| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 141279051 by freebeer @ 2023-09-14 23:07 | 1 | 2023-09-14 23:08 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141279070 where the changeset comment is: Stop deleting my work, you big bully. |
| 141278540 by freebeer @ 2023-09-14 22:37 | 1 | 2023-09-14 23:07 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141279051 where the changeset comment is: Learn how to map, luser |
| 136762016 by ahlem6 @ 2023-05-30 20:15 | 1 | 2023-08-24 19:35 | freebeer | Hi, it appears this changeset has pulled a lot of building nodes way out of position.I fear I have lost all my knowledge of the tools available to visualise this from three years ago, so I defer to an up-to-date expert to decide how best to revert the unwanted changes -- and maybe find out what... |
| 2 | 2023-09-09 01:34 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,129 | DWG reverthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141007281 | |
| 71321700 by BryanBatista @ 2019-06-17 08:48 | 1 | 2020-09-16 05:14 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90958854 where the changeset comment is: maps.me castle for a personal home |
| 80721655 by Alexshanti @ 2020-02-08 12:13 | 1 | 2020-09-15 13:12 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90928649 where the changeset comment is: no alpine huts in a big city |
| 90544792 by Viki_travel_weak @ 2020-09-07 18:19 | 1 | 2020-09-07 18:19 | Viki_travel_weak ♦119 | UPD comment: Our Mapbox team received a local report that the Redford town. Added a town per customer request. |
| 2 | 2020-09-14 03:19 | freebeer | isn't this just a redundant copy of the label https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6276755487 ? | |
| 90508324 by tofrenz @ 2020-09-07 06:30 | 1 | 2020-09-07 07:15 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi tofrenz, welcome to OSM.May we know the reason behind deleting several paths to the house entrances? Thanks.---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMaphttps://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious |
| 2 | 2020-09-07 12:46 | tofrenz ♦3 | All deleted ways are just entrances and no actual ways. Those entrances are all private property.Either all entrances in the whole city are taped or this view are deleted. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-07 12:47 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Thanks for your answer.If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way! | |
| 4 | 2020-09-07 12:51 | tofrenz ♦3 | This are no real ways. They are like path on private property. There is no benefit for any map to hold this information. | |
| 5 | 2020-09-14 03:02 | freebeer | these paths were correctly mapped as private by the firm which added them to osm as useful to their business model of to-the-door delivery, much like amazon is doing today with service drives.osm is not a map but a database of objects that exist in the real world. just because something in on p... | |
| 84629713 by zyxzyx @ 2020-05-04 14:27 | 1 | 2020-05-04 17:12 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! please check the key bu from the way https://www.osm.org/way/471101937 |
| 2 | 2020-05-05 23:38 | freebeer | Hallo Georg,I see you have deleted this `bu=yes' tag, but if you look at other road segments in this changeset it seems what was intended is `bus=yes' as that is present in the other two I checked. | |
| 3 | 2020-05-06 04:29 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | With only two letters it is too risky for me to guess the following. The registering colleague (not a beginner) did not comment on it so I have deleted the error. Of course you can correct others. | |
| 4 | 2020-05-07 03:55 | zyxzyx ♦19 | Hello,It was intended to be "bus=yes." "bu=yes" would be a type by me. | |
| 42369297 by Evgeny Baburov @ 2016-09-23 09:56 | 1 | 2020-05-04 23:13 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84651397 where the changeset comment is: remove added personal info |
| 50473304 by Chrizalene Santos @ 2017-07-22 03:26 | 1 | 2020-04-16 05:58 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83626240 where the changeset comment is: bogus maps.me campsite personal bookmark in a building |
| 65725843 by b-jazz @ 2018-12-23 22:29 | 1 | 2020-04-15 06:29 | freebeer | greetz,in this changeset you tweaked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651845815 , a winding footway overlaid atop several other roads.i suspect there is not a footway down the centre of the street, but at best on one or both sides.alternatively, each of the afflicted streets could be gi... |
| 2 | 2020-04-16 15:58 | b-jazz ♦657 | I suspect that you're right, and that way should be corrected. There were two problems with the way. The first was that it overlapped itself and made reuse of nodes incorrectly. The second is that it is using the same nodes as another path incorrectly.I fixed the first problem, but didn... | |
| 82451278 by fordelit @ 2020-03-21 02:55 | 1 | 2020-04-04 05:39 | freebeer | see comment to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2125898 |
| 80104162 by mcheck @ 2020-01-26 17:30 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-06 13:59 | Andrea Del Sarto ♦65 | salve, ho visto che hai modificato la relation del sentiero ret 141. su quali basi? le parti erano state taggate come inesistenti in realtà ci sono ma sono inagibili.la traccia ufficiale ret non è quella di adesso.attendo tue grazie |
| 2 | 2020-03-28 13:40 | freebeer | ciao mcheck,in this changeset you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316490717/history based on the contents of a note that i cannot be arsed to find, but there is definitely a path that i was able to walk, even if the previously mapped path is probably missing some switchbacks and now th... | |
| 81610503 by maro21 @ 2020-02-29 00:09 | 1 | 2020-02-29 23:01 | CRCulver ♦189 | I was unable to verify the existence of the artwork when I walked the street last night. That is why I removed it, along with other things (shops) that no longer exist on this street. Did you verify it with your own eyes before restoring? |
| 2 | 2020-02-29 23:15 | CRCulver ♦189 | If the POI is still there and I missed it, it would be good to set artwork_type to a value described on the wiki, so that mappers know what exactly they should be looking for. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-01 23:20 | maro21 ♦711 | Because dwarves like to hide :)It's above your head, on the signboard. So I added location=overhead. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-01 23:40 | CRCulver ♦189 | Thanks for the explanation. Now could you please set artwork_type to a tag that will be universally understood? | |
| 5 | 2020-03-04 21:38 | maro21 ♦711 | Artwork_type is and was set. | |
| 6 | 2020-03-05 02:23 | CRCulver ♦189 | Yes, but the problem is that you have set artwork_type to a value that is not even suggested by the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_typeYou set the artwork_type to what the artwork *depicts*, and not what the *type of artwork* is. Consequently, this POI will be missed by... | |
| 7 | 2020-03-05 02:27 | CRCulver ♦189 | Also, in English the customary term for these kind of figures depicted in statues is "gnome", not "dwarf". See Google results: the number of hits for "Wroclaw dwarf" is less than a third that of for "Wroclaw gnome". | |
| 8 | 2020-03-07 01:18 | maro21 ♦711 | I didn't set the artwork_type, I just revived the dwarf.All dwarves in Wrocław are tagged in the same way.Artwork_type=dwarf is commonly used.https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/artwork_type=dwarfDwarf is a type of sculpture. Like a statue or a bust are types of sculptures. And like... | |
| 9 | 2020-03-07 02:13 | CRCulver ♦189 | Yes, I have noticed this. However, I do not think this usage of an ad hoc tag, mainly limited to a single Polish city and with no wiki description, is ideal. There is a way to tag these objects so that they are readily available both to worldwide consumers of OSM data (who would appreciate being abl... | |
| 10 | 2020-03-07 07:19 | freebeer | hmmm, gnome suggests to me `garden gnome' which is a particular style of german kitsch found all over.while originally i was put off by `dwarf', somehow today i was reminded of various sculptures i've seen, probably from the baroque, possibly rococo, era, of what today i'd de... | |
| 77987695 by harshjs @ 2019-12-05 10:57 | 1 | 2020-03-06 18:33 | freebeer | hoi, amazon mapper,did you really mean to mark the service drive you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752957509 with the tag ford=yes (valid over the entire length), when there is no stream or waterway mapped anywhere in the area?yhanks |
| 2 | 2020-03-09 05:44 | harshjs ♦3 | Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error caused here, I've corrected the same under changeset#: 81944259Thanks,harshjs | |
| 81752271 by TravGW @ 2020-03-04 03:19 | 1 | 2020-03-04 03:21 | TravGW ♦355 | Please alert me if I made a mistake when removing description tags. |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 04:57 | jmapb ♦405 | Hi TravGW -- please don't perform these continent-sized mass edits. They are very difficult for both humans and software to process.I consider your motive, reducing description tag spam, to be a good one, but this is not a good way to go about it. Some mappers I'm familiar with from ... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-04 05:08 | TravGW ♦355 | I suppose I should have done a few hundred at a time since it covers such a large area. For this changeset I loaded all nodes in question into JOSM and used the ToDo plugin to review each and every one. Any tag that read like a advertisement was removed. Any tag that I was unsure of was left alo... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-04 05:36 | jmapb ♦405 | Thanks for the quick reply TravGW -- I'm happy to hear you did check these manually. But I'd appreciate if you attempted to contact the users in question first, at least those who seem legit. I know that sorting out who's a real mapper with a penchant for adspeak and who's just a... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-04 21:51 | skquinn ♦804 | I'm with jmapb, changesets like this should be split into at least one per state with possible exceptions for combining e.g. Delaware with Maryland and DC, Rhode Island with Connecticut and Massachusetts, Vermont with New Hampshire and possibly Maine. | |
| 6 | 2020-03-05 01:42 | freebeer | having just reviewed 28 of these, the nature of these nodes as potential spam means a good number of them will be candidates for purging entirely after an in-depth review of all details and not just the altered description.as such, knowing i'd probably be strung up for deleting known and ob... | |
| 7 | 2020-03-11 02:51 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Id argue most of these are wrongly using the name tag as a descriptor also. Instead of being used for the actual name of the object. | |
| 8 | 2020-03-11 03:11 | skquinn ♦804 | Most of the names look okay but I question the need to repeat the full business name for a Bitcoin ATM. | |
| 9 | 2020-03-11 03:12 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Agreed, but then you just have name=Bitcoin Atm. How's that not descriptive? | |
| 10 | 2020-03-11 03:30 | skquinn ♦804 | Maybe dispense with name=* entirely and just use brand=* and whatever additional tag(s) to indicate it's for Bitcoin. | |
| 81755045 by jmapb @ 2020-03-04 04:47 | 1 | 2020-03-04 05:08 | jmapb ♦405 | This was an attempt to revert a poorly-researched mass edit changeset (81752271) which overzealously attempted to remove spammy description tags.In fact it appears I only reverted 28 of the 1045 nodes affected by changeset 81752271. And it's highly likely that most/all of these WERE spam de... |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 23:50 | freebeer | looks like Jan got a start as the first one i looked at was obviously non-objective advert copy - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7261169196/historythe second one is obviously advert copy as it overflows the 255 character limit mid-sentence, which is the mark of an seo spammer. but it has n... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-05 00:13 | freebeer | forgot to paste the url for the second...https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7244829302/historythe third one i'd let stay, it's not an advert as such.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161569016/historyit's not a description, and i don't know if there's a suitabl... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-05 01:03 | freebeer | two more place-of-warship spams.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5936260671a fake shopping mall for something that has no place at all in osm -- an app. also abuses the note= field.place-o-warship, place-o-warship.next, this (osm) is a map, and conveys more precisely the thousand wo... | |
| 81748331 by EditConscript @ 2020-03-03 23:57 | 1 | 2020-03-04 07:43 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | Hi again, the fast_food which was there before is gone? Or do we have to restore it?Thx, Alex |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 09:57 | EditConscript ♦12 | only restore if it is verifiable to be the case on the ground, i caution you this. please use note to ask for local_knowledge if you must?Danke, | |
| 3 | 2020-03-04 23:39 | freebeer | it was deleted by you after being damaged by a faulty editor (MapRoulette? see changeset in node history) with the changeset description of``demo' d''What does that mean? a demonstration of what the editor can do? what were you trying to do? do you mean `demonstrated' or... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-05 08:42 | EditConscript ♦12 | given your history of getting under the community's skin, i shall refrain from further response in this discussion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74552428#map=5/24.067/-166.201i shall direct my efforts into a positive channel for the open climate fix groupDanke, | |
| 81743100 by rjipper @ 2020-03-03 19:55 | 1 | 2020-03-04 09:07 | bopoh13 ♦25 | Why did you delete the object osm.org/node/1 ?The site still exists. |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 16:34 | rjipper ♦1 | Not sure what you mean? I only deleted some duplicate items. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-04 22:59 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | Have you verified that the large number of "brand" and wikidata tags you have added are actually correct according to your own knowledge, or have you simply applied suggestions without checking them? | |
| 4 | 2020-03-04 23:05 | freebeer | Loading...Node: 1addressing warnings in issues tab Deleted 1 day ago by rjipper Version #21 · Changeset #81743100 Download XML · View Historysee https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1/history | |
| 5 | 2020-03-04 23:24 | rjipper ♦1 | What is so special about node 1? I don't even know what it is. For the warnings I used common sense. If the suggestion was a brand that didn't make sense for the location I ignored it, but some were obvious, like Domino's Pizza. | |
| 6 | 2020-03-04 23:25 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello rjipper,First of all - welcome to OpenStreetMap! You may be a bit confused by all the mails you're receiving about your first and (so far) only edit in OSM.It's a bit complicated - I'll try and explain. When anyone makes changes to OSM, everything they add gets a number, s... | |
| 7 | 2020-03-04 23:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Actually - one more thing - I noticed that you (or the editor that you were using) merged the node for Greenwich library into the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538205297/history . There's also a node in there for a fitness centre and a swimming pool, both of which match the counci... | |
| 80412185 by ☆Finvenkulo @ 2020-02-01 14:59 | 1 | 2020-03-04 17:51 | aachso ♦242 | You've added a fixme to the European Union, which apparently translates to: "The 'name' tag should contain the name in one of the official languages (Polish) or should be removed."The name tag contains the name of the European Union in English ("European Union"... |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 18:44 | ☆Finvenkulo ♦91 | UE ma 24 oficjalne języki, znacznik "name" powinien albo zawierać je wszystkie (co nie jest możliwe), albo zostać usunięty - co byłoby najlepszym rozwiązaniem. Po usunięciu znacznika "name" edytor iD i strona openstreetmap.org dalej będą poprawnie wyświetlać tę relac... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-04 18:49 | ☆Finvenkulo ♦91 | Pomimo słuszności mojej propozycji, wolę się wstrzymać z edycją, aby nie zostać ponownie zablokowany.Despite the rightness of my proposal, I prefer to abstain from editing so as not to be blocked again. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-04 18:55 | aachso ♦242 | I understand now and definitely agree. Has there been prior discussion about this issue? Do you mind if I translate the "fixme" tag to English so most people will understand?Rozumiem teraz i zdecydowanie się zgadzam. Czy była wcześniej dyskusja na ten temat? Czy masz coś przeciwko,... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-04 22:51 | freebeer | to correct any misunderstanding, osm.org osm-carto style only has a single set of tiles, which make use of the `name=' value, and not any `name:xx='. although i think what you mean is that the relation name as shown below, which i've never seen on any tiles, is shown for me in englis... | |
| 62693800 by danuta_telenav @ 2018-09-18 11:32 | 1 | 2020-03-04 22:11 | freebeer | salve,did you mean to add the same name to both segments of this long and winding road, including the still-unnamed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11113912 ?thanks |
| 52402722 by Patipon Jaroenrat @ 2017-09-27 04:54 | 1 | 2020-03-04 20:47 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81792222 where the changeset comment is: delete a maps.me wilderness hut inna big city |
| 53705875 by Tawon Pera @ 2017-11-12 07:30 | 1 | 2020-03-04 06:59 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81759373 where the changeset comment is: delete a maps.me mistagged personal home |
| 80281521 by Mark Esperanto @ 2020-01-29 23:21 | 1 | 2020-03-03 01:34 | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | Mark,what kind of "mechanical fixup" did you "revert" specifically? |
| 2 | 2020-03-03 14:09 | freebeer | from what i looked at, it looks as if two mappers are blindly following iDs validator suggestions, doing the usual wikiwhatever tags and apparently a bunch of geometry `fixes'. those changesets refer to solving `issues' and `error nodes' which sounds like blind trust in the iD algori... | |
| 80819127 by FarmFreshMaps @ 2020-02-11 00:09 | 1 | 2020-02-28 04:07 | AgusQui ♦578 | What images did you use? I don't see what he drew in the images of Maxar |
| 2 | 2020-02-28 21:37 | FarmFreshMaps ♦10 | Hi AgusQui,I referenced a recent DigitalGlobe image from 2020-01-08, which shows progress of the construction at this junction.Thanks,FarmFreshMaps | |
| 3 | 2020-03-01 19:26 | AgusQui ♦578 | In JOSM these images appear, what is the resource you are using? | |
| 4 | 2020-03-02 20:21 | FarmFreshMaps ♦10 | Hi, thanks for the question. We have an agreement with Digital Globe to use some of their recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap. Where we use it, we always cite the date in the changeset source. We mostly use the imagery that’s already available on iD and JOSM. If you’d like to learn more... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-03 04:24 | AgusQui ♦578 | Please can you show where that agreement is between you and DG? | |
| 6 | 2020-03-03 13:33 | freebeer | while i've not followed the above dg url, i want to point out that this appears to be a mapper working for Apple. there are multiple mappers working for amazon logistics who also have a special licence to use special maxar imagery, presently under clarification in https://forum.openstreetmap.o... | |
| 80650474 by Ebenich @ 2020-02-06 15:42 | 1 | 2020-03-03 10:40 | osm915 ♦64 | Hallo! Der Tag vending=excrement_bags "erfordert" amenity=vending_machine und wird daher idR nur in diesem Zusammenhang ausgewertet (siehe https://osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:vending=excrement%20bags).Durch die Änderung hast du aus dem KTS einen "normalen" Mülleimer gemacht.... |
| 2 | 2020-03-03 13:12 | freebeer | actually, i see two issues here: amenity waste_basketcombined with waste dog_excrementis one thing, as most robidogs and belloos and the like combine a bin together with a dispenser, amenity vending_machine fee no vending excrement_bagsbut they are independent fun... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-04 11:10 | osm915 ♦64 | I am not sure I fully understand what you want to say, but guess we agree ;-)Yes, vending and disposal can be independent, but at this location they are combined. I think it is unlikely that this bin will be used for other waste, as there are some "waste_basket" nearby. But just in case,... | |
| 81724228 by Tacomaflooringpros @ 2020-03-03 11:07 | 1 | 2020-03-03 11:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81725882 where the changeset comment is: undo commercial seo map vandalism |
| 81436854 by chepteja @ 2020-02-25 06:07 | 1 | 2020-02-25 15:08 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,Why did you decide to delete these driveways? As far as I can tell, the houses are still there, and the driveways are still there. |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 10:13 | chepteja ♦1 | Hi,Apologies for the incorrect edit. While I was assigning the road attribute to the road, I've accidentally deleted them. I shall take this as a learning and consider avoid such errors in future edits. To correct the same, I've added the driveways under changeset #81496886Regards,ch... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-27 09:02 | freebeer | hallo chepteja and the rest of the amazon team,this is just general info about how OSM likes to handle old data and accidental deletions like this.while you have added the driveways deleted, this was very simply done by drawing them from nothing, so that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan... | |
| 81511848 by WallOfDeath @ 2020-02-26 16:10 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-26 18:22 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi WallOfDeath, welcome to OSM.May we know the reason behind deleting more or less the entire park with its paths? For me this looks like #vandalism. Thanks.See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81511848---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2020-02-27 08:39 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81538046 where the changeset comment is: repeated vandalism once again, edit wars are fun | |
| 69136218 by Olyon @ 2019-04-12 01:59 | 1 | 2020-02-25 15:58 | muralito ♦2,019 | MVA is not a typo, It's a unit like MW, but not the same. They are not interchangeable.Please check if this "typo correction" should be reverted, IMHO it should. |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 11:18 | freebeer | agreed, kW and MW are not replacements for kVA and MVA.I also followed the wiki link to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:output:electricity?uselang=en and there i see there needs to be clarification as to the allowable values (and in the translated languages), and probably an expert... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-26 13:30 | Olyon ♦127 | The problem is the Central Térmica "La Tablada" ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180080441If so, I made a mistake.I corrected and put 212 MW for the complete power plant as I found here: https://portal.ute.com.uy/institucional/infraestructura/fuentes-de-generacionOn the oth... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-26 13:44 | muralito ♦2,019 | I spotted the problem in "La Tablada", but didn't check if the same mistake was done in the other plants in the same or other changesets.Thanks for correcting them. | |
| 81420732 by desert2020 @ 2020-02-24 19:24 | 1 | 2020-02-25 07:18 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi desert2020, welcome to OSM.May we know the source of this data import? Thanks.---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2020-02-25 23:33 | desert2020 ♦1 | Hello, the source is paper maps, we used to draw a file outside, then we decided to upload it to the server to work better. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-26 10:52 | freebeer | can you be more specific than `paper maps'? most paper maps are under a copyright that prevents their contents from being used for OSM.also, can you describe what you are doing better than the `vvvvvv' that you have used for multiple edits recently? thanks | |
| 4 | 2020-02-26 12:06 | desert2020 ♦1 | They are just points and I drew out on the geographical reality in the region, and I do not know that it is prohibited. Therefore, if I have annoyed you, you can delete what you added by adding this hashtag. vvvvv I apologize for the title of the wheel | |
| 5 | 2020-02-26 12:09 | desert2020 ♦1 | If you violated the laws, please delete what you added and thank you | |
| 6 | 2020-02-29 12:21 | BCNorwich ♦4,853 | Hi desert2020,I must first say that I don't recall the extensive wetland or scrub areas, they certainly don't show on any imagery. I have to point out some problems that I see on many of your changesets. There are lots of names that do not seem to be formal names, rather they look li... | |
| 81476738 by Pedja @ 2020-02-26 01:13 | 1 | 2020-02-26 01:21 | Pedja ♦30 | This feature does not exist. It should be erased. I was unable to do so, so I just changed feature from stream to line and changed name to minimize confusion until it is erased. |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 10:40 | freebeer | you seem to refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776374334 , later referenced by your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81476804 .this looks to be edited not by an osm editor, but by an old probably customised iD at created_by iD 2.5.1 hashtags #error;... | |
| 81338508 by aepunavy @ 2020-02-22 04:48 | 1 | 2020-02-23 11:25 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Hi aepunavy, is "Private Earth Watch Imagery" the same as DigitalGlobe's EarthWatch? If so, did you get a permission from DigitalGlobe to use it for improving OSM? |
| 2 | 2020-02-24 10:15 | freebeer | while it's not obvious from the changeset lack of `host' i did click the username to confirm this is an amazon edit. i'm quite sure amazon has special permission or a licence to use imagery that is not generally available to normal osm mappers, and while it has been the subject of di... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-24 12:20 | ravsjith ♦18 | Hi ndrw6, Replying on behalf of aepunavy. Thanks for looking into our edits. This edit is partially based on the GPS traces of our delivery partner. Please go through the link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics#Editing_Process for a detailed understanding of the editing process.... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-24 19:51 | ndrw6 ♦77 | Thank you freebeer and ravsjith. I didn't realise it was an Amazon changeset. I have no problem with using proprietary imagery with permission of the copyright holder.I am a bit surprised DigitalGlobe is OK with using their imagery for improving OSM but this imagery is not available for bro... | |
| 81159958 by ssange @ 2020-02-18 08:53 | 1 | 2020-02-21 02:57 | gpserror ♦221 | Uh WOAH, how did West 400S get overlaid on top of Mulberry St in Fort Collins. Please respond ASAP, may need to do an emergency revert on this. |
| 2 | 2020-02-21 17:08 | gpserror ♦221 | It looks like you edited the original road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81159035 (road is circa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221353854#map=13/40.7078/-86.1217)Seems like your editor tool is dropping bits and pieces of old edits without clearing them, and placed in weird places. ... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-22 04:09 | gpserror ♦221 | Couldn't contact in 24 hours on this serious problem, I went ahead and deleted the erroneous road in Fort Collins, CO that overlapped Mulberry Street. | |
| 4 | 2020-02-22 04:21 | gpserror ♦221 | The changeset that I did so is in # 81338179 ... sorry I had to change this back so quickly before you had a chance to respond to figure out how this happened to begin with. | |
| 5 | 2020-02-22 19:56 | freebeer | off-topic, but i thought i'd mention this is an amazon edit, but unlike earlier where i could identify them based on the absence of a particular header, this one does in fact include host https://www.openstreetmap.org/editalthough i've not paid attention for some weeks to know if thi... | |
| 6 | 2020-02-22 22:11 | gpserror ♦221 | This was a fairly large piece of road that was plopped down, I really would like to get an explanation on how this got through. Unlike the previous overlapping roads that were of the same road, this one was two different roads in two different states... Noting that the overlapping roads problem is... | |
| 7 | 2020-02-23 07:07 | freebeer | yeah, now that i look at this, the v1 is a clone of the edited v6 (names need tweaking in indiana, some of the roads with this naming pattern have been expanded to South but not this S), it is not within the bbox of this edit which should be limited to the single car park service drive in pennsylvan... | |
| 8 | 2020-02-23 17:40 | gpserror ♦221 | oh fu** (expletive self censored) the openmapchest USA map snapshotted this error :( Looks like this two weeks I have a bad map. Need to make sure I don't archive this weeks map with a known problem.But anyway I was always worried about how iD handles restored sessions. I knew that if yo... | |
| 9 | 2020-02-24 03:43 | freebeer | dunno why, but the obsessive-compulsive in me has decided to look more into this behaviour, and thanks for your observations.i started an iD window - it took several minutes to get beyond the white screen, but eventually it did. admittedly i've got far too many tabs open, three with dubiou... | |
| 10 | 2020-02-24 06:00 | freebeer | Nachtrag:in fairness to the issue of iD startup time, i should note that i have observed that it attempts to make a connection to some microsoft mothership, for which i see no reason and which i do not permit, unlike the imagery layers and the like. it could be that iD waits for this connection... | |
| 11 | 2020-02-24 08:27 | gpserror ♦221 | iD takes forever to startup on slow machines like my Atom 1.6GHz - it takes minutes to load up and very sluggish in edits. On fast machines, it's not really noticeable, mostly network latency. However when editing several hundred node ways, it gets slow on even fast machines. when i was draw... | |
| 12 | 2020-02-24 08:52 | gpserror ♦221 | BTW if anyone was looking at my thousand edits, a lot of them were trying to address the errors showing up at https://www.openmapchest.org/mapfixer/united-states/ -- I click through them one by one, and each time they pull up iD or whatnot to edit, I can't "merge" multiple edits into ... | |
| 13 | 2020-02-24 10:01 | ssange ♦3 | Hi,Apologies for the late response. Ideally our team responds within 24 hours any changeset comment unless its a weekend. Thank you for correcting the wrong edit and providing me inputs for improvement. On 18th, Feb somehow West 400S road got copied into my cache and was popping up every time I pa... | |
| 14 | 2020-02-24 12:32 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | > Dang. Really need a chat forum for discussions like this.There are a bunch of these - probably the most widely used in the US is the OSM US one listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Slack_workspaces . There's also IRC (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... | |
| 15 | 2020-02-24 21:18 | gpserror ♦221 | Yeah there are a lot of them around, unfortunately I'm not affiliated (nor really want to be affiliated) with any other organizations. Would be nice to have a shared authentication that all OSM users can use directly. The comments field works but quickly devolves off topic such as what I just... | |
| 81327277 by CRCulver @ 2020-02-21 17:31 | 1 | 2020-02-22 15:24 | maro21 ♦711 | Please don't remove cash machines. |
| 2 | 2020-02-22 15:30 | CRCulver ♦189 | When the ATM is not standalone, then setting atm=yes on the bank POI is the standard tagging. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-22 18:55 | freebeer | that loses the information of the precise location of the bancomat. in a recent note i noted a bank poi was improperly located, while the bancomat was precisely mapped where it could be found, on the proper side and well down of a streetcorner, and not on the main street of the bank entrance.th... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-22 19:04 | CRCulver ♦189 | OK, I will let these separate ATM nodes stand in the future. | |
| 5 | 2020-02-22 19:50 | maro21 ♦711 | Exactly. Atm=yes is inaccurate and is used when you know that there is an ATM, but don't know where exactly. Amenity=atm is better, no matter if it's inside or outside, becasuse I can add precise location, opening hours (even if it's inside a building it can be both 24/7 or open at th... | |
| 6 | 2020-02-23 07:34 | freebeer | +100 for opening hours. it's been an eternity since i've seen a bancomat that is only available when the bank is open, as the banks cut back on their hours to save money.further, with, say, a wall of bancomats within a bank building, there may be separate functions that have been prop... | |
| 81103139 by mitesl @ 2020-02-17 08:54 | 1 | 2020-02-19 15:58 | vorpalblade-kaart ♦21 | Can you please make your changesets more geographically precise? (i.e., if you make modifications in Kentucky and then in one in California, they should not be in the same changeset).It makes it harder to QC an area with OSMCha (or see editors in an area with OpenStreetMap History) when there ar... |
| 2 | 2020-02-20 07:56 | mitesl ♦2 | Hi,Thanks for your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved.I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.Regards,mitesl | |
| 3 | 2020-02-20 13:24 | vorpalblade ♦101 | I've had issues with iD not being responsive before.Its one of the (many) reasons why I use JOSM.You might want to look into using JOSM. Its a bit more complicated than iD, but if you are editing for more than an hour or two a day, it is well worth learning. | |
| 4 | 2020-02-21 07:07 | mitesl ♦2 | Hi,Thank you for the suggestion, our team is currently working on the migration. We shall soon change the editor. Alternatively we're also looking at identifying and correcting edits that are abnormally far.Thanks again for your help! Always happy to learn from the community! Regard... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-23 04:46 | freebeer | as for identifying edits that cover too large an area, once an edit has been uploaded and saved, you cannot change its area.as far as i know, there is nothing to change after the fact; the two edits that form the bounding box visualised in the changeset overview were probably correct and the onl... | |
| 71689202 by chachafish @ 2019-06-27 23:29 | 1 | 2020-02-19 17:06 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Should Edgewater be mapped as a city? It certainly doesn't have the population or amenities that would indicate a city. Just because it has 'city' in the name doesn't mean it should be mapped as one; otherwise, all incorporated municipalities in states like Idaho would be cities ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-20 03:04 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello. Thank you for your question. From my perspective, it is irrelevant whether Edgewater is mapped as a city or not. OSM does not have strict guidelines as to what defines a place as a city. However, OSM does have an "on the ground" rule. Edgewater officially refers to itself as a city,... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-20 06:29 | freebeer | the `on-the-ground' rule doesn't refer to definitions and terms used by other sites, but to how a disinterested mapper, when confronted by the object in question, would choose to map it in osm terms going by osm definitions.there are plenty of so-called parks referred to by other autho... | |
| 81127886 by Hb- @ 2020-02-17 17:04 | 1 | 2020-02-17 22:28 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | In Australia a farm yard does not have a name. Typically the homestead (building=farm in OSM) will be named. Usually the entire property will have the same name. Unfortunately with property amalgamations some property names are being lost over time, the homesteads fall into disrepair and their n... |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 18:25 | Hb- ♦288 | I named the farmhouse according to the Karlsruhe Schema. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-18 22:04 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | The Karlsruhe Schema is about addresses. The name of a building, Park or Bridge does not necessarily relate to its address. I note you are still doing 'burnt' .. and this time 'historic'... there does not appear to be anything historic about them.Your source state for thi... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-19 21:12 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Building name, not address. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addressesand https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NamesIf you insist on using add:housename then please consider retagging the followning from name=* to addr:housename=*Way: Finanzamt Hameln (100575712)Way: Ha... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-19 21:13 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Historic "key is used to identify features that are of historic interest". See the wiki. The things you have tagged "historic" are not historic. | |
| 6 | 2020-02-20 05:44 | Hb- ♦288 | I consider the effects and the aftermath of the December 2019 bushfire as historic for the town of Cobargo. | |
| 7 | 2020-02-20 06:10 | freebeer | you are confusing various different meanings of `historic' as used in english (and probably other languages) with the osm definition of `historic' | |
| 8 | 2020-02-20 06:28 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Thank you for your interest 'freebeer', however I did quote part of the OSM wiki for 'historic'. More quotation? "It should only be used with aspects of the cultural heritage that are also of historic importance."I do not think a glasshouse that burnt in the fires... | |
| 9 | 2020-03-07 22:05 | Hb- ♦288 | >Way: Finanzamt Hameln (100575712) That is not the name of the building but the name of the governmental agency in the building.Its not the farmyard nor the farm house nor the barn to be named, but the geographic locality.Unfortunately the Australian Tagging Guideline are lacking from t... | |
| 10 | 2020-03-08 03:40 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | The value 'Breakfast Creek' was place on a farmyard. It is now placed on a building as addr:housename=Breakfast Creek.This is not correct. It should be tagged as name=Breakfast Creek on the building as it is the name of the homestead. This is certainly not an 'isolated_dwelling&... | |
| 54012740 by Daniel Paz @ 2017-11-22 21:26 | 1 | 2020-02-19 16:02 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81229598 where the changeset comment is: maps.me fake rest areas |
| 81186543 by pokey @ 2020-02-18 19:41 | 1 | 2020-02-18 19:56 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,What is your source for these changes? You are changing things that I surveyed myself in the last few months, so I know that they are wrong. |
| 2 | 2020-02-18 20:09 | aweech ♦369 | I'm sorry, that was rude of me to say your source was wrong. What I meant was that I am puzzled at the discrepancies between my survey and your source. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-18 20:26 | pokey ♦13 | no worries. I'm using GPS traces that i made a while ago. Trying to clean out my backlog. I may be out of date. Sorry if I "incorrected" anything. | |
| 4 | 2020-02-18 20:28 | aweech ♦369 | Ah, I've thought about trying to get speed limit data out of GPS traces. What software do you use for it if I might ask? I'll go ahead and fix the roads I surveyed recently. | |
| 5 | 2020-02-18 20:35 | pokey ♦13 | I use OSMTracker. I use a custom dashboard so that I can hit a button for the speed limit change (or surface transition) right as I get to the speed limit sign (or surface transition). I'm usually pretty accurate. Can you tell me what I got wrong in this one? | |
| 6 | 2020-02-18 20:41 | aweech ♦369 | Yeah, Oak Hill Road in Northfield is 35 mph, not 30. It changes speed limits at the town line. You can see the sign on the streetside imagery too. I'll check out that program! | |
| 7 | 2020-02-18 20:50 | pokey ♦13 | OK. Thank you. OSMTracker can be found in f-droid, but you need the one that is v 0.7.2 or later in order to upload. Its also on the Play store, but you want the one by "Laboratorio Experimental." Any older version has been abandoned by the original maintainer.If you want, I can send y... | |
| 8 | 2020-02-18 20:52 | pokey ♦13 | Thanks for catching the mistake, btw. I do my best to be accurate, but sadly perfection continues to elude me. | |
| 9 | 2020-02-18 20:58 | aweech ♦369 | As it does us all! Again, sorry about the grief at the top. Thinking too much about having to plow the snow tonight and not enough about being polite and clear in my speech, haha. | |
| 10 | 2020-02-18 21:04 | pokey ♦13 | No worries at all. I know the feeling. I'd like to tell people not to use "paved" when the surface is "asphalt" but I don't know how to tell who did what tag. | |
| 11 | 2020-02-18 23:56 | freebeer | that would be an easy one to point out if one of the below that i looked at had that change, but i didn't look far enough.the manual way to inspect the history of object tags is at the bottom of the link for the object, like Download XML · View Historythat gives a URL likeh... | |
| 12 | 2020-02-19 02:53 | pokey ♦13 | freebeer, you're just a troublemaker. We should hang out. | |
| 13 | 2020-02-19 02:55 | pokey ♦13 | #my OSMTracker config file (portrait)(for anyone interested)<layouts>\t<layout name="root">\t\t<row>\t\t\t<button type="tag" label="dirt" icon="dirt.png" />\t\t\t<button type="tag" label="previous" ico... | |
| 14 | 2020-02-19 02:56 | pokey ♦13 | #my OSMTracker config file (landscape)(for anyone interested)<layouts>\t<layout name="root">\t\t<row>\t\t\t<button type="tag" label="dirt" icon="dirt.png" />\t\t\t<button type="tag" label="camera" icon... | |
| 46723929 by Junior Delgado Blanco @ 2017-03-09 22:29 | 1 | 2020-02-17 05:49 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81093539 where the changeset comment is: maps.me fake rest areas |
| 81040868 by salat99 @ 2020-02-15 11:29 | 1 | 2020-02-16 12:23 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Willkommen bei OSM! Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte den Unterschied zwischen Namen und Referenznummern. Packstation haben keine Namen. |
| 2 | 2020-02-16 13:06 | salat99 ♦3 | Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Allerdings habe ich mich beim Namen an den anderen Einträgen zu "DHL Packstation" orientiert, so dass ich den Namen noch nachgetragen haben.Und ohne Namen sind die Objekte auf der Karte extrem schwer zu finden. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-16 19:34 | freebeer | i have to agree with salad99, if this Packstation is not a generic name, it certainly appears as a label on the objects illustrated in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packstation .the operator, DHL, label is separated too far from the Packstation label for me to insist that `DHL Packstation' ... | |
| 81053993 by Andrew Yacomen @ 2020-02-15 20:34 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-16 12:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello Andrew Yacomen,Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.You've recently started editing in Sweden, and all your previous edits were in Cardiff. Can you send an email to us at data@osmfoundation.org please to let us know if things are OK or if they are not?Best Regards,Andy, o... |
| 2 | 2020-02-16 17:52 | freebeer | hallo someoneelse,it seems like andrew has learned norwegian so maybe a translation would be helpful? tak...(not being serious, obviously, though i should be) | |
| 3 | 2020-02-16 18:12 | archie ♦1,304 | @freebeer could you please let dwg do their jobb in quiet. Do not arouse unnecessary alterness that might hamper their jobb. Thank you. | |
| 80971169 by Ascheberger @ 2020-02-13 18:20 | 1 | 2020-02-13 19:02 | archie ♦1,304 | Hi, you have not been active for quite some years, Welcome back! What's the meaning of this edit? |
| 2 | 2020-02-14 18:48 | Ascheberger ♦1 | No Idea! It's not my doing! | |
| 3 | 2020-02-14 19:44 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hi Ascheberger,Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. When you say "not my doing" do you mean that you didn't make this edit and you don't know who did?Best Regards,Andy | |
| 4 | 2020-02-14 22:24 | Ascheberger ♦1 | Exactly. I was not active for years.As a precaution I established a stronger password today.Ascheberger | |
| 5 | 2020-02-14 22:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hi Ascheberger,Thanks for letting us know.Also (and apologies if this is me stating the obvious) if you've been using the same password for multiple sites it'd be a good idea to change any password you might have used in more than one place to something unique.If you'd like to a... | |
| 6 | 2020-02-15 10:37 | Ascheberger ♦1 | Hi Andy,I don't know exactly the point of time of my last edits for OpenStreetMap, but if there are any more Ascheberger-edits later than 2015: these are definitely not from me!Appreciating your thorough workingAscheberger | |
| 7 | 2020-02-16 17:34 | freebeer | grüezi ascheberger,your editing history can be seen at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ascheberger/history and in the last two days, it seems you have given up on the beginner editor JOSM and joined the far superior iD crowd, as well as giving in to and embracing the cultural dominance o... | |
| 81040777 by Bluedabadee @ 2020-02-15 11:25 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-16 15:30 | pangoSE ♦409 | What was the purpose of this edit? |
| 2 | 2020-02-16 17:16 | freebeer | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bluedabadee/blocks , and look around for discussion of similar edits, and mention on the two swedish communications channels. i could probably go into details here as i think the person who edited this is not the mapper who sees this e-mail conversation, but f... | |
| 81064814 by patman37 @ 2020-02-16 09:08 | 1 | 2020-02-16 13:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello,Can you explain what "source=knowledge" means here? Usually that would imply that you have visited all of these places, which would make you very widely travelled!Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2020-02-16 13:47 | patman37 ♦35 | Hello,You are right that I did not visit all these places. My understanding was that duplicate nodes are errors (maybe as a result of data imports), which should be corrected and do not require local knowledge. I wrote knowledge meaning the general knowledge of correcting the errors.I did not fi... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-16 13:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | > My understanding was that duplicate nodes are errorsIt depends - two electronic boxes on the same pole may have different nodes in OSM but the same lat and long.The same's true with buildings were one room may be above another. In that case, different levels are indicated with the lev... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-16 13:54 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | One more thing - it sounds like what you're doing might be a mechanical edit. If that's the case, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct , an important part of which is "Document a... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-16 15:26 | pangoSE ♦409 | I think this should be reverted. Duplicate nodes are best judged individually when JOSM warns about them IMO and not through a mechanical edit. | |
| 6 | 2020-02-16 17:04 | freebeer | moin andy,in your way history link, the two/one end nodes of the way were merged as seen in the history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7213739352 , now shared by both areas.click on the two objects of which it is a member, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772676282 and https://www.open... | |
| 7 | 2020-02-17 09:13 | patman37 ♦35 | Hello allThank you for your feedback. I did not do it mechanically but checked each case individually before merging or deleting a duplicate node. In case I did brake something I agree that it should be reverted.Best regardsPatrick | |
| 8 | 2020-02-17 11:49 | pangoSE ♦409 | Hi patman37. Thanks for the clarification, we can keep it then. Because of the size of the bbox I cannot see what you changed in achavi. Please upload more often and with smaller bboxes to help others review your work. | |
| 68412686 by pgsm88 @ 2019-03-22 14:06 | 1 | 2020-02-14 20:33 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81025145 where the changeset comment is: alpine huts are not found in cuba and personal info should not be published to osm |
| 73574208 by Amsaza @ 2019-08-21 10:41 | 1 | 2020-02-13 17:53 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80970091 where the changeset comment is: resolve note 1987046, a maps.me versus maps.me conflict |
| 75603706 by Rassilon @ 2019-10-12 15:42 | 1 | 2020-02-13 07:36 | freebeer | hi, can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/61483240/history which along with another nearby node looks to have been dragged from its correct position and joined with your boundary here? thanks |
| 2 | 2020-04-26 17:16 | Rassilon ♦18 | Wow sorry I never got any notice about this. I have no messages in my inbox after July 2019. Thanks for fixing this! | |
| 80927156 by iandees @ 2020-02-13 00:15 | 1 | 2020-02-13 06:49 | freebeer | hoi ian,can you tell if this is actually a house and not some random farm building, as aerials lead me to believe the eastern-most of the three buildings would be the house, this roof missing the characteristics of a residence, having been selectively added by a persistent fantasy mapper.tha... |
| 2 | 2020-02-13 14:14 | iandees ♦724 | I switched it to building=yes and added some other buildings nearby in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80962440. | |
| 80223110 by Perun1917 @ 2020-01-28 23:42 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-13 06:35 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80939164 where the changeset comment is: despite multiple user blocks, you continue to add this fictional rubbish to osm |
| 80875187 by Perun1917 @ 2020-02-12 01:28 Active block | 1 | 2020-02-13 06:32 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80938934 where the changeset comment is: despite multiple user blocks, you continue to add this fictional rubbish to osm |
| 80912509 by Pippi Dissertation @ 2020-02-12 15:22 | 1 | 2020-02-12 15:26 | Pippi Dissertation ♦2 | Is this addition ok? I have named the reputable sources and the data is understandable to all. Let me know if this is not contributing appropriately to the OpenStreetMap. |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 17:29 | Allison P ♦1,136 | If a tag needs to have multiple values, they should be separated with semicolons rather than slashes. Since edifice_height is an undocumented tag, it would be helpful to create a page on the OSM wiki explaining what it means. While it would be incorrect to delete it, it would clear up confusion for ... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-13 06:00 | freebeer | I'm a bit concerned about the admissibility of your source for OSM, as mentioned in the multiple comments to your earlier changeset, in that the best I could get from a search was an abstract describing the paper, and the feeling it was behind a paywall or something, but I wasn't motivated... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-14 19:54 | Carnildo ♦905 | Is "edifice_height" the same thing as topographic prominence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographic_prominence)? If so, there have been intermittent efforts to establish the tag "prominence" for that, and I recommend using it rather than something completely undocumented. | |
| 80871099 by pkoby @ 2020-02-11 21:34 | 1 | 2020-02-12 11:15 | freebeer | two things - looks like the housenumber got lost between the database-dump node, and your transfer of this info to the way.and second, are you certain the single business or office is the sole occupant of the property, as implied by tagging the way? when i feed the full address into a search, i... |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 12:59 | pkoby ♦110 | 1: JOSM user-error. Fixed.2: I think so, based on https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BwHaEe19zrQoXICnNTlabA (both signs are for Stapleton). I also didn't find any other businesses with an address search, but I'll swing by in person soon to check. | |
| 80855411 by user_5359 @ 2020-02-11 14:08 | 1 | 2020-02-11 21:34 | pkoby ♦110 | I have reverted the revert and fixed the tags. The information was a bit spammy, sure, but I think it would have been better to leave it to be verified on the ground. |
| 2 | 2020-02-12 10:50 | freebeer | it would be one thing were this to be a simple beginner edit, where georg provided the appropriate feedback to an obvious genuine newbie as seen within a day or so mixed with dozens of seo dump cleanups, but this edit bears all the fingerprints of a paid professional who has no interest in mapping p... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-12 12:51 | pkoby ♦110 | Good points, and things I did not consider. I guess it's hard to tell if it's the owner of the business (as the username could suggest either way), or an SEO company. I understand that at large scales, this would get very annoying... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-12 15:05 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | The point is that I am giving contributors the opportunity to report this misconception. (... If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. ...)So far, exactly three people (significantly less than 1 percent) have reported it and all of them have su... | |
| 80765193 by Brian@Brea @ 2020-02-09 21:42 | 1 | 2020-02-10 17:45 | vogelfreier ♦91 | Hi Brian@Brea, nice toy with 'GoMap' to capture the data - but the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771150180 doesn't look like natural=wood to me - more like landuse=grass.Have you ever had a quiet look at the powerful JavaOpenStreetmap-Editor (JOSM) https://josm.openstreetmap.de/... |
| 2 | 2020-02-11 05:50 | Brian@Brea ♦45 | The original purpose to this edit is to update the area with new data not yet visible yet on Ariel imagery as I live in the area and visit this parking lot every couple of weeks. New Parking toll booths have been installed on the North-East portion of the lot. I was dividing the original tagged &ldq... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-11 07:46 | Brian@Brea ♦45 | Speaking of using JOSM, I last tried JOSM several years and did not like the user interface compared to Potlatch. But with both Google and Microsoft abandoning Flash player support in the coming months I might need to start using it with Potlatch relying on Flash. | |
| 4 | 2020-02-12 09:55 | freebeer | actually, you ought to be able to continue to use potlatch so long as osm keeps links to the p1 and p2 executables. just keep one or more flash binaries downloaded and saved, and keep an old version of a compatible browser that you don't update, maybe in a restricted sandbox if security concer... | |
| 80155033 by Andykravitz @ 2020-01-27 17:21 Active block | 1 | 2020-01-28 15:20 | sdoerr ♦71 | This church of St George seems to be in the same place as an existing church with the name Ayia Napa. It seems unlikely that both are correct. |
| 2 | 2020-01-28 17:52 | freebeer | Two objects here have been infected, one for the second time, with the spam of a couple years ago that plagued cyprus and even today causes maps.me false alarms when people use ancient data from that time.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516407797/historyDWG will be getting an earful Real S... | |
| 80156723 by Guylamar2006 @ 2020-01-27 18:01 | 1 | 2020-01-27 19:49 | skquinn ♦804 | Please try to avoid combining edits hundreds of miles apart in the same changeset. Because you have an edit in Austin, TX, somewhere in Florida, and somewhere in Central America, the bounding box stretches across a huge chunk of Texas including Houston as well as many other non-pertinent areas. |
| 2 | 2020-01-28 11:20 | freebeer | It's trivial to review these four changed objects, though, and the nice thing about these globe-spanning changesets is that so many more eyes will concentrate on them, unlike a remote backwater Pokémon remapping vandalism unnoticed for years.It catches my eye that two of the four obj... | |
| 54629760 by Speedie @ 2017-12-14 16:52 | 1 | 2020-01-27 21:57 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80163114 where the changeset comment is: pokémon vandalism where not fixed by others |
| 54629964 by Speedie @ 2017-12-14 16:59 | 1 | 2020-01-27 21:55 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80163069 where the changeset comment is: pokémon vandalism where not fixed by others |
| 54629998 by Speedie @ 2017-12-14 17:00 | 1 | 2020-01-27 21:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80163036 where the changeset comment is: pokémon vandalism where not fixed by others |
| 54629301 by Speedie @ 2017-12-14 16:35 | 1 | 2020-01-27 21:46 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162831 where the changeset comment is: pokémon vandalism where not fixed by others |
| 80062393 by lakshina @ 2020-01-25 08:00 | 1 | 2020-01-25 18:42 | freebeer | there seems to be something very wrong here, with buildings added near null island |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 21:36 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162565 where the changeset comment is: undo pileup at null island for a university wrongly tagged as a pokémon park | |
| 80079060 by Githmi @ 2020-01-25 17:19 | 1 | 2020-01-25 18:53 | freebeer | this changeset has gone very wrong and should be reverted, seem to be a bunch of these recently |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 21:23 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162299 where the changeset comment is: undo pileup at null island | |
| 79968982 by KHN Kulapathi @ 2020-01-23 10:34 | 1 | 2020-01-23 14:33 | Cucazer ♦60 | Hi, it looks like you've messed up coordinates, because the contents of this changeset are shown near 0 N 0 E point in Atlantic Ocean |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 21:20 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162240 where the changeset comment is: undo pileup at null island, tests should not be made on the production database | |
| 80064266 by Isurukulathunga @ 2020-01-25 09:17 | 1 | 2020-01-25 18:44 | freebeer | this changeset is very wrongly placed and should be reverted |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 21:15 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162149 where the changeset comment is: undo pileup at null island | |
| 79985962 by sdicke @ 2020-01-23 15:50 | 1 | 2020-01-25 14:46 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hallo,was ist denn 'payment:maestro_contactless'? Den Begriff gibt es so nicht. Entweder (wenn es wirklich Maestro ist) heißt das Verfahren "paypass", oder in DE wesentlich wahrscheinlicher ist es "girocard" und "girocard_contactless"https://www.op... |
| 2 | 2020-01-26 04:56 | freebeer | Maestro is a worldwide branding of the payment card under Eurocard/Mastercard/and their ilk. Given the appearance of other non-local marks and the general acceptance of Maestro in germany, i could believe this, however it is called.The Girocard, whatever variant, is a german Thing and while pro... | |
| 79945810 by HeyItsAdam @ 2020-01-23 02:50 | 1 | 2020-01-23 04:20 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Thanks for getting those, I've reported this mapper to the DWG as they have made several problematic changes at this location as well as others. |
| 2 | 2020-01-23 10:18 | freebeer | by the way, if my difficult history navigation is correct, the german name:de field now clones name:en, rather than being the actual deutsch introduced in revision v5. i think. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-23 20:10 | HeyItsAdam ♦41 | Thanks for pointing that out, guess I made a mistake when re copying tags from revision v8. Fixed. | |
| 79700976 by Chester Thrash @ 2020-01-17 13:58 | 1 | 2020-01-23 10:01 | freebeer | please stop spamming the map with these ridiculous and badly-positioned nodes. you are just creating more work for other volunteers to clean up after you, than you are adding anything useful and correct to the map. the app or whatever you are using looks to be very badly designed and should not be... |
| 71619765 by TheDude05 @ 2019-06-26 02:56 | 1 | 2020-01-21 12:37 | atomwaffen Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 18:53 | TheDude05 ♦7 | It's not so I didn't. Might want to change your username, that group is pretty violent and intolerant, you wouldn't want to be confused with a white supremacist group. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 19:42 | freebeer | the word Atomwaffen has a particular meaning, and i suspect most of the world, including myself, do not associate in any way with a particular ideological group.looking at this mapper's recent edit history confirms my expectations. a google text search makes scant mention of the US-based g... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 20:24 | TheDude05 ♦7 | It not only has inroads in Germany it also has branches in the UK, Ukraine, Canada, and the Baltic States. They have been responsible for at least 7 murders one of which was a openly gay Jew who was targeted, kidnapped, and stabbed over 20 times. Atomwaffen has also made threats against the Royal ... | |
| 5 | 2020-09-28 02:40 | ppjj ♦56 | I'm reverting this. It's low-quality, and it's copied from a map that might not even hap a compatible license. | |
| 6 | 2020-09-28 03:01 | TheDude05 ♦7 | It's not copied but through GIS processes it is derived from a public domain map which is 100% compatible because it has no license whatsoever. Secondly this is a way of deriving land cover that is used in many maps by professionals. Thirdly you should not be reverting something without havin... | |
| 7 | 2020-09-28 03:02 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Near as I can tell Jersey is a long ways away from Coke County Texas | |
| 8 | 2020-10-24 18:45 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello,Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.I'm writing this to address some of the issues that have been raised above.Firstly, it;s clearly an import. The source says "Texas Natural Resources Information System raster ran through QGIS for conversion and cleaning, Mapbox Sate... | |
| 9 | 2020-10-24 19:01 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Hi Andy,I don't feel that this qualifies as an import due to how removed it is from the source material, generally speaking imports don't go through transitions except those necessary for it to be recognized by the map (tags, relations, sometimes simplification). As for a license ther... | |
| 10 | 2020-10-24 19:04 | TheDude05 ♦7 | I love this idea that proven processes of land classification made by professionals in the field are somehow suspect and erroneous to the self appointed gate keepers of the map or their niche interests. | |
| 11 | 2020-10-24 21:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @TheDude05 Re "As for your Mapbox satellite idea we do know that these types of area are generalizations of underlying vegetation right?" Yes, of course - one key question is whether those generalisations are any good or not. That's why it's important to discuss with the rest o... | |
| 12 | 2020-10-24 21:27 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Again by the definitions and rules of imports as I have read them and as have been spoken about in other groups I still don't feel this is an import based on those definitions. You may disagree and since you sit on the DWG what you do is your decision. I honestly am at the point where you and... | |
| 13 | 2020-10-24 22:18 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | What makes you think that this is not an import? | |
| 14 | 2020-10-24 22:39 | TheDude05 ♦7 | I created the data using GIS processing tools, I hand edited in JOSM, there is no license to public domain maps. It is no different than having a friend collect GPS points, processing them in other software, and then loading them into JOSM and fine tuning the data through hand edits. You have made... | |
| 15 | 2020-10-24 23:01 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Let's do a hypothetical to see why you believe this is an import. Let's say I go to a museum and while there I notice a map on display showing historical trails between the California Missions that was made during the time of St. Junipero Serra. Now I take a high resolution photo of this... | |
| 16 | 2020-10-25 07:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | > Would you consider that an import?Yes, based on your description of the process and the definition on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import "Importing is the process of uploading external data to OSM". In this case you're doing exactly that - copying everything from a map... | |
| 17 | 2021-04-22 23:59 | Allison P ♦1,136 | There's been discussion about reverting this changeset, but no such thing has occurred. | |
| 18 | 2021-04-23 01:03 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Probably because the discussion hasn't lead to a confident conclusion. If a member of the DWG dropped it then it should probably be left alone by others who are not in geographic proximity to the area as well but feel free to bump it up the chain and we will see what happens. | |
| 19 | 2021-06-22 02:27 | ZeLonewolf ♦559 | Hi, this is a courtesy note to let everyone know that I've reverted this land cover import. We discussed this on Slack and concluded that there were considerable quality issues (which appear to be artifacts of your generalization approach) with this undiscussed import which warranted its remov... | |
| 20 | 2021-06-22 02:34 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Just to satisfy my curiosity under what authority did you revert my dataset, how many people on slack agreed, and what percentage of total mappers would this consensus constitute if it was only a slack discussion used as your authority? I would also point out that the import guidelines need some up... | |
| 21 | 2021-06-22 03:28 | compdude ♦169 | Here's the link to the Slack thread where this was discussed: https://app.slack.com/client/T029HV94T/CCJ2P6KCH/thread/CCJ2P6KCH-1624314522.088100I didn't participate in this discussion but you can see that most of the people who participated in that discussion agreed that the data qual... | |
| 22 | 2021-06-22 03:38 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Again by that definition of an outside data source being an import I could use a handheld gps and bring those points into JOSM and that would be considered an import.It seems that there isn't a very defined nature to the process which is a shame.I asked how many people, what authority, and ... | |
| 23 | 2021-06-22 04:03 | compdude ♦169 | The difference is that an import is bringing in data to OSM that was created by someone other than you, usually like a governmental source as is the case here, as opposed to GPS data which you would have most likely collected yourself. And using the aerial imagery to trace landcover isn't an im... | |
| 24 | 2021-06-22 04:59 | TheDude05 ♦7 | Ah but this data I have created myself using tools in the same way as your example so how is it an import?Look at other vegetation areas and you will see discontinuity, holes, and areas that claim a vegetation but don't have it as well. Georgia has been mentioned and I've seen it in o... | |
| 25 | 2021-06-22 05:11 | compdude ♦169 | But the fact that you claim to have used an external data source, (TX National Resources Information System) as opposed to just tracing from aerial imagery, is what makes this an import. If it isn't an import, why did you indicate that an external government data source was used? | |
| 26 | 2021-06-22 06:51 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | Documentation and consensus is the standard for bulk additions of data into OSM, not for backing out undiscussed bulk edits. Large-scale edits have been summarily reverted countless times in the past, not necessarily by anyone in a position of authority. What sets Coke County apart is only that it t... | |
| 76844455 by bahnpirat @ 2019-11-09 13:33 | 1 | 2020-01-20 07:05 | Basstoelpel ♦368 | Moin Bahnpirat, es macht mich wundern daß ausgerechnet Du den frequency tag bei den Bahnstromleitungen entfernst.Gruß,Baßtölpel |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 21:07 | bahnpirat ♦26 | Ich hatte Ende September eine Treffen in Karlsruhe mit anderen Leuten und mich intensiv unterhalten. Tatsächlich ist die Frequenz nicht Teil der (physikalischen) Infrastruktur, sondern eine veränderbare Betriebsweise des elektrischen Systems. Die Information der Frequenz ist weiterhin auf ... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-20 21:55 | Basstoelpel ♦368 | Als ich in einer der letzten Wochennotizen gelesen habe, daß Ilya Zverev OSM den Untergang in die Bedeutungslosigkeit voraussagt weil die Daten nicht (mehr?) auswertbar sind, habe ich ihn nicht begriffen. (übersetzter link: translate.google.de/translate?sl=auto&tl=de&u=http%3A%2F%... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 04:11 | BeKri ♦713 | Servus bahnpirat,"eine veränderbare Betriebsweise des elektrischen Systems" was soll das heißen ???Ist damit zu rechnen das die Frequenz demnächst auch mal 14,2 oder 38,7 Hz betragen kann ?Ich kenn kein elektrisches System, dass mit variabler Frequenz betrieben wir... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-21 19:05 | freebeer | seeing the bbox here is entirely within germany is different than i expected, to see a segment in a border area which can be powered from either country's norm, be it the D/A/CH alpine 16 2/3 Hz, or the 50Hz mains frequency or DC of neighbouring countries.there are of course limits, in that... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-23 15:15 | Basstoelpel ♦368 | Ich verstehe den Punkt, der sich anscheinend bei der Diskussion in Karlsruhe ergeben hat: man könnte die Bahnstromleitung auch zur DC-Leitung oder wasauchimmer umwidmen. Es ist den ÜNB sowieso ein Dorn im Auge, daß da ein Kunde sein eigenes Netz betreibt. Ich finde es aber unauswer... | |
| 7 | 2020-01-23 16:06 | BeKri ♦713 | Ich möchte noch auf die Aspektehttps://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leitungsbel%C3%A4ge und damit einhergehend die frequenzabhängige https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verdrillschema hinweisen.Eine Hochspannungsleitung ist keine Draht in der Luft, durch den man beliebiges durchschicken kann.Grus... | |
| 79768733 by rsavoye @ 2020-01-20 00:22 | 1 | 2020-01-20 20:28 | phidauex ♦194 | Hi, things are coming along nicely with the cleanup, thanks! One thing I'm noticing is that there is often a mismatch between Avenue and Street for the addresses in Ouray (and possibly elsewhere), so addresses that should be 5th Avenue are getting labeled 5th Street, for example. See this inspe... |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 02:25 | rsavoye ♦46 | OSMInspector seems to have a long delay after updates, and I'm not sure it's always accurate. I found a different way to find and fix addr:street a different way in the rest of the county. I'll keep cleaning the import every day till done, but will be busy for a few days during the ... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 18:46 | freebeer | salut,the osm inspector should update the overlays once daily, time of day depending on overlay. it seems to take about four to six hours from the approximate snapshot time shown, until the overlay is processed and the updated data (dis)appear, so if that is too long, fine, or if you've ex... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-22 05:58 | phidauex ♦194 | True, there is a delay before it picks up changes, though I've found the address tools to be pretty accurate once they've sync'd up. I've put a lot of work into the DRCOG buildings and addresses import in Denver, so have learned (the hard way) about both correcting issues from th... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-22 14:40 | rsavoye ♦46 | The ice is fat! I also like to map the areas I play in in addition to emergency response. The new fun is some of the streets in the address data don't exist, but I have road data too, so I'll add those after the mess is fixed. I've found using OSMInspector once a day works ok, and use... | |
| 79815327 by OneTree @ 2020-01-20 19:44 | 1 | 2020-01-21 12:27 | trigpoint ♦2,373 | Hi, please keep your changes to sensible areas as continent spanning changesets, such as this, make your changes difficult to review.Please save your changes before editing a different area.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 18:30 | freebeer | pedantically speaking, this was trivial to review - a way at v1 and points at v1, and a second way at v2 with an added tag.now, if this were more extensive or i were wedded to a particular tool, i'd agree, and there are other legit reasons for limiting changeset scope, but here checking the... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-23 21:37 | aquarix ♦115 | Hello,I would agree with freebeer that this changeset is trivial to review because the number of objects is small.Nevertheless for the sake of clarity it would be better to edit in one country, upload the changes and then move on to another country or region.I have already seen enough examples... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-29 01:59 | OneTree ♦2 | Thank you all for your comments and advices. I will be more careful next time. | |
| 79815750 by Sly_64 @ 2020-01-20 19:59 | 1 | 2020-01-21 08:37 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi Sly_64, welcome to OSM.Is this a test or reality? Thanks.---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 16:09 | Sly_64 ♦1 | Hi, No, This was just a test. I was testing a software that uses OSM. I will revert it (once I figure out how to do it:) | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 16:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | For testing you can use a development server - https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org . The API works in the same way (you'll need to create a separate account), and unfortunately there isn't anything rendering tiles from that. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 18:16 | freebeer | hoi andy,this is sort of a dilemma if one wants to check the rendering toolchain, like for the correct direction of island coastlines, or if one has the suspicion that the non-immediate updates, of which coastlines are an example, are getting hung up (partition fills when unpacking data flooding... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-21 18:53 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @freebeer Somewhat related, there was an offer a few years ago to bankroll a "full" OSM sandbox: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2016-November/029557.html It'd "just" need someone to do all the setup and admin work for it. | |
| 79817475 by kieran-costello @ 2020-01-20 21:00 | 1 | 2020-01-21 10:53 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hiyou added a strange tag here:"RyersonGEO441=Winter 2020"What does that mean? |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 16:47 | kieran-costello ♦1 | Hi Mueschel,The strange tag is for a course that I am taking and I was required to add it for an assignment | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 16:51 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,thanks for the reply. This is not common.Could you point your teacher / leader of the course to the 'Organised Editing Guidelines'?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_GuidelinesThank you! | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 18:05 | freebeer | serwoas,also, you should not add this tag data to OSM regardless of what someone has mistakenly told you, it is of no use to OSM or any mappers, and is just private junk that should be kept private as it is meaningless.further, the changeset description should reflect what was done or intend... | |
| 79749232 by Kelly Reaburn @ 2020-01-19 08:58 | 1 | 2020-01-19 13:07 | InsertUser ♦446 | Please try to upload frequently enough that changes are on the same continent. |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 01:45 | skquinn ♦804 | Does maps.me not allow changeset comments? That's another huge issue with a changeset like this on top of the ridiculously large bounding box. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-20 10:16 | freebeer | To be fair to the original mapper, as I understand it, maps.me is largely responsible for these original sins by taking control away from the user and automatically uploading the way it wants.And further, despite the range of this edit, there are only three nodes at v1 added, so even on my incon... | |
| 79563016 by lawyeril @ 2020-01-14 11:49 | 1 | 2020-01-14 14:51 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please check you address, there is another business (https://www.osm.org/node/7114349340) with the same address. |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 09:31 | freebeer | Georg, looks like they are the same business, the other being a scammy on-line front to appeal to those that seek that sort of thing and not suitable for a serious map like OSM, while the data here seems realistic to reflect the physical reality one hopes to find with a visit, and not a virtual serv... | |
| 71127918 by WoodWoseWulf @ 2019-06-11 06:40 | 1 | 2019-06-12 23:49 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Note: Mapper has contacted me via private message regarding this removal requesting a way to upload photos of the location. I have provided several options and offered to assist as required when it comes to getting correct data onto the map.I still consider this removal valid as each time the ma... |
| 2 | 2019-06-13 05:47 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | I am also attempting to make direct contact with the City of Centralia's "See Centralia" service in order to gain more information on this location regarding both the park and the Bed and Breakfast | |
| 3 | 2019-06-13 12:12 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | The mapper in question has now sent me another private message threatening that they and their friends will mass report me for this changeset.For the sake of record keeping the same user:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69878880Changed park to landuse=military on way 584066649Remo... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-14 00:06 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Response received from Economic Development Director for the City of Centralia stating that they are not presently aware of either Dogwood B&B or Meadow Park, but will investigate further | |
| 5 | 2019-06-14 02:29 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I think if your contacting city officials over some troll Pokemon Go fake park mappers your taking this way to seriously and probably won't get much else done because you'll be spending all your time on none sense. It's much better to just delete, ignore, and move on. They want to you... | |
| 6 | 2019-06-14 02:30 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Btw, they will never contact the DWG either. Know one that threatens to ever does. It's just a bullying tactic. Its best to just ignore it. | |
| 7 | 2019-06-14 15:01 | freebeer | adam, woody is publicly documenting what is happening out-of-sight, which will help the dwg in case they need to again take action as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549033571/history and the relevant changeset discussions.it is part of the Open of osm, and keeps mappers civil. sometimes.\... | |
| 8 | 2019-06-18 06:22 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | I have received a response from the Economic Development Developer (who has been extremely helpful). There is no B&B at this location at this time, and there is no park as either the local government or OSM defines it.Adamant1, point well taken - in most cases of obvious Pokemon Go inspired ... | |
| 9 | 2020-01-09 04:12 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hhhmm, well WoodwoseWulf, what about the "Blueberry Garden" and other clearly Pokemon Go gruff, including the paths, that have replaced it? Time to call the Economic Development Developer this again to see if this place is a blueberry garden? Then maybe in 7 more months they can be called ... | |
| 10 | 2020-01-09 22:51 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Provided this mapper doesn't add anything else to this location which will send people on a wild goose chase looking for non-existent bed and breakfast business or park, I'm done with this location.I've taken SomeoneElse's comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset... | |
| 11 | 2020-01-11 09:00 | Adamant1 ♦222 | "Thumbs up emoji" | |
| 12 | 2020-01-12 09:51 | freebeer | > "Thumbs up emoji" | |
| 13 | 2020-01-12 10:01 | freebeer | what the bl**dy f*??? ghost-touch has infected a further device. take two:> "Thumbs up emoji"shows up as a black box with my device font. are people going to start using obscure emojis to replace entire words soon rather than bothering to type out the full word? i say, when ... | |
| 14 | 2020-01-16 07:26 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | @freebeer - by all means, be my guest :DKeep in mind that in this case, the mapper is a rampant sock-puppeteer and has continued to attempt to make strange changes as recently as a couple of months ago such as:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77344731Unfortunately, for the OSM commu... | |
| 15 | 2020-01-20 09:06 | freebeer | is Rochester still a Thing? I thought that sock-puppetry had ceased, based on the lack of new user blocks since a three-pronged (at least) attack on that vandal's changes one nice day some months back. Well, it was probably rainy. First and only time I was involved.Your work here is appr... | |
| 16 | 2020-01-20 11:47 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Rochester kind of petered out after that day you mentioned. But as a whole Rochester is a case study on Pokemon GO (and more broadly, gameification-inspired) vandalism at its worst. By some miracle, Niantic actually updated the map data they (still) use while the vandal was active, but somehow none ... | |
| 17 | 2020-01-20 11:55 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | And on "Your work here is appreciated" - Thank you, I really appreciate it. | |
| 18 | 2020-05-06 04:17 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Looks like a lot of the scrappy areas here were removed in the following recent changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84301393Will have to see how this pans out over the coming weeks. | |
| 19 | 2020-06-03 23:20 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Aaaaannnd all 527 nodes have been (poorly) reverted back into existence in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86143199 ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ | |
| 20 | 2020-06-04 02:14 | Adamant1 ♦222 | That was a crap move. I left them a changeset comment and will just delete the stuff again or report them depending on the response. | |
| 21 | 2020-06-04 02:15 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Although having to delete the 527 empty nodes again is going to be an extreme hassle. | |
| 22 | 2020-06-04 02:59 | edbort ♦3 | Hello. I apologise for the bad revert. I was only trying to fix the grass areas, gardens, and paths that were wrongly deleted. | |
| 78792999 by PaulBrown2 @ 2019-12-24 00:01 | 1 | 2020-01-20 08:42 | freebeer | No, really. When I feed `arsonist' and `Callewaert' into the search engine of my choice, there are too many results off-limits to europe, so you're going to have to help me out, as a different Callewaert perished in an inferno in Tennessee; Willy, don't be a hero, don't be ... |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 20:55 | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | This CS was reverted in 79817172 with the comment:US: revert vandalism, DWG Ticket#2020012010000056, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3388 | |
| 78792633 by PaulBrown2 @ 2019-12-23 23:36 | 1 | 2019-12-23 23:53 | mcall20 ♦1 | This is accurate. Will Callewaert was recently named the Head of the Board. Following his election by the board, the street formerly known as Lyford Cay Drive has since been renamed to Will Callewaert Drive due to the success of his fundraising drive geared to much needed road repairs. |
| 2 | 2019-12-25 23:10 | InsertUser ♦446 | This seems to be an odd conversation on a changeset that didn't change the name of the street. P.S. the dual carriageway part by the roundabout still has the old name. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-02 16:31 | Canyonsrcool ♦53 | I don't believe this is accurate. I've been here. What is your source? Your old username used to be Willcallewaert so I think this could be vandalism. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-20 07:52 | freebeer | Which Board? and why has this fiction as well as the others not yet been reverted? | |
| 5 | 2020-01-20 17:53 | Canyonsrcool ♦53 | Has been reverted. | |
| 79271564 by PaulBrown2 @ 2020-01-07 02:37 | 1 | 2020-01-15 21:34 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Interesting. Could you site some federal legislation that renamed this section of the refuge. I couldn't find anything on google. |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 07:46 | freebeer | if you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PaulBrown2/history you will see a lot of these changes that have not yet been reverted and for which google provides absolutely no hints. looks to be completely bogus, as such a great benefit to society should not need to be hidden in the results reda... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-20 20:55 | Polarbear-repair ♦690 | This CS was reverted in 79817172 with the comment:US: revert vandalism, DWG Ticket#2020012010000056, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3388 | |
| 79700992 by Chester Thrash @ 2020-01-17 13:58 | 1 | 2020-01-17 18:28 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! Your point is in the middle of a building and you didn't set a name you us a (wrong) description. Is inside the building a restaurant name "White House"? I am glad to add this information to the address. |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 06:31 | freebeer | no. my lengthy reply got lost | |
| 79204805 by Guylamar2006 @ 2020-01-05 03:51 | 1 | 2020-01-19 14:53 | pangoSE ♦409 | Please avoid worldwide changesets. See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/79577457 |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 06:00 | freebeer | To pick nits, this was not worldwide (with Gilles Peterson, arrgh, someone extract that earworm from me brane) but spread geographically thinly.To defend the mapper, the two items I checked were completion hig->highway; had that specific info, and not the generic `typo' been in the chang... | |
| 79241350 by vpprahar @ 2020-01-06 09:46 | 1 | 2020-01-08 03:13 | mapman44 ♦526 | In this changeset you have a bounding box that stretches across the entire US to add a few driveways in two locations over 2000 miles apart. When you have edits in areas that are far apart please create a changeset for each area. --- Published using OSMCha: ... |
| 2 | 2020-01-08 06:31 | vpprahar ♦3 | Hi,Thanks for your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved. However, as suggested by you I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.Regards,vpprahar. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-09 03:51 | freebeer | 'giorno,if iD appears to freeze for you, then you should try to figure out the reason for this. years ago i would have suspected memory pressure causing disk writes and reads due to paging and swapping, where adding more memory would help.these days i've been degraded to non-swap ... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-13 03:59 | vpprahar ♦3 | Hi,Thanks for your response. This has happened because of the editor being unresponsive for a while, this was on the same day of other changeset which we've conversed about #79241350. My apologies that I missed to check this, I shall be watchful of such errors before saving.Thanks,vpp... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-13 04:00 | vpprahar ♦3 | Hi,Apologies for the issue here. While we are attempting to work around the change of editing tool, we are progressing towards testing the new features with our development team. As we add ~10k changesets/day to OSM, such errors are inevitable, we are putting efforts towards having such issues rec... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-13 09:08 | freebeer | thanks - a minute freeze is definitely a productivity killer, and i don't blame you for taking action.i take it you are accessing iD through a browser - as the rest of the system is responsive, is it just the iD tab that goes nowhere - that is, are you able to open a new browser tab and wor... | |
| 79457941 by Dark Kirb @ 2020-01-11 18:47 | 1 | 2020-01-12 20:44 | sorcrosc ♦412 | Please read and make sure you understand this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductIn my opinion this changeset should be reverted.Lorenzo |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 03:07 | freebeer | not only that, the node i investigated happened to be in italia, where the change to type=bell_tower failed to include the wiki page subclassification of bell_tower=campanile , thereby losing information present in the previous mapping. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-14 00:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Does this need reverting? | |
| 4 | 2020-02-25 19:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81469755 after changing that data had still been lost (see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641179417/history ) | |
| 79485931 by Alan Bragg @ 2020-01-12 19:51 | 1 | 2020-01-13 02:58 | freebeer | hola alan,i see a weirdness in the map rendering, a discontinuity that when investigated shows a line attempting to represent a bollard that is not rendered (should be a point along the way) as well as a discontinuity along the way.a bollard does not imply a road break, quite the opposite, a... |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 19:12 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Interesting. Whats on the ground is a line of about 15 boulders creating a wall with a space for pedestrians on the east side. The road is none existent. I re-mapped the area with a path, the sidewalk connections, fire hydrant and bike rack. | |
| 79462244 by saabgeorge @ 2020-01-11 22:02 | 1 | 2020-01-12 19:40 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | Welcome to OSM. Amazon has added a lot of driveways to help their drivers make delivery. You could add access=private if you'd like to reinstate your driveway. No router will send cars down your driveway. |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 02:49 | freebeer | as seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645169783/history the access tag was already present and there is no grounds for this deletion, which IMHO should be reverted as the mapping reflected the actual situation that there are in fact driveways (not all mapped yet) branching from the roads to r... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-13 15:17 | saabgeorge ♦1 | The problem is that Apple Maps uses this information and depicts my driveway as a public road - not a driveway. This is a violation of my privacy especially since my driveway is only three feet from my house at it's closest point. Also my wife and I daycare my grandchildren who use the driveway... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-13 19:00 | Alan Bragg ♦152 | I added driveway stubs at both ends of your un mapped driveway. That should be enough to let Amazon find your house. It's not right for a map to cause you grief. Living near Boston, the worst congested city in the US causes a lot of people to seek a short cuts and your driveway is a huge short ... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-13 22:10 | saabgeorge ♦1 | Thanks for all your help Alan - your latest edit is great and should please everyone. Now I just need Apple to change - they will be getting a registered letter tomorrow with my complaint but I''l also contact the Amazon person to see if he can help. | |
| 6 | 2020-01-13 23:35 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | If the road exists, it should be on the map. Issues with rendering should be addressed by the renderer. | |
| 7 | 2020-01-14 01:19 | saabgeorge ♦1 | I would have to ask what your definition of a road is. Does a 12 foot wide driveway - just wide enough for a single vehicle to pass - used for a private home and located on private land meet the need to be made public? | |
| 8 | 2020-01-14 02:15 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | Maybe not "need", but yes | |
| 79364405 by Jamie jp @ 2020-01-09 04:47 | 1 | 2020-01-09 05:55 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | The address does not belong in the name of a building. But, deleting your attempts after only two hours is also wrong, because there is always a time delay from our search tools when someone changes the information. The address should be found even without a name. How did you search exactly? |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 06:12 | Jamie jp ♦1 | I was searching with 13900 Lincoln Park Dr. Herndon, VA 20171 which results in no output but if I search using 13900 Lincoln Park Dr. (name of the building) it will pull the location. This is why I changed the name to the full address to see if it would correct the issue but it failed to do so. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-09 15:57 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | In the OSM data there is no (registered) street named Lincoln Park Drive for the 20171 postal code. There is only this building. If you know where this street is, enter it first (it can't be the service way https://www.osm.org/way/262558034). But again, such a change of a location takes t... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-09 17:27 | mapman44 ♦526 | Lincoln Park Drive is shown in the Fairfax County VA GIS map. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/gisapps/DMV/Default.aspx It is the dual carriageway road shown in OSM as a service road just south of the address in question, continuing south along VA 28. | |
| 5 | 2020-01-09 17:45 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I have already looked on the dark side of the map (I'm just kidding) The corresponding path is wrongly classified and has no name. Since I have the knowledge from an unauthorized source I cannot correct this. But this shows, that it is important to enter even seemingly harmless information ... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-12 01:44 | mapman44 ♦526 | The website that theFairfax County GIS map is a part of is copyrighted, but it is paid for by the taxpayers of the county, for the use of those taxpayers and other visitors to the area. They are welcome to view it and download it for their personal use. OSM is a non-commercial organization that is a... | |
| 7 | 2020-01-12 09:30 | freebeer | mapman, there are many thousands of governments which are paid for by taxpayers but whose data is not made public domain, worldwide. the us government is a notable exception, but one cannot extrapolate from that to regional and local governments. texas is known to be particularly problematic despi... | |
| 8 | 2020-01-12 12:12 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | This morning I accidentally put the Tiger 2019 card behind the OSM data. There the name is also in it. Here mapman has come a few hours before me. We could now follow the legal situation, reverse the changeset and I officially enter the name from a legal source, but that would really be overdoing it... | |
| 79441627 by Shameem VAST @ 2020-01-11 04:00 | 1 | 2020-01-12 06:39 | freebeer | another buggy app, dumping things at null island? should be reverted, i'm trying my best but don't mind if someone beats me to it |
| 79407273 by Chester Thrash @ 2020-01-10 08:04 | 1 | 2020-01-10 10:36 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! Is "peachtree Road highrise" a shop http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft ? |
| 2 | 2020-01-11 11:52 | freebeer | georg, many thanks for cleaning this poorly-designed-app spam.i would guess from the name (if it is not just a description for personal use - and it needs capitalisation to Peachtree, and if the proper name, Highrise), that it should be tagged like the nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26... | |
| 79353329 by Otzitello @ 2020-01-08 19:21 | 1 | 2020-01-09 02:44 | freebeer | please do not upload these misplaced, improperly tagged personal bookmarks to osm. this changeset should be reverted, the address info is useless where placed |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 19:44 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | I believe he is just trying to add addresses as nodes, they may be retained as useful info, deleting amenity=shower and name=. Maps.me does not allow you to create a node with just an addr: tag, it is not the first time I see something like that. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-10 00:38 | freebeer | please tell me how https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7117686288 is useful and should be kept. it's clear only from the nearby 69 as to which side of the street, assuming all-odd numbering, but unless the mapper updates this edit (which s/he has done elsewhere i have seen and commented), this ... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-10 14:48 | Alecs01 ♦1,423 | Well indeed I forgot to mention addresses in Italy should be mapped as nodes by convention as they represent the entrance rather than the building itself, so that's perfectly fine per se, while that particular node you mention is misplaced for sure, you cannot guess where it belongshttps://wi... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-11 11:35 | freebeer | thank you for that feedback, before i have bothered to add addresses.my eyes glaze over before understanding what little italian i know, and it is a good thing i have not added any addresses, because what if one address has three or more residential entrances? i would have put the address i kno... | |
| 49427714 by CybranACU @ 2017-06-10 19:57 | 1 | 2020-01-11 07:40 | freebeer | ciao,please check what you have used for naming of the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499539138 that is shown prominently on the map.is there really signage using this name? it reads to me as a generic description that can be inferred from its mapped location, and not something that... |
| 79142516 by Laurent Maillot @ 2020-01-03 05:57 | 1 | 2020-01-03 13:57 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | G'day Laurent, and thanks for your contributions.Just with the building outlines, for future reference you can use the "square" key in the editor to ensure that all angles in your outlines are right angles as generally this is the case with buildings.Cheers,ortho_is_hotT... |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 22:51 | Laurent Maillot ♦1 | Hi Ortho_is_hot,Thank you for your advise, unfortunately there is no square key on the iD editor !Trying my best to do square angles...Cheers,Laurent | |
| 3 | 2020-01-10 00:00 | freebeer | the `q' (quadrilateralise() ) key in the most common online editors including current iD will do this for you. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-10 03:00 | ortho_is_hot ♦252 | Yep, as freebeer commented the "q" key will do it. Also the beta iD v3 allows you to square multiple buildings or objects at once and includes a right angle tool if you are interested | |
| 5 | 2020-01-10 04:17 | Laurent Maillot ♦1 | Hi Guys,Thank you for the advise, I didn't know this feature !Cheers, Laurent | |
| 75527048 by FantasticalFruit @ 2019-10-10 17:38 | 1 | 2020-01-09 20:45 | freebeer | please explain this lake. you've made two edits both of which added implausible lakes, almost as if you want to fake the map data to cheat at some irrelevant game or something. this looks like it should be reverted too. |
| 75530813 by FantasticalFruit @ 2019-10-10 19:27 | 1 | 2020-01-09 20:43 | freebeer | why have you added a lake here that does not jive with the rest of the map data? i've a feeling this changeset should be reverted without a good clarification, something i can't do at present |
| 2 | 2021-08-14 19:16 | JayTurnr ♦155 | This object made it into the Pokemon Go overworld map, well done. (They use old data to avoid vandalism like this but I guess this didn't manage it this time.) | |
| 79263054 by stevea @ 2020-01-06 19:42 | 1 | 2020-01-07 19:05 | Adamant1 ♦222 | SteveA, what about the polygons where "sloppy" except that you don't like my edits? Also, it doesn't help when you do 133 pages of changes in one go, including deleting a bunch of stuff. Especially by using the SCCGIS zoning data. Which you've been told before already can�... |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 19:48 | stevea ♦304 | I believe my changeset comments in changeset/79261829 answer your concerns here. If not, please let me know here. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-07 21:19 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | Data Working Group here. You have bother been asked in the past to refrain from fiddling with data contributed by the other. @Adamant1, there is lots of rubbish data all over California that you could fix; could you be persuaded to concentrate your efforts in areas not originally worked by stevea? @... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-07 22:02 | stevea ♦304 | Thank you for taking the time to arbitrate, DWG. The previous (and only) time both of us were blocked, I was admonished for not specifically saying who was responsible for a poor edit (as you said "it was obvious from the comments who that was") yet here I am told that calling out a speci... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-07 22:39 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Woodpeck, with all due respect where's your comment in changeset 79131363 about how SteveA shouldn't write needless messages to me in discussions I'm involved in? I'm not doing this one sided thing where I should piss off to "my side" of the state, never to map where he... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-08 22:35 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Woodpeck Et al. I opened https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2501 to helpfully address the "messages are to long" issue. Its natural to run with the amount of rope we are given. I don't put that on SteveA, freebeer, me, or other users who sometimes write ... | |
| 7 | 2020-01-09 04:38 | freebeer | A. Dama, to go off-topic but to throw in two pence, a character limit on changeset comments seems pointless, as i've not seen the abuse in comments (that can't be anonymous), unlike the osm notes we worked in common in the past where complete junk was posted.i've hit the recent no... | |
| 8 | 2020-01-09 05:07 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Freebeer, opening the issue was more to push the issue to wider audience so if it gets shot down there hopefully it won't come up here again. Although, I mostly agree shorter won't solve most the problems that come up in changeset comments. As far as the polygon thing, since your bette... | |
| 79229608 by Artemisia Vulgaris @ 2020-01-06 04:07 | 1 | 2020-01-07 20:58 | jmapb ♦405 | Hi AV, is this really a winery? From the website it appears that it's just a place to store wine. |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 21:01 | Artemisia Vulgaris ♦5 | It's a wine storage warehouse. Wasn't sure if there was an existing OSM tag for that. Feel free to make it more specific! :) | |
| 3 | 2020-01-07 23:10 | jmapb ♦405 | I couldn't find any specific tag for wine storage so I just tagged it as storage rental and added a description.Definitely better not to have it tagged as craft=winery, though, so it won't come up if someone's trying to do a tour of wineries.(Seems like there's only two on ... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-09 04:18 | freebeer | if it's just a storage area of no public interest (apart from what it is), a warehouse without sales, then rental storage is not the right tag, as that's something the public is supposed to be able to rent.if the public can buy from here, as i did at places that were storage warehouses... | |
| 79308635 by Chester Thrash @ 2020-01-07 19:43 | 1 | 2020-01-08 05:17 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! You add this address on an existing restaurant node (https://www.osm.org/node/2184964312) and inside a building (https://www.osm.org/way/208169605). But I can't merge them because you set the value "30306 Dash4279" for addr:postcode. What is your interpretation of Da... |
| 2 | 2020-01-09 04:03 | freebeer | i suspect this is an early extension to the five digit postal codes in the us, known by the trademark or whatever, ZIP Code, where to subdivide the area covered by the earlier single shared postcode, a four-digit hyphen-separated number was appended in order to, if memory serves, narrow it down to a... | |
| 79094121 by Otzitello @ 2020-01-01 23:36 | 1 | 2020-01-09 02:51 | freebeer | thank you for adding the address info properly to this building. however, nearby there is a so-called `shower' with this number, please delete it and do not add these as address markers - the majority of your changesets i see consist of adding bogus showers, and these should not be uploaded to... |
| 79353973 by Otzitello @ 2020-01-08 19:44 | 1 | 2020-01-09 02:42 | freebeer | this looks like a private bookmark, badly tagged and in the road and unsuitable for osm |
| 79259667 by choro0711 @ 2020-01-06 18:05 | 1 | 2020-01-06 19:13 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! A highway restarea inside of a building? Really? |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 07:29 | freebeer | unfortunately this is the mapper's first and only edit so far, so it's not clear if their background is in a country where maps.me sees high usage and an Autobahn amenity is frequently abused to tag a park-bench or similar. with no user description, hard to tell.or a completely differ... | |
| 73041391 by sean2019alt @ 2019-08-05 21:51 | 1 | 2020-01-06 04:08 | freebeer | this description is pointless. please review your tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711132566/history and touched in later edits, also failing a meaningful description, i do not believe a building exists as mapped, engulfing other buildings correctly mapped by others. |
| 79039753 by sean2019 @ 2019-12-31 04:10 | 1 | 2019-12-31 12:39 | Jean-Marc Liotier ♦333 | Please keep your changesets local - this one is almost worldwide and therefore even appears in watch lists for tiny regions because it intersects them... --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79039753 |
| 2 | 2019-12-31 19:53 | mapman44 ♦526 | Please provide some description of your edits so they can be verified. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79039753 | |
| 3 | 2020-01-05 17:14 | bradrh ♦66 | Since change set is so broad (worldwide), & doesn't have a description, I suggest that it should be reverted. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-06 03:53 | freebeer | i agree, checking a small number of objects shows no common theme. a mechanical wikidata tagging to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156844543/history that suggests no on-the-ground visit is mixed with further edits around alaska in geographically diverse areas:adding a name tag to https://www... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-06 11:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | It's a huge bounding box only because of the inclusion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2774722248 , I think.That said, this user has been blocked for a period of time for previous problems (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3362 ), and we await their reply on a number of iss... | |
| 75987879 by kanleela @ 2019-10-21 10:18 | 1 | 2019-12-28 09:21 | gpserror ♦221 | Not sure who caused this issue, but there is an overlapping road here and you were a recent editor of this road, if you could fix it that would be great. The problem area is at (39.50248,-74.99426) near the service road. If you don't understand the problem, feel free to please contact me. |
| 2 | 2019-12-29 03:51 | freebeer | salve, gpserror...is your detection of these overlaps able to spit out the id of the two (or more) ways of concern?i know my editor will make them obvious, but due to multiple catastropic equipment failure i'm reduced to viewing osm data on a castrated device where tracking the history ... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-29 19:07 | gpserror ♦221 | I was trying to fix some turn restrictions here but noticed the overlap so I stopped and tried looking for who caused it. Still tough to tell. Anyway the two broken ways can be determined without an editor through OSM main web browser, just "Query Features" on the point and it will show ... | |
| 4 | 2019-12-30 07:49 | gpserror ♦221 | OKAY: The person who created the overlap is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yerramg who had version 1, not this last changeset. It's scary that people are editing on top of this before noticing a duplicate. This is kind of dangerous. | |
| 5 | 2019-12-30 15:35 | gpserror ♦221 | I was able to fix another overlap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2038869 -- luckily that one wasn't too hard to fix, just tedious. Used iD to fix(!) | |
| 6 | 2019-12-31 02:57 | gpserror ♦221 | OK I fixed this overlap: changeset is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79037833 | |
| 7 | 2020-01-03 10:42 | kanleela ♦5 | Hi,Apologies for the delay in response. I was unaware that my edit was being duplicated at the node. As freebeer mentioned, this could have happened because of the bug with tool. However, we are putting efforts to proactively identify and resolve such errors if committed by our editor. We are al... | |
| 8 | 2020-01-04 17:40 | freebeer | salut, gps-systematic-offset,thanks for the tip. normally one is never too old to learn something new, but there's always an exception to every rule.i agree, not detecting these promptly is an issue as errors that take more effort to correct get compunded. in the case of the two ways ... | |
| 9 | 2020-01-05 16:46 | gpserror ♦221 | Oops, I think I misunderstood your question, sorry for answering incorrectly. When I edit things now in iD, most of the times I end up zooming into the intersection very closely and randomly click on the items in the vicinity. For each intersection I should see specific items highlight as one wou... | |
| 10 | 2020-01-06 02:44 | freebeer | by the way, all, i think i was mistaken in my claim that potlatch2 would highlight this sort of overlap, haven given meself time to digest the random drivel i wrote.i likely confused my investigative work on this error with that performed earlier, several months ago, on a different iD irregular ... | |
| 51442160 by Aljubory @ 2017-08-25 18:44 | 1 | 2020-01-03 12:28 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | I cannot see a castle on aerial imagery at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5058776734 - is it possible that this was an accident? I am exasperated at these useless auto-generated changeset comments; if this were a human-written comment we could compare the content of the message to the actual act... |
| 2 | 2020-01-04 13:59 | freebeer | the value (?) of the auto-generated comment is that when looking at the history of the object, one does not need to pull up the changeset proper to know immediately it is a maps.me rubbish edit and very probably rubbish content, as any real castles will have been mapped by a Real Editor, and pretty ... | |
| 79131363 by sean2019 @ 2020-01-02 21:34 | 1 | 2020-01-03 01:37 | alester ♦187 | Try to upload your changes in smaller areas, like one for the changes in California, one for Alaska, etc. This changeset and some of your previous ones have covered massive areas and show up on QA tools for widespread areas when they don't need to. |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 06:44 | mapman44 ♦526 | Just three days ago you were asked to make your changeset areas smaller but you ignored that with this changeset. Please listen to more experienced editors. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-03 07:05 | freebeer | a description of what you have done as `many edits' is unhelpful, it's obvious from the list below.in the list there are multiple items as areas which appear to have incorrect names, that should instead be descriptions.with grouping so many unrelated objects over such an area into ... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-03 07:54 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I already messaged them myself a couple of times on changesets about it awhile back and they never responded. So I wouldn't expect a response here either. Although I'm not sure if it is the case here, I'm semi under the belief that people are not consistently getting notified abou... | |
| 5 | 2020-01-04 03:42 | stevea ♦304 | We just read a prediction of what someone else might do, self-uncertainly, unsure belief if the adopted project is broken, an unsolicited recommendation, a commentary about others "going off," an "eye roll," a complaint about things being harder and hyperbole about needing to nee... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-04 11:00 | freebeer | adamant, this user has been repeatedly blocked by the DWG and if memory serves the most recent block was a two month duration from which the mapper has promptly emerged continuing to map exactly as told not to in the block message.a user block is not something that can be ignored, be it a zero-h... | |
| 7 | 2020-01-04 21:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | For info, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3362 amd https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3363 .Best regards,Andy | |
| 8 | 2020-01-04 23:31 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Freebeer, so I assume akin to SteveA contacting me here in the same manor and tone that he was blocked multiple times by Woodpeck for and told not to do again? If such is the case that multiple violations and blocks should not be taken lightly and be dealt with accordingly. So I patiently await ... | |
| 9 | 2020-01-04 23:36 | stevea ♦304 | Untruth: I have not been "blocked multiple times," simply once. It was a "zero time block."Another untruth: I did not "verbally harass" anybody. I stated (characterized) what was said and asked for less ineffective talk.This always goes nowhere with this per... | |
| 10 | 2020-01-05 00:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @stevea Re: "More map, less talk. I'm likely guilty of "too much talk" right here"Yes you are. It's not relevant to the discussion here.@Adamant1 "I was going to, but got busy being named called and forgot" was also not relevant. @both of you: It'... | |
| 74330162 by SeyfuLakew_lyft @ 2019-09-10 21:52 | 1 | 2020-01-04 03:54 | freebeer | hi,can you review your change here which is pointed out by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2045621 ?clearly something was added or moved in a place it should not have been.thanks |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 22:36 | SpencerJaquish ♦14 | Thank you for pointing this out, freebeer! Looks like we accidentally adjusted the geometry without intending to do so. We'll be sure to look out for this in the future :D | |
| 79057383 by rhondalea @ 2019-12-31 13:30 | 1 | 2019-12-31 17:26 | wireguy ♦548 | Welcome to OSM rhondalea. Everything looks good, but... in another change you deleted the node with the park name. That node contained other data, and a history of what was changed in the past. OSM likes to retain all the history of what happened. JOSM has a menu item called 'replace g... |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 14:46 | rhondalea ♦1 | @wireguyThanks. I'm twice an idiot. I wasn't thinking about the other data. I was just thinking about not having the park name appear twice.I also didn't realize I had to reply here, and I replied to the email notifying me of your comment, instead of replying here, which expla... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-02 17:05 | freebeer | there is a way to restore the node you deleted without resorting to JOSM, and if you wish, i can attempt that as i slowly get my damaged computing hardware rebuilt from other damaged hardware, if all goes well.or someone else can step up and undo the deletion, as it's trivial to do, also wi... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-02 17:08 | wireguy ♦548 | @freebeer i undeleted the node and merged it's info with park way. sorry, sent direct message to rhonda with info | |
| 5 | 2020-01-02 17:09 | rhondalea ♦1 | Hi freebeer,wireguy fixed it, but thank you for your help. Good luck with your hardware rebuild. | |
| 79026318 by pnorman @ 2019-12-30 18:32 | 1 | 2019-12-30 19:28 | mapman44 ♦526 | Why do you have a bounding box that covers most of the US and Canada for what appears to be one tiny edit? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79026318 |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 07:01 | freebeer | the southern bounday extends out of canada due to reverting bogosity seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44569751 located near phoenix arizona that the pokemon mapper did not already purge.presumably the commonality is being flagged as broken polygons despite the wide area range; i d... | |
| 59422946 by promiseofbirth @ 2018-05-31 09:11 | 1 | 2019-12-28 15:19 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,I found the tag 'beet=yes' on this pharmacy.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1809517496It's not used in other places, what does it mean? |
| 2 | 2019-12-29 03:00 | freebeer | i'm seeing drink:beer=yes on other entries in this changeset, which kinda makes me boggle for a traditional pharmacy as i understand it, but a prescription i'll be happy to get refilled. repeatedly. looks similar as typo. doctor, is there nothing i can take, to relieve my bellyache | |
| 78938317 by seattlefyi @ 2019-12-27 18:46 | 1 | 2019-12-28 10:16 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! What is the meaning of the keys qqhn, qqst ? Could this be an address? See http://www.osm.org/node/7089477176 |
| 2 | 2019-12-29 02:37 | freebeer | has been mended, but for protocol, qq-> shortcut for addr: ; hn-> shortcut for housenumber and st street, which shortcuts failed here, described elsewhere | |
| 78909921 by naresksv @ 2019-12-27 05:59 | 1 | 2019-12-27 13:01 | freebeer | ahoj, amazon mapper...it would be helpful if in addition to explaining what you have done (which is obvious from below in this simple changeset), you give the reason behind your edit in your changeset description.i trust this is based on your driver feedback, but in this case this deletion h... |
| 2 | 2020-01-03 08:22 | naresksv ♦5 | Hi,Apologies for the incorrect deletion of road, we have corrected it under the changeset #79145757 based on the latest aerial imagery. Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,naresksv. | |
| 78511793 by stevea @ 2019-12-17 07:26 | 1 | 2019-12-26 16:11 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags ACRES, AGNCY_ID, AGNCY_TYP, HOLDING_ID, MNG_AG_TYP, UNIT_IDin this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. See also http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Pfg |
| 2 | 2019-12-26 17:33 | stevea ♦304 | They are from CPAD 2019b data, as documented on our Contributors and Santa_Cruz_County,_California wiki pages.While I endeavor during these additions to remove all tags (except sometimes ACRES and usually UNIT_ID, so that we may compare between older CPAD, OSM versions and newer CPAD versions of... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-26 19:48 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I don't have anything against a version number (source) and / or an ID from the source (ref:source). However, I am not a friend of undocumented keys, which also violate the rule of lower case and British English. Furthermore, an area indication (ACRES) to a key without unit is difficult and onl... | |
| 4 | 2019-12-26 20:03 | stevea ♦304 | Going forward (and backward, as it has been included for exactly this reason), in time, UNIT_ID is a highly-useful tag to "index" between various versions of CPAD data (so far we are up to a third, though we no longer call them v1 / 2016a or v2 / 2018a, as no v3 was coined with 2019b, we n... | |
| 5 | 2019-12-26 20:33 | stevea ♦304 | Think of ACRES as a kind of checksum of the data, as that is how it gets used (for comparison purposes between versions of data). | |
| 6 | 2019-12-27 01:40 | freebeer | UNIT_ID as you use it, seems a property of the source data that, much like the TIGER wozzit numbers that get automagically deleted upon editing by most editor utilities, and are stored as subtags of top-level tiger tags. that sentence lost its way mid-stream, if you find it, please send it home.\... | |
| 7 | 2019-12-27 01:58 | stevea ♦304 | Thank you for your opinions. | |
| 8 | 2019-12-27 05:02 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I really appreciate your work and I also answer respectfully. And I'm not the only one who worries about rash adoption of original keys, although there are quite useful suggestions according to OSM standard, which would allow a clean classification without further sources. And because I app... | |
| 9 | 2019-12-27 05:07 | stevea ♦304 | This isn't rash, this isn't adoption. This is a live, plastic map made by humans, plural.The process being built is not radically altered by the plastic uses of tags as they are used here; it is human and organic.Because of the tone here, I have begun to formulate in my mind a pla... | |
| 10 | 2019-12-27 05:48 | stevea ♦304 | It is helpful for me to absorb more community input about "source" tags: explicitly set on each datum or does a reference to the source in changeset comments suffice? I've watched the trend towards the latter for many years, yet I consider an explicit source tag on each CPAD datum, ... | |
| 11 | 2019-12-30 21:59 | stevea ♦304 | I have created https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Using_CPAD_dataFeedback is welcome and appreciated.If you'd like me to "go the extra mile" and search and purge older tags, I will do so if requested, but I consider that an annoying errand, as there isn't a great deal of this &quo... | |
| 78863508 by 73inc Limited @ 2019-12-26 04:43 | 1 | 2019-12-26 05:53 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby. |
| 2 | 2019-12-27 00:50 | freebeer | it is pure SEO map vandalism, and should be reverted back to v8 out of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62211504/history to restore the now-deleted information.i would not do any favours for this SEO vandal by correcting their multiple errors, nor allowing their advert copy to remain and threa... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-27 04:43 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | done! | |
| 78709931 by Leinwand @ 2019-12-21 11:01 | 1 | 2019-12-21 12:59 | kartonage ♦987 | Muss tatsächlich erst die die Data Working Group eingeschaltet werden um dieses Benutzerkonto zu sperren?Muss nochmehr Zeit von Freiwilligen in Anspruch genommen werden, die ihre Zeit auch andersweitig nutzen könnten?Kann man sowas nicht einfach mal lassen? Und ich glaube nicht, dass e... |
| 2 | 2019-12-24 20:40 | freebeer | um, yes, the DWG is the eartrumpet that needs to be consulted as they are the only osm members with the ability to block a user. (technically there are a handful of admins who can do the same but the DWG is the official path.)if that is your goal. i know this is a rhetorical question in that ... | |
| 78713716 by adrumillon @ 2019-12-21 14:23 | 1 | 2019-12-21 14:56 | gileri ♦1,003 | Hello,You are adding name:en tags to shops that don't need them (they only have a name in french, no official english name).I've removed them, please do not add them again. |
| 2 | 2019-12-24 20:28 | freebeer | gileri, the three nodes below all have unneeded name:en tags (and in the case of mont blanc, it should be Mount to be actual english) so your removal you mention has not actually happened (or refers to the one single entry that got the unneeded tag after your fix) | |
| 3 | 2019-12-24 22:06 | gileri ♦1,003 | Nice catch freeber, this time I fixed the three of them : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78832473 | |
| 78722030 by Billjh @ 2019-12-21 21:41 | 1 | 2019-12-22 07:03 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. |
| 2 | 2019-12-23 13:31 | Billjh ♦1 | Was attempting to add home address. Unsubscribing. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-24 19:33 | freebeer | your attempt was repaired by Georg, who sent you a form-letter mail describing what you did not quite get right.further, comparing the map data now, it appears Georg also fixed the imported road to better match reality and put your added address in a probable likely location.thanks Georg for... | |
| 42942859 by carciofo @ 2016-10-16 18:34 | 1 | 2019-12-21 09:35 | freebeer | just wondering why you removed the building=yes tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323906654/history so that this library outline no longer renders, only as an icon. thanks |
| 2 | 2019-12-21 12:04 | carciofo ♦186 | Because the area it covers is not a building. Making the perimeter of the plot as a building so that it renders would be mapping for the renderer. An icon is fine in this case afaic: the underlying data is correct. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-21 12:04 | carciofo ♦186 | *marking | |
| 77702209 by EnlVako @ 2019-11-29 01:26 | 1 | 2019-12-21 09:13 | freebeer | you have made a lot of errors with this, changing correctly-tagged highways into parks and non-rendering objects. i have not analysed every change and i am no longer able to edit or revert objects, but someone should review these items, as what i am seeing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27319... |
| 78492161 by Carnildo @ 2019-12-16 21:14 | 1 | 2019-12-16 21:20 | crossdiver ♦1 | Thank you. Also, I can't seem to get that one island to render on all zoom levels?! Gah. |
| 2 | 2019-12-17 05:33 | Carnildo ♦905 | The map isn't updated at all zoom levels at the same time. The higher zoom levels usually sync up in an hour or two, a couple days at most, while the lower zoom levels can take longer (when I was mapping some farmland around Spokane, it took nearly three months for it to show up at the "a... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-19 13:28 | freebeer | islands can also be a special case, for multiple reasons. there was an area i watched for days or weeks until i forgot about it, in hopes the invisible islands would appear.some months later i was reminded to revisit that area to see that at last the islands were rendering, with no changes sinc... | |
| 53348599 by linerider @ 2017-10-29 17:56 | 1 | 2019-10-31 12:41 | Polarbear ♦940 | Bitte keine unzutreffenden Attribute um des Renderns willen vergeben. Ein Klettergerüst, Trampolin oder Karussell ist kein Gebäude, ein Balancierbalken keine Bollard-Absperrung und auch kein Treppengeländer. Repariert. |
| 2 | 2019-10-31 22:29 | linerider ♦8 | Du hast vollkommen Recht. Ich war damals etwas enttäuscht, dass man von den vielen Details so wenig in der Karte gesehen hat. Mir ist es aber klar geworden und ich wollte es auch ändern, auch, da der Spielplatz noch umgestaltet wurde. Wie das dann so ist fehlte die Zeit. Hoffentlich finde ... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-07 16:51 | freebeer | i see a number of ways tagged as benches but also as building=yes that are rendered as irregular polygons - wouldn't there be a better way to mark these outlines, perhaps a wall or something, or would these be some sort of roof structure?these are the first few entries below. | |
| 4 | 2019-12-12 13:56 | linerider ♦8 | Hi freebeer. These are small islands made of wood you can sit on. Two of them can be seen here: https://www.facebook.com/BeuthHochschule/photos/pcb.1613462682010087/1613462555343433/I did not know how to map it correctly so it can be seen on the map. The shapes are quite accurate. I probably misin... | |
| 5 | 2019-12-12 14:14 | Polarbear ♦940 | Thus the thing the kids are sitting on would be a small playground=structure.Please do not expect everything we map in OSM to be rendered in the general carto style. Se my first comment here. | |
| 6 | 2019-12-19 13:19 | freebeer | it would be good to be able to map as a bench, something more than the roughly-two-metre linear feature implied by the point node, and which the higher-zoom osm-carto tiles reproduce as rough points, here not reflecting the actual orientation at all.for example, i saw that a significant section ... | |
| 77049234 by garrent1274redder @ 2019-11-14 05:01 | 1 | 2019-12-19 10:16 | freebeer | Welcome to osm, Virginal Mapper!!! we are always in need of fresh blood, and you will fit the bill nicely!!@ this is your first edit, so ... how can we stop asking you about your lack of meaningful changeset comments when you haven't even failed to make any yet?do you possess any useful s... |
| 78424669 by garrent1274redder @ 2019-12-15 09:07 | 1 | 2019-12-15 10:57 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Hello,Could you give a bit more information in your changeset comments? It is hard to see for other mappers what you mean by "5hy", "dt" or "are you gonna finish that C R O I S S A N T"?Did you read this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments\... |
| 2 | 2019-12-15 21:55 | skquinn ♦804 | This one is a bit better on not spanning a ridonkulously big area but "dt" still isn't informative as to what was changed or why. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-19 09:45 | freebeer | this appears to me to be the third soxkpuppet (i'll leave that typo for now, thankyouverymuch) account of a particular user who has received several dwg blocks for identical reasons as this account, said account created about the same time (i can't see the actual date a block was issued no... | |
| 78122074 by DETHBR @ 2019-12-09 00:58 | 1 | 2019-12-18 01:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello FultonOSM,I'm just trying to understand why http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=710773519 seems to be fli-flopping back and forth between "highway=path" and "highway=track" (or highway=service; service=driveway". On the available imagery it does look like a... |
| 2 | 2019-12-19 03:55 | freebeer | why are the three buildings surrounding this particular changeset encircled by a footway? i've repeatedly removed these in the past but am in no state at present to mend this. these are not public footpaths but are on private property and just because it is possible to walk around a house doe... | |
| 78544750 by stevelux89 @ 2019-12-17 20:29 | 1 | 2019-12-18 16:17 | aweech ♦369 | Hi, some of these pathways you deleted are used. Can you please re-add the ones that are used? |
| 2 | 2019-12-18 16:21 | stevelux89 ♦1 | These pathways that I removed that are shown on the map are logging/clearing roads and are not actual pathways or roads. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-18 19:21 | aweech ♦369 | Logging roads should be on the map as `highway=path`. If they are not open to the public, then they should also have the tag `access=forestry`. Some of these paths are used by the public. Please replace them. | |
| 4 | 2019-12-19 03:17 | freebeer | seems to me a logging road would be a multi-spur highway=track, unless it becomes overgrown to the point only a single spur can be usefully followed, whereupon it should then be downgraded to a path.if off-limits i would not expect to see the path designation before it becomes too overgrown to m... | |
| 75211228 by Neebski @ 2019-10-03 05:57 | 1 | 2019-10-18 20:59 | freebeer | isn't this a rather unlikely place for a lawyer?it looks to me that you've memorialised some misplaced onosm.org spam co-located on the city node before i could get around to nuking it. there is no building here. |
| 2 | 2019-10-18 21:20 | Neebski ♦3 | Ah my bad. I think I had taken the note info and location from another users note and added it. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-18 22:37 | Neebski ♦3 | Did some digging and found this address on their Facebook page. 101 W Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101Do you suggest we add and move the poi location? | |
| 4 | 2019-10-20 08:16 | freebeer | > location from another users note be careful about this. while onosm.org was naïvely conceived as a way for small businesses to put themselves on the map by proxy, recently in the english-speaking countries i monitor, it's been discovered by lazy or vandalistic seo companies, s... | |
| 5 | 2019-12-10 05:28 | freebeer | are you going to move or delete this node? another town/city/country node spam appeared recently at this point, so naïve blind transfer from maps.me or onosm.org notes into osm data will result in a pile-up here, or in the other places.i myself would nuke it, but due to android memory mang... | |
| 76868869 by daviesp12 @ 2019-11-10 13:47 | 1 | 2019-11-11 21:39 | rivermont ♦221 | Hi, is this import discussed somewhere? I can't find anything on the wiki and your source is wrong; these are not buildings. |
| 2 | 2019-11-11 21:51 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | The source tag seems to be a holdover from changeset 76867595 and previous changesets where buildings were being imported instead. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-12 08:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Reported to Data Working Group as undiscussed import, with unknown source, possibly a copyright violation | |
| 4 | 2019-11-13 09:37 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | To be more specific: mandatory import guidelines are at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 5 | 2019-11-15 21:44 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | This invalid import seems now to be reverted. | |
| 6 | 2019-11-16 01:33 | freebeer | yeah, wondering why some zoomlevels show remnants of green that disappeared when zooming in, leaving vast areas of white. | |
| 7 | 2019-11-16 07:49 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Caching at some level - have you tried clearing your browser cache?It may be also that tile servers are unable to deal with load and re-rendered only part of tiles. | |
| 8 | 2019-11-16 08:41 | freebeer | oh yeah, i know that, mateusz ;-)i was just brought here after i opened up an half-there area in potlatch1 to see why a reasonable-looking addition to the map had been deleted, whether vandalism or not, and the `more' button opened the way history hit by this changeset. all was suddenly cl... | |
| 69789351 by Eraque22 @ 2019-05-02 05:20 | 1 | 2019-11-16 01:50 | freebeer | salut,did you intend for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158978069 to get the South of South Cleveland Avenue which joins it at both ends, but along its short length, it and the parallel opposite way have the name of Tamiami Trail that matches the rest of the tagging across route 865?i can... |
| 69440250 by Timothy Smith @ 2019-04-22 05:08 | 1 | 2019-11-16 00:30 | freebeer | hoi,when you made this edit, did you notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/659256 from several years ago, and verify your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175722958 here, now at v6 and not changed from any previous shop incarnation over even more years?wondering if the note sh... |
| 2 | 2019-11-16 03:47 | Timothy Smith ♦43 | After some searching it looks like this was replaced with total wine and tuesday morning. I'm assuming since one is suite 101 and the other is 103 they just split the building. Not sure if there's a 102. | |
| 71093698 by HiddeWie @ 2019-06-10 09:02 | 1 | 2019-11-13 13:15 | borishag ♦150 | De Naam van ICI PARIS XL dient altijd met hoofdletters geschreven te worden, inmiddels hersteld. |
| 2 | 2019-11-15 12:27 | freebeer | > The name ICI Paris XL means 'This is Paris'`Ici' is a french word, not an acronym. if it is to be written in OSM in uppercase, it should be replaced with the words it represents written out in full. if there are no words to form this acronym, it should be written in lowerca... | |
| 76569890 by Adamant1 @ 2019-11-04 05:39 | 1 | 2019-11-13 22:01 | UAN51 ♦15 | Volunteer responding - GNIS tags MUST be preserved! |
| 2 | 2019-11-14 08:12 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Really? Why's that? Show me anywhere in the OSM guidelines where it says GIS "MUST!Q!!!!!!@#!#$@$" be PRESERVED!!@!!!!!!. People delete them in all kinds of situations all the time (for instance with TIGER imported roads). As they are essentially useless and just make it harder for pe... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-15 11:42 | freebeer | adman, calm down and lay off the methanol. unlike the 20 to 30 per day fortified added-sugar beers i've resorted to for lack of good Reinheitsgebot beverages, i'm sure it can't be good for you.TIGER roads probably do not have GNIS data. tiger was an import with a lot of question... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-17 17:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here. Echoing freebeer's comments it'd be great if everyone could calm down a bit. Firstly, the historical tags on objects can be seen at http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=283793237 . In this case someone expolicitly added them in... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-17 21:25 | UAN51 ♦15 | Well, here's the wiki page about GNIS https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/USGS_GNIS and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Data"The Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) is the authoritative database on place names. The tags may possibly be imprecise in position, so... | |
| 6 | 2019-11-17 21:37 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Sorry for the heatedness on my side. It just seems like there's been an almost constant onslaught of people taking issue with things that aren't issues in an extremely passive aggressive manor. Which has just put me on edge. In this case use of capitals and exclamation marks in UAN51'... | |
| 7 | 2019-12-05 02:58 | Adamant1 ♦222 | A few thoughts about the GNIS thing now that I have looked into is that the only reason given for why we shouldn't delete GNIS tags is because "GNIS if possibly the only database in the US to share work from OSM." I'd say 1. In both instances of that being mentioned the sent... | |
| 8 | 2019-12-05 04:08 | MikeN ♦353 | There was some talk of exchanging GNIS updates with OSM, but once the current OSM license terms solidified, it's clear that it would not be within the OSM data license terms. | |
| 9 | 2019-12-05 05:16 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Thanks for the information. That's what I figured. | |
| 10 | 2019-12-08 00:28 | UAN51 ♦15 | Anywhere on the wiki or someplace that discuss about removal of GNIS? I'm only seeing wiki pages that says to keep them. | |
| 11 | 2019-12-08 03:00 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I don't think there has to be. The responsibility is on you to justify why the tags shouldn't be deleted. As Andy said, "If anyone has a particular reason to keep tags like "gnis:created" around then please do explain that, and link to where it was discussed with the communi... | |
| 12 | 2019-12-08 03:27 | Adamant1 ♦222 | UAN51, go to https://taghistory.raifer.tech/ and look at the tagging history for gnis:feature_id, etc. All of them where added in a single import in 2009, which contentious at the time and still is, and they have all been on a steady decline since then. The use of gnis:state_id has gone down by almo... | |
| 13 | 2019-12-08 19:21 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | The gnis:feature_id tag and its synonyms are also documented at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:gnis:feature_id>. Unlike many other import tags, gnis:feature_id contains a stable external identifier. In that sense, it’s quite like a Wikidata QID, except that it’s the U.S. ... | |
| 14 | 2019-12-08 19:27 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | * virtually all parks in GNIS, that is | |
| 15 | 2019-12-09 00:16 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I appreciate you bringing that up. I didn't know it was an option. I have zero problem with converting them to QIDs where I can going forward. I only delete them in extremely rare cases anyway. I can't remember why I did here. I probably would have been cool with UAN51 just adding them bac... | |
| 16 | 2019-12-09 00:21 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I had actually suggested we take it to the tagging mailing list to get it clarified better, but UAN51 said not to because it was "personal" and that he didn't want other people getting involved in it. So I never did. Looking back I probably should have though. | |
| 17 | 2019-12-09 04:05 | UAN51 ♦15 | Calm down Adamant1. I'm only doing what the Wiki says. If you actually clicked and read the links I sent above, you should have seen the part where it says "he tags may possibly be imprecise in position, so GNIS-tagged features should be corrected for position and especially name, keeping ... | |
| 18 | 2019-12-09 05:47 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Obviously I read the wiki pages because I directly quoted them multiple times. Its cool though. I know the whole "well, you just must not of read it" or whatever similar argument is a pretty popular refrain on here when people are disagreed with. So, I'll give you a pass on it. We... | |
| 19 | 2019-12-09 05:54 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hhhmm, it seems this park doesn't have a QID. Bummer. Oh well. It's not like it's in my state anyway. I don't want the locals here to go off me for editing things where I don't live anyway. "shrug." Maybe someone who cares about it and lives here can create one for... | |
| 20 | 2019-12-09 06:53 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | There’s nothing inherently wrong with contributing in an area where you don’t live or haven’t visited lately. That’s called armchair editing and I’m guiltier of it than anyone in this thread.Once you get comfortable enough with OSM, you should feel free to fix what ... | |
| 21 | 2019-12-09 07:07 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Minh, I did do a search for it on Wikidata. I thought that entry was for a different park though. My bad. Thanks for adding it. | |
| 67511556 by annytt @ 2019-02-24 09:25 | 1 | 2019-11-15 08:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77111240 where the changeset comment is: duplicate better mapped nearby |
| 53316639 by ko sithu @ 2017-10-28 12:22 | 1 | 2019-11-15 07:34 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77109502 where the changeset comment is: bogus maps.me castles that clearly are not |
| 62406270 by sina ehteshami @ 2018-09-08 16:23 | 1 | 2019-11-14 09:32 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77062103 where the changeset comment is: nuke bogus maps.me private residence castles with personal data |
| 76502589 by patadivy @ 2019-11-01 15:10 | 1 | 2019-11-04 02:20 | gpserror ♦221 | Might be better to use "Parking Aisle" instead of "Service Road" where the road doesn't really lead anywhere except to a row of parking spots, at least that's what I'd do. |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 09:52 | patadivy ♦2 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #76580345 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter. Regards,patadivy. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-04 19:19 | gpserror ♦221 | Cool, thanks for updating. I just think it looks a bit better when roads that aren't used for getting from point A to point B (like if A or B is just a one car parking spot) should be a thin road that can be easily dropped when zoomed out without needing some algorithm to guess. | |
| 4 | 2019-11-05 13:51 | patadivy ♦2 | Hi,Thanks for the suggestion, this completely make sense. We will ensure to follow your suggestion.Regards,patadivy. | |
| 5 | 2019-11-10 11:33 | freebeer | moin gpserror,i find your interpretation of service v. parking aisle interesting, where you would use service to get from point a to b.i've used parking aisle for sections of service drives where at any point one can turn off into a parking spot, even if it is possible to pass through t... | |
| 6 | 2019-11-12 17:20 | gpserror ♦221 | I guess my main reason for making the distinction is I'd like the map to stand on its own if suddenly all the parking aisles were deleted from the map. What troubles me is there would be a lot of dangling roads now if parking aisles were removed, and IMHO this should not be the case! The main... | |
| 7 | 2019-11-14 02:44 | freebeer | ciao gpserror,i suspect that i view parking aisles as an enhancement on the service drive concept, with the additional info that in theory it would be possible to turn off into a parking space pretty much anywhere, taking into account granularity, but then with facepalm moments of the last week ... | |
| 76769922 by b-jazz-bot @ 2019-11-07 17:15 | 1 | 2019-11-07 23:34 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
| 2 | 2019-11-13 09:20 | Wulf4096 ♦159 | @b-jazz,your bot removed a line break from the "description" tag. Could you fix that bug please?@abakus, b-jazz-bot did not add/modify the address. Please consider adding automatic changeset comments only in those cases, not when only unrelated changes were made to an object. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-14 01:30 | freebeer | i'm failing, with `lynx' browser, to see any difference between pre- and post-b-jazz.i'm guessing the line break refers to one or more of the unix/dos/mac linefeed, carriage-return, or CRLF combination. to me these seem inappropriate for a value which i would expect should be lim... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-14 07:26 | Wulf4096 ♦159 | curl https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/5359159260/history | grep description | |
| 5 | 2019-11-14 22:48 | b-jazz ♦657 | Thanks @Wulf4096! I have created a bug (https://gitlab.com/b-jazz/https_all_the_things/issues/11) and will look into it. | |
| 70408915 by tordans @ 2019-05-19 12:26 | 1 | 2019-11-13 16:18 | Karthoo ♦214 | Hi, den Netto hast du leider falsch getaggt. Die Supermarktkette, die du gewählt hast (Netto mit Hund), gibt es nur in Ostdeutschland. Das hier ist ein Netto Marken-Discount. Den Aldi könnte man auch als Aldi Süd taggen.Grüße |
| 2 | 2019-11-14 00:48 | freebeer | i'm quite positive i used to shop at the netto (colour scheme dark-ish yellow and black) in several places in danmark, which, last i knew, was not yet conquered by the kingdom of east germany.i've never heard anyone refer in everyday speech, or in adverts, to aldi nord or aldi süd... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-15 16:54 | tordans ♦407 | @doktorpixel14 thanks for noticing. It was fixed by @fixedbusiness at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77024409@freebeer the wikidata tagging is becoming quite popular and has a few advantages for data consumers. There are a few related talks from the SOTM US 2019 and other conferences ab... | |
| 76983328 by sean2019 @ 2019-11-12 22:00 | 1 | 2019-11-13 04:12 | freebeer | you have been told off by a fellow mapper in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76837496 for failing to provide useful changeset descriptions. why are you continuing to fail to do so? `edits' or `Edits' or even `EDITS' is a meaningless description. |
| 76562562 by han6man @ 2019-11-03 21:14 | 1 | 2019-11-04 06:25 | NKA ♦247 | Ikke fjern noder slik, men legg heller til flere noder. Veier har ikke slike skarpe vinkler i virkeligheten. Du har også fjernet en hel vei ved Fabrikkvegen. |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 17:23 | han6man ♦2 | De aller aller fleste steder i verden mapper man ikke bakgården til private. Det er irrelevant informasjon for at allmenheten skal kunne navigere. Allmenheten har normalt heller ikke tilgang til private eiendommer. Å gi informasjon om hvor innkjørselen er burde være mer enn ... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-04 17:49 | NKA ♦247 | I OSM kan man i grunnen mappe hva man vil, men det er ikke god tone å fjerne noe som andre har mappet.Det er ingen grunn til å spare på noder. Tvert i mot forsøker vi i OSM å legge inn mange ganger så mye informasjon som dette. Igjen er det slik at noen har b... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-04 19:44 | han6man ♦2 | Kan mappe omtrent hva man vil, ja, men hvilken allmenn nytte har det når tegner opp alt som finnes på en privat eiendom hvor allmennheten ikke har adgang? Dette grenser også til opp mot å forstyrre privatlivets fred. I allefall så finnes det mye som er umappet og som ku... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-04 19:47 | han6man ♦2 | Og glem ikke at alt som er detaljert mappet fort fremstår som feilinformasjon med en gang det er skjedd endringer - vedlikeholdsbyrden (vedlikeholdsansvaret) øker. | |
| 6 | 2019-11-04 22:31 | Marius Geitle ♦14 | Det å fjerne gyldig informasjon som andre brukere har lagt inn er å beregne som vandalisme i OSM. Det er ingen grunn til å spare noder. Der er derimot opp til mapperen om han ønsker å bruke tiden sin på å mappe innkjørsler, eller fokusere på no... | |
| 7 | 2019-11-10 10:59 | freebeer | > Jeg mener at dette endringssettet bør bli reversert.i see that some days later, this has not happened, and checking a few ways below, they remain deleted or unchanged.https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76562562 shows me compared with aerials that the simplification (supp... | |
| 8 | 2019-11-10 20:22 | han6man ♦2 | Javel, det har ikke kommet inn støtteerklæringer for mitt syn her, så da må jeg vel føye meg. Greit nok.Nå har det seg slik at jeg ikke er dreven på dette, og har hverken kunnskap eller verktøy om å reversere endringssettet på en god... | |
| 9 | 2019-11-11 06:08 | NKA ♦247 | Det er ikke så viktig for meg å få reversert akkurat dette, poenget var bare at det ikke burde fortsette. Jeg har fått tatt vare på ny Fv1774 som construction.Det er flott at du får oppdatert så mye i Brumunddal. Fint å ha en lokal mapper her :) | |
| 10 | 2019-11-11 07:21 | freebeer | han6man, it is true that a detailed and accurate map will have a lot of useless info for specific end-users. however for a garmin, one can select to ignore or include select features, such as the residential driveways that have been simplified, with `mkgmap' rules, while still including generi... | |
| 11 | 2019-11-11 19:31 | han6man ♦2 | Da har jeg fått ordnet opp litt. Håper dere godtar det.Bakkehaugvegen 2 - ryddet opp bygg og parkering til svært nær dagens virkelighet. Jeg valgte å betegne innkjøringsveien som service road og ikke parking aisle da jeg er usikker. Det er både næ... | |
| 12 | 2019-11-11 19:32 | han6man ♦2 | Og det gjelder changeset #76927178, for ordens skyld. | |
| 13 | 2019-11-11 20:27 | han6man ♦2 | Og en ting til - takk til dere alle for at dere deler deres innsikt og bruker tid på å forklare. NKA - beklager det med veien din som forsvant. Jeg fikk ikke med meg at den var construction. | |
| 65852893 by MrOutdoor @ 2018-12-28 21:09 | 1 | 2019-11-08 13:33 | nurdafur ♦225 | Gibt es hier am Glattufer tatsächlich 2 parallel laufende Fusswege?Gemäss Orthophoto gibt es dort nur einen Weg und der sieht eher aus wie ein Track Grade 2 mit Zugang für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge |
| 2 | 2019-11-10 22:17 | freebeer | are bicycles really forbidden on that side of the glatt? i know the marked cycle path crosses to the other side just northwest of here, but i don't ever recall seeing any prohibition for cycles on any paths or tracks, particularly as the aerial imagery shows no obvious reason a non-road-bike s... | |
| 3 | 2019-12-03 08:12 | MrOutdoor ♦1 | @ nurdafur: Ja, es sind zwei Wege. Direkt an der Uferböschung entlang führt der offiziell ausgeschilderte Wanderweg.@ freebeer:Yes, bicycles are forbidden. There is a no vehicles traffic sign "Allgemeines Fahrverbot" on the ground. | |
| 4 | 2019-12-03 17:02 | nurdafur ♦225 | Der Zufall wollte es, dass ich genau heute nach Bülach fuhr, um etwas ab zu holen. Da habe ich die Situation vor Ort angeschaut und nun bereinigt. Zum Beispiel gab es da noch eine Treppe. Und die beiden Wege kommen schon viel früher zusammen. | |
| 76859561 by sean2019alt @ 2019-11-10 04:48 | 1 | 2019-11-10 21:26 | freebeer | you have been repeatedly asked to use meaningful and non-gibberish changeset comments, and you have received several DWG blocks for failing to do so.yet you continue to make further map edits without explaining what you have done. your latest changes include a meaningless `edits' here, and... |
| 76577811 by Demetrio Fat @ 2019-11-04 09:01 | 1 | 2019-11-05 06:11 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,954 | DO NOT USE CRAP.ME APP |
| 2 | 2019-11-05 06:11 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,954 | Reverted edit | |
| 3 | 2019-11-10 11:08 | freebeer | the entire edit was not reverted, only the way.i have doubts about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6944588985 named `Craft beer fest' as the name implies an event, not an object, and would be typical for the sort of maps.me personal bookmarks that somehow get uploaded to the osm map itse... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-10 11:12 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,954 | I only reverted changes by CRAP.ME in Lithuania. 99% you can freely revert any other changes done via this editor. | |
| 76544078 by WakefieldMapper @ 2019-11-03 07:00 | 1 | 2019-11-04 07:56 | BCNorwich ♦4,853 | Hi you're still making some mistakes. Duplicate highways, crossing highways without joining, joining highways to area outlines. |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 17:11 | Cebderby ♦300 | This changeset has been reverted for the following reasons: - you have again realigned existing well-mapped ways to unaligned Maxar imagery, an issue you have previously been made aware of, including moving a way to run into a mapped building which is clearly and obviously bad mapping. - adde... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-05 00:52 | WakefieldMapper ♦28 | No stop it | |
| 4 | 2019-11-10 11:01 | freebeer | this is a completely unhelpful comment. mapper Cebderby has given a detailed and clear explanation of the problems and issues with your mapping, which should be respected and not simply dismissed in the way you have by trying to deny reality, closing your eyes, and hoping it is all a bad dream and ... | |
| 76589874 by ad_maps @ 2019-11-04 12:25 | 1 | 2019-11-04 12:46 | aquarix ♦115 | Hallo ad_maps,wenn ein Parkplatz nur für Gäste zur Verfügung steht ist es trotzdem noch ein Parkplatz.Um das zu kennzeichnen gibt es das access Tag. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking?uselang=de#TagsIn dem Fall wäre access=private oder access=c... |
| 2 | 2019-11-10 10:30 | freebeer | ad_maps, thanks for your correction to the private car park, as described above. | |
| 76538762 by david12345 @ 2019-11-02 21:52 | 1 | 2019-11-03 08:50 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,what does the tag ABF-FID mean? If this is a reference number of the city, it should be in a "ref:*" tag. If it is not necessary, it should be removed.And: There is no need to give the height of a building to sub-millimeter precision. That's at least two digits more than anyo... |
| 2 | 2019-11-03 13:45 | david12345 ♦2 | Fair enough. I'll get both issues corrected.Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-10 09:51 | freebeer | also, it looks as if you are running a custom script or utility, as the changeset tag created_by David Nicholsonappears to refer to your own name, i'm guessing, rather than to identify the particular trackable source-code of the data (like Acme Fix-o-bot v.003644). | |
| 4 | 2019-11-10 21:02 | david12345 ♦2 | It's my own program. no name for it. I will publish it on GitHub once I it's done with Airdrie. | |
| 76764349 by Юрий Семенович @ 2019-11-07 14:59 Active block | 1 | 2019-11-07 18:45 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Congratulations – you just shifted parts of London by 3352.6 km to the East all across Europe :) |
| 2 | 2019-11-07 18:51 | Richard ♦220 | I suggest maybe using a proper editor like iD instead of JOSM which is well-known for breaking data like this<runs away very very fast> | |
| 3 | 2019-11-07 18:54 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | The nodes shifted coincide with the corners of newly mapped buildings. This looks like a faulty mechanical edit or something like this to me. | |
| 4 | 2019-11-07 18:55 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Viewed in an improper editor: [url=https://ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt][img]https://i.ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt/Screenshot-20191107-194840.png[/img][/url] | |
| 5 | 2019-11-07 18:55 | maxbe ♦26 | and parts of Oslo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6228745 | |
| 6 | 2019-11-07 18:55 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | sorry: https://ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt | |
| 7 | 2019-11-07 19:02 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76773501 | |
| 8 | 2019-11-07 19:03 | Richard ♦220 | Thanks \\o/ | |
| 9 | 2019-11-10 09:27 | freebeer | this changeset (that i missed at the time, due to Having A Real Life™, whatever that is) is being discussed elsewhere, and what caught my eye is:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/108172/historythis shows an old node, long since deleted, and improperly brought back from the dead with t... | |
| 10 | 2019-11-10 12:49 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | If only Юрий Семенович could tell us what exactly has been done in JOSM within this changeset (plugins used etc.), the culprit could be hunted down. | |
| 11 | 2019-11-10 13:15 | maxbe ♦26 | perhaps we need a translator to ask him... | |
| 76291845 by stadiaarcadia @ 2019-10-28 10:04 | 1 | 2019-11-05 22:09 | dekatherm Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-11-09 21:49 | freebeer | i am not [name revealed elsewhere], but i believe he is passionate about stadiums/stadia and their sports, and while he is related to a website that may or may not use osm data, his work on osm is not sponsored as such.he may receive payment outside osm. at this point i should probably let stad... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-12 06:36 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | Ofcourse I’m not paid. I just like to improve OSM with adding and improving buildings / stadiums. I just wanted to add the new current stadium name the way it is, because Weserstadion is the former name of the stadium. I can understand if you don’t like a commercial name, but that commer... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-12 06:40 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | Do I guess “wohninvest Weserstadion” would be the most accurate name then on OSM? | |
| 76665863 by CitySuite @ 2019-11-05 19:56 | 1 | 2019-11-05 20:20 | DD1GJ ♦2,286 | Hallo CitySuite, wenn Du weiterhin an jeden Baum Deine Firmenreklame klebst, dann lasse ich Deinen Account sperren. |
| 2 | 2019-11-09 21:12 | freebeer | mojn citysuite,thanks for your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76667142 , `Links entfernt.'. good work.this came after changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76667012 , `Werbelinks entfernt' by DD1GJ, and in the first example i look at, https://www.opens... | |
| 47068898 by biancah_telenav @ 2017-03-22 13:43 | 1 | 2019-11-03 16:23 | ShadowFoxNixill ♦23 | Why add the turn restriction when the slip road that allows the turn it isn't mapped?(Or was it mapped back then and somehow got deleted?) |
| 2 | 2019-11-04 06:10 | biancah_telenav ♦4 | The road was there when I added the restriction | |
| 3 | 2019-11-04 06:31 | ShadowFoxNixill ♦23 | Oki. I've re-added it anyway because of DDOT 16 using it. | |
| 4 | 2019-11-09 14:01 | freebeer | for reference, the deleted way (within this year, after this changeset) can be sorta seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39568965/history or history inspections.no idea why it was deleted or anything. | |
| 76230264 by Kent Shaffer @ 2019-10-25 22:06 Active block | 1 | 2019-11-03 22:12 | S-zation ♦108 | Hi,Don't move things such as underground pipelines just because you think they shouldn't be there. Underground pipeline markers on Street Road and Emma Lane show that the pipeline passes under the golf course. |
| 2 | 2019-11-09 08:24 | freebeer | based on the visualisation offered by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76230264 (zoom in to the area of activity as this covers the whole pipeline segment), this looks not dissimilar to another golf mapper who repeatedly distorted and shoved to the side various features in the vicinity of... | |
| 76255698 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-10-27 01:41 | 1 | 2019-10-27 16:42 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! You add in different change sets the tagsUpdate=Subwayamenity=restaurantbe=amenity/fast_foodsee http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NtW. I assumed you want only change the existing amenity=restaurant to amenity=fast_food instead adding Update=subway and be=amenity/fastfood. |
| 2 | 2019-11-03 10:54 | freebeer | why are all these changesets appearing without a created_by tag such as created_by JOSM/1.5 (15390 en)used for the correction of this, obviously produced by a buggy editor, but with no clue as to which? | |
| 3 | 2019-11-03 19:35 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | answer to freebeer> Is isn't a bug, this is a feature (please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:created_by) | |
| 4 | 2019-11-09 08:03 | freebeer | moin moin, georg,i' verstehe dein antwort nid, weil... This tag is used to describe the computer program (editor or script) which made the changes' - similar to a user agent - and is automatically added by editors to a saved changeset.[i quote from the wiki 05.aug.2019 edit, ... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-09 08:31 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I will answer with private mail (on german) :) | |
| 76519276 by sean2019 @ 2019-11-02 03:07 | 1 | 2019-11-02 21:35 | skquinn ♦804 | Please save your changes before moving to a different area. This changeset's bounding box stretches from the southern US/northern Mexico all the way to Saudi Arabia. This interferes with the ability of other mappers to see where changes are really being made. |
| 2 | 2019-11-08 22:42 | freebeer | further, without actually analysing any of the changesets you've made recently, i can only say you have been ignoring my and other mappers' requests to use relevant and meaningful changeset comments. which include:Edits (repeated)[an off-topic sensible description]jwdtjhcget... | |
| 76531353 by 24coins @ 2019-11-02 15:58 | 1 | 2019-11-02 16:51 | 24coins ♦1 | I did not notice we were not to use Google as a source; I only used it to corroborate my personal knowledge. How do I remove it as a source? |
| 2 | 2019-11-08 22:22 | freebeer | you cannot, the changeset is immutable.but by explaining as you did in your comment that google was secondary to your personal observations on the ground, you've done the correct thing, and so long as no google data (precise location, name, details) was copied that you did not observe in pe... | |
| 76520444 by PerplexingPenguins @ 2019-11-02 06:06 | 1 | 2019-11-02 06:06 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | ignore the nonsense source, this was submitted by a cat |
| 2 | 2019-11-08 11:24 | freebeer | catnapping catburglar mappers make happy crappy cat-5e app catmappers in nappies caterwauling `cat /dev/random` on the catwalk. your tom obviously knows what that cat clinic will do to his masculinity; wipe down your walls | |
| 76292945 by Saeed SJ @ 2019-10-28 10:29 | 1 | 2019-10-28 13:11 | ClarkstonCorrect ♦62 | Why is this edit box so large when all you edited was 1 node |
| 2 | 2019-11-02 05:28 | Saeed SJ ♦47 | Actually I just uploaded one node in Iran and I don't know why the edit box was shown as worldwide.Anyway, I deleted the node. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-08 11:16 | freebeer | why in the first place are you uploading deleted nodes with low ID numbers? old nodes should never be re-used because it makes reverting to their original undeleted state impossible.secondly, you are uploading these recycled nodes with rubbish tags, gamification yes player_id ... | |
| 40795520 by MikeRumpf @ 2016-07-17 10:46 | 1 | 2019-11-08 07:06 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76789584 where the changeset comment is: personal private info maps.me bogus viewpoint |
| 76270886 by andy mackey @ 2019-10-27 16:52 | 1 | 2019-10-31 12:23 | ACarlotti ♦158 | I don't see any reason for including the tag "oneway=no" - it's the default for this type of road, and there's no reason why any other mapper might think it weren't twoway. |
| 2 | 2019-10-31 22:18 | andy mackey ♦6 | from memory i clicked on two way, default potlatch2 edit. but i may be wrong . | |
| 3 | 2019-11-07 16:55 | freebeer | i have seen where the arrow keys in potlatch2 work to both pan the map and to cycle between tag possibilities when not trapped properly.i have also had oneway=no get added due to this bug on selected ways.dunno if this is what happened here, but just thought i'd mention it, as my own su... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-07 21:24 | andy mackey ♦6 | Thank you freebeer well spotted i hadn't noticed that before, it's a possible explanation. Good news the A14 will open on the 12th Dec next, according BBC news a couple of days ago . Happy Mapping Andy | |
| 74988384 by aboges26 @ 2019-09-27 04:32 | 1 | 2019-11-04 05:53 | freebeer | moin,just wondering. in this changeset you seem to have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728934729/history which at present bears no tags, and is not a member of any of the three relations this changeset affects.do you remember the purpose behind this way, which at least at time of... |
| 76271073 by 511792 @ 2019-10-27 17:00 | 1 | 2019-10-27 18:37 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the School building please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels. I've already corrected it. |
| 2 | 2019-10-27 21:09 | 511792 ♦1 | Thanks, this building only has one level though. Very tall ceilings. I will change it. | |
| 3 | 2019-11-03 11:17 | freebeer | also, we write out names in full, rather than use abbreviations, so the street address of the school is likely to be East M36, or `East M 36' to match the existing highway spacing style. | |
| 76261953 by I__diaz @ 2019-10-27 10:12 | 1 | 2019-10-27 13:28 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi I__ziad, welcome to OSM."adjusted"? You deleted almost 40 buildings with this changeset.More information about this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76261953---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2019-10-27 13:46 | I__diaz ♦1 | Hi pitscheplatsch,I did adjust the buildings in a batch process. I detected that buildings in this area are traced using the "Bing" layer which lacks accuracy and consistency. On the other hand "Japan GSI Standard Map" allows a more clear and precise tracing process. I s... | |
| 3 | 2019-11-03 10:43 | freebeer | the preferred way to carry out such an edit is to use JOSM and the plugin, replace geometry.this allows you to draw accurate outlines, then to copy the history and tagging from the poor outline, which preserves the object history, still giving credit to the original mapper as is the standard pra... | |
| 76323302 by D517Mi @ 2019-10-29 04:27 | 1 | 2019-11-03 06:32 | freebeer | you are failing to map buildings properly, and are making incorrect changes to them here.https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/472248851 will show the bowling alley whose nodes, previously correctly mapped by rivermont to match the building outline, have been moved well outside their cor... |
| 2 | 2019-11-03 06:44 | freebeer | you have also deleted building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/739603307/history which is clearly visible in the latest maxar imagery as well as the two nearby pools. has this building been recently demolished, or is it still standing, and have the pools been removed and filled in, or are they ju... | |
| 75592049 by Dipesh Ligal 77 @ 2019-10-12 05:16 | 1 | 2019-11-02 20:59 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76537785 where the changeset comment is: nuke bogus maps.me private residence castles with personal data |
| 76260981 by fragumi @ 2019-10-27 09:18 | 1 | 2019-10-27 10:26 | HerbertGun ♦4 | Hallo fragumi,du hast die Ferienwohnung "Am Hagen" bearbeitet und mit dem Tag "closed" versehen; gibt es diese etwa nicht mehr?Viele GrüßeHerbert |
| 2 | 2019-10-27 13:51 | fragumi ♦1 | Hallo Herbert,der Vermieter ist über 80 und vermietet seid 3 Jahren nicht mehr. Bitte den POI entfernen.Viele Grüße-frank- | |
| 3 | 2019-11-02 18:25 | freebeer | by leaving the tourism=apartment tag present, a search for a FeWo will still return this in the results.changing the name alone does not give any hint to a search engine. | |
| 4 | 2019-11-02 22:58 | DD1GJ ♦2,286 | FeWo entfernt, Hausadresse wieder hergestekkt | |
| 76242208 by OpenBoys @ 2019-10-26 12:25 | 1 | 2019-10-27 00:34 | sykul ♦58 | Hi. This is a great, detailed addition to OSM, so thanks. The only thing is, the name tag should only be used for the name of the thing. The address info should be put into other tags. I've just separated this name tag into different tags so you can see how I've done it. https://www.open... |
| 2 | 2019-11-02 17:44 | freebeer | the name however should not be in ALL CAPS unless it is an acronym, but should be written in mixed case as `Siya Cuisine' | |
| 74968107 by 84Norman @ 2019-09-26 14:53 | 1 | 2019-11-01 17:19 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76507732 where the changeset comment is: nuke private pokémon mapping not open to the public |
| 76150196 by Profilwerkstatt @ 2019-10-24 11:56 | 1 | 2019-10-24 17:59 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Willkommen bei OSM!Ich habe mir erlaubt Deine Geschäftsbezeichnug anzupassen. |
| 2 | 2019-10-25 06:27 | Profilwerkstatt ♦1 | Guten Morgen, was heißt das genau? Viele Grüße | |
| 3 | 2019-10-25 07:09 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Dein Wert war kein Standardwert (u.a Deutsch statt Englisch). Den Unterschied kannst hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5169871296/history sehen. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-26 04:29 | freebeer | ich glaube, `descent' ist falsch-autocomplete; `decription' passt besser.. aber noch besser, `description'. stupid kezboard. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-26 04:34 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Danke für den Hinweis: Ist bereits korrigiert. | |
| 39718131 by jojotux @ 2016-06-01 19:26 | 1 | 2019-10-25 13:45 | habi ♦1,841 | According to the [OSM Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor) 'addr:floor' "is not commonly used". I added the according "level" tag where appropriate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2696584431/ |
| 2 | 2019-10-26 03:06 | freebeer | addr:floor as part of a complete postal address is in fact used in some places; an example i know would be a block of flats in danmark, which also includes an additional field to indicate whether the particular address location can be found to the right or to the left. this would be appropriate to ... | |
| 75737290 by lmason_aph @ 2019-10-15 17:33 | 1 | 2019-10-25 08:16 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Note that individual enclosures are not separate zoos, tagging every enclosure as zoo is incorrect. |
| 2 | 2019-10-25 12:18 | lmason_aph ♦2 | Hello Mateusz,This is a cut and paste of the rule from the Wiki that I used. It comes up if you put ‘zoo=enclosure’ into the search bar:“Part of zoo fits this descriptionCreate an area inside tourism=zoo and tag it zoo=enclosure. If you are not sure of its border you can ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-25 14:33 | lmason_aph ♦2 | I am further concerned, because it has come to my attention another mapper made edits at the same time, and the first one I clicked on, which was "Zebra Area" has Lynx listed as the wiki entry, so with three mappers making edits the duplicates and consistency are now an issue. May we discu... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-26 02:53 | freebeer | the first node below i pulled up was not tagged as you described at any point in its history as zoo=enclosure, but as a duplicate tourism=zoo which is incorrect.i have not checked further past this one. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-26 05:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | Tagging that you mention seems ok.But you tagged individual animal areas as tourism=zoo - see for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6882884517/historyIn addition in most cases this areas were mapped already.Some incorrectly mapped duplicates remain, it would be great to fix them... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-26 05:21 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,645 | For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6882884516 is still mapped as an individual zoo. | |
| 7 | 2019-10-26 12:34 | lmason_aph ♦2 | This is bizarre. I started the job offline and saved it as an osm file. On my local version, there is definitely "zoo=enclosure" on my tags. I uploaded that saved file. Yesterday, a lot of oddities occured when I downloaded the area from OSM into JOSM, and "zoo enclosure" was the... | |
| 8 | 2019-10-28 12:28 | lmason_aph ♦2 | Monday, 10/28:Not to belabor this point, only doing so because I find the situation so bizarre and disturbing. This is the file I uploaded. This is an IMGUR link to a screen shot of my .osm file upload. You can plainly see the tagging schema and icons I used with "zoo=enclosure" written ... | |
| 75786938 by mrohret_aph @ 2019-10-16 14:34 | 1 | 2019-10-16 14:38 | mrohret_aph ♦1 | The building was deleted because according to visual representation from Google Maps - May 2019, the building no longer exists. |
| 2 | 2019-10-20 13:14 | freebeer | you may not delete the building based on google maps or imagery. you may not use google maps either as a source for osm, nor as a reference to update the osm data as you have done. to do so goes against the google terms of service, as well as osm policy.as the building you deleted seems to be ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-25 14:58 | mrohret_aph ♦1 | Through new imagery visually surveyed and taken by my immediate supervisor on 10-24-2019 and uploaded onto Mapillary the building does not exist. The images were taken at the corner of West Jefferson Street and South 5th Street. This is a bus stop without a shelter building. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-26 02:48 | freebeer | glad you made this comment to verify your observation - i wanted to suggest the same but the osm website seems to have gone partially pearshaped, giving me a blank page attempting to reply to the personal messages this changeset originated, not to mention a severe case of auto-logout-itis (mentioned... | |
| 76135875 by blodern @ 2019-10-24 06:59 | 1 | 2019-10-24 17:32 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hallo! Meinst Du ein Automat der auch Geld einkassiert (von wegen money_transfer) oder ein normaler Geldautomat (das wäre dann https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Datm)? |
| 2 | 2019-10-25 05:07 | freebeer | another thing is the typo in `name Raiffeis*T*enbank Automat' | |
| 3 | 2019-10-25 08:48 | blodern ♦6 | Hallo user_5359,habe folgende Anpassungen gemacht.Änderung: 76194161Ob der Automat auch Geld annimmt, weiß ich leider nicht. | |
| 76143302 by Carrsupply @ 2019-10-24 09:31 | 1 | 2019-10-24 16:34 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. |
| 2 | 2019-10-24 19:54 | MerlinPendragon ♦29 | If you don't mind me asking, what indicated that this was SEO spam? I did remove the description spam when I noticed this node had been added (along with making sure the opening hours and phone number follow the standard formats), but everything else seemed to be pretty normal for a POI. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-25 04:50 | freebeer | without giving too many secrets away, for one thing, the time the eastern-european seo spam drones added it. it's morning my time, but corresponds to late night in the timezone of the addition.i feel free to reveal this because it will cause the ukrainian spam farms to have to keep abnorma... | |
| 76173520 by fanboy1986 @ 2019-10-24 20:19 | 1 | 2019-10-24 20:20 | fanboy1986 ♦1 | #MicrosoftLife #OXOMapathon2019 #OXOGive #missingmaps #microsoft #OXOCanvasGraphics |
| 2 | 2019-10-25 04:38 | freebeer | what is this soup of pointless hashtags supposed to mean?osm changeset descriptions, as well as comments thereto, are meant to describe what you have done or your intentions, for other mappers to understand.i am totally unable to parse anything meaningful from this gibberish.maybe i have... | |
| 67949190 by Divorce Lawyer Singapore @ 2019-03-09 05:50 | 1 | 2019-10-25 03:50 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76180477 where the changeset comment is: revert untagged advert spam that caused map damage (repaired by others) |
| 76118883 by ReadingCrown @ 2019-10-23 18:11 | 1 | 2019-10-23 19:52 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! You have only created nodes that were described with the keys name and description. These are usually the characteristics of SPAM submitters. Please try to explain what the nodes mean, otherwise we have to delete this entry. |
| 2 | 2019-10-24 10:52 | freebeer | another thing,you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6026625888 , a point, with the name 7th drive. this is unusual for a drive to be named by a point, itself being a part of three named (differently) drives. | |
| 75804539 by David Trueman @ 2019-10-16 23:33 | 1 | 2019-10-23 22:08 | jtracey ♦166 | I don't see a centerline tag documented anywhere, and there's only 90 uses worldwide. Are you intentionally trying to create a new tag, or was this a typo of some kind? |
| 2 | 2019-10-24 00:36 | David Trueman ♦5 | This tag was invented by Bike Ottawa and documented by them in their tagging guide: https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide#Physically%20ProtectedI am using it because it is an important distinction -- Ontario Traffic Manual Book 18 calls for a centerline to distinguish Multi-U... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-24 10:43 | freebeer | two things:osm uses the spellings as used in blightly, so if this were to be documented, the appropriate spelling for inclusion into osm would be `centreline'.second, how does this differ from segregated=yes, which is implied by a painted line and sign akin to https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-24 11:29 | David Trueman ♦5 | Yes, I need to correct the spelling. You are correct in your surmise that segregated is for separation of foot and cycle traffic whereas centreline is for separation of directionality -- but importantly, it is a vivid and constant reminder that it is a shared use path and those on foot should stick ... | |
| 76014418 by Boopbopbeepbap @ 2019-10-21 18:55 | 1 | 2019-10-22 13:27 | freebeer | hello, google employee, and welcome to openstreetmamps!you, google employee, are very welcome to contribute to openstreetmamps, but i find this a bit puzzling, as you wrote in a personal message dated 19 October 2019 at 19:40, and i quote:> Have fun getting your account banned.> P.S. I... |
| 2 | 2019-10-24 06:01 | freebeer | that would be 80-year-old virgin, you young google whippersnapper.my advanced dementia caused me to repeatedly typo openedstreetmamps above. o tempora, o mores. for the lack of an edit button my ruined reputation is.where's the GDPR Article 8 implementation at openedstreetmamps, requi... | |
| 69191161 by JonahF2014 @ 2019-04-14 01:08 | 1 | 2019-10-22 19:00 | Wulf4096 ♦159 | Hallo!SIehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1970324Wo kommt der Name "Rehot Insel" bzw. "Rehot watt" her? |
| 2 | 2019-10-23 02:48 | freebeer | see also my comment to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72743845 .i thought i had posted a detailed analysis, but apparently i shortened that into a vague commentary about how the name and language are invented based on some game using osm data. now i regret not writing the full details ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-23 04:22 | Wulf4096 ♦159 | Didn't see that one.I found an interesting link: https://micronations.wikia.org/wiki/ZimeaIn general I prefer to give other users the opportunity to explain their changes. Might be I missed something. But now I came to the conclusion that this MUST be pure fictional data.I'll rev... | |
| 4 | 2020-08-29 06:30 | Wulf4096 ♦159 | Hallo!Du hast den Namen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88144606 wieder hinzugefügt.Magst bitte noch erläutern, woher dieser Name kommt? | |
| 31596215 by ika-chan! UK-USA @ 2015-05-31 00:38 | 1 | 2019-10-18 13:20 | DaveF ♦1,564 | HiDo you remember why you amended 'network' from National Rail to TFL Rail? |
| 2 | 2019-10-18 14:56 | ika-chan! ♦242 | If I recall correctly, TfL does not use the National Rail symbol for stations that only serve TfL services. There is a clear tendency for TfL to set their services (Overground and Crossrail) apart from the rest of National Rail. Of course, we expected back in 2015 that Crossrail would open in 2818. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-18 14:57 | ika-chan! ♦242 | No, not 2818, 2018! | |
| 4 | 2019-10-18 17:09 | DaveF ♦1,564 | HiThe Great Eastern Main Line is still a part of National Rail network I believe . | |
| 5 | 2019-10-18 17:38 | ika-chan! ♦242 | To be honest, I do not know why you are worried about a 4-year old edit that reflected the situation at the time, with clear evidence of devolution: if any station on the Shenfield line had started serving GA or GWR trains again, then add National Rail back into the network tag. You don't need ... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-18 17:46 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Ah ,FFS! I can't win with some on OSM. Check with them to make sure any changes are accurate & I get this kind of reply. Don't inform them & they cry like big girls blouses.Unlike some I could mention I take time to ensure my contributions are as accurate as possible | |
| 7 | 2019-10-22 23:11 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | DaveF, it was good of you to ask before making a change. ika-chan, no need to get all defensive about this, a simple "I thought it made sense at the time, feel free to change" would have been sufficient. DaveF, please let's keep this civil and refrain from quoting Boris Johnson. | |
| 8 | 2019-10-23 02:22 | freebeer | BoJo said that? i didn't know, i just knew the expression pre-dates current politics by several decades, at least.osm, where you learn something new every day. whether it's useful is another topic entirely. | |
| 76060793 by JamesChevalier @ 2019-10-22 16:54 | 1 | 2019-10-22 18:21 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area. |
| 2 | 2019-10-22 19:54 | JamesChevalier ♦7 | Apologies, but I don't know what you mean by "before you change the area." | |
| 3 | 2019-10-22 20:49 | freebeer | try to take a look at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76060793you have made eight changes, in areas that span a wide area. if the above link worked, i would point to you the standalone items too far from any others which should have been saved to a separate changeset so as not to cr... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-22 21:04 | freebeer | to be more specific, now that i've looked at this small number of changes, while seven of them are clearly in connecticut as your changeset description claims, you may wish to have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7825323 , a glastonbury located near edmonton in alberta, canada... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-22 23:14 | JamesChevalier ♦7 | Thank you! I understand that I should be making edits as localized as possible, now.I also see that I _did_ change the wrong Glastonbury. I have since changed that back to the admin level 7 that it was before I "helped". :-) | |
| 6 | 2019-10-23 02:13 | freebeer | no worries -- had your edit gone as planned, there would have been no problems with eight CT locations in a single changeset.you did well with the changeset comment so it was immediately obvious something had gone pear-shaped with such a large bbox.since there were relatively few items in th... | |
| 65627435 by Harrisonlollar @ 2018-12-20 01:28 | 1 | 2019-10-21 19:38 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Short question to your maxspeed value: Roundup Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656373171) is a living_street and has 69 mph value for maxspeed? Can you please check this? |
| 2 | 2019-10-21 20:55 | freebeer | and no aerial imagery shows this as any sort of highway. also, this is obviously not an urban area so there are no osm municipal parks here. and it is very odd to rename a lake after yourself following earlier edit wars. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-21 21:21 | iandees ♦724 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76018858 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65627435 | |
| 76002089 by FreeWiFiBerlin @ 2019-10-21 14:14 | 1 | 2019-10-21 14:20 | kartonage ♦987 | Hej FreeWiFiBerlin, das sieht mir nach einem Import von Daten aus. Daher die Fragen: Woher kommen die Daten und sind sie lizenztechnisch geieignet für die Übertragung in OSM?Desweiteren bin ich etwas verwundert, dass WLAN-Eigenschaften an Adress-Knoten gelegt werden? Was ist da der... |
| 2 | 2019-10-21 20:20 | freebeer | of the last three of the 12 edits so far, only https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2024623195 , the address node for Weinmeisterhaus, corresponds to a publicly visible node of Freifunk Berlin at https://www.freifunk-karte.de/ (among others).the tagging ofinternet_access \twlaninternet_access:... | |
| 29249468 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2015-03-04 17:36 | 1 | 2019-10-21 16:47 | AgentKamenski ♦1 | Building needs a officer from FBI cybercrimes to inspect the property and the Comcast Xfinity wifi open networks |
| 2 | 2019-10-21 17:47 | freebeer | so what's wrong about open WLAN networks? i'm operating one right now with a foreign client connected to it.please to be enlightening me. | |
| 75957392 by ItchyDemon @ 2019-10-20 15:33 | 1 | 2019-10-20 15:37 | ItchyDemon ♦2 | This should have two shop types: craft and second_hand (it is a second_hand shop for craft supplies). The editor wouldn't let me specify two shop tags, and there isn't a single option for the tag value combining both. I left it at shop=craft , but I would appreciate if someone can figure o... |
| 2 | 2019-10-21 12:01 | freebeer | i agree the shop value should show the what; the how or why is second-hand to that.does this quote from the wiki help? For a shop=* that sells a specific type of good (e.g. shop=clothes), use second_hand=* with value: * yes if it sells new and second-hand items * only if it sel... | |
| 75754019 by jguthula @ 2019-10-16 05:54 | 1 | 2019-10-18 07:08 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! What is the meaning of maxspeed=55 mph;50 mph;45 mph? You can have only one value as max value. Also the source link isn't existing anymore. Please don't copy any value, you didn't understand (specially, if the comes from amazon :) See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69... |
| 2 | 2019-10-18 07:09 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | sorry: see https://www.osm.org/way/735056342 and https://www.osm.org/way/129104851 | |
| 3 | 2019-10-21 04:30 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi user_5359,Thanks for your inputs. I didn't add the maxspeed tag to this road. Before my edit, there was a overlapping road on top of this road with multiple turn restrictions added to it. I removed that road and just corrected the turn restrictions. As a part of correcting the turn restr... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-21 05:14 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | When I create new objects, I am responsible for the correctness of the information. If you know that the values are wrong, you have to delete them. In addition, your shared e-mail account has been refusing to accept e-mails for several days due to an SMTP error. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-21 11:46 | freebeer | georg, amazon did not create a new way from nothing. this new way exists as a result of splitting an existing way, and the correct thing for any editor to do, be it iD, osm, potlatch, or whatever, is to preserve the existing tagging for the entire previous length before splitting.such splits ar... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-21 13:34 | jguthula ♦65 | Sure user_5359, I will keep a note of that going forward. I didn't know my emails are getting refused. Thanks for bringing this to my notice, will work on getting that fixed.Regards,Jothirnadh | |
| 69893881 by rojganes @ 2019-05-05 04:17 | 1 | 2019-10-13 22:04 | freebeer | hallo amazon,it has happened here too.by using the iD editor to add a turn restriction, you have again introduced buggy map data by duplicating part of the way starting at this (buggy) relation.are you able to fix this? i fixed the last time i reported this, but i will not have the time... |
| 2 | 2019-10-16 06:43 | rojganes ♦10 | Hi,Thanks for your comments. I've fixed this duplicate under changeset #75754019. We are resolving such errors in a reactive manner. Request you to flag them if you notice any such errors, please don't fix them. As most of our data backup is linked to iD, we are unable to switch the ed... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-20 13:43 | freebeer | looks good. i was worried that the newly-added overlapping road was lacking connectivity to two sets of pedestrian crossings, but josm worked with the old segment. there were no other conflicts as far as differences between the overlapping ways here, as there were in the previous overlap where i n... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-22 06:49 | rojganes ♦10 | Hi,Thanks for confirming. Looking forward to learning from you.Regards,rojganes | |
| 75692622 by EGriff @ 2019-10-15 01:13 | 1 | 2019-10-16 13:47 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. "Chicken house" is a description not a name. |
| 2 | 2019-10-20 13:23 | freebeer | as is `Stable (horses)' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734645073 | |
| 3 | 2019-10-20 13:31 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Okay I didn't mention all possible improvements: Please don't mark single building as landuse=farmland. Please use building=yes. | |
| 75612950 by GolfMapper @ 2019-10-13 02:15 | 1 | 2019-10-16 23:20 | Mashin ♦557 | 10+ hours of work and "Job appeared as rushed and without much care taken". Ouch. |
| 2 | 2019-10-20 12:38 | freebeer | you have also deleted some 20 ways listed below, only to re-draw most with minor variations.this loses the history of mashin's contributions making it appear there was nothing there, and that goes very much against the osm policy to preserve the history and respect other users' edits.\... | |
| 75810943 by McCabeInc @ 2019-10-17 04:55 | 1 | 2019-10-17 06:35 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for discovering and deleting the SPAM. However, there is a place node there that I have restored (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/154318726/history) |
| 2 | 2019-10-20 11:19 | freebeer | hallo georg,it looks as if you should have restored v3 of the node, as it presently has the name of some business, plus additional info that should not be part of the name.i'll probably see if i can pull up v3 for you to get the name (printer? odd) correct again.ciao | |
| 75933325 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-10-19 15:44 | 1 | 2019-10-19 16:03 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | Please do not perform large search and replace operations like you did here. It appears that you have added craft=glaziery to quite a few objects where this tag does not match (eg 328531320). Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for details. |
| 2 | 2019-10-19 16:58 | sorcrosc ♦412 | The same in this changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75933301See node:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3016775101 | |
| 3 | 2019-10-19 21:23 | alester ♦187 | This user is performing a massive number of mechanical edits all over the world. They need to be stopped immediately. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-20 06:37 | freebeer | agreed.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3651038416/history was obviously tagged correctly by a local mapper, and it's not surprising to find crystal glass shops throughout bohemia as well as the rest of ex-czechoslovakia that are no more than (souvenir) shops.one would think this user... | |
| 68086641 by Ka1000 @ 2019-03-13 04:51 | 1 | 2019-10-18 22:16 | freebeer | sorry, you can't add an area (recreation ground) tagging to an item that is a way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543977804/history |
| 74811186 by kaxtillo @ 2019-09-23 14:05 | 1 | 2019-10-14 13:49 | Recoil16 ♦64 | Is there a particular reason you removed the highway=primary tag from a part of 23rd Street in Washington D.C.? Construction or something of that nature maybe? If so, please tag it accordingly. Just removing the highway tag prevents routing and creates confusion. |
| 2 | 2019-10-14 14:38 | freebeer | and how is it that washington dc got included into a `vias Popayán' colombia changeset? something to do with RapiD maybe? | |
| 69210691 by Allison P @ 2019-04-14 18:32 | 1 | 2019-10-14 01:13 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | Is access to Cesar Chavez Lane actually restricted? I haven't seen any signage indicating that |
| 2 | 2019-10-14 02:23 | Allison P ♦1,136 | The street sign on Capitol is blue (verified in person) indicating that the road is private. However on Broadway the street sign is green which means public. The street sign at the point where the road goes from one-way to two-way is also private. Thus I inferred that the section up to the West Stad... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-14 04:07 | PerplexingPenguins ♦55 | I haven't been able to find a source on what a private road actually implies, but I don't think it necessarily affects access | |
| 4 | 2019-10-14 04:45 | freebeer | private in terms of ownership is not what osm maps, but in terms of access.that is, all the forest roads i walk are privately owned but the law requires the public have access, and so they appear in osm without any sort of access restriction.i suspect the same should be true here. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-14 14:09 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Hmm, I wonder how I should map it then. I don't think BSU wants thru traffic to use the private section of the road, but use for anyone with business at BSU is fine. Mapping it as public might result in OSM-based navigators telling people to take it as a shortcut but mapping it as private might... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-14 14:44 | bhousel ♦278 | Picking "destination" in the access dropdown should do what you want. It means that people may use that road for local traffic or if they have a good reason (e.g. to deliver something).. For more info see the descriptions of the access values here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... | |
| 7 | 2019-10-14 15:53 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Thanks bhousel, that's exactly what I was looking for. I added the tag to the road. | |
| 75531695 by AshishKohli9 @ 2019-10-10 19:52 | 1 | 2019-10-13 19:56 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75633419 where the changeset comment is: maps.me rubbish with totally bogus tags. only add real facts to osm |
| 50007681 by Wong Tze Kwong @ 2017-07-03 12:24 | 1 | 2019-10-13 12:51 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75623094 where the changeset comment is: bogus maps.me autobahn rest area |
| 75520949 by Katie V @ 2019-10-10 15:05 | 1 | 2019-10-10 16:17 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as area=yes Please use building=yes.Is LaundroMAX a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ? |
| 2 | 2019-10-12 17:42 | freebeer | second try.based on the name, i'd have guessed amenity=laundry but that shows how little i know as it should be shop=laundry.i'll turn in my osm mapper badge for this faux pas. and yes, i did google the shop name to confirm my guess. | |
| 75487450 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-10-10 02:11 | 1 | 2019-10-10 09:20 | flohoff ♦2,355 | Hi,did you actually have a look at this object?It does not match any object in the aerial imagery.Flo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75487450 |
| 2 | 2019-10-10 14:35 | freebeer | this is a simple worldwide mechanical edit carried out by the spiffy *NEW!* functionality of the iD editor in order to force a uniform worldwide tagging norm, that a handful of iD enthusiasts have been carrying out. i've reverted many tens of thousands of such changes across the us of a where ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-10 15:08 | flohoff ♦2,355 | But how? I mean somebody must have drawn this object - There is a photovoltaic but its MUCH huger and more to the north. So i wonder how this can actually happen (I am josm user)Flo | |
| 4 | 2019-10-23 17:09 | rivermont ♦221 | This was reverted in 75953633.It is supposed to be a roof part, not a solar panel anyway. I've added the actual solar panels, see changeset 76116519. | |
| 75511599 by Premium Law Firm PLLC @ 2019-10-10 12:35 | 1 | 2019-10-10 13:11 | TravGW ♦355 | I don't know what company you're with but STOP spamming the map. Your reckless edits are destroying vital features on the map such as the major road removed in this changeset. This reckless spamming will not be tolerated. |
| 2 | 2019-10-10 14:17 | freebeer | good lord, achavi runs out of memory when i try to visualise this. thanks for the revert. this seems to be a new breed of spammer, and probably should be nuke-on-sight rather than turn repair work over to osm volunteers given how many dozens of malformed entries they pump in per day. | |
| 75201755 by VLD072 @ 2019-10-02 20:24 | 1 | 2019-10-03 01:28 | A67-A67 ♦926 | This is also a bus stop named 'School'. Please recheck all your edits. I think you removed a lot of correct information from Openstreetmap. |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 08:55 | eggie ♦40,705 | Send PM with the following message.Hi VLD,Please stop mapping this way. You are removing lots of good data from OSMThe name for busstops in The Netherlands is often School. Even at my own school.Why removing this usefull data. It’s asked again and again. . and you still continue ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-03 10:14 | freebeer | why is this still happening? these edits were made between 14 and 12 hours ago, joe responded to comments about the same issue a day ago and should have learned from that.it's almost as if facebook doesn't care about osm, with their own mapping app being broken for over a week and ins... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-04 22:08 | RVR004 ♦34 | Hi,Joe is part of my team. I want to apologize for the continued errors. OSM is very important to us which is why we created these challenges to clean up some bad data in the first place. We will be pausing on our MapRoulette challenges while we reevaluate our workflow to ensure we do not remove... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-06 14:40 | freebeer | here are a few examples. if one searches one will find several hundred i have marked as resolved (useless for osm)https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1944749https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1944871https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1945120https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1947024htt... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-10 13:47 | freebeer | second try, netwerking probs as shown withinis it possible that this continuing minor flood (dozen or so detected by me per day) originates not from the main face:b00c website proper, but from an app, Marquette place [sic] related, that got b0rked on late 23.09.2019 ?my firefox, where i'... | |
| 7 | 2019-10-11 19:03 | RVR004 ♦34 | Hi Freebeer,Thank you very much for sharing the example notes, and helping locating where these notes are possibly from. We've already started an investigation on OSM Notes. We will also investigate further on "report" feature in maps on Facebook, coordinate with other internal... | |
| 75347013 by wsoroe @ 2019-10-06 17:48 | 1 | 2019-10-07 07:16 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Hallo,bitte für ungenutzte Läden nicht shop=vacant benutzen sondern disused:*=*vg |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 08:02 | wsoroe ♦33 | Sowohl vacant (in Hamburg 215) als auch disused: (86) sind gebräuchliche Schlüsselwerte. Wenn du einen davon durchsetzen möchtest, betreibe die Änderung der Wiki-Einträge.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shophttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 08:40 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Inhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dvacantsteht:Besser ist disused:shop=* oder disused:*=* zu verwenden. Grüße aus dem Süden | |
| 4 | 2019-10-09 14:51 | wsoroe ♦33 | Diese Behauptung hat es bisher nicht geschafft, dass shop=vacant in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop als falsch eingestuft wurde. Deswegen hat auch mMn zu unterbleiben, per Änderungssatzkommentar den Gebrauch von disused einzufordern. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-09 21:08 | freebeer | the advantage of the lifecycle prefix is that by prefixing shop, it immediately prevents it from being parsed as an active shop and rendered. regardless of the prefix - proposed, construction, disused, razed, not, was.otherwise one needs a special rule that `vacant' is a special case, like... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-09 21:22 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | @wsoroe:wie bereits die Vorredner schrieben, und ich dich ja nur gebeten habe und nicht gefordert; Ist es sehr zu empfehlen disused:*=* zu verwenden.vg | |
| 75451611 by 911hazmatcleanup @ 2019-10-09 10:12 | 1 | 2019-10-09 12:10 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | I edited your entry to follow the OSM rules for a number of items in this object.We received your remark.Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 13:30 | freebeer | there are still fields needing work:addr:street includes an abbreviation that should be written out in fullcontact:phone and phone are missing the country code prefixdescription should be rewritten to be less like advert coryoffice field is not an osm valueopening_hours is not in osm forma... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 15:30 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | And probably this is something that the can be fixed/added by the first mapper? | |
| 4 | 2019-10-09 19:49 | freebeer | if they actually cared, they would have followed osm conventions in the first place.but all they care about is to dump several dozen pois per day all with similar non-osm tags, onto the map. they probably don't care if they get fixed up or not, they've been paid regardless of the qual... | |
| 75441886 by cxcsimulationscom @ 2019-10-09 07:13 | 1 | 2019-10-09 15:15 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building! |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 19:38 | freebeer | the name should also include just the name and not a description as well. | |
| 74615286 by michael_f_osm @ 2019-09-18 09:39 | 1 | 2019-09-24 23:07 | WillyGarcia ♦5 | Why did you change Beehive to a tourist attraction? It is a natural geyser just like the other springs, geysers, and so on in the area. I believe this should be reverted, as with the other update. Happy to read your thoughts though! |
| 2 | 2019-09-27 07:40 | michael_f_osm ♦1 | It is of course a natural geyser but a tourist attraction as well, so for me it was very difficult to decide. Greetings Michael | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 16:58 | WillyGarcia ♦5 | Fair enough! Cheers friend. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-09 19:19 | freebeer | the problem is that a tourist attraction is very broad and can cover virtually anything, and gives no clue as to what it really is, and is widely abused in osm.natural=geyser is far more specific and accurately describes the feature so that someone seeking such things can find it without having ... | |
| 75425902 by Cachetiger @ 2019-10-08 18:05 | 1 | 2019-10-09 02:56 | opendcc ♦1,535 | Hallo,eine Sperre wird nicht durch Entfernen getagged (die Brücke ist ja noch da), sondern durch access=no. Beim Weg 732730847 ist eine Selbstüberkreuzung drin gewesen.Und bitte mach in einem Edit nur ein kleines Gebiet und nicht Hamburg bis Rom. Viele Grüße |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 17:43 | Cachetiger ♦1 | Danke für die Hinweise.Das Problem mit der Brücke war nur, dass mein GPS-Gerät einen Weg anzeigte. Ob der gesperrt ist, konnte ich auf der Karte nicht sehen. Das große Gebiet ist entstanden, weil ich bei Potlach keinen Weg gefunden habe, ein neuen Editir-Vorgang auszul&oum... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 18:54 | freebeer | in both p1 and p2:`s' saves the present work. no new changeset is opened for the following hour. you may continue to work and incrementally upload your work so as not to lose it.`c' will close the present changeset. if you continue to work in potlatch, your next save will open a new... | |
| 75435072 by IMJustice Marketing @ 2019-10-09 02:04 | 1 | 2019-10-09 04:22 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM!Is your business a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ? |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 12:39 | IMJustice Marketing ♦1 | It's a home office, where I also have taken local appointments as well ... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-09 13:14 | freebeer | regardinghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379674429/historyi am having a slight mental disconnect, trying to relate a two-level building that is 30 metres tall.i suppose it is possible for a cathedral or similar, but these appear to be condominiums | |
| 4 | 2019-10-09 14:39 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | The question is not how big the office is, but what kind of job you do (if you are not looking for names but for marketing agencies (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dadvertising_agency)).Colleague freebeer wants to point out the standard unit of height is meter. Height=30 mea... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-09 14:39 | IMJustice Marketing ♦1 | Oh, I understand now ... No, the "building" is that tall, I only have cathedral ceilings in my 2nd floor home and office ... Plus, a front and rear balcony ... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-09 14:46 | IMJustice Marketing ♦1 | creating, planning, and handling advertising (and sometimes other forms of promotion) for its clients.That seems to kind of say it right on ... If asked in person, I would say I am a Lead Generation & Marketing Strategist ... I am also a Business Coach & Author ...Before defining mys... | |
| 7 | 2019-10-09 14:48 | IMJustice Marketing ♦1 | Very difficult to be "short" and quick with an answer ... I don't want to over-simplify, or cut myself short in any way ... | |
| 52113935 by Gouled Med Warss @ 2017-09-17 10:11 | 1 | 2017-09-17 10:38 | antoineg ♦4 | Hi Gouled, thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.It seems that you have uploaded personal information to OSM.org which does not belong to the publicly available geographic database.I suppose that you wanted to create a personal bookmark in Maps.me instead of Adding a new place to share w... |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 09:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75448919 where the changeset comment is: get rid of a bogus maps.me personal castle with private info | |
| 65478701 by ma-rt-in @ 2018-12-14 16:23 | 1 | 2019-10-08 17:11 | wsoroe ♦33 | maxspeed=1 ist aber sehr langsam.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8080649 |
| 2 | 2019-10-08 20:11 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Huch, das sollte natürlich nicht passier. Ist angepasst | |
| 3 | 2019-10-08 21:36 | freebeer | try again? | |
| 4 | 2019-10-09 06:42 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | jetzt aber :) | |
| 75370098 by AMF Building Products @ 2019-10-07 11:02 | 1 | 2019-10-07 16:44 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 22:23 | freebeer | i didn't know one could use a node for highway=service, but as i look closer at this SPAM i see it is abusing =serviceS which is something so far removed from either and irrelevant to this entry. it's like the maps.me highway=rest_area being used to tag benches and non-motorway amenities.... | |
| 65857109 by njtbusfan @ 2018-12-29 02:30 | 1 | 2019-10-07 18:01 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! You add on the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658956513/history the tag "maxspeed" = "35,45". Please notice we use a dot as decimal separator. But did you mean 35.45 km/h or 35.45 mp/h? Booth are very crooked speed values for the USA. Please have a look on the docum... |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 22:12 | freebeer | i bet it was 35;45. as to units, i'm not going to guess. i think in one only. and it's used in all but a small handful of countries. greetz | |
| 75025742 by VLD072 @ 2019-09-27 20:40 | 1 | 2019-09-28 09:07 | ligfietser ♦122 | Why do you do this?Marking a bus stop named "school" you turn it into a school? |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 20:43 | VLD072 ♦10 | Hi ligfietser,Thank you for messaging me with your feedback. I was attempting to correct the name of the stop, since a bus-stop with name=school isn't common. I should have been more cautious on the update. Speaking of the name of this bus stop, do you happen to know the actual name? Ha... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 07:59 | ligfietser ♦122 | Hi Joe, thanks for your answer. It is the actual name:https://reizen.keolis.nl/nl/utrecht/haltes/naam/zwartebroek-schoolSee alsohttps://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jy0lbiAIydAzIukhXZKRwQ | |
| 4 | 2019-10-03 21:54 | VLD072 ♦10 | Thank you ligfietser. This is definitely helpful. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-06 15:48 | freebeer | are you planning to re-add the removed names, or just leave them like this? thanks | |
| 6 | 2019-10-06 16:47 | ligfietser ♦122 | Fixed, thanks for noticing freebeer! | |
| 55732150 by Khris Santos @ 2018-01-25 07:01 | 1 | 2019-10-05 01:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75307256 where the changeset comment is: get rid of a maps.me personal castle |
| 75201675 by VLD072 @ 2019-10-02 20:22 | 1 | 2019-10-03 11:46 | alphensebezorger ♦393 | Hello VLD072,It seems you tagged this road as a school. I don't know why it was named "School", which is indeed a unlikely street name. But replacing the name-tag by amenity=school is even more unlikely to be correct. Could you please have a look a this change again, and remedy th... |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 13:09 | freebeer | the weird thing is that tiger:name_base_1 is still present appearing in the TIGER 2018 background at different zoomlevels.then again this is an untouched area of osm, with clear offsets of the POIs against imagery.there is a POI for an elementary school but only displayed when zoomed in, aga... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-04 23:37 | RVR004 ♦34 | Hi alphensebezorger,Thank you for sharing you feedback on the edits. I agree with you that it's more inappropriate to tag this map feature with amenity=school. Without more support on local knowledge about the road name, I reverted the tag change back to the version (Version #6) before ou... | |
| 75159344 by shadty @ 2019-10-01 15:32 | 1 | 2019-10-01 16:16 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) members (from, to, via), see relation Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) members (from, to, via), see the eight reations from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10022547 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1002255... |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 19:08 | freebeer | if i'm seeing right, you also deleted one of two amazon-added service drives in almost the same position. did you report it to them? i've been noting some workflow issues that they should improve...thanks | |
| 3 | 2019-10-03 10:41 | shadty ♦12 | Hi,Apologies for the miss in relations. I've corrected the edit under changeset 75224418Regards,shadty | |
| 4 | 2019-10-03 12:24 | freebeer | and now that i actually look at the changeset tags lacking the host= key, it's obvious you are from amazon.hard to keep up with these sorts of things... | |
| 75199974 by jpbari @ 2019-10-02 19:26 | 1 | 2019-10-02 19:53 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Please don’t delete private ways, if the exists. You can mark them with access=private (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) . |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 20:45 | jpbari ♦1 | This one was not a road at all - it was just a driveway. If it is still appropriate to leave it marked I apologize. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 21:15 | mapadu ♦8 | Driveways can mapped. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway | |
| 4 | 2019-10-02 22:27 | freebeer | this had been incorrectly tagged as a residential highway. the correct thing to do would be to change it to highway=service, service=driveway, and optionally add access, but by default residential driveways can be considered private plus depending on micromapping, parts of it may be open to the pub... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-03 10:59 | jpbari ♦1 | If it is reinstated, we'll get the tag changed.Thanks. | |
| 6 | 2019-10-03 12:18 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75230816 where the changeset comment is: at mapper request, undelete private residential driveway for re-tagging as what it is. good luck :-) | |
| 62013634 by Bob the Shibe @ 2018-08-26 18:55 | 1 | 2019-10-01 16:44 | Allison P ♦1,136 | On what planet is the United States considered third-world? |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 12:11 | freebeer | isn't this time the thrid time we've been through this? i would think by the thrid time it would be obvious, the thrid planet from the sun.Moses Minor: Unless ye do grant release to these, the prisoners of your vile enslavement which is called Greyfriars, there shall be sorely visited... | |
| 72028080 by daweaselyo @ 2019-07-08 19:43 | 1 | 2019-10-03 07:26 | acet2ngaia ♦17 | Hi again! This isn't a park. Please don't remove or falsify existing information. Many other projects use data from OSM besides Pokemon Go! There are still a lot of missing real world features that could be mapped instead, which would be helpful for everyone :) |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 08:10 | daweaselyo ♦1 | Can someone who's better at editing seperate the Army Heritage Center from the Carlisle Barracks itself? Army Heritage Center is open year round to the public. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-03 11:26 | freebeer | am i guessing correctly the heritage centre would be off army heritage drive, near army heritage trail(s), where there's a stonking big car park and a vast empty void?ah, when i look at imagery, i see a couple unmapped buildings. (more, looking at mapbox aerials) i take it one or more wo... | |
| 75123970 by milkey-mouse @ 2019-10-01 01:11 | 1 | 2019-10-01 22:13 | Glassman ♦5,232 | access=yes isn't really needed as its assumed to be yes unless tagged otherwise. But it doesn't hurt either. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75123970 |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 19:47 | milkey-mouse ♦1 | I submitted this with StreetComplete; if these kinds of tags are a problem it's StreetComplete's fault | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 23:02 | freebeer | my guess is streetcomplete is using access=yes to show it was surveyed and known to be so, whilst leaving access untagged could lead to lingering nagging doubts as to whether it needs to be checked (again and again and again...) | |
| 4 | 2019-10-02 23:57 | Glassman ♦5,232 | That's a reasonable assumption. The StreetComplete folks do seem to make up their own rules. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-03 09:59 | freebeer | discussed in-great-depth forward-stroke to-death in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855&p=9 (auf deutsch) | |
| 75183123 by briggsandbriggs @ 2019-10-02 09:44 | 1 | 2019-10-03 02:53 | Glassman ♦5,232 | SEO - but only one small error |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 08:20 | freebeer | and two bigger ones -- the use of a description tag to deliver advert copy, shortened into something meaningless and useless for osm, but more critically, the use of multiple throwaway accounts which is a violation of the osm guidelines, when a single account should be used for all such user edits. | |
| 75211623 by ygudeti @ 2019-10-03 06:14 | 1 | 2019-10-03 06:22 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! A restriction relation must have three different roles (from, to, via), see all relation. |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 08:06 | freebeer | how is it that iD is leaving behind broken turn restrictions when one member is deleted? do other editors do this? does iD even warn about this? this seems to be happening far too often from the comments on detected brokenness i am seeing several times daily. | |
| 75198676 by user_5359 @ 2019-10-02 18:42 | 1 | 2019-10-02 23:51 | freebeer | to be deleted as misplaced spam. what is up with these housenumbers? is this revenge for how i handle notes like https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1946052 or others that are even on land like https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1945353 ? |
| 75187520 by zarrillihomes @ 2019-10-02 12:39 | 1 | 2019-10-02 19:18 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding your business. I suspect you had some help entering these data. Please inform the person that the way is suitable to delete the data as SPAM immediately. If he needs help to improve his method, he is welcome to contact me. |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 23:30 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75205271 where the changeset comment is: undo careless could not care less SEO damage to roads. node was updated so deleted separately. | |
| 75199716 by user_5359 @ 2019-10-02 19:18 | 1 | 2019-10-02 23:06 | freebeer | the description left behind really adds nothing of value. it states things totally irrelevant to osm. |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 23:11 | freebeer | oh, and more importantly, this address is given as 607, while if i can trust the address across the street of the cycle shop, the real addresses for this area should be in the 100s. i may have to check further. i deal with a lot of notes spamvertisements nowhere near the actual business. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 23:20 | freebeer | got that backwards. this node has no place here, and i won't relocate it for a lazy seo spammer. this is as bad as google maps was near me which drove me to osm years ago, and it's sad the reputation of osm accuracy is being damaged by seo spammers who could not care less.i'll d... | |
| 75194030 by And_12 @ 2019-10-02 16:08 | 1 | 2019-10-02 20:40 | Aqaba Shark ♦1 | Please Stop Translating Streets Name |
| 2 | 2019-10-02 20:43 | And_12 ♦2 | Why should I stop translating? I'm trying to improve the street data in Jordan. | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 22:46 | freebeer | i see nothing technically wrong; the data i looked at had the english only in name:enhowever, when i see the map, i'm seeing english displayed, or - tile mismatch...half Ba and the rest arabic.i think i need to look into this... | |
| 4 | 2019-10-02 22:52 | freebeer | got it, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100707482/historyi don't expect to see english in the name= tag here, is that right?i do see the english displayed looks pretty iffy, with unwanted abbreviations and ALL CAPS as well as a typo in Kimg Faysal STi am only aware of a few custom... | |
| 5 | 2019-10-03 16:18 | And_12 ♦2 | Yeah, the OSM policy states that the official language for the country should be represented in the main name tag, and any other languages used should be added as "name:en" for example. An that's what I was trying to do here. | |
| 75105411 by KWIOOSTB7 @ 2019-09-30 14:28 | 1 | 2019-10-02 22:18 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75204196 where the changeset comment is: STOP adding callsigns to the village node. i am about to revert it back to v4 before you started to abuse it, and report your actions to the DWG so they can keep watch on it. |
| 74977623 by WallOfDeath @ 2019-09-26 18:57 Active block | 1 | 2019-10-02 09:38 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75182956 where the changeset comment is: undo deletion of ways, no idea about the rest of the changes but boundary is wrong. in memoriam Karel Gott, na shledanou |
| 74971488 by WallOfDeath @ 2019-09-26 15:59 Active block | 1 | 2019-10-02 09:00 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75182081 where the changeset comment is: i see no justification for the absurd claim a cemetery was razed and is now an industrial construction site. reverting until irrefutable concrete proof is offered |
| 73999143 by WallOfDeath @ 2019-09-02 12:35 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-26 19:17 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi WallOfDeath, welcome to OSM.May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped paths and (private) service ways? Thanks.If a way is not accessible to the public, we add the access=private tag.More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73999143-... |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 19:28 | freebeer | why did you change a cemetery into a construction site?see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728809987/historyi believe this changeset is deliberate vandalism and should be reverted, there having been no follow-up.the so-called ``building'' at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-02 08:55 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75181498 where the changeset comment is: so-called private property is no reason to delete anything, nor to vandalise a cemetery and destroy the lovingly-traced work of others. you are deleting far too many valid existing mapped items t... | |
| 53407435 by woodpeck @ 2017-10-31 20:27 | 1 | 2019-10-02 07:24 | freebeer | not just remove the advert copy, but being co-located with a differently housenumbered starbucks, as i try to determine how misplaced a distant spam note is, it's nowhere in the area so i'm deleting it - no interest in fixing paid seo entries and no interest in having such inaccurate entri... |
| 74272107 by WallOfDeath @ 2019-09-09 16:20 Active block | 1 | 2019-10-01 21:16 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75171526 where the changeset comment is: undelete a service drive clearly visible on all imageries. you are deleting far too many valid existing mapped items that belong on the map. |
| 74977562 by WallOfDeath @ 2019-09-26 18:55 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-26 19:11 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi WallOfDeath, welcome to OSM.May we know the source of your mapping? Thanks.---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2019-09-27 12:27 | WallOfDeath Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-27 12:29 | WallOfDeath Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-01 19:51 | freebeer | your proposed construction also includes four houses.can you point to some news article announcing this? i can find nothing of that sort.also an upgrade is not represented for a cemetery by turning it into a construction site as that will almost never reflect the reality of respect for the ... | |
| 74827494 by KWIOOSTB7 @ 2019-09-23 21:46 | 1 | 2019-09-29 18:32 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75069407 where the changeset comment is: this is the village node and should only include the name of the village, and nothing more in the name. |
| 74213245 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:47 | 1 | 2019-09-16 19:35 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74547254 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 2 | 2019-09-27 14:24 | Gas & Electric ♦7 | @Guylamar2006 If you want to change something globally, ask for permission and then let it be done by a bot.(Undeclared) mechanical tag changing is not only not permissible – it also a waste of your precious time. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-28 23:32 | freebeer | to be precise, the multiple changesets i reverted were limited to the continental untied snakes and i badly need a new kezboard.the huge number of FIXMEs should be a clue that this is not a trivial change. and i stick behind my stance that when i write FIXME, the best change i'll accept wo... | |
| 74400355 by freebeer @ 2019-09-12 16:15 | 1 | 2019-09-25 06:42 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hi. Not to troll your changeset comments section, but I saw this guys/girls/persons FIXME to fixme edit come up in my feed and I was like "well, this is totally going to piss someone off." Glad it got reverted. I looked over some of the other persons edits and it looks like a lot of them a... |
| 2 | 2019-09-27 10:19 | freebeer | hallo honourable hadam hant,you are correct, andy townsend (SomeoneElse) from the dwg did comment on one of the multiple changesets that in my rough, very rough estimate, affected some 40'000 FIXMEs across the continental 48 of the us of a. no attempts i could see were made in other countr... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-27 21:19 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Good to know SomeoneElse sent him a message. I did to on a changeset where he had tagged a bunch of sport pitches and dog parks as recreation grounds. Not surprisingly, I didn't hear back. Even so, the push back is a good thing I think. iD editor should really get rid of the warning also. When ... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-28 20:40 | freebeer | > message length phobicsdon't think this is a problem here yet. i know it's Notes issue I've encountered repeatedly (do i have a problem? i think so) but as far as i know, changeset comments are for me limited by TCP issues, so it is up to you to guess if this my eighth attem... | |
| 74160760 by manitec @ 2019-09-06 07:36 | 1 | 2019-09-22 19:19 | freebeer | hallo amazon, how is this happening?this changeset was uploaded three minutes after another one tracing the exact same ways through a drive-through. yet there are tagging differences between the two.first, how can two of your mappers be working on the same thing?second, i presume the le... |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 17:14 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks a lot for bringing this up. The 2 users have been working on the same area and had edited the segment in question. While the 2nd editor had received a conflict, the editor went ahead and gave "Keep mine" which lead to the duplication and henceforth the detaching of t... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-24 08:33 | freebeer | hoi ganesh,thanks for the cleanup. a few hours earlier, i cleaned up after the iD-bug overlapping way that i mentioned earlier in XXX FIXMEthis was pointed out in a now-lengthy Notes discussion to be read at XXX FIXME, and my fix probably means the amazon-added turn restriction that user gp... | |
| 74775535 by DJ Cane @ 2019-09-22 16:02 | 1 | 2019-09-23 07:56 | Carnildo ♦905 | The farmland you added doesn't look very farm-like to me, it looks like someone's back yard. Are you sure you tagged it correctly? |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 13:31 | DJ Cane ♦3 | I marked this as farmland because that piece of land (along with some others on residential properties) are primarily used as pasture for a small number of cows. When this part of Kennewick was annexed, a few families had farm animals and those who did were allowed to continue using their proper... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-23 18:21 | Carnildo ♦905 | Might want to add a "note=" tag to that effect -- cows don't show up too well in aerial imagery. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-24 06:35 | freebeer | actually, cows show up great. i want to point you at a particular imagery where you could count the flies accompanying them, but i've searched in vain with the realisation the overflights were made at the end of winter when the meadows were barren and the cows were still in the barn. i'l... | |
| 59373673 by Ganpurew Khurelbaatar @ 2018-05-29 16:52 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74795111 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me private info personal bookmarks |
| 59384230 by Ganpurew Khurelbaatar @ 2018-05-30 03:18 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:47 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74795057 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me private info personal bookmarks |
| 59445542 by Ganpurew Khurelbaatar @ 2018-05-31 22:48 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:46 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74794996 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me private info personal bookmarks |
| 61730227 by Ganpurew Khurelbaatar @ 2018-08-17 00:04 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:44 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74794928 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me private info personal bookmarks |
| 73380147 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-15 13:16 | 1 | 2019-08-16 01:52 | jmapb ♦405 | Hi MustafaD, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!Question for you -- you seem to be naming everything you add in Manhattan some variation on "Manhattan Simit&Simit" -- two supermarkets in this changeset and also this cafe:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6711055485Offhand this see... |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 08:29 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74794293 where the changeset comment is: mistagged and misplaced maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets | |
| 73470234 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-18 18:10 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:28 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74794218 where the changeset comment is: redundant misplaced maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 73578427 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-21 12:26 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:20 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74793830 where the changeset comment is: mistagged and misplaced maps.me private info personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 73722279 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-25 17:02 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:16 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74793645 where the changeset comment is: mistagged private info maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 73773243 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-27 00:32 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:15 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74793587 where the changeset comment is: mistagged and misplaced maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 73795619 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-27 12:29 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:14 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74793546 where the changeset comment is: mistagged and misplaced maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 73393358 by MustafaD @ 2019-08-15 22:00 | 1 | 2019-09-23 08:12 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74793482 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me personal bookmarks as supermarkets, supermarkets, supermarkets |
| 62200885 by Ganpurew Khurelbaatar @ 2018-09-01 15:46 | 1 | 2019-09-23 07:57 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74792849 where the changeset comment is: mistagged maps.me personal bookmarks that do not belong on osm |
| 74171182 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 11:37 | 1 | 2019-09-10 08:10 | Thomas8122 ♦204 | Actually there are many cliffs in Saxon Switzerland. What do you mean with 'MNT data'? |
| 2 | 2019-09-13 16:54 | Akkurator ♦293 | Has this automated edit (there are 7 CSs of this kind within 5 minutes) been discussed somewhere before it was done? | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 01:01 | freebeer | and more to the point, with the fairly extensive discussion on the talk mailing list that i felt concluded the unique cliff features were accurate, is the plan to restore the deleted data by reverting this changeset and the others? still working on a country-wide retagging with many dozens of thous... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-17 08:43 | Akkurator ♦293 | Is there a link to this "discussion on the talk mailing list"?Still wondering what "MNT data" is.Mapper not responding IMO also supports a full revert here. | |
| 5 | 2019-09-17 09:38 | freebeer | i've probably botched the link here but the thread starting with https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-September/083236.html . 13 entries.i can see from viewing this changeset at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=74171182 these are clearly not continuous topo lines.... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-22 10:44 | MichaOSM ♦23 | I have entered most of the data.I find this type of deletion disproportionate and incomprehensible. Since the data are released in Saxony, they can also be used from my point of view. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoSN_Open_Data) | |
| 7 | 2019-09-23 07:23 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74788815 where the changeset comment is: second try. i hates netwerking problems. following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while | |
| 8 | 2019-09-23 07:33 | freebeer | relation 1750661 last edited in another changeset/by another user (Rongel/74466239)https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1750661 now at v252, forest/valley. i suspect trying to figure what got lost through these deletions, which i probably should have reverted earlier to avoid these conflicts,... | |
| 9 | 2019-09-23 07:51 | MichaOSM ♦23 | Hi freebeer,Thank you very much :-) MichaOSM | |
| 10 | 2019-10-02 18:33 | Nop ♦6 | I think there still is a problem here. The same tag usually used for macromapping is used for excessive micromapping.To me, a stone tower with a few meters in diameter is not the same as a 200m cliff side. But with this tagging they are indistinguishable and mess up all topomaps. https://tools.g... | |
| 11 | 2019-10-02 19:00 | Nop ♦6 | As the region is in Germany, I started a new discussion in the German section of the forum.https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=764518#p764518 | |
| 12 | 2019-10-13 13:02 | Vlad ♦12 | I agree with @nop this tagging is nonsense what we have here are NOT cliffs in the sense they are defined on the OSM WIKI page for the tag natural=cliff where for example it is clearly stated : "Also do not use natural=cliff just for mapping an inclined bare rock surface, use natural=bare_rock ... | |
| 74171995 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 11:57 | 1 | 2019-09-23 04:11 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74785291 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74171999 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 11:57 | 1 | 2019-09-23 03:56 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74785119 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74172003 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 11:57 | 1 | 2019-09-23 03:34 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74784816 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74172055 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 11:58 | 1 | 2019-09-23 03:30 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74784738 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74172137 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 12:00 | 1 | 2019-09-23 02:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74784256 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74767574 by AlphaPupRemy @ 2019-09-22 09:28 | 1 | 2019-09-23 02:08 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74785202 where the changeset comment is: revert repeated vandalism, again |
| 74647343 by Peseika @ 2019-09-18 22:42 | 1 | 2019-09-19 05:31 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi Peseika, welcome to OSM.May I know the reason behind reverting more or less all your mapped buildings in this area? Thanks.---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 01:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74784156 where the changeset comment is: revert a changeset consisting almost entirely of building deletions, visible in aerials, nearly 600, after no mapper response to clarify "wrong digitising" and why the work of ot... | |
| 74782322 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-22 21:44 | 1 | 2019-09-23 01:08 | freebeer | are you even looking at the things you are turning iD loose upon in this multi-continent-spanning changeset?like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4702081092/history , a maps.me full-fledged bus station smack dab in the middle of the road. |
| 74172279 by Vlad @ 2019-09-06 12:03 | 1 | 2019-09-23 00:47 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74783912 where the changeset comment is: following talk mailing list discussion, restore micromapped sächs.CH rock formation details, this will take a while |
| 74759142 by sopmod @ 2019-09-21 20:49 | 1 | 2019-09-22 13:54 | aweech ♦369 | Hi, if you don't provide evidence that these features have been destroyed in real life, you will be reported for vandalism. |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 14:48 | sopmod ♦3 | Do you work for OpenStreetMap Foundation?My driveways are private with zero access and are being used by trespassers using the false pretense of an "actual passable road" that they may use.A cursory inspection of the surrounding area demonstrates no such consistency for labeling/taggin... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-23 00:01 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74783786 where the changeset comment is: undo vandalism deletions of properly-tagged items clearly visible in aerial imageries | |
| 74160641 by buddhirv @ 2019-09-06 07:33 | 1 | 2019-09-22 19:21 | freebeer | see comment added tohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74160760which this much smaller changeset overlaps and conflicts. |
| 2 | 2019-09-23 17:16 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,I have cleaned up the segment (changeset # -74810585). There was an issue of conflict and the user missed it. I have advised the editors to be careful in handling the conflicts. Let me know your suggestions.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 74204132 by carlins @ 2019-09-07 12:01 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-09 14:25 | korolenok ♦83 | Hi, carlins! It looks like you are making fake edits. If this is not the case, provide any images or links to the source.And please, do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's t... |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 15:29 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74774305 where the changeset comment is: remove fake fiction | |
| 74552438 by _Van_imports @ 2019-09-16 22:51 | 1 | 2019-09-17 13:16 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted five buildings that were created years ago. Could you please go back and replace these buildings and keep the editing history? Thanks :) Also, quite a few of the buildings you've c... |
| 2 | 2019-09-18 02:49 | freebeer | i count eight objects below.which is weird in that in another changeset with numerous deletions, nothing appears at the start of the list.in achavi, though, i see seven in the two areas deletions are obvious.got it, that last bit is an outer part to one of the other two. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-18 04:08 | chachafish ♦462 | Yep, you're right. I missed those two buildings. Now I count a total of eight deletions along with the small roof section. https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=74552438 | |
| 4 | 2019-09-18 04:50 | freebeer | they're back. man, i don't think the effort to write a script to feed the numbers below was worth the bother... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-18 10:52 | chachafish ♦462 | Awesome! Thanks for doing that :) | |
| 6 | 2019-09-22 14:14 | freebeer | the idea behind the script came about seeing mass deletions elsewhere mixed with additions and other changes that would be lost by a revert, that i've had to let slide.now i can keep an eye more closely on user plitscheplatsch (however it's properly spelled, never was enough a sandm&au... | |
| 74723573 by sopmod @ 2019-09-20 15:20 | 1 | 2019-09-21 18:43 | aweech ♦369 | Hi, driveways are mapped in OpenStreetMap and are used by many data consumers. Rather than deleting features, please edit the tags to better reflect on the ground truth. |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 13:45 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74772310 where the changeset comment is: undelete driveways that were in fact tagged as driveways and not roads | |
| 3 | 2019-09-22 14:57 | sopmod ♦3 | I request that at a minimum an administrator be called in and possibly the OpenStreetMap Foundation legal department to resolve this issue. | |
| 74658454 by AlphaPupRemy @ 2019-09-19 08:04 | 1 | 2019-09-22 09:07 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74767172 where the changeset comment is: revert of mass deletions not reflected in aerial imagery |
| 74660008 by AlphaPupRemy @ 2019-09-19 08:40 | 1 | 2019-09-22 08:52 | freebeer | please use proper changeset comments. a single full stop conveys no info. and do not make fictional edits like this. reverted. |
| 74742749 by AlphaPupRemy @ 2019-09-21 08:08 | 1 | 2019-09-22 01:44 | TravGW ♦355 | Why have you deleted all of the footways? |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 08:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74766670 where the changeset comment is: revert of mass deletions not reflected in aerial imagery | |
| 74658196 by AlphaPupRemy @ 2019-09-19 07:59 | 1 | 2019-09-19 18:18 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi AlphaPupRemy, welcome to OSM.May I know the reason behind deleting several footpaths, which have been mapped just a month ago? Thanks.More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74658196---Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 08:42 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74766617 where the changeset comment is: revert of mass deletions not reflected in aerial imagery | |
| 74718095 by ANNABUR @ 2019-09-20 13:09 | 1 | 2019-09-20 16:07 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Please write change comments describing what you changed. The note Testtask only raises doubts whether this is possibly just SEO SPAM. |
| 2 | 2019-09-22 08:03 | freebeer | the use of UPPERCASE NAMES is wrong for osm, and many categories are wrong, such as bank for an insurance office, supermarket for a package store, or clothing shop for a cleaners.what's up with the weird swimming pool north of here with the road through it? it's long out-of-date and s... | |
| 74735102 by _Van_imports @ 2019-09-20 21:05 | 1 | 2019-09-21 04:28 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | Hello! Do you know that you paint over existing buildings with complete address data with detailed, but only inadequate address data? Please urgently (manually) clean up and take over the data. Example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79818260 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/726974368 |
| 2 | 2019-09-21 07:18 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | You also add three building with the height=0 ! Exists this building or not? See https://www.osm.org/way/726974401, https://www.osm.org/way/726974409, https://www.osm.org/way/726974421 | |
| 3 | 2019-09-21 13:53 | chachafish ♦462 | user_5359, thank you for catching these errors. I've communicated with organizers of this import about these and other issues, but it seems the same errors continue to persist. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-21 14:06 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I don't quite understand the organizer's statement. The tag height=0 should be intercepted by simple methods before importing and even the overlapping buildings can be fixed by JOSM methods. | |
| 5 | 2019-09-21 14:37 | chachafish ♦462 | user_5359, I agree. I just sent the organizers of the Denver import messages asking them if they can assist with correcting these type of errors before they're placed in the OSM database. User _Van_imports has been asked to correct previous import errors he/she has made, but these errors remain... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-21 17:43 | freebeer | hallo an alle,i followed the link to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Denver_Planimetrics_Import to try to edumicatify meself after seeing weirdness i could not ignore.my opinion is that rounding height to full metres is too crude. that's a granularity of half me height and could pu... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-21 19:31 | phidauex ♦194 | FYI, I just pushed a lot of updates to the workflow documentation for the DRCOG import which should help inform importers of some of these potential issues and how to correct them before importing.The DRCOG data is pretty clean, but no dataset is perfect. These height=0 buildings are a new one f... | |
| 8 | 2019-09-21 19:38 | phidauex ♦194 | Ok, I see the problem, those buildings are of type "building=foundation/ruin", probably because they were traced while the development was still in construction, which is why they have a height of zero. They shouldn't have been imported that way. I'll update the documentation for... | |
| 9 | 2019-09-26 13:13 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello _Van_imports, the errors pointed out here have still not been corrected. You have also not replied to the comments left here. Can you please reply and can you please correct the errors? Thank you. | |
| 10 | 2019-09-26 13:18 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello _Van_imports, in this changeset you have changed Platt Park Apartments from building=apartments to building=commercial. Also, just south of this building there were previously three buildings. You seem to have incorrectly combined all three into a single structure. Can you please correct these... | |
| 11 | 2019-09-26 15:13 | _Van_imports ♦2 | What am I supposed to do when the DRCOG import digitized the building as one roofprint and there are three existing separate polygons? My understanding was that the DRCOG data would be more accurate, so I gave priority to it over old polygons with often sparse attributes. What is the best practice h... | |
| 12 | 2019-09-26 19:16 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, thank you for your reply. I can't say whether you should import DRCOG data or not. This is simply a question of incorrect data being placed in OSM. As it stands now, the data is incorrect, so it needs to be corrected. Thanks :) | |
| 13 | 2019-09-28 19:12 | phidauex ♦194 | Hi Van, I've done you a solid and corrected most of the geometry and tagging errors, doing my best to preserve history, and the best traced building regardless of source.I'd encourage you to go back through the list of issues pointed out above to make sure I got them all, and correct a... | |
| 14 | 2019-09-30 15:18 | _Van_imports ♦2 | Thanks, phidauex! | |
| 73438492 by Changaiz Khan @ 2019-08-17 09:34 | 1 | 2019-09-19 02:25 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74650030 where the changeset comment is: delete totally bogus maps.me personal castle rubbish |
| 73438420 by Changaiz Khan @ 2019-08-17 09:31 | 1 | 2019-09-19 02:24 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74650008 where the changeset comment is: delete totally bogus maps.me personal castle rubbish |
| 74550973 by _Van_imports @ 2019-09-16 21:29 | 1 | 2019-09-17 13:44 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted a building that was created years ago. Could you please go back and replace this building and keep the editing history? Thanks :) Also, you've created a new building on top of an o... |
| 2 | 2019-09-17 17:24 | mspyker_imports ♦13 | How do I go back and replace a building? | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 21:20 | chachafish ♦462 | Well, that's a good question. I can't say I'm an expert on all the different ways the OSM database can interact with various editing tools, but my experience says you'd have to revert the changeset completely and start over. There may be other ways to do it, but I don't know... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-17 21:21 | chachafish ♦462 | If you need any help with the JOSM revert tool, just let me know | |
| 5 | 2019-09-18 00:26 | freebeer | that sounds like overkill for just one deletion, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501526036/history .if it's not too messy i'd poke around with potlatch1; if it looks too much work it's about time i write a wrapper around the undelete and related scripts.oh, that was too easy... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-18 00:38 | freebeer | by the way, i couldn't remember if the 5-year-old your village maps overlap of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282842300/history was mentioned - it was, so now you have two pairs of items here to use the josm `replace geometry' feature on.i'm guessing the other changesets i reca... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-18 01:16 | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks, freebeer, for bringing back the original building :) | |
| 8 | 2019-09-18 14:42 | _Van_imports ♦2 | Thanks freebeer and chachafish. I did not have the plugin installed that includes the replace geometry tool until yesterday - I'll make sure to use it moving forward with this project. | |
| 9 | 2019-09-18 15:54 | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks, van_imports. I'd recommend you go over your import changesets. In some of them, you may have some duplicated work that needs to be addressed. Cheers :) | |
| 10 | 2019-09-18 16:55 | freebeer | might help, probably won't as i don't know what-all tools are out there, but if you see my changesets of this morning they should guide you with better focus to the particular places i restored now-duplicates:74610154 74604876 the third one here is trivial to see both buildings.\... | |
| 11 | 2019-09-21 13:59 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, _Van_imports. It looks like you are continuing to create building imports (which contain errors) before correcting older errors which were pointed out to you. Will you please correct older errors before moving on with more imports? Thank you. | |
| 12 | 2019-09-26 13:20 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello _Van_imports, the errors in this changeset remain outstanding, will you please correct them? Thank you. | |
| 13 | 2019-09-26 15:06 | _Van_imports ♦2 | Yes chachafish. I have not had time but should be able to fix later today. | |
| 69913240 by omgitsgela_imports @ 2019-05-05 18:52 | 1 | 2019-09-18 13:14 | freebeer | mojn gela,i'm checking another importer's work and i came across puzzling changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69754556 which led me here.i'm just getting started after working with chachachafishy to put back history onto remapped items, so i'll be looking mo... |
| 2 | 2019-09-18 14:32 | freebeer | okay, an achavi check led me to the conclusion that nrenner's copy doesn't just need a plain osm background, but also a vivid eyewatering-osm so one can actually see the difference between the pale building and the more pale residential when the former is outlined. like how osm-carto used... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-18 15:16 | freebeer | nevermind; i see there's an outline from a later changeset, but lacking rendering tagging. also nextdoor two overlapping outlines, one a shed, the other not rendered, both with an unneeded node.i'll trust your deletions were made in mentor capacity as the faulty replacement for the si... | |
| 74546499 by _Van_imports @ 2019-09-16 18:36 | 1 | 2019-09-17 14:02 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted numerous buildings that were created long ago. Could you please go back and replace these buildings and keep the editing history? Thanks. Also, just so you know, after you deleted the o... |
| 2 | 2019-09-18 06:59 | freebeer | okay, this is weird that no ways are listed below as deleted, while the raw changeset seems to show 11. also 80 nodes, while 49 are enumerated below.but wait, apparently only 1371 ways were created, yet the count below seems to include the 11 deleted.i just have no idea on what page(s) to f... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-18 10:59 | chachafish ♦462 | In the past, I wasn't checking every changeset, but now I check all of them at least every 24 hours. It looks like the Denver import project needs some QA assistance ;) | |
| 4 | 2019-09-18 13:51 | freebeer | i started at the very beginning, a really good place to start, and no further deletions from this user account were found.what was weird was to see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69754556 which was also the only gap, while picking another random deletion pointed again to this user accou... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-26 13:26 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello _Van_imports, errors are still outstanding in this changeset. Will you please review this changeset and correct the outstanding errors? Thank you. | |
| 69754556 by _Van_imports @ 2019-05-01 00:01 | 1 | 2019-09-18 13:06 | freebeer | alright, start small, but, um, there's a gap here as it seems gela had a beef.set this one to the side for a bit |
| 74554536 by AverageOSMEditor @ 2019-09-17 02:13 | 1 | 2019-09-17 19:37 | TravGW ♦355 | Concerning this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71372992 You do not need to convert a single highway into a divided highway unless there is a physical barrier dividing the ways. Also this change may have broken the route relation although I haven't checked. |
| 2 | 2019-09-18 01:03 | freebeer | yep, that's a centre turn lane for most of its length. and some of those turns it allows are not mapped from both directions.and yes, the route relation is buggy. | |
| 74238299 by JessAk71 @ 2019-09-08 23:04 | 1 | 2019-09-17 12:26 | Burisma ♦31 | You may merge the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357926420/history into the dam poly. |
| 2 | 2019-09-17 15:41 | JessAk71 ♦116 | Hi Burisma, that node was deleted because there was another duplicate node with similar information here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357941533 Figured it was best to remove the duplicate node that had older dates (357926420) and keep the node with a more recent date as is (357941533). Also t... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 19:56 | freebeer | (blast. try again...)hoi jess,if you didn't know you can also create a simple polygon in p2 from a node, keeping its history and transferring the tags. i forget which meta-key it is - shift? - and drag the node near the desired outline. my tablet soft-kezboard keeps that modifier to ... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-18 06:32 | JessAk71 ♦116 | Hi freebeer! Thanks for the tip! Good idea. Burisma, feel free to make any adjustments to tags, like I said all that was changed was node 357926420 was deleted (because it was a duplicate) and node 357941533 that had similar information was kept (because it has a more recent date), so up to you ... | |
| 74160143 by buddhirv @ 2019-09-06 07:20 | 1 | 2019-09-17 16:42 | freebeer | hallo amazon (i'm sure without checking) iD editor user,something has gone very wrong with this changeset.if you look below, you have updated the original version of oregon pike with a lower way number to revision 12.just below that is v1 of a new oregon pike, which apparently is th... |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 08:29 | vssms ♦12 | Hi Freebeer,Apologies for the issue and delay in response. Our editor has added a restriction instead of splitting the road into a dual carriage way. By the time we understood the problem there were multiple changes that had happened in this location which stopped us from making any further chan... | |
| 74553359 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-17 00:30 | 1 | 2019-09-17 12:43 | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? Thanks :) |
| 2 | 2019-09-17 15:21 | freebeer | it's an automated edit that is prefixing colour codes with an octothorpe.however like many such simplistic automated edits, it's not well thought out and the one example i grabbed, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604112653 , shows a 50% success rate and 50% failure in detecting each ... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-21 07:10 | skquinn ♦804 | If that's really what is going on, "Fix with Osmose" doesn't tell us that. "Prefix color codes with '#'" would. | |
| 74552428 by freebeer @ 2019-09-16 22:50 | 1 | 2019-09-17 00:40 | stevea ♦304 | Seems your 'bot is overzealous, freebeer. Your "revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where I prevented reasons to keep existing tagging" statement, especially when issued by a 'bot, is hyperbolic hubris.This started because it appeared a place=suburb tag is pro... |
| 2 | 2019-09-17 01:43 | freebeer | i'm not sure where the place=suburb comes in, because all i am doing is reverting an ongoing country-wide undiscussed mechanical edit that multiple users have taken issue with and the DWG has weighed in on. mechanical edits such as this that are affecting multiple tens of thousands of mapper c... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 01:52 | stevea ♦304 | Your "not sure" is likely because you haven't read the History of the node.It appears (I do believe this but I could be slightly mistaken) that I entered FIXME tags which get 'bot corrected to fixme and somehow your bot gets involved as "something you edited" (as di... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-17 03:17 | freebeer | ohhh-kay...this changeset reverted a changeset that touched nearly a hundred items. i would not be reviewing every item. one changeset covered around 5'000 items, maybe part of california heavily mapped where users aren't afraid to voice uncertainties.i take it you somehow get a ... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-17 04:41 | stevea ♦304 | I appreciate that you took the time to type all that, even the snark about California.I have not had "prolonged edit wars," that is a false characterization on your part and looks a lot like you casting the first stone.Whether something is at v1 or not matters not. Somebody has to... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-17 06:53 | freebeer | (this isn't wanting to post. try again)the so-called california snark was an honest comment that while i see you are active all over, i would expect that if you have opted into notifications somehow, i would expect it to be geographically limited to your area of greatest interest, as the f... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-17 08:08 | stevea ♦304 | Nice chatting with you. | |
| 74213768 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:12 | 1 | 2019-09-13 15:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello,Please don't make automated edits like this that really don't add any value to OSM..Best Regards,Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 16:19 | freebeer | i would even go so far as to claim in some cases, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252570658 , before i restored the tagging a mapper presumably chose to use (i don't have a preset either way), the changed fixme had disappeared off the first screen and out of casual view of a mapper inspe... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 02:03 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74554216 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74192643 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 20:29 | 1 | 2019-09-17 01:42 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74554048 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74193185 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:00 | 1 | 2019-09-17 01:14 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553750 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74193251 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:04 | 1 | 2019-09-17 01:10 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553672 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74193599 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:19 | 1 | 2019-09-17 01:00 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553421 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74193635 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:21 | 1 | 2019-09-08 02:37 | Carnildo ♦905 | Most tools don't care if you spell it "FIXME", "fixme", or "FixMe", they'll alert on any variation of capitalization. |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 12:06 | freebeer | FIXME also has the advantage for humans of standing out in a non-tool review as YELLING, and it appears for me in a C locale sorted before normal OSM lowercase tags, rather than being mixed halfway down the ever-increasing tags that require further scrolling and often easy to overlook.i have als... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-17 00:35 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553367 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74194324 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 21:53 | 1 | 2019-09-17 00:25 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553171 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 73959145 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-08-31 22:05 | 1 | 2019-08-31 23:20 | edathy Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-09-17 00:04 | freebeer | this is another large and pointless change from FIXME to fixme from what i have seen so far, while other equally generic descriptions include FIXME changes with other automated iD retagging carried out over a large area.feels like a candidate for a revert. | |
| 74194484 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 22:03 | 1 | 2019-09-16 23:55 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74553047 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74194594 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-06 22:11 | 1 | 2019-09-16 23:49 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74552915 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213571 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:03 | 1 | 2019-09-16 23:31 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74552524 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213692 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:09 | 1 | 2019-09-16 22:52 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74552428 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74208685 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 16:04 | 1 | 2019-09-16 22:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74550136 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74212736 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:21 | 1 | 2019-09-16 20:52 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74550103 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74212871 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:27 | 1 | 2019-09-16 20:49 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74549960 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74212983 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:33 | 1 | 2019-09-16 20:43 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74549446 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213020 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:35 | 1 | 2019-09-16 20:23 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74549325 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213081 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:38 | 1 | 2019-09-16 19:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74548263 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213298 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 19:50 | 1 | 2019-09-16 18:26 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74543946 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 18:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74546277 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74214338 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:49 | 1 | 2019-09-16 17:24 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74543133 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215008 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:33 | 1 | 2019-09-16 17:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74542841 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215021 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:34 | 1 | 2019-09-16 16:39 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74541751 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213798 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:14 | 1 | 2019-09-16 16:32 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74541354 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74213885 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:18 | 1 | 2019-09-16 16:01 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74538960 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 16:23 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74540460 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74213951 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:22 | 1 | 2019-09-16 15:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74537944 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74214306 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:47 | 1 | 2019-09-16 15:02 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74537719 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215058 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:37 | 1 | 2019-09-16 14:58 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74537160 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215143 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:43 | 1 | 2019-09-16 14:46 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74535674 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215303 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:54 | 1 | 2019-09-16 13:59 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74528003 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74513209 by personaltouchconsultingservices @ 2019-09-16 05:50 | 1 | 2019-09-16 06:41 | b-jazz ♦657 | Does this consulting business actually exist at this location? The satellite imagery (which can be a few years old) for where the marker was placed shows it in the middle of a grove of trees. |
| 2 | 2019-09-16 13:51 | freebeer | it certainly is not where it is now mapped, for sure (it's been randomly moved).i prefer my life undeveloped, thank you. what does this advert copy word salad even *mean*? | |
| 74215359 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 21:59 | 1 | 2019-09-16 11:55 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74527488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215934 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 22:50 | 1 | 2019-09-16 11:45 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74527429 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74215960 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 22:52 | 1 | 2019-09-16 11:44 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74527055 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74456791 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-13 22:46 | 1 | 2019-09-16 11:32 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74526092 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74456820 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-13 22:48 | 1 | 2019-09-16 11:06 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74524590 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74456907 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-13 22:56 | 1 | 2019-09-16 10:50 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74524486 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74456908 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-13 22:56 | 1 | 2019-09-16 10:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74524397 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74197855 by Andre68 @ 2019-09-07 04:59 | 1 | 2019-09-09 17:16 | MV_GIS ♦2 | Good morning. What is the nature of the duplicates that you are fixing? The node count was below 2000 as was specified. Why is the changeset #74197855 closed and no data has been posted? |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 03:02 | freebeer | being familiar with this sort of repair, i can speculate that the tool you used either put two nodes in the same spot, or included the same node twice.seeing v2 of the nodelist takes 123 pages in my `lynx' browser, and the full history takes 242 pages, there may have been just one redundant... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 04:50 | Andre68 ♦88 | Yes, exactly. These dupe nodes are nearly always due to a faulty editor tool. I do a lot of these fixes all day and it seems that all editors do this. To compare the versions you could load the way with JOSM and use the history tool (ctrl-h) to visualize the difference. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 12:01 | freebeer | as i've been unable to sleep for days, i decided to try and analyse this without the usual visual inspection.on the original changeset seen at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74189315 which created this polygon, you see that 1868 new nodes were uploaded to osm.when i process the... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-10 17:49 | MV_GIS ♦2 | Good morning again. Thank you for your insight and mods of this. The original problem may have originated from the simplification of the original 11,000 nodes of this very intricate and large polygon. I would guess that the simplification process does condense 2+ points into one vertex. I was about ... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-11 01:15 | freebeer | if you are satisfied with the detail in the simplified polygon, no need to do anything.you are aware that if you want to keep the full level of detail, you can split the original polygon into a number of smaller sections, uploading each as outers of a multipolygon?i would have to zoom into s... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-11 03:58 | freebeer | good morning, almost, depending on how you define it - the to-work commuters are flowing in the dark.i zoomed in on your polygon around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6777984774 where it looked sufficiently jaggy. i measured the distance to the nearby node as over 15 metres, far outside of ... | |
| 8 | 2019-09-13 21:36 | MV_GIS ♦2 | Good afternoonThanks for your help on this. I did modify the tags - basically it is a closed drinking watershed - but the polygon is not displaying when zoom out to its full extent. If I zoom in, I can see the boundary and i can query it. The neighbouring Seymour Watershed does display. What els... | |
| 9 | 2019-09-14 22:41 | freebeer | good middle-of-the-night, with a wonderful moon here. after one of the most amazing sunsets i spent well over an hour watching when i should have been mapping.thanks for the update; i can confirm the area you have added is displayed viewing https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.55191/-123.10... | |
| 74437090 by gerritgerrit @ 2019-09-13 12:57 | 1 | 2019-09-14 21:13 | gerritgerrit ♦1 | Kann mir jemand erklären was ich falsch gemacht habe? Warum verschwindet die Beschriftung des Hauses nicht? |
| 2 | 2019-09-14 21:23 | freebeer | i see nowt but 141. give it time, you have old cached tiles. no problems. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-14 21:26 | gerritgerrit ♦1 | I see. Thanks! | |
| 74270490 by ksnghr @ 2019-09-09 15:34 | 1 | 2019-09-10 13:06 | mvexel ♦144 | Hi, Maxar Standard imagery does not show these roads as completed yet, if you have another source please specify it in the changeset tags, or mark the road as construction. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 14:25 | ksnghr ♦2 | Hi Mvexel,I made the edit using latest Digital Globe imageries and missed mentioning it the changeset. We have clear imageries that the roads are well built and hence reverting it back to residential road (Changeset # - 74314475). Thanks for your update. Will definitely mention the source in the... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 18:32 | mvexel ♦144 | I looked at both regular and Maxar Premium but neither shows the roads as completed. Could you please share a screenshot that shows the roads are completed and accessible to the public? | |
| 4 | 2019-09-11 01:00 | freebeer | martijn, do you have a way to determine the ages of the imageries you view? i'd expect a lag of months before the imageries open to osm go live for processing.except sentinel-2, have you checked that?i'm betting my last quatloos from the phrasing of the response this is amazon.\... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-11 13:06 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel,We have the latest imagery from July 2019. As freebeer suggested, there is a lag in the latest imageries being made available in OSM. Let me know in case you need any updates.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 6 | 2019-09-11 16:29 | mvexel ♦144 | This is what I see with publicly available imagery:* [Maxar Premium](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/mZ6S6Yr9pK8ePHG)* [Maxar Standard](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/xi4nPcjQAcEtdF7)* [Bing](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/MwNgcNLazJRgrqC)None of these images show the road as completed. My point is, unl... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-11 17:43 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel,We have the private stack of latest imageries from DigitalGlobe. The imagery is from July 2019 which clearly suggests that the construction are complete. If there are any local updates much recent from you, we will definitely go ahead revert the changes, Let me know your suggestion.\... | |
| 8 | 2019-09-11 20:59 | mvexel ♦144 | I see, so this is imagery that is not available to regular OSM mappers. Please understand that this makes it hard for the community to check your edits. It would help if you could be very specific in attributing your sources in the changeset comments, so the community at least is aware that you have... | |
| 9 | 2019-09-12 15:10 | @kevin_bullock ♦6 | Maxar (DigitalGlobe) licenses imagery to many organizations around the world. It might be worth coming up with a metadata tag convention to indicate that. In this case, KSNGHR has a license to fresh Maxar imagery that most OSMers don't have access too. I like still tagging Maxar but maybe we ne... | |
| 10 | 2019-09-12 15:14 | @kevin_bullock ♦6 | i.e. the imagery used was not literally the "Maxar Standard Imagery (Beta)", rather a newer vintage of Maxar imagery. | |
| 11 | 2019-09-12 15:29 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Mvexel, Kevin,Our editors generally tag the cases with "Source:Digital Globe". This editor has however missed doing it. I would definitely go ahead advise the editor to be careful and add the same. It does not reflect in the changeset but in the Way ID. Example where our editor used... | |
| 12 | 2019-09-12 17:37 | mvexel ♦144 | Ganesh -- source=Digital Globe is too generic to be useful. The entire OSM community has access to DG / Maxar imagery. As Kevin said, it would be useful to define some metadata that indicates that this is newer / private imagery that the general community does not (yet) has access to. Lacking that, ... | |
| 13 | 2019-09-12 17:45 | gseethar ♦67 | True. Makes sense. I will definitely take this up and deep dive if there are any specific patterns that is being followed in OSM and get back to you in a day or two. Thanks a lot Mvexel, Kevin for your inputs.Best regards,Ganesh | |
| 14 | 2019-09-13 17:06 | freebeer | martijn, ganesh, i take it as a given that all amazon edits are powered by non-public gps traces, even though it's not stated explicitly here. it's not transparent to an arbitrary osm mapper-checker and probably should be stated explicitly.then again, the last edits i've made usi... | |
| 74154352 by MelioraCogito @ 2019-09-06 01:44 | 1 | 2019-09-06 05:18 | alester ♦187 | Google Earth isn't allowed for editing. Please revert this changeset immediately to remove any data that doesn't comply with the ODbL license |
| 2 | 2019-09-13 04:15 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | 1. I DID NOT use GE to "EDIT" anything. I used it as a visual source & collected some (untrused) coordinate/measurements info to import into AutoCAD Civil 3D whereupon I used that data to "best approximate" the parking layout. Normally I would have used VicMap, but the aer... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-13 13:55 | freebeer | first, never use google mapping products in any way for osm mapping. lose them from your source. punkt. aus.second, changeset comments are the preferred public way to report and discuss your edits. what goes out-of-sight is invisible to me and dozens of other users who have nothing better to... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-16 06:21 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | Once again... some unknown JA jumps in to poor alester's def. Pathetic.1. Understood – GE ist verboten! Period. (Won't make that mistake again.)2. Mind you, it seems even some of the "rule keepers" don't actually know the f'n "rules" themselves...... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-25 08:59 | richlv ♦388 | Everybody, please take a moment away from the keyboard.Let's keep things civil and polite. | |
| 73859402 by N50 @ 2019-08-28 22:52 | 1 | 2019-08-29 06:41 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo N50,Du gibst als Quelle für Deine Aktualisierungen "DigitalGlobe, Maxar, Esri Clarity" an.DigitalGlobe und Esri Clarity kann ich in JOSM gar nicht (mehr) finden. Und auf Maxar .. ist Deine Erweiterung des Silit-Betriebsgeländes nicht nachvollziehbar.Auch diesen "... |
| 2 | 2019-08-29 13:21 | N50 ♦9 | Hallo PT-53,so sieht mein JOSM aus: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/39840300/63942870-d75e3700-ca6e-11e9-8a99-e933fafdae55.png – Ich habe* DigitalGlobe Premium* DigitalGlobe Vivid* Maxar Premium* Maxar Standard* Esri World Imagery und (Clarity)Der User dx125 hat mit b... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-29 14:18 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Daß mit Esri Clarity wohl Esri World Luftbilder (Clarity) Beta gemeint ist, habe ich erst später bemerkt.Es bleibt dabei, daß mit den in JOSM zur Verfügung stehenden Luftbildern die Erweiterung des Silit-Betriebsgeländes und auch der "Polder" nicht sichtbar sin... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 08:46 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo N50,ich warte immer noch auf eine Antwort ob die von Dir genannten Sentinel-2-Bilder legal für OSM genutzt werden dürfen?Grüße | |
| 5 | 2019-09-10 13:33 | freebeer | yes, even the google preview in my second search result (english) summarises that.it's not as select-and-go as the other aerials which is one reason it's not quite so well-known, | |
| 6 | 2019-09-10 15:06 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo freebeer,mit mir mußt Du schon deutsch sprechen. | |
| 7 | 2019-09-11 02:43 | freebeer | i write in the language i best communicate to avoid misunderstandings and mistranslations.same way as angela merkel makes speeches in german despite being fluent in the languages of her host countries.i can answer`jawohl.'then i would not bother with the background info, as i ha... | |
| 8 | 2019-09-11 05:46 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo freebeer,wieso antworstet Du für N50? Bist Du der Chef von N50? Und für welche Firma arbeitet ihr? Und wieso verdeckt? | |
| 9 | 2019-09-12 16:48 | freebeer | du weisst schon, changeset comments sind öffentlich für alle? zum beispiel, https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions , wo ich habe dies entdeckt?folgende fremdsprachische scheisse bitte ignoriereni answer on behalf of said mapper because i know the info and have looked into... | |
| 10 | 2019-09-12 16:58 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo freebeer,Du hast also nichts mit N50 zu tun und Dich nur so in die Diskussion eingeklinckt?Na gut.Mich würde aber immer noch interessieren woher N50 die Informationen für seine Änderungen hat und ob diese für OSM verwendet werden dürfen. | |
| 11 | 2019-09-23 11:34 | glglgl ♦274 | @freebeer No need to use a language like this, we can keep on communicating in a civilized way.That we insist on only using licensed data doesn't come from any "germanic tradition", but merely from the fact that we want to keep OSM free of any legal charges which could create seve... | |
| 12 | 2019-09-23 11:37 | glglgl ♦274 | BTW,there is a OSM Wiki page which talks about Sentinel 2:es bibt eine OSM-Wikiseite, die über Sentinel 2 spricht:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_Sentinel-2_imagery | |
| 13 | 2019-09-23 13:09 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo N50,im OSM-Forum ist man der Meinung, daß die Nutzung von Sentinel-2-Bilder für OSM nicht legal sei:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67486Du könntest Deine Meinung dazu im OSM-Forum beisteuern.Grüße | |
| 14 | 2019-09-26 09:11 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo N50,wie ich gerade erst bermerkt, hast Du das Betriebsgelände von Silit über die Bundesstraße hinaus "erweitert". Seit wann gehört eine Bundesstraße zum Betriebsgeläbde einer Firma?Bravo | |
| 74375705 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:18 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74400503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74375872 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:37 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:20 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74400355 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74375965 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:50 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:14 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74400250 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74375990 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:52 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:10 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74400149 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74376003 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:53 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74400048 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74376032 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 01:57 | 1 | 2019-09-12 16:02 | freebeer | i am unsure if the revert i am carrying out is this, but from the corner of me eye i see that *seven* of my FIXMEs in this MASSGIS-plaguged area have been castrated without my consent. i strongly object to changing MY SHOUTING. furrfu. |
| 2 | 2019-09-12 16:03 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74399548 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 74376128 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 02:08 | 1 | 2019-09-12 15:46 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74399247 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 74376156 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-12 02:12 | 1 | 2019-09-12 15:33 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74398496 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging |
| 2 | 2020-04-07 02:34 | RussNelson ♦47 | I don't understand why you would change FIXME to fixme. It's traditional to use FIXME because it stands out from other tags. Was this change discussed somewhere? | |
| 74214438 by Guylamar2006 @ 2019-09-07 20:56 | 1 | 2019-09-11 14:37 | edathy Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-09-12 15:14 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74397879 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed automated retagging of objects where i have presented reasons to keep existing tagging | |
| 3 | 2019-09-13 15:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @edathy - tools are entirely capable of detecting "fixme", "FIXME" or any case insensitive version. If there is one that @Guylamar2006 uses that doesn't, a pull request to it would be a far better use of their time than numerous tagfiddling changesets like this one.Best R... | |
| 74292799 by VLD120 @ 2019-09-10 07:17 | 1 | 2019-09-11 07:12 | freebeer | hi faceb00c, please enlighten me, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723322852 what should `im' mean?'uf düütsch macht koi Sinn, so-there PT-53 (off-topic for this, sorry, i shall seek more punishment) |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 14:38 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Hey freebeer,Looks like our import=yes tag got partially deleted on this one. I corrected it.Do you have your overpass queries shared somewhere? They seem valuable for our own QA processes.Thanks,Jeff | |
| 3 | 2019-09-12 14:46 | freebeer | thanks jeff, i'm not sure why i was unable to grok that obvious expansion, other than i was in desperate need of sleep at the time, and well aware of it when posting. for which i am ashamed.this was actually pointed out by the OSM inspector instance i carry out worldwide, with too many fal... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-13 18:38 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Thanks for the info! | |
| 73101746 by fräbrawu @ 2019-08-07 09:47 | 1 | 2019-08-09 13:59 | elgolfo ♦399 | Hi, kannst du bitte aufhören, Abkürzungen in Namen (ev., kath etc) zu verwenden?Auf das Thema und den passenden Text im Wiki[0] wurdest du meines Wissens schon öfters hingewiesen. Bitte halte dich daran und fixe die Namen deiner bearbeiteten Kirchen am besten gleich noch.Moritz\... |
| 2 | 2019-08-15 09:36 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207886434/history heisst "Michaelskirche", nicht "Ev. Michaelskirche". | |
| 3 | 2019-09-07 13:16 | fräbrawu ♦4 | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Kirchen_in_Baiersbronn | |
| 4 | 2019-09-07 14:23 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | https://www.kirchenbezirk-freudenstadt.de/kirchengemeinden/baiersbronn/ "1951 erhielt die Siedlung eine eigene Kirche, die Michaelskirche." - Bildunterschrift: "Michaelskirche Friedrichstal" | |
| 5 | 2019-09-10 16:00 | fräbrawu ♦4 | In vielen Regionen ist es üblich, die Konfession (in abgekürzter Form) vor den Gebäudenamen zu setzen... | |
| 6 | 2019-09-11 02:00 | freebeer | osm does not use abbreviations. punkt. weltweit.the exception i am aware of is sankt/saint.if an abbreviated form is used on signage, spell it out for osm. else i will not know if ev. means there are evening services, if this is incomplete and will eventually bear the following name, or i... | |
| 72752419 by VLD117 @ 2019-07-29 04:12 | 1 | 2019-09-10 15:58 | freebeer | hallo again facebook,can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437490654 that i suspect should be reversed to lanes=1?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 16:05 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Hey, freebeer,Looks the mapper before us made the tagging mistake but I'm happy to fix it.Thanks for the feedback,Jeff | |
| 3 | 2019-09-11 01:40 | freebeer | ah, good point - i see in my delayed-display scrolling (pain) that i must have missed v8. oops, sorry. `lynx' pointed out my stupidity.i've another open query in this part of the world for the same error.i'll have a look to make sure your change is reasonable.thanks and ... | |
| 74289994 by freebeer @ 2019-09-10 06:03 | 1 | 2019-09-10 23:55 | JustinPLain ♦1 | "Used to tag an area of water. The type of water body can be specified with water=*. Note that despite key name it is also used for artificial structures like moats, basins of a wastewater treatment plants, canals etc."natural=water from the official OSM wiki, there is no reason why fo... |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 00:34 | freebeer | i see you just joined osm yesterday, so you would be unaware of the recent controversy of expanding the use of natural=water and redefining subcategories away from landuse and the like.my editor displays these pools without subtags as lakes. in order to be categorised as pools, they need an add... | |
| 40041449 by Russ McD @ 2016-06-15 15:51 | 1 | 2019-09-08 23:11 | freebeer | hi russ,for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425151747 , is `y' supposed to be `note' or `description' or some such?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 07:29 | Russ McD ♦223 | Apologies, yes it should have just been a note to explain why I changed the main route after riding through it. It was not obvious on the aerial photos then.I have removed the note, and changed to residential hwy, along with tracing/updating a few more roads in the area now the aerial pic quality... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 17:02 | freebeer | yo :-)wanna try again? v3 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425151743/history still has `y' (not note) unless the potlatch2 bug i've seen often has re-converted it back.or mebbe it's a plea, why oh why oh spells yo-yo.sorry for all this... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-11 07:35 | Russ McD ♦223 | All done ... I think was where I split the road and there were two errors ... anyway fixed now (again, I hope).Cheers | |
| 8406037 by lyx @ 2011-06-11 13:38 | 1 | 2019-09-10 16:38 | freebeer | ho,you probably would not remember why you tagged several ways in the area of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117200527 with the cryptic `si=B'?a more recent addition nearby hints ti me as `so(urce)=B(ong).biy di o hates this tiuchscreen... |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 19:48 | lyx ♦11 | I have not the slightest idea. Must have been a mistake, obviously. If you come across one of these tags, please feel free to remove them. | |
| 74158742 by priya6 @ 2019-09-06 06:37 | 1 | 2019-09-10 16:26 | freebeer | hallo,can you explain the meaning of the tag you have added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721878429/history ?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 08:54 | priya6 ♦2 | I have inadvertently added the tag. I have corrected the changes pertaining to tag in question.Apologies for the inconvenience caused due to my action and looking forward to your suggestion/feedback in future as well. I'll pay closer attention to these things.Regards,priya | |
| 57214843 by Johnny Carlsen @ 2018-03-15 15:14 | 1 | 2019-09-10 16:23 | freebeer | hallo,just wanted to check the three items i tweaked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74319960 are reasonable, as i was working blind.thanks |
| 72077826 by Arma IRM-ED @ 2019-07-10 05:09 | 1 | 2019-09-10 16:10 | freebeer | hallo,for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702970909 you must mean lanes=1 ?just want to verify there are no other possibilities before i repair the same quietly. |
| 2 | 2019-09-11 03:52 | Adiatma IRM-RV ♦109 | Hello freebeerMaybe the mapper on changeset/71164583 means as you say. I agree with you.Thank you. | |
| 74271776 by DrSantiagoDakudaoSrNHS @ 2019-09-09 16:12 | 1 | 2019-09-10 15:54 | freebeer | hallo,can you look at the only thing in this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6781625867 , as there are a lot of invalid non-osm keys repeated by the value, so i think what you are trying to do is wrong, with nothing to indicate it is a school, thanks |
| 72532859 by VLD040 @ 2019-07-22 21:59 | 1 | 2019-09-10 15:48 | freebeer | hi facebook,can you look at the `ww' key on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703455495 that does not match anything else in this path, and identify if it meant to be something, or a mis-typed hotkey?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 15:58 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Hi freebeer,I suspect this way was split from the bridge segment next to it. W is used for wireframe mode in iD so chances are that bridge was selected, then the user hit W and overwrote it. Thanks for heads up on bad tag, we appreciate the feedback.-Jeff | |
| 56923713 by Sunfishtommy @ 2018-03-06 06:05 | 1 | 2019-09-10 15:20 | freebeer | hallo,v4 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380848798/history here added `y=yes'. i had thought this would be a potlatch2 bug cloning oneway=yes, but i see you used josm. i am suspicious as did not note a tag on the parallel opposite direction way.can you say if this is a mistake, or ... |
| 2 | 2019-10-07 03:14 | Sunfishtommy ♦16 | Yea i looked at it it must have been added by mistake. | |
| 15170947 by Minh Nguyen @ 2013-02-26 09:36 | 1 | 2019-09-10 15:02 | freebeer | hoi,can you help me with the puzzle presented by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/509583261 ?one-way seems wrong, so might you have meant a re-ordered `no' to be expanded into, oh, i dunno, no-exit, no-way-out, no-future, no-worries, or something equally negative?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 16:23 | Minh Nguyen ♦566 | Thanks for spotting this error. I had intended to tag it as highway=turning_circle. Most likely I used the R key (repeat) but previously mistagged another node due to an overreliance on Potlatch 2’s autocompletion suggestions. Sometimes my keystrokes got inserted out of order due to asynchrono... | |
| 74285974 by TravGW @ 2019-09-10 02:24 | 1 | 2019-09-10 03:14 | K0rtosh ♦1 | Buildings were tagged by mistake, as for the stuff you deleted, I guess I can laugh once satellite has updated. I work in real estate in that area |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 03:21 | K0rtosh ♦1 | Curious question though, why would accidentally (or purposefully) flooding a house make me a Pokemon player? | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 03:27 | Tindog ♦9 | I honestly have no idea what this conversation is about, but water type Pokemon are the most common type of Pokemon but only spawn near water. So some PoGo players flood there houses to increase their chances. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 06:48 | freebeer | the pools added need to be permanent. i deleted small inflatable pools seen in a different place than you mapped them. i re-shaped a large above ground pool that was visible in two separate locations that by now could be permanent and excavated. even if it stretches the osm standards of privacy a... | |
| 74286583 by K0rtosh @ 2019-09-10 03:05 | 1 | 2019-09-10 05:47 | freebeer | the natural=water tag does not belong on a swimming pool, as it is reserved for lakes and ponds, not backyard pools. |
| 74197376 by AverageOSMEditor @ 2019-09-07 03:56 | 1 | 2019-09-07 12:25 | TravGW ♦355 | What is the source for these name changes? We must use the official name of a feature regardless of our personal opinions or feelings. |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 04:53 | freebeer | coming up empty-handed still for all three of these as well, which doesn't give much confidence these changes are real, and subjective undocumented ``facts'' should not appear in osm. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 16:04 | TravGW ♦355 | No answer, time to revert. | |
| 74197026 by AverageOSMEditor @ 2019-09-07 03:06 | 1 | 2019-09-07 12:17 | TravGW ♦355 | What is your source for this name change? |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 04:40 | freebeer | even today i am unable to find any links to this proposed name, no news reports, no official announcement. enclosing this alleged naming in quotes results in my local google datacentre returning a single result directly drawn from osm. it seems premature to rename this without evidence and for a m... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 16:03 | TravGW ♦355 | No answer, time to revert. | |
| 74205946 by carlins @ 2019-09-07 13:35 Active block | 1 | 2019-09-10 03:32 | freebeer | please use meaningful changeset comments to help other mappers understand what you are doing, as you have to create a new one for each edit. |
| 74275773 by BelfastCity @ 2019-09-09 17:44 | 1 | 2019-09-09 18:20 | RathcooleRambler ♦9 | What was the purpose of deleting everything? |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 21:49 | BelfastCity ♦1 | Hi Because these just tree and they are not on any search results and they can make extra data in map's database.If my opinion is wrong, I am so sorry. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 02:30 | freebeer | do they exist? if so, maybe someone has a reason for them, like some towns are using osm to keep inventory of their trees. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 19:22 | riiga ♦90 | This changeset has been reverted in 74326315. | |
| 74237009 by Andre68 @ 2019-09-08 21:14 | 1 | 2019-09-09 23:24 | PLima785 ♦155 | Hi there,, did i do something wrong?If it helps this is the same owner, but one building is dedicated to the restaurant and the point is the place for snacks and coffee |
| 2 | 2019-09-10 02:24 | freebeer | if you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416926725/history and compare the number of nodes making up the outline, it appears to have more than doubled in your last edit.but in reality if you follow the node numbers, you will see some being repeated, often several times, as you mak... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-10 04:39 | Andre68 ♦88 | These loops or dupe nodes are nearly always due to a faulty editor tool. So no, you didn't do anything wrong. Likely... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 22:41 | PLima785 ♦155 | ok i understand and i will send this to the OsmAnd, thank you | |
| 73806973 by OSMchecker @ 2019-08-27 16:41 | 1 | 2019-09-08 23:28 | Akkurator ♦293 | Hallo OSMchecker,du hast hier das Gebäude Reichlestr. 19 verschoben.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268634809War das Absicht? Wenn ja, auf welcher Grundlage?Nach Maps4BW und aktuellen Luftbildern war die Position vorher korrekt, jetzt nicht mehr.Grüße,Akkurator |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 00:16 | OSMchecker ♦30 | Die Treppe befindet sich genau zwischen den Gebäuden Nr.19 und Nr. 21. Deswegen habe ich das Gebäude verschoben, damit es den gleichen Abstand zur Treppe hat, wie Nr.21. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-09 08:10 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo OSMckecker,Potlatch2 wird - schon seit längerem - nicht mehr weiter entwickelt. Deshalb kann in Potlatch2 auch die amtliche Karte Maps4BW nicht eingeblendet werden.Schau Dir Deine "Verschiebung" doch bitte mal im Editor ID an. Dort steht Maps4BW als Hintergrund zur Verf&uum... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-09 09:23 | Akkurator ♦293 | Abgesehen davon, dass ich auch dringend rate, den moderneren Editor "ID" zu verwenden:die naheliegende Lösung wäre gewesen, den Weg zu verschieben, nicht das Haus.Ich habe das Haus nun wieder an die richtige Position zurückgeschoben.https://www.openstreetmap.org/change... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-09 11:16 | OSMchecker ♦30 | Der Weg geht nun mal genau zwischen den zwei Häusern entlang und da war Nr.19 einfach zu nah dran. | |
| 6 | 2019-09-09 11:25 | Akkurator ♦293 | Nicht das Haus war zu nah am Weg, sondern der Weg zu nah am Haus. | |
| 7 | 2019-09-09 11:28 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Könnte es nicht auch sein, daß der Weg nicht richtig eingezeichnet war?Hast Du Dir jetzt mal In ID mit Maps4BW als Hintergrund angesehen? | |
| 8 | 2019-09-09 20:40 | OSMchecker ♦30 | Bin grad eben nochmals den Weg entlang gelaufen, sieht irgendwie immer noch so aus wie bei meinem letzten Spaziergang. | |
| 9 | 2019-09-09 22:39 | Akkurator ♦293 | Super, danke. Was bedeutet das nun für die Position von Reichlestr. 19? | |
| 10 | 2019-09-10 00:08 | OSMchecker ♦30 | Passt so. | |
| 11 | 2019-09-10 01:27 | freebeer | to pt53 re: potlatch2, it should be possible to use WMS backgrounds in p2 by using a redirecting url, for mappers who feel that iD is too often seen to be responsible for problem edits - pulled and glued nodes, areas frequently joined to lines when nearby, broken relations of many types, or who are ... | |
| 72964787 by badenk @ 2019-08-03 08:45 | 1 | 2019-09-09 10:13 | freebeer | hi baden,urk, go map!!1 again. i probably don't need your answer, but can i assume the added node and strange appearance of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83227546/history was not your intention, but i can reasonably return it to v1?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 17:43 | badenk ♦47 | thanks!{:-) | |
| 3 | 2019-09-09 17:44 | badenk ♦47 | I guess I should state it has been corrected.Baden | |
| 74183446 by Géovélo @ 2019-09-06 15:49 | 1 | 2019-09-09 00:43 | freebeer | salut,please take a look around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2781019856 .it appears you have pulled several nodes and probably a section of footway out of position there.merci |
| 70556776 by ika-chan! @ 2019-05-23 15:46 | 1 | 2019-09-08 23:28 | freebeer | a question,what do you mean on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692014414 with s=no ?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 06:37 | ika-chan! ♦242 | Yeah, that was the editor going haywire. I fixed it now. | |
| 47559168 by Johnny Carlsen @ 2017-04-08 06:11 | 1 | 2019-09-08 22:43 | freebeer | hi,is it reasonable for me to guess that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485456380 , as well as the small road branching it, should both be tagged with `surface' in place of `ur', and `un' should be filled with the remaining -paved? |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 07:33 | Johnny Carlsen ♦94 | That is correct, I have fixed it now. | |
| 74234224 by user_5359 @ 2019-09-08 18:44 | 1 | 2019-09-08 22:14 | freebeer | hallo georg,after your revert of the other `dabito' items at this address, i think the bank added by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74232689 is just as fictional - i get no search results for the name, and i bet this is a private residential address. |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 04:18 | user_5359 ♦19,383 | I have delete this entry also, see the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74232689 | |
| 70344550 by Adamant1 @ 2019-05-17 06:42 | 1 | 2019-09-08 12:23 | freebeer | i'm just picking one random changeset, but it looks as if you're deleting a lot of relation outers without taking care of the inners. the inners would previously act as gaps.now these inners are being rendered as outers, also filling the osmi cyan all over cali. that is the result of... |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 18:51 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Keep deleting I guess. That's what would/am doing. None of these little farmyard areas are that anyway. Whatever the relation details are. What are using for QA? I tried to review some stuff in OSM Inspector but it's just giving me a pink screen for some reason. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-08 18:52 | Adamant1 ♦222 | *or they are double mapped as farmyard/farmland (both of which are usually wrong). | |
| 4 | 2019-09-08 21:40 | freebeer | the osm inspector has been in a state of titsup for maybe six hours since it started failing intermittently with some points returning an error i can't reproduce now, with a server path, because it seems to have been given a kick a few minutes ago and is no longer blanking over the underlying ... | |
| 66333600 by Y_Suzuki @ 2019-01-15 14:31 | 1 | 2019-09-08 16:17 | freebeer | hallo,you seem to be adding a lot of items with `s' as a key, which should be `source', such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6210416201 from this changeset, but other items have the full key.can you look at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=138.93106&lat... |
| 73327040 by CmdrThor @ 2019-08-13 22:36 | 1 | 2019-09-08 14:58 | freebeer | hate to say it, but in this changeset you appear to have grabbed a node from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60779902#map=16/38.6104/-90.6732&layers=N and joined it to the southeast end of the park boundary, probably replacing the node there. |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 00:41 | CmdrThor ♦31 | Whoops, the creek was actually already joined to the park boundary in several spots by someone else and I could've swore I had unglued all those nodes, but I must've missed one. Guess that's what I get after scolding someone else for accidentally moving a node, hah.Strange that jo... | |
| 74211122 by YeeYeetus @ 2019-09-07 18:02 | 1 | 2019-09-08 10:40 | freebeer | this does not match the 2018 tiger data. nor does it particularly match any of the relatively poor aerial imageries |
| 73894181 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:48 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:33 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007188 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 2 | 2019-09-02 16:38 | Hooka ♦4 | That is not a residential road. It is a driveway. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-08 10:22 | freebeer | that is either a residential road (although narrow) or a service drive from which real (unmapped) driveways branch as is very clear from the mapbox aerials.as i am not local i cannot guess the correct tagging to be used and any additional tagging for access or oneway properties missed from the t... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-08 10:30 | Hooka ♦4 | Whoever mapped this is not very smart and has not contributed anything of value to OSM. This is a private driveway and shouldn’t even be mappped in the first place. It’s obvious. Your comments are condescending and rude. | |
| 5 | 2019-09-08 20:24 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @Hooka Please take a moment to step back and consider what you have written, and ask yourself whether a third-party observer might consider it "condescending and rude", given how you feel able to judge the intelligence of some who mapped something 11 years ago. Your statement "This... | |
| 71085445 by Adamant1 @ 2019-06-10 03:01 | 1 | 2019-09-03 06:57 | freebeer | do you plan to re-map this area, or are you just going to leave the entire riverbank relation broken?if you had done this in brasil, you would have gotten an earful. same with landuses in hungary inaccurately imported.there's someone in georgia (usian) who twisted multipolygons out of ... |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 07:30 | Adamant1 ♦222 | It's been dealt with. So, you can keep the spoons in the silverware drawer for now. Just so you know, a lot of the relations and other stuff where already screwed up before me. What I did personally mess up (I.E. not finish) got left behind because of being hounded. Otherwise, it would have bee... | |
| 70337176 by Adamant1 @ 2019-05-16 22:24 | 1 | 2019-09-03 05:25 | freebeer | hi adam,came across this changeset with osmi to see it has left behind https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1015365 with a single member https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64297575 .was your intent to delete that landuse=forest entirely, or to improve upon it?just trying to clean up a bit... |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 05:38 | Adamant1 ♦222 | I'm pretty sure my intent was to delete the landuse=forest entirely and that got accidentally left behind after SteveA wen't off on me somewhere around here about deleting forests. After that I kind of abandoned the whole thing. Anyway, I took care of it. Thanks for mention it. Hopeful... | |
| 70195457 by mapman44 @ 2019-05-13 14:33 | 1 | 2019-09-03 04:54 | freebeer | hi,i'm seeing that this edit b0rked a bunch of things, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8810085/history . actually i'm not sure if the missing segment across the river i fixed came from this edit, but you did edit there and i have seen iD dropping members from relations in mo... |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 05:09 | freebeer | well, that was trivial. i wonder what happened with all the other previous members.sorry if i came across as too accusatory, i'm now awake some 28 hours and in no state for social interaction..wait, i see -- there should be a lot of scattered wetlands, like along the slough. i might h... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-03 20:47 | mapman44 ♦526 | @freebeer I'm pretty much finished with OSM so you can fix however you think it should be. If not I'll try to get to it at some point. | |
| 71072397 by mapman44 @ 2019-06-09 14:10 | 1 | 2019-09-03 04:27 | freebeer | hi,i notice in this changeset you've created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9672617 which consists of one older part on v3, and a v1 you created, but with a gap between the two.do you want to look at this and somehow close things so the park renders?thanks |
| 74016471 by Kadgrin @ 2019-09-03 00:51 | 1 | 2019-09-03 03:02 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74017919 where the changeset comment is: revert pokemon tagging vandalism |
| 73904004 by Kadgrin @ 2019-08-30 03:42 | 1 | 2019-09-01 03:14 | TravGW ♦355 | Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated. |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 00:44 | Kadgrin ♦1 | Please refrain on commenting about places you don't know. Alonso de Ercilla is a big, Chilean educational centre and can be labeled as kindergarten, school or college. As the latter is the highest denomination, it fits better than the other ones. Don't make me waste my time correcting you.... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-03 03:00 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74017910 where the changeset comment is: revert pokemon tagging vandalism | |
| 73838677 by DaveF @ 2019-08-28 12:10 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:56 | freebeer | moin,it looks like you've got a bit too much shrubbery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4298343026 .ho-ho, a p2 edit? if this is a potlatch 2 bug, it's completely different from the others i've seen so far... |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 11:44 | DaveF ♦1,564 | Thanks for that. Now corrected. More likely PICNIC error. | |
| 73891629 by Siguatepeque @ 2019-08-29 16:29 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:52 | freebeer | hi,it looks like you wanted to add a lengthy description somewhere that ended up as nonsense tags seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719670561/history |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 19:13 | Siguatepeque ♦2 | Hey freebeer, thanks for reaching out. The tags have been removed. | |
| 60477413 by RVR005 @ 2018-07-06 20:52 | 1 | 2019-08-17 07:23 | freebeer | hallo facebook,this is weird. you have added the tag n=yes, akin to the pre-existing import=yes, in this changeset.that i expect from an infrequent potlatch2 bug i am tracking now, but this was a josm edit, where i have seen `n' point to what i guess was meant as `note' elsewhere ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-19 17:30 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Hey freebeer,Adrian isn't active anymore but was part of my team. I'm not sure what the typo was supposed to be here but I corrected the mistake.Thanks for letting us know about it!-Jeff | |
| 3 | 2019-09-03 01:40 | freebeer | thanks jeff.could you have a quick look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535778598/history which should be trivial?thx | |
| 4 | 2019-09-03 16:31 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | No problem. Fixed that as well. I suspect the issue was the users typing out a tag then trying to use the hotkey to hide map data, which in our version of iD was N. Thanks again for the heads up,Jeff | |
| 73901388 by CO Coy @ 2019-08-29 23:46 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:27 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74016785 where the changeset comment is: these are not maps.me castles, plus they contain personal info that has no place in osm |
| 67383234 by andi9876 @ 2019-02-20 09:00 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:20 | freebeer | hallo,do you remember what you were trying to add here, if you meant this to be name=... and not n=... ?danke |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 03:27 | andi9876 ♦295 | Hi,yes, name, thanks for hint, edited already.Gruß | |
| 21908097 by kucai @ 2014-04-24 13:37 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:16 | freebeer | hallo,do you remember if in your v3 edit of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180349372/history whether you wanted to add a new tag, and if so what it was?if you did not, then it is a potlatch2 bug i see sometimes where it turns something like oneway into a single letter of four, or it copies ... |
| 73827160 by siripurapu @ 2019-08-28 08:04 | 1 | 2019-09-03 01:08 | freebeer | hallo,what are you trying to say in v3 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715701786/history with `No=Updated Imagery' ?did you maybe intend to write `no(te)=Updated...' or did you mean for `something=No Updated Imagery' ?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 04:19 | siripurapu ♦15 | Hi freebeer,Thanks for flagging, this was updated by mistake. Deleted the incorrect tag.Thanks,siripurapu | |
| 54638705 by Thiagocebriano @ 2017-12-14 23:22 | 1 | 2019-09-03 00:22 | freebeer | hallo,somehow you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5284901373/history from a restaurant, to an incomplete name.do you know the full name? |
| 68085187 by BobGod @ 2019-03-13 03:17 | 1 | 2019-09-03 00:12 | freebeer | hallo,when you made this edit, you added tohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172853152 , a residential road, the tag of `al=1'.might it be you meant to add `la(nes)', or something completely different?thanks |
| 2 | 2019-09-03 23:18 | BobGod ♦3 | Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will delete this information as it seems to not pertain to any data of ours. Thanks again | |
| 74007618 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 16:50 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:20 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009665 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 74007578 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 16:49 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:19 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009635 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 74007552 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 16:48 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:16 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009582 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 74007471 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 16:45 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:13 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009544 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 74007447 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 16:44 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:13 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009508 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 74007901 by Hooka @ 2019-09-02 17:01 | 1 | 2019-09-02 18:11 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74009437 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893393 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:24 | 1 | 2019-09-02 17:06 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74008060 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893369 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:24 | 1 | 2019-09-02 17:01 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007865 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893247 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:18 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:56 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007749 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893142 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:14 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007686 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893028 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:09 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:50 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007594 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73892957 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:05 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007518 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73892807 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:00 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:46 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007359 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893557 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:30 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:40 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007297 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73894005 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:43 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:27 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74007007 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893745 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:36 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:22 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74006933 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893691 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:34 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:18 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74006847 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73894085 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:45 | 1 | 2019-09-02 16:16 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74006791 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways |
| 73893659 by Hooka @ 2019-08-29 17:33 | 1 | 2019-09-02 12:02 | Takogin ♦57 | Hi! I noticed a mass deletion of roads which you made. Can you explain the reason of these deletions? All these roads look correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73893659 |
| 2 | 2019-09-02 14:54 | Hooka ♦4 | Yes. There were a bunch of residential driveways that lack consistency making the map cluttered and unreadable. Some driveways were marked while others were not. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-02 16:10 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74006585 where the changeset comment is: restore existing correctly mapped driveways | |
| 72286041 by YeeYeetus @ 2019-07-16 03:17 | 1 | 2019-09-02 07:44 | freebeer | it is a great disappointment that `e' is the best honour you can bestow upon the great Penis Road renaming action commemorated by this changeset. please learn to be more descriptive and give a swell explanation of just what you are trying to get up to, it really isn't that hard. |
| 72245895 by YeeYeetus @ 2019-07-15 02:10 | 1 | 2019-09-02 07:31 | freebeer | same here. `e' gives no clue that there is a 420 metre tall erection to be found here. `label Penis Land' would be much more considerate to your followers to explain what you have done, or close enough. |
| 72287649 by YeeYeetus @ 2019-07-16 05:07 | 1 | 2019-09-02 07:17 | freebeer | please use a meaningful like `rename Tuolumne as Sex City' description as i cannot tell that Sex City has become the name from the `e' you have used over the majority of your changesets, whether related to Sex City, or unrelated to Sex City. thanks!! |
| 63466650 by Gohoop @ 2018-10-12 17:23 | 1 | 2019-09-01 10:42 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73969848 where the changeset comment is: delete a maps.me personal bookmark added as a pointless viewpoint |
| 72463425 by Derfla Izzorip @ 2019-07-20 15:20 | 1 | 2019-08-29 20:46 | luschi ♦417 | Hallo, ein Architekturbüro als Pub zu erfassen ist wohl weit entfernt von der Realität. Falls du in OSM POI korrekt erfassen willst, solltest du den Editor auf www.osm.org verwenden. MAPS.ME ist kein vollwertiger Editor und ist nicht in der Lage POI usw. korrekt zu erfas... |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 18:26 | freebeer | and what about the previous usage of this recycled point? is this an additional entry at this address that should not have replaced rudi's konditorei or cafe or bistro, that still appears in my search results? | |
| 3 | 2019-08-31 11:20 | luschi ♦417 | there is no "rudi's konditorei" POI in OSM...you should update your maps | |
| 4 | 2019-08-31 17:58 | freebeer | i am referring to this point, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2491260331/history , which up to a month ago was rudis.it seems odd to me that an office would take this over, i would expect it to be in an upper floor sharing the same address.i fed the address, bahnhofstr.1 and the keyword r... | |
| 73703443 by tylerchill @ 2019-08-24 19:43 | 1 | 2019-08-31 16:31 | freebeer | mojn,can you elaborate on the reason behind the deletions visualised by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73703443 ?i fail to understand why a dense urban environment necessitates losing detailed mapping that describes how one accurately reaches from point a to point b.grazie |
| 2 | 2019-08-31 17:25 | tylerchill ♦18 | Too much detail makes a map as difficult to read as too little detail. In this case a sidewalk alongside any residential, secondary or primary road in NYC would be assumed. You would just follow the street to walk from point A to B. Adding a sidewalk doesn't add any new information and redu... | |
| 50429282 by KindredCoda @ 2017-07-20 10:55 | 1 | 2019-08-30 19:22 | ke9tv ♦82 | Can the mapper that made this change please explain to me what it was trying to do other than create invalid multipolygons? I can fix the multipolygons (and I want to, because I now have better data available from the state), but I can't make out whether there was some other substantive change ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-31 06:15 | freebeer | zooming into https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50429282 i see an added traffic signal as well as some minor geometry smoothing. relations are not shown, of course. the deleted ways are not visible as the one i checked shared all nodes with a different way i see you've started to fix... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-31 07:34 | KindredCoda ♦8 | If I recall correctly, the polygon was not displaying correctly, and I was attempting to get it to do so. Please take whatever means necessary to make sure it works properly if it’s still incorrect. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-31 15:47 | ke9tv ♦82 | End result is a better boundary for the parks than what was there before it got broken, so it's all good!Sorry for the tone. I was tired, and I've spent too many hours fixing up damage from people who've thought that whatever goverrnment data set they've got is better than wh... | |
| 73839713 by OF0 @ 2019-08-28 12:34 | 1 | 2019-08-28 23:15 | N50 ♦9 | Hallo OF0,du könntest bitte trotz deines aktiven Kampfs mit vielen anderen Mappern schreiben, was du tatsächlich an der Karte geändert hast.Vielen Dank |
| 2 | 2019-08-29 06:36 | dx125 ♦125 | Hallo N50,unabhängig davon, dass ein vernünftiger Änderungssatzkommentar eigentlich der Standard sein sollte, was offensichtlich hier nicht der Fall ist, kannst du leicht selbst heraus finden, was er gemacht hat.Gehe zu https://www.hdyc.neis-one.org/?OF0dann dort bei "Recen... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-30 07:24 | OF0 ♦114 | @N50 Wie man unter den Kommentaren sieht, sie wurde ein Node verändert und ein Node neu erstellt. Einfach darauf klicken und mit der Chronik vergleichen. Der von dx125 vorgeschlagene weg über www.hdyc.neis-one.org ist bei so kleinen Änderungsätzen fast schon zu umständlich. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-31 04:42 | freebeer | and as you yourself describe what has been done technically, but not your reason for doing so, your changeset description is totally off-topic.further, it has a logic flaw.> Das Teilen von Nodes durch Flächen [...] ist eine anerkannte Mappingmethode. right that, but> Flä... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-01 10:14 | OF0 ♦114 | It looks as if Mr. Ramm wants to shut my mouth. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73908975I assume that the discussion with you will take a little longer. I am waiting with my answer therefore still something. It would be a pity if I could not answer you anymore. | |
| 73900350 by freebeer @ 2019-08-29 22:30 | 1 | 2019-08-30 06:30 | gurglypipe ♦872 | How would you propose tagging them instead? Because now these buildings have lost any information about the fact that they are bookable bunkhouses.As far as I can tell, tourism=alpine_hut is the most appropriate tag for them, even if it isn’t 100% appropriate. |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 19:15 | freebeer | hmmm, bunkhouses suggest to me what i understand is among the offerings of a hostel. then the osm definition of a hostel may differ from mine, never having been in one meself as my ex-girlfriend was long past the point of a communal or group experience.what i expect seeing an alpine hut on osm ... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-02 11:01 | gurglypipe ♦872 | These bunkhouses: - provide bunk accommodation - a small self-service kitchen - basic toilet and showering facilities - heating - are owned by private mountaineering clubs - generally have spaces bookable for non-members in advance, although sometimes only if those non-members are member... | |
| 73884012 by Bytemark @ 2019-08-29 13:33 | 1 | 2019-08-30 05:53 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Bytemark,was soll das heißen "Landuses "geschlichtet"" ?Als Quelle gibtst Du "DigitalGlobe Vivid Imagery" an. Die stehen doch in JOSM gar nicht mehr zur Verfügung.Fragende Grüße |
| 2 | 2019-08-30 16:57 | freebeer | i had the idea that josm (which i've never used) did not automatically download from https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index , unlike the other major editors.anyway, what used to be vivid is now the maxar layer by name, the url needed no changes i am aware of, so if a manual josm updat... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-01 06:33 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Bytemark, es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.Grüße | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 08:19 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Bytemark, ich warte immer noch auf eine Antwort.Grüße | |
| 41063995 by Dildar Ahmed Kamil @ 2016-07-27 14:20 | 1 | 2019-08-30 04:41 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73904860 where the changeset comment is: shedload of bogus maps.me viewpoints that are really private homes and include personal information |
| 70842582 by MirBhutto @ 2019-06-01 19:34 | 1 | 2019-08-30 03:11 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73903589 where the changeset comment is: both already mapped four years in far more likely locations. why does maps.me even allow creating such a widely abused item that really cannot be mapped as a point... |
| 68723265 by Oo Maung Gee @ 2019-03-31 12:40 | 1 | 2019-08-30 01:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73902202 where the changeset comment is: a boatload of bogus maps.me castles just filled with personal info |
| 58334065 by mpro5 @ 2018-04-23 09:54 | 1 | 2019-08-29 22:36 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73900459 where the changeset comment is: remove housename and address added to tunbridge wells town node. disgustedly yours. |
| 53212772 by John Stanworth @ 2017-10-24 16:15 | 1 | 2019-08-29 22:30 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73900350 where the changeset comment is: just because the operator is a mountaineering group does not make these alpine huts, located in town. |
| 73705299 by Iman Nurrahman @ 2019-08-24 21:23 | 1 | 2019-08-29 22:06 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899995 where the changeset comment is: delete still another random map scribble |
| 73705370 by Iman Nurrahman @ 2019-08-24 21:27 | 1 | 2019-08-29 22:03 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899942 where the changeset comment is: delete a random map scribble |
| 73713198 by Iman Nurrahman @ 2019-08-25 09:38 | 1 | 2019-08-29 22:00 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899898 where the changeset comment is: delete a random map scribble |
| 71116710 by ArcherSeven @ 2019-06-10 20:04 | 1 | 2019-08-28 12:55 | ArcherSeven ♦1 | Why was this undone? |
| 2 | 2019-08-28 14:33 | freebeer | what was undone? | |
| 73829076 by laserforeverybody @ 2019-08-28 08:46 | 1 | 2019-08-28 10:54 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73834764 where the changeset comment is: another place of worship spam |
| 72951999 by GLADYS25 @ 2019-08-02 18:01 | 1 | 2019-08-04 16:13 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi GLADYS25, welcome to OSM.I guess something went wrong here.This motorway can't be true, right?See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710289979More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72951999--- Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 22:30 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73815997 where the changeset comment is: the mapper has not replied about this obviously bogus section of autobahn, reverting. the changeset description is of no use either | |
| 73474274 by AAMR Dispatch @ 2019-08-18 21:34 | 1 | 2019-08-24 17:15 | mapman44 ♦526 | In OSM we map what actually exists on the ground. I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish but there are no gates crossing the highway so they will be deleted. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73474274 |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 07:35 | AAMR Dispatch ♦1 | Here at American Animal Medical Response Headquarters collaborator with ALL City Mayors, Road Maintenance Services, State Police. We make sure that the Maps are updated as much as possible to improve the uses of OSM. The Gate will be installed May 30, 2020. For any questions please reach... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 18:01 | freebeer | i seriously doubt that two stonkin' yuge fences are to be installed as mapped across a public highway, blocking all access.further nothing should be added to the map before it exists.the date you give is nine months in the future. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-28 06:21 | AAMR Dispatch ♦1 | Thank you for your concerns, please not we would like to give you Highway Maintenance Blue Prints ID# 91836600 STATE OF OREGON & AAMR DEMAND Reference Case ID# A-8199-0277.For future assistance please call State of Oregon Public Works of Jackson County. If you wish to see a copy of the bluepri... | |
| 67299214 by b-jazz-bot @ 2019-02-18 03:17 | 1 | 2019-08-27 02:36 | freebeer | okay, he sighs in disgust seeing that potlatch1 fails to offer me a trivial way to go from the just-as-bogus v4 to a sane v2. i mean, this is nowhere in the area of the spammed business and i don't even know how i spotted it.off i go to brush up on the commndline tools and resolve that if ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 09:29 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | @freebeer Well P1 works for me - I've just reverted it.@b-jazz-bot This isn't the first example where changing a spam or undiscussed imported node from http to https has caused problems with people trying to get rid of it. Even a really simple check like not modifying nodes with a rea... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 15:44 | freebeer | thanks andy; huh, now even though the `way history' doesn't work, this time i was able to pull up the `h'istory, which did not seem to work, probably poor network connectivity issues at that time, as sometimes it takes several minutes to appear.i'll try to be more patient nex... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-27 17:38 | b-jazz ♦657 | Thanks for letting me know of the issue. I've added a bug (https://gitlab.com/b-jazz/https_all_the_things/issues/10) to add checking for long descriptions before making a change. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-27 17:43 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Great - thanks. | |
| 73770313 by JuliaXO @ 2019-08-26 21:16 Active block | 1 | 2019-08-27 10:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73789079 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism |
| 67901033 by 2012-2019 addresshistory*org @ 2019-03-07 21:27 | 1 | 2019-08-24 18:47 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | Mir ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675301110 aufgefallen, dass sich eine von mir anhand hochwertiger Luftbilder fein gemappte Straße, ohne dass dies in der Way Historie dokumentiert ist, in Auflösung drastisch reduziert hat.Generell daher meine Frage, wo ist ein solches Re... |
| 2 | 2019-08-24 18:48 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | I noticed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675301110, that one of me on the basis of high-quality aerial photos fine-mapped street, without this in the Way history is documented, in dissolution drastically reduced.In general, therefore, my question, where has such a reduction or simplificati... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-25 09:07 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | Mir wurde mitgeteilt, dass es kein Programm zur automatischen Linien Vereinfachung gibt, ich habe mich wohl geirrt. Grüße Johann | |
| 4 | 2019-08-27 05:16 | freebeer | hoi johann,the way you point out is at the first edit, v1, and is how you have uploaded it. it is possible that someone may have moved nodes making up this way, which will leave a history trail, so those points will be at v2 or greater.i'm a bit lazy to write a script to check every no... | |
| 68078298 by 2012-2019 addresshistory*org @ 2019-03-12 21:09 | 1 | 2019-08-24 19:15 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | Seltsame undokumentierte Reduktion der Linienauflösung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222431775 |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 09:06 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | Mir wurde mitgeteilt, dass es kein Programm zur automatischen Linien Vereinfachung gibt, ich habe mich wohl geirrt. Grüße Johann | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 04:59 | freebeer | hallo johann,i have taken the liberty of passing your way into https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/222431775 to see if there have been significant geometry changes. nothing i see can be called a simplification.i also viewed the entirety of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22243... | |
| 71702134 by pitscheplatsch @ 2019-06-28 10:23 | 1 | 2019-06-28 13:01 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Hi pitscheplatsch (Pascal Neis),In relation to an error (?) made in the registration of the "How did you contribute to OpenStreetMap?" edits I would like to ask you about this (I don't know how to do this otherwise).After mapping on Project #5959 today, and saving my mapping data,... |
| 2 | 2019-06-28 20:04 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Tonight the correct mapping edits were reset of 24/6/19 and 25/6/19 (see http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?martinairmaps).Still it is mysterious and I would like to know why and how this could happen.I do hope you will find time to respond.Regards, martinairmaps. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-28 20:09 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi martinairmaps,you can also write a mail or could use the OSM messaging system. You don't have to comment my changesets ;)However, on twitter you can find some additional information, see https://twitter.com/pascal_nAs mentioned, I did an reimport of the latest changeset dump. Sad... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-28 21:21 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Hi Pascal Neis,Thanks for your reaction.Yes, the changeset data are in order again.Sorry about my way of messaging to you, but Idon't have your e-mail address, nor do I use twitter.Also am I not familiar with the OSM messaging system.Thanks again anyway, martinairmaps | |
| 5 | 2019-08-25 09:53 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Hi Pascal Neis,Since I don't have your e-mail address and am not familiar with any other means of contacting you, I do it like this again.The thing is, your site HDYCtoOSM seams out of order, keeps on flickering on the screen and does not open. Please advise. Regards, martinairmaps.... | |
| 6 | 2019-08-25 10:07 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Correction, I just noticed that the "flickering" has stopped and the site is available and working again.Regards, martinairmaps | |
| 7 | 2019-08-25 10:41 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Yes, my service had some issues with re-importing the OSM notes table this morning. Should be fixed now and normally mostof the services should be sync within the coming 30min.And again, you can also use the OSM messaging system. You don't have to comment my changesets. Thanks. | |
| 8 | 2019-08-25 12:18 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Thanks for your reaction.As I mentioned already, it seems to be working OK now.Also, it may seem stupid of me, but I say this again, I don't know how to contact you otherwise than this way. Sorry about that!Cheers. | |
| 9 | 2019-08-25 12:23 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Maybe this helps you: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Using_personal_messages_at_openstreetmap.org | |
| 10 | 2019-08-25 14:10 | martinairmaps ♦11 | Honestly, it does not.I don't understand why it has to be so complicated! Pages full of info about the many different ways of how to communicate around or within OSM.Where ordinary e-mailing just works fine. And the way we're using now.But than again, I may be rather stupid.A... | |
| 11 | 2019-08-26 01:06 | freebeer | martin, click on this link that appears repeatedly in pascal's replies:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pitscheplatschnote the Send Message link that appears at the top:https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/pitscheplatschthis has the advantage/disadvantage that your comms ... | |
| 73717335 by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy @ 2019-08-25 13:11 | 1 | 2019-08-25 14:14 | Jonatansan ♦4 | Hi Kaligrafy,While I appreciate your enthusiasm for OpenStreetMap, can you please stop adding random paths / roads ? Multiple times, the paths you are adding are crossing directly through bushes / barriers, which are of course impassable. Furthermore, stop duplicating roads for bus lane. If you... |
| 2 | 2019-08-25 15:16 | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦351 | Hi!I understand your concern, and I may have added too many paths to connect to nearest streets, but we need to make sure openstreetmap is suitable for realistic routing purposes, which is one of its main use these days (osrm, mapbox, tom tom, etc.), and for pedestrian routing, we need to add pa... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-25 15:25 | freebeer | i should note that under tags host http://localhost:8080/indicates a non-standard use, and further imagery_used Custom (https://www.google.cn/maps/vt?lyrs=s@189&gl=cn&x={x}&y={y}&z={z})google maps, regardless of top-level domain, may not be used in any way for osm.\... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-25 15:31 | ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦351 | I use an up to date version of id editor that I compile on my own machine, so that is why localhost is appearing. No problem here. For the google imagery, I did not used it since it is blacklisted in id editor and selecting it will just go back to none, but it appeared in the list and I don't k... | |
| 60129640 by Teester @ 2018-06-24 20:35 | 1 | 2019-08-24 15:47 | freebeer | hallo,not sure if this was a one-off, but from your changeset comment, you forgot to actually mark the note resolved.i'm only mentioning it because as i systematicallly troll around ireland, i'm finding a lot of these open notes pointing at things on the map.thanks, and sorry |
| 2 | 2019-08-24 15:50 | freebeer | oh feck me, the open note was https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1457062 so there must have been multiple notes as i also see too often.really sorry. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-06 15:07 | Teester ♦22 | Not to worry. It's understandable that someone would make a new note since the cafe name doesn't show up on the map at any zoom. | |
| 73525180 by stadiaarcadia @ 2019-08-20 07:28 | 1 | 2019-08-22 22:09 | freebeer | i think the only thing you needed to do here was to delete the vandalism added over top of the stadium parts by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714476238 .although by starting anew, thus losing the contributions of the other mappers, it looks like things are nicely smoothly curved.i'v... |
| 2 | 2019-08-22 23:50 | freebeer | wait a minute, from https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73525180 i can see there were four grandstand child relations with further tags were deleted here, and i can't see them in the map data, even though you have made at least one more edit since.good thing i am far too tired to do... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-24 00:43 | freebeer | by the way, i noticed when you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715674760/history and copied the tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6768395/history , it looks like you used the value from the addr:suburb field that is lacking in your new entry, instead of the previous value fo... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-24 06:22 | stadiaarcadia ♦109 | Yes, I’m going to add those grandstand child relations, but I didn’t have time to fix it immediately. I’ve tried to remove the vandalism building, but I couldn’t remove it without removing the stadium tag. That’s why I’ve contacted you, so you could check my edit ... | |
| 73587555 by badenk @ 2019-08-21 15:49 | 1 | 2019-08-23 07:10 | freebeer | servus,i'm too tired to think straight but i think you have added riverbank-equivalent tagging to the restored way, v8 below, as i see bits of woods in it. that way being the outer, it will be rendered as solid by whatever tags it has, and the inners of its multipolygon tagging if the sa... |
| 2 | 2019-08-23 17:07 | badenk ♦47 | Hi Freebeer:Thanks for the tip! What I did for the "new" section you restored, was just enclose it and copy of the tags from the previous (southern) Athabasca River section I separated from the Snaring section.I am still not 100% clear on the proper or best way to tag these rivers... | |
| 73421288 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 15:45 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:50 | freebeer | what you have drawn as v1 here bears no relation to the aerial imagery, nor does it appear on the map. please take care to trace accurately what you wish to add, as jagged items or areas that differ from the real car park surface, do not help anyone to understand and use the map. |
| 73422499 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 16:18 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:35 | freebeer | what you have mapped here is not a building in the aerial imagery, but a collection of storage tanks and should be mapped that way. |
| 73422076 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 16:06 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:19 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73642371 where the changeset comment is: do not tag an ordinary Casa from your description as an historic manor, which it is obviously not. |
| 73422030 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 16:05 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:17 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73642330 where the changeset comment is: do not tag an ordinary Casa from your description as a castle, which it is obviously not. |
| 73422101 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 16:07 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:07 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73642120 where the changeset comment is: these are in no way any sort of castle. do not use osm for play or testing, but describe these ordinary residences accurately as this is a serious project. |
| 73421354 by Mithrandir3021 @ 2019-08-16 15:47 | 1 | 2019-08-22 21:00 | freebeer | hallo,can you please be more descriptive in your changeset descriptions? what you did that can be seen at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73421354 is not something i can understand as anything but testing or deliberate vandalism.in order to try and understand what happened here,... |
| 73590451 by JessAk71 @ 2019-08-21 17:14 | 1 | 2019-08-22 09:31 | azakh-world ♦282 | Hello!Line direction matters for natural=coastline. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#How_to_enter_the_data |
| 2 | 2019-08-22 13:20 | JessAk71 ♦116 | Hi azakh-world!Thanks for the note and your fixes, so sorry about that! Yes you are right, Ill start using JOSM for any new coastline fixes, Potlatch2 doesnt have very a very good interface for direction for coastline polys... Ill look at the coastline validator for any of my coastline polys and s... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-22 16:41 | freebeer | hi jess,i trust you know the p2 lower-right icon that will show polygon directions. i checked a few coastlines for fun, then a co-located polygon, and observed the latter differed in direction.i wonder if it can be influenced by handedness, as it seems i tend to draw polygons opposite from mo... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-22 18:11 | JessAk71 ♦116 | thanks freebeer, did not notice that option! Nice find! | |
| 73424284 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 17:09 | 1 | 2019-08-21 18:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73592084 where the changeset comment is: the monument is correctly mapped |
| 73419885 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 14:58 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:52 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591606 where the changeset comment is: the mosque is correctly mapped |
| 73417562 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 13:56 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:49 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591514 where the changeset comment is: the church is already correctly mapped |
| 73416779 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 13:38 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:47 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591441 where the changeset comment is: bogus maps.me personal spammage |
| 73420518 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 15:19 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:45 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591366 where the changeset comment is: the mosque is correctly mapped |
| 73421326 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 15:46 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:42 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591304 where the changeset comment is: greenland is still not for sale |
| 73422419 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 16:16 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:40 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591226 where the changeset comment is: there is no church here in antarctica, deleting maps.me personal spam |
| 73423155 by VeniSancteIesuAmen @ 2019-08-16 16:35 | 1 | 2019-08-21 17:36 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73591094 where the changeset comment is: the church is already correctly mapped |
| 73230469 by badenk @ 2019-08-10 22:44 | 1 | 2019-08-12 16:58 | badenk ♦47 | It looks like I probably inadvertently deleted a whole section of river bank [Relation: Snaring River (6447166)] a few days back on the Athabasca River between Snaring river and Brule Lake. It was incorrectly named "Snaring River". The transgression may have been in Changeset: 73236201... |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 20:53 | freebeer | it looks like a segment you want back was deleted in this changeset and can be seen at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/434850562it was obviously part of a relation, but i have not dug that far just yet, though you can see if it works as an outer by itself.the scary tying is i... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-19 16:52 | freebeer | szia,i have restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434850562i have added as a second outer member to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9905661however at the area of the snoring river, zoomed in at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9905661/history#map=17/53.01430/-118.07467 ... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-19 17:29 | badenk ♦47 | Hi Freebeer:Thanks so much for your assistance!I now have my work cut out for me, as these braided rivers are a confusing mess, on the ground, and on 'paper'. I wish Canvec didn't have all the little streamlets, as they are transitory, as often are the main channels.thank... | |
| 71521440 by mapman44 @ 2019-06-23 01:30 | 1 | 2019-08-14 03:04 | Sowa1980 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 18:13 | mapman44 ♦526 | Я не верю, что мои правки сломали какую-либо геометрию или дороги. Если вы не согласны, приведите пример редактирования, в котором ничего не получалось. Если вы хот... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-15 18:23 | Sowa1980 Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-15 20:11 | mapman44 ♦526 | I have already told you that I will not edit in your area but you continue to threaten. You accuse me of vandalism but you will not provide even one example of how deleting a node with no tags has broken anything. I have deleted thousands of nodes with no tags around the world and you are the only o... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-19 13:58 | freebeer | not quite true about the no complaints; i vividly remember a case of extreme vandalism around miami f-l-a, hitchhiked her way across the u-s-a, where an unsuccessful attempt to revert the deletions resulted in disconnected nodes without a way to join them.the visual link i provided at the time ... | |
| 73462027 by pio2_122 @ 2019-08-18 11:49 | 1 | 2019-08-18 13:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Hello, your changeset comment here is "Wycofanie wandalizmów" - can you explain what the problem was? Vandalism is very rare in OSM - are you sure that this really was vandalism and wasn't just an honest mistake?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-08-18 13:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Witaj, twój komentarz na temat zestawu zmian to „Wycofanie wandalizmów” - czy możesz wyjaśnić, na czym polega problem? Wandalizm jest bardzo rzadki w OSM - czy jesteś pewien, że to naprawdę był wandalizm i nie był to tylko uczciwy błąd?Z poważaniem,Andy | |
| 3 | 2019-08-18 13:34 | pio2_122 ♦1,075 | https://zapodaj.net/064b9e7f83f0c.png.htmlPrzesunięcie granicy o kilka kilometrów bez podania źródła jest dla mnie wandalizmem. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-18 14:34 | pio2_122 ♦1,075 | Edit: My changesets were reverted by the user Constrado without a word of explanation.Despite sending a private message about this case to him. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-18 14:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Thanks - I've commented at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8023523 and we'll keep an eye on future edits. | |
| 6 | 2019-08-18 14:51 | SomeoneElse ♦13,369 | Dzięki - skomentowałem na http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8023523, a my będziemy pilnować przyszłych zmian. | |
| 7 | 2019-08-19 05:47 | freebeer | cześć andy,totally off-topic, but as i operate a legal-loophole open wlan accesspoint, may i suggest you use https:// links to pascal's site?that's how i have it bookmarked, as well as a https-everywhere rule as too many internal links lead to sniffable URLen.of course, verif... | |
| 73236201 by badenk @ 2019-08-11 08:54 | 1 | 2019-08-12 16:54 | badenk ♦47 | It looks like I probably inadvertently deleted a whole section of river bank [Relation: Snaring River (6447166)] a few days back on the Athabasca River between Snaring river and Brule Lake. It was incorrectly named "Snaring River". The transgression may have been in Changeset: 73236201... |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 17:33 | freebeer | are you asking for a revert, or for detective work, for what i see now as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6447166 shows a lot of inners that are now outside of the stub that remains as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712561121 .at the least you may want to add all the outer inners to yo... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-12 17:51 | badenk ♦47 | Hi Freebeer:Thanks for your response.Ideally, it would be preferable to add or restore the missing river way only from the Snaring mouth to Brule Lake without impacting the subsequent changes. I could then manually change the isolated islands over to the new Athabasca River relation, as I d... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 19:04 | freebeer | i don't think this changeset deleted it. i'm totally unfamiliar with this area, and my attempt to undelete near the junction where now i can see what you are talking about reveals an unholy mess, so i'll either try up northwards, or review your other commented changesets... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-12 20:42 | badenk ♦47 | Hi Freebeer:I have very limited competence in investigating these things, however, from what I could ascertain, the deficiency only came to my attention after the whole river section disappeared on Mapnik. I have no recollection of recently seeing that section when I was modify it, however, it ... | |
| 6 | 2019-08-12 21:17 | freebeer | lucky for me, there were still older tiles at lower zooms showing the whole riverbanks, so i started looking in the wrong direction until i zoomed in further.much nearer the lake i saw where it diverged from the woods cleanly enough and the single deleted item folllowing that course was clear, u... | |
| 7 | 2019-08-17 04:34 | badenk ♦47 | Hi FreeBeer:Would it be possible for you to correct this error, as I am not able to?thanks,Baden | |
| 8 | 2019-08-18 16:01 | Viajero Perdido ♦243 | Hopefully this is unrelated (because I don't want to get involved in this...)Because JOSM complained after I did a minor fix to the river inside Jasper town, I added natural=water (it was missing) to a long section of the river, to correspond with the water=river tag. Don't know if th... | |
| 9 | 2019-08-19 05:17 | freebeer | hi baden,thanks for the reminder. several unfortunate crashes took this issue from my screen, but not from my guilty conscience of unresolved osm issues. i'll see what i can do after two days of catching up on other osm ... issues. who would have thought such a free-time hobby would be s... | |
| 10 | 2019-08-19 17:40 | badenk ♦47 | Viajero:Thanks! I didn't want to do anything until after the reversion, as the possibility existed that it all could be reverted.Freebeer:I look at OSM as a pastime like gardening, unfortunately gardening doesn't seem to be as addictive nor time consuming (wasting) as OSM. {:... | |
| 72782697 by Weasel-Wiesel @ 2019-07-29 18:35 | 1 | 2019-08-02 11:02 | map_fu ♦2 | Ich bitte darum, die Einstufung von way 708591390 als Gewerbegebiet zu überdenken.Erstens befinden sich dort öffentliche Einrichtungen wie Polizeipräsidium (landuse=civic_admin?), eine Bundesanstalt und das Dt. Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt - keine Gewerbe.Zweitens wird dam... |
| 2 | 2019-08-18 17:52 | Weasel-Wiesel ♦16 | Thanks for your comment.Regarding the tag: Not sure I agree. landuse=civic_admin is only a draft proposal at this point. landuse=commercial is widely used in practice for any area that primarily consists of office buildings (including government and administration). This might of course change in ... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-18 18:38 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo Weasel-Wiesel,Du kannst doch deutsch, oder?Warum antwortest Du dann auf englisch? | |
| 4 | 2019-08-19 05:02 | freebeer | i thought i addressed this in my response to an unfortunate racist/ausländerfeindlich comment in the us of a. every osm user should have the right to communicate in the way most comfortable to them. there are plenty of translation sites to introduce comical errors not present in the original ... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-19 06:07 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo freebeer,Ausländerfeindlich ?Da liegt Du bei mir total falsch. Ich gehöre nicht zum Braunen Sumpf.Weasel-Wiesel spricht deutsch! Da hätte ich es als höflich empfunden, wenn auf eine Anfrage in deutsch auch deutsch geantwortet wird. | |
| 6 | 2019-08-19 08:18 | map_fu ♦2 | Guten Morgen allerseits, Good morning!I didn't intend to trigger a discussion on language with my comment. I'm comfortable with answering in both German and English, but I'm also aware that not everyone is. I chose German because the area under discussion is in Germany, and I gues... | |
| 7 | 2019-08-20 18:38 | Weasel-Wiesel ♦16 | No worries, map_fu. Looks like it was me who inadvertently triggered this discussion.Ich habe die Form des Gebietes angepasst wie vorgeschlagen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73552196). Danke noch mal für Deinen Hinweis. | |
| 73262121 by sean2019 @ 2019-08-12 10:08 | 1 | 2019-08-17 01:16 | freebeer | neither your changeset description, nor the source you have provided, are of any use.osm is not a creative writing contest, but a serious mapping activity. |
| 73263126 by sean2019 @ 2019-08-12 10:37 | 1 | 2019-08-17 01:14 | freebeer | what is this changeset description supposed to mean?and how am i to interpret the source you have provided? |
| 2 | 2019-11-09 16:56 | skquinn ♦804 | "Gianni sneak" could refer to: "Giannis Antetokounmpo's First Nike Signature Sneaker" which of course has nothing to do with map data.I agree, it is ridiculous that someone can submit such flagrantly useless changeset comments and source descriptions. "Added details... | |
| 46312693 by عمار علاوي @ 2017-02-22 16:46 | 1 | 2019-08-14 05:43 | freebeer | given many of these 43 camp sites are scattered over the autobahn at exits, i think a massive retagging, or a revert, is in order. native speaker needed. |
| 73298154 by Юкатан @ 2019-08-13 09:30 | 1 | 2019-08-13 22:34 | edathy Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-08-13 22:59 | iandees ♦724 | Hi edathy, do you think you could leave a more helpful comment? Perhaps you meant "Please use a more descriptive changeset comment in the native language of the area you're editing in so mappers in the area can help verify changes." | |
| 3 | 2019-08-14 04:19 | freebeer | shalom,maybe the mapper feels more confident in russian or hebrew, and like me, chooses the language best conveying her or his meaning.machine translations (that i don't use at all) are good enough that one can have a good laugh at their flaws, when i know people laugh at me behind my ... | |
| 51279160 by SJFriedl @ 2017-08-20 15:09 | 1 | 2019-08-14 01:42 | freebeer | stupid question time, do you remember your intent behind the tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505121298 ? |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 01:52 | SJFriedl ♦29 | I don't remember it in particular, but it seems obvious to me that I *intended* to delete the previous-to-me no=changesets but deleted the highway=service instead. I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73329072Thank you. | |
| 61415773 by felipeeugenio @ 2018-08-06 21:07 | 1 | 2019-08-13 08:06 | freebeer | aha! hello,i see you also use potlatch, to explain how something like this has happened.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446168142/history has changed here from surface=asphalt, to v=asphalt, where i found it today.i want to check these and similar changes are an error i now understand... |
| 58045831 by jptolosa @ 2018-04-12 19:38 | 1 | 2019-08-13 07:55 | freebeer | hello,i see you used potlatch like me, so now i have an explanation why i see keys being changed, when updating other fields directly above.but i wanted to verify this was not deliberate, as in this changeset, i see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561050955/history went from lanes=2 t... |
| 73266158 by nandinab @ 2019-08-12 12:03 | 1 | 2019-08-13 00:34 | freebeer | cześć, amazon (guessing)i would go further and categorise two of the three service drives added here, near where i removed the co-located node, as service=parking_alley to further narrow them down like a private residential driveway.no, parking_aisle, sorry, i really need sleep as i can&... |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 08:02 | nandinab ♦4 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks for the comments. I've made the parking aisles as suggested.Regards,nandinab | |
| 73259684 by saksudan @ 2019-08-12 08:45 | 1 | 2019-08-13 00:18 | freebeer | hej,if this is amazon, please check your mapping here. i'm seeing a cluster of duplicate nodes in georgia that were not there 24 hours before the osmi cutoff shortly before 18h gmt yesterday (as of 2min ago)more importantly, viewing this edit against archive clarity showed an arc north... |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 15:11 | saksudan ♦2 | Hi Freebeer,Our team is working on setting up a process and are following up the issue on ID editor as well. Thanks for your patience in helping us out.Looking forward to learn more from you. Please let us know if you have any other suggestions.Regards,saksudan | |
| 3 | 2019-08-14 15:31 | saksudan ♦2 | Hi Freebeer,I have made some changes to the geometry as per the "Esri World imagery"Regards,saksudan | |
| 73257401 by reswara @ 2019-08-12 07:31 | 1 | 2019-08-12 22:54 | freebeer | hi,if you can find a better imagery than maxar, use that for better looking results. here the archived clarity images from bing that are about a decade old, taken from aeroplane overflights, but have been better corrected to align the roads than any satellite imagery, recognised from being nowh... |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 23:36 | freebeer | wow, now that i have examined things, it seems you have been very busy as a team.it seems this TN12 highway was split at the edwards mentioned in the changeset description from an over 10km length, several days ago, creating a virginal section to the north.i would advise to be careful with t... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-14 15:31 | reswara ♦5 | Hello Freebeer,Thanks for your patience in looking into the edit. I have noted down the points and will ensure I share it with my team as well. We generally check all the imageries and pick the latest imageries as suggested by you. We use the latest along with the more clear imagery incase the l... | |
| 72879760 by atomwaffen @ 2019-08-01 04:13 Active block | 1 | 2019-08-12 14:55 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hi there. I was just wondering if there was power towers attached to the power lines before you deleted and remapped them. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 15:50 | freebeer | moin moin advert amant,i zoomed into https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72879760 and set the background to plain osm to be able to see anything, and where there were nodes they were not tagged as pylons previously.it was also v1 of a tiger import typically intersecting with electro-... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-12 16:22 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hhmmm, I don't know why I don't think of doing those things. I wasn't exactly worried about it per say. I've been trying to expand coverage of power stuff around here. So I was thinking about adding the power poles. There was a couple of pretty righteous fires through this area l... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 16:29 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Id be interested to know if burned out power poles are rebuilt in exactly the same spots. My guess is that its at least along the same line if not. The ones between here and like Weaverville have probably been rebuilt by now but I can't really tell accurately by the latest images. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-12 17:54 | phidauex ♦194 | It would almost certainly be built along the same line (they aren't likely to change the right-of-way and access easements for PG&E), however, the poles are probably not in the same position - if the originals were destroyed then they will redesign the line with whatever current pole-type a... | |
| 43151656 by kanthorse1 @ 2016-10-25 08:59 | 1 | 2019-08-12 03:59 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73254561 where the changeset comment is: revert gibberish changeset |
| 71312909 by HubMiner @ 2019-06-17 01:31 | 1 | 2019-08-12 02:41 | freebeer | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6438563532/historyweirdest atlanta i've ever seen, except for all the other spams.i'm nuking it so you'll have to use other tools to see where it was. |
| 2 | 2019-12-26 23:41 | skquinn ♦804 | Hi,The tool used for this changeset seems to like to change "Jan 01" to "Jan 01:00" as well as "Dec 24" to "Dec 24:00" etc. This is resulting in syntax errors. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-27 15:46 | HubMiner ♦271 | Hi, you are right. I was not aware about this bug when I started using the tool, and injected some errors. Later on I started checking for that. There is a big submitted against Osmose, but no one is actively in it.We could run Overpass query to catch this text pattern. | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 06:51 | HubMiner ♦271 | Here is the Overpass query that seems to catch the problem. It found a small number of global instances, including some false positives. I'll start fixing the issue.opening_hours~/(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Dec) [0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9][ ]?[;,]/ | |
| 5 | 2020-01-25 02:50 | HubMiner ♦271 | I fixed a few instances worldwide, I consider this done - let me know if you see anymore of these, or feel free to fix them yourself. :) | |
| 6 | 2020-01-25 03:28 | skquinn ♦804 | Thanks, will do. | |
| 72220457 by iandees @ 2019-07-13 22:55 | 1 | 2019-08-11 21:26 | freebeer | hi ian,noticed you changed this poi and in the process, removed the phone number.i was wondering if you intended to update the number but forgot, or if you meant to delete it entirely but it did not go quite right.as i've never heard of poism, i won't glare in that direction as p... |
| 2 | 2019-08-11 21:28 | iandees ♦724 | Yep intended to remove the phone number as the business changed and no longer has the phone number.Ideally my tool should have deleted the tag. I'll fix that. | |
| 73024711 by jomorri @ 2019-08-05 13:35 | 1 | 2019-08-11 13:34 | freebeer | hi,don't know exactly what the iD warnings above refer to, but there are some eight intersections with co-located nodes problems i can see when editing zoomed out from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6684422585 .this i analysed to find has no connection with the other way meeting at ... |
| 73199804 by java100 @ 2019-08-09 16:06 | 1 | 2019-08-09 23:13 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Hi,This park also seems to be in a parking lot. Is it intentional? |
| 2 | 2019-08-10 06:26 | java100 ♦1 | Hello Sir,Yes, I used to search parking lot of park because drive and stop by couple coast line sightseeing spot. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-11 00:36 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Hi java100,Thank you for your quick reply.Is the actual park the area to the north/north east? | |
| 4 | 2019-08-11 02:00 | java100 ♦1 | Yes, actual park in north. Google map pin parking lot as park. It is easier for driver. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pacifica+Beach+View+Park/@37.6108245,-122.4968968,518m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xec096c1a3b3e1ab2!8m2!3d37.6107979!4d-122.4959064 | |
| 5 | 2019-08-11 07:33 | freebeer | so you have copied this mislocated info and mislocation from google? | |
| 6 | 2019-08-11 10:36 | java100 ♦1 | I am SF bay resident and visit there many times. Are you living in here and you had been there many times? Do you have strong data to prove Google map is wrong? | |
| 7 | 2019-08-11 12:44 | freebeer | no, no, and yes, as proven by woodwosewulf's question referring to the actual location, and your reply referring to google and their unique style.osm may not copy from google, this means their data, their toolchain, and their presentation.that they deliberately distort their data for th... | |
| 73086196 by _jcaruso @ 2019-08-06 22:05 | 1 | 2019-08-11 11:44 | freebeer | one of the above warnings i fixed was for two overlapping nodes, one part of a, one part of b, no additional dupes there, yet it should have been created as an intersection (usually at such a branch i find a co-located iD intersection with an isolated dupe. mentioning this variant, as i see this is... |
| 68317298 by Tbarrozo @ 2019-03-20 02:45 | 1 | 2019-08-11 11:21 | freebeer | hi,what have you tried to do here? in the area of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678039307 you have created an elongated bench, some untagged ways i cannot figure out, near a bench that esri imagery shows is near the road centreline.i haven't looked further to see what else might be a... |
| 55051318 by Tom_Holland @ 2017-12-31 06:47 | 1 | 2019-08-09 12:11 | sskalyan ♦67 | Hi Tom_Holland,Good job editing in this vicinity.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16897754#map=17/32.45162/-111.00765 Is this really a taxi way? Our internal GPS traces suggest motor vehicles can access this road. Please shed some light into this, we are always happy to learn from experienced... |
| 2 | 2019-08-10 20:18 | freebeer | i would suggest it is mixed use, as the aerial imagery clearly shows it is a mix of hangars and private residences sharing the infrastructure to the airstrip.also that before this edit it was tagged residential | |
| 3 | 2019-08-12 09:53 | sskalyan ♦67 | Hi,Thanks for your quick response. What could be the proper fix here, please let us know the proper tags for these kind of roads.Thanks,Kalyan. | |
| 72588493 by VLD103 @ 2019-07-24 07:48 | 1 | 2019-08-09 09:01 | Joseph E ♦137 | Hi VLD103, thank you for improving the map here in Papua. We appreciate having more mappers at work adding the many missing roads, streets and rivers. I noticed that you added the tag "import=yes" to many roads. This tag should only be used as a changeset tag when you import data from an... |
| 2 | 2019-08-09 09:50 | freebeer | hallo joseph,> I noticed that you added the tag "import=yes" to many roads. This tag should only be used as a changeset tag when you import data from an outside source, like another database.you do realise whom you are addressing here? i hope... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-09 13:35 | Joseph E ♦137 | I believe user "VLD103" created this changeset. It looks like this mapper is with fb. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/VLD103 | |
| 4 | 2019-08-10 19:13 | freebeer | and i'm glad to see the thailand history behind facebook's use has made its way into the tagging mailing list discussion, so that i do not need to mis-remember it, or vainly seek to find it for some context.i'm done here :-) | |
| 5 | 2019-08-15 19:09 | Jeff Underwood ♦68 | Hi Joseph E, I lead the editing team at Facebook. As freebeer mentioned this is part of our AI assisted mapping of Indonesia so we have been using the import=yes tag to let the community identify our roads.We always appreciate local feedback on mapping schemas as they tend to be a little dif... | |
| 73166299 by Luzandro @ 2019-08-08 18:02 | 1 | 2019-08-09 08:24 | woodpeck ♦2,428 | Ich habe in diesem Changeset einige wilde und substanzlose Spekulationen entfernt, die mit dem konkreten Änderungssatz nichts zu tun haben. |
| 2 | 2019-08-09 08:36 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | ich habe das Thema Organisierte Arbeit, vor einigen Tagen auf talk-at gestartet, ich würde vorschlagen dass wir die Diskussion dort fortsetzen. Grüssehttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2019-July/010094.html | |
| 3 | 2019-08-09 10:11 | freebeer | ...but what about us group of Disorganised Mappers LLC who can't even figure out which side of bed to get out of before taking orders from our overlords on how to systematically sabotage The Mapp. i demand equal representation. signed, The Cabal [TINC] | |
| 4 | 2019-08-09 10:15 | beautifulplaces ♦82 | dear freebeer, for such comments, there is my blog blog.hxg.at | |
| 72310333 by sinreeya @ 2019-07-16 15:01 | 1 | 2019-08-03 23:05 | freebeer | this is interesting in that along this loop, there have been placed five! nodes in the same location, ...519 down to ...514, with 515 the odd one out in that it is a nearby gate. i'm leaving this one alone for analysis, it's pretty unique. |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 14:05 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,As i can see, this edit was performed in the older version of OSM. I have removed the overlapping nodes. Please let us know if you have any suggestions.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 3 | 2019-08-07 14:49 | freebeer | blast, clicked the entirely wrong button bringing up editor Potlatch1, but i can see your repair of the multiple nodes here was, in contrast to an earlier comment i made today, totally effective.as an aside, what you refer to as an older version of OSM is more correctly described as an earlier v... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 09:07 | gseethar ♦67 | We try to use the latest version as soon as possible. However as pointed out by you, the issue seems to persist in .4 as well. We are trying to be little more careful during edits and audit the case post edit.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72629480 by shasband @ 2019-07-25 07:08 | 1 | 2019-08-03 23:15 | freebeer | this is interesting that the newly-added drive itself has no co-located nodes, but ridge park drive now has five overlapping nodes at the junction. my head hurts. |
| 2 | 2019-08-06 07:27 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer, For a larger segment, we do ensure there are no self intersecting segments. I have fixed this issue here. Please let us know your suggestion.Regards, Ganesh | |
| 3 | 2019-08-07 13:10 | freebeer | mojn ganesh,i would suggest with the frequency of this bug, you open an issue at the github iD editor repository:https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issuesthereby selling your soul or at least personal details to what is now microsoft.i checked the first two pages but with 441 open issue... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-07 13:29 | freebeer | urgh, i should have verified this earlier, but when i invoke Potlatch2 deliberately here, at https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2&way=707194420#map=17/38.77517/-121.19255 , i see from the red-white no-vehicle-traffic-sign-alike there are still overlapping nodes, so either your rep... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-07 18:12 | bhousel ♦278 | freebeer, the issue about the duplicate nodes is https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6327 | |
| 6 | 2019-08-12 09:04 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer, Bhousel,We tried to recreate the bug, but we are not able to. Currently we are trying to be little careful during edit and audit the edits post they are saved. Let us know your suggestions.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72542056 by uhhany1 @ 2019-07-23 07:14 | 1 | 2019-08-03 21:22 | freebeer | this amazon logistics edit was interesting that where i merged the overlapping nodes, three ways met, but only in a way that you could get from the first to the second, or from the second to the third, but not directly from the first to the third.if that makes any sense. it's now fixed so ... |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 10:49 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi,Thanks Freebeer for the update. I will have a chat with the editor and ensure that they look at the issues little more carefully and that they do not repeat in future.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 3 | 2019-08-06 15:53 | freebeer | hi ganesh,please go easy on your (presumably) human editors. within reason, of course.this is an analysis of a tool iD editor bug that can happen, and does, to all users of iD. i quietly fix non-amazon edits, and now trivial amazon edits, sometimes with commentary like in canada where the ... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 08:53 | gseethar ♦67 | Thanks a lot for your constant support. We have not been hard on the editors but have asked to be careful when they edit and audit their cases post completion so that we can capture the issue.Looking forward for more support from you.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 73035519 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 18:01 | 1 | 2019-08-06 14:36 | freebeer | YES!!1!i am so glad you replaced the hiking paths i deleted around the water tower, with the fence i deduced from the archive old-bing clarity imagery must be present, and seemed likely.good work. |
| 73043495 by TravGW @ 2019-08-06 00:23 | 1 | 2019-08-06 13:13 | freebeer | hi trav,thanks for continuing the cleanup here, as well as your changeset comments re paths v. footways. and anything else you might have done i've not discovered yet. |
| 72992486 by OSMCheck @ 2019-08-04 15:33 | 1 | 2019-08-05 07:16 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Hallo,leider bin ich mit deinen Änderungen nicht einverstanden. Die Polizei hat nun keinen Namen, aber der Namen in der Beschreibung, das ergibt keinen Sinn bitte ändern.Ein Biergarten ohne Namen? Vllt würde da leisure=outdoor_seating besser passen.Zu den 2 Restaurant nutzen d... |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 09:46 | OSMCheck ♦1 | Name für Polizei ist IMO Nonsens. Ergibt sich aus POI und dem Ort. Name in der Beschreibung aus Kulanz, kann auch weg.Gebäude für sich alleine? Wenn da nur die Eigentümer wohnen ist das IMO ingesamt ein Restaurant. Alles andere wäre Haarspalterei. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-05 10:21 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Polizei: Nein ist es nicht. Der Name der Polizei kann ich nicht durch POI und Ort ermitteln.Zum Restaurant: Ja wenn es so ist, dann passt es ja | |
| 4 | 2019-08-05 13:15 | OSMCheck ♦1 | Weshalb braucht die Polizei einen Namen?amenity=police in Verbindung mit addr: ist doch eindeutig, außer es ist ein spezieller Polizeiposten, was hier nicht der Fall ist. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-05 13:18 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Wenn du nach dieser Art vorgehen würdest, müsstest du einen Haufen Einträge des Key name löschen. Es ist gängige Praxis ein Objekt, welches einen Namen trägt, es mit name zu benennen. Meines Wissens nach wertet derzeit keine Software einen Namen für ein Objekt aus ... | |
| 6 | 2019-08-05 13:42 | sdicke ♦38 | Ein Biergarten sollte nur dann einen Namen bekommen, wenn er einen eigenen hat. Wenn es nur der Biergarten von x ist, dann ist x der Betreiber, nicht der Name des Biergartens. | |
| 7 | 2019-08-05 13:44 | sdicke ♦38 | Warum sollte eine Polizeiwache keinen Namen haben? Wenn am Gebäude oder auf der Website die Wache einen Namen hat, dann hat sie einen Namen. | |
| 8 | 2019-08-05 14:35 | CamelCaseNick ♦174 | Man kann Namen nie aus POIs o.ä. herleiten. Zwar hängen sie häufig mit anderen Eigenschaften zusammen, aber das heißt nicht, dass es immer dieselbe ist. Rathäuser heißen häufig nach den Gemeinden/Städten während McDonald's-Filialen einfach "Mc... | |
| 9 | 2019-08-05 17:31 | freebeer | jumping in here, do not forget the importance that a posted sign or entrance has for a non-native speaker seeking emergency services.even if the sign for the police is as simple as Polizei or Gendarmerie, this may not be immediately obvious for a tourist whose maps.me presents the logo in a com... | |
| 10 | 2019-08-07 21:25 | ma-rt-in ♦1,752 | Nabend,zur Informationen: Ich hab dieses CS zurückgesetzt, aber sogleich auch die betorffenden Objekt aktulisiert an Hand von deren Webseiten und Inhalte der OG Bordenbach.vg | |
| 73020170 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 12:07 | 1 | 2019-08-05 16:24 | freebeer | nice changeset. i'm glad you were able to correct/augment the driveways i was unclear about, due to my chosen imagery at the time, as actual driveways and not business/gummint service drives in this area.one thing i noticed where i had not corrected your mis-tagged additions, is that it ap... |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 16:36 | DETHBR ♦3 | Its just a lot easier for me to map with the browser since most of the features are correct as well as since i am in this area a good amount. The rest i can fairly well guesstimate | |
| 73002905 by freebeer @ 2019-08-05 03:03 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:06 | DETHBR ♦3 | Must have gotten pretty bad then since you like stalking huh? |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 15:55 | freebeer | given your recent change in username but most importantly, the changeset comments in the past hours you have made, i will cautiously welcome you to the club of productive and correct mappers.of course, i will be reviewing these, but i hope to be able to offer constructive input to improve the ma... | |
| 73001730 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 01:22 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:22 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003141 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. |
| 73001766 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 01:25 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:21 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003129 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. |
| 73002209 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 01:57 | 1 | 2019-08-05 01:59 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Hello,As other mappers have already asked, please do not change driveways to footways, these edits are incorrect and will be removed. |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 03:18 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003100 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. | |
| 73002311 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 02:06 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:16 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003064 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. |
| 73002338 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 02:08 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:12 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73003034 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. |
| 73002603 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 02:37 | 1 | 2019-08-05 02:44 | WoodWoseWulf ♦1,163 | Nice to see that you're putting your own words into practice here:https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/c4ukz4/osm_question_will_changing_a_roads_path_influence/eryhz9l/?context=3 |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 03:10 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73002968 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. | |
| 73002625 by DETHBR @ 2019-08-05 02:39 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:04 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73002905 where the changeset comment is: revert persistent pokemon vandalism. this time it's personal. dwg has been notified. |
| 72857559 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 13:39 | 1 | 2019-08-04 21:56 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72999658 where the changeset comment is: restore highway=footpath tagging |
| 72857279 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 13:33 | 1 | 2019-08-04 21:53 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72999607 where the changeset comment is: restore carpark service drives turned into walking paths |
| 69706122 by DETHBR @ 2019-04-29 17:40 | 1 | 2019-08-04 21:48 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72999363 where the changeset comment is: these are service drives. not paths. stop trying to turn everything on the map that was correctly tagged, into paths. osm is a serious project used for navigation and delivery, and false data l... |
| 72856322 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 13:11 | 1 | 2019-08-04 21:26 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72998987 where the changeset comment is: what is this rubbish? this is vandalism pure and simple and has no place in osm. https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72856322 |
| 72692456 by Calum Jackson @ 2019-07-26 15:12 | 1 | 2019-07-28 08:40 | freebeer | can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17194553 ?it seems some nodes got dragged, and even where it looks reasonable, i cannot see the background imagery quite agreeing with what is on the map.thanks |
| 2 | 2019-07-29 01:52 | Calum Jackson ♦2 | Ya, that looks werd as all heck. Unfortunately, my vacation is over, so I'm no longer in that area. I made it into something I think is reasonable Thoughts? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72750565 | |
| 3 | 2019-08-04 21:19 | freebeer | yeah, that looks good enough to be almost real that i'll let it pass. the esri aerials seem ideal in this area for tracing - oh, connecticut, of course - so i resisted the temptation to repeat my earlier mistakes adding copious details and striving for improvement.thanks | |
| 72244689 by peace2 @ 2019-07-14 23:48 | 1 | 2019-08-04 17:15 | freebeer | while one node was included looping back over itself twice. now renders. |
| 72985970 by MatinMb @ 2019-08-04 09:54 | 1 | 2019-08-04 09:56 | MatinMb ♦1 | https://goo.gl/maps/m6LZCzDGweM9He8p9 |
| 2 | 2019-08-04 14:42 | freebeer | you have listed google maps as a source.you may not copy any information from google maps for osm or source from google. | |
| 72731833 by Adamant1 @ 2019-07-28 08:05 | 1 | 2019-07-29 19:48 | freebeer | yep, this changeset is the second of the earlier linked trio around red bluff. the vertical line only has node 970, while the horizontal pairs it with 968, while 969 is located somewhere else entirely.in some edits i fix, i see four or more nodes piled up, so i wonder if they were meant to appe... |
| 2 | 2019-07-29 21:54 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Hhhmmm, I check for this stuff on my end when doing edits and I never see it happening on the edit side. So, I'm under the impression this is something happening on iD Editor's side that isn't due to bad mapping habits. Who knows when its happening or why though. If I read things on ... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-31 10:54 | freebeer | blast. my previous firefox session wherein i had links to the erroneous fence is gone, so i can't link directly to demonstrate my observations.i've seen it enough to suspect a pattern.amazon is not using what i consider a fork the way dragonflyBSD is a fork from freeLSD, but what ... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-02 12:04 | freebeer | adam, i did not even notice that this was your 11'999th edit until just now. but to add a further observation, from an amazon edit from nothingness i just mended, user drew a-b-c-d, then went back to branch from c. duplicate node e, co-locaated with c, was uploaded. in the order of the fir... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-02 19:58 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Yep. That's pretty funny. It's pretty crazy I've had that many edits in only like 2 1/2 years also. All with no imports. I was totally planning on retiring at 10,000 edits, but now I'm thinking 20,000. I should probably call it good and get a girlfriend or something instead, but ... | |
| 6 | 2019-08-04 11:10 | freebeer | by the way, don't you invoke your editor with a middle-button click in a new tab? i'm into that habit because of how painfully slow reloading and redrawing any page is so by now i have something like a hundred tabs to sort through with enough works-in-progress that i almost hope for a cra... | |
| 72113446 by elucett @ 2019-07-10 22:47 | 1 | 2019-08-04 05:19 | freebeer | hi,looks like in this edit you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703230884 , joining it at several locations to other features, and then moving it out of position, dragging the nearby paths and a pond out of shape.could you look at this? thanks |
| 72942636 by gohimans @ 2019-08-02 14:03 | 1 | 2019-08-04 04:54 | freebeer | hi amazon,same issue, stepping through the nodes starting from the highway shows the terminating node is not part of the sequence heading in.revealed by https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-98.27035&lat=29.41548&zoom=18&opacity=0.66&overlays=self_intersecti... |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 13:49 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,For a larger segment, we do ensure there are no self intersecting segments. I have fixed a node connection here.Please let us know your suggestion.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72928234 by shkshar @ 2019-08-02 08:25 | 1 | 2019-08-04 04:46 | freebeer | hallo amazon,please check the termination of the loop of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709883992 for it is reported as a self-intersecting way.thanks |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 11:04 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,The editor has missed the connectivity. I have had a quick connect with the editor to be careful and ensure better edits going forward.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72868894 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 18:32 | 1 | 2019-08-04 03:13 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72980610 where the changeset comment is: this is a cemetery, not a park. these are not paths, these are clearly roads and were correctly mapped earlier. |
| 72869000 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 18:36 | 1 | 2019-08-04 03:05 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72980546 where the changeset comment is: these are not paths, these are clearly roads and were correctly mapped earlier. |
| 72869038 by DETHBR @ 2019-07-31 18:37 | 1 | 2019-08-04 03:00 | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72980515 where the changeset comment is: these are not paths, these are clearly roads and were correctly mapped earlier. |
| 72857058 by goraia @ 2019-07-31 13:28 | 1 | 2019-08-04 02:22 | freebeer | hello amazon,please check the driveway loop here. the terminating way node is located on but not joined to the other part of the loop, where stepping along the nodes skips over this point.this is flagged as a self-intersecting way. |
| 2 | 2019-08-06 08:14 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,There was a missed node connection. I had a connect with my team on the same to ensure it is repeated again. Also fixed the self intersection. changeset #: 73053386Let me know if there are any other suggestions.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72978366 by sean2019 @ 2019-08-03 22:04 | 1 | 2019-08-03 22:36 | freebeer | this is not a meaningful description. in fact, looking at your edit history for the past days, there are very few edits where your descriptions appear to be sensible. |
| 72962919 by sean2019 @ 2019-08-03 07:01 | 1 | 2019-08-03 22:33 | freebeer | your changeset description should summarise what you are doing, in order to aid in troubleshooting whether error seen are a result of operator error, or in this case an editor bug.`dgh' is not useful to anybody. |
| 72458052 by amarajz @ 2019-07-20 11:30 | 1 | 2019-07-28 10:34 | freebeer | one more, amazon team, then i will probably leave any more of this common type this morning unreported.single overlapping node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/705940962 at an intersection, i have merged it. also an older edit. |
| 2 | 2019-08-02 03:19 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks a lot for pointing out the issue. We have passed on the message to our team and asked them to check for repetition of this issue so we can have a tab on it and fix them immediately.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 3 | 2019-08-02 11:23 | freebeer | hi ganesh,this seems to be some obscure logic bug in iD, infrequent, and not a mapper issue. i do not know if iD highlights overlapping nodes in an obvious way as Potlatch2, or the throbbing pulsating angry red pustule of potlatch1.in any case, as i repair more, including some non-amazon ed... | |
| 4 | 2019-08-02 13:10 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,Thanks a lot for the update. We are trying to find a pattern to it as well. We will keep you posted if we get find anything.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 72928375 by sean2019 @ 2019-08-02 08:28 | 1 | 2019-08-02 11:01 | freebeer | please use sensible changeset comments to explain your intentions, not this gibberish. |