PlaneMad participated in the following changeset discussionsPlaneMad participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167912783 by Splendidindia @ 2025-06-21 12:59 | 1 | 2025-07-03 05:50 | PlaneMad | Hi, many thanks for your contributions to the localized names. Unfortunately, you have replaced the English names in the process.The right way is to add it as a multilingual name with 'Marathi' as the language.Let me know if you need help to fix your past edits. |
| 140883322 by Hindusree Rachamalla @ 2023-09-06 08:17 | 1 | 2025-03-11 04:07 | PlaneMad | Fantastic work mapping GEC in so much detail! |
| 2 | 2025-03-11 04:09 | PlaneMad | Have added the outline of GEC from satellite imagery. Please check if it is looking ok. | |
| 3 | 2025-03-11 04:12 | PlaneMad | You can check out the campus in 3D here: https://amche.in/#17.09/15.422047/73.98104/-46.4/53 | |
| 122480034 by Korgi1 @ 2022-06-16 20:09 | 1 | 2025-02-24 07:07 | PlaneMad | Thank you for adding roads in Goa.So this also answers your question. Wanted to check the source of a road on the map which might possibly be a stream under the woods. |
| 127914278 by redeseblokah @ 2022-10-22 09:22 | 1 | 2024-12-09 09:23 | PlaneMad | Just stumbled upon your mapping at Chad. nice work! |
| 158587212 by Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga @ 2024-10-31 15:42 Active block | 1 | 2024-11-01 10:11 | PlaneMad | Hi, thank you for your edits around Indian highways, but you have incorrectly retagged many trunk roads as motorways.Most of these national highways are not access controlled and have a mix of local traffic.Can you please explain why they were tagged as motorway? |
| 154041452 by PlaneMad @ 2024-07-17 06:17 | 1 | 2024-10-25 14:53 | dottir34 ♦3 | Hello!There are a few points/questions about the classification:1. If they're suburbs then of which town/city?2. E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candolim says its a "census town" which in Indian terms means a well-developed village with a population > 5000. It doesn�... |
| 2 | 2024-10-25 17:21 | PlaneMad | Calangute has a village government https://indianexpress.com/article/india/calangute-goa-plans-entry-tax-tourists-9376663/ and has significant agricultural land https://www.goa.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/DraftODPCalangute.pdfIt is planned as a suburb of Mapusa and Panjim in the regional p... | |
| 3 | 2024-10-25 18:59 | dottir34 ♦3 | Thanks for the clarification! | |
| 150852972 by Kastenbrust @ 2024-05-03 19:19 | 1 | 2024-06-13 08:19 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for adding the Navi Mumbai Coastal Road. Is this currently motorable or is it still an unpaved track? |
| 146050364 by Harshavts @ 2024-01-09 03:58 | 1 | 2024-01-11 07:50 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your edits adding residential outline.Looks like the entire Nallamala Hills was also mistakenly tagged as residential. Will correct it. |
| 141898085 by Brij11 @ 2023-09-29 07:06 | 1 | 2023-11-17 16:23 | PlaneMad | For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887508702 not sure if it should be tagged a cycleway. Its just a dirt track to access the fields and highway=track would be more appropriate |
| 134999105 by Brij11 @ 2023-04-17 05:27 | 1 | 2023-11-16 16:32 | PlaneMad | Hi Brij11, many thanks for all the local mapping around Siolim. Have been adding a lot of details inspired by your micro mapping :) |
| 2 | 2023-11-16 16:51 | Brij11 ♦1 | No worries 🙂 | |
| 136203816 by Yogesh Meena @ 2023-05-17 09:39 | 1 | 2023-10-12 15:30 | PlaneMad | Hi nice work mapping Gangapur city! |
| 124655918 by PlaneMad @ 2022-08-08 19:58 | 1 | 2023-08-18 21:00 | keithonearth ♦314 | Today I just heard about the Zoji La tunnel project. Thanks for adding it to the map! |
| 2 | 2023-08-19 16:54 | PlaneMad | :) | |
| 138202936 by PlaneMad @ 2023-07-06 19:54 | 1 | 2023-07-25 12:44 | NaanAvanIllai ♦5 | @PlaneMad : Can you check if Way (348495914) has a Typo in its name and also update the addr:street tag as it doesn't match with any of the Street names nearby? |
| 2 | 2023-07-25 14:46 | PlaneMad | Not sure, I just copied the tags from an existing node by someone else. If you have locale knowledge, feel free to correct it. | |
| 9740004 by PlaneMad @ 2011-11-04 16:55 | 1 | 2023-07-03 23:50 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1829601the pipeline is in a tunnel ? or it's in the ground without tunnel location=underground ?type=lpg->utility=lpgRegards,Marc |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 06:10 | PlaneMad | Hi Marc, you are right it should be tagged as an underground LPG pipeline. Feel free to correct it. | |
| 136108029 by Brij11 @ 2023-05-15 05:03 | 1 | 2023-06-19 07:35 | PlaneMad | Nice work with the Siolim farmland mapping!Have added some more details, do check if it looks ok. |
| 136888526 by vaibhavnz @ 2023-06-03 02:41 | 1 | 2023-06-06 20:04 | PlaneMad | Detailing of Mopa looks amazing. Very nice! |
| 84910989 by Rahul Krisna @ 2020-05-08 18:37 | 1 | 2023-05-29 16:07 | PlaneMad | Hi Rahul, many thank for your contributions around Karamana.I was unable to verify most of the POIs on the group and it looks like you may have added fictional locations to the map. I'm cleaning them up, so as to not mislead others who may be looking for genuine places. |
| 22480513 by n'garh @ 2014-05-22 07:48 | 1 | 2023-04-14 20:29 | PlaneMad | Since place=locality is for marking locations without populations https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality , a better tag might be `suburb` for urban villages |
| 2 | 2023-04-14 20:32 | PlaneMad | Since these villages are still primarily agricultural with farmlands around, 'village' might suit it better rather than a suburb which would indicate its fully builtup | |
| 134555936 by Kastenbrust @ 2023-04-05 22:46 | 1 | 2023-04-06 19:59 | PlaneMad | Hi Kastenbrust, thank you for your contributions. For highway tags do familiarize yourself with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/HighwayMany of the the tags you have used seem to be classifying roads on a much higher level than they are. Example https://www.openstreetmap.or... |
| 2 | 2023-04-06 20:02 | PlaneMad | Tags for designated cycleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150870038 should be used if this was a legally declared cycle track with proper signages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=designatedThis is unlikely to be the case to my knowledge. highway=path should be used for such... | |
| 134546754 by PlaneMad @ 2023-04-05 16:54 | 1 | 2023-04-06 07:02 | vikrambagade ♦3 | Hello, Is any specific reason to change the road classification as "Unclassified"for "Seawoods NRI Service Road" |
| 2 | 2023-04-06 07:39 | PlaneMad | The NRI road road is a first order collector road from just a couple of complexes. There's not enough traffic feeding into it to justify increasing classification to a tertiary road.Based on the traffic pattern I have observed here. | |
| 134198413 by Kastenbrust @ 2023-03-28 01:18 | 1 | 2023-04-05 16:32 | PlaneMad | Incredible work adding hiking paths in Parsik Hills! |
| 54274013 by ashu4ubest @ 2017-12-02 16:01 | 1 | 2022-12-15 19:12 | PlaneMad | Hi, very nice to see your work mapping in this area |
| 128449817 by arichnad @ 2022-11-03 17:46 | 1 | 2022-11-09 04:56 | PlaneMad | It seems more appropriate to classify Beach Drive as pedestrian rather than a cycleway.It definitely sees a lot more foot traffic compared to cyclists. |
| 2 | 2022-11-09 18:39 | arichnad ♦33 | Hello PlaneMad,I think you misunderstood, I didn't make that change you describe. My edits were to set the surface and access along beach drive. I think you're discussing this change here instead: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128414888For what it's worth, though,... | |
| 127440921 by John Kastner @ 2022-10-12 23:54 | 1 | 2022-11-09 04:50 | PlaneMad | Thanks for this update. Had no idea it had got renamed! |
| 119737181 by Peter Van Geit @ 2022-04-15 06:18 | 1 | 2022-08-08 19:32 | PlaneMad | Can you check if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526526770 should be Kailash Kund?Amazing work with all the trail mapping! |
| 2 | 2022-08-09 06:04 | Peter Van Geit ♦20 | Moved Kaplas Kund (as per Survey Maps) to alt_name | |
| 118803682 by PlaneMad @ 2022-03-23 06:10 | 1 | 2022-04-11 19:56 | user_5359 ♦19,400 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965141853. What is the meaning of highway=u? |
| 2 | 2022-04-12 04:05 | PlaneMad | Sorry looks like an error on my end. Please fix it to unclassified as I’m not able to edit at this time. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-12 05:35 | user_5359 ♦19,400 | Done! I updated seven highways (six additional highways in Naga Bazar).You are welcome! | |
| 4 | 2022-04-12 19:07 | PlaneMad | Thank you | |
| 117967041 by bhawani999 @ 2022-03-01 06:20 | 1 | 2022-03-02 15:49 | PlaneMad | Thank you for all the mapping in Badalwas. I've made some corrections by removing duplicates about Badalwas city and tagging it as a village as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Places |
| 117365383 by Ti_Ru @ 2022-02-13 18:42 | 1 | 2022-02-14 16:04 | PlaneMad | Amazing mapping around Madurai! |
| 2 | 2022-03-15 09:37 | Ti_Ru ♦18 | Thanks for your kind words of appreciation. : D | |
| 112450396 by amnmalik @ 2021-10-13 08:40 | 1 | 2021-11-01 18:39 | PlaneMad | This is amazing, thank you for adding details to the mines! |
| 110755705 by ashketchum60606 @ 2021-09-05 15:55 | 1 | 2021-10-07 03:06 | PlaneMad | Wow, this is wonderful. Thank you for mapping the trees!! |
| 112064058 by lobo_sach @ 2021-10-04 08:17 | 1 | 2021-10-06 21:24 | PlaneMad | Hi, nice work with the detailed mapping. Have made a few minor updates in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112187749 do see if it looks ok |
| 102832086 by Peter Van Geit @ 2021-04-12 23:47 | 1 | 2021-09-03 18:55 | PlaneMad | Many thanks for the amazing updates in the Himalayan region. Theres 2.6k places with name=Unknown . https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1aS8Unknown is not a valid name value and should likely be removed. Let me know if this is ok and am happy to delete them. |
| 2 | 2021-09-03 19:39 | Peter Van Geit ♦20 | The "unknown" hamlets/villages/dwellings are verified either in field while hiking or satellite map. I gave them name=Unknown so that they would be visible on the map. Any other suggestion to keep them visible? | |
| 100082882 by Priyanshi_2004 @ 2021-02-27 05:08 | 1 | 2021-08-10 20:34 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building a better map of your area soon! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... |
| 108858459 by User5499 @ 2021-07-30 05:08 | 1 | 2021-08-05 04:09 | PlaneMad | Hi nice work adding a lot of the SH9 road details. Since the highway is still a state highway with at grad crossings, it seems like it would not fit a definition of a motorway and should probably remain highway=primary. |
| 84764518 by Ajith_Sagar_Z @ 2020-05-06 13:45 | 1 | 2021-03-03 16:18 | PlaneMad | Hi Ajith, amazing work with the detail mapping of Karuvatta! It would be great to know how you did the field mapping, was it on paaper first and then digitized on the laptop?There are also many buildings where you have added the name of the residents. By any chance, did you have the house names ... |
| 97850123 by SANTOSH NAPA @ 2021-01-20 16:50 | 1 | 2021-02-28 20:46 | PlaneMad | Nice work with mapping this area! |
| 65936852 by ramelakks @ 2019-01-01 16:45 | 1 | 2021-02-24 05:06 | PlaneMad | This is wonderful work, thank you for mapping the farmlands with crop details! |
| 99634292 by Naveen Gibbs @ 2021-02-20 10:26 | 1 | 2021-02-23 18:19 | PlaneMad | Hi Naveen, your edit added a large building polygon for the CMA area. Reverting this and adding it again with more suitable tags and not touching other road features. |
| 2 | 2021-02-23 18:47 | PlaneMad | Have added it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12353813 | |
| 98554098 by Mr_80tude @ 2021-02-02 06:33 | 1 | 2021-02-22 03:41 | PlaneMad | Hi, many thanks for your contributions around Danda. I've done a bit of mapping around Chuim when i used to be in the area.Are the names like Kolifornia Buulevard actual names of gullies here? |
| 2 | 2021-02-22 03:51 | PlaneMad | Have also made a fix for the place point for Republic of Danda and merged with the Khar Danda Koliwada point. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-09 11:10 | i3ren ♦2 | Hi, thank you for noticing the following were pseudo names.I have corrected them with the right names. | |
| 97732142 by Starboy Infinity @ 2021-01-19 04:05 | 1 | 2021-02-16 14:17 | PlaneMad | Keep up the great effort, the map of Nagarukhra looks amazing!! |
| 2 | 2021-02-16 14:42 | PlaneMad | Please join the OSM India telegram group, would be great to hear what you are using OSM for. | |
| 78024547 by SamBombay @ 2019-12-06 03:39 | 1 | 2021-02-16 06:01 | PlaneMad | Amazing work mapping around Golaghat! |
| 99031484 by aiswaryaabhilash @ 2021-02-10 09:54 | 1 | 2021-02-12 10:06 | Hannifin Parker ♦8 | Dear aiswaryaabhilash,you are connecting streams in a crazy manner. Please stop! |
| 2 | 2021-02-12 14:26 | muzirian ♦140 | Hi aiswaryaabhilash,can you please share more about the source for mapping these waterways. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-12 15:46 | PlaneMad | Some streams are correct, but most are impossible since they would flow upwards and over mountains.You need to:- Use the OpenCycleMap as background reference for contour lines - Delete all impossible connections that cross over watersheds- Correct the direction of streams so they always fl... | |
| 99143594 by aiswaryaabhilash @ 2021-02-12 04:08 | 1 | 2021-02-12 15:41 | PlaneMad | Please check the streams, most of them are not following the topography and are crossing over mountains which are impossible. Please enable the OpenCycleMap background layer in Id to get contour details for reference. If you need help, please join the telegram group https://t.me/OSMIndia ... |
| 98999684 by NativeMapper @ 2021-02-09 20:52 | 1 | 2021-02-12 03:55 | PlaneMad | Due to the mountain slope, its impossible that there is standing water at this location. Please explain what you meant by snow lakes? |
| 2 | 2021-02-12 18:02 | NativeMapper ♦1 | You can see in the image, water is available in the area. | |
| 98999738 by NativeMapper @ 2021-02-09 20:53 | 1 | 2021-02-12 03:52 | PlaneMad | Is there a reason, the glacier was tagged as a lake? reverting now as there does not seem to be any evidence of this happening. |
| 52971095 by Rajsamand Local Guide @ 2017-10-16 04:18 | 1 | 2021-01-11 04:43 | PlaneMad | Wow, this is the most detailed mapping with field boundaries i have seen in India. Amazing work!! |
| 65702215 by Heinz_V @ 2018-12-22 20:13 | 1 | 2021-01-04 06:07 | PlaneMad | It looks like SH 67 should actually be SH 22 according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Madhya_Pradesh |
| 93676310 by Vibhor Dube @ 2020-11-06 16:58 | 1 | 2021-01-04 06:04 | PlaneMad | Thanks for adding the bypass. Have completed the missing segments and aligned it to the latest imagery.Have also retagged it as under construction. Has it already been opened? |
| 95710952 by PlaneMad @ 2020-12-12 03:43 | 1 | 2020-12-22 21:22 | dalip123 ♦2 | Is it tracing bypass road? Curious to know more about bypass trace. I only see rectangle here. |
| 2 | 2020-12-23 02:44 | PlaneMad | Should be visible if you zoom in since its under construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/15.0740/77.6228 | |
| 94190126 by Petevilie Khatsu @ 2020-11-16 09:00 | 1 | 2020-11-16 17:59 | PlaneMad | Saw you removed the tags for NH 702A. Is this not the same road? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_702A_(India) |
| 93623968 by BBB137 @ 2020-11-05 20:50 | 1 | 2020-11-06 04:55 | PlaneMad | Nice! Since it is a small population <10,000, it should be a village and not a city https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| 93623752 by BBB137 @ 2020-11-05 20:42 | 1 | 2020-11-06 04:47 | PlaneMad | Wonderful, thanks for adding and welcome to OSM.This location was previously marked as a health subcentre, do you know where that should be located? https://osmcha.org/changesets/93623752 |
| 93085238 by naveenmtp @ 2020-10-27 00:23 | 1 | 2020-11-02 17:53 | PlaneMad | Wonderful effort mapping all these villages.Curious about the use of localised tags like `place:ta` . Any specific reason to add them? |
| 92865066 by Ti_Ru @ 2020-10-22 05:01 | 1 | 2020-10-29 16:12 | PlaneMad | Keep up the amazing mapping work around Tamil Nadu!With names, the accepted convention from past discussion is to keep the `name` tag in latin characters for data consistency.See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages for some background.Is th... |
| 2 | 2020-10-29 16:37 | Ti_Ru ♦18 | Yes there is a big reason.I don't understand this convention. In North African countries Arabic and Tamazight scripts are used. In West Asia, Arabic, Persian and Urdu Scripts are used. In Ethiopia and Eritrea, Ge'ez script is used. In former Soviet countries in Eastern Europe and Centr... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-30 02:10 | PlaneMad | The goal for everyone has been to create India maps that we can fully translate into each Indic language https://github.com/osm-in/openstreetmap.in/issues/14, theres no question about not being proud of our own languages.By not following a common convention for the data, it makes it harder to re... | |
| 92949628 by ADIL ASHRAF K @ 2020-10-23 12:24 | 1 | 2020-10-25 02:32 | PlaneMad | This changeset comment is fantastic.Kindly consider adding such wonderful details as a 'description' field on the object itself so its available as part of the map data. |
| 92843920 by PriyankaPradeep @ 2020-10-21 16:11 | 1 | 2020-10-22 09:02 | PlaneMad | Thank you and nice work improving the map.Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
| 92881132 by Aparna Srinivas @ 2020-10-22 08:55 | 1 | 2020-10-22 09:02 | PlaneMad | Thank you and nice work improving the map.Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
| 92875537 by Ancy S B @ 2020-10-22 07:35 | 1 | 2020-10-22 09:01 | PlaneMad | Thank you and nice work improving the map.Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
| 92881187 by Thara1996 @ 2020-10-22 08:56 | 1 | 2020-10-22 09:01 | PlaneMad | Thank you and nice work improving the map.Is this edit organised as part of mapathon keralam. If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
| 92523560 by milindoka @ 2020-10-15 12:37 | 1 | 2020-10-15 13:05 | PlaneMad | Wow, truly fantastic work mapping trees! |
| 2 | 2020-10-15 14:15 | milindoka ♦2 | Thanks :) | |
| 89862307 by reueld @ 2020-08-24 13:53 | 1 | 2020-09-30 04:40 | PlaneMad | Would be interested to know more about the process to map trees. Have mapped quite a bit around Indiranagar and its quite hard to do it accurately. |
| 2 | 2020-10-03 09:15 | reueld ♦1 | It is tough. I use the buildings as a reference. My method is the following:1. Walk around and record audio2. Ensure buildings are correct3. Call out trees based on the building property wall. Eg: tree at 20% through Brigade Hallmark; etc.4. Listen to the audio and add the trees5. Later I ... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-04 05:46 | PlaneMad | yes, have used a fairly similar process by referencing them with respect to buildings.Have also tries using mapillary to capture photos that can be used as reference, but framing trees with their surroundings is hard. | |
| 91717742 by reueld @ 2020-09-29 15:48 | 1 | 2020-09-30 04:28 | PlaneMad | Wow, this is incredible detail! |
| 73575035 by Rudra123ps @ 2019-08-21 11:02 | 1 | 2020-09-27 04:40 | PlaneMad | Amazing work adding all the building details, it is looking beautiful.Its quite hard to trace buildings accurately because they are so close to each other, but i tried for some areas near Maa Vaishno Devi Temple. Please check if it is ok. |
| 2 | 2020-09-27 04:48 | Rudra123ps ♦1 | all good sir...I will also trace everything again later.... | |
| 73530078 by Rudra123ps @ 2019-08-20 09:46 | 1 | 2020-09-27 04:35 | PlaneMad | Saw the use of the conveying tag. It seems is used to indicate escalators which may not be the case here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying |
| 91551705 by gographer @ 2020-09-26 13:27 | 1 | 2020-09-27 02:28 | PlaneMad | Looks like you might have missed adding the school tag to the object so its not showing up. |
| 2 | 2020-12-13 11:59 | gographer ♦1 | Thanks @PlaneMad. I'm still learning and exploring the different tools. Also, as I was marking the boundary - I thought it unwise to add building type tag. But now I have added. Let me know if I should keep it. | |
| 88769686 by Kannan samy @ 2020-07-31 08:10 | 1 | 2020-09-23 16:23 | PlaneMad | Hi Kannan, nice work mapping the area.Authivilai was added as a railway line that i have corrected as a neighborhood, please check. |
| 83805314 by Petevilie Khatsu @ 2020-04-20 07:52 | 1 | 2020-09-14 16:37 | PlaneMad | Wow, amazing work adding sidewalks |
| 87472389 by tJY6V4u3LPmjLbpe39FTHWYxn7Rx @ 2020-07-02 22:18 Active block | 1 | 2020-09-07 18:53 | PlaneMad | Nice work adding all the storage tanks.It looks like many unclosed ways got tagged as a building as well https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796976654 . Why did that happen? |
| 89867240 by sharonabraham380 @ 2020-08-24 15:47 | 1 | 2020-08-24 17:38 | Heinz_V ♦296 | With your mapping activities you destroyed many boundaries!!! So please controll the whole Palakkad district and remap all these boundaries!!!!!!!! |
| 2 | 2020-08-24 18:36 | PlaneMad | Palakkad district boundary now: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XlwHow it was:http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XlA | |
| 3 | 2020-08-24 18:36 | PlaneMad | Oops, this is the current state: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XlC | |
| 81650890 by ALPZz @ 2020-03-01 18:12 | 1 | 2020-08-19 15:51 | PlaneMad | Hi can you clarify what these road names are?Having been to Bhuj these are certainly not the street names. If they are some official identifier, we can move them to the 'ref' tag, otherwise they should be deleted.Let me know if you have any objections to removing them as they do no... |
| 2 | 2020-08-20 14:03 | PlaneMad | Here is an overpass query that can find any road named with this scheme: Starts with L or R and followwed by atleast one number: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XfgYou can run for any area and export the results to JOSM. In JOSM you can do ctrl+f and search for `way` to select all roads and then edit... | |
| 83060497 by sruthyso1996 @ 2020-04-04 06:14 | 1 | 2020-08-14 16:09 | PlaneMad | Hi, have corrected a few stream here that did not seem to match the terrain.Please check if you have more local knowledge. |
| 78438209 by PlaneMad @ 2019-12-15 19:23 | 1 | 2020-07-30 16:46 | keithonearth ♦314 | Hi Arun, wanted to let you know that I have changed the tagging of a way you tagged as `highway=pedestrian`, back to `=service`. Based on your edit summary, I think you based the tag on the satellite imagery. I visited Srinagar in 2016, and came this way. At the time, some of the road was too narrow... |
| 2 | 2020-08-02 20:35 | PlaneMad | Have only walked on a short stretch in front of Suffering Moses back in 2012 and did not recall seeing vehicles on it. Will definitely trust your judgement and service definitely seems like a better option. | |
| 3 | 2020-08-02 20:39 | PlaneMad | Suffering Moses is west of Zero bridge, so looks like we both have been on different parts of the road :DUltimately would be great to have someone local update it (hopefully soon!) | |
| 4 | 2020-08-03 17:14 | keithonearth ♦314 | Small world! I"ll bet the right thing to do would be tag sections as pedestrian and parts as service. Although I've always been bothered by how the `highway=pedestrian` is used for such a wide variety of very different ways from something like The Mall in Shimla, to the galees in varan... | |
| 5 | 2020-08-04 03:58 | PlaneMad | My interpretation of a `pedestrian` street is one that has been restricted for vehicles to give pedestrians right of way and not "too narrow for vehicles to use".Reason for tagging it pedestrian was more of hunch that the whole route was closed off for entry to vehicles, but from your ... | |
| 6 | 2020-08-04 04:04 | PlaneMad | It was a handicraft shop, but i wouldn't be surprised if there was houseboat named that :P | |
| 84168719 by Amalu Shaju @ 2020-04-27 04:38 | 1 | 2020-07-29 01:25 | PlaneMad | Hi Amalu, fantastic work tracing all the waterway network, this is really useful for so many applications. Keep up the great work! |
| 67322527 by PRAVEEN REDDY GORLA @ 2019-02-18 16:42 | 1 | 2020-07-22 17:04 | PlaneMad | Hi Praveen, excellent work mapping Gollacherla village, it looks really beautiful.Have added some buildings and made some more improvements. Have a nice day! |
| 63841679 by hridayanand @ 2018-10-24 17:42 | 1 | 2020-07-19 04:33 | PlaneMad | Very nice to see your detailed mapping around Bayang. Have made some more improvements like add the village name. |
| 87512585 by Ti_Ru @ 2020-07-03 17:00 | 1 | 2020-07-12 03:11 | PlaneMad | Hi, many thanks for your wonderful contributions around Madurai.There are a few issues, particularly in this changeset:1) Removal of Madurai place node tags. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Mapping_populated_places_as_areas mapping cities as an area is problematic and is disc... |
| 2 | 2020-07-12 07:59 | Ti_Ru ♦18 | Hi, thanks for your suggestions. 1. I was unaware about the conventions in the mapping of populated areas as places. Just now got familiar of it and I'll make amends in further edits. Regarding this particular changeset your suggestions are correct. But the problem is I'm familiar only w... | |
| 85577405 by PlaneMad @ 2020-05-22 00:54 | 1 | 2020-07-04 12:36 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | Hello - a quick question about http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=97671416 . I've recently undone an edit by a new mapper that broke the boundary of Nepal ( http://osm.org/browse/changeset/87486943 ) but noticed that the names on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97671416 were a bit odd. ... |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 01:42 | PlaneMad | Done. Sounds like the best approach considering https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule | |
| 3 | 2020-07-05 12:24 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Great - thanks. | |
| 73058770 by Sundar1 @ 2019-08-06 10:24 | 1 | 2020-06-30 20:50 | PlaneMad | Hi Sundar, Phatehpur Sikri looks like a rather odd spelling. What is the reason to change that? |
| 87093593 by ALPZz @ 2020-06-24 15:25 | 1 | 2020-06-29 17:31 | PlaneMad | Hi, you seem to have added an incorrect placeholder name 'addme' for many places. There is no reason to do this since its possible to query unnamed places using overpass.Please remove these name tags. Let me know if you need help with it --- Publ... |
| 81651413 by ALPZz @ 2020-03-01 18:36 | 1 | 2020-06-29 17:26 | PlaneMad | Thanks for all the Gujarat edits.What is the source for all these alphanumeric street names in Bhuj. Are these real street names or identifiers from some database? |
| 85574373 by PlaneMad @ 2020-05-21 21:29 | 1 | 2020-05-28 00:10 | Kautilya3 ♦38 | Hi PlaneMad, you seem to have fixed a lot of the problems introduced in the previous edit. Thanks a lot. But Uttarakhand boundary is still not closed at Kalapani:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9987086#map=10/30.1672/81.0297 |
| 2 | 2020-05-28 01:18 | PlaneMad | Thanks for spotting, fixed. | |
| 85523480 by bharatdahal @ 2020-05-21 01:51 | 1 | 2020-05-22 01:15 | PlaneMad | Was updating Kalapani territory according to the new Nepal map https://assets-cdn.kathmandupost.com/uploads/source/news/2020/news/98353477_1682609495224206_5916763212010749952_o.jpg and noticed that the Kuthi Yankti river was renamed to Kali in this changeset.While doing some research it seems l... |
| 85114623 by KABIRAJ ROKAYA @ 2020-05-13 03:25 | 1 | 2020-05-20 16:21 | Flynn Marquardt ♦36 | Hi,this change breaks the border of India, it does not close anymore, the border of India cannot be used for reverse geocoding or cutting.Can you please finish your work and close the border again.In josm there is a check button, which helps to verify the border and zoom to the error are... |
| 2 | 2020-05-21 21:31 | PlaneMad | Made a few more fixes to revert the changes made https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85574373 | |
| 71613133 by keithonearth @ 2019-06-25 20:11 | 1 | 2020-05-12 04:07 | PlaneMad | Fantastic work with all the details. Map is looking beautiful! |
| 2 | 2020-05-12 06:18 | keithonearth ♦314 | Thanks Arun, that's kind of you to say. Means lots coming from a pro. | |
| 72338458 by PlaneMad @ 2019-07-17 09:33 | 1 | 2020-04-15 09:37 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,abandoNNed:railway : one too many n :)Regards,Marc |
| 2 | 2020-04-16 00:16 | PlaneMad | Whoops, fixed! | |
| 82794096 by Shubham Vishwakarma @ 2020-03-29 21:35 | 1 | 2020-04-10 16:12 | PlaneMad | Hi looks like you may have accidentally tagged whole of IIT campus to a park. Correcting it. |
| 2 | 2020-04-10 16:17 | Shubham Vishwakarma ♦1 | Yes I just noticed it I am extremely sorry i will make the changes | |
| 62176225 by BABUL KUMAR @ 2018-08-31 15:27 | 1 | 2019-11-18 05:52 | PlaneMad | Hi, super work mapping Khorda! |
| 76992071 by Ro Sun @ 2019-11-13 05:36 | 1 | 2019-11-13 16:40 | PlaneMad | Hi Ro Sun, given that disputed boundaries are always an emotional issue between countries, i urge you to take a look at the OSMF policy regarding mapping these in a neutral way: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdfTo my knowledge all sources indicate th... |
| 2 | 2019-11-13 18:17 | Kautilya3 ♦38 | I do not quite understand what has been done. But the border looks correct up to map resolution 12. For resolution 13 or higher, it shows the Nepalese claim line as the real border. Should there not be a way for the Nepalese claim line? | |
| 3 | 2019-11-13 19:45 | PlaneMad | This changeset changed the Kalapani disputed territory to be within the Nepal relation from the de-facto situation of being within the India relation as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territoryThe Nepalese claim line should exist just like the Indian claim lines on parts of Kashmir c... | |
| 4 | 2019-11-14 13:41 | Kautilya3 ♦38 | I still don't understand. Wikipedia says, "Kalapani is a territory disputed between India and Nepal, but under Indian administration as part of Pithoragarh district in the Uttarakhand state". This is showing correctly up to map resolution 12, but at resolution 13, it is showing the Ne... | |
| 5 | 2019-11-14 15:15 | PlaneMad | The tiles have still not updated to the changed data upto z12. After z13 you can see the tiles reflect the updates made in this changeset.Like you said, the data that was present was correct as per the OSMF guidelines on representing disputed territories, there was nothing to update unless there... | |
| 6 | 2019-11-14 16:01 | PlaneMad | Its been over 24 hours with the boundary relations not have been updated consistently across levels. Have reverted the change for now https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77083852 Feel free to share any evidence of on the ground change and we can make a proper update of all admin levels affecti... | |
| 76832698 by RRCh @ 2019-11-08 22:54 | 1 | 2019-11-09 02:49 | PlaneMad | Thanks for adding the corridor but NH703AA is for the road starting from Kapurthala connecting Goindwal Sahib and terminating near Taran Taran http://ddnews.gov.in/national/nh-no-703aa-punjab-named-guru-nanak-dev-ji-marg-gadkariMaking this correction to the road. |
| 73617781 by Rudra123ps @ 2019-08-22 10:58 | 1 | 2019-11-05 04:15 | PlaneMad | Fantastic work mapping Sakti. Looks beautiful! |
| 68034492 by Readpeoplemap @ 2019-03-11 18:55 | 1 | 2019-11-04 20:43 | PlaneMad | Many thanks for a lot of the mapping in the area. While doing some cleanup, i merged the different sections of Rambagh Flyover and also removed many duplicated turn restriction relations that did not seem necessary.From online reports it looks like the flyover is completely open, but maybe i cou... |
| 51699939 by udayanvidyanta @ 2017-09-03 18:44 | 1 | 2017-09-04 11:19 | mueschel ♦6,572 | Are there really 56 police stations in this small area? It could be a "amenity=security_booth", a tag that is used 74 times already. Other question: Guard_type=Guard 30: H15 C wing - shouldn't this be a name = ...And these tags I don't understand, could you explai... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 20:14 | udayanvidyanta ♦1 | These are the position of the security guards. I couldn't find an appropriate icon/tag for them, so had to use the one for police. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 11:02 | rasagy ♦10 | Are these guards at an entrance (better to use barrier=entrance) or at a gate (better to use one of the gates in barrier tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier). Along with that, you can use barrier:personnel=yes (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier:personnel)Also, not a... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-10 17:18 | PlaneMad | Have updated the tag to barrier:personnel which is more appropriate. | |
| 51697744 by vineetkamboj @ 2017-09-03 17:12 | 1 | 2019-09-10 17:17 | PlaneMad | Hi Vineet, many thanks for mapping stores around IITB. Just made a bunch of updates including correcting the department_store tag to convenience which better descibes the small stores that are there. |
| 9703590 by PlaneMad @ 2011-10-31 13:37 | 1 | 2019-07-17 04:23 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | As per http://apenvis.nic.in/wetland.html there are no wetlands in Prakasam district. Hence this needs to be deleted. Actually, there exists villages and dry land used for farming. |
| 2 | 2019-07-17 12:18 | PlaneMad | You are right, this was traced long back with low resolution landsat imagery which looked like a wetland but are just very well irrigated farmlands. Updating it now, thanks. | |
| 3 | 2019-07-18 05:07 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | Thanks for your response, I will clean up if any left over in Prakasam district | |
| 4 | 2019-07-29 12:09 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | @planemad | |
| 5 | 2019-07-29 12:10 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | It has been 12 days. When will the change reflect in OSM standard maps? Is there anyway to speed it up? | |
| 6 | 2019-07-29 12:46 | PlaneMad | Check in a private tab? you might be ssing cached tiles. | |
| 7 | 2019-08-01 05:01 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | I tried in private tab, there is no difference. I tried to see in landuse focussed webmap provider. They also do not seem to be updating frequently. While the features are removed from database, we do not seem to have a way of getting the latest updated map for land use. | |
| 8 | 2019-08-01 05:54 | PlaneMad | Cann you share the map link of the location? i can see updated tiles on my end. | |
| 9 | 2019-08-01 07:04 | arjunaraoc ♦569 | Got to know about the /dirty suffix for url to refresh the tiles. Now it is working. Thanks | |
| 71342991 by alsiladka @ 2019-06-17 20:20 | 1 | 2019-07-29 18:34 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping Nagpur. Ive corrected some roads mistakenly tagged as a motorway. |
| 34943829 by cdacosm @ 2015-10-29 08:44 | 1 | 2019-07-17 10:49 | PlaneMad | Amazing work with the survey and mapping around Sabarimala. Have made some more updates and corrections, please check. |
| 68028339 by PlaneMad @ 2019-03-11 16:10 | 1 | 2019-03-14 17:44 | Druzhba ♦13 | Hi Planemad. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45248331 wrong or why was it deleted? |
| 2 | 2019-03-15 02:41 | PlaneMad | These were farmlands in the river valley that was added incorrectly as a wetland by me 6 years ago using landsat imagery. | |
| 63977851 by Deepak Saravanan @ 2018-10-29 13:21 | 1 | 2019-03-04 06:36 | PlaneMad | Curious why the platform lines at YPR are tagged as siding. Arent they considered part of the mainline? |
| 2 | 2019-03-04 14:34 | Deepak Saravanan ♦6 | Not all lines are sidings. In railways term, the line which runs through the stations are called main lines and Platform lines which start and terminate with in the station yard are called Loop lines. So have marked them as Sidings, which is right as per the wiki knowledge as well. In YPR you can se... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-05 08:58 | PlaneMad | Just looked at the wiki, it doesnt look like platform lines are considered to be tagged as siding.Looking elsewhere like UK and Germany, all platform lines are tagged like mainlines https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.47784/-1.89881 | |
| 4 | 2019-03-09 16:50 | Deepak Saravanan ♦6 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:serviceCheck the picture in this page, it clearly states service=sidng for the lines apart form main lines passing through the station.Definition for siding is "This tag is used for tracks which run parallel to the main track and are connected to ... | |
| 5 | 2019-03-09 18:30 | PlaneMad | Got it, seems like a lot of tracks i've tagged as sidings in the past should actually be service=yard. Thanks, will keep this in mind in future. | |
| 23207870 by jagadish0595 @ 2014-06-27 07:54 | 1 | 2019-02-25 16:57 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping chandikhole. Have made some corrections, do see if they look ok. |
| 67272154 by Anoushka_Dayal @ 2019-02-17 07:57 | 1 | 2019-02-18 19:37 | PlaneMad | This is amazing, thank you for adding the details of the buildings! |
| 66997665 by Petevilie Khatsu @ 2019-02-07 15:09 | 1 | 2019-02-18 14:04 | PlaneMad | Just wanted to thank you for your amazing work adding details to Kohima!Have been going through the map and making some updates, mostly downgrading the classification of roads based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway#Urban_RoadsLet me know if this is ok and matches gro... |
| 58450979 by khizarpk @ 2018-04-26 17:18 | 1 | 2018-05-09 23:03 | سامبا ♦28 | I did not find any source on the internet for the existence of a city named "King Road" in Pakistan. Do you have any? |
| 2 | 2018-05-09 23:07 | سامبا ♦28 | I also found no sources for a city named "Haid Faqeryan". | |
| 3 | 2018-06-23 16:17 | khizarpk ♦1 | regards and thanks for comments, above both cities/town you mentioned are practical available. trust me because Gunian Teh Malakwal is my home town and i know well about my region. | |
| 4 | 2019-02-09 20:10 | PlaneMad | Hi, a lot of the places that you have classified as cities do not seem to match the criteria to be called a city:- Population of atleast 100,000- Has a Wikipedia pageSince you are a local, please check if these places have a city government like a municipal corporation with a mayor. Its like... | |
| 22894166 by Himanshu @ 2014-06-12 18:07 | 1 | 2019-01-26 11:34 | PlaneMad | Nice work with all the mapping around the coal mines. Have made some more improvements to the tagging, please check. |
| 63157258 by PlaneMad @ 2018-10-03 11:57 | 1 | 2019-01-10 19:57 | Die immer lacht Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2019-01-11 06:00 | PlaneMad | Happy to unmerge, but i dont feel that the right solution to this is to not have multipolygons.All large water bodies face the same problem. | |
| 42792038 by Manotosh Mandal @ 2016-10-11 04:56 | 1 | 2019-01-05 19:01 | PlaneMad | Many railway stations were incorrectly tagged as bus stations. Fixed it :) |
| 44029629 by Gops24996 @ 2016-11-29 09:15 | 1 | 2018-12-29 19:42 | PlaneMad | Have changed some of the areas that were wrongly marked as farmyard to other landuses. Please check. |
| 39535556 by Saikat Maiti @ 2016-05-24 14:56 | 1 | 2018-12-19 19:31 | PlaneMad | Is Raja'r Gadh an actual palace/castle? |
| 2 | 2018-12-19 20:30 | Saikat Maiti ♦24 | I would like to say that it is a castle. Because it is surrounded by man made water tank and only two small bridges are there to reach this place.Local people can easily recognize that place with this name. | |
| 3 | 2018-12-20 10:48 | Saikat Maiti ♦24 | @PlaneMadMy apology! It's a palace. I reconfirmed it. I talked with a senior person about the history. Though this palace one cannon house. The school near by this palace named after the name of the "Jamindar" of this palace. | |
| 4 | 2018-12-21 13:53 | PlaneMad | Excellent, just added the tagged it historic=castle + castle_type=palace | |
| 28786860 by Pavan Y @ 2015-02-12 01:20 | 1 | 2018-12-17 19:21 | PlaneMad | Wonderful work mapping Chanderi. Have made more updates. |
| 49881558 by Kwangdi @ 2017-06-28 08:22 | 1 | 2018-12-10 18:34 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping this area. Is Tendu a town or village? not able to find much information online. |
| 64999525 by Greeshmag @ 2018-11-29 07:27 | 1 | 2018-12-08 05:27 | PlaneMad | Restored a mainline railway line that was deleted. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64999525 |
| 2 | 2018-12-10 05:38 | Greeshmag ♦38 | ok | |
| 64935702 by R Jolly @ 2018-11-27 12:58 | 1 | 2018-11-27 18:13 | PlaneMad | Wow, thank you for adding this! Corrected this as a tree rather than a park. |
| 53283826 by Arunkumarjoshi @ 2017-10-27 08:39 | 1 | 2018-11-26 10:06 | PlaneMad | Many thanks for your contributions around Masturi. Have made several corrections and the map should look much better now. |
| 63279117 by prabesh chapagain @ 2018-10-07 13:23 | 1 | 2018-10-07 18:52 | PlaneMad | Hi Prabesh, amazing work with the map at Butwal. I had noticed lots of unconnected nodes that i removed using the JOSM validator, there still a lot of work to do to connect roads all along Mahendra highway. Hope you can look into it :) |
| 27201077 by shaikh nikhat @ 2014-12-03 14:29 | 1 | 2018-09-17 17:09 | PlaneMad | Many thanks for your amazing contributions to improve the map at Deonar. Have made lot of updates, please see if it looks ok. |
| 62265970 by Advanced Enzymes @ 2018-09-04 05:33 | 1 | 2018-09-07 17:05 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. It look like you incorrectly marked the city of Thane as a building. Have fixed it now :) please take a look at https://learnosm.org/en/ to better understand how to map features correctly. |
| 61420020 by Aphole @ 2018-08-07 02:53 | 1 | 2018-08-27 11:09 | manings ♦209 | This edits seems to have deleted a lot of POIs. Can you clarify the intent? |
| 2 | 2018-08-30 20:43 | PlaneMad | Have restored the most important node for Manila City. The others need a little more careful work with the revert since there are some conflicts. | |
| 61501907 by PlaneMad @ 2018-08-09 13:32 | 1 | 2018-08-10 04:10 | chnav ♦1,073 | Please do not delete/re-draw anything but fix instead. Object history removed after your fix.Objects restored. |
| 2 | 2018-08-10 04:18 | chnav ♦1,073 | Well... you are part of Mapbox team... Very disappointed that you use such bad practice as work procedure. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-11 09:46 | PlaneMad | chnav, sorry for the trouble. Please fix the tags on the crossing so that they are footway=crossing across the junction. | |
| 60841464 by Kensou23 @ 2018-07-18 15:25 | 1 | 2018-07-31 07:16 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building a better map of your area soon! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... |
| 60706832 by Boboblupo @ 2018-07-14 08:03 | 1 | 2018-07-20 16:46 | PlaneMad | Thanks for fixing the vandalism and making corrections, but looks like you added some vandalism again by mistake? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60706832 |
| 2 | 2018-10-21 06:22 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63717752#vandalism | |
| 60031306 by wewakemumbai @ 2018-06-21 06:11 | 1 | 2018-07-02 06:37 | PlaneMad | Why is the whole CWC compound tagged as a building? It should be an industrial area and specific buildings inside should be tagged as warehouses --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60031306 |
| 55122558 by Bhagavathi Prasad @ 2018-01-03 08:49 | 1 | 2018-07-02 03:29 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. You had crossed some overlapping highways by dragging them around which ive fixed :)Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building ... |
| 59341407 by PlaneMad @ 2018-05-28 13:50 | 1 | 2018-06-16 20:42 | keithonearth ♦314 | I've deleted the forest tags off these parks, as none of these parks were entirely forested, many already had the forested areas mapped more accurately, and adding the forest tag to the park hid the more accurate forest boundary. I know you are a very experienced mapper, but I think it is bette... |
| 2 | 2018-06-16 20:54 | PlaneMad | Agree. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-16 21:41 | keithonearth ♦314 | Thanks bhai. :-) | |
| 4 | 2018-06-17 00:32 | keithonearth ♦314 | I've realized that without the forest tag the parks stopped rendering at all. While I don't want to tag for the renderer, I do want these parks to render. I checked how national parks are tagged in Canada, and found that the `leisure=nature_reserve` tag was on all of them, in addition ... | |
| 5 | 2018-06-18 09:41 | PlaneMad | Looks good! Btw you should definitely be speaking at SOTM Asia http://bit.ly/sotmasia-cfp | |
| 6 | 2018-06-21 23:09 | keithonearth ♦314 | That's very flattering, I'm just a amateur though. Are you speaking at it? | |
| 59350153 by hydraserp @ 2018-05-28 20:26 | 1 | 2018-05-29 05:37 | Chetan_Gowda ♦214 | Hi hydraserp,I see you are localizing the default "name" tag. Keeping English names as a default name tag is what Indian OSM community agreed upon. Please use name:language=* for localizing city/town/village names. Thanks, Chetan |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 16:11 | hydraserp ♦2 | Thanks for the message but shouldn't it not make a difference for maps that use OSM as long as the English name is kept using name:en? | |
| 3 | 2018-05-30 04:50 | Saikat Maiti ♦24 | @hydraserp I don't think this is a good practice, replacing English name with local language name. It will create a huge confusion. If you want to add local language then add that key name with local language code.Read this for referencehttps://thejeshgn.com/projects/state-of-indian-languag... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-30 08:51 | naveenpf ♦714 | Please follow the guidelines.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages | |
| 5 | 2018-05-30 15:21 | PlaneMad | @hydraserp Your edits go against the convention followed so far in India to keep the local name in the latin script in the name tag. There are both pros and cons to the approach, but mainly its important we make the data consistent throughout the country.Before making more changes please discuss... | |
| 6 | 2018-05-30 19:17 | hydraserp ♦2 | Okay, I will begin reverting back to English for default names. | |
| 7 | 2018-05-31 06:32 | PlaneMad | Thank you for reverting. It certainly would be helpful for you to share your thoughts on using the `name` tag and the process you followed for others to learn from. | |
| 59344398 by Prashere @ 2018-05-28 15:53 | 1 | 2018-05-29 06:35 | PlaneMad | Wow, nice work! |
| 59297812 by hydraserp @ 2018-05-26 16:56 | 1 | 2018-05-29 06:30 | PlaneMad | Thank you for adding the localization, but you have overwritten many of the English names in the `name` tag. These should have been copied over to the `name:en` tag so that the information is not lost. |
| 2 | 2018-05-29 06:32 | PlaneMad | For eg. the Chennai object no longer has an English name now https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1766358 | |
| 3 | 2018-05-29 06:32 | PlaneMad | Let me know if you need help fixing this. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-29 15:52 | hydraserp ♦2 | My bad. Thanks for the message. I will fix them right away. | |
| 55672647 by DarkCalibre @ 2018-01-23 04:10 | 1 | 2018-05-15 20:21 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions, but there were some issues in this changeset where you added a fake objects. All your other contributions look great. Looking forward to seeing more great map improvements from you! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSM... |
| 57955180 by pkoby @ 2018-04-09 23:25 | 1 | 2018-04-14 03:11 | PlaneMad | You think it makes sense for the PSU city campus to have its own feature that is independent from the research farms? It seems like the current mapping confuses geocoders into believing the main point of the relation is at the farm and not the main campus since they both are a single feature. |
| 2 | 2018-04-14 03:12 | PlaneMad | One way to do it is to maybe create a new college relation for just the city campus that is a child of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3602151 | |
| 3 | 2018-04-15 22:09 | pkoby ♦110 | That's a fair point. I didn't realize that the geocoders had trouble. Although, might that be a problem with the geocoders and not the database?I don't enjoy making landuse/area polygons that abut when I can use the adjacent sections as part of relations for each (so one line used t... | |
| 4 | 2018-04-16 06:06 | PlaneMad | Its not a geocoder issues since there is no way to disambiguate the town campus separately with the current mapping as all the parts under a single name.> And I also don't think that the main campus section (in town) should be separated from the research farmPer http://agsci.psu.edu/... | |
| 5 | 2018-04-17 23:02 | pkoby ♦110 | I understand. I was not aware of the distinction between the campus and ag-sci area. I've removed the latter from the former, and added the ag-sci area to the super-relation of Penn State that includes all the campuses.Sorry for the misunderstanding. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-18 07:54 | PlaneMad | Thank you for the fix! | |
| 57871603 by soale @ 2018-04-06 17:01 | 1 | 2018-04-18 07:05 | PlaneMad | Nice, thanks for updating the codes! |
| 56552907 by tintin1192 @ 2018-02-21 15:24 | 1 | 2018-04-16 06:26 | PlaneMad | Hi tintin, thank you for contributing to the map of mcleod.It looks like you have added lot of feature which do not exist in reality. This is unhelpful for others who are using this map for important applications like navigation and may be misled by the data you added. |
| 2 | 2018-04-16 06:27 | PlaneMad | Let me know if you would like help to fix your contributions. There are many missing features like shops that you can add to make a better map. | |
| 57230894 by Saiproperties @ 2018-03-16 05:26 | 1 | 2018-03-19 17:50 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building a better map of your area soon! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... |
| 57096451 by Scharf Energy Systems @ 2018-03-12 00:40 | 1 | 2018-03-14 09:33 | PlaneMad | Hi! Why did you delete the detailed airport boundary? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57096451 |
| 57096483 by Scharf Energy Systems @ 2018-03-12 00:46 | 1 | 2018-03-14 09:31 | PlaneMad | Thanks for these contributions. I'm trying to understand why you deleted the more detailed airport boundary and converted it to just a point? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57096483 |
| 2 | 2018-03-14 21:07 | Scharf Energy Systems ♦9 | Hey PlaneMad, thanks for the comment. The reasoning behind it was basically from an error I found in some apps. The airports show up correctly on the website, but in some apps, the detailed editing I did to the airports (grass, trees, scrub, etc) is all covered by the airport area polygon. I check... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-17 23:29 | Claytonlukes77 ♦3 | I think it might be a better idea to leave the airport boundary polygon and then just add the point. That way you have both. You shouldn't delete the more detailed polygon data just because it doesn't project properly in an app. That's the app developers fault and not something you sh... | |
| 4 | 2018-03-19 20:52 | Scharf Energy Systems ♦9 | Will do. I'll keep that in mind for future updates. I'll also inform the app developer that they have a display problem and see if they can get it fixed. | |
| 57091954 by onnyyonn @ 2018-03-11 19:52 | 1 | 2018-03-13 09:41 | PlaneMad | Thank you for you edits. IITB has been neglected for quite a while. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57091954 |
| 28653626 by dineshchoudhary @ 2015-02-06 15:02 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:19 | PlaneMad | Namaste, thank you for your mapping. Nice work! |
| 2 | 2018-03-03 09:30 | PlaneMad | I have added more details, please check | |
| 25645660 by anilsingh @ 2014-09-24 14:09 | 1 | 2018-02-22 10:31 | PlaneMad | Namaste Anil. Thank you for the mapping, have made some fixes. Please check :) |
| 56481888 by cantor34 @ 2018-02-19 06:42 | 1 | 2018-02-20 08:45 | PlaneMad | Hi, these stations of the Chennai metro is still under construction https://www.thebetterindia.com/130477/chennai-central-metro-station/They should be tagged as under construction right? |
| 56297038 by chad moore @ 2018-02-12 14:56 | 1 | 2018-02-13 20:11 | PlaneMad | Can you explain why you deleted these features? |
| 55658881 by sirishachadalawada @ 2018-01-22 15:59 | 1 | 2018-02-10 06:49 | PlaneMad | Reversible would indicate this is a oneway but changes its direction regularly, is that what you meant? |
| 56002344 by Justice_Bringer @ 2018-02-02 17:19 Active block | 1 | 2018-02-08 23:09 | PlaneMad | Can you explain why these schools were deleted? |
| 56170077 by Sad_Panda @ 2018-02-08 05:41 Active block | 1 | 2018-02-08 22:33 | PlaneMad | Can you provide more information on why you deleted these schools from the map? |
| 55573156 by Asheesh Sharma @ 2018-01-19 09:51 | 1 | 2018-01-21 13:21 | mueschel ♦6,572 | Hi,this way has a strange tag - did you mean "barrier = fence"?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554219952Cheers, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 23:18 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55573156 | |
| 3 | 2018-02-06 00:24 | mueschel ♦6,572 | @PlaneMad: Did you actually check this changeset? Most of the objects have tags like road=road, building=Gargares, Fench=fench.That's not what I would call 'great'. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-06 02:04 | PlaneMad | Hello! My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error. Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55573156 | |
| 5 | 2018-02-06 02:05 | PlaneMad | You are right, I checked some of the smaller buildings and from the shapes it looked good, but the tags are messed up. | |
| 55927599 by ScarlettMavis @ 2018-01-31 10:42 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:37 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55927599 |
| 54287888 by Rajeevkaran @ 2017-12-03 03:40 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:37 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54287888 |
| 54322514 by chin2rao @ 2017-12-04 08:59 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:36 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54322514 |
| 54371719 by arunk140 @ 2017-12-05 16:26 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:36 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54371719 |
| 55005521 by ChandraMounika @ 2017-12-29 10:19 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:36 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55005521 |
| 55099005 by Yaksh Kishore Bhatnagar @ 2018-01-02 12:14 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:36 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55099005 |
| 55157556 by @ThorsWrath @ 2018-01-04 13:18 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:35 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55157556 |
| 55258951 by hgeed @ 2018-01-08 09:24 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:35 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55258951 |
| 55540846 by Chaitanya Nimmagadda @ 2018-01-18 06:53 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:33 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55540846 |
| 55643993 by Laxit @ 2018-01-22 04:23 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:33 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55643993 |
| 55682727 by Ad1tya @ 2018-01-23 12:42 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:33 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55682727 |
| 55689262 by Yashesh Dattaram Kambli @ 2018-01-23 16:42 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:33 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55689262 |
| 55882490 by Nishanth Nair @ 2018-01-30 06:35 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:28 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55882490 |
| 55960656 by Akshat Singh @ 2018-02-01 09:50 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:28 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55960656 |
| 54586046 by Prakash Joshi @ 2017-12-13 05:52 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:26 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54586046 |
| 54704827 by a_Senthil26 @ 2017-12-17 14:36 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:25 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54704827 |
| 55082594 by arun m @ 2018-01-01 18:10 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:24 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55082594 |
| 55575790 by Surendran Subramaniam @ 2018-01-19 11:50 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:24 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55575790 |
| 56089270 by Ti_Ru @ 2018-02-05 16:06 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:24 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56089270 |
| 56090677 by Ti_Ru @ 2018-02-05 16:59 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:23 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56090677 |
| 55608176 by mottiger @ 2018-01-20 16:58 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:22 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55608176 |
| 55638950 by tommyltaylor @ 2018-01-21 21:41 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:21 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55638950 |
| 55776730 by MobiTamilan Mobi @ 2018-01-26 16:00 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:21 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55776730 |
| 55884704 by ScarlettMavis @ 2018-01-30 08:09 | 1 | 2018-01-30 08:52 | ScarlettMavis ♦1 | Added a public park which is active since recent years |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 08:54 | ScarlettMavis ♦1 | https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&hs=mPU&sa=X&channel=fs&dcr=0&biw=1317&bih=673&q=padmanabhangar+park&npsic=0&rflfq=1&rlha=0&rllag=12917263,77557752,208&tbm=lcl&ved=0ahUKEwj32af4p__YAhWDJZQKHWTjDqgQtgMIKg&tbs=lrf:!2m1!1e2!2m1!1e3!3sIA... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-05 23:21 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55884704 | |
| 55993648 by Mayur Batle @ 2018-02-02 11:47 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55993648 |
| 56034240 by khizarpk @ 2018-02-03 17:07 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56034240 |
| 55888989 by Gwenaël Jan @ 2018-01-30 10:27 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:19 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55888989 |
| 55894684 by musisra @ 2018-01-30 13:52 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:19 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55894684 |
| 55764751 by TdBm @ 2018-01-26 08:55 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:18 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55764751 |
| 55776149 by msmethun6 @ 2018-01-26 15:43 | 1 | 2018-02-05 23:18 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55776149 |
| 55777050 by MobiTamilan Mobi @ 2018-01-26 16:11 | 1 | 2018-02-05 17:12 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55777050 |
| 55822335 by Gagan1604 @ 2018-01-28 07:27 | 1 | 2018-02-05 17:10 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55822335 |
| 55838330 by Revant Mishra @ 2018-01-28 19:08 | 1 | 2018-02-05 17:07 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55838330 |
| 55993076 by Mayur Batle @ 2018-02-02 11:21 | 1 | 2018-02-05 17:06 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55993076 |
| 54982789 by MarceloBruna @ 2017-12-28 13:06 | 1 | 2017-12-28 13:08 | viloan ♦9,905 | Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-ptTambém temos um... |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 16:58 | PlaneMad | Hello! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.o... | |
| 42445480 by Toyota Nexus7 @ 2016-09-26 13:36 | 1 | 2018-01-25 03:01 | PlaneMad | Wonderful work with all the mapping in Pudukottai. Made many more updates, hope its good. |
| 55501959 by PlaneMad @ 2018-01-16 18:50 | 1 | 2018-01-17 14:05 | JaggedMind ♦5 | What's up with the three bus stop nodes in the UN building in San Francisco? |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 20:53 | cropmapper Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-18 07:11 | PlaneMad | Yikes, not sure how they got uploaded from a different layer. Fixing it. | |
| 55462946 by easyKL @ 2018-01-15 13:49 | 1 | 2018-01-17 11:29 | PlaneMad | Amazing work! |
| 53708426 by selvaprakash @ 2017-11-12 10:01 | 1 | 2018-01-17 10:03 | PlaneMad | Nice work with all the mapping. You can read about different road classes for India here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 11:25 | PlaneMad | Have also made a bunch of fixes in the area, do check | |
| 52635332 by sfrank @ 2017-10-04 19:30 | 1 | 2018-01-17 09:59 | PlaneMad | Amazing work! |
| 55292657 by adivik2000 @ 2018-01-09 13:12 | 1 | 2018-01-17 09:16 | PlaneMad | Nice, thanks for cleaning up my older ward boundaries! |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 11:17 | adivik2000 ♦14 | I know. It's been eons. :D | |
| 55300806 by adivik2000 @ 2018-01-09 18:41 | 1 | 2018-01-16 19:00 | PlaneMad | Thank you! Added as subareas to the Mumbai relation. |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 11:19 | adivik2000 ♦14 | Thanks, Arun. | |
| 55422638 by Answerquest @ 2018-01-14 05:57 | 1 | 2018-01-15 06:28 | PlaneMad | Should this rather be protect_class=21 based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area |
| 2 | 2018-01-17 04:01 | Answerquest ♦5 | oh yes! I had just seen "grove" and stopped there. protect_class=2 is better | |
| 54575723 by onnyyonn @ 2017-12-12 19:43 | 1 | 2018-01-13 19:21 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54575723 |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 19:22 | PlaneMad | Nice work, finally someone mapping fom IITB :) | |
| 54532859 by RARS2057 @ 2017-12-11 08:32 | 1 | 2018-01-13 19:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54532859 |
| 54391142 by vigneshm555 @ 2017-12-06 06:12 | 1 | 2018-01-13 19:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54391142 |
| 54391096 by Sitaphala @ 2017-12-06 06:09 | 1 | 2018-01-13 19:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54391096 |
| 54391297 by Uma Dey Sarkar @ 2017-12-06 06:21 | 1 | 2018-01-13 19:20 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54391297 |
| 54861529 by Shankar bahadur @ 2017-12-23 11:36 | 1 | 2018-01-13 18:26 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54861529 |
| 54900323 by Gagan1604 @ 2017-12-25 06:09 | 1 | 2018-01-13 18:26 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54900323 |
| 54927841 by Rahul Pillai @ 2017-12-26 11:51 | 1 | 2018-01-13 18:25 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54927841 |
| 54974408 by Grishma G @ 2017-12-28 06:22 | 1 | 2018-01-13 18:23 | PlaneMad | Nice work, have added more details! |
| 55159772 by wiredbaba @ 2018-01-04 14:39 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:52 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55159772 |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 17:52 | PlaneMad | Wonderful work! | |
| 55179855 by Ajaya S B @ 2018-01-05 08:18 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:52 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55179855 |
| 55344332 by Suvra @ 2018-01-11 07:49 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:49 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55344332 |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 17:51 | PlaneMad | Have fixed the feature to a canal type, it should be visible now. | |
| 55408706 by SahilS @ 2018-01-13 15:08 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:48 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55408706 |
| 54472621 by Oberaffe @ 2017-12-08 23:13 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:47 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54472621 |
| 2 | 2019-01-13 05:06 | Gazer75 ♦284 | What source was used for this "765kV" line? If it is operating at 400kV then tag it as such, not the design voltage. Leave that in the note. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-13 22:57 | Oberaffe ♦45 | The source is my own knowledge! I learned that we have to tag something how everybody can see it and there are 765kV towers! Furthermore it will be change in some month to 765kV because the transformer will arrive soon! | |
| 4 | 2019-01-14 00:38 | Gazer75 ♦284 | I see. I could not see the line many places on aerials and there was no source mentioned anywhere. I guess it is ok to tag it as 765kV if the towers are marked with that. I'm used to having official numbers here with actual operating voltage. So I put design voltage in a note for future referen... | |
| 54744966 by bdiscoe @ 2017-12-18 23:20 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:46 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54744966 |
| 54949478 by bdiscoe @ 2017-12-27 08:49 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:46 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54949478 |
| 55399130 by Arun Balaji @ 2018-01-13 06:23 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:45 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55399130 |
| 2 | 2018-01-14 07:44 | Arun Balaji ♦4 | Thanx. I'm just trying to improve the road networks in South Tamil nadu :) | |
| 55410213 by indigomc @ 2018-01-13 16:12 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:45 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55410213 |
| 55411479 by indigomc @ 2018-01-13 17:11 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:45 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55411479 |
| 55316903 by Bkumar1893 @ 2018-01-10 09:35 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:42 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55316903 |
| 55359892 by indigomc @ 2018-01-11 18:32 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:42 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55359892 |
| 55320146 by Bkumar1893 @ 2018-01-10 11:57 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:41 | PlaneMad | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55320146 |
| 55155430 by chandusekharreddy @ 2018-01-04 11:53 | 1 | 2018-01-10 06:27 | PlaneMad | This is amazing, thank you! Btw, should we use `ref` for the ward nos instead of alt_name?Also it would be great if you could write a small howto on how this was done as a diary post.Overpass query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/uqZ |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 07:28 | chandusekharreddy ♦20 | Hi Draft use dairy posted | |
| 52853072 by soale @ 2017-10-12 08:53 | 1 | 2017-11-13 07:54 | PlaneMad | Hey, thanks for updating! I used to live in Rakkar and did most of the mapping. Do you have details of the ward boundaries? |
| 2 | 2017-11-15 06:00 | soale ♦10 | Hi Arun, ofcourse I know you :)I haven't tried getting the ward maps, and I wonder if the local panchayat also has them. I could try and ask the locals for the information on the ward boundaries. They have now put street signs with names for every street in Rakkar. I intend to mark them all o... | |
| 41053254 by harishdkk @ 2016-07-27 05:16 | 1 | 2017-10-24 08:58 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping in Denkanikottai! |
| 14831106 by parambyte @ 2013-01-29 06:57 | 1 | 2017-10-20 10:53 | PlaneMad | Amazing work! |
| 36545936 by Umair memon @ 2016-01-13 09:54 | 1 | 2017-10-20 10:42 | PlaneMad | Just saw your edits in Khardi. Amazing work, thank you! |
| 2 | 2017-10-20 12:47 | Umair memon ♦1 | Welcome | |
| 45815336 by nagyi54 @ 2017-02-04 21:08 | 1 | 2017-10-04 08:59 | PlaneMad | Please don't add fictional cities |
| 49993587 by raidh @ 2017-07-02 20:45 | 1 | 2017-10-04 07:10 | PlaneMad | Thank you for contributing. You have added the Arabic name in the wrong language field, please be careful about this. |
| 45496016 by Casey Coauette @ 2017-01-26 01:34 | 1 | 2017-10-04 07:07 | PlaneMad | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1161724 |
| 47099840 by Arun Pillai @ 2017-03-23 15:30 | 1 | 2017-10-04 05:03 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your edits, but this looks like an incorrect way to tag proposed roads. Please check the tagging on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposedChange it from `highway=X` -> `highway=proposed`+`proposed=X` |
| 51986794 by agbyaj @ 2017-09-12 20:58 | 1 | 2017-09-26 15:52 | PlaneMad | This road classification of `motorway` is used for freeways. This looks more like an unpaved track. You can easily fix this by selecting and changing the type.Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa |
| 51986657 by agbyaj @ 2017-09-12 20:53 | 1 | 2017-09-26 15:49 | PlaneMad | This looks great, thank you |
| 52131871 by jozefva @ 2017-09-18 05:04 | 1 | 2017-09-25 10:34 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for your edit! Looks like you also accidently dragged 3rd main road into Wind Tunnel road. Have fixed it now :) |
| 51592134 by Arie1955 @ 2017-08-30 19:48 | 1 | 2017-09-22 20:25 | PlaneMad | Thanks for mapping! you seem to have dragged a few roads in Colaba by mistake, fixing them for you |
| 51168162 by LiJuThomas @ 2017-08-16 11:25 | 1 | 2017-09-13 12:45 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your edits Liju. Please check the tagging of this road as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway`trunk` should be used for national highways |
| 2 | 2017-09-14 03:39 | LiJuThomas ♦3 | Corrected.. Thanks | |
| 51891607 by Walter Schlögl @ 2017-09-09 20:44 | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:17 | maxerickson ♦234 | Hi-This changeset accidentally moved a node of a building a long distance, something to watch out for. It ends up creating rendering artifacts across a wide area.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ika-chan!/diary/42268 |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 15:27 | tyr_asd ♦440 | Now the restaurant is duplicated in Vienna:* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5009482079* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5009482081It's really strange that this happened at all. The two node ids differ only by 2, but it's not a single bitflip. Did you do something special w... | |
| 3 | 2017-09-11 15:28 | tyr_asd ♦440 | PS: I couldn't help but notice that the comment on this changeset could be better. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments – your fellow mappers would appreciated that very much :) | |
| 4 | 2017-09-12 11:57 | PlaneMad | Does JOSM not throw a warning for this? | |
| 5 | 2017-09-12 12:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | There's a ticket from 3 years ago: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11215 (which is worth a read, just for a giggle). | |
| 6 | 2017-09-12 12:23 | tyr_asd ♦440 | I would assume that Walter did not intentionally move this node from Africa to Europe in this changeset: Walter seems to be an experienced user, and this changeset looks quite fine (adding a precise cuisine tag, teaking the coordinates slightly) if it wasn't affecting the wrong node. – I&... | |
| 7 | 2017-09-13 18:42 | Walter Schlögl ♦28 | It seems to me that there is a bug in JOSM that could have moved this point that far, but I'm not sure how to identify such a bug. | |
| 51902064 by GauravBubna @ 2017-09-10 09:19 | 1 | 2017-09-11 14:16 | PlaneMad | The area near this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523231280/history#map=19/1.35645/103.93680 should ideally be a roundabout according to the imagery |
| 51834319 by GauravBubna @ 2017-09-08 07:25 | 1 | 2017-09-11 13:12 | PlaneMad | This looks a little misaligned from the imagery, please check if its correct. |
| 51902702 by GauravBubna @ 2017-09-10 09:42 | 1 | 2017-09-11 13:04 | PlaneMad | This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523238641/history could probably be split to avoid the multiple 90 degree turns |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 13:07 | PlaneMad | This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523236362/history#map=18/1.34829/103.93512 through the building can be split and tagged `tunnel=building_passage` https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-common-features/#intersections | |
| 9789500 by PlaneMad @ 2011-11-10 15:17 | 1 | 2017-09-05 06:21 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505878No idea what this could be.Stumbled over it while looking at highway=ford onhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505867which probably should be highway=track + ford=yes, but the south-east end is now not connected to any oth... |
| 2 | 2017-09-05 12:35 | PlaneMad | It is indeed a ropeway https://www.telegraphindia.com/1091221/jsp/jharkhand/story_11890946.jsp | |
| 3 | 2017-09-05 12:38 | GerdP ♦2,751 | amazing. Maybe add this link as a note.Do you also know more about the ford? | |
| 4 | 2017-09-05 12:42 | PlaneMad | Added. Don't know about the ford except that its common for tractors on seasonal rivers in India | |
| 51707668 by Rajsamand Local Guide @ 2017-09-04 05:32 | 1 | 2017-09-04 05:41 | manoharuss ♦252 | Hi Rajsamand Local Guide,Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review. Your edits look great. One suggestion is to square off the polygons and buildings. For more information, use http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/ for understanding iD editor for OpenStreetMap. LearnOSM is... |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 06:38 | PlaneMad | These are some amazing contributions! Do look into https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway for how roads in India are classified. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 06:41 | manoharuss ♦252 | Observed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521146165/history looks like school grounds in the satellite imagery. Let me know if it is a new building that is missing from the imagery.Thanks :) | |
| 50588012 by Arathy Nair @ 2017-07-26 12:26 | 1 | 2017-09-01 09:19 | PlaneMad | One more mistaken tag change to a National Highway. Please see on how the tags work https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway |
| 51601060 by Arathy Nair @ 2017-08-31 06:05 | 1 | 2017-09-01 09:13 | PlaneMad | Hi Arathy, you have incorrectly changed the classification of a national highway from trunk to unclassified. This is incorrect and can cause routing engines to give wrong navigation for this road. Any reason you have done this? |
| 48944300 by AnnetteLewis @ 2017-05-24 11:12 | 1 | 2017-09-01 07:08 | PlaneMad | Hi you seem to have dragged a path by mistake. Its fixed now. |
| 48944673 by AnnetteLewis @ 2017-05-24 11:25 | 1 | 2017-09-01 07:03 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. It looks like you added features that were already on the map causing some duplicates. Have fixed that for you :) |
| 51508179 by Mohammed Azharuddin @ 2017-08-28 12:42 | 1 | 2017-08-29 06:09 | PlaneMad | Hi, thank you for your edits. It looks like these roads are already mapped and you added empty ways. You may want to clean them up. |
| 50486844 by mango123 @ 2017-07-22 18:32 | 1 | 2017-07-23 00:37 | iandees ♦724 | Reverted lettering/spam ways in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50491420 |
| 2 | 2017-08-25 13:26 | PlaneMad | Hi, thank you for contributing to the map, you have added some useful details like missing buildings and playgrounds which are very useful, but it doesn't explain why you drew various words like “PENIS” “YUKI” “YoYos Crib” “Smd ww” and also drew a... | |
| 40811202 by PlaneMad @ 2016-07-18 06:17 | 1 | 2017-08-22 15:39 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!please check highway=seton https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431603155Guess service was meant? |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 05:02 | PlaneMad | Whoops, fixed. Thank you! | |
| 50965695 by Krawujewatz @ 2017-08-09 09:10 | 1 | 2017-08-09 09:48 | PlaneMad | Hi, it looks like a small section of Berliner Ring is deleted, maybe by mistake?https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50965695?filters=%7B%22reasons%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Impossible%20angle%20in%20a%20highway%22%2C%22value%22%3A70%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22va... |
| 2 | 2017-08-09 10:55 | MKnight ♦910 | reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50969319 | |
| 50271170 by docaneesh @ 2017-07-14 01:23 | 1 | 2017-08-03 09:15 | PlaneMad | The tag for the u/c station nodes should also follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction |
| 2 | 2017-08-03 09:17 | PlaneMad | disused=yes indicates this was already built and not in use.http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qMB | |
| 3 | 2017-08-03 16:36 | docaneesh ♦2 | so i should removed the disused tag? | |
| 50617287 by Akash Kumar burman @ 2017-07-27 11:33 | 1 | 2017-07-28 05:34 | Chetan_Gowda ♦214 | Hi Akash Kumar burman, Ramanagar already exists on map. This is a town actually. City should be tagged for larger one, like Bengaluru. To add Kannada tag use "name:kn = *" For any help, please reply here. I'm happy to help. |
| 2 | 2017-07-28 05:59 | Akash Kumar burman ♦2 | Ok Chetan. | |
| 3 | 2017-08-03 08:47 | PlaneMad | Akash, the guidelines for naming in local language is here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languagesThe town already has a Kannada name https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245609255A Kannada map with this data is available here http://yogi... | |
| 50345606 by PlaneMad @ 2017-07-17 09:48 | 1 | 2017-07-27 07:07 | Oberaffe ♦45 | Dear Planemad,do you have any information about the rerouting of the NH27? I couldnt find anything in he media nor in actual videos!With best regards |
| 2 | 2017-07-27 12:34 | PlaneMad | Rerouted based on http://www.uppwd.gov.in/pdf/NHB.pdf which mentions it is a NH, but specifically NH230.Other NHs would also use this to bypass the city. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-27 13:24 | Oberaffe ♦45 | OK thanks for the link. :-) | |
| 50372427 by bgdoo @ 2017-07-18 08:39 | 1 | 2017-07-19 11:29 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your edits, but you introduced thousands of duplicate segments and nodes in your edit. Do look at the JOSM warnings before upload. Have cleaned up most of the data :) |
| 2 | 2017-07-19 17:48 | bgdoo ♦1 | Thanks for cleaning up. computer froze and didn't know if they had been uploaded. I guess I got my answer! | |
| 50392986 by Tinkerbell9597 @ 2017-07-19 01:17 Active block | 1 | 2017-07-19 06:28 | PlaneMad | Hi Tinkerbell, many thanks for contributing to OSM, but it seems like many of your fictional edits are not in line with the guidelines for Pokemon Go mapping which clearly state to only map what you see on the ground: > do map things that exist on the ground. The map is used by pedestrians, p... |
| 39045368 by IndianaJones737 @ 2016-05-02 16:56 | 1 | 2017-07-18 17:07 | PlaneMad | In India, the convention is to use trunk for National Highways. Is it ok to retag them? |
| 50058649 by JLaLonde13 @ 2017-07-05 12:57 | 1 | 2017-07-05 13:13 | PlaneMad | Not sure if this change is needed since the trail seems to be primarily a bike trail that can also be used for walking.The original tagging of `highway=cycleway` and `foot=yes` seems to be correct. |
| 2 | 2017-07-06 12:27 | JLaLonde13 ♦1 | The main reason i created this change is because in Pokemon Go the Pokemon will not spawn on bike path, however if it is marked as a walking path then they are more commonly spawning along that path. As someone who walks and bikes the path frequently, i would enjoy it if some pokemon would spawn alo... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-06 20:08 | PlaneMad | This map data is also used by several application that navigate bikers, and such a change would cause them not to be routed on this trail. It would be great if you can make the correction.It may not be too hard to find actual footpaths/sidewalks that are missing on the map, you should add them. | |
| 49909095 by Hamish Kirkman @ 2017-06-29 07:11 | 1 | 2017-07-05 13:31 | PlaneMad | Noticed that you removed the Stadium, has it been demolished? |
| 2 | 2017-07-06 05:24 | Hamish Kirkman ♦1 | Yes it was demolished about 2013 | |
| 3 | 2017-07-06 07:09 | PlaneMad | Thanks, found it on https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/49909095/ | |
| 50053772 by Tubk86 @ 2017-07-05 09:21 | 1 | 2017-07-05 18:29 | PlaneMad | Tubk86 thank you for your edits. It looks like you may need to fix the tags on all your address points. Please see the OSM wiki on how to add addresses.If you continue adding this data with wrong tags, your contributions might have to be removed. |
| 2 | 2017-07-05 18:30 | PlaneMad | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses | |
| 3 | 2017-07-14 10:55 | Tubk86 ♦1 | Thanks for your help. After reading the manual, i've understood how to choose right address tags. I'll change them to right tags as soon as possible.^^ | |
| 4 | 2017-09-12 16:52 | daganzdaanda ♦253 | Hi Tubk86, I have just found this old discussion. Do you think you can still correct all these nodes? Can we help you somehow? Or would it be easier for you if we just delete all the nodes with wrong tagging? | |
| 38240212 by Jeremy Quanno @ 2016-04-01 23:06 | 1 | 2017-07-05 14:25 | PlaneMad | Thank you for the edit. Is this motorway link really there? |
| 2 | 2017-07-05 14:27 | PlaneMad | According to http://i93exit4a.com/ this exit is proposed. I'm reverting this change. | |
| 49898011 by teoardenne @ 2017-06-28 17:46 | 1 | 2017-07-05 13:35 | PlaneMad | Why was the cycleway deleted? |
| 49994787 by BuilderRoadMaps @ 2017-07-02 21:51 | 1 | 2017-07-05 06:12 | PlaneMad | Thank you for your contributions. What is your source for the power lines? They don't seem to be visible in the satellite imagery. |
| 37381037 by geoffengland @ 2016-02-23 04:31 | 1 | 2017-06-22 05:48 | PlaneMad | Are all of the places actually cities? Town seems more appropriate for a place <100,000 inhabitants. |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 22:51 | geoffengland ♦7 | Metro Vancouver calls them cities and they are all separate cities in Metro Vancouver. The City of Port Moody calls itself City of Port Moody not Town of Port Moody. | |
| 25952993 by Rhubarb @ 2014-10-09 04:02 | 1 | 2017-06-22 01:53 | PlaneMad | Why is this a secondary road? Retagging it as a residential which seems more appropriate. |
| 2 | 2017-06-22 05:56 | Rhubarb ♦10 | Well spotted. Residential is probably the best tag for Liz Kernohan Drive (the parts you've changed anyway). However major parts of it are under construction, most of it (all of it?) currently is / will be quite a large segregated road. Chances are Liz Kernohan Drive has had more construction s... | |
| 49095156 by Arif Khan11 @ 2017-05-30 07:39 | 1 | 2017-06-14 05:24 | PlaneMad | Hi Jem, you have once again downgraded a national highway which should be a `trunk` road to a primary road. Can you please explain your reason to do this? |
| 49331398 by Rahul Tandon @ 2017-06-07 10:30 | 1 | 2017-06-07 10:57 | PlaneMad | Awesome, thanks for adding these! |
| 49260302 by MartinKleynhans @ 2017-06-05 07:27 | 1 | 2017-06-05 07:32 | PlaneMad | Thank you for taking the effort to improve this! |
| 48959722 by JPUnsolicited @ 2017-05-24 22:57 | 1 | 2017-05-25 05:45 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your edits! noticed that you tagged Ellenton as a city which is incorrect, have fixed this :) |
| 48633890 by MintCondition @ 2017-05-12 19:52 | 1 | 2017-05-25 03:40 | PlaneMad | Many of these roads do not look like access controlled motorways, they should likely be trunk or primary depending on the local classification |
| 39139653 by Zulfiqarib @ 2016-05-06 09:58 | 1 | 2017-05-22 19:29 | PlaneMad | Thanks for adding the building heights! Were they supposed to be in metres? A height of 504m for a 25 floor building seems incorrect https://publicmap.github.io/#15.17/18.9851/72.8276/9.6/60 |
| 46111992 by Arif Khan11 @ 2017-02-15 17:00 | 1 | 2017-05-22 09:48 | PlaneMad | Any reason you removed the existing translation and changed the classification of this trunk road? |
| 46877254 by Shah Abdur Rahman @ 2017-03-15 18:32 | 1 | 2017-05-22 06:46 | PlaneMad | Hi and welcome to OSM. It looks like you have converted the main roads in Islamabad to a footpath. Could you correct it, thanks! |
| 42911374 by Mr-psg @ 2016-10-15 06:14 | 1 | 2017-05-21 15:39 | PlaneMad | Noticed that you tagged quite a few places in the western province as cities even though their population is under 100,000 which is accepted as the standard to be a city. Let me know if it is ok to tag them back as a town? |
| 43885876 by Arif Khan11 @ 2016-11-23 03:42 | 1 | 2017-05-21 15:07 | PlaneMad | Jem, many thanks for all your contribution. It seems like you use the primary tag for all the roads which is incorrect. Primary roads are the major roads connecting cities and towns at the level next to a national highway. Making fixes to many of these roads. |
| 48359591 by Arif Khan11 @ 2017-05-03 09:21 | 1 | 2017-05-20 18:24 | PlaneMad | You might have mistakenly changed a railway line to a road in this change, have fixed it https://osmcha.mapbox.com/48359591/ |
| 48845446 by Arif Khan11 @ 2017-05-20 16:03 | 1 | 2017-05-20 17:47 | PlaneMad | Hi Jem, wondering why you have been removing the road names and changing the classification of national highways? They should be trunk and not primary. |
| 41820162 by sanjay kewat @ 2016-08-31 07:29 | 1 | 2017-05-19 06:18 | PlaneMad | Amazing work mapping in Chandrapur! |
| 45071340 by keithonearth @ 2017-01-11 09:00 | 1 | 2017-05-13 07:34 | PlaneMad | Theres some amazing new imagery from DigitalGlobe that has coverage for all the missing areas! |
| 2 | 2017-05-22 21:08 | keithonearth ♦314 | Thanks for letting me know. I just took a quick look, and the DigitalGlobe imagery looks great! I'll have to spend a bit more time looking over the area. The improved Bing imagery didn't come out very long ago (was that 6 months ago?), so I'd think there's *lots* of room for ... | |
| 45508365 by stop edit @ 2017-01-26 10:57 | 1 | 2017-05-03 06:22 | PlaneMad | Hi, you have created wrong city point for yadong county https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4634505374The correct one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244082492 |
| 48079343 by SidPat @ 2017-04-24 05:36 | 1 | 2017-04-27 10:03 | PlaneMad | Nice work with all the details! |
| 48106820 by Tarun Kumar Chaudhary @ 2017-04-25 01:55 | 1 | 2017-04-26 10:29 | PlaneMad | Nice work adding the bus stops! |
| 47885258 by SEEPANA SUNEETHA @ 2017-04-17 20:56 | 1 | 2017-04-18 07:28 | PlaneMad | Great work adding all the details! |
| 46898112 by Bhojaraj @ 2017-03-16 13:16 | 1 | 2017-04-18 07:21 | PlaneMad | Nice edits. Have made a lot of updates and fixed some tags, please check if its ok.There are still many untagged roads you have added, you can add a `residential` tag to them. |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 07:45 | Bhojaraj ♦12 | Yes thank you for your suggestion and I am tagging those untagged roads now. | |
| 47612591 by ranjithjoy @ 2017-04-10 07:21 | 1 | 2017-04-18 05:49 | PlaneMad | Nice work here, have added more details to the campus! |
| 47832775 by evt35 @ 2017-04-16 08:41 | 1 | 2017-04-17 07:54 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Hello evt35,Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I came across your changeset and found that you are using much updated imagery source than BING or mapbox for mapping. If possible can you help me in understanding what this imagery source is and is it legal to use this source to map. W... |
| 2 | 2017-04-17 11:42 | PlaneMad | The imagery source is documented here https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2016-June/081308.html&prev=search | |
| 3 | 2017-04-17 11:50 | evt35 ♦2 | Hi,For me (and because i live around this area, main updated information are extracted from "cadastre" map and IGN map (https://proxy-ign.openstreetmap.fr/bdortho/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg). SOurces are legal (FR-Cadastre is a legal map pubished by french administration and automatically added ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-17 12:39 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Thanks for the information. Really helpful. | |
| 47735727 by chachafish @ 2017-04-13 09:04 | 1 | 2017-04-17 06:47 | PlaneMad | Your edits are amazingly detailed :O |
| 2 | 2017-04-20 09:58 | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks. I do my best ;) | |
| 47655012 by Arathy Nair @ 2017-04-11 12:00 | 1 | 2017-04-11 13:46 | PlaneMad | Very impressed with your work. Have you considered using JOSM? It can be much more convenient and easy for making large edits. These guides might help https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/ |
| 47572488 by edtha @ 2017-04-08 16:33 | 1 | 2017-04-11 05:35 | PlaneMad | Thank you for adding the missing Wikidata links! |
| 47444512 by preethamrk @ 2017-04-04 14:33 | 1 | 2017-04-05 11:27 | PlaneMad | Nice work! Are you surveying these roads by foot? |
| 2 | 2017-04-05 11:39 | preethamrk ♦1 | Thanks PlaneMad. Good to see commits are being reviewed. Yes I have. | |
| 47398827 by Tui Sery @ 2017-04-03 04:15 | 1 | 2017-04-03 07:20 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM! It looks like the foot overbridge and connection to the station already exits. I'm correcting the duplicates if its ok. |
| 47316252 by PlaneMad @ 2017-03-31 07:48 | 1 | 2017-04-01 06:24 | DaxServer ♦115 | Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177626343/ is a railway yard. The same one as http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/13.09815/80.27270 Probably landuse=railway suits better? |
| 2 | 2017-04-01 11:26 | PlaneMad | Done | |
| 3 | 2017-04-01 12:25 | DaxServer ♦115 | (Y) | |
| 47263153 by Sahara12394 @ 2017-03-29 15:16 | 1 | 2017-03-31 20:31 | PlaneMad | Beautiful work, thank you for adding these! |
| 47313948 by snakeeyes @ 2017-03-31 06:14 | 1 | 2017-03-31 12:23 | PlaneMad | Hi, this was infact the bus stop for the railway station. Have fixed it back now with some more details. |
| 47315906 by PlaneMad @ 2017-03-31 07:38 | 1 | 2017-03-31 09:11 | DaxServer ♦115 | Sweet :) Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-03-31 09:13 | PlaneMad | \\m/ | |
| 47309222 by KaleenaSawyer @ 2017-03-30 23:32 | 1 | 2017-03-31 06:37 | PlaneMad | You had tagged the ferry as a road, fixed it now. |
| 47309045 by troy goodwalt @ 2017-03-30 23:18 | 1 | 2017-03-31 06:32 | PlaneMad | Hi, are you sure these post office locations are correct? There is one named as swimming pool. |
| 47178533 by Arshsy @ 2017-03-26 16:00 | 1 | 2017-03-31 05:08 | PlaneMad | Hi Arshy, welcome to OSM. This is a live map seen by millions of users. Please don't use it for testing, i'm reverting your edits. |
| 47253730 by India Map Team @ 2017-03-29 09:20 | 1 | 2017-03-30 04:49 | PlaneMad | Thanks for adding the admin levels! |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 05:21 | India Map Team ♦1 | @PlaneMad. Please note that this is an initial start towards adding the admin boundaries. The boundaries are not accurate and I am hoping that the community will help refine these. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-30 05:30 | PlaneMad | Looking forward to it, you should announce the plan on the talk-in list to get others involved. | |
| 47246021 by kadalcalypse @ 2017-03-29 01:32 | 1 | 2017-03-30 04:45 | PlaneMad | This is amazing work! |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 17:00 | kadalcalypse ♦1 | Thanks! It's quite easy actually.I'll write a diary entry. | |
| 47197056 by map changer @ 2017-03-27 10:04 | 1 | 2017-03-28 13:05 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM :) Have fixed some tags for you here to render the apartment correctly. |
| 47177074 by zevbn @ 2017-03-26 14:54 | 1 | 2017-03-27 05:49 | PlaneMad | Hi, welcome to OSM. Have removed the duplicate station you added for Cite. It already exists! http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/264514896#map=19/48.85527/2.34766 |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 12:09 | zevbn ♦1 | OK. What about the correct icon? The rectangle is not useful | |
| 3 | 2017-03-27 12:13 | PlaneMad | The default OSM rendering style is limited to a blue square. For custom icons check one of the Mapbox Styles: https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/streets-v9.html?title=true&access_token=pk.eyJ1IjoibWFwYm94IiwiYSI6ImNpejY4M29iazA2Z2gycXA4N2pmbDZmangifQ.-g_vE53SD2WrJ6tFX7QHmA#14.95/48.8553/2.3... | |
| 46379766 by marcknj @ 2017-02-24 20:57 | 1 | 2017-03-27 06:46 | PlaneMad | Hi, why was the name:ru label removed from the town? |
| 47173090 by Amanda SB @ 2017-03-26 11:47 | 1 | 2017-03-27 05:15 | PlaneMad | Hi Welcome to OSM! It looks like you have deleted some important features from the map , I have fixed them now. OSM is a collaborative project by thousands of users in your area to make a map, please try to contribute positively, thank you. |
| 46757428 by Yeomanry Survey @ 2017-03-11 08:45 | 1 | 2017-03-24 11:56 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM! James town is too small to be a city, have reversed the change. |
| 2 | 2017-03-24 16:47 | Yeomanry Survey ♦5 | Hi - it's too small in one sense of the term "city" however this is a British territory the same 'city status' law applies as in the UK. James Town is a City officially. I made the change mainly to ensure that it appears on the map with primacy over neighbouring Half Tree Ho... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-24 17:58 | PlaneMad | Have added a capital=2 to associate is a territory capital. This should give it preference on the map. | |
| 4 | 2017-03-24 20:59 | Yeomanry Survey ♦5 | Thanks. | |
| 46521920 by FreedSky @ 2017-03-02 13:10 | 1 | 2017-03-24 11:29 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your change, you can also add the wikipedia article for a place, like `wikipedia=en:Khorgas` |
| 2 | 2017-09-23 16:23 | FreedSky ♦181 | i dont like add this tag - - | |
| 46450345 by Omaticsgps @ 2017-02-27 19:59 | 1 | 2017-03-24 10:21 | PlaneMad | Looks like a place point for the town already exists. Deleting this one :) |
| 46399937 by Peng-Chung @ 2017-02-25 18:35 | 1 | 2017-03-24 09:55 | PlaneMad | Wikipedia says Reading is a town. Any reason you changed it to a city? |
| 2 | 2017-04-10 05:19 | Peng-Chung ♦2 | Thanks for this PlaneMad! It was a mistake actually. I will fix this... | |
| 47085557 by Pablo Pesantez @ 2017-03-23 04:27 | 1 | 2017-03-24 06:51 | PlaneMad | Hi Pablo, thank you for the edits. Some of the features are missing tags to allow it to render. |
| 47081235 by josecesartrevino @ 2017-03-22 22:33 | 1 | 2017-03-24 06:39 | PlaneMad | Hi, welcome to OSM! Many of the buildings don't line up very well with the imagery, can you please check this again? |
| 47080783 by EmGee0430 @ 2017-03-22 22:09 | 1 | 2017-03-24 06:29 | PlaneMad | Hi and welcome to OSM. Nice work on buildings, if you can correct any overlapping buildings that would be great! |
| 47080057 by franken-pinguin @ 2017-03-22 21:40 | 1 | 2017-03-24 06:21 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM. Nice edits! Some of the names needs better capitalization bird pond -> Bird Pond. |
| 47071492 by Manuchehr @ 2017-03-22 15:24 | 1 | 2017-03-23 15:29 | PlaneMad | Hi, it looks like you have a broken changeset where you are only uploading nodes, but not the actual buildings. Please check! |
| 46880749 by Sisd GIS Admin @ 2017-03-15 20:41 | 1 | 2017-03-23 10:56 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM! The natural=water tag is used for water areas and not lines. Details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3DwaterRemoving the property from Rio Grande. |
| 45985555 by Roel Verhoeven @ 2017-02-10 22:12 | 1 | 2017-03-23 09:37 | PlaneMad | Hi boundary=national_park is the correct tag to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_parkUndoing your change since the park is now off the map :) |
| 47075660 by isaure debrulle @ 2017-03-22 18:37 | 1 | 2017-03-23 08:10 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM! It looks like you deleted a lot of useful information on the map https://osmcha.mapbox.com/47075660/ . This might have been a mistake, so I am correcting it. If you need help improving the map please let me know. Thank you :)--Bienvenue à OSM! Il semble que vous avez s... |
| 2 | 2017-03-30 19:16 | colargol ♦27 | En complément des remarques de PlaneMad j'ajouterai que vous pouvez rentrer en contact avec des membres de la communauté osm de la région Toulousaine en vous inscrivant sur la liste de diffusion mentionnée sur cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toulou... | |
| 46692547 by Hobbitdoug @ 2017-03-08 21:25 | 1 | 2017-03-23 07:16 | PlaneMad | Hi, you seem to be incorrectly converting roads to footpath. Its fixed now, please be careful. |
| 47072458 by Hollywood Theater Burleson TX @ 2017-03-22 16:10 | 1 | 2017-03-23 05:47 | PlaneMad | Hi, you have deleted the lot for walmart and added and added the broadcasting station with incorrect tags with no proper source. I'm reverting this change for now, if this was done in error please let me know. |
| 46389234 by Whitegiraffe @ 2017-02-25 10:21 | 1 | 2017-03-22 09:38 | PlaneMad | Hi, why did you remove the German and French translation of this place? |
| 46919691 by woodennature @ 2017-03-17 07:46 | 1 | 2017-03-21 12:29 | PlaneMad | Hi, you have renamed various streets to German in the `name` tag. This is wrong and needs to be fixed. Please add any German names in the `name:de` tag. |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 12:34 | PlaneMad | Why was the English name removed and Rushan renamed to Prinz-Heinrich-Burg? This does not look correct | |
| 47024535 by AchieZim @ 2017-03-20 21:26 | 1 | 2017-03-21 12:24 | PlaneMad | Hi, you just accidentally renamed Harare on the map. Have fixed it now! |
| 42122478 by EVGstreet @ 2016-09-13 11:03 | 1 | 2017-03-21 10:14 | PlaneMad | Why was the highway tagged as residential? |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 03:56 | EVGstreet ♦3 | Hi.А. Создание "Отношения": Белгородская улица (6583287) ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6583287#map=10/51.0222/37.2748 >) = явная моя ошибка !:1. Применение type street = highway\tresidential к элементам ... | |
| 46574258 by hivltg06 @ 2017-03-04 14:53 | 1 | 2017-03-06 06:10 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for adding the park :) |
| 42905350 by sushma v @ 2016-10-14 20:02 | 1 | 2017-03-02 11:57 | PlaneMad | Hi Sushma, noticed that you added the shiva temple at NAL in the wrong location. Have made the correction based on knowledge of my relative.How did you locate this temple? |
| 38338269 by Viral Dave @ 2016-04-06 04:06 | 1 | 2017-03-02 06:53 | PlaneMad | Just retagged Himatnagar place node as a town based on population status |
| 45886886 by Gã Trùm @ 2017-02-07 14:16 | 1 | 2017-02-24 10:05 | PlaneMad | Hi, noticed you are changing the classification of overpass roads to motorway. Is this correct? |
| 46245059 by cosmobird @ 2017-02-20 14:08 | 1 | 2017-02-22 08:37 | PlaneMad | The Wiki ids have been incorrectly added to the individual ways instead of the boundary object. |
| 2 | 2017-02-26 02:50 | cosmobird ♦2 | oh... sorry for the delayed reply... will correct em asap | |
| 46236247 by cosmobird @ 2017-02-20 07:58 | 1 | 2017-02-20 09:44 | naveenpf ♦714 | This edit is wrong..we have to add qid to district boundary |
| 2 | 2017-02-22 08:09 | PlaneMad | Yes, the wiki ids of districts have incorrectly been added to the city or town features.Full list of incorrect edits is here http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/mUP | |
| 3 | 2017-02-26 04:36 | cosmobird ♦2 | yeah.... realized the confusion... silly and dumb edits... now i think they have been corrected... thanks for the feedback folks... | |
| 46235930 by cosmobird @ 2017-02-20 07:47 | 1 | 2017-02-21 12:22 | PlaneMad | Thanks for the edit, but looks like you added the Wiki page for the district to the city object.Unfortunately the boundary for the district does not seem to be on OSM, so will need to be added first. In the meantime please remove the incorrect link. |
| 46267074 by chandusekharreddy @ 2017-02-21 08:35 | 1 | 2017-02-21 08:40 | PlaneMad | Dropping in to say fantastic work! Just saw your name as the top mapper in the country! http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=India |
| 46208820 by ninjaslayer461 @ 2017-02-19 08:10 Active block | 1 | 2017-02-20 14:28 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions ninjaslayer461.Adding incorrect information is not fair to the others in your area who are making positive contributions to make this a highly useful resource for the benefit of others.It would be great if you could fix your edits to accuratel... |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 20:02 | user_5359 ♦19,400 | I hvae revert your changeset! | |
| 46225398 by iambibhas @ 2017-02-19 19:50 | 1 | 2017-02-20 11:54 | PlaneMad | Thanks for the edits here, i live in the area so happy to help :) |
| 2 | 2017-02-20 11:57 | iambibhas ♦1 | @planemad I live here too. :) | |
| 3 | 2017-02-20 11:59 | iambibhas ♦1 | And I was wondering why this area has so much details. Your comment answers it. :D | |
| 4 | 2017-02-20 12:28 | PlaneMad | lets meet for juice at beri-to sometime this week :D | |
| 46195781 by Ash Bijoor @ 2017-02-18 16:05 | 1 | 2017-02-20 09:39 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your edit :) |
| 46071885 by Arathy Nair @ 2017-02-14 08:28 | 1 | 2017-02-14 09:36 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM, and nice work on improving the Mumbai data :) |
| 45927590 by jaymc84 @ 2017-02-08 19:29 | 1 | 2017-02-09 06:31 | PlaneMad | Not sure if it is appropriate to mark https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4675337297 as a place of worship on a public map. This should rather be tagged as a residential address? |
| 2 | 2017-02-09 06:39 | PlaneMad | Have retagged it as a residential house name for now. | |
| 44363855 by Vijayotp @ 2016-12-13 06:16 | 1 | 2016-12-13 08:06 | PlaneMad | Nice work! |
| 39019521 by PlaneMad @ 2016-05-01 15:53 | 1 | 2016-12-12 21:29 | indigomc ♦187 | Are there really 5 bus stops here next to each other? |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 03:11 | PlaneMad | Yup, there are 5 bus shelters | |
| 44308584 by Narayani Barve @ 2016-12-10 18:00 | 1 | 2016-12-10 18:47 | PlaneMad | Nice work with all the mapping in Maharashtra! |
| 10447611 by PlaneMad @ 2012-01-20 15:42 | 1 | 2016-12-07 15:30 | DaxServer ♦115 | Hi, Arun! Node 1598973198 (Nellore city) is not called "Potti Sriramulu Jilla". Let me know, I'll remove it. I've added respective alt_names for the district Relation 2022291.Nellore node - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1598973198/historyDistrict relation - https://www... |
| 2 | 2016-12-07 15:57 | PlaneMad | Please change it :) It seems to have been added by a previous mapper. Awesome work on the relations! | |
| 3 | 2016-12-08 05:33 | DaxServer ♦115 | Thanks, Arun ;) | |
| 43900171 by MaverickAtWork @ 2016-11-23 16:35 | 1 | 2016-11-23 20:57 | PlaneMad | So awesome, congrats on your first edit on the open map of the world!This activity can be quite addictive if you start trying to map all of these https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features Have aded a few more roads that I could make out. Also visit the Asansol station for updates :) |
| 42138763 by Himanshu @ 2016-09-14 01:14 | 1 | 2016-11-23 02:39 | PlaneMad | Nice work adding the bay numbers. Have just retagged them to the more appropriate `aeroway=parking_position`https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43885321#map=17/28.56547/77.11465 |
| 42949110 by stop edit @ 2016-10-17 02:06 | 1 | 2016-11-19 18:09 | PlaneMad | H, you have added over 100 villages with name=村庄 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kbpIs this correct? |
| 42503745 by Marco_T @ 2016-09-28 19:59 | 1 | 2016-11-17 09:44 | PlaneMad | There is a duplicate place here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4322351175 |
| 41845107 by GidonW @ 2016-09-01 10:04 | 1 | 2016-11-16 04:01 | nammala ♦517 | Hi GidonW,Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you have adding `curve_geometry` tags to the highways for the node, It is not good way of tagging unless and until there is a mark . So please don't add these tags.cheers,nammala |
| 2 | 2016-11-16 13:17 | GidonW ♦3 | Hi, I'd like to explain these tags - I work for a company named Via, a ride-sharing transportation company. We use OSM as one of our map data sources in order to navigate in areas where we operate. One of the tags we use internally is "curve_geometry" which allows us to id... | |
| 3 | 2016-11-17 05:43 | nammala ♦517 | Hi GidonW,Thanks for getting back. I really like the work you do using OSM. But the tagging system you have been following is inappropriate and that data should be on OpenStreetMap. Making OSM the best should be our motto. Hope you will stop tagging them.Let me know if you need anything.Re... | |
| 4 | 2016-11-17 05:52 | nammala ♦517 | Oops!! the data should not be on OpenStreetMap. | |
| 5 | 2016-11-17 05:59 | PlaneMad | GidonW, there is nothing wrong with adding your own tags, but if its not discussed or documented, there is a high chance other mappers may remove them as being non useful. Maybe as a start, you could write a diary post explaining your rationale behind the tag and why it is useful to be on OSM. | |
| 43679238 by AHADZI RICHARD KWASI @ 2016-11-15 19:30 | 1 | 2016-11-16 05:52 | PlaneMad | Hi it seems like you have removed the highway number R201 from the road. Also do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines on choosing the correct tags for the roads |
| 43612355 by On the Top @ 2016-11-13 18:24 | 1 | 2016-11-13 19:11 | PlaneMad | Hello, and welcome to OSM :)The `operator=India Post` tag might be relevant here. |
| 43187605 by manoharuss @ 2016-10-26 10:04 | 1 | 2016-10-26 12:49 | zeromap ♦81 | The wikidata tag you added refers to the administrative division and is already present on this relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4196753Tagging towns as points was done from a TIGER import, before boundary data was available. To make things more confusing, the point location refe... |
| 2 | 2016-10-27 09:48 | manoharuss ♦252 | @zeromap Thanks for keeping an eye out. The point location from satellite imagery does seem like a hamlet as in small number of buildings around the intersection along the roads. Do you think it would be a good idea to tag the point as a hamlet and remove the wikidata tag I added?Best,Manohar | |
| 3 | 2016-10-27 12:21 | zeromap ♦81 | Yes, but this problem is more widespread. There are many town administrative divisions mapped as nodes, at least in New York State. They all need to be checked to see if, like in this case, they correspond to a hamlet or other place tag and if a relation exists with the proper information. In the ca... | |
| 4 | 2016-11-02 05:15 | manoharuss ♦252 | @zeromap starting to understand the problem. This point is now a hamlet(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43342659) and wikidata I added was deleted, according to our discussion. But now, I feel like the census and population tags which are at 20658 does not correspond to this hamlet but indee... | |
| 5 | 2016-11-02 11:07 | zeromap ♦81 | The population tag should be added to the relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4196753 | |
| 6 | 2016-11-09 03:11 | PlaneMad | zeromap, what do you estimate is the scale of the problem? it would be great if you could point to any previous discussion that talks about a potential cleanup effort. | |
| 7 | 2016-11-09 08:07 | PlaneMad | Have extracted the GNIS place where wikidata tags were added that are <v4:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B9AOAixeLPdYIcvxR-mR4CVbaZQD8TdWY-YpC3neiEc/edit#gid=0Looked into a sample of 20 and they all look like well urbanised areas. My hunch is that these cases are more of a minority... | |
| 8 | 2016-11-12 13:57 | zeromap ♦81 | >these cases are more of a minority than a majorityYes, I believe so.>What would be the best way to find out how many incorrectly tagged towns there are?Hard to say, but I noticed they are more common among towns without eponymous larger settlements. Consider this map of Onondaga C... | |
| 42451041 by Arun Balaji @ 2016-09-26 17:07 | 1 | 2016-11-03 07:15 | PlaneMad | Amazing work here. I've removed some duplicate streets and made some improvements near the station, please check |
| 2 | 2018-01-06 06:22 | Arun Balaji ♦4 | Thanx. I'm planning to add more POIs and photos. :) | |
| 43000926 by DivyaVijayan @ 2016-10-19 06:30 Active block | 1 | 2016-10-29 07:39 | PlaneMad | Made some corrections by merging with the duplicate ways. Thanks. |
| 43223880 by yurasi @ 2016-10-27 17:33 | 1 | 2016-10-28 13:15 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | I see you've added the wikidata tag to the Hucknall node here (and in case you were wondering, of the two Hucknalls / former Hucknalls in Notts, you got the right one).However I notice from https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/242#issuecomment-256905178 that this seems to be part of a m... |
| 2 | 2016-10-28 20:25 | PlaneMad | Hi Andy, as outlined in the Github ticket, every addition of Wikidata tag is manually reviewed by checking the location and context on both OSM and WIkidata before it is added.This is a carefully scoped effort only for cities and towns where it is possible to match the Wikidata item with a very ... | |
| 34445139 by hasan @ 2015-10-05 10:36 | 1 | 2016-10-28 08:55 | PlaneMad | Hi, noticed that the Kecamatans have been tagged as place=city which may not be an appropriate tag as they don't indicate an urban area. Is there a more appropriate tag for them in Indonesia? |
| 42339522 by Chalit Kaewjaroon @ 2016-09-22 06:45 Active block | 1 | 2016-09-23 05:04 | keithonearth ♦314 | I'm sorry to do this again, but I've not gotten any clarification on why you're adding Thai language name (and name:hi) tags to places in India, so I've reverted this edit. I can't say definitively that any of these tags are inaccurate, but that camp-site looks pretty un... |
| 2 | 2016-10-07 15:38 | PlaneMad | Keith, thanks for looking into the edits, there's a block on the user now https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1056 to force them to read the messages. Is there still some cleanup to do? | |
| 3 | 2016-10-11 18:26 | keithonearth ♦314 | I reverted their edits as I came across nodes with Thai names. I was not methodical in making sure I got all of this users edits fixed, so I would think that there is still clean up to do.Thanks for the heads-up about the user being blocked, I'm glad to hear that happened. | |
| 4 | 2016-10-11 18:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Just to be clear, the block isn't to stop them editing, it's to alert them to the fact that they're editing a shared map :)Hopefully they'll read the message and engage with other mappers. Unfortunately MAPS.ME doesn't make this very clear (and it's more complicated h... | |
| 5 | 2016-10-12 19:17 | keithonearth ♦314 | Hi SomeoneElse. I have a hard time believing these edits are not vandalism. Did you see my edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42477487) that removed one of their caravan sites that had been placed in the middle of an airport taxiway? While I did not survey that location in person, it... | |
| 6 | 2016-10-12 19:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Well, until they login to the osm.org site to clear the message http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chalit%20Kaewjaroon/blocks they're still not able to edit the map. Whether you'd call this "vandalism" rather depends on whether they realise they're actually updating a shared... | |
| 7 | 2016-10-24 17:12 | indigomc ♦187 | Having put the Thai content into a dictionary, they seem to represent things of interest for travellers, e.g. cafe's, viewpoints, et.c.. I suspect that they are not names and actually describe the mapping feature. Until a Thai speaker can be found to check, the thing to do might be to at least ... | |
| 42625531 by GIS EXECUTIVE @ 2016-10-04 10:18 | 1 | 2016-10-05 19:11 | PlaneMad | Hi, welcome to OSM!Noticed that you deleted all the shops in Phoenix market city that was added with a lot of hard work by another mapper.https://osmcha.mapbox.com/42625531/I'm going to restore the shops, but please make sure you are more careful in the future. |
| 42602546 by Tejas Jadhav @ 2016-10-03 11:17 | 1 | 2016-10-03 19:35 | PlaneMad | Nice work! |
| 42520420 by Ekta Ranjan @ 2016-09-29 14:26 | 1 | 2016-10-03 19:19 | PlaneMad | Hi Ekta, you just created an edit that is not real.Please do not make harmful edits on the map. If you are new, please read http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/introduction/ fist to understand the basics of mapmaking. Let me know if you require help to improve the map.Cheers, Arun |
| 2 | 2016-10-07 18:57 | sanjayb ♦288 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import | |
| 41483904 by harishdkk @ 2016-08-16 07:58 | 1 | 2016-10-03 19:12 | PlaneMad | This is amazing work! Do you stay here? |
| 42485393 by Parmanand Sahu @ 2016-09-28 05:27 | 1 | 2016-10-03 19:03 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping the campus. I have made some updates and fixed the tags. Please let me know if this is good? |
| 42605833 by drishya @ 2016-10-03 13:46 | 1 | 2016-10-03 17:58 | PlaneMad | Hi Drishya, you just deleted an important road in the city which was the result of someones hard work. Please do not make harmful edits on the map. If you are new, please read http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/introduction/ fist to understand the basics of mapmaking. Let me know if you require hel... |
| 2 | 2016-10-07 18:56 | sanjayb ♦288 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import | |
| 42533979 by midhu ks @ 2016-09-30 05:58 | 1 | 2016-09-30 19:01 | PlaneMad | Hi midhu, welcome to OSM. Noticed that you have been deleting a lot of the map data and adding fictional features like this. Please explain your edits or your contributions will be reverted immideately. |
| 2 | 2016-09-30 21:17 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552721 where the changeset comment is: revert 77 changesets by user midhu ks after they were found to damage the map in India; no response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42533979 question yet but speedy revert deemed best s... | |
| 3 | 2016-09-30 21:31 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones | |
| 4 | 2016-10-07 18:57 | sanjayb ♦288 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import | |
| 24821909 by jaisuvyas @ 2014-08-18 01:14 | 1 | 2016-09-14 15:08 | PlaneMad | Jaisen, was trying to convert the village boundaries to relations and noticed that the panchayat boundaries don't neatly align with the ward boundaries: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iowIs this expected? |
| 2 | 2016-09-14 15:50 | jaisuvyas ♦1 | Yes, I know that. And we came to know about it, soon after the mapping party exercise. Panchayat boundaries are not correct, along the unsurveyed / partially surveyed tracts of western ghat in Kerala. And I have initiated a move to solve it (for the Koorachundu village panchayat), consulting with th... | |
| 3 | 2016-09-15 04:22 | PlaneMad | Make sense. But it looks like the ward boundaries are close to accurate? If so can we start converting them into relations? | |
| 4 | 2016-09-15 07:24 | jaisuvyas ♦1 | Inner limits of ward boundaries are close to accurate. But outer limits are unlikely. The volunteers who mapped the area couldn't go through dense forest areas and through difficult hilly terrains (areas surrounding the village panchayat). When I prepared the hard copy map, I had to manually ad... | |
| 5 | 2016-09-15 09:24 | PlaneMad | An interesting case study into the state of management of land revenue :) | |
| 41211655 by GidonW @ 2016-08-03 10:52 | 1 | 2016-09-07 11:36 | PlaneMad | Hi, can you explain what the curve_geometry=yes tag means? There are over 6,000 nodes with this tag added by you http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/curve_geometry |
| 2 | 2016-10-24 23:12 | richlv ♦388 | other changesets with questions about this tag :* http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42080251* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41953577 | |
| 41693328 by ridixcr @ 2016-08-25 16:47 | 1 | 2016-08-28 13:54 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi ridixcr,thank you for fixing this multipolygon. :-)You caused a conflict with my revert I am currently doing.Instead of blindly (as blind and stupid as a bot) fixing "erros", I have a look at the object history before fixing an error. That's why I found this changesets,... |
| 2 | 2016-08-31 17:27 | PlaneMad | Hi Nakaner, could you please be more clear with what the issue is with the changeset? Was the multipolygon not fixed? | |
| 3 | 2016-08-31 18:26 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi PlaneMad,you fixed the multipoygon which was broken. That's the good thing. Thank you.Unfortunately, you did not have a look at the history of this relation. That's a problem you share with your workmates. If you had took a look at it, you would have found that it is part of an ... | |
| 4 | 2016-08-31 18:32 | mikelmaron ♦34 | Whatever the situation on the map, whomever is in a conversation, saying things like "blind and stupid as a bot" is completely uncalled for. I have to assume, you wouldn't say something like that to someone's face. Take the same kind of basic courtesy from real life to intera... | |
| 5 | 2016-08-31 19:54 | PlaneMad | Michael, this was uploaded 3 months ago by an experienced Canadian mapper with a proper comment and source mentioned, and the data aligns with the imagery. If this is really a broken import, we should be working to create systems that can catch this much earlier on. If you could be more construc... | |
| 31172985 by Hi10 @ 2015-05-15 13:02 | 1 | 2016-08-31 07:56 | PlaneMad | Hi, Kaveri Nivas is missing a tag, is it a hotel? |
| 41769019 by manings @ 2016-08-29 05:17 | 1 | 2016-08-29 19:58 | ajashton ♦17 | These ways should not have coastline tags - they are part of a water multipolygon, not the coastline. There are no other coastline tags on the St Lawrence until further downriver http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/i5L |
| 2 | 2016-08-30 06:01 | PlaneMad | Removed the coastline tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41793432 | |
| 41317656 by awireman @ 2016-08-08 07:19 | 1 | 2016-08-08 07:34 | PlaneMad | Welcome to the map that anyone can edit. Don't draw airplanes yet ;) |
| 41054234 by Editmapdsp123 @ 2016-07-27 06:32 | 1 | 2016-07-27 16:40 | PlaneMad | Hi Deppendra, thank you for your contributions. Is this your actual home? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4322756589I would suggest adding it as an address instead by clicking on the building and entering the number. Happy to help if you are stuck :) |
| 41061425 by sharad patil @ 2016-07-27 12:18 | 1 | 2016-07-27 14:33 | PlaneMad | Nice work with the mapping. Did some cleanup with tags and improved the geometries in the central area. Do check if its ok. Thanks! |
| 40795841 by uttelamiak @ 2016-07-17 11:06 | 1 | 2016-07-17 12:26 | PlaneMad | This is amazing, nice work! |
| 40672475 by asdofindia @ 2016-07-12 05:53 | 1 | 2016-07-14 10:47 | PlaneMad | Very cool to see school information from rural areas, are you traveling here? |
| 2 | 2016-07-14 11:27 | asdofindia ♦1 | @PlaneMad, yes. Actually, I was visiting all these kindergartens as a part of my internship (doing health checkup for kids). It's going to be pretty useful for people who come after me to spot these places also now. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-14 12:03 | PlaneMad | Thats amazing, would love to hear more about what you are doing. Maybe you could share your experience on the diary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary | |
| 4 | 2016-07-14 22:29 | asdofindia ♦1 | @PlaneMad, done here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asdofindia/diary/39052Thanks for the idea! My first diary entry. Any feedback is welcome. | |
| 40555748 by Miroslav Peška @ 2016-07-07 20:52 | 1 | 2016-07-08 16:57 | PlaneMad | Hi, you have changed the name of the village from 'Čachnov' to '2'. Looks like a mistake, if you want, I can help revert back to the original name. |
| 2 | 2016-07-08 21:48 | Miroslav Peška ♦1 | Hi, you are right, I accidentally renamed the place instead of just my bookmark. Thank you for letting me know, it's now back to the original (correct) name. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-09 04:31 | PlaneMad | Excellent, thanks. | |
| 31979868 by jd1121 @ 2015-06-15 10:02 | 1 | 2016-07-07 15:21 | PlaneMad | Nice work mapping the city. Have made some tag fixes and updates near the palace, do check if its ok :) |
| 2 | 2016-07-08 08:56 | jd1121 ♦2 | Thank you and tag fixes and updates seems fine. | |
| 40472998 by ramyaragupathy @ 2016-07-04 08:01 | 1 | 2016-07-04 14:52 | Toyota Nexus7 ♦2 | Adding bilingual is perfectly legal.Before remove name you should have a discussion. It's vandalism.Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_namesExampleBrusselsBrussels is completely bi-lingual, which means that the city council must operate in both languages, ... |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 15:10 | Toyota Nexus7 ♦2 | Please rollback the deletion. I appreciate that. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-04 15:46 | Toyota Nexus7 ♦2 | Try CSS3 unicode-range https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-3/#unicode-range-descin your mapbox product | |
| 4 | 2016-07-04 17:34 | ramyaragupathy ♦54 | Hi @Toyota Nexus7, your point on Brussels holds good. However in India, the general agreement is to use English names for name key and have a separate tag for Indic languages. Related reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages | |
| 5 | 2016-07-05 05:44 | PlaneMad | Its perfectly ok to have multilingual names in the `name` tag but goes against the convention we have been following in India till now for simplicity. Please join the discussion on the talk-in mailing list to discuss why you think this is a good idea.https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tal... | |
| 6 | 2016-08-23 22:41 | Geography Canada ♦104 | Maybe it should be in just Tamil, then.. | |
| 7 | 2016-08-24 08:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | @EzekielT As has been said many times before in OSM, "languages are complicated". I suggest that you respectfully follow PlaneMad's advice here if you believe that something is wrong. | |
| 40479134 by Editmapdsp123 @ 2016-07-04 13:45 | 1 | 2016-07-04 13:57 | PlaneMad | So cool, thanks for the edits! |
| 32085759 by Viajero Perdido @ 2015-06-19 22:26 | 1 | 2016-07-04 05:44 | PlaneMad | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37453089 Are these stairs actually called `Beer Drinkers and Pot Smokers` ? |
| 32111015 by h0m0sepian @ 2015-06-21 07:29 | 1 | 2016-06-26 14:42 | PlaneMad | Hi! Have made some tag updates to some of your edits. Some more schools and colleges should show up now! |
| 40199075 by jssulapas @ 2016-06-22 08:35 | 1 | 2016-06-24 07:08 | PlaneMad | Hi, welcome to OSM!It seems like you have added address tags `addr:city=Dasmariñas` to every single object in your changesets including the nodes of buildings and even rivers.Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses on how to use the address tags properly. Let me know i... |
| 2 | 2016-06-24 07:37 | jssulapas ♦1 | Hi! Thank you for noticing. I'm actually new to this and I just wanted to add the address tag to the buildings. If it's okay with you, I'd like to ask for your help in cleaning it up. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-24 09:04 | PlaneMad | Done! Here's how I did the cleanup http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PlaneMad/diary/38926 | |
| 40225535 by comrad @ 2016-06-23 09:53 | 1 | 2016-06-23 14:50 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hallo!Mir fiel auf, daß Du recht viele in OSM eingetragene Wege löscht. Ich möchte Dich darauf hinweisen, daß dies nicht gewünscht ist, sofern der Weg existiert. Zugangsbeschränkungen werden durch das access=* Tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) g... |
| 2 | 2016-06-23 15:02 | comrad ♦2 | Okay, dann die Änderungen bitte ignorieren und ich setze die Zugangsbeschränkung. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-23 16:19 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hi! Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ignorieren ist nur die zweitbeste Idee, da die Wege in der Database gelöscht sind. Warte bitte kurz ab, ich melde mich noch einmal, nachdem die Wege wieder hergestellt sind. Danach kannst Du dann access=* dranhängen. Danke! | |
| 4 | 2016-06-23 16:54 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | So, fertig. Da hingen vorher schon access=* Tags dran. Schau es Dir nochmal an. Wenn Dir etwas auffällt, was nicht passt, gern ändern. Generell mappen wir alles, was "on the ground" ist. Ob Privatbesitz oder nicht, ist eigentlich irrelevant, da es für alle Gelegenheiten die ... | |
| 5 | 2016-06-23 19:51 | Stalfur ♦47 | Good show! Excellent that this was solved so quickly--OSM Iceland | |
| 6 | 2016-06-24 06:22 | PlaneMad | Hi highflyer74, nice work catching this. How did you find this changeset? | |
| 7 | 2016-06-24 14:43 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello Stalfur & PlaneMad! Actually this one was pure coincidence, as I stumbled across a deleted way close to the town where I live and checked the other CS' of the user. I am using https://overpass-api.de/achavi/, http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm and https://taginfo.openstree... | |
| 40199604 by nitinmankar @ 2016-06-22 09:01 | 1 | 2016-06-22 10:05 | PlaneMad | Hi Nitin welcome to OSM! You should check out the [wiki]e(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India) for some help to get started if you are new.Enjoy mapping! |
| 12923732 by PlaneMad @ 2012-08-30 21:16 | 1 | 2016-06-21 00:19 | utack ♦280 | Can https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178708307 be deleted? New aerial images don't match it at all |
| 2 | 2016-06-21 07:40 | PlaneMad | Removed, feel free to remove any other forests like this. Was mostly done on low zoom on not so clear imagery. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-21 07:45 | utack ♦280 | Ok | |
| 39498379 by 6Demen - (Scorpion) @ 2016-05-23 00:02 | 1 | 2016-06-03 06:48 | PlaneMad | Hi 6Demen, nice edits. You should give better changeset comments :) |
| 2 | 2016-06-03 14:01 | 6Demen - (Scorpion) ♦1 | yeah iam sorry when i wrote that the ediotor bugged i had to do everything from the begins ^^ | |
| 3 | 2016-06-03 14:11 | PlaneMad | Ha, i thought so, you should document the bug on https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues so it can be fixed. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-03 23:45 | 6Demen - (Scorpion) ♦1 | ok thanks | |
| 30460493 by PlaneMad @ 2015-04-24 18:50 | 1 | 2016-05-25 02:41 | Alan ♦134 | Hi PlaneMad, this boundary=claim tag is interesting, but I don't see it documented anywhere. Can you point me to any more information about this tag? |
| 2 | 2016-05-25 03:42 | PlaneMad | It was more of a trial without disturbing any existing tags for custom rendering I was doing with tilemill. Its not documented anywhere, but if you think it makes broader sense, I think I'll start a wiki proposal for this. | |
| 3 | 2016-05-25 03:51 | Alan ♦134 | I think it does make a lot of sense... but this is my first time trying to understand the complexity of disputed boundaries in OSM. It seems like boundary=claim is useful, and less complicated than some of the other options. | |
| 39256596 by bleutaxi @ 2016-05-12 03:03 | 1 | 2016-05-24 06:39 | PlaneMad | Why is the name of the airport "Make Up Baggage"? This looks like a mistake. |
| 39479062 by JayCBR @ 2016-05-22 00:25 | 1 | 2016-05-23 06:35 | PlaneMad | Hi Jay, noticed you removed the tags for this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275784052 . Was it accidental or were the tags incorrect? |
| 2 | 2016-05-23 11:30 | JayCBR ♦39 | we try to reconstruct the whole road network, including creation of missing relations, correcting names and refs..after extensive talks in the forum we decided to tag provincial roads with reg_ref=ΕΠ# and include the names of the destinations, after consulting the map provided by okxe..yo... | |
| 3 | 2016-05-23 11:59 | PlaneMad | Thank you! | |
| 4 | 2016-05-23 12:01 | PlaneMad | Maybe you can use JOSM, which is easier to use for such large changes :) | |
| 39471959 by Scott Highland @ 2016-05-21 16:11 | 1 | 2016-05-23 06:01 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your updates. I've fixed some tags as per the map conventions to better indicate that the road is closed for traffic https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39500955Please check and see if it looks ok.Cheers |
| 31521204 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-28 05:59 | 1 | 2016-05-11 19:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Are you trying to say here that the geographical location of the border is disputed, or referring to the dispute where Serbia still thinks that Kosovo is a province of Serbian?If just the latter, then according to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf an... |
| 2 | 2016-05-12 04:03 | PlaneMad | Wonder if the `disputed_by` tag would do the trick like what we have in Kashmir http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ga9 | |
| 39148564 by Arefin Bashar Arif @ 2016-05-06 17:08 | 1 | 2016-05-09 07:16 | PlaneMad | Arefin, noticed that you might have removed the name of the road Tanzil Road from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180049225#map=14/25.7318/89.1967Please check if it was an error. |
| 39046734 by salvabarquin @ 2016-05-02 17:33 | 1 | 2016-05-06 05:15 | PlaneMad | Hi, have reverted the name change you made. The official name is 'Mezquita-Catedral de Córdoba' |
| 38540558 by calfarome @ 2016-04-13 22:10 | 1 | 2016-04-14 09:54 | R0bst3r ♦1,094 | Is there a reason for deleting this roundabout instead of fixing the problem described?Some local mappers are on it ... |
| 2 | 2016-04-14 13:10 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Änderungen / Löschung Kreisverkehr revertet, Kreisverkehr berichtigt | |
| 3 | 2016-04-14 14:32 | calfarome ♦78 | Hello here, I working resolving connectivity issues throughout the world, but anyway I will have more careful with the roundabouts to future. Thanks for the feedback. | |
| 4 | 2016-04-14 19:53 | MarkusHD ♦176 | Hello calfarome, the problem are not the roundabouts, but the use of old aerial imagery. | |
| 5 | 2016-04-15 00:39 | calfarome ♦78 | That's right MarkusHD, it is even more for remote mappers we want to help improve the map, I hope that very soon we have updated satellite images. But in this particular case possibly roundabouts has been removed by a connectivity problem and navigabilidad map. And thanks to local mappers we c... | |
| 6 | 2016-04-15 06:06 | MarkusHD ♦176 | I think you didn't get me: If you have to fix errors, then do just that, but don't change stuff based on satellite imagery without local knowledge. It should be suspicious for you if data and satellite do not match. Keeping the roundabout AND fixing the problem would have been no problem h... | |
| 7 | 2016-04-17 01:18 | calfarome ♦78 | Well, your comment is valid. | |
| 8 | 2016-04-22 05:23 | PlaneMad | Thanks MarkusHD for flagging this. All of us at the data team at Mapbox use [this JOSM paint style](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mapbox/mapping/master/JOSM/data-qa.mapcss) to highlight recently edited data. It looks like a recent change caused the filter `JOSM_search("timestamp:2015/today&... | |
| 31161159 by Kondekar @ 2015-05-15 05:53 | 1 | 2016-04-14 09:04 | PlaneMad | Great work on mapping Shirur Anantpal. I have made some tag fixes in the area for villages, please check if it looks ok. |
| 38531313 by 4rch @ 2016-04-13 17:13 | 1 | 2016-04-14 07:51 | PlaneMad | Noticed this change touched a lot of disputed boundaries and reverted many edits. Were the other edits bad? |
| 2 | 2016-04-17 08:31 | 4rch ♦138 | Yes, SomeoneElse is already in touch with this topic: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588368#p588368 The edits I've reverted covered areas which aren't under control of Morocco. Especially territorial waters of Spain around Melilla and Ceuta and of Western Sahara/Sahra... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-03 22:20 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello,I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.We're aware t... | |
| 4 | 2016-08-30 21:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello again,Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.ph... | |
| 38483906 by Narayani Barve @ 2016-04-11 19:51 | 1 | 2016-04-13 06:47 | PlaneMad | Welcome to OSM! The road looked more like a district road rather than a state highway. Have tagged it `tertiary` |
| 38084048 by Maanya @ 2016-03-26 15:05 | 1 | 2016-04-07 07:56 | PlaneMad | Made a bunch of fixes and updates at UAS. Fixed the road classifications, removed overlapping roads, improved the connections, added details to the playgrounds. Please check if it looks ok. |
| 21448481 by It's so funny @ 2014-04-01 22:54 | 1 | 2016-04-07 05:37 | PlaneMad | Hi, is this cycleway still under construction? http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/541425 |
| 37577370 by Geoboy645 @ 2016-03-03 00:27 | 1 | 2016-03-24 19:12 | PlaneMad | Hi Geoboy645, can you explain why you deleted the farms? If you don't want to see it, the right solution is to render your own map style, not delete correct data. |
| 2 | 2016-03-25 05:45 | PlaneMad | Have reverted your deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38055289 | |
| 30929953 by Med @ 2015-05-09 08:01 | 1 | 2016-03-23 11:24 | PlaneMad | Just noticed you might have orthoganalized the boundary of Half Moon Bay in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33115531#map=12/37.4462/-122.3420Can you check if any other objects in you changeset were affected this way? |
| 2 | 2016-04-16 07:29 | FvGordon ♦217 | I have reverted the recangular boundary. | |
| 37991196 by FreedSky @ 2016-03-22 05:05 | 1 | 2016-03-22 06:35 | PlaneMad | Hi FreedSky, amazing work with all the boundaries. Please add a comment to your changesets to give context to other editors of the map. |
| 2 | 2016-04-06 14:47 | FreedSky ♦181 | thks 但是我没这个习惯 i dont like write reason~ | |
| 37824698 by Emcoe @ 2016-03-14 16:27 | 1 | 2016-03-15 05:10 | PlaneMad | Welcome to Bengaluru :) |
| 37684630 by nammala @ 2016-03-08 11:41 | 1 | 2016-03-09 05:39 | PlaneMad | Nice work! You might want to fix the names so that they are in the proper case.Beach road -> Beach Roadreliance fresh -> Reliance Fresh |
| 37678994 by SM@Edit @ 2016-03-08 04:57 | 1 | 2016-03-08 05:31 | PlaneMad | Nice work! Noticed some disconnected junctions and fixed them. |
| 2 | 2016-03-08 05:31 | PlaneMad | You should update the map data in JOSM to avoid any conflict. | |
| 3 | 2016-03-16 12:56 | SM@Edit ♦1 | Thanks. I will check properly and update. In the recent edits I made sure that all the junctions are connected. | |
| 37565104 by BharataHS @ 2016-03-02 12:16 | 1 | 2016-03-03 06:15 | PlaneMad | Do the signs still say NH-206? The NHs have officially been renumbered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_206_(India)(old_numbering) |
| 33304948 by PlaneMad @ 2015-08-13 06:16 | 1 | 2016-02-24 23:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | For info the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032013 looks a bit iffy; I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/518603 so that hopefully it'll get a proper survey. |
| 2 | 2016-02-27 14:26 | PlaneMad | Thanks Andy. | |
| 37269062 by Sudhira @ 2016-02-17 15:06 | 1 | 2016-02-17 17:38 | PlaneMad | Sudhira, any idea if IISc have a spatial database of all the trees on campus? That would be really amazing data. |
| 2 | 2016-02-17 17:43 | Sudhira ♦1 | TVR has a layer with all trees mapped. Not sure if he will share :) We can plan a mapping party to do that otherwise. | |
| 36923653 by DeVietor @ 2016-01-31 19:23 | 1 | 2016-02-17 06:42 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for all the wonderful contributions! Noticed you were using iD, and was wondering if you tried JOSM to make it easier to make large changes. You might find these guides helpful to get started https://www.mapbox.com/blog/tags/josm/Cheers, |
| 36910365 by Seandebasti @ 2016-01-31 06:30 | 1 | 2016-02-17 06:39 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for all the wonderful contributions! Noticed you were using iD, and was wondering if you tried JOSM to make it easier to make large changes. You might find these guides helpful to get started https://www.mapbox.com/blog/tags/josm/Cheers, |
| 37248832 by drehrumbum71 @ 2016-02-16 16:00 | 1 | 2016-02-17 06:31 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for all the wonderful contributions! Noticed you were using iD, and was wondering if you tried JOSM to make it easier to make large changes. You might find these guides helpful to get started https://www.mapbox.com/blog/tags/josm/Cheers, |
| 37258472 by David Rule @ 2016-02-17 01:56 | 1 | 2016-02-17 06:17 | PlaneMad | Hi, welcome and thank you for contributing to OSM. Noticed that you might have accidently deleted the work of others in this area http://osmcha-django-staging.tilestream.net/37258472/. Can you verify that these changes are ok or were they deleted by mistake? Let me know if you need any help to get t... |
| 37259599 by patodiez @ 2016-02-17 05:22 | 1 | 2016-02-17 05:57 | PlaneMad | Hi, thanks for your edits. I noticed you are an expert mapper and using iD. You should try out JOSM so that making large number of edits is much easier.Take a look at this guide to JOSM https://www.mapbox.com/blog/making-the-most-josm/ |
| 36269605 by pavanvijjapu @ 2015-12-30 19:29 | 1 | 2016-02-10 10:08 | PlaneMad | Nice edits here! Have made some improvements in the area like adding the sector names as neighborhoods based on the addresses you added. Can you verify if they are correct? |
| 2 | 2016-02-10 10:28 | PlaneMad | If you are interested to know how the highway tagging scheme in OSM works, check out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway | |
| 3 | 2016-02-12 13:52 | pavanvijjapu ♦2 | Sector 5 and 8 are correct. Sector 4 is actually sector 3 | |
| 4 | 2016-02-14 05:41 | pavanvijjapu ♦2 | I studied the guidelines of Highway tagging, I have a doubt in this regard, the guidelines state that NH should not be used to refer highways within the city, so does it mean that the NH 16 beside Sector 4 MVP should be renamed? | |
| 5 | 2016-02-16 19:04 | PlaneMad | Usually NH's would bypass the city, but looks like in Vizags case this is correct. Or have they made a bypass? in which case the trunk route should be rerouted through that. | |
| 6 | 2016-02-21 15:59 | pavanvijjapu ♦2 | There is bypass but not a prominent one. Its a two lane road and not termed as national highway for now though there are plans to make it a six lane road. For now I suppose its better to leave it as mentioned. | |
| 37191391 by poornibadrinath @ 2016-02-13 17:45 | 1 | 2016-02-14 07:21 | BCNorwich ♦4,856 | Hi, There are now two outlines for the park, and one outline duplicates itself by going round twice. so in fact three circuits of the park in total. May I also suggest that the park does not extend to the center line of the surrounding roads and that it should be mapped to it's physical boundar... |
| 2 | 2016-02-15 07:32 | PlaneMad | Poornima, I have removed the duplicate park, please check if it looks ok. | |
| 3 | 2016-02-15 14:09 | poornibadrinath ♦176 | Thank you so much :) I will look into it :) | |
| 37056122 by rarad74 @ 2016-02-07 09:46 | 1 | 2016-02-12 07:14 | PlaneMad | Thanks for reverting. Curious to know how you detected the vandalism? |
| 2 | 2016-02-12 07:23 | rarad74 ♦278 | The user to which i reverted changeset aleatory deleted in entire country valid data without giving any explanation , even to Data Working Group too...PS: I am curious too, why you are so curios? You are an experienced user if i must take in consideration the number of your edits... | |
| 3 | 2016-02-12 07:46 | PlaneMad | Thanks. I have been looking into automatic flagging of changesets with vandalism using osmcha. We have a test instance running if you would like to try: http://osmcha-django-staging.tilestream.net/Found your changeset by looking up changes with the comment 'vandal' ;) | |
| 37039836 by opendcc @ 2016-02-06 12:29 | 1 | 2016-02-12 07:23 | PlaneMad | Thank you for fixing the vandalism. Can you share the changeset of the vandalism that you fixed? |
| 2 | 2016-02-12 07:35 | opendcc ♦1,535 | Just look in the history of Birkenstraße and Lindenstraße. These streets were deleted and redrawed, but without any connections to other streets. | |
| 37109210 by Papayaved @ 2016-02-09 19:33 | 1 | 2016-02-10 08:24 | PlaneMad | Wow, fantastic work :DHad done a lot of the initial mapping around Gokarna village during a visit many years ago. Are you there now? |
| 2 | 2016-02-11 16:14 | Papayaved ♦14 | No, now i am in my country. I was in Gokarna 3 times. Nice place in India | |
| 3 | 2016-02-11 17:24 | PlaneMad | Gokarna has a special role in Indian mythology. One can feel the different culture of the people in such places. Glad that you had a good time :) | |
| 37123268 by Rishikesh Kulkarni @ 2016-02-10 12:22 | 1 | 2016-02-10 12:40 | PlaneMad | Wow, some detailed buildings! |
| 2 | 2016-02-11 04:03 | Rishikesh Kulkarni ♦1 | Thank you :) | |
| 3 | 2016-02-11 06:48 | PlaneMad | Have you tried mapping your hometown yet? Its a lot more fun when you know the place well :) | |
| 37114278 by Triangle37 @ 2016-02-10 00:45 | 1 | 2016-02-10 11:58 | PlaneMad | Nice work with the landuse. Is this based on the detailed development plan from CMDA? |
| 2 | 2016-02-10 15:42 | Triangle37 ♦1 | Thank you!Yes it is based on CMDA dataset. | |
| 37121670 by Mordel42 @ 2016-02-10 10:56 | 1 | 2016-02-10 11:57 | PlaneMad | Wow, thanks for adding all the beaches. Are you in Goa? |
| 37097151 by Ashvini Kumar @ 2016-02-09 09:35 | 1 | 2016-02-09 13:32 | PlaneMad | The building is actually Prestige Nebula, and the consulate is just a small office space on the first floor. Don't think we should be tagging the building name as the consulate. |
| 2 | 2016-02-10 05:29 | Ashvini Kumar ♦2 | In that case, you are right. will change. | |
| 37092341 by Ortsangabe @ 2016-02-09 00:22 | 1 | 2016-02-09 03:37 | PlaneMad | Thank you for contributing in India :) |
| 36988355 by Jack_B @ 2016-02-03 23:46 | 1 | 2016-02-08 07:14 | PlaneMad | Looks amazing, great edits! |
| 37033202 by Indrayudh Roy @ 2016-02-05 23:46 | 1 | 2016-02-06 03:48 | PlaneMad | Nice work improving Pune :) |
| 2 | 2016-02-06 12:46 | Indrayudh Roy ♦1 | Thanks :) | |
| 36949853 by EC95 @ 2016-02-02 03:28 | 1 | 2016-02-05 08:55 | PlaneMad | Thanks for your edits :)You should also add changeset comments, to let others know what you edited. |
| 37014330 by Akash Kumar burman @ 2016-02-05 07:56 | 1 | 2016-02-05 08:53 | PlaneMad | Hey Akash, nice work improving Hyderabad! |
| 2 | 2016-02-06 05:40 | Akash Kumar burman ♦2 | Thank you.... | |
| 37011865 by MNobrega @ 2016-02-05 02:12 | 1 | 2016-02-05 05:26 | PlaneMad | Thank you for fixing this. Cheers, |
| 36938532 by RandomPhantom @ 2016-02-01 15:05 | 1 | 2016-02-03 11:17 | PlaneMad | Nice work here! Did some updates to the campus, do check if its ok. |
| 33723833 by sujandeb @ 2015-09-01 10:23 | 1 | 2016-02-03 07:09 | PlaneMad | Hey Sujan, absolutely amazing work with mapping in Bidhannagar! |
| 2 | 2016-02-03 15:23 | sujandeb ♦1 | Hey thanks ! You've been a lot of places too | |
| 36896136 by Sabeeh Sabir Baz @ 2016-01-30 10:55 | 1 | 2016-02-02 05:55 | PlaneMad | Sabeeh, this is amazing data. Can you please share a link to the source of the data? |
| 36788698 by Ashvini Kumar @ 2016-01-25 04:48 | 1 | 2016-01-26 13:30 | PlaneMad | Wow, are you traveling here? I traced some more details, please check. |
| 2 | 2016-01-26 13:57 | Ashvini Kumar ♦2 | Yes, traveling :-)Thanks, added few more details.. | |
| 36757921 by Neha Turakhia @ 2016-01-23 13:26 | 1 | 2016-01-26 11:39 | PlaneMad | Nice work on the edits here. Have added some more detail at the SDAT grounds. Can you please check if they are correct. |
| 36718849 by Govand EduFest @ 2016-01-21 12:25 | 1 | 2016-01-25 14:31 | PlaneMad | These edits are amazing. Were they really by class 4 students? Would love to know more.Arun |
| 35962680 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-15 09:34 | 1 | 2015-12-22 16:53 | ediyes ♦110 | Hi,Please fix the building.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385969308/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:51 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358841 | |
| 35960997 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-15 07:46 | 1 | 2015-12-22 16:53 | ediyes ♦110 | Hi,Please fix the building.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385955496/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:46 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358750 | |
| 35981499 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-16 07:12 | 1 | 2015-12-22 17:43 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Please realign this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386121817/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:43 | PlaneMad | Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358709 | |
| 35983428 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-16 09:03 | 1 | 2015-12-22 17:43 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Please realign this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386137395/history |
| 2 | 2016-01-04 12:23 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36358252 | |
| 30228912 by samit_53 @ 2015-04-15 07:21 | 1 | 2015-12-29 18:11 | PlaneMad | Great job on all the edits in Haldia, the map looks amazing!Did some cleanup here, mostly retagging of some internal roads as service and ungluing some areas from roads. Do check and let me know if its ok. |
| 2 | 2015-12-30 05:31 | samit_53 ♦1 | All the changes made by you are correct. Thank you for the changes. | |
| 15340040 by PlaneMad @ 2013-03-12 13:34 | 1 | 2015-10-30 10:50 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review way 209561034:the tag highway=median is rarely used,it seems to mean the same as highway=centreline, which is currently discussed as well, seehttp://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/when-should-highway-centreline-be-used-tp5857994.html |
| 2 | 2015-10-30 10:51 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please check also barrier=medianon way 209561046 | |
| 3 | 2015-12-21 10:58 | PlaneMad | Have made the changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36082674 | |
| 32386221 by PlaneMad @ 2015-07-03 12:08 | 1 | 2015-07-08 19:44 | calfarome ♦78 | Hi PlaneMad, there are many duplicate nodes in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3632810452/history#map=16/11.9218/79.8129 |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 10:48 | PlaneMad | Thanks, fixed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36082512 | |
| 35938610 by saikabhi @ 2015-12-14 06:35 | 1 | 2015-12-14 10:06 | PlaneMad | Still seeing issues. For instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385795420 should be `left|||` as there are no through markings on the other lanes. |
| 35882534 by Jothirnadh @ 2015-12-11 11:30 | 1 | 2015-12-11 19:12 | PlaneMad | You need to be more careful with changeset comments. |
| 2 | 2015-12-12 10:49 | Jothirnadh ♦75 | Okay... I will be careful with that next time. Thanks for reminding me Planemad. | |
| 35883326 by saikabhi @ 2015-12-11 12:15 | 1 | 2015-12-11 16:30 | PlaneMad | The turn lanes on this way looks incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66984273Can you check? |
| 2 | 2015-12-11 16:30 | PlaneMad | Also check the other roads around this intersection. | |
| 3 | 2015-12-11 19:10 | PlaneMad | Also your changeset comments don't match the edits. | |
| 4 | 2015-12-14 07:02 | saikabhi ♦159 | Thank you for the feedback. Have made the required changes.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35938814 | |
| 35865542 by saikabhi @ 2015-12-10 13:24 | 1 | 2015-12-11 16:09 | PlaneMad | Turn lanes on this way looks incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95973116Can you check? |
| 2 | 2015-12-14 07:25 | saikabhi ♦159 | Thank you for the feedback. Can you take a look at the changes made.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35939027 | |
| 35799002 by PlaneMad @ 2015-12-07 04:41 | 1 | 2015-12-08 18:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | B&M Bargains or B&M Homestore? They've got (at least) two brands in the UK. |
| 2 | 2015-12-08 20:29 | PlaneMad | The official listing of the address is a Homestore with Garden Centre. http://www.bmstores.co.uk/stores?location=Gordon's%20Lodge%2C%20Milton%20Keynes%2C%20UK&locationid=35839940-2839-11E2-B468A4BADB4726BE®ion=UK | |
| 27038989 by shaikhuzma @ 2014-11-26 08:22 | 1 | 2015-12-05 14:40 | PlaneMad | Uzma, looks like you changed the name by mistake of Kurla Terminus. Corrected it, thanks. |
| 35441954 by richlv @ 2015-11-19 17:57 | 1 | 2015-11-19 18:22 | PlaneMad | The note mentioned `temporarily converted to two-way due to Central Subway construction` which was the reason to remove the oneway. Do check the other ways in the area as they might now be accessible if the construction is complete. |
| 2 | 2015-11-19 23:17 | richlv ♦388 | ah, thanks for the info. that change has been reversed by now and should be reflected in the map then. unfortunately, won't be able to survey this region anytime soon, will have to involve locals :) | |
| 34823048 by abel801 @ 2015-10-23 15:40 | 1 | 2015-10-28 15:12 | mfuji ♦2 | Please don't break our data!You have deleted the SECONDARY roads #335726311 and #313944874 by merging into a different TERTIARY road #376538841.But they are roads in different class and they are unknown from imagery. Then we have lost many informations tagged in these roads, including inf... |
| 2 | 2015-11-13 12:08 | PlaneMad | Thank you mfufi was detecting this. abel, can you explain why these roads were merged? | |
| 3 | 2015-11-13 12:09 | PlaneMad | Also thanks for fixing the issues mfuji, please report if you found any other incorrect merging, will have the changeset reverted. | |
| 4 | 2015-11-16 15:12 | abel801 ♦33 | Thanks mfuji for fixing my errors and I will take into account your suggestions. | |
| 27025584 by Luis36995 @ 2014-11-25 16:29 | 1 | 2014-11-29 11:57 | OverQuantum ♦10 | Wrong. Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27109418Issue created: https://github.com/osmlab/to-fix/issues/53 |
| 2 | 2015-11-12 11:23 | PlaneMad | Replied on https://github.com/osmlab/to-fix/issues/53#issuecomment-156078387 | |
| 35120429 by keithonearth @ 2015-11-06 08:28 | 1 | 2015-11-06 09:10 | keithonearth ♦314 | I don't know if anyone reads the notes here, but my edit summary was wrong, as I forgot to update it after my previous summary. This time I was, in fact, adding farmland and wooded areas. |
| 2 | 2015-11-06 13:56 | PlaneMad | Wow, Leh looks amazing! Thanks for all the mapping! :D | |
| 3 | 2015-11-09 09:21 | keithonearth ♦314 | Thanks for the complement PlaneMad! I appreciate it very much, especially coming from a professional like you. | |
| 35110184 by habib5 @ 2015-11-05 19:41 | 1 | 2015-11-06 11:08 | PlaneMad | Habib, thank you for contributing to OSM. Can you explain why you changed the name of Riyadh to persian Gulf in Arabic? I'm reverting your change, please don't add wrong information to the map. |
| 15188347 by PlaneMad @ 2013-02-27 17:32 | 1 | 2015-10-31 09:55 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:the tag highway=divider is only used by you (7 times)Is it a barrier=line or maybe barrier=kerb?Sample: way 207489502 |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 19:11 | PlaneMad | Thanks, have retagged them to barrier=kerb | |
| 3 | 2015-11-04 19:14 | GerdP ♦2,751 | thanks for that and for the feedback | |
| 4 | 2015-11-05 15:08 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Do you think that this might also match here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15340040 | |
| 34861324 by PlaneMad @ 2015-10-25 15:16 | 1 | 2015-10-26 11:06 | Mediatinker ♦1 | Hey, you made Sushiya a lot bigger that it really is. :-) |
| 2 | 2015-10-26 11:13 | PlaneMad | Sorry about that, it was a case of lazy hands. Will be more careful from now on, thanks :) | |
| 34455643 by AnilT @ 2015-10-05 20:01 | 1 | 2015-10-06 06:05 | PlaneMad | Hey Anil, so good to see you editing here. Just gave Porabandar a facelift a week ago. |
| 34155722 by Andyt30 @ 2015-09-21 08:13 | 1 | 2015-09-24 06:16 | PlaneMad | Hi Andrew, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. Many of your edits have name changes to 'Andrew Taylor' or similar family names. These includes names of towns, streets, buildings and even footpaths.Can you provide a source for these changes and your reasoning to mod... |
| 2 | 2015-09-24 07:37 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34219913 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits | |
| 33989906 by a6y @ 2015-09-12 22:32 | 1 | 2015-09-14 06:31 | PlaneMad | From http://www.dougloudenback.com/oklahomacity/coretoshore.htm it looks like much of the old elevated expressway has been turned down and is being reconstructed as a boulevard. I'm retagging this as a primary road, but cant find references for the construction being complete.Do you know if... |
| 2 | 2015-09-14 21:14 | a6y ♦2 | I do not know - I don't live in the area, and these changes were based on an article I read about the new route being completed (but I don't know about the boulevard). | |
| 3 | 2015-09-14 21:18 | a6y ♦2 | Also, the ones you tagged as primary are actually the new route (which is open), and should be tagged as motorway. The old route is to the south, and is listed as the I-40 motorway. This route is the one that should be marked as a boulevard. | |
| 4 | 2015-09-15 02:14 | PlaneMad | You can check the articles again, it all mentions the new alignment as being a few blocks south of the old one. This is also mentioned on this map as existing I40 http://s8.photobucket.com/user/DougLoudenback/media/coretoshore/i40relocationaerial.jpg.htmlThe new motorway alignment has been open ... | |
| 33283305 by poojakenjale @ 2015-08-12 06:06 | 1 | 2015-08-18 07:32 | PlaneMad | Hi Pooja, thank you for your contribution to OSM. I'm part of the [data team at Mapbox](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapbox#Mapbox_Data_Team) and my teammate from Bhopal noticed that there were many incorrect roads and road names added by you. On closer inspection he found that these road... |
| 33304615 by PlaneMad @ 2015-08-13 05:42 | 1 | 2015-08-17 14:02 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hi Arun - are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032015 is really an unclassified road? It doesn't particularly look like one from the imagery. What I suspect it is is a farm track with a "public right of way" over it (given that someone's named in "leeds c... |
| 2 | 2015-08-17 17:04 | PlaneMad | The section leads only to the Airport service road apart from the couple of properties and the footpath branching out. There are no ways that branch into farms to suggest this is primarily for agricultural use.Have been trying to understand UK roads better and would really appreciate to know why... | |
| 3 | 2015-08-17 18:08 | SK53 ♦864 | First dont rely on the wiki "tracks are for agricultural use". This may be applicable in Germany. In Britain I suspect we will use track or service for any non-public ways which vehicles can be seen to traverse. Most indeed will be for agricultural purposes (including things like Pheasant ... | |
| 4 | 2015-08-17 18:22 | PlaneMad | > For instance many railway lines will have access tracks used by maintenance crews.This should be an unpaved service road, no? | |
| 5 | 2015-08-17 21:40 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Personally, I'd map railway access tracks as "highway=track" as for example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30010081 , but obviously it depends on what they look like - some are more like service roads, and there are lots that are just footpaths. Here it's difficult to tell ... | |
| 6 | 2015-08-18 05:55 | PlaneMad | Ok this seems a little at odds with how i'm understanding highway tags, that they primarily define function of a way in the road network, otherwise most unpaved roads in developing countries would end up being tagged as tracks.If tracks in UK don't follow the wiki guidelines of being f... | |
| 7 | 2015-08-18 10:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | slightly related - a discussion on the Dutch forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32342&p=1 | |
| 32954543 by unsungNovelty @ 2015-07-29 11:47 | 1 | 2015-07-29 14:33 | EdLoach ♦171 | Did you mean to delete Currys PC World when you were amending the building outline? |
| 2 | 2015-08-01 06:09 | PlaneMad | Restored the deleted building. Nikhil, please be more careful with existing objects and make sure you don't accidentally remove the work of others while making improvements. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-16 08:32 | unsungNovelty ♦52 | I will @PlaneMad. Thanks for pointing this out. | |
| 31520895 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-28 05:33 | 1 | 2015-07-18 17:21 | FTA ♦201 | H there. I was wondering about the motivation for "tunnel=building_passage" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349390889 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349390900 . From visiting, it looks like these walkways are inside (must walk through a door) and not surrounded by outer walls (li... |
| 2 | 2015-07-19 15:49 | PlaneMad | Hey FTA. Not sure what I was thinking at that time, but was likely a case of over enthusiastic mapping based on the building geometry and paths leading to it.Thanks for highlighting this, I'm going to revert the change.Cheers, | |
| 32454816 by saikabhi @ 2015-07-06 18:11 | 1 | 2015-07-08 13:44 | PlaneMad | This is amazing work! But i'm seeing there is a lot of duplicated ways since you are drawing on top of roads that already exist. Did you download the existing data before you started? |
| 2 | 2015-07-09 07:43 | saikabhi ♦159 | Thank you Arun for the comments. Yes, I did not download the layer first. Instead I digitized the whole map in JOSM using reference of BING imagery and uploaded the new layer. That is the reason you are finding the duplicate layers. I have just started with open street mapping and it was an error on... | |
| 3 | 2015-07-09 09:18 | PlaneMad | Aha thought so. Thats the whole power of OSM that you work on existing data instead of creating your own from scratch. See if you can download all the data again and merge features by removing the duplicates. You would need to split(p), join(j) and combine(c) ways for this. let me know if you ar... | |
| 4 | 2015-07-09 10:01 | saikabhi ♦159 | Thank you. Will do that and get back to you. | |
| 5 | 2015-07-09 21:29 | saikabhi ♦159 | Arun. Please have a look. I have tried but the process may still be erroneous. If yes, please provide me some pointers to the places I am going wrong. I have edited the downloaded data and tried to remove the duplicates. Thank you for your patience. | |
| 30997591 by sdivya @ 2015-05-11 09:54 | 1 | 2015-05-12 12:56 | PlaneMad | Multiple overlapping buildings in this area. Please do a cleanup, thanks. |
| 2 | 2015-05-12 13:04 | PlaneMad | Sorry, looks like its already cleaned up, thanks! | |
| 30846895 by PlaneMad @ 2015-05-06 16:01 | 1 | 2015-05-09 13:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Thanks for fixing this!Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2015-05-09 16:18 | PlaneMad | No problem! Do you have any tool to find issues like this automatically? I'm worried more such cases go unnoticed. | |
| 3 | 2015-05-10 09:33 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Like this, no - I just noticed the forum post about it. I did write https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/Changeset1 to look for certain sorts of issues locally by new users, but "nothing but deletes in the changeset" isn't currently one of them.There was a more general GSoC proposal... | |
| 4 | 2015-05-10 14:21 | PlaneMad | Thanks, that is really useful to dig into! | |
| 29588350 by Map King @ 2015-03-19 09:58 | 1 | 2015-04-23 05:53 | PlaneMad | Hey Map King!Am trying to understand some of your edits in near Magnolia Ave.See reference:The satellite imagery does not corelate with your changes and wa... |
| 30207919 by medakeshav @ 2015-04-14 10:16 | 1 | 2015-04-15 15:02 | PlaneMad | Mmm, puliyogre point sounds yum. Thanks for adding these to osm :) |
| 2 | 2015-04-15 21:45 | medakeshav ♦1 | Give me a call if you come by to try it :) | |
| 30173693 by akshara @ 2015-04-12 21:14 | 1 | 2015-04-13 08:10 | PlaneMad | Hi Akshara, welcome to OSM!Noticed that you have drawn a duplicate of Uloor Akkulam Road. You can fix it by deleting the one you dont need. Let me know if you need any help.Cheers, |
| 2 | 2015-04-13 09:15 | akshara ♦1 | That was a mistake i l delette | |
| 3 | 2015-04-15 13:30 | PlaneMad | Awesome, thanks! | |
| 29830285 by Ironforester @ 2015-03-29 15:54 | 1 | 2015-04-01 09:50 | PlaneMad | Hi, I found a broken segment in your edit of Bethunestraße which I have fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29900411The two segments looked like they were joined, but the nodes were not attached. I have connected the nodes now.I think this might be a bug in iD which did no... |
| 29780270 by 9porcupine @ 2015-03-27 15:29 | 1 | 2015-03-27 19:27 | PlaneMad | Welcome to the open street map :D |
| 2 | 2015-03-30 15:00 | 9porcupine ♦1 | Thanks! ^_^ | |
| 29520473 by Darshan Jagadish @ 2015-03-16 15:49 | 1 | 2015-03-16 18:16 | PlaneMad | Hi Darshan, I noticed you have deleted a few points and streets in Malleshwaram. Just checking that it was not accidental.Welcome to the openstreetmap :) |
| 25655841 by Jacob Cyriac @ 2014-09-25 00:04 | 1 | 2015-03-08 19:55 | PlaneMad | Hi Jacob, I noticed that you removed a lot of station names from the Chennai region. Any reason for this? |
| 2 | 2015-08-08 14:05 | Jacob Cyriac ♦1 | Hello PlaneMad, Noticed this message just now in my email.I was attempting to update electrified: tags in this region. If I deleted station names, that's definitely a mistake or a sync with JOSM gone wrong. My apologies!It's been a while since I was active, sorry this escaped m... | |
| 28750860 by dexterslu @ 2015-02-10 13:56 | 1 | 2015-03-01 06:41 | PlaneMad | Noticed that you deleted the Detroit node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18994998/history and its now missing from most maps.Was this by accident? |
| 2 | 2015-03-02 01:13 | dexterslu ♦4 | Ah yes, accidentally removed it! sorry about that. |