| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 49407705 | VictorIE | When doing pedestrian crossings and other road ways, do make sure that they join up with adjacent roads. :) The geometry and Routing layers here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ are good tools. |
|
| 48336286 | VictorIE | Is a right turn allowed from Saint Michael's Drive to the R852? |
| TimLynch | Sorry, don't know |
|
| 49527802 | VictorIE | Cool |
|
| 43503259 | VictorIE | This appears to be on the wrong continent. |
|
| 43771281 | KDDA | Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line? It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense. Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp |
| VictorIE | This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.eirgr... |
| KDDA | NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen. |
|
| 45138255 | VictorIE | Is Newtownards Exchange NINT a BT telephone exchange? |
|
| 46659194 | Polarbear | Victor, when reverting CS 46496897 with the boundary splitting, I had to include your CS here in the revert. I attempted to restore useful stuff from both CSs, you might doublecheck. It would be a good idea to do repairs and own additions in separate CSs, though. |
| VictorIE | Fair point. I've done a quick tidy up.I was only drawn to the area by the newly disconnected road of a previous changeset. |
| Polarbear | Thanks, and no criticism from my side. Reverting is a race against time, as lots of people do small fixes quickly. Thus just the recommendation when fixing something, upload, before doing regular refinements and uploading them. |
|
| 46496897 | VictorIE | Again main road split from side road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299490794 |
| Polarbear | @VictorIE: those will be fixed automatically when I revert the incorrect boundary line separations. |
| Polarbear | Full revert in CS 46692924 for incorrectly separating roads+waterways serving as border member; restoring useful additions in 46693197, refinements in 46693752. |
|
| 46483415 | VictorIE | Hi,Can you just be careful when splitting boundaries and roads that you don't disconnect roads? This road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104377544 became split from the R357.VictorIE |
|
| 41490163 | KDDA | Why did you add the street name as Lacky Road? |
| VictorIE | Is that not the road it is on? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114282636#map=16/54.2318/-7.2600 |
|
| 41502741 | manoharuss | Hi VictorIE,Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. I looked through this changeset along with your other changesets 41465760, 41488327, 41488458 to understand what happened here. The wiki for tagging power stations is here(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsta... |
| VictorIE | Hi,Apologies for the unorthodox method. I've been removing deprecated tags and names. For example:http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-o.html lists operator=ESB (154), operator=ESB Generation and Wholesale Markets (21), operator=ESB Networks (394), operator=ESB Telecoms (3), operator=ESB ec... |
| VictorIE | http://stat.latlon.org/ has updated. I'll get to work. :) |
| VictorIE | I'm working on the last set and it should be gone today |
|
| 38185952 | KDDA | Is disused the correct tagging for this section? This section has been restored, complete with a train carriage and crossing gates. |
| VictorIE | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused "A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place." I can only image "used" should be construed as "used for transport" or a **mobile** museum piece, no... |
|
| 26646130 | Polarbear | Hi VictorIE, do you have further details about this club, and who it operates? Would you know if it targets children, juveniles, or both? Is there a website for the club? |
| VictorIE | I know nothing of it. I only got the details from passing by on the bus. you might try http://www.cdysb.ie/ - they might know something. Google doesn't throw up much, but it seems to have been around for a long time.Alternatively, I presume the city council housing department is their landlord. |
|
| 33534460 | Polarbear | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. As your changeset comment already suggest, the correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesThis also avoids using unsupported keys as "sport_1". |
| VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. |
| Polarbear | Nice. But your goal should be sport=gaelic_games. If you change a freestyle tag into a deprecated one, it would have to be corrected again by somebody else. Question again, is iD proposing gaelic_football? If so, we would need to file a bug report with iD. |
|
| 33975213 | Polarbear | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. The correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesetc.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dgaelic_games |
| VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. |
|
| 33534431 | Polarbear | I've seen the deprecated sport=gaelic_football coming mostly from iD and Potlatch users. Could there be an outdated preset in iD? |
| VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. |
|
| 34416216 | Vincent de Phily | Sorry, I don't agree with that change (healthcare:speciality -> health:speciality).The heathcare:speciality tag is the documented one and used 7613 times, vs 6 times for health:speciality.Please revert that change, unless you have a very convincing argument to transition obkects to the he... |
| VictorIE | You're correct, my apologies. I was correct a group of mis-spelling sand seem to have put int he wrong spelling. Will sort this evening. |