| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60666006 by vorsignal | 1 | 2018-07-13 21:32:28 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi vorsignal, thanks for these edits. Can you explain why you have added access tags to the roads in Grasmere, eg on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43617587 ? As far as I'm aware there's no access restrictions on these roads. Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2018-07-14 07:50:24 UTC | vorsignal | Hi,I've been there four days ago on vacation. There is one traffic sign at the southern entrance to the village just between the primary school and the Car & Coach Park and another one at the bus stop "The Swan Hotel" in direction of Grasmere. As far as I could remember yesterday the... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-14 10:16:46 UTC | lakedistrict | I've had a look and that road sign really doesn't make any sense - "no buses except buses" - "no coaches except for local buses" would make more sense but that's not what the sign says. Thanks for the corrections and I hope that you enjoyed your holiday. :) | |
| 60679354 by SecondEdition2 | 1 | 2018-07-13 21:38:15 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi, Thanks for all these edits as always. I doubt that Meml is a locality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5758168727), but is probably an abbreviation for memorial? |
| 60634926 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2018-07-12 10:09:23 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for these edits. Are you sure that Kirk Stone is at node 5755379221 - it's already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513046741 unless it's moved? :) |
| 2 | 2018-07-12 11:51:02 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I am not entirely sure since there is no inscript, but there is a stone resembling a steeple at the spot I mapped it, and having read on Wikipedia that the KS is close to the northbound side of the road and just a few yards off the inn, I thought that was it. Unfortunately it’s hardly visible ... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-12 12:26:34 UTC | lakedistrict | Based on local knowledge, Ordnance Survey, Geograph photos and local websites I've fixed this in changeset 60650483. The wiki article is wrong regarding the distance from the inn. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-12 12:33:35 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Thanks for fixing. Maybe the WP writers fell for the same error than me :) | |
| 59971339 by Matt Gooding | 1 | 2018-06-19 12:06:06 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Matt, thanks for your recent edits. Please try to capitalise the first letter of each word in shop names. Thanks :-) |
| 59921605 by Nils in Jesmond | 1 | 2018-06-18 17:49:40 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Nils in Jesmond, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your first edit, hope to see more from you soon! I'm a local mapper so feel free to let me know if you have any questions. (In fact I recognise your name from the JRA, unless of course there's another Nils in Jesmond!) :-) |
| 59845678 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-06-14 20:27:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Does this resolve any of the nearby map notes? |
| 59486742 by tchaik | 1 | 2018-06-02 20:30:52 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi tchaik, why are you replacing the addr: tags with contact: tags? Addresses use the address key and contact is mainly for social media - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact for more info. :) |
| 2 | 2018-06-11 12:03:22 UTC | tchaik | Well, there is no general agreement regarding how to use the addr: tags I'm afraid. The main addresses wiki page [1] says that address informations should be unique (one addr:housenumber per street). Obviously, a building may host more than one POI, sharing the same address. Thus, tagging POI with a... | |
| 3 | 2018-06-14 12:20:35 UTC | SK53 | This is completely and utterly wrong. We have well in excess of half a million addresses mapped in the UK on OSM mapped with the Karlsruhe Scheme. The latter is the de facto standard for mapping addresses and is used worldwide (some countries such as NL, DK, EE have complete national addresses mappe... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-14 12:24:08 UTC | SK53 | I should also add that we have been successfully mapping addresses of POIs in Nottingham for many years now and have a dedicated application which uses address data. http://osm-nottingham.org.uk/.What you are adovating is a kind of data normalisation (which OSM does not do), which doesnt work an... | |
| 59401119 by skifans | 1 | 2018-05-30 15:57:56 UTC | lakedistrict | That would be because you've also edited the Morecambe Road/Owen Road junction in Lancaster in the same changeset, which is part of a load of other bus relations. You can visualise your changeset here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59401119. Have a look at one of the Lancaster bus route relat... |
| 2 | 2018-05-31 12:38:43 UTC | skifans | Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense.About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-31 13:04:04 UTC | lakedistrict | To add the other tags (for one direction) you just need to edit the tags on the relation - you won't need to click on every road again. Just zoom into any road section, click edit, click the road, scroll down to and click All Relations Bus Route Malham Tarn Shuttle, then add extra tags. Normally the... | |
| 59353154 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2018-05-29 11:19:03 UTC | lakedistrict | Been watching Least Used Stations? :) |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 11:36:28 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | possibly.... :) | |
| 3 | 2018-05-29 18:02:28 UTC | trigpoint | I suspect this is a halt, rather than a station. Will listen to the announcement next time I'm on a Heart of Wales train. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-29 18:12:36 UTC | lakedistrict | It's still a station though isn't it? And what's the difference between station and halt? I thought that the halt tag was more for tourist railways; the wiki isn't very helpful. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-29 18:33:45 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | I thought British Railways/British Rail classified them all as stations to hide how many it was making un-manned in the 60s/70s | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 18:36:43 UTC | trigpoint | In the UK we map request stops as halts and principle stations as stations. It gives an indication that you will have to go and find the guard, or put your hand out if you want the train to stop.The wiki is confusing, not sure what points have to do with it. By that rule Telford is a halt :) | |
| 7 | 2018-05-29 18:39:48 UTC | trigpoint | They use the term Principal stations.The usual announcement when when my train leaves Shrewsbury is "We shall be calling at the following principle stations, Wem, Whitchurch, Nantwich and Crewe. Yorton, Prees and Wrenbury are request stops and you need to speak to the conductor if you want ... | |
| 58935348 by The Maarssen Mapper | 1 | 2018-05-18 12:20:04 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi, are you sure that Skelwith (node 5615914897) is a separate hamlet from Skelwith Bridge village (node 434301526)? As a local, I suggest deleting the Skelwith hamlet node and making Skelwith Bridge the admin_centre, even though it's on the edge of the boundary. |
| 2 | 2018-05-18 13:55:23 UTC | The Maarssen Mapper | Hi, thanks for your local view. Having searched high and low for evidence of Skelwith as a separate entity, I have not found anything on old maps or similar. However I have seen photos indicating there is a sign in the sharp right bend in the A593, opposite the Skelwith parish notice board....That... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-18 14:05:14 UTC | lakedistrict | It's here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256204861Perhaps the Skelwith Bridge node can be moved across the river so that it's actually in the parish, maybe at the south end of the bridge? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-18 15:20:05 UTC | The Maarssen Mapper | Sounds like a good compromise to me... I will do it like that. Are you local enough to check for that sign anyway? It has got my curiosity going. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-18 15:32:13 UTC | lakedistrict | Yes, but I probably won't be going that way for a month or so. Thanks :) | |
| 58922494 by Lance227 | 1 | 2018-05-13 23:33:13 UTC | gurglypipe | Hi, you appear to have accidentally moved some geometry of a car park so it’s no longer correct. What were you trying to achieve with this edit? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-05-14 10:01:11 UTC | lakedistrict | @gurglypipe The changeset comment partly translates as "experimental updates"@Lance227 Please note that OSM is a live database and shouldn't be used for test edits. You can use https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=8/54.211/-3.312 for that. Given that this appears to be a test... | |
| 58813870 by Casey_boy | 1 | 2018-05-09 10:43:51 UTC | lakedistrict | Secondary is for B roads so unless it's got a B number leave it as tertiary(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads) |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 11:35:24 UTC | Casey_boy | Thanks for the confirmation and link. Very handy! | |
| 58591792 by _Colin_Watson | 1 | 2018-05-02 12:26:48 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Colin, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your detailed edits around Ouseburn - all done to a very good standard! Hope to see more edits from you soon. Any questions just ask. All the best, lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
| 2 | 2018-05-02 16:26:10 UTC | _Colin_Watson | Thank you for the feedback. Something i did wonder was about updates - the edits I did yesterday don't seem to be visible yet on the default map - how long does that usually take? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-02 17:41:08 UTC | lakedistrict | It can take anything from a few minutes to a few days for the main map to update - even longer for some zoom levels. :)Another tip: in your profile settings you can change your "Preferred Languages:" from American English to en-GB so that in the editor it's "zebra crossing" rat... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-02 18:38:40 UTC | _Colin_Watson | Thank you! | |
| 58613846 by archiemouse | 1 | 2018-05-02 13:43:21 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Archie, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Yesterday you added some pavements but you deleted them today - was that intentional? Any questions feel free to ask. :)lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
| 55958569 by Mark_07 | 1 | 2018-04-24 15:10:55 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Mark, thanks for your edits to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure that there's a spring called "Mark's Spring" on Clavering Place? I'd be surprised if there was, given the location. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:57:12 UTC | lakedistrict | Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591500 | |
| 49216856 by Samc94 | 1 | 2017-06-03 15:13:29 UTC | lakedistrict | What attraction is here? Can you give more details? The Bing imagery just shows a field... |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:55:15 UTC | lakedistrict | Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591432 | |
| 52514459 by PalmerJ | 1 | 2017-10-01 13:24:19 UTC | lakedistrict | This doesn't sound like an attraction - have a look in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) for a better tag. Additional tags should go on the way of the pond rather than a new node in the middle too. I'd move the name to description= too. |
| 2 | 2018-05-01 17:51:56 UTC | lakedistrict | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58591308 | |
| 55536721 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-04-25 11:38:42 UTC | lakedistrict | Did you mean to map Burneside Bakery (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5345931621) as an office here? |
| 2 | 2018-04-25 11:47:11 UTC | gurglypipe | I didn’t survey that bit on foot, so I couldn’t check whether it’s a shop or an office. All the other evidence pointed to it being an office/commercial bakery without a shop front. Do you know otherwise? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-25 12:16:28 UTC | lakedistrict | It looks like it has a shop front here: http://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/16076294.At_risk_meals_on_wheels_service_saved_thanks_to_Burneside_bakery/As it has an fhrs:id it's more likely that it's a shop=bakery than an office, although I wasn't aware of it until I saw it on OSM | |
| 4 | 2018-04-25 12:17:30 UTC | gurglypipe | That’s quite convincing. Do you want to update it? | |
| 5 | 2018-04-25 12:26:34 UTC | lakedistrict | Done cs 58406661 | |
| 58216798 by Paul Berry | 1 | 2018-04-22 19:27:41 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Paul, what's the source for these edits please? The previous ref tagging reflected what the signs and lane markings said. (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56451569) |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 21:24:01 UTC | Paul Berry | Sorry, armchair-mapped because I noticed A1508 was wrong number (should be A1058 of course; (M) part debatable). Having looked at the comments on changeset 56451569, feel free to revert it. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-22 22:02:38 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks, I've partially reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58321493. Another mapper told me elsewhere that sliproads don't need ref numbers so I guess the refs could be moved to destination:ref but that would be a job for another day. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 07:17:37 UTC | Paul Berry | Agreed, destination:ref makes sense, however I would still contend that slip roads do have refs because, of course, the start-of-motorway sign (with number) is at the beginning of them. However, i will defer to agreed practice.Thanks for the information. | |
| 58311876 by Casey_boy | 1 | 2018-04-22 19:01:31 UTC | lakedistrict | I think that leisure=nature_reserve is the better tag anyway, particularly for anywhere managed by the local Wildlife Trusts. I've been using leisure=nature_reserve in South Cumbria so for consistency it's good to see it used in North Lancs too. :) |
| 347341 by Ben | 1 | 2018-04-20 17:03:27 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1240830#map=17/54.63385/-2.66093 ? |
| 2 | 2018-04-21 12:55:16 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Ben, I know it's an old changeset but do you remember what these untagged arrowheads are? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29472088 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29472091 There's several of them mapped. :) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-21 17:52:32 UTC | Ben | They just mean that the path continues, and i was unable to map any further. They were the OSM version of an ellipsis. | |
| 53267684 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2017-10-26 16:32:13 UTC | gurglypipe | The cycle path (non-segregated pavement on the west side) on the A591 needs some work still. Needs a re-survey to work out which bits are cycle path and which bits are foot-only, and whether any of it is NCN6 any more. Probably best to move it into a separate way and set sidewalk=separate on the A59... |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 17:37:25 UTC | lakedistrict | NCN6 has been completely rerouted through Bowness and the western shore; I surveyed the new route last year. Another user deleted much of the original route along the A591 when it was moved, so there are just a few sections of cycleway left on the map now, although it all still exists as a cycleway ... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-27 13:18:42 UTC | gurglypipe | When was it re-routed? Are these Mapillary images still relevant? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.39510819999998&lng=-2.9230128000000377&z=17&pKey=tFVjjGT7imBo538aI65P_Q&focus=photoSounds like the cycle lane needs to be reinstated on the A591 (but not as part of the NCN6 re... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-27 16:55:11 UTC | lakedistrict | It was rerouted last year (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/584690), the current NCN6 relation is up to date (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/54.3880/-2.9464&layers=C). Nothing's really changed since those Mapillary images were taken so they're good to use. | |
| 5 | 2018-04-15 16:31:37 UTC | lakedistrict | Cycle path reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58114194 | |
| 57980199 by MrBoyt | 1 | 2018-04-12 13:38:23 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for this and your other road edits around Gateshead! Keep up the good work! :) |
| 57956642 by sachinv | 1 | 2018-04-12 12:03:42 UTC | lakedistrict | This doesn't seem right, are pedestrians and cyclists not allowed? What's your source? |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 12:19:16 UTC | SK53 | At a guess this is another Global Logic edit. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks?page=4 | |
| 3 | 2018-04-18 22:27:01 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-09 17:34:10 UTC | Casey_boy | I can confirm (local knowledge) that this change was inaccurate. The revert is correct. | |
| 57784203 by matt_twam_asi | 1 | 2018-04-10 16:15:15 UTC | lakedistrict | Did you mean to tag this changeset review_requested=yes? It looks fine to me :) |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 21:32:12 UTC | matt_twam_asi | Thanks for looking, yes I tagged this with a review_requested for a couple of reasons. Firstly I was doing it from memory (although I just noticed I put source=survey, oops) and couldn't remember the exact geometry of Dunelm and TK Maxx (I happened to have the chance to survey it a couple of days la... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 21:45:18 UTC | lakedistrict | From what I remember TK Maxx goes quite far back (probably further than what's mapped) but in terms of tagging it all looks OK. | |
| 57927410 by mvviveka | 1 | 2018-04-10 16:09:18 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi mvviveka, the tags motor_vehicle=no with bus=yes and psv=yes means that general motor vehicle access is not allowed, but buses and public service vehicles are allowed. I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57977854.Please check the tagging carefully before making futur... |
| 2 | 2018-04-18 22:25:08 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57906448 by Steeley | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:55:43 UTC | lakedistrict | Are you sure that Loft Bar (first floor) has gone? Doesn't El Paso just replace Scalini's? |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 13:00:52 UTC | Steeley | Everything I can find suggests the Loft Bar was owned by Scalini's and has closed, and will/has become a Gin Bar (see Phase 3 of http://malhotragroup.co.uk/jesmond-block-development/). | |
| 57971526 by JamesBourne | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:31:20 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi James, why did you remove the public_transport tag? For tourists it's part of a popular route Haverthwaite - Lakeside - Bowness/Waterhead |
| 2 | 2018-04-11 06:40:59 UTC | JamesBourne | Hi, in all cases I have seen public_transport tags are only added/relevant to transport run/regulated by pubic bodies e.g. national rail, local authority tram, metro, bus services etc. And is not applied to heritage railway lines. No other station on this line had those tags. By all means add it bac... | |
| 57530038 by Robert Whittaker | 1 | 2018-04-10 15:25:32 UTC | lakedistrict | Regarding the fixme, it might be worth asking the original mapper - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51378456 |
| 57626302 by Premsakhare | 1 | 2018-03-29 14:48:50 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Premsakhare, are you sure that these edits are correct? Last time I was there that section of Grey Street was definitely pedestrianised - there were bollards at the end of Hood Street (https://flic.kr/p/RZToTp). One of us probably needs to do a survey - Hood Street being oneway looks incorrect t... |
| 2 | 2018-04-10 14:41:26 UTC | tux67 | Hi lakedisdrict .. this seems to be a bigger issue .. pls. have a look here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974This is also discussed in the German OSM Forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964BR Stephan (tux67) | |
| 3 | 2018-04-10 14:56:39 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks, it was also mentioned on the talk-gb mailing list last month https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021259.html | |
| 4 | 2018-04-18 22:25:51 UTC | Nakaner-repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They "fixed" routing "errors" but hided real errors instead of... | |
| 57835471 by Stuuu | 1 | 2018-04-05 14:18:58 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Stuuu, thanks for your edits! I see that you requested a review so I've had a look and all looks good to me. Just a tip that you might find useful: you can use the 'S' key (or right click > square) after drawing buildings to square the corners. Any questions just ask. :-) |
| 2 | 2018-04-05 14:31:15 UTC | Stuuu | Did not know about the shortcut, im still pretty new to this. Thank you! | |
| 57686053 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2018-03-31 12:21:21 UTC | lakedistrict | Could you link to the CCC map data please?By the way, we've got a little ongoing project to add details to the roads in Cumbria - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/North_West#Road_navigation_for_tourists |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 12:48:28 UTC | SK53 | I'm not sure this is a particularly good idea. This was done in the Highlands and it turned out that many of the local highway classifications were based on physical properties rather than the functional view which is used on OSM. The highway authority might be useful to highlight potential discrepa... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-31 18:21:19 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I thought a bit about this but found it useful at last. It is true (and good) that road tagging in OSM is supposed to depict the traffic importance rather than the official classification. From this point of view, Villages like Great Asby or Crosby Garrett being reachable only by unclassified roads ... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-31 18:46:44 UTC | SK53 | I would agree that all but the smallest villages should notionally be accessible by tertiaries, and have used it as a rule of thumb when looking at roads in the past: at the very least one road should be feasible for larger vehicles. As I said the two old OS maps + OS Streetview also provide another... | |
| 5 | 2018-03-31 19:17:27 UTC | kreuzschnabel | nothing really substitutes for a visit: true. That’s why I prefer to map regions I have already seen, even if its a while ago. Last time I came through here was on my latest C2C in 2012 but I don’t think the roads have changed significantly since. As for the passing places, I actually di... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-01 09:46:10 UTC | SK53 | Heatmap of Passing Places https://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/41035716242/in/photostream/ | |
| 57685310 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-03-31 11:20:24 UTC | kreuzschnabel | There are some more, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/xuu – you think we could do a small mechanical edit here? |
| 2 | 2018-03-31 12:05:07 UTC | lakedistrict | Sounds like a good idea - can you do it? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-01 08:02:56 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57706364 | |
| 4 | 2018-04-15 22:33:03 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Thanks for fixing it! | |
| 57633130 by EgrettaGarzetta | 1 | 2018-03-29 14:05:06 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Egretta, Thanks for your edits. Just to let you know the housename field is for the building name which isn't always the same as the hostel name. Also, the operator field only needs the name of the operator, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator. I've adjusted your edits to YHA Amb... |
| 57498730 by Mike Baggaley | 1 | 2018-03-25 14:59:03 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Mike, thanks for your edits around here. I guess you were walking (part of) the Dales Way? Did you see if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38555464 is accessible yet or if it is still closed? Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-03-25 15:20:15 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, yes, I was walking what might be considered the first part of the Dales Way - Bowness to Burneside, then caught the train back. Very enjoyable in Sunday's snow! I didn't see whether way 38555464 was open or closed - I note that the way has access=no and foot=designated, which are contradictory f... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-25 15:42:08 UTC | lakedistrict | No worries, I'm local so I'll check it out sometime soon. | |
| 57385619 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-03-21 14:58:05 UTC | gurglypipe | I guess the terminal node could do with a fixme= key indicating why the pipeline hasn’t been continued all the way to Manchester. Good work mapping this! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57385619 |
| 2 | 2018-03-21 15:10:45 UTC | lakedistrict | Although the old maps have been removed from iD, I've found that they're still available in JOSM so it can be continued at some point. The relation itself has a fixme on it, and there's more details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Thirlmere_Aqueduct | |
| 3 | 2018-03-21 15:13:34 UTC | gurglypipe | Aah, I didn’t notice the relation. Nice one. | |
| 4 | 2018-03-21 17:11:35 UTC | John-O | I think the aqueduct might go "over" this bridge. below the footpath, but inside the bridge itself. The bridge is very well built and it's a strange place for it to be otherwise. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125028047 | |
| 5 | 2018-03-21 17:18:19 UTC | gurglypipe | Yeah, I think this bridge is basically a viaduct with a footpath on top. Certainly there are no pipes obvious from the top when I’ve run over it.It’s the Ottergear bridge here: http://www.jdscomponents.co.uk/gates/thirlmere/bridges.asp(what a marvellous website) | |
| 6 | 2018-03-21 17:55:52 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for noticing, I somehow missed that. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57394488 | |
| 57360393 by jonwil28 | 1 | 2018-03-20 20:31:08 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi jonwil28, thanks for your edits in Cumbria. You've added a name to the map but not tagged what it actually is. Bike shop, hire, factory or something else? :) |
| 57085892 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-03-12 11:52:51 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice one. You might also want to add heritage=2 and heritage:operator=Historic England as suggested on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:listed_status#England |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 19:02:44 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks. HE_ref shows that HE is the "heritage operator". | |
| 56984222 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-03-08 09:39:17 UTC | gurglypipe | You should probable add access=private to those driveways, since it isn’t implicit (I think). |
| 2 | 2018-03-08 13:49:47 UTC | lakedistrict | They're dead ends so probably won't be routed along but I might add access=private at a later date. | |
| 56919281 by RuneyViolet | 1 | 2018-03-06 14:29:03 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi RuneyViolet, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your edits in Ambleside, I've made a few tweaks to them for you (the church buildings aren't in the park or the graveyard so I've created a churchyard area for them). I'm also a local mapper so feel free to get in touch if you need any help or hav... |
| 2 | 2018-03-08 15:14:25 UTC | RuneyViolet | Ah thank you for the update and I am also local and just tweaking a few things I've noticed that currently wrong. :) | |
| 56153439 by mon929 | 1 | 2018-03-03 23:06:17 UTC | John-O | Just wondering if you know anything about the "narrow guage railway" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461227090)? I'm suspicious because I can't see anything on the aerial imagery and because railways don't have such sharp bends. |
| 2 | 2018-03-04 00:47:05 UTC | lakedistrict | This has been queried before - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1290747 . Given the lack of evidence for it I suggest deleting it. | |
| 3 | 2018-03-04 11:50:06 UTC | John-O | Thanks - I hadn't seen the note. Have turned on the notes layer in JOSM now. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56868584 | |
| 56730384 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-27 23:05:59 UTC | lakedistrict | Holmescales: Although you didn't add the original tags you've copied them directly to the new area. Key type=* should only be used on relations. Perhaps shooting=clay_pigeon;paintball would be better? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dshooting and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki... |
| 2 | 2018-02-28 00:35:12 UTC | gurglypipe | Good catch. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56739346. | |
| 56724126 by murble | 1 | 2018-02-27 23:00:35 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi murble, thanks for your edits in the Lakes today. Just to let you know that phone numbers should be in the international format with no brackets or dashes (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone). As the area code for Grasmere is 015394 the correct format for the phone box should be &q... |
| 56672808 by matt_twam_asi | 1 | 2018-02-25 23:24:58 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks Matt! I never did a proper survey of Swan Walk when I did the other streets in 2016 so thanks for this. I also missed out Middle Street and some of Carfax so if you get the chance to survey them too that would be great. :) |
| 2 | 2018-03-20 21:51:13 UTC | matt_twam_asi | No problem, I don't usually have the time to do a full survey but I'm filling in details and updating features from memory when I notice them. :) | |
| 56668935 by BortBortson | 1 | 2018-02-25 22:55:54 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Bort, thanks again for your edits. You don't need to include the name "Bench" when adding benches (amenity=bench tells us it's a bench), just use for name field for actual names, not descriptions. I've fixed these for you (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56672933). :) |
| 56654271 by Casey_boy | 1 | 2018-02-25 08:36:49 UTC | Casey_boy | Changed tags on old church building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56654541 |
| 2 | 2018-02-25 21:51:13 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Casey_boy. If St Michael's House looks like a church then tag it building=church and building:use=apartments. I'd probably change building=hospital to building=yes on The Residence given that the wiki suggests it's only for actual hospitals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=hospit... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-26 10:40:21 UTC | Casey_boy | Thanks! I've updated the tags as you suggested. I'm not 100% sure where the entrances are so have set the addr:flats subkey on the building itself.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56685721 | |
| 56648121 by BortBortson | 1 | 2018-02-25 00:20:16 UTC | lakedistrict | Hey sogunsakin, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your edits - they all look perfect! Just ask if you have any questions or need some help. Hope to see more edits from you soon! :D |
| 56616023 by Rogerc | 1 | 2018-02-23 18:00:42 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Rogerc, thanks for your updates. The preferred way to map places is as a node in the centre of the settlement. This is because the boundary cannot always be verified and doesn't always match up with the main residential area. Reinstating the Gleaston hamlet node and removing the name from the res... |
| 2 | 2018-02-23 18:02:16 UTC | lakedistrict | Actually village would probably be better (that's what they call themselves). | |
| 3 | 2018-02-23 18:33:29 UTC | Rogerc | Thanks, lakedistrict. I will take your advice. The reason I did it was that I found Gleaston was not showing up well an the rendered map (I was there yesterday), but probably changing it to village would help on that. | |
| 56563540 by jimstn | 1 | 2018-02-21 22:54:33 UTC | lakedistrict | Nice edits! In case you didn't know, Network Rail have given us permission to copy data from NESA/the sectional appendix into OSM, which includes speed limits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UKRail_Project http://archive.nr.co.uk/browseDirectory.aspx?root=&dir=%5csectional%20appendix%5cSect... |
| 2 | 2018-02-22 11:38:03 UTC | jimstn | Thanks. The Sectional Appendix will be useful to fill in a lot of the gaps, although there's no easy way to work out where a given mileage/chainage is. 'Track Locator' apps exist, but there's no open source solution I know of? | |
| 3 | 2018-02-22 15:18:33 UTC | lakedistrict | Not that I'm aware of. I was planning to add some maxspeeds for a different line using stations, levels crossings etc as a rough guide but this method probably won't work everywhere. | |
| 56556112 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-21 18:42:43 UTC | lakedistrict | Nice one! Do any of them have names? I'd also be tempted to merge the Highgate shop nodes with the building outlines (the shops use both floors for either sales or stock/staff space). |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 23:15:53 UTC | gurglypipe | None that I could be sure of. I wasn’t sure about the shops using both floors either, but if you’re sure of that, please merge them. | |
| 56550553 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-02-21 15:11:03 UTC | gurglypipe | Whoops, I was obviously having a slow day with those turn:lanes. Thanks for the fix. |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 15:34:33 UTC | lakedistrict | Not sure if they're planning to include destination tagging, but hopefully support for lanes will be introduced in iD at some point https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/3822#issuecomment-277545127 | |
| 56472402 by John-O | 1 | 2018-02-19 12:00:19 UTC | gurglypipe | Have you verified the stop exists separately on the southbound side of the road? I can’t spot a bus stop sign there, there’s nowhere sensible for buses to stop, and I’ve never seen a bus stopping on that side of the road. I suspect the buses pull in to the layby on the northbound s... |
| 2 | 2018-02-19 14:34:53 UTC | lakedistrict | I know that the college buses only use the northbound layby for all journeys; I think that the southbound 555 and X6 (and others) went via Lound Road to call at K Village a few years ago, but they might not do anymore, now that K Village is dead. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-19 14:50:44 UTC | John-O | When I used the 555 bus recently, from Kendal to Lancaster, I don't recall the bus pulling into the northbound layby. The AtcoCode for the southbound bus_stop appears in bus route data for a number of different routes. I think adding `physically_present=no` would be good. I'm unsure about removi... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-19 14:52:35 UTC | gurglypipe | According to that wiki page, given what we know (it is used as a stop, and there is no sign present), it should be highway=bus_stop, physically_present=no. No need to add customary_stop=yes because that’s already in the naptan data, right? | |
| 5 | 2018-02-20 23:14:48 UTC | lakedistrict | According to someone who goes to Kendal College, the buses won't stop to drop off or pick up here, you have to use the stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486598075 | |
| 6 | 2018-02-21 21:20:03 UTC | John-O | Whilst the stop appears in data on both Traveline (OGL) and Stagecoach (licence unknown) websites; I feel that the physical evidence is suggesting that buses do not stop there. I think it's best if I revert edits in this area | |
| 56527294 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-20 18:36:46 UTC | lakedistrict | I'm not sure whether we should map the "mobile" branches which only set up shop for a couple of mornings a week - they have no permanent presence and we don't map ice cream vans or yoga classes etc. If you are adding them the opening hours would be very useful - they're already in the corr... |
| 2 | 2018-02-20 18:38:50 UTC | lakedistrict | Although maybe this one will have some sort of permanent presence - it's open 4 part days each week. http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/96428 | |
| 3 | 2018-02-20 23:04:39 UTC | gurglypipe | Good point about the opening_hours. I was hesitant to add them, since I wasn’t sure how correct they would be. But after verifying them against some other branches in Kendal, they seem pretty consistent. I’ll add them.I think it’s useful to have the ‘mobile’ post of... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-20 23:07:29 UTC | gurglypipe | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534742 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534715. | |
| 56451569 by Greyseal18 | 1 | 2018-02-18 14:39:42 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Greyseal18 and welcome to OSM. I don't think that renumbering the motorway slip roads and changing them from highway=motorway_link to highway=motorway is entirely correct. The motorway sliproads were tagged A1508 and A167(M) because that's how they're labelled on the road signs. We tend to &q... |
| 2 | 2018-02-18 14:43:00 UTC | Greyseal18 | If it’s more on the ground why can I see the A195(M) and the A14(M). Also on website like Pathetic Motorways and SABRE Wiki can I see the number A1058(M). | |
| 3 | 2018-02-18 14:52:43 UTC | lakedistrict | I don't know about those motorways, I was talking about A1508 and A167(M). Perhaps the road signs that say "A1508" and "A167(M)" (surveyed by OSMers) are incorrect, if the websites you mention are more reliable. But motorway_link should be used for sliproads, which is what these ... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-18 14:55:30 UTC | Greyseal18 | Ok I got the road type wrong but SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road network. Go to https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A1058(M) and you will see that I’m right. | |
| 5 | 2018-02-18 15:19:17 UTC | SK53 | We don't generally give motorways names: these are usually terms which were used to describe the motorway when it was built. These names are not signed, nor in widespread use. Adding such names can interfere with routing applications which use such information for spoken directions. Changing motorwa... | |
| 6 | 2018-02-18 15:41:41 UTC | Richard | > SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road networkIt also doesn't expressly have an open licence. We can't copy information from it without that. | |
| 7 | 2018-02-18 19:12:41 UTC | lakedistrict | Following the above discussion, I've reverted this changeset in 56471405. | |
| 56395287 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-02-15 21:33:37 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice one. Note that the platforms and stop_positions for a given bus stop have to be in a stop_area relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area). |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 21:49:44 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks, I'll do that at some point. | |
| 56381153 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-15 13:41:10 UTC | lakedistrict | Another village mapped! Just a few ideas: guest houses should probably have a name tag; you can map churchyards as landuse=churchyard (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dchurchyard); names should be moved from residential areas to a place node. :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 13:44:17 UTC | lakedistrict | (Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56384859) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-15 13:46:05 UTC | gurglypipe | Thanks. I was rushing a bit, so missed those few things. | |
| 56364831 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-02-15 09:34:56 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice! Do you have a plan for the addresses too? |
| 2 | 2018-02-15 13:22:59 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! I'd probably go for addr:place over addr:street as I said in cs 56348618, but I don't plan on making any changes given that a survey is probably needed first to update the businesses and fix their locations. | |
| 56348618 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:51:33 UTC | lakedistrict | Perhaps 'Lake District Business Park' could be moved to addr:place? |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 14:00:43 UTC | gurglypipe | The wiki explicitly says that addr:place and addr:street are mutually exclusive: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place#Tagging.I’m not entirely satisfied with how we do addresses for business parks (or street names for them, either; ‘Fell View Trading Park’ being a... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-14 14:32:37 UTC | lakedistrict | OK. addr:place over addr:street is probably preferential (for the LDBP addresses) since "1 Mint Bridge Road" is a different address to "(Unit) 1 Lake District Business Park" and if they are both mapped as "1 Mint Bridge Road" they aren't differentiated. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-14 15:56:40 UTC | lakedistrict | Also address data and OSSV suggests that the business parks are mapped wrong in OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1299774 | |
| 56348505 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:51:25 UTC | lakedistrict | What's addr:parentstreet? I can't find anything on the wiki about it. |
| 2 | 2018-02-14 13:55:19 UTC | gurglypipe | See the blurb at the top of http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/addresses/street-warnings/LA.html and the recent mailing list discussion on talk-gb (‘Errors in Street Names in Addresses’).tl;dr: addr:parentstreet does nothing except to make the errors go away on the street warnings list. I... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-14 13:56:37 UTC | gurglypipe | It would also be relevant for the places where we have (for example) addr:street=Woolpack Yard and the address checker expects addr:street=Highgate. However, changing all those nodes consistently would be a massive effort and I’m not sufficiently convinced of the value or longevity of addr:par... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-14 14:35:11 UTC | lakedistrict | Good point with the yards. It could probably do with being on the wiki though so it's use is more apparent. | |
| 56348119 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-14 13:50:21 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! I'd been meaning to do this but wasn't sure how to do it, using alt_name's a good idea. :) |
| 56293799 by Charlotte2702 | 1 | 2018-02-12 18:42:04 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Charlotte, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits, they look good to me. It may take a few days for the changes you made to show up on all zoom levels. :-) |
| 56241959 by Area Sheffield | 1 | 2018-02-10 16:46:27 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Area Sheffield, welcome to OSM. You removed the building and theatre tags on Newcastle City Hall so I've added them back.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56244512) |
| 56201182 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-09 14:52:01 UTC | lakedistrict | 👍 Did you spot the electric car charging point? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1190429) Looking at Big Onion's fb page they might be shop=art (or shop=gift) rather than shop=craft (craft supplies). |
| 2 | 2018-02-09 15:17:07 UTC | gurglypipe | Bother, I didn’t check on the notes to know to look for it. I didn’t spot it, but I could easily have missed it (the car park was rammed). I was unsure about the best way to tag Big Onion, since they sell all sorts, including food. I wanted to avoid a food-type shop just in case people t... | |
| 56154462 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-07 17:03:49 UTC | lakedistrict | What was wrong with unclassified? The likes of Library Road and Stricklandgate aren't residential. |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 17:06:41 UTC | gurglypipe | They’re within a residential area. I think ‘residential is a bit of a misnomer’; unclassified is definitely wrong, since it’s for the little back roads which connect villages: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified. The test I’ve been using is &l... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 17:32:50 UTC | lakedistrict | The wiki definitions are all over the place. From the page linked above: "In an urban context, unclassified roads may be more likely to have pavements ... They are commonly found in industrial, retail, or commercial areas..." https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_r... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-08 10:45:17 UTC | lakedistrict | FYI I asked about this in the chat room yesterday and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads has since been extended to include non-residential roads in towns. :) | |
| 5 | 2018-02-08 18:39:41 UTC | gurglypipe | OK, I’ll have a re-read of that lot and potentially revert the highway= changes here in the next few days. Thanks. | |
| 6 | 2018-02-09 23:38:38 UTC | gurglypipe | Done. | |
| 56123812 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-02-06 22:21:44 UTC | lakedistrict | North-east Kendal aka Sandylands. You could add a suburb node in the middle of the park by Kentmere Brow. Heron Hill could do with one too, maybe by the Spar? |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 00:31:21 UTC | gurglypipe | Good point. Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56133545. | |
| 56081738 by Stonemill2 | 1 | 2018-02-05 13:59:52 UTC | lakedistrict | Great edits Stonemill2, it's good to see all the mines and crags added to the map - probably of interest to both walkers and those with historical interests. :) On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5389560052 you've used the tag highway=culvert (or inherited it from a previously mapped node). If th... |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 08:56:51 UTC | Stonemill2 | Hi, I've now done it like I normally would, have a look if you wish. I remember seeing that and thinking it was wrong but just left it but am confused why it's attributed as a version 1 change to me. Anyhow, fixed now I think. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-06 12:59:55 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing. You probably "inherited" it by splitting/continuing a way or by copying and pasting something and iD unfortunately and mistakenly attributes you as the creator. | |
| 56096814 by tms13 | 1 | 2018-02-05 21:18:02 UTC | lakedistrict | Nice edits! By the way we've got a little project going on to improve the mapping of the roads in Cumbria, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/North_West#Road_navigation_for_tourists . Feel free to help out if you're interested or perhaps just incorporate some of the tagging ideas in your sur... |
| 55994866 by kreuzschnabel | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:06:28 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi kreuzschnabel, the road is known as Dunmail Raise for the length of the dual carriageway, so removing it from the road sections is incorrect. Can you add it back? Thanks, lakedistrict :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-02 19:56:46 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Thanks for notifying. In the OS Opendata Streetview map, the road is labelled "Pass of Dunmail Raise" which seems rather a description than a name to me. But if it’s known by that name, the name should be tagged as such of course. Sorry, I didn’t know that. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-02 20:05:29 UTC | kreuzschnabel | By the way: I changed the origin of the southern fork of Raise Beck which, as I learned from a walk report, has been the original course until it got re-routed to feed Thirlmere. So the southern fork has no source or spring on its own but forms a "dead fork" off today’s main course. ... | |
| 4 | 2018-02-02 21:09:14 UTC | lakedistrict | No worries and thanks for fixing. The southern part is still called Raise Beck. The final part of the northern fork is part of Birkside Gill, so I've renamed that section. The bit inbetween doesn't seem to have a name on any old maps but Cumbria County Council and others called it Raise Beck in Stor... | |
| 55999197 by GCarty | 1 | 2018-02-02 16:06:03 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for your edits around Newcastle and Gateshead, but it looks like the website address is incomplete on this - could you fix it please? Thanks :) |
| 55353986 by SDMeer | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:25:19 UTC | lakedistrict | By the way, you can use the S key (or right click square) in the editor to square the corners of buildings (you might want to do this on Beehive https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552398178, for instance). :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 09:05:34 UTC | SDMeer | I didn't know that. Thanks. In this case, the building is an odd shape. | |
| 55994701 by SDMeer | 1 | 2018-02-02 15:19:32 UTC | lakedistrict | Great edits SDMeer! It's good to see some updates in this part of the county. Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338929888 have a building tag on it, such as building=college? :) |
| 2 | 2018-02-06 09:02:55 UTC | SDMeer | Updated. Thanks for the suggestion. | |
| 46921824 by James Derrick | 1 | 2018-01-29 21:29:01 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi James, This changeset has added quite a few untagged nodes (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4739438978) which look like unconnected duplicates of building vertices. Please could you check them and amend as necessary? Thanks :-) |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 19:04:34 UTC | James Derrick | I suspect this could have been a josm-latest bug or upload failure. Either way, I've used JOSM to fix the duplicated nodes (and a few other building validation issues).Changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55904437 | |
| 3 | 2018-01-30 19:29:12 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 55838179 by Phill87 | 1 | 2018-01-29 16:31:11 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Phill87, welcome to OSM and thanks for your detailed edits around Horsham. Just a few bits of feedback: on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556538294 the width should be 0.5 and not .5; when you add a building you can use the S key (or right click 'square') in the editor to square the corners. O... |
| 55814070 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-27 20:46:08 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! I meant to do this last month when the changeset appeared; bus routes addr:unit also dropped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55814153 |
| 55804557 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-27 14:46:25 UTC | lakedistrict | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556265904 - `amenity=biergarten` and `building=yes` looks wrong here (also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=en-GB), you might want `leisure=outdoor_seating` with `operator=Miners Arms`? If you used a misleading iD preset you cou... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 15:12:21 UTC | gurglypipe | Oops, good catch. leisure=outdoor_seating is a more appropriate tag than amenity=biergarten anyway (since the latter is aimed more at the German-style biergarten, which isn’t a garden attached to a pub). Fixed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55805992. | |
| 55788680 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-27 13:31:09 UTC | lakedistrict | Are you tweaking the names based on the FHRS records? "Hare & Hounds" was the name on the pub when I mapped it, and I copied "CofE" on the schools from the Edubase comparison tool (http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/LA/), although what you've changed them to have ... |
| 2 | 2018-01-27 13:33:29 UTC | gurglypipe | Not entirely. I’m tweaking them based on what seems right, since ‘&’ is normally a stylistic contraction of ‘and’, and ‘CofE’ just doesn’t make sense. I’m open to being persuaded this is not a good idea. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-27 13:50:17 UTC | lakedistrict | I tend to map names as they're styled on a sign or on a website. 'CofE' was what my old school used and what Edubase tends to use but after checking a few school websites there's no uniform styling with 'CE', 'C of E', 'C.E.' and 'CofE' all being used. I guess C of E is easier to read and would be b... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-27 19:55:34 UTC | gurglypipe | Yeah, I was aware there’s no consistent uniform styling. Although I vaguely remembered that in my home town, everything was styled as ‘C of E’ on the signs. You make a good point about text to speech software. I’ll continue changing schools to ‘C of E’ as I come a... | |
| 11635863 by Meersbrook | 1 | 2017-11-11 15:25:49 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Meersbrook, I know that this is an old changeset but what are the untagged lines you added across the railway line such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164086827 ?Thanks, lakedistrict :) |
| 2 | 2018-01-24 16:46:18 UTC | lakedistrict | Should they be deleted? | |
| 55654504 by Luke Randall | 1 | 2018-01-24 14:44:30 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing the name. Are you sure that the college still use it? This article says that the uni acquired it in 2016: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/news-events/news/2016/09/sandyford-strengthens-city-centre-campus/ In the editor, click on the building so it glows red, click the wo... |
| 55390655 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-01-13 23:46:45 UTC | gurglypipe | Is that car park for The Grey Walls? If so, you could add operator=The Grey Walls to make it clearer who the ‘customers’ are. |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 23:52:07 UTC | lakedistrict | yes, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55419405 | |
| 3 | 2018-01-13 23:52:48 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice! | |
| 55327897 by ds47uk | 1 | 2018-01-11 06:21:36 UTC | lakedistrict | Did you mean to put any tags on this node? |
| 2 | 2018-01-11 08:57:02 UTC | ds47uk | This was supposed to have been deleted. Hatton Gallery added as an artwork, since there is not a specific art gallery logo | |
| 3 | 2018-01-11 09:19:23 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the reply. Best not to just 'tag for the renderer' with the incorrect tags, but to request rendering of art galleries at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues. I'll probably remap it as a separate building at some point when I update the map around campus. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-11 13:52:08 UTC | ds47uk | OK thanks. Surprised it wasn't already on! I had to use G$$gle to find out where it was! | |
| 55322180 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-10 14:13:18 UTC | lakedistrict | Is all of the building now a pub or is some of it still Manna House (homeless shelter)? |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 14:18:18 UTC | gurglypipe | Ah, I suspect some of it is still Manna House. I didn’t know about Manna House before; I’ve been to the pub, and the public part of it certainly doesn’t occupy all of the mapped building, but I didn’t know how far the private part of it extends. If you have surveyed/seen Mann... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-10 14:25:54 UTC | lakedistrict | There's been quite a few changes in this area over the last 5 or so years so a survey is probably needed. I won't make any changes yet. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-10 22:59:52 UTC | gurglypipe | OK. I’ve added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1264507 so we don’t forget about it. | |
| 55243898 by alexandrebc | 1 | 2018-01-10 13:31:23 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi alexandrebc, Thanks for your edits. Please only map what's still on the ground - the wall here no longer exists so tagging it as a wall is incorrect; also try not to use descriptive names. I've fixed this for you and cleared up a few duplicates. |
| 55220049 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2018-01-07 00:12:12 UTC | gurglypipe | Hah, was this prompted by my Thirlmere aqueduct edit? I wasn’t expecting that. Nice one. :-) |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 00:18:24 UTC | lakedistrict | Yes it was, maybe mapping the full length of the TA within Cumbria could be a project in the pipeline for this year... :D | |
| 3 | 2018-01-07 01:58:08 UTC | gurglypipe | Hah, very good. Count me out though; I found it hard enough to work out where the cut-and-cover line of the pipeline was from the satellite imagery when I could see where the aqueduct bridges were! | |
| 55135118 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-04 00:41:06 UTC | lakedistrict | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55135118 |
| 55138288 by Legolash2oLiam | 1 | 2018-01-03 20:30:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Legolash2oLiam, thanks the the detail that you're adding to the railways in OSM. I'm guessing that ref:lor refers to these codes http://www.railwaycodes.org.uk/pride/pride0.shtm ? It might be worth creating a OSM wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:lor to briefly explain what... |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 20:39:02 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Yes, you are correct. I've added a small page as requested :) | |
| 3 | 2018-01-03 21:04:39 UTC | Legolash2oLiam | Also, if you would like me to add desired information on a railway I haven't added yet, feel free to ask. i.e. restrictions, speed, ELR, etc.. | |
| 55106150 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2018-01-02 17:25:25 UTC | lakedistrict | Nice edits. Just wondering, does the station area need to include the surgery building and the railway corridor beyond the platform end to the NW? |
| 2 | 2018-01-02 17:49:09 UTC | gurglypipe | I was on the fence about the surgery building; it was geometrically simpler to include, but in hindsight probably more incorrect than correct. I’ll remove it.I included the railway corridor to the NW so that there isn’t a gap. An alternative would be to lengthen the railway corridor ... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-02 17:50:01 UTC | gurglypipe | Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55107351. | |
| 54842427 by i_hsien | 1 | 2017-12-23 13:07:54 UTC | lakedistrict | Nice edits i_hsien! Just a few pointers: it's normally best to join zebra crossings to the road itself, that way satnav routers can warn drivers that there's a crossing on the road. You could also map Holland & Barrett shops as health food shops (shop=health_food) rather than the non specific sh... |
| 54544624 by Petenjen | 1 | 2017-12-12 21:06:40 UTC | lakedistrict | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, Petenjen. Thanks for your edits. You've added a nursing home in the middle of a roundabout (at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5277875129). Did you mean to do that? Let me know if you need help correcting it or you have any questions. lakedistrict :-) |
| 54405908 by Charkyem | 1 | 2017-12-07 13:21:40 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Charkyem, nice edits! Just a quick tip: to make sure that the buildings you draw have nice square corners, click on the side of the building once you have drawn it (so it glows red/pink) and then press the S key (or right click then square). Hope this helps. Look forward to seeing more edits from... |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 17:23:34 UTC | Charkyem | Oh, that's good to know! I'll keep that in mind. | |
| 54286803 by Baa90 | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:40:10 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Baa90, I've changed this back to military area from industrial - it's land owned by the Royal Navy so landuse=military is the correct tag. Please remember to leave a changeset comment which describes the changes you have made to the map in the future. It seems that you've got the hang of how to e... |
| 54321956 by Brenty1892 | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:32:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Welcome to OpenStreetMap Brenty1892! I see that you requested an edit review so I'm just letting you know that the changes you have made look good to me - hopefully we'll see more edits from you soon! :-) |
| 54324310 by Dansafc | 1 | 2017-12-05 18:29:28 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Dan, Please only add things to OpenStreetMap that actually exist. I've undone your edit for you. In the future please leave a changeset comment that describes what changes you have made to the map. Thanks :-) |
| 54037439 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2017-11-29 20:24:34 UTC | lakedistrict | Usually a fitness station is an outdoor facility (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station) but you've put this inside a building - did you mean to use leisure=fitness_centre for an indoor gym? Also in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1215611 you've left the comment... |
| 2 | 2017-11-30 16:32:16 UTC | Beselch Gonzalez Peña | Well...is a indoor gym actually....and is a sport club too!! No streptease club | |
| 3 | 2017-12-01 15:52:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info, I've changed it to a gym/fitness centre and added some details from their website. Thanks again for your edits in Newcastle, you can also edit on a computer at http://www.openstreetmap.org which allows you to add different points of interest that aren't in maps.me. :) | |
| 53977755 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-11-21 14:53:14 UTC | lakedistrict | *Walkergate |
| 53765075 by Tom317 | 1 | 2017-11-15 13:12:29 UTC | lakedistrict | Why did you change it to subway? Only a small portion of the route is underground so it's probably best described as a light rail system. |
| 2 | 2017-11-20 09:40:18 UTC | Tom317 | Yes, but still it is metro. But if you feel, it's better described as a light rail, you can change it back. | |
| 53669145 by jimstn | 1 | 2017-11-10 15:31:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for all your edits around Newcastle, particularly the cycling infrastructure ones. In this edit it looks like you've missed the building=yes tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539663566 ? :-) |
| 2 | 2017-11-10 15:32:50 UTC | lakedistrict | Sorry, ignore me - I hadn't spotted it was part of a relation. Keep up the good work! | |
| 3 | 2017-11-13 11:21:43 UTC | jimstn | Thanks! I also hadn't spotted that it was part of a multipolygon/relation! Not sure why it has been created like that in the first place. It might be a job for the future to tidy that up. | |
| 53639425 by simon_84 | 1 | 2017-11-09 15:22:51 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for your recent changes simon_84, it's good to see some edits in this part of the county.Are you sure that Abbey Road, New Road and the road through Dalton are highway =secondary (B roads)? They need a ref (eg B123) if they are. For reference OS OpenData StreetView doesn't show them as se... |
| 53638179 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2017-11-09 12:47:28 UTC | lakedistrict | FYI iD's put layer=-1 tags on the building_passages which aren't needed. Also are you able to resolve this https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1174196 ? |
| 2 | 2017-11-09 13:10:00 UTC | gurglypipe | Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.I don’t know about the tourist information centre; this was an armchair edit based on e-mailing Herdy for their new address. If I get a chance to wander down to Stramongate I’ll keep an eye out for the tourist information centre, but it won... | |
| 53621426 by jennycerris | 1 | 2017-11-08 23:59:59 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi jennycerris, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Newcastle! I see that you requested a review so I'm just letting you know that the edits look good, you could change the operator tags (scroll down to the All Tags section) from Newcastle/Northumbia Uni to Liberty Living if you wanted. ... |
| 52257109 by Beselch Gonzalez Peña | 1 | 2017-10-16 20:34:47 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Beselch Gonzalez Peña,I left this message as a reply to one of your 5 identical notes. I'm copying it here as well in case you didn't see it and for discussion.>>"Hi Beselch, Thanks for your additions to the map. :-) You seem to have added quite a few "vinyls reco... |
| 2 | 2017-11-05 15:28:23 UTC | lakedistrict | I've fixed them all for you in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53531049. Also, please try and capitalise the first letter of each word in shop names, since they are proper nouns. :) | |
| 53204723 by John Stanworth | 1 | 2017-10-24 14:51:41 UTC | lakedistrict | Welocme to OSM and thanks for your edits. It's good practice to tag the building with what it is used for (eg shop, pub, guest house etc). This is a bunk house for climbing groups etc to rent out isn't it? I've tagged similar buildings as tourism=alpine_hut, but you could use tourism=chalet (holiday... |
| 53131932 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-10-22 22:52:30 UTC | gurglypipe | Wow, nice work! |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 00:39:11 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 53155005 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-10-22 22:47:08 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice. #CumbriaRoads work? |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 00:38:28 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks. Ah yes, missed the hashtag and wiki link. All #CumbriaRoads tags (lit, sidewalk, turn:lanes etc) are now on the A591 between Orrest Head Farm (start of 30 zone to the west) and Cooks House Corner A592 mini roundabout, but I haven't put give ways on all the side roads yet. | |
| 53160923 by bigfatfrog67 | 1 | 2017-10-22 21:30:16 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the edits but I'm not sure that they are entirely correct. Are you sure that the northern part of the road through the car park takes such a central position? Last time I checked it went along the edge of the library gardens, like it was mapped previously. Also are WTC really the operator... |
| 2 | 2017-10-22 21:52:43 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | Hi, Yes, I was there today. There is parking either side of the parking isle, which is down the centre. I will need to double check the operators as I have the ticket still in the car, will look tomorrow. How else would you tag the entrance way? Jonathanhttp://bigfatfrog67.me | |
| 3 | 2017-10-23 00:34:12 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the description, it must have changed a bit since I was last there (about a year ago). I normally tag entrances as just highway=service, I always thought that driveway was more for residential properties, but I guess it still works.lakedistrict :) | |
| 4 | 2017-11-02 14:23:01 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | I just thought I'd let you know that I checked the parking ticket and you were right so I've updated that accordingly. | |
| 52994917 by lakeuk | 1 | 2017-10-16 21:27:01 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi lakeuk,Thanks for your edit. However it is best to update the tags on the node rather than deleting it because the shop unit and address still physically exists. For this one you could have removed the name tag and changed shop=clothes to disused:shop=yes. Please keep this in mind for future ... |
| 2 | 2017-10-16 21:30:58 UTC | lakedistrict | I've managed to undelete both the Room and Native nodes and I've updated them to show that they're currently disused, along with fixmes to update in the future. :) | |
| 52694565 by pamman | 1 | 2017-10-07 00:00:31 UTC | gurglypipe | What’s a frog permit? Without a changeset description, this looks like vandalism. |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 11:43:36 UTC | lakedistrict | Reverted in changeset 52788976 | |
| 3 | 2017-10-14 17:11:11 UTC | gurglypipe | From a private message from pamman:> With reference to Mill Yard, Staveley the intention was to make users aware that parking can no longer be regarded as free. During weekdays the first 2 hours are free after that a “Frog Permit” is required, apparently if you are not a frog you&... | |
| 4 | 2017-10-14 17:16:38 UTC | gurglypipe | Hmm, this is a tricky one to tag. I think the tags as they currently stand – fee=no maxstay=2h – are the most appropriate I can come up with. They are correct, in that the first 2h are free. If people choose to park there, they should see the big signs explaining what this Frog Permit sy... | |
| 5 | 2017-10-14 17:53:15 UTC | pamman | Agree, even if a Frog Permit is obtained the parking is still free. | |
| 6 | 2017-10-14 18:16:24 UTC | lakedistrict | I agree with your tagging ideas gurglypipe, I suppose any other info could always go in a note= tag. Maybe some conditional tags could be used here if any of them are suitable: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane#Parking_conditions_.28terms.29 | |
| 15006292 by pamman | 1 | 2017-06-28 17:02:14 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi pamman, do you remember where you got the name "Jakey Tanners" from for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149906114 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480951913 ? The source:name=OS_OpenData_StreetView tag refers to the previous tagged name, Brigsteer Road. |
| 2 | 2017-10-10 08:24:58 UTC | gurglypipe | There are no road signs calling it Jakey Tanners. There are some references to a road called Jakey Tanners in the Kendal Oral History Group records, but no details online. I’m going to revert this back to Brigsteer Road. pamman, please reply with some source information if you think that stret... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-10 11:16:54 UTC | lakedistrict | When I first asked this I got a message saying that the name had been "passed down through generations of Kendalians", but as a local I've never heard this name in my life. If there is a source it should be put under loc_name. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#loc_name) | |
| 4 | 2017-10-10 11:29:37 UTC | gurglypipe | Indeed. I was also wondering whether Jakey Tanners is the name of the track to the SE just E of the A591 bridge. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-13 13:38:38 UTC | pamman | Jakey Tanners is the name of the road up the hill from the 30 mph sign to the brow of that hill where ‘Dick the Fruiterer’ had a market garden behind the high wall at the entrance to Stainbank Green. The name has been (and still is) used by generations of Kendalians, obviously since Jake... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-14 17:09:10 UTC | gurglypipe | Thanks for the information. I agree that the name Jakey Tanners should be in the map, but I don’t think it should be the canonical name of the road. The canonical name according to the modern naming databases (the OS Location database and the Royal Mail address database) is Brigsteer Road. As ... | |
| 7 | 2017-10-14 17:48:24 UTC | pamman | loc-name added | |
| 8 | 2017-10-14 18:11:25 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info and thanks for adding the name back to the map, pamman. | |
| 52544444 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2017-10-01 18:50:01 UTC | lakedistrict | Good work. Does this resolve http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1089871 ? |
| 2 | 2017-10-01 21:08:44 UTC | gurglypipe | It does. I’ve closed that note, thanks for pointing it out. | |
| 52392521 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-09-27 10:14:22 UTC | gurglypipe | Nice work! |
| 2 | 2017-09-27 11:47:38 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! | |
| 50758710 by Harti | 1 | 2017-08-02 21:00:59 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for your edits in Ambleside, but Tesco Express isn't open 24/7 - was that a mistake? Also do you remember what type of shop "Hide & Horn" is or what it sells? Happy mapping, lakedistrict :-) |
| 2 | 2017-09-24 16:57:32 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for fixing in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50843900. I fixed Hide & Horn in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52333386 - it was a leather shop. :-) | |
| 52245473 by nickharri | 1 | 2017-09-23 11:47:18 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi nickharri,Thanks for your edits to the paths and cairns. I notice that you requested a review so I'm just letting you know that they all look good to me. Any questions just ask.Happy mapping, lakedistrict :) |
| 51395624 by Locator | 1 | 2017-09-19 12:36:50 UTC | lakedistrict | Does this mean that the Post Office at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1589533100 has closed and it has relocated here? The old node needs updating to its new use if that's the case. |
| 51884385 by Arthtoach | 1 | 2017-09-09 17:58:23 UTC | lakedistrict | The previous version of the phone number was correct, since the area code is 013394. so it should be +44 15394 36354 |
| 2 | 2017-09-09 18:06:57 UTC | lakedistrict | *area code is 015394 | |
| 3 | 2017-09-10 09:52:29 UTC | Arthtoach | Apologies, I checked that 01539 was a valid area code, not relalising there was a more specific one. I've changed this back. | |
| 51785859 by Mike Parfitt | 1 | 2017-09-06 17:23:06 UTC | lakedistrict | Did you mean to tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243753843 as tertiary? highway=service seems a more appropriate tag for this location. |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 08:08:44 UTC | Mike Parfitt | Perhaps its a usage thing. My concept of a service road is the sort of roads that go down the back of shops for delivery lorries, or those leading into/outof car parks and inbetween their lines of painted bays. This was a narrow single-track road with passing places going through open country, far... | |
| 51081216 by DanGregory | 1 | 2017-08-13 21:27:02 UTC | matt_twam_asi | Hi Dan, thanks for updating these shops. Do you have any idea what will be replacing the cafe? It may be worthwhile keeping the node but removing the cafe and name tags as currently there is useful address information that will be lost. |
| 2 | 2017-08-20 12:25:48 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Matt and Dan, I've undeleted the node and updated the tags on it so that the address info isn't lost. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51275939 | |
| 51037820 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-08-11 19:28:48 UTC | gurglypipe | Wow, that’s fantastic! I thought I’d finished the A5074, but obviously I got ahead of myself at the A592 junction and forgot about the rest up to the A591. Thanks for finishing it off! |
| 2 | 2017-08-11 20:19:26 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks! I think I've got the hang of the tagging now, what road are you going to do next? | |
| 3 | 2017-08-11 20:47:49 UTC | gurglypipe | I’ll probably do the Lake District passes and valleys next. That’s probably got a bit more impact than doing something like the A5074. | |
| 51010220 by gurglypipe | 1 | 2017-08-10 18:26:16 UTC | gurglypipe | This includes reworking the junction with Brantfell Road and St. Martin’s Hill to make it a cross-roads, since there seems to be no restriction on coasting down Brantfell Road and onto St. Martin’s Hill in real life. |
| 2 | 2017-08-10 20:54:21 UTC | lakedistrict | Yes, Brantfell Rd and St. Martins Hill is a crossroads, the rest of the edits look good too :) | |
| 50858311 by CasualMapper | 1 | 2017-08-05 11:13:42 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the edits. The sign at the gates actually reads "Kirkstone Quarries", and Burlington seem to be the first/only ones to use the spelling "Pett's", previously only the spelling "Pets" has been used. (Defra and OS both use "Pets")Do you know if it ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-06 06:21:30 UTC | CasualMapper | I'm reading the book Slate Mining in the Lake District by Alastair Cameron and it called it Petts. It went bust in 2012 and was bough by Burlingtonhttp://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/9707126.Burlington_takes_on_failed_firm_s_quarry/On their website they call it Petts, http://www.burlingt... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-06 12:52:21 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for the info, I've added the other names I mentioned into an alt_name tag. :D | |
| 4 | 2017-08-08 13:08:51 UTC | Aoc-One | Sorry to butt in. The area is called Pets Brae, so Pets would be right. However I bet it's a tax thing from the 2012 bankruptcy - a similar but different name for the new company. it's still active it seems also. | |
| 50785643 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-08-02 20:52:36 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Gabriel, In future edits please add a changeset comment explaining what edits you have made so that other mappers can see what you've done. Thanks.(something along the lines of "corrected road types and junctions and added a caravan park in High Newton" would have worked here) |
| 50619186 by ACS1986 | 1 | 2017-07-27 18:19:54 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks :-) |
| 49896014 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2017-07-02 16:37:55 UTC | Mike Baggaley | HI, you seem to have added access=no to Gooseholme Bridge, with a note that it was closed when surveyed. However, as the way has foot=yes, the access=no has no effect on pedestrians, which is the only form of transport normally enabled for a footway. I suggest removing the foot tag if this bridge is... |
| 2 | 2017-07-04 11:05:34 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Mike, Thanks for this advice, I've now removed the foot=yes tag since it isn't required on highway=footway and currently the bridge is closed to all. | |
| 49678353 by shirokazan | 1 | 2017-06-19 22:24:53 UTC | lakedistrict | I notice that the survey dates say 2016. Is this correct or did you mean 2017? |
| 48916653 by pamman | 1 | 2017-05-23 15:17:10 UTC | gurglypipe | Why did you just delete this entire railway line with no comment? |
| 2 | 2017-05-25 15:04:08 UTC | lakedistrict | Looks like it is just the old railway=abandoned line that has been deleted, the current railway line is still mapped. But to echo what gurglypipe said - please leave changeset comments in the future. Thanks :-) | |
| 3 | 2017-05-25 15:11:17 UTC | gurglypipe | Correct, but surely the abandoned railway should remain mapped? It’s a useful historical bit of information. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-25 17:37:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3DabandonedHowever there is still a railway line here even though its just a single line now and not double. Also the current track takes the centre of the trackbed now, not just half of it like it used to when it was double track. I'm n... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-25 19:54:36 UTC | pamman | The existing rail line was moved to the centre of the double track bed, therefore no old track bed exists. The reason for removing the track bed was that 2 bridges were shown at each intersection, this was picked up on "keep right" ( https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&e... | |
| 48954821 by Chuangmeimei | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:59:16 UTC | lakedistrict | I've deleted your co-op node since it's already been mapped in the correct location. |
| 48971926 by Chuangmeimei | 1 | 2017-05-25 14:58:25 UTC | lakedistrict | Bridge House was already mapped, so I've deleted your duplicate node (wrong location anyway). "599" bus stop has the wrong name, but needs checking. |
| 46599573 by Yorvik Prestigitator | 1 | 2017-03-05 20:37:46 UTC | lakedistrict | HI Yorvik,I'm not sure why you've tagged Heathwaite Convenience Stores (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388295422) as a post office - it lost its post office counter around 10 years ago! lakedistrict :-) |
| 2 | 2017-03-06 01:02:53 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | I was basing it on the signs above the shop windows saying "Heathwaite Post Office & Stores" which were still up recently.I will remove the amenity=post_office tag if you think the shop signs are incorrect. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-06 10:59:11 UTC | lakedistrict | Yes, despite the signs the post office counter has gone. Thanks for removing the tag. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-06 11:20:23 UTC | Yorvik Prestigitator | no problem, thank you for the inside information | |
| 44467456 by DanGregory | 1 | 2017-03-05 18:02:16 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Dan,Is there a reason why you changed East Street to highway=living_street? I'm not too familiar with that tag myself. I thought that highway=pedestrian would be more correct, since there are "Pedestrian Zone" signs at each end. Certain vehicles can still drive on highway=pedestrian s... |
| 39328573 by dazzac | 1 | 2016-12-02 17:48:44 UTC | lakedistrict | What is the line/way that you've added ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372635979 )? It has a source tag but nothing else. |
| 43973279 by Daniel Routledge | 1 | 2016-11-26 22:57:19 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Daniel,I think these were supposed to be mapped as railway=stop and placed on the metro lines. Since you have now correctly put railway stops on the Metro tracks I have copied across the naptan codes onto the stop nodes that you added. It would be useful to add platform numbers to the stop node... |
| 42552722 by pjdavill | 1 | 2016-10-02 11:20:33 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice that you have deleted a number of ways (lines such as roads and paths among other features) from the map. If you are local or have recently visited you will of course know that these roads and paths do still exist, so they shouldn't have been deleted.OpenStr... |
| 2 | 2016-10-02 12:53:59 UTC | lakedistrict | I have managed to undo your deletions in a revert. Any questions just ask. :-) | |
| 42552900 by pjdavill | 1 | 2016-10-02 12:53:44 UTC | lakedistrict | I have managed to undo your deletions in a revert. Any questions just ask. :-) |
| 41583108 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2016-08-20 21:10:59 UTC | lakedistrict | #Kendal ;) |
| 41248299 by Guy | 1 | 2016-08-12 15:20:15 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Guy,Park Terrace and Kensington Terrace no longer match up with the buildings shown on the Bing imagery because they were demolished or partly demolished and have been rebuilt. The Bing imagery is fairly outdated in the North of England. Is it possible for you to undo your changes to the bu... |
| 41067996 by Guinevere23 | 1 | 2016-07-27 20:50:08 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Guinevere23, is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27577599 actually called Log Lane? I know that you didn't add that name but just wondered if you had spotted any signs with this name or seen it on a map. :-) |
| 2 | 2016-07-28 17:21:47 UTC | Guinevere23 | Hi lakedistrict, actually there were some signs with a name for that lane and I have a feeling that it was something else other than Log Lane because I thought it was unusual for it to have a name but, unfortunately, I didn't record what it was ... doh! | |
| 16216199 by michaelinredhill | 1 | 2016-07-04 21:20:40 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi Michael, do you remember or know where the name "Log Lane" came from for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27577599 ? I don't remember seeing this name anywhere and OS Street View gives it a different name (Truss Lane). I'll resurvey if I need to. All the best :-) |
| 40345104 by Yorkie71 | 1 | 2016-07-03 19:49:28 UTC | lakedistrict | Is the whole road really a bridge or just the bit over the motorway? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23238197 |
| 40387474 by CreakyBike | 1 | 2016-07-02 22:30:25 UTC | lakedistrict | I've separated the metro lines from the road. (You have to remove the relations first, then add them back after) I don't think that the metro actually takes the same route as New Bridge St W but actually follows a route under http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428809408 which I think is a vent. |
| 39840854 by SkaBook | 1 | 2016-06-09 23:31:20 UTC | lakedistrict | Welcome to OSM SkaBook! Thanks for your very detailed edits - Ambleside looks very well mapped now. :-) |
| 2 | 2016-06-10 07:47:51 UTC | SkaBook | Hi,A discrete actioncam and a sunny day helps! | |
| 38100495 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2016-04-01 14:27:46 UTC | Skidle | Ha! Yes, you're right, that was (mostly)me. I had no exact idea of where they were, just that they existed. I added them in the hope they would be amended. Generally I see folks will adjust stuff to help, but see the task of adding stuff as too onerous, so I though I'd get it started. |
| 2 | 2016-04-01 15:52:31 UTC | lakedistrict | Thanks for adding them - saved me (or someone else) a lot of time! :-) | |
| 37965601 by Mauls | 1 | 2016-03-21 13:30:23 UTC | lakedistrict | Where does the name Red Brow come from on way 403956832? |
| 37176532 by pmailkeey | 1 | 2016-02-21 18:34:17 UTC | lakedistrict | Hi pmailkeey, the A591 itself hasn't been diverted or moved to the temporary road or the West Thirlmere road, these are just the routes that the shuttle buses will take. Any chance you can revert your edits around Thirlmere/Dunmail Raise? ThanksPS Please add a note to the map before doing big ch... |
| 2 | 2016-02-21 21:16:05 UTC | pmailkeey | It seems you've failed to include any proof of what you claim whereas what is there now is quite logical. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-21 22:24:57 UTC | lakedistrict | Changing the road to construction is good, but it retains its A591 number. The temp track and road to the west of Thirlmere haven't gained the A591 number and are not trunk roads. But hopefully the road will be reopened soon! | |
| 36595948 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2016-01-15 15:44:02 UTC | lakedistrict | #OSMschools |
| 36562590 by lakedistrict | 1 | 2016-01-14 01:17:57 UTC | lakedistrict | Wrong changeset comment! Should say bridge closed for 4 weeks follwing river bed erosion under 2 pillars, ref=Lakeland Radio/Cumbria County Council https://twitter.com/CumbriaCC/status/687302705358843906 |