| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50433366 by Andreas Köppen | 1 | 2017-07-21 10:52:42 UTC | Entur AS | Johan Wiklund | Is this the streetname on the signs? Official street name from Norwegian map authorty says "Krukeveien". |
| 2 | 2017-07-21 13:41:02 UTC | Andreas Köppen | Hei Johan!Yes, it is the official streetname from norwegian authorty, and it is written on the streetsigns. The name is >>Krugeveien<< from Hvasserveien to Krukeveien!Hilsen Andreas | |
| 3 | 2017-07-21 13:54:19 UTC | Gazer75 | Sorry Andreas but street signs and official name is not the same. Street signs often use local dialects. Official address name is showin the nodes imported from Kartverket. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-21 14:00:26 UTC | Gazer75 | If you do not like the official name then send a complaint to Kartverket or local authority and it will be considered there. Municipalities are known to set up street signs with names in dialect in many places. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-21 14:04:17 UTC | Entur AS | Johan Wiklund | You should probably change it back or it will mismatch with all other databases (people searching with car navigation etc). | |
| 6 | 2017-07-21 14:06:15 UTC | Entur AS | Johan Wiklund | (and you should change your garden from "park" to "garden" with "access=private". Also, naming your house and garden is not common practice in OSM :) - even if its pretty and funny. | |
| 49588420 by Skippern | 1 | 2017-07-21 09:02:12 UTC | Gazer75 | Where did you find info about a ferry between Liabyda and Eidsdal? |
| 2 | 2017-07-21 09:03:14 UTC | Gazer75 | Emergency routes should not be in the map as it will mess up routing. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-21 09:06:49 UTC | Skippern | The ferry routes was already mapped, I mainly only added the relations. I think the emergency route should be mapped, but maybe use different tagging to avoid routing problems, i.e. route=emergency_ferry | |
| 4 | 2017-07-21 09:10:07 UTC | Gazer75 | Strange... I did some editing there not long ago and didn't remember seeing this route.Routers do not care about relations they only see the route=ferry and use that (as long as it is connected to a road) | |
| 5 | 2017-07-21 10:28:04 UTC | Skippern | I'm travelling right now, but I can change the route tag on the emergency route to avoid routing mistakes. Didn't check when the different routes was added, I just added relations on the routes. I am spending the summer months in this region, but mostly a little further north. | |
| 6 | 2017-07-21 13:17:26 UTC | Gazer75 | Found the route in the list of emergency routes. Download pdf at http://frammr.no/Ruter/Ferje and look on page 51. | |
| 47225381 by Tarall | 1 | 2017-07-02 03:52:08 UTC | Gazer75 | Er Ring 2 flytta til Kværnerveien? Litt dårlig klassifisering i området. Bør ikkje hoppe opp og ned slik mellom trunk, tertiary og primary. Om Ring 2 fortsatt går via Bispegata og St. Harvards gate så burde vel den kanskje få secondary? |
| 2 | 2017-07-02 05:01:56 UTC | Tarall | Ring 2 er flytta. Har til og med snakka med Statens vegvesen om dette (som for øvrig ikke har oppdatert veikartet sitt). Hun jeg prata med var helt klar på at Ring 2 er flytta til Kværnerveien. Google-maps er oppdatert, bortsett fra at de ikke har greid å fjerne den utdatert... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-02 07:04:27 UTC | Gazer75 | Så Kværnerveien skal vere Kv161 + Ring2?Bør vel få fikse samanhengande primary frå E6 og fjerne ref på St. Halvards gate vest for Kværnerveien. Kva med Dyvekes vei? Den står som secondary ned til Bispegata. Virkar litt feil å la secondary ende... | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 08:43:17 UTC | Tarall | Kværnerveien skal være Ring 2. Ring 2 skal starte/ende i øst i E6 (trafikkmaskina i Lodalen). Sjekk google-maps. Dyvekes vei skal nedgraderes til samme nivå som Bispegata. Krysset Oslo gate / Bispegata heter forøvrig "Oslo torg". Navnsatt i 1997, på gr... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-02 08:53:49 UTC | Tarall | For øvrig skal også Dronning Eufmeias gate og Langkaia nedgraderes (jf. Bispegata). Ser at det er en haug med gamle E18-markeringer som henger igjen i Bjørvika. Litt dumt. E18 går nå via Bjørvikatunnelen (under vannet) og derfra videre via ymse tunneler i begge... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-02 14:53:37 UTC | Gazer75 | Husk på at det er ingen fylkesvegar i Oslo, så det har vore lagt opp med eit eige system for å få god ruting her. Vi må nok berre vente på data frå SVV og Oslo kommune når det gjeld Bjørvika. Meiner og at eg fekk beskjed ein gong at vegen fr&ari... | |
| 7 | 2017-07-02 18:59:02 UTC | Tarall | Uansett er det uproblematisk å rette opp i området Gamlebyen/Lodalen! Slik google-maps har gjort. Unødig å henge etter her, tykkjer eg! | |
| 8 | 2017-07-02 21:51:51 UTC | Gazer75 | Har fiksa samanhengande primary og ref for Ring 2 på Kværnerveien. Meldt inn eit feilspørsmål på Dronning Eufemias gate til SVV via http://fiksvegdata.opentns.org/ så får vi sjå kva svaret blir ;) | |
| 9 | 2017-07-03 06:32:10 UTC | Gazer75 | Fekk svar at Dronning Eufemias gate fortsatt skal vere del av E18 | |
| 10 | 2017-07-03 07:07:24 UTC | Tarall | Ok. Takk. Flott med rensing i Ring 2 /161 Dyvekes vei kan du uansett nedgradere. Det har t.o.m. Vegsvesenet gjort på kartet sitt. | |
| 11 | 2017-07-03 08:10:05 UTC | NKA | Dyvekes vei og Bispegata har samme funksjonelle vegklasse fra Oslo kommune som de andre secondary i byen. | |
| 12 | 2017-07-03 08:17:56 UTC | Gazer75 | Kan vere at dei blir nedgradert til kl 5, men at det ikkje kjem fram i NVDB endå. Slike ting kan ofte ta lang tid. | |
| 49593397 by SM031 | 1 | 2017-07-01 20:24:53 UTC | Gazer75 | Ikkje del opp vegane slik om det ikkje er fysisk skilje mellom felta. Bruk turn:lanes i staden for. |
| 48029822 by crazyhakim | 1 | 2017-06-28 13:46:49 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not Bing map in Norway unless you know what you are doing. Placing or moving stuff so that it is over roads and buildings should cause a bell to ring, telling you the aerial might be wrong.If you see anything sourced with Kartverket and/or NVDB then that is official data and will most li... |
| 49211132 by jonarx1 | 1 | 2017-06-04 10:06:09 UTC | Gazer75 | Why add this water here?? There is no such thing. Unless they tore down the house recently to make a big pool or something. |
| 49211120 by jonarx1 | 1 | 2017-06-03 12:57:49 UTC | Gazer75 | Something went wrong with one of your edits. You've moved a node for the residential area and the path you made is really messed up somehow. |
| 48581858 by Nesim | 1 | 2017-05-11 21:37:56 UTC | Gazer75 | No point editing stuff in this area. it will be replaced with official data. Wait until the import is done and then you can improve it if needed. DG Premium is still not properly georectified so it will be offset in many places. |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 11:36:49 UTC | imagico | So you want to ban manual mapping from Norway to make it easier to create and maintain a map based on 'official' data there? That would be an extremely short sighted attitude.If you want to address problems with the alignment of images (which are indeed severe in some parts of Norway) a good wa... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-16 12:26:50 UTC | Gazer75 | Did I say anything about banning? Edits during import will slow it down significantly. Just wanted to notify you of this. It's much better to improve the N50 data after import if needed. I stay away from municipalities with a lot of manual data even it if is badly mapped with offset aerials. Just to... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-16 12:34:49 UTC | Gazer75 | You can follow the progress of import of N50 data here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway/assignment | |
| 5 | 2017-05-16 12:47:57 UTC | imagico | I was referring to the "No point editing stuff in this area." remark which is pretty unfriendly to someone manually mapping stuff in the area.As far as the "semantic nonsense" is concerned - i pointed out some of the problems in the import discussion - in particular regarding... | |
| 6 | 2017-05-16 12:53:47 UTC | Gazer75 | Maybe its a language thing. If it came across as unfriendly then that was not my intent. I wanted to be short and to the point.What discussion? Where? | |
| 7 | 2017-05-16 13:48:36 UTC | imagico | I mentioned this primarily inhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-October/002300.htmland in subsequent discussion (continuing in June 2014) | |
| 48407731 by robin0van0der0vliet | 1 | 2017-05-04 22:33:53 UTC | Gazer75 | You changed the relation to a ferry route... |
| 2 | 2017-05-04 22:38:28 UTC | Gazer75 | Norway main land that is | |
| 47697254 by ArGeBre | 1 | 2017-04-14 06:47:39 UTC | Gazer75 | Please stop Bing mapping Norway if you have no idea how to. Bing is terribly offset in many places and you're wasting time.You even completely ignored the raw GPS data for roads which would tell you Bing is not good here. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 19:24:16 UTC | ArGeBre | Alright - sorry bout that! I saw a road going right through a lake. Apparently the lake was mapped from Bing also. Lessons learnt - wont happen again! | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 20:12:05 UTC | ArGeBre | Changset is undone. Please check if I missed something. And thanks for the hint... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-14 20:27:33 UTC | Gazer75 | Its all good. Much of the roads are being imported from official free data. Just takes time as we do not have many active mappers and only some know how to do this properly. Automatic import is bad so has to be done fairly manual.Same goes for water, coastline and landuse. Though this data is on... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-14 20:40:12 UTC | Gazer75 | You can actually look at bing.com/maps and see how poorly aligned the imagery is.https://binged.it/2ofVrlrThe roads in Bing are where they should be as it is official data. | |
| 47329685 by EivindWAA_import | 1 | 2017-04-07 06:57:35 UTC | Gazer75 | Du må passe på primary og secondary når du importerer. Her har du endra fv43 og 461 frå primary til secondary. |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 13:09:36 UTC | EivindWAA | Takk for info, håper det ble rettet medhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47329685 | |
| 46984699 by EivindWAA_import | 1 | 2017-04-07 06:52:22 UTC | Gazer75 | Fv455 og 459 er "primary" då det er skilta fylkesveg. Dette bør ein sjekke under import ;) |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 13:41:09 UTC | EivindWAA | fikset 459 med https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47540017455 med https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47532860 | |
| 34902499 by Papa Schlumpf | 1 | 2017-03-31 15:10:35 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not alter road class in countries you do not know. All E routes and national roads in Norway are classed as trunk road in OSM. |
| 28919163 by Noen | 1 | 2017-03-28 12:28:20 UTC | Gazer75 | Greit å opne vegen igjen når arbeid er ferdig :) Vegen har vore open sidan desember 2015. |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 12:34:23 UTC | Gazer75 | Fiksa problemet ;) | |
| 3 | 2017-03-28 21:08:19 UTC | Noen | Lett å glemme når man ikke bor i området. Skal bruke meg på temporary:*=* @ (time range) tagging neste gang!https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional) | |
| 4 | 2017-03-28 23:25:59 UTC | Gazer75 | Temporary er ikkje i bruk. Er vel conditional som gjeld. Ikkje mange som støttar conditional endå...Brukar ein kalendar her på slike ting.Den minner meg på slike ting ein gong pr mnd. | |
| 47182992 by LKTomren | 1 | 2017-03-27 12:14:21 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not move house number nodes to buildings. they should be left as separate nodes. Helps verification and updates from official data later. |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 12:16:29 UTC | Gazer75 | I see you actually added the addr tags to building. This creates duplicates as we use separate nodes in Norway. | |
| 32713435 by Wikilux | 1 | 2017-03-22 20:34:31 UTC | Gazer75 | Stop breaking map with Bing mapping. Bing is not to be used unless you know it is properly georectified. The road was already lined up with official data from the Norwegian Mapping Authority. |
| 37083402 by FredrikLindseth | 1 | 2017-03-22 19:30:13 UTC | Gazer75 | Really not needed in a route going back and forth between A and B. |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 20:16:43 UTC | FredrikLindseth | I guess my plan was to make it public_transport:version=2 at some point, but I guess a relation was a bit overkill at this moment :-) | |
| 46700603 by SM031 | 1 | 2017-03-18 12:48:16 UTC | Gazer75 | Vinstra is not a city. A town at best. Cities in are normally 100k people. In Norway this is 50k with exceptions of Tromsø, Bodø, Kristiansand.Please do not mistake the city status some places have given themselves after 1996 as the same. Places with less than 1000 people have city s... |
| 41117814 by ruhn | 1 | 2017-02-20 11:07:00 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not edit with Bing in Norway unless you know what you're doing.House number nodes should never be moved, these are imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority and have high quality position. They can actually be of great help to see if Bing is bad. |
| 44598307 by SM031 | 1 | 2017-01-02 14:51:35 UTC | Gazer75 | So they have actually signposted this road with the white number signs? |
| 2 | 2017-01-02 20:47:59 UTC | SM031 | https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fylkesvei_312_(Oppland)#/media/File:FV312P.jpg | |
| 3 | 2017-01-02 22:31:54 UTC | Gazer75 | That's down between fv213 and the "new" connection to E6 and fv255 south of Storhove. If you haven't visually verified signs north of this yourself then please do not alter class.NVDB list no signs outside this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241573731 | |
| 4 | 2017-01-03 07:49:20 UTC | SM031 | Viser også til dette: http://www.dolen.no/nyheter/2016/10/17/Gamal-veg-f%C3%A5r-nytt-namn-13656129.eceBildet fra Wikipedia er ikke tatt i den nye forbindelsen mellom E 6 og fv 312, men rett nord for rundkjøringen mellom fv 213 og fv 312. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-03 12:21:23 UTC | Gazer75 | Flott! Då er den grei. Om du bur i området så kan du kanskje sjekke 312 mellom Granrudmoen og Tretten også?Ser ut til at SVV går bort frå det normale her. Normalt sett har vegklasse 2 og 3 vore skilta, men no ser det ut til at dei også skiltar 4. Får... | |
| 44729991 by SM031 | 1 | 2017-01-02 01:36:22 UTC | Gazer75 | Tunnelen er ikkje åpna! |
| 44715724 by SM031 | 1 | 2016-12-29 12:52:33 UTC | Gazer75 | Veit ikkje kven som har lagt motortrafikkveg inn der, men det er feil. Teknisk sett så er faktisk "trunk" i OSM det samme som motortrafikkveg her i Norge, men sidan vi brukar den på alle riks- og europavegar, så blir det feil. Vi brukar motorroad=yes på motortrafikk... |
| 2 | 2016-12-29 12:59:02 UTC | Gazer75 | Kan legge til at litt av grunnen er at vi setter "class" til vegeigar. Fylkesvegar kan og vere motortrafikkveg og kan jo då ikkje taggas som motorveg. Men som "primary/secondary" + motorroad=yes | |
| 43088144 by km2bp | 1 | 2016-12-23 13:10:35 UTC | Gazer75 | Please don't alter roads that have already been improved with data from Kartverket and/or NVDB. Unless you use an industrial grade GPS, or the road have changed significantly, data from Kartverket will always be better quality. |
| 44168333 by SM031 | 1 | 2016-12-08 11:36:40 UTC | Gazer75 | Vaskehallen er ikkje teikna inn på kartet. Det du markerte som vaskehall her faktisk taket på truck diesel pumpene :) |
| 42679735 by peet192 | 1 | 2016-11-11 12:27:10 UTC | Gazer75 | Did they actually close this before completing the new temporary ramp?There is no mention of this on the projects Facebook page. |
| 43068202 by alpesk | 1 | 2016-11-07 18:12:51 UTC | Gazer75 | Short constructions like this do not really warrant a map edit. There will be a lot of tunnels closed at different times due to maintenance. |
| 42236483 by alpesk | 1 | 2016-10-18 01:17:04 UTC | Gazer75 | Is the tunnel closed? Can't find any info about that at http://www.vegvesen.no/trafikkbeta?lat=59.28118&long=10.42620&zoom=12 |
| 2 | 2016-10-18 21:41:18 UTC | alpesk | No, it's not closed. I can't see any info about that on Open Street Map. I changed some info about a month ago that pedestrians and cyclists are not admitted on this road.alpesk | |
| 3 | 2016-10-19 01:50:00 UTC | Gazer75 | The access=no tag is a blanket one that will not allow anything. Should never be used unless completely closed. Simply use foot=no and bicycle=no | |
| 42287018 by TrulsBekk | 1 | 2016-10-17 18:59:40 UTC | Gazer75 | Du har laga alt for komplisert kryss mellom rv3 rampar og fv215/601. Heilt unødvedig og kan lage rare problem for ruting software.Skal heller ikkje vere eigen "way" for avkøyringsfelt (Haugedalsveien mot rv3) i OSM. Bruk heller turn:lanes= |
| 41837245 by NKA | 1 | 2016-09-16 04:03:07 UTC | Gazer75 | Intersection for fv410 and 420 needs a lot of fixing. Do not use separate ways for lanes at intersections and crossing ways over another like this.Use turn lanes and turn restrictions.Only lanes physically divded by kerbs or similar should have separate ways. |
| 2 | 2016-09-16 04:38:52 UTC | NKA | Agree. This is a problem from the Elveg import data. Will look into it. | |
| 3 | 2016-09-16 06:11:12 UTC | Gazer75 | I had that intersection perfectly mapped out before you replaced it with Elveg :) | |
| 4 | 2016-09-16 06:13:20 UTC | Gazer75 | Never replace existing roads unless you have local knowledge of the road and know that what is there is wrong ;) | |
| 5 | 2016-09-16 07:00:22 UTC | NKA | Agree. I know this place very well. | |
| 41640846 by Papalinux | 1 | 2016-08-27 08:40:41 UTC | Gazer75 | Please use english description.From google translate I see you used BIng to map this? I would advice against using Bing in Norway unless you have very good reference gps points or local knowledge. The Bing aerials are often very poorly georectified in Norway. |
| 2 | 2016-09-03 16:39:45 UTC | Papalinux | Hi Gazer75,thanks for your mean. I was in Holidays in Norway and have saw, that OSM is uncomplite. That was my fist try for correct the map. Now I have real GPS-Tracks and will send this in the next days. | |
| 41281860 by Ansgar G Grimsrud | 1 | 2016-08-27 08:26:18 UTC | Gazer75 | Vær snill å ikkje kall "changesets" for Div. Gi meir info om kva som er endra. |
| 41322896 by Styrheim | 1 | 2016-08-17 16:34:11 UTC | Gazer75 | Vegen kunne vel like godt vore fjerna heilt då den ikkje vil sjå ut slik i framtida? Ny veg ligg inne som "construction". |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 17:15:23 UTC | Styrheim | Nå er det ei ukes tid siden jeg forlot Kongsberg. Men da var veien fortsatt der, synlig i terrenget. Og så lenge den er fysisk til stede, tror jeg det kan være en god idé at den er like synlig på kartet som i terrenget?I alle fall - det viktigste er nok at GPS'ene ... | |
| 41293653 by cmeeren_import | 1 | 2016-08-13 08:23:10 UTC | Gazer75 | Your import made duplicate ways along the coastline. Also the coastlines have no dates from Kartverket. And please check existing data before overwriting with an import. I've had to fix all the ferry terminals... |
| 2 | 2016-08-13 09:16:43 UTC | cmeeren | Beklager på det sterkeste! Dette var bare slurv fra min side. De gamle kystlinjene var så håpløst unøyaktige at jeg overhodet ikke tenkte på at linjene rundt fergeterminaler kunne være oppdaterte.De fleste kystlinjene har dato, men ikke alle - jeg slo ... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-13 10:49:16 UTC | Gazer75 | Import av ein kommune så stor som Gulen ville nok eg brukt noken timar på. Den er ikkje den verste pga lite eksisterande data.Hyllestad rett nord for Gulen brukte eg vel halve dagen på ;) | |
| 41354267 by HelgeO | 1 | 2016-08-10 12:41:32 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | (1) Could you please use a more descriptive changset comment than "fixing the map"(2) What is the purpose of this change, I checked a few of the edits and you seem to be replacing e.g. name="Rema 1000 Lakselv" with "Rema 1000" which I fail to see the advantage of. |
| 2 | 2016-08-10 20:03:34 UTC | FredrikLindseth | The names of the shops on their webpage clearly states their names as "Rema 1000 $place" ref https://www.rema.no/butikker/Bergen/rema-1000-kalmarhuset/100909This edit is clearly not correct | |
| 3 | 2016-08-13 08:26:06 UTC | Gazer75 | Someone need to revert this change. All supermarkets like this should have its location name. Makes it easier to look up in a navigation device. | |
| 4 | 2016-08-13 22:07:41 UTC | HelgeO | I have a backup of the dataset before the change and can revert. It need some time to process it.I have not replied before as I have tried to get in contact with Rema 1000 to get a statement from them regarding this issue.If you look at the shop - at least any shop that I have been in you wi... | |
| 5 | 2016-08-14 05:24:55 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | Please do the revert. I see no disadvantage of having rema 1000 $place but I see the advantages.In addition to the points mentioned, my guess from looking at the job section of finn.no, is that if you ask an employee he will tell you he works at rema 1000 $place.Feel free to discuss an impor... | |
| 6 | 2016-08-21 09:47:08 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | Any progress on reverting this? You may find the following proposal of interest as it seems to be accepted: https://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2012-April/003391.html Note also the use of capital letters, which should be REMA 1000 $place. | |
| 7 | 2017-01-03 18:55:02 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | Since you have not fixed this, I reverted this with changeset 44868733. | |
| 40934441 by docschenk | 1 | 2016-07-31 17:55:23 UTC | Gazer75 | Why change this to construction? |
| 2 | 2016-07-31 18:02:25 UTC | docschenk | Because IT IS construction at the moment. There even is a deviation for cyclists (about + 10km, about + 500 m elevation). I somehow managed to pass the construction site but had to carry my bike some meters and also couldn't ride for another some 100 meters. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-31 18:56:36 UTC | Gazer75 | The entire stretch of road is still under construction? I thought the road past the residential area at Espavegen 781 is not closed? | |
| 40746367 by ridixcr | 1 | 2016-07-30 11:46:30 UTC | Gazer75 | This change broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5302948If you do not know how to deal with large multipolygons then please ask for help fixing errors.I have fixed the problem. |
| 2 | 2016-08-10 16:47:09 UTC | ridixcr | Hey there! Thanks for notifying me about this change. I will be more careful in future especially when working on large multipolygons and relations.Thank you for your feedback. | |
| 37018285 by tknudsen | 1 | 2016-06-03 08:32:02 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not edit roads and things you know nothing about. You reverted my edit around Anda. Was tempted to revert the entire changeset, but I have instead fixed your road mistakes.Ask the previous editor if you find data that might not match before editing. |
| 2 | 2016-06-03 11:10:21 UTC | tknudsen | Dear sir, what external source are you using that allow you to indicate that my edits are false? Please answer and do not do any more changes until we figure out what source is more valid. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-03 11:28:19 UTC | Gazer75 | My own eyes?They altered the area when the runway was made longer.You can check out Google, Bing, Norge i bilder and vegkart.no if you do not believe me. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-03 11:40:51 UTC | tknudsen | Thank you for your answer.. I used statens kartverk for changing this, but will re-check when I get home from work. Do you know when they changed this due to extension of the runway.. Reason why I am asking is that we are making the the airport for x-plane and we are using the map to populate roads ... | |
| 5 | 2016-06-03 12:05:55 UTC | Gazer75 | Karverket can be slow to update some data. Though "Norge i bilder" is showing the new runway and E39 in a picture taken May 2013. Further back in 2010 it was still under construction. Looks like Google map aerial is from around 2010. Bing however have a more recent one showing the longer r... | |
| 6 | 2016-06-03 12:14:40 UTC | Gazer75 | Keep in mind that "Norge i bilder" can not be used as a source when editing here. This data is not considered open. | |
| 7 | 2016-06-03 14:19:28 UTC | tknudsen | I have permission to use Norge i Bilder and their wms version is even more detailed within JOSM. But I did check and it seems that Norge i bilder has some older imagery showing the runway not to be updated, so I checked with statkart and it seems to be correct. So for me this is truly ok. Thank you ... | |
| 8 | 2016-06-03 15:03:48 UTC | Gazer75 | If you have a written permission by Kartverket to use those aerials in OSM then you need to post a copy of the permit on the mailing list and put on the OSM wiki. If this is a permission for only you then you can not use it in OSM.I needs to be reported in as a source we can legally use. | |
| 9 | 2016-06-03 16:08:14 UTC | tknudsen | The permission is for my company and cannot be shared with the community for all to use. | |
| 10 | 2016-06-03 16:33:58 UTC | Gazer75 | But then you are not allowed to use this in OSM. Data used in OSM need to be open data, not some data that one person have access to. | |
| 11 | 2016-06-03 16:41:37 UTC | Gazer75 | Only data from Kartverket that can be used in OSM is what you find at http://kartverket.no/Kart/Gratis-kartdata/ which is licensed under CC BY 4.0 | |
| 12 | 2016-06-04 23:52:33 UTC | tknudsen | I use my wms data in JOSM, this works great, I also use data from statkart to check in accordance with OSM, been doing this for years. Have a good one. Case closed. | |
| 13 | 2016-06-05 00:14:51 UTC | Gazer75 | This is not a closed case. Will take this with the OSM data working group. Can't have OSM end up in a copyright problem.You might end up with account ban and all data reverted. Really hope not, but they are very strict on this. So unless you can show a letter saying they explicitly allow you to us... | |
| 14 | 2016-06-05 22:23:13 UTC | tknudsen | Do what you like, I have all in perfect order so I have nothing to worry about,There is not copyright issue here, but do what you feel you need to do :)PS..Norgeibilder has no user restrictions https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/kartverket/norge-i-bilder-wms/50eaadfc-1f54-4a90-abca-8f3... | |
| 15 | 2016-06-05 23:43:52 UTC | Gazer75 | Sent a request for clarification on this.From what I can tell the wms data is restricted and not released under NLOD or CC BY.https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/search?text=bilderSome of the data have no icon under open data column, but that doesn't mean it can be used. Only data with a green ope... | |
| 16 | 2016-06-06 08:07:23 UTC | Gazer75 | Got a reply from Jon Arne Trollvik saying no, the Norge i bilder WMS data can not be used for OSM. It has licensing and is not open. So please stop using your WMS access to edit. | |
| 37352279 by Noen | 1 | 2016-03-04 11:17:44 UTC | Gazer75 | Bør bruke conditional access tags her. Date on/off skal ikkje brukast lenger. |
| 2 | 2016-03-05 17:35:49 UTC | Noen | Jeg følgte taggingen beskrevet i dette forslaget: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporaryMulig forslaget er utdatert? | |
| 3 | 2016-03-05 17:45:35 UTC | Gazer75 | Var ein gammal draft der der. Ikkje klar over at den eksisterte. | |
| 4 | 2016-03-05 17:48:55 UTC | Gazer75 | date_on og date_off var satt som utdatert i 2013.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features | |
| 37078620 by sucxces | 1 | 2016-02-20 19:47:27 UTC | Gazer75 | Where is the approval to use these aerials? I have never seen this been discussed on the mailing list. |
| 35238853 by Hjart | 1 | 2016-02-19 19:46:14 UTC | Gazer75 | Her har du laga mykje rot i N50 importen.... |
| 2 | 2016-02-19 19:59:50 UTC | Hjart | I think I may have connected a lot of very short similarly tagged coastlines, but other than that? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=35238853 | |
| 3 | 2016-02-19 20:13:06 UTC | Gazer75 | Ups! Wrong set. You were listed as having changed a relation and a border. Apparently Mr. Lindseth is the one to blame :) | |
| 32830488 by Svein Olav | 1 | 2015-07-25 18:05:07 UTC | Gazer75 | Denne laga veldig mange duplikat. Ver så snill å samle data med eksisterande. |
| 2 | 2015-07-25 18:07:41 UTC | Gazer75 | Kva source har du brukt? Manuel leiting på nett? | |
| 3 | 2016-02-19 20:07:27 UTC | Gazer75 | Har du tenkt å rydde opp? | |
| 36557447 by FredrikLindseth_import | 1 | 2016-01-16 06:33:30 UTC | Gazer75 | Ver så snill å ikkje importere blindt. Masse av importen har faktisk laga kartet dårlegare. Ta inn Elveg data der det ikkje er gater fra før. |
| 35392202 by Glenn Andreassen Aksdal | 1 | 2015-11-20 20:06:00 UTC | Gazer75 | Så heile Knappetunnelen er skilta som motorveg?? |
| 34645794 by Emmor | 1 | 2015-11-13 08:57:29 UTC | Gazer75 | Do not move house number nodes if you do not know what you are doing. These are very good quality data from Kartverket. Moving them destroys the accuracy of the map.If the nodes do not match the aerial imagery then assume the aerial is wrong. Bing and other aerials are often misaligned with the re... |
| 33001846 by Øystein Bjørndal | 1 | 2015-11-07 07:43:29 UTC | Gazer75 | Why was Ski upgraded to city? If a place with 10-15000 people is considered a city then we have a lot of them :)Listed population is for the entire municipality and not the town itself. According to SSB the town itself has 12344. Population number set currently includes Ås as well. |
| 2 | 2015-11-07 09:18:33 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | I used the 'by-status', "I 2004 valgte kommunestyret i Ski å gi tettstedet bystatus." https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ski_(tettsted)Hvis det er feil er det bare å endre tilbake igjen. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-07 09:23:41 UTC | Gazer75 | Trur vi må ta vurdering etter andre kriterier. Rjukan har også by status men under 1500 innbyggere ;) | |
| 4 | 2015-11-07 09:34:20 UTC | Øystein Bjørndal | det er du som snakker om antall innbyggere, jeg har bare sett på 'by-status'. Hvis det er slik at man skal tagge etter antall innbyggere får du endre tilbake. Jeg har brukt SSR som kilde fordi Ski ligger inne som 'city' i SSR importen. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-07 09:38:34 UTC | Gazer75 | Om du sjekker wiki så snakkar den faktisk om city for byer over 100k.Ein kan ikkje bruke bystatus i OSM. | |
| 34399704 by MintCondition | 1 | 2015-11-04 02:50:34 UTC | Gazer75 | Please undo this set. Aerials in this area is badly aligned. Its clearly visible when you look at the house numbers. They are from the Norwegian mapping agency and are normally accurate to less than a meter. They are also normally placed at the house main entrance. |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 03:00:56 UTC | Gazer75 | A Bing offset of 2.35; 13.70 is good for the houses you added. | |
| 34002266 by FredrikLindseth_import | 1 | 2015-09-13 20:44:15 UTC | Gazer75 | Du har sett feil klasse på fv 561. Den skal vere primary. |
| 32844327 by mb_stefan | 1 | 2015-08-28 19:23:33 UTC | Gazer75 | Never use Bing to correct data unless you've surveyed it. Especially house number nodes are never to be moved unless surveyed. Data from the Norwegian Mapping Authority (Kartverket) is usually of better quality. If you notice a large number of number nodes not aligning with Bing then Bing is most li... |
| 33209912 by Christian Madsen | 1 | 2015-08-27 17:08:23 UTC | Gazer75 | Do not move house numbers imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority unless you know it is wrong from gps or local knowledge. And never use Bing over data from "Kartverket". Only reason to do that is if you have local knowledge from survey or GPS that match Bing.I have already corre... |
| 2 | 2015-08-28 08:58:21 UTC | Christian Madsen | Thank you. | |
| 33387657 by Protoni | 1 | 2015-08-21 10:59:41 UTC | Gazer75 | Please do not change road class unless you know how the system works in Norway. This road is a national highway and is therefore a trunk road. Please revert this change. |
| 2 | 2015-08-21 12:02:18 UTC | Protoni | Realy? Then I will revert this change.But I have looked at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Norwegian_roadsThere are written: Streets with three digits are primary roads.I think, in this area the national highway E18 is the Operatunnelen. | |
| 3 | 2015-08-21 17:38:40 UTC | Gazer75 | The number of digits have nothing to do with it. Its the background of the sign that is important. National roads and E routes use green. Primary county roads use white.Keep in mind the Norwegian Public Roads Administration are sometimes slow to replace signs if they change something. Like the nat... | |
| 33447799 by keepright! ler | 1 | 2015-08-21 11:07:34 UTC | Gazer75 | Please revert the road class changes. They are wrong. E route and national highways in Norway are trunk class. |
| 33446434 by keepright! ler | 1 | 2015-08-21 10:39:30 UTC | Gazer75 | Why did you change this? This road is an E route road and thus should be trunk. All E routes and national highways in Norway will always be trunk or higher class. |
| 32741946 by Wikilux | 1 | 2015-07-21 11:50:52 UTC | Gazer75 | Waste of time to do any coastline edits with Bing in Norway. They are being updated slowly by better data from Norwegian Mapping Authority. Bing is also not adviced to use much in Norway as its often badly georeferenced. |
| 2 | 2015-07-21 13:30:56 UTC | Hjart | I agree . In Norway using Bing alone is not a good idea, since it is often 30-100 m off and you can't even expect it to be equally much off anywhere. You really need to consult the gps layers and Strava heatmaps http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava wherever available. | |
| 32460404 by anderfo | 1 | 2015-07-07 16:43:05 UTC | Gazer75 | Hah! Ja Bing er håplaust mange plassar. Ser at fv60 frå Hellesylt til Sykkylven er ganske ille. Skal sjå om eg kan ta den med NVDB/Elveg overlay ein dag.Er nokre tettstader som er mappa med dårleg Bing som vil krevje masse arbeid å rette opp i. |
| 2 | 2015-07-08 07:50:04 UTC | anderfo | Stemmer. Istedet for å aktivt korrigere mye offset har jeg bestemt meg for å lære bort litt om dette til de som har gjort inntegninga. F.eks. å tipse dem om å bruke N50 og Strava heatmap som bakgrunn for å korrigere offset. Jeg har fått tilbakemelding fra fl... | |
| 3 | 2015-07-08 08:13:28 UTC | Gazer75 | Wikien kan endrast litt. Strava ligg inne alt og treng ikkje leggjast til i JOSM | |
| 4 | 2015-07-08 08:15:06 UTC | anderfo | Fordelen med å legge det inn selv er at man da kan få valgt en passelig farge og opacity på heatmap.I tillegg kan man legge inn sin egen personlige Stravaheatmap (som kan oppdateres på et blunk), men det har jeg ikke beskrevet på wikien. | |
| 31962621 by gormur | 1 | 2015-07-03 18:28:54 UTC | Gazer75 | Kvar har du dette frå? http://www.vegvesen.no/Europaveg/e6halogalandsbrua/Nyhetsarkiv/utsetter-%C3%A5pning-av-e6-e10-tr%C3%A6ldaltunnelen |
| 2 | 2015-07-03 21:33:25 UTC | gormur | Det kan hende jeg var litt rask på labben når jeg leste denne (eller en annen gjengivelse av Vegvesenet si pressemelding).http://www.nordlys.no/steinras-stenger-e6-apner-uferdig-tunnel-for-trafikk/s/5-34-175814 | |
| 3 | 2015-07-03 21:39:40 UTC | Gazer75 | Stemmer. Det var vel ledebil gjennom der ei stund. | |
| 30492546 by Baudy | 1 | 2015-06-30 18:20:20 UTC | Gazer75 | 651 Volda-Nordfjordeid is still a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change. |
| 30410338 by Baudy | 1 | 2015-06-30 18:17:00 UTC | Gazer75 | This is a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change.All national roads and E roads are trunks in Norway. |
| 30434146 by frokor_import | 1 | 2015-04-24 10:50:37 UTC | Gazer75 | Her har du rota det til :P Bergen er full av skog :) |
| 2 | 2015-04-24 10:52:55 UTC | Gazer75 | Ser ut til at det er http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340146784 som har feil | |
| 30413308 by frokor_import | 1 | 2015-04-22 22:30:18 UTC | Gazer75 | Eit par ting her. Myr området ved dagens IKEA er jo ikkje myr så der burde du ha fjerna litt og laga nye linjer. Altså "merge". Er difor Bergen kan blir ei utfordring med å ta høgde for eksisterande data.Når du la inn vatn så brukte du kun N50 o... |
| 2 | 2015-04-23 16:07:04 UTC | frokor | Ja, det har du heilt rett i. Har prøvd å retta det opp att så godt som rå. Har sjølvsagt prøvd å la det som er gjort bra være i fred. Spesielt i Åsane-området, og i sentrumsområdet er det veldig mykje data. Mange nodar på sm&... | |
| 3 | 2015-04-23 23:40:59 UTC | Gazer75 | Er difor eg utsette Bergen :) Rekna med å bruke over ei veke total arbeidstid på den kommunen åleine pga alle eksisterande data. | |
| 30417568 by Andre68 | 1 | 2015-04-23 13:26:33 UTC | Gazer75 | What kind of fixes were these? If you altered the segments then you need to update the source and remove the date from Kartverket import. This is important for future updates of Kartverket N50 data. |
| 30390454 by frokor_import | 1 | 2015-04-22 14:10:14 UTC | Gazer75 | Er det noko feil med data her? Lange rette kutt i skogen rundt Trengereid? |
| 2 | 2015-04-22 17:07:32 UTC | frokor | Det er ein veg som ikkje vart lasta opp, truleg fordi JOSM slutta å svare under opplastinga. Driv og går over området på ny, og lastar opp i mindre bolkar, så reknar med det snart er på plass. | |
| 3 | 2015-04-22 17:20:56 UTC | frokor | Nei, han var ikkje lukka. Er i orden no når eg får lasta opp endringa. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-22 22:15:48 UTC | Gazer75 | ja såg neste ut som du hadde byta om på kva poly som var outer og inner :) | |
| 30347900 by anderfo_import | 1 | 2015-04-22 13:26:35 UTC | Gazer75 | Problemene med Nore Uvdal kan fiksast med å slette data. Det som er lagt inn er av dårlegare kvalitet enn Karverkets N50, så vi må ta den kommunen på nytt uansett. |
| 2 | 2015-04-22 13:46:34 UTC | anderfo | Jepp, men litt sketchy å slette data - dette gjelder både denne importen og corine-importen. Men vi kan kanskje slette dersom det er uendret etter import? | |
| 3 | 2015-04-22 14:01:56 UTC | Gazer75 | Ja klart det. Tenkte meir på at ein ikkje bruka tid på og fikse på data som bør bytast ut seinare. Duplicate nodes fiksar JOSM "automatisk" så det går jo greit.Blir bra med litt N50 ;) Norge ser ganske trist og øde ut i dag. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-22 14:11:54 UTC | anderfo | Problemet var egentlig at JOSM ikke ville la meg laste opp data med valideringsfeil i - og feilene i nabokommunen gjorde det dessuten vanskeligere enn vanlig å detektere feil i mitt eget datasett (bruker jo JOSM validering for å finne bl.a. duplikatnoder der) siden de få duplikatno... | |
| 5 | 2015-04-22 14:18:16 UTC | Gazer75 | Var det så ille!? hmm... Eg kjem nok til å ta litt etter kvart som eg gidd å arbeide med det. Tenker å fullføre Hordaland så lenge eg ikkje går lei :) | |
| 6 | 2015-04-24 15:17:26 UTC | anderfo | Det var ille, ja ;) Sjekk OSM Inspector for Nore og Uvdal: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=9.12224&lat=60.26192&zoom=10&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touc... | |
| 30306515 by frokor_import | 1 | 2015-04-18 15:24:44 UTC | Gazer75 | Pass på at det ikkje blir doble kystlinjer. JOSM validator vil gi beskjed om dette |
| 2 | 2015-04-18 15:28:30 UTC | Gazer75 | Er og eit par plassar kor desse doble øyane har feil retning på kystlinje | |
| 3 | 2015-04-18 15:38:58 UTC | frokor | Ja, eg er klar over det. Det er i dette området eg har arbeidd mest tidlegare, så det vart meir plukk her enn i dei andre områda. Eg held på å rette opp i det, men kom ikkje i mål, før eg måtte eit æren. Skal ta det om litt. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-18 15:55:05 UTC | Gazer75 | Då er det betre om du ventar med å laste opp til alt er ok. Andre som brukar OSM Inspector og diverse verktøy kan få beskjed om feil og vil då prøve å rette opp. Det kan lage meir arbeid for deg i ettertid. Snakkar av erfaring her ;) | |
| 26449923 by gormur | 1 | 2015-03-29 22:05:43 UTC | Gazer75 | If you use special letters in names then make sure the streets match. No idea what the special sign is, but it's not available on any keyboard. |
| 2 | 2015-03-29 22:55:27 UTC | gormur | Example? | |
| 3 | 2015-03-30 05:29:00 UTC | Gazer75 | All names with an apostrophe. You can find them using OSM Inspector. Using this apostrophe is creating problems imo. Only way to type it in Windows is by using ALT+0146 on the numpad. No GPS unit I have seen is capable of typing this as well. Yes, there is a difference between ’ and ' First on... | |
| 4 | 2015-03-30 08:56:46 UTC | gormur | This changeset only touched the addr:postcode, as the comment clearly says. Please comment on the original changeset. | |
| 28770372 by Honning | 1 | 2015-02-20 16:09:09 UTC | Gazer75 | Uskilta fylkesvegar skal vere "secondary" |
| 28867354 by Noen | 1 | 2015-02-19 17:51:55 UTC | Gazer75 | Å legge til "oneways" framfor alle rundkøyringar som har den vetle triangel øya er unødvendig etter mi meining. Lagar berre støy i kartet. Eg la dei inn når eg starta med OSM, men har heilt slutta med dette. Så lenge vengen ikkje er delt over e... |
| 2 | 2015-02-19 18:40:27 UTC | Noen | Først må jeg si at hovedpoenget med dette endringsettet var legge inn gang og sykkelveiene. Du har rett i at det ikke har noen betydning for ruting, om veien foran en rundkjøring er splittet opp eller ikke, men for å "representere virkeligheten" er det en releva... | |
| 3 | 2015-02-19 21:21:29 UTC | Gazer75 | Ser det at du la til gang- og sykkelveg. Bra det.Merka meg berre at du hadde lagt til alle desse stubbane også. For meg så er dette unødvendige detaljar som ikkje har praktisk betydning. Mange av desse små trekantane er vel maks 2x5 meter. "Mappe" to einvegsk&osl... | |
| 28699720 by gormur | 1 | 2015-02-14 16:28:51 UTC | Gazer75 | Wouldnt use Bing in this area, it is terribly misaligned along all axis. |
| 2 | 2015-02-14 18:28:02 UTC | gormur | I know. Bing wasn't much used, just left it in the source field by default... | |