| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167205807 by VictorIE @ 2025-06-05 05:56 | 1 | 2025-06-05 05:57 | Tounkis ♦1 | Cv |
| 142322261 by VictorIE @ 2023-10-08 22:39 | 1 | 2025-05-31 14:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207742279/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 110926031 by VictorIE @ 2021-09-08 15:04 | 1 | 2025-05-14 15:17 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9074201437/history has shop = funeral that was added in this editshop=funeral ? Is it intentionally used instead of shop=funeral_directors ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors ). If it was deliberately used instead - how i... |
| 2 | 2025-05-14 15:51 | VictorIE | Definitely NOT funeral directors. https://www.facebook.com/p/The-Remembrance-Shop-100087220220355/I'm not sure what else it could be called. Shop=gift would seem ... unkind. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:14 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | shop=grave_accessories ? | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 13:15 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | (but adding it here would double global usage to two times worldwide) | |
| 165671981 by VictorIE @ 2025-05-01 11:51 | 1 | 2025-05-01 14:07 | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦596 | Please attach speed cameras to the road.Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera |
| 165671312 by VictorIE @ 2025-05-01 11:35 | 1 | 2025-05-01 14:06 | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦596 | Please attach speed cameras to the road.Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera |
| 164832131 by VictorIE @ 2025-04-11 20:04 | 1 | 2025-04-12 09:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376867539/history was accidentally created as a duplicate way of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366119186 in this changeset and as well as fixing some invalid relation that created others ("5446375 | Miltonsfields" fell out of the databas... |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 19:12 | VictorIE | Thank you | |
| 164734865 by VictorIE @ 2025-04-09 17:07 | 1 | 2025-04-10 10:32 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/966688375. What is the mean of the tag ":levels = 1" specially with "building:levels = 2"? |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 10:48 | VictorIE | Hi,That's a copy-paste error. :( :)I wouldn't have expected :levels = 1 to be a valid tag.Thank you for spotting this. I've corrected it now. | |
| 164464463 by VictorIE @ 2025-04-03 13:09 | 1 | 2025-04-04 08:36 | ramthelinefeed ♦61 | Hi Victor, this changeset seems have broken a bunch of bus relations (X1, X5, X2A, X3, 32, 785...) - the bus route tagging is gone from these segments of the Drogheda by-pass? |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 12:50 | VictorIE | Him Thanks for spotting this. I changed a few tunnels to bridges, but didn't think I had done anything (specific) to the relations. Odd. I'll ask for it to be reverted. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-04 14:13 | ramthelinefeed ♦61 | The ID editor does seem to sometimes drop relation tags when a way or node changes type (not sure why!) | |
| 155109159 by VictorIE @ 2024-08-11 15:39 | 1 | 2024-08-15 09:09 | PubUpdater ♦8 | Just wondering why was the city was changed to Tuam here? These buildings are nowhere near Tuam |
| 2 | 2024-08-15 12:01 | VictorIE | Tuam is the postal town for Garrafrauns. It's hard to call Garrafrauns a city or even a town.A usual Irish rural postal address is Person or businessTownlandPostal townCounty | |
| 154951060 by VictorIE @ 2024-08-07 19:31 | 1 | 2024-08-13 00:08 | gogorm ♦29 | Re. your fixme. It is effectively one-way due to how narrow it is, and due to the turn restrictions at the western junction which prevent traffic from entering it at that end.However, there are no road markings or signs to stop someone from driving westwards on this section of road, then parking a... |
| 153741187 by VictorIE @ 2024-07-09 11:49 | 1 | 2024-07-10 20:10 | Own Oh ♦21 | Thanks for adjusting. Was on the go up around here on a wet day. |
| 129059905 by VictorIE @ 2022-11-17 21:00 | 1 | 2024-05-28 14:58 | mackerski ♦34 | Part of this edit named the footpath "Gutty". Was that intentional? |
| 2 | 2024-05-28 17:26 | VictorIE | Correction, loc_name=The Gutty | |
| 3 | 2024-05-28 17:28 | mackerski ♦34 | That’s random. How did you discover that? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-28 18:36 | VictorIE | I follow some people on Twitter and they share stuff to be mapped.One is big on man_made = sewer_vent :DIn places, you will see minor lanes, green spaces, etc. in housing estates with names. I don't know about this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747915173 but I think this one: h... | |
| 151579782 by VictorIE @ 2024-05-20 13:11 | 1 | 2024-05-20 19:45 | NLBRT ♦15 | Hi, could you be please a bit more descriptive with the changes you have made? |
| 2 | 2024-05-20 20:18 | VictorIE | The bridge was re-furbished and re-opened today. Most of what I've done is add to the tagging of the bridge and approach roads. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-22 07:34 | NLBRT ♦15 | Oh, thanks for the info! I was checking it out on OsmCha and was a bit suspicious of the "crude"-looking ways, that's why I thought of asking about it. | |
| 151457622 by VictorIE @ 2024-05-17 14:30 | 1 | 2024-05-17 17:44 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,I would kindly suggest to not remove objects mapped as areas instead of nodes without proper reason(, or alternatively discussing with the original mapper).https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_likeObjects which c... |
| 2 | 2024-05-17 18:48 | VictorIE | It's a transformer. Transformers are mapped as nodes.Street cabinet fanboys calling transformers "street cabinet" is poor practice.So, not my monkey, not my problem. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-18 00:07 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | That seems to be true as far as the wiki is concerned. Thanks for clarifying. | |
| 151405856 by VictorIE @ 2024-05-16 12:27 | 1 | 2024-05-16 13:31 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Thanks for the research and fix! |
| 2 | 2024-05-16 13:31 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Thanks for the research and fix! | |
| 150531097 by VictorIE @ 2024-04-26 10:14 | 1 | 2024-04-29 16:01 | b-unicycling ♦242 | The "beach" doesn't really fall under the definition on the wiki. Maybe leisure=swimming_area would be more appropriate? |
| 2 | 2024-04-29 16:35 | VictorIE | Not my monkey. :) I only detached it from the power line. Looking at Bing, it's more meadow or water meadow (the area floods, not sure if it floods at this particular spot, given the weir). As there is a weir, I'm not sure if it is a leisure=swimming_area | |
| 3 | 2024-04-29 18:59 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Fair enough. If it's vandalism for Pokemon's sake, I wouldn't expect them to respond to the changeset comment anyways. | |
| 148839752 by VictorIE @ 2024-03-19 01:06 | 1 | 2024-04-04 21:34 | JezCrow ♦150 | Is this definitely a Royal Mail post box? All of the other features added near here by user "Blane Marchant" seem to be features of the care home, not publicly accessible services. |
| 147597395 by VictorIE @ 2024-02-18 07:18 | 1 | 2024-02-19 14:30 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | The `name:en` of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488355770 seems wrong, should actually be in English.Using Irish for the main `name` tag looks like the right choice according to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4117571 ? |
| 59103851 by VictorIE @ 2018-05-19 14:29 | 1 | 2024-02-17 13:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hello,On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/990208722/history , what does "passenger_information_display=prepared" mean?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2024-02-17 14:29 | VictorIE | If I'm correct, part of the equipment had been installed, but there was no working passenger_information_displayLet me check the streetside photos. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-17 14:39 | VictorIE | I've updated all 3 stops that had this tag. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-17 14:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Thanks! | |
| 146725956 by VictorIE @ 2024-01-26 21:43 | 1 | 2024-01-26 22:44 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Seems to remove "from" memberhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17081714 |
| 42161619 by VictorIE @ 2016-09-15 00:46 | 1 | 2024-01-10 21:51 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | Care to weigh in on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4061311 ? |
| 145213665 by VictorIE @ 2023-12-17 12:45 | 1 | 2023-12-17 13:01 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,I would like to suggest changing to description and adding informal=yes to both steps and path.Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2023-12-17 16:39 | VictorIE | Hi,I have no skin in the game. I was only dealing with name="Steps (Added by residents)"If the steps are concrete or other robust material, I think adding informal=yes would be unkind. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-17 17:06 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | It looks like the surface is tagged paving_stones, so a few loosely stacked pavers. Anyhow, I'm fine with leaving it as-is. | |
| 123601184 by VictorIE @ 2022-07-14 10:03 | 1 | 2023-11-05 16:49 | CjMalone ♦233 | Hey it looks like you've removed some details eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2624736613https://www.dunnesstores.com/store-locator/stores/41 to http://www.dunnesstores.com/http?! in 2022, and from a specific website for the POI to a generic brand website. |
| 2 | 2023-11-05 18:17 | VictorIE | Fixed. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-05 20:04 | CjMalone ♦233 | Thanks | |
| 143476526 by VictorIE @ 2023-11-01 13:52 | 1 | 2023-11-04 17:04 | Coirib ♦14 | Id say the Screeb line is just a single circuit and the other two wires above the 3 power ones are just a lightning shield or something |
| 142414527 by VictorIE @ 2023-10-11 00:03 | 1 | 2023-10-11 10:11 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,This is clearly a landuse area, not a building. You can see on aerial imagery:It is an enclosed area, mostly paved, with a building only in the corner.- Esri Clarity: Outdoor area seems to have been used for selling items, which is common with some shops.- Bing/Esri: Outdoor are... |
| 2 | 2023-10-11 10:54 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Adjusted the parking inhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142430294subsequentlyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142431095Someone with local knowledge of how the non-parking areas are used can adjust them where needed later. | |
| 119926967 by VictorIE @ 2022-04-19 22:20 | 1 | 2023-08-06 10:07 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9678573912. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139424510 you change the most nodes from power=pole to man_made=utility, but not this node. Why? |
| 2 | 2023-08-06 10:26 | VictorIE | Ooops!Do you have a diagnostic tool for telecoms? | |
| 3 | 2023-08-06 10:56 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | No, that was "just" a random discovery when correcting your typo. But the idea is not bad. | |
| 138876603 by VictorIE @ 2023-07-23 02:23 | 1 | 2023-07-23 02:32 | Infinite_Bed ♦2 | Thank you for your edit. To make things clearer in future, could you add more detail to your changeset comment, such as "Changed Layer of Building"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138876603 |
| 134497610 by VictorIE @ 2023-04-04 13:49 | 1 | 2023-04-06 11:09 | ivanbranco ♦2,697 | hi VictorIE,you added place=locality to a residential area, but: "The place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location" so it doesn't seems right to me. Could you check it out please? |
| 2 | 2023-04-06 16:17 | VictorIE | Hi,I hadn't appreciated that. The reason I used it is that I have to use addr:place for the houses instead of addr:street, as there is no street called Ramleh Villas. I'll need to re-think it. | |
| 3 | 2023-04-06 16:21 | ivanbranco ♦2,697 | You could consider place=plot, place=city_block or place=neighbourhood.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplothttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity_blockhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood | |
| 134074770 by VictorIE @ 2023-03-24 15:56 | 1 | 2023-03-24 16:38 | No Mo ♦7 | Hi. Yes, it's a typo. It's the retired fire station. |
| 2 | 2023-03-24 17:05 | No Mo ♦7 | I have added the new fire station which is at the south end of the town. I have changed the relevant operation status of each station to make their roles clear. | |
| 130223070 by VictorIE @ 2022-12-18 20:15 | 1 | 2022-12-21 12:58 | Felipe Aron ♦1 | Thank you for your updates, VictorIE. I live in Avourwen, and I previously added some of the latest streets but you improved a lot with the upcoming streets and more details. I wonder if we can add the properties. |
| 2 | 2022-12-21 15:06 | VictorIE | Hi, could you check the names of the existing streets? This note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3463007 points to The Cedars, but mentions The Laurels.https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3463007 | |
| 3 | 2022-12-29 14:04 | Felipe Aron ♦1 | I checked and it is not accurate. The Laurels has a number 26, but the location pointed indeed is in the middle of The Cedars. Most likely the person who lives there tried to add their address but the GPS on their phone was lacking precision. | |
| 4 | 2022-12-30 01:49 | VictorIE | I've added more road details, houses and other features.Could you do a survey of the house numbers and what houses are built?The apartments are 3-storey. Are all of the houses 2-storey? | |
| 5 | 2022-12-31 15:02 | Felipe Aron ♦1 | All the houses, no exceptions, are 2-storey. I can do a survey regarding the house numbers, I will try to do it shortly. | |
| 6 | 2022-12-31 21:19 | DeBigC ♦116 | This is best done with use of a mobile application by yourself on the ground. So here is what you do. Download StreetComplete on an android phone and associate the username to your osm account and password. Go to settings> switch off all quests except “building levels” and “hous... | |
| 7 | 2023-01-01 01:06 | VictorIE | Looking good so far. | |
| 8 | 2023-01-03 14:37 | Felipe Aron ♦1 | Thank you, DeBigC, I am using the StreetComplete application now. I was cycling through the streets in Avourwen while completing the quests earlier. However, the rain stopped me to go to The Alders to finish. Also, VictorIE, I noted that a new road, The Oaks, is partially open, the way to the first ... | |
| 130740421 by VictorIE @ 2023-01-01 09:02 | 1 | 2023-01-02 17:04 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,You only need to add a lifecycle prefix to the main key (here: highway) in order for it to no longer render on the standard style (Carto). It is also easier to maintain.Keeping name as name (not old_name or name:YYYY) is fine for no longer existing physical objects. It will also b... |
| 2 | 2023-01-02 18:03 | VictorIE | I hear what you are saying. I was being a bit paranoid in case people removed / overwrote names, especially as some roads might get renamed.It is unfortunate that some parts of old roads (here and elsewhere) get deleted instead of 'archived', thereby reducing usefulness when people are... | |
| 116767994 by VictorIE @ 2022-01-30 07:11 | 1 | 2022-12-28 07:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Sorry for question about an old edit but maybe you remember this place.Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/804937549/history cairn, shrine or both? |
| 2 | 2022-12-28 12:20 | VictorIE | I did some brief investigation at the time and my impression was cairn only. In Ireland, they tend to be pre-historic way markers or graves only, not shrines. My conclusion was that it was a case of over-tagging.I'm not happy that the location is precise. | |
| 130305796 by VictorIE @ 2022-12-20 20:50 | 1 | 2022-12-21 22:50 | gogorm ♦29 | Some of the roads you added don't seem to exist anymore.If you look at the Bing aerial imagery (Apr 2021) and compare with Maxar, it looks like some of the roads were only built for temporary construction vehicle access, and removed once the north runway was completed.These are the two ... |
| 2 | 2022-12-21 22:52 | gogorm ♦29 | My previous comment was supposed to contain this link aswell: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123737263 | |
| 3 | 2022-12-22 00:31 | VictorIE | Fixed.Thanks, I added a bunch more also. | |
| 130164311 by VictorIE @ 2022-12-16 17:23 | 1 | 2022-12-17 08:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | more info beyond " Power. " is in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113672421 |
| 113672421 by VictorIE @ 2021-11-11 23:09 | 1 | 2022-12-16 16:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339006330/historyNote that you added operator:wikidata=Q7058492to object withnot:operator:wikidata=Q7058492Is it intentional? Which one is correct?Another mapper using my https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ reported th... |
| 2 | 2022-12-16 17:36 | VictorIE | That wasn't intentional. Unfortunately with the debugger in iD the link for "Upgrade the tags" is next to "Tag as not the same "NIE Networks"". :( :)Northern Ireland Electricity is the parent company of NIE Networks, However, there is effectively no difference,... | |
| 123588639 by VictorIE @ 2022-07-14 04:47 | 1 | 2022-12-10 17:53 | DeBigC ♦116 | I'm intrigued by the shape of the windfarm. It doesn't relate to any extant fence, hedge or subdivision. I see it also says "proposed", so should we have it on the map until it is there? |
| 2 | 2022-12-11 01:33 | VictorIE | The shape follows the location for the proposed wind turbines (also marked).Construction is actually nearing completion."proposed" is a documented category. It's for things that have some basis, e.g. planning permission, not just a press release or someone's crayon drawin... | |
| 129883294 by VictorIE @ 2022-12-09 03:22 | 1 | 2022-12-09 12:29 | b-unicycling ♦242 | True, the combination of pharmacy and deli is a bit strange. I can't remember that location now, to be honest. |
| 127936936 by VictorIE @ 2022-10-22 20:20 | 1 | 2022-11-17 10:58 | mueschel ♦6,567 | Hi,what is a 'ped-crossing-post=yes'? |
| 128493318 by VictorIE @ 2022-11-04 17:06 | 1 | 2022-11-08 14:44 | Local Person ♦1 | Thank you, that's much cleaner! |
| 2 | 2022-11-16 13:27 | VictorIE | :) | |
| 128231208 by VictorIE @ 2022-10-30 01:58 | 1 | 2022-11-16 11:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... |
| 122912086 by VictorIE @ 2022-06-27 13:49 | 1 | 2022-10-29 15:58 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,"Trail marker 2" and "Trail marker 3" look like descriptive names. The reference number may be tagged with "ref" instead if it is explicitly signed.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptionsRegards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2022-10-29 16:28 | VictorIE | Hi,I've never been to Freshford, so I don't know how I came to making these edits! I can only imagine they came about in relation to the nodes that were deleted in this changeset. Maybe there were duplicate markers.Feel free to adjust. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-30 11:32 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Thanks for the pointer. I've replied to Anne's original changeset. It does look like they were duplicates.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122912086 | |
| 116269359 by VictorIE @ 2022-01-17 19:51 | 1 | 2022-10-24 18:14 | GinaroZ ♦1,280 | Hi, just be careful when updating brands as these are not banks. |
| 114885630 by VictorIE @ 2021-12-13 14:14 | 1 | 2022-08-23 06:42 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi!In this Changeset, you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34871626 to have the key "mapillary" say "mapillary" as value. I'm sure that's not what you meant.As there are loads of pictures from that roundabout, I wasn't able to figure out which picture ... |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 19:55 | VictorIE | I have no idea why I added that. :) Deleted. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-24 08:22 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Thank you for your assistance :-) Have a great day! | |
| 4 | 2022-08-24 10:17 | VictorIE | :) | |
| 118830251 by VictorIE @ 2022-03-23 17:00 | 1 | 2022-07-12 21:02 | InfosReseaux ♦147 | HelloThis substation got voltage:primary in this changeset and it's not an appropriate usage according to key's definitionhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002130808https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:voltage:primaryThere is a transformer inside the substation which is a... |
| 2 | 2022-07-14 06:50 | VictorIE | The transformer(s) isn't always identifiable, so as a policy, I put the information on both.For example a substation may have a transformer to convert from 110 kV to 38 kV and another to convert from 38 kV to 10 kV. The bigger one will normally be the 110 kV to 38 kV. But what if the imager... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-14 20:03 | InfosReseaux ♦147 | As I understand what you describe, you intend to put the same information on both but you actually can't do that (I mean physically, it's not a policy).A substation is a facility and it doesn't have primary and secondary sides.voltage=a;b;c applies on such perimeters if you wish... | |
| 123602874 by VictorIE @ 2022-07-14 10:39 | 1 | 2022-07-14 11:08 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | website should preferably be brand:website or operator:website instead, since it belongs to the chain, not the store itself. |
| 2 | 2022-07-14 12:05 | VictorIE | Yes, you're right. I've been trying to do it recently. This time I had too many sites with too many details to fix. | |
| 95374187 by VictorIE @ 2020-12-06 17:15 | 1 | 2022-06-26 19:38 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6068474211/historyhas since been likely duplicated byhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9142685792/historyFeel free to (re)move/place where the node should be. I don't think keeping them split would be needed. |
| 49691125 by VictorIE @ 2017-06-20 11:50 | 1 | 2022-06-23 21:32 | DeBigC ♦116 | I wish you bagged the number at the end of this interpolation. I am making a guess at it |
| 2 | 2022-06-23 23:59 | VictorIE | My recollection was that this was a photo survey, probably on a summer's Friday evening in 2015 or so. The guy in the newsagents was panicked and wondering why I was taking photos. It was the end of the survey and having got the details of #238 I forgot to cross the road to get the last odd #. ... | |
| 116121816 by VictorIE @ 2022-01-13 19:56 | 1 | 2022-06-05 20:25 | DeBigC ♦116 | Really useful to have these interpolations scattered around. It will be a good basis for a ground survey |
| 2 | 2022-06-06 05:28 | VictorIE | I'm sure they were based on your Mappillary! | |
| 3 | 2022-06-06 14:56 | DeBigC ♦116 | Whatever way you get them keep em coming, the Mapillary here was patchy. | |
| 121634576 by VictorIE @ 2022-05-28 22:25 | 1 | 2022-05-28 22:40 | sektov ♦21 | You mean solar? |
| 2 | 2022-05-29 07:06 | VictorIE | Solar power is mapped as power=generator, so power. :) | |
| 3 | 2022-05-30 06:31 | VictorIE | Hi again. Just for clarity, the solar panels I was updating are solar-electric, not solar-thermal. | |
| 93030933 by VictorIE @ 2020-10-25 22:21 | 1 | 2022-05-29 17:41 | DeBigC ♦116 | Maybe you know what does this, "the way contains a segment twice" |
| 2 | 2022-05-29 17:50 | VictorIE | Node 1531246495 seems to be used twice in the church.Node 2394165098 seems to be used twice in the pedestrian area. | |
| 121655066 by VictorIE @ 2022-05-29 12:30 | 1 | 2022-05-29 14:15 | SK53 ♦864 | Wow, just spotted these. Impressive progress on solar in Northern Ireland! |
| 2 | 2022-05-29 17:13 | VictorIE | Check out https://openinframap.org/#5.7/53.77/-6.565 | |
| 120771566 by VictorIE @ 2022-05-10 03:44 | 1 | 2022-05-16 17:21 | spiregrain ♦197 | Hi VictorIE - in this changeset you added a school site as way 1058744980. I think it's a new site for Gaelscoil na gCrann. Do you know if the site on the other side of the road (same institution) is now decommissioned? (I've added some details to the new site) |
| 2 | 2022-05-16 18:20 | VictorIE | Hi, I have no knowledge of the area or the school - I was mostly mapping power=*m anything else was incidental. As of mid-2021, all the school buildings north of the main road have been demolished https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1058744980#map=19/54.60036/-7.25333 | |
| 3 | 2022-05-17 07:58 | spiregrain ♦197 | Thanks! | |
| 51388189 by VictorIE @ 2017-08-23 20:41 | 1 | 2022-05-10 04:10 | DeBigC ♦116 | The shopping centre car park seems to be drawn twice here. There are a number of issues, one version incorporates a service/loading yard on the west of the building. Other things I would point out is that the car park is drawn as a connected feature to the building, but on the ground it doesn't... |
| 120680855 by VictorIE @ 2022-05-07 19:53 | 1 | 2022-05-07 20:44 | ملاك ساقط ♦19 | Please write out the projects name: "This multipolygon is a simple polygon" |
| 2 | 2022-05-08 00:50 | VictorIE | Thanks. Only started using MapRoulette yesterday and didn't know what to say. | |
| 82231076 by VictorIE @ 2020-03-16 01:04 | 1 | 2022-04-13 06:42 | DeBigC ♦116 | The construction site on the top left corner of this changeset is now fully built out and landscaped. Buildings visible on the 2019 Bing release. I have deleted the construction landuse |
| 110345747 by VictorIE @ 2021-08-27 14:30 | 1 | 2022-04-10 19:32 | Coirib ♦14 | As per your fixme, the Galway - Dalton line (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342835295) appears to be gone in the new Bing imagery. Should it be deleted? or is disused:power a thing? |
| 2 | 2022-04-10 20:58 | VictorIE | I think demolished:power would be suited in this case, given that it appears to be gone completely. I think it's good to keep things, so that they don't get remapped. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-10 22:55 | Coirib ♦14 | Good point thanks, ill change it to demolished:power | |
| 116225174 by VictorIE @ 2022-01-16 18:42 | 1 | 2022-02-15 08:17 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Do you really need your work lines in the production database? Can I ask you to clean it up? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g7b |
| 114836771 by VictorIE @ 2021-12-12 05:39 | 1 | 2022-02-08 00:18 | InfosReseaux ♦147 | Hi VictorIEMany power=substation objects combined with voltage:primary, voltage:secondary... in your area caught my attention.primary, secondary, tertiary and so on relate to power transformer interfaces. A transformer is a device inside a substation, which is a facility.See wiki : https... |
| 84929105 by VictorIE @ 2020-05-09 08:17 | 1 | 2022-01-29 23:10 | DeBigC ♦116 | `The back lane (north of Dunluce Road, and south of Furry Park Rd has two versions. One version is a hammerhead arrangement which I don't think is correct. Seems like the garages all along the back lots would need access.... worth a quick review |
| 116321054 by VictorIE @ 2022-01-19 01:31 | 1 | 2022-01-19 12:05 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,I would suggest usingsubject:wikidatahttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_linksIs there a reason you used "related" instead?Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2022-01-19 21:31 | VictorIE | Good comment.related:wikidata and related:wikipedia have been used in Ireland, but I suspect a lot of it has been me. Sometimes the entries didn't have named article, e.g. with a memorial to a key person in an organisation, but there is only a wiki article for the organisation, not the pers... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-19 23:26 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | I'd preferably leave out anything if it's not directly related to the object, like the organization a person's worked in. It usually doesn't sufficiently describe said person.In that case, you may have a better, shorter description which you can fit in as a description or subje... | |
| 4 | 2022-01-20 01:14 | VictorIE | I had edited a few wiki links that day and this memorial came to mind. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3579222549 When I had added the memorial, there was a wiki for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Irish%20Citizen%20Army?uselang=en-GB but not (that I could find) for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... | |
| 108516862 by VictorIE @ 2021-07-24 00:50 | 1 | 2022-01-19 17:11 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Are you sure Templedowney Church of Ireland is on Main Street? (preferably the postal address)Its main entrance seems to be on Church Street, which name also seems to imply this (though this doesn't have to be the case). I do see maybe one narrow entrance on Main Street, but that's all I... |
| 2 | 2022-01-19 21:23 | VictorIE | Hi.Part of Main Street was renamed as Church Street in the last few months. I've raised a query https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107765479#map=17/52.85136/-8.03367 | |
| 3 | 2022-01-19 23:01 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Thanks for the reply. I didn't take time to check this.Do you agree the wikidata entry I mentioned is the relevant one? You can add it if you want to. | |
| 4 | 2022-01-20 01:10 | VictorIE | Added. | |
| 115592610 by VictorIE @ 2021-12-31 04:59 | 1 | 2022-01-02 06:20 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have look on your changes. What is the meaning of pha=3? |
| 2 | 2022-01-02 08:16 | VictorIE | Typo :) | |
| 63386202 by VictorIE @ 2018-10-10 16:16 | 1 | 2021-12-26 09:13 | DeBigC ♦116 | You left a fixme a these tracks (on the construction site). They are gone now, I have removed them. |
| 114304549 by VictorIE @ 2021-11-27 19:09 | 1 | 2021-11-29 22:07 | DeBigC ♦116 | I can't see where you mean. We are supposedly using a task manager to stop this |
| 2 | 2021-11-30 10:46 | VictorIE | I think it was this housing estate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47079772 | |
| 114183504 by VictorIE @ 2021-11-24 13:56 | 1 | 2021-11-28 09:46 | mueschel ♦6,567 | Hi,generator:height and generator:rotordiameter are very uncommon tags. The typical tags arerotor:diameterheight:hubheightCould you have a look and change that? |
| 111662257 by VictorIE @ 2021-09-24 18:38 | 1 | 2021-11-18 23:06 | gogorm ♦29 | Hi, I'm not sure if you know but there's a 30 km/h speed limit on Charlestown Road in the eastbound direction, according to a sign placed just as you come onto it from North Road. I had tagged the limit as 30 from there to the end of Charlestown Place, as there was no later sign to indicat... |
| 77281842 by VictorIE @ 2019-11-19 16:10 | 1 | 2021-11-08 10:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2927584 ? |
| 100226603 by VictorIE @ 2021-03-01 19:15 | 1 | 2021-11-03 11:10 | shiftee ♦11 | It seems you changed the Lidl car park from access:customers to access:permissive. Is that something specific to this location? |
| 2 | 2021-11-03 12:03 | VictorIE | I may have been editing lots of Lidl shops at the time and concentrating on operator=* and operator:type=* and didn't notice that access was already set. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-03 12:36 | shiftee ♦11 | So you are putting access:permissive as standard?Are there reasons to prefer that over access:customers? | |
| 111694778 by VictorIE @ 2021-09-25 16:32 | 1 | 2021-11-02 20:25 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | Hey Victor,I have fixed some tags (typos) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113300989Also, you used a combination of roof_tiles (originally contributed as "tile") and slate; these are two different things, so just fyi if you are unsure, check the wiki.Regards,Danie... |
| 2 | 2021-11-02 21:39 | VictorIE | It seems that houses on the one street were built by different builders. One chose tile, the other slate. ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯The iD editor prompts both "tile" and "roof_tiles" - that's how that glitch crept in. :) | |
| 3 | 2021-11-02 21:40 | VictorIE | Oh, thank you. | |
| 4 | 2021-11-03 10:55 | danieldegroot2 ♦674 | iD may occasionally suggest incorrect or odd values (i.e. those with capital letters or spaces). This is because it takes the most popular tags from taginfo, as you may know. It also has some warnings which may suggest adding outdated/synonymous tags or similar, this you should already know. (e.g. b... | |
| 110414867 by VictorIE @ 2021-08-29 14:20 | 1 | 2021-10-17 22:08 | DeBigC ♦116 | The interpolation in Ventry Avenue went up to 32, but was two rows too far up. I moved it and left it there for you to note, and applied the house numbers. I was confident of this because the road is West(even) East(odd) and started at 1 and 2 in the north and progressed south. |
| 2 | 2021-10-18 04:55 | VictorIE | Ventry Road?I added the numbers based on Mapillary. If my recollection is correct, there were only few good images of numbers. Getting the wrong terrace would have been easy, so I've no problems with edits. | |
| 102014681 by VictorIE @ 2021-03-31 01:33 | 1 | 2021-10-06 21:35 | DeBigC ♦116 | I couldn't see why this was a relation. Osmose says this is a mistake in any case, so I just made it into a closed way |
| 2 | 2021-10-07 08:34 | VictorIE | Sorry, I can't see what you are referring to. | |
| 55049986 by VictorIE @ 2017-12-31 03:57 | 1 | 2021-08-19 07:50 | DeBigC ♦116 | Thank you so much for these interpolations. The mapillaries are too close to the number surfaces [high risk of blurring] and so this gave me certainty and less guesswork [and no return visits :) to this area] |
| 2 | 2021-08-19 08:08 | VictorIE | name=Orchard Terrace looks problematic. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-20 07:15 | DeBigC ♦116 | Yes it is. I left it there for the moment as it seems to be bleeding through the terracing tool and applying that name in place of the addr:housenumber=*. Never saw this problem before. | |
| 64132035 by VictorIE @ 2018-11-03 02:15 | 1 | 2021-08-19 21:54 | DeBigC ♦116 | The Parnell Pub here is now gone several years and it appears as though there are houses, and maybe a shop - though empty - on the outer property beside the main road. I will change the landuse and include the new buildings |
| 66278872 by VictorIE @ 2019-01-13 16:47 | 1 | 2021-08-10 17:32 | DeBigC ♦116 | This bird (Just Chicken) has flown the coop in 2018-9. Now there is a cafe called Two Boys Brew. Pins are being added infinitely as businesses come and go. Defunct businesses like this then stay cluttering up the area. Adding a pin should be a temporary holding point for a place of business, adding ... |
| 2 | 2021-08-10 17:53 | VictorIE | Lots of buildings have more than one business. :) | |
| 3 | 2021-08-11 09:40 | DeBigC ♦116 | I'm working on that, I hear there is a way to subdivide a relation. But if it can be done without a relation all the better. | |
| 44128879 by VictorIE @ 2016-12-03 03:09 | 1 | 2021-08-09 21:41 | MacLondon ♦215 | Hi. It looks like you might have applied the wrong set of tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457358275 plus also to the 2 ways connected at the north end.The full 'T' shape is tagged as a zebra crossing. |
| 2 | 2021-08-09 21:53 | VictorIE | There used to be walkways that were marked out as zebra crossings. It has now been split. I've updated the mapping. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-09 21:53 | VictorIE | Oh, thanks. | |
| 33038551 by VictorIE @ 2015-08-01 22:02 | 1 | 2021-07-30 11:36 | DeBigC ♦116 | Spring Garden Street as it touches Annesley Place has a little shopping district, which indeed deserves a landuse, but it seems to be having a polygon identity crisis as it trims around the building edges - impossible. The other problem, unless there is a different railway embankment to what my poor... |
| 2 | 2021-07-30 14:11 | VictorIE | The railway there is a series of arches and bridges, It is only embankment west of Bsallybough Road.My impression was that Kelly's (mapped as 3 buildings, 2 landuse) was all one site from North Strand to west of the railway, likely including under the railway arches. They could be given a s... | |
| 80378433 by VictorIE @ 2020-01-31 14:08 | 1 | 2021-07-27 10:56 | DeBigC ♦116 | The building that replaced these demolished ones at Ardilaun is now erected. It is visible on the current bing, so I am going to get rid of those and put the new one in. If only I had some recent mapillary to verify height and usage...... :) |
| 2 | 2021-07-27 11:20 | VictorIE | I haven't been past Parnell Street in 2 years. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-27 11:38 | VictorIE | That's the new handball centre. 2 storeys.The canal seems to have been broken. :)I tend to use demolished:building=* when a building is still visible on *any* photo set, to avoid, err, accidents, like the Limerick one I did. | |
| 24623381 by VictorIE @ 2014-08-08 20:18 | 1 | 2021-07-18 15:04 | DeBigC ♦116 | @VictorIE Can you let me know about the commercial building off Grove Road here, seems to be a backland. I don't see it anymore and there are 7 new houses squeezed in |
| 2 | 2021-07-18 15:04 | DeBigC ♦116 | exact location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24623381#map=19/53.39322/-6.28810 | |
| 3 | 2021-07-18 18:48 | VictorIE | It was a singles-storey warehouse-style building. I'm not sure if it had any signage. I may have photos.You can see it on the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta imagery. | |
| 77847423 by VictorIE @ 2019-12-03 01:27 | 1 | 2021-07-17 09:29 | DeBigC ♦116 | At the LIDL store North Road I had to rotate and slightly re-shape the building to ground truth. The Car park needed to be adjusted as a consequence. I think works there changed the car-park 2+ years ago, this v of bingmaps seems to relflect that. |
| 2 | 2021-07-17 12:45 | VictorIE | Sure. It looks like they rebuilt and expanded the store. | |
| 98142573 by VictorIE @ 2021-01-25 20:09 | 1 | 2021-07-13 19:05 | Coirib ♦14 | Why is the suburb point Rinmore but the relation is Renmore? I've never heard it be called Rinmore before. |
| 2 | 2021-07-14 03:46 | VictorIE | Rinmore appears to be the official spelling https://www.logainm.ie/en/1413604 However, I will check with logainm.ie | |
| 3 | 2021-07-14 13:58 | VictorIE | "Rinmore is the official English spelling of this anglicised townland name, and, as you mention, it is also found as such on the Cassini map, although with the noted typological error. It appears as Rinmore on the OS 25" map also. It has, however, been altered to Renmore on the OS Discover... | |
| 104068196 by VictorIE @ 2021-05-03 16:02 | 1 | 2021-05-03 16:04 | VictorIE | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938142072access=no means nobody can access the path. access=private may be more appropriate. |
| 93624048 by VictorIE @ 2020-11-05 20:52 | 1 | 2021-04-21 14:31 | ika-chan! ♦242 | I would like to draw your attention to https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72572, where we believe that adding "access=yes" to all trunk roads is redundant in the British Isles.For controlled access trunk roads, use "motorroad=yes", or the combinations "bic... |
| 2 | 2021-04-24 18:19 | VictorIE | Hi,The observed issue was that some journey planners, e.g. the native OSRM, don't map pedestrian and cyclist journeys via trunk roads. Example https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.98803%2C-7.74369%3B51.98943%2C-7.74110#map=13/51.9912/-7.7291Ther... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-24 20:14 | ika-chan! ♦242 | OSRM shouldn't be doing that: I have written to them at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2021-April/001968.html. | |
| 102687020 by VictorIE @ 2021-04-10 08:49 | 1 | 2021-04-10 21:12 | mackerski ♦34 | Hey, I'm curious about the western end of the Sallins Link Road, which is showing as a cycle way only. We have highway=cycleway. Because of lockdown, I haven't seen this for ages, so maybe this reflects the main roadway being unfinished, but just in case... |
| 2 | 2021-04-10 23:51 | VictorIE | It is open for bikes and pedestrians, but there is a mostly built road there. Not a lot of imagery available, so I'm expecting a fair bit of reworking anyway. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-12 11:43 | VictorIE | From boards.ie https://vimeo.com/535611594 | |
| 37204950 by VictorIE @ 2016-02-14 14:19 | 1 | 2021-04-05 14:53 | DaveF ♦1,563 | HiIsn't South Devon Railway over by Totnes? |
| 2 | 2021-04-05 15:22 | VictorIE | Hi, Apologies, this was 5 years ago and I don't recollect where I got my information. Feel free to edit. | |
| 101140803 by VictorIE @ 2021-03-16 19:19 | 1 | 2021-03-16 22:02 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I forgot to mention that I already reversed it, so now it needs to be reversed again. Oops. |
| 2 | 2021-03-16 23:25 | VictorIE | lol. After I had "fixed it" again, I had hit refresh several times and it wouldn't show properly. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-17 04:23 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Coastlines aren't updated on any scale very frequently. | |
| 101014103 by VictorIE @ 2021-03-15 02:35 | 1 | 2021-03-16 18:46 | Allison P ♦1,136 | The coastline needs to be reversed. |
| 2 | 2021-03-16 19:20 | VictorIE | Well spotted, thank you! | |
| 66641015 by VictorIE @ 2019-01-25 19:08 | 1 | 2021-02-23 00:16 | DeBigC ♦116 | Along Magenta Crescent going into Burnside - I have seen the power box. The tagging "location"="kiosk" is suggested as "deprecated by the JOSM validator. Any alternative ideas? |
| 2 | 2021-02-24 09:05 | VictorIE | Will send you a message. | |
| 99849013 by VictorIE @ 2021-02-23 18:49 | 1 | 2021-02-23 19:51 | --Alex ♦1 | Hi Victor. Thanks for fixing. Could you please, in a few words, explain what I did wrong exactly so I don't map incorrectly again?Was it about having only one point on the 2 roads crossing? |
| 2 | 2021-02-23 21:11 | VictorIE | There's no 'wrong way' to do things, just certain things that make things complicated and ambiguous. One thing is that we are mapping using lines (ways) of objects that have areas.The piece of footway on the traffic island and the roadway were one on top of the other on Templeogue... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-24 08:56 | --Alex ♦1 | Got it, thanks ;-) | |
| 95906087 by VictorIE @ 2020-12-16 00:55 | 1 | 2020-12-16 11:26 | dónal ♦85 | Is this change correct? The original wikidata entry is for Tesco Express, the newer one for Tesco Plc --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95906087 |
| 2 | 2021-02-10 19:46 | VictorIE | Talking to another user, he thinks I've been wrong on accepting the advice of the iD Checker and they have raised the issue with the Checker manager.We had unwittingly been engaged in an edit war for almost a year. :D | |
| 97462257 by VictorIE @ 2021-01-13 20:02 | 1 | 2021-01-17 20:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hello,The user that you were tidying up after here was a sock-puppet of the "Longford Bypass Deleter" (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8312253364/history - their previous changeset comment was "lol"). I've tidied up now I think and slightly reshaped the junction to... |
| 95906081 by VictorIE @ 2020-12-16 00:54 | 1 | 2020-12-16 11:24 | dónal ♦85 | Is this change correct? The original wikidata entry is for Tesco Express, the newer one for Tesco Plc. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95906081 |
| 95775821 by VictorIE @ 2020-12-14 01:24 | 1 | 2020-12-14 09:56 | dónal ♦85 | Should the amenity=post_office node inside this area be removed? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95775821 |
| 2 | 2020-12-14 16:07 | VictorIE | Duplicate deleted. | |
| 85978025 by VictorIE @ 2020-05-30 10:45 | 1 | 2020-12-12 23:23 | DeBigC ♦116 | @VictorIE can you tell me if this really is a castle - looks to be a house to me |
| 2 | 2020-12-13 04:36 | VictorIE | It is consistent with the wikipedia page, which has a photo.It's in the style of a tower house. Appears to have modern renovations.Note shadow is much longer than adjacent houses.As to whether it is a tower or a castle is arguable. I think it's more than a tower. | |
| 51387045 by VictorIE @ 2017-08-23 19:58 | 1 | 2020-11-11 19:40 | DeBigC ♦116 | On Grange road, beside the fence of Naomh Barrog you mapped a few metres of footpath. It seems the community have decided against mapping footpaths as separate ways. |
| 2 | 2020-11-11 20:39 | VictorIE | Do you mean the pavement at Kilbarrack Way / Parade? Did you delete it? | |
| 3 | 2020-11-11 21:48 | DeBigC ♦116 | Nope, I rarely delete stuff unless I think its vandalism. Sorry the location I refer to is Kilbarrack Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51387045#map=19/53.38942/-6.15259 | |
| 4 | 2020-11-11 22:24 | VictorIE | Kilbarrack Road is in a deep cutting under the railway and there are steps / ramps. The only pieces that I have mapped are those that connect different roads / carriageways.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518057990#map=19/53.39011/-6.15662https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183511119#map=18... | |
| 93565994 by VictorIE @ 2020-11-04 23:01 | 1 | 2020-11-09 09:00 | NoelB ♦20 | VictorIE, I had to remove an edit you made to the R291. The N4, N15, N16 and R291 area is currently a building site, with works not due for completion until the new year. |
| 2 | 2020-11-09 09:08 | VictorIE | Cool. | |
| 91994546 by VictorIE @ 2020-10-05 15:20 | 1 | 2020-10-22 10:17 | spiregrain ♦197 | Morning VictorIE - what do you know about the unnamed school building next to St John's church? It seems to be accessible only via the church grounds - is it a Sunday School or a primary/secondary school in the normal sense? Asking because it doesn't seem to be on the DENI school lists... |
| 2 | 2020-10-22 13:41 | VictorIE | Hi,I and another user were doing an exercise in tidying up Church of Ireland objects that were mis-tagged. I have no specific memory of editing here, as I edited 1,700 of them over a period of a few weeks. I can only assume there was school tagging and I noted that it shared the site with th... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-22 14:05 | spiregrain ♦197 | That's great! I've just extended the religious area boundary and set it the building up as a religious community hall - which seems to be the best guidance.Well done on the 1700 church assets. I grew up in the CoI. I've just done something similar for NI schools, hence my i... | |
| 4 | 2020-10-22 21:21 | VictorIE | You're welcome. The real thanks has to go to brianh, who has mapped a huge amount, including parish boundaries. I was just rationalising the tags. | |
| 80282175 by VictorIE @ 2020-01-30 00:09 | 1 | 2020-10-11 16:08 | DeBigC ♦116 | The houses here are about 1/3 the size they need to be. |
| 2 | 2020-10-11 18:26 | VictorIE | Ah, now, I only improved the building:levels tagging. They were drawn 9 years ago, 3 years before I joined OSM. :D | |
| 3 | 2020-10-12 20:30 | DeBigC ♦116 | @VictorIE my mistake. Maybe other contributors will know | |
| 4 | 2020-10-12 23:14 | VictorIE | :) | |
| 89155123 by VictorIE @ 2020-08-09 14:05 | 1 | 2020-08-11 08:54 | wrpa ♦1 | Hi,Here is a picture of that cabinethttps://ibb.co/NYh0LzB |
| 82064581 by VictorIE @ 2020-03-11 14:08 | 1 | 2020-03-16 23:30 | mackerski ♦34 | Corduff Roads 1 and 2? New one on me - where do these names come from? |
| 2 | 2020-03-17 00:02 | VictorIE | Roads schedule. They're placeholder names by the council.Importantly, the road numbers were not what one would expect. L7146 was marked as part of L7145. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-17 00:05 | mackerski ♦34 | Interesting. As a local, I'm surprised at the names, but some name is probably better than no name, and they are attested. | |
| 4 | 2020-07-30 16:56 | obyrnegps ♦17 | The Planning Authority prepared a naming scheme for the distributor roads in the 1980's that would have been later added to the County Road Schedule - then Dublin County Council, now Fingal County Council. These are generally the roads with no direct access so no or very few postal addresses. ... | |
| 86727636 by VictorIE @ 2020-06-16 14:46 | 1 | 2020-07-03 14:47 | dónal ♦85 | I guess this relation still needs it's boundary updated. It doesn't reflect the published data from Cork Co. Co. (see https://corkcoco.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=cf736a70890748638e693ad7c37e8692) |
| 2 | 2020-07-03 15:58 | VictorIE | I don't know anything about the details of the boundary. I just changed the name from "Cobh" to "Cobh Municipal District". Feel free to make any changes. | |
| 78129084 by VictorIE @ 2019-12-09 04:53 | 1 | 2019-12-12 07:52 | malcolmh ♦50 | What are the nodes "Sea Rescue"? I don't see any object on the satellite imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-12-12 10:37 | VictorIE | I don't know. I can only assume it is some form of marker used by the local lifeguards / lifeboats. they were mapped by someone else, I just tagged them with *=yes instead of something more specific. | |
| 75055802 by VictorIE @ 2019-09-29 08:25 | 1 | 2019-09-29 22:02 | MCDA ♦112 | Where is this data from? |
| 2 | 2019-09-29 22:31 | VictorIE | I only added the operator=Royal Mail bit, robbieonsea did the rest. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6828753372/history He had done about 25 in a line from Larne to Fermanagh, through Donegal, Coleraine and back to Larne, so I suspect a cycle tour survey.I get the impression some amenity~post ... | |
| 41498272 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-16 20:13 | 1 | 2019-05-27 12:10 | RathcooleRambler ♦9 | This post office isn't listed on the much more recent post office data (as listed on https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/progress/BT), should it be removed from the map? |
| 2 | 2019-05-27 12:33 | VictorIE | I've no personal knowledge of this post office, I was just adding the postal operator.The usual thing would be to confirm with another source / survey and if correct mark it disused.You might flag the node with "fixme=possibly closed" or similar. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-27 12:34 | VictorIE | Oh, if you look at https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/progress/BT/#8/53.953/-4.911 between the Isle of Man and Wales, there is meant to be a post office in the middle of the sea. Sometimes sources are wrong. :) | |
| 69276307 by VictorIE @ 2019-04-16 15:33 | 1 | 2019-04-16 18:59 | RathcooleRambler ♦9 | Why have you made this footpath go partially into the building? |
| 67523334 by VictorIE @ 2019-02-24 17:31 | 1 | 2019-02-28 14:30 | mueschel ♦6,567 | Hi,you used the tag "tactile_writing:braille:yen" on a bus stop. Was this a spelling mistake?Jan |
| 2 | 2019-02-28 14:52 | VictorIE | Typo. Fixed.Thank you! | |
| 62837846 by VictorIE @ 2018-09-22 22:48 | 1 | 2018-09-23 08:59 | norcross ♦11 | Please add this information to the relation and don't tag for the renderer. And I know that it's not gonna be rendered, but other people are to blame for this. Regards |
| 50216829 by VictorIE @ 2017-07-12 02:58 | 1 | 2018-09-20 14:32 | Stereo ♦359 | I'm delighted to see I'm not the only one interested in Inishtrahull :) |
| 2 | 2018-09-20 19:34 | VictorIE | :) | |
| 60310351 by VictorIE @ 2018-06-30 21:03 | 1 | 2018-07-05 15:19 | AA_NP ♦4 | Hi thereI am not 100% sure that the new coding for the M50 from the motorway roundabout eastbound is correct. The signs show it as the R139 (June 2017). There is no reason why this section should be coded as motorway - can you verify with current and up to date road signs please? Thanks |
| 2 | 2018-07-05 21:24 | VictorIE | Ultimately, unless you want to double back, it only leads to motorways. The "motorway ahead" sign is east of the Bewley's (Clayton Hotel) roundabout.To be honest, the situation / signage is a bit of a shambles, with a mix of blue, green and white signage in use. The roads schedule... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-06 08:09 | AA_NP ♦4 | Thank you for your reply and all the information you have supplied. It does look inconsistent in the signing. This one here looks to be clear showing it as motorway - https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.4103644,-6.2160402,3a,75y,265.04h,89.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRgzQaQ039Nv3r3U29tJcAg!2e0!7i13312!8i... | |
| 33903917 by VictorIE @ 2015-09-09 09:43 | 1 | 2018-01-31 15:30 | MCDA ♦112 | What is this - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162476851#map=18/53.45747/-6.24083 |
| 2 | 2018-01-31 17:47 | VictorIE | Possibly changed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55935823#map=15/53.4569/-6.2417 when a mouse had a spasm. | |
| 55360045 by VictorIE @ 2018-01-11 18:39 | 1 | 2018-01-18 18:42 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello, You add to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3169166666/history a " (MOVED)" to the key name, want does this mean? If the business moved to an other address, please add the prefix disused: to the main keys.I am also interest on maning of contact:dx (used on https://www.openstre... |
| 2 | 2018-01-18 19:59 | VictorIE | I took some photos as I went by on a bus. There have been several changes in the businesses along Arran Quay. I will need to go back and confirm the changes.I understand KOD Lyons have moved, but I want to be sure. I don't want to delete them and not add the new location / only to have to r... | |
| 41632559 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-23 08:40 | 1 | 2017-12-19 00:10 | MCDA ♦112 | Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building? |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 00:12 | MCDA ♦112 | Also, the address should not be Aghadrumsee, it is just the name of the club, not the actual location. The townland is actually Cortrasna. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 21:25 | VictorIE | "Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building?" - possibly because the ID Editor defaults leisure=sports_centre to be buildings and I didn't notice. If I remember correctly, I edited dozens of GAA clubs that day,Address - I used to be zealous on adding addresses, have calmed down... | |
| 46918041 by VictorIE @ 2017-03-17 05:57 | 1 | 2017-12-15 12:44 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | You left some untagged ways here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543455 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235543453#map=19/53.33074/-6.26178What's going on with them? Maybe best to just delete the ways if the buildings are gone... |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 02:37 | VictorIE | Thanks for noting this. Fixed :)They're demolished buildings. I wanted to note that they were demolished to prevent them being re-mapped. | |
| 52497510 by VictorIE @ 2017-09-30 01:07 | 1 | 2017-10-03 14:25 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello VictorIE. It's me again ;-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528907370`contact:flikr` instead of `contact:flickr`#typo |
| 2 | 2017-10-03 14:44 | VictorIE | :(:) | |
| 52293484 by VictorIE @ 2017-09-23 02:44 | 1 | 2017-09-24 10:21 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello VictorIE. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5123390146 you have tagged `contact::instagram` instead of `contact:instagram`, right? And for instagram it is enough to tag the @username, please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact #typo |
| 52130533 by VictorIE @ 2017-09-18 02:59 | 1 | 2017-09-20 17:30 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello VictorIE. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5112030988 you have tagged `contact:pintrest` instead of `contact:pinterest`, right? And if you have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact you see, that you could (although pinterest isn't mentioned there) use only the user... |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 13:34 | VictorIE | Hi, Typing error related to not knowing the correct spelling. :) Error fixed.VictorIE | |
| 51922100 by VictorIE @ 2017-09-10 22:10 | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:19 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello VictorIE. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4454170327 you have introduced some new (undocumented) keys (`googleplus`, `soundcloud`, etc.), which has a smell of SEO. So be careful with that ;-) #newkey |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 16:06 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | or move it all to the `contact`-namespace (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact) | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 19:31 | VictorIE | Both methods seem to be in use, e.g. with Facebook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:facebookhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook | |
| 37619575 by VictorIE @ 2016-03-05 00:41 | 1 | 2017-06-14 13:49 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | I don't think that's a soccer pitch, I've changed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49527802 |
| 43771281 by VictorIE @ 2016-11-18 15:56 | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:21 | MCDA ♦112 | Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line? It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense. Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 18:50 | VictorIE | This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 23:08 | MCDA ♦112 | NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen. | |
| 46659194 by VictorIE @ 2017-03-07 18:28 | 1 | 2017-03-08 22:26 | Polarbear ♦940 | Victor, when reverting CS 46496897 with the boundary splitting, I had to include your CS here in the revert. I attempted to restore useful stuff from both CSs, you might doublecheck. It would be a good idea to do repairs and own additions in separate CSs, though. |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 23:47 | VictorIE | Fair point. I've done a quick tidy up.I was only drawn to the area by the newly disconnected road of a previous changeset. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-09 13:11 | Polarbear ♦940 | Thanks, and no criticism from my side. Reverting is a race against time, as lots of people do small fixes quickly. Thus just the recommendation when fixing something, upload, before doing regular refinements and uploading them. | |
| 41490163 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-16 13:43 | 1 | 2017-02-09 11:49 | MCDA ♦112 | Why did you add the street name as Lacky Road? |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 12:45 | VictorIE | Is that not the road it is on? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114282636#map=16/54.2318/-7.2600 | |
| 41502741 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-17 02:03 | 1 | 2016-08-17 06:32 | manoharuss ♦252 | Hi VictorIE,Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. I looked through this changeset along with your other changesets 41465760, 41488327, 41488458 to understand what happened here. The wiki for tagging power stations is here(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsta... |
| 2 | 2016-08-17 08:03 | VictorIE | Hi,Apologies for the unorthodox method. I've been removing deprecated tags and names. For example:http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-o.html lists operator=ESB (154), operator=ESB Generation and Wholesale Markets (21), operator=ESB Networks (394), operator=ESB Telecoms (3), operator=E... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-17 08:27 | VictorIE | http://stat.latlon.org/ has updated. I'll get to work. :) | |
| 4 | 2016-08-18 13:33 | VictorIE | I'm working on the last set and it should be gone today | |
| 41518395 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-17 18:25 | 1 | 2016-08-18 03:56 | nammala ♦517 | Hi VictorIE,Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing . Great work on deleting the above edits there are another two left can you please delete the other stuff.Happy Mapping.cheers,krishna |
| 36325473 by VictorIE @ 2016-01-02 19:42 | 1 | 2016-07-07 11:38 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | Just seeing your s/planned/proposed/ now. A bit late to complain (I'll try to survey soonish and update the whole area, tagging more stuff as construction) but please note that "planned" was used instead of "proposed" on purpose. The difference between the two tags being the... |
| 38185952 by VictorIE @ 2016-03-31 01:54 | 1 | 2016-03-31 07:45 | MCDA ♦112 | Is disused the correct tagging for this section? This section has been restored, complete with a train carriage and crossing gates. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 10:11 | VictorIE | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused "A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place." I can only image "used" should be construed as "used for transport" or a **mobile** museum piece, no... | |
| 35692493 by VictorIE @ 2015-12-01 19:40 | 1 | 2015-12-04 08:59 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!I've noticed the rarely used tag highway=crossing. I've changed it to highway=footway,footway=crossingand added some more details, seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35742146and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing |
| 2 | 2015-12-04 13:57 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | @GerdP er, what? The "rarely used tag highway=crossing" has 1.6 million examples in the database. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=crossing . | |
| 3 | 2015-12-04 14:18 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Yep, it is rarely used for ways. | |
| 26646130 by VictorIE @ 2014-11-08 16:43 | 1 | 2015-11-07 16:23 | Polarbear ♦940 | Hi VictorIE, do you have further details about this club, and who it operates? Would you know if it targets children, juveniles, or both? Is there a website for the club? |
| 2 | 2015-11-07 19:38 | VictorIE | I know nothing of it. I only got the details from passing by on the bus. you might try http://www.cdysb.ie/ - they might know something. Google doesn't throw up much, but it seems to have been around for a long time.Alternatively, I presume the city council housing department is their landl... | |
| 33534460 by VictorIE @ 2015-08-23 22:38 | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:17 | Polarbear ♦940 | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. As your changeset comment already suggest, the correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesThis also avoids using unsupported keys as "sport_1". |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:35 | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 3 | 2015-10-25 19:30 | Polarbear ♦940 | Nice. But your goal should be sport=gaelic_games. If you change a freestyle tag into a deprecated one, it would have to be corrected again by somebody else. Question again, is iD proposing gaelic_football? If so, we would need to file a bug report with iD. | |
| 33975213 by VictorIE @ 2015-09-12 06:29 | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:48 | Polarbear ♦940 | sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. The correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yesgaelic_games:football=yesetc.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dgaelic_games |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:32 | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 33534431 by VictorIE @ 2015-08-23 22:35 | 1 | 2015-10-25 12:53 | Polarbear ♦940 | I've seen the deprecated sport=gaelic_football coming mostly from iD and Potlatch users. Could there be an outdated preset in iD? |
| 2 | 2015-10-25 15:30 | VictorIE | If you look at http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-s.html there are 9 "GAA" or "gaelic" tags in use. Last month there had been about 20. I did my best to rationalise them. | |
| 34416216 by VictorIE @ 2015-10-03 21:12 | 1 | 2015-10-05 14:30 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | Sorry, I don't agree with that change (healthcare:speciality -> health:speciality).The heathcare:speciality tag is the documented one and used 7613 times, vs 6 times for health:speciality.Please revert that change, unless you have a very convincing argument to transition obkects to t... |
| 2 | 2015-10-05 15:27 | VictorIE | You're correct, my apologies. I was correct a group of mis-spelling sand seem to have put int he wrong spelling. Will sort this evening. | |
| 32566645 by VictorIE @ 2015-07-11 16:00 | 1 | 2015-07-12 12:47 | Vincent de Phily ♦112 | I'd much rather create a polygon for the city boundary than add addr:city to all the addresses in there... |