2018-10-28 18:44 | lakedistrict | Hi Stuart, I notice that you've been removing addresses from nodes and remapping some features as nodes. IMO the address also belongs to the (shop) node and should be retained. And when a POI takes up an entire building (like the climbing wall) they should be mapped as buildings. |
| 2 | 2018-10-28 23:40 | Stuart Ward ♦4 | Lakedistrict. Thanks for your comments. But I think it is generally better to map the building and attach attributes to the building that are relevant to the building. And put the activity in the building in a separate node. You mention the Climbing wall. I understand that there is a separate cafe r... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-29 18:21 | lakedistrict | The cafe is part of the climbing wall so a node inside the building or climbing wall area would be fine. Just like how Costa is mapped within the Oxford Road Tesco Extra building. I don't think that there's any harm in duplicating the address data on both the building and nodes, in fact it... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-30 20:46 | Stuart Ward ♦4 | Right I see what you mean, sorry I misunderstood. Yes I agree that the addr: attributes should be attached to the business as well. | |
| 63260476 by dazzac @ 2018-10-06 16:04 | 1 | 2018-10-28 19:23 | lakedistrict | Hi dazzac, thanks for all these edits around Newcastle. There's now 2 Purple Bears https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5961871386 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4415157358 so one will need deleting. Is it more of a restaurant or pub? |
| 63827516 by Chris S @ 2018-10-24 10:47 | 1 | 2018-10-26 19:25 | lakedistrict | Thanks Chris, it's a great improvement and was a much needed update. In the editor you can change the background layer to DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery or Esri World Imagery which are more recent and show the new layout. Any questions just ask. :) |
| 2 | 2018-10-29 11:11 | Chris S ♦1 | Thanks for the tip! I _think_ the Esri/DigitalGlobe images are actually showing the junction under construction (hard to tell), but i’ve made a couple of minor tweaks to reflect them. | |
| 62871305 by Bttuffley @ 2018-09-24 08:08 | 1 | 2018-09-29 11:00 | Chris Fleming ♦374 | Do you have any more details for these? |
| 2 | 2018-10-02 21:14 | lakedistrict | Given the lack of details and that fact that they don't seem to correspond with anything on bing imagery, I think that this changeset can be reverted. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-23 20:44 | lakedistrict | Reverted in 63810814 | |
| 63639417 by EoghanM @ 2018-10-18 10:31 | 1 | 2018-10-18 17:38 | lakedistrict | Hi Eoghan, thanks for the edit. There's already a Hale hamlet node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31390030 - do you want to delete one of them? Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2018-11-01 14:26 | EoghanM ♦36 | I see you've already deleted the one I added and transferred the extra datum; thanks!Don't know how I missed it the first time round. | |
| 62467585 by mcld @ 2018-09-10 21:08 | 1 | 2018-10-14 15:42 | lakedistrict | Should this be tagged as a cafe or restaurant? |
| 2 | 2018-10-14 15:55 | mcld ♦68 | Oops, thank you - forgot that tag! | |
| 55852649 by Casey_boy @ 2018-01-29 08:37 | 1 | 2018-01-29 12:17 | gurglypipe ♦872 | (For those interested in the details, here’s the council’s page on it: http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/council/strategies-policies-plans/roads-parking-and-travel/major-transport-schemes/greyhound-bridge-lancaster.aspx) |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 18:25 | lakedistrict | It looks like user Mastreme has made a start with reopening it in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/63268533. I haven't been to Lancaster recently so I'm not sure if there's been any related road layout changes or not. Could one of you locals take a look? Thanks :) | |
| 3 | 2018-10-07 20:09 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Looks like there might be some further edits to do (https://www.lancashire.gov.uk/council/strategies-policies-plans/roads-parking-and-travel/major-transport-schemes/greyhound-bridge-lancaster/) but haven't been able to verify personally. Have asked on that changeset thread. | |
| 62934631 by Coach hire Bradford @ 2018-09-26 05:48 | 1 | 2018-09-26 05:53 | Coach hire Bradford ♦1 | coach hire bradford, we provide seven day service taxi in bradford bus hire bradford minibus hire bradford coach hire bradford bradford taxi. |
| 2 | 2018-10-02 21:07 | lakedistrict | Welcome to OSM. Looks like you've added your business in the wrong city - this is Newcastle not Bradford! Changeset reverted in 63138882 | |
| 62064794 by MikeLusty @ 2018-08-28 09:42 | 1 | 2018-08-30 17:32 | lakedistrict | Hi Mike, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please only map things that exist in real life and can be verified on the ground, measurement locations don't belong in OSM. I'll get his changeset reverted for you. All the best with your coasts project. :) |
| 2 | 2018-10-02 19:58 | lakedistrict | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63136796 | |
| 62083614 by Andre68 @ 2018-08-28 20:01 | 1 | 2018-08-30 17:30 | lakedistrict | Hi Andre68, thanks for this. Would you be able to revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62064794 which predates this changeset? :) |
| 2 | 2018-08-30 19:34 | Andre68 ♦88 | Hi lakedistrict, if you want to completely revert that changeset, you will have to revert my changeset first. If you have checked everthing you may do this. I'm mainly checking for coastline errors. If the coastline errors are still gone afterwards, everthing is fine. You are welcome to do this... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-02 19:57 | lakedistrict | Rather than do a double revert, it was easier just to delete them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63136796 | |
| 63021711 by GinaroZ @ 2018-09-28 20:10 | 1 | 2018-09-29 16:43 | lakedistrict | I only just "fixed" the tagging on this a few weeks ago. Is it really a tower? I'd probably describe it as a mast, based on the wiki descriptions. :) |
| 2 | 2018-09-30 21:26 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | The wiki isn't very clear on the whole mast v tower situation. From the mb21 images it looks like a self-supporting structure or lattice tower, a smaller version of towers like Crystal Palace? | |
| 3 | 2018-10-01 21:59 | lakedistrict | I read somewhere that towers had platforms and staircases whilst masts only had ladders. However there's a lot of crossover between the two tags so either tag is probably suitable for this transmitter. | |
| 63063602 by lakedistrict @ 2018-09-30 13:17 | 1 | 2018-10-01 19:11 | jpennycook ♦327 | Hello.You converted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37802686 from a residential road tagged as cycleway=shared_lane to a path. This way is part of National Cycle Network Route 4 - can you tag it (or the relavant sections of road and path) to allow cycling, and add the surface, please? Highwa... |
| 2 | 2018-10-01 19:46 | lakedistrict | Hi Jon, I've merged the adjacent path sections together so all the details are in place. I notice that there's a tracktype tag - should this be used on paths which aren't tagged as highway=track? I guess it's redundant given the surface tag. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-01 21:21 | jpennycook ♦327 | Hello.Thanks for getting back to me, and sorting out the path. The tracktype does seem redundant here. Tracktype does get used on some paths, especially bridleways, but doesn't seem to be useful on compacted or paved footpaths.Jon | |
| 62671894 by 4004 @ 2018-09-17 17:11 | 1 | 2018-09-17 17:46 | lakedistrict | Thanks for this edit. Did you mean to change the levels to 0 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59155434 ? |
| 2 | 2018-09-17 19:45 | 4004 ♦1,887 | thanks for spotting this fat fingering, reverted.nice to see someone still doing qa around here | |
| 3 | 2018-09-20 17:40 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing. Do you know if this area has a name? A suburb or neighbourhood node would be useful here if a name exists. | |
| 4 | 2018-09-20 18:04 | 4004 ♦1,887 | Sorry, not really aware of a name for that particular area, I’d just refer to it as (lower) Earley | |
| 33660411 by kreuzschnabel @ 2015-08-29 10:01 | 1 | 2018-09-15 17:41 | lakedistrict | FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1517630 |
| 62267505 by r3d3r-bro @ 2018-09-04 06:50 | 1 | 2018-09-04 18:15 | lakedistrict | Thanks for all your edits in Reading! Hopefully we'll get clearer imagery to use at some point or someone with will survey and fix them. If you want to be more specific, there is a House tag (search House in the editor). Hope to see more edits from you soon! :). |
| 2 | 2018-09-04 18:16 | lakedistrict | *or someone will survey and fix them | |
| 62047754 by Stuart Ward @ 2018-08-27 17:59 | 1 | 2018-08-27 18:58 | lakedistrict | Hi Stuart, thanks for these edits. Just in case you didn't know about it, https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/RG/RG1/2/ is useful if you wanted to add postcodes. :) |
| 54893248 by PeterP @ 2017-12-24 18:25 | 1 | 2018-07-27 12:01 | brianboru ♦158 | Please be careful - this changeset has deleted the entire relation for the Warwickshire Centenary Way! It's going to be hard work recreating it. |
| 2 | 2018-07-27 12:33 | lakedistrict | The Undelete plugin in JOSM should work? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete r75266 | |
| 3 | 2018-07-30 09:45 | brianboru ♦158 | Relation has been successfully recovered | |
| 35935498 by Sam888 @ 2015-12-13 23:16 | 1 | 2016-01-01 08:40 | BCNorwich ♦4,853 | Are the areas tagged as heath really heath lands? As far as I am aware these are fells and should be tagged natural=fell. |
| 2 | 2018-07-26 12:25 | lakedistrict | @BCNorwich Is there an easy way to delete the larger heath areas? I've deleted a few of the smaller ones based on the fact that they didn't fit the wiki's heath definition and/or they massively overlapped with other natural=/landuse areas. I'd estimate that <10% of the natural... | |
| 60986699 by PalmerJ @ 2018-07-23 13:07 | 1 | 2018-07-23 22:12 | lakedistrict | Hi PalmerJ, thanks for this edit. I realise that maps.me doesn't allow you to add certain features to the map but please avoid adding everything as an attraction. I mapped the tarn as an area and deleted the duplicate well node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60999508. Can you descri... |
| 60666006 by vorsignal @ 2018-07-12 21:35 | 1 | 2018-07-13 21:32 | lakedistrict | Hi vorsignal, thanks for these edits. Can you explain why you have added access tags to the roads in Grasmere, eg on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43617587 ? As far as I'm aware there's no access restrictions on these roads. Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2018-07-14 07:50 | vorsignal ♦4 | Hi,I've been there four days ago on vacation. There is one traffic sign at the southern entrance to the village just between the primary school and the Car & Coach Park and another one at the bus stop "The Swan Hotel" in direction of Grasmere. As far as I could remember yesterda... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-14 10:16 | lakedistrict | I've had a look and that road sign really doesn't make any sense - "no buses except buses" - "no coaches except for local buses" would make more sense but that's not what the sign says. Thanks for the corrections and I hope that you enjoyed your holiday. :) | |
| 60679354 by SecondEdition2 @ 2018-07-13 08:50 | 1 | 2018-07-13 21:38 | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for all these edits as always. I doubt that Meml is a locality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5758168727), but is probably an abbreviation for memorial? |
| 60634926 by kreuzschnabel @ 2018-07-12 05:52 | 1 | 2018-07-12 10:09 | lakedistrict | Thanks for these edits. Are you sure that Kirk Stone is at node 5755379221 - it's already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513046741 unless it's moved? :) |
| 2 | 2018-07-12 11:51 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | I am not entirely sure since there is no inscript, but there is a stone resembling a steeple at the spot I mapped it, and having read on Wikipedia that the KS is close to the northbound side of the road and just a few yards off the inn, I thought that was it. Unfortunately it’s hardly visible ... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-12 12:26 | lakedistrict | Based on local knowledge, Ordnance Survey, Geograph photos and local websites I've fixed this in changeset 60650483. The wiki article is wrong regarding the distance from the inn. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-12 12:33 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Thanks for fixing. Maybe the WP writers fell for the same error than me :) | |
| 59971339 by Matt Gooding @ 2018-06-19 09:30 | 1 | 2018-06-19 12:06 | lakedistrict | Hi Matt, thanks for your recent edits. Please try to capitalise the first letter of each word in shop names. Thanks :-) |
| 59921605 by Nils in Jesmond @ 2018-06-17 19:11 | 1 | 2018-06-18 17:49 | lakedistrict | Hi Nils in Jesmond, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your first edit, hope to see more from you soon! I'm a local mapper so feel free to let me know if you have any questions. (In fact I recognise your name from the JRA, unless of course there's another Nils in Jesmond!) :-) |
| 59845678 by gurglypipe @ 2018-06-14 13:38 | 1 | 2018-06-14 20:27 | lakedistrict | Does this resolve any of the nearby map notes? |
| 59486742 by tchaik @ 2018-06-02 14:20 | 1 | 2018-06-02 20:30 | lakedistrict | Hi tchaik, why are you replacing the addr: tags with contact: tags? Addresses use the address key and contact is mainly for social media - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact for more info. :) |
| 2 | 2018-06-11 12:03 | tchaik ♦1 | Well, there is no general agreement regarding how to use the addr: tags I'm afraid. The main addresses wiki page [1] says that address informations should be unique (one addr:housenumber per street). Obviously, a building may host more than one POI, sharing the same address. Thus, tagging POI w... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-14 12:20 | SK53 ♦864 | This is completely and utterly wrong. We have well in excess of half a million addresses mapped in the UK on OSM mapped with the Karlsruhe Scheme. The latter is the de facto standard for mapping addresses and is used worldwide (some countries such as NL, DK, EE have complete national addresses mappe... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-14 12:24 | SK53 ♦864 | I should also add that we have been successfully mapping addresses of POIs in Nottingham for many years now and have a dedicated application which uses address data. http://osm-nottingham.org.uk/.What you are adovating is a kind of data normalisation (which OSM does not do), which doesnt work an... | |
| 59401119 by skifans @ 2018-05-30 14:45 | 1 | 2018-05-30 15:57 | lakedistrict | That would be because you've also edited the Morecambe Road/Owen Road junction in Lancaster in the same changeset, which is part of a load of other bus relations. You can visualise your changeset here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59401119. Have a look at one of the Lancaster bus route ... |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 12:38 | skifans ♦37 | Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense.About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-31 13:04 | lakedistrict | To add the other tags (for one direction) you just need to edit the tags on the relation - you won't need to click on every road again. Just zoom into any road section, click edit, click the road, scroll down to and click All Relations Bus Route Malham Tarn Shuttle, then add extra tags. Normall... | |
| 59353154 by Yorvik Prestigitator @ 2018-05-28 23:30 | 1 | 2018-05-29 11:19 | lakedistrict | Been watching Least Used Stations? :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 11:36 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | possibly.... :) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-29 18:02 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | I suspect this is a halt, rather than a station. Will listen to the announcement next time I'm on a Heart of Wales train. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-29 18:12 | lakedistrict | It's still a station though isn't it? And what's the difference between station and halt? I thought that the halt tag was more for tourist railways; the wiki isn't very helpful. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-29 18:33 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | I thought British Railways/British Rail classified them all as stations to hide how many it was making un-manned in the 60s/70s | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 18:36 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | In the UK we map request stops as halts and principle stations as stations. It gives an indication that you will have to go and find the guard, or put your hand out if you want the train to stop.The wiki is confusing, not sure what points have to do with it. By that rule Telford is a halt :) | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 18:39 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | They use the term Principal stations.The usual announcement when when my train leaves Shrewsbury is "We shall be calling at the following principle stations, Wem, Whitchurch, Nantwich and Crewe. Yorton, Prees and Wrenbury are request stops and you need to speak to the conductor if you want ... | |
| 8 | 2018-07-26 15:27 | DaveF ♦1,564 | They are all stations, just varying in size & facilities. Any differences should be noted in sub tags. Such as railway=station, station=halt (although it should be more accurately described: request_stop=yes). Can't speak for everywhere, but there's a couple of 'halts' on my ... | |
| 58935348 by Colin Smale @ 2018-05-13 22:16 | 1 | 2018-05-18 12:20 | lakedistrict | Hi, are you sure that Skelwith (node 5615914897) is a separate hamlet from Skelwith Bridge village (node 434301526)? As a local, I suggest deleting the Skelwith hamlet node and making Skelwith Bridge the admin_centre, even though it's on the edge of the boundary. |
| 2 | 2018-05-18 13:55 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi, thanks for your local view. Having searched high and low for evidence of Skelwith as a separate entity, I have not found anything on old maps or similar. However I have seen photos indicating there is a sign in the sharp right bend in the A593, opposite the Skelwith parish notice board....That... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-18 14:05 | lakedistrict | It's here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256204861Perhaps the Skelwith Bridge node can be moved across the river so that it's actually in the parish, maybe at the south end of the bridge? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-18 15:20 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Sounds like a good compromise to me... I will do it like that. Are you local enough to check for that sign anyway? It has got my curiosity going. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-18 15:32 | lakedistrict | Yes, but I probably won't be going that way for a month or so. Thanks :) | |
| 58922494 by Lance227 @ 2018-05-13 11:55 | 1 | 2018-05-13 23:33 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hi, you appear to have accidentally moved some geometry of a car park so it’s no longer correct. What were you trying to achieve with this edit? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 10:01 | lakedistrict | @gurglypipe The changeset comment partly translates as "experimental updates"@Lance227 Please note that OSM is a live database and shouldn't be used for test edits. You can use https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=8/54.211/-3.312 for that. Given that this appears to be a... | |
| 58813870 by Casey_boy @ 2018-05-09 09:43 | 1 | 2018-05-09 10:43 | lakedistrict | Secondary is for B roads so unless it's got a B number leave it as tertiary(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads) |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 11:35 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Thanks for the confirmation and link. Very handy! | |
| 58591792 by _h5pppy @ 2018-05-01 18:05 | 1 | 2018-05-02 12:26 | lakedistrict | Hi Colin, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your detailed edits around Ouseburn - all done to a very good standard! Hope to see more edits from you soon. Any questions just ask. All the best, lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
| 2 | 2018-05-02 16:26 | _h5pppy ♦2 | Thank you for the feedback. Something i did wonder was about updates - the edits I did yesterday don't seem to be visible yet on the default map - how long does that usually take? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-02 17:41 | lakedistrict | It can take anything from a few minutes to a few days for the main map to update - even longer for some zoom levels. :)Another tip: in your profile settings you can change your "Preferred Languages:" from American English to en-GB so that in the editor it's "zebra crossing"... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-02 18:38 | _h5pppy ♦2 | Thank you! | |
| 58613846 by archiemouse @ 2018-05-02 12:34 | 1 | 2018-05-02 13:43 | lakedistrict | Hi Archie, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Yesterday you added some pavements but you deleted them today - was that intentional? Any questions feel free to ask. :)lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
| 55958569 by Mark_07 @ 2018-02-01 08:22 | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:10 | lakedistrict | Hi Mark, thanks for your edits to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure that there's a spring called "Mark's Spring" on Clavering Place? I'd be surprised if there was, given the location. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:57 | lakedistrict | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591500 | |
| 49216856 by Samc94 @ 2017-06-03 10:04 | 1 | 2017-06-03 15:13 | lakedistrict | What attraction is here? Can you give more details? The Bing imagery just shows a field... |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:55 | lakedistrict | Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591432 | |
| 52514459 by PalmerJ @ 2017-09-30 15:20 | 1 | 2017-10-01 13:24 | lakedistrict | This doesn't sound like an attraction - have a look in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) for a better tag. Additional tags should go on the way of the pond rather than a new node in the middle too. I'd move the name to description= too. |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:51 | lakedistrict | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591308 | |
| 55536721 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-18 00:51 | 1 | 2018-04-25 11:38 | lakedistrict | Did you mean to map Burneside Bakery (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5345931621) as an office here? |
| 2 | 2018-04-25 11:47 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I didn’t survey that bit on foot, so I couldn’t check whether it’s a shop or an office. All the other evidence pointed to it being an office/commercial bakery without a shop front. Do you know otherwise? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-25 12:16 | lakedistrict | It looks like it has a shop front here: http://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/16076294.At_risk_meals_on_wheels_service_saved_thanks_to_Burneside_bakery/As it has an fhrs:id it's more likely that it's a shop=bakery than an office, although I wasn't aware of it until I saw it ... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-25 12:17 | gurglypipe ♦872 | That’s quite convincing. Do you want to update it? | |
| 5 | 2018-04-25 12:26 | lakedistrict | Done cs 58406661 | |
| 58216798 by Paul Berry @ 2018-04-18 21:44 | 1 | 2018-04-22 19:27 | lakedistrict | Hi Paul, what's the source for these edits please? The previous ref tagging reflected what the signs and lane markings said. (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56451569) |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 21:24 | Paul Berry ♦124 | Sorry, armchair-mapped because I noticed A1508 was wrong number (should be A1058 of course; (M) part debatable). Having looked at the comments on changeset 56451569, feel free to revert it. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-22 22:02 | lakedistrict | Thanks, I've partially reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58321493. Another mapper told me elsewhere that sliproads don't need ref numbers so I guess the refs could be moved to destination:ref but that would be a job for another day. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 07:17 | Paul Berry ♦124 | Agreed, destination:ref makes sense, however I would still contend that slip roads do have refs because, of course, the start-of-motorway sign (with number) is at the beginning of them. However, i will defer to agreed practice.Thanks for the information. | |
| 58311876 by Casey_boy @ 2018-04-22 14:47 | 1 | 2018-04-22 19:01 | lakedistrict | I think that leisure=nature_reserve is the better tag anyway, particularly for anywhere managed by the local Wildlife Trusts. I've been using leisure=nature_reserve in South Cumbria so for consistency it's good to see it used in North Lancs too. :) |
| 347341 by Ben @ 2009-02-11 13:48 | 1 | 2018-04-20 17:03 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1240830#map=17/54.63385/-2.66093 ? |
| 2 | 2018-04-21 12:55 | lakedistrict | Hi Ben, I know it's an old changeset but do you remember what these untagged arrowheads are? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29472088 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29472091 There's several of them mapped. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-21 17:52 | Ben ♦2 | They just mean that the path continues, and i was unable to map any further. They were the OSM version of an ellipsis. | |
| 53267684 by gurglypipe @ 2017-10-26 16:29 | 1 | 2017-10-26 16:32 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The cycle path (non-segregated pavement on the west side) on the A591 needs some work still. Needs a re-survey to work out which bits are cycle path and which bits are foot-only, and whether any of it is NCN6 any more. Probably best to move it into a separate way and set sidewalk=separate on the A59... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 17:37 | lakedistrict | NCN6 has been completely rerouted through Bowness and the western shore; I surveyed the new route last year. Another user deleted much of the original route along the A591 when it was moved, so there are just a few sections of cycleway left on the map now, although it all still exists as a cycleway ... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-27 13:18 | gurglypipe ♦872 | When was it re-routed? Are these Mapillary images still relevant? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.39510819999998&lng=-2.9230128000000377&z=17&pKey=tFVjjGT7imBo538aI65P_Q&focus=photoSounds like the cycle lane needs to be reinstated on the A591 (but not as part of the NCN6 re... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-27 16:55 | lakedistrict | It was rerouted last year (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/584690), the current NCN6 relation is up to date (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/54.3880/-2.9464&layers=C). Nothing's really changed since those Mapillary images were taken so they're good to use. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-15 16:31 | lakedistrict | Cycle path reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58114194 | |
| 57980199 by MrBoyt @ 2018-04-10 17:29 | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:38 | lakedistrict | Thanks for this and your other road edits around Gateshead! Keep up the good work! :) |
| 57956642 by sachinv @ 2018-04-10 01:39 | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:03 | lakedistrict | This doesn't seem right, are pedestrians and cyclists not allowed? What's your source? |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 12:19 | SK53 ♦864 | At a guess this is another Global Logic edit. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks?page=4 | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 22:27 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-09 17:34 | Casey_boy ♦83 | I can confirm (local knowledge) that this change was inaccurate. The revert is correct. | |
| 57784203 by matt_ellery @ 2018-04-03 20:39 | 1 | 2018-04-10 16:15 | lakedistrict | Did you mean to tag this changeset review_requested=yes? It looks fine to me :) |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 21:32 | matt_ellery ♦74 | Thanks for looking, yes I tagged this with a review_requested for a couple of reasons. Firstly I was doing it from memory (although I just noticed I put source=survey, oops) and couldn't remember the exact geometry of Dunelm and TK Maxx (I happened to have the chance to survey it a couple of da... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 21:45 | lakedistrict | From what I remember TK Maxx goes quite far back (probably further than what's mapped) but in terms of tagging it all looks OK. | |
| 57927410 by mvviveka @ 2018-04-09 03:15 | 1 | 2018-04-10 16:09 | lakedistrict | Hi mvviveka, the tags motor_vehicle=no with bus=yes and psv=yes means that general motor vehicle access is not allowed, but buses and public service vehicles are allowed. I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57977854.Please check the tagging carefully before making ... |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:25 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57906448 by Steeley @ 2018-04-08 07:30 | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:55 | lakedistrict | Are you sure that Loft Bar (first floor) has gone? Doesn't El Paso just replace Scalini's? |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 13:00 | Steeley ♦5 | Everything I can find suggests the Loft Bar was owned by Scalini's and has closed, and will/has become a Gin Bar (see Phase 3 of http://malhotragroup.co.uk/jesmond-block-development/). | |
| 57971526 by JamesBourne @ 2018-04-10 12:43 | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:31 | lakedistrict | Hi James, why did you remove the public_transport tag? For tourists it's part of a popular route Haverthwaite - Lakeside - Bowness/Waterhead |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 06:40 | JamesBourne ♦4 | Hi, in all cases I have seen public_transport tags are only added/relevant to transport run/regulated by pubic bodies e.g. national rail, local authority tram, metro, bus services etc. And is not applied to heritage railway lines. No other station on this line had those tags. By all means add it bac... | |
| 57530038 by Robert Whittaker @ 2018-03-26 10:30 | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:25 | lakedistrict | Regarding the fixme, it might be worth asking the original mapper - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51378456 |
| 57626302 by Premsakhare @ 2018-03-29 08:56 | 1 | 2018-03-29 14:48 | lakedistrict | Hi Premsakhare, are you sure that these edits are correct? Last time I was there that section of Grey Street was definitely pedestrianised - there were bollards at the end of Hood Street (https://flic.kr/p/RZToTp). One of us probably needs to do a survey - Hood Street being oneway looks incorrect t... |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 14:41 | tux67 ♦1,940 | Hi lakedisdrict .. this seems to be a bigger issue .. pls. have a look here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974This is also discussed in the German OSM Forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964BR Stephan (tux67) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 14:56 | lakedistrict | Thanks, it was also mentioned on the talk-gb mailing list last month https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021259.html | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:25 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57835471 by Stuuu @ 2018-04-05 13:17 | 1 | 2018-04-05 14:18 | lakedistrict | Hi Stuuu, thanks for your edits! I see that you requested a review so I've had a look and all looks good to me. Just a tip that you might find useful: you can use the 'S' key (or right click > square) after drawing buildings to square the corners. Any questions just ask. :-) |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 14:31 | Stuuu ♦1 | Did not know about the shortcut, im still pretty new to this. Thank you! | |
| 57686053 by kreuzschnabel @ 2018-03-31 11:40 | 1 | 2018-03-31 12:21 | lakedistrict | Could you link to the CCC map data please?By the way, we've got a little ongoing project to add details to the roads in Cumbria - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/North_West#Road_navigation_for_tourists |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 12:48 | SK53 ♦864 | I'm not sure this is a particularly good idea. This was done in the Highlands and it turned out that many of the local highway classifications were based on physical properties rather than the functional view which is used on OSM. The highway authority might be useful to highlight potential dis... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 18:21 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | I thought a bit about this but found it useful at last. It is true (and good) that road tagging in OSM is supposed to depict the traffic importance rather than the official classification. From this point of view, Villages like Great Asby or Crosby Garrett being reachable only by unclassified roads ... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 18:46 | SK53 ♦864 | I would agree that all but the smallest villages should notionally be accessible by tertiaries, and have used it as a rule of thumb when looking at roads in the past: at the very least one road should be feasible for larger vehicles. As I said the two old OS maps + OS Streetview also provide another... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-31 19:17 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | nothing really substitutes for a visit: true. That’s why I prefer to map regions I have already seen, even if its a while ago. Last time I came through here was on my latest C2C in 2012 but I don’t think the roads have changed significantly since. As for the passing places, I actually di... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-01 09:46 | SK53 ♦864 | Heatmap of Passing Places https://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/41035716242/in/photostream/ | |
| 57685310 by lakedistrict @ 2018-03-31 11:04 | 1 | 2018-03-31 11:20 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | There are some more, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/xuu – you think we could do a small mechanical edit here? |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 12:05 | lakedistrict | Sounds like a good idea - can you do it? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 08:02 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57706364 | |
| 4 | 2018-04-15 22:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Thanks for fixing it! | |
| 57633130 by EgrettaGarzetta @ 2018-03-29 13:01 | 1 | 2018-03-29 14:05 | lakedistrict | Hi Egretta, Thanks for your edits. Just to let you know the housename field is for the building name which isn't always the same as the hostel name. Also, the operator field only needs the name of the operator, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator. I've adjusted your edits ... |
| 57498730 by Mike Baggaley @ 2018-03-25 01:08 | 1 | 2018-03-25 14:59 | lakedistrict | Hi Mike, thanks for your edits around here. I guess you were walking (part of) the Dales Way? Did you see if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38555464 is accessible yet or if it is still closed? Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-03-25 15:20 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, yes, I was walking what might be considered the first part of the Dales Way - Bowness to Burneside, then caught the train back. Very enjoyable in Sunday's snow! I didn't see whether way 38555464 was open or closed - I note that the way has access=no and foot=designated, which are contr... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-25 15:42 | lakedistrict | No worries, I'm local so I'll check it out sometime soon. | |
| 57385619 by lakedistrict @ 2018-03-21 13:45 | 1 | 2018-03-21 14:58 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I guess the terminal node could do with a fixme= key indicating why the pipeline hasn’t been continued all the way to Manchester. Good work mapping this! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57385619 |
| 2 | 2018-03-21 15:10 | lakedistrict | Although the old maps have been removed from iD, I've found that they're still available in JOSM so it can be continued at some point. The relation itself has a fixme on it, and there's more details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Thirlmere_Aqueduct | |
| 3 | 2018-03-21 15:13 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Aah, I didn’t notice the relation. Nice one. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-21 17:11 | John-O ♦65 | I think the aqueduct might go "over" this bridge. below the footpath, but inside the bridge itself. The bridge is very well built and it's a strange place for it to be otherwise. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125028047 | |
| 5 | 2018-03-21 17:18 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Yeah, I think this bridge is basically a viaduct with a footpath on top. Certainly there are no pipes obvious from the top when I’ve run over it.It’s the Ottergear bridge here: http://www.jdscomponents.co.uk/gates/thirlmere/bridges.asp(what a marvellous website) | |
| 6 | 2018-03-21 17:55 | lakedistrict | Thanks for noticing, I somehow missed that. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57394488 | |
| 57360393 by jonwil28 @ 2018-03-20 17:39 | 1 | 2018-03-20 20:31 | lakedistrict | Hi jonwil28, thanks for your edits in Cumbria. You've added a name to the map but not tagged what it actually is. Bike shop, hire, factory or something else? :) |
| 57085892 by lakedistrict @ 2018-03-11 15:58 | 1 | 2018-03-12 11:52 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice one. You might also want to add heritage=2 and heritage:operator=Historic England as suggested on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status#England |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 19:02 | lakedistrict | Thanks. HE_ref shows that HE is the "heritage operator". | |
| 56984222 by lakedistrict @ 2018-03-08 00:25 | 1 | 2018-03-08 09:39 | gurglypipe ♦872 | You should probable add access=private to those driveways, since it isn’t implicit (I think). |
| 2 | 2018-03-08 13:49 | lakedistrict | They're dead ends so probably won't be routed along but I might add access=private at a later date. | |
| 56919281 by RuneyViolet @ 2018-03-06 00:16 | 1 | 2018-03-06 14:29 | lakedistrict | Hi RuneyViolet, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your edits in Ambleside, I've made a few tweaks to them for you (the church buildings aren't in the park or the graveyard so I've created a churchyard area for them). I'm also a local mapper so feel free to get in touch if you ... |
| 2 | 2018-03-08 15:14 | RuneyViolet ♦1 | Ah thank you for the update and I am also local and just tweaking a few things I've noticed that currently wrong. :) | |
| 56153439 by mon929 @ 2018-02-07 16:00 | 1 | 2018-03-03 23:06 | John-O ♦65 | Just wondering if you know anything about the "narrow guage railway" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461227090)? I'm suspicious because I can't see anything on the aerial imagery and because railways don't have such sharp bends. |
| 2 | 2018-03-04 00:47 | lakedistrict | This has been queried before - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1290747 . Given the lack of evidence for it I suggest deleting it. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-04 11:50 | John-O ♦65 | Thanks - I hadn't seen the note. Have turned on the notes layer in JOSM now. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56868584 | |
| 56730384 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-27 18:17 | 1 | 2018-02-27 23:05 | lakedistrict | Holmescales: Although you didn't add the original tags you've copied them directly to the new area. Key type=* should only be used on relations. Perhaps shooting=clay_pigeon;paintball would be better? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dshooting and https://wiki.openstreetma... |
| 2 | 2018-02-28 00:35 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good catch. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56739346. | |
| 56724126 by murble @ 2018-02-27 14:02 | 1 | 2018-02-27 23:00 | lakedistrict | Hi murble, thanks for your edits in the Lakes today. Just to let you know that phone numbers should be in the international format with no brackets or dashes (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone). As the area code for Grasmere is 015394 the correct format for the phone box should be &q... |
| 56672808 by matt_ellery @ 2018-02-25 22:46 | 1 | 2018-02-25 23:24 | lakedistrict | Thanks Matt! I never did a proper survey of Swan Walk when I did the other streets in 2016 so thanks for this. I also missed out Middle Street and some of Carfax so if you get the chance to survey them too that would be great. :) |
| 2 | 2018-03-20 21:51 | matt_ellery ♦74 | No problem, I don't usually have the time to do a full survey but I'm filling in details and updating features from memory when I notice them. :) | |
| 56668935 by BortBortson @ 2018-02-25 19:26 | 1 | 2018-02-25 22:55 | lakedistrict | Hi Bort, thanks again for your edits. You don't need to include the name "Bench" when adding benches (amenity=bench tells us it's a bench), just use for name field for actual names, not descriptions. I've fixed these for you (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56672933)... |
| 56654271 by Casey_boy @ 2018-02-25 08:20 | 1 | 2018-02-25 08:36 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Changed tags on old church building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56654541 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 21:51 | lakedistrict | Hi Casey_boy. If St Michael's House looks like a church then tag it building=church and building:use=apartments. I'd probably change building=hospital to building=yes on The Residence given that the wiki suggests it's only for actual hospitals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 10:40 | Casey_boy ♦83 | Thanks! I've updated the tags as you suggested. I'm not 100% sure where the entrances are so have set the addr:flats subkey on the building itself.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56685721 | |
| 56648121 by BortBortson @ 2018-02-24 23:05 | 1 | 2018-02-25 00:20 | lakedistrict | Hey sogunsakin, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your edits - they all look perfect! Just ask if you have any questions or need some help. Hope to see more edits from you soon! :D |
| 56616023 by Rogerc @ 2018-02-23 17:33 | 1 | 2018-02-23 18:00 | lakedistrict | Hi Rogerc, thanks for your updates. The preferred way to map places is as a node in the centre of the settlement. This is because the boundary cannot always be verified and doesn't always match up with the main residential area. Reinstating the Gleaston hamlet node and removing the name from th... |
| 2 | 2018-02-23 18:02 | lakedistrict | Actually village would probably be better (that's what they call themselves). | |
| 3 | 2018-02-23 18:33 | Rogerc ♦6 | Thanks, lakedistrict. I will take your advice. The reason I did it was that I found Gleaston was not showing up well an the rendered map (I was there yesterday), but probably changing it to village would help on that. | |
| 56563540 by jimstn @ 2018-02-21 22:20 | 1 | 2018-02-21 22:54 | lakedistrict | Nice edits! In case you didn't know, Network Rail have given us permission to copy data from NESA/the sectional appendix into OSM, which includes speed limits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UKRail_Project http://archive.nr.co.uk/browseDirectory.aspx?root=&dir=%5csectional%20appendix%5... |
| 2 | 2018-02-22 11:38 | jimstn ♦10 | Thanks. The Sectional Appendix will be useful to fill in a lot of the gaps, although there's no easy way to work out where a given mileage/chainage is. 'Track Locator' apps exist, but there's no open source solution I know of? | |
| 3 | 2018-02-22 15:18 | lakedistrict | Not that I'm aware of. I was planning to add some maxspeeds for a different line using stations, levels crossings etc as a rough guide but this method probably won't work everywhere. | |
| 56556112 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-21 17:31 | 1 | 2018-02-21 18:42 | lakedistrict | Nice one! Do any of them have names? I'd also be tempted to merge the Highgate shop nodes with the building outlines (the shops use both floors for either sales or stock/staff space). |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 23:15 | gurglypipe ♦872 | None that I could be sure of. I wasn’t sure about the shops using both floors either, but if you’re sure of that, please merge them. | |
| 56550553 by lakedistrict @ 2018-02-21 14:03 | 1 | 2018-02-21 15:11 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Whoops, I was obviously having a slow day with those turn:lanes. Thanks for the fix. |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 15:34 | lakedistrict | Not sure if they're planning to include destination tagging, but hopefully support for lanes will be introduced in iD at some point https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/3822#issuecomment-277545127 | |
| 56472402 by John-O @ 2018-02-18 19:59 | 1 | 2018-02-19 12:00 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Have you verified the stop exists separately on the southbound side of the road? I can’t spot a bus stop sign there, there’s nowhere sensible for buses to stop, and I’ve never seen a bus stopping on that side of the road. I suspect the buses pull in to the layby on the northbound s... |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 14:34 | lakedistrict | I know that the college buses only use the northbound layby for all journeys; I think that the southbound 555 and X6 (and others) went via Lound Road to call at K Village a few years ago, but they might not do anymore, now that K Village is dead. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-19 14:50 | John-O ♦65 | When I used the 555 bus recently, from Kendal to Lancaster, I don't recall the bus pulling into the northbound layby. The AtcoCode for the southbound bus_stop appears in bus route data for a number of different routes. I think adding `physically_present=no` would be good. I'm unsure ab... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-19 14:52 | gurglypipe ♦872 | According to that wiki page, given what we know (it is used as a stop, and there is no sign present), it should be highway=bus_stop, physically_present=no. No need to add customary_stop=yes because that’s already in the naptan data, right? | |
| 5 | 2018-02-20 23:14 | lakedistrict | According to someone who goes to Kendal College, the buses won't stop to drop off or pick up here, you have to use the stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486598075 | |
| 6 | 2018-02-21 21:20 | John-O ♦65 | Whilst the stop appears in data on both Traveline (OGL) and Stagecoach (licence unknown) websites; I feel that the physical evidence is suggesting that buses do not stop there. I think it's best if I revert edits in this area | |
| 56527294 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-20 17:26 | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:36 | lakedistrict | I'm not sure whether we should map the "mobile" branches which only set up shop for a couple of mornings a week - they have no permanent presence and we don't map ice cream vans or yoga classes etc. If you are adding them the opening hours would be very useful - they're alre... |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 18:38 | lakedistrict | Although maybe this one will have some sort of permanent presence - it's open 4 part days each week. http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/96428 | |
| 3 | 2018-02-20 23:04 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good point about the opening_hours. I was hesitant to add them, since I wasn’t sure how correct they would be. But after verifying them against some other branches in Kendal, they seem pretty consistent. I’ll add them.I think it’s useful to have the ‘mobile’ post of... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-20 23:07 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534742 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534715. | |
| 56451569 by Greyseal18 @ 2018-02-17 22:59 | 1 | 2018-02-18 14:39 | lakedistrict | Hi Greyseal18 and welcome to OSM. I don't think that renumbering the motorway slip roads and changing them from highway=motorway_link to highway=motorway is entirely correct. The motorway sliproads were tagged A1508 and A167(M) because that's how they're labelled on the road signs... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 14:43 | Greyseal18 ♦17 | If it’s more on the ground why can I see the A195(M) and the A14(M). Also on website like Pathetic Motorways and SABRE Wiki can I see the number A1058(M). | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 14:52 | lakedistrict | I don't know about those motorways, I was talking about A1508 and A167(M). Perhaps the road signs that say "A1508" and "A167(M)" (surveyed by OSMers) are incorrect, if the websites you mention are more reliable. But motorway_link should be used for sliproads, which is what t... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-18 14:55 | Greyseal18 ♦17 | Ok I got the road type wrong but SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road network. Go to https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A1058(M) and you will see that I’m right. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-18 15:19 | SK53 ♦864 | We don't generally give motorways names: these are usually terms which were used to describe the motorway when it was built. These names are not signed, nor in widespread use. Adding such names can interfere with routing applications which use such information for spoken directions. Changing mo... | |
| 6 | 2018-02-18 15:41 | Richard ♦220 | > SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road networkIt also doesn't expressly have an open licence. We can't copy information from it without that. | |
| 7 | 2018-02-18 19:12 | lakedistrict | Following the above discussion, I've reverted this changeset in 56471405. | |
| 56395287 by lakedistrict @ 2018-02-15 20:03 | 1 | 2018-02-15 21:33 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice one. Note that the platforms and stop_positions for a given bus stop have to be in a stop_area relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area). |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 21:49 | lakedistrict | Thanks, I'll do that at some point. | |
| 56381153 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-15 11:21 | 1 | 2018-02-15 13:41 | lakedistrict | Another village mapped! Just a few ideas: guest houses should probably have a name tag; you can map churchyards as landuse=churchyard (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dchurchyard); names should be moved from residential areas to a place node. :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 13:44 | lakedistrict | (Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56384859) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-15 13:46 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks. I was rushing a bit, so missed those few things. | |
| 56364831 by lakedistrict @ 2018-02-14 20:23 | 1 | 2018-02-15 09:34 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice! Do you have a plan for the addresses too? |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 13:22 | lakedistrict | Thanks! I'd probably go for addr:place over addr:street as I said in cs 56348618, but I don't plan on making any changes given that a survey is probably needed first to update the businesses and fix their locations. | |
| 56348618 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-14 10:15 | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:51 | lakedistrict | Perhaps 'Lake District Business Park' could be moved to addr:place? |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 14:00 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The wiki explicitly says that addr:place and addr:street are mutually exclusive: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place#Tagging.I’m not entirely satisfied with how we do addresses for business parks (or street names for them, either; ‘Fell View Trading Park’ being a... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-14 14:32 | lakedistrict | OK. addr:place over addr:street is probably preferential (for the LDBP addresses) since "1 Mint Bridge Road" is a different address to "(Unit) 1 Lake District Business Park" and if they are both mapped as "1 Mint Bridge Road" they aren't differentiated. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-14 15:56 | lakedistrict | Also address data and OSSV suggests that the business parks are mapped wrong in OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1299774 | |
| 56348505 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-14 10:10 | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:51 | lakedistrict | What's addr:parentstreet? I can't find anything on the wiki about it. |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 13:55 | gurglypipe ♦872 | See the blurb at the top of http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/addresses/street-warnings/LA.html and the recent mailing list discussion on talk-gb (‘Errors in Street Names in Addresses’).tl;dr: addr:parentstreet does nothing except to make the errors go away on the street warnings list. I... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-14 13:56 | gurglypipe ♦872 | It would also be relevant for the places where we have (for example) addr:street=Woolpack Yard and the address checker expects addr:street=Highgate. However, changing all those nodes consistently would be a massive effort and I’m not sufficiently convinced of the value or longevity of addr:par... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-14 14:35 | lakedistrict | Good point with the yards. It could probably do with being on the wiki though so it's use is more apparent. | |
| 56348119 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-14 09:52 | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:50 | lakedistrict | Thanks! I'd been meaning to do this but wasn't sure how to do it, using alt_name's a good idea. :) |
| 56293799 by Charlotte2702 @ 2018-02-12 13:01 | 1 | 2018-02-12 18:42 | lakedistrict | Hi Charlotte, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits, they look good to me. It may take a few days for the changes you made to show up on all zoom levels. :-) |
| 56241959 by Area Sheffield @ 2018-02-10 14:32 | 1 | 2018-02-10 16:46 | lakedistrict | Hi Area Sheffield, welcome to OSM. You removed the building and theatre tags on Newcastle City Hall so I've added them back.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56244512) |
| 56201182 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-09 00:56 | 1 | 2018-02-09 14:52 | lakedistrict | 👍 Did you spot the electric car charging point? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1190429) Looking at Big Onion's fb page they might be shop=art (or shop=gift) rather than shop=craft (craft supplies). |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 15:17 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Bother, I didn’t check on the notes to know to look for it. I didn’t spot it, but I could easily have missed it (the car park was rammed). I was unsure about the best way to tag Big Onion, since they sell all sorts, including food. I wanted to avoid a food-type shop just in case people t... | |
| 56154462 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-07 16:39 | 1 | 2018-02-07 17:03 | lakedistrict | What was wrong with unclassified? The likes of Library Road and Stricklandgate aren't residential. |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 17:06 | gurglypipe ♦872 | They’re within a residential area. I think ‘residential is a bit of a misnomer’; unclassified is definitely wrong, since it’s for the little back roads which connect villages: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified. The test I’ve been using is &l... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 17:32 | lakedistrict | The wiki definitions are all over the place. From the page linked above: "In an urban context, unclassified roads may be more likely to have pavements ... They are commonly found in industrial, retail, or commercial areas..." https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_r... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-08 10:45 | lakedistrict | FYI I asked about this in the chat room yesterday and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads has since been extended to include non-residential roads in towns. :) | |
| 5 | 2018-02-08 18:39 | gurglypipe ♦872 | OK, I’ll have a re-read of that lot and potentially revert the highway= changes here in the next few days. Thanks. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-09 23:38 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Done. | |
| 56123812 by gurglypipe @ 2018-02-06 17:41 | 1 | 2018-02-06 22:21 | lakedistrict | North-east Kendal aka Sandylands. You could add a suburb node in the middle of the park by Kentmere Brow. Heron Hill could do with one too, maybe by the Spar? |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 00:31 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Good point. Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56133545. | |
| 56081738 by Stonemill2 @ 2018-02-05 11:12 | 1 | 2018-02-05 13:59 | lakedistrict | Great edits Stonemill2, it's good to see all the mines and crags added to the map - probably of interest to both walkers and those with historical interests. :) On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5389560052 you've used the tag highway=culvert (or inherited it from a previously mapped no... |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 08:56 | Stonemill2 ♦3 | Hi, I've now done it like I normally would, have a look if you wish. I remember seeing that and thinking it was wrong but just left it but am confused why it's attributed as a version 1 change to me. Anyhow, fixed now I think. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-06 12:59 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing. You probably "inherited" it by splitting/continuing a way or by copying and pasting something and iD unfortunately and mistakenly attributes you as the creator. | |
| 56096814 by tms13 @ 2018-02-05 20:48 | 1 | 2018-02-05 21:18 | lakedistrict | Nice edits! By the way we've got a little project going on to improve the mapping of the roads in Cumbria, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/North_West#Road_navigation_for_tourists . Feel free to help out if you're interested or perhaps just incorporate some of the tagging ideas i... |
| 55994866 by kreuzschnabel @ 2018-02-02 12:40 | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:06 | lakedistrict | Hi kreuzschnabel, the road is known as Dunmail Raise for the length of the dual carriageway, so removing it from the road sections is incorrect. Can you add it back? Thanks, lakedistrict :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-02 19:56 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Thanks for notifying. In the OS Opendata Streetview map, the road is labelled "Pass of Dunmail Raise" which seems rather a description than a name to me. But if it’s known by that name, the name should be tagged as such of course. Sorry, I didn’t know that. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-02 20:05 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | By the way: I changed the origin of the southern fork of Raise Beck which, as I learned from a walk report, has been the original course until it got re-routed to feed Thirlmere. So the southern fork has no source or spring on its own but forms a "dead fork" off today’s main course. ... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-02 21:09 | lakedistrict | No worries and thanks for fixing. The southern part is still called Raise Beck. The final part of the northern fork is part of Birkside Gill, so I've renamed that section. The bit inbetween doesn't seem to have a name on any old maps but Cumbria County Council and others called it Raise Be... | |
| 55999197 by GCarty @ 2018-02-02 15:30 | 1 | 2018-02-02 16:06 | lakedistrict | Thanks for your edits around Newcastle and Gateshead, but it looks like the website address is incomplete on this - could you fix it please? Thanks :) |
| 55353986 by SDMeer @ 2018-01-11 14:39 | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:25 | lakedistrict | By the way, you can use the S key (or right click square) in the editor to square the corners of buildings (you might want to do this on Beehive https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552398178, for instance). :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 09:05 | SDMeer ♦3 | I didn't know that. Thanks. In this case, the building is an odd shape. | |
| 55994701 by SDMeer @ 2018-02-02 12:33 | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:19 | lakedistrict | Great edits SDMeer! It's good to see some updates in this part of the county. Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338929888 have a building tag on it, such as building=college? :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 09:02 | SDMeer ♦3 | Updated. Thanks for the suggestion. | |
| 46921824 by James Derrick @ 2017-03-17 09:12 | 1 | 2018-01-29 21:29 | lakedistrict | Hi James, This changeset has added quite a few untagged nodes (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4739438978) which look like unconnected duplicates of building vertices. Please could you check them and amend as necessary? Thanks :-) |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 19:04 | James Derrick ♦78 | I suspect this could have been a josm-latest bug or upload failure. Either way, I've used JOSM to fix the duplicated nodes (and a few other building validation issues).Changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55904437 | |
| 3 | 2018-01-30 19:29 | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 55838179 by Phill87 @ 2018-01-28 19:04 | 1 | 2018-01-29 16:31 | lakedistrict | Hi Phill87, welcome to OSM and thanks for your detailed edits around Horsham. Just a few bits of feedback: on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556538294 the width should be 0.5 and not .5; when you add a building you can use the S key (or right click 'square') in the editor to square the ... |
| 55814070 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-27 20:39 | 1 | 2018-01-27 20:46 | lakedistrict | Thanks! I meant to do this last month when the changeset appeared; bus routes addr:unit also dropped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55814153 |
| 55804557 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-27 14:14 | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:46 | lakedistrict | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556265904 - `amenity=biergarten` and `building=yes` looks wrong here (also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en-GB), you might want `leisure=outdoor_seating` with `operator=Miners Arms`? If you used a misleading iD preset you cou... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 15:12 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Oops, good catch. leisure=outdoor_seating is a more appropriate tag than amenity=biergarten anyway (since the latter is aimed more at the German-style biergarten, which isn’t a garden attached to a pub). Fixed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55805992. | |
| 55788680 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-26 22:32 | 1 | 2018-01-27 13:31 | lakedistrict | Are you tweaking the names based on the FHRS records? "Hare & Hounds" was the name on the pub when I mapped it, and I copied "CofE" on the schools from the Edubase comparison tool (http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/LA/), although what you've changed them to ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 13:33 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Not entirely. I’m tweaking them based on what seems right, since ‘&’ is normally a stylistic contraction of ‘and’, and ‘CofE’ just doesn’t make sense. I’m open to being persuaded this is not a good idea. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-27 13:50 | lakedistrict | I tend to map names as they're styled on a sign or on a website. 'CofE' was what my old school used and what Edubase tends to use but after checking a few school websites there's no uniform styling with 'CE', 'C of E', 'C.E.' and 'CofE' all... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-27 19:55 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Yeah, I was aware there’s no consistent uniform styling. Although I vaguely remembered that in my home town, everything was styled as ‘C of E’ on the signs. You make a good point about text to speech software. I’ll continue changing schools to ‘C of E’ as I come a... | |
| 11635863 by Meersbrook @ 2012-05-18 18:19 | 1 | 2017-11-11 15:25 | lakedistrict | Hi Meersbrook, I know that this is an old changeset but what are the untagged lines you added across the railway line such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164086827 ?Thanks, lakedistrict :) |
| 2 | 2018-01-24 16:46 | lakedistrict | Should they be deleted? | |
| 55654504 by Luke Randall @ 2018-01-22 13:16 | 1 | 2018-01-24 14:44 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing the name. Are you sure that the college still use it? This article says that the uni acquired it in 2016: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/news-events/news/2016/09/sandyford-strengthens-city-centre-campus/ In the editor, click on the building so it glows red, click the wo... |
| 55390655 by lakedistrict @ 2018-01-12 20:04 | 1 | 2018-01-13 23:46 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Is that car park for The Grey Walls? If so, you could add operator=The Grey Walls to make it clearer who the ‘customers’ are. |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 23:52 | lakedistrict | yes, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55419405 | |
| 3 | 2018-01-13 23:52 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice! | |
| 55327897 by ds47uk @ 2018-01-10 17:00 | 1 | 2018-01-11 06:21 | lakedistrict | Did you mean to put any tags on this node? |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 08:57 | ds47uk ♦1 | This was supposed to have been deleted. Hatton Gallery added as an artwork, since there is not a specific art gallery logo | |
| 3 | 2018-01-11 09:19 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the reply. Best not to just 'tag for the renderer' with the incorrect tags, but to request rendering of art galleries at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues. I'll probably remap it as a separate building at some point when I update the map around camp... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-11 13:52 | ds47uk ♦1 | OK thanks. Surprised it wasn't already on! I had to use G$$gle to find out where it was! | |
| 55322180 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-10 13:27 | 1 | 2018-01-10 14:13 | lakedistrict | Is all of the building now a pub or is some of it still Manna House (homeless shelter)? |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 14:18 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Ah, I suspect some of it is still Manna House. I didn’t know about Manna House before; I’ve been to the pub, and the public part of it certainly doesn’t occupy all of the mapped building, but I didn’t know how far the private part of it extends. If you have surveyed/seen Mann... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-10 14:25 | lakedistrict | There's been quite a few changes in this area over the last 5 or so years so a survey is probably needed. I won't make any changes yet. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-10 22:59 | gurglypipe ♦872 | OK. I’ve added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1264507 so we don’t forget about it. | |
| 55243898 by alexandrebc @ 2018-01-07 19:14 | 1 | 2018-01-10 13:31 | lakedistrict | Hi alexandrebc, Thanks for your edits. Please only map what's still on the ground - the wall here no longer exists so tagging it as a wall is incorrect; also try not to use descriptive names. I've fixed this for you and cleared up a few duplicates. |
| 55220049 by lakedistrict @ 2018-01-06 19:41 | 1 | 2018-01-07 00:12 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hah, was this prompted by my Thirlmere aqueduct edit? I wasn’t expecting that. Nice one. :-) |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 00:18 | lakedistrict | Yes it was, maybe mapping the full length of the TA within Cumbria could be a project in the pipeline for this year... :D | |
| 3 | 2018-01-07 01:58 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hah, very good. Count me out though; I found it hard enough to work out where the cut-and-cover line of the pipeline was from the satellite imagery when I could see where the aqueduct bridges were! | |
| 55135118 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-03 17:41 | 1 | 2018-01-04 00:41 | lakedistrict | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55135118 |
| 55138288 by Legolash2oLiam @ 2018-01-03 19:52 | 1 | 2018-01-03 20:30 | lakedistrict | Hi Legolash2oLiam, thanks the the detail that you're adding to the railways in OSM. I'm guessing that ref:lor refers to these codes http://www.railwaycodes.org.uk/pride/pride0.shtm ? It might be worth creating a OSM wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:lor to briefly ex... |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 20:39 | Legolash2oLiam ♦6 | Yes, you are correct. I've added a small page as requested :) | |
| 3 | 2018-01-03 21:04 | Legolash2oLiam ♦6 | Also, if you would like me to add desired information on a railway I haven't added yet, feel free to ask. i.e. restrictions, speed, ELR, etc.. | |
| 55106150 by gurglypipe @ 2018-01-02 16:56 | 1 | 2018-01-02 17:25 | lakedistrict | Nice edits. Just wondering, does the station area need to include the surgery building and the railway corridor beyond the platform end to the NW? |
| 2 | 2018-01-02 17:49 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I was on the fence about the surgery building; it was geometrically simpler to include, but in hindsight probably more incorrect than correct. I’ll remove it.I included the railway corridor to the NW so that there isn’t a gap. An alternative would be to lengthen the railway corridor ... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-02 17:50 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55107351. | |
| 54842427 by i_hsien @ 2017-12-22 14:19 | 1 | 2017-12-23 13:07 | lakedistrict | Nice edits i_hsien! Just a few pointers: it's normally best to join zebra crossings to the road itself, that way satnav routers can warn drivers that there's a crossing on the road. You could also map Holland & Barrett shops as health food shops (shop=health_food) rather than the non s... |
| 54544624 by Petenjen @ 2017-12-11 16:32 | 1 | 2017-12-12 21:06 | lakedistrict | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, Petenjen. Thanks for your edits. You've added a nursing home in the middle of a roundabout (at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5277875129). Did you mean to do that? Let me know if you need help correcting it or you have any questions. lakedistrict :-) |
| 54405908 by _Charky @ 2017-12-06 16:17 | 1 | 2017-12-07 13:21 | lakedistrict | Hi Charkyem, nice edits! Just a quick tip: to make sure that the buildings you draw have nice square corners, click on the side of the building once you have drawn it (so it glows red/pink) and then press the S key (or right click then square). Hope this helps. Look forward to seeing more edits from... |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 17:23 | _Charky ♦3 | Oh, that's good to know! I'll keep that in mind. | |
| 54286803 by Baa90 @ 2017-12-03 01:58 | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:40 | lakedistrict | Hi Baa90, I've changed this back to military area from industrial - it's land owned by the Royal Navy so landuse=military is the correct tag. Please remember to leave a changeset comment which describes the changes you have made to the map in the future. It seems that you've got the h... |
| 54321956 by Brenty1892 @ 2017-12-04 08:39 | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:32 | lakedistrict | Welcome to OpenStreetMap Brenty1892! I see that you requested an edit review so I'm just letting you know that the changes you have made look good to me - hopefully we'll see more edits from you soon! :-) |
| 54324310 by Dansafc @ 2017-12-04 10:10 | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:29 | lakedistrict | Hi Dan, Please only add things to OpenStreetMap that actually exist. I've undone your edit for you. In the future please leave a changeset comment that describes what changes you have made to the map. Thanks :-) |
| 54037439 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña @ 2017-11-23 22:26 | 1 | 2017-11-29 20:24 | lakedistrict | Usually a fitness station is an outdoor facility (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station) but you've put this inside a building - did you mean to use leisure=fitness_centre for an indoor gym? Also in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1215611 you've left t... |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 16:32 | Beselch Gonzalez Peña ♦1 | Well...is a indoor gym actually....and is a sport club too!! No streptease club | |
| 3 | 2017-12-01 15:52 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info, I've changed it to a gym/fitness centre and added some details from their website. Thanks again for your edits in Newcastle, you can also edit on a computer at http://www.openstreetmap.org which allows you to add different points of interest that aren't in maps.me. :) | |
| 53977755 by lakedistrict @ 2017-11-21 14:45 | 1 | 2017-11-21 14:53 | lakedistrict | *Walkergate |
| 53765075 by Tom317 @ 2017-11-14 08:58 | 1 | 2017-11-15 13:12 | lakedistrict | Why did you change it to subway? Only a small portion of the route is underground so it's probably best described as a light rail system. |
| 2 | 2017-11-20 09:40 | Tom317 ♦2 | Yes, but still it is metro. But if you feel, it's better described as a light rail, you can change it back. | |
| 53669145 by jimstn @ 2017-11-10 15:08 | 1 | 2017-11-10 15:31 | lakedistrict | Thanks for all your edits around Newcastle, particularly the cycling infrastructure ones. In this edit it looks like you've missed the building=yes tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539663566 ? :-) |
| 2 | 2017-11-10 15:32 | lakedistrict | Sorry, ignore me - I hadn't spotted it was part of a relation. Keep up the good work! | |
| 3 | 2017-11-13 11:21 | jimstn ♦10 | Thanks! I also hadn't spotted that it was part of a multipolygon/relation! Not sure why it has been created like that in the first place. It might be a job for the future to tidy that up. | |
| 53639425 by simon_84 @ 2017-11-09 13:37 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:22 | lakedistrict | Thanks for your recent changes simon_84, it's good to see some edits in this part of the county.Are you sure that Abbey Road, New Road and the road through Dalton are highway =secondary (B roads)? They need a ref (eg B123) if they are. For reference OS OpenData StreetView doesn't show ... |
| 53638179 by gurglypipe @ 2017-11-09 12:36 | 1 | 2017-11-09 12:47 | lakedistrict | FYI iD's put layer=-1 tags on the building_passages which aren't needed. Also are you able to resolve this https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1174196 ? |
| 2 | 2017-11-09 13:10 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.I don’t know about the tourist information centre; this was an armchair edit based on e-mailing Herdy for their new address. If I get a chance to wander down to Stramongate I’ll keep an eye out for the tourist information centre, but it won... | |
| 53621426 by jennycerris @ 2017-11-08 20:18 | 1 | 2017-11-08 23:59 | lakedistrict | Hi jennycerris, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Newcastle! I see that you requested a review so I'm just letting you know that the edits look good, you could change the operator tags (scroll down to the All Tags section) from Newcastle/Northumbia Uni to Liberty Living if you wan... |
| 52257109 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña @ 2017-09-21 20:55 | 1 | 2017-10-16 20:34 | lakedistrict | Hi Beselch Gonzalez Peña,I left this message as a reply to one of your 5 identical notes. I'm copying it here as well in case you didn't see it and for discussion.>>"Hi Beselch, Thanks for your additions to the map. :-) You seem to have added quite a few "v... |
| 2 | 2017-11-05 15:28 | lakedistrict | I've fixed them all for you in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53531049. Also, please try and capitalise the first letter of each word in shop names, since they are proper nouns. :) | |
| 53204723 by John Stanworth @ 2017-10-24 10:53 | 1 | 2017-10-24 14:51 | lakedistrict | Welocme to OSM and thanks for your edits. It's good practice to tag the building with what it is used for (eg shop, pub, guest house etc). This is a bunk house for climbing groups etc to rent out isn't it? I've tagged similar buildings as tourism=alpine_hut, but you could use tourism=... |
| 53131932 by lakedistrict @ 2017-10-21 16:00 | 1 | 2017-10-22 22:52 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Wow, nice work! |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 00:39 | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 53155005 by lakedistrict @ 2017-10-22 15:49 | 1 | 2017-10-22 22:47 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice. #CumbriaRoads work? |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 00:38 | lakedistrict | Thanks. Ah yes, missed the hashtag and wiki link. All #CumbriaRoads tags (lit, sidewalk, turn:lanes etc) are now on the A591 between Orrest Head Farm (start of 30 zone to the west) and Cooks House Corner A592 mini roundabout, but I haven't put give ways on all the side roads yet. | |
| 53160923 by bigfatfrog67 @ 2017-10-22 19:44 | 1 | 2017-10-22 21:30 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the edits but I'm not sure that they are entirely correct. Are you sure that the northern part of the road through the car park takes such a central position? Last time I checked it went along the edge of the library gardens, like it was mapped previously. Also are WTC really the ope... |
| 2 | 2017-10-22 21:52 | bigfatfrog67 ♦8 | Hi, Yes, I was there today. There is parking either side of the parking isle, which is down the centre. I will need to double check the operators as I have the ticket still in the car, will look tomorrow. How else would you tag the entrance way? Jonathanhttp://bigfatfrog67.me | |
| 3 | 2017-10-23 00:34 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the description, it must have changed a bit since I was last there (about a year ago). I normally tag entrances as just highway=service, I always thought that driveway was more for residential properties, but I guess it still works.lakedistrict :) | |
| 4 | 2017-11-02 14:23 | bigfatfrog67 ♦8 | I just thought I'd let you know that I checked the parking ticket and you were right so I've updated that accordingly. | |
| 52994917 by lakeuk @ 2017-10-16 20:31 | 1 | 2017-10-16 21:27 | lakedistrict | Hi lakeuk,Thanks for your edit. However it is best to update the tags on the node rather than deleting it because the shop unit and address still physically exists. For this one you could have removed the name tag and changed shop=clothes to disused:shop=yes. Please keep this in mind for future ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 21:30 | lakedistrict | I've managed to undelete both the Room and Native nodes and I've updated them to show that they're currently disused, along with fixmes to update in the future. :) | |
| 52694565 by pamman @ 2017-10-06 20:52 | 1 | 2017-10-07 00:00 | gurglypipe ♦872 | What’s a frog permit? Without a changeset description, this looks like vandalism. |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 11:43 | lakedistrict | Reverted in changeset 52788976 | |
| 3 | 2017-10-14 17:11 | gurglypipe ♦872 | From a private message from pamman:> With reference to Mill Yard, Staveley the intention was to make users aware that parking can no longer be regarded as free. During weekdays the first 2 hours are free after that a “Frog Permit” is required, apparently if you are not a frog you&... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 17:16 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Hmm, this is a tricky one to tag. I think the tags as they currently stand – fee=no maxstay=2h – are the most appropriate I can come up with. They are correct, in that the first 2h are free. If people choose to park there, they should see the big signs explaining what this Frog Permit sy... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 17:53 | pamman ♦6 | Agree, even if a Frog Permit is obtained the parking is still free. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-14 18:16 | lakedistrict | I agree with your tagging ideas gurglypipe, I suppose any other info could always go in a note= tag. Maybe some conditional tags could be used here if any of them are suitable: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane#Parking_conditions_.28terms.29 | |
| 15006292 by pamman @ 2013-02-12 13:10 | 1 | 2017-06-28 17:02 | lakedistrict | Hi pamman, do you remember where you got the name "Jakey Tanners" from for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149906114 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480951913 ? The source:name=OS_OpenData_StreetView tag refers to the previous tagged name, Brigsteer Road. |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 08:24 | gurglypipe ♦872 | There are no road signs calling it Jakey Tanners. There are some references to a road called Jakey Tanners in the Kendal Oral History Group records, but no details online. I’m going to revert this back to Brigsteer Road. pamman, please reply with some source information if you think that stret... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-10 11:16 | lakedistrict | When I first asked this I got a message saying that the name had been "passed down through generations of Kendalians", but as a local I've never heard this name in my life. If there is a source it should be put under loc_name. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#loc_name) | |
| 4 | 2017-10-10 11:29 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Indeed. I was also wondering whether Jakey Tanners is the name of the track to the SE just E of the A591 bridge. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-13 13:38 | pamman ♦6 | Jakey Tanners is the name of the road up the hill from the 30 mph sign to the brow of that hill where ‘Dick the Fruiterer’ had a market garden behind the high wall at the entrance to Stainbank Green. The name has been (and still is) used by generations of Kendalians, obviously since Jake... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-14 17:09 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Thanks for the information. I agree that the name Jakey Tanners should be in the map, but I don’t think it should be the canonical name of the road. The canonical name according to the modern naming databases (the OS Location database and the Royal Mail address database) is Brigsteer Road. As ... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-14 17:48 | pamman ♦6 | loc-name added | |
| 8 | 2017-10-14 18:11 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info and thanks for adding the name back to the map, pamman. | |
| 52544444 by gurglypipe @ 2017-10-01 18:26 | 1 | 2017-10-01 18:50 | lakedistrict | Good work. Does this resolve http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1089871 ? |
| 2 | 2017-10-01 21:08 | gurglypipe ♦872 | It does. I’ve closed that note, thanks for pointing it out. | |
| 52392521 by lakedistrict @ 2017-09-26 17:57 | 1 | 2017-09-27 10:14 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Nice work! |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 11:47 | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 50758710 by Harti @ 2017-08-01 17:18 | 1 | 2017-08-02 21:00 | lakedistrict | Thanks for your edits in Ambleside, but Tesco Express isn't open 24/7 - was that a mistake? Also do you remember what type of shop "Hide & Horn" is or what it sells? Happy mapping, lakedistrict :-) |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 16:57 | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50843900. I fixed Hide & Horn in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52333386 - it was a leather shop. :-) | |
| 52245473 by nickharri @ 2017-09-21 14:28 | 1 | 2017-09-23 11:47 | lakedistrict | Hi nickharri,Thanks for your edits to the paths and cairns. I notice that you requested a review so I'm just letting you know that they all look good to me. Any questions just ask.Happy mapping, lakedistrict :) |
| 51395624 by Locator @ 2017-08-24 06:36 | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:36 | lakedistrict | Does this mean that the Post Office at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1589533100 has closed and it has relocated here? The old node needs updating to its new use if that's the case. |
| 51884385 by Arthtoach @ 2017-09-09 16:13 | 1 | 2017-09-09 17:58 | lakedistrict | The previous version of the phone number was correct, since the area code is 013394. so it should be +44 15394 36354 |
| 2 | 2017-09-09 18:06 | lakedistrict | *area code is 015394 | |
| 3 | 2017-09-10 09:52 | Arthtoach ♦15 | Apologies, I checked that 01539 was a valid area code, not relalising there was a more specific one. I've changed this back. | |
| 51785859 by Mike Parfitt @ 2017-09-06 15:41 | 1 | 2017-09-06 17:23 | lakedistrict | Did you mean to tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243753843 as tertiary? highway=service seems a more appropriate tag for this location. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 08:08 | Mike Parfitt ♦12 | Perhaps its a usage thing. My concept of a service road is the sort of roads that go down the back of shops for delivery lorries, or those leading into/outof car parks and inbetween their lines of painted bays. This was a narrow single-track road with passing places going through open country, far... | |
| 51081216 by DanGregory @ 2017-08-13 12:55 | 1 | 2017-08-13 21:27 | matt_ellery ♦74 | Hi Dan, thanks for updating these shops. Do you have any idea what will be replacing the cafe? It may be worthwhile keeping the node but removing the cafe and name tags as currently there is useful address information that will be lost. |
| 2 | 2017-08-20 12:25 | lakedistrict | Hi Matt and Dan, I've undeleted the node and updated the tags on it so that the address info isn't lost. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51275939 | |
| 51037820 by lakedistrict @ 2017-08-11 15:29 | 1 | 2017-08-11 19:28 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Wow, that’s fantastic! I thought I’d finished the A5074, but obviously I got ahead of myself at the A592 junction and forgot about the rest up to the A591. Thanks for finishing it off! |
| 2 | 2017-08-11 20:19 | lakedistrict | Thanks! I think I've got the hang of the tagging now, what road are you going to do next? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-11 20:47 | gurglypipe ♦872 | I’ll probably do the Lake District passes and valleys next. That’s probably got a bit more impact than doing something like the A5074. | |
| 51010220 by gurglypipe @ 2017-08-10 18:23 | 1 | 2017-08-10 18:26 | gurglypipe ♦872 | This includes reworking the junction with Brantfell Road and St. Martin’s Hill to make it a cross-roads, since there seems to be no restriction on coasting down Brantfell Road and onto St. Martin’s Hill in real life. |
| 2 | 2017-08-10 20:54 | lakedistrict | Yes, Brantfell Rd and St. Martins Hill is a crossroads, the rest of the edits look good too :) | |
| 50858311 by CasualMapper @ 2017-08-05 09:49 | 1 | 2017-08-05 11:13 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the edits. The sign at the gates actually reads "Kirkstone Quarries", and Burlington seem to be the first/only ones to use the spelling "Pett's", previously only the spelling "Pets" has been used. (Defra and OS both use "Pets")Do you know i... |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 06:21 | CasualMapper ♦1 | I'm reading the book Slate Mining in the Lake District by Alastair Cameron and it called it Petts. It went bust in 2012 and was bough by Burlingtonhttp://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/9707126.Burlington_takes_on_failed_firm_s_quarry/On their website they call it Petts, http://www.bur... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-06 12:52 | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info, I've added the other names I mentioned into an alt_name tag. :D | |
| 4 | 2017-08-08 13:08 | Aoc-One ♦2 | Sorry to butt in. The area is called Pets Brae, so Pets would be right. However I bet it's a tax thing from the 2012 bankruptcy - a similar but different name for the new company. it's still active it seems also. | |
| 50785643 by Gabriel Reynolds @ 2017-08-02 16:49 | 1 | 2017-08-02 20:52 | lakedistrict | Hi Gabriel, In future edits please add a changeset comment explaining what edits you have made so that other mappers can see what you've done. Thanks.(something along the lines of "corrected road types and junctions and added a caravan park in High Newton" would have worked here... |
| 50619186 by ACS1986 @ 2017-07-27 12:46 | 1 | 2017-07-27 18:19 | lakedistrict | Thanks :-) |
| 49896014 by lakedistrict @ 2017-06-28 16:13 | 1 | 2017-07-02 16:37 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | HI, you seem to have added access=no to Gooseholme Bridge, with a note that it was closed when surveyed. However, as the way has foot=yes, the access=no has no effect on pedestrians, which is the only form of transport normally enabled for a footway. I suggest removing the foot tag if this bridge is... |
| 2 | 2017-07-04 11:05 | lakedistrict | Hi Mike, Thanks for this advice, I've now removed the foot=yes tag since it isn't required on highway=footway and currently the bridge is closed to all. | |
| 49678353 by shirokazan @ 2017-06-19 22:02 | 1 | 2017-06-19 22:24 | lakedistrict | I notice that the survey dates say 2016. Is this correct or did you mean 2017? |
| 48916653 by pamman @ 2017-05-23 12:53 | 1 | 2017-05-23 15:17 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Why did you just delete this entire railway line with no comment? |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 15:04 | lakedistrict | Looks like it is just the old railway=abandoned line that has been deleted, the current railway line is still mapped. But to echo what gurglypipe said - please leave changeset comments in the future. Thanks :-) | |
| 3 | 2017-05-25 15:11 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Correct, but surely the abandoned railway should remain mapped? It’s a useful historical bit of information. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-25 17:37 | lakedistrict | Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3DabandonedHowever there is still a railway line here even though its just a single line now and not double. Also the current track takes the centre of the trackbed now, not just half of it like it used to when it was double track. I... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-25 19:54 | pamman ♦6 | The existing rail line was moved to the centre of the double track bed, therefore no old track bed exists. The reason for removing the track bed was that 2 bridges were shown at each intersection, this was picked up on "keep right" ( https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&e... | |
| 48954821 by Chuangmeimei @ 2017-05-24 19:07 | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:59 | lakedistrict | I've deleted your co-op node since it's already been mapped in the correct location. |
| 48971926 by Chuangmeimei @ 2017-05-25 12:05 | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:58 | lakedistrict | Bridge House was already mapped, so I've deleted your duplicate node (wrong location anyway). "599" bus stop has the wrong name, but needs checking. |
| 46599573 by Yorvik Prestigitator @ 2017-03-05 16:00 | 1 | 2017-03-05 20:37 | lakedistrict | HI Yorvik,I'm not sure why you've tagged Heathwaite Convenience Stores (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388295422) as a post office - it lost its post office counter around 10 years ago! lakedistrict :-) |
| 2 | 2017-03-06 01:02 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | I was basing it on the signs above the shop windows saying "Heathwaite Post Office & Stores" which were still up recently.I will remove the amenity=post_office tag if you think the shop signs are incorrect. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-06 10:59 | lakedistrict | Yes, despite the signs the post office counter has gone. Thanks for removing the tag. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-06 11:20 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | no problem, thank you for the inside information | |
| 44467456 by DanGregory @ 2016-12-17 11:21 | 1 | 2017-03-05 18:02 | lakedistrict | Hi Dan,Is there a reason why you changed East Street to highway=living_street? I'm not too familiar with that tag myself. I thought that highway=pedestrian would be more correct, since there are "Pedestrian Zone" signs at each end. Certain vehicles can still drive on highway=pedestr... |
| 39328573 by dazzac @ 2016-05-15 10:47 | 1 | 2016-12-02 17:48 | lakedistrict | What is the line/way that you've added ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372635979 )? It has a source tag but nothing else. |
| 43973279 by Daniel Routledge @ 2016-11-26 22:45 | 1 | 2016-11-26 22:57 | lakedistrict | Hi Daniel,I think these were supposed to be mapped as railway=stop and placed on the metro lines. Since you have now correctly put railway stops on the Metro tracks I have copied across the naptan codes onto the stop nodes that you added. It would be useful to add platform numbers to the stop node... |
| 42552722 by pjdavill @ 2016-09-30 21:15 | 1 | 2016-10-02 11:20 | lakedistrict | Hi,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice that you have deleted a number of ways (lines such as roads and paths among other features) from the map. If you are local or have recently visited you will of course know that these roads and paths do still exist, so they shouldn't have been deleted.Op... |
| 2 | 2016-10-02 12:53 | lakedistrict | I have managed to undo your deletions in a revert. Any questions just ask. :-) | |
| 42552900 by pjdavill @ 2016-09-30 21:28 | 1 | 2016-10-02 12:53 | lakedistrict | I have managed to undo your deletions in a revert. Any questions just ask. :-) |
| 41583108 by lakedistrict @ 2016-08-20 21:09 | 1 | 2016-08-20 21:10 | lakedistrict | #Kendal ;) |
| 41248299 by Guy @ 2016-08-04 21:49 | 1 | 2016-08-12 15:20 | lakedistrict | Hi Guy,Park Terrace and Kensington Terrace no longer match up with the buildings shown on the Bing imagery because they were demolished or partly demolished and have been rebuilt. The Bing imagery is fairly outdated in the North of England. Is it possible for you to undo your changes to the bu... |
| 41067996 by Guinevere23 @ 2016-07-27 17:34 | 1 | 2016-07-27 20:50 | lakedistrict | Hi Guinevere23, is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27577599 actually called Log Lane? I know that you didn't add that name but just wondered if you had spotted any signs with this name or seen it on a map. :-) |
| 2 | 2016-07-28 17:21 | Guinevere23 ♦1 | Hi lakedistrict, actually there were some signs with a name for that lane and I have a feeling that it was something else other than Log Lane because I thought it was unusual for it to have a name but, unfortunately, I didn't record what it was ... doh! | |
| 16216199 by michaelinredhill @ 2013-05-20 20:50 | 1 | 2016-07-04 21:20 | lakedistrict | Hi Michael, do you remember or know where the name "Log Lane" came from for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27577599 ? I don't remember seeing this name anywhere and OS Street View gives it a different name (Truss Lane). I'll resurvey if I need to. All the best :-) |
| 40345104 by Yorkie71 @ 2016-06-28 14:26 | 1 | 2016-07-03 19:49 | lakedistrict | Is the whole road really a bridge or just the bit over the motorway? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23238197 |
| 40387474 by CreakyBike @ 2016-06-30 09:32 | 1 | 2016-07-02 22:30 | lakedistrict | I've separated the metro lines from the road. (You have to remove the relations first, then add them back after) I don't think that the metro actually takes the same route as New Bridge St W but actually follows a route under http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428809408 which I think is a ve... |
| 39840854 by SkaBook @ 2016-06-06 15:19 | 1 | 2016-06-09 23:31 | lakedistrict | Welcome to OSM SkaBook! Thanks for your very detailed edits - Ambleside looks very well mapped now. :-) |
| 2 | 2016-06-10 07:47 | SkaBook ♦2 | Hi,A discrete actioncam and a sunny day helps! | |
| 38100495 by lakedistrict @ 2016-03-27 14:09 | 1 | 2016-04-01 14:27 | Skidle ♦4 | Ha! Yes, you're right, that was (mostly)me. I had no exact idea of where they were, just that they existed. I added them in the hope they would be amended. Generally I see folks will adjust stuff to help, but see the task of adding stuff as too onerous, so I though I'd get it started. |
| 2 | 2016-04-01 15:52 | lakedistrict | Thanks for adding them - saved me (or someone else) a lot of time! :-) | |
| 37965601 by Mauls @ 2016-03-20 22:56 | 1 | 2016-03-21 13:30 | lakedistrict | Where does the name Red Brow come from on way 403956832? |
| 37176532 by pmailkeey @ 2016-02-12 20:43 Active block | 1 | 2016-02-21 18:34 | lakedistrict | Hi pmailkeey, the A591 itself hasn't been diverted or moved to the temporary road or the West Thirlmere road, these are just the routes that the shuttle buses will take. Any chance you can revert your edits around Thirlmere/Dunmail Raise? ThanksPS Please add a note to the map before doing b... |
| 2 | 2016-02-21 21:16 | pmailkeey Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-21 22:24 | lakedistrict | Changing the road to construction is good, but it retains its A591 number. The temp track and road to the west of Thirlmere haven't gained the A591 number and are not trunk roads. But hopefully the road will be reopened soon! | |
| 36595948 by lakedistrict @ 2016-01-15 15:43 | 1 | 2016-01-15 15:44 | lakedistrict | #OSMschools |
| 36562590 by lakedistrict @ 2016-01-14 01:15 | 1 | 2016-01-14 01:17 | lakedistrict | Wrong changeset comment! Should say bridge closed for 4 weeks follwing river bed erosion under 2 pillars, ref=Lakeland Radio/Cumbria County Council https://twitter.com/CumbriaCC/status/687302705358843906 |