| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58172738 by Dafo43 | 1 | 2018-05-10 00:28:47 UTC | VictorIE | This seems to have a corrupt tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407698767(new tag)=Serough Island |
| 2 | 2018-05-10 09:27:27 UTC | Dafo43 | fixed | |
| 3 | 2018-05-10 11:02:08 UTC | VictorIE | Cool. I would have fixed it, but thought you want want to know how it came about. :) | |
| 4 | 2018-05-11 10:14:42 UTC | Dafo43 | It's just the default null value in Potlatch, so usually if you select the first letter it will autofill the value. | |
| 5 | 2018-05-11 13:00:07 UTC | VictorIE | Ah, ID doesn't allow blank tags. | |
| 58748263 by CrushedSoul | 1 | 2018-05-08 06:19:01 UTC | VictorIE | Is this lake accurate? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585651249 |
| 2 | 2018-05-08 11:10:06 UTC | CrushedSoul | Hi VictorIEIt is not accurate. We used to have the river in the Pokémon game, but eversince OSM, it's been gone. I'm just fiddling around a bit, to see if we can get it back. I'm using the area around the park to test with | |
| 33643374 by Easky30 | 1 | 2018-04-28 01:02:22 UTC | VictorIE | Is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3718519988 a public library? Not listed here: http://www.fingalcoco.ie/community-and-leisure/libraries/find-a-library-and-check-opening-hours/ |
| 27756392 by brianboru | 1 | 2018-04-23 12:00:01 UTC | VictorIE | I think this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4434330 should be "Castle Farm" the problem arising from the edge of a map being cropped and the "C" being missing from the 1:25k background map. |
| 2 | 2018-04-24 08:18:35 UTC | brianboru | Thanks for spotting this error. Please go ahead and correct it ( and any others like this you come across - no need to go through changeset comments for my edits - I'm not precious about them) | |
| 40158904 by Bob Harper | 1 | 2018-04-16 14:17:34 UTC | VictorIE | In https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426140344 shouldaccess=p be access=private? |
| 57567979 by gaoithe | 1 | 2018-03-28 23:48:40 UTC | VictorIE | Are you happy with this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573606000 It seems to not match the overhead photos and duplicates other ways |
| 53885651 by THE_Chris | 1 | 2018-03-28 09:33:26 UTC | VictorIE | Is the section of deleted road correct? this image seems to indicate it should be 50-100 metres further north. https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2018/0328/950576-road-dublin/It seems from the photo it is open for pedestrians and cyclist. |
| 56723721 by Dafo43 | 1 | 2018-03-17 22:35:39 UTC | VictorIE | Could you take a look at this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273446650#map=16/53.3142/-6.2871 ? thanks |
| 2 | 2018-03-18 11:28:20 UTC | Dafo43 | should be fixed now | |
| 33903917 by VictorIE | 1 | 2018-01-31 15:30:24 UTC | KDDA | What is this - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162476851#map=18/53.45747/-6.24083 |
| 2 | 2018-01-31 17:47:44 UTC | VictorIE | Possibly changed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55935823#map=15/53.4569/-6.2417 when a mouse had a spasm. | |
| 51306995 by AquaHibernia85 | 1 | 2018-01-22 05:02:58 UTC | VictorIE | Is this a Civil Defence or Defence Forces training area?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517317566 |
| 50484297 by Teester | 1 | 2018-01-22 04:10:24 UTC | VictorIE | Hi, what is this relation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7411709The rest of Luas has operator=Luas - Transdev Dublin Light Rail LimitedNote that operator is the system operator, not the tram driver. With Luas, the system operator is complicated enough to include both names. |
| 2 | 2018-01-23 16:55:05 UTC | Teester | It's a network relation. A super-relation for route masters. It's suggested in JOSM as an option, but I don't think it's an approved relation type on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network), but it's used in several cities. I have one for Dublin Bus as well which ... | |
| 55360045 by VictorIE | 1 | 2018-01-18 18:42:04 UTC | user_5359 | Hello, You add to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3169166666/history a " (MOVED)" to the key name, want does this mean? If the business moved to an other address, please add the prefix disused: to the main keys.I am also interest on maning of contact:dx (used on https://www.openstre... |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 19:59:12 UTC | VictorIE | I took some photos as I went by on a bus. There have been several changes in the businesses along Arran Quay. I will need to go back and confirm the changes.I understand KOD Lyons have moved, but I want to be sure. I don't want to delete them and not add the new location / only to have to restor... | |
| 52418952 by westprt | 1 | 2018-01-12 18:48:42 UTC | VictorIE | Marked as both bicycle_parking and cycleway? |
| 50415421 by RinIRL | 1 | 2017-12-22 01:45:05 UTC | VictorIE | Hi,The water here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508793701#map=16/53.1224/-6.7339 seesm to be grossly over-stated. If you zoom in on the 'DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery', it shows the streams as quite modest. |
| 41632559 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-12-19 00:10:29 UTC | KDDA | Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building? |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 00:12:54 UTC | KDDA | Also, the address should not be Aghadrumsee, it is just the name of the club, not the actual location. The townland is actually Cortrasna. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 21:25:54 UTC | VictorIE | "Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building?" - possibly because the ID Editor defaults leisure=sports_centre to be buildings and I didn't notice. If I remember correctly, I edited dozens of GAA clubs that day,Address - I used to be zealous on adding addresses, have calmed down sinc... | |
| 46918041 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-12-15 12:44:33 UTC | rorym | You left some untagged ways here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543455 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543453#map=19/53.33074/-6.26178What's going on with them? Maybe best to just delete the ways if the buildings are gone... |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 02:37:44 UTC | VictorIE | Thanks for noting this. Fixed :)They're demolished buildings. I wanted to note that they were demolished to prevent them being re-mapped. | |
| 52652975 by Dafo43 | 1 | 2017-10-21 01:19:36 UTC | VictorIE | Could you check these two:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530060414#map=19/53.29516/-6.23789 - zero area landuse.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530063748#map=17/53.29335/-6.23646 Taney -> Taney Estate? Not all 'Taney; highways included.:) |
| 52497510 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-10-03 14:25:09 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello VictorIE. It's me again ;-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528907370`contact:flikr` instead of `contact:flickr`#typo |
| 2 | 2017-10-03 14:44:29 UTC | VictorIE | :(:) | |
| 46106153 by weralesniak | 1 | 2017-10-03 10:33:48 UTC | VictorIE | Is this line defunct? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363908732 |
| 52130533 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-09-20 17:30:45 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello VictorIE. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5112030988 you have tagged `contact:pintrest` instead of `contact:pinterest`, right? And if you have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact you see, that you could (although pinterest isn't mentioned there) use only the username ... |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 13:34:37 UTC | VictorIE | Hi, Typing error related to not knowing the correct spelling. :) Error fixed.VictorIE | |
| 51780738 by Stabilo_boss | 1 | 2017-09-19 18:25:34 UTC | VictorIE | Wasn't the Camp Field (section south of Old Youghal Road) sold off? |
| 2 | 2017-09-20 07:17:34 UTC | Stabilo_boss | It's still in Defence Forces Possession, The Housing was supposed to be handed over to Cork City Council for Social Housing. but no move yet. | |
| 43503259 by g sumithra | 1 | 2017-04-19 09:58:21 UTC | VictorIE | This appears to be on the wrong continent. |
| 2 | 2017-09-16 23:06:24 UTC | VictorIE | Deleted | |
| 33061607 by brianh | 1 | 2017-09-16 20:07:47 UTC | VictorIE | This appears to be a duplicate of the river: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363692578 |
| 40120745 by g&co | 1 | 2017-09-16 03:32:53 UTC | VictorIE | Could you check the paths around the lake?source=GPSsurface=Bing - this seems incorrect. |
| 51072240 by Teester | 1 | 2017-09-05 12:49:57 UTC | VictorIE | Duplicate ways here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515121896https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515123278 |
| 2 | 2017-09-07 11:57:32 UTC | VictorIE | Duplicate ways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515121882https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515123264 | |
| 3 | 2017-09-08 23:41:21 UTC | Teester | I've deleted the duplicate Route 27A relations in changesets #51866689 and #51866735. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-09 01:12:50 UTC | VictorIE | Thanks. I didn't want to break things! :) | |
| 5 | 2017-09-15 17:26:45 UTC | VictorIE | Could you check these two?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515121887https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515123269Thanks | |
| 51922100 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:19:09 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello VictorIE. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4454170327 you have introduced some new (undocumented) keys (`googleplus`, `soundcloud`, etc.), which has a smell of SEO. So be careful with that ;-) #newkey |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 16:06:02 UTC | Harald Hartmann | or move it all to the `contact`-namespace (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact) | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 19:31:20 UTC | VictorIE | Both methods seem to be in use, e.g. with Facebook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:facebookhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook | |
| 25428036 by GoalkeeperJ | 1 | 2017-09-09 23:41:55 UTC | VictorIE | What does this line represent? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303287754 |
| 31517703 by NoelB | 1 | 2017-09-02 01:06:17 UTC | VictorIE | This looks like a duplicate of the townland boundary: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349333803 |
| 2 | 2017-09-02 01:06:49 UTC | VictorIE | Oh, that said, this line appears to be correct - townland boundary slightly off | |
| 618318 by mapryan | 1 | 2017-08-30 16:54:56 UTC | VictorIE | Does this road exist? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29257244 |
| 2 | 2017-08-30 21:05:54 UTC | mapryan | Victor, you're right. I'll go ahead and remove it. Thanks,. Mike | |
| 50697544 by CoubazRemy | 1 | 2017-08-29 11:03:06 UTC | VictorIE | Is this line a duplicate? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260655142 |
| 50814708 by brianh | 1 | 2017-08-28 10:39:08 UTC | VictorIE | Can you check the tags on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512633011 ? :) |
| 50591504 by Jord5792 | 1 | 2017-08-27 16:10:58 UTC | VictorIE | The connection between the N52 and Main Street seems to be missing. Has the layout of Emmet Square changed? |
| 2 | 2017-08-29 10:44:50 UTC | Jord5792 | Yes it has changed. They removed the straight connection between N52 and Main street, creating a one way road from Green St./The Green (R439) to MainSt. in front of the Garda Station and a two way from N52 to MainSt. in front of Doolys Hotel. A pedestrian area was made around the statue there. | |
| 50391952 by MacLondon | 1 | 2017-08-24 22:11:02 UTC | VictorIE | The edit to this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419502785 seems to have broken the bus / cycle connection from St. Stephen's Green East to Leeson Street Lower |
| 2 | 2017-08-25 00:33:27 UTC | MacLondon | Thanks. I think I have now resolved this issue. | |
| 49288104 by LateNightTone | 1 | 2017-06-24 10:21:20 UTC | VictorIE | Instead ofbridge=low_water_crossingwould ford=yesbe more appropriate? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford |
| 2 | 2017-06-24 20:29:01 UTC | LateNightTone | Hi VictorIE, no a ford wouldn't be appropriate here as it is a tidal body of water, so the crossing can only be made at low tide. The highway is covered at any other time. A ford is only where a waterway i.e. flowing river is to be crossed, so the highway would be passable in all but flood condition... | |
| 49407705 by Joey Seth | 1 | 2017-06-20 12:35:13 UTC | VictorIE | When doing pedestrian crossings and other road ways, do make sure that they join up with adjacent roads. :) The geometry and Routing layers here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ are good tools. |
| 48336286 by TimLynch | 1 | 2017-06-20 04:35:06 UTC | VictorIE | Is a right turn allowed from Saint Michael's Drive to the R852? |
| 2 | 2017-06-23 08:50:50 UTC | TimLynch | Sorry, don't know | |
| 49527802 by rorym | 1 | 2017-06-14 17:25:17 UTC | VictorIE | Cool |
| 43771281 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:21:42 UTC | KDDA | Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line? It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense. Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 18:50:16 UTC | VictorIE | This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.eirgr... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 23:08:48 UTC | KDDA | NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen. | |
| 45138255 by Ards Man | 1 | 2017-03-26 05:08:41 UTC | VictorIE | Is Newtownards Exchange NINT a BT telephone exchange? |
| 46659194 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-03-08 22:26:30 UTC | Polarbear | Victor, when reverting CS 46496897 with the boundary splitting, I had to include your CS here in the revert. I attempted to restore useful stuff from both CSs, you might doublecheck. It would be a good idea to do repairs and own additions in separate CSs, though. |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 23:47:28 UTC | VictorIE | Fair point. I've done a quick tidy up.I was only drawn to the area by the newly disconnected road of a previous changeset. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-09 13:11:23 UTC | Polarbear | Thanks, and no criticism from my side. Reverting is a race against time, as lots of people do small fixes quickly. Thus just the recommendation when fixing something, upload, before doing regular refinements and uploading them. | |
| 46496897 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-07 18:16:35 UTC | VictorIE | Again main road split from side road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299490794 |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 19:59:40 UTC | Polarbear | @VictorIE: those will be fixed automatically when I revert the incorrect boundary line separations. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-08 22:30:34 UTC | Polarbear | Full revert in CS 46692924 for incorrectly separating roads+waterways serving as border member; restoring useful additions in 46693197, refinements in 46693752. | |
| 46483415 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-07 18:14:26 UTC | VictorIE | Hi,Can you just be careful when splitting boundaries and roads that you don't disconnect roads? This road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104377544 became split from the R357.VictorIE |
| 41490163 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-02-09 11:49:37 UTC | KDDA | Why did you add the street name as Lacky Road? |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 12:45:16 UTC | VictorIE | Is that not the road it is on? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114282636#map=16/54.2318/-7.2600 | |
| 41502741 by VictorIE | 1 | 2016-08-17 06:32:27 UTC | manoharuss | Hi VictorIE,Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. I looked through this changeset along with your other changesets 41465760, 41488327, 41488458 to understand what happened here. The wiki for tagging power stations is here(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsta... |
| 2 | 2016-08-17 08:03:32 UTC | VictorIE | Hi,Apologies for the unorthodox method. I've been removing deprecated tags and names. For example:http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-o.html lists operator=ESB (154), operator=ESB Generation and Wholesale Markets (21), operator=ESB Networks (394), operator=ESB Telecoms (3), operator=ESB ec... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 08:27:05 UTC | VictorIE | http://stat.latlon.org/ has updated. I'll get to work. :) | |
| 4 | 2016-08-18 13:33:15 UTC | VictorIE | I'm working on the last set and it should be gone today | |
| 38185952 by VictorIE | 1 | 2016-03-31 07:45:37 UTC | KDDA | Is disused the correct tagging for this section? This section has been restored, complete with a train carriage and crossing gates. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 10:11:49 UTC | VictorIE | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused "A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place." I can only image "used" should be construed as "used for transport" or a **mobile** museum piece, no... | |
| 26646130 by VictorIE | 1 | 2015-11-07 16:23:40 UTC | Polarbear | Hi VictorIE, do you have further details about this club, and who it operates? Would you know if it targets children, juveniles, or both? Is there a website for the club? |
| 2 | 2015-11-07 19:38:25 UTC | VictorIE | I know nothing of it. I only got the details from passing by on the bus. you might try http://www.cdysb.ie/ - they might know something. Google doesn't throw up much, but it seems to have been around for a long time.Alternatively, I presume the city council housing department is their landlord. | |
| 33534460 by VictorIE | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:17:44 UTC | Polarbear | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. As your changeset comment already suggest, the correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesThis also avoids using unsupported keys as "sport_1". |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:35:23 UTC | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-25 19:30:01 UTC | Polarbear | Nice. But your goal should be sport=gaelic_games. If you change a freestyle tag into a deprecated one, it would have to be corrected again by somebody else. Question again, is iD proposing gaelic_football? If so, we would need to file a bug report with iD. | |
| 33975213 by VictorIE | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:48:41 UTC | Polarbear | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. The correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesetc.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dgaelic_games |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:32:04 UTC | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 33534431 by VictorIE | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:53:13 UTC | Polarbear | I've seen the deprecated sport=gaelic_football coming mostly from iD and Potlatch users. Could there be an outdated preset in iD? |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:30:57 UTC | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 34416216 by VictorIE | 1 | 2015-10-05 14:30:37 UTC | Vincent de Phily | Sorry, I don't agree with that change (healthcare:speciality -> health:speciality).The heathcare:speciality tag is the documented one and used 7613 times, vs 6 times for health:speciality.Please revert that change, unless you have a very convincing argument to transition obkects to the he... |
| 2 | 2015-10-05 15:27:37 UTC | VictorIE | You're correct, my apologies. I was correct a group of mis-spelling sand seem to have put int he wrong spelling. Will sort this evening. | |