Paul Berry participated in the following changeset discussionsPaul Berry participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167209430 by Paul Berry @ 2025-06-05 07:48 | 1 | 2025-06-05 16:39 | Paul Berry | Changeset comment was meant to say Ashtree Gardens. |
| 165091458 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-04-17 23:06 | 1 | 2025-05-23 09:13 | Paul Berry | Thanks for picking this up. I've now fixed this on changeset #166645811. |
| 2 | 2025-05-23 12:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks! | |
| 165710082 by Paul Berry @ 2025-05-02 09:29 | 1 | 2025-05-02 09:31 | Paul Berry | Salters Way house numbering. |
| 158678132 by mapeing @ 2024-11-02 21:39 | 1 | 2025-04-25 12:45 | Paul Berry | Hi,Please note we're not allowed to use what3words data in OpenStreetMap, even if they're posted on a sign, so I have removed them. Please read if you would like to know why: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3wordsThanks for your understanding.Regards,_Paul_ |
| 155458502 by DandyGallery @ 2024-08-19 12:37 | 1 | 2025-04-25 12:41 | Paul Berry | Hi,Please note we're not allowed to use what3words data in OpenStreetMap so I have removed them. Please read if you would like to know why: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3wordsThanks for your understanding.Regards,_Paul_ |
| 163263295 by philipcullen @ 2025-03-05 22:03 | 1 | 2025-03-11 23:14 | Paul Berry | Hi Philip,Just to let you know that UPRN 2007010321 referred to a community centre that was demolished over a decade ago. (It seems UPRNs don't get updated very often!) I have therefore deleted the building, despite your having touched it only a week ago. Details of the demolition: https://... |
| 2 | 2025-03-12 18:21 | philipcullen ♦8 | Thanks Paul - that was a good spot. I've seen rows of houses that were demolished years ago, and new ones built in their place, with both sets of UPRNs still on Open UPRN. I'm not sure if they are retained indefinitely, but it does seem like they may be. | |
| 132792004 by Colin Smale @ 2023-02-20 13:44 | 1 | 2025-02-12 10:48 | Paul Berry | Hi Colin,I'm guessing the answer's no but does this unparished area have a name?Regards,_Paul_ |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 10:59 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi Paul,Formally, unparished areas don't have a name. They often cover wide areas containing many settlements, making it difficult to imagine a sensible name for the whole area. Sometimes they are created by the abolition of a civil parish, so I guess the name of that could be carried over. B... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 16:01 | Paul Berry | I'll mark it as noname=yes, if that's OK. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-12 16:29 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Sounds a bit redundant, tbh. A bit like "this page intentionally left blank (apart from this text, obviously)" | |
| 155039421 by Dee Kaart @ 2024-08-09 20:22 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:18 | Paul Berry | We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it.Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 15:58 | Dee Kaart ♦2 | Ooohh. Well, I didn't know that! Thank you for excising that data. I think I haven't recorded its equivalent anywhere else, and I certainly won't do so again. It seems that the UK patent office has been rightly cautious - good for it. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 23:56 | Paul Berry | Don't worry. I only found about 10 examples across the whole country where W3W data was mistakenly added and only this one was yours. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-12 12:00 | Dee Kaart ♦2 | Thank you - and thank you for your vigilance! | |
| 152843796 by NTTrailsLSE @ 2024-06-18 11:24 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:22 | Paul Berry | We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it from this relation and also 17731899, 17732380, 17732514.Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words |
| 109588130 by Grantham Cycling Infrastructure Campaign @ 2021-08-12 18:06 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:20 | Paul Berry | We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it.Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words |
| 120282502 by UtterClutter @ 2022-04-28 02:49 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:19 | Paul Berry | We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it.Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words |
| 151425696 by ZenPhil @ 2024-05-16 20:04 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:19 | Paul Berry | We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it.Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words |
| 160187478 by HolaAmigos @ 2024-12-11 22:28 | 1 | 2025-01-21 11:42 | Paul Berry | If possible, could you let me know which navigation apps were attempting to use this stub road? |
| 2 | 2025-01-21 11:47 | HolaAmigos ♦2 | Hey @Paul Berry, I was using Magic Earth when it tried to navigate me off the roundabout and then immediately back on via these ways instead of going around the roundabout as normal. I understand that this is technically "editing for the router" but if it doesn't provide any value kee... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-21 16:56 | Paul Berry | Hi,Tricky one, this. Strictly speaking it's tagging for the router (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_router), to make life easier for them even though what's on the ground is correct. I'd go for what works rather than being a purist, so let's leave it as it... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-21 17:58 | HolaAmigos ♦2 | Magic Earth actually hasn't updated it's OSM data yet so I was still able to replicate the old behaviour. It handles that way you linked fine, perhaps because of the longer junction arms?I don't really like editing for the router in major cases (like changing an entire road classi... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-21 18:13 | HolaAmigos ♦2 | I've reverted the construction changes and reached out to the Magic Earth team, I'll let you know if they get back to me. | |
| 6 | 2025-01-21 20:08 | Paul Berry | Appreciated, thank you. | |
| 161348738 by Paul Berry @ 2025-01-14 15:07 | 1 | 2025-01-14 15:08 | Paul Berry | Worcester: Various street → associatedStreet relations. |
| 161137994 by Paul Berry @ 2025-01-08 15:28 | 1 | 2025-01-08 18:32 | tomhukins ♦217 | Like Uppermill, Greenfield is not a suburb of Oldham, so many of these changes seem unhelpful. |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 20:58 | Paul Berry | I've retagged addr:suburb to addr:village for Greenfield. | |
| 161137917 by Paul Berry @ 2025-01-08 15:26 | 1 | 2025-01-08 18:28 | tomhukins ♦217 | Tagging Uppermill as a suburb of Oldham seems weird. Uppermill is a distinct village, part of Saddleworth, traditionally in Yorkshire, whereas Oldham is traditionally in Lancashire.Uppermill, like other Saddleworth villages, is part of the borough of Oldham and has Oldham as its postal town, bu... |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 20:57 | Paul Berry | I've retagged addr:suburb to addr:village for Uppermill. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-09 13:58 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thank you for fixing this, and similar with Greenfield nearby. | |
| 160698667 by Comedy Lounge @ 2024-12-28 02:04 | 1 | 2025-01-05 22:15 | Paul Berry | Now added to the correct location, according to the original address of 413 Murray Street, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147937910 |
| 27232245 by Sheffield_mapper @ 2014-12-04 10:35 | 1 | 2014-12-05 16:17 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Unfortunately Google's licence terms don't allow data from Google Street View (or other Google products) to be added to OpenStreetMap. There's some information that might help here: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Google#Why_not_Google.3FYou need to actually walk past to see if it is st... |
| 2 | 2025-01-05 19:14 | Paul Berry | This is now a private house. | |
| 160086510 by Ollie @ 2024-12-09 10:35 | 1 | 2024-12-09 11:09 | Paul Berry | I wondered if you'd mapped on the basis of this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFhH6eeGuJs |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 11:51 | Ollie ♦5 | Yes indeed! (although I did check some news articles too, prefer not to use a single source). There was also a staff halt I noticed on the video but I couldn't determine its location from the OSM-provided aerial imagery so I didn't put it in - but that's worth adding too if you know w... | |
| 159551786 by Paul Berry @ 2024-11-24 22:23 | 1 | 2024-11-25 17:47 | ntzm ♦39 | Hey, thanks for this. I will remember to add addr:city next time. Where do you get the data for addr:suburb from? As at least for Crookes they aren't in our actual post office addresses |
| 2 | 2024-11-25 19:17 | Paul Berry | Local knowledge: I used to live in S10. However, checking where the suburb/neighbourhood label is on the map and making a judgement is usually enough. | |
| 159199535 by Kingsley AMANKWE @ 2024-11-16 09:20 | 1 | 2024-11-17 22:37 | Paul Berry | Congratulations on creating node 12345678910 😊 |
| 138747785 by Paul Berry @ 2023-07-20 06:56 | 1 | 2024-09-15 11:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,I'm not convinced that High Bentham (misspelt here as "Hgh Bentham") is a suburb of Lancaster! It's a very long way away and in a different county.Wars have started for less :)Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2024-09-15 15:45 | Paul Berry | Hi Andy,The post town (addr:city in the UK addressing schema) is Lancaster, despite the cross-border contention (examples exist throughout the UK).https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom explains more.I've nudged addr:suburb to addr:village and corrected ... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-16 20:11 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks Paul,"addr:village" makes much more sense to me.As for post town tagging, maybe it needs a run across the mailing list or even a poll on the forum. The last round brought forth gems like https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-January/022424.html and https://list... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-16 20:44 | Paul Berry | Hi Andy,Thanks for the pointers. Clicking through the last thread there revealed a reply I made five years back!My position is that it only makes sense to add address data that cannot be derived from other means or just by looking at the map (typically house name and/or number, post town, po... | |
| 156170990 by Paul Berry @ 2024-09-04 06:54 | 1 | 2024-09-04 10:16 | DaveF ♦1,562 | Did validator software prompt you to make this change? |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 11:07 | Paul Berry | Yes, JOSM complained about addr:place and addr:street being in the same address. Please amend it if you have more local knowledge.(I first found it because there was a zero-width space before the postcode value.) | |
| 3 | 2024-09-04 12:12 | DaveF ♦1,562 | It was just a warning, not an errorPlease be aware validators are usually giving advice to check.In this instance there is no road called 'Broadway Court' so I'll be reverting it. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-04 12:58 | Paul Berry | Thank you. | |
| 153912546 by Paul Berry @ 2024-07-13 23:10 | 1 | 2024-07-14 10:48 | Paul Berry | № 11 & 12 need adding to street relation. |
| 2 | 2024-08-13 08:06 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #155182182. | |
| 153491649 by Paul Berry @ 2024-07-03 08:54 | 1 | 2024-07-03 09:53 | Andrew Chadwick ♦54 | Thanks for this.So, no need for addr:nostreet in the UK I guess? I saw "[t]his tag is unused outside Lithuania" on the wiki, but I'm never fond of blanket statements like that. I'd be interested to know if anything's flagging it as deprecated.(Wytham's definitel... |
| 2 | 2024-07-03 10:11 | Paul Berry | There were only 10 uses of the tag in the UK (see https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/addr-tags.html) and all were from this one village. Whether the tag is included or not, JOSM still flags it as a warning of "address without street" upon validation, which I've ignored. There are plent... | |
| 3 | 2024-07-03 11:11 | Andrew Chadwick ♦54 | No issues with its removal, thanks! Like you say, it's not necessary in the UK, like you say, and it doesn't work around JOSM's false positive.Just mentioning because I'm the author of https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/UnitedKingdomAddresses , and I'm interested... | |
| 152378109 by Paul Berry @ 2024-06-07 13:56 | 1 | 2024-06-12 18:33 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | Hello,Just spotted you've changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10529390 to be the description again rather than the name. I changed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142413576 following the broad consensus of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-us... |
| 2 | 2024-06-14 10:20 | Paul Berry | Hi Andy,I wasn't aware of the discussion beforehand. However, for long relations that are split into smaller sections, I renamed them because it's otherwise very difficult to tell at a glance which bits of the TPT are which. Naming all 14 parts of the TPT as just "Trans-Pennine Tr... | |
| 3 | 2024-06-14 10:35 | Paul Berry | The Pennine Way superroute and member relations have this section-as-name convention as well, though the sections don't follow the established stages of the route:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4080347I'll give it some more thought, come up with some more examples and count... | |
| 152069618 by Paul Berry @ 2024-05-31 08:58 | 1 | 2024-05-31 17:24 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | HiNot sure if you have surveyed this, but I know it well.I am not convinced this fits the definition of a busway.The first paragraph starts with "Busways are not meant to be used by motorists, pedestrians, or cyclists.". Whilst there are no entry signs there is no restriction on foot... |
| 2 | 2024-05-31 23:19 | Paul Berry | Hi Phil.You're right: I had mis-tagged (it doesn't help that the Standard Layer _still_ doesn't render busways). Now corrected on changeset #152101448.Regards,_Paul_ | |
| 3 | 2024-06-01 08:05 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | Thank you | |
| 151362568 by Miner The Miner @ 2024-05-15 13:53 | 1 | 2024-05-15 16:22 | spiregrain ♦196 | Are you quite sure this is a motorway? Asking because in the UK roads thst are called "motorway" have a reference number like M11, which the North Circular does not. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151362568 |
| 2 | 2024-05-15 21:05 | Miner The Miner ♦3 | I changed it to a motorway because it is a limited access freeway, and I though that it was the correct classification. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-16 12:18 | TomH ♦14 | So are some trunk and primary roads but it doesn't make them motorways - there are well established standards for road tagging in the UK and this is not correct. | |
| 4 | 2024-05-16 12:36 | gurglypipe ♦870 | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom | |
| 5 | 2024-05-16 15:05 | Paul Berry | If there's one thing we have absolutely covered mapping-wise in the UK it's all the motorways. There are some edge cases, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599716561, but all major routes were fully mapped over a decade ago. | |
| 150180563 by Paul Berry @ 2024-04-18 15:10 | 1 | 2024-04-19 09:49 | DaveF ♦1,562 | HiAre you sure the gauge is 1520?That's wider than standard. |
| 2 | 2024-04-19 12:30 | Paul Berry | Quite right. It's 5" gauge which is 127 mm. Now updated. Thank you. | |
| 149857376 by Paul Berry @ 2024-04-11 10:17 | 1 | 2024-04-11 15:26 | mce ♦1 | Just having a PR post code does not make a place part of Preston. I think all these changers should be rolled back. |
| 2 | 2024-04-11 16:07 | Paul Berry | I used the data given on https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/PR.html and the advice on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom as a guide to making the changes. I can change these addresses back if you want but be aware that the addr:* tagging is intended to map ... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-11 16:27 | mce ♦1 | I won't make an issue of it. I wouldn't want to upset the Post Office at the moment! | |
| 4 | 2024-04-15 11:11 | Paul Berry | Yes, and thanks for your understanding. It's appreciated. | |
| 148867658 by Paul Berry @ 2024-03-19 15:39 | 1 | 2024-04-08 11:36 | Pink Duck ♦151 | It still says Kettle Foods on the main building exterior (along with colourful graphic of 12 crisp packets) |
| 2 | 2024-04-08 11:53 | Paul Berry | There is a company registered to that address (https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06242292) but I've put it back to the main one of Kettle Foods. Thanks for the tip. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-08 11:55 | Pink Duck ♦151 | Kettle Foods is actually owned by Valeo that bought out the Meat Snacks company. This site appears to be purely crisp manufacture. | |
| 149365591 by Paul Berry @ 2024-03-30 19:26 | 1 | 2024-03-31 07:57 | Paul Berry | Seem to have found a bug in StreetComplete. |
| 147273784 by Joaquin_90_UK12345 @ 2024-02-09 21:29 | 1 | 2024-02-10 15:44 | VictorIE ♦907 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206417264https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248318147There are two overlapping buildings here. |
| 2 | 2024-03-18 21:45 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #148835925. | |
| 123443291 by Falsernet @ 2022-07-10 18:43 | 1 | 2024-03-05 11:41 | Paul Berry | This is a lorry turning area (so they can make the sharp turn) but I'll map the road area instead. |
| 2 | 2024-03-05 11:52 | Paul Berry | Mapped on changeset #148246933. | |
| 147910338 by Paul Berry @ 2024-02-25 21:59 | 1 | 2024-02-25 22:01 | Paul Berry | Revisited my first edit made 9,999 changesets ago (was changeset #18835077). |
| 147727691 by Paul Berry @ 2024-02-21 10:55 | 1 | 2024-02-21 15:38 | KasperSFranz ♦62 | Hi,Why is it required to add Great Britain to the road names? It seems not to have any value, should all the Motoways be updated as well? |
| 2 | 2024-02-21 16:50 | Paul Berry | It's only on the relation name, not the members of the relation. It's so the relation is unambiguous at the global level and brings it in line with others such as the A10, A14, A41, etc...The motorway relations already have this naming covnention. | |
| 140593156 by AudreyBousquet @ 2023-08-30 14:52 | 1 | 2023-09-06 12:39 | Paul Berry | This is very likely an innocent mistake by a first-time user but I don't think the ways that were added have the names and land uses described. |
| 2 | 2024-01-26 15:29 | Paul Berry | Resolved by another user on changeset #145893661. | |
| 145566766 by Via-velo @ 2023-12-27 10:18 | 1 | 2023-12-28 15:29 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Congratulations on adding way 1234567890! |
| 2 | 2024-01-02 10:42 | Paul Berry | Looks like you were the lucky one to have added way 1234567890 😀 | |
| 143521590 by Paul Berry @ 2023-11-02 10:14 | 1 | 2023-12-12 15:41 | chillly ♦819 | I have just seen this edit changing the addresses in the village I live in to North Ferriby. This is a mistake. I live in Swanland, not a suburb of North Ferriby. The 'Postal Town' is a disused remnant of the PAF from Royal Mail. The PAF is COPYRIGHT material that we cannot use. It is the ... |
| 2 | 2023-12-12 20:25 | Paul Berry | I used the data given on https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/HU.html and the advice on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom as a guide. I can change these addresses back if you want but be aware that the addr:* tagging is intended to map the postal address onl... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-12 20:26 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Chris,I don't think this is Paul's fault as this seems to have become the standard, and if he hadn't done it confusedbuffalo would be along real soon now.I'm afraid this ship has sailed; I was shouted down when I suggested addr:postal_town for those who want to clone P... | |
| 145029430 by Paul Berry @ 2023-12-12 09:28 | 1 | 2023-12-12 10:00 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Hi, there now appear to be a number of ways in this changeset which don’t include the place they’re in in their address tagging at all.For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398407870 is bang in the middle of Slaidburn, but its address tagging doesn’t mention Slaidburn ... |
| 2 | 2023-12-12 11:01 | Paul Berry | Address details now have the locales added. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-12 11:05 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Ta | |
| 139621557 by andy mackey @ 2023-08-08 16:19 | 1 | 2023-12-04 14:03 | Paul Berry | I'm going to change this to addr:housenumber=16. Then you won't have numbered it 🤨 |
| 144713440 by Paul Berry @ 2023-12-03 08:25 | 1 | 2023-12-03 19:28 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Hi, are you sure this is right? This edit looks like it’s removing information from the map, because those buildings are only odds house numbers. The new tagging does not reflect that. |
| 2 | 2023-12-03 22:01 | Paul Berry | Apologies, I missed off the interpolation tag. Now added. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-03 22:19 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Thanks. (For anyone reading this in future, the interpolation tag was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144733917.)I think you might need to make similar changes for at least the following changesets too: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144713523 - https://www.openst... | |
| 4 | 2023-12-04 11:49 | Paul Berry | All corrected. Thank you. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-04 11:56 | gurglypipe ♦870 | That’s great, thanks a lot :) | |
| 144419760 by Paul Berry @ 2023-11-24 19:42 | 1 | 2023-11-24 20:29 | Paul Berry | Moved a node that had always been on the wrong continent. |
| 103221945 by nickjohnston @ 2021-04-19 20:43 | 1 | 2023-09-29 08:18 | Paul Berry | To map The Coach House, you can just set each address out as:addr:housenumber=1addr:street=The Coach Houseaddr:parentstreet=Parabola Roadaddr:city=Cheltenhamaddr:postcode=GL50 3BDaddr:housenumber=2addr:street=The Coach Houseaddr:parentstreet=Parabola Roadaddr:city=Cheltenhama... |
| 2 | 2023-10-06 15:57 | Paul Berry | I've now done this on changeset #142239447 but kept the relation. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-07 20:52 | nickjohnston ♦45 | Thanks for the comment. I made heavy use of associatedStreet relations when adding addresses in Cheltenham, as at the time that was what people on the #osm-gb IRC channel recommended. (Capturing the information was the most important thing; later it could be represented differently if desired.) Now ... | |
| 141903992 by Fradeve11 @ 2023-09-29 09:53 | 1 | 2023-10-03 08:08 | Paul Berry | This is the wrong school. Southgate School is on Southfield Road, Almondbury, HD5. This school is Lydgate School, Kirkroyds Lane, HD9. |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 08:18 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #142088025. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-04 15:33 | Fradeve11 ♦19 | Hi Paul, very sorry about this. I am helping with importing quite a lot of information from Edubase, the occasional error could happen.Really appreciate the feedback and the fix, thanks for looking into this! | |
| 4 | 2023-10-04 16:17 | Paul Berry | No worries. It's a part of the world I know well so I was able to spot the issue and correct it.I've made a few errors myself! | |
| 128758849 by Falsernet @ 2022-11-11 04:42 | 1 | 2022-12-23 15:23 | Paul Berry | Not your fault but the busways are no longer showing up on the Standard layer. Might be the "access=no" tagging? |
| 2 | 2022-12-29 16:52 | Falsernet ♦151 | Nah it's the renderer. The new busway tagging has only recently been adopted and hasn't yet been incorporated by OSM Carto. highway=busway is definitely the current tagging scheme - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway | |
| 3 | 2023-09-20 08:45 | Paul Berry | I noticed you had to revert some tagging-for-the-renderer changes elsewhere regarding this - has the invisibility issue been raised with OSM, do you know? | |
| 4 | 2023-09-20 09:00 | Paul Berry | Found it: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4226 | |
| 5 | 2023-09-20 09:02 | Paul Berry | It's embarrassing how long it's taking for this to be fixed. | |
| 6 | 2023-09-21 03:26 | Falsernet ♦151 | Yeah I 100% agree, it's problematic.I can understand why bus guideway tagging was established first, as they're definitely less of a normal road, however the fact they've been prioritised as far as rendering with highway=busway still on the backburner is questionable. The issue on... | |
| 140989590 by Paul Berry @ 2023-09-08 14:28 | 1 | 2023-09-09 16:47 | JezCrow ♦150 | Laurence Jackson Sports Village in Slapewath? I disagree - Slapewath is only the tiny hamlet next to Charltons, not a wider area of Guisborough town. |
| 2 | 2023-09-09 21:08 | Paul Berry | Would you say it's Charltons instead? | |
| 3 | 2023-09-09 22:52 | JezCrow ♦150 | The Sports Village (way 89549933) and wider school grounds are part of Guisborough in my opinion so don't need an additional addr:suburb tag - it's nearly two miles to Slapewath from there and Charltons is even further away! | |
| 4 | 2023-09-10 10:17 | Paul Berry | Sorry, just had a fresh look and I've clearly mistagged this. Now corrected on changeset #141055963. Thanks for pointing it out. | |
| 140000000 by CorinthCanal @ 2023-08-17 08:21 | 1 | 2023-08-17 08:45 | Paul Berry | Nice changeset id! |
| 2 | 2023-08-18 06:44 | ljc_jlyb ♦37 | I'd like to know how did you manage to access maxar imagery... | |
| 3 | 2023-08-21 16:13 | CorinthCanal ♦1 | Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent SecureWatch imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, w... | |
| 4 | 2023-11-03 18:43 | We're no strangers to love You know the rules and so do I do I A full commitment's what I'm thinking of You wouldn't get this from any other guy I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling Gotta make you understand Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 136796251 by Paul Berry @ 2023-05-31 16:06 | 1 | 2023-05-31 16:48 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Hi, is there some documentation of the tagging scheme you're applying here? Helwith Bridge definitely isn't a suburb of Settle, for example.And having both addr:city= and addr:suburb= set to Settle for addresses within Settle seems odd. |
| 2 | 2023-05-31 20:15 | Paul Berry | Hi,Yes, Settle is the post town for BD24 but read on.Tagging for UK addresses means you have to read through the labels to arrive at the actual meanings, thus:addr:suburb = town, village, hamlet name (if different from the post town)addr:city = post townWe're describing the addr... | |
| 3 | 2023-05-31 20:30 | Paul Berry | Sources I used:https://envelopes.osmuk.org/#18/54.12129/-2.29193https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/BD.html | |
| 4 | 2023-06-01 10:24 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Thanks for the explanation, I can see it does strictly make sense.However, given how few people use post towns in addressing any more (since their purpose is fully covered by the first half of the postcode), and how the ID editor doesn’t provide any guidance about esoteric UK addressing ru... | |
| 5 | 2023-06-02 10:40 | SK53 ♦864 | @gurglypipe: I agree with you, but what Paul describes is the broad consensus of the UK community. I personally feel that defining addr:* tags as related to postal information only was a mistake: but it was exactly what the Karlsruhe scheme designers intended. It does mean that for non-postal us... | |
| 6 | 2023-06-02 11:05 | Paul Berry | Thanks for the advice and engagement here. I'm currently looking at filling in postcode information and post towns happens to be a side-effect of that. | |
| 132575933 by Paul Berry @ 2023-02-15 10:58 | 1 | 2023-02-15 15:04 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi Paul, the source for the boundary you added is strictly speaking not for the civil parish, but for an electoral district or ward of Ryedale DC. They may be coincident, but that is not guaranteed. A better source for civil parish boundaries is Ordnance Survey, which was actually used in this case ... |
| 2 | 2023-02-15 16:55 | Paul Berry | Hi Colin,Thanks for the correction. I've reverted this in changeset #132591441.Regards,_Paul_ | |
| 132020592 by Paul Berry @ 2023-02-02 22:10 | 1 | 2023-02-11 21:25 | Hufkratzer ♦747 | Hi,here you have removed the tag building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273717343Therefore it is no longer rendered as a building.If it is a building, it should have a building tag, no matter what other tags it has.The tag leisure=horse_riding (preset name "Horse Riding Cen... |
| 2 | 2023-02-11 22:04 | Paul Berry | Thanks for spotting this. I've resolved it on changeset #132424144. | |
| 128547975 by Sir Tristan @ 2022-11-06 09:46 | 1 | 2023-01-08 12:21 | Paul Berry | What's your source for "Pussy Lane" please? |
| 2 | 2023-01-08 12:32 | Paul Berry | Actually, I found one:https://www.kirklees.gov.uk/beta/food-exercise-and-sport/search-for-walking-and-cycling-routes/maps/Shelley_Pathways.pdfNever knew it was called that! | |
| 3 | 2023-01-11 08:41 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | It's also on OS 25 inch maps from 1892-1914 (via NLS) and existed before Westerley Way.https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=18.0&lat=53.59838&lon=-1.69402&layers=168&right=osm | |
| 4 | 2023-01-11 10:35 | Paul Berry | Thanks again. | |
| 5 | 2023-01-11 12:04 | Sir Tristan ♦2 | Hi PaulI thought you might pull me up on the spelling of Westerley (on the older signage attached to walls) versus the newer freestanding signs with Westerly. My preference is for Westerley as it was used by my mates that lived along there and could have the same root as Shelley itself. Westerle... | |
| 6 | 2023-01-11 14:28 | Paul Berry | It'll be a typo by Kirkees I'm sure. In which case, even though it is nominally "ground truth" I'd ignore it.This has happened elsewhere, eg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4325553 | |
| 7 | 2023-01-13 18:47 | Paul Berry | Upon a survey today, even that note was wrong. All signs show "Westerley" so no issue. | |
| 131181781 by rskedgell @ 2023-01-12 10:48 | 1 | 2023-01-13 18:04 | Paul Berry | Resurveyed and fixme resolved on changeset #131240068. |
| 2 | 2023-01-14 00:16 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | Thanks! | |
| 130000000 by colinic @ 2022-12-12 13:52 | 1 | 2022-12-12 16:29 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | Congrats on the changeset number! :party: |
| 2 | 2022-12-12 22:20 | Paul Berry | Nice changeset number! | |
| 3 | 2022-12-19 08:57 | Magick93 ♦35 | GET! 130 millionth changeset! | |
| 4 | 2023-06-13 09:15 | Aphroditelita ♦18 | GET 130mil | |
| 129780724 by Paul Berry @ 2022-12-06 12:06 | 1 | 2022-12-06 12:11 | gurglypipe ♦870 | Hi, I’m not sure this is a useful change. From spot-checking a few of them, the ref is already tagged separately on these relations, and the country can be determined by spatial data.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_onlyWhat was your reasoning for adding d... |
| 2 | 2022-12-06 12:45 | Paul Berry | A great many have already been tagged in this way over the years by various authors. Just bringing the tags up to the same consistency. | |
| 3 | 2022-12-06 12:47 | Paul Berry | If they add nothing, I'm happy to remove them. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-06 12:48 | gurglypipe ♦870 | But what value does it add to the map? | |
| 5 | 2022-12-06 12:49 | gurglypipe ♦870 | I think I replied before seeing your latest reply. Yeah, from my point of view I don’t think they (or the similar names on other relations) add anything to the map that isn’t already given by the ref= tag. 🤷 | |
| 6 | 2022-12-06 12:54 | Paul Berry | I'll remove them then. If there's an actual name that describes the whole road (eg Great North Road), I'll put that in its place. Probably most of them will go. | |
| 7 | 2022-12-06 15:20 | gurglypipe ♦870 | That sounds like it would be a good improvement to the map, thanks for taking the time to do so :) | |
| 125699981 by Paul Berry @ 2022-09-02 13:44 | 1 | 2022-10-25 19:28 | Paul Berry | Still wrong! |
| 2 | 2022-10-26 11:08 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #128078151. | |
| 127347954 by Paul Berry @ 2022-10-11 09:29 | 1 | 2022-10-11 20:50 | spod ♦1 | Why have you removed the addr:country=GB tag? Is there a purpose to it? |
| 2 | 2022-10-12 06:25 | Paul Berry | Overtagging. It's not needed and only about a third of the address in the area had it anyway. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-12 09:08 | spod ♦1 | Where was the discussion before you made this mass edit, or where has the UK community agreed and documented that the address:country tag is "not needed"? If it has been agreed by the community, then I have no real problem with it. But if not, then it's not a very valid edit.A mas... | |
| 4 | 2022-10-12 09:48 | Paul Berry | Reverted on changeset #127404106. | |
| 5 | 2022-10-12 09:58 | Paul Berry | Thanks. You're right to call out the mass edit. I'll raise the issue in the proper way.My reasons were: I don't think the tag adds any information, the country code might be better represented as UK anyway, and these tags themselves mostly originated from fhrsid imports in the fir... | |
| 6 | 2022-10-12 10:38 | spod ♦1 | Thanks a lot. I couldn't find any info about the addr:country tag in the UK-specific discussions/wiki, so not sure if there is community consensus in the UK. Personally, I'm a bit wary of edits that just delete stuff based on an idea of "making the data tidier/smaller". There... | |
| 125779486 by CasGroenigen @ 2022-09-04 16:23 | 1 | 2022-09-04 18:39 | martianfreeloader ♦167 | Congrats on creating nodes 9999999999 and 10000000000 !! |
| 2 | 2022-09-04 19:18 | CasGroenigen ♦43 | OMG Really? Thanks! 10 Billion wow... that's amazing! | |
| 3 | 2022-09-04 19:39 | RollTideRoll_asdfjkll ♦30 | Congratulations on the 10 billionth node! | |
| 4 | 2022-09-04 20:46 | snoozingnewt ♦82 | Congrats! | |
| 5 | 2022-09-04 21:20 | Intrinsical ♦87 | wooo | |
| 6 | 2022-09-04 21:42 | Paul Berry | Now at 10 bn nodes! | |
| 7 | 2022-09-05 09:02 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦514 | Congratulations for the 1000000000 nodes! 祝贺您达成百亿节点的成就！ | |
| 8 | 2022-09-05 15:05 | Fiszi37 ♦10 | Congrats for the 1000000000 node! | |
| 9 | 2022-09-05 15:57 | CapitaineMoustache ♦44 | Wooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!More and more nodes!Mooooooore! :D | |
| 10 | 2022-09-05 18:43 | jmarchon ♦426 | Nice! | |
| 11 | 2022-10-01 07:40 | ChonkerStonker ♦9 | 10 billion nodes, wow.Can we get a brand new node density map? | |
| 125379866 by The_JF @ 2022-08-25 21:12 | 1 | 2022-08-26 02:06 | Alex_457 ♦76 | Hi is this still an A road? If it is then primary would be the correct tag. See here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom |
| 2 | 2022-09-01 08:12 | Paul Berry | If this is now a B road what's the number? | |
| 123910995 by Paul Berry @ 2022-07-21 21:32 | 1 | 2022-07-22 21:59 | Paul Berry | Live demonstration of changes made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4G99ROu9CM |
| 123456789 by d1sr4n @ 2022-07-11 06:27 | 1 | 2022-07-11 06:30 | d1sr4n ♦57 | 123456789 get! |
| 2 | 2022-07-11 06:59 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | Congratulations! | |
| 3 | 2022-07-11 09:07 | Paul Berry | There it is! | |
| 4 | 2022-07-11 11:19 | scai ♦267 | \\o/ | |
| 5 | 2022-07-11 17:35 | 西园寺铃 ♦55 | nice number! Congratulations! | |
| 6 | 2022-07-11 19:03 | 022 ♦16 | awesome changeset number :D | |
| 7 | 2022-07-11 20:17 | 喵耳引力波 ♦185 | let's bless this lucky guy! \\o/ | |
| 8 | 2022-07-12 12:51 | luca009 ♦1 | Congrats! | |
| 9 | 2022-07-13 09:28 | Ualik ♦7 | nice! | |
| 10 | 2022-07-13 19:55 | LeSharkoiste ♦11 | aaah yes | |
| 11 | 2022-07-14 20:40 | iriman ♦196 | :D | |
| 12 | 2022-07-15 14:42 | KingVik ♦14 | Wow, that's really good | |
| 13 | 2022-07-17 12:54 | redd ♦386 | Congratulations to Changeset #123456789! | |
| 14 | 2022-07-19 15:09 | timoteo_sg ♦5 | nice | |
| 15 | 2022-07-20 16:13 | Robot8A ♦67 | Congrats! Поздравляем! | |
| 16 | 2022-07-21 14:36 | voteforpedro ♦20 | big ups! huge changeset milestone | |
| 17 | 2022-07-24 05:40 | Nonichase ♦6 | nice number!Congrats | |
| 18 | 2022-08-03 12:12 | lefuturiste ♦173 | Nice number | |
| 19 | 2024-04-20 23:21 | Ewrt1 ♦44 | Looking forward to changeset 1234567890! | |
| 123108599 by roseandsonsglassca @ 2022-07-02 06:29 | 1 | 2022-07-02 08:42 | BCNorwich ♦4,848 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.You've somehow got the wrong place. You placed the shop POI in Cambridge UK.Could you please amend the location, if you need help please just comment here. Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2022-07-11 09:06 | Paul Berry | Moved to correction location on changeset #123464025. | |
| 121853609 by Colin Smale @ 2022-06-02 14:03 | 1 | 2022-06-17 08:05 | Paul Berry | I assume this is intentionally the same as the South Yorkshire relation?https://osm.org/relation/88078 |
| 2 | 2022-06-17 08:36 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi Paul,Although the boundaries are the same, they are two different entities. It is entirely possible (but rather unlikely) that the boundaries may diverge in the future. It's not about drawing the line on the map, it's about representing real-life objects. | |
| 3 | 2022-06-17 08:58 | Paul Berry | Hi Colin,That's fine and makes sense. I just wanted to check that was the intention. Thanks for confirming.Regards,Paul | |
| 121860461 by Paul Berry @ 2022-06-02 16:48 | 1 | 2022-06-02 20:22 | RHEast ♦8 | Has it been impossible to find a name for this waterway? |
| 2 | 2022-06-02 22:44 | Paul Berry | No trace seems to exist on any public domain mapping I can find. If you know otherwise, even if it's a name only in local use and not signed anywhere, please let me know. | |
| 120000000 by Sawan Shariar @ 2022-04-21 12:50 | 1 | 2022-04-21 17:14 | Kovoschiz ♦2,536 | Congrats on changeset #120M |
| 2 | 2022-04-21 17:27 | 022 ♦16 | cool changeset number! | |
| 3 | 2022-04-21 22:36 | Paul Berry | Kudos on a nice changeset number. | |
| 4 | 2022-04-22 04:00 | Sawan Shariar ♦42 | Thank you so much @Kovoschiz @eric710 @Paul Berry It is really amazing thing. Love this number ❤️😍 | |
| 5 | 2022-04-23 15:25 | Koreller ♦46 | Congratulations for this changeset and thanks to the community in general for your additions and your involvement | |
| 6 | 2022-04-23 20:46 | charles chilufya ♦68 | Congratulations ambassador. This is awesome and great Achievement. 120M | |
| 90035128 by Stuart H 42 @ 2020-08-27 15:29 | 1 | 2022-04-20 23:43 | Paul Berry | It's actually rather easy to "do islands" in the iD editor: simply select the lake and the island then select Merge and it will create a multipolygon with the correct roles (inner and outer).I have done this for you on changeset #119975917. |
| 118107557 by Paul Berry @ 2022-03-04 20:50 | 1 | 2022-03-18 17:43 | confusedbuffalo ♦332 | I'm not sure how you managed it, but in this and another changeset you had a non-printing character between the sections of the postcodes for a couple of places (S36 7JW and S36 7JY)I've fixed them, but something to watch out for in future |
| 2 | 2022-03-20 19:59 | Paul Berry | Thanks for spotting this. I've managed to track down the source so I'll be sure to sanitise for non-breaking spaces from now on. | |
| 116741271 by confusedbuffalo @ 2022-01-29 12:02 | 1 | 2022-02-01 15:13 | Paul Berry | Hi,Thanks for fixing the otherwise invisible non-breaking spaces in the postcodes I recently added. I know now to check for these characters and I've sanitised my upcoming changes accordingly.Regards,_Paul_ |
| 116544635 by John Stanworth @ 2022-01-24 14:55 | 1 | 2022-01-24 20:08 | Paul Berry | Hi John,Looks like I started a changeset while you had this one open. As such, it might look like I reverted a couple of your changes around Gunthwaite but this was not intentional.Regards,_Paul_ |
| 2 | 2022-01-24 20:48 | John Stanworth ♦23 | Hi Paul,Good to hear from you. I’ve been very aware that I’m back in your territory :). If ever you are unhappy with anything I do please feel free to revert/change/get in touch. I think you might live in that area - it’s a nice part of the world isn’t it. I will be back ... | |
| 116484358 by Paul Berry @ 2022-01-22 23:56 | 1 | 2022-01-22 23:58 | Paul Berry | Intended changeset comment:Penistone: Bridge Street house numbering. |
| 110575743 by Paul Berry @ 2021-09-01 16:16 | 1 | 2022-01-09 15:05 | Paul Berry | Changeset comment should have been: "NR11/NR12/NR13: Post box/defibrillator box survey." |
| 113456051 by Hiausirg_Import @ 2021-11-06 17:36 | 1 | 2021-11-06 17:38 | zluuzki ♦224 | Aaaaand we have 1 billion ways :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000000000 |
| 2 | 2021-11-06 17:52 | RollTideRoll_asdfjkll ♦30 | Congrats on 1 billion ways! | |
| 3 | 2021-11-06 18:09 | Kovoschiz ♦2,536 | Yes you can have it! Lots of buildings. | |
| 4 | 2021-11-06 19:17 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | Hiausirg, I err on the part sticking out on one side of that building.. ;) | |
| 5 | 2021-11-06 19:50 | friedrice428 ♦8 | small step for a mapperbut a big step for the mapping community! | |
| 6 | 2021-11-07 07:27 | turtle-bienhoa ♦8 | Yay on 1 billion ways! | |
| 7 | 2021-11-07 21:19 | ipple ♦6 | congrats on getting way 1000000000 | |
| 8 | 2021-11-09 14:57 | Paul Berry | 1 bn ways! | |
| 9 | 2021-11-14 19:44 | d1sr4n ♦57 | Cool | |
| 10 | 2021-11-15 16:25 | syntex ♦808 | nice | |
| 16132818 by PeterEastern @ 2013-05-15 00:07 | 1 | 2014-11-18 17:59 | Paul Berry | Should the Purple Line relation extend to Meadowhall? It's an off-peak service but still part of the overall routing. |
| 2 | 2021-09-15 08:29 | Paul Berry | The Purple Line no longer goes to Meadowhall. | |
| 30920706 by abc26324 @ 2015-05-08 20:53 | 1 | 2015-05-10 12:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | You've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505971350 as a "locality" yet surely this is actually the name of a bridge - but where exactly is it? Also you'll see from http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10475119 (by a mapper who actually goes out and surveys stuff!) that ... |
| 2 | 2021-07-27 15:14 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #108696877. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-27 15:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks! | |
| 108278023 by Paul Berry @ 2021-07-19 23:16 | 1 | 2021-07-20 07:29 | spiregrain ♦196 | Hi there - are you sure the roundabout at the Richmond Road/ Hampton Road boundary is really gone? I *think* I remember it being there a few weeks ago, and the 'Bing aerial imagery' you've used as a source for this changeset shows it pretty clearly. |
| 2 | 2021-07-20 08:38 | Paul Berry | It's not gone but it was mapped as a roundabout when actually it's a mini-roundabout (you can drive over it) as opposed to the other three on the road which have solid islands. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-20 08:55 | spiregrain ♦196 | Oh yes - so it is. Thanks for getting back to me, and sorry to hassle you. | |
| 4 | 2021-07-20 08:58 | Paul Berry | It's no problem at all. All comments and discussion are most welcome! | |
| 100000000 by Lamine Ndiaye @ 2021-02-25 19:29 | 1 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | FinB2000 ♦13 | Congratulations on getting changeset 100,000,000! |
| 2 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | tungster ♦7 | 100 MILLION LET'S F****** GOOOOOOOOOO | |
| 3 | 2021-02-25 19:29 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Congratulations! | |
| 4 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ycool ♦4 | YES! | |
| 5 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mneko ♦9 | lucky changeset! | |
| 6 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | ottwiz ♦385 | Congratulations! | |
| 7 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | mDav ♦6 | YAHOOOOO!!!!!!!! <3 <3 Viva La OSM! | |
| 8 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Stereo ♦359 | Félicitation pour le 100 millionième changement sur OpenStreetMap!! | |
| 9 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Incredible! Here's to 100 million more. | |
| 10 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Palolo ♦457 | Good job | |
| 11 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Abdullah Abdulrhman ♦711 | Congratulations! | |
| 12 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | Enock4seth ♦548 | Whoopiii!! | |
| 13 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | syntex ♦808 | Congratulations! | |
| 14 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | fghj753 ♦50 | 100000000 !!! | |
| 15 | 2021-02-25 19:30 | VLD085 ♦2 | Awesome!!!!!!! | |
| 16 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | JriSv250 ♦31 | Congratulations! You managed to do the 100,000,000 changeset! | |
| 17 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Robot8A ♦67 | 🎉 | |
| 18 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Mannivu ♦213 | Changeset #100,000,000, congratulations! | |
| 19 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | overflorian ♦49 | Wonderfull changeset ! Congrat | |
| 20 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Kachkaev ♦23 | 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉GO OSM!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 21 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Domkot_UA Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 22 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | don-vip ♦11 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 23 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Michael Montani ♦5 | Congratulations Lamine! Thank you for the Wolof lesson before :) | |
| 24 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | Steve ♦1 | woo! | |
| 25 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | GeoMechain ♦26 | Congratulations !! | |
| 26 | 2021-02-25 19:31 | LorenzoStucchi ♦129 | 🎉🎉🎉 congrats!! | |
| 27 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kovoschiz ♦2,536 | Oh god this is going to be the most changeset comment ever | |
| 28 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | cafeconleche ♦19 | Congratulations! | |
| 29 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | BubbaJuice ♦124 | 🎉 | |
| 30 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | freeExec ♦628 | 0/ | |
| 31 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | sandeman_13 ♦2 | 100M :D | |
| 32 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | ToniE ♦1,229 | You've got it! Congrats! | |
| 33 | 2021-02-25 19:32 | Kateregga1 ♦11 | Congratulations Lamine!!!! | |
| 34 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | rouelibre1 ♦5 | Wohooooooooooooooooooooooo! Bravo !!! C'est génial ! | |
| 35 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | FinB2000 ♦13 | I think this changeset has the WORLD RECORD for the most comments! | |
| 36 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Johnny Mapperseed ♦99 | Congratulations! - And thanks for mapping Senegal! | |
| 37 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | gendy54 ♦584 | Félicitations. En plus un contributeur francophone ! | |
| 38 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | LivingWithDragons ♦52 | Well done, and if you're not aware you can claim a prize for making the 100 millionth changeset in OSM. Contact the people that run WeeklyOSM. | |
| 39 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | Sammyhawkrad ♦87 | Congratulations!!! | |
| 40 | 2021-02-25 19:33 | kkowalsky ♦1 | !!!!!! 100,000,000 !!!!!!! | |
| 41 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Immaculate Mwanja ♦1 | 💃💃💃yesss! 100M | |
| 42 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | dmlu ♦164 | Félicitations!🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 43 | 2021-02-25 19:34 | Friendly_Ghost ♦635 | Congrats on mapping changeset 100,000,000 !!! | |
| 44 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Dawid2849 ♦709 | Congrats! | |
| 45 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | Julian S ♦4 | Amazing, congrats, and congrats to the whole OSM community for this amazing and weird thing we've built! :) | |
| 46 | 2021-02-25 19:35 | *Martin* ♦641 | Congrats!https://www.facebook.com/FreemapSlovakia/posts/3864774783568639 | |
| 47 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | osmer120311 ♦14 | You did it! Congrats! OSM FOREVER!!! | |
| 48 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Mxdanger ♦77 | This is quite the achievement. | |
| 49 | 2021-02-25 19:36 | Laura Mugeha ♦4 | 🙌🏿🙌🏿🙌🏿 | |
| 50 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Bexhill-OSM ♦94 | 👍🏻 nice | |
| 51 | 2021-02-25 19:37 | Darrell ♦5 | Congratulations! ✊ | |
| 52 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Congratulations! | |
| 53 | 2021-02-25 19:38 | MAPconcierge ♦6 | Congratulations!!!!!!!! :-) | |
| 54 | 2021-02-25 19:39 | श्र ♦4 | Yay! Congrats! | |
| 55 | 2021-02-25 19:41 | Ndangane ♦3 | Félicitations !Un contributeur Sénégalais à l’honneur. J'espère qu'il sera reçu par Macky Sall.Et c'est un petit village de brousse nommé Nianiane qui lui a porté bonheur.Congratulations ! | |
| 56 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Mashin ♦556 | First! .. oh man not again :(Congratz! | |
| 57 | 2021-02-25 19:42 | Jrachi ♦766 | Evviva! 1000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 58 | 2021-02-25 19:44 | Ben Abelshausen ♦14 | Yay! Senegal for the win! :) | |
| 59 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | CharliePlett ♦20 | Congrats on the 100 mil! | |
| 60 | 2021-02-25 19:45 | geoJenn ♦8 | Congratulations!!! 🎉🥳 | |
| 61 | 2021-02-25 19:48 | UNGSC-isoipsa ♦5 | Congratulations!!!🎉 | |
| 62 | 2021-02-25 19:50 | BASHIZI CIKURU Christian ♦1 | Congratulations😃 | |
| 63 | 2021-02-25 19:51 | E de Wit ♦231 | Lets pay respect to his inbox exploding. :)Also congratulations to the whole community on getting to 100 mil edits. May there be many more. | |
| 64 | 2021-02-25 19:52 | puzzled ♦1 | Congratulations to you and the Senegal :D | |
| 65 | 2021-02-25 19:53 | CapitaineMoustache ♦44 | Congratulations!🎉Félicitations Lamine ! Le Sénégal en fête !Contactez l'équipe de WeeklyOSM pour recevoir votre prix ! | |
| 66 | 2021-02-25 19:57 | Negreheb ♦257 | I looked at your blog post and want to thank you for the work you are doing in afrika! I compared this region with google and its amazing to see OSM is way better than Google. All the best from austria! | |
| 67 | 2021-02-25 20:04 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Very nice | |
| 68 | 2021-02-25 20:08 | annofgreenlake ♦1 | Go Senegal! | |
| 69 | 2021-02-25 20:13 | mikelmaron ♦34 | https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2021/02/25/100-million-edits-to-openstreetmap/ congrats Lamine! | |
| 70 | 2021-02-25 20:14 | KuoLLK ♦21 | Good！！ | |
| 71 | 2021-02-25 20:21 | yopaseopor ♦68 | Felicitats des de la Comunitat Catalana d'Openstreetmap. Congratulations!! | |
| 72 | 2021-02-25 20:26 | ikiya ♦27 | Congratulations!100,000,000 changesets ! | |
| 73 | 2021-02-25 20:27 | AKE Amazan ♦1 | Félicitations 🎉🎉 | |
| 74 | 2021-02-25 20:35 | EnumMapper ♦50 | Congrats🎉 | |
| 75 | 2021-02-25 20:40 | Buck Shockley ♦2 | Congratulations on getting the 100 millionth edit | |
| 76 | 2021-02-25 20:53 | hocu ♦75 | Congratulations! What a great milestone 🎉 | |
| 77 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | omniss ♦1 | 🎉Time to get a lotery ticket :-) | |
| 78 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | Eddie Burke ♦1 | We did it OSM, we saved mapping | |
| 79 | 2021-02-25 20:57 | zaizone ♦63 | Félicitations Lamine pour ce cent-millionième changeset ! Je crois que tu as gagné un petit quelque-chose ! --> http://weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/14294 | |
| 80 | 2021-02-25 21:06 | trial ♦870 | Bonjour, ça fait plaisir à voir. Et regardez la carte que beaucoup prétendent de référence : pas un chemin pour y aller. J'ai l'impression que ce changeset est l'occasion d'améliorer encore le coin ;-) : les tuiles évoluent bien. | |
| 81 | 2021-02-25 22:35 | Reino Baptista ♦93 | Félicitations Lamine,Also congratulations to all OpenStreetMap organisation! | |
| 82 | 2021-02-25 22:52 | S-zation ♦108 | Le cent millionième changeset 🎉 | |
| 83 | 2021-02-25 22:58 | SierraIm ♦6 | 🎊🎊🎊 | |
| 84 | 2021-02-25 23:13 | Farras ♦55 | Congratulations! 🎉 | |
| 85 | 2021-02-25 23:43 | Leo1590 ♦15 | Congrats!!!! | |
| 86 | 2021-02-25 23:45 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 87 | 2021-02-25 23:57 | Kingtin ♦2 | Congrats | |
| 88 | 2021-02-26 00:47 | heimweh17 ♦1 | congratulations!!! | |
| 89 | 2021-02-26 00:55 | Adiatma IRM-RV ♦109 | Congratulations Lamine Ndiaye! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉Happy to have you in 100 million changeset.Just in case you don't know (https://weeklyosm.eu/archives/14294) | |
| 90 | 2021-02-26 01:44 | ◪ Jarv ♦240 | 100 Million! WOOOO!!! | |
| 91 | 2021-02-26 02:19 | Nearby0051 ♦152 | Congrats! | |
| 92 | 2021-02-26 03:06 | Creeps_ ♦4 | Bien joué mon pote ! | |
| 93 | 2021-02-26 03:10 | Miftah IRM-ED ♦16 | congratulations! | |
| 94 | 2021-02-26 03:48 | DP24PH ♦418 | From DP24 in the Philippines, congrats to the 100M changeset! | |
| 95 | 2021-02-26 04:01 | booktiger ♦56 | Congratulations from the Chinese mapper！ | |
| 96 | 2021-02-26 05:06 | Magick93 ♦35 | Lucky Changeset number. GET! | |
| 97 | 2021-02-26 05:38 | 快乐的老鼠宝宝 ♦514 | Congratulations ！You get the exact No.100000000 changeset！Good luck！ | |
| 98 | 2021-02-26 06:53 | AlexRiabtsev ♦46 | Congrats from Ukraine! | |
| 99 | 2021-02-26 07:24 | Lejun ♦480 | 🎉🎉🎉That’s our boy !🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 100 | 2021-02-26 08:06 | Nesim ♦50 | Congratulations | |
| 101 | 2021-02-26 08:16 | schwukas ♦52 | I'm glad someone so important to the community created this very special changeset! :) | |
| 102 | 2021-02-26 08:20 | ionut_radu ♦2 | Congrats from Cluj, Romania !!! Let's go for 1 billionth changeset! | |
| 103 | 2021-02-26 08:33 | GartenStuhl ♦103 | Congrats from Switzerland also :) | |
| 104 | 2021-02-26 09:57 | tux67 ♦1,938 | And congratulations from Germany .. great job - let's map the world together! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100000000 | |
| 105 | 2021-02-26 11:01 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | Congrats from the UK! 🎉🎉 | |
| 106 | 2021-02-26 11:14 | JackNUMBER ♦10 | Congrats from France! 🙌 | |
| 107 | 2021-02-26 11:40 | Paul Berry | Congratulations on making the 100 millionth changeset! | |
| 108 | 2021-02-26 11:47 | berndw ♦586 | !!!!!!!!!!! | |
| 109 | 2021-02-26 12:21 | stragu ♦25 | Bravo Lamine ! Merci pour tes contributions :) | |
| 110 | 2021-02-26 13:50 | Kuritsyn Roman ♦57 | 100 000 000!!!Congratulations!!! | |
| 111 | 2021-02-27 00:33 | salve100 ♦32 | 100M WOOOOO! | |
| 112 | 2021-02-27 10:11 | NM$L ♦83 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 113 | 2021-02-27 10:52 | edvac ♦219 | Félicitations, Lamine! Nianiane est maintenant une ville de renommée au niveau mondiale. J'espère un jour aller là pour visiter le village !! | |
| 114 | 2021-02-27 12:59 | kaartense ♦15 | 100 million!!! Congratulations!!! | |
| 115 | 2021-03-02 00:29 | Silva1989 ♦64 | Congrats! | |
| 116 | 2021-03-10 18:30 | AhmadHB ♦7 | Wow 100,000,000 Changeset | |
| 117 | 2021-03-15 15:23 | osm-mapping ♦24 | AWESOME CHANGESET | |
| 118 | 2021-03-24 20:57 | sdoorex ♦3 | Congrats on change 100M! | |
| 119 | 2021-04-02 03:27 | DawsZed ♦17 | Congrats on changeset 100M, with love from the United States!!! 🎉🎉🎉 | |
| 120 | 2021-04-05 21:40 | AlexMorpurgo ♦2 | Nice | |
| 121 | 2021-04-10 21:35 | rareanimal ♦1 | gg | |
| 122 | 2021-07-29 23:44 | Kento Kei ♦22 | Nice | |
| 123 | 2021-09-25 19:24 | Mason1007 ♦7 | ;) | |
| 124 | 2021-11-05 22:28 | conifermapper ♦58 | 100 MIL BOIIIIS!! | |
| 125 | 2022-07-24 05:38 | Nonichase ♦6 | Congratulations from China! | |
| 126 | 2023-01-17 17:44 | Enderbyte99 ♦14 | Your timing is epic!100 MILLION CHANGESETS | |
| 127 | 2023-03-29 10:03 | CactiStaccingCrane ♦60 | Nice | |
| 128 | 2023-04-13 18:54 | I-76 ♦38 | amazing it has more comments than #1 | |
| 129 | 2023-06-13 09:13 | Aphroditelita ♦18 | 100M lfg senegal! | |
| 130 | 2023-11-05 02:39 | Lamine Ndiaye ♦3 | thanks all | |
| 131 | 2024-02-23 14:42 | Road–Runner ♦221 | Awesome! | |
| 132 | 2025-02-16 18:49 | HugoC01 ♦33 | Congrats from France | |
| 133 | 2025-02-16 19:00 | HugoC01 ♦33 | 123 messages sur le 1 Millionième changesets.Un record ? | |
| 97794287 by Paul Berry @ 2021-01-19 22:00 | 1 | 2021-02-01 13:58 | skifans ♦37 | Hi Paul, did you mean to add this with a public_transport:version=2 tag? Looks to a little sort of between 1 and 2 to me? Its mostly 2 but you've still get the forward/backwards roles which are not valid under V2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_streets_to_the_relation |
| 2 | 2021-02-01 16:37 | Paul Berry | Yes, it's intended to be compliant with version 2 tagging (both parent and child relations) My understanding was that the role reflected whether the actual route followed the flow of the way (forward) or went against it (backward), so that, for example, data consumers can tell which way round a... | |
| 91977369 by saiguru @ 2020-10-05 10:17 | 1 | 2020-11-20 22:38 | Paul Berry | This is not a service road. Reverting. |
| 2 | 2020-11-24 05:44 | saiguru ♦1 | Hi,Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies. It is a mistake from my end. thanks for the correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement it in my future edits.Thanks,saiguru | |
| 46320282 by Xccdeefd Vasddf @ 2017-02-22 21:40 | 1 | 2017-02-22 21:47 | chillly ♦819 | Welcome to OSMYou seem to have added a tourist viewpoint over a house. Would you like some help with this? |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 19:49 | Paul Berry | Clearly wrong and no activity from the original mapper for over 3 years so I've deleted it (changeset #92194135). | |
| 78992071 by The_JF @ 2019-12-29 23:22 | 1 | 2020-09-05 15:17 | Paul Berry | Hi,Thanks for all your updates to the east end of Leeds, however way 759460985 does not exist as mapped; there is an enormous Amazon distribution warehouse right on top of where it would be.I see your source was the Leeds Public Rights of Way Map but in this instance it's way out of dat... |
| 2 | 2020-09-08 14:31 | The_JF ♦13 | yes the way has been closed for a long time but remained on the PROW map, so legally they had to maintain some access/ temporary close it. It has now been rerouted onto Skelton Moor Way.The path at top of the road with Halton Moor will need a survey as it was still under construction last time I... | |
| 3 | 2020-09-09 08:55 | Paul Berry | The bridleway was formally open to Halton Moor Road last time I looked (March 2020) though it's still a construction site with temporary placement of concrete blocks to filter out motor vehicles. | |
| 4 | 2020-09-09 08:56 | Paul Berry | It needs another survey. | |
| 81426230 by Paul Berry @ 2020-02-24 23:05 | 1 | 2020-07-02 21:49 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, the status of way 54962163 (Bridge Street) changed to oneway in this changeset. It has oneway segments in the opposite direction to and from it, which doesn't look correct. Can you please review?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 08:34 | Paul Berry | Hi Mike,Good spot. I've corrected it on changeset #87491295.Thanks,Paul | |
| 83948794 by Mark____ @ 2020-04-22 15:10 | 1 | 2020-04-22 15:39 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | Hi, welcome to OSM.There is a grass runway visible on imagery so it does exist. Maybe missing some tags but it should not be deleted.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2020-06-04 20:45 | Paul Berry | Wentworth Private Airstrip, code GB-0592, does appear to be a real place.Compare it with the similar Birds Edge Airstrip, code GB-0484, not far away which consists of a grass runway and a windsock: http://osm.org/node/4530404950 | |
| 68539723 by danofcourse @ 2019-03-26 10:03 | 1 | 2019-06-02 12:02 | robert ♦234 | I'll add a not:name tag to it in the hopes nobody will come and change it back (it's what's in OS Locator: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=979851) |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 11:41 | Paul Berry | This keeps getting changed and I'm not sure why. It would be helpful if mappers could explain their reasons why.Here's my reasoning for how the street name should be mapped:The road is signed on the ground, at both ends, as "Scholes Village S62" and Royal Mail have all ad... | |
| 72849004 by The_JF @ 2019-07-31 10:31 | 1 | 2019-08-02 13:08 | Paul Berry | Hi. Thanks for your updates. Some of the cycle infra is a bit off I'm afraid (eg Grove Street). I work just off Wellington Street and I'm actually in the middle of surveying everything as it's changing rapidly. As such, there will be changes in the next few days based on ground survey... |
| 71846634 by mudunur @ 2019-07-03 06:54 | 1 | 2019-07-18 21:48 | Paul Berry | These ways don't exist so I'm going to remove them. |
| 2 | 2019-07-19 11:06 | mudunur ♦6 | Hi Paul, Thanks for looking into the changeset. I edited this based on the digital globe imagery - dated July 2018. In case you have an access to a more recent source or local knowledge, please go ahead and revert the edit. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Always happy t... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-19 17:16 | Paul Berry | That's OK. You weren't to know that this site is undergoing rapid development and that I come past here every day!Stay tuned for updates.Regards,Paul | |
| 4 | 2019-07-20 22:27 | Paul Berry | Resolved on changeset #72470855. | |
| 71881909 by flevin @ 2019-07-04 04:49 | 1 | 2019-07-04 22:37 | Paul Berry | The service road you've drawn overlaps the park and no longer exists anyway. |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 07:31 | Paul Berry | I've corrected this on changeset 71912629. I was in the area yesterday and about to map when I noticed your recent changes. | |
| 68813798 by Meegan @ 2019-04-02 21:02 | 1 | 2019-05-03 19:54 | Paul Berry | Are these the actual names of the places described? |
| 35286187 by Warofdreams @ 2015-11-13 15:10 | 1 | 2016-07-25 19:36 | Paul Berry | The high-rise block "The Fosters" (way 380095247) was demolished in 2011. I'm not sure anything has taken its place yet. |
| 2 | 2019-03-07 18:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @Paul Berry - I'm guessing you'll have to tidy this up yourself... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-08 09:13 | Paul Berry | Yeah, I'll take a look next time I'm down there (which is fairly often). | |
| 4 | 2019-04-07 16:21 | Paul Berry | Started mapping on changeset #68980322. Needs a survey on foot (this one was a drive-by). | |
| 5 | 2019-04-28 18:45 | Paul Berry | Ground survey completed on changeset #69671654. | |
| 58168167 by Paragon_ @ 2018-04-17 13:31 | 1 | 2018-04-23 08:02 | CompactDstrxion ♦2 | This edit is wrong. The 'trunk' status on OSM is used to describe primary routes in the UK. The A644 between Dewsbury and the M62 is signed on the ground as a primary route (green signs). |
| 2 | 2018-05-17 16:46 | Paul Berry | I'm reverting the A644 and A642 back to trunk. Yes, this doesn't actually mean trunk in the Highways England sense of the term, it's just a term OSM use to define what we know as primary routes. It's not you, it's OSM and it's confusing, however these are yellow-text-on... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-31 22:58 | Paul Berry | Corrected on changeset #65923305. | |
| 65302213 by Paul Berry @ 2018-12-08 22:07 | 1 | 2018-12-09 17:19 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi Paul,AFAIK Skelmersdale does not (yet) have a town council... An admin boundary relation is not appropriate in this case. If and when West Lancs Borough does a Community Governance Review and formally create the Civil Parish should this relation be created. My opinion is that this relation shou... |
| 2 | 2018-12-09 18:30 | Paul Berry | Ah, I wondered why it wasn't already there. OK, I'll delete it and the changeset can always be reverted if ever the situation changes.To be honest, I assumed I'd inadvertently broken it in previous edits, hence the reason I added it. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-09 18:32 | Paul Berry | Deleted in changeset #65322158. | |
| 64361310 by JayCBR @ 2018-11-10 20:25 | 1 | 2018-11-14 17:29 | Paul Berry | Hi again,You seem to be turning C-roads into B-roads around Leeds.Could I please ask why?Regards._Paul_ |
| 2 | 2018-11-14 17:44 | Paul Berry | If it's helpful, here are the road tagging guidelines for the UK:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads | |
| 3 | 2018-11-14 17:58 | JayCBR ♦39 | i know there is an official classification as any country, but we dont need to be so strict, especially in cities..some roads are more significant than others, dont we need to show this??of course i m not talking about trunk and primary, just some tertiary roads connecting major roads and motorways | |
| 4 | 2018-11-14 18:00 | JayCBR ♦39 | leeds road network cant just rely in tertiary roads, the loop needs to be secondary, the same with major connections | |
| 5 | 2018-11-14 19:43 | Paul Berry | Like a lot of cities Leeds quite deliberately doesn't have many classified roads within the centre because they want traffic to move around it not through it.The Loop is an important road but it's not classified so it's "just" a tertiary road. You can infer its importanc... | |
| 6 | 2018-11-14 20:16 | JayCBR ♦39 | i know better than tagging for the renderer, i m actually doing the opposite, mapping whats on the ground..i ve been driving all around Leeds for the past 6 months, i can tell where is all the traffic..the whole idea of the loop is to keep cars out of the central commercial area, this makes it the m... | |
| 7 | 2018-11-15 08:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | @JayCBR I agree with Paul above when he says "the map has to reflect what actually there, not what you'd like to be there". The road classification scheme in the UK isn't random - it's deliberately designed to be easy to apply. If you think that it should be changed, the p... | |
| 63985222 by Rob Dyson @ 2018-10-29 17:14 | 1 | 2018-11-09 19:26 | Paul Berry | Hi Rob,Which Ochre Dike is the right one?https://osm.org//way/273807323 or https://osm.org//way/639130726 ?You might have accidentally duplicated one of them...Regards,_Paul_ |
| 62055221 by Yorvik Prestigitator @ 2018-08-28 01:25 | 1 | 2018-09-05 21:15 | Paul Berry | Hi. The Village Store is no more, I'm afraid. The property is now in private ownership, having recently been sold: https://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-73821839.html |
| 2 | 2018-09-05 23:47 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | That is a shame, do you know if the defibrillator and postbox are still there? | |
| 3 | 2018-09-06 07:30 | Paul Berry | Yes they are, although the defib box may move if the new owner doesn't agree to keep it going (in which case, I'll update it). | |
| 4 | 2018-10-09 22:20 | Paul Berry | Defix box gone as of changeset #63361680. (It may be back next year, mounted to the lamppost.) | |
| 5 | 2018-10-09 23:39 | Yorvik Prestigitator ♦151 | Thanks for checking, fingers crossed it will be back | |
| 6 | 2018-10-20 21:13 | Paul Berry | Reinstated (now lamppost-mounted) in changeset #63714760. | |
| 42921156 by Paul Berry @ 2016-10-15 16:10 | 1 | 2018-10-10 04:07 | Warin61 ♦2,663 | Hi,For Way: 447878335 you have tagged landuse=scrub.Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'. |
| 2 | 2018-10-10 12:35 | Paul Berry | Corrected in changeset #63379263. Thanks for spotting this! | |
| 62060260 by BCNorwich @ 2018-08-28 06:56 | 1 | 2018-09-06 09:00 | Paul Berry | The junction of the road is wide so I mapped the space between as an area. It's that way to allow buses to swing round Oakwood Square as a turning circle/terminus. |
| 2 | 2018-09-06 14:02 | BCNorwich ♦4,848 | Hi OK, but you actually duplicated the two ways with the area. I've had another close look and removed the false one-ways, reinstated the T junction and added an area:highway=residential to the extent of the highway surrounding the junction.Regards Bernard | |
| 3 | 2018-09-06 19:37 | Paul Berry | Ah, it looks like I was tagging for the renderer. Thanks for setting an example :) | |
| 60723534 by MacLondon @ 2018-07-15 01:52 | 1 | 2018-07-16 10:27 | Paul Berry | Hi. I'm sure you didn't mean to, as you're an experienced mapper, but this changeset appears to have messed up a swathe of the West End of London. Could you correct it or roll back the changeset? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-07-16 13:46 | MacLondon ♦215 | I've rechecked and can't find any issue with the changeset.What I did included putting all proposed (but not open) Q2 sections into https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8448916, which is tagged with state=proposed.The exact Q2 route in central London west of Bloomsbury hasn'... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-16 14:05 | MacLondon ♦215 | On further investigation I spotted the big error you were referring to. I have hopefully now corrected this.Thanks | |
| 4 | 2018-07-16 18:19 | Paul Berry | It looks like the fix has already taken effect. Thanks for correcting it. | |
| 5 | 2018-11-27 08:22 | BCNorwich ♦4,848 | Hi, while looking at a separate issue I noticed that Node: 5760942541 and Node: 5760942538 (highway=traffic_signals), Node: 5760942542 (cycleway=asl) are placed in buildings on Sackville Street. Regards Bernard | |
| 6 | 2018-11-27 14:57 | MacLondon ♦215 | Hi Bernard. I've had a look into this changeset again and have now deleted a large number of errant nodes - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64939468. Regards, Mac | |
| 58311382 by JayCBR @ 2018-04-22 14:22 | 1 | 2018-04-22 21:41 | Paul Berry | The Headrow axis is not a B-road. It's not even open to all traffic. |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 07:30 | JayCBR ♦39 | its more than a b-road, its the major road in Leeds..couldnt be even secondary? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-23 08:01 | Paul Berry | It's a C-road (not sure of unpublished number) but note that it's restricted to buses/taxis/cycles/access for most of its length. Even the Loop Road is only C-class: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4148004 | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 14:39 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | HI, Ways 400349313 and 454077550 have ref=A64, so either the ref is wrong or they should not be secondary. I am not local, but have been along that road and believe it has green signs, indicating it should be trunk. Can you please review these two ways?Thanks,Mike | |
| 5 | 2018-04-23 14:55 | Paul Berry | There's possibly some confusion with recent changes regarding how OSM represents A-roads. Apologies in advance if this is already known...OSM | RealityTrunk | Primary A-Road (yellow on green signage)*Primary | Secondary/Non-Primary A-Road (black on white signage)Secondary | B-RoadUn... | |
| 6 | 2018-04-23 16:37 | JayCBR ♦39 | i am sorry i didnt realize there was such a restriction..if thats the case maybe the restricted section should be a service road and maybe the loop could be secondary..about the underground section of A64 i need to have some research | |
| 7 | 2018-04-23 20:50 | JayCBR ♦39 | i dont think ways 400349313 and 454077550 are parts of A64, the signs only point out where it leads (York A64), its like a side road | |
| 8 | 2018-04-24 11:03 | Paul Berry | Those ways are signed York A64--no brackets--according to local signage on the ground. | |
| 58247724 by JayCBR @ 2018-04-19 22:36 | 1 | 2018-04-22 21:38 | Paul Berry | Please map what's on the ground. Westgate/West Street running either side of the A58(M) aren't under motorway regs but do have primary route signage. That's why they were mapped as primary.I can go and snap photos if you want evidence (I work about 2 mins' walk from Westgate)... |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 07:40 | JayCBR ♦39 | im afraid i dont get the exact problem..do you mean the slip roads (motorway links) getting to and off A58(M)?? or the side road West Street starting near Ibis hotel? | |
| 3 | 2018-04-23 08:11 | Paul Berry | Ways 216965787 & 6136466 (Westgate) are not motorway links but tertiary. You'll notice from the map they don't ever join the motorway (intentionally) and, from the ground, are not under motorway regs either.However, you do have West Street right (ways 6136477 & 6136478 & 34... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-24 19:01 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | After thinking a bit about the "primary" gap between Rigton Hill and Collingham within an otherwise "trunk" A58, I came across https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37759 which doubts the A58 is a primary route at all – it might have been downgraded due to th... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-24 19:08 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A58 agrees – white sign on the Leeds–Wetherby section :) so highway=primary would be appropriate. | |
| 6 | 2018-05-29 12:47 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | A58 re-tagged to hw=trunk between Leeds and Wetherby. Both of them are primary destinations, and the A58 between them is shown green on any map available as yet. | |
| 58216798 by Paul Berry @ 2018-04-18 21:44 | 1 | 2018-04-22 19:27 | lakedistrict ♦308 | Hi Paul, what's the source for these edits please? The previous ref tagging reflected what the signs and lane markings said. (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56451569) |
| 2 | 2018-04-22 21:24 | Paul Berry | Sorry, armchair-mapped because I noticed A1508 was wrong number (should be A1058 of course; (M) part debatable). Having looked at the comments on changeset 56451569, feel free to revert it. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-22 22:02 | lakedistrict ♦308 | Thanks, I've partially reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58321493. Another mapper told me elsewhere that sliproads don't need ref numbers so I guess the refs could be moved to destination:ref but that would be a job for another day. | |
| 4 | 2018-04-23 07:17 | Paul Berry | Agreed, destination:ref makes sense, however I would still contend that slip roads do have refs because, of course, the start-of-motorway sign (with number) is at the beginning of them. However, i will defer to agreed practice.Thanks for the information. | |
| 58216203 by Paul Berry @ 2018-04-18 21:26 | 1 | 2018-04-18 21:51 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Are you planning on adding ref= to all of the motorway links in the UK? |
| 2 | 2018-04-19 07:14 | Paul Berry | Yes, where they are missing, since slip roads take the parent motorway's number, and signage on the ground confirms this.An exception is direct motorway-to-motorway links where it's ambiguous. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-19 09:26 | Paul Berry | Having said that... check the changeset comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54852723 | |
| 56183385 by Paul Berry @ 2018-02-08 13:39 | 1 | 2018-02-08 13:57 | Paul Berry | I meant street lighting :( |
| 55377588 by hornbydd2 @ 2018-01-12 11:45 | 1 | 2018-01-12 13:57 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi.... You might not be aware of this but these edits to the rivers are screwing up the admin boundaries... Can you please ensure the boundaries are complete and correct again? Example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4253482Any questions, please get in touch. Otherwise I expect this... |
| 2 | 2018-01-12 15:08 | hornbydd2 ♦2 | Hello,I followed your link and if I have understood correctly my attempts to update the river network by breaking it at junctions is loosing the relationship with the parish boundary? I have stopped my bulk editing and update until I can work out how to resolve this.It looks like my edit... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-12 15:30 | Colin Smale ♦319 | It looks like where you split a way, the "old" half (which retains the original ID) is OK but the "new" part (which gets a new ID) does not inherit the relation membership. You need to make sure the relation membership is copied over. Potentially it is not just parishes, but any ... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-12 16:23 | SK53 ♦864 | In general such topological changes should not be done in OSM. Ideally you should create a post-processing chain which does the splits as required (large numbers of routing tools already do this for road networks). Not only is the risk of breaking other things as pointed out above; but breaking a st... | |
| 5 | 2018-01-12 16:50 | hornbydd2 ♦2 | I have found a plugin in JOSM that allows me to revert changes, I'm running this in the hope this undoes my edits. Interesting argument SK53, I look at the river data and a see an unusable topological nightmare. I was attempting to improve it so that it can be used by the wider scientific commu... | |
| 6 | 2018-01-12 17:02 | Paul Berry | I don't know what your exact aims are, so forgive my question, but can you not use relations to better organise the waterways? Example of my own here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7851221 | |
| 7 | 2018-01-12 17:05 | SK53 ♦864 | We probably ought to find a way to continue discussion elsewhere as this could be long-winded, I've long had trying OSM for hydrography models on my todo list (see http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/floods-of-transient-data.html). The best way is to publish post-processing tools/code as ope... | |
| 8 | 2018-01-12 19:01 | hornbydd2 ♦2 | I believe I have been able to revert my changes that I made today. I want to go away and discuss with others what next step should be. I'm personally for editing OSM so there is one definitive version that everyone can benefit from. Having snapshots with considerable post processing squirrelle... | |
| 9 | 2018-01-12 19:14 | SK53 ♦864 | Many thanks for that.The post-processing step is what all road routing engines do. See the recent email from Frederik Ramm on talk-gb.It's also unlikely that you can guarantee that any additional data added will be in a topologically convenient form, or that editors will leave your spli... | |
| 10 | 2018-01-13 17:09 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Unfortunately it appears your reverts were not complete... And now another user (FvGordon) has started to patch up the admin boundaries but I have no idea if they are fixing ALL the broken relations. That may now complicate the revert process, This is starting to become a proper mess.Take a look... | |
| 11 | 2018-01-14 00:43 | FvGordon ♦217 | Hi.. This evening I saw that many errors on http://www.loach.me.uk/osm/boundaries/ and started repairing the broken boundaries. After having repaired half of them, I saw this changeset and this discussion. Until now I have checked/repared the whole list on that site. Let's see, what errors will... | |
| 12 | 2018-01-14 10:16 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Thanks for engaging here. Could I ask you to explain your process for this? Where do you source the knowledge to make the right repairs? I have seen a couple of cases where the admin boundaries have been fixed, but other relations (for example type=waterway=river are not. My opinion is that the pers... | |
| 13 | 2018-01-14 10:35 | FvGordon ♦217 | When there is a gap in a boundary outline ring, I can see both ends of the gap. Often a segment from an other boundary relation fits to close the gap or (in this case) the river, that he has split.This morning I have repaired all gaps in type=waterway relations south and south-west of London. I ha... | |
| 14 | 2018-01-14 13:24 | hornbydd2 ♦2 | I'm showing naivety here, I've never seen this website (http://www.loach.me.uk/osm/boundaries/) before. I was expecting to see my [offending] username all over it as someone who has broken a relationship. I was not able to find myself on it and a lot of the areas appear to be elsewhere in ... | |
| 15 | 2018-01-14 13:56 | Colin Smale ♦319 | Hi,The reason your name is not here, is that you have NOT updated the relation when splitting a component way - and this is the exact problem. The fact that a component way (or node) has changed, does not change the relation itself. This is one of the "quirks" of OSM. However a relation ... | |
| 53794744 by chrisarmitage @ 2017-11-15 08:33 | 1 | 2017-11-20 08:18 | Paul Berry | A big thank you for tidying up the stands at the bus station - they were a bit messy before and I'd been meaning to fix them for ages. |
| 53911840 by John Stanworth @ 2017-11-18 21:35 | 1 | 2017-11-19 23:27 | Paul Berry | I used to live close by but moved away a couple of years ago. However, it looks about right from memory. Nice mapping! |
| 53255552 by vatheeskumar @ 2017-10-26 07:24 | 1 | 2017-10-26 12:45 | Paul Berry | This changeset should be reverted immediately as it contains numerous examples of vandalism:http://osm.org/way/535487628http://osm.org/way/535487632http://osm.org/way/535487635 |
| 2 | 2017-10-26 12:56 | SK53 ♦864 | Dear Vatheeskumar ,I'm afraid your additions to OpenStreetMap are causing a number of problems. In particular you seem to be adding buildings with an area of several tens of thousands of square kilometers. Can you please stop editing with JOSM and engage in a conversation with us to identi... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-26 13:05 | SK53 ♦864 | I'm afraid I have had to remove all your additions to OpenStreetMap as they were seriously affecting the contributions and workload of many other contributors. Notwithstanding this, your contributions are welcome. I would suggest using a different editor next time. | |
| 4 | 2017-10-26 13:48 | bgirardot ♦15 | @paul BerryNewbie mistakes are not vandalism.@SK53 thank you for reverting these kindly and letting people who can possible directly the contact the mapper know about the issue as well. | |
| 5 | 2017-10-26 13:54 | SK53 ♦864 | @bgirardot2: not every contributor has the time to assess the full aspects of contributions which are interfering with their use of OSM. They may be in the middle of a complex series of changes or trying to achieve something quickly. It has taken me around 90 minutes to get to grips with this: not e... | |
| 6 | 2017-10-26 14:05 | bgirardot ♦15 | I think if you are going to accuse someone of vandalism, you should be pretty sure it is vandalism, even if that takes some time to figure out.Otherwise, it is just bad mapping that is causing a problem. Vandalism has a pretty specific meaning.But I appreciate your point sk53 | |
| 7 | 2017-10-26 14:26 | SK53 ♦864 | කලින් පණිවිඩවල ගූගල් භාවිතයෙන් ස්වයංක්රීය පරිවර්තනය:ආදරණීය වේෂේෂ්කුමාර්,OpenStreetMap ඔබගේ එකතු කිරීම් ගැටළු ගණනාව... | |
| 49510986 by peregrination @ 2017-06-13 20:14 | 1 | 2017-06-15 14:24 | Paul Berry | Hi,I thought you'd like to know it looks like you've clipped a building with the footpath you've mapped.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179457250 refers.)Thanks.Regards,Paul |
| 49126700 by stev @ 2017-05-31 07:47 | 1 | 2017-05-31 12:08 | Paul Berry | Thanks, I was just about to fix this myself. See changset comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47688939 |
| 47688939 by gopherdeals @ 2017-04-12 10:24 | 1 | 2017-04-26 13:31 | Paul Berry | Hi,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks a though you've mapped an area instead of a point of interest (ie office) for your company. Could you please map this correctly. I'll revisit this in 7 days. Let me know if you need any help in the meantime.Regards,Paul Berry |
| 2 | 2017-05-31 12:07 | Paul Berry | Fixed on changeset #49126700. | |
| 24499979 by ika-chan! UK-USA @ 2014-08-02 15:18 | 1 | 2017-05-23 16:12 | Paul Berry | Hello. Should the route_master include the path of the Woolwich Ferry (relation #392885) or not? |
| 2 | 2017-05-23 18:16 | ika-chan! UK-USA ♦76 | It was too ambiguous to include the ferry at the time, because it doesn't operate 24 hours a day. | |
| 3 | 2017-05-24 08:21 | Paul Berry | OK, that makes sense. | |
| 14624724 by DCM_HD @ 2013-01-12 17:20 | 1 | 2017-03-19 11:55 | Paul Berry | A survey today showed "Moldgreen Liberal Club" is spelt as such. |
| 45856935 by Dan Clarke @ 2017-02-06 14:04 | 1 | 2017-02-09 14:05 | Paul Berry | Hi,Did you mean to put this William Hill in a different place? You've put it in the former Yorkshire Post building which is now a car park. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330071182 refers.Thanks. |
| 37502994 by DCM_HD @ 2016-02-28 17:06 | 1 | 2017-01-31 13:16 | Paul Berry | Railway Street *is* one way in all but signage.Evidence:* Single lane along its length.* No traffic lights facing north into Railway Street at the junction with Westgate (if it was two-way there would be).I have logged this with Kirklees Council. Let's see what they come back with: ... |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 18:59 | Paul Berry | Have just resurveyed on foot. There is also a speed table with the road marking in one direction only. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-31 19:14 | Paul Berry | I've just taken a moment to appreciate this from your point of view: this was a changeset of yours from 11 months ago that I've just picked up on and that might look a little impertinent. Not my intention: I'm just trying to make sense of a slightly odd street, as I'm sure you we... | |
| 4 | 2017-02-01 19:39 | DCM_HD ♦1 | I agree that your further comments are as it is. I hope Kirklees Council come back to you quicker than they did me. I logged the problem through the council's own website exactly a year ago. It seems most locals know the score and the taxi drivers seem trained to take the longer route from thei... | |
| 43883720 by Alevtine Maksimoff @ 2016-11-22 23:53 | 1 | 2016-12-20 22:59 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Is "Rillington Place 10" really a tourist attraction, and is it here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4516194593 |
| 2 | 2016-12-21 19:15 | shawmat ♦1 | 10 Rillington Place was the house where John Christie murdered several women in the 1950s. What made it even more notorious was that a lodger at the house, Timothy Evans, was convicted of the murder of his wife and was executed. But it had been Christie that did it. More than any other case, the wr... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-23 15:47 | Paul Berry | There is no trace whatsoever left of Rillington Place or any of the properties that lined it. So although this might be the geographical point at which the infamous house, wash-house and gardens stood, nothing physical remains at all (quite deliberately). When the area was redeveloped in the 1970s i... | |
| 43509055 by Paul Berry @ 2016-11-09 10:33 | 1 | 2016-11-12 14:00 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,way 389961326 has the tag 'adpoted =no' that doesn't make sense to me. Could you check that?Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2016-11-12 14:56 | trigpoint ♦2,372 | That looks like a typo, it should be adopted=no. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-13 14:22 | Paul Berry | My mistake; thanks for correcting it, @mueschel. | |
| 41444391 by werner2101 @ 2016-08-14 11:01 | 1 | 2016-09-03 10:01 | Paul Berry | Hi,I think your change to change the relation here from a grouping to a multipolygon has meant the map now shows each of the three reservoirs as "Ingbirchworth Reservoirs" when they should instead have their own names (Ingbirchworth, Royd Moor, Scout Dike).Respectfully, could you p... |
| 2 | 2016-09-04 07:43 | werner2101 ♦14 | Changed relation type to the neutral type=collection. Not switched back to waterways, because that type doesn't fit well. Regards Werner | |
| 3 | 2016-09-04 19:31 | Paul Berry | Many thanks. | |
| 40500464 by CompactDstrxion @ 2016-07-05 13:49 | 1 | 2016-07-15 16:15 | Paul Berry | Sorry to impinge on your hard work but there is no cycle track on Wellington Street (excepting the contraflow between King Street and City Square) nor is there a even a cycle lane marked on the road, in either direction. |
| 2 | 2016-07-15 17:00 | CompactDstrxion ♦2 | Thanks I have taken it back to Westgate Roundabout. | |
| 36503005 by crossmyloof @ 2016-01-11 13:09 | 1 | 2016-05-25 15:53 | Paul Berry | Is this not Cann Hall? |
| 2 | 2016-05-25 17:50 | SK53 ♦864 | Both names seem to be old names of the former CP of Wanstead. I seriously doubt if they have any relevance now http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/essex/vol6/pp317-322 | |
| 38320109 by wnX08hgh2TJ @ 2016-04-05 14:57 | 1 | 2016-04-06 22:12 | Paul Berry | The road classifications need amending too. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2016-04-07 07:06 | wnX08hgh2TJ ♦1 | Yep. And the pedestrian crossings have all moved too. | |
| 3 | 2016-04-07 11:47 | Paul Berry | Since you're midway through mapping I'll leave you be :) | |
| 35203604 by Paul Berry @ 2015-11-09 22:11 | 1 | 2015-11-09 22:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Thanks for this (and for resolving those notes). |
| 2 | 2015-11-10 09:56 | Paul Berry | A pleasure. | |
| 26435327 by Paul Berry @ 2014-10-30 13:04 | 1 | 2015-10-30 15:54 | Paul Berry | Really this shouldn't be marked as a secondary road but a tertiary one (except on the trunk sections). However it does allow the route to show up as being special in some way. |
| 29193818 by PeterEastern @ 2015-03-02 09:04 | 1 | 2015-03-06 12:42 | Paul Berry | Motorway regulations don't apply until the route is signed, which is immediately after the footpath crossing, so this part is not a motorway. You'll notice there are similar changes of classification on the slip roads elsewhere about this junction.Thanks. |
| 28590066 by HovisCoder @ 2015-02-03 14:13 | 1 | 2015-02-05 16:21 | Paul Berry | Not much about the routing of the A61 around this area makes any sense so I'll let your changes stand :) |
| 2 | 2015-02-05 19:28 | HovisCoder ♦2 | Thanks for that. :) I've written a tool that makes the road references visual and I tend to correct there where possible. I agree with your remark about the A61 that clearly shows. | |
| 27322338 by Paul Berry @ 2014-12-07 22:25 | 1 | 2014-12-07 22:26 | Paul Berry | Or tram routes, even. |
| 10511077 by DaveOxford @ 2012-01-27 10:47 | 1 | 2014-12-03 23:15 | Paul Berry | Trams in Morecambe? If these are former or proposed stops they should be tagged as such. |