MCDA participated in the following changeset discussionsMCDA participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 160685591 by HarrisonK @ 2024-12-27 17:19 | 1 | 2024-12-27 22:02 | MCDA | Why did you delete the give way node? |
| 159063799 by LateNightTone @ 2024-11-12 19:05 | 1 | 2024-12-23 10:04 | MCDA | Pretty sure a lot of these areas are lit, therefore speed limits are reduced to 40mph. There are also rumble ramps coming off the dual carriageway onto the roundabout, but no physical speed limit signs (way:262097519). These sections were purposely not tagged because the actual speed limit is not ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 10:06 | MCDA | When I was learning to drive, any area that was lit by overhead lights, was assumed to be 40mph unless otherwise stated ie 20mph around schools or 30mph in built up areas | |
| 3 | 2024-12-24 11:37 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Hi MCDA, thanks for the query. This was part of some large-scale maxspeed updates over the past few months to improve routing & for any other data applications - I've tried my best to minimise errors, but I accept there may be some.Regarding street lights however, I researched this as m... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-24 16:45 | MCDA | I was just on that section of road today and there is no actual speed limit signs. Approaching the roundabout from Enniskillen side the only sign is a warning roundabout ahead. Even when you get on the dual carriage way there are no signs saying 70. Coming back the other way from dual carriage wa... | |
| 5 | 2024-12-26 16:19 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Ah yes - there are no signs because it is still national speed limit in all directions - no signage is required, as there is no change. Rumble strips may cause a driver to reduce speed, but "maxspeed" is for the legal limit of the road, not the driveable limit. So on the A4 dual carriagewa... | |
| 157923963 by AdrianLangtry @ 2024-10-15 14:31 | 1 | 2024-12-21 12:41 | MCDA | Is this the roads actual name? If not, name should just remain blank |
| 2 | 2024-12-21 18:45 | AdrianLangtry ♦15 | According to Cavan County Council it is: https://cavancc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/media/index.html?appid=4c15ed863e6f426e9d8f0bf2ce399aba | |
| 144722833 by MCDA @ 2023-12-03 15:35 | 1 | 2023-12-05 02:22 | VictorIE ♦907 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303327121Ftom: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit "noexit=yes – used at the end of a highway=* to indicate that there is no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a formal path or route". :)So it goes on ... |
| 2 | 2023-12-05 10:46 | MCDA | I was under the impression that we used this tag to indicate a dead end (you would need another mode of transport to continue ie a ferry) and was to help routing. Part of the road is public, therefore has an official road name, maintained by the Roads Service or whatever they call themselves these ... | |
| 50432066 by MCDA @ 2017-07-20 12:29 | 1 | 2023-07-15 12:09 | b-unicycling ♦242 | man_made=cabinet is not an established tag. what were you trying to map there? |
| 2 | 2023-07-16 00:31 | MCDA | The Erne Boat Hire company has a locked cabinet here they operate their business from. It's not really a building, more of a cabinet. Looking at their website it looks like they have upgraded to sheds on the pier a bit further up - https://erneboathireltd.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/o... | |
| 3 | 2023-07-16 00:33 | MCDA | Last time I was in the area it was definitely a locked cabinet they were operating from. | |
| 112840351 by Chris_hynds @ 2021-10-22 14:14 | 1 | 2021-10-22 20:05 | MCDA | Why did you remove the wooded area? |
| 2 | 2021-10-23 08:00 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | MCDA: If there will be no answer from Chris_hynds, I suggest you revert the situation.Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 112469124 by impey @ 2021-10-13 16:13 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:46 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:38 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete | |
| 3 | 2021-10-14 15:29 | MCDA | The main issue here is that the name is already in the relation for the island, see - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3998505If you look at the history of that relation - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25084499 I was putting these islands into the corresponding Civil Parishes, whic... | |
| 112422758 by impey @ 2021-10-12 15:20 | 1 | 2021-10-12 19:06 | MCDA | While there are mostly Christian burials right now, there have been studies that suggest this was a religious site before St Tiernan founded the monastery here ~550. A site much like and related to the carvings on Boa and White Island and therefore may have been a site adopted by early Christians. |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:38 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete | |
| 3 | 2021-10-14 14:58 | MCDA | No, I agree with you that there are Christian burials here. But I just want to point out that many of these sites were in use before Christianity arrived in Ireland . Your involvement in the local community would be appreciated. We surely have the same goal here, in making OSM the best map it can... | |
| 112415607 by impey @ 2021-10-12 12:08 | 1 | 2021-10-12 14:21 | NoelB ♦20 | Why did you change the name of Lough Vearty? Can you please revert to the original name? |
| 2 | 2021-10-12 15:36 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5380Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group | |
| 3 | 2021-10-13 15:46 | impey ♦10 | According to the PRONI Ordnance Survey of NI Historical Maps Editions 1 dating back to 1832-1846; this Lough is known as Nearty not Vearty | |
| 4 | 2021-10-13 17:24 | NoelB ♦20 | On the first Ordnance survey maps 1837/42 it is called Lough Nearty. but on the OSNI mapping and OSI since then it is called Lough Vearty. Please revert the name to Vearty | |
| 5 | 2021-10-13 19:09 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | NoelB and impey, you are having different opinions as to the naming of this object. Before ending up in an edit war may I ask you to discuss this either here or in the appropriate user groups or mailing-lists?Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 6 | 2021-10-13 20:56 | MCDA | 1) PRONI Ordnance Survey of NI Historical Maps Editions 1 is a copyrighted source and using this as source is a breach of their copyright as are most of the edits by this user!2) NoelB is an experienced mapper in the area and has out of copyright maps available.3) The DWG need to review all edit... | |
| 112468583 by impey @ 2021-10-13 15:57 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:41 | MCDA | What are you doing??!? The island has a name tagged on the relation!https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3998520 |
| 2 | 2021-10-13 20:47 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM | |
| 3 | 2021-10-14 13:34 | impey ♦10 | Ok then, you can delete | |
| 112468752 by impey @ 2021-10-13 16:02 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:47 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:34 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete then | |
| 112468783 by impey @ 2021-10-13 16:03 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:46 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:35 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete | |
| 112468908 by impey @ 2021-10-13 16:07 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:46 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:35 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete | |
| 112469051 by impey @ 2021-10-13 16:11 | 1 | 2021-10-13 20:46 | MCDA | Source : https://apps.spatialni.gov.uk/PRONIApplication/ is copyrighted to OSNI/LPS and CAN NOT be used in OSM |
| 2 | 2021-10-14 13:38 | impey ♦10 | ok then please delete | |
| 112416478 by impey @ 2021-10-12 12:31 | 1 | 2021-10-12 13:58 | MCDA | Seriously, would you stop with your vandalism of the map!! You are not "updating" it as per your changeset comment, but are removing relations and ways that are needed to generate the Parish, Barony and County relations. Basically breaking all the data structures required to power sites ... |
| 2 | 2021-10-12 15:35 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5380Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 3 | 2021-10-12 17:44 | MCDA | Hi Marc, can you revert these change-sets? This user is ignoring previous attempts to communicate and make things right and these deleted/broken relations are going to play havoc with downstream users who rely on OSM data. | |
| 4 | 2021-10-12 19:51 | Garmin-User ♦335 | Hello, I have reverted changesets #112416478 and #112422691 (couldn't wait). But there are other changesets where islands are now duplicated. Someone should take a deeper look at these.Best regards,Mario | |
| 5 | 2021-10-12 19:54 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | After my block, this user has not been active again. I'm waiting for their reply. | |
| 6 | 2021-10-13 15:53 | impey ♦10 | I’m not sure what the issue is here; I am simply updating the island names are per original OSNI Historical Maps 1/2/3 Editions as available from PRONI website publicly available to all. Some of the islands had lines around them however I had to create areas along the same lines in order to gi... | |
| 7 | 2021-10-13 19:18 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | impey, why did you have to "create" areas to give the island its proper name? If you want to change a name why do you have to take such a step?Are you aware of the complex multipolygons and relations in use here?So, before doing any more edits, please discuss this with the other users ... | |
| 8 | 2021-10-13 20:31 | MCDA | 1) The PRONI Historical Maps are copyrighted (see the agreement that must be accepted before use - https://imgur.com/tgHPpPJ ) and therefore CAN NOT be used to source information.2) The Islands DO have a name, but are tagged within the relation. If you do not understand how relations work, please... | |
| 9 | 2021-10-14 09:55 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | impey, do you understand whats going on here?Marc Zoutendijk OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group | |
| 108699034 by LateNightTone @ 2021-07-27 16:01 | 1 | 2021-07-27 18:46 | MCDA | Has this project been given the green light? Last I heard they hadn't got the funding for it! |
| 2 | 2021-07-27 19:02 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Hi MCDA. Yes it's been moving surprisingly quickly of late (especially given the speed at which stuff normally happens here!) - the latest update on http://www.wesleyjohnston.com/roads/a4enniskillensouthernbypass.html says that ownership of lands will transfer to DFI in around three weeks. | |
| 3 | 2021-07-27 19:10 | MCDA | Oh interesting!! I wonder is there any historic sites in the path, like the Drumclay crannog. Do you know what they doing with the old railway bridge? | |
| 4 | 2021-07-27 19:21 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Judging by the route, the old bridge won't be affected, but the route does appear to overlie a section of the railway bed shortly after crossing the Erne - which is a shame, I'm always a fan of disused railways either reopening or becoming cycling routes 🙂The web page I posted above... | |
| 70551260 by impey @ 2019-05-23 12:57 | 1 | 2021-05-14 11:28 | MCDA | Where are these names sourced from? These names look like the mistakes Google Maps make! |
| 70551521 by impey @ 2019-05-23 13:04 | 1 | 2021-05-14 11:27 | MCDA | Where are these names sourced from? These names look like the mistakes Google Maps make! |
| 101145647 by LateNightTone @ 2021-03-16 21:41 | 1 | 2021-05-03 19:23 | MCDA | You seem to have broken the Lough, was this intentional? |
| 2 | 2021-05-03 19:33 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Damn... thanks for spotting! That took a lot of time too, I thought I had kept it together. Not helped of course by the different landuses that bordered it. I'll try and fix it now. | |
| 3 | 2021-05-03 19:37 | MCDA | The wood and water polygons seem to have been merged together. You able to fix it via ID? I tend to use JOSM as it better for working with polygons! | |
| 4 | 2021-05-03 19:40 | LateNightTone ♦48 | Yes, fixed it there now - it must have been the last thing I did in the area, joining all the outers and inners of the wood, which merged it with the lake. Thanks again for spotting it. I tend to use iD as my bread and butter as it's just quicker to get things done... Last time I used JOSM it w... | |
| 102263266 by mueschel @ 2021-04-04 09:43 | 1 | 2021-04-04 21:47 | MCDA | Why did you change these tags? |
| 2 | 2021-04-04 22:02 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,mobile_phone:technology doesn't exist as a tag yet. Tagging this information as communication:XX is common and already used >1000 times. | |
| 3 | 2021-04-04 22:11 | MCDA | if it is so common, where is this documented? | |
| 4 | 2021-04-04 22:17 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Unfortunately I'm not aware of a Wiki page yet...I consult Taginfo in these cases:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=communication%3A | |
| 5 | 2021-04-04 22:24 | MCDA | Yet there are people using communication:mobile_phone=gsm;umts;lte are you going to mass edit these too?https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/communication%3Amobile_phone#values | |
| 6 | 2021-04-04 22:30 | mueschel ♦6,568 | I'm not doing any mass edits. Feel free to use this scheme if you like. As long as there is no accepted proposal, communication:lte=yes and communication:mobile_phone = lte are equally valid.I only changed these 3 nodes because the tags there were yet another new, different scheme. | |
| 7 | 2021-04-04 22:43 | MCDA | I'd argue that as long as there is no accepted proposal the person collecting the data and placing the node should be able to tag it as they see fit without others making automated edits and trampling over their work. | |
| 8 | 2021-04-05 08:35 | mueschel ♦6,568 | This was not an automated edit. I did not delete any information. I changed your tags to an established tagging scheme that is used thousands of times by hundreds of mappers.If you want to introduce a new tagging scheme, please write a proposal. | |
| 9 | 2021-04-05 12:15 | MCDA | Level0 is an automated "find and replace" tool. Of course it is used hundreds of times because people like you are going round changing tagging to suit yourself! If you are so confident that your tagging is correct, why don't YOU make the proposal and get consensus before you go... | |
| 10 | 2021-04-05 12:27 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Level0 is an editor like any other one. There's nothing automatic there - changing a tag is even more manual work than in JOSM, because you can't edit several nodes at once.If you want to use 'mobile_phone:technology', feel free to do so. But please keep the common 'comm... | |
| 89526036 by computerfan0 @ 2020-08-17 15:14 | 1 | 2021-03-22 19:27 | MCDA | Why are you upgrading tiny back road to tertiary?!? Please read - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Roads/Local_roads and/or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Northern_Ireland for roads in the North !! |
| 90754629 by Mauls @ 2020-09-11 11:17 | 1 | 2021-03-21 02:26 | MCDA | Hi, why did you upgrade this road to tertiary? |
| 2 | 2021-03-21 13:31 | Mauls ♦28 | Because it should be according to the definition of highway=tertiary - it is a part of the through route between Roslea and Clones. Tertiary roads do not have to be a 'C' class road in the UK. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-21 15:37 | MCDA | "it is a part of the through route between Roslea and Clones", have you a source for that? I discussed this at length with what used to be the Roads Service and put it on the wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Northern_Ireland#.27C.27_roadsThe through route for anything bigger... | |
| 96141518 by computerfan0 @ 2020-12-20 14:27 | 1 | 2021-03-21 02:29 | MCDA | Why did you upgrade the Fermanagh roads to tertiary? They are classified as unclassified by the local council and Road Service/Transport NI. |
| 99592159 by thommcg @ 2021-02-19 12:02 | 1 | 2021-02-19 22:27 | MCDA | What is the source of this data? |
| 2 | 2021-02-19 22:50 | thommcg ♦4 | I've been to pretty much every fast charger on the island. | |
| 97007748 by eoghanach @ 2021-01-05 22:13 | 1 | 2021-01-05 23:00 | MCDA | Hi, while adding postcodes is a good idea, I'm not sure if adding them to the road way is a good idea. They tend to be added to building ways or nodes, not roads. |
| 96995837 by Merlin O'Brien @ 2021-01-05 17:13 | 1 | 2021-01-05 19:39 | MCDA | Hi, I don't think these roads are tertiary. Please refer to the OSM Ireland Wiki page - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland#InfrastructureHave you got Telegram? Come have a chat to other mappers working in Ireland - https://t.me/joinchat/B-IOzw9jCWmpo-Ghjhk6uA |
| 96987236 by Merlin O'Brien @ 2021-01-05 14:36 | 1 | 2021-01-05 19:34 | MCDA | Hi, OpenStreetMap is a real map of the world, used by many people for many things. I have noticed that your edits seem to be primarily for playing Minecraft Earth and this is not allowed if the edits are not representative of what is there in reality. For example the camp site,I can't see any... |
| 91661441 by MCDA @ 2020-09-28 18:25 | 1 | 2020-10-21 14:56 | spiregrain ♦197 | Hi there - is way 852501522 definitely an in-use school? Or is it a former school, now closed? Asking because it doesn't appear in the dept. education's lists (processed for OSM cross-checking here: https://osm.mathmos.net/schools/progress/BT/#8/54.675/-6.793) |
| 2 | 2020-10-21 20:28 | MCDA | Sorry, it was a former school. They built a new school over by the chapel and merged with Corranny ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2232645 ) There was some talk of maybe converting one into a community centre, but don't think anything has progressed with it. Can you update the tagging pl... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-22 09:42 | spiregrain ♦197 | Done via Changeset: 92884314. I've added the old reference numbers and made the old school names part of the old school building names. Thanks for your help! | |
| 4 | 2020-10-22 09:45 | spiregrain ♦197 | (Perhaps you know if there is a better local name for the old buildings?) | |
| 5 | 2020-10-22 21:50 | MCDA | I'm not sure, the local name of Cornagague is what interests me. It is what we call a sub townland and is only referenced via this school (marked on old OS maps) and Cornagague Lough. | |
| 84070762 by Lilly_96 @ 2020-04-24 16:18 | 1 | 2020-10-07 23:44 | MCDA | The A1/A3/A4/A5 Belfast-Lisburn-Portadown-Ballygawley-Omagh-Derry are trunk roads, known as the T3 or the Western Transport corridor - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2017/226/madeI am requesting these change-sets be reverted. |
| 2 | 2020-10-17 21:24 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92642411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some trunk to primary changes in NI following a complaint to the DWG. See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=aX4dUN8V-7Sux3mU4_DM0g&lat=54.83099226210294&am... | |
| 84010494 by Lilly_96 @ 2020-04-23 15:29 | 1 | 2020-10-07 23:43 | MCDA | The A1/A3/A4/A5 Belfast-Lisburn-Portadown-Ballygawley-Omagh-Derry are trunk roads, known as the T3 or the Western Transport corridor - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2017/226/madeI am requesting these change-sets be reverted. |
| 2 | 2020-10-17 21:24 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92642411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some trunk to primary changes in NI following a complaint to the DWG. See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=aX4dUN8V-7Sux3mU4_DM0g&lat=54.83099226210294&am... | |
| 83936383 by Lilly_96 @ 2020-04-22 11:11 | 1 | 2020-04-23 12:09 | MCDA | Why?! |
| 2 | 2020-10-07 23:43 | MCDA | The A1/A3/A4/A5 Belfast-Lisburn-Portadown-Ballygawley-Omagh-Derry are trunk roads, known as the T3 or the Western Transport corridor - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2017/226/madeI am requesting these change-sets be reverted. | |
| 3 | 2020-10-17 21:24 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92642411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some trunk to primary changes in NI following a complaint to the DWG. See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=aX4dUN8V-7Sux3mU4_DM0g&lat=54.83099226210294&am... | |
| 87511278 by CoolDude101 @ 2020-07-03 16:05 Active block | 1 | 2020-07-04 19:03 | MCDA | Why did you remove the Belturbet Bypass? |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 08:43 | FvGordon ♦217 | I have reverted this CS in CS 87549397, what he wished in the irish mailing list. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-05 11:51 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87553034 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some odd bypass deletions in Ireland following a complaint to the DWG. | |
| 85513467 by YourWorstThought @ 2020-05-20 18:14 | 1 | 2020-05-20 20:22 | MCDA | Hi, to be honest I think you are making this junction more complex than it needs to be.Personally, I would prefer the use of lanes, as the current lay out suggests that there are separate distinct roads for bypassing the junction. For example, coming into the town from the Dublin road and going... |
| 2 | 2020-05-21 00:28 | YourWorstThought ♦1 | That's understandable and I fully understand where you're coming from. My original intention, however, was to incorporate the pedestrian islands within the junction which previously weren't "on the map". Perhaps I should shorten the "turn roads" which appear to byp... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-22 04:49 | Cebderby ♦299 | One issue with junctions that are 'turn off to stay on' (in this case the A4), is that the choice if which ways are link and non-_link can be reversed from 'normal'. I would have been tempted to allow routing along the A4 in both directions to stay on the A4 (non _link), which i... | |
| 83170491 by Sheep Farmer @ 2020-04-07 02:34 | 1 | 2020-04-07 18:54 | MCDA | Hi, you do realise that this node is a duplicate of the following way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4019887 |
| 80500999 by townie27 @ 2020-02-03 22:54 | 1 | 2020-04-04 10:09 | MCDA | While it is funny to rename St Michaels College to HMP Drumclay, it is not very helpful for other users of the map who are probably using it for more serious matters. Please correct this. |
| 78173073 by polak3011 @ 2019-12-09 22:20 | 1 | 2019-12-11 10:17 | SK53 ♦864 | The addition of a hospital here seems most unlikely. I do not recall any road signs pointing to a hospital at the junction by Dunnes Stores. Monaghan Hospital itself is clearly signposted, as can be seen in Mapillary imagery. |
| 2 | 2019-12-11 19:36 | MCDA | Definitely NOT a hospital, it is an area used by buses and cars to drop off and some parts are used as a car park. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-11 19:42 | MCDA | Also the road is NOT residential, it is an access road to a school!!Why are you vandalising the map? | |
| 74220987 by Garmin-User @ 2019-09-08 08:14 | 1 | 2019-11-06 20:22 | MCDA | Why did you remove the admin_level from this relation?Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Boundaries |
| 2 | 2019-11-06 21:22 | Garmin-User ♦335 | The admin_level is valid only for administrative boundaries. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-06 22:22 | SK53 ♦864 | Dear Garmin User,Please do not do this. You will break lots and lots of things which real people really use. If you continue to do this I will need to report this to the Data Working Group.Please read all the pages on the wiki about the Irish Townlands project and you might realise this tagg... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-07 15:28 | MCDA | Upon bring this matter to the Irish OSM community, it has come to our attention that this is not the first time you have purposely removed tagging and you were made aware of the issue in the following changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62861564 | |
| 5 | 2019-11-07 16:25 | Garmin-User ♦335 | @KDDA: This was another case. I had no idea of the Townlands and had wrongly corrected "overlaps" - I know that now.Concerning admin_level: If the Irish community wants to keep the admin_level on historic boundaries, then that's ok for me. | |
| 74220718 by Garmin-User @ 2019-09-08 07:56 | 1 | 2019-11-06 21:15 | MCDA | Again, why are you removing admin_level from the county relations?Please read the Ireland wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Boundaries |
| 2 | 2019-11-06 21:24 | Garmin-User ♦335 | The admin_level is valid only for administrative boundaries. | |
| 75055802 by VictorIE @ 2019-09-29 08:25 | 1 | 2019-09-29 22:02 | MCDA | Where is this data from? |
| 2 | 2019-09-29 22:31 | VictorIE ♦907 | I only added the operator=Royal Mail bit, robbieonsea did the rest. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6828753372/history He had done about 25 in a line from Larne to Fermanagh, through Donegal, Coleraine and back to Larne, so I suspect a cycle tour survey.I get the impression some amenity~post ... | |
| 57878260 by FrischLuftWege @ 2018-04-06 21:10 | 1 | 2019-09-20 23:33 | MCDA | why is the forest relation called "aa" ? |
| 2 | 2019-09-24 17:23 | FrischLuftWege ♦5 | that was added accidentially. fixed | |
| 66602887 by Patmcatee @ 2019-01-24 14:05 | 1 | 2019-01-24 17:30 | MCDA | Are you aware that you have dragged a road node which joins to a bridge in Finona? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231693589 |
| 63757534 by Lowat @ 2018-10-22 12:23 | 1 | 2018-10-22 12:46 | MCDA | Hi, what is this changeset doing? |
| 2 | 2018-10-22 13:08 | Lowat ♦1 | no idea | |
| 60194506 by vcsggl @ 2018-06-26 20:58 | 1 | 2018-06-27 12:28 | MCDA | Yes, this is the townland of Carrickmore and we have it on OSM. Why create another node?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4782998http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=16&lat=54.21363&lon=-7.1776&layers=B00FTFFFFFFFFFFT |
| 2 | 2018-06-27 13:43 | vcsggl ♦1 | Sorry, I couldn 't see carrickmore named on the map. I can' t see the road to my house there either ??88î | |
| 3 | 2018-06-27 13:47 | MCDA | Unfortunately the main OSM style does not make townlands very prominent. They are marked by a purple dotted lines. The Irish map server allows you to see them better - http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=16&lat=54.21363&lon=-7.1776&layers=B00FTFFFFFFFFFFTI will add a bit more detail... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-27 13:54 | MCDA | BTW are you a local to that area? Do you know of any "lost" names in the area? | |
| 5 | 2018-06-27 14:03 | MCDA | Also, do you know where the large rock is that gives this townland it's name? | |
| 6 | 2018-06-27 15:36 | vcsggl ♦1 | i am local in the sense that my maternal grandparents farmed on carrickmore since 1943 and i have been a regular visitor there ever since. their house and farm buildings are clearly visible on google earth. i have had a small boat on rathkeevan loch for the past 60 years, last thete last week! no... | |
| 7 | 2018-06-27 15:45 | MCDA | Lost places. ie Rathkeevan Lough. A rath is normally located on a hill top, so this lough is named after something that used to exist and there doesn't seem to be any reference to it today. I was wondering if you knew where this fort used to be. Sometimes there are clues in local folklore a... | |
| 8 | 2018-06-27 17:01 | vcsggl ♦1 | there is a fort on the neighbouring townland, lislannan, the land belongs to liam moore whose parents and grandparents farmed the land. liam is well aware of exactly where the fort is and makes sure it is never disturbed - bad luck inevitably follows if a fort is disturbed!! i' ve a va... | |
| 9 | 2018-06-27 18:37 | MCDA | Up near Killyfole Lough if you ever seen/walked around it :) | |
| 10 | 2018-06-27 19:00 | vcsggl ♦1 | know it well ! There was a very nice booklet published a few years ago of local stories and photos from all around the area as I recall. | |
| 11 | 2018-06-27 20:22 | MCDA | Yeah, we published a few books via the association. | |
| 12 | 2018-06-28 08:30 | vcsggl ♦1 | I am new to this site so still finding my around the various settings, additions etc. I see you have added quite a lot to the carrickmore townland - thank you. Something that needs checking is the road from which the lane up to my house leads. This is known locally as the Gorry Lane, it doesn'... | |
| 13 | 2018-06-28 09:45 | MCDA | oh that is a difficult one. I have a historic right of way to a bog up the mountain, however in recent years the Forestry have blocked access to it due to dumping, dirty bike racing and other anti-social behaviour. And by blocking access they have literally dug the road out and placed huge rocks a... | |
| 14 | 2018-06-30 14:39 | vcsggl ♦1 | with regard to the fort - if you look on google earth and go more or less due east from my house at carrickmore you can see a white house with a red barn roof, a little way EES you can see a single white house and just a little east there is a clear circular outline of the fort, it's in the to... | |
| 59885503 by norcross @ 2018-06-15 22:47 | 1 | 2018-06-17 23:22 | MCDA | I really doubt the voltage is 110kV, as far as I know NIE only have 11 or maybe 33kV lines in this area. http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/connections/11kv_network.aspx |
| 2 | 2018-06-17 23:34 | MCDA | http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/connections/networkmap_33kv.aspx | |
| 3 | 2018-06-17 23:42 | MCDA | Apologieshttp://www.windwatchni.com/uploads/1/6/4/9/16490250/nie_grid-connection.pdf Slide 5 does show a 110kV Single CCT from Enniskillen to Aghyoule | |
| 4 | 2018-06-18 08:30 | nplath ♦23 | Apologies for not reporting my source:http://www.iwea.com/contentFiles/Conference%20Documents/NI%20Workshop%2009/Presentations/1._Alistair_Brown_NIE.pdf | |
| 5 | 2018-09-22 22:53 | VictorIE ♦907 | voltage=medium is a tag I use where I don't know the voltage and I am presuming it to be 33kV (38kV in RoI), but it could be a step higher or lower.The relation has a fixme="Should be 18 turbines, but more included in this area. Possible has separate name". I suspect the 3 in Co C... | |
| 58124658 by griffonboi @ 2018-04-16 02:55 | 1 | 2018-04-16 21:15 | MCDA | Are you aware that you have broken the cycling relations?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1707362#map=18/54.11253/-7.57754 |
| 56720324 by bamcgill @ 2018-02-27 11:50 | 1 | 2018-02-27 13:46 | MCDA | Hi, thanks for adding this to the map. leisure=park tends to be more for a park with grass, benches etc where you go for a walk. leisure=pitch would probably be more appropriate? Please see how the grounds in Enniskillen are tagged - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194820107 |
| 56597700 by seanobro @ 2018-02-23 03:41 | 1 | 2018-02-23 15:14 | MCDA | Hi, This is not the established way to add the Irish name. We use the tag name:ga to record these names. If you are interested in creating a map in Irish, please see http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=7&lat=53.5&lon=-6&layers=00BFFFFFFF |
| 2 | 2018-02-23 15:21 | MCDA | I also question the source of this information, as the official placenames websites seem to use "Baile na Croise"https://www.logainm.ie/en/1411814?s=Draperstown | |
| 56429743 by Glees1 @ 2018-02-17 01:22 | 1 | 2018-02-17 02:28 | MCDA | The other local paper seems to call the park something else - http://www.impartialreporter.com/news/15651664.Service_of_Dedication_at_Princess_Diana_Cairn/ |
| 2 | 2018-02-17 02:36 | MCDA | Also see the official placenames database for Northern Ireland - http://www.placenamesni.org/resultdetails.php?entry=17103and the official placenames database for Republic of Ireland - https://www.logainm.ie/en/1411925 | |
| 3 | 2018-02-17 03:02 | MCDA | It appears that Transport NI are the source of this new spelling and the Herald is just repeating the information published in this news article - https://www.infrastructure-ni.gov.uk/news/ps55000-resurfacing-scheme-friths-pass-enniskillen | |
| 33903917 by VictorIE @ 2015-09-09 09:43 | 1 | 2018-01-31 15:30 | MCDA | What is this - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162476851#map=18/53.45747/-6.24083 |
| 2 | 2018-01-31 17:47 | VictorIE ♦907 | Possibly changed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55935823#map=15/53.4569/-6.2417 when a mouse had a spasm. | |
| 54963583 by James Bankhead @ 2017-12-27 18:16 | 1 | 2017-12-28 14:27 | MCDA | What is your source of these street names? |
| 2 | 2017-12-28 16:13 | James Bankhead ♦1 | Driving or walking around and looking at the street signs. Why? Did I get some of them wrong? | |
| 3 | 2017-12-28 20:40 | MCDA | Just wondering if you could maybe capture some imagery for the likes of Mapillary or OpenStreetCam, as it is very bare. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=map&lat=54.60303533428504&lng=-7.296886345031567&z=13.855949985350529https://www.openstreetcam.org/map/@54.60100832180092,-... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-28 23:19 | James Bankhead ♦1 | That might be possible. I will look into it. | |
| 41632559 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-23 08:40 | 1 | 2017-12-19 00:10 | MCDA | Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building? |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 00:12 | MCDA | Also, the address should not be Aghadrumsee, it is just the name of the club, not the actual location. The townland is actually Cortrasna. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-19 21:25 | VictorIE ♦907 | "Why is this multipolygon tagged as a building?" - possibly because the ID Editor defaults leisure=sports_centre to be buildings and I didn't notice. If I remember correctly, I edited dozens of GAA clubs that day,Address - I used to be zealous on adding addresses, have calmed down... | |
| 46523754 by WernerP @ 2017-03-02 14:31 | 1 | 2017-03-02 15:30 | SK53 ♦864 | Can you please stop needlessly changing Bing to bing. It totally obscures other changes which you are making. You're changeset comments are not adequate to understand what you are doing. Please discuss this type of edit with the local community first. |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 15:37 | SK53 ♦864 | Can you please stop these edits immediately you are creating bad data https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history | |
| 3 | 2017-03-02 22:29 | Polarbear ♦940 | Besides the Bing issue, you are messing up county boundaries. Boundaries might be legally defined by a stream or river. Look at this example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71656812 was serving both as a county boundary (admin_level 6) in a boundary relation, and a waterway. It might not be idea... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-07 02:18 | Polarbear ♦940 | Fivemiletown edits 46526305+46525145+46523754 reverted in 46637434 and selectively restored in CS 46637891, 46639210, 46639252, 46639371, 46639474 | |
| 5 | 2017-09-08 12:27 | MCDA | Can this please be put back to how it was before. The waterway is NOT called Tyrone / Fermanagh | |
| 6 | 2017-09-08 12:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | @KDDA - there are only 2 bits called "Tyrone / Fermanagh" left - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490542618 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369383412/history - it's probably easiest just to change them manually. | |
| 7 | 2017-09-08 21:43 | Polarbear ♦940 | There was one of WernerP's changeset still on my todo list from the series of repairs above, which were done manually. Let me check that manually at daylight tomorrow if that is the reason for your question. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-09 08:38 | Polarbear ♦940 | Checked my records, seems my unfinished repair is in Ballinasloe/RoI, not the Fivemiletown/NI here. Anyway, it seems that for w369383412, I had removed the Tyrone / Fermanagh name from WernerP's edits in March.On the other hand, for w490542618 and w261564260, KDDA himself added waterway=str... | |
| 9 | 2017-09-09 08:42 | Polarbear ♦940 | The names of the counties and the admin levels are in the respective border relations. Thus the border way as a member (waterway or anything else) can have its natural name or no name. Anything else might be in a note tag. | |
| 50406445 by ATSR Maps @ 2017-07-19 13:55 | 1 | 2017-07-19 20:20 | MCDA | I don't get the logical for these edits. You changed the maxspeed tag to 51, then back to 50. Is this a automatic edit ? |
| 49946918 by Gabriel Reynolds @ 2017-06-30 15:33 | 1 | 2017-06-30 15:55 | MCDA | Shouldn't this be on the node where you leave the roundabout and join the M5? Currently it's on the node where you leave the M5 and join the roundabout. |
| 2 | 2017-06-30 16:00 | MCDA | Please see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction | |
| 49691700 by Gerry CCTV @ 2017-06-20 12:13 | 1 | 2017-06-20 12:22 | MCDA | What is this node? If it is a CCTV camera, then please tag it as such, using the following formathttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance |
| 49311035 by LateNightTone @ 2017-06-06 16:39 | 1 | 2017-06-06 18:31 | MCDA | Hi, where is this data sourced from? |
| 2 | 2017-06-06 20:01 | LateNightTone ♦48 | I forget exactly what's in this specific changeset, but the tracks and fences are from the Bing imagery in iD, sinkholes and names (and confirmation that all the above exists in these locations) are from local knowledge. Sinkholes and names are also available in the book The Caves of Fermanagh ... | |
| 48951525 by PaddyMatthews @ 2017-05-24 16:08 | 1 | 2017-06-01 00:10 | MCDA | What are these ways for? |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 12:50 | PaddyMatthews ♦1 | Redefining lake boundary (townland boundaries in Cavan are on lake shore) | |
| 3 | 2017-06-01 21:32 | MCDA | what are you using as source for the Lough shoreline? | |
| 4 | 2017-06-02 13:20 | PaddyMatthews ♦1 | Bing imagery & GSGS3906 where there are reed banks to indicate what should be treated as land and what as water. | |
| 48704202 by Dominik Picheta @ 2017-05-15 15:03 | 1 | 2017-05-15 15:11 | chillly ♦819 | Welcome to OSMThe road you added doesn't join up to anything, so routing to the road won't work. I suggest you join it to a point in Thomas Street if that is how it is accessed.If it supports residential properties then I would change the tag to highway=residental. Does the road have... |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 15:20 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Done http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48704526#map=15/54.4195/-6.4427 | |
| 3 | 2017-05-15 15:58 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Thanks for accepting!btw pointers on how to make "Flat 1, Mourneview House" (through to "Flat 29, Mourneview House") and "1 Mourneview House" (through to "29 Mourneview House") searchable would be appreciated. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-15 16:30 | chillly ♦819 | I didn't accept your work - in OSM we try to use everything. :-)You can add a point for each address and add addressing for each one. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses for more info. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-15 17:49 | MCDA | Amazingly that is not surprising, as Google Maps is very wrong in a lot of areas!I have traced the building more accurately from Bing and added some local features. | |
| 6 | 2017-05-15 17:57 | Dominik Picheta ♦1 | Nice! Beautiful job :)Thanks for the links chillly! | |
| 48657168 by михаил илиев @ 2017-05-13 19:01 | 1 | 2017-05-13 19:37 | MCDA | Where are you sourcing this information? |
| 48045604 by Claire byrne @ 2017-04-22 21:40 | 1 | 2017-04-22 22:44 | MCDA | Does this crossroads have a name? |
| 43771281 by VictorIE @ 2016-11-18 15:56 | 1 | 2017-04-16 15:21 | MCDA | Hi Victor, where did you source the voltage for this line? It is definitely 33kV or more and I would not class it as a minor line in any sense. Please take a look at it on StreetView https://goo.gl/maps/4o5g4R7v1Kp |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 18:50 | VictorIE ♦907 | This one? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444670138I don't have a specific recollection. Importantly, it only connects to a 110kV substation at one end.It seems to be consistent with: http://www.nienetworks.co.uk/documents/Connections/Networkmap_33kv.aspx and http://smartgriddashboard.... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 23:08 | MCDA | NIE/ESB have done a lot of work on this line, I think it joins two 110kV substations now and is designed as a "bypass" around Enniskillen. | |
| 47680692 by J Slevin @ 2017-04-12 03:38 | 1 | 2017-04-12 14:21 | MCDA | Why did you change the maxspeed tag from 60 mph to 40 ? |
| 47546034 by MalingaGIS @ 2017-04-07 17:13 | 1 | 2017-04-07 19:06 | MCDA | Hi,highway=residential is usually used for roads with housing estates and so forth. Maybe highway=service, service=driveway might be more appropriate?Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice |
| 2 | 2017-04-08 15:10 | MalingaGIS ♦5 | Hi, KDDA, Thanks for the correction. I updated that road in to, highway-service, which seems ok to me now.Its nice to sharing ideas. Keep it up good works. | |
| 47441116 by carinaf @ 2017-04-04 12:23 | 1 | 2017-04-04 13:02 | MCDA | You have added a post office with the following address - Kilronan, Inishmore, Aran Island, County Donegal (Way: 484714800)Are you aware that this is no-where near County Donegal?Where did you obtain this information, as i have serious concerns regarding it's source and accuracy? |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 13:06 | MCDA | There isn't even a building at this location! | |
| 47009176 by geozeisig @ 2017-03-20 11:04 | 1 | 2017-03-20 16:00 | MCDA | Why have you changed the tagging for the standing stone at Cloghagaddy? |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 06:15 | geozeisig ♦224 | megalith_type =standing_stone was not described in the wiki. So I assumed it would be a menhir. As I have read more about it, it can also be a historic=stone. Maybe I must also revert it? | |
| 46944828 by Paul Clapham @ 2017-03-18 00:06 | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:58 | MCDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 2 | 2017-03-18 02:23 | Paul Clapham ♦1 | Damn. But I see you've fixed and improved on my edits. Thanks. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-18 03:05 | MCDA | Unfortunately, there is no resolution to this issue. The official addresses are listed here - http://www.whatsmyaddress.net/viewer/index.html?objId=22086&townland=ROSSLEA and the Irish Placename database https://www.logainm.ie/en/1411823?s=rossleaLike a lot of townlands, the name originates... | |
| 46944819 by Paul Clapham @ 2017-03-18 00:04 | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:58 | MCDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 46944810 by Paul Clapham @ 2017-03-18 00:04 | 1 | 2017-03-18 01:57 | MCDA | The other local newspaper "The Impartial Reporter" spells it Rosslea as well as the signposts in the area, see here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.2383819&lng=-7.1805281&z=17&pKey=CKZgKsno_xxwsKOEQmcawg&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.23496819&a... |
| 46525145 by WernerP @ 2017-03-02 15:37 | 1 | 2017-03-02 16:15 | MCDA | What are you doing?!? Please STOP with these changesets |
| 2 | 2017-03-03 00:39 | Polarbear ♦940 | You were modfying https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123595674 which was serving both as boundary way and road, took away the road attributes and created a new way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478098420. You did not realise that the old way was both in a boundary and a bus relation, thus now... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-03 00:43 | MCDA | This user has done this type of thing in a number of changesets, this is why I asked the DWG to place a ban on this account. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-03 00:45 | MCDA | While there are some good and welcomed additions to the map, there are also strange changes like this were it is totally messing things up. | |
| 5 | 2017-03-03 08:58 | Polarbear ♦940 | Yes I had seen this and was just tuning into the detail analysis. | |
| 6 | 2017-03-07 02:17 | Polarbear ♦940 | Fivemiletown edits 46526305+46525145+46523754 reverted in 46637434 and selectively restored in CS 46637891, 46639210, 46639252, 46639371, 46639474 | |
| 46520040 by WernerP @ 2017-03-02 11:49 | 1 | 2017-03-02 15:11 | MCDA | Seriously? All OSM wiki pages say to use source=Bing ie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source and JOSM fills this in automatically when I have the bing layer added. Why do you feel the need to change this accepted standard? |
| 2 | 2017-03-02 22:12 | Polarbear ♦940 | Well, first of all this is a mechanical edit violating our policies, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductSecond, this change is pointless, as both versions, bing or Bing, correctly explain the source being used, thus you needlessly increase the version count of... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-02 22:24 | MCDA | @Polarbear - I don't know about your JOSM, but you will see that most of my edits have this tag, which was automatically added when I have the Bing layer active in JOSMThis user has done the same in a number of other edits in the local area, but has mixed them in with some useful edits, the... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-02 23:58 | Polarbear ♦940 | @KDDA - ok, JOSM can add them to the changeset (not the object), in particular if you click "obtain from current layer" in the upload menu it adds all currently visible layers. Cool.)Back to the topic, the user started some "area unglueing" in Germany some days ago, I am curren... | |
| 41490163 by VictorIE @ 2016-08-16 13:43 | 1 | 2017-02-09 11:49 | MCDA | Why did you add the street name as Lacky Road? |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 12:45 | VictorIE ♦907 | Is that not the road it is on? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114282636#map=16/54.2318/-7.2600 | |
| 45763457 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-03 00:15 | 1 | 2017-02-03 00:41 | MCDA | It is highly unlikely there are ATM's in these location. Please revert this changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 08:24 | chillly ♦819 | reverted | |
| 45756121 by Rokas Piekus @ 2017-02-02 18:49 | 1 | 2017-02-02 19:26 | chillly ♦819 | Welcome to OSMAre you sure there is an ATM in this farmyard? |
| 2 | 2017-02-03 00:40 | MCDA | I doubt it, all changesets to date look incorrect | |
| 3 | 2017-02-03 08:23 | chillly ♦819 | reverted | |
| 44023913 by Olyon @ 2016-11-29 03:18 | 1 | 2016-11-29 19:10 | MCDA | What is this correction and why is it a worldwide edit? Can you please direct me to the discussion of what this mass edit is about and why its needed. |
| 2 | 2016-11-30 00:08 | Olyon ♦127 | sorry. It is small change on many elements to correspond to the correct way to write the values for plant: output:electricity=* and generator:output:electricity=*.A space between number and unit and uppercase or lowercase for units as shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:outpu... | |
| 42831035 by alanmoore @ 2016-10-12 14:02 | 1 | 2016-10-12 22:03 | MCDA | A culvert is a structure that allows water to flow under a road, railroad, trail, or similar obstruction from one side to the other side. Typically embedded so as to be surrounded by soil, a culvert may be made from a pipe, reinforced concrete or other material.Are you sure this stream is in a c... |
| 18450982 by Mauls @ 2013-10-20 13:03 | 1 | 2016-07-28 08:52 | MCDA | Why are you removing members from the Sliabh Beagh Route 1 - McKenna Trail (1689109) relation? |
| 40639063 by Kieran Moynihan @ 2016-07-10 21:53 | 1 | 2016-07-10 23:50 | MCDA | Are you sure there is a hospital here? Is it new as I can see nothing that looks like a hospital on Bing imagery? |
| 40504501 by curlyq426 @ 2016-07-05 17:11 | 1 | 2016-07-06 10:27 | MCDA | Hi, the tree is perfectly okay to be in OpenStreetMap. The problem I had was that the tree was tagged with addressing tags. I've added the tree back again without the address. |
| 40498702 by curlyq426 @ 2016-07-05 12:29 | 1 | 2016-07-05 14:07 | MCDA | I really don't think we need a name and address a particular tree. The only exception is _maybe_ if someone was actually living in said tree. |
| 2 | 2016-07-05 17:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | It's probably not actually _named_ "Tree" either, I suspect... | |
| 38461237 by 22scott11 @ 2016-04-10 21:19 | 1 | 2016-07-04 18:28 | MCDA | You are tagging ploughed fields as natural=mud which is not correct. Also the tracing accuracy is very poor. I am deleting these ways. |
| 40460497 by Kate McCarthy @ 2016-07-03 15:23 | 1 | 2016-07-03 18:08 | MCDA | Please remove earlier changesets and only comment on what this particular changeset is doing ie "Adding restaurant and bar" |
| 2 | 2016-07-03 18:14 | MCDA | Also, there is a Bar and Restaurant located in the middle of the road?!? | |
| 3 | 2016-07-03 20:41 | Kate McCarthy ♦1 | Hi, How do I remove them? Thanks. | |
| 40460080 by Kate McCarthy @ 2016-07-03 15:01 | 1 | 2016-07-03 18:03 | MCDA | Please use the correct format for the phone tag. For more details see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone |
| 39626748 by Alleykat @ 2016-05-28 15:51 | 1 | 2016-06-02 13:10 | MCDA | Why did you capitalise the name from Lisburn to LISBURN? |
| 2 | 2016-06-02 13:13 | Alleykat ♦1 | Just thought nit would make it more easily to see | |
| 3 | 2016-06-02 13:23 | MCDA | Ah, please understand that the OpenStreetMap is a database and has standards on how we input data. If you are confused there is information in the wiki. (ie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names )What you see on the OSM website is only a sample render of the database. Other people render t... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-02 13:26 | MCDA | This render is quite nice too - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.5092/-6.0408&layers=H | |
| 39696586 by Alleykat @ 2016-05-31 19:43 | 1 | 2016-06-02 13:12 | MCDA | Again, what's with the capitalisation of names? |
| 36438300 by Mumbambu @ 2016-01-08 05:11 | 1 | 2016-01-08 10:39 | MCDA | I dont see the confusion, the name is either Derry or Londonderry, people can choose which they want to use. Please revert the name change to Londonderry. |
| 2 | 2016-01-08 10:59 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Hi Mumbambu. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your interest in the Ireland, however please be cautious of taking a side on such a complex issue. The dual name solves a lot of problems. Like many things in OSM there are many correct answers to the question of "What is the official name?"... | |
| 3 | 2016-01-08 11:02 | MCDA | Maybe it is worth studying that the local council serving the area refer to themselves as Derry City Council, see their website here - http://www.derrystrabane.com/Services/Contact-UsYou can also read lots of very interesting history regarding the naming dispute here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w... | |
| 4 | 2016-06-02 00:00 | Mumbambu ♦1 | https://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/Judicial%20Decisions/PublishedByYear/Documents/2007/2007%20NIQB%205/j_j_WEAF5707.htmAlso sorry for mixing edits of two different two different edits. At the time I did not sure how to edit properly. | |
| 5 | 2016-06-02 12:07 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | The name tag in OSM is not the "official"/"legal" name. | |
| 6 | 2016-06-02 12:53 | MCDA | I don't understand why you felt the need to edit this node in the first place. The name includes the names it is known as locally. You also moved the node into the river which is totally wrong as well. | |
| 38677965 by malcolmh @ 2016-04-18 20:46 | 1 | 2016-04-19 19:23 | MCDA | Updating seamarks? How is deleting 40 nodes updating?This is not a sea, its an inland waterway called Lower Lough Erne. |
| 2 | 2016-04-19 20:49 | malcolmh ♦50 | Whoops! Fat finger trouble on my part. - now reverted | |
| 38185952 by VictorIE @ 2016-03-31 01:54 | 1 | 2016-03-31 07:45 | MCDA | Is disused the correct tagging for this section? This section has been restored, complete with a train carriage and crossing gates. |
| 2 | 2016-03-31 10:11 | VictorIE ♦907 | From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused "A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place." I can only image "used" should be construed as "used for transport" or a **mobile** museum piece, no... | |
| 37062732 by Riggwelter @ 2016-02-07 16:23 | 1 | 2016-02-08 06:44 | ramyaragupathy ♦54 | Hello Riggwelter, Looks like the data you have deleted is for roads that are clearly visible in the imagery. Did you verify the accuracy of the data before deleting them? |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 11:05 | Riggwelter ♦7 | Yes. What's the point in adding like 25 m worth of access road, like the access to a garage in your yard? It just clutters the map. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-11 09:47 | ramyaragupathy ♦54 | @Riggwelter: Would like you to have a look at this page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Micromapping | |
| 4 | 2016-02-11 10:09 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | Hi Riggwelter. Thanks for your concern, but mapping driveways is helpful for OSM and is quite common. There are more than 2.5 million driveways mapped in OSM (service=driveway), from all over the world. ( http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway )Concern for how the map appears is ... | |
| 5 | 2016-02-12 22:57 | Riggwelter ♦7 | Thanks for your kind message, and above all, thanks for your explanation! I suppose I just need to revise my view on what OSM is - to me, having taken it at face value, it's a map and not a database. However, it does make sense to - also - call it a database, and that's how I will refer to... | |
| 6 | 2016-02-13 11:42 | MCDA | Hi Riggwelter, OSM is definitely a database and a very powerful one at that! Did you know that the OSM Ireland have custom maps? You can see some of the maps we render here - http://www.openstreetmap.ie/resources/maps/This is an example using our Irish Language layer showing hill shadi... | |
| 36044071 by SK53 @ 2015-12-19 12:26 | 1 | 2015-12-20 12:05 | MCDA | Phewwwwww That was some work! |
| 2 | 2015-12-20 15:11 | SK53 ♦864 | It's closing down imminently, but I eventually realised that the Geograph picture shows it at the end of the building with the garden centre bit beyond. That gave me a chance by looking at the places I'd previously mapped as landuse=retail. I must say I'd hoped the detective work woul... | |
| 35793617 by hm4 @ 2015-12-06 20:03 | 1 | 2015-12-06 21:18 | MCDA | Google in their copyright statement do not allow copying from either their Map or Streetview. Since you have used the Streetview product as a source of this information, you are breaching Google policy and also that of OSM, see the copyright link on the OSM website, here part of it for your convinc... |
| 2 | 2015-12-06 21:19 | MCDA | We are however allowed to use Bing imagery to trace building and so forth, can you use Bing to trace this building? | |
| 3 | 2015-12-06 21:40 | hm4 ♦1 | I used OSM, but just included the google link for my own reference, I understand it should be removed. | |
| 4 | 2015-12-06 22:03 | MCDA | I have aligned the building to what I can see on Bing images. Ive also added more buildings in the area. Do you know what religion Drum Gospel Hall is? Ive tagged it religion=christian, but it can be tagged further, ie denomination=methodist etc | |
| 5 | 2015-12-06 22:13 | MCDA | Are you from this area? It would be really nice to capture more data in this area. There is an app for smartphones called Mapillary which allows you to capture images while you walk, cycle or drive. (www.mapillary.com) Its great for capturing data for OSM and also uses a compatible licence :) | |
| 32585033 by Paul Donlon @ 2015-07-12 17:06 | 1 | 2015-12-04 12:24 | MCDA | While it is extremely interesting and important for local communities to remember the past, OSM is about mapping what is currently here. This information should be moved to the Open Historical Map ( http://www.openhistoricalmap.org ) |
| 35743153 by noah0000 @ 2015-12-04 09:45 | 1 | 2015-12-04 12:19 | MCDA | Hi Noah, welcome to OSM. Please be aware the OSM is a public map. House names such as "My House", "Bens House" and "Evan's Gafferooney" are of little use to the community. We are more interested in the street names, house numbers and Eircodes to be honest. |
| 35727726 by David Parke @ 2015-12-03 14:16 | 1 | 2015-12-03 19:54 | MCDA | Where did house number 116 disappear to? Are you sure this is correct? |
| 2 | 2021-08-18 06:11 | DeBigC ♦116 | I have split the object as I can see 116 on Mapillary | |
| 35608848 by balorevileye @ 2015-11-27 10:51 | 1 | 2015-12-01 19:04 | MCDA | Why are you deleting townland boundary ways? |
| 35412626 by wambacher @ 2015-11-18 17:20 | 1 | 2015-12-01 16:44 | MCDA | Can you please explain how you fixed them? As far as I can see you have actually broken them! |
| 2 | 2015-12-01 18:32 | wambacher ♦435 | I fixed that area 13 days go and it was fine. but 4 days ago user balorevileye deleted ways 363393382 and 381013023 . (just click them in this list).Please talk to him.regardswalter | |
| 3 | 2015-12-01 18:34 | wambacher ♦435 | 13 das ago, of course. | |
| 35542195 by beartai @ 2015-11-24 00:58 | 1 | 2015-11-24 20:09 | MCDA | Fair enough the village/hamlet name might have been wrong, but why delete it? |
| 35288242 by MCDA @ 2015-11-13 16:39 | 1 | 2015-11-14 09:28 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:what is meant with highway=gi# ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/579036516 |
| 2 | 2015-11-14 11:31 | MCDA | Apologies, the tag was supposed to be highway=give_way as from Bing I can see a giveway/yield markings on the road junction. I have corrected the tag, thanks for bring it to my attention. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-14 11:37 | MCDA | Are you a local to this area? The road "Great Victoria Street" to which this junction joins, appears to have markings which would indicate traffic lights. I have added them, could you please review? | |
| 4 | 2015-11-14 12:22 | GerdP ♦2,751 | thanks for the feedback, and sorry, I am not a local, just noticed the unusual tag in Taginfohttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway | |
| 35286716 by Volunteer Now @ 2015-11-13 15:34 | 1 | 2015-11-13 16:41 | MCDA | Hi, what is this node for? It has no tags, but obviously marking something? If you need a marker you can use the Share feature, which generates a link, like this - http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.59042&mlon=-5.93453#map=19/54.59042/-5.93453 |
| 2 | 2015-11-13 16:42 | MCDA | I have added some of the buildings in the area, maybe this will help you | |
| 35281490 by General Grievious @ 2015-11-13 11:16 | 1 | 2015-11-13 11:48 | MCDA | Thanks for showing the entire world where your house is! Are you sure this is a good idea? |
| 35280607 by scooney @ 2015-11-13 10:35 | 1 | 2015-11-13 11:46 | MCDA | Is it wise letting the whole world know where you live? I'm sure the house name is not "Scooneys Gaf" |
| 35123435 by Taraxx @ 2015-11-06 11:10 | 1 | 2015-11-06 11:22 | IrlJidel ♦8 | Dont think you should be using hotosm-project-1169 in changeset comments - you're not mapping in Lesotho |
| 2 | 2015-11-06 12:23 | MCDA | Regarding "The Lambert Household", it is probably not a good idea to enter the family name of the house owner/occupier into a public database. | |
| 33055777 by WJSOC @ 2015-08-02 20:17 | 1 | 2015-08-16 01:26 | MCDA | Why have you created another way for Roscor Bridge? |
| 31994703 by dmchugh675 @ 2015-06-15 22:16 | 1 | 2015-06-15 22:28 | MCDA | Why is this house round and got a road running through it?!? |
| 2 | 2015-06-16 15:08 | Derick Rethans ♦156 | Looks fine to me now... | |
| 3 | 2015-06-16 18:37 | MCDA | Ive been in touch with the mapper via PM and have fixed it. | |
| 30067544 by Abominable Snowman @ 2015-04-08 16:01 | 1 | 2015-04-08 16:06 | MCDA | Why does it have a road running through it?!? Is the coffee shop a drive through? |
| 2 | 2015-04-08 16:21 | Abominable Snowman ♦1 | I'm sorry there isn't a road going through it. I'm not fully sure of the exact area of the shop because there isn't a picture of the foundation there. You cannot miss it as the coffee shop should be visible from the road and the minute you enter the car park. Apologies for any co... | |
| 22616687 by ingramireland @ 2014-05-29 11:27 | 1 | 2015-03-11 15:54 | MCDA | The Island of Enniskillen is mostly commercial properties, with very little residential. I therefore disagree with this large area of residential landuse, when it clearly is not the case. Also the landuse area is extending into the water in places. |
| 28819905 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 @ 2015-02-13 12:51 | 1 | 2015-02-17 20:32 | MCDA | This change-set should be reverted, as the name has been removed from a valid townland relation. |
| 2 | 2015-02-20 05:37 | zool ♦50 | The townland appears to be from the "mapping townlands" effort and is needed in some cases for addressing and local navigation. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Mapping_Townlands | |
| 3 | 2015-02-20 11:42 | MCDA | hi zool. Yes, the townland is part of the project. The problem I have with this user and the majority of his/her change-sets is that data (mostly names) is being deleted from OSM, mainly suburbs and townlands. I have messaged the user directly, but no answer. I would like to know why the user is... | |
| 4 | 2015-02-21 06:46 | zool ♦50 | hi KDDA, Indeed i'm involved in this discussion on behalf of the DWG, another mapper brought the deletions to our attention saying he didn't want to make a big deal of it, but it looks like some data disruption is being caused. See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28819735 f... | |
| 5 | 2015-02-21 14:03 | MCDA | Thanks for looking into it Zool. Is there a time frame on how long a decision from the DWG takes? | |
| 6 | 2015-02-21 14:10 | MCDA | I would just like to point out that here in NI, the townland within the address is a legal requirement. The official (copyrighted) address source is called PointerNI and is maintained by the LPS. ( http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/pointer ) The local OSM community have been working very hard to map ... | |
| 7 | 2015-02-23 05:37 | zool ♦50 | Hi KDDA, there's no timeframe for the DWG, case-by-case basis, as we've heard nothing back about the townlands deletions, but we'll likely go ahead and revert them very soon. Sorry to be vague here, it's all very much a volunteer effort. | |
| 8 | 2015-02-24 10:02 | zool ♦50 | All right, it's been a week so I am now going ahead and reverting the following list of deleteing changesets on behalf of the DWG:287961272879694628796962288084252880861128819183288196102881966828819735288198392881990528819922288199322882008428820242288202462... | |
| 28819610 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 @ 2015-02-13 12:38 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:04 | MCDA | Again you have removed valid townland tags! This change-set should be reverted. |
| 28819668 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 @ 2015-02-13 12:41 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:02 | MCDA | You have removed the tags from a valid townland. This change-set should be re-verted. |
| 28819183 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 @ 2015-02-13 12:15 | 1 | 2015-02-17 21:00 | MCDA | Again, you are removing tags for a valid townland. This change-set should be reverted. |
| 28820440 by A2B-Cabs-02890309090 @ 2015-02-13 13:17 | 1 | 2015-02-17 20:21 | MCDA | Is this area not Turf Lodge? |
| 26627980 by Ch_Foyer @ 2014-11-07 21:08 | 1 | 2014-11-08 01:03 | MCDA | I dont understand why this is tagged as commercial, these are agricultural buildings. |
| 26629275 by Ch_Foyer @ 2014-11-07 21:34 | 1 | 2014-11-08 01:02 | MCDA | Why is this tagged as an area, when it is a farm yard building of some sort? |