| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50997932 by gamboroedmund | 1 | 2017-08-17 06:17:16 UTC | saikabhi | HI,This way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514484312 does not look like a river to me. Can you please correct this?Thanks Abhishek |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 08:57:07 UTC | freebeer | After a quick review, all this user's changesets outside Nigeria, that is - in Texas, should be reverted, as they add fictional data. They all use this same changeset comment. See the nearby `MY HOUSE' to the northeast with some 250 metre walls... And the TRAIN STATION to the north... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-18 09:07:43 UTC | saikabhi | Hello, Thanks for catch. Can you go ahead and revert/fix this user's other edits also?Thanks,Abhishek | |
| 50834186 by J H Baldwin | 1 | 2017-08-07 12:54:53 UTC | sdoerr | OK, so you didn't like my idea of retaining the node (with its useful address information) and modifying the tea-room-related tags to effectively 'comment them out'? |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 10:38:48 UTC | J H Baldwin | Sorry, this was my first attempt at modifying map data and I'm unsure of the protocol. (Perhaps I won't try any more.) I didn't intend to upset anyone. If you wish to retain the node with its information, o.k., but I can't see the point of retaining nodes simply for possible future use. After all, t... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-08 16:35:41 UTC | freebeer | If the node is still present, then there is no chance of someone re-adding it with out-of-date information... | |
| 4 | 2017-08-09 17:05:05 UTC | sdoerr | J H Baldwin, I hope you won't be put off editing by my comment above. Maybe I was a bit curt - sorry! | |
| 50888110 by Highfidelity | 1 | 2017-08-07 00:27:36 UTC | hadw | The name:en doesn't make sense. I'm also concerned that gesperrt isn't really part of the name, but is actually meta data. The fact that it isn't capitalised adds weight to that concern.There is also no need for name:de if it is the same as name.If you add name:en, it should be because tha... |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 10:20:52 UTC | freebeer | I'd guess name:en should beHoedinger Tobel (closed)(sorry for lack of diaeresis on my kezboard layout) or... (no entry)MAPS.ME . 'Nuff said. The user added an attraction (ha ha) which probably should have been a change to the path access -- without knowledge of the area, I cannot say more.... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-08 10:26:57 UTC | hadw | "(closed)" would be meta data and should not form any part of the name.(I too think maps.me is harming the map. Normally maps.me users don't respond to changeset comments, but this user has also posted to a forum. I think I will add a map note as well.) | |
| 4 | 2017-08-08 11:05:33 UTC | Highfidelity | Hello Freibier and hadwI am using osm regularly via maps me and wanted to contribute not knowing the conventions. Sorry when I did something wrong. Appreciate your support how to deal with such information inthronisiert future. Fact is that the city has set up a plate that states in German languag... | |
| 5 | 2017-08-08 11:19:01 UTC | hadw | Is this a restriction on entry at this particular point, or is it a restriction on the whole length? In the latter case, you should add an access=no tag to the main feature.In the former case, you should add the appropriate barrier=* tag to the point on the way that people are not allowed to pa... | |
| 6 | 2017-08-08 11:27:32 UTC | hadw | I notice that most of the Hoedinger Tobel is already mapped as access=no. It is only the westernmost bit that isn't. There is also a change from track to path, where the access changes, which I suspect is not real. As it is on administrative boundary, I think different sources have been used for ... | |
| 7 | 2017-08-08 13:57:19 UTC | Highfidelity | o.k.will check how I can Change that.The plate states that People should not enter the "tobel = valley". No reason is given, but I regarded this as valid for the whole pass. Whill check how I can Change that. | |
| 8 | 2017-08-08 16:12:59 UTC | freebeer | Hallo all,The actual attraction within the woods is already mapped since 2012 and appears on OSM from zoomlevel 18.Node 1825598023 (typed by hand)The path/track has the same name; three months ago user Micha2307 added the note, roughly translated as ``as of 2017; path closed since 2015'' (so i... | |
| 50809760 by Draxous85 | 1 | 2017-08-07 06:02:59 UTC | karitotp | Hi, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Could you please confirm if this lake (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512592707) is there currently. According the satellite imagery it is not there. Thanks Karito |
| 2 | 2017-08-08 10:07:47 UTC | freebeer | Argh, again I lost my typed text. Must be more careful what I am doing...Hi Karito,The newer Bing z20 imagery with full leaf cover is not a good reference.If you look at USGS Topographic maps at zoom level 16, you will see, with a slight offset, the path of the brook and a small pond.This i... | |
| 50794842 by inputsolution | 1 | 2017-08-04 10:24:54 UTC | Spanholz | Welcome to OSM,if you see buildings that are rectangular in real life but not in OSM. Just make them rectangular by pressing "s" in your editor. Also footways should always be connected to other roads otherwise navigation/routing will not be possible. |
| 2 | 2017-08-04 23:23:03 UTC | inputsolution | Thank you for the tips! Should I be connecting footways to roads, sidewalks, or both? Also, do you know if the 2 un-marked lines beside most roads are meant to be sidewalks? I've been adjusting them to sidewalks as i progress. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-06 06:27:59 UTC | freebeer | Hi,Without a precise example, I can only note that from my observations in Canada, the ``unmarked lines'' beside most roads may well be address (housenumber) interpolation, which can be seen in the area of your work at zoom level 17 and above, with real-or-planned numbers at the ends of the lines ... | |
| 50754014 by luciecohen | 1 | 2017-08-01 18:14:18 UTC | BCNorwich | Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.I don't suppose you are aware that OSM is a live worldwide database that is able to instantaneously change the characteristics of hundreds of folks maps. I hope you can realise that the live database is not the place to conduct tests. (Tests can be done off line ... |
| 2 | 2017-08-01 22:01:11 UTC | luciecohen | Hi Bernard,My apologies - I didn't appreciate the nature of the programme. Thank god I didn't do more damage! Thanks for being so polite in your response - I'll leave the site alone in future. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-02 11:12:43 UTC | SomeoneElse | If you want to add test data you can try https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ - it's just like the "live" site but with just test data in it. | |
| 4 | 2017-08-02 20:59:00 UTC | freebeer | Hallo Lucie,May I repeat the welcome Bernard gave...You wrote:"I'll leave the site alone in future."Please don't... Constructive contributions are always welcome, and there is a lot to be done, perhaps less in London relative to elsewhere -- but I see dozens of unresolved notes ne... | |
| 50513480 by jbwalters22 | 1 | 2017-07-24 04:18:30 UTC | karitotp | Hi, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. You added a pond and a parking that do not visible on the satellite imagery, would you please share the source for this edition? Thank youKarito |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 13:21:24 UTC | freebeer | Hi,If one views the DigitalGlobe Standard aerial imagery, or for that matter Mapbox, I see an area at the time in construction. I assume this has been completed, and this user has added this info with iD based on local knowledge, without realising other imagery newer than the default Bing is avai... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-26 13:30:57 UTC | freebeer | Actually, by manually adding the ESRI aerial imagery as background (not yet allowable as such for tracing into OSM) I can see the completed-mostly carpark with painted lines, and the actual pond, as suspected, not aligned to the approximate drawn data, but close enough to confirm the user's intent. ... | |
| 49956426 by beemerphile | 1 | 2017-07-01 16:23:47 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately there exists no bridge in the OSM data.But you mean the road does not cross the river Manson Mill Creek? If so, the road must be divided. If you need help: You are welcome!! |
| 2 | 2017-07-01 17:57:59 UTC | beemerphile | There was a bridge which was destroyed over 30 years ago. The center of the missing bridge is one of the corners of my property. East Jones Chapel Road has been abandoned by the county government at the 861 address by virtue of over 20 years of disuse. It is not possible to travel from East Jones... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-01 17:58:25 UTC | beemerphile | I do not know how to make the map edits. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 09:18:31 UTC | freebeer | Hi there, lover of BMW...I have just saved the first of several edits to clean up this area based on aerial orthophotography, even though I know some to be years or decades out of date.This area is not mapped to the standards we can find elsewhere, because most data I looked at was imported ... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-02 09:22:06 UTC | freebeer | Look here "freebeer" (IF that is your real name), if you can't keep comments short, at least spend that wasted time doodling and scrawling over our beloved map so we don't have to read your pathetic drivel.Signed, a fan (NOT) | |
| 6 | 2017-07-02 11:08:36 UTC | beemerphile | Commenting only on your edit and not your editorial, the rock abutments of the missing bridge still exist. The road is private property (mine) beginning at the left turn where E Jones Chapel ends, though it continues 150 feet past my entrance where there is a barricade. The former road past the ba... | |
| 7 | 2017-07-02 13:12:01 UTC | user_5359 | Can I help one of you? | |
| 8 | 2017-07-02 16:38:21 UTC | beemerphile | Hi. My objective was to have the connection between East Jones Chapel Rd. and Phillips Rd. shown as permanently impassable because of a bridge out. GPS programs route through here and cause significant confusion. | |
| 9 | 2017-07-02 17:57:14 UTC | bhousel | Thanks @beemerphile, I marked the bridge as `highway=destroyed` and `destroyed:highway=track`. This along with the `access=no` tag should prevent OSM-based routers from sending cars down the road. (They should not route traffic along `highway=track` anyway). | |
| 10 | 2017-07-02 18:00:05 UTC | beemerphile | many thanks! | |
| 11 | 2017-07-05 23:51:30 UTC | freebeer | Hi Beemer, after a few days offline...I took the liberty of interpreting your reply to me to make changes matching your description:* Remove road name left behind after the left turn* Add a barrier approximately where you describe; for lack of actual knowledge I picked concrete blocks, and tag... | |
| 12 | 2017-07-06 00:17:55 UTC | beemerphile | Madison County Georgia still maintains and claims right of way past the power line to the line that I described. Phillips Road does go a bit closer to the creek than E Jones Chapel does, however the edits that were done should be sufficient to stop routing. Many thanks. I have even had a moving v... | |
| 45596609 by puzzle | 1 | 2017-05-01 07:40:40 UTC | Jo Cassel | Hier ist etwas schiefgegangen,bitte die Bearbeitung überprüfen und korrigieren. |
| 2 | 2017-07-01 09:14:45 UTC | Jo Cassel | Nach 2 Monaten keinerlei Reaktion von https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/puzzle-> Revert | |
| 3 | 2017-07-02 10:56:27 UTC | puzzle | Was war schiefgegangen, bitte einen näheren Hinweis. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 12:25:14 UTC | freebeer | Way: 150065690 Edited 1 day ago by Jo Cassel Version #6 · Changeset #49960743Tags landuse residentialWasserwerk hinzu Edited 5 months ago by puzzle Version #5 · Changeset #45596609Tags building yes building:levels 1 Edited over 2 years... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-02 12:47:28 UTC | freebeer | Wasserwerk besser sichtbar via ESRI schneebedeckte Luftbilder, aber 14,5m entfernung von Gebaeude.DigitalGlobe Premium sieht aus wie 'ne Verschlimmbesserung von ESRI.Verschiebung in DigitalGlobe Standard, overzoom z20, um 7,7m. (andere Gebaeude haben so gut wie keine Verschiebung gegen z19 Bing... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-02 15:19:34 UTC | Jo Cassel | Ja, der Grund für meinen Revert war, dass das ganze Wohngebiet seit Monaten als ein Gebäude daherkommt.@puzzle dies hätte sich vermieden lassen, wenn Du dir deinen Edit auch mal abschließend auf der Karte angeschaut hättest.Ich hoffe, alles ist zur allgemeinen Zufrieden... | |
| 49705614 by rlittle08 | 1 | 2017-06-21 07:32:09 UTC | manoharuss | Hi rlittle08,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map. I have observed that you have changed the school name. Are you sure this is correct, is there a way one can verify this change?Asking, as this school's name did not change in a long time.Thank you,Manoha... |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 19:16:42 UTC | freebeer | Hi,A quick googling showed both names at this address, but that the Elementary school closed in 2008, shortly after the import into OSM which has remained untouched. Therefore I am tempted to accept this change as reasonable, limiting myself to the two CA Dept of Ed results and not bothering with... | |
| 48211815 by AT84 | 1 | 2017-04-28 05:45:05 UTC | nammala | Hi AT84,Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and every data is very valuable. May I know the reason behind deleting highways and also adding `waterway=pond` to the `park` tag is not a valid one. Could you please make those changes please.... |
| 2 | 2017-04-28 06:28:56 UTC | AT84 | Nammala, I very much do understand that every piece of data is valuable to OSM, which is why I'm providing it with the latest data of the Village of Maxwell. I am on the local board as a landscaper, and the board has recently been asking, "How can we get word out about Maxwell?", so upda... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-28 06:46:56 UTC | nammala | Thanks AT84 for getting back . Like the way you have mentioned each and every point clearly. Happy mapping.Let me know if I can help you in any way.Best Regards,nammala | |
| 4 | 2017-04-28 19:25:59 UTC | freebeer | Hi. Maxwell? Hmmm.I'm taking a look at the area to see if I can help, and how I can avoid doing too much damage.If the roads/paths are presently impassable due to rain, I would not delete anything, but at best, mark with appropriate access tags. After all, I spend a lot of time in the sun at ... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-28 22:33:11 UTC | freebeer | I know it's rude to reply to myself, but here are my thoughts:The roads should not have been deleted, but instead retagged as not-residential. They look like the paths I walk to my Sometimes-Underwater Spot. Which paths are, at times, impassable for me, but that is not marked as such. At other ... | |
| 48118823 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2017-04-25 13:54:41 UTC | chadbunn | There is newer inamgery for this area than Bing and Mapbox. Local Utah imagery from 2016 and there is most definitely a park here. I will capture with Mapillary today. In the future please refrain from deleting before you have contacted me about an error in this area. |
| 2 | 2017-04-25 13:58:05 UTC | poornibadrinath | Hi, Yeah, sorry about that. I deleted thinking it was not there, but very quickly realised that I had made a mistake. I am trying to revert my chnageset, but somehow it was not happening. I will revert my changeset. Thanks for notifying me about this. Best,Poornima | |
| 3 | 2017-04-25 14:01:05 UTC | chadbunn | Here is proof of the building: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.05898662628968&lng=-111.96608631248533&z=15.694566360039444&pKey=LeOn6x3FubSkEj3JSBu38g&focus=photoI appreciate the interest in this area, but do you have any local knowledge of Layton, UT or are you just doing ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-25 14:09:21 UTC | chadbunn | NAIP Imagery from earlier this month also indicates a building here. Even Google Maps or Earth clearly indicate a building here. If you are unable to revert I will just add it back in. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-25 14:17:26 UTC | poornibadrinath | Hi, Thanks for all the clarification. I realised it when I checked it myself the second time. I was verifying newly added parks due to random edits by new mappers. Since Bing and Mapbox both didn't show the park and the park changeset had the imagery source listed as Bing, I deleted it as I could... | |
| 6 | 2017-04-25 20:30:06 UTC | chadbunn | This building has been verified on Mapillary. | |
| 7 | 2017-04-26 06:50:18 UTC | poornibadrinath | Right, got it. Got it verified on the most recent Mapbox satellite imagery as well. The changeset has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48128984#map=19/41.05891/-111.96633. Thanks for bringing this to my notice. Poornima | |
| 8 | 2017-04-26 20:23:03 UTC | mvexel | chadbunn, do you have JOSM configured to use Utah AGRC imagery? I have tried and failed :( I would love to be able to use it in JOSM! | |
| 9 | 2017-04-27 03:56:04 UTC | freebeer | Just to butt in, without knowing the contents of the other imagery sources, I can verify that both building and park are present in the (degraded) USGS Large Scale Imagery background in Potlatch2, although only at zoom levels 16 and server-side scaled to zoom 20, with nothing for me from 17-19 here.... | |
| 47765668 by octants | 1 | 2017-04-26 06:33:55 UTC | upendrakarukonda | Hi octants,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. According to imagery I can't see soccer pitch here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469284392/history#map=19/40.23083/-74.67116 Landuse and leisure tags can't be given to one feature. Can you check this?Regards,Upendra. |
| 2 | 2017-04-26 07:41:22 UTC | freebeer | I can clearly see that there is a soccer pitch in Bing zoomlevel 20 aerial orthophotos. The user has mapped the pitch outlines a bit too far north and likely too narrow to render with field markings on openstreetmap.de . At the same time I can see an unmarked pitch visible to the northeast on the ... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-26 11:47:20 UTC | upendrakarukonda | Thank you Freebeer for clarification . | |
| 4 | 2017-04-26 20:47:34 UTC | freebeer | To followup to meself...I chose to not adjust anything, as I saw the net distance is some 69 metres, while OSM.de seems to first want to add pitch markings from 80 (or 90?)m. It would not surprise me if there is a sub-regulation size pitch in use at elementary schools like here, but not being fam... | |
| 47872768 by Oil Ranch | 1 | 2017-04-20 12:58:36 UTC | freebeer | Howdy Ms/Mr O. Ranch, Good to see you have not abandoned OSM and have in fact tagged The Big Barn. I recommend to add names to as many things as possible, since I've done my experiments and tried to clean up my preposterous placeholders. In my Easter mythmapping, I collected a number of i... |
| 47335776 by Oil Ranch | 1 | 2017-04-04 06:07:29 UTC | nammala | Hi Oil Ranch,Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth please don't add fantasy data and the names to the name tag. I have reverted your changeset. Please let me know if you need anything regarding mapp... |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 12:30:31 UTC | Oil Ranch | Hello. Will you please expound on what data was deemed fantasy and what tag was inaccurately populated? Intent was the truth, but perhaps I misapplied some construct? Any help in better understanding what was done incorrectly is appreciated. Kindest regards. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-04 12:39:37 UTC | nammala | The park you have added doesn't seem to be present in the ground and OSM is the data which is ground truth. and also the name of the park, May I know the reason behind doing it | |
| 4 | 2017-04-04 14:41:27 UTC | Oil Ranch | Thanks for your response. Perhaps I mislabeled it "park"? The Oil Ranch is working ranch that is an theme/amusement park for families, educational field trips, and events like birthday parties and reunions. You can see the entrance at https://www.google.com/maps/@30.1155678,-95.8246921,3a... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-14 10:57:31 UTC | freebeer | Greetings Oil Ranch, I see no reason for the full revert that was carried out based on what was clearly simple mis-tagging of a theme_park tourism tag. I took the opportunity to trace some simple rectangular building outlines in and around your theme park to try and fill in the copious whi... | |
| 45977234 by ScrubOG | 1 | 2017-03-01 23:22:00 UTC | freebeer | Vandalism -- This and most if not all other changesets from this user should be reverted, look in this area for more similar vandalism |
| 37181509 by halli77 | 1 | 2017-02-11 13:17:09 UTC | Rini1 | Hallo halli 77Du gibst einem Haus in der Friedhofstr. in Lauchringen die Nummer 1.In Map4 BW (wwwlgl-bw.de) ist das die Nummer 5. Die Karte ist nicht zu 100% genau.Bitte gib mir eine Rückmeldung, Wichtig dabei wäre deine Quelle.Grüße aus Rheinheim |
| 2 | 2017-02-23 19:52:10 UTC | freebeer | Halli halloo 1. RiniDie Hausnummern 5-7c stimmen.Quelle: Worn-out shoes and worn-out eyeballsGreetings from Rheinheim -- no, wait, I had to move away, far away. Narri narro | |