| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46523754 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-02 15:30:17 UTC | SK53 | Can you please stop needlessly changing Bing to bing. It totally obscures other changes which you are making. You're changeset comments are not adequate to understand what you are doing. Please discuss this type of edit with the local community first. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 15:37:15 UTC | SK53 | Can you please stop these edits immediately you are creating bad data https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history | |
| 3 | 2017-03-02 22:29:57 UTC | Polarbear | Besides the Bing issue, you are messing up county boundaries. Boundaries might be legally defined by a stream or river. Look at this example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71656812 was serving both as a county boundary (admin_level 6) in a boundary relation, and a waterway. It might not be idea... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-07 02:18:15 UTC | Polarbear | Fivemiletown edits 46526305+46525145+46523754 reverted in 46637434 and selectively restored in CS 46637891, 46639210, 46639252, 46639371, 46639474 | |
| 5 | 2017-09-08 12:27:50 UTC | KDDA | Can this please be put back to how it was before. The waterway is NOT called Tyrone / Fermanagh | |
| 6 | 2017-09-08 12:37:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | @KDDA - there are only 2 bits called "Tyrone / Fermanagh" left - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490542618 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history - it's probably easiest just to change them manually. | |
| 7 | 2017-09-08 21:43:03 UTC | Polarbear | There was one of WernerP's changeset still on my todo list from the series of repairs above, which were done manually. Let me check that manually at daylight tomorrow if that is the reason for your question. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-09 08:38:09 UTC | Polarbear | Checked my records, seems my unfinished repair is in Ballinasloe/RoI, not the Fivemiletown/NI here. Anyway, it seems that for w369383412, I had removed the Tyrone / Fermanagh name from WernerP's edits in March.On the other hand, for w490542618 and w261564260, KDDA himself added waterway=stream t... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-09 08:42:28 UTC | Polarbear | The names of the counties and the admin levels are in the respective border relations. Thus the border way as a member (waterway or anything else) can have its natural name or no name. Anything else might be in a note tag. | |
| 50406445 by ATSR Maps | 1 | 2017-07-19 20:20:51 UTC | KDDA | I don't get the logical for these edits. You changed the maxspeed tag to 51, then back to 50. Is this a automatic edit ? |
| 49946918 by Gabriel Reynolds | 1 | 2017-06-30 15:55:15 UTC | KDDA | Shouldn't this be on the node where you leave the roundabout and join the M5? Currently it's on the node where you leave the M5 and join the roundabout. |
| 2 | 2017-06-30 16:00:30 UTC | KDDA | Please see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction | |
| 49691700 by Gerry CCTV | 1 | 2017-06-20 12:22:53 UTC | KDDA | What is this node? If it is a CCTV camera, then please tag it as such, using the following formathttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance |
| 49311035 by LateNightTone | 1 | 2017-06-06 18:31:45 UTC | KDDA | Hi, where is this data sourced from? |
| 2 | 2017-06-06 20:01:51 UTC | LateNightTone | I forget exactly what's in this specific changeset, but the tracks and fences are from the Bing imagery in iD, sinkholes and names (and confirmation that all the above exists in these locations) are from local knowledge. Sinkholes and names are also available in the book The Caves of Fermanagh and C... | |
| 48951525 by PaddyMatthews | 1 | 2017-06-01 00:10:47 UTC | KDDA | What are these ways for? |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 12:50:09 UTC | PaddyMatthews | Redefining lake boundary (townland boundaries in Cavan are on lake shore) | |
| 3 | 2017-06-01 21:32:01 UTC | KDDA | what are you using as source for the Lough shoreline? | |
| 4 | 2017-06-02 13:20:44 UTC | PaddyMatthews | Bing imagery & GSGS3906 where there are reed banks to indicate what should be treated as land and what as water. | |
| 48704202 by Dominik Picheta | 1 | 2017-05-15 15:11:17 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMThe road you added doesn't join up to anything, so routing to the road won't work. I suggest you join it to a point in Thomas Street if that is how it is accessed.If it supports residential properties then I would change the tag to highway=residental. Does the road have a name? I... |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 15:20:03 UTC | Dominik Picheta | Done http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48704526#map=15/54.4195/-6.4427 | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 15:58:03 UTC | Dominik Picheta | Thanks for accepting!btw pointers on how to make "Flat 1, Mourneview House" (through to "Flat 29, Mourneview House") and "1 Mourneview House" (through to "29 Mourneview House") searchable would be appreciated. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-15 16:30:32 UTC | chillly | I didn't accept your work - in OSM we try to use everything. :-)You can add a point for each address and add addressing for each one. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses for more info. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-15 17:49:21 UTC | KDDA | Amazingly that is not surprising, as Google Maps is very wrong in a lot of areas!I have traced the building more accurately from Bing and added some local features. | |
| 6 | 2017-05-15 17:57:28 UTC | Dominik Picheta | Nice! Beautiful job :)Thanks for the links chillly! | |
| 48657168 by михаил илиев | 1 | 2017-05-13 19:37:19 UTC | KDDA | Where are you sourcing this information? |
| 48045604 by Claire byrne | 1 | 2017-04-22 22:44:28 UTC | KDDA | Does this crossroads have a name? |
| 43771281 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:21:42 UTC | KDDA | Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line? It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense. Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 18:50:16 UTC | VictorIE | This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.eirgr... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 23:08:48 UTC | KDDA | NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen. | |
| 47680692 by J Slevin | 1 | 2017-04-12 14:21:57 UTC | KDDA | Why did you change the maxspeed tag from 60 mph to 40 ? |
| 47546034 by MalingaGIS | 1 | 2017-04-07 19:06:48 UTC | KDDA | Hi,highway=residential is usually used for roads with housing estates and so forth. Maybe highway=service, service=driveway might be more appropriate?Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 15:10:20 UTC | MalingaGIS | Hi, KDDA, Thanks for the correction. I updated that road in to, highway-service, which seems ok to me now.Its nice to sharing ideas. Keep it up good works. | |
| 47441116 by carinaf | 1 | 2017-04-04 13:02:39 UTC | KDDA | You have added a post office with the following address - Kilronan, Inishmore, Aran Island, County Donegal (Way: 484714800)Are you aware that this is no-where near County Donegal?Where did you obtain this information, as i have serious concerns regarding it's source and accuracy? |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 13:06:52 UTC | KDDA | There isn't even a building at this location! | |
| 47009176 by geozeisig | 1 | 2017-03-20 16:00:52 UTC | KDDA | Why have you changed the tagging for the standing stone at Cloghagaddy? |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 06:15:04 UTC | geozeisig | megalith_type =standing_stone was not described in the wiki. So I assumed it would be a menhir. As I have read more about it, it can also be a historic=stone. Maybe I must also revert it? | |
| 46944828 by Paul Clapham | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:58:44 UTC | KDDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 02:23:31 UTC | Paul Clapham | Damn. But I see you've fixed and improved on my edits. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 03:05:47 UTC | KDDA | Unfortunately, there is no resolution to this issue. The official addresses are listed here - http://www.whatsmyaddress.net/viewer/index.html?objId=22086&townland=ROSSLEA and the Irish Placename database https://www.logainm.ie/en/1411823?s=rossleaLike a lot of townlands, the name originates... | |
| 46944819 by Paul Clapham | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:58:18 UTC | KDDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 46944810 by Paul Clapham | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:57:30 UTC | KDDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 46525145 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-02 16:15:37 UTC | KDDA | What are you doing?!? Please STOP with these changesets |
| 2 | 2017-03-03 00:39:43 UTC | Polarbear | You were modfying https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123595674 which was serving both as boundary way and road, took away the road attributes and created a new way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478098420. You did not realise that the old way was both in a boundary and a bus relation, thus now... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 00:43:48 UTC | KDDA | This user has done this type of thing in a number of changesets, this is why I asked the DWG to place a ban on this account. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-03 00:45:14 UTC | KDDA | While there are some good and welcomed additions to the map, there are also strange changes like this were it is totally messing things up. | |
| 5 | 2017-03-03 08:58:27 UTC | Polarbear | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org | |
| 6 | 2017-03-07 02:17:43 UTC | Polarbear | Fivemiletown edits 46526305+46525145+46523754 reverted in 46637434 and selectively restored in CS 46637891, 46639210, 46639252, 46639371, 46639474 | |
| 46520040 by WernerP | 1 | 2017-03-02 15:11:41 UTC | KDDA | Seriously? All OSM wiki pages say to use source=Bing ie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source and JOSM fills this in automatically when I have the bing layer added. Why do you feel the need to change this accepted standard? |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 22:12:48 UTC | Polarbear | Well, first of all this is a mechanical edit violating our policies, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductSecond, this change is pointless, as both versions, bing or Bing, correctly explain the source being used, thus you needlessly increase the version count of... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-02 22:24:16 UTC | KDDA | @Polarbear - I don't know about your JOSM, but you will see that most of my edits have this tag, which was automatically added when I have the Bing layer active in JOSMThis user has done the same in a number of other edits in the local area, but has mixed them in with some useful edits, therefor... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-02 23:58:12 UTC | Polarbear | @KDDA - ok, JOSM can add them to the changeset (not the object), in particular if you click "obtain from current layer" in the upload menu it adds all currently visible layers. Cool.)Back to the topic, the user started some "area unglueing" in Germany some days ago, I am curren... | |
| 41490163 by VictorIE | 1 | 2017-02-09 11:49:37 UTC | KDDA | Why did you add the street name as Lacky Road? |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 12:45:16 UTC | VictorIE | Is that not the road it is on? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114282636#map=16/54.2318/-7.2600 | |
| 45763457 by Rokas Piekus | 1 | 2017-02-03 00:41:19 UTC | KDDA | It is highly unlikely there are ATM's in these location. Please revert this changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 08:24:08 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 45756121 by Rokas Piekus | 1 | 2017-02-02 19:26:46 UTC | chillly | Welcome to OSMAre you sure there is an ATM in this farmyard? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 00:40:06 UTC | KDDA | I doubt it, all changesets to date look incorrect | |
| 3 | 2017-02-03 08:23:57 UTC | chillly | reverted | |
| 44023913 by Olyon | 1 | 2016-11-29 19:10:01 UTC | KDDA | What is this correction and why is it a worldwide edit? Can you please direct me to the discussion of what this mass edit is about and why its needed. |
| 2 | 2016-11-30 00:08:27 UTC | Olyon | sorry. It is small change on many elements to correspond to the correct way to write the values for plant: output:electricity=* and generator:output:electricity=*.A space between number and unit and uppercase or lowercase for units as shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:outpu... | |
| 42831035 by alanmoore | 1 | 2016-10-12 22:03:47 UTC | KDDA | A culvert is a structure that allows water to flow under a road, railroad, trail, or similar obstruction from one side to the other side. Typically embedded so as to be surrounded by soil, a culvert may be made from a pipe, reinforced concrete or other material.Are you sure this stream is in a c... |
| 18450982 by Mauls | 1 | 2016-07-28 08:52:24 UTC | KDDA | Why are you removing members from the Sliabh Beagh Route 1 - McKenna Trail (1689109) relation? |
| 40639063 by Kieran Moynihan | 1 | 2016-07-10 23:50:55 UTC | KDDA | Are you sure there is a hospital here? Is it new as I can see nothing that looks like a hospital on Bing imagery? |
| 40504501 by curlyq426 | 1 | 2016-07-06 10:27:30 UTC | KDDA | Hi, the tree is perfectly okay to be in OpenStreetMap. The problem I had was that the tree was tagged with addressing tags. I've added the tree back again without the address. |
| 40498702 by curlyq426 | 1 | 2016-07-05 14:07:40 UTC | KDDA | I really don't think we need a name and address a particular tree. The only exception is _maybe_ if someone was actually living in said tree. |
| 2 | 2016-07-05 17:06:11 UTC | SomeoneElse | It's probably not actually _named_ "Tree" either, I suspect... | |
| 38461237 by 22scott11 | 1 | 2016-07-04 18:28:39 UTC | KDDA | You are tagging ploughed fields as natural=mud which is not correct. Also the tracing accuracy is very poor. I am deleting these ways. |
| 40460497 by Kate McCarthy | 1 | 2016-07-03 18:08:01 UTC | KDDA | Please remove earlier changesets and only comment on what this particular changeset is doing ie "Adding restaurant and bar" |
| 2 | 2016-07-03 18:14:22 UTC | KDDA | Also, there is a Bar and Restaurant located in the middle of the road?!? | |
| 3 | 2016-07-03 20:41:51 UTC | Kate McCarthy | Hi, How do I remove them? Thanks. | |
| 40460080 by Kate McCarthy | 1 | 2016-07-03 18:03:33 UTC | KDDA | Please use the correct format for the phone tag. For more details see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone |
| 39626748 by Alleykat | 1 | 2016-06-02 13:10:31 UTC | KDDA | Why did you capitalise the name from Lisburn to LISBURN? |
| 2 | 2016-06-02 13:13:44 UTC | Alleykat | Just thought nit would make it more easily to see | |
| 3 | 2016-06-02 13:23:54 UTC | KDDA | Ah, please understand that the OpenStreetMap is a database and has standards on how we input data. If you are confused there is information in the wiki. (ie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names )What you see on the OSM website is only a sample render of the database. Other people render t... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-02 13:26:07 UTC | KDDA | This render is quite nice too - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.5092/-6.0408&layers=H | |
| 39696586 by Alleykat | 1 | 2016-06-02 13:12:03 UTC | KDDA | Again, what's with the capitalisation of names? |
| 36438300 by Mumbambu | 1 | 2016-01-08 10:39:37 UTC | KDDA | I dont see the confusion, the name is either Derry or Londonderry, people can choose which they want to use. Please revert the name change to Londonderry. |
| 2 | 2016-01-08 10:59:09 UTC | rorym | Hi Mumbambu. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your interest in the Ireland, however please be cautious of taking a side on such a complex issue. The dual name solves a lot of problems. Like many things in OSM there are many correct answers to the question of "What is the official name?"... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-08 11:02:23 UTC | KDDA | Maybe it is worth studying that the local council serving the area refer to themselves as Derry City Council, see their website here - http://www.derrystrabane.com/Services/Contact-UsYou can also read lots of very interesting history regarding the naming dispute here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-02 00:00:14 UTC | Mumbambu | https://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Judicial%20Decisions/PublishedByYear/Documents/2007/2007%20NIQB%205/j_j_WEAF5707.htmAlso sorry for mixing edits of two different two different edits. At the time I did not sure how to edit properly. | |
| 5 | 2016-06-02 12:07:01 UTC | rorym | The name tag in OSM is not the "official"/"legal" name. | |
| 6 | 2016-06-02 12:53:42 UTC | KDDA | I don't understand why you felt the need to edit this node in the first place. The name includes the names it is known as locally. You also moved the node into the river which is totally wrong as well. | |
| 38677965 by malcolmh | 1 | 2016-04-19 19:23:17 UTC | KDDA | Updating seamarks? How is deleting 40 nodes updating?This is not a sea, its an inland waterway called Lower Lough Erne. |
| 2 | 2016-04-19 20:49:39 UTC | malcolmh | Whoops! Fat finger trouble on my part. - now reverted | |
| 38185952 by VictorIE | 1 | 2016-03-31 07:45:37 UTC | KDDA | Is disused the correct tagging for this section? This section has been restored, complete with a train carriage and crossing gates. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 10:11:49 UTC | VictorIE | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused "A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place." I can only image "used" should be construed as "used for transport" or a **mobile** museum piece, no... | |
| 37062732 by Riggwelter | 1 | 2016-02-08 06:44:43 UTC | ramyaragupathy | Hello Riggwelter, Looks like the data you have deleted is for roads that are clearly visible in the imagery. Did you verify the accuracy of the data before deleting them? |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 11:05:19 UTC | Riggwelter | Yes. What's the point in adding like 25 m worth of access road, like the access to a garage in your yard? It just clutters the map. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-11 09:47:07 UTC | ramyaragupathy | @Riggwelter: Would like you to have a look at this page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Micromapping | |
| 4 | 2016-02-11 10:09:39 UTC | rorym | Hi Riggwelter. Thanks for your concern, but mapping driveways is helpful for OSM and is quite common. There are more than 2.5 million driveways mapped in OSM (service=driveway), from all over the world. ( http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway )Concern for how the map appears is ... | |
| 5 | 2016-02-12 22:57:47 UTC | Riggwelter | Thanks for your kind message, and above all, thanks for your explanation! I suppose I just need to revise my view on what OSM is - to me, having taken it at face value, it's a map and not a database. However, it does make sense to - also - call it a database, and that's how I will refer to it as of ... | |
| 6 | 2016-02-13 11:42:37 UTC | KDDA | Hi Riggwelter, OSM is definitely a database and a very powerful one at that! Did you know that the OSM Ireland have custom maps? You can see some of the maps we render here - http://www.openstreetmap.ie/resources/maps/This is an example using our Irish Language layer showing hill shadi... | |
| 36044071 by SK53 | 1 | 2015-12-20 12:05:50 UTC | KDDA | Phewwwwww That was some work! |
| 2 | 2015-12-20 15:11:46 UTC | SK53 | It's closing down imminently, but I eventually realised that the Geograph picture shows it at the end of the building with the garden centre bit beyond. That gave me a chance by looking at the places I'd previously mapped as landuse=retail. I must say I'd hoped the detective work would have been eas... | |
| 35793617 by hm4 | 1 | 2015-12-06 21:18:06 UTC | KDDA | Google in their copyright statement do not allow copying from either their Map or Streetview. Since you have used the Streetview product as a source of this information, you are breaching Google policy and also that of OSM, see the copyright link on the OSM website, here part of it for your convinc... |
| 2 | 2015-12-06 21:19:14 UTC | KDDA | We are however allowed to use Bing imagery to trace building and so forth, can you use Bing to trace this building? | |
| 3 | 2015-12-06 21:40:16 UTC | hm4 | I used OSM, but just included the google link for my own reference, I understand it should be removed. | |
| 4 | 2015-12-06 22:03:43 UTC | KDDA | I have aligned the building to what I can see on Bing images. Ive also added more buildings in the area. Do you know what religion Drum Gospel Hall is? Ive tagged it religion=christian, but it can be tagged further, ie denomination=methodist etc | |
| 5 | 2015-12-06 22:13:34 UTC | KDDA | Are you from this area? It would be really nice to capture more data in this area. There is an app for smartphones called Mapillary which allows you to capture images while you walk, cycle or drive. (www.mapillary.com) Its great for capturing data for OSM and also uses a compatible licence :) | |
| 32585033 by Paul Donlon | 1 | 2015-12-04 12:24:57 UTC | KDDA | While it is extremely interesting and important for local communities to remember the past, OSM is about mapping what is currently here. This information should be moved to the Open Historical Map ( http://www.openhistoricalmap.org ) |
| 35743153 by noah0000 | 1 | 2015-12-04 12:19:39 UTC | KDDA | Hi Noah, welcome to OSM. Please be aware the OSM is a public map. House names such as "My House", "Bens House" and "Evan's Gafferooney" are of little use to the community. We are more interested in the street names, house numbers and Eircodes to be honest. |
| 35727726 by David Parke | 1 | 2015-12-03 19:54:36 UTC | KDDA | Where did house number 116 disappear to? Are you sure this is correct? |
| 35608848 by balorevileye | 1 | 2015-12-01 19:04:07 UTC | KDDA | Why are you deleting townland boundary ways? |
| 35412626 by wambacher | 1 | 2015-12-01 16:44:01 UTC | KDDA | Can you please explain how you fixed them? As far as I can see you have actually broken them! |
| 2 | 2015-12-01 18:32:56 UTC | wambacher | I fixed that area 13 days go and it was fine. but 4 days ago user balorevileye deleted ways 363393382 and 381013023 . (just click them in this list).Please talk to him.regardswalter | |
| 3 | 2015-12-01 18:34:04 UTC | wambacher | 13 das ago, of course. | |
| 35542195 by beartai | 1 | 2015-11-24 20:09:36 UTC | KDDA | Fair enough the village/hamlet name might have been wrong, but why delete it? |
| 35288242 by KDDA | 1 | 2015-11-14 09:28:20 UTC | GerdP | please review:what is meant with highway=gi# ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/579036516 |
| 2 | 2015-11-14 11:31:39 UTC | KDDA | Apologies, the tag was supposed to be highway=give_way as from Bing I can see a giveway/yield markings on the road junction. I have corrected the tag, thanks for bring it to my attention. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-14 11:37:51 UTC | KDDA | Are you a local to this area? The road "Great Victoria Street" to which this junction joins, appears to have markings which would indicate traffic lights. I have added them, could you please review? | |
| 4 | 2015-11-14 12:22:17 UTC | GerdP | thanks for the feedback, and sorry, I am not a local, just noticed the unusual tag in Taginfohttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway | |
| 35286716 by Volunteer Now | 1 | 2015-11-13 16:41:30 UTC | KDDA | Hi, what is this node for? It has no tags, but obviously marking something? If you need a marker you can use the Share feature, which generates a link, like this - http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.59042&mlon=-5.93453#map=19/54.59042/-5.93453 |
| 2 | 2015-11-13 16:42:17 UTC | KDDA | I have added some of the buildings in the area, maybe this will help you | |
| 35281490 by General Grievious | 1 | 2015-11-13 11:48:11 UTC | KDDA | Thanks for showing the entire world where your house is! Are you sure this is a good idea? |
| 35280607 by scooney | 1 | 2015-11-13 11:46:19 UTC | KDDA | Is it wise letting the whole world know where you live? I'm sure the house name is not "Scooneys Gaf" |
| 35123435 by Taraxx | 1 | 2015-11-06 11:22:33 UTC | IrlJidel | Dont think you should be using hotosm-project-1169 in changeset comments - you're not mapping in Lesotho |
| 2 | 2015-11-06 12:23:38 UTC | KDDA | Regarding "The Lambert Household", it is probably not a good idea to enter the family name of the house owner/occupier into a public database. | |
| 33055777 by WJSOC | 1 | 2015-08-16 01:26:00 UTC | KDDA | Why have you created another way for Roscor Bridge? |
| 31994703 by dmchugh675 | 1 | 2015-06-15 22:28:14 UTC | KDDA | Why is this house round and got a road running through it?!? |
| 2 | 2015-06-16 15:08:01 UTC | Derick Rethans | Looks fine to me now... | |
| 3 | 2015-06-16 18:37:46 UTC | KDDA | Ive been in touch with the mapper via PM and have fixed it. | |
| 30067544 by Abominable Snowman | 1 | 2015-04-08 16:06:07 UTC | KDDA | Why does it have a road running through it?!? Is the coffee shop a drive through? |
| 2 | 2015-04-08 16:21:42 UTC | Abominable Snowman | I'm sorry there isn't a road going through it. I'm not fully sure of the exact area of the shop because there isn't a picture of the foundation there. You cannot miss it as the coffee shop should be visible from the road and the minute you enter the car park. Apologies for any confusion. | |
| 22616687 by ingramireland | 1 | 2015-03-11 15:54:19 UTC | KDDA | The Island of Enniskillen is mostly commercial properties, with very little residential. I therefore disagree with this large area of residential landuse, when it clearly is not the case. Also the landuse area is extending into the water in places. |
| 28819905 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 | 1 | 2015-02-17 20:32:10 UTC | KDDA | This change-set should be reverted, as the name has been removed from a valid townland relation. |
| 2 | 2015-02-20 05:37:36 UTC | zool | The townland appears to be from the "mapping townlands" effort and is needed in some cases for addressing and local navigation. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Mapping_Townlands | |
| 3 | 2015-02-20 11:42:28 UTC | KDDA | hi zool. Yes, the townland is part of the project. The problem I have with this user and the majority of his/her change-sets is that data (mostly names) is being deleted from OSM, mainly suburbs and townlands. I have messaged the user directly, but no answer. I would like to know why the user is... | |
| 4 | 2015-02-21 06:46:42 UTC | zool | hi KDDA, Indeed i'm involved in this discussion on behalf of the DWG, another mapper brought the deletions to our attention saying he didn't want to make a big deal of it, but it looks like some data disruption is being caused. See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28819735 for the del... | |
| 5 | 2015-02-21 14:03:54 UTC | KDDA | Thanks for looking into it Zool. Is there a time frame on how long a decision from the DWG takes? | |
| 6 | 2015-02-21 14:10:07 UTC | KDDA | I would just like to point out that here in NI, the townland within the address is a legal requirement. The official (copyrighted) address source is called PointerNI and is maintained by the LPS. ( http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/pointer ) The local OSM community have been working very hard to map ... | |
| 7 | 2015-02-23 05:37:32 UTC | zool | Hi KDDA, there's no timeframe for the DWG, case-by-case basis, as we've heard nothing back about the townlands deletions, but we'll likely go ahead and revert them very soon. Sorry to be vague here, it's all very much a volunteer effort. | |
| 8 | 2015-02-24 10:02:40 UTC | zool | All right, it's been a week so I am now going ahead and reverting the following list of deleteing changesets on behalf of the DWG:28796127287969462879696228808425288086112881918328819610288196682881973528819839288199052881992228819932288200842882024228820246288202... | |
| 28819610 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:04:41 UTC | KDDA | Again you have removed valid townland tags! This change-set should be reverted. |
| 28819668 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:02:39 UTC | KDDA | You have removed the tags from a valid townland. This change-set should be re-verted. |
| 28819183 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:00:23 UTC | KDDA | Again, you are removing tags for a valid townland. This change-set should be reverted. |
| 28820440 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 | 1 | 2015-02-17 20:21:09 UTC | KDDA | Is this area not Turf Lodge? |
| 26627980 by Ch_Foyer | 1 | 2014-11-08 01:03:05 UTC | KDDA | I dont understand why this is tagged as commercial, these are agricultural buildings. |
| 26629275 by Ch_Foyer | 1 | 2014-11-08 01:02:03 UTC | KDDA | Why is this tagged as an area, when it is a farm yard building of some sort? |