richlv participated in the following changeset discussionsrichlv participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166701131 by Klavsse @ 2025-05-24 14:54 | 1 | 2025-06-05 21:02 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Šobrīd šis posms ir palicis kā autoceļš, bet tam ar auto vairs nekā nevar piekļūt. Vai tas ir ar auto braucams? Ja jā, kur tam ir piekļuve?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290846945 |
| 2 | 2025-06-12 14:51 | Klavsse ♦1 | Tas viss ir gājēju ceļš | |
| 3 | 2025-06-14 07:24 | richlv | Paldies par atbildi un izmaiņu veikšanu.Vai tas ir kaut kā labiekārtots gājēju ceļš (piem., grants vai cits segums), vai arī taka mežā?Latvijā tiek izmantots neliels nošķīrums, takas apzīmējot ar highway=path, savukārt gājēju ceļus - ar footway. | |
| 4 | 2025-06-16 07:10 | Klavsse ♦1 | Tas ir parkā iekārtots celiņš ar grants klājumu | |
| 5 | 2025-06-16 10:41 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies par precizējumu un kartes uzlabojumiem. | |
| 167484097 by dy24 @ 2025-06-11 10:22 | 1 | 2025-06-12 19:31 | Pilsetkartetajs ♦8 | Labdien!Izmaiņas atcēlu, nepamatoti dzēsts esošs ceļš.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167548857 |
| 2 | 2025-06-14 06:41 | richlv | Sveiki, kas te noticis - vai ceļš bija pilnībā zudis, vai tomēr palicis un, piemēram, pieejams kājām ejot? | |
| 124156494 by Beton Krai @ 2022-07-27 20:06 | 1 | 2025-06-05 20:56 | richlv | Hey, just to confirm - does this shop=farm exist?I don't recall seeing it when passing by, but I might just be not too attentive towards such things :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2910671198 |
| 166628073 by Tramparam Parampampam @ 2025-05-22 19:51 | 1 | 2025-05-23 11:35 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Why did you delete this clearcut https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18704374 / https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359826336 ?Also, as already mentioned, please stop tagging and changing isolated dwellings and residential areas to farmyards when they clearly are not. For example, ho... |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 14:57 | Tramparam Parampampam ♦12 | clearcuts are shows in the map as white squares, i don't think is important to keep em.farmyards shows nice in the map, isolated dwellings are white. i'm making map better, not making data better.anyway, if you against this, i'll stop editing for a while. cya. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-26 15:48 | HellMap ♦674 | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer .OSM data has to be correct. You cannot delete or change something because you personally don't like it. OSM is a community-driven project, which means everyone is expected to follow consistent editing practices and sta... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-05 20:53 | richlv | And to add to the great explanation HellMap posted, you are very welcome to discuss these topics in the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 167017213 by richlv @ 2025-05-31 15:28 | 1 | 2025-05-31 17:21 | somehundred ♦98 | Tagad sanāk tā, ka ēku sauc "Alus tirgus", jo nav noņemta "name" birka. |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 12:13 | richlv | Paldies, tā EveryDoor dara - tagad salabots. | |
| 166276124 by Eugene G @ 2025-05-14 20:29 | 1 | 2025-05-14 21:39 | somehundred ♦98 | Why didn't you just change the old location to "disused:shop=music" and move the missing tags from the old point to the new point.In a situation where a shop would have moved to an entirely different city, would you also drag the point all the way there?If this is how you expe... |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 12:46 | richlv | Actually, I would have moved the object as well, I did so with Leningrad years ago ;)EveryDoor shows POIs from data, and render is secondary - and that should not remain with old tiles for long, too.Or is there some specific problem with EveryDoor? | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 13:10 | somehundred ♦98 | No problems with EveryDoor. When I created vinylla.lv shop point at the new address (which got deleted in this changeset) I didn't know that the point in the old location (Brīvības iela 98) was mapped.I not against the general idea of moving objects to their new locations. But I am agains... | |
| 4 | 2025-05-15 17:52 | richlv | Got it, thank you for the clarification.It might be due to node merging, not sure whether that is feasible in iD.In any case, further discussions welcome in Zulip :) | |
| 5 | 2025-05-17 16:02 | Eugene G ♦9 | Sorry for that, anyway I didn't mean to cause any inconvenience! | |
| 6 | 2025-05-18 18:17 | richlv | No worries at all, this is one of those things where there's no single correct approach, and it's hard to cause huge problems anyway :) | |
| 166099683 by ctrnz @ 2025-05-11 09:20 | 1 | 2025-05-12 19:20 | richlv | Sounds great, thank you for the contributions.Given that Vārpu iela is living_street, it seems highly likely that Vasaras iela is the same. Is that correct?Additionally, you're very welcome to discuss things in the OSM Latvian community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . |
| 2 | 2025-05-13 03:59 | ctrnz ♦1 | Yes, that's correct - it is living street (residential area). | |
| 3 | 2025-05-13 08:53 | richlv | Thanks, I've changed it - although afterwards I wondered whether you would have preferred to change it yourself.In such a case, hopefully there are some other unmapped things nearby :) | |
| 4 | 2025-05-14 17:08 | ctrnz ♦1 | All good! And thanks for all the input and help! | |
| 166001864 by PasaulesGlabejs @ 2025-05-08 20:19 | 1 | 2025-05-09 10:03 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši šeit ir mainījies? Ja ceļš ir norakts un pārstādīta zāle, tad ceļš te vairs nevarētu būt. Vai arī, ja joprojām ir ceļš, tad zāle to nevarētu pilnībā pārklāt. |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 15:14 | richlv | Varētu arī būt pirmais zīmēšanas tuvinājums, iezīmējot vienu laukumu - tas gan tikai minējums. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-09 15:24 | HellMap ♦674 | Es balstījos uz "Not public parking" komentāru no citas izmaiņas. Ļoti reti tādi izbraukāti laukumi pagalmos pārtop atpakaļ par apzaļumojumiem bez kārtīgas norobežošanas. Parasti, ja tur joprojām ir ceļš, tad viss atkal būs izbraukāts pēc mēneša. Tāp... | |
| 166001701 by PasaulesGlabejs @ 2025-05-08 20:14 | 1 | 2025-05-09 10:02 | HellMap ♦674 | Lūdzu adreses punktus nedzēst. Tie ir automātiski importēti no VZD adrešu/kadastrālās informācijas. |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 15:13 | richlv | Tam punktam šķietami nebija parkinga apzīmējumu - kāpēc šķita, ka to vajag dzēst? | |
| 166001202 by PasaulesGlabejs @ 2025-05-08 19:58 | 1 | 2025-05-09 06:34 | richlv | Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Šķiet, te ceļi ap dzelzceļu tika dzēsti. Iespējams, nedaudz labāk būtu bijis tos atstāt, bet nomainīt uz highway=construction - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction .Aicinām arī pievienoties La... |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 09:56 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki, es izmaiņas atcēlu un iezīmēju pa jaunu, jo tajās bija vairākas problēmas, viena no tām augstāk minētā. Dzēst ceļu noteikti nevar, jo uz tiem ir daudz maršrutu, kuri būs salauzti.Tā saprotu, ka izmaiņas ir par https://sigulda.lv/atsakusies-parbuves-darbi-sigulda-no... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-09 11:06 | PasaulesGlabejs ♦1 | Sveiki,Pareizi, dzelzceļa pārbrauktuve ir ciet.To vajadzētu ielikt | |
| 4 | 2025-05-09 11:35 | PasaulesGlabejs ♦1 | Skatos, ka tagad viss ir salikts pareizi. Liels paldies! Vienkārši šis ir ļoti aktuāli ēdienu kurjeriem. Platforma apgalvo, ka ceļu satiksmes izmaiņas kartē saņem no šīs vietnes. Kā arī samaksa tiek aprēķināta tā, itkā tiktu braukts pāri dzelzceļa pārbrauk... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-09 13:04 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies - un noteikti aicinām kartē zīmēt arī visu ko citu :) | |
| 165529195 by Toms12345 @ 2025-04-28 03:05 | 1 | 2025-05-08 16:22 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Could you please clarify a bit more about this gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793778879 here? The road is not tagged as private to either side, but it is now impossible to reach the East part by motor vehicle. The gate also implies pedestrians/bicycles are not allowed. But there... |
| 2 | 2025-05-08 16:41 | Toms12345 ♦3 | Hi, this isn’t the first time I’ve been riding there and got stopped at the gate that says it’s private property. Entry is not allowed.I’m not sure if the road should be tagged as private, but I guess it is now. I haven’t seen the bridge, since entry wasn’t al... | |
| 3 | 2025-05-08 16:44 | Toms12345 ♦3 | P.S. On the gate (or hurdle?), it says:Private PropertyEntry Prohibited | |
| 4 | 2025-05-08 17:21 | HellMap ♦674 | Thanks for clarifying, the photo is helpful.I believe there is now a new road here to the East of residentials: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372445873 . I traced it from Strava, so I am not 100% sure about anything here, but this appears to match the news article https://beztabu.tv3.lv/neje... | |
| 5 | 2025-05-08 17:35 | Toms12345 ♦3 | Thank you.Next time I’m there, I’ll try riding from the other side and update if necessary. | |
| 6 | 2025-05-09 06:48 | richlv | Thank you both for the useful updates.Too bad the bicycle route is quite rekt now with the extra detour. The circular one less so, just passing through is eww now.https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/56.9813/24.4608 | |
| 165512154 by Руслан Мамедов @ 2025-04-27 15:49 | 1 | 2025-04-29 18:03 | Mezonens ♦13 | Hi! Restored to highway=residential. Officially it's called Samteņu iela, even though it's gated. A path is usually a narrow way intended for pedestrians and not suitable for two-track vehicles. In this case, it's enough to specify access=private. Changeset: 165603817 |
| 2 | 2025-04-29 19:19 | richlv | The smaller offshoots might also be classified as highway=service, depending on their condition. | |
| 165284454 by InitaNiedz @ 2025-04-22 12:52 | 1 | 2025-04-23 05:46 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Šajos labojumos bija iespējami nelieli uzlabojumi (celju savienošana, landuse apzīmējums, platību pārklāšanās).Būtu jauki, ja būtu iespēja pievienoties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatam un apspriest šīs liet... |
| 134626125 by richlv @ 2023-04-07 17:19 | 1 | 2025-04-16 07:59 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10793499416/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this editWhat kind of shop is here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting? |
| 2 | 2025-04-18 09:22 | richlv | Not quite sure - according to https://moop.lv/ , it's chemist, wine, food...Might need an in-person survey to do better than guessing. If not, I'd hit with chemist, but that absolutely leaves out other aspects that slightly hint at deli, but not really. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 22:26 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4761261 | |
| 164112350 by AleksejsFischer @ 2025-03-26 09:20 | 1 | 2025-04-09 18:38 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello, is there really a ford here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12701869415 - this seems very unlikely for a driveway.Also, please don't change driveways into tracks when they lead to properties - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway |
| 2 | 2025-04-12 18:09 | AleksejsFischer ♦1 | Edited, thanks. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-13 08:02 | richlv | Thank you so much for the map improvements and the response.It is also appreciated when changeset comments are a little bit more descriptive than "comment" ;) | |
| 4 | 2025-04-13 16:24 | AleksejsFischer ♦1 | Pāris sīkām izmaiņām neredzu jēgu rakstīt rindkopu, bet pacentīšos. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-13 21:54 | richlv | Liels paldies - noteikti nevajag rindkopu, var pietikt arī ar dažiem vārdiem. Kas nu šķiet atbilstošākais. | |
| 163722339 by dy24 @ 2025-03-17 09:20 | 1 | 2025-04-09 15:48 | HellMap ♦674 | Jau daudz reižu ir teikts izbeigt dzēst ceļa posmus un citus elementus, bet norādīt tos ar pareizām piekļuves vērtībām un elementiem, ja šeit ir kaut kādi ierobežojumi vai šķēršļi. |
| 2 | 2025-04-09 18:49 | richlv | Sveiki, dy24.Vai būtu iespēja tikties videozvanā vai kā citādi, lai apspriestu Jūsu kartēšanu?Šāda atkārtota dzēšana novedīs pie pilnīgas Jūsu konta bloķēšanas, jo tā būtībā ir vandālisms.Citu kopienas dalībnieku ziņu ignorēšana un ... | |
| 151371594 by HellMap @ 2024-05-15 16:44 | 1 | 2025-03-29 19:33 | richlv | Couldn't spot anything for skateboarding at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283332715 , only two smallish playgrounds. I there something for skateboarding nearby? |
| 2 | 2025-03-29 19:48 | HellMap ♦674 | I do not remember exactly why I added it. There was nothing mapped here before and I was mostly fixing another user's edit, so I must have assumed it was one from aerial. Since I haven't surveyed this in a very long time, I was probably misremembering the area. So feel free to adjust anyth... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-29 20:06 | richlv | Neat, thank you for the clarification. | |
| 163925308 by Dumvadi @ 2025-03-21 21:31 | 1 | 2025-03-22 06:27 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Te bija veikala dublikāts - apvienoju tos un novietoju ēkā, kur šķietami objekts atrodas. |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 07:03 | Dumvadi ♦2 | Jā pareizā vieta ir Lejupes iela 2. Paldies | |
| 3 | 2025-03-22 07:23 | somehundred ♦98 | Es arī gribu pieminēt, ka kamīnu veikalus apzīmē ar shop=fireplace. | |
| 4 | 2025-03-22 07:43 | richlv | Te pievienots arī veikals Imantā. Vai tas tiešām atrodas daudzdzīvokļu namā?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12688695201 | |
| 163930127 by latvia-bot @ 2025-03-22 02:03 | 1 | 2025-03-22 06:14 | richlv | Šis gan laikam vairāk būs shop=trade - bet vai tas tiešām atrodas daudzdzīvokļu namā? |
| 2 | 2025-03-22 07:33 | somehundred ♦98 | @richlv Man šķiet, ka iekomentēji zem nepareizas izmaiņu kopas. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-22 07:42 | richlv | Ak, paldies - atkal. | |
| 158999423 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2024-11-11 09:10 | 1 | 2025-03-07 20:49 | richlv | Vai šis shop=garden_centre bija domāts Depo, un sanāk dublikāts?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12330400558/history |
| 2 | 2025-03-08 15:55 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Tas ir viens koks. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-08 20:52 | richlv | Paldies, droši vien adreses tagi jāņem nost :) | |
| 162805118 by evdence @ 2025-02-22 07:07 | 1 | 2025-02-22 07:08 | evdence ♦31 | I deleted the original building way because geometry replacment had errors |
| 2 | 2025-02-23 11:19 | richlv | That seems suboptimal - what exact errors were those?If there are errors, and the tool cannot be fixed, it is still suggested to keep the ways, for example, by applying the desired changes to the original way[s]. | |
| 162591373 by arcth @ 2025-02-17 00:02 | 1 | 2025-02-17 12:57 | somehundred ♦98 | You recreated multipolygons around Ivana kapi, aroudn Ziedoņdārzs and in areas south of Daugavas Stadions. The only useful changes done by you are at the third location. What was the reason for it? They have no reason to exist! These elements can exist as simple polygons without problems! ... |
| 2 | 2025-02-17 23:17 | arcth ♦35 | Are there any mapping guidelines (OSM wiki?) stating that it was not a valid way to map landuse with multipolygons? Or is it just your personal view on uselessness of certain map features or mapping techniques?While you correctly admit that it may be easier to use multipolygons to map landuse, i... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-17 23:40 | somehundred ♦98 | I don't know if there are but from my own experience I know that area borders divided into countless multipolygons make mapping extremely hard, especially for casual mappers who are not into advanced stuff like multipolygons. Other mappers have expressed frustration with this as well. And this ... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-18 23:05 | arcth ♦35 | Did you try to find out why was the landuse mapped this way before declaring multipolygons useless and mass-converting them?Mapping usually isn't one-off action. Once mapped, landuse may need further editing e.g. in order to add previously missed detail or reflect changes on the ground. For... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-19 08:55 | somehundred ♦98 | "Did you try to find out why was the landuse mapped this way before declaring multipolygons useless and mass-converting them?"That's one the reason why I started this discussion and my theory that you find it easier to edit with mps was confirmed.This method might be an easier... | |
| 6 | 2025-02-20 00:26 | arcth ♦35 | iD is not suitable for any complex editing by design. I believe this is not a reason to adjust the map data to fit iD's restrictions. Map data should not be adjusted for a particular piece of software i.e. editor/renderer [1]. Furthermore, iD has quite a long history of controversy [2] includin... | |
| 7 | 2025-02-20 08:43 | richlv | We have had lengthy and fruitful discussions on this in the past - what came out of that was that the general tendency of OSM is to make editing as frictionless as possible for an many people as possible.This definitely is an important topic to discuss further, but changeset comments do not work... | |
| 8 | 2025-02-27 17:05 | somehundred ♦98 | @arcth I really recommend you to check out the group chat @richlv posted. We can continue this discussion there. Another mapper made a really good point (that's as good as reply I would give) about this topic so advise you to read it: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-gene... | |
| 162515729 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2025-02-14 19:37 | 1 | 2025-02-14 19:40 | evdence ♦31 | Vai šis ir no oficiāla kalnu saraksta? |
| 2 | 2025-02-14 22:11 | Emils Mikelsons ♦9 | Šis ir no Latvijas Valsts Mežu kartes- vietējie kalni. Vai tomēr nevajadzēja pievienot? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-15 10:52 | richlv | Pievienošana šķiet jauka - bet kā ar avotu, vai licence atļauj izmantošanu? | |
| 4 | 2025-02-15 12:25 | evdence ♦31 | LĢIA kartē var redzēt Ģeodēzisko kalnu punktus. Bet vārdus gan ne, es domāju var palikt. | |
| 144652131 by Yarex @ 2023-12-01 08:05 | 1 | 2023-12-01 10:46 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Just to let you know, I removed `landuse=military` from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058121 . This location is not a military land use location. |
| 2 | 2023-12-01 13:24 | richlv | Hi, many suspect objects here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058132 is a tree that has tags name=Batuti, operator=Labirinti and tourism=attraction - this looks a lot like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer .https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3829203580 has a s... | |
| 3 | 2023-12-01 13:26 | richlv | The node mentioned by Hellmap still has military=obstacle_course, which is likely incorrect. Perhaps something from the "leisure" namespace is a better fit. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-13 18:42 | richlv | Also discussed in a note - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4625901 . | |
| 162345301 by Hjukers @ 2025-02-10 10:56 | 1 | 2025-02-11 11:48 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Te pareizs mājas numurs būtu 15 - kas ir "1", vai tas ir dzīvokļa numurs? |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 06:50 | Hjukers ♦1 | Sveiks, Atvainojos! Jā 1 ir dzīvokļa numurs | |
| 3 | 2025-02-13 08:05 | richlv | Viss kārtībā, paldies par atbildi.Kā var redzēt objekta vēsturē, adrešu bots jau bija paspējis noņemt " - 1" daļu. Pieliku to addr:unit tagā.Laipni aicināti apspriest šo un citas tēmas Latvijas OpenStreetMap kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.co... | |
| 162442199 by HellMap @ 2025-02-12 19:10 | 1 | 2025-02-12 19:16 | evdence ♦31 | it was oneway in lvm map, so i tagged it as oneway a while ago |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 19:29 | HellMap ♦674 | What "LVM map" exactly are you referring to? https://www.lvmgeo.lv/en/maps has many different maps and some are even copyrighted.In general, please don't use other maps unless you are reasonably certain about them. A random LVM forest road being oneway (when almost none others are... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-13 08:00 | richlv | It's highly likely "oneway" for LVM trucks only.Their forest road maps have a ton of properties that are relevant only for large vehicles - and even then, only their vehicles. | |
| 4 | 2025-02-13 09:27 | evdence ♦31 | last time ive been on this road, it looks like trucks cant even pass here (2025 january) | |
| 5 | 2025-02-13 11:55 | HellMap ♦674 | I'm not sure what data exactly is lvmgeo.lv using for this, since it's not listed on atvertiedati / LVM website or in data layer. It seems to be some internal layer not available as shapefiles or public WMS. Theoretically, we can add `oneway:forestry=yes` for this, but I would want to make... | |
| 162369665 by signalv @ 2025-02-10 22:04 | 1 | 2025-02-11 10:17 | somehundred ♦98 | I merged the office node into the smaller building because it's unacceptable to add incorrect data like this. Add the node where the object actually exists on the ground, not wherever you want, to avoid creating confusion in people who navigate there.And also, it is completely acceptable to... |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 16:50 | signalv ♦1 | Thank you for the explanation! I agree with the argument that the physical truth should be represented.Regarding the name/operator change: The area is handled by Rimi Baltic. However, realistically people would either look for the distribution center or the office building. This is why I removed... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 17:49 | somehundred ♦98 | Do you think it is correct to change building names to versions you proposed? There are two companies operating in Latvia: Rimi Baltic and Rimi Latvia. Which one is operating here? If not clear, we could drop "Baltic" and simply name this surrounding commercial area "Rimi".Ge... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-11 18:20 | HellMap ♦674 | As an option, access=customers is less restrictive than access=private (which is technically less restrictive than access=no). It would be more or less correct if one can enter/park if they have customer "business" here, broadly speaking. I don't personally know the situation on the g... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-11 21:18 | richlv | To understand the usecase better, were there any particular routers that directed to the delivery entrance when navigating to the office?Specific examples could allow identifying the best solution. | |
| 6 | 2025-02-11 21:19 | richlv | Un noteikti laipni aicināti apspriest detalizēti OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 7 | 2025-02-24 11:28 | somehundred ♦98 | Atliku atpakaļ "name" vērtību pagaidām. Ja izmaiņas autors vēlēsies turpināt šo diskusiju, tad redzēs vai būs kaut kas jāmaina. | |
| 162385048 by richlv @ 2025-02-11 10:38 | 1 | 2025-02-11 10:38 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Te pareizs mājas numurs būtu 15 - kas ir "1", vai tas ir dzīvokļa numurs? |
| 2 | 2025-02-11 10:45 | somehundred ♦98 | Iekomentējāt pats savā izmaiņu kopā... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 11:48 | richlv | Meh, paldies - sanāca apmaldīties diezgan veikli :) | |
| 162289819 by evdence @ 2025-02-08 17:59 | 1 | 2025-02-08 19:32 | HellMap ♦674 | Why is this not a historic=memorial + memorial=obelisk ? You have been changing these tags and have now completely removed tags that actually describe it as a memorial location. |
| 2 | 2025-02-09 08:58 | evdence ♦31 | according to wikipedia, an obelisk is a monument. the description is still here, along the name | |
| 3 | 2025-02-09 09:50 | richlv | A memorial is a orthogonal property to something being a monument.A memorial can be huge (like Brāļu kapi in Rīga), or it can be a 10x10 cm plaque on a wall. This could be a good topic for the Zulip chat, too :) | |
| 4 | 2025-02-09 11:01 | HellMap ♦674 | Description and name also do not define a feature. Since OSM is a database, it would be impossible for any automated processing (like map rendering or search) to know that this is a memorial from the name - you would need a human to tell that. The purpose of tags is to unambiguously define this so t... | |
| 162290834 by evdence @ 2025-02-08 18:37 | 1 | 2025-02-08 20:20 | somehundred ♦98 | Correct tag would be "disused:man_made=water_tower". But an alternative would be: "man_made=water_tower" with "disused=yes" to make it remain visible on the map. |
| 2 | 2025-02-09 05:32 | evdence ♦31 | Oki, thanks! | |
| 3 | 2025-02-09 09:46 | richlv | Yeah, we pretty much always use man_made=water_tower, as it can be impossible to survey usage, and because they work as major navigation aids. | |
| 162288569 by evdence @ 2025-02-08 17:19 | 1 | 2025-02-08 19:55 | HellMap ♦674 | Again, you are deleting elements instead of redrawing them like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136473191 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248912698 . The garages, for example, were mapped 13 years ago and you are just deleting all history for no reason. This is now like a dozenth time this i... |
| 2 | 2025-02-08 20:09 | somehundred ♦98 | At least this mapper did redraw these elements in the same changeset. They might not have fully mastered editing with JOSM yet, they're a new mapper after all. That's why they might be finding it easier and faster to just delete and redraw. Have you explained this mapper how to edit elemen... | |
| 3 | 2025-02-08 21:08 | HellMap ♦674 | Yes, it was explained before. JOSM's "improve way" and "replace geometry" functions were mentioned. Modifying elements instead of deleting them was mentioned many times. I have not received any replies or acknowledgements about this issue, nor has the mapper ever attempted t... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-09 05:34 | evdence ♦31 | Oh yeah. I completely forgot about replace geometry. I will try not deleting them. | |
| 5 | 2025-02-09 09:45 | richlv | You can also improve ways manually by dragging the nodes, adding nodes directly, dragging segment midpoints etc. You can use tools like https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/Extrude and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/ImproveWayAccuracy .If any of that seems confusing or ... | |
| 162096929 by Alex Mixa @ 2025-02-03 18:02 | 1 | 2025-02-06 16:25 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Te dzelzceļš gan izskatās samērā mazticami - pagaidām to dzēsīšu ārā.Ja tomēr ir kas reāls, vajadzētu vairāk info.Un jebkuras ar OSM saistītas tēmas laipni aicinām apspriest arī OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā... |
| 2 | 2025-05-26 20:47 | HellMap ♦674 | Dzelzceļš atkal bija iezīmēts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163065763 . Tā kā atbildes pat to vēl nav, tad izdzēsu. | |
| 162162572 by Kaamis007 @ 2025-02-05 12:07 | 1 | 2025-02-06 11:29 | somehundred ♦98 | Tags "disused" netika noņemts. Ja vieta ir atvērta, tad šis tags ir nederīgs. |
| 2 | 2025-02-06 16:19 | richlv | Vai note="Closed till October" arī būtu jāņem nost? | |
| 3 | 2025-02-15 16:27 | somehundred ♦98 | Izlaboju pats, jo, šķiet, nelasat izmaiņu komentārus. | |
| 162023800 by Тимофей Арсенич @ 2025-02-01 19:41 | 1 | 2025-02-02 14:25 | Colbertson ♦104 | Šo informāciju būtu labāk atzīmēt ar barrier=log punktu lai maršutētāji var saprasthttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier |
| 2 | 2025-02-06 16:16 | richlv | Un varbūt šis tagad ir highway=path?Vismaz visi potenciāli piekļūstamie ir tikai path. | |
| 162064890 by adams V @ 2025-02-02 22:11 | 1 | 2025-02-06 16:11 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu :)Laipni aicināti arī apspriest kartēšanu OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .Un ja skolai vai Ādažos kopumā ir interese sarīkot kādu pasākumu par kartēšanu, noteikti varam kaut ko s... |
| 153411637 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2024-07-01 13:00 | 1 | 2025-01-31 13:47 | somehundred ♦98 | Nedrīkts likt meža elementu ap koku lapotnēm, ja tās ir lielas. Šajā izmaiņu kopā tas tika izdarīts ap dižozolu, bet ap dižozolu neviens cits koks, cits saprotu no ortofoto, neatrodas. Meža elementu liek tikai tad, ja vienā vietā ir daudz koku tuvu viens pie otra. |
| 2 | 2025-01-31 15:02 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Sveicināti!Ir citi varianti, kā iezīmēt vērā ņemamus dižkoku vainagus, lai tie vizuāli atainotos kartē? Būvēm jumtus un pārkares var iezīmēt, jābūt arī veidam, kā to izdarīt ar lapotni. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-31 15:36 | somehundred ♦98 | Pameklēju wiki.osm.org un taginfo.osm.org, bet nevaru atrast ieteikumus, kā jāapzīmē koku lapotnes. Man šķiet, ka parasti neviens lapotni vizuāli nezīmē kokiem OSM'ā, vien apraksta to izmēru ar tagu diameter_crown=. Taču var arī izgudrot jaunus tagus, ja vēlas zīmēt, piem... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-31 15:46 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Ok, paldies. Būtu vērts izcelt mūsu dižkokus ar ko atbilstošāku, jo tas mazais zaļais punktiņš ir nenopietns. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-31 19:33 | HellMap ♦674 | Diemžēl daudz ko OSM nevar ietegot tā, lai noklusētā karte to attēlotu. Bet to noteikti nevajadzētu apzīmēt ar nekorektiem tegiem priekš vizualizācijas. Jo OSM nav tikai priekš karšu vizualizācijas, bet ir vispārīga ģeotelpiska datubāze. Noklusētā karte, kas red... | |
| 6 | 2025-02-03 13:19 | richlv | denotation=natural_monument ir būtisks tags, jā.Šo arī būtu burvīgi apspriest Zulip :) | |
| 161416035 by Jurisco12 @ 2025-01-16 12:11 | 1 | 2025-01-17 15:27 | richlv | Paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Vai te ir zīme ar 20 km/h ierobežojumu vai tas kā citādāk noteikts? |
| 161349591 by Leicha @ 2025-01-14 15:33 | 1 | 2025-01-14 22:48 | HellMap ♦674 | I have already provided 4 sources all of which describe these boundaries as city parts.How is the meaning of the name relevant?Please undo your edit or explain why this is a problem. |
| 2 | 2025-01-17 15:15 | richlv | Lūdzu apspriest šo tēmu kādā publiskā topikā Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com , changeset komentāros viss ir pamatīgi izšķīdis. | |
| 161264325 by Aleksejs Moisejenko @ 2025-01-12 08:33 | 1 | 2025-01-12 15:57 | richlv | Heya, this ended up duplicating way & node content.I merged them onto the building way, and simplified the descriptive name.Please check whether this looks good now. |
| 160681698 by HellMap @ 2024-12-27 15:40 | 1 | 2025-01-10 15:12 | somehundred ♦98 | Tad kā turpmāk ir jāzīmē koku rindas? Tikai kokus, tikai tree_row vai abus kopā? Tree_row liek, ja negrib likt katru koku individuāli. Bet, ja ir katrs koks salikts, tad tree_row nav jēgas vispār atstāt. |
| 2 | 2025-01-10 15:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Es liktu abus kopā. Šeit ir objekts - koku rinda. Ja šī līnija nav iezīmēta, tad datos šīs rindas nav. Koku punkti paši par sevi neveido koku rindu.Te jau ir tieši otrādāk - ja rinda ir iezīmēta, nav "jēgas" tegot koku punktus, jo pietiek j... | |
| 3 | 2025-01-10 16:09 | somehundred ♦98 | Nebiju paskatījies uzmanīgi, atbalstu koku likšanu pašas koku rindas punktos. Šeit viss ir kārtībā. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-10 20:19 | richlv | Teorētiski koku rindu renderēšanai var uzģenerēt no individuāliem kokiem. Praktiskā sarežģītība man nav zināma.Es gan koku rindas ņemu nost, ja sazīmēju individuālus kokus, vēsturiski abu zīmēšana nav bijusi "lieta".Šī jau sanāk tēma Zulip :) | |
| 5 | 2025-01-10 20:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Ģenerēšanai vajag kontekstu. Kāpēc piemēram tie koki šeit dienvidos nav rinda tad?Tā pat kā elektrības vadus nevar viennozīmīgi noteikt tikai no elektrības stabiem un nevar dzēst vadus, pat ja stabi uzzīmēti. | |
| 6 | 2025-01-10 20:53 | somehundred ♦98 | Nevajag salīdzināt koku rindas ar elektrības līniju. Elektrības stabus fiziski savieno vadi, bet kokus rindā nekas nesavieno. | |
| 7 | 2025-01-10 21:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Tas bija piemērs tikai par ģenerēšanu. Neatkarīgi no tā, vai tur ir fizisks objekts vai nē, bez līnijas datos šī savienojuma nebūs un uzģenerēt to automātiski nevar.OSM nav daudz piemēru ar tādiem abstraktiem objektiem kā koku rindas. Bet nu teiksim jūras zīmju/boj... | |
| 8 | 2025-01-11 11:11 | richlv | Bojas ir tālāk. Var būt (un ir) stabi vispār bez vadiem. Var būt (un ir) stabi ar 1, 2, 3, 4 līniju savienojumiem. To ir neiespējami noteikt automātiski.Koku rindu var noteikt pēc parametriem - novirze no taisnas līnijas, attālums starp kokiem, koku skaits. Vai to kāds dara un darīs... | |
| 161188134 by Satelis @ 2025-01-09 23:59 | 1 | 2025-01-10 07:25 | richlv | Thanks, "operator" remains as Elenger - is that correct? |
| 2 | 2025-01-10 07:30 | Satelis ♦1 | Yes, Elenger is right name for operator. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-10 07:44 | richlv | Great, thanks. | |
| 4 | 2025-01-10 12:11 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi,It looks like you used Google as a source for this name? Please note that we cannot legally use Google Maps or any similar copyrighted product for this.I am looking at https://elenger.lv/ieguldot-2-5-miljonus-eiro-elenger-atklaj-pirmo-saules-elektrostaciju-latvija/ to confirm the name and... | |
| 5 | 2025-01-10 13:29 | Satelis ♦1 | Thank you for the correct source link instead of google maps!Electricity Distribution system operator “Sadales tīkls AS” is using a name “SOLAR NICA SES” for this PV park (SES in Latvian means Solar Electrical Station).Elenger is naming their PV parks in the same names a... | |
| 6 | 2025-01-10 14:06 | HellMap ♦674 | Thanks for clarifying. I guess it makes sense to keep it as "Solar Nice" rather than "Nices SES" (like the rest in Latvia at the moment, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28138140) or "Solar Nice SES" ("solar" twice). I guess this is the first case where ... | |
| 7 | 2025-01-10 20:23 | richlv | Nice, not Nice - right? | |
| 8 | 2025-01-10 20:28 | HellMap ♦674 | I love how you misspelled it when pointing out a misspelling. But, yes, "Nica" with "a". Terrible word to spell between two languages. And don't get me started on auto-correct. | |
| 9 | 2025-01-11 10:41 | richlv | Harr, indeed :DWas in a rush, sorry about that. | |
| 10 | 2025-01-11 11:14 | Satelis ♦1 | Hi,Please keep the name simple as “Solar Nica”.Idea for the name of solar station was to represent closest most sunny Latvian village called Nīca (with “long ī”) but write it in English. When we spelling Nica, it also makes hint to sunny cost of France called Nice as in... | |
| 137252732 by Raitisx @ 2023-06-12 16:56 | 1 | 2025-01-10 09:13 | richlv | Ha, labs - orto neredzot gandrīz nomainīju uz "demolished:" - labi, ka paskatījos rediģēšanas datumu :) |
| 161122182 by Zusurs @ 2025-01-08 07:23 | 1 | 2025-01-08 11:18 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Just wanted to let you know that address data is Latvia is automatically imported from the official VZD database. And the address point in the official address database is actually on the other building here - you can see it has the full nominal address. If you want the point "moved... |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 11:21 | Zusurs ♦1 | Hi!Actually I'm the owner of the building. :) And yes, the other buildings that I deleted have been demolished last autumn - the aerofoto imaging is quite old.I just checked in the kadstrs.lv (VZD) map - there the address is assigned to the correct building. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-08 11:35 | HellMap ♦674 | Here is the map from kadastrs.lv https://imgur.com/zB7sP1J . You can see the red point (the exact address point) is on the southern building rather than the northern one. You have to search the exact address id to see it on their website. This is the point that would appear in https://data.gov.lv/da... | |
| 4 | 2025-01-08 21:49 | richlv | BTW, if a building has been demolished but is still visible on some ortophoto layers, it might be a good approach to add a "demolished:" prefix, making it "demolished:building".This way it disappears from most/all renders, but stays in data, preventing somebody from retracing i... | |
| 160781736 by Dacia_D @ 2024-12-30 09:28 | 1 | 2025-01-08 11:45 | evdence ♦31 | Sveiki! Kapēc Jūs nomainījāt building=entrance uz entrance=yes? Ieejas nekartē kā ceļus. (ways) (pēc Wiki) Arī par ceļiem 1346668870 un 1346668871, kādēļ jūs viņus gan padarījāt šķībākus, gan noņēmāt sētas vārtus, kas ir diezgan labi redzami īstajā dzīvē. Man diem... |
| 2 | 2025-01-08 21:47 | richlv | building=entrance atzīmēts kā deprecated: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=entrance?uselang=en-GB . | |
| 3 | 2025-01-09 04:14 | evdence ♦31 | Var izmantot abus tegus, vienīgais atzīmēt building kā building=yes | |
| 4 | 2025-01-09 10:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Var, bet labāk nevajag. `entrance` is standarda tegs priekš ieejām. Šeit es gan nesaprotu, ko tas vispār nozīmē uz bijušās ēkas? Uz kurieni šī ieeja ved? Principā privātīpašumos vispār tādas lietas parasti nekartē. | |
| 5 | 2025-01-09 18:47 | evdence ♦31 | Ieeja ved uz pagrabu, kas aizbērts, bet var viņu vispār tad nelikt | |
| 6 | 2025-01-09 19:27 | HellMap ♦674 | Skaidrs. Ja pagrabs aizbērts, tad tīri precīzi tas laikam būs `disused:entrance=cellar` kā punkts uz ēkas kontūras līnijas. Bet es te vispār nekartētu to - nekad to neviens cits tik un tā nevarēs to pārbaudīt privātīpašumā. | |
| 161098094 by Colbertson @ 2025-01-07 14:34 | 1 | 2025-01-07 15:30 | richlv | Šis gan laikam graffiti, ne? :) |
| 2 | 2025-01-07 15:59 | Colbertson ♦104 | hmm, tuvāk paskatījos bildes un jā | |
| 160888506 by richlv @ 2025-01-01 23:12 | 1 | 2025-01-02 18:38 | HellMap ♦674 | Šim punktam https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12060930551 (vairs) nav galvenā tega. |
| 2 | 2025-01-02 19:20 | richlv | Jā, tas ir normāli - disused paliek pārējie tagi, kuriem neko nevajadzētu ietekmēt. Tas arī ir EveryDoor darbības modelis, kad kādu vietu atzīmē kā slēgtu. | |
| 3 | 2025-01-02 19:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Ā, ups, es nepamanīju, ka tu disused: uzliki birku zupā. Es nemaz nezināju, ka Every Door to māk.FALSE ALARM. 🔔❌ | |
| 160801815 by SAVVALA @ 2024-12-30 17:24 | 1 | 2024-12-30 19:22 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Pārvietoju nosaukumu no mājvārda punkta uz atsevišķu punktu, apzīmēju kā mākslas galeriju. Neesmu pārliecināts, vai tas attiecas uz šādiem āra objektiem, bet to var vēlāk precizēt.Vēl iezīmēju ēku, pāris dīķus un ... |
| 160551319 by Edža @ 2024-12-23 19:35 | 1 | 2024-12-25 19:25 | richlv | Te gan "Kremlis" nebija adreses vietā, tas bija papildus adresei. osm.org vizualizācija vārdus rāda kā primāros, ja tādi pievienoti.Par pašu nosaukumu - tieši pirms dažiem gadiem brīnījos un atradu vietējos, kuri pastāstīja :)Tas esot reāls nosaukums, jo ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-26 11:30 | HellMap ♦674 | To drošvien gan vajadzētu `loc_name` ar paskaidrojumu.P.S. Šis kārtējais piemērs, kad oriģinālais autors nenorādīja nekādu avotu un informāciju par to, no kurienes nosaukums. Un tad darbs vēlāk pazūd, jo parasti neviens nevar to pēc tam pārbaudīt. | |
| 160551633 by Edža @ 2024-12-23 19:46 | 1 | 2024-12-23 20:18 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Vai varētu lūdzu precizēt par šo "ielu"? Kādi tieši šeit ir ierobežojumi ceļam? Vai šeit kādas ceļa zīmes? Vai arī šis ceļš vispār neeksistē - pēc ortofoto te it kā tikai zāle. Vai uz to īpašumu tas ceļš ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-25 19:11 | richlv | Varbūt tagad piekļuve ir no Daugavas ielas? | |
| 160536643 by FunkyEvil @ 2024-12-23 12:38 | 1 | 2024-12-23 20:58 | richlv | Paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Vai sanāk, ka SIA Mottra nav visā šajā teritorijā, kā šobrīd iezīmēts? |
| 2 | 2024-12-23 21:36 | FunkyEvil ♦1 | Jā tā ir, mottra ir tikai zivjaudzētavas daļa kompleksā, sanāk tā ēka virs Lāsītes. Nezinu vai ir atsevišķi industriālās teritorijas nosaukums, bet to varētu noskaidrot. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-25 15:18 | richlv | Super, paldies - sadalīju industriālās teritorijas atbilstoši izvietojumam. | |
| 160431019 by somehundred @ 2024-12-20 12:23 | 1 | 2024-12-20 12:57 | HellMap ♦674 | Čau,Gribēju tikai pieminēt, ka neaizmirsti par Binga sistemātisko nobīdi. Citādi te viss jaunais sanāk ar kādu metra nobīdi. |
| 2 | 2024-12-20 13:26 | somehundred ♦98 | Man likās, ka jaunais Bing Rīgas teritorijā ir bez nobīdes, bet izrādās, ka nē. Paldies par info. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-22 16:04 | richlv | Ja vēl nav sanācis, droši vien vērts pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatam - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 4 | 2024-12-22 16:19 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, tā gadās, kad niku nomaina ;) | |
| 5 | 2024-12-22 21:25 | somehundred ♦98 | Jau esmu, nesen nomainīju niku. | |
| 141194170 by riilhiiro @ 2023-09-13 07:26 | 1 | 2024-12-22 12:10 | richlv | Sveiki, šajā ēkā LU fakultāte nav nu jau diezgan daudzus gadus - noņēmu šo info.Kāds bija informācijas avots šim, vai nav kādas citas izmaiņas ar pavecākiem datu avotiem? |
| 15396954 by rusjanis @ 2013-03-17 15:32 | 1 | 2024-12-09 00:32 | richlv | Šis tāds vecs labojums, bet varbūt varam kaut ko uzrakt :)Vai te tiešām ir nosaukums "Dārzs", vai arī tas aprakstošs nosaukums sanāk? |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 10:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Šis lūk ir labs piemērs, kāpēc vienmēr vajag atstāt izmaiņas komentāru un avotus. Tagad nevienam nav pienākums tērēt laiku mēģināt saprast. Internetā pa ātro meklējot, neko neredzu, tāpēc šādu nosaukumu šeit varētu mierīgi noņemt. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-09 10:58 | richlv | Kopumā jā, bet ne vienmēr lielākā izmaiņu kopā katrai detaļai sanāks norādīt avotu :)Kas mulsina - autors vēl nupat bija lietotājs rusjanis, bet nu jau parādās "deleted". Šķiet, varētu nebūt atbildes. | |
| 159919171 by kbargais @ 2024-12-04 13:30 | 1 | 2024-12-07 09:57 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Te sanāca duplicēta informācija (punktam un ēkai) - es tos apvienoju. |
| 2 | 2024-12-07 10:08 | kbargais ♦4 | Paldies! | |
| 158959775 by valdisj @ 2024-11-10 09:28 | 1 | 2024-11-11 16:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Gribēju minēt, ka Latvijā Bing ortofoto ir ar nobīdi. Daudzās vietās var būt pat ar vairāku metru nobīdi. Pirms zīmēt vai pārvietot elementus balstoties uz Bing, vajag salīdzināt to atrašanās vietu ar citiem avotiem - LVM ortofoto, GPS trekiem, personīgu apseko&scar... |
| 2 | 2024-11-11 19:10 | valdisj ♦3 | Par nobīdēm zinu, paldies par atgādinājumu. Caur ID editoru jaunājo LVMGEO dabūt nevar. Tapēc balstījos uz BING. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-14 09:24 | richlv | Starp citu, ja vēl nav sanācis pievienoties, aicinām apspriesties arī Latvijas kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 158829321 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2024-11-06 18:36 | 1 | 2024-11-07 22:17 | Cucazer ♦60 | Čau! Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331445061, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331445062 un pārējie nav būtu landuse=grass un tad viens kopīgs leisure=park apkārt (ja to vispār var skaitīt par parku)? Citādi kaut kā neloģiski sanāk, ka vienā vietā ir 6 dažādi mazi parciņi... |
| 2 | 2024-11-14 09:22 | richlv | Pārlikts uz grass, kas šķiet daudz atbilstošāk, paldies.Tur gan visi mazie gabali apvienoti multipolygon, kas šķiet overkill - bet to varbūt vēlāk vienkāršos :) | |
| 158495168 by Rolands Reksnis @ 2024-10-29 12:10 | 1 | 2024-10-29 12:15 | Emīls Ginters ♦1 | Skaisti! |
| 2 | 2024-11-14 08:56 | richlv | Un arī pozitīvi komentāri ir jauki, yay :) | |
| 158047513 by Matdo @ 2024-10-18 11:59 | 1 | 2024-10-21 09:52 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!A couple small notes I wanted to mention.Trees likehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324986784 should be mapped as individual tree nodes (`natural=tree`) and not a forest area. Areas are generally only for locations with at least half a dozen trees where mapping individual trees would ... |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 07:50 | richlv | Liels paldies par Mālpils kartes papildināšanu :)Nomainīju pieminēto vienu koku uz natural=tree punktu, lai būtu piemērs :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324986783/history arī varētu mainīt, bet tur dabā vajadzētu saprast, vai ir viens vai divi atsevišķi stāvo&... | |
| 152934863 by Martins Larinovs @ 2024-06-20 09:52 | 1 | 2024-10-25 07:41 | richlv | Šajā izmaiņu kopā nav mainīts nekas tāds, kas ietekmētu piekļuvi - būtu derīgi apspriesties par iecerētajām izmaiņām, un kā tās veiksmīgāk veikt. |
| 158239970 by Martins Larinovs @ 2024-10-23 07:24 | 1 | 2024-10-25 07:38 | richlv | Labdien, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Šīs izmaiņas atcēlu, jo administratīvā robeža bija pārviedota par ceļu.Būtu ļoti derīgi aprunāties kopienā par to, kā labāk veikt izmaiņas - citādāk kļūdainās nākas atcelt, un tiek zaudēts laiks.Aicinām piev... |
| 94479752 by Martins Larinovs @ 2020-11-20 06:49 | 1 | 2021-02-24 14:19 | UrSuS ♦58 | Kāpēc ceļš ir izdzēsts? |
| 2 | 2024-10-23 07:22 | Martins Larinovs ♦1 | Jo pa to nav iespējams pārvietoties 13 tonnu smagam atkritumvedējam | |
| 3 | 2024-10-23 07:40 | UrSuS ♦58 | OSM dati ir paredzēti ne tikai "13 tonnu smagam atkritumvedējam", bet arī vieglajiem automobiļiem, velosipēdiem un gājējiem. Ir tagi, kas attiecas uz kravas automobiļiem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv | |
| 4 | 2024-10-25 07:28 | richlv | Kā UrSuS minēja, nedrīkst dzēst datus, kuri nav piemēroti ļoti šauram lietojumam - tā būtu apzināta datu bojāšana, vandālisms.Tomēr informācijas papildināšana ar maksimālā svara ierobežojumiem un citām pazīmēm tiktu ļoti novērtēta.Aicinu pievienoties... | |
| 157718995 by evdence @ 2024-10-10 14:39 | 1 | 2024-10-11 20:19 | HellMap ♦674 | Ar šo izmaiņu velotrase iezīmēta divreiz - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322921074 Arī zāle iezīmēta divreiz.Pēc izdzēstā zāles gabala https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317424529 palikuši pāri daudzi neizmantoti punkti, piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/node... |
| 2 | 2024-10-12 10:36 | evdence ♦31 | Kautkas nogājis greizi ar JOSM, jo pēdejo reizi kad editoju šeit, viss bija normāli. | |
| 3 | 2024-10-15 20:08 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi.Kā at HellMap minēto būves nosaukumu, kā tas uzzināts / ko nozīmē? | |
| 4 | 2024-10-15 20:23 | HellMap ♦674 | @richlv: Tur vairs nav nosaukums. | |
| 5 | 2024-10-16 15:52 | richlv | Tas laikam labi - tik gribējās saprast, kāds bijis avots un vai nav kādi autortiesību riski :) | |
| 6 | 2024-10-21 16:44 | evdence ♦31 | Būves nosaukums bija lokāls, un tam nav neviena avota internetā | |
| 7 | 2024-10-22 18:34 | richlv | Paldies, ja nosaukums ir īsts, varbūt to pat vērts atstāt - bet sīkāk droši vien var apspriest kopienas Zulip čatā :) | |
| 156996227 by dy24 @ 2024-09-23 13:32 | 1 | 2024-10-02 14:26 | Pēteris Caune ♦3 | Kāds šim nosaukumam avots? |
| 2 | 2024-10-07 08:56 | richlv | Potenciāls privātu datu izplatīšanas risks?Pagaidām šo nosaukumu tikai noņēmu. | |
| 157350446 by HellMap @ 2024-10-01 17:41 | 1 | 2024-10-02 12:12 | somehundred ♦98 | Vai highway=pedestrian nav pietiekami labi? Gan tas, gan area:highway=footway apzīmē vienu un to pašu. |
| 2 | 2024-10-02 12:47 | HellMap ♦674 | Vienu un to pašu tie gluži neapzīmē. [1]`highway=*`+`area=yes` ir plaša vieta, kur nevar noteikt celiņu "virzienu". Parasti ar to ir daudz savienojumi un faktiski pārvietošanās ir visos virzienos. Konkrēti `highway=pedestrian`+`area=yes` nāk klāt nozīme, ... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-02 13:32 | somehundred ♦98 | Jā, šo vietu tiešām var uzskatīt arī kā `area:highway=footway`. Tikai man jebkuru platu gājēju laukumu gribās tagot kā `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes`, jo tad tas parādās kartē. Tad citi zin, ka tajā vietā ir kaut kāds laukums nevis tikai parasts šaurs celiņ&sc... | |
| 4 | 2024-10-07 08:53 | richlv | Ja tas ir pietiekami plats, lai to nevarētu uzskatīt tikai par "platāku celiņu", IMHO pieņemami ir highway=footway + area=yes . | |
| 5 | 2024-10-07 09:01 | somehundred ♦98 | Tā ir lieliska ideja! Taču iD vienmēr sūdzās, ja šādi tago. | |
| 6 | 2024-10-07 09:24 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, kā minēju, `highway=*`+`area=yes` ir "plaša vieta", bet tikai tas arī nozīmē, ka maršrutēšana visos virzienos. Bet šitas celiņš pievienojas vienā galā piebraucamajam ceļam un otrā galā celiņiem, bet pa vidu ir vienkārši plats. Fa... | |
| 157564704 by rain_99 @ 2024-10-07 05:02 | 1 | 2024-10-07 08:43 | richlv | Hi, thank you for the map contributions.OpenStreetMap changeset comments serve as a way to better understand the changes other mappers make - collaboration is crucial.Could you please consider a bit more informative comments instead of "123", "321" etc? |
| 156862502 by Big Knoop @ 2024-09-20 11:14 | 1 | 2024-09-20 11:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi,Just wanted to let you know that typically private residential areas like this when traced within "blocks" are only drawn to the (cadastral) property lines. Usually to the fence/hedge or something. Of course, there are 100s of exceptions in real-life, but the general principle is to... |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 11:48 | Big Knoop ♦1 | That makes sense, thanks for letting me know. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-21 16:51 | richlv | It's also not strictly defined - for example, personally I prefer more broad residential landuse mapping, not trying to follow every nook and cranny of every fence, path or lawn :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/56.505218/27.359412 being a somewhat recent example area. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-21 17:02 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, like mentioned - lots of styles and preferences and everything has exceptions. The one problem with large mapped areas like that example is that you couldn't add something like `residential=single_family` or `access=private` since that would then be a mistake (roads aren't private an... | |
| 156436588 by HellMap @ 2024-09-10 11:51 | 1 | 2024-09-14 06:26 | richlv | Kaut kad jāiezīmē, kaut kad jāiezīmē...Ā, nokavēju :D |
| 2 | 2024-09-14 08:38 | HellMap ♦674 | Es jau arī gribēju ierobežojumus salikt, bet ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156369107 ... | |
| 156355001 by Jānis Upenieks @ 2024-09-08 14:37 | 1 | 2024-09-08 16:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši ir domāts are šo izmaiņu? Kādā veidā (zīmes, norādes, noteikumi) tieši velosipēdiem šajās divās vietās ir ierobežota piekļuve un norādīta kā "klientiem"? Vai tas neattiecas arī uz citiem transportlīdz... |
| 2 | 2024-09-10 19:10 | richlv | Kartes skatā šķiet, ka varētu būt domāts vispārējs access, vai arī motor_vehicle. | |
| 156200027 by streckengaenger21 @ 2024-09-04 18:35 | 1 | 2024-09-05 11:58 | Colbertson ♦104 | Hey, have you considered doing your abandoned railway mapping on https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ ?Itd be nice to not have things that no longer exist in OSM. |
| 2 | 2024-09-06 18:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Yes, please map what is on the ground. If there are any visible traces that a road or track or something were a railway, then it's fine to add former railway tags. But if there is absolutely nothing on the ground, then there should not be any tagged features, for example over completely rebuilt... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-10 19:09 | richlv | The relation in question was deleted with a comment "Some people state that this information is useless in OSM. Sorry for all cyclists who plan bicycle tours along old railway tracks".That does not seem correct - if there is a cycling route (and thus paths, tracks etc), that is highly ... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-11 09:00 | HellMap ♦674 | This also doesn't only apply to this particular changeset, but all of them. There is no problem mapping route relations if they have some sort of identifiable remains. The problem is all the sections that don't exist on the ground that are mapped as real features, such as https://www.opens... | |
| 155962737 by Janis_Puga @ 2024-08-30 08:54 | 1 | 2024-09-05 17:02 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Vai šeit veloceļš fiziski nodalīts no brauktuves? |
| 2 | 2024-09-06 10:34 | Janis_Puga ♦2 | Sveiki!Paldies par ziņu. Atsevišķās vietās nodalīts ar mazajām barjerām, bet lielākoties ir nenodalīts. Kā Jums liekas, varbūt šajā gadījumā labāk tomēr atstāt statusu ielai un dzēst veloceļu kā atsevišķu objektu blakus ielai? | |
| 3 | 2024-09-06 12:21 | HellMap ♦674 | Ja vietām fiziski nodalīts (ar barjerām u.c.), tad bieži tiešām zīmē kā atdalītu. Drīzāk atkarīgs, cik tur to nodalījumu - vai labāk uzskatīt ceļu kā atsevišķu vai vienkārši to pašu brauktuvi.Es tā saprotu, ka vienā pusē josla aiz parkinga - to p... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-10 19:03 | richlv | Laikam līdzīgi skatītos - ja mainās nodalīts/nē, paliktu pie atsevišķi iezīmēta. Bet ja nav viennozīmīgi, tad kā vietējie kartētāji nolemj, tā ir labi :) | |
| 5 | 2024-09-10 19:04 | richlv | Un jebkādas OSM tēmas noteikti laipni gaidītas Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 155316461 by richlv @ 2024-08-16 08:52 | 1 | 2024-08-16 10:44 | thautal ♦34 | Hello! Can you elobrate why did you mark these as access=private? They already had access:conditional and the property is part of university so accessible to public. |
| 2 | 2024-08-17 09:40 | richlv | Oh, sorry if that's wrong - the gates at both ends were locked.Admittedly, didn't notice the conditional on the phone, but checking it now - it was during the supposedly accessible period (around 10 on a Friday).Could the access conditions have changed? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-19 08:17 | thautal ♦34 | No worries! It should be open, but maybe it's closed for some reason during summer. I need to check it again at some time, I will leave it as it is for now. | |
| 154468187 by didier2020 @ 2024-07-27 05:41 | 1 | 2024-07-27 16:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Can I ask how exactly you are determining that features are duplicates?For example, for this camera POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021/history , the location here indeed has two cameras on either side of the shop doors: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278736972142704... |
| 2 | 2024-07-28 14:09 | richlv | Could it be safer to revert the changeset and redo valid fixes? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-29 13:05 | didier2020 ♦91 | Hello,changeset is reverted.For example, for this camera POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442716021https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9442707523this 2 node had exactly the same tags and exactly same geometry (lat and lon)so there are duplicated since you had to add another... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-29 13:19 | didier2020 ♦91 | or change the lat and lon for ex, lat lon of nodes1812435083 and 1715103641 (right and left of the door of mapillary's photo) | |
| 154061036 by thetorturedpoetsdepartment @ 2024-07-17 14:23 | 1 | 2024-07-25 11:34 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,It looks like you are again incorrectly specifying and changing landuse areas. For example, you changed grass to non-existent parks, allotments to meadow, etc.I previously asked you about this kind of changes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151360724 , but did not receive a ... |
| 2 | 2024-07-28 13:55 | richlv | Please also consider joining the OSM Latvian community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 153751609 by Cucazer @ 2024-07-09 16:29 | 1 | 2024-07-14 17:58 | Mezonens ♦13 | Hi!I surveyed the situation in nature and made some changes to the geometry and attributes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153941266 |
| 2 | 2024-07-16 15:20 | Cucazer ♦60 | Thanks!So you mean that some of the cutlines are not usable as track/path? I guess, it's not confidently identifiable just from the aerial imagery. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-16 19:53 | Mezonens ♦13 | Hmm... well, cutlines are essentially drivable if you have a good off-road vehicle, like a Lada Niva. And sometimes they are also used as tracks, but in forestry, these strips are created to separate forest blocks. However, cutline=firebreak is plowed every year to limit the spread of fire through t... | |
| 4 | 2024-07-17 08:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Cutlines that are usable as tracks should indeed have both `man_made=cutline` and `highway=track` (or have two lines for one each). Usually it would be grade 5 tracks with very low smoothness. There's a fairly low "standard" for what is considered a track. Something where only a fore... | |
| 5 | 2024-07-17 13:33 | Mezonens ♦13 | Thank you for the explanation. From now on, for man_made=cutline ways, if I see that they are used for transportation purposes, I will also apply highway=track. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-28 13:45 | richlv | Yep, it was intended that =cutline marks actual cutlines only, and any navigable features are tagged on top of it as needed.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3DcutlineAs the inventor of that tag, thank you so much for using and improving it :) | |
| 104816326 by Ieronimus @ 2021-05-17 10:06 | 1 | 2022-03-06 21:06 | richlv | Hi, this changeset changed this whole path to access=private : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164510899 .Is the whole path not accessible?If so, what about the offshoot paths, viewpoints along it? |
| 2 | 2024-06-23 10:59 | lukie80 ♦14 | Seems valid. According to "Catastro Spain" layer, all paths lay within the same parcels. Also the German hiking guide "Rother Wanderführer" warns about the land owner and mentions barriers. Welcome to Spanish laws. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-23 23:07 | richlv | Thanks, what about the side/offshoot paths, viewpoints along it? That would make them all =private, too. | |
| 4 | 2024-06-24 19:20 | lukie80 ♦14 | If the claim of private property is correct, all side paths are most likely affected. I've removed access=private on parts of the paths which are on public land. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-22 06:52 | lukie80 ♦14 | Have been there 2024.07. All paths are blocked by a fence or a gate. According to a Masca supervising personnel the owner was fed up with vandalism and gated his property. In romanic countries public access rights don't exist, so the current state is correct. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-22 20:12 | richlv | The linked section is not marked as private anymore, though. | |
| 153751883 by mrmaxguns @ 2024-07-09 16:36 | 1 | 2024-07-12 06:06 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | They don't sell even a single vegetable/fruit, impossible to be shop=greengrocer. |
| 2 | 2024-07-13 21:26 | richlv | What should it be? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-14 06:19 | mrmaxguns ♦3 | Meats, cheeses, mostly. I misinterpreted what "produce stand" meant on Street complete. Don't see it as primarily a cafe. Maybe butcher? | |
| 4 | 2024-07-14 07:18 | richlv | If this is similar to other Enhars, it might be a bit difficult to classify in OSM. They sit somwhere between convenience, deli, butcher...The one in Jugla has been approximated to convenience with a separate cafe node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11670118102 .Would that be acceptable her... | |
| 5 | 2024-07-14 07:37 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Yes, with Enhars it's a bit complicated as they differ from each other also. This one has a butcher, pastry, ability to order a coffee and a table with a pairs of chairs, if I remember correctly. | |
| 6 | 2024-07-30 20:03 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Corrected to more suitable tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154621988 | |
| 153869473 by richlv @ 2024-07-12 19:26 | 1 | 2024-07-13 08:23 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai te arī dzīvojamā zona mainījusies vai arī klasifikācija ne tā ap https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084714523 ? |
| 2 | 2024-07-13 10:04 | richlv | Oi, nepievērsu tam uzmanību - paskatīšos bildēs drīz. Paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 3 | 2024-07-13 20:52 | richlv | Nu, nav visas zīmes [vēl]...Šur tur saliku kā living_street, bet būs vēl jāpārbauda, kad viss būs līdz galam sabūvēts. Pieliku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4332122 . | |
| 151284291 by artuuurs @ 2024-05-13 20:11 | 1 | 2024-07-01 21:12 | richlv | Sveiki, te dažiem rotaļu laukumiem noņēmu name="Private playground" - tas tomēr nav nosaukums, OSM to apzīmē ar access=private. Tas šiem trim ir pievienots. |
| 2 | 2024-07-01 21:22 | artuuurs ♦20 | Es jau gaidīju, ka drīz pamanīsi un noņemsi, jo mums nesen bija līdzīga sarakste par name. Paldies! Vajadzēja jau man pašam noņemt. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-01 21:23 | artuuurs ♦20 | Ā, sorry, diskusija droši bija ar HellMap. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-02 20:33 | richlv | Kaut ko varbūt par parkingu nosaukumiem runājām, bet jebkurā gadījumā - viss kārtībā, kopā palēnām karti uzlabojam :) | |
| 123445488 by somix @ 2022-07-10 19:59 | 1 | 2024-07-01 21:18 | richlv | Te šur tur arī stāvvietu joslas utml. nelieli ceļi bij dabūjuši living_street - daļu nedaudz pielaboju atpakaļ uz "service". |
| 153401607 by HellMap @ 2024-07-01 09:00 | 1 | 2024-07-01 20:30 | richlv | Šis padara nepieejamu arī https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787175064/history - varbūt vērts tā pievienošanās punktā dalīt serviceway un atstāt tā austrumu posmiņu pieejamu? |
| 2 | 2024-07-01 20:36 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, kaut kā to taku pat nepamanīju. Sadalīju. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-01 20:44 | richlv | Super, paldies :) | |
| 153263924 by Ceroklis @ 2024-06-27 19:53 | 1 | 2024-06-27 20:29 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Please don't add `addr:country` to random features that are not generally addressable entities (like a building or a shop). They do not have an official addresses and should not be using address tags, especially when it's just the country and nothing else.Thanks |
| 2 | 2024-07-01 08:15 | richlv | Ko ar šo addr:country labāk darīt, datu tīrības dēļ ņemt nost? | |
| 3 | 2024-07-01 08:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Bots tos tik un tā notīrīs, tāpēc es manuāli neaiztiku. | |
| 153201443 by edzuslv @ 2024-06-26 12:53 | 1 | 2024-06-27 19:39 | richlv | It kā sanāk blakus Evelatus - bet varbūt tas ir cits stāvs? |
| 2 | 2024-06-27 19:51 | edzuslv ♦2 | Evelatus ir blakus, jā. H&M gan otrajā stāvā. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-28 21:47 | richlv | Tātad Evelatus ir pirmajā stāvā (level=0), tāpat kā defibrilators?Vaicāju, jo Evelatus nav norādīta stāva info.Te vispār lielai daļai veikalu nav stāvu info, bet tā laikam plašāka tēma :)https://openlevelup.net/?l=1#18/56.93485/24.14416 | |
| 4 | 2024-06-29 14:38 | somehundred ♦98 | Īstenībā defibrilators ir vairāk uz labo pusi, tuvāk autostāvvietai, pretī bankomātiem pāri highway=footway. Kartē precīzu pozīciju nevaru atzīmēt, jo iekštelpu kartēšana ir sarežģīta. Jau tā ir daudz kas šeit galīgi šķībi atzīmēts. | |
| 5 | 2024-06-29 15:51 | edzuslv ♦2 | Piekrītu, es pēc tā augšas kupola vadījos. 😀 | |
| 152832130 by MārisD @ 2024-06-18 06:45 | 1 | 2024-06-20 18:26 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Vai internetā ir kādi resursi par šo restorānu?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989599110 |
| 2 | 2024-06-20 20:28 | MārisD ♦1 | Paldies par jautājumu! Nosaukums tomēr ir SIIL. Interneta resursos ir par restorānu SIIL. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-20 23:05 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies.Pievienoju arī epastu un telefonu no https://liepaja.travel/edinasana/restorans-siil/ .Spriežot pēc pieejamās informācijas, tas nav saīsinājums - nomainīju uz "sentence case". | |
| 152747270 by Stendera biedrība @ 2024-06-16 06:57 | 1 | 2024-06-17 19:31 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Veicu nelielas izmaiņas - tā kā OpenStreetMap gandrīz vienmēr izmantojami pilni nosaukumi, nomainīju saīsinājumus.Saskaņā ar https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun%C4%81kstes_luter%C4%81%C5%86u_bazn%C4%ABca , "Sunākstes Baltā baznīca" ... |
| 115141893 by arcth @ 2021-12-19 22:58 | 1 | 2024-06-10 10:28 | richlv | Sveiki, šeit bez diskusijas tika noņemts nosaukums, mājaslapu linki - kādēļ tā?Šādās situācijās noteikti vajadzētu apspriesties Latvijas OSM kopienā, šobrīd vislabākā vieta - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381734745/his... |
| 2 | 2024-06-17 11:10 | arcth ♦35 | Labdien!Jau dažus gadu desmitus tas nav "slepenais objekts", nekas saistīts ar sakariem vai radio/TV tur arī nav palicis. Turklāt, cik es zinu, "rezerves teleradio centrs" bija citā vietā. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-17 11:41 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi.Vai pareizi sapratu, ka diggers.lv atsauce atbilst, bet tas būtu vienkārši bijušais ~"Sakaru tīkls "Iskra". Objekts 535"? | |
| 152643675 by TheWildFox @ 2024-06-13 17:31 | 1 | 2024-06-13 19:14 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Vai šie ceļi ir apzīmēti ar (zilo) dzīvojamās zonas zīmi? |
| 2 | 2024-06-17 12:45 | TheWildFox ♦1 | Nē, nekādu zīmju nebija. Smainīju uz residental. Cerams būs pareizi. | |
| 152600773 by Lussii @ 2024-06-12 18:24 | 1 | 2024-06-13 09:10 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Nosaukums palicis iepriekšējais citos posmos - vai būtu vēlme arī tos salabot?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875285180https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875285181Vēl laikam būtu vērts vienādot ar šī posma kartējumu... |
| 149911566 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2024-04-12 13:39 | 1 | 2024-06-12 21:16 | richlv | Te ir divi "outer" ceļi, vai mazākajam vajadzēja būt "inner"?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17462424/history |
| 2 | 2024-06-13 10:58 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Ja ātrijs, tad jau būs inner. Samainīju. | |
| 135601874 by kautkas @ 2023-05-02 06:50 | 1 | 2024-06-09 19:31 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Could you please clarify what specifically on these paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166854394 make them private access? Are there signs or some such? This path crosses other paths and then connects to paths that were previously surveyed. Currently, the path under the bridge is... |
| 2 | 2024-06-10 09:59 | richlv | My first take would be "remove & clarify later" to preserve map usefulness - for example, also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372863312 (which seems unlikely, there are no signs of any access restrictions in the cemetery). | |
| 3 | 2024-06-10 18:29 | HellMap ♦674 | I decided to pick this route for today's survey. I had this planned before, but routing created weirdness here, which is why I asked. The one path that is still not made private access is what threw me off. Anyway, this whole area is actually now fenced off and currently no entry. https://imgur... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-14 11:50 | HellMap ♦674 | I have adjusted the West side of the area for now. It seems much of the construction and forestry works happened recently. There's a fence now with only a couple entrances and both are signed with no access signage. Seems like the area is going to be a recreation area but private/customer acces... | |
| 152405219 by HellMap @ 2024-06-08 09:19 | 1 | 2024-06-09 18:35 | richlv | Kuros datos/orto redzamas šīs ēkas, piem., https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290407963/history ?Paskatījos Orto_LKS un ESRI, VZD ēku kontūrās - nekur nemanīju. |
| 2 | 2024-06-09 18:45 | HellMap ♦674 | Kadastrā. Es nezinu, kāds VZD slānis tev ir, bet iD standarta kadastrs vai arī tas LVM salīmētais. Bet jebkurā gadījumā, tur tavā Mapillary arī visi redzami kā jau gatavi. Es to tavu kaļķu torni saskatīt centos. :D | |
| 3 | 2024-06-09 19:24 | richlv | Āāāā. Tik precīzi no kadastra, ka datu līnijas pilnībā paslēpa.Kadastrā liela iespēja, ka neprecīzi, bet to jau no svaigākiem orto pēc tam varēs.Ceplis te redzams, būs arī svaigākas bildes drīz :)https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=298098425264434 | |
| 4 | 2024-06-09 20:43 | HellMap ♦674 | Es jau neko vairāk par aptuvenu kvadrātiņu arī nezīmēju šitādiem. Tur jau kadastrā vēl ar visādiem izbīdījumiem.Foršas bij. vējdzirnavas! | |
| 98532529 by arcth @ 2021-02-01 20:16 | 1 | 2024-06-07 22:03 | richlv | Hehe, šis labs - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8385148144 iezīmēts kā vējdzirnavas, bet šī ir viena no tām viltīgajām lietām, kura ir kas cits ;)Es te biju 2020-07-15, un arī gandrīz šo kā vējdzirnavas iezīmēju, bet tad uzzināju, ka tas ir bijis kas cits... |
| 2 | 2024-06-08 09:00 | Colbertson ♦104 | Tātad historic=lime_kiln? | |
| 3 | 2024-06-09 18:41 | richlv | Paldies, jā - tobrīd nebija laika visu salikt :)Noskaidroju un pieliku arī ēkai start_date un vēl šādas tādas detaļas. | |
| 140153249 by riharcc @ 2023-08-20 21:52 | 1 | 2024-06-07 10:40 | richlv | Sveiki, šeit ietvēm kontūras iezīmētas kā highway=pedestrian. Tas ir apzīmējums, kuru galvenokārt izmanto gājēju ielām - ietvju kontūrām piemērotāks būtu area:highway=footway[1].https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3DfootwayVai to būtu iespēja nomain... |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 13:56 | riharcc ♦2 | Darīts, skat.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152378015#map=17/56.49792/25.85675 | |
| 3 | 2024-06-07 18:53 | richlv | Liels paldies - tehniski tiem laukumiem, kuri ir tikai garenvirziena ietve, piemērotāks būtu minētais area:highway=footway , bet tā varētu nebūt tik kritiska lieta :) | |
| 152269986 by Mezonens @ 2024-06-05 05:21 | 1 | 2024-06-06 10:33 | Colbertson ♦104 | whyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17677881this has no reason to be a multipolygon |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 15:24 | Mezonens ♦13 | The boundary of the Swamp polygon (way) is simultaneously its outer boundary and the inner boundary of the wood polygon. A multipolygon is necessary here to avoid overlapping of the two polygons and to reduce the number of geometries. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-07 15:33 | Colbertson ♦104 | you can just add swamp tags on the wood multipolygon inner way instead of a new single-member multipolygon | |
| 4 | 2024-06-07 15:46 | Mezonens ♦13 | As far as I understand, natural=wetland can only be a polygon and cannot be a way. | |
| 5 | 2024-06-07 16:33 | Colbertson ♦104 | polygon yeah whatever its calledhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840931136i mean something like this, its tagged as a lake and its also a member of the big multipolygonno need for multiple multipolygons | |
| 6 | 2024-06-07 17:05 | Mezonens ♦13 | Understood now. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am a relatively new OSM mapper and there are things I still don't fully understand. :) | |
| 7 | 2024-06-07 18:49 | richlv | Yay, thank you both - and discussions are also welcome in the Latvian OSM community chat: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 150250881 by somix @ 2024-04-20 07:47 | 1 | 2024-04-20 09:49 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Are you sure you are doing these highway area conversions correctly?My understanding is that `area:highway` is the geometry of a single road - basically representing the same thing as the road way, but full width/shape. It is generally implied all travel happens along the main way and n... |
| 2 | 2024-06-07 10:44 | richlv | Jā, šis neizskatās līdz galam pareizi, nomainīšu uz area=yes.Šo arī būtu jauki apspriest OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com | |
| 152322254 by ItsMikyyy @ 2024-06-06 09:33 | 1 | 2024-06-07 10:33 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Daži precizējoši jautājumi.a) Droši vien šiem int_name jāņem nost?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124358221/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124353012/historyb) Vai šī joprojām ir skola? Ja tā, kā... |
| 47870537 by richlv @ 2017-04-17 13:08 | 1 | 2024-05-11 16:00 | HellMap ♦674 | A kas tas tāds ir/bija te? 2017 Mapillary tikai stāvvieta. |
| 2 | 2024-05-11 18:46 | richlv | ĀĀĀ, droši vien barrier=chain, tajā laikā maps.me bija praktiski vienīgā mobilā appa, un tur bija ļoti ierobežoti POI tipi :) | |
| 3 | 2024-05-26 14:35 | somehundred ♦98 | Var šo dzēst ārā, ja? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-26 20:39 | richlv | Derētu kādas svaigas bildes un pārbaudīt, kas tajā stūrī tagad ir sazīmējams, ja jau sākām skatīties :) | |
| 5 | 2024-06-07 09:36 | richlv | Ķēde redzama apakšējā kreisajā stūrī te - bet bildei jau 7 gadi.https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=550282825959539 | |
| 143306702 by Tripsix @ 2023-10-29 10:57 | 1 | 2024-06-06 09:51 | richlv | Sveiki, izskatās, ka te bārs pārtapis par apģērbu veikalu - droši vien netīšām?Atcēlu pēdējās divas izmaiņu kopas. |
| 2 | 2024-06-06 09:52 | richlv | Piemirsu iekopēt objekta linku, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6521600285/history . | |
| 148382505 by richlv @ 2024-03-08 12:37 | 1 | 2024-06-03 11:49 | HellMap ♦674 | Tur tiešām abi Itella? |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 12:03 | richlv | Cik atceros, tur bija jocīgi, ka blakus divi viena uzņēmuma pakomāti, jā. | |
| 151363500 by somehundred @ 2024-05-15 14:13 | 1 | 2024-05-30 16:58 | richlv | Sveiki, pamanīju, ka dažas ēkas diezgan šķības, piem., https://imgur.com/a/bHahzPc .Ja tas noticis tādēļ, ka pieejamie ortofoto nav bijuši pietiekami labi, noteikti vērts pāriet uz LVM uzturēto LĢIA slāni - tas ir šobrīd vislabākais visā Latvijā pieejamais o... |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 17:56 | somehundred ♦98 | Es pārsvarā zīmēju no Esri, jo gandrīz visur Esri ir paši jaunākie attēli. Man nepatīk Esri sliktā kvalitāte, zinu, ka mūsējais Ortofoto ir pašā augstākajā kvalitātē un ar to būtu patīkamāk kartēt, taču, lai kartē nejauši neiezīmētu vecus elementus, izma... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-30 18:15 | somehundred ♦98 | Esri īstenībā rāda ortofoto no diviem laika periodiem. Ļoti liels tuvinājums automātiski pāriet uz ļoti vecu ortofoto, kamēr ne tik tuvs, normāls, tuvinājums rāda ortofoto, kas jaunāks par lvmgeo ortofoto. Arī šis ir ļoti kaitinoši, taču tam var pielāgoties. | |
| 4 | 2024-05-31 09:47 | HellMap ♦674 | Pieminēšu, ka ESRI mazākā tuvinājumā ārpus lielajām pilsētām izmanto tās pašas bildes, ko Bing un Mapbox - laikam Maxar satelītus. Tikai viņiem nobīdes dažādas pēc procesēšanas. | |
| 5 | 2024-05-31 10:42 | somehundred ♦98 | Tiešām, HellMap! Šķiet, šo jau biju pamanījis agrāk, taču īsti nebiju pievērsis uzmanību. Bing ir nobīde, tāpēc es to arī neizmantoju.Starp citu Rīgā visjaunākais ir Esri. Apskatiet šo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158290993 stadionu galvenajos 4 or... | |
| 6 | 2024-05-31 10:59 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, manā komentārā jau bija pieminēts "ārpus lielajām pilsētām" ;) Cik es zinu, satelītu tuvās bildes ir ļoti dārgi taisīt un licenzēt, tāpēc faktiski tas notiek tikai blīvi apdzīvotās vietās. Es neesmu skatījies konkrēti, kur vēl ir sīkā izšķirtspēja, be... | |
| 7 | 2024-05-31 17:22 | richlv | Jā, tas noteikti ir super, ja pārbauda, kurš ortofoto slānis ir jaunāks.Ja tam ir nobīde vai ne tik laba izšķirtspēja, tad gan ir vērts pielāgot LVMa versijai - vai nu uzzīmējot objektus citā slānī un tad pielīdzinot precīzajam, vai tam citam slānim uzliekot pareiz... | |
| 151890746 by grinvaldsjanis @ 2024-05-27 10:20 | 1 | 2024-05-30 10:28 | somehundred ♦98 | Sveiki.Lūdzu ņemiet vērā, ka nevajag dzēst ceļus tikai tādēļ, ka pa tiem braukt nedrīkst. Ja braukt nedrīkst tad ir jāpieliek access=private tags klāt un ar to būs pietiekami.Jādzēš ārā kaut kas tikai tad, ja konkrētais elements neeksistē. |
| 2 | 2024-05-30 16:26 | richlv | Tas būs labāk arī tādēļ, ka vienkārši izdzēstus ceļus kāds cits var iezīmēt atpakaļ - bet nu jau bez access taga.OSM vienmēr zīmējam visu, kas eksistē, un pievienojam papildapzīmējumus, lai norādītu piekļuvi u.c. detaļas. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-30 16:30 | richlv | Pievienoju vidus segmentu ar access=private - vai izskatās labi? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-30 16:56 | somehundred ♦98 | Izskatās labi. | |
| 149487679 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2024-04-02 15:34 | 1 | 2024-04-05 18:15 | richlv | Sveiki, šis izskatās mazliet aizdomīgi kopā ar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149487227 .Šobrīd kā highway=construction is apzīmēti vairāki samērā gari ceļa posmi.highway=construction nozīmē ceļu, kurš tiek būvēts - tātad pa to nav iespējama moto... |
| 2 | 2024-04-06 09:08 | HellMap ♦674 | `highway=construction` teorētiski var braukt, ja ir pielikts `access`. Nezinu, vai mēs arī tā gribam likt, jo rūteri kā kurš (ne)saprot. Es šeit iepriekš biju paskatījies izmaiņas, lai visur būtu vismaz access un pielaboju. Bet nebiju galveno tegu aizticis.No izmai... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-06 13:32 | richlv | Ļoti daudzi maršrutētāji nemācēs, jo īpaši dažādi offline, slēgtie utt.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction īpaši norādīts "currently under construction and impassable by the traffic it is intended for".Šobrīd Zemīte... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-06 13:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, drošvien labāk atlikt atpakaļ pilno klasifikāciju (izņemot to vienu gabalu).Var pielikt `construction=minor`, ja kāds to apņemas pēc tam arī noņemt. | |
| 5 | 2024-04-06 13:47 | richlv | Emīl, vai varētu precizēt, kuri posmi pilnībā slēgti satiksmei?Par Graphopper - es pat nezinu, vai tas nav datu atjaunošanas aiztures dēļ. Maršrutēšana pa =construction nešķiet atbilstoši agrākam lietojumam un wiki aprakstam. | |
| 6 | 2024-05-26 21:04 | richlv | Izbraucu tur piektdien - ceļš šur tur pa vienu joslu ar luksoforiem, bet braucams. Tātad noteikti nav highway=construction.=construction pilnībā pazūd no tālākiem zūmleveļiem, un pilnībā pazūd no Garmin iekārtām (kā man bija...).Atliku atpakaļ uz highway=primary, no... | |
| 151768390 by Daidamb @ 2024-05-24 12:52 | 1 | 2024-05-26 18:25 | richlv | Thank you for the map updates.According to the official cadastre data, the east-west segment has no name, update accordingly. |
| 117296649 by artuuurs @ 2022-02-11 17:33 | 1 | 2024-05-22 20:15 | richlv | Skatoties uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9468467235 , droši vien būtu jāņem nost name* - varbūt uz description jāpārliek.Kā ar access, vai =customers būtu pareizi? |
| 2 | 2024-05-22 22:00 | artuuurs ♦20 | Jā, tā gan jau ir pareizāk. Tu jau esi eksperts :) Un tur tagad ir viesu māja uztaisīta, nezinu, vai parkings tai ir tieši tajā vietā vai nedaudz citā. Ja turpat, tad tas vairs nav tikai "ski parking". Varu uzjautāt īpašniekam. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-23 08:42 | richlv | Visi jau mēs te kopā veidojam "ekspertumu" :)Šobrīd pārliku "name" uz "description" un pieliku access=customers - šķiet, tas pagaidām pietiekami. | |
| 151689962 by ttomst @ 2024-05-22 18:00 | 1 | 2024-05-23 08:40 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par burvīgajiem kartes papildinājumiem.Šim veikalam (?) Hellmap mazliet precizēja tipu.Tā kā šai ēkai laikam nav piešķirta oficiāla adrese, to pagaidām noņēmu.Un, ja vēl nav bijusi iespēja pievienoties, laipni aicinām Latvijas OSM ko... |
| 151681964 by ttomst @ 2024-05-22 15:24 | 1 | 2024-05-22 20:20 | richlv | Pirmajam labojumam burvīgi, liels paldies :)Pāris sīkumi - oficiālā adrešu sintakse mazliet atšķiras, skat. Hellmap veikto labojumu.Es nedaudz vienkāršoju darba laika pierakstu - tas bija pareizs, bet "We,Fr" apvienošana to padara nedaudz īsāku ... |
| 2 | 2024-05-23 17:33 | ttomst ♦1 | Paldies! | |
| 9516384 by richlv @ 2011-10-09 19:32 | 1 | 2024-05-21 11:26 | somehundred ♦98 | Sveiki! Ko bijāt domājis, atzīmējot kartē https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1460453428? Es satelītattēlā neredzu neko, kas atbilstu tourism=attraction tagam. |
| 2 | 2024-05-21 11:30 | richlv | Ļoti labs jautājums. Pirms 12 gadiem, JOSM... šis izskatās pēc netīša punkta, dzēšam ārā :) | |
| 3 | 2024-05-21 12:58 | somehundred ♦98 | Izdzēsu! | |
| 4 | 2024-05-21 19:31 | richlv | Super, liels paldies par pamanīšanu un uzlabošanu. | |
| 122685588 by Riggwelter @ 2022-06-21 20:56 | 1 | 2024-05-19 17:08 | richlv | Hi, this changeset has changed isolated_dwelling to locality, for example, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2073687599/history .As per OSM wiki, "place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location for which there is no extant feature to which the tag could be associated", ... |
| 151251769 by Markalex2209 @ 2024-05-13 06:38 | 1 | 2024-05-14 13:05 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Just a note that you should not change any objects solely to render on the default map. OSM is used by many maps and data consumers and what is rendered or parsed is different. For example, tagging this as a separate building means that the data now contains a separate building here (even if ... |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 22:47 | Markalex2209 ♦6 | Thanks for correcting!I had same exact problem with somewhat similar "air corridor" here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475617182I fixed it in a similar way, as you explained. I still fill a bit confused regarding path underneath. Once I extended building and added building p... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-14 23:00 | HellMap ♦674 | Sure thing!Warnings will happen, but they are just warnings - if the tagging and geometry are correct, then they can be ignored. The iD editor is not very good with complex situations with levels and building parts and often complains about stuff and offers incorrect fixes. Technically, the poin... | |
| 4 | 2024-05-15 05:48 | Markalex2209 ♦6 | Not great. As a novice in tagging, I try to err on side of caution. And when I see warnings, I assume that it's my fault, not editor's (except for obviously ignored by somebody else previously warnings, like happens a lot with crossings). | |
| 5 | 2024-05-15 09:25 | richlv | The standard and documented practice (for example, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage ) is to have shared nodes where ways pass buildings in this way. | |
| 6 | 2024-05-15 09:28 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, it's not great. But warnings are technically not errors. So you don't HAVE to follow them - the software doesn't always know.By the way, most crossing warnings can be fixed - these are more like "upgrades". The crossing tagging scheme was standardized not too long ... | |
| 7 | 2024-05-15 09:53 | HellMap ♦674 | @rich: True building passages where the way goes *through* (like many Soviet apartment blocks have around her) are indeed generally connected and this doesn't stop routing. This here isn't a building passage but a sky bridge. It's more similar to a bridge area - you wouldn't conn... | |
| 24425344 by HellMap @ 2014-07-29 16:23 | 1 | 2024-05-14 18:52 | richlv | Was this small landuse=residential intended like this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294977510 |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 19:02 | HellMap ♦674 | I have no recollection of this ;)I think this was supposed to be a building from the terplāns. I changed it to a building, although tree cover prevents me from confirming. And it's not on cadaster, but the terplan included a bunch "unofficial" buildings like that, so it either ex... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-14 19:20 | richlv | Neato, thanks :) | |
| 151244877 by Reinis Bērziņš @ 2024-05-12 23:24 | 1 | 2024-05-14 13:21 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Vienu kapsētu vairākos gabalos zīmēt nevajadzētu, jo tad te datos sanāk ir 3 atsevišķas kapsētas (ar vienādiem nosaukumiem). Tā vietā, konkrēti kapsētām, katru "apgabalu" var norādīt ar `cemetery=sector`.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%... |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 18:45 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Apvienoju 2 jaunākos sektorus vienā "Katlakalna kapi". Šī kapsēta nav digitalizēta, lai precīzāk iezīmētu sektorus. Agrāk šis ceļš iezīmēja faktisko kapsētas robežu - bija ārpus kapiem. Tagad arī otrpus ceļam izveidotas kapu vietas, bet vietējie &sca... | |
| 3 | 2024-05-14 19:18 | richlv | Liels paldies par burvīgo diskusiju un kartes papildinājumiem :)Runājot par brāļu kapiem, gribēju tik nedaudz pareklamēt potenciālus papildtagus:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dwar_cemetery | |
| 151274877 by Pilsetkartetajs @ 2024-05-13 16:18 | 1 | 2024-05-14 12:48 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Informācijai, vispārīgi sakot pamatgadījumos, ja ir ar zilo zīmi apzīmēta dzīvojamā zona, tad galvenos ceļus ir jāatzīmē kā dzīvojamās ielas neatkarīgi vai tur gar sāniem stāvvietas vai maģistrāle. Noteikumi iekšpagalmos (un stāvvietās) gandrīz sakrīt, bet ... |
| 2 | 2024-05-14 19:14 | richlv | Agrāk (nu jau droši vien pirms gadiem 10 :) ) vienojāmies, ka living_street ir tur, kur ir attiecīgās zīmes. Citur liekam service, potenciāli ar precizējošiem tagiem. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-16 06:10 | Pilsetkartetajs ♦8 | Sveiki, paldies par komentāriem!Nomainīju šeit ceļiem klasifikāciju, jo šai teritorijai pie šlagbaumiem ir privātās stāvvietas zīme (P burts ar papildzīmi), kas nozīmē, man liekas, ka visi ceļi māju pagalmā atrodas stāvlaukumā un ir attiecīgi service ceļi. | |
| 141253716 by saulsardzene @ 2023-09-14 11:44 | 1 | 2024-05-13 16:45 | richlv | Vai te agrāk bija kāda vizuāla informācija par veikalu?Dabā it kā nekas nav manāms:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=971421637824347 |
| 2 | 2024-05-13 17:22 | saulsardzene ♦1 | Jā, tur nav veikals, bet erycasynths instrumentu ražotne, komplektēšanas vieta, birojs, radošā darbnīca, no kuras arī sintezatori tiek izsūtīti pa visu pasauli. Nezināju, kādu labāk "tagu" likt. Ko ieteiktu? https://www.ericasynths.lv/ | |
| 3 | 2024-05-13 19:10 | richlv | Varbūt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=company ? | |
| 4 | 2024-05-14 07:24 | saulsardzene ♦1 | Paldies! Jā, šis laikam varētu būt atbilstošāk. | |
| 112262265 by IvarioLV @ 2021-10-08 12:10 | 1 | 2024-05-03 18:09 | richlv | Sveiki, pamanīju, ka šajā izmaiņu kopā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268498822/history "source" tagam pievienots "Balticmaps".Tā kā šīs izmaiņas ir no 2021. gada, iespējams, viss jau atrisināts - bet drošības labad jāpiemin, ka OSM nedrīk... |
| 150591926 by Colbertson @ 2024-04-27 18:25 | 1 | 2024-04-27 18:26 | Colbertson ♦104 | Couldnt add some due to demolished or weirdly mapped buildings, oh well. |
| 2 | 2024-04-29 17:27 | richlv | Weirdly mapped could be fixed, demolished wouldn't fit in OSM, I guess :) | |
| 150577514 by Ansisr @ 2024-04-27 12:24 | 1 | 2024-04-27 21:50 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Thanks for you edits.Just wanted to let you know that technically none of the roads you tagged as `foot=no` have a legal restriction for pedestrians. Latvian Traffic Law allows pedestrians on pretty much any road. It may not be wise to walk on viaduct trunk roads like here, but it's ... |
| 2 | 2024-04-27 21:59 | Ansisr ♦1 | Hello,Thank you for the detailed reply. Yes, apparently my knowledge is limited regarding the laws, thank you for bringing your attention to this. And you are right - that one indeed has parked cars, somehow overlooked it.I will refrain from making such edits in future.Take care,Ansis | |
| 3 | 2024-04-29 16:56 | richlv | Thank you so much for map improvements and the considerate discussion.All discussions on OSM are also highly welcome in the Latvian OSM community chat - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 150394337 by Ir_jau_aizņemts_vārds @ 2024-04-23 12:53 | 1 | 2024-04-23 18:29 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par interesi par OpenStreetMap.Kāds ir pamatojums šīm izmaiņām? |
| 2 | 2024-04-24 05:48 | Ir_jau_aizņemts_vārds ♦1 | Labrīt!Strādāju Latvijas Ģeotelpiskajā informācijas aģentūrā. Bija lūgums no Aizsardzības Ministrijas šādu informāciju neattēlot. Līdzīgi kā citām līdzīgām vietām. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-24 22:47 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi. Šobrīd gan ar šāda veida izmaiņām ir dažādas problēmas, piemēram:1. Šī ir publiska, oficiāli izplatīta informācija: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/143599-par-nacionalo-brunoto-speku-vienibu-izvietojumu-miera-laikam2. Organizāciju veiktām i... | |
| 149828367 by herevii @ 2024-04-10 16:19 | 1 | 2024-04-24 14:52 | richlv | Paldies par autoservisa nosaukuma pievienošanu, tieši noderēja :) |
| 150344743 by Centra Nams Center Apartments @ 2024-04-22 12:33 | 1 | 2024-04-22 12:57 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Vai kaut kur internetā pieejama informācija par Centra namu?Vai tas aizņem visu ēku, vai arī šajā ēkā ir vēl kas cits? |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 17:01 | Centra Nams Center Apartments ♦1 | Sveiki, Drīzumā būs informācija, mājas lapa un naktsmītņu rezervēšanas kanāli tiks palaisti. Kopumā būs 8 īstermiņa īres dzīvokļi. Papildināju karti, lai varam viesiem norādīt stāvvietas iespējas SIA Madara 89 nekustamie īpašumi teritorijā.Privat bank nav ... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-22 18:37 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par atbildi.Vai šajā ēkas daļā būs tikai dzīvokļi?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67219242Īpašs paldies par Pasēdnīcas iezīmēšanu :)Citi kartētāji arī nedaudz pielaboja stāvvietu kartējumu u.c. detaļas - ja ir interese par s... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-22 18:57 | Centra Nams Center Apartments ♦1 | Šajā ēkas daļā ir apartamenti un Latio jeb LVKV birojs | |
| 5 | 2024-04-22 23:26 | richlv | Super, paldies - iespējams, tos būs labāk abus pievienot kā punktus. Apspriedīsimies kopienā. | |
| 150345836 by richlv @ 2024-04-22 12:56 | 1 | 2024-04-22 13:16 | HellMap ♦674 | Tu nosaukumu izlaboji, bet te palika vēl 2 punkti ar "nosaukumiem" [1], [2], adrese kafejnīcai bija salūzusi [3] kā arī "stāvvieta" ar šķībiem tegiem [4]. Es to visu arī izlaboju, bet te gan varēja revertu vispirms uztaisīt un tikai pareizo pielikt.[1] https... |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 16:07 | richlv | Liels paldies par pamanīšanu.Varēja pat droši revertēt manu un tad oriģinālo changesetu, ja tā būtu bijis vieglāk. | |
| 150034583 by Torators @ 2024-04-15 12:00 | 1 | 2024-04-15 19:00 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes papildinājumiem.Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272736698 jau izbūvēta kā pilnvērtīga iela visā garumā, vai arī vairāk atbilst track statusam?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack |
| 2 | 2024-04-20 10:10 | HellMap ♦674 | Šajā izmaiņā administratīvās teritorijas līnijai ir "pievienota" upe - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139504730 . Es šo noņēmu. | |
| 136144283 by Reinis Bērziņš @ 2023-05-15 21:56 | 1 | 2024-04-10 18:46 | richlv | Šim bija access=foot - tādu principā iesaka nelietot, nomainīju uz access=destination saskaņā ar šovakar novēroto :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154314648/historyhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Possible_tagging_mistakes |
| 2 | 2024-04-13 10:13 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Vai tur joprojām ir 302. zīme "Braukt aizliegts" (balts aplis ar sarkanu apmali)? Tātad pēc CSN arī ir pareizi access=destination. Lai gan dabā neizskatās, ka viņi gribēja ierobežot velosipēdistus. Un faktiski varētu ietagot arī motor_vehicle=destination. Bet labāk laikam ats... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-13 10:18 | richlv | Y, tieši tā zīme - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=452014137348057.Un jā, gan šo, gan ķieģeli Latvijā gandrīz visur liek ar domu tikai par auto. Velo papildzīmes tik tā lēnām sāk likt Rīgā. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-13 12:28 | HellMap ♦674 | Precizēšu - tā kā gājējiem šīs zīmes kustību neaizliedz, tad pēc OSM principiem tas ir `vehicle`. Šeit ar 302. tātad `vehicle=destination`. [1] Bet `access` gan nevajadzētu, jo tas tad aizliedz gājējiem - tad te vajadzētu vēl būt "staigāt aizliegts" z... | |
| 5 | 2024-04-13 12:36 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Jā, piekrītu, ka vehicle=destination būtu vispareizākā birka zīmei "Braukt aizliegts". access šeit netiek tiešā veidā ierobežots. | |
| 149835696 by richlv @ 2024-04-10 19:16 | 1 | 2024-04-13 09:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai tu esi pārliecināts, ka visa [1] iela ir ciet ar būvniecību? No [2] izskatās tā pat kā marta vidū - atļauts tikai taksometriem un pa vidu šur tur kaut kāda būvniecība, bet izbraukt var (un līdzīga situācija principā uz daudziem ceļiem un ietvēm). Mans Mapillary vēl nav ... |
| 2 | 2024-04-13 10:03 | richlv | Paldies par pamanīšanu, slēgts tiešām ir no plānotās Parka ielas - atjaunināju. | |
| 149882674 by epxmap @ 2024-04-11 21:17 | 1 | 2024-04-12 10:47 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Lūgums nepievienot ietvēm `bicycle=yes`, ja uz tām nav kaut kādā veidā speciāli norādīts velo maršruts vai kādas zīmes, kas skaidri liecinātu par speciāli paredzētu atļauju velosipēdiem. `access` vērtības ir atļautai/legālai lietošanai. Un Latvijā uz iet... |
| 2 | 2024-04-12 13:39 | richlv | Ja tas darīts kāda maršrutētāja dēļ (lai maršrutētu pa ietvēm/gājēju celiņiem), to vislabāk ziņot maršrutētāja autoriem, lai izlabo.Aicinām arī pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 149792788 by Sandra ČAB @ 2024-04-09 19:51 | 1 | 2024-04-10 21:43 | richlv | Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija&... |
| 2 | 2024-04-22 08:17 | Sandra ČAB ♦1 | Sveiks, tur ir tikai objekts - Lielās šupoles. | |
| 149795546 by richlv @ 2024-04-09 21:31 | 1 | 2024-04-09 21:34 | richlv | Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija"... |
| 2 | 2024-04-10 11:45 | AmOosm ♦3 | Man šķiet, ka tu nokomentēji uz nepareizā changeset :D | |
| 3 | 2024-04-10 21:43 | richlv | Oi, tiešām. Liels paldies par pamanīšanu :) | |
| 149793239 by Sandra ČAB @ 2024-04-09 20:06 | 1 | 2024-04-09 21:30 | richlv | Sveiki, bija prieks šodien (vakar) tikties, un liels paldies par turpmākiem papildinājumiem :)Šeit es nedaudz pielaboju nosaukumu (OSM pieņemts likt gramatiski pareizus nosaukumus bez stilizācijas, kādu dažreiz mēdz lietot uzņēmumi), un nomainīju no amenity=doctors uz ame... |
| 149488467 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2024-04-02 15:49 | 1 | 2024-04-03 08:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Vai uz šīs takas ir aizliegums (vai fiziski neiespējams piekļūt ar) velosipēdiem? Redzu, ka ir norādīts `mtb:scale:imba`, bet iepriekš jau bija pievienots aizliegums `bicycle=no`. Varbūt varētu precizēt atļauto piekļuvi, piemēram no informācijas plāksnes vai c... |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 20:59 | Emils Mikelsons ♦9 | Sveiki!Tas, ko es gribēju izdarīt ir atzīmēt to, ka tur nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt ar velosipēdiem. Tur ir atļauts braukt ar velosipēdiem, bet nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt pa taku.Varbūt jūs varētu to izlabot? Skatos ka esat lietpratējs šādās lietās. | |
| 3 | 2024-04-04 09:06 | HellMap ♦674 | Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu.Es `mtb:scale:imba` tad noņēmu.Tīri precīzi OSM `bicycle` (un visi citi `access` kā `foot` vai `vehicle`) ir domāti legālai un/vai atļautai pieejai. Praktiski to dažviet lieto arī lai norādītu par fiziski neiespējamu, kaut gan tā nevajadzētu u... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-05 18:10 | richlv | "nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt ar velosipēdiem" - vai MTB braucēji piekristu? :)Principā laikam jau labāk būtu tomēr likt smoothness utml tagus, ne bicycle=no. Mums jau ir diezgan daudz sazīmētu taku, kuras ar velo dažādu iemeslu dēļ nav diezko ērti braucamas, bet brauc... | |
| 149469427 by kautkas @ 2024-04-02 09:01 | 1 | 2024-04-03 09:18 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Can you please clarify what happened to the path at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081129240 ? There are currently two other paths/stairs still connecting to the old path - are they also gone? And the North section does not connect anymore - is there no way to pass through? The Svētā... |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 13:23 | richlv | Also it's a bit dubious that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429780169/history is unclassified, what was the reasoning for the road upgrade? | |
| 149282126 by manijs @ 2024-03-28 18:13 | 1 | 2024-03-28 21:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Just wanted to let you know that we don't generally specify access values unless they are different from default or ambiguous. All (non-sidewalk) footways and other paths and roads in Latvia imply bicycle=yes by default unless there is some restriction. This is like they imply foot=ye... |
| 2 | 2024-03-29 10:56 | richlv | Could this have been prompted by some routing applications not routing on footways/paths? | |
| 3 | 2024-03-29 13:04 | manijs ♦1 | I encountered issues, when cycling there. The route wanted to take me on the car path, although there is a perfectly safe and convenient under pass the bridge. @HellMap, I’ll take a look at this, since some places when explicitly allowing bike, OsmAnd then routed correctly. | |
| 4 | 2024-03-29 13:28 | HellMap ♦674 | Urgh, I just realized someone put incorrect `bicycle=dismount` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91301229 and nearby , which causes most routers to go around. And this has been here for years... I will fix this.But, yes, broadly speaking, this is a difficult issue with routers. It is technica... | |
| 149184645 by drtzdrfh @ 2024-03-26 15:58 | 1 | 2024-03-27 17:18 | HellMap ♦674 | Šajā izmaiņā ir daudz kļūdu. Piemēram, savienoti laukumi un ceļi, kas nav jāsavieno; pārvietoti laukumi no oficiālajām kadastra līnijām; nodzēstas pareizas teritorijas; nodzēsti ēku punkti; izdzēsti ceļi; atvienoti ceļi; laukumi iezīmēti pāri upēm, ceļiem un teritorij... |
| 2 | 2024-03-28 06:58 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Kas jums ir pa problēmām, cilveki izlabo lai vis izskatitos un butu atbilstošs dotiem datien no būvvaldes un kadastra, a jūs visu sabojājat, tāda necieņa | |
| 3 | 2024-03-28 10:16 | HellMap ♦674 | Ja tiek izmantoti trešie avoti, tad lūdzu tos norādīt, lai var šādas izmaiņas pārbaudīt. Pretējā gadījumā, atbilstoši kādiem būvvaldes un kadastra datiem ir atvienoti un izdzēsti ceļi, izdzēsti punkti un laukumi, izdzēstas adreses un piebraucami ceļi un visas p... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-28 11:03 | richlv | Sveiki drtzdrfh, rakstu kā OpenStreetMap datu pārvaldības grupas darbinieks.Vai varētu, lūdzu, norādīt kādu konkrētu vietu, kur veiktas izmaiņas saskaņā ar būvvaldes datiem vai kadastru, kura pēc tam būtu sabojāta?Ja Jūsu rediģēšana ir saistībā ar pašvaldī... | |
| 5 | 2024-03-28 16:07 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Labdien!Paldies "Hellmap" par ieteikumu, pārskatīšu un vērsīšos pie jautājumiem.Atbilde RichLv: nekas nav saistībā ar pašvaldību, viss balstīts pēc online pieejamiem datiem un lokālās zināšanas pēc izbraukumiem, | |
| 6 | 2024-03-28 16:15 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi, izklausās burvīgi - prieks par aktīviem iedzīvotājiem.Ja rodas kādi jautājumi vai citas ar kartēšanus saistītas tēmas, tās laipni aicinām apspriest Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 119520218 by Beton Krai @ 2022-04-09 23:36 | 1 | 2024-03-22 05:40 | richlv | Yay, liels paldies par addr:flats pievienošanu :) |
| 124821609 by HellMap @ 2022-08-12 14:34 | 1 | 2024-03-19 19:51 | richlv | Šis changeset pielika access=destination Robežu ielai.Lai gan tāda zīme tiešām ir bijusi no Berģu ielas puses (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1354590711590301), tāda nav manāma no otras puses. Zīmes novietojums priekšā citai zīmei mazliet mudina domāt, ka tā... |
| 2 | 2024-03-19 20:00 | HellMap ♦674 | Tīri pareizi būtu `vehicle:direction=destination`. Pašdarbība jau drošvien ir, bet ko darīt... Tu piedāvā ņemt nost? | |
| 3 | 2024-03-19 20:05 | richlv | Nu es nezinu - no otras puses tādu zīmju nav, un tas arī nav pareizi.Tā jau ir ar šķībām zīmēm, nevar statusu nemaz normāli reģistrēt.Paskatījos, tādu zīmju nav no Līgo/Jaunības/Akmeņu ielu puses.Varētu jau jautāt pašvaldībai, bet par tām visām š... | |
| 4 | 2024-03-19 20:19 | HellMap ♦674 | Zīmēm jau principā nav jābūt simetriskām. Te gan protams prasītos otrā pusē loģiski domājot tās zīmes jēgu - nebraukāt cauri. Dēļ šitādiem stulbiem gadījumiem bieži sanāk ielikt pēc zīmes kaut kādu ierobežojumu, bet faktiski tas bija tikai no vienas puses. Šeit... | |
| 5 | 2024-03-19 20:24 | richlv | Zin, izskatās padsmit cm ārā no Rīgas :) | |
| 148738302 by aviation0178 @ 2024-03-16 15:55 | 1 | 2024-03-16 19:16 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Thanks for your additions!Just to let you know, it's not really necessary to include a `source` tag on every element. This makes data more difficult to maintain because everyone later has to update this tag when they make any changes. It's also redundant, because we can see elem... |
| 2 | 2024-03-16 19:33 | aviation0178 ♦2 | @HellMap Thank you for correcting me! I am still new to this, but I am trying my best here. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-16 19:38 | HellMap ♦674 | No worries, let me know if you have any questions. Your edits look good otherwise. | |
| 4 | 2024-03-16 19:58 | aviation0178 ♦2 | I recently (not in this edit) added a cut-down area. Is it made correctly? Do I need to specify a relation ID, or I can't see it because it isn't just published yet? | |
| 5 | 2024-03-16 20:17 | HellMap ♦674 | The map takes a little bit of time to update. Sometimes a few minutes, sometimes longer. You will probably also need a browser cache clear.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cacheClearcuts won't appear on the default map unless you combine it into a multipolygon with the forest... | |
| 6 | 2024-03-16 20:25 | aviation0178 ♦2 | Big thank you! | |
| 7 | 2024-03-17 20:56 | richlv | Also very much welcome to discuss things in the Latvian OSM community chat - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :) | |
| 8 | 2024-03-20 11:50 | gileri ♦1,003 | Hi, thank you @aviation0178 for contributing to OSM, and @Hellmap for your welcoming messages !Just a quick note: while putting source=* tags on objects is not often useful or encouraged for the reasons HellMap put forward, using it on changesets is definitely useful and encouraged.It allows... | |
| 148551337 by Eric Amponsah @ 2024-03-12 13:57 | 1 | 2024-03-12 16:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Please do not delete buildings and redraw them (or not draw them at all), but correct the existing building location/shape and/or whatever pathways need correction depending on the actual situation.In Latvia, please either use the local imagery or set the correct offset for the Bing ae... |
| 2 | 2024-03-12 19:35 | richlv | That seems like a lot of problems, some of them related to the process (mappers would be expected to be instructed about the process - like not deleting-redrawing buildings, using non-offset imagery and all the other identified issues).Flagged the challenge at https://github.com/maproulette/chal... | |
| 148333170 by Gatis Kurzemnieks @ 2024-03-07 10:12 | 1 | 2024-03-07 10:49 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Paldies par papildinājumu.Gribēju norādīt, ka grāvjus kā tuneļus vajag norādīt tikai tur, kur tie faktiski ir kā caurtekas (parasti zem ceļiem). Virszemes grāvjiem `tunnel=*` un `layer=-1` neliek.Es šeit izlaboju.Paldies |
| 2 | 2024-03-07 11:33 | Gatis Kurzemnieks ♦2 | Paldies par aizrādījumu.Grāvis - parasts grāvis. Ceļu tas šķērso pa betona trubu/caurteku.Laikam neuzmanības pēc sanāca uzlikt visam grāvim. Labošos ;) | |
| 3 | 2024-03-07 12:14 | richlv | Liels paldies par burvīgajiem papildinājumiem un atbildēm :)Ja ir vēlme pievienoties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatam, tas pieejams https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 148261751 by PickAqua @ 2024-03-05 17:50 | 1 | 2024-03-06 13:56 | richlv | Sveiki, te pievienots lielveikala punkts, bet mājaslapā neizskatās, ka tas būtu lielveikals - kas īsti fiziski atrodas šajā vietā? |
| 2 | 2024-03-06 15:21 | PickAqua ♦1 | Sveiki! Šeit ir ūdens veikals. Šeit jūs varat iegādāties dažādus ūdens produktus veselībai un sportam. Mēs arī pasniedzam ūdens someljē kursus. Ir arī mobilā ūdens aplikācija. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-06 15:35 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi, nomainīju uz shop=water, nedaudz pielaboju adresi. | |
| 4 | 2024-03-06 15:41 | PickAqua ♦1 | Paldies jums! | |
| 148111987 by marlie2024 @ 2024-03-01 20:55 | 1 | 2024-03-02 11:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Vai šie punkti tiešām ir fordi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618791 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618792 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618793 ? |
| 2 | 2024-03-02 15:54 | richlv | AKA brasli :) | |
| 3 | 2024-04-01 10:56 | HellMap ♦674 | Atbildi nesaņēmām, tāpēc šos punktus nodzēsu. | |
| 148066472 by El_Comandante @ 2024-02-29 18:55 | 1 | 2024-03-01 10:41 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Pievienoju https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair apzīmējumu un nedaudz nomainīju nosaukumu uz vienotu stilu. |
| 147828318 by LF100 @ 2024-02-23 17:41 | 1 | 2024-02-27 16:32 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Mainot ielu nosaukumus, lūdzu to darīt uzmanīgāk. Vairāki gabali/posmi palika nenomainīti. Šeit visiem gabaliem ir palikuši `name:etymology:wikidata=Q649`, kas norāda nosaukuma izcelsmi uz Maskavu. Dzēšot veco, jaunā nosaukuma etimoloģija nav pielikta. Ņemo... |
| 2 | 2024-02-27 18:34 | richlv | Noteikti laipni aicināti apspriest OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com | |
| 147808038 by AneteK @ 2024-02-23 11:34 | 1 | 2024-02-23 12:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Zīmējot laukumus kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042055081 jāņem vērā, ka pie tiem pievienotus ceļus nevajadzētu atstāt tikai līdz robežai, jo tad maršrutēšana vairs pareizi nestrādās. Pašiem ceļiem ir jābūt arī savstarpēji savienotiem, lai t... |
| 2 | 2024-02-23 20:26 | richlv | Kā arī varbūt ir vēlme apspriest šādas tēmas OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com | |
| 147800719 by Bolt026 @ 2024-02-23 07:57 | 1 | 2024-02-23 13:00 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,When placing barriers, like a gate, please be careful not to place it on an incorrect location. You placed it on the node that is a crossing between the cycleway and the service road, thus blocking all routing along the cycleway.I have fixed this.Thanks |
| 2 | 2024-02-23 13:14 | Bolt026 ♦25 | Hi,Thank you for letting me know and also for your fix! I will keep this in mind for future edits.Have a great day! | |
| 3 | 2024-02-23 20:24 | richlv | Thank you for the quick reply, greatly appreciated :) | |
| 147665579 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2024-02-19 19:41 | 1 | 2024-02-19 21:04 | richlv | Sveiki, pieņemu, ka šis nav oficiāls nosaukums, bet vietējs - vai pareizi?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11641378695 |
| 2 | 2024-02-20 15:26 | Emils Mikelsons ♦9 | Sveiks. Mākoņkalns ir officiāls nosaukums jau kopš 2021 gada :) | |
| 3 | 2024-02-21 13:20 | richlv | Oho, varbūt to varam uzreiz tagos norādīt - vai ir kādi avoti šim? | |
| 147654898 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2024-02-19 15:15 | 1 | 2024-02-19 21:34 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Vai šo objektu vietējie tā sauc, vai arī tas vairāk kā apraksts?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252427242 |
| 2 | 2024-02-20 15:28 | Emils Mikelsons ♦9 | Jā, šo mežu vietējie sauc par Birzīti. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-21 13:16 | richlv | Paldies, tehniski tas varbūt vairāk iederētos loc_name, bet gan jau ka pagaidām šādi būs labi :) | |
| 147667040 by Emils Mikelsons @ 2024-02-19 20:27 | 1 | 2024-02-19 22:18 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Vai šajā vietā tiešām ir tilts nevis caurteka? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252560895 |
| 2 | 2024-02-20 15:34 | Emils Mikelsons ♦9 | Sveiki. Jā, šeit ir caurteka. Taču man nav ne jausmas kā to pārmainīt. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-20 15:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Es izlaboju/pārmainīju. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-21 00:04 | richlv | Par to, kā [labāk] kartēt - noteikti var vaicāt Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 107012570 by HellMap @ 2021-06-26 18:06 | 1 | 2024-02-15 20:28 | richlv | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958484501/history ir highway=path, maxspeed=20, lanes=2 - tā laikam nebija domāts, ne? |
| 2 | 2024-02-15 20:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Nē, tie palika kā kopija no ceļa, kuru sadalīju. Nepamanīju/nenodzēsu tegus. | |
| 147318262 by Zusurs @ 2024-02-11 08:20 | 1 | 2024-02-12 11:23 | richlv | This change might not stick, as the official address seems to be assigned to the building right to southeast, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249444948/history .Addresses are automatically synchronised in Latvia, and that will likely remove address from this building and assign it to the SE one... |
| 141987508 by giggls @ 2023-10-01 13:05 | 1 | 2024-02-11 14:30 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Please do not remove or split paths that cross a railway if they are actually used and exist. This breaks routing. An illegal crossing should be tagged with `crossing=no` to prevent routing that does not allow rail crossings outside designated locations. But nothing here physically blocks ... |
| 2 | 2024-02-11 19:59 | giggls ♦104 | While it might be common to map illegal crossings in Lithuania it is definitely not in my country.This said if you actually *do* map such stuff which I still do not consider a good idea please tag them at least something like access=no.RegardsSven | |
| 3 | 2024-02-12 10:49 | richlv | Lithuania is some 100km away, the mapping practice there might indeed differ ;)But in general OSM is about mapping what is on the ground, with appropriate access tags. Same as roads or paths on private property - they should get correct access tags, not be removed. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-12 10:56 | giggls ♦104 | Of cource this is Latvia but nevertheless this did not look like on the ground like an existing path either.I actually *know* a little bit about OSm as I have been contributing for 17 years now.However as I already said: This way should be tagged access=no either way. | |
| 5 | 2024-02-12 11:23 | HellMap ♦674 | On the ground, this is a well-used path: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=255754737334209&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=6393645144089678&focus=photo .`access=no` implies that you are not able or allowed to pass through here. That is not true - this is still a cro... | |
| 6 | 2024-02-12 11:45 | giggls ♦104 | Well access tag is about what is allowed to do not about what is possible to do.I do not know about the legal status of crossing railways in Latvia but it is completely illegal to cross a railway at spots without a corresponding traffic-signs in my country (Germany).A very similar example wo... | |
| 7 | 2024-02-12 13:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Very briefly - it is de facto allowed to cross here in Latvia.To elaborate, the law talks (somewhat ambiguously) about crossing railways at designated crossings and goes into detail about what a "crossing" is and what "dangerous rail sections" are. But it's all very lega... | |
| 8 | 2024-02-12 19:43 | giggls ♦104 | Well basically cycle-routing *did* lead us this way:https://bikerouter.de/#map=16/56.9988/24.2664/osm-mapnik-german_style&lonlats=24.263241,56.996132;24.26624,57.003135&profile=trekking-ignore-crBTW only reason I went looking at the data exactly at this place afterwards because I think... | |
| 9 | 2024-02-12 20:31 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, there is a pretty vast difference between German and post-Soviet infrastructure and culture. If we didn't map these places as crossings, we would be missing half the crossings in the country. I imagine if you didn't map them in Germany, no one would even notice.And, to be fair, t... | |
| 147166939 by Ieva Stalšene @ 2024-02-07 09:11 | 1 | 2024-02-07 12:40 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Nedaudz pielaboju darba laiku, lai tas atbilstu informācijas strukturēšanas prasībām. |
| 121179913 by Bolt025 @ 2022-05-19 07:44 | 1 | 2024-02-04 21:12 | richlv | Hi, just FYI - this relation was partially duplicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/162396 , removed it. |
| 146992910 by HellMap @ 2024-02-02 16:46 | 1 | 2024-02-02 23:33 | somehundred ♦98 | Pieliku noexit tagus, lai atrisinātu almost-junction problēmas, kas ID rādījās. Izdzēšot tos, tu atkal šīs problēmas atjaunoji. Kāds ir tavs risinājums šai šīm almost-junction problēmām? |
| 2 | 2024-02-03 02:29 | richlv | Es te ar skatu no malas - man nav viedokļa par konkrēto tagu, bet kopumā:"It is important to understand that warnings are just warnings, they should be examined and fixed where possible but never at the cost of introducing wrong data. Some validators warnings are generated for valid data... | |
| 3 | 2024-02-03 10:48 | HellMap ♦674 | Kā jau minēts, tās nav automātiski problēmas. Tas, ka iD to rāda kā "warning" (un "warning" nav "error"), nenozīmē, ka tos nepieciešams labot. (Tur pat blakus iD ir arī "ignore" poga.) Ja tu atvērsi JOSM redaktoru, tur būtu vēl simtiem &quo... | |
| 146924998 by somehundred @ 2024-01-31 23:23 | 1 | 2024-02-02 17:13 | HellMap ♦674 | Lūdzu beidz redaktorā spiest fix/upgrade pogu, ja tu neesi uzmanīgi paskatījies, ko tieši tu "labo". Tas, ka redaktors rāda paziņojumu nenozīmē, ka tā ir vienmēr kļūda.Tas nav seamark https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763125934Ar layer elementu pārklāša... |
| 2 | 2024-02-02 21:41 | richlv | Iespējams, par šādām izmaiņām vērts apspriesties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .iD redaktors tiešām ar saviem ieteikumiem pārāk bieži samulsina lietotājus. | |
| 146980122 by AivarsVitins @ 2024-02-02 10:58 | 1 | 2024-02-02 21:37 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par OSM uzlabošanu.Mazliet palaboju tagus, tai saitā nodzēsu website tagu - tam bija nepareizs SSL sertifikāts, kurš pāradresēja uz kādu Lietuvas domēna lapu, kura savukārt pāradresēja uz kādu Instagram lapu, kura nestrādāja.Iezīmēju arī dažas ēk... |
| 146820290 by JulijaFrid @ 2024-01-29 12:43 | 1 | 2024-01-30 14:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Could you please clarify your intention with this edit? This road has never been tagged as open to public because it is a gated bus-only access with only private (employee) access for other vehicles. Have the restrictions changed now after reconstruction? Setting tag to `motor_vehicle=yes` do... |
| 2 | 2024-01-30 14:25 | JulijaFrid ♦1 | Hello,Problem is that GraphHopper can't create route with this road. This road is used only for bus to get to Riga International Bus Station. I's doesn't matter it will be public or opened I just need to download osm.pbf for GraphHopper. At this moment this road is used by buses to ... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-30 16:06 | HellMap ♦674 | Thanks for clarifying! A couple points.You should not make any changes to OSM to "fix" some other router (or navigator, map, app, etc.). OSM contains the data and it should be correct and accurate. If another application is not using it correctly - it should be fixed there.You say ... | |
| 4 | 2024-01-31 08:46 | JulijaFrid ♦1 | Diar Sir/Madam!Let me explain my problem in more detail - this road has always been used for buses. But before updating the map, GraphHopper allowed to get directions there. These routes are used by official bus carriers. Now, after updating the osm of the map, but without changing any setti... | |
| 5 | 2024-01-31 10:21 | HellMap ♦674 | Sorry, I don't think I understand you.If this road is for buses only, then how can `motor_vehicle=yes` be correct? That includes all motorized vehicles - automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, buses, etc.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicleAll these roads have (and alway... | |
| 6 | 2024-01-31 11:58 | richlv | BTW, it might be more convenient to discuss this in the OSM community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 146702653 by Alex Kritenko @ 2024-01-26 09:44 | 1 | 2024-01-26 12:15 | richlv | Sveiki, šis droši vien nav tourism=viewpoint - droši vien domāta personīga piezīme?Iespējams, Organic Maps aplikācija (maps.me forks) varētu būt ērtāka lietošanā šādu personīgu piezīmju ziņā. |
| 2 | 2024-01-26 20:00 | Alex Kritenko ♦1 | Labdien. Jā, tā bij personīga piezīme. Droši var dzēst to viewpoint. Paldies | |
| 3 | 2024-03-31 12:33 | Colbertson ♦104 | Izdzēsu | |
| 140496109 by HellMap @ 2023-08-28 13:42 | 1 | 2024-01-20 12:08 | richlv | I suspect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202815903/history might not be power-related - it seems to be more water, sewage etc related. |
| 2 | 2024-01-20 13:10 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, you are probably right. I didn't really look closer, but looks at the well nearby and what looks like outgasing pipes, it's probably a pumping/life station or something. Not sure though, so removed power tag. | |
| 146047262 by Cucazer @ 2024-01-09 00:39 | 1 | 2024-01-09 10:55 | richlv | Not sure which generations still use this, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3749270 has some useful context. |
| 2 | 2024-01-09 11:46 | Cucazer ♦60 | Yes, this changeset is related to that note, thank you for linking | |
| 145989486 by drtzdrfh @ 2024-01-07 12:45 | 1 | 2024-01-07 15:41 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par interesi OpenStreetMap projektā.Šādas izmaiņas gan īsti neiederas OSM - te tiek ievietotas reālas lietas, kuras ir dzīvē pārbaudāmas, eksistējošas.Šādiem projektiem, iespējams, piemērotāk būtu atrasties https://opengeofiction.net .&... |
| 2 | 2024-01-07 15:43 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Nē, kļūdaties jūs, reālā pasaulē arí pastāv šis, varat aiziet un pats parbaudit | |
| 145969855 by drtzdrfh @ 2024-01-06 20:07 | 1 | 2024-01-07 01:40 | richlv | Sveiki, izskatās, ka šajā izmaiņu kopā mājvārdi duplicēti visām ēkām saimniecībā. Tā kā adreses tiek importētas no oficiālajiem datiem, šāda duplicēšana nav vispāratzīta prakse.Vai ir kāds īpašs iemesls šādai duplicēšanai? |
| 2 | 2024-01-07 10:13 | HellMap ♦674 | Nosaukumus arī neliek katrai ēkai atsevišķi, jo tie nav ēku nosaukumi, bet īpašuma (t.s. viensētas) nosaukumi.Šajā izmaiņā arī izdzēsts dīķis, cits iezīmēts kā ezers, izdzēsti vairāki piebraucamie ceļi, izdzēsti adrešu punkti, upe nomainīta uz k... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-07 10:17 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Viss tiek izdaríts ar visiem Beites territorijas īpašniekiem, un tie r māju nosaukumi, un vispārēji zemesgabali ir kopīgi | |
| 4 | 2024-01-07 10:18 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Pēc principa dzēstie ceļi vairs nav braucami vai arī īpašnieks man lika izņemt privātos ceļus | |
| 5 | 2024-01-07 10:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Reāli eksistējošus ceļus noteikti dzēst nedrīkst. Šeit ir jānorāda pareiza ceļa klasifikācija (piemēram, piebrauktuves) un `access` vērtības, kas šajā gadījumā izklausās pēc `access=private`.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_... | |
| 6 | 2024-01-07 10:43 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Paldies vecīt!Izlabošu tuvākajā laikā! | |
| 7 | 2024-01-07 11:04 | richlv | Liels paldies par uzlabojumiem un atbildēm.Šo izmaiņu kopu varbūt vislabāk būtu ātri atcelt, pirms sākas rediģēšanas konflikti? | |
| 8 | 2024-01-07 11:05 | richlv | Starp citu, vēl varētu būt ļoti noderīgi apspriest kartēšanu OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 9 | 2024-01-07 11:20 | drtzdrfh ♦3 | Es jau laboju šobrīd | |
| 145267190 by Peremenov @ 2023-12-18 21:06 | 1 | 2023-12-18 22:33 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Has this path really been recently removed? It was still there mid-November after most of the works were finished. It snowed soon after, so it seems unlikely something else was done here.Thanks |
| 2 | 2024-01-03 17:47 | richlv | Heya, any thoughts on this, was it indeed removed? | |
| 3 | 2024-01-03 18:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Oh, I restored in 1223789629. It's still there as of 20 Dec. It's basically a deadend sidewalk. I haven't left a comment because my Mapillary is stuck processing and I cannot link to it. | |
| 4 | 2024-01-03 18:27 | richlv | Thanks, perhaps railing is still there, too?https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145267101 | |
| 5 | 2024-01-03 18:33 | HellMap ♦674 | The railing along the road is mostly gone. Only the angled part that is currently mapped remains. | |
| 6 | 2024-01-03 19:17 | richlv | Great, thank you for the confirmation. | |
| 7 | 2024-01-03 20:00 | Peremenov ♦2 | Hello!I can send a photo of the place. The railing has been removed for sure. | |
| 8 | 2024-01-03 20:02 | Peremenov ♦2 | https://ibb.co/nPLR4SW | |
| 9 | 2024-01-03 20:04 | Peremenov ♦2 | Here is a bit different anglehttps://ibb.co/BnSPq2s | |
| 10 | 2024-01-03 20:20 | richlv | Excellent, thank you so much for the pictures and the great updates.BTW, there's a Latvian community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com , if you aren't there yet. | |
| 11 | 2024-01-03 20:31 | Peremenov ♦2 | I guess this is roadside and can be considered as a part of the road (that's why I removed it) and nobody actually uses it for walk since there is a proper path nearby 🤷♂️Also it starts | |
| 12 | 2024-01-03 20:31 | Peremenov ♦2 | Thank you for the link :) | |
| 13 | 2024-01-03 20:34 | Peremenov ♦2 | ... also it begins and ends suddenly into the soil | |
| 14 | 2024-01-03 21:43 | HellMap ♦674 | Thanks!This location is fairly detailed, so including sidewalks as separate ways is generally preferred. At least, you shouldn't remove sidewalks once they are drawn. This one is admittedly a useless one, but it still exists, is not like the surrounding grass, has a kerb and the service roa... | |
| 140627258 by Mister_R2 @ 2023-08-31 10:09 | 1 | 2023-12-21 16:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!Did you mean to tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203896584 as a river? Did you intend it to be a ditch or trench? It's not connected to anything, so it's not likely more than a ditch. But I am not sure if this is a trench instead. From LIDAR, it could be either. |
| 2 | 2023-12-22 06:50 | Mister_R2 ♦21 | When I created this change, I had walked in the forest I did see trenches with many other things I confirmed it with some old USSR stuff laying around. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-28 21:20 | richlv | I guess the question was whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203896584 is mistagged as waterway=river - perhaps it should be barrier=ditch, military=trench? | |
| 145398766 by StreamMaps @ 2023-12-22 09:11 | 1 | 2023-12-22 09:20 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Maps of Jāņa sēta ar a proprietary source and cannot be used in OSM. Changes must be reverted! |
| 2 | 2023-12-22 09:25 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145399206 | |
| 3 | 2023-12-22 09:47 | StreamMaps ♦2 | https://active.kartes.lv/?salaspils perhaps this will work. | |
| 4 | 2023-12-22 09:50 | Dāvis Kļaviņš ♦15 | Not, it won't work. It's the same data source. | |
| 5 | 2023-12-22 18:34 | richlv | Indeed, please note that we may not use data from any other map unless it has been explicitly allowed.If other maps are used, it risks having all your contributions reverted.Please see paragraph 1 in https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms .Also from https://www.openstreet... | |
| 145307549 by J4maL @ 2023-12-19 21:26 | 1 | 2023-12-21 01:32 | richlv | Vai Staļģenes skolas ēkā tiešām ir tikai pamatskola?No https://www.stalgenesskola.lv/lv/kontakti/ un https://www.jelgavasnovads.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/stalgenes-pamatskola-0 izskatās, ka tur tomēr ir arī vidusskola. |
| 144694641 by somehundred @ 2023-12-02 15:03 | 1 | 2023-12-02 15:58 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki!Paldies par šo punktu pievienošanu; vienmēr ir grūti apsekot punktus ēkās.Gribēju pieminēt, ka nevajadzētu neko novietot vai pārvietot, pamatojoties uz to, kā tas parādās kartē. Ir daudz dažādu karšu, kuras izmanto OSM, un katrā no tām lietas var t... |
| 2 | 2023-12-15 13:04 | richlv | Jā, precīza novietošana vēlama, jo tas arī palīdz vieglāk atrast objektus.Tas ļauj arī veidot vēl detalizētākas dažādu ēku kartes, piemēram, https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#18/56.98260/24.20382 . | |
| 144715281 by Denis9090 @ 2023-12-03 09:50 | 1 | 2023-12-03 10:36 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Can you please clarify where exactly is this guest house is located? The node you placed is almost on top of an intersection in a park area. Is it in the building nearby? Does it have a name?Thanks |
| 2 | 2023-12-04 08:59 | richlv | Might be a personal note for the nearby hotel. | |
| 3 | 2023-12-08 22:31 | richlv | It's been 5 days without a response, perhaps worth deleting the node? | |
| 4 | 2023-12-09 13:07 | HellMap ♦674 | Yes, I think it's fair to delete the node.I am however also interested in the other 2 hotel nodes added previously. One is on top of some rural residentials and one is in a multistorey building, but nothing in Mapillary or quick search suggests an obvious hotel. These could be Airbnb-style ... | |
| 5 | 2023-12-13 17:53 | richlv | Yeah, I don't think it makes sense to map AirBnB locations, those are located by address 99% of the time anyway.Deleted this node.Regarding the other nodes, would you have a chance to comment on those changesets? | |
| 6 | 2023-12-13 18:36 | HellMap ♦674 | One of the other two was already deleted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141846834 . I deleted the other one.Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my time on leaving yet another comment that won't be replied to. | |
| 7 | 2023-12-15 13:01 | richlv | Hehe, all good, no worries :)One use from changeset comments is that in the future they potentially can allow to see which users are not responding, but in this case - likely not that relevant. | |
| 126430801 by The Kiotio @ 2022-09-20 16:43 | 1 | 2023-12-14 09:40 | richlv | Sveiki, skatos, ka te ir mēģināts pievienot Jaunbērzu adreses punktu pie ēkas, kura no oficiālās adreses ir 150 metru attālumā.Tā kā oficiālās adreses tiek sinhronizētas automātiski, no ēkas punkts visas reizes pazuda.Ja adresi gribētos piešķirt tai konkrētajai ēkai, l... |
| 2 | 2023-12-14 19:15 | The Kiotio ♦1 | Sveiki,PaldiesTā arī sapratu kad pirmo reizi adrese pazuda no mājas. | |
| 144968108 by Vitalijs Gagunovs @ 2023-12-10 15:14 | 1 | 2023-12-11 00:51 | richlv | Sveiki, ar šo izmaiņu kopu pievienots šis ceļš: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230108345 .Ja tur ir kāds ceļš, to vajadzētu savienot ar citiem ceļiem, lai pareizi strādātu maršrutēšana.Vēl būtu labi saprast, kas tas ir par ceļu. Varbūt... |
| 144654745 by HellMap @ 2023-12-01 09:27 | 1 | 2023-12-01 13:11 | richlv | As far as I understand, "Smartpost" is a brand "Itella" operates under, split it in operator/brand tags.https://itella.ee/en/private-customer/smartpost/ |
| 144513617 by AleksPLV19 @ 2023-11-27 15:54 | 1 | 2023-11-28 10:09 | richlv | Changeset comment is "closed forever", but it also adds https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4132149969 - that location is still present, right?If so, would be great to adjust the name to "AlkOutlet", they don't have the double "o" in the name. |
| 2 | 2023-11-28 10:14 | AleksPLV19 ♦1 | AlkOultlet - is the correct name, this place still exists. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-29 10:00 | richlv | Thanks, fixed the name | |
| 144371611 by somehundred @ 2023-11-23 14:17 | 1 | 2023-11-24 08:56 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.Šajā gadījumā objekts jau ir amenity=toilets, tam var droši ņemt nost toilets=yes - šo otru tagu dažreiz pievieno pamatobjektam (piemēram, degvielas uzpildes stacijai), lai norādītu, ka tajā ir pieejama tualete.Ko... |
| 2 | 2023-11-26 18:24 | somehundred ♦98 | Sveiki. Pieliku, lai vieglāk varētu atrast šādas vietas ar overpass turbo. Piemēram, ja rakstīs ["toilets"], tad paradīsies arī šī vieta, turpretī vietas ar amenity=toilets tagu neparādīsies. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-26 18:58 | richlv | Paldies par skaidrojumu.Tad gan būtu jāņem nost, jo OSM ir "don't tag for the renderer" princips - neveidot datus, "hakojot" kādu rīku.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_rendererOriģināli tas bija par tagiem, kurus nepareizi izmantoja, lai kau... | |
| 144406056 by HellMap @ 2023-11-24 12:14 | 1 | 2023-11-24 12:17 | richlv | Technically https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3266772963/history was ~ 7 years older than https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8768021724/history , thus from the node history perspective the opposite might have been pedantically more correct ;) |
| 2 | 2023-11-24 12:26 | HellMap ♦674 | Fixed :) | |
| 3 | 2023-11-24 13:11 | richlv | Pedantic high-five! =) | |
| 143943448 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2023-11-12 18:21 | 1 | 2023-11-13 10:41 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki,Izdzēšot Gaujas ielas posmu tika salauzti autobusu maršruti. Es šeit izlaboju, bet lūdzu nākotnē uzmanīgāk, ja tiek dzēsti būtiski ielu gabali. |
| 2 | 2023-11-13 15:53 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Vai tad Brasas pārbrauktuve vēl ir vaļā? Google un Wāze rāda, ka slēgta. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-13 16:07 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | https://www.rigassatiksme.lv/lv/aktu%C4%81la%20inform%C4%81cija/no-9-novembra-par-brasas-parvadu-atsaks-kurset-9-autobuss/ | |
| 4 | 2023-11-13 16:08 | HellMap ♦674 | Ir slēgta, bet runa par 9. autobusa turp-atpakaļ maršrutu/relācijām, kuras bija palikušas pa Gaujas ielu un ar pārrāvumu Brasas pārbrauktuvei. Tās vajadzēja pārlikt uz Brasas tiltu. Vai pagaidām vismaz nedzēst pārbrauktuvi (uzlikt access=no, piemēram), lai maršruts... | |
| 5 | 2023-11-13 18:29 | richlv | Vēl jāatceras, ka no Google/Waze nedrīkst neko pārzīmēt. | |
| 6 | 2023-11-14 17:12 | HellMap ♦674 | Kāds cits kartētājs norādījis, ka pārbrauktuve joprojām ir vaļā līdz mēneša beigām. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144015095Tā kā, ja tiešām ir izmantots Waze/Google nevis personīgi pārbaudīts (vai no piemēram ziņām) - tad to nevajadzēja vispār main... | |
| 143797286 by Martins_P @ 2023-11-08 20:43 | 1 | 2023-11-09 08:13 | richlv | How could vasara.shop be classified? Is it more like a shop or more like an office?If a shop, what category could it be? |
| 2 | 2023-11-09 08:21 | Martins_P ♦2 | Tā ir kaut kāda radošā darbnīca/veikals. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-10 09:34 | richlv | Ak, reālās pasaules klasifikācijas grūtības :)Skatos, šobrīd shop=crafting, kas šķiet ļoti OK un parādās defaultajā kartē. | |
| 4 | 2023-11-10 09:49 | Martins_P ♦2 | manuprāt, hibrīdi un inovācijas dara savu, lai taptu jauni apzīmējumi. | |
| 5 | 2023-11-10 12:42 | i-ky ♦2 | Par shop=crafting nav Wiki apraksta. Apraksts ir shop=craft, kas nešķiet atbilstošs.Mājaslapā (https://sparkle.is/par-radoso-studiju/) teikts:* organizējam radošās darbnīcas* izīrējam telpas jūsu radošajām nodarbībām/darbnīcām/biznesa tikšanā... | |
| 143604801 by Pytsa @ 2023-11-04 09:29 | 1 | 2023-11-04 11:52 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello,Could you please clarify what are these two tourism points you created? What exactly is here?Thanks |
| 2 | 2023-11-04 16:01 | Pytsa ♦1 | There's supposed to be only one point for Jauniela street - this is the street that was used as Baker Street for the Sherlock Holmes films in the Soviet Union | |
| 3 | 2023-11-08 14:14 | richlv | It was mapped years ago (as a locality or something...), but somebody apparently nuked it. Not enthusiastic about trying to find when that happened, but would appreciate if somebody would find it :) | |
| 4 | 2023-11-08 14:29 | HellMap ♦674 | You mapped the POI as place=locality 8 years ago and it was changed to historic=memorial 6 years ago. It sounds... correct? | |
| 5 | 2023-11-08 15:03 | richlv | Ahah, nice - thank you so much for paying attention to detail more than me :) | |
| 6 | 2023-11-08 15:04 | richlv | ...although technically the alleyway was called (loc_name) like that back then, there was no memorial - not sure whether a memorial exists there now, the place is private and fenced off. | |
| 143527825 by dy24 @ 2023-11-02 12:20 | 1 | 2023-11-08 14:07 | richlv | Šī laikam nav oficiāla adrese, jo nav VZD datos? |
| 143231730 by epxmap @ 2023-10-27 21:59 | 1 | 2023-10-28 09:00 | HellMap ♦674 | Sveiki vēlreiz!`access` tegi (`bicycle`, `foot` utt.) uz satiksmes ceļiem ir galvenokārt domāti legāliem ierobežojumiem, piemēram ceļa zīme, kas aizliedz braukt vai arī tas ir fiziski neiespējams.Ņemot to vērā, gribēju noskaidrot, kāds avots vai princips izmantots atzīmējot... |
| 2 | 2023-10-28 15:06 | epxmap ♦4 | Sveiki!Izmaiņas veicu maršrutēšanas uzlabošanas nolūkos - ar velosipēdu tiek piedāvātas brauktuves, kaut gan drošāk un ērtāk būtu izmantot ietves, kas uz Akmens tilta un krastmalā būtu loģiskākais variants. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-28 15:38 | HellMap ♦674 | Skaidrs.Ja maršrutētājs rāda nepareizi, tad sūdzība jāraksta maršrutētājam par nepareizu maršruta izvēli. Šeit vest pa `primary`/`secondary` ielām ir galīgi šķībi.Bet OSM datos gan nevar likt nepareizas vērtības. Drošība un ērtums ir... | |
| 4 | 2023-10-28 16:12 | epxmap ♦4 | Paldies, ņemšu vērā. | |
| 5 | 2023-11-07 13:45 | richlv | Velo maršrutēšanas "hintiem" var noderēt šie:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dseparatehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dsidepath | |
| 6 | 2023-11-08 09:10 | HellMap ♦674 | Jā, bet te gan tādu nav - te visur parastās ietves. | |
| 143611850 by N1kita123 @ 2023-11-04 12:41 | 1 | 2023-11-06 09:02 | richlv | This changeset deleted a bus stop. The bus stop was present at least as late as of September this year (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=663510702413809), and is shown as existing in https://saraksti.rigassatiksme.lv/index.html#riga/map,page .Why was it deleted, is there some very new change ... |
| 2 | 2023-11-06 15:50 | HellMap ♦674 | Given that Rigas Satiksme still lists this stop for many routes, I have reverted this changeset pending clarification. | |
| 138974559 by Mister_R2 @ 2023-07-25 08:04 | 1 | 2023-10-16 10:49 | richlv | Thank you so much for all the great map improvements.One minor issue in this changeset and maybe somewhere else - road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192018197/history was not connected to Pasta iela. This is very important for routing purposes, as unconnected roads cannot be used for routing.... |
| 2 | 2023-10-16 13:27 | Mister_R2 ♦21 | Thanks, I didn't notice that! | |
| 142345330 by Aleksandra Jan @ 2023-10-09 11:26 | 1 | 2023-10-09 15:16 | richlv | Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Forevers droši vien ir gaļas veikals - vai pareizi?Enkurs - vai tas ir "standarta" nelielais veikals, varbūt arī ar kādu nepārtikas preci?Ja tā, tas varbūt būtu shop=convenience. |
| 142315991 by WietseLV @ 2023-10-08 18:21 | 1 | 2023-10-09 09:10 | richlv | Thank you for the map improvements.This changeset has resulted in overlapping wood areas - the new https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214120083 overlaps with the existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15104238 .What was the intent behind adding a new wood area, any ideas how this coul... |
| 2 | 2023-10-09 09:26 | WietseLV ♦1 | Hi,Thanks for getting back to me. As I am very new in this, it may well be that I made some mistakes there. My idea is to delete the original forest and replace it by the same "forest" as you can see in the rest of this Marsili area. In grey you see the area where houses may be bui... | |
| 3 | 2023-10-09 12:56 | richlv | Thank you so much for the quick reply. It's perfectly fine to make mistakes, that's the best way to learn :)Briefly, the green areas with treee icons are forest (landuse=wood), grey areas are landuse=residential.These can overlap (residential area that has dense tree cover), which wo... | |
| 4 | 2023-10-09 18:41 | WietseLV ♦1 | To start with your map changes question - it must be cache, as when I opened in another browser I did see the changes, and also understood where I must have gone wrong - thanks!As for what I meant with yellow - it is very light yellow or light ochre, like the colour on the outside of the grey &q... | |
| 142026529 by PS_LV @ 2023-10-02 08:13 | 1 | 2023-10-02 13:34 | richlv | Hi, what does "Gate officially has to be open" mean here? |
| 2 | 2023-10-02 15:23 | PS_LV ♦1 | There is law in Latvia what every river coast has to be freely available for public but that is not welcome by private owners near by.There are gates in every side of this river side path. One of the gates is closed to be entered from other side.I would not want commute app to guide me through t... | |
| 3 | 2023-10-03 10:05 | richlv | Thanks, I believe in this case they are not allowed to fence up to 4m (10m for select larger bodies of water) from the edge of the river (or the top of the steep banks), so this particular gate might be legal.Definitely a correct approach on mapping the current situation - if there was a legal r... | |
| 142005580 by Mangosose @ 2023-10-01 21:18 | 1 | 2023-10-02 13:45 | richlv | Hi, thank you for the map improvements.In this changeset, a restaurant was added that was already mapped. As you have added it with maps.me, it seems likely that data there is outdated.You might want to try Organic Maps app, which is a fork of maps.me that receives more frequent map updates. |
| 140764026 by artuuurs @ 2023-09-03 15:28 | 1 | 2023-09-17 18:20 | richlv | Noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204702405/history is not visible in any imagery, nothing in cadaster.Just to be sure, does it exist at this location? |
| 2 | 2023-09-17 18:26 | artuuurs ♦20 | It is in the Google satellite and ESRI low level zoom, also exists in nature, I saw it with my own eyes :) But the location is approximate, could be off by a couple of meters. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-17 18:55 | richlv | Thank you for the quick reply - indeed, it's visible in the ESRI World imagery higher zoom levels (I only checked the lower zooms).No concerns remain about the existence :)We're not allowed to use Google imagery, though - if any edits have been made from it, that would have to be rev... | |
| 4 | 2023-09-17 19:35 | artuuurs ♦20 | I am sometimes doing like this - I see some object in real life, then open Google satellite view (only to get more precise location) and then roughly draw the object in OSM trying to match the shape and location. Is it not allowed too? | |
| 5 | 2023-09-17 19:47 | richlv | Unfortunately Google does not allow such usage in their terms of service, we are not allowed to use any of their data or services.It would be great to check those objects via cadaster data, ESRI high zoom or other legal sources, otherwise such edits might have to be reverted. | |
| 6 | 2023-09-17 20:39 | artuuurs ♦20 | OK, good to know, I will no longer use it for anything. In most cases these buildings etc. were also visible in ESRI at low level zoom, it would be sad to revert everything. | |
| 7 | 2023-09-18 06:44 | richlv | Indeed, that's why OSM works hard to avoid using any inappropriate sources - copying from other maps, imagery etc is not good unless explicitly allow.As any other imagery was not used for tracing, verifying those cases in ESRI high zoom & real life seems sufficient to me in this case. | |
| 137853034 by artuuurs @ 2023-06-27 21:15 | 1 | 2023-09-15 14:46 | richlv | Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185384005/history perhaps be building=construction ?At least it seems so from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=819781419262974 . |
| 2 | 2023-09-17 18:28 | artuuurs ♦20 | Not sure how it looks today. I will check the next time I'm there. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-17 18:58 | richlv | Thanks, we both more or less passed it recently, but building survey wasn't quite the top priority ;)My camera mount broke off, so no Mapillary images from Saturday either. | |
| 140713047 by richlv @ 2023-09-02 10:44 | 1 | 2023-09-03 18:03 | HellMap ♦674 | Note that this area now has both `highway=service` + `area=yes` AND `area:highway=yes`. |
| 2 | 2023-09-04 10:00 | richlv | Duh, indeed. Thanks, fixed now. | |
| 140562735 by richlv @ 2023-08-29 23:31 | 1 | 2023-08-30 09:40 | HellMap ♦674 | Just a note that these footways need indoor tagging scheme rather than covered=yes or similar. |
| 2 | 2023-08-30 10:47 | richlv | Probably, I was following the simpler approach that's feasible in a mobile editor for me - hopefully that's easier to update once the approximate layout is there :) | |
| 140488213 by threearmedshiva @ 2023-08-28 10:42 | 1 | 2023-08-28 12:14 | richlv | Thanks, is the part from P6 to the lift gate also inaccessible?If the road is traversible by pedestrians/cyclists, maybe better to mark it as motor vehicle inaccessible instead? |
| 140194813 by EddieMarch @ 2023-08-21 18:08 | 1 | 2023-08-22 08:45 | richlv | Hi, thank you for the map improvements.This changeset deletes several tracks - are they completely gone, or was there some other change? |
| 2 | 2023-08-22 09:00 | EddieMarch ♦2 | Hi! After the forest was cut out and the area was plowed, there are actually no forest roads there. | |
| 3 | 2023-08-22 09:13 | richlv | Noted, thank you so much for the updates.If map drawing seems interesting enough, it might also be useful to chat with the Latvian OSM community at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 140194932 by EddieMarch @ 2023-08-21 18:11 | 1 | 2023-08-22 08:46 | richlv | Similarly, this changeset deletes a bunch of tracks - were they completely gone? |
| 2 | 2023-08-22 09:01 | EddieMarch ♦2 | Yes, they are completely gone. The forest area was plowed. | |
| 133908057 by Reinis Bērziņš @ 2023-03-20 17:12 | 1 | 2023-08-13 07:38 | richlv | Hi, thank you so much for the great map improvements :)Looking at orthophoto, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155849240/history does not seem to be fenced, and it's not clear whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155849241/history is fully fenced. Have they been surveyed to be so?... |
| 2 | 2023-08-14 13:40 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Hi! I was there in March 2023. I observed fence from all sides. As it is a thine wire fence - you won't see it in orthophoto layers but from Google Street View where you can already see a fence along Zīļu street, but now there is another across the middle of the meadow.This is an interim so... | |
| 3 | 2023-08-14 14:14 | richlv | Got it, thanks - that makes sense, mapping fences that limit movement is very useful.One more reason to map them separate, not on landuse - currently the adjacent residential landuse areas have fence tag applied, sort of implying double fence. And if fence type tags get added, there could easily b... | |
| 4 | 2023-08-14 14:45 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Yes, duplicate fences of two adjacent neighbours was my biggest concern at least in theory. In practice the problem arises when one neighbour has a wall, whereas another - fence. And probably in some specific map display styles where left and right side of the fence are not symetrical. | |
| 5 | 2023-08-14 14:46 | HellMap ♦674 | By the way, there is some recent Mapillary here from May https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1935502296801471&focus=photo . It doesn't let you see much beyond the immediate fences along the road, but I can confirm there's a new fence. Of course, per richlv, one is wire mesh and the oth... | |
| 139669246 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2023-08-09 16:41 | 1 | 2023-08-11 10:54 | richlv | Sveiki, te Siguldas Jaunās pils parkā pievienoti vairāki akmeņi. Dabā tādus neredzu, un ortofoto vispār pavecs (mainījušies celiņi utt). No kādiem datiem šie akmeņi zīmēti? |
| 2 | 2023-08-11 16:04 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Sveiciens! Jā, akmeņi pēc parka rekonstrukcijas pārvietoti kur citur. Veci dati no Google Earth. | |
| 3 | 2023-08-11 17:23 | richlv | Hmm, paga, Google Earth?Mēs nedrīkstam to izmantot necik. Ja veikti labojumi no jebkādiem Google servisiem, tie jāatceļ.Vai ir vēl kādi līdzīgi labojumi, kuri būtu atceļami šādu autortiesību problēmu dēļ? | |
| 139674569 by OgyTheGreat @ 2023-08-09 19:07 | 1 | 2023-08-10 08:40 | richlv | Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements.The road added in this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196532494 , is not connected to other roads. This causes problems for routing applications.Do you happen to know how this road connects to other roads and would have a chance to up... |
| 139340598 by rusantro @ 2023-08-02 10:38 | 1 | 2023-08-02 12:39 | richlv | Thank you for the map updates.Address information is automatically synced from the official data sources, and would be overwritten in near future.Where does the information about "11A" come from?Also, the ATM node is currently outside the building - would you happen to know where e... |
| 2 | 2023-08-02 12:41 | richlv | Checking further, 11A is another building - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123080910 . Should the address change be reverted? | |
| 3 | 2023-08-03 09:38 | rusantro ♦1 | Hello! I work in the building Rigas 11 and there has never been an ATM there. It's just that someone made a mistake in the address when they created this point on the map. The ATM is located in a nearby shopping center and the correct address "Jelgava, Rigas 11A" is indicated on the b... | |
| 4 | 2023-08-03 10:41 | richlv | Looks like you moved the node already - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2370468014 .Perfect, thank you so much :)If you feel like further improving the map, please consider joining the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . | |
| 139365173 by zurmutay @ 2023-08-02 21:26 | 1 | 2023-08-03 10:34 | richlv | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193998524 currently has width=0.Should it perhaps be changed to highway=path instead? |
| 2 | 2023-08-03 10:39 | HellMap ♦674 | I just deleted the width=0, but I guess the question stands. | |
| 139363044 by KārlisK @ 2023-08-02 20:08 | 1 | 2023-08-03 10:29 | richlv | This change will be automatically reverted, as the addresses are updated from the official sources.Should this node perhaps be moved to "Ulmaņa parks 2" instead? |
| 138109283 by dy24 @ 2023-07-04 13:46 | 1 | 2023-08-01 12:55 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies papildinājumiem.Spriežot pēc ortofoto un reljefa modeļa, šo ceļu būtu labāk apzīmēt ar highway=track.Aicinām ceļu klasifikāciju un citas tēmas apspriest arī kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com . |
| 2 | 2023-08-01 12:58 | richlv | Rūpīgāk paskatoties, laikam bija domāts Ozolu ielas posms (mazliet vairāk uz DR). Palaboju saskaņā ar dažādiem datu avotiem - vai šādi izskatās pareizi? | |
| 138275330 by richlv @ 2023-07-08 19:37 | 1 | 2023-07-08 19:44 | HellMap ♦674 | The boardwalk way still has smoothness=bad and surface=dirt left from before. These are probably not correct anymore. |
| 2 | 2023-07-08 19:55 | richlv | Thank you for spotting, fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2023-07-11 11:23 | richlv | I had messed up the extent of the boardwalk (failed split?).Fixed now - the boardwalk is actually very short. | |
| 4 | 2023-07-11 11:35 | HellMap ♦674 | I saw the long boardwalk and I assumed that was correct. The one NE is pretty long, so it seemed reasonable. I only saw it flooded/below water so I had no idea how far it goes. | |
| 5 | 2023-07-11 12:10 | richlv | Yeah, sorry about the confusion :) | |
| 100628286 by AndrisS @ 2021-03-08 10:28 | 1 | 2023-06-01 19:51 | richlv | Sveiki, te pievienots veikala punkts: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8496527560/history .Vai varētu būt, ka tas duplicē šajā ēkā esošo LaTS veikalu? |
| 2 | 2023-06-02 07:07 | AndrisS ♦4 | Tas būtu jāapseko uz vietas, jo šī punkta izveidošanas brīdī, tajā ēkā tiešām atradās 2 veikali. Šobrīd iespējams ka ir palicis tikai Lats. | |
| 3 | 2023-06-02 11:55 | richlv | Liels paldies par atbildi, tad tiešām jāpārbauda. Nesen tur biju, bet nepamanīju šo punktu tajā brīdī :) | |
| 4 | 2023-06-02 12:42 | richlv | Oo, bet ir veiksmīga Mapillary bilde - izskatās, ka tas otrs veikals ir zudis:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1621493214985317 | |
| 5 | 2023-06-02 17:24 | HellMap ♦674 | Šodien apskatījos, otrs veikals joprojām tur ir. Nekādu nosaukumu un lielu uzrakstu tur nav, tikai "pārtikas un rūpniecības preces" uzraksti uz logiem. Durvis/ieeja atsevišķas. Tā kā pa vidu ir pasts, nedomāju, ka iekšpusē tas ir savienots ar Latu. Mapillar... | |
| 6 | 2023-06-03 09:57 | richlv | O, paldies. Agrāk bija liels uzraksts "Veikals".Vai veikals tur tiešām bija, vai tikai uzraksti palikuši? :) | |
| 7 | 2023-06-03 10:20 | HellMap ♦674 | Uzraksti tādi paši kā Latam - uz loga svītra. Pie durvīm bija visādi papīri. Un suņu barības reklāma un miskaste. Viss sakopts. Pa logu var redzēt plauktus. Nav labi redzamu darba laiku. Bet izskatās pēc atvērta. | |
| 8 | 2023-06-06 19:06 | HellMap ♦674 | Šeit Mapillary skati: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=959088812081139&focus=photohttps://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=216182447416232&focus=photo | |
| 136124455 by Aleksandar1994 @ 2023-05-15 12:29 | 1 | 2023-05-15 20:03 | HellMap ♦674 | Hello again,Building additions like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173048317 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173048172 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173047928 etc. are all misaligned. As I mentioned before, Bing is not a good source in Latvia for aerial tracing with no referenc... |
| 2 | 2023-05-15 21:22 | richlv | Hi Aleksandar1994, as this problem does not seem to be an exception, please pause any additions in Latvia for now.Before resuming, please discuss with the local community (preferably at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com) how to best fix these recurring issues. | |
| 3 | 2023-05-18 09:40 | Aleksandar1994 ♦52 | Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We apologize for any misunderstandings or oversights and are committed to making sure our processes adhere to local guidelines. As we strive to validate map edits worldwide, we sometimes use Bing aerial imagery when local imagery is not available or ... | |
| 4 | 2023-05-25 12:41 | richlv | Hi Aleksandar, thank you for your reply.It seems to be rather generic, though. As this same problem has happened multiple times, could you please detail the exact steps taken to fix this - especially regarding the manual aspect (as per the changeset message, "Manually checked")?Such ... | |
| 5 | 2023-05-26 14:19 | Aleksandar1994 ♦52 | Hi richlv, Thank you for the invitation to the conference and the local community! I will ask about the possibility to attend the conference and we will explore how we can work closely with the local community (in Latvia and in general). We improved our validation software so that our editor... | |
| 135163685 by richlv @ 2023-04-20 18:44 | 1 | 2023-05-08 21:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Hey! I shrunk the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164141365 construction area. You mapped it across the entire location, but it's currently only a portion of it. It looks like it matches the cadaster plot, so that's what I retraced it to. |
| 2 | 2023-05-09 09:05 | richlv | Thanks, looking at these images, construction seems to be ongoing to the left pretty much up to the roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277585273166386 , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=952713332430452 .Also, along Lubānas iela, it's ongoing right up to the edge of the st... | |
| 3 | 2023-05-09 10:20 | HellMap ♦674 | I see what you mean. But I think you are confusing the Reinvaldu to Lubānas section with the Lubānas to roundabout section. It does indeed go almost all the way to R/L intersection in a sort of triangle shape but not all the way to roundabout - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=759671655623268 ,... | |
| 4 | 2023-05-09 11:09 | richlv | Oh, I see - thank you for checking it, that makes sense. | |
| 100451377 by IvarioLV @ 2021-03-05 00:25 | 1 | 2023-01-26 16:24 | richlv | Hi, given that the changeset message mentions a proprietary map provider, please note that it is not allowed to take any information from JS maps.In case any information remains in OSM from that provider, it should be re-surveyed from valid sources, or removed. |
| 131648293 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2023-01-24 11:55 | 1 | 2023-01-24 14:09 | Colbertson ♦104 | Lūdzi pieraksti jebko kas nav "Updates_2023"šim piemēram derētu "Iģenes muižas dīķis"https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 2 | 2023-01-24 18:12 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Sveiciens!Skaidrs, ka ir zolīda prakse visu aprakstīt, bet, ja pie katra papildinājuma to darītu, veltot kaut pārdesmit sekundes, lidz šim komentāriem vien būtu veltījis vairākas dienas. Tas nav tā vērts. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-24 19:54 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Noteikums par pareizu komentāru sniegšanu par savu izmaiņu kopumu nav bez iemesla, kā jūs varat izlasīt šeit:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsJūs varētu vēlēties pārskatīt, sniedzot pienācīgu komentāru vienalga? Un jūsu komentārs par la... | |
| 4 | 2023-01-24 20:37 | richlv | Hey, vēl daži centi :)Parasti jau nevajag ļoti garus komentārus, pietiek ar dažiem vārdiem, kas būs dažas, ne daždesmit sekundes.Mums dažreiz var šķist, ka mūsu rediģēšanu citi īsti pat nepamana, bet Latvijas kopiena aug, un biežāk sanāk saskarties ar citu kartēt... | |
| 52315461 by HellMap @ 2017-09-23 21:45 | 1 | 2019-09-08 08:13 | richlv | Sveiki, 2017. gadā dažas ielas pie Saulkrastiem tika nomainītas no access=destination uz access=private, bet tur tagad cauri iet Jūrtaka.Vai tās tiešām ir "private", nevis "destination"?Piemērs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70117367/history . |
| 2 | 2019-09-08 08:33 | HellMap ♦674 | (I'll reply in English, since that makes it accessible to more people.)Yeah, these roads have the "braukt aizliegts" signs (https://likumi.lv/ta/id/274865#p259 302.), so only residents/deliveries. There's a bunch of places in Saulkrasti like this, which seems silly. I guess I... | |
| 3 | 2022-12-30 19:01 | HellMap ♦674 | Pārliku uz vehicle=destination tagad, kad labāk saprotu access nozīmi un lietošanu un saistību ar zīmēm. Toreiz ne līdz galam sapratu. Better late than never :) | |
| 4 | 2023-01-03 09:34 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies :) | |
| 11042738 by osmmaker @ 2012-03-20 17:17 | 1 | 2022-08-17 11:28 | richlv | Hi, this changeset added name:fr for a Latvian town of "Dagda" - but it was added as "Dadga".Was that a typo?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/119253538/history |
| 2 | 2022-12-20 16:16 | richlv | Removed that tag. | |
| 128051012 by ELVIJSVITINS @ 2022-10-25 17:58 | 1 | 2022-12-07 12:38 | richlv | Heya, thank you for the great map improvements :)In this changeset, some name=* tags were added to buildings - but those were just addresses.In OSM, address tags are structured in addr:street and addr:housenumber tags, among others.Names are used only for objects that actually have names.\... |
| 129147095 by somix @ 2022-11-20 08:19 | 1 | 2022-11-22 17:13 | richlv | Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements. The road classification change unclassified->track would need community discussion and consensus, though - I've reverted this changeset for now.Additionally, in this changeset alt_name and isolated_dwelling tags were removed (this got rever... |
| 2 | 2022-11-22 17:49 | somix ♦88 | HiAs the wiki says:- unclassified: The least important through roads in a country's system;- track: Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses.I change "unclassified" to "track" if road doesn't give access to anything (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa... | |
| 128141197 by boomboom14 @ 2022-10-27 18:06 | 1 | 2022-10-28 11:11 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi, why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177033064/history ? |
| 2 | 2022-11-10 20:01 | richlv | Sveiki boomboom14, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :) | |
| 128092423 by Leicha @ 2022-10-26 16:20 | 1 | 2022-10-26 19:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Hi!These structures do not look like buildings: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1166353293788990&focus=photoWhat did you mean to fix with this edit?`historic=memorial` is probably wrong and should be around the whole area. But these look like (retaining) walls. |
| 2 | 2022-10-27 17:20 | HellMap ♦674 | You tagged more of these as buildings (changesets 128132917 and 128132992). Can you please clarify what you are trying to do? These are clearly not buildings. | |
| 3 | 2022-11-10 20:00 | richlv | Sveiki Leicha, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :) | |
| 4 | 2022-11-11 14:39 | Leicha ♦5 | Hello, sorry for late reply. Im trying to map the structures around the cemetery. Maybe im using the wrong description. I didnt find in the osm.com webpage catalouge the one i needed (wall or smtng like that) so used buildings as i saw that somewhere it was used like that too. If im using wrong desc... | |
| 5 | 2022-11-11 15:21 | HellMap ♦674 | Thanks for getting back! And thanks for changing the features.Yeah, not everything has a tag. And the default openstreetmap.org editor iD does not have all of them. Sometimes things need custom values or even new values.I think `barrier=retaining_wall` matches the primary purpose here. These... | |
| 128453848 by richlv @ 2022-11-03 20:00 | 1 | 2022-11-03 22:39 | HellMap ♦674 | Is there a new a bridge here? |
| 2 | 2022-11-03 22:59 | richlv | Yeah, so I was told, and shown a photo of a wooden bridge :) | |
| 127904968 by richlv @ 2022-10-21 22:58 | 1 | 2022-10-22 10:25 | HellMap ♦674 | Hey! I think this changeset broke something about the forest multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13480473. I can't tell exactly what and why (and I'm not even 100% sure it's this edit). If I had to guess, the lake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112309345/history now... |
| 2 | 2022-10-23 13:38 | richlv | Thank you so much for spotting this.The overlap causing this seems weird, as the residential area isn't a member of the multipolygon.I've removed the overlap anyway, let's see whether it helps any. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-23 13:40 | richlv | Seems to be rendered as expected even before my latest changes, though.The multipolygon is crazy, not seeing anything obvious that could have affected this. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-23 14:17 | HellMap ♦674 | Yeah, it has re-rendered correctly now, so I suspect the crossing ways was indeed what caused it. They were one outer and one inner, which probably confused the default renderer.Oh whoops, yeah, the residential is drawn as separate way. I was selecting the main/big forest way going down the same... | |
| 5 | 2022-10-23 20:24 | richlv | I doubt my residential area change made a difference here - it actually had started rendering as expected before the change, I just had not refreshed it all.Given the complexity of that multipolygon (just look at the number of inner ways), I'll just be glad it looks mostly OK now :) | |
| 6 | 2022-10-23 20:37 | HellMap ♦674 | Weird. I don't see any other edits or changes here, so it may have been the renderer bugging out initially or later. Oh well. | |
| 122365735 by HellMap @ 2022-06-14 10:14 | 1 | 2022-10-16 19:24 | richlv | This added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069549979 , but it's not quite residential landuse, filled with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcabin .Looking at the landuse and leisure tag wikipages, cannot find anything better, though.Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... |
| 2 | 2022-10-16 19:53 | HellMap ♦674 | I didn't survey as much as you, but there were some private property signs and these looked like ghetto forest cabins, so I couldn't think of of anything better than residential other than to not map at all. I wouldn't tag is as camp site either as I don't think you can actually ... | |
| 3 | 2022-10-17 08:45 | richlv | There's a relatively fresh sign one building there with the name, but overall it seems likely that this will turn into a mostly summer house area. keeping it "residential" might indeed be the best option right now.That "attraction" seems wrong, haha. As a minimum, it... | |
| 117082558 by HellMap @ 2022-02-06 15:07 | 1 | 2022-10-15 07:24 | richlv | Perhaps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028666803 should be place=islet, or not have place tag at all?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland#When_to_avoid_place=island |
| 2 | 2022-10-15 09:54 | HellMap ♦674 | Indeed, changed to islet. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-15 10:17 | richlv | Great, thanks :)I usually leave such tiny islands/islets untagged, but either way seems fine. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-15 10:35 | HellMap ♦674 | I would probably not tag it as an islet if I added actual land cover tag(s), like scrub or wood or something. | |
| 124396404 by richlv @ 2022-08-02 15:05 | 1 | 2022-09-19 19:05 | HellMap ♦674 | Is there (now) a living zone here around [1]? From your Mapillary and my earlier visit, it doesn't look like it, but wanted to double check.[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083248667 |
| 2 | 2022-09-21 10:42 | richlv | As far as I recall, it's not market as living street (yet?). | |
| 3 | 2022-09-21 10:44 | richlv | I guess I kept living_street classification from this original way when I was splitting it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989378384/history .As it's all work-in-progress there, I'm fine with either classification :) | |
| 4 | 2022-09-21 11:08 | HellMap ♦674 | I guess I'll change it to residential until and if this actually gets designated as a living zone. Someone might end up converting these to living streets assuming that's what they are once they are built. | |
| 5 | 2022-09-21 11:57 | richlv | Sounds good, thanks. | |
| 126367398 by HellMap @ 2022-09-19 11:26 | 1 | 2022-09-19 14:06 | richlv | You committed this changeset 1.5 hours after I wanted to map the place - well done :D |
| 2 | 2022-09-19 14:24 | HellMap ♦674 | :) Gotta be fast with you around or there will nothing new left to map.There are still a lot of minor details to map here though. Notably, all the grass dividers/medians/separators. But without aerial, they are a real pain. The only saving grace is that the building has an accurate cadaster outl... | |
| 3 | 2022-09-21 10:49 | richlv | Harrr - well, I did add a bicycle parking stand and surface for all the serviceways ;)More micromapping possible almost always (surveillance cameras? lamp posts?), but from the dedicated survey point of view, I'd say this is good enough. | |
| 4 | 2022-09-21 11:14 | HellMap ♦674 | Personally, I think "normal" mapping should end at pedestrian amenity and accessibility routing. So sidewalks, kerbs, surfaces, trash cans, benches, crossing details, fences, gates, etc. Basically, can someone in a wheelchair reliably and safely navigate/route through?Then micromapping... | |
| 114526128 by IvarioLV @ 2021-12-03 14:47 | 1 | 2022-06-16 21:20 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienoti vairāki vārdi, kas neatbilst OSM vadlīnijām - piemēram, ēkas "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km ielas māja" un "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km sētas māja", stāvvieta "Rīgas-Sig... |
| 2 | 2022-06-20 13:20 | IvarioLV ♦1 | Sveiks. Paldies par adrešu salabošanu šosejas adresēm. Māju nosaukumus es ņēmu no BalticMaps, un tobrīd kaut kā neatradu veidu, kā pielikt māju oficiālo nosaukumu (lai cik muļķīgs tas būtu) kādā citā veidā, kurā tās varētu arī atrast pēc šī nosaukum... | |
| 3 | 2022-07-15 08:10 | richlv | Izrādās, pilnais nosaukums ir oficiālā adrese arī VZD datos.Adrešu imports šo nosaukumu ir atjaunojis - atvainojos par kļūdaino noņemšanu :)No BalticMaps informāciju gan nedrīkstam ņemt nekādu, ja kaut kas vēl palicis, vajadzētu paskatīties, kādi citi avoti v... | |
| 4 | 2022-07-15 09:07 | IvarioLV ♦1 | Labi, paldies par norādēm. | |
| 122150553 by epxmap @ 2022-06-09 07:55 | 1 | 2022-06-27 19:32 | richlv | Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienots "attraction" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8987840335 , pievienots tikai nosaukums "RĒZEKNE".Kas ar to domāts? |
| 2 | 2022-06-28 14:36 | epxmap ♦4 | Līdzīgi kā pie Brīvības pieminekļa ir nolikti priekšā burti RĪGA. Šajā gadījumā - RĒZEKNE. Attēls: https://www.facebook.com/rezeknespilseta/photos/pcb.5223204504461629/5223160061132740 | |
| 3 | 2022-06-28 14:52 | richlv | Super, liels paldies par atbildi - it kā prasās klāt "artwork", bet tas pats key :)Skatos bildē, ka lietots "title case" - varbūt "name" vērts nomainīt uz "Rēzekne"? | |
| 4 | 2022-06-28 15:17 | epxmap ♦4 | Nomainīju. Paldies! | |
| 5 | 2022-07-01 20:46 | richlv | Burvīgi, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.Starp citu, papildus oficiālajai epasta listei ir arī OSM Latvijas Signal grupa - varbūt tur ir vēlme pievienoties :)https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL | |
| 104318854 by Sveta_RocketData @ 2021-05-07 12:36 | 1 | 2022-06-27 21:33 | richlv | This changeset changed operator and other tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3709531147 , while ignoring the incorrect name. Please be more diligent when editing map data. |
| 104318807 by Sveta_RocketData @ 2021-05-07 12:35 | 1 | 2022-06-27 19:42 | richlv | This changeset created a duplicate ATM at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8709526406 (duplicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8693082929). Please be more diligent regarding existing map contents. |
| 118120232 by gvozd2006 @ 2022-03-05 10:13 | 1 | 2022-06-12 20:40 | richlv | Sveiki un liels paldies par interesi par OpenStreetMap.Šajā projektā objektus nemēdz dzēst - ja tie ir, piemēram, privāti, tos nepieciešams pareizi apzīmēt. Tādējādi arī tiek izslēgta iespēja, ka kāds tos iezīmētu atpakaļ no ortofoto slāņiem vai citiem datiem.&S... |
| 2 | 2022-06-12 20:49 | richlv | Pārlūkojot izmaiņas, radās iespaids, ka daļa ceļu ir privāti - tos nomarķēju ar tādu atzīmi. | |
| 121857721 by HellMap @ 2022-06-02 15:43 | 1 | 2022-06-07 10:22 | richlv | Hi, in the changeset comment you talk about entrances and living streets.In Latvia, only roads, explicitly marked with the living street sign, are marked as living_street - this was discussed and agreed upon years ago. Luckily, even documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagg... |
| 2 | 2022-06-07 11:11 | HellMap ♦674 | It was? Hmmm. Thanks for letting me know about this.This looks like a rather recent change on the wiki then as of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines&diff=2187729&oldid=2147581. I specifically checked this point on wiki and in practice years ago... | |
| 3 | 2022-06-07 15:38 | richlv | Yeah, that one was mostly clarification, as it did say "{{Tag|highway|living_street}} - ceļi, kas apzīmēti ar ceļazīmi "Dzīvojamā zona"." before.It has been discussed since 2010 at least, with some consensus a few years later, but somehow the wikipage did not get updated... | |
| 115014645 by Upesciema Ziņas @ 2021-12-16 15:32 | 1 | 2022-05-30 10:05 | richlv | Labdien un liels paldies par interesi.Diemžēl šīs izmaiņas nācās atcelt, jo tika izdzēsti daudzi objekti (gājēju celiņi utt).Iespējams, šādi tika atceltas arī derīgas izmaiņas - ja ko tādu manāt, lūdzu, papildiniet karti jebkurā laikā.Ja rodas šaubas pa... |
| 118483859 by richlv @ 2022-03-14 19:46 | 1 | 2022-03-15 13:49 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040341399. What ist the meaning of the tag landusend = cons? |
| 2 | 2022-03-15 17:38 | richlv | Haha, when my computer is slowish, I get all kinds of weird content in dialogs. Usually I spot it before uploading, but missed this time.Thank you for noticing, fixed now. | |
| 117199479 by Beton Krai @ 2022-02-09 12:08 | 1 | 2022-03-01 21:37 | richlv | Sveiki, pamanīju, ka šajā changeset importēti VZD ēku dati, bet tas nav norādīts "source".To var redzēt no tā, ka ēku kontūras atbilst VZD datiem, bet tie, diemžēl, dauz kur ir ļoti neprecīzi.Lūdzu apspriest potenciālu VZD datu importu epasta listē https://lists... |
| 2 | 2022-03-02 11:42 | richlv | Te pāris piemēri: https://imgur.com/a/WfwzCE2 . | |
| 3 | 2022-03-14 21:11 | Beton Krai ♦26 | Labdien, palaboju dažas neprecīzas ēkas un nākotnē mēģināšu atcerēties norādīt source :) | |
| 4 | 2022-03-15 17:36 | richlv | Paldies par atbildi un labojumiem :)Varbūt vērts apspriest VZD datu importu epasta listē? | |
| 87535037 by arcth @ 2020-07-04 15:58 | 1 | 2020-08-12 09:33 | ronery-mapper ♦5 | Why have you remove *:en tags from objects here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=56.96531&lon=24.14289 |
| 2 | 2020-09-05 12:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello ronery-mapper,Which objects were it that have "*:en" tags removed? You've linked to a query in the middle of Riga, but it'd be much easier if you could link one of the objects themselves.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 3 | 2022-03-08 08:55 | richlv | Heya, šajā izmaiņu kopā ir ievietoti objekti no VZD ēku kontūrām.To īsti nevajadzētu darīt, jo atbilstība reālajai situācijai daudz kur ir diezgan slikta - piemērs no šīm izmaiņām: https://imgur.com/a/NKWHZze .Pie tam, šeit tas acīmredzot ir noticis pirms VZ... | |
| 82482926 by mtrutman @ 2020-03-22 13:15 | 1 | 2022-02-10 08:52 | richlv | Hi, this changeset left a straight path of ~1.5 km marked as underground, crossing a few cliffs.Is this expected?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141977386 |
| 2 | 2022-02-10 09:04 | mtrutman ♦4 | Yes, this is expected. It is an underground tunnel connecting two neighbouring valleys. It is well passable except for a short wet section at south end. There more tunnels like this in this area. Some of those are carrying water for irrigation purposes, but this one is just a tunnel. | |
| 3 | 2022-02-10 19:10 | richlv | Oh wow, that's very interesting - thank you for confirming :) | |
| 116715577 by arcth @ 2022-01-28 16:57 | 1 | 2022-02-03 11:44 | richlv | Sveiki, paldies par papildinājumiem - epasta listē apspriežam labākos variantus ievietošanai un uzturēšanai (ieskaitot potenciālu pāreju uz adresēm kā punktiem) - būtu jauki te iesaistīties:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2022-January/006354.htmlPapil... |
| 2 | 2022-02-08 17:02 | arcth ♦35 | Labdien,tagad listē iet runa par addr:* tagu sakārtošanu.addr:place ir domāts to adresācijas objektu nosaukumiem kuri VARIS datos ir līdzvērtīgi ielam, bet kuriem nav atbilstošu highway=*, piemēram, Zirgu sala Liepajā, Pils rajons Jēkabpilī, Vērmanes dārzs Rīgā.\... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-10 18:03 | richlv | Paldies par atbildi. Jā, addr:place ir viena tēma, vēl tiek spriests par procesa automatizēšanu ilgtermiņā.Vēl svarīgs aspekts - VZD ir apstiprinājuši, ka Latvijā adreses ir punkti. Līdz ar to principā vajadzētu pāriet no adresēm ēkām u.c. objektiem uz adresēm kā a... | |
| 114770108 by Poxie26 @ 2021-12-10 06:16 | 1 | 2021-12-11 16:43 | richlv | Sveiki, liels paldies par burvīgajiem kartes uzlabojumiem :)Daži nelieli ieteikumi:a) Te un citur punkti apzīmēti kā natural=wetland un wetland=pond. Labāk to būtu iezīmēt kā laukumu, un pareizāks apzīmējums būtu natural=water.b) Mazos ceļus, kas ved uz vienām mājām, Latvijā... |
| 113444022 by Tramparam Parampampam @ 2021-11-06 12:29 | 1 | 2021-11-08 15:11 | richlv | Hi, this changeset changes tags on highway areas - for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538568103/history .Has this been discussed in the local community mailing list? |
| 2 | 2021-11-08 15:15 | richlv | Another example - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921051459/history . That area is not marked as parking, thus the functional change might be incorrect.There might be other suspect changhes like that - so this would require discussion in the talk-lv mailing list. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-08 18:36 | Tramparam Parampampam ♦12 | hello. no, it is not discussed, i just freefixed everything around. if you think that this is wrong you are free to change as you wish. just don't roll back changeset please. | |
| 4 | 2021-11-14 15:52 | richlv | Thank you for the reply, greatly appreciated.How do you find things that need fixing, and how do you decide how to fix them?In some cases, highway=service + area=yes have been replaced with area:highway=yes, losing information about way classification - and this seems to go against the tag docum... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-14 17:27 | Tramparam Parampampam ♦12 | i use ID editor, this is fixes offered by it. | |
| 6 | 2021-11-14 17:29 | Tramparam Parampampam ♦12 | btw - you could always find me in https://discord.gg/openstreetmapmy name there is wad#4687 | |
| 112229569 by arcth @ 2021-10-07 18:24 | 1 | 2021-11-11 20:35 | richlv | Heya, this changeset deleted parking area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817289946/history .Has there been some re-development here? |
| 2 | 2021-11-12 15:43 | arcth ♦35 | This is rather a parking lane than a separate designated parking space. It is mapped using parking:lane tag [1] on the appropriate part of the street [2].[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81243931 | |
| 111273654 by Martins Larinovs @ 2021-09-16 06:37 | 1 | 2021-09-21 08:53 | richlv | Hi and thank you for the great map improvements :)Unfortunately, this changeset ended up removing a couple of roads in Ratnieki. I've done a partial revert to fix this and preserve your other changes - if you have a chance, please check the revert at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11... |
| 109033340 by jslawin2 @ 2021-08-02 12:57 | 1 | 2021-08-11 10:27 | richlv | Hi, your changes remove a lot of mapped forest areas - for example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1923404/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142086146/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142085348/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142085287/historyhttps://www.op... |
| 2 | 2021-08-12 09:38 | jslawin2 ♦33 | Bo rozległe multipoligony leśne zostały przez kogoś niechlujnie skopiowane. Obrysy nie odpowiadają rzeczywistości. Są ponakładane na obszary, które nie są lasami. Wielokrotne poprawki przez różne osoby doprowadziły do ich uszkodzenia. Jedynym wyjściem jest ich usunięcie i ... | |
| 109353634 by Oskars Ušpelis @ 2021-08-08 16:23 | 1 | 2021-08-08 17:53 | richlv | Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes papildinājumiem :)Pamanīju dažus nesavienotus ceļus - piemēram:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971383217https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971382919Ceļiem (ways) vajadzētu būt savienotiem ar citiem ceļiem, ja tur dzīvē iespējams pārvietoties... |
| 2 | 2021-08-09 09:26 | Oskars Ušpelis ♦1 | Sveiks,paldies par norādēm. Statistika rāda, ka reizi 5 gados ievelku taciņas:)Kopumā diezgan ievelkošs pasākums tā kartes zīmēšana - ļoti jāfokusējas uz konkrētu vietu vai lietām, lai neizplūstu bezmērķīgā "braukāšanā" pa karti. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-09 10:53 | richlv | Jā, un uzreiz var redzēt smukāku karti, un tad vēl uzlabojumi nonāk mobilajās aplikācijās...Nedaudz palīdz sazīmēta karte, jo tad mazāk acīmredzamu uzlabojumu :)Es te vēl nedaudz paspēlējos ar ceļu savienojumiem (lai ir savstarpēji savienoti, lai nav savienoti ar landuse utt)... | |
| 109016907 by richlv @ 2021-08-02 09:14 | 1 | 2021-08-08 14:15 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | Hey richlv,I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969742117/history is marked as service way. I think this should be marked as residential, similar to the way to the north of it.(It's possible there were access restrictions on this way segment. If so, tag them with the relevant acces... |
| 2 | 2021-08-08 15:59 | richlv | Heya, thank you for checking.If these were separate, named streets, "residential" would be a good fit indeed - otherwise, I'd stick with "service".In our recent mapping party here we didn't get to these streets - will check with locals :) | |
| 81970540 by Ersis @ 2020-03-09 15:24 | 1 | 2020-03-12 07:44 | richlv | Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)Ja iespējams, būtu jauki izmaiņas sadalīt mazākās daļās, tās būtu vieglāk pārskatīt.Šajā changeset ir dažas izmaiņas, kuras laikam tika veiktas ļoti ātri - būs nepieciešami daži labojumi.Piemēram:* https://www.o... |
| 2 | 2020-03-12 12:05 | Ersis ♦1 | Protams, ka vajag labot, ja tikai varētu tās kļūdas un neatbilstības atrast. Neiedomājos, ka automātiskā fīča var ko sabojāt.:)) | |
| 3 | 2020-04-09 08:44 | richlv | Ne visas automātiskās lietas ir vienādas - iD dažreiz izmaiņas notiek strauji, un ne vienmēr tiek rūpīgi parbaudītas.Paldies par labojumiem :) | |
| 4 | 2021-05-17 13:48 | iav ♦18 | Layer=-1 on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158268131 looks like an error, I remove it. Please get it back it not error. | |
| 5 | 2021-05-21 22:39 | iav ♦18 | about layers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer | |
| 6 | 2021-05-22 09:09 | richlv | Layer part - it was probably intended to fix the error with the intersecting building, but that's not the correct solution in this case, of course.Splitting the way, having common nodes at the building intersections and marking the segment correctly seems the most common approach. | |
| 103575305 by Maris33 @ 2021-04-25 13:47 | 1 | 2021-04-27 19:09 | richlv | Čau, pamanīju, ka pieturām noņemti shelter/bench tagi - piemēram, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3431637984/history .Kādēļ tā? |
| 2 | 2021-04-28 17:27 | Maris33 ♦10 | shelter un bench tagi nav obligāti, ja pieturās tie ir, tad tos lietoju | |
| 3 | 2021-04-28 17:29 | Maris33 ♦10 | tas ir, ja pieturā ir sols vai nojume, tad lietoju shelter=yes, bench=yes, ja nav tad nelietoju | |
| 4 | 2021-04-28 17:31 | richlv | Noteikti nav obligāti - biju domājis esošu tagu noņemšanu. Šo tagu neesamība parasti apzīmē info trūkumu (nezinām, vai ir vai nav), bet shelter=no/bench=no nozīmē precizējumu - pārbaudīts, ka nav.Vismaz dažām pieturām, kuras nesen biju pārbaudījis, pieliku at... | |
| 97770496 by Bolt001 @ 2021-01-19 12:55 | 1 | 2021-02-22 20:16 | richlv | Hi, thank you for the recent map improvements in Latvia (which also includes at least Bolt002, 009 and 010).In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activites/Bolt , it is stated that "We are constantly in contact with the local community through the local talk list", but... |
| 2 | 2021-02-23 05:41 | Bolt001 ♦7 | Hey, thank you for your comments. We have sent a message to talk-lv@openstreetmap.org on Feb 3, but had no response. I'm afraid it wasn't approved by moderators. So far the talk-lv is the only contact channel we could find for Latvian community. Please let me know if you have other comm ch... | |
| 3 | 2021-04-22 17:47 | richlv | Hi, I asked around - indeed, non-subscriber messages to talk-lv are dropped (as majority of them is spam anyway).You are correct, talk-lv is the main communication channel for Latvia.May I suggest to subscribe to the list, and post again? That way the message will go through, and you will be les... | |
| 4 | 2021-04-26 06:00 | Bolt001 ♦7 | Hey richlv, thank you for the comment. I have subscribed to the talk list and sent a message once more! | |
| 5 | 2021-04-26 10:55 | richlv | Wonderful, thank you so much :) | |
| 101008529 by richlv @ 2021-03-14 21:31 | 1 | 2021-03-19 09:52 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Could you check this bus stop? It got a strange 'sheln' tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8518899452 |
| 2 | 2021-03-19 13:58 | richlv | Ah, thanks - was tabbing too quickly through the input fields.Fixed now. | |
| 99943178 by Bolt018 @ 2021-02-25 04:38 | 1 | 2021-03-10 20:56 | richlv | Hi and thank you for the map improvements.In this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910683506/history was added as highway=residential.Given that it is marked as private (can be seen in Mapillary images), I've changed it to highway=service and access=private. |
| 2 | 2021-03-11 03:39 | Bolt018 ♦6 | Hi richlv,Thank you for your valuable feedback and reviewing the edits made. Will follow the udpate and make use of mapillary moving forward. Happy Mapping.-Bolt018 | |
| 98045495 by richlv @ 2021-01-24 07:56 | 1 | 2021-01-24 14:08 | Colbertson ♦104 | "sat tracing" but what imagery? |
| 2 | 2021-01-24 18:46 | richlv | Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at... | |
| 62549061 by Reinis Bērziņš @ 2018-09-13 11:43 | 1 | 2021-01-06 16:34 | richlv | Heya, don't see this shop in Mapillary images or ortophotos - what was it, where is it located?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2140260603/history |
| 2 | 2021-01-07 11:48 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | I moved it by mistake. Now I moved it back to its correct location - second building to South West. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-07 17:13 | richlv | Perrrrfect, thank you - glad I didn't just delete it :) | |
| 58057674 by Lūķis @ 2018-04-13 08:49 | 1 | 2020-11-29 20:02 | richlv | Hi, this changeset has added multiple strange footways that do not seem to match surface model / ortophotos:https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/57.8047/25.2223Also a footway named "Rūnnu ZĪmes tak":https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579496738What are these, what's the s... |
| 2 | 2024-12-09 17:15 | HellMap ♦674 | Most of these have been reverted since. I removed a few remaining ones. (And also fixed a bunch of other errors and minor issues.) These names look completely fictitious and the paths themselves are placed in impossible or dubious locations, like over ditches and through dense cutlines. The changese... | |
| 93477040 by kate_rocketdata @ 2020-11-03 11:01 | 1 | 2020-11-28 16:32 | richlv | This changeset damages pharmacy data for the 3rd time.Reverted in #94951717. |
| 2 | 2020-12-08 14:07 | kate_rocketdata ♦118 | thanks, we'll fix it | |
| 83884200 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2020-04-21 13:32 | 1 | 2020-10-31 15:38 | richlv | Sveiki, kāds ir datu avots šim objektam?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794405569Izskatās pēc bijušās dzelzceļa līnijas atrašanās vietas, bet šobrīd vismaz konkrētā posma rietumpusē laikam nav pat path, kur nu vēl track... |
| 92568480 by Asumarin @ 2020-10-16 08:25 | 1 | 2020-10-30 22:03 | richlv | Hi Asumarin, thank you for your contributions.Unfortunately, there are several issues with this changeset.a) This is an undiscussed mass edit.b) This breaks data by incorrectly changing amenity=pharmacy into amenity=veterinary. I have reverted this changeset.I also noticed that you are doi... |
| 73460626 by Reinis Bērziņš @ 2019-08-18 10:35 | 1 | 2020-10-16 13:25 | richlv | Skatos, esi bijis šajā reģionā pāris mēnešus pēc manis, un tik smuki sazīmējis dižkokus :)Vai pareizi saprotu, ka šie ir divi atsevišķi dižkoki?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6720621816/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6720621827/historyA... |
| 2 | 2020-10-16 15:30 | Reinis Bērziņš ♦18 | Jā, pareizi 2 dažādi dižkoki, katrs savā dīķa pusē. Informāciju uzzināju no ozols.daba.gov.lv, bet pārbaudot dabā, viss sakrita. Taču natural=tree gan piemirsu pierakstīt. :) | |
| 3 | 2020-10-16 18:08 | richlv | Super, milzu paldies par uzlabojumiem :) | |
| 92040807 by ozolslawfirm @ 2020-10-06 10:27 | 1 | 2020-10-16 15:38 | richlv | Hi there, thank you for the map improvements.I traced a few buildings and a parking lot in this area, as well as moved your office to where I believe it belongs (the building, not the parking lot). Please let me know if I got the building wrong.Additionally, I removed the description of the node... |
| 11870543 by richlv @ 2012-06-12 02:35 | 1 | 2020-09-22 01:52 | Mashin ♦556 | I thought you would appreciate to know that the position and the shape of your Troll House from 2012 was finally fixed. :D |
| 2 | 2020-09-23 11:03 | richlv | Haha, that's wonderful - and you kept all the object history, that's one well done import :)Thank you so much for the map improvements and this notice. | |
| 34064822 by Natfoot @ 2015-09-16 15:11 | 1 | 2020-09-11 09:22 | richlv | Hi Natfoot, thank you for the great improvements.A user is reporting that the footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243471032 does not exist.If you have recent on-the-ground knowledge that it actually still exists, I'll remove it next week. |
| 2 | 2020-09-11 15:29 | Natfoot ♦56 | The problem like a lot of these paths is not if it does or does not exist the problem is if it is legal or trespassing. Has the user identified themselves as the property owner? | |
| 3 | 2020-09-11 16:00 | richlv | They seem to be a local, but they did not identify their interest further.Do you have a chance to survey this location (and perhaps even upload Mapillary imagery)? | |
| 4 | 2020-09-15 12:00 | richlv | Heya, looks like you removed that way - thank you for looking into it :) | |
| 6482348 by richlv @ 2010-11-28 21:31 | 1 | 2020-09-03 02:27 | Aglis IRM-ED ♦109 | Hi richlv, i changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/86962626). I also made change around this way. Thankyou |
| 2 | 2020-09-15 08:56 | richlv | Great, thank you for the map improvements :) | |
| 84688501 by dacjanis @ 2020-05-05 11:05 | 1 | 2020-05-25 08:00 | richlv | Hi, this fence looks a bit strange - could it be some other feature instead?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800363192 |
| 2 | 2020-05-25 08:32 | dacjanis ♦2 | The short answer is no - it is actually a fence. The long answer is - it's complicated, there are a lot more features to this area - it's a recreational nature park with lots of foot paths and fenced animal habitats. Since there are a lot of fences it would probably be better to simply del... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-26 09:19 | richlv | Thank you for clarifying.I assume the fence is perpendicular to the footpath then - not connecting two paths?If some segments can be drawn reasonably accurately, no need to delete them - incomplete data is still better than nothing.Thank you so much for the great improvements :) | |
| 4 | 2020-05-27 12:00 | dacjanis ♦2 | The fence was in fact connecting the two foot paths. It's a difficult to map construction - the footpath is a raised boardwalk on top of a fence. I guess it used to go all the way across the field but for some reason a segment of the boardwalk was removed so that just the fence underneath remai... | |
| 5 | 2020-05-27 12:25 | richlv | Neat, that makes sense (and the fence would be great to keep in the map). Thank you for the attention to detail.BTW, various places could be photographed with the Mapillary application, then a link to the image would clarify things immediately. | |
| 6 | 2020-05-27 12:53 | dacjanis ♦2 | Yeah, I haven't really started using Mapillary yet, only recently started updating OSM, not entirely fluent with all the tools available. I'll make sure to check it out, thanks :) | |
| 84777631 by Nagerevnu @ 2020-05-06 18:21 | 1 | 2020-05-08 20:09 | richlv | Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabošanu :)Būtu jauki izmaiņu aprakstā sīkāk uzrakstīt, kas darīts - ja visi apraksti ir tikai "Labojumi", nav noprotams, kas un no kādiem avotiem ir darīts. |
| 2 | 2020-05-11 06:49 | Nagerevnu ♦2 | Sveiki, Varu pievienot. Bet šeit ir uz sava GPX faila pielabots viss (ir publiski ielādēts fails), bet ir problēma ar Relationships - nemāku salikt, lai virs ūdens utt. nebūtu meža, ja varu dabūt, ka nav mežs, tad problēmas ar meža attēlojumu - viņš pazūd. Irt kāda iesp... | |
| 3 | 2020-05-17 07:20 | richlv | Paldies par atbildi.iD redaktorā to neesmu darījis, bet varbūt palīdz šī dokumentācija:https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#drawing-multipolygonsVai ar tādu metodi izdodas? | |
| 14323303 by Raitisx @ 2012-12-18 20:32 | 1 | 2020-04-14 19:09 | soshial ♦26 | Labdien, Raiti. Es pamaniju, ka jus pielikat visas viensetas ar so izmainu. Kuru avotu tolaik izmantojat, jo sis saraksts nav pilns un pirms 7 gadiem ari pilns nebija :) Varbut, mes varam so papildinat vai izdzest un uzlikt visus pa jaunam? |
| 2 | 2020-05-08 20:21 | richlv | Dzēst noteikti nevajadzētu, bet papildināt būtu brīnišķīgi.Droši vien vislabāk apspriest epasta listē talk-lv. | |
| 82795280 by arcth @ 2020-03-29 23:21 | 1 | 2020-03-31 07:35 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Kuram traucē pilsdrupu detalizācija? Lūgums atjaunot. |
| 2 | 2020-04-03 03:22 | arcth ♦35 | Izdzēsta detalizācija [1] bija neprecīza [2][3] un maldinoša. Muižas ēkas paliekam ir vienkārša taisnstūra kontūra [4] un caurumus jumtā/pārsegumos nevar uzskatīt par iekšpagalmiem.[1] https://www.upload.ee/image/11394915/lustes_mz.png[2] https://wiki.openstre... | |
| 3 | 2020-04-03 10:42 | Anrijs Terauds ♦41 | Tad precizējiet un papildiniet, nevis dzēsiet un aizstājiet ar neko neizsakošām kontūrām. Papētiet, kā tiek detalizēti kultūrvēsturiski objekti kau vai Vācijā. Drupās tiek iezīmēta katra siena, atvērums vai kolonna. Es bieži izmantoju openstreet resursu pārgājienos un prie... | |
| 4 | 2020-04-15 18:55 | UrSuS ♦58 | Pie lidostas takas ari bija izdzesti! | |
| 5 | 2020-05-08 20:16 | richlv | Heya, paldies visiem par labojumiem :)arcth, varbūt ir vērts uzrakstīt ziņu autoriem, ja kaut kur šķiet par daudz sazīmēts - noteikti kopā varam vienoties par vispareizāko risinājumu. | |
| 84136182 by HellMap @ 2020-04-26 10:06 | 1 | 2020-04-27 19:24 | richlv | Woah, thank you for mapping this area.I just went through it all and was going to map some stuff =)Mapillary imagery coming soon, should help to add detail ;) |
| 47998805 by AkageMuk @ 2017-04-21 10:39 | 1 | 2020-04-10 20:37 | richlv | Now that addr:flats is rendered, it can be seen that all entrances for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110797504 have it tagged as 1-15.Could this be accidental? |
| 82403548 by richlv @ 2020-03-19 19:06 | 1 | 2020-03-20 18:40 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello! Please the tags of node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070668, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070670, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310070672. I assumed you mean addr:housenumber. |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 20:15 | richlv | Oops, they were supposed to be addr:flats.Fixed now.Thank you for spotting that. | |
| 80864972 by olo81 @ 2020-02-11 18:19 | 1 | 2020-02-17 14:35 | vrg ♦12 | W jakim celu zamieniasz polne ścieżki typu "track" na drogi serwisowe (utwardzone) oraz dodajesz przebiegi który nie istnieją? Nie ma połączenia ulicy Wschodniej z Lawendową, tam jest ze 3-5m różnicy terenu. |
| 2 | 2020-02-17 18:20 | olo81 ♦666 | sprawdź nawierzchnię tych dróg jest dodana, różnica między drogą polną a dojazdową polega właśnie na tym że dojazdowa prowadzi do budynków a nie na pole czy przez las | |
| 3 | 2020-02-17 18:29 | olo81 ♦666 | Na najnowszych zdjęciach widać że jednak już jest połączenie lewendowej | |
| 4 | 2020-02-18 14:27 | vrg ♦12 | Po pierwsze nie dokonujemy zmian na podstawie wyłącznie zdjęć satelitarnych a po drugie nie mając wiedzy jak to wygląda w praktyce. Tak jak powiedziałem - nie ma i nie będzie połączenie Lawendowej z Gdańską ponieważ jest tam kilka metrów różnicy wysokości, obie drogi wed... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-18 14:47 | olo81 ♦666 | A jeśli z terenu budowy osiedla zwieziono ziemię by zniwelować różnice wysokości i zrobić drogę dojazdową do budowy którą naniosłem? | |
| 6 | 2020-02-20 20:45 | olo81 ♦666 | Nie wiem z czego wynika twoja ignorancja ale polecam doczytać dokumentacje wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highwayDrogi dojazdowe "service" służą do oznaczania dojazdów do budynków, budów itd. nawierzchnia drogi nie obliguje do używania tago... | |
| 7 | 2020-02-21 15:14 | vrg ♦12 | Nie można zawłaszczyć sobie czegoś, co się robi od niemal 10 lat. Może i nie jestem jakiś ekspertem w tej dziedzinie ale zaczynałem nanosić zmiany kiedy projekt OSM w Polsce był jeszcze w powijakach a mapa Czeladzi to była jedna wielka biała plama. Co do usuniętego skrótu pomięd... | |
| 8 | 2020-02-21 16:10 | olo81 ♦666 | Czyli dalej nie czytałeś czym jest droga dojazdowa w dodatku konfabulujesz, piszesz że jednak jest skrót do budowy a dajesz zdjęcie miejsca obok. | |
| 9 | 2020-03-18 09:43 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | "A nawet jeśli obok pojazdy z budowy wyjeździły tam dziki i nielegalny skrót to nie oznacza, że należy go usankcjonować na mapie. Droga ta nie jest zgodna z ewidencją gruntów i miejscowym planem zagospodarowania."Jeśli jest droga to można ją zaznaczyć. Zgodnoś... | |
| 10 | 2020-03-18 09:46 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | "Także absolutnie tego dzikiego wyjazdu z budowy nie należy nanosić na mapę."nie jest to coś specjalnie wartościowego do mapowania ze względu na tymczasowość i nieistotność dla większości ludzi.Ale mapowanie tego jest OK, a jeśli istniejący obiekt został zmapowany t... | |
| 11 | 2020-03-18 11:48 | Arnebius ♦63 | Dopisuję się i popieram stwierdzenia zawarte w komentarzu od Mateusz Konieczny. Jeśli obiekt istnieje w terenie nie ma jakichkolwiek przeciwwskazań aby nanieść go na mapę OSM. Zapisy EGiB, MPZP czy SUiKZP nie mają nic do tego bo OSM nie jest mapą urzędową tworzoną przez urzędnikó... | |
| 12 | 2020-03-18 16:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | (są pewne rodzaje obiektów które nie są mapowane nawet jak istnieją, np prywatne toalety w budynkach mieszkalnych - ale istniejące drogi zawsze można zaznaczyć) | |
| 13 | 2020-03-20 09:18 | richlv | Hi everybody. This topic has been raised with DWG, let's try to find a consensus here.Sorry for writing in English, but my Polish has not progressed beyond a few words.In cases when something has been constructed illegally or is not open to public, it is better to map it and tag access (&... | |
| 14 | 2020-03-21 12:57 | vrg ♦12 | Hey, "vrg, does that sound like an acceptable solution?"Of course, it's absolutely a good solution at all to map something that really exist. Also I'm mapping this way all the time. But!! In this case, that small piece of field is not a road, truck or sth. It is small ent... | |
| 15 | 2020-05-21 09:56 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,593 | "panowie, rozmawiamy o kilku metrach wyjeżdzonego kawałka pola."https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MicromappingLudziom zdarza się czasem mapowac chodniki jako obszary, wszystkie drzewa w parku czy wszystkie najmniejsze nawet drogi.Na ogół nie jest to specjalnie przy... | |
| 81415695 by Ersis @ 2020-02-24 17:00 | 1 | 2020-03-12 07:09 | richlv | Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)Šajās izmaiņās nedaudz nepareizi nomainījās šī te garāžu teritorija (pazuda puse teritorijas): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154745145/historyVai ir zināms, kā tas gadījās? |
| 79476983 by richlv @ 2020-01-12 14:14 | 1 | 2020-01-12 23:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porz... |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 11:09 | richlv | The note on addr:steet missing acknowledged, couldn't easily figure it out on the ground (the number plate did not specify the street). Looking at it now, made a guess and added addr:street.There's a popular opinion that addr:city should be inferred, thus skipping that one. | |
| 79081415 by richlv @ 2020-01-01 13:36 | 1 | 2020-01-01 20:37 | RicoElectrico ♦1,770 | I found information on the various real estate sited that construction of Gołębia 33 was also done. Removed landuse=construction from there as well. |
| 2 | 2020-01-01 20:40 | richlv | Great, thank you for checking that :) | |
| 74154352 by MelioraCogito @ 2019-09-06 01:44 | 1 | 2019-09-06 05:18 | alester ♦187 | Google Earth isn't allowed for editing. Please revert this changeset immediately to remove any data that doesn't comply with the ODbL license |
| 2 | 2019-09-13 04:15 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | 1. I DID NOT use GE to "EDIT" anything. I used it as a visual source & collected some (untrused) coordinate/measurements info to import into AutoCAD Civil 3D whereupon I used that data to "best approximate" the parking layout. Normally I would have used VicMap, but the aer... | |
| 3 | 2019-09-13 13:55 | freebeer ♦1,598 | first, never use google mapping products in any way for osm mapping. lose them from your source. punkt. aus.second, changeset comments are the preferred public way to report and discuss your edits. what goes out-of-sight is invisible to me and dozens of other users who have nothing better to... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-16 06:21 | MelioraCogito ♦15 | Once again... some unknown JA jumps in to poor alester's def. Pathetic.1. Understood – GE ist verboten! Period. (Won't make that mistake again.)2. Mind you, it seems even some of the "rule keepers" don't actually know the f'n "rules" themselves...... | |
| 5 | 2019-09-25 08:59 | richlv | Everybody, please take a moment away from the keyboard.Let's keep things civil and polite. | |
| 73113510 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2019-08-07 13:51 | 1 | 2019-09-09 04:14 | richlv | Mapping this node as historic=castle might be a bit misleading - there do not seem to be even any ruins for several centuries by now.Is there at least a hill? |
| 65376901 by HellMap @ 2018-12-11 13:54 | 1 | 2019-08-14 13:35 | richlv | This changeset added a duplicate building over an existing one, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654246503/history - I cleaned it up.Might be worth checking the workflow on how the original building was not spotted. |
| 2 | 2019-08-14 13:51 | HellMap ♦674 | That must have been a glitch with the iD preview version that I did not notice. I was probably moving the whole building to align. Or something else weird happened. Nothing else was different in the workflow besides the iD being in preview version, which I have used a bunch and (as far as I know) wi... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-14 14:44 | richlv | Sounds good, thank you for the quick reply. | |
| 73040126 by arcth @ 2019-08-05 20:50 | 1 | 2019-08-06 05:36 | richlv | Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem.Būtu jauki, ja varētu tos sadalīt pa mazākiem reģioniem, un pierakstīt nedaudz detalizētāku komentāru - citiem kopienas dalībniekiem ļoti grūti izsekot izmaiņām, kuras aptver visu Latvijas teritoriju. |
| 2 | 2019-08-13 17:17 | richlv | Šīs izmaiņas aizvietoja tourism=attraction Lauču akmenim ar natural=stone. Lai gan stone tags ir vērtīgs, pats objekts tomēr ir pietiekami slavens, pievienoju tourism=attraction tagu. | |
| 70816437 by arcth @ 2019-05-31 17:12 | 1 | 2019-06-05 14:31 | richlv | Hi, this changeset has removed a lot of map data. For example, here footways, fences and all other detail has been deleted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/57.09902/22.96025&layers=N .Example deleted footway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692284646/history .What happened in this ... |
| 2 | 2019-06-20 20:32 | richlv | Hi, have you had a chance to look into this topic?I have also sent you a personal message, please check it at your convenience.On the note of communication, are you subscribed to the Latvian OSM mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv ? If not, it would be great to joi... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-06 16:31 | richlv | Hi arcth, have you had a moment to check this topic? | |
| 4 | 2019-08-12 21:19 | arcth ♦35 | Hi,most buildings and highways around Lamiņi were displaced by 20-30 metres to match unaligned sat images. There was quite a lot of other issues including forests and cemeteries tagged as parks, broken route relation, randomly placed tree rows, etc. I could have deleted the footway and some oth... | |
| 5 | 2019-08-13 14:55 | richlv | Thank you for the response and all the map improvements, it's now much more clear what happened there.Perhaps it is worth leaving a comment such changesets to see whether the original mapper can improve the situation themselves, and to avoid miscommunication.I see that most of the detai... | |
| 72558990 by ruthmuz @ 2019-07-23 13:30 | 1 | 2019-08-05 19:23 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. |
| 72621244 by ruthmuz @ 2019-07-24 22:48 | 1 | 2019-07-28 13:20 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | You have entered several grid cells in OSM, which probably only landed there accidentally. Could you please delete them as soon as possible? |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 19:22 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72643100 by ruthmuz @ 2019-07-25 12:35 | 1 | 2019-07-28 09:12 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 19:20 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72643317 by ruthmuz @ 2019-07-25 12:39 | 1 | 2019-08-05 19:20 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. |
| 72646885 by LUSEY @ 2019-07-25 13:45 Active block | 1 | 2019-08-05 19:17 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. |
| 72643558 by LUSEY @ 2019-07-25 12:44 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-28 09:12 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 19:16 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72559584 by obeiseyene @ 2019-07-23 13:42 Active block | 1 | 2019-08-05 19:14 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. |
| 72643386 by obeiseyene @ 2019-07-25 12:40 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-26 20:45 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Welcome to OSM! You add some ways with the key "Highway" (misspelling of "highway"). I coorect this error, but it seems you paint your ways over existing ways. Please check this. |
| 2 | 2019-07-28 09:12 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan | |
| 3 | 2019-07-29 10:44 | obeiseyene Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-05 19:12 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72643856 by Etoile brillante @ 2019-07-25 12:50 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-28 09:13 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 19:07 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72643747 by GRANDFORMAT @ 2019-07-25 12:48 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-28 09:13 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 19:06 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 72644145 by Basmos @ 2019-07-25 12:56 | 1 | 2019-07-28 09:13 | mueschel ♦6,564 | This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-08-05 18:56 | richlv | Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity. | |
| 53875234 by osm_saint-louis @ 2017-11-17 13:48 | 1 | 2017-11-18 02:47 | FTA ♦201 | Hi there,I am wondering where you were sourcing these village names. I've been interested in mapping in North Korea, especially because of the lack of ability to survey, but I am curious of sources regarding location data in the country that have a compatible license.Cheers and Happy Mappin... |
| 2 | 2017-11-18 10:17 | osm_saint-louis ♦25 | Hi,the source is: https://www.hrnk.org/uploads/pdfs/ASA_HRNK_Camp16_v8_fullres_FINAL_12_15_15.pdfGreetings,uli.l aka osm_saint-louis | |
| 3 | 2018-01-21 17:29 | FTA ♦201 | Hi uli.l,Thanks for the info. Unfortunately it looks like this source is actually copyrighted and not something we can extract names from (at the bottom of every page on that pdf). Unless, did you receive some sort of waiver?Best,Ethan | |
| 4 | 2019-07-12 00:00 | richlv | uli.l, have you had a chance to look into the copyright status here? | |
| 5 | 2019-09-11 21:37 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | As there's been no reply I'll revert this.Best Regards,Andy (from the DWG) | |
| 6 | 2019-09-11 21:43 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74372654 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mapping from an incompatible source in the DPRK. Attempts to contact the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53875234 | |
| 7 | 2019-09-11 22:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74372654 . | |
| 70964029 by Anrijs Terauds @ 2019-06-05 18:36 | 1 | 2019-07-06 16:33 | richlv | Sveiki, vai ir bijis brīdis paskatīties komentārus pie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1802021 - par datu avotu un epasta listi? |
| 70642957 by arcth @ 2019-05-26 22:39 | 1 | 2019-06-05 17:29 | richlv | Hi, this changeset has removed a number of features, including a named feature "Vircavas pils parks" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9610533/history#map=8/56.810/24.560&layers=N .What happened in this changeset? |
| 2 | 2019-06-07 11:21 | arcth ♦35 | Hi, to my knowledge there is no park, instead there is a schoolyard with a sports pitch surrounded by some allotments and farmland. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-10 15:28 | richlv | Thank you for the reply, greatly appreciated.Given that there apparently was an old park, maybe that name could be moved in the old_name tag? | |
| 66909917 by dmbm6 @ 2019-02-04 17:16 | 1 | 2019-05-27 19:40 | richlv | Hi, this changeset (with a comment ".") changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103163479/history from highway=track to highway=footway. Based on the local orthophoto layer, I improved its layout and changed to highway=service (both imagery and previous tagging seemed to indicate that as... |
| 70493213 by richlv @ 2019-05-21 21:11 | 1 | 2019-05-25 18:45 | 4004 ♦1,882 | thanks! |
| 2 | 2019-05-25 18:46 | 4004 ♦1,882 | just to check, did you revert all of his changesets not reverted by Tomas Straupis? | |
| 3 | 2019-05-25 19:13 | richlv | I reverted all cemetery import changesets except one, where the revert had conflicts with changes by Tomas. Perhaps Tomas did manual deletes which caused that. | |
| 70417106 by soshial @ 2019-05-19 17:56 | 1 | 2019-05-21 20:46 | richlv | Hi there. This seems to be the first changeset in a series of cemetery imports in the Baltic states. It is really great to see interest in this topic - I've mapped a few missing cemeteries myself and love see additional data.Unfortunately, this import has not been discussed, and there are qua... |
| 2 | 2019-05-21 20:59 | soshial ♦26 | Hi, sorry for some mess that I might have invoked.1. The data is taken from timenote.info (https://timenote.info/lv/copy). It is written that the data is published under CC-BY, which means that we might use this data freely (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/).2. I explicitly checked... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-21 21:19 | richlv | Thank you for the quick response, really appreciated - and thank you again for the interest in this topic. The first thing to do is go by the import process, outlined at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines .Given that this is spanning 3 countries, initial discussion would be best... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-21 21:25 | richlv | Looks like the licence might be the first challenge - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility . | |
| 5 | 2019-05-21 21:29 | RM87 ♦8 | I took a quick look at Estonian edits.at least one was from wikimapia for sure. There were duplicates, some because some of those old cemeteries are now parks. There are redundancies in names.There are stone graves, that are hard to concider as cemeteries.Few edits that added new info, but wou... | |
| 6 | 2019-05-22 07:21 | soshial ♦26 | @richlv, I didn't quite understand how exactly those are not compatible. Is it possible that I persuade the owner of the DB to change license to ODbL?@RM87, thank you for clearing this out for me. Including estonian data was a mistake, sorry. | |
| 7 | 2019-05-22 07:28 | soshial ♦26 | If data for Estonia and Lithuania is much worse than for Latvia, than I will narrow my goal to only Latvia. Where is the place for discussion about it? | |
| 8 | 2019-05-22 12:23 | richlv | soshial, it would be sufficient for the data owner to allow importing it in OSM without changing the original licence - if they are legally allowed to do it.https://timenote.info/lv/copy says the team is a few individuals, and "~8800 other persons". On top of that, the sourcing of that d... | |
| 68689833 by richlv @ 2019-03-30 08:22 | 1 | 2019-03-31 22:59 | arcth ♦35 | These buildings were demolished around year 2016. |
| 2 | 2019-04-01 09:35 | richlv | Dang, thank you - they looked fairly fresh on the sat layer ;)Perhaps a "note" tag around here could help future mappers. | |
| 3 | 2019-04-04 09:34 | richlv | Noticed in #osm that for another location it was suggested to leave the outlines in place, prefixing them with demolished: - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: .Does that sound good? | |
| 66691848 by arcth @ 2019-01-28 02:32 | 1 | 2019-03-17 16:41 | richlv | Hi, this changeset removed name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224286093 , added a name to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646431456 and changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646431457 .What was the source of these changes? |
| 67496578 by richlv @ 2019-02-23 15:38 | 1 | 2019-02-23 16:49 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,950 | What is it? |
| 2 | 2019-02-23 22:23 | richlv | Ha - thank you for the quick catch :)This had to wait for me checking the images (also coming up on Mapillary). This is http://www.skrastas.lt/?data=2009-09-22&rub=1065924831&id=1253544039 - but checking spelling and capitalisation would be appreciated. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-24 06:37 | Tomas Straupis ♦1,950 | Thank you. Spelling seems correct :-) | |
| 4 | 2019-02-24 18:45 | richlv | Yay, thank you. And for the record, here's a Mapillary image: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/7bLLuAWEUpmdkUW7rhbgzw | |
| 65582542 by HaimToGo @ 2018-12-18 14:26 | 1 | 2018-12-27 17:38 | richlv | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this changeset added two untagged ways, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655966964 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655966965 - this duplicated some of the existing ways and did not seem useful so I have reverted this changeset. Please let me kno... |
| 65582623 by HaimToGo @ 2018-12-18 14:30 | 1 | 2018-12-27 17:33 | richlv | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this changeset added an untagged way, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655967272 - this duplicated the existing track and did not seem useful so I have reverted this changeset. Please let me know if there was an intent I have missed. |
| 48497567 by RoterEmil @ 2017-05-08 10:20 | 1 | 2018-11-25 12:41 | richlv | Hi, I noticed that this changeset has created a new water area that overlaps with older water areas, and seems to include some non-water, based on ortophoto.https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/57.11687/24.67541What's the source of this area, was this a mechanical edit? |
| 63924354 by Hilton Hotels @ 2018-10-27 10:33 | 1 | 2018-10-27 16:22 | richlv | Hi there and thank you for the improvements to OSM.This changeset added building=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132364752 . From the imagery it is obvious that this whole area is not a building, so I have removed this tag.Could you please check whether you have added building=yes to si... |
| 60742324 by open-steet-map-editor @ 2018-07-15 23:02 | 1 | 2018-08-03 12:12 | richlv | Hi there. Addresses do not have a requirement to be on buildings, quite the opposite - they are even legally points in some countries. Have you removed any other addresses that were mapped as points? |
| 2 | 2018-08-04 08:47 | open-steet-map-editor ♦6 | Hi,thanks for your care and message!I added this point mapping on the street (using Vespucci, see its v1) and later fixed it: as I couldn't find the exact location of "26", but found "26/B" and "26/C", I added them (as entrances, to the right location) and ... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-04 13:36 | richlv | Ah, that's great - thank you for improving the map and for the quick reply. | |
| 45773381 by nikhil78jain @ 2017-02-03 09:51 | 1 | 2018-02-03 14:34 | richlv | this changeset added several large "buildings" where actually multiple smaller buildings exist. one of these huge buildings is not shown to exist in any of the imagery layers - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471741241 . i will remove this one and add notes to the ones that need fixing. |
| 54852984 by coventry332 @ 2017-12-22 23:20 | 1 | 2017-12-23 00:18 | ToeBee ♦183 | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please do not add things that do not exist on the ground. This "lake" is clearly not real. If you are trying to manipulate the Pokemon game... well please don't. I have removed this lake. If you have any real world information to add, OSM would welcome your c... |
| 2 | 2018-01-09 19:43 | richlv | dear coventry32, you have continued adding such fake features. that's really not cool, as people are creating a wonderful, free resource for all to use. | |
| 38659823 by GoWestTravel @ 2016-04-18 07:27 | 1 | 2017-10-10 17:20 | richlv | hi there. could you please clarify what is the data source for these additions/edits ? |
| 2 | 2017-10-11 11:19 | GoWestTravel ♦14 | Hi Richlv,I'm working in the travel industry and used my source for hotels for these additions. I hope I was able to contribute the correct hotels.Thank you,GoWestTravel | |
| 50761298 by trakais @ 2017-08-01 18:47 | 1 | 2017-09-23 12:22 | richlv | hi. several of these ways look unlikely to be useful - like one 5-node "hook" over the buildings in ogre. was this by any chance direct conversion of a gps track ?would you have the time to check all of the ways in the changeset and clean up any that were added accidentally ? |
| 48580533 by noteka @ 2017-05-11 05:52 | 1 | 2017-05-13 07:27 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87406131/history was previously a forest; are you sure it's best tagged as a park and not a forest at all? |
| 2 | 2017-05-13 07:49 | noteka ♦1 | Totally. It was created at the end of 19.th century as regular planning Manor Park so it is not a forest. I get the confusion it has the name forest in it and all but this park is also called and more recognized as "Anniņmuižas parks".Description of park: http://www.citariga.lv/lat/ima... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-13 12:56 | AkageMuk ♦30 | Hello, noteka and welcome in OSM. Although you perform right the same activity in OSM, as OSM user Diana777 peviously I should inform you about your mistakes.We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, NOT S... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-13 17:15 | richlv | even the referenced page says "...forest, also called a park"; it also says "the local council plans to convert part of the forest into a park".this should be clarified/surveyed, and if some parts have been converted to a park, they should be mapped accordingly. the whole area ... | |
| 5 | 2017-06-01 09:36 | AkageMuk ♦30 | For your information, edit war continues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133727 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49133791 | |
| 47972778 by Andr Voloshenko @ 2017-04-20 13:54 | 1 | 2017-04-20 15:03 | richlv | hi there. it seemed a bit unlikely that a shopping centre would be operating an atm, so i have reverted this change.please let me me know what was the intended change here. |
| 47791286 by Erglis @ 2017-04-14 18:59 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:50 | richlv | Thank you for the map improvements. What was added here as a park did not seem to be a park actually - no official note I could find at http://www.rigasmezi.lv/lv/Rigas_darzi_un_parki/par_parkiem/Darzi_un_parki_Pardaugavas_iecirknis/ .I have removed the park designation in OpenStreetMap, too. |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 10:58 | AkageMuk ♦30 | A strange wave last weeks of stubborn adding fake parks, duplicate parks, change forests into parks and changing paths into footways from various new users. Could be some pokemon game related vandalism. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-18 11:03 | richlv | Yes, this does seem to be PokemonGO inspired. Some of it is not vandalism, looks like genuine improvements - although maybe slightly misguided.If the editors stay around and "upgrade" to quality map editing, we all stand to benefit.To the new editors: don't be discouraged to make ... | |
| 47897168 by Mārtiņš Gailītis @ 2017-04-18 08:17 | 1 | 2017-04-18 09:46 | richlv | the "Ezera vārti" memorial, what is that and where exactly is it located ? at the current location, nothing of interest can be seen on the mapillary imagery.could you please take images (see www.mapillary.com for detail), upload them and share the link here ? |
| 47828495 by Sophie Nelissen @ 2017-04-16 02:18 | 1 | 2017-04-16 20:00 | richlv | thanks for the map update - what is the name of the added hostel ? |
| 47791948 by Erglis @ 2017-04-14 19:03 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:53 | richlv | Most of these looked like paths, I have modified them accordingly.If that does not seem to be correct, you could you please provide Mapillary images of the area ? See www.mapillary.com for more detail. |
| 47789648 by Ernests Pūliņš- Cinis @ 2017-04-14 18:22 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:34 | richlv | This one indeed designated as a park - thank you for spotting :)http://www.rigasmezi.lv/lv/Rigas_darzi_un_parki/par_parkiem/Darzi_un_parki_Pardaugavas_iecirknis/I changed it to use the official name, and added the previous name in the loc_name tag. |
| 47789664 by Ernests Pūliņš- Cinis @ 2017-04-14 18:23 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:28 | richlv | I cleaned up the duplicate here, but getting back to the topic of the object itself - the name seems to be describing a memorial. What indicates that it is not one ? |
| 47789439 by Ernests Pūliņš- Cinis @ 2017-04-14 18:14 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:20 | richlv | Have all of these been surveyed to be designated footways?If you have a chance, could you please add Mapillary images of these footways ?See https://www.mapillary.com/ for the detail. |
| 47789260 by Ernests Pūliņš- Cinis @ 2017-04-14 18:06 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:14 | richlv | Hi there, new mappers.We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, not serve some other goal - be it playing some online game or anything else.While it is nice that the area here has benches, it is not offi... |
| 47757296 by Diana777 @ 2017-04-13 21:07 | 1 | 2017-04-14 23:12 | richlv | Hi there, new mappers.We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, not serve some other goal - be it playing some online game or anything else.While it is nice that the area here has benches, it is not offi... |
| 47123137 by lunar_maria @ 2017-03-24 12:12 | 1 | 2017-03-27 12:18 | richlv | hi there and thank you a lot for the improvements :)maybe you can take a look at these steps here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429780132 .can they be connected to the nearby road - maybe by a footway or a path ?that would be great to do, as disconnected ways cause issues for routing... |
| 46969534 by Aleksandr Springis @ 2017-03-19 00:13 | 1 | 2017-03-25 23:03 | richlv | hi there. this looked more like a bus stop than a station, so i changed it. please let me know if that was wrong :) |
| 46955168 by Marius marenas @ 2017-03-18 12:39 | 1 | 2017-03-25 21:48 | richlv | Hi there. Thank your for your interest in OpenStreetMap.We highly value all contributions, but it is worth rememberging that this is a public, global dataset - all the things you add are added for many users worldwide.Personal notes/bookmarks/pins should not be added to the map.If you would ... |
| 46934958 by Rolands Roma @ 2017-03-17 17:01 | 1 | 2017-03-17 21:49 | richlv | hi there and welcome to openstreetmap :)please note that your edits are public, and go into a global database. in this case, there did not seem to be a public sauna at this location, thus i have removed it.please let me know if there indeed is a sauna - maybe it is a guesthouse then ? |
| 46791668 by Valera-bogema @ 2017-03-12 18:11 | 1 | 2017-03-12 20:39 | richlv | heya, are you sure about the addr:street tag here ? "Namdaru" street seems to be quite some distance to the northhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305601461/history |
| 46777650 by Dmitrij Beltjukov @ 2017-03-12 05:24 | 1 | 2017-03-12 20:28 | richlv | heya - not sure what the addition to the pub name was supposed to mean here, but it didn't seem like part of the pub name, so i removed it. please let me know if there's something that should be added :) |
| 46774342 by Pavels Skiluap @ 2017-03-11 22:49 | 1 | 2017-03-12 00:28 | richlv | hi there - thank you for the map update, but it seemed unlikely that there is a shop in the middle of the forest, so i removed it :)please note that the map edits happen in the global openstreetmap database - these edits are visible by everybody.if you would like to save places for personal ... |
| 46706676 by edgars rutko @ 2017-03-09 11:17 | 1 | 2017-03-09 12:41 | richlv | hi and thank you for the improvements to the map :)could you please clarify whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4725816389 is indeed a public guesthouse ? if so, what is the proper name of it ?please note that your edits are public and this location now shows up as a guesthouse in various... |
| 46599799 by JoernBur @ 2017-03-05 16:09 | 1 | 2017-03-06 11:46 | richlv | hi there. you have added this place as a hamlet, although it definitely is not one.do you have some sources/clarification on what is actually located at this place ? |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 09:35 | JoernBur ♦1 | https://pelecalasitava.lv/pirma-darznieciba-talsos/ | |
| 46534014 by rimantsjana @ 2017-03-02 21:44 | 1 | 2017-03-05 22:37 | richlv | you have added a lot of highways and other objects that do not seem to exist.do you have a source for these objects actually existing ? |
| 46166842 by MaCTePoK @ 2017-02-17 14:51 | 1 | 2017-02-19 13:07 | richlv | is this really a furniture shop, or is it more like a workshop ? |
| 45925794 by Arturs Brokans @ 2017-02-08 18:13 | 1 | 2017-02-18 16:04 | richlv | is there really an artwork at this location ? what is it ? |
| 45769935 by Juri Punane @ 2017-02-03 07:18 | 1 | 2017-02-10 01:36 | richlv | is that really a hostel, and is its name "Martas 9" ? |
| 43960002 by Alinskaya @ 2016-11-26 09:34 | 1 | 2016-11-26 17:37 | richlv | there doesn't seem to be a building here - is this supposed to be the parking entrance ? in any case, the name is wrong.also, any url for "pizza daugava" ? |
| 2 | 2017-02-05 17:25 | richlv | these objects do not seem to exist and have been removed.if they do exist, please provide photo evidence (use the mapillary.com application) and url for the pizza place website | |
| 45573753 by harambewarlord @ 2017-01-27 20:37 | 1 | 2017-01-30 19:32 | richlv | hi there. if these feature indeed do exist, would you be able to install the mapillary.com application and taking sequences of photos around there, showing the surroundings ?sunny daytime preferred ;) |
| 45590549 by Эрик Иванов @ 2017-01-28 12:35 | 1 | 2017-01-28 13:32 | richlv | hi there and thank you for your contribution to the map :)this looks like a private sauna that is not open to public. i've added access=private and removed the non-name in the name tag, but otherwise left it as-is.please note that your contributions are public - that is, your map edits are ... |
| 45589069 by MelnaisErglis @ 2017-01-28 11:35 | 1 | 2017-01-28 13:28 | richlv | hi there and thank you for your interest in osm :)the are that has been added as a park in this changeset did not look like a park - i've changed it to the more appropriate village_green tag.if that is indeed a park, please let me know and we can restore it, along with a proper name. |
| 45555398 by Wendigo90 @ 2017-01-27 11:56 | 1 | 2017-01-27 19:27 | richlv | is this really a park, or is it more like a grass area ? |
| 2 | 2017-01-27 19:33 | richlv | after considering this a bit more, i've changed all the freshly added parks to landuse=grass.if those indeed are parks, please let me know and we can re-add them - with names and other proper tagging :) | |
| 45552415 by Maplios @ 2017-01-27 10:20 | 1 | 2017-01-27 19:12 | richlv | hi there and thank you for your interest in openstreetmap.the footway, added in this changeset, as a bit suspect and i have removed it. sat imagery seems to show other ways between the buildings here that might be more appropriate to draw - if you have the time for this, please do improve the ar... |
| 45548308 by chuwax @ 2017-01-27 08:18 | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:10 | richlv | hi there. thank you for your interest in openstreetmap. the highway=pedestrian feature, added in this changeset, was not supported by the satellite imagery or by mapillary images and i have removed it.if it does exist, could you please install the mapillary.com application and take some photos... |
| 45468417 by Oskars Belruss @ 2017-01-25 09:13 | 1 | 2017-01-25 11:14 | richlv | Hi there. Thank you for the interest in OSM :)Unfortunately, it looks like the park that was added was not valid data - sat imagery showed it crossing some bare grassland, some industrial area and residential area.Please note that OSM is a vibrant, global community of volunteers that strive to ... |
| 45223198 by volcom_lv @ 2017-01-16 18:54 | 1 | 2017-01-17 09:45 | richlv | the added ATMs are unlikely to exist. please note that your edits go to a public, worldwide map dataset that is meant only for mapping real, visible things.if you want to save some location for personal usage, please save it as a "bookmark" - see https://support.maps.me/hc/en-us/articles... |
| 45035278 by ukdet @ 2017-01-09 19:49 | 1 | 2017-01-10 01:29 | richlv | this changeset adds a disconnected footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464790888 - all ways should be connected in ways entities could traverse them (cars could drive, pedestrians could walk etc) - that helps to make the map routable :)could you please check where the footway should be pro... |
| 2 | 2020-01-16 16:25 | rskedgell ♦1,467 | Footway/sidewalk ways now connected at crossings, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79658072 | |
| 44988737 by KohrAhr 2015 @ 2017-01-07 21:21 | 1 | 2017-01-07 23:58 | richlv | hi there - and thank you for the map improvements :)here, and overlapping landuse was added. as it did not seem verifiable and no source was mentioned, i converted it to a simple housenumber node. please let me know if there is a source for mapping areas. |
| 44726872 by Lenusy Levchenko @ 2016-12-28 10:37 | 1 | 2016-12-28 13:11 | richlv | mapillary imagery shows no buildings here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4577009396 - is there really a cafe ? |
| 2 | 2016-12-28 13:28 | richlv | ...and there does not seem to be a carwash here either : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4577009395 | |
| 44603651 by Dai Kaito @ 2016-12-22 22:00 | 1 | 2016-12-27 16:17 | richlv | hey, these footways do not seem to match the sat imagery much, and it's lightly doubtful that they are 2 metres wide...could you please take mapillary imagery of all the affected area ?the data does not look that good currently, i have to admit that i'm inclined to remove it. |
| 44702018 by arcool6 @ 2016-12-27 09:52 | 1 | 2016-12-27 14:30 | richlv | thanks a lot for the map improvements - unfortunately, this footway currently overlaps two segments of the street and a building.it is probably easier to draw it in anew - i will revert this changeset for now. if the footway really exists, please draw it in in a way that does not overlap the exist... |
| 44632316 by RalfsBelo @ 2016-12-23 20:05 | 1 | 2016-12-23 21:22 | richlv | highway=pedestrian already implies primary/only pedestrian usage as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian - could you please clarify on this change ? |
| 44621485 by Kristine1995 @ 2016-12-23 14:08 | 1 | 2016-12-23 16:00 | richlv | hey, a question on these recreational grounds - are there really areas like that ?please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground?uselang=en-GB for detail on tagging.given that this mapping seemed to include much more than necessary (a few buildings etc), i have ... |
| 44619025 by Kinskis @ 2016-12-23 12:02 | 1 | 2016-12-23 15:47 | richlv | this bench seems a bit suspect - where is it located ? |
| 44552424 by alex tsvetkov @ 2016-12-20 21:52 | 1 | 2016-12-20 23:30 | richlv | hey, is operator "igors" correct here ? is that a detail static enough to be added to the public map dataset ? |
| 44540929 by Kristaps Lauris @ 2016-12-20 13:08 | 1 | 2016-12-20 21:07 | richlv | hey, this did not look like a real camp site, so i have removed it - please let me know if that was wrong :)please note that the edits in maps.me application go in a public, worldwide database - such edits should only be used to update things that exist in the real world. if you would like to ad... |
| 29768341 by superfly15000 @ 2015-03-27 02:00 | 1 | 2016-11-13 13:05 | richlv | hey, what's this "Deep Tunnel" here ? |
| 43315281 by Uģis Spriņģis @ 2016-10-31 22:26 | 1 | 2016-11-01 10:59 | richlv | thanks a lot for the improvement - should it be marked as a "living street" ? |
| 2 | 2016-11-01 16:23 | Uģis Spriņģis ♦1 | Hi,did not know the difference between residential and living street - but probably yes. | |
| 3 | 2016-11-02 11:14 | richlv | thanks for the response. if it's a normal , smaller street, it's residential. if it's in an area, marked by signs like http://www.iauto.lv/_mm/i/20160106/20795_4849c138b57.jpg , it's living street.i'll update this one accordingly then :) | |
| 40474923 by richlv @ 2016-07-04 09:57 | 1 | 2016-10-28 16:28 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Wahoo! Now in Lavian |
| 2 | 2016-10-28 16:36 | richlv | Latvian ;) | |
| 43176014 by Dorowenko @ 2016-10-25 21:15 | 1 | 2016-10-25 22:25 | richlv | thanks a lot for the improvement and for the useful changeset message :) |
| 41211655 by GidonW @ 2016-08-03 10:52 | 1 | 2016-09-07 11:36 | PlaneMad ♦449 | Hi, can you explain what the curve_geometry=yes tag means? There are over 6,000 nodes with this tag added by you http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/curve_geometry |
| 2 | 2016-10-24 23:12 | richlv | other changesets with questions about this tag :* http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42080251* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41953577 | |
| 41953577 by GidonW @ 2016-09-06 11:54 | 1 | 2016-10-02 18:28 | richlv | hey, could you please clarify what the "curve_geometry=yes" tag is supposed to mean ?it is not documented anywhere, and does not seem to add any value, at least not at the first glance. |
| 2 | 2016-10-24 23:12 | richlv | other changesets with questions about this tag :* http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42080251* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41211655 | |
| 42080251 by GidonW @ 2016-09-11 14:25 | 1 | 2016-10-24 22:32 | DavidKewley ♦195 | Hi! I live very near here, and would like to work on this area, especially Cabot Road. Two questions for you. 1) What does the curve_geometry=yes tag mean? It appears you may be the only OSM user tagging this way; I want to respect it if it's useful to the community, but it's not obvious w... |
| 2 | 2016-10-24 23:12 | richlv | other changesets with questions about this tag :* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41211655* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41953577 | |
| 43093687 by BVG0806 @ 2016-10-23 06:05 | 1 | 2016-10-23 12:59 | richlv | the shops you added here looked very suspect and i removed them.if there indeed are shops at those locations, please re-add them and specify the names, too :) |
| 41134694 by V MLK @ 2016-07-30 21:42 | 1 | 2016-07-30 22:19 | richlv | is there really a guesthouse here ? if so, what's the proper name, and where is it located (current node is in the middle of the street) ? |
| 2 | 2016-10-17 07:38 | Raitisx ♦5 | Nav tur tuvumā neviena viesu māja | |
| 3 | 2016-10-17 08:49 | richlv | paldies. node gan vēl bija palikusi, izdzēsu :) | |
| 42768731 by Imants Pielis @ 2016-10-10 05:52 | 1 | 2016-10-12 21:53 | richlv | hey, you can add (save) favourites - use the "save" button with a star on it.using "add a pace to the map" adds it for all users in a global database :)i have removed the incorrect fast_food. |
| 42597262 by jeijei66 @ 2016-10-03 06:36 | 1 | 2016-10-03 08:08 | richlv | hey, there are now two places names Jaunjaunzemi - this one, and the already existing one 500m to the southeast.would it be correct to assume that this is the correct location and the other dwelling is just called "Ķieģeļceplis" ? |
| 42374338 by Slsva @ 2016-09-23 13:40 | 1 | 2016-09-23 16:19 | richlv | what's the name of this museum ?there seems to be a typo in addr:street - should it be "Rāznas" ?is the location correct ? that is, shouldn't it be more to the north ? |
| 41990627 by Eriks Velneenc @ 2016-09-07 21:59 | 1 | 2016-09-07 22:20 | richlv | that didn't sound like a proper nightclub, so i have removed it - please let me know if that was wrong :) |
| 41832090 by Alucards @ 2016-08-31 17:51 | 1 | 2016-09-01 08:19 | richlv | is cafe "Olmāra" closed and renamed to "Pumpuri", or is "Olmāra" now located somewhere else ? |
| 41764406 by Dim17 @ 2016-08-28 21:04 | 1 | 2016-08-29 11:56 | richlv | hi there. this changeset added several untagged ways that duplicated existing streets. i couldn't figure out what meaningful information was supposed to be added, so i reverted it. please let me know if something was lost in the process :) |
| 41718959 by Oskars Muižnieks @ 2016-08-26 16:44 | 1 | 2016-08-29 11:30 | richlv | this was a very unlikely guesthouse - i have removed it. please let me know is a guesthouse exists in this area that should be mapped. |
| 41595826 by MrBrightsideTK @ 2016-08-21 15:26 | 1 | 2016-08-25 11:36 | richlv | thanks for the updates - the "randene" object, is it a signpost ? is the full name possibly 'J. Raiņa piemiņas vieta "Randene"' ? |
| 41622702 by Janis Smaukstels @ 2016-08-22 19:43 | 1 | 2016-08-23 04:34 | richlv | hi there. this changeset added a highly unlikely butcher's shop name of "Ломбард" - i have removed it for now.if there have been any changes in the shop layout, could you please provide more detail ?also, mapillary imagery might be helpful :) |
| 41473892 by Lisa Bostelmann @ 2016-08-15 18:46 | 1 | 2016-08-16 04:13 | richlv | please note that the edits you make with the maps.me application are uploaded to a global, public database :)you can have your own local favourite list by clicking on the 'star' icon ("save") |
| 41429531 by garik1506 @ 2016-08-13 13:23 | 1 | 2016-08-14 11:38 | richlv | hey, this changeset added the same housenumber to two buildings - is that really correct ? |
| 34909534 by importLT @ 2015-10-27 18:00 | 1 | 2016-08-08 09:23 | richlv | hi there. this import has also added nodes with lithuanian names in latvia (and they are duplicates at a wrong position) - please check that further imports don't spill too much :) |
| 41234195 by Andris Antons @ 2016-08-04 10:26 | 1 | 2016-08-04 11:08 | richlv | that's very unlikely to be a bakery...is it even a real campsite ? |
| 41191510 by Deby Malamud @ 2016-08-02 12:59 | 1 | 2016-08-02 15:59 | richlv | it seemed that the address was changed on the wrong building - are you sure it was this building ?i've added 136F approximately where it seems to be and changed this one back to 136 - please let me know if that is wrong :) |
| 41161374 by alena Sirota @ 2016-08-01 08:11 | 1 | 2016-08-01 10:56 | richlv | hi there - this looks a bit strange. is there really a shelter with wlan access there ? |
| 40343936 by Braveheart501 @ 2016-06-28 13:30 | 1 | 2016-07-30 23:45 | richlv | a highly unlikely rest area. will remove. |
| 40609274 by Braveheart501 @ 2016-07-09 10:27 | 1 | 2016-07-30 23:40 | richlv | highly unlikely that there would be an embassy here. will remove. |
| 36703449 by headwatersolver @ 2016-01-20 15:31 | 1 | 2016-07-25 19:41 | richlv | hi there. this changeset has added a lot of footways near street crossings. unfortunately, these footway "boxes" or lines share no nodes with the ways they cross like they should (this can break routing), and the whole footway is tagged as a crossing (while only crossing nodes should be).\... |
| 2 | 2016-07-25 20:09 | richlv | as pointed out by maxerickson on irc, tagging the actual crossing way as a crossing would actually be correct - sorry, my bad :)connecting nodes would still be needed. | |
| 40800264 by Ignas Jagminas @ 2016-07-17 15:12 | 1 | 2016-07-17 18:11 | richlv | is there really a nightclub here ? got any references ? |
| 40502021 by Finn Andersen @ 2016-07-05 15:02 | 1 | 2016-07-05 16:44 | richlv | the artwork that was created at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4284267991 - does that really exist ? |
| 40362063 by Donald Jacman @ 2016-06-29 08:57 | 1 | 2016-06-29 11:28 | richlv | heya - i removed name "Prieža" as it seemed like a weird name. please let me know if that was actually correct :) |
| 40258888 by Joachim Witt @ 2016-06-24 12:29 | 1 | 2016-06-25 20:54 | richlv | cuisine=russian is a bit suspect for a restaurant called "Piebalga" - are you sure that is accurate ? |
| 40165677 by SQ KQ @ 2016-06-20 19:54 | 1 | 2016-06-20 20:59 | richlv | i suspect that's not really a public camp site, is it ?please note that your edits are available to the whole world - we make the map together :) |
| 40162347 by Remo Pender @ 2016-06-20 17:21 | 1 | 2016-06-20 19:03 | richlv | sat imagery doesn't seem to show a fuel station here - is that a new development ?is it really that close to the street ? |
| 39900535 by Snuks @ 2016-06-09 07:25 | 1 | 2016-06-10 10:04 | richlv | heya, this changeset marked a road as private. is the whole section between p34 and v387 private and not available for public access ?if so, the road should be downgraded, it's currently marked as tertiary.probably unclassified or service would be better. |
| 39690522 by queendawn @ 2016-05-31 14:48 | 1 | 2016-06-01 17:15 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Welcome to OSM! Did you really live on the street? And by the way: Is the name of the street Owens Drive (see add:street) or Owens (see the name of the highway)? |
| 2 | 2016-06-01 17:37 | queendawn ♦1 | Yes, I live on the street. The name of the street according to the USPS is Owens Drive | |
| 3 | 2016-06-01 17:40 | user_5359 ♦19,351 | Hello, I change the name of the street. But I think the house is right or left from the street and not on the street. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-01 17:54 | queendawn ♦1 | I'm pretty sure I know where my house is. It is located ON Owens Drive. You can confirm this with the post office or village of Aurora | |
| 5 | 2016-06-01 19:55 | richlv | queendawn, it was supposed to mean that you probably don't live literally "on" the street - as in, in the middle of it. which would require moving the address node to where your house actually is :)well, unless it's something like the classic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwI... | |
| 39577476 by AkageMuk @ 2016-05-26 10:12 | 1 | 2016-05-26 12:32 | richlv | the bus stops are named "Sporta iela", but they are part of a relation named "Arēna Rīga" - is that correct ? |
| 2 | 2016-05-26 12:35 | AkageMuk ♦30 | True mistake :-(, will correct it | |
| 39550900 by richlv @ 2016-05-25 08:11 | 1 | 2016-05-26 11:13 | AkageMuk ♦30 | Sveiks! Vai nav tā, ka koledžai ir jābūt amenity=college ? |
| 2 | 2016-05-26 11:37 | richlv | jā, paldies - izlaboju.maps.me tāda nebija, un es vēl nepaspēju no kompja salabot :) | |
| 39345511 by Kirill S @ 2016-05-16 07:45 | 1 | 2016-05-16 10:17 | richlv | that's a really great first edit and changeset comment - thank you :) |
| 39277290 by umka4x4 @ 2016-05-12 20:25 | 1 | 2016-05-12 21:06 | richlv | heya - is there really a viewpoint here ? name "c" doesn't sound right :) |
| 39101378 by Vladimir Pavkin @ 2016-05-04 17:48 | 1 | 2016-05-04 18:12 | richlv | what is the attraction, created in this changeset ? |
| 38879439 by Venche @ 2016-04-26 08:30 | 1 | 2016-04-26 09:33 | richlv | heya - this bank on the embassy premises is a bit suspect. is there really a bank ? what's the name then ? |
| 37894214 by Dwoex @ 2016-03-17 11:42 | 1 | 2016-03-18 06:26 | richlv | thanks for the update - but what happened with the previous road ?notice how the new road now overlaps with the southern part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292102086 |
| 2 | 2016-03-18 07:48 | Dwoex ♦1 | They had built this in Sep 2015. I visited Latvia in Jan 2016 and rode the bike on it. Suprisely, it doesn.t have proper finishing on the north end. Some pics of the road are here http://www.velo36.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=12772&p=251631#p251631 | |
| 36144845 by GidonW @ 2015-12-24 13:46 | 1 | 2016-03-05 02:06 | richlv | this changeset adds tag curve_geometry=yes. what is that ? it does not seem to be documented in the wiki. |
| 7025837 by Gints @ 2011-01-19 22:55 | 1 | 2016-02-22 17:18 | richlv | this changeset adds untagged ways with tags like PDF_layer - that does not match the changeset comment either - comment claims it was drawn from bing, but looks like some import was going on.what were there ways supposed to be, what were they imported from ?examples :https://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | 2016-02-22 18:33 | Gints ♦1 | Really do not remember what was this about. If you feel it wrong, remove. | |
| 36805164 by armq @ 2016-01-25 21:02 | 1 | 2016-01-28 15:47 | richlv | this changeset removes a no_left_turn restriction from gustava zemgala gatve to a serviceway - was that intended ? |
| 36805040 by armq @ 2016-01-25 20:57 | 1 | 2016-01-28 15:44 | richlv | could you please clarify what kind of a company is it ? is it the office there ?the placement is also in the parking lot, i assume it should be in the nearby building ?additionally, it has been added to two weird relations - was that done intentionally ? |
| 35441954 by richlv @ 2015-11-19 17:57 | 1 | 2015-11-19 18:22 | PlaneMad ♦449 | The note mentioned `temporarily converted to two-way due to Central Subway construction` which was the reason to remove the oneway. Do check the other ways in the area as they might now be accessible if the construction is complete. |
| 2 | 2015-11-19 23:17 | richlv | ah, thanks for the info. that change has been reversed by now and should be reflected in the map then. unfortunately, won't be able to survey this region anytime soon, will have to involve locals :) | |
| 33787213 by Māris @ 2015-09-04 07:09 | 1 | 2015-09-07 09:44 | richlv | if this is an operating school, maybe amenity=school tag is needed here ? |