12 changesets created by biancah_telenav have been discussed with 4 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
47068898
by biancah_telenav
@ 2017-03-22 13:43
12019-11-03 16:23ShadowFoxNixill
♦23
Why add the turn restriction when the slip road that allows the turn it isn't mapped?

(Or was it mapped back then and somehow got deleted?)
22019-11-04 06:10biancah_telenav The road was there when I added the restriction
32019-11-04 06:31ShadowFoxNixill
♦23
Oki. I've re-added it anyway because of DDOT 16 using it.
42019-11-09 14:01freebeer
♦1,598
for reference, the deleted way (within this year, after this changeset) can be sorta seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39568965/history or history inspections.

no idea why it was deleted or anything.
66896147
by biancah_telenav
@ 2019-02-04 08:31
12019-02-11 07:21Warin61
♦2,666
Hi
Way 546709282 does not connect to way 546708622
22019-02-11 07:26biancah_telenav Thank you. I corrected it
63631911
by biancah_telenav
@ 2018-10-18 05:17
12018-10-18 23:34Horza
♦110
I would be very wary of trusting TIGER Roads here. It is rarely as up to date as the 2017 bit suggests. Checking Bing Streetside suggests Whitmore Oaks Drive
63186898
by biancah_telenav
@ 2018-10-04 08:49
12018-10-06 07:03Karthoo
♦214
Is this relation really necessary? As far as I know u turns are not allowed in the whole city of Columbus.
60039379
by biancah_telenav
@ 2018-06-21 10:46
12018-06-22 22:43Jaku103
♦28
in answer to your question, "Is this area still under construction?" I believe so. here is a recent photo, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/S8dcutPBBo-cvgWVgKIT0w
59635382
by biancah_telenav
@ 2018-06-07 12:05
12018-06-07 21:58bye12
♦34
Yes, construction is done, and road open. Updated way changeset: 59650359
56321263
by biancah_telenav
@ 2018-02-13 11:26
12018-02-15 00:46Baloo Uriza
♦2,117
A little bit of a shaky edit based on the available DG imagery
46370146
by biancah_telenav
@ 2017-02-24 15:05
12017-08-12 00:00Kakurady
♦2
Perhaps except=bicycle should be bicycle=yes instead? (Also, city recently removed Mo-Fr)
22017-08-16 06:03biancah_telenav Hi, first of all let me thank you for your comment. I made the update regarding the restriction days. regarding the except tag, i used the rules from this wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction and I'm not sure that i should change it
45028079
by biancah_telenav
@ 2017-01-09 15:01
12017-04-11 18:28LogicalViolinist
♦83
That lemieux street section you added doesn't exist (way 45028079) it's filled in with concrete as there were too many accidents. I've deleted it
22017-04-11 18:48LogicalViolinist
♦83
Please check OSC: http://openstreetcam.org/details/28966/27
(was available at the time)
or:
http://openstreetcam.org/details/31688/33
32017-04-18 06:03biancah_telenav thank you so much for your correction
43915946
by biancah_telenav
@ 2016-11-24 09:54
12017-02-18 21:28Alouette955
♦34
On Carrefour and Daniel-Johnson intersection there is no more links since major road building last summer. You certainly use older picture so please avoid recreatiing it. See change 46202416.
43891243
by biancah_telenav
@ 2016-11-23 09:57
12016-12-02 19:43kartler175
♦556
Plesa do not duplicate highways turn restrictions: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-73.84951&lat=45.49634&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways

Please consult JOSM-validator before uploading.
41319858
by biancah_telenav
@ 2016-08-08 09:30
12016-08-29 15:16PierZen
♦262
Zooming-in with Bing, we see that these are service roads inside the mine and not railways. Way 436205830 is partly used by cars going to the parking at the entrance of the mine. Other ways are used by overweight trucks inside the open mine.