Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
47068898 by biancah_telenav @ 2017-03-22 13:43 | 1 | 2019-11-03 16:23 | ShadowFoxNixill ♦23 | Why add the turn restriction when the slip road that allows the turn it isn't mapped?(Or was it mapped back then and somehow got deleted?) |
2 | 2019-11-04 06:10 | biancah_telenav | The road was there when I added the restriction | |
3 | 2019-11-04 06:31 | ShadowFoxNixill ♦23 | Oki. I've re-added it anyway because of DDOT 16 using it. | |
4 | 2019-11-09 14:01 | freebeer ♦1,598 | for reference, the deleted way (within this year, after this changeset) can be sorta seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39568965/history or history inspections.no idea why it was deleted or anything. | |
66896147 by biancah_telenav @ 2019-02-04 08:31 | 1 | 2019-02-11 07:21 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | HiWay 546709282 does not connect to way 546708622 |
2 | 2019-02-11 07:26 | biancah_telenav | Thank you. I corrected it | |
63631911 by biancah_telenav @ 2018-10-18 05:17 | 1 | 2018-10-18 23:34 | Horza ♦110 | I would be very wary of trusting TIGER Roads here. It is rarely as up to date as the 2017 bit suggests. Checking Bing Streetside suggests Whitmore Oaks Drive |
63186898 by biancah_telenav @ 2018-10-04 08:49 | 1 | 2018-10-06 07:03 | Karthoo ♦214 | Is this relation really necessary? As far as I know u turns are not allowed in the whole city of Columbus. |
60039379 by biancah_telenav @ 2018-06-21 10:46 | 1 | 2018-06-22 22:43 | Jaku103 ♦28 | in answer to your question, "Is this area still under construction?" I believe so. here is a recent photo, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/S8dcutPBBo-cvgWVgKIT0w |
59635382 by biancah_telenav @ 2018-06-07 12:05 | 1 | 2018-06-07 21:58 | bye12 ♦34 | Yes, construction is done, and road open. Updated way changeset: 59650359 |
56321263 by biancah_telenav @ 2018-02-13 11:26 | 1 | 2018-02-15 00:46 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,117 | A little bit of a shaky edit based on the available DG imagery |
46370146 by biancah_telenav @ 2017-02-24 15:05 | 1 | 2017-08-12 00:00 | Kakurady ♦2 | Perhaps except=bicycle should be bicycle=yes instead? (Also, city recently removed Mo-Fr) |
2 | 2017-08-16 06:03 | biancah_telenav | Hi, first of all let me thank you for your comment. I made the update regarding the restriction days. regarding the except tag, i used the rules from this wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction and I'm not sure that i should change it | |
45028079 by biancah_telenav @ 2017-01-09 15:01 | 1 | 2017-04-11 18:28 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | That lemieux street section you added doesn't exist (way 45028079) it's filled in with concrete as there were too many accidents. I've deleted it |
2 | 2017-04-11 18:48 | LogicalViolinist ♦83 | Please check OSC: http://openstreetcam.org/details/28966/27(was available at the time)or:http://openstreetcam.org/details/31688/33 | |
3 | 2017-04-18 06:03 | biancah_telenav | thank you so much for your correction | |
43915946 by biancah_telenav @ 2016-11-24 09:54 | 1 | 2017-02-18 21:28 | Alouette955 ♦34 | On Carrefour and Daniel-Johnson intersection there is no more links since major road building last summer. You certainly use older picture so please avoid recreatiing it. See change 46202416. |
43891243 by biancah_telenav @ 2016-11-23 09:57 | 1 | 2016-12-02 19:43 | kartler175 ♦556 | Plesa do not duplicate highways turn restrictions: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-73.84951&lat=45.49634&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_waysPlease consult JOSM-validator before uploading. |
41319858 by biancah_telenav @ 2016-08-08 09:30 | 1 | 2016-08-29 15:16 | PierZen ♦262 | Zooming-in with Bing, we see that these are service roads inside the mine and not railways. Way 436205830 is partly used by cars going to the parking at the entrance of the mine. Other ways are used by overweight trucks inside the open mine. |