| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168156488 by saemiko @ 2025-06-26 20:16 | 1 | 2025-07-15 06:50 | Gazer75 | Please don't add random false access restrictions. You blocked routing to Tafjord doing this.There is no restrictions for this tunnel. |
| 162718857 by Have Map Will Travel @ 2025-02-19 22:08 | 1 | 2025-07-15 06:40 | Gazer75 | Why did you change the access at Trollstigen several months ago? It has been closed until 11. July 2025 due to risk of rock fall.Please don't change access tags before asking when you don't know the local situation. |
| 168086996 by Gazer75 @ 2025-06-25 10:07 | 1 | 2025-06-26 08:40 | Jan Olieslagers ♦201 | Is the aerodome completely closed? According to en:wikipedia, Avinor closed it to commercial aviation, but recreational use remains possible. Local confirmation welcome! |
| 2 | 2025-06-28 23:15 | Gazer75 | Seems it is still in use. I didn't do my research properly. Apparently even the airforce is using it for practice still. I'll add back the aerodrome tag, but leave it off for the old terminal building as there is no public service. | |
| 3 | 2025-06-29 09:07 | Jan Olieslagers ♦201 | Thanks! I tweaked some minor parameters. | |
| 166504911 by Gazer75 @ 2025-05-20 04:57 | 1 | 2025-06-01 21:00 | gormur ♦119 | Men det er vel bare ét av løpene som skal bygges nå i første byggetrinn?https://www.vegvesen.no/vegprosjekter/europaveg/e134vagsliseljestad/ |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 00:45 | Gazer75 | Var ikkje tydeleg kva løp i så fall. Alle planar visar to. Blir uansett oppdatert når anlegget dukkar opp i NVDB. | |
| 156061276 by LarsChristianGamborg @ 2024-09-01 16:01 | 1 | 2025-05-27 23:20 | Gazer75 | Still closed? No info on https://www.vegvesen.no/trafikk |
| 2 | 2025-07-12 11:47 | EvenEvneNeve ♦1 | Opened again end of November 2024. https://www.mittloerenskog.no/e6-pakjoringen-har-endelig-apnet-for-trafikk/s/5-129-105139 | |
| 164474351 by Kovirii @ 2025-04-03 16:43 | 1 | 2025-05-25 21:27 | Gazer75 | Please don't duplicate wind farms with a land use area. Wind farms use site relations for the info.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374473984 is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14165956 |
| 166112355 by Rovastar @ 2025-05-11 14:50 | 1 | 2025-05-19 13:55 | Gazer75 | Isn't access=customer a bit pointless for the Instavolt hub? All stores and services would be this by default.This would be different for a parking lot where parking is only for the store or mall customers. |
| 2 | 2025-05-25 18:28 | Rovastar ♦37 | yeh I agree. I didn't realise I added it tbh. Deleted that now | |
| 3 | 2025-05-25 18:31 | Rovastar ♦37 | Oh it was meant to be for the playground only which I did before I must added the whole facility as well. I think is fair enough to add it to their playground for customers of them or Starbucks. | |
| 162713668 by the-passivist @ 2025-02-19 18:57 | 1 | 2025-04-20 10:11 | Gazer75 | Please don't attach power cables/lines to roads. Pay attention to snapping to other objects. |
| 2 | 2025-04-20 21:12 | the-passivist ♦1 | Apologies - unintentional, editor wants to attach often though I don't. See the problems it causes (also for me). (1) Interested in hints on how I can set certain type of line as "no snap" in which editor? (2) Interested in how to handle powerlines when they go exactly under roads/foo... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-20 22:32 | Gazer75 | I think iD has a key you hold to disable snapping completely. I rarely use iD as I got used to JOSM early on.I just put cables in a general area and try to keep them as far away from any road or sidewalk as I can without spending to much time on it.In JOSM it is easy to disable items with sp... | |
| 163243661 by Visaman @ 2025-03-05 12:47 | 1 | 2025-04-03 16:47 | synfarer ♦16 | Hi Visaman. This changeset seems to have set waterway=pressurised on a bunch of nodes, in addition to the ways. I assume this is a mistake? Could you fix it? |
| 2 | 2025-04-04 09:21 | Visaman ♦2 | These are tunnels that leads to turbines,- so they are correct.The problem is,- if one uses waterway=canal these will show up on the surface. They are under ground.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Waterways_millrace.png | |
| 3 | 2025-04-04 20:13 | synfarer ♦16 | I'm not arguing changing from waterway=canal to waterway=pressurised on the ways is wrong. I'm saying that in addition to that you also added waterway=pressurised to nodes that previously were untagged, and that seems like a mistake. | |
| 4 | 2025-04-04 22:38 | Gazer75 | Unless its a penstock the tunnel=flooded should be used | |
| 5 | 2025-04-08 06:40 | Gazer75 | You going to revert or do some else have to do this? Big changes like this need to be discussed first. | |
| 6 | 2025-04-08 08:53 | Visaman ♦2 | reverted. Gazer75, please fix the waterway =canal issue. It looks bad with canals on the surface when they should be under ground. I have left remarks on that long ago,- but nothing was done with it. | |
| 7 | 2025-04-08 09:51 | Gazer75 | Got links to the ways that are on surface? | |
| 8 | 2025-04-08 09:58 | Gazer75 | All tunnel=flooded canals should render as a tunnel on the map and that is normal. | |
| 9 | 2025-04-11 09:23 | Visaman ♦2 | They seem to render correctly now,- and not as solid blue lines. That was how they rendered.PS: look at,-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638948943#map=13/59.65972/6.46159 | |
| 10 | 2025-05-04 11:20 | Visaman ♦2 | Here it is something wrong Gazer75.https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=tafjord&zoom=13&minlon=11.128120422363281&minlat=61.71599354088629&maxlon=11.448612213134766&maxlat=61.789681098855084#map=14/62.23098/7.41959 | |
| 122128881 by Gazer75 @ 2022-06-08 17:45 | 1 | 2025-03-25 05:35 | ZLima12 ♦252 | Hello,I am looking at the following two ways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31722444https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176299267In this changeset, it looks like you added the tag `toll:backward=||designated`. What did you mean by this? I would have just changed it to `toll:lanes:backw... |
| 2 | 2025-03-25 06:53 | Gazer75 | Thanks for pointing this out, I've fixed the tags now. Not sure what happened here as its been years. Might have been some copy/paste mistake at one point. The toll point changed direction back in 2020 as well, so may have been something there. | |
| 163603840 by peet192 @ 2025-03-14 10:21 | 1 | 2025-03-14 14:29 | Gazer75 | You need to provide proper changeset description. One letter or number is not acceptable. |
| 161778374 by peet192 @ 2025-01-26 12:37 | 1 | 2025-03-13 17:38 | Gazer75 | Why did you change this? The motorway end sign is inside the tunnel. |
| 161672816 by ejh3445 @ 2025-01-23 12:39 | 1 | 2025-01-29 11:00 | Gazer75 | Welcome to OSM. Please don't start with buss routes as they require route relations. They are not as easy to do as regular elements. I have reverted both of your edits because of many mistakes. |
| 154967760 by WWagter @ 2024-08-08 08:54 | 1 | 2024-11-14 15:20 | Gazer75 | This is not a 420kV transformer. It is connected to the 300 and 132kV and has a third winding at 17kV that used to be connected to some capacitor banks. |
| 2 | 2024-12-22 22:11 | WWagter ♦4 | When looking at aerial imagery this transformer does seem to be connected to the 420kV line via the short line on the east side of the substation. Via Google Street view is visible that that short line is connected to the passing 420kV line. From another angle the other end of this line looks connec... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-23 06:57 | Gazer75 | Public documents by Statnett and aerials at norgeibilder.no that we can use in OSM. Latest image will be the one shown for the preferred layer in iD. The images clearly show the 420kV line drops down to the compact switchgear and then into the reactor at the back of the bay. Statnett applied for a n... | |
| 4 | 2024-12-23 06:59 | Gazer75 | Statnett is currently planning to build a new station roughly 500m WSW of the old one to allow for 420kV and line upgrades. | |
| 5 | 2024-12-23 07:23 | Gazer75 | Should add that you can clearly see in images that the low side on the transformer is on the west side as the cable tie drops into the duct along the wall. If this was a 420/3000 transformer it would have both the high and low side terminals being big. | |
| 123631943 by Gazer75 @ 2022-07-15 03:57 | 1 | 2024-12-09 20:35 | drnoble ♦49 | Hi, these cables are marked as 33kV, but this article [1] states they are 66kV. Curious if you have a better source, or if they should be changed?Cheers, Donald[1] https://www.offshore-mag.com/field-development/article/14071989/jdr-adapting-power-cables-for-hywind-tampen-floating-wind-farm |
| 2 | 2024-12-10 23:58 | Gazer75 | Most articles quotes 33kV that I could find. Maybe that is just the internal cabling while the cables to the platforms are at 66kV. | |
| 3 | 2024-12-20 13:05 | drnoble ♦49 | Cheers, looked into this a bit more and perhaps they were planing 33kV, as this is on some pages as you say, but changed to 66kV during hte design phase. The Equinor page also states 66kV, so I've updated it.https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-tampen | |
| 4 | 2024-12-20 13:09 | Gazer75 | It is most likely 33k internally and then transformed to 66kV for the cables to the platforms. No wind farm I know use more than 33kV from each turbine due to size of equipment. The generators are often 690V and then a transformer at the base ups this to 33kV. | |
| 5 | 2024-12-20 13:21 | drnoble ♦49 | The Guide to a Floating Offshore Wind Farm states "Array cables are typically rated at 66 kV. In the next few years, array cable voltages are expected to increase to 132 kV."https://guidetofloatingoffshorewind.com/guide/b-balance-of-plant/b-1-cables/b-1-1-array-cable/ | |
| 6 | 2024-12-20 13:26 | Gazer75 | Cable rating and actual operating voltage is not the same. I believe they landed on 33kV to avoid having to do heavy modifications on the platforms. Space is already limited for power handling. It seems they landed on JDR Cable Systems to provide these 66kV cables. They are designed to break if ther... | |
| 7 | 2024-12-20 13:29 | Gazer75 | Only way to know for sure is to contact Equinor directly, but I'm not sure they would respond to such a question. | |
| 149841875 by TWHB @ 2024-04-10 23:20 | 1 | 2024-12-03 14:11 | Gazer75 | Where did you get the transformer rating for Skagerak 4 transformer? Also DC voltage does not equal AC voltage after conversion. |
| 140289027 by zluuzki @ 2023-08-23 18:38 | 1 | 2024-12-02 13:41 | Gazer75 | Where did you find the distribution voltage for this area? The voltage regulators on the distribution lines in the area says 7620V which would mean 13.2kV L-L voltage. |
| 2 | 2024-12-02 15:36 | zluuzki ♦224 | Do you mean the "voltage=115000;13860" tags on substations? They are from FERC Form 1 annual reports -elibrary.ferc.gov-, which include listings of operated substations+associated data, such as primary and secondary voltage, see https://data.catalyst.coop/ferc1_xbrl/substations_426_instant... | |
| 3 | 2024-12-02 16:08 | Gazer75 | Ahh, probably the classic left hand not knowing what the right is doing. I've seen varying values used for varying companies and documents even if it is essentially the same. | |
| 152545969 by Hans Wurst @ 2024-06-11 14:18 | 1 | 2024-11-25 06:07 | Gazer75 | Please don't mess with the bus stops in Norway. They are updated automatically and we dont use the public transportation tags. Many of them don't even have a platform so the public_transport=platform tag is wrong. |
| 159143526 by Jarle Gamst Pedersen @ 2024-11-14 19:24 | 1 | 2024-11-15 19:42 | sbre ♦22 | Hei, det ser ut som du baskar rundt på eit ganske stort multipolygon her. Treng du noko assistanse? Eller vil du heller unngå at nokon andre redigerer her til du er ferdig med myrone? |
| 2 | 2024-11-16 22:17 | Gazer75 | Trur du må stoppe og redigere landcover til du forstår relasjonar og kan bruke desse. Du er på veg å rasere heile området med masse feil. | |
| 3 | 2024-11-16 23:31 | Gazer75 | Har no fiksa alle valideringsfeil i området. Ver så snill å ikkje lag meir krøll er du snill. | |
| 4 | 2024-11-18 11:44 | Jarle Gamst Pedersen ♦1 | Hurra, skogen er tilbake!Tusen takk for at du har rettet opp mine feil. Eg skal være veldig forsiktig med endringer jeg gjør i framtiden. | |
| 158989735 by TWHB @ 2024-11-11 00:28 | 1 | 2024-11-11 19:48 | Gazer75 | That voltage may not be accurate. The AC voltage after converting from DC to AC is never 1:1. That is why I removed it in my edit. You have to ask the operator or manufacturer as this will vary from station to station. The most common to use is 0.636 as the average and 0.707 for RMS. So most likely ... |
| 155526192 by Bathyscapher @ 2024-08-20 19:20 | 1 | 2024-08-28 15:05 | Gazer75 | Adding bicycle=designated on a cycleway is pointless tag bloat. It's implied via highway=cycleway Tags like this could get removed via a validator we use here in Norway. |
| 2 | 2024-09-05 18:47 | Bathyscapher ♦22 | This was a tag upgrade suggested by OSM's iD. Thus, I assumed it to apply useful tags only. | |
| 3 | 2024-09-06 01:01 | Gazer75 | There are different school of thought here unfortunately. Some want a value for every possible tag instead of using a default value if missing. Tagging with every key and value available in OSM will lead to a lot of tags per object. | |
| 4 | 2024-09-25 09:26 | Bathyscapher ♦22 | You are right. Personally, I'm a fan of parsimony. But - being more a "user" (mapper) - I align with the strategy OSM thinks is best :) | |
| 154961189 by grmblwrz @ 2024-08-08 05:16 | 1 | 2024-09-04 06:34 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Please make sure paths do not cross buildings and that they connect to another way. All roads and paths should connect to form a single routing network. |
| 2 | 2024-09-04 07:33 | grmblwrz ♦1 | Thanks for commenting! Re "building": It looked correct when editing it in Vespucci. Will check again. ThxUli | |
| 3 | 2024-09-04 12:47 | Gazer75 | Probably because you used Bing aerials. Those are not to be used in Norway as they usually have a bad offset. No idea what imagery is available, but in iD the Norway Orthophoto is default and best option. | |
| 155868722 by Dauerläufer @ 2024-08-28 08:56 | 1 | 2024-08-28 14:56 | Gazer75 | This is a duplicate of the already existing ferry line. The ferry go via Frønningen if needed. |
| 2 | 2024-08-28 15:20 | Dauerläufer ♦1 | Fjord1 does not stop in Frønningen (https://www.fjord1.no/eng/Routes-and-timetables/Vestland/Kaupanger-Gudvangen?from=NSR%3AQuay%3A99291&to=NSR%3AQuay%3A99772&date=28.08.2024) | |
| 3 | 2024-08-28 15:41 | Gazer75 | It is the same service. Fjord1 operates this in summer months. AFAIK the ferry still calls at Frønningen on request. Same with Styvi. It seems as though there is a separate ferry Kaupanger-Frønningen these days. Maybe more appropriate to update the existing route as there are not two s... | |
| 4 | 2024-08-28 16:16 | Gazer75 | I just called the ferry operating the route to clarify. The Gudvangen-Kaupanger ferry no longer go via Frønningen or Styvi. It also only operates 1. May - 1. September. From 2024 there is a separate ferry Kaupanger-Frønningen. Styvi is served via the electric passenger ferry between Gu... | |
| 5 | 2024-08-29 15:16 | Dauerläufer ♦1 | Gazer75 - thanks for clarification! | |
| 149374138 by forteller @ 2024-03-31 01:59 | 1 | 2024-08-24 12:06 | Gazer75 | Du har blanda produksjon og effekt. Fennefoss er 9,5 MW. Produksjon har ingen tag i OSM. |
| 152441748 by AEK24PLUS @ 2024-06-09 07:22 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-04 18:45 | Gazer75 | Please do not add small road link segments to intersections unless its a slip separated from the rest. Also the same for bus stops and passing places. |
| 151916915 by CreCrePL @ 2024-05-27 20:10 | 1 | 2024-08-02 08:36 | Gazer75 | Did you add duplicate fuel station on purpose? There are two nodes at this location now. |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 14:01 | CreCrePL ♦29 | No, it was accidental. Already merged them. Thanks for pointing it out :) | |
| 3 | 2024-08-02 14:04 | Gazer75 | No problem. New fuel pumps? Didn't see them in pictures from last year. | |
| 4 | 2024-08-02 14:08 | CreCrePL ♦29 | Looked pretty new alright - the tanks and pumps ware laid on the asphalt. | |
| 154639215 by Kryp705 @ 2024-07-31 09:23 | 1 | 2024-08-01 09:49 | Gazer75 | Please don't add duplicate charging area where there is a node. EV chargers should only be a node as well. |
| 2 | 2024-08-02 08:25 | Kryp705 ♦1 | Hi, thanks for your feedback. That means the structure it’s doesn’t appear on the map? | |
| 3 | 2024-08-02 08:29 | Gazer75 | If you wanted to map the "shed" the chargers are under it would be a building or something. Not tagged as a charging station. If you do it will appear as a duplicate. I really don't see the point in adding such sheds as they have no value for people. If the whole parking lot where you... | |
| 151725335 by bobbyxng @ 2024-05-23 14:05 | 1 | 2024-07-25 04:45 | Gazer75 | Please don't map this as 3 circuits. 1-2 form one circuit and 3+4 is one. Thus the line only contains 2 circuits. (1+2) and 3, so technically 1.5 circuits as 4 is in the ground. Bipolar HVDCs are considered as a single circuit even though they technically can run at reduced capacity using elect... |
| 153950372 by kitsee @ 2024-07-15 00:00 | 1 | 2024-07-17 20:26 | Gazer75 | You messed up some voltages and circuit tag on a few line segments. Line between Coventry and Ratcliffe is a 275kV that shares towers with a couple of 400kV lines.I've already tagged the segments back to correct value. |
| 2 | 2024-07-17 20:31 | Gazer75 | Looking at more of these changes you've removed the proper voltage tags on several lines that has mixed 400kV and 275kV | |
| 3 | 2024-07-17 21:16 | Gazer75 | I've fixed all the errors I could find around Birmingham. Please don't modify values unless you know what you're doing. Ask previous person if unsure. | |
| 4 | 2024-07-17 23:23 | kitsee ♦96 | I do apologise, I was rushing and made a bad assumption since I've never seen mixed voltage pylons. In hindsight I'm not sure why I change the voltages, should have tagged the ref and left the rest alone. Thanks for fixing it. | |
| 5 | 2024-07-17 23:42 | Gazer75 | They can happen in some places. For the "ring" around Birmingham it's historical. Several substations used to have 275kV switchgear and as they get upgraded they have to mix. Several substations are still 275kV in Birmingham.You can see how it all connects on Openinframap | |
| 153386566 by TinyOslo @ 2024-06-30 21:30 | 1 | 2024-07-01 23:45 | Gazer75 | Is E16 opened again after the plastering of the riverbank? If so then the access tag also needs updating. |
| 2 | 2024-07-02 04:11 | TinyOslo ♦1 | Opened Friday 28/6. Will address the tag now. | |
| 139896902 by googlenaut @ 2023-08-15 05:22 | 1 | 2024-05-29 05:34 | Gazer75 | Why did you delete the layer tag in this change? The tunnel is a spiral with several layers. |
| 138762989 by kao @ 2023-07-20 12:35 | 1 | 2024-05-29 05:22 | Gazer75 | Please don't split roundabouts for route relations. All the small segments increases the chance of an error down the line if there is a tagging update. |
| 151030053 by MaggieWaggie @ 2024-05-07 21:45 | 1 | 2024-05-12 08:20 | Gazer75 | Did they open the old rail tunnel again now? I've seen nothing in the news or on BaneNOR website about it. |
| 2 | 2024-05-12 08:29 | Gazer75 | So all I found was a Bergens Tidende article behind a paywall, so I guess its open? | |
| 149493956 by Arne Vold @ 2024-04-02 18:17 | 1 | 2024-04-23 20:20 | Gazer75 | Hei og velkomen til OSM. Riksvegar vil ha "tunk" som vegtype. Du kan lese meir på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways |
| 141811210 by FennecusZerda @ 2023-09-27 09:58 | 1 | 2024-01-12 14:22 | Gazer75 | You duplicated Tokke power station by mapping it with same tags on the outside buildings. The turbine hall is inside and mapped already. Under ground power plants are mapped at the turbine hall for consistency as this can be several km from the entrance. |
| 2 | 2024-01-15 13:44 | FennecusZerda ♦17 | Thanks for update. It looks like you have corrected it. I'll make sure to not change too much on things I don't know the tagging structure of for the future and stick to cycle infrastructure. :) Regards, Trond S. | |
| 142095738 by qwertet @ 2023-10-03 11:25 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-03 11:56 | harahu ♦51 | Hei qwertet,Du presenterer ikke en gyldig grunn til å slette nevnte sti, per OSM-praksis. Jeg måtte derfor tilbakestille endringene dine.Ellers lykke til som ny OSM-bruker! |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 12:01 | Gazer75 | Planting som er gjort for å hindre ferdsel vil vere brot på §13 i friluftslova. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-03 12:26 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-03 12:36 | harahu ♦51 | Du antar at du er den eneste som har lokalkunnskap, noe som ikke stemmer. Vi vet at stien de facto eksisterer. Ergo SKAL den være i OSM, uavhengig av lovlighet.Ift. friluftsloven så ignorer du gjeldende rettspraksis som slår fast at "hustomt" bare skal forstås s... | |
| 5 | 2023-10-03 12:36 | Gazer75 | Du har lest den i form av fast bustad. Når det kjem til hytter og tilgang til utmark så er det lov å gå over "innmark". Det er typisk at den private sfære rundt hytter blir rekna til 10-20m frå hytteveggen.Stien har vore der sidan hyttefeltet vart by... | |
| 6 | 2023-10-03 13:55 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 7 | 2023-10-03 14:19 | Gazer75 | Orkar ikkje diskutere dette meir. Kommunen kan gjere vedtak i slike saker. Det står om dette i §20 og 24.Skaden du peikar på i §3a kunne kanskje vore grei om det var opparbeidd område rundt hytta. Her er det snakk om litt lyng og snaufjell.Stien er vel delvis grod... | |
| 8 | 2023-10-03 18:27 | harahu ♦51 | Forresten, qwertet, er du grunneier i nr. 67? I så fall ville du jo i alle fall ha rett til å prøve deg på et argument ut fra §3a, selv om dette ikke nødvendigvis ville holdt. | |
| 9 | 2023-10-03 19:11 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2023-10-03 20:17 | harahu ♦51 | Jeg repeterer at vårt standpunkt er at lovverket ikke taler imot vårt standpunkt.Jeg vil også minne om at dere ikke er de eneste folkene på bakken her. Vi har også flere OSM-brukere, og ikke-brukere som kan bekrefte at det går en sti der, uten at de nød... | |
| 11 | 2023-10-03 20:31 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 142096997 by harahu @ 2023-10-03 11:51 | 1 | 2023-10-03 11:58 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 11:59 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-03 12:26 | Gazer75 | Hes simply restoring what is there qwertet. Deleting what is there because you don't want it there is not local knowledge it is vandalism.This path is a conflict that only proper authorities can solve. Unless they say otherwise the freedom to roam law would apply here. | |
| 142057023 by oarn @ 2023-10-02 20:33 | 1 | 2023-10-02 20:38 | Gazer75 | Du kan jo berre fortsette å slette så kjem du raskare til å bli blokkert...Du eig ikkje kartet og data i dette. OSM har hage og vegar og parkering som er private andre plassar. Så lenge ting er tagga på rett måte så har du ingen rett til å fjerne. |
| 141495337 by oarn @ 2023-09-20 06:02 | 1 | 2023-09-20 14:29 | Gazer75 | Reversert. Allemannsretten vil gjelde her. |
| 2 | 2023-09-20 14:35 | Gazer75 | Sidan du ikkje kan vise til eit vedtak frå kommunen så kan stien vere der og folk kan bruke den. Om du fortset og slette så vil du bli rapportert til DWG for vandalisme. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-20 15:54 | harahu ♦51 | Set at dette changesettet slettet deler av en sti jeg har tegnet inn. Som Gazer75 sier: det er ikke noe grunn til å tro at dette området vil regnes som "privat", eller innmark, som vi sier på norsk. Etter norsk lovpraksis har ikke hytteeiere mulighet til å begrense ... | |
| 4 | 2023-09-22 06:59 | oarn ♦5 | Dette er en sak som har pågått i flere år.og grunnen er at det aldrig egentlig har gått sti her og det er heller ikke spurt om det. Stidelen ble også fjernet fra norgeskart av kommunen.Sjekk Norgeskart.no som er karverket sitt kart. Du kan også forhøre ... | |
| 5 | 2023-09-22 07:09 | Gazer75 | Stien er meir eller mindre synleg på foto som går 19 år tilbake i tid, så det er vel ikkje heilt rett. | |
| 6 | 2023-09-22 07:11 | Gazer75 | Som det er peika på over så må ein ikkje spørje om lov til å gå forbi hytter så lenge ein er på god nok avstand. | |
| 7 | 2023-09-22 07:53 | oarn ♦5 | Men å lage seg sti må det spørres om.Det ble spor der etter at veien ble bygd, pga. folk tok seg til rette og gikk over | |
| 8 | 2023-09-22 07:55 | oarn ♦5 | Det er en grunn til at den er fjernet av kartverket kanskje? | |
| 9 | 2023-09-22 08:04 | Gazer75 | Ein lagar ikkje ein sti den oppstår fordi folk går der. At ein sti ikkje er i kartverket sine kart betyr lite. Dei bestemmer ikkje kor det er sti eller ikkje.Du kan argumentere alt du vil, men så lenge du ikkje kan vise til eit skriftleg vedtak frå kommunen som også... | |
| 10 | 2023-09-22 08:07 | oarn ♦5 | Stien blir et problem da folk ødelegger privat beplanting og utstyr som står på sin egen eiendom. | |
| 11 | 2023-09-22 08:19 | Gazer75 | Foto visar ingen buskar i sprekken der stien går i 2022, og så ein rosebusk midt i stien. Dette er jo heilt klart for å gi argument og hindre ferdsel. Usikker på om dette faktisk er lov.Som eg skreiv over så kan dette enkelt løysast ved å eventuelt plan... | |
| 141589160 by oarn @ 2023-09-22 06:49 | 1 | 2023-09-22 08:07 | Gazer75 | Du vart advart... Reverted og blir meldt til DWG for vandalisme. |
| 141298893 by UK Moose @ 2023-09-15 11:34 | 1 | 2023-09-16 13:41 | Gazer75 | The tags hour_on and hour_off is not really valid anymore if they were ever used. You'd have to use conditional restrictions to define when the gate is closed to general traffic. |
| 2 | 2023-09-16 13:44 | Gazer75 | Suggestion: motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-10:00) With additional tags like psv=yes this should work as intended. | |
| 140169928 by Veronica Solbak @ 2023-08-21 09:05 | 1 | 2023-08-21 14:13 | Gazer75 | Ikkje slett vegar på den måten. Om dette er ein privat veg som er skilta private eller avstengt så kan du legge på access tags. Står info om dette på wiki |
| 2 | 2023-08-21 14:32 | Gazer75 | Har reversert og lagt inn access tag på vegen. | |
| 139911937 by DoubleA @ 2023-08-15 12:11 | 1 | 2023-08-18 05:14 | user_5359 ♦19,415 | Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/4814795. What is the mean of the tag "Linie 1163848956 # Treschows gate (2 Punkte)" = "only"? |
| 2 | 2023-08-18 07:50 | Gazer75 | Pretty sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163848956 need to be replaced by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163848955The route runs east so it would be impossible to use the segment mentioned. The tag seem to use bad English to point this out. | |
| 127814304 by kmpoppe (@ Mapillary Update) @ 2022-10-20 01:06 | 1 | 2023-08-12 17:19 | Gazer75 | Please don't duplicate charging stations. The node is for a group of chargers, not individual dispensers. I've removed the duplicates leaving one as it should be. |
| 2 | 2023-08-12 18:52 | Noen ♦316 | This changeset does as the changeset comment suggest, and only touch the «mapillary» tag. Gazer75's message should be directed to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116591570 | |
| 3 | 2023-08-12 19:01 | Gazer75 | Of course, my bad... I find it hard to figure out who made the actual error. | |
| 137466895 by Gazer75 @ 2023-06-18 05:47 | 1 | 2023-06-18 05:48 | Gazer75 | Hit enter to early on accident.Description should read "Fagrafjell substation now completed and energized." |
| 136959860 by Simfr24 @ 2023-06-05 08:05 | 1 | 2023-06-10 23:04 | Gazer75 | This is wrong. The old tunnel is closed for upgrades while the new south tube is open. Please revert your changes. |
| 2 | 2023-06-10 23:19 | Gazer75 | I've reverted this already. The bottom part of that article mentioned that the old tunnel is closed for upgrades until 2024. | |
| 130967963 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-01-07 03:14 | 1 | 2023-05-07 08:37 | Gazer75 | Where did you get the voltages from? AFAIK they are all wrong unless they recently built a new substation at the Charlottetown generating station. Last I heard that was not happening before 2030 or something.The 138kV from West Royalty terminates on a pole just north of the hospital by Pioneer Av... |
| 130888641 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-01-05 03:12 | 1 | 2023-05-07 07:58 | Gazer75 | Did they rebuild https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942697064 as dual circuit recently? |
| 130883424 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-01-04 21:30 | 1 | 2023-05-07 07:34 | Gazer75 | Why did you change the towers to poles? That is not accurate for that high voltage level no matter the design. Those are towers. Poles are for distribution lines mostly. |
| 2 | 2023-05-07 07:48 | Gazer75 | Looks like you've just selected all nodes in the line and tagged it as a power=pole completely disregarding my detailed mapping. Like the terminal at the transition station. Please don't do this and ruin other peoples work. Thank you. | |
| 30434146 by frokor_import @ 2015-04-23 16:49 | 1 | 2015-04-24 10:50 | Gazer75 | Her har du rota det til :P Bergen er full av skog :) |
| 2 | 2015-04-24 10:52 | Gazer75 | Ser ut til at det er http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340146784 som har feil | |
| 3 | 2023-04-17 08:39 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Burde 340145956 slettes? Ser ut til å være skog i både N50 og ortofoto | |
| 4 | 2023-04-17 10:55 | Gazer75 | Om du tenker way, så kan den sikkert det. Er mykje gammalt N50 som ikkje lenger stemmer. Folk fiksar litt her og der etter kvart. Berre litt viktig at ein har kontroll på relasjonar og forstår korleis dei fungerer. | |
| 133275324 by CartoonistHenning @ 2023-03-04 02:12 | 1 | 2023-03-06 10:49 | Gazer75 | I'd suggest going with the lifecycle prefix was:*=* on the tags for the ferries. Disused might not be supported in many cases, and many maps will still show a route as long as the ferry tags are there. A was:route=ferry will not. |
| 2 | 2023-03-06 19:13 | CartoonistHenning ♦1 | Hi. Thank you for your suggestion. You are absolutely right. I corrected my contribution. | |
| 113340063 by SverigeFan @ 2021-11-03 16:26 | 1 | 2023-02-10 12:01 | Gazer75 | Careful when editing. You managed to move https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709830242 back to the old 66kV spot. I had made a note on the line warning about this :) Maxar was more up to date in the area than the Norwegian orthophoto. Currently only the low res orthophoto layer is up to date.Line i... |
| 123176876 by hkvisgaard @ 2022-07-04 07:43 | 1 | 2023-02-05 03:57 | Gazer75 | This is not a proper tag for peoples driveway. It also blocks proper routing.Don't confuse owner with access.This tag would only apply to fenced off areas with locked gates. |
| 132045437 by MartorCZ @ 2023-02-03 14:47 | 1 | 2023-02-03 16:31 | Gazer75 | Date is variable, depends on how much snow there is. That's why these winter closed roads only have a moth. |
| 2 | 2023-02-06 07:12 | MartorCZ ♦14 | ok, thank for clarification, i've changed it back on May | |
| 130061326 by DeltA_Shok @ 2022-12-14 07:00 | 1 | 2023-01-15 15:34 | Gazer75 | This is actually wrong. A substation is an area and anything inside it is part of this station. |
| 2 | 2023-01-15 15:38 | Gazer75 | To explain a bit more. The south building contains an indoor compact gas insulated switchgear for both the 66kV and 132kV grid. The north building had the old 66kV and probably some 22kV switchgear inside.The old one is afaik going to be removed along with the old outdoor 132kV to make room for a ... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-16 14:47 | DeltA_Shok ♦1 | Thanks, Gazer75 for reaching out. It makes sense that you have rolled the data back, but I have a follow-up question about adding a multipolygon relation to a substation. As the relation only has a single member (outer), can we transfer all the tags in it to a simple area and remove the multipolygon... | |
| 4 | 2023-01-16 15:45 | Gazer75 | It could be moved out from a relation now yes. At the time I originally mapped it, the station only included the north part and thus the north building was partially the outer way. Didn't bother moving it out from the relation and just changed the fenced area when they expanded the station.Th... | |
| 5 | 2023-01-17 09:02 | DeltA_Shok ♦1 | Hi Gazer75, sounds good. I have removed the multipolygon and transferred all tags to the existing polygon. Thanks for your insight about this substation. | |
| 130378939 by YOSTWPI8YR @ 2022-12-22 14:24 | 1 | 2022-12-22 17:00 | Gazer75 | Do not use Bing aerials i Norway! If this "Map builder" can't use the Norwegian Orthophoto then it can't be used here. |
| 128695225 by Kokosnøtt @ 2022-11-09 16:29 | 1 | 2022-11-16 22:07 | Gazer75 | Source on this? Last I checked NVDB it was tagged as 582 |
| 125473319 by Gazer75 @ 2022-08-28 11:23 | 1 | 2022-09-18 19:57 | PierZen ♦262 | L'Imagerie ne permet pas encore de confirmer la connexion de la station Romaine-4 avec la ligne Montagnais. Quelle source vous permet de déduire ce schéma de connexion ? |
| 2 | 2022-09-18 22:08 | Gazer75 | Ezri imagery shows it nearly complete. Hydro Quebec states construction was completed in 2019 and Romaine 4 is scheduled to begin production in 2022. | |
| 125941923 by PulisakZ @ 2022-09-08 12:49 | 1 | 2022-09-15 08:41 | Gazer75 | Make sure you remove the source and date on the part you modify. The Kartverket N50 is imported data and the date is when that data was created/modified by them. It is no longer valid after you've modified it. |
| 2 | 2022-09-16 06:46 | PulisakZ ♦45 | Hi. Thanks for pointing this out. Will pay more attention for this tag. Best regards, Zvonko. | |
| 125380434 by km2bp @ 2022-08-25 21:27 | 1 | 2022-09-05 08:47 | Negreheb ♦263 | I'm not sure adding google photos through an additional layer to hide it is allowed for OSM. Do you have any comments on that? |
| 2 | 2022-09-05 14:35 | NKA ♦247 | And you did promise to stop splitting lines, right? Here, a river has been splitted just to insert a picture. Please use nodes. | |
| 3 | 2022-09-05 16:26 | Gazer75 | Please stop adding random photo links of things like a stream. You're also going in on someones private road and property taking picture of their homes.Did you ask for permission from the owner before publishing it? | |
| 125312024 by knaskeladden @ 2022-08-24 11:48 | 1 | 2022-08-24 13:22 | NKA ♦247 | Bruk motor_vehicle=yes dersom en highway=track er kjørbar med vanlig bil, evt. motor_vehicle=permissive dersom det er etter spesiell tillatelse fra grunneier.motor_vehicle=designated/yes skal ikke brukes på highway=service (det er allerede implisitt for slike vanlige bilveier).H... |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 01:26 | Gazer75 | Sette delar av denne vegen som path blir feil då dette er ein traktorveg og ikkje ein naturleg sti. Det vil også hindre sykkelruting på ei nasjonal sykkelrute. Kan ikkje fikse dårlege ruting motorar med å tagge feil. Set track type til mellom 3 og 5 så kanskje det... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-29 11:06 | knaskeladden ♦1 | Deler av veien som er satt til path har aldri vært traktorvei, og det har ikke vært organisert vedlikehold av denne rasutsatte strekningen på 30-40 år. Etter skogrydding på privat initiativ ser det slik ut https://imgur.com/a/lne6mo8 | |
| 4 | 2022-08-29 16:37 | Gazer75 | Ahh, passar med highway=footway + bicycle=yes då tenker eg. Den er tross alt bygd og ikkje oppstått naturleg? | |
| 123666278 by Robert66 @ 2022-07-15 19:17 | 1 | 2022-08-29 09:59 | Gazer75 | Why did you tag all distribution lines as 25kV when they are in fact 14.4kV? |
| 2 | 2022-08-29 10:08 | Gazer75 | Mixing line to line and line to neutral will make things rather confusing. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-29 10:19 | Gazer75 | OK, i see what you've done. When they branch off a single phase with neutral you tag it as 14.4kV.Its all good, ignore my ignorance :) | |
| 124811000 by 9ls 1ar @ 2022-08-12 10:00 | 1 | 2022-08-14 05:27 | NKA ♦247 | Er det skiltet «fotgjenger forbudt» i disse gatene?foot=yes betyr at det er forbudt/straffbart å gå der, ikke at gaten er uegnet for gåing eller at det finnes bedre alternativer. |
| 2 | 2022-08-15 06:59 | 9ls 1ar ♦1 | Det er ikkje forbudt for fotgjengarar i desse gatane, men iht vegtrafikklova skal dei benytte fortauet, ikkje køyrefeltet.Har du eit godt forslag til andre måtar å løyse det på? | |
| 3 | 2022-08-16 04:07 | NKA ♦247 | Som du vet er det unntak for dette i trafikkreglene om det ikke er "rimelig", å bruke fortauet så foot=no som er et absolutt forbud blir feil. Vi har ikke noen måte å tagge dette på i OSM. Det måtte i så fall ha vært gjort på samtli... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-17 13:21 | 9ls 1ar ♦1 | Lovverket er tydeleg på at dersom vegen har fortau so skal dette brukast: § 19.Særlige bestemmelser for gående1. Gående skal nytte gangveg, fortau eller vegens skulder. Er det ikke rimelig på grunn av farten m.v. eller mulig å gjøre dette, kan g&... | |
| 5 | 2022-08-17 13:26 | 9ls 1ar ♦1 | Hovudårsaka til at eg har endra rettigheitar til fotgjengarar (som eg ser at du jobbar med å reversere) er at appar som nyttar OSM ber folk om å gå i vegbanen og dette er ikkje spesielt heldig og skapar trafikkfarlege situasjonar. | |
| 6 | 2022-08-17 14:19 | balchen ♦27 | De trafikantene som er nevnt i §2, ledd 3 er regnet som gående. Dersom du mener unntaket fra bruk av fortau gjelder dem, så er likevel foot=no feil. foot=* gjelder gående, hva nå enn lovens definisjon av det er. | |
| 7 | 2022-08-17 14:21 | Gazer75 | Det er jo appen sitt problem at den ikkje prioriterer fortau osv | |
| 8 | 2022-08-17 14:23 | balchen ♦27 | Det er videre ikke bare fart som er nevnt, men "farten m.v.", dvs. at det finnes andre rimelighetsforhold som gjør at gående kan la være å benytte fortau. At fart er knyttet til §2 er greit, men leddet i sin helhet er ikke KUN knyttet til fart. | |
| 9 | 2022-08-17 14:25 | balchen ♦27 | "appar som nyttar OSM ber folk om å gå i vegbanen"Som Gazer75 sier er det vel som hovedregel appens problem hva den gjør, men hvordan eksakt ber appene gående om gå på kjørebanen og ikke på fortauet? | |
| 125010618 by kao @ 2022-08-17 10:25 | 1 | 2022-08-17 12:53 | Gazer75 | Please undo this. Short closures should be handled in the nav apps via traffic messages. This will only create a mess if the app updates rarely and happens to take a snapshot of the OSM db during the closure. |
| 2 | 2022-08-17 18:45 | kao ♦3 | I see your point, but I will wait till tomorrow to see status then. I closed them mainly because of foot relations in the travel planner at entur.no, but I notice that the bridges is still open for walking and cycling (with new decison tomorrow). | |
| 3 | 2022-08-18 07:55 | kao ♦3 | Reverted today | |
| 125012583 by kao @ 2022-08-17 11:11 | 1 | 2022-08-17 12:30 | Gazer75 | Don't do this. Its a short temp closure. It will mess up nav apps that do not update often. I'd say a road closure over months is ok, but this will probably last a couple of weeks or so. |
| 123314599 by Seat Ibiza @ 2022-07-07 11:10 | 1 | 2022-08-14 11:39 | Gazer75 | Classification is based on the number and owner in Norway so this is kind of wrong. Four digit roads are secondary roads.I do agree that this is a valid exception though |
| 124546849 by BR_pebble @ 2022-08-06 05:41 | 1 | 2022-08-10 05:03 | Gazer75 | Don't bother adding road names with a number like that. They are temporary until the municipality finalize the naming. |
| 2 | 2022-08-11 04:16 | BR_pebble ♦97 | Hi Gazer75, Thanks for reaching out. I have added the name based on the NVDB source | |
| 3 | 2022-08-11 05:18 | Gazer75 | Don't waste time on roads named "vei" or "veg" with a number at the end. As I said they are temporary, and you'll have to go back later and update again when the final name is decided. | |
| 124299464 by MvanderHeide @ 2022-07-31 11:30 | 1 | 2022-08-08 11:01 | Gazer75 | Is that a new charge point at the Esso station? If not then its misplaced and a duplicate of the one by the main road.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6017211507 |
| 2 | 2022-08-08 11:45 | MvanderHeide ♦15 | This is a complete new set of charging stations on the side of the Esso station.The main charging station at the main road is still there and still in use.The new set of charging stations is already in use and when we were there a week ago it was very busy…. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-08 13:00 | Gazer75 | Nice! Guessing they are all HPC with 150kW or more? | |
| 4 | 2022-08-08 13:11 | MvanderHeide ♦15 | Correct, the CCS connectors are 150kW. The ChadeMo connectors have 62.5 kW. I only don’t know how to mention that without access to a fullblown laptop. | |
| 123625937 by Maarten Deen @ 2022-07-14 21:03 | 1 | 2022-07-16 22:24 | Gazer75 | Why did you delete a website link for this? |
| 2 | 2022-07-17 10:34 | Maarten Deen ♦73 | I did not delete the website tag, I added it. | |
| 3 | 2022-07-17 15:19 | Gazer75 | Oh my... brainfart... no idea how I viewed it like that. My bad. LOL | |
| 123307612 by Runar Wesenlund Hjønnevåg @ 2022-07-07 08:47 | 1 | 2022-07-08 17:50 | Gazer75 | Velkomen til OSM. Husnummer på bygningen har lite for seg då det blir duplikat med node. Desse blir oppdatert automatisk frå Kartverket. Desse punkta skal normalt vere ved inngangen, men det varierer. |
| 122939779 by Inge Rønstad @ 2022-06-28 06:45 | 1 | 2022-07-01 10:11 | Gazer75 | Er denne opna? Prosjektleiar sa nei. |
| 2 | 2022-07-05 13:26 | Inge Rønstad ♦2 | Åpna feil tunnel. Endrer tilbake | |
| 3 | 2022-07-07 11:22 | Gazer75 | Ah ok. Er du lokalkjent? Om så veit du kva bilferjer som fortsatt skal gå? | |
| 4 | 2022-07-07 11:57 | Inge Rønstad ♦2 | Jeg er ruteplanlegger i FRAM | |
| 122806439 by iWowik @ 2022-06-24 14:36 | 1 | 2022-07-01 09:50 | Gazer75 | Please do not do changes across the world in a single changeset |
| 2 | 2022-07-04 13:07 | iWowik ♦1,071 | Please write about your difficulties to to the authors of the program you use. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-07 07:47 | muchichka_s ♦284 | @iWowik, в мене немає слів вулиця Лева, названа на честь тварини перекладена "Левая улица" 🤬. Я впевнений, що ти додав ще багато неправильних перекладів, і все це р... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-07 07:47 | muchichka_s ♦284 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677706999 | |
| 5 | 2022-08-09 17:33 | iWowik ♦1,071 | Спасибо, Льва улица\t | |
| 6 | 2022-08-23 08:01 | Poliakoff Mykhailo ♦754 | iWOWIK The streets of Western Ukraine, even under the USSR, actually did not have Russian names because Western Ukraine resisted the policy of Russification (what is it, read on Wikipedia in the article Russification of Ukraine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russification_of_Ukraine )Even in... | |
| 7 | 2022-08-23 08:08 | Poliakoff Mykhailo ♦754 | Therefore, based on the arguments I gave in the last message, stop adding name:ru, which is equivalent to spreading fakes in Western Ukraine.Поетому на основании аргументов кооторьіе я привел в прошлом сообщениии , прекрати ... | |
| 122910564 by Crick_RN @ 2022-06-27 13:13 | 1 | 2022-06-28 19:17 | NKA ♦247 | Please revert this and similar Tomtom changesets. There should be one amenity=school, not three.Why are you doing such modifications? |
| 2 | 2022-06-28 20:45 | Gazer75 | Yeah this is pointless. The school is already mapped as an amenity here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943956343 This is just amenity inside amenity which is wrong. | |
| 3 | 2022-06-30 05:07 | Crick_RN ♦4 | Hi NKA & Gazer75,Thank you for your input. I restored the data to the previous version.Regards. | |
| 122888545 by Gan_toon @ 2022-06-27 05:07 | 1 | 2022-06-27 08:21 | NKA ♦247 | Why did you change from highway=track to highway=path. Track is clearly correct.And please use the "Norway Orthophoto" background imagery in Norway, not Maxar which has considerable offset. |
| 2 | 2022-06-27 08:33 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | I agree. This should be "track". | |
| 3 | 2022-06-27 14:42 | Gazer75 | Yep, please do not change tracks to paths. Paths in Norway are naturally formed trails or shortcuts by people or animals walking there repeatedly.Tracks should normally not be used by regular cars, they are for agricultural use. | |
| 4 | 2022-06-28 05:24 | Gan_toon ♦44 | Hi NKA, ENTUR Johan Wiklund Gazer75Thank you for your valuable input and recommendations.I already changed them back to its original status "track" as per the community's guidelines and local advice. | |
| 122123568 by Bolt4147 @ 2022-06-08 15:17 | 1 | 2022-06-08 19:05 | Gazer75 | Hi, and welcome to OSM.Setting negative values like that is kind of a waste of time tbh. No tag means that there is no such feature normally.If we are going to add negative values for all features the tag list would be extremely long. |
| 2 | 2022-06-08 20:02 | Bolt4147 ♦1 | Thank you, and I appreciate the feedback. It makes sense, and I will take it into consideration when updating in the future.Cheers. | |
| 97984008 by GustavGustavson @ 2021-01-22 15:40 | 1 | 2021-10-22 11:24 | Gazer75 | Nice maping, but please don't attach land use/cover to roads and buildings. They are not related and cause a maintenance nightmare later on. |
| 2 | 2021-11-30 11:17 | GustavGustavson ♦1 | I'll look into it as soon as I can! Thanks for the hint! | |
| 3 | 2022-06-04 10:40 | Gazer75 | So... Any plans to fix these? Been months. Even found out you attached landcover to a tunnel. | |
| 4 | 2022-06-04 11:56 | GustavGustavson ♦1 | Yes, I still have it on my to do list. But my real life crashed me pretty hard ... I'll start as soon as possible. Sorry for causing serious troubles | |
| 121745893 by Gazer75 @ 2022-05-31 04:48 | 1 | 2022-05-31 04:57 | Hannah Piggen ♦9 | In 9 days ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121302444 ) you haven't found time to inform the user? |
| 2 | 2022-05-31 04:58 | Gazer75 | Posted a comment on one of the changesets. | |
| 121302873 by HanatakeYurii @ 2022-05-22 02:48 | 1 | 2022-05-31 04:56 | Gazer75 | Please don't merge houses with numbers. They are separate for a reason here in Norway. Number should be at or near the main entrance. Also I do believe the address update script will undo any merging with houses anyway, so your work is pointless.I have reverted all your merging and did some... |
| 120631271 by haakol @ 2022-05-06 13:17 | 1 | 2022-05-30 08:47 | Gazer75 | Why? This tunnel is just a service tunnel. Cable will go straight up through a vertical shaft to the new indoor switchgear building. |
| 2 | 2022-05-30 11:40 | haakol ♦1 | Have changed it back to a private service road now. Point was to avoid having it show up in the road network for public roads but as long as it's set as a private road it doesn't matter. | |
| 3 | 2022-05-30 11:45 | Gazer75 | The roads and the gate was set to private from the start I belive. Think his tunnel will remain in the future to access the tunnel from this area. The tunnel will eventually be extended to Ulven as well. | |
| 119429004 by TWHB @ 2022-04-07 12:47 | 1 | 2022-04-09 10:27 | voiden ♦16 | Hi, thank you for your contribution. I see you changed quite a few roads from secondary to service, and I don't think this is the correct use of this tag. For example, you changed way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334014366 . This is a major local road carriying a lot of traffic to/from the... |
| 2 | 2022-04-09 14:49 | TWHB ♦11 | Hi voiden, thanks for your reaction. to my knowledge this road you are referring to is a busway, thats why I changed it to a serviceway as normal cars are not allowed to access it. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-09 16:18 | voiden ♦16 | sorry, I was wrong. forgot this road only allows passenger cars in one direction the other one-way road. have a great day! | |
| 4 | 2022-05-28 14:20 | Gazer75 | Road classes in Norway are generally set based on owner, not function.E routes and national roads are trunk, county roads numbered below 999 are primary.You basically set wrong class in Bergen city center. | |
| 119539259 by Gazer75 @ 2022-04-10 14:59 | 1 | 2022-04-10 15:00 | Gazer75 | Big bounding box due to long power lines modified. |
| 119364800 by VLD194 @ 2022-04-06 02:02 | 1 | 2022-04-06 11:38 | Gazer75 | Please do not use Bing in Norway! Only use Norway Orthophoto layer. Other aerials are not properly georectified. Other aerials can be adjusted to fit this layer in case some parts are newer. |
| 118401373 by CallMeDinsdale @ 2022-03-12 15:05 | 1 | 2022-03-16 22:29 | Gazer75 | Please be more specific about what you changed. A single word like this is not acceptable. |
| 117461674 by archie @ 2022-02-16 06:39 | 1 | 2022-02-16 06:43 | archie ♦1,305 | @NKAAfter survey on ground I could not find any hints of the value for the name-tag you inserted in this changeset. I could not find any possible means of this charging station to recieve letters (no post box no person). So why and on what grounds did you insert the name-tag and later on the add... |
| 2 | 2022-02-16 07:30 | NKA ♦247 | Please let us have the discussion in the other changeset.Furthermore, it is bad practice to revert in the middle of a discussion.Here is what you call "a couple of electrical outputs": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_aTV3E9d54I did not introduce the name. That was done in ear... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-16 07:39 | archie ♦1,305 | As I wrote, in contrast to you, I have been at this place. I can verify lots of parking spaces and some electrical outlets. You did a revert regarding the addr-tags in the middle of this discussion. Why then and not now? | |
| 4 | 2022-02-16 09:41 | Gazer75 | And what do you think happens if a user searches for Tesla chargers in the navigation in the car or app? They will just get a long list of Tesla Supercharger and nothing more. How is the user supposed to figure out where they are unless they check each one?The silly on the ground rule is fine fo... | |
| 5 | 2022-02-16 10:03 | archie ♦1,305 | Because osm-tagging differs from GoogleMap-tagging. The other day I had contact w a new mapper who was mapping a camp site. I explained to him/her why tagging a building w name-tag-value "Serivcehus" is more paper-maps or GoogleMaps tagging and that the osm-way of tagging was by tagging b... | |
| 6 | 2022-02-16 10:10 | Gazer75 | Did you even read what I wrote?If the name field only contains "Tesla Supercharger" for all superchargers then a search in navigation will only show a list with that, nothing else.You probably also get the distance to that location, but nothing more.So my question is, how do you kn... | |
| 7 | 2022-02-16 10:13 | archie ♦1,305 | "name field need to be more descriptive." As I explained in the example above the osm-way of tagging is far more descriptive. The information I get from the osm-tagging tells me more about this object than the Googlemap-tagging in name-field "Servicehus". So the on the on the gr... | |
| 8 | 2022-02-16 10:17 | archie ♦1,305 | "Tesla Supercharger" tagged as name? That's the contrary to what I said. Tesla Supercharger is a brandname (look it up at wikidata, you will see). Osm has a special tag for this "brand". | |
| 9 | 2022-02-16 10:20 | Gazer75 | Why are you talking about a building?That is totally different.I'm talking names of chargers and shops/fuel stations that have locations all over the place.If you only put name=St1 in all fuel stations then a search for fuel will return a long list of St1 and nothing else.How do I k... | |
| 10 | 2022-02-16 10:29 | archie ♦1,305 | In order to achive this the osm-tagging schema should be droppet and made Googlemaps like? | |
| 11 | 2022-02-16 10:31 | Gazer75 | In order for the OSM database to be usable we can't do weird things like leave name= blank because we move "Tesla Superchager" to the brand=. Do that and you can't search for the charger at all in navigation systems in cars or phone apps. | |
| 12 | 2022-02-16 10:37 | archie ♦1,305 | Then it's really about wheather to adhere to the osm-tagging schema or to make tagging for developer's of apps. Personally I like the osm-way better. "leave name=blank", well when there is no name you have either the choice of leaving name blank or to invent a phonyname/pseudonam... | |
| 13 | 2022-02-16 10:42 | Gazer75 | No invention needed. Simply use the name the chain uses in its database and/or maps. Those tend to be quite descriptive and good.Tbh I don't care what you do in Sweden as I'm not going there anytime soon. But good to know I should use Google instead if going there :PAt least we got... | |
| 14 | 2022-02-16 11:03 | archie ♦1,305 | Yes I agree with you the geographical references are quite descripive and good but they are not names but references to some geographical surroundings. Modern enterpises don't spend time on giving names to things, they know there are coordinates and geodatabases and ref-numbers. | |
| 15 | 2022-02-17 17:32 | Mathias Haugsbø ♦18 | Modern enterprises give names to all their locations Archie, that is how they communicate what location they are talking about.Adding name="Servicehus" makes perfectly sense if this is what the inhabitants of the campground commonly name that building. Google Maps knows perfectly well ... | |
| 16 | 2022-02-17 18:40 | NKA ♦247 | @archie: I ser nå at du kan ha misforstått "on the ground" regelen. Det er intet krav i OSM om at navnet må stå på et skilt på bakken for å komme med i name=*. Om det hadde vært regelen så kunne vi ikke tagget name=* for en fjelltopp el... | |
| 116493806 by harahu @ 2022-01-23 10:52 | 1 | 2022-02-12 22:13 | Gazer75 | Please don't use site relation for hydro plants. This is more for wind farms. There is no defined main point in the current system so looking up hydro plants using this can cause the center point to be off my many kilometers. Some hydro plants have tunnels and reservoirs in a 100 square km area... |
| 2 | 2022-02-13 10:07 | harahu ♦51 | I see your point. I noticed myself that the rendering in OpenInfraMap ended up looking ugly. Both in terms of center point and surrounding polygon. Nonetheless, I decided not to revert this mapping style, because I feel like it’s the renderer failing rather than the mapping being inaccurate. A... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-13 10:18 | Gazer75 | There is no consensus on this as the site relation never considered the vast areas covered by hydro plants and its tunnels and reservoirs.I have reverted old mapping using site for hydro plants due to this and only used site for wind farms.As long as there is no defined center point for a si... | |
| 4 | 2022-02-13 10:21 | Gazer75 | If a consumer is using generators as center point, what happens if generators are missing? Not all plants have generators defined as they might not be known.Unless there is a proper system for site relation with roles aimed at power plants for each component it is going to be a mess for them to ... | |
| 5 | 2022-02-13 16:42 | harahu ♦51 | Not sure I recognise the vastness of these plants as a problem. That seems to apply to wind farms as well. See for instance this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11343101#map=11/53.9769/1.7080 In fact, it seems this quality of being spread out over a large area is exactly why you might wa... | |
| 6 | 2022-02-14 00:44 | Gazer75 | As you probably figured out, I'm not a fan of mapping hydro power stations as sites regardless. I could maybe accept it if the whole site relation thing was better defined, but probably not.If you want to keep doing it like this I can't stop you, but I'll hand over power mapping. ... | |
| 7 | 2022-02-14 07:34 | harahu ♦51 | I am getting the feeling you're not a big fan, no. I'd love to hear you out on that, though. I know you have far more experience than me with regards to mapping these structures, hence, if you have any thoughts on why you prefer areas over the site relation in this case, in addition to the... | |
| 116448459 by zidel @ 2022-01-21 21:29 | 1 | 2022-01-22 19:22 | Gazer75 | How did you find all the solar panels?I've also noticed that you've misplaced a lot of them because you've completely ignored image perspective. You can't just add the panel on tall buildings right at the the spot in the image if the photo is taken at an angle. |
| 115293853 by Gazer75 @ 2021-12-23 11:23 | 1 | 2021-12-23 11:24 | Gazer75 | Removed a 166km long duplicate 400kV line north of Karlstad causing the large changeset area. |
| 114072196 by simtho @ 2021-11-21 20:28 | 1 | 2021-12-13 02:38 | Gazer75 | Please be more careful when editing things. You managed to change a power=line to higway=path and connected it to several tracks and paths that go under it. |
| 2 | 2021-12-13 08:24 | simtho ♦1 | Hi, thanks for the notice. I`m very sorry for this. It was unintentional, and I was not aware the consequence. And not quite sure how I managed to do so. I tried to add more terrain details with trails and tracks. How do I approach this issue "next time"? Should trail tracks stop when it c... | |
| 3 | 2021-12-13 08:30 | Gazer75 | Just don't place a node at the point the line goes over/under unrelated data. You risk linking them together.I am not very familiar with the iD editor as I went to JOSM early on. In JOSM I can use Ctrl when placing nodes creating a way to keep it from accidentally connecting to nearby ways. | |
| 4 | 2021-12-13 10:31 | simtho ♦1 | Thanks, I looked into the issue and I think I know how now. Except it is difficult to this when a trail follows the powerline. But I will try to avoid this in the future. Tanks again for the notification. | |
| 5 | 2021-12-13 19:26 | Gazer75 | Apparently you can hold Alt when clicking to place node when in way more to avoid connecting to existing elements.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts | |
| 112878947 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-10-23 15:37 | 1 | 2021-12-08 05:05 | Gazer75 | We don't tag all roads that are part of a national highway or E roads as trunk. If its a resting area or bus terminal with limited access it will get the service tag. |
| 113521090 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-11-08 12:40 | 1 | 2021-11-29 23:09 | Gazer75 | Please stop breaking landuse relations. If you don't know how to map with relations, then read up on it and use JOSM that can is much better at dealing with them. |
| 114330073 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-11-28 16:21 | 1 | 2021-11-29 23:04 | Gazer75 | Please don't use garden for residential areas. This is better used for public gardens. It is also conflicting with residential landuse. |
| 113392283 by Gazer75 @ 2021-11-05 03:33 | 1 | 2021-11-12 16:26 | harahu ♦51 | What is the thinking behind this reversion? The reason I modified this junction in the first place was because JOSM complained about power line noes that weren't towers. I agree with JOSM: I don't see it as likely that these power lines are connected in mid air, as opposed to a connect... |
| 2 | 2021-11-12 19:54 | Gazer75 | Lines can have a mid air tap where one crosses over the other. there is no connection like you did. Problem is it is impossible to know for the validator if there should be a tower at a node or not, so you can't remove it. | |
| 3 | 2021-11-12 20:01 | Gazer75 | Hard to find visual examples of this, but here is one close to a streetview: https://goo.gl/maps/cXHLkhVzvFfwpy4V8 | |
| 4 | 2021-11-12 20:05 | Gazer75 | Mid air taps are quite common in those types of junctions actually. The tower on the through line is an anchor termination tower with no connection of the line, so it has to go via the two branch ones to the nearby substation. | |
| 5 | 2021-11-12 20:38 | Gazer75 | Was thinking I would start counting, but if I include 22kV distribution lines then there are probably thousands of taps around the country.Some examples on openinframap:4 taps on this one for the 132kV lines: https://openinframap.org/#17.9/59.276012/9.5436133 taps here: https://openinframap.or... | |
| 6 | 2021-11-15 07:25 | harahu ♦51 | I learnt something new today! Thank you for this thorough and high quality feedback.To me, it seems like it would be natural to have a tag for this; something like `power=tap`. There is no similar tag, as far as I can see. Having one would at least help remove a false positive warning in this ca... | |
| 7 | 2021-11-15 12:09 | Gazer75 | I fully agree we should have a tag for these to help with validation. I'm not that good with formulating things and don't have enough wiki knowledge to add a proposal. | |
| 8 | 2021-11-15 23:16 | harahu ♦51 | I've been digging around and found this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Apower%3DconnectionIt only has status: proposed, but seems fairly uncontroversial, and seems like an exact match for what we're after.I tagged the nodes as suggested in the wiki in this changeset: htt... | |
| 9 | 2021-11-15 23:18 | harahu ♦51 | It doesn't resolve the JOSM warnings, but at least it is a statement that the mapping is as intended, and perhaps the warnings will be resolved this way in future updates. | |
| 10 | 2021-11-15 23:24 | Gazer75 | Nice find!Could probably make a ticket for JOSM asking to add this to validator. It is very much needed.Taginfo shows 2378 uses so far as well, so its not that rare. | |
| 11 | 2021-11-15 23:32 | Gazer75 | https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21566 | |
| 12 | 2021-11-15 23:44 | harahu ♦51 | Thanks! Might want to specify in the ticket that we specifically would like the "Missing power tower/pole within power line" warning to go away when two distinct lines are connected using `power=connection`. They might also want to reword the error message for connected lines without said ... | |
| 113203142 by harahu @ 2021-10-31 17:52 | 1 | 2021-11-02 09:38 | Gazer75 | Make sure to check with all sources before moving roads. Aerials might not be up to date. The segment of highway 13 between the bridge and tunnel was perfect, but you moved it for some reason.If you could revert that part it would be nice.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822323407Nice impor... |
| 2 | 2021-11-02 16:51 | harahu ♦51 | Thank you for catching this! The changes were based on outdated aerials, as you seem to have suspected.I have now corrected the road based on N50 (the iD layer, which seems to be a lot more detailed than N50). It seems to look more or less like I remember it from before I touched it.Feel fre... | |
| 3 | 2021-11-02 22:05 | Gazer75 | The "kartverket road network" overlay is the best one to use. Its a bit spotty with iD as the sever don't like to many requests at once.The N50 layer is actually currently showing way to much. It's supposed to be 1:50000 max. The resolution it's currently showing we are ... | |
| 4 | 2021-11-02 22:17 | Gazer75 | Also keep in mind we might have used plan drawings to add a road that is not yet in the official Kartverket road database. These are often found on road project websites.If you don't find a match, ask the previous editor first.The Norway Orthophoto layer should never be older than around ... | |
| 5 | 2021-11-04 09:51 | harahu ♦51 | > The resolution it's currently showing we are not legally allowed to use. Keep that in mind.Fair point, and I'll keep that in mind until the layer is mended. Although in this particular case I assume there isn't any difference between this source and other sources we would be ... | |
| 6 | 2021-11-04 09:57 | harahu ♦51 | Am done mending most trivial issues resulting from the Vik import, btw. So if you have any feeling of ownership to the area, please have a look and see if there is anything you want to address, post import.The import has taken quite a bit of effort, so will take a break for the next couple of we... | |
| 110765394 by BJKavan @ 2021-09-05 20:58 | 1 | 2021-10-30 05:44 | Gazer75 | Why did you add fictional lines inside the power station at Three Gorges Dam? |
| 112463579 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-10-13 13:51 | 1 | 2021-10-21 11:07 | Gazer75 | Trur du har misforstått gang og sykkelveg som er segregert. Kopling til Flyplassvege ved Meyerskiftet busstopp er neppe rett. Dei som skal bort til til nummer 32 og 36 må faktisk køyre via Grimseidvegen og så inn på Siljustølsvegen. Så via gang og sykk... |
| 110811332 by Edelsalami @ 2021-09-06 16:09 | 1 | 2021-10-15 12:52 | Gazer75 | Please do not mess with the power lines if you don't know what you're doing. This 132kV line is new and have no connection to the 22kV distribution network below it. The towers are placed based on new Aviation obstacle data available as a layer in editor. |
| 2 | 2021-10-15 13:06 | Edelsalami ♦106 | And a good day to you as well. A simple mistake, that is. It looked like a reasonable connection at that time. Thanks for correcting it. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-15 13:12 | Gazer75 | Sorry if I came on a bit direct. Had to deal with random people breaking the power grid over the years. To be honest if you think connecting a 132kV line to a 22kV tower/pole sounds reasonable, then you don't know what you're doing ;) There is a big difference in size on towers/poles betwe... | |
| 4 | 2021-10-15 13:24 | Edelsalami ♦106 | No worries. Yeah, that's true. But I can't see any poles of the high voltage line on the imagery, it's just so blurry... so there's that ;) I'll be more careful in the future. | |
| 5 | 2021-10-15 13:36 | Gazer75 | Norway Orthophoto imagery should not be blurry. But they can be a few years old in some cases. The low res images are 0.25m refreshed every 5 years. Higher res is 0.1m or better and is more random. Current image for this area is from 2018, and the line was completed in 2019/20 I believe.You can ... | |
| 6 | 2021-10-15 13:44 | Gazer75 | A tip, there are another two 132k lines just north of that spot which would show typical H tower size for this voltage level.I use multiple sources/layers available to keep lines up to date. Imagery, Karverket DOM, Aviation obstacle and NVE data. Unfortunately the DOM and DTM layers don't w... | |
| 109956063 by mikkolukas @ 2021-08-19 22:14 Active block | 1 | 2021-10-05 18:51 | Gazer75 | Please revert the Bergen light rail back to its original tag. It is not a tram as it is fully signaled and on dedicated track for most of the line. |
| 2 | 2021-10-05 19:51 | Gazer75 | And please do not mess with access tags if you do not know how they work in Norway. Agnes Mowinckels gate has a sign forbidding general motor vehicles except buses. the access=no tag is not used here unless its forbidden for all traffic modes. You effectively blocked walking and biking on the road. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-08 14:49 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2021-10-08 14:55 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2021-10-08 15:19 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2021-10-08 15:26 | Gazer75 | People tag for the renderer by using the banket tags. Its only access= values that show up on the map. So you end up with a bunch of overrides making the tag list unnecessary long.Norwegian sign 306.1 should be tagged a motor_vehicle=noIf i left some tags stating use sidepath, then that is an ... | |
| 7 | 2021-10-09 07:56 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | The Bergen Light Rail is surely a light rail. I'm sure this discussion is in another changeset some years ago and it was agreed.Parts of the rail can be on thing and parts cant be another, it should all be the same | |
| 8 | 2021-10-09 10:15 | Wulfmorn ♦193 | "I assume the law states that foot and bicycle MUST use the provided cycleways/sidewalks, when they are available, right?"No, it does not. Not in Norway. | |
| 9 | 2021-10-09 10:31 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2021-10-09 19:46 | Wulfmorn ♦193 | That's hardly the case here though. I don't see why you would insist on different rail-types for different parts of the Bybanen-network. It's a closed system. | |
| 11 | 2021-10-10 10:54 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 12 | 2021-10-10 11:20 | Wulfmorn ♦193 | I'm saying nothing is connected. | |
| 13 | 2022-05-15 02:09 | voiden ♦16 | I det siste har EnTur hatt problemer med å vise Bybanestrekningen skikkelig. Om et reiseforslag inneholder bybanen, er det store deler av strekningen kun rette linjer i stedet for en kurve som følger sporet. Det kan godt være at inndeling av sporet i tram og light rail er år... | |
| 14 | 2022-05-15 09:15 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Det er Skyss sitt ansvar å levere slike data, men de bruker OSM i sitt planverktøy, så ja, det kan være problemer. Jeg skal sjekke med Skyss om de opplever utfordringer. | |
| 63717159 by Gazer75 @ 2018-10-21 00:57 | 1 | 2021-09-28 09:47 | Leonard Ehrenfried ♦17 | Are the woods near Bergen city centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4824384) really this square? |
| 2 | 2021-09-28 10:45 | Gazer75 | The N50 data is made up of areas. Someone destroyed the wood relation south of it so it looks weird. I'll fix that. | |
| 3 | 2021-09-28 11:20 | Leonard Ehrenfried ♦17 | Thanks a lot! | |
| 110765536 by BJKavan @ 2021-09-05 21:05 | 1 | 2021-09-12 18:28 | Gazer75 | Why did you add fictitious power lines at the dam? Please don't do that. |
| 109697816 by Varpino @ 2021-08-15 11:40 | 1 | 2021-08-29 11:24 | Kokosnøtt ♦6 | Why did you make this a motorway? This road doesn't have motorway status. |
| 2 | 2021-09-01 18:23 | Gazer75 | Fixed it now. Use access tags, not highway class in the future. | |
| 3 | 2021-09-01 19:49 | Varpino ♦1 | I made it a "motorway" cause that was the first thing in the list that made sense, or was even remotely close to being what it is. We're not allowed to use bikes, mopeds or tractors in that section up until it connects with 4454. Nor are we allowed to stop/turn. Same goes for a small ... | |
| 4 | 2021-09-01 20:08 | Gazer75 | Road class in OSM is set based on what kind of road it is. You can look at the wiki for this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways There is also a page for the default access restrictions for each highway class. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restric... | |
| 5 | 2021-09-01 20:15 | Gazer75 | Added the foot and bicycle restrictions on fv510 as well now so it should be all good. | |
| 110041048 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-08-21 20:17 | 1 | 2021-08-22 10:40 | Gazer75 | Please don't use areas for highway tags it confuses routers that end up using the edge of the area at times.There are other tags for outlining highway areas.You also made a duplicate at the helipad by adding an area over the node.You can draw the outline of the helipad and use that tag, b... |
| 110040031 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-08-21 19:35 | 1 | 2021-08-22 10:31 | Gazer75 | The ways around the school should probably be highway=footway or cycleway.The pedestrian value is used for "gågate" or a square in towns/cities.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways |
| 109931435 by Gazer75 @ 2021-08-19 12:15 | 1 | 2021-08-21 19:18 | Kokosnøtt ♦6 | The stretch of road (Borgavegen) between Hegglandsdalsvegen and Nordmarka is now wider after a road reconstruction that was completed in the winter of 2021. This part of Borgavegen has never been steep at all. Would this part have "tertiary standard" or must the whole road between Hjelle a... |
| 2 | 2021-08-21 20:59 | Gazer75 | Tertiary is not really set in stone for Norway so some put it on a lot of roads.Use of tertiary might encourage more through traffic on roads depending on the router used for the app or website.I believe some routers actually ignore tertiary due to the variation in use cases.I've become m... | |
| 3 | 2021-08-22 09:43 | Kokosnøtt ♦6 | Borgavegen didn't get a separate foot- and cycleway. I think you have better experience when it comes to road classification since you have been editing on osm for longer than me. | |
| 109651361 by SherbetS @ 2021-08-13 22:43 | 1 | 2021-08-14 03:29 | Gazer75 | Please explain the reason for this change. They were tagged as communication_tower for a reason. |
| 2 | 2021-08-14 17:40 | NKA ♦247 | This is a unwanted and undiscussed mass edit. The towers in question are the largest and the main communication towers ("hovedsendere") in Norway, which constitute the core radio network. | |
| 3 | 2021-08-15 01:47 | SherbetS ♦155 | can you point to any particular towers that were incorrectly tagged? I tried my best to match the data to the information on the wiki. | |
| 4 | 2021-08-15 01:52 | Gazer75 | You changed them all from communication_tower to tower. Those two are not the same. The wiki is kind of confusing on this unfortunately.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower | |
| 5 | 2021-08-15 02:41 | SherbetS ♦155 | in my interpretation, a tower is a structure with places to stand, while a communications tower is a tower that is greater than 100 meters tall. I downloaded all the objects with man_made=communications_tower and changed any that I found didn’t meet this specification. | |
| 6 | 2021-08-15 05:02 | NKA ♦247 | The 100 meters mentioned in the wiki is just an indication, not a strict limit. Your mechanical edit has destroyed a carefully curated selection of special communication towers in OSM for Norway.I am going to revert this changeset. Bye. | |
| 7 | 2021-08-15 19:28 | SherbetS ♦155 | okay. | |
| 107635966 by Mikael Balto Størkersen @ 2021-07-08 12:27 | 1 | 2021-07-08 17:33 | Gazer75 | Velkommen til OSM. Eit tips: flytt heller gammal node og ikkje rediger adresse nodar som er automatisk importert frå Kartverket. Grunnen er at mange plassar kan det vere fleire personar/bedrifter på samme adresse. |
| 106176844 by mtbboy1993 @ 2021-06-10 20:24 | 1 | 2021-06-16 15:25 | Gazer75 | Hei, vær snill å ikkje ta knekken på lancover relasjonar når du redigerer. |
| 103948739 by Kokosnøtt @ 2021-05-01 09:35 | 1 | 2021-06-14 22:21 | Gazer75 | Please don't map residential and private properties like these as leisure=garden. This is more for public gardens |
| 96621711 by harahu @ 2020-12-29 19:11 | 1 | 2021-06-07 18:21 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | Dear harahu, in this changeset you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889782930 which leads down westwards from Burkelandsfjellet. Are you local to the area - can you confirm that this path is legal to use and does not cross private property? |
| 2 | 2021-06-08 00:00 | harahu ♦51 | woodpeck, for uncultivated land specifically, right to roam is given by law in Norway: https://lovdata.no/lov/1957-06-28-16/§2Hence, whether or not this is private property isn't a concern, as long as you show appropriate care and respect for said property. | |
| 3 | 2021-06-08 23:31 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | The reason I wrote is that DWG has received a complaint from a land owner that says: "In Norwegian Friluftslov people are not allowed through farms and private roads. These paths are not marked and not in official maps". I am not familiar with local laws. Will it be sufficient to send them... | |
| 4 | 2021-06-08 23:33 | woodpeck ♦2,431 | (It is currently unclear to me exactly which of the paths leading down from Burkelandsfjellet they have a problem with.) | |
| 5 | 2021-06-09 07:53 | harahu ♦51 | Given a complaint has been issued, I feel obliged to help you resolve the matter to the best of my abilities. Although it is not clear which specific trail the complainant is referring to, I am responsible for most trails on the mountain, so I am probably the person to get in touch with anyway. I am... | |
| 6 | 2021-06-09 14:32 | harahu ♦51 | CONTINUED:My reading of the complaint is that they take issue with some section of path, or road, that crosses "innmark" (cultivated land), as I can see no conceivable argument as to why access should be restricted on the parts of these trails that cross uncultivated land. Hence, I ass... | |
| 7 | 2021-06-09 15:08 | harahu ♦51 | I found an English translation of the Outdoor Recreation Act (or Friluftslov) that both me and the complaint is referring to. The translation is not considered official, but is written by the government, and more or less conveys the information content of the Norwegian law: https://www.regjeringen... | |
| 8 | 2021-06-14 21:11 | Gazer75 | This area where the path is is considered uncultivated land and the freedom to roam applies. There is no law forbidding people to walk this path. Even if its not marked it can be naturally created by people walking the same path over and over. This is what highway=path is used for in Norway, natural... | |
| 105358185 by Vegard Skjefstad @ 2021-05-26 12:34 | 1 | 2021-05-26 13:48 | Gazer75 | Ikkje endre på addressenodar som er langt inn automatisk. Lag heller ein ny node med bedrift og anna info. |
| 2 | 2021-05-26 13:50 | Gazer75 | Ei adresse kan ha fleire firma, så difor er det ikkje smart å bruke desse nodane. Dei er henta frå kartverket og blir automatisk oppdatert. | |
| 100524462 by BenRune @ 2021-03-06 07:51 | 1 | 2021-03-17 14:43 | Gazer75 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please be careful when editing landcover relations in the future. You made a pretty big mess of things. I have hopefully fixed it all and properly mapped the golf course area. |
| 100799087 by Olav Stornes @ 2021-03-10 20:11 | 1 | 2021-03-11 00:44 | Gazer75 | Please undo this. They have started work on this road now. |
| 2 | 2021-03-11 00:46 | Gazer75 | I reverted this actually. Please do not delete data without discussion first. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-11 00:49 | Gazer75 | In case you wonder...https://www.nyeveier.no/prosjekter/e6-trondelag/e6-ranheim-vaernes/nyhetssaker-om-e6-ranheim-vaernes/ | |
| 4 | 2021-03-11 07:46 | Olav Stornes ♦2 | I stand corrected then. Sorry about that | |
| 100405922 by FennecusZerda @ 2021-03-04 08:59 | 1 | 2021-03-05 16:24 | Gazer75 | Taggen motorroad=yes impliserer foot=no og bicycle=no så det lagar berre meir unødvendig tagging. Er ruteren sitt ansvar å lese denne taggen først. |
| 2 | 2021-03-06 10:58 | TrondSBuskerudbyen ♦4 | Beklager. Det visste jeg ikke. Kan rette på det. Takk for tilbakemelding. | |
| 100346212 by Ghostrider_88 @ 2021-03-03 11:28 | 1 | 2021-03-03 12:03 | Gazer75 | Hei, velkomen til OSM. Husa du redigerte var heilt fine frå før og er feil no. Må tenke på perspektivet i bildet og ikkje berre sjå på taket. Kartverket DOM visar ofte eit betre bilde av omriss. Endring av vegnavn og posisjon på adresser vil ha liten effekt... |
| 2 | 2021-03-03 12:49 | Ghostrider_88 ♦1 | Hei. Har da gjort endringer igjen og brukt Kartverket DOM, har bedt om review for å være sikker på at det blir korrekt igjen. | |
| 3 | 2021-03-03 13:08 | Gazer75 | Ser betre ut no ja :) Ein funksjon du har i høgre klikk menyen er å rette opp bygget så alle hjørnene er 90 grader. Veldig fint så lenge bygget har kun rette vinklar.Vil anbefale å sjå på JOSM editor om du vil redigere meir seriøst i OSM. ... | |
| 100198910 by Epas AS @ 2021-03-01 11:03 | 1 | 2021-03-01 11:30 | Gazer75 | Hei, velkomen til OSM. Tok og fiksa litt på tagginga av butikken. Adresse nodar i OSM er automatisk oppdatert frå kartverket og bør ikkje endrast på. Lag ny node for butikken. |
| 98408027 by aytfadc @ 2021-01-30 10:29 | 1 | 2021-01-30 22:07 | Gazer75 | What is the point of adding int_ref to roads where ref and int_ref is the same? At least use proper numbers on single digit digit refs like E 1-9. They do not have a leading 0. |
| 2 | 2021-02-06 11:01 | aytfadc ♦17 | ref and int_ref do not refer to the same thing,int_ref is a European road network https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:int_ref https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Europe/E-road_network) https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/MapAGR2007.pdf http://ra.osmsu... | |
| 3 | 2021-02-06 11:15 | Gazer75 | Norway, Sweden and Demark have all incorporated the E route numbering so any E route is signed as such and have no other number.What "standardization"? The E route network has clearly defined single digit numbers with no leading zero. You're basically tagging a value that doesn'... | |
| 97958241 by LMadeleine @ 2021-01-22 08:37 | 1 | 2021-02-03 21:58 | Gazer75 | Setting access=private will prevent all routing to those places. Living street is also only used where the street is signposted with "gatetun" sign. Please read the wiki on mapping. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways |
| 97715070 by LMadeleine @ 2021-01-18 18:24 | 1 | 2021-02-03 20:55 | Gazer75 | Please return 557 to primary. This is a county road and thus a primary, not trunk. Please read the wiki on proper tagging of highways in Norway. |
| 98437053 by oarn @ 2021-01-31 06:12 | 1 | 2021-02-02 15:07 | Gazer75 | Har denne stien vore vurdert juridisk? Allemannsretten kan nok trumfe her sidan den går på grensa mellom to hytter. |
| 2 | 2021-02-02 16:49 | oarn ♦5 | Det er klarert med kommunen, ettersom det mange andre muligheter ut i terrenget, og det er regulert som hyttefelt. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-02 17:18 | Gazer75 | Bør sette opp skilt med privat sti og vedtaket frå kommunen då. Stien er der visuelt så den skal vere i OSM men med access=private ;) | |
| 4 | 2021-02-02 17:42 | Tractor ♦40 | Har kommunen fattet vedtak? | |
| 96092285 by Jarovr @ 2020-12-18 22:10 | 1 | 2021-01-22 22:40 | Gazer75 | Please stop adding a big box with residential for Austrepollen. There is no such thing. Austrepollen is a road name and a bay, not a residential area. |
| 2 | 2021-01-23 08:08 | Jarovr ♦1 | I live in this village, so I think I know very good what the name of this residential area is. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-23 11:05 | Gazer75 | That doesn't change the official fact that there is no residential area or village name in Kartverket data. If you feel there should be then complain to them. | |
| 4 | 2021-01-23 11:07 | Gazer75 | Residential areas are also used as lancover for just that, a built up residential area, not for making a big random square over other landcover types like you do. | |
| 5 | 2021-01-23 11:10 | Gazer75 | The hamlet is actually called Mauranger in Kartverket data. https://www.norgeskart.no/#!?project=norgeskart&layers=1002&zoom=14&lat=6697662.11&lon=18986.49&sok=mauranger&markerLat=6697662.110554731&markerLon=18986.487201736483&panel=searchOptionsPanelhttps://stadn... | |
| 6 | 2021-01-23 18:13 | Jarovr ♦1 | First of all. I live in the village Austrepollen. There are several villages in the region Mauranger. Kartverket has put the name Austrepollen in the bay, because the name means «the east bay». It is like the city York which means also «bay» (old name Jorvik). It still refers... | |
| 7 | 2021-01-23 18:17 | Gazer75 | Complain to the municipality and/or Kartverket if you feel its wrong. We kind of have to follow the official data if OSM is to be taken serious by gov. agencies and more. | |
| 8 | 2021-01-23 18:29 | Gazer75 | Best option we can do in OSM for cases like this would be to add a node with place=hamlet + name=Mauranger + alt_name=Austrepollen. The node would then be put at the SSR location for Mauranger at the intersection between fv49 and fv500. | |
| 9 | 2021-01-24 20:33 | Jarovr ♦1 | Hello. Yes, I need to write a note to Kartverket that Mauranger is wrongly put in some of the ratios of the map. If you zoom out long enough you can see that Mauranger cover more villages. Interesting about the node you are writing about, is that possible to do? How could it be fixed that Austrepoll... | |
| 10 | 2021-01-24 20:57 | Gazer75 | It would be just like the farm names in the area basically. A point on the map. How maps and apps choose to use an alt_name or loc_name depends on them. Usually i would say Mauranger as that is the main name. Places are not really defined as areas in OSM, but rather as points on the map. One... | |
| 11 | 2021-01-24 21:40 | Jarovr ♦1 | A couple of months ago I wrote to Kartverket because the farm name "Gjerde" was put in SSR as hamlet, and not farm name. They changed that, but instead they have put the regional name "Mauranger" as a hamlet name, which is wrong. Austrepollen they have put as the name of the bay ... | |
| 12 | 2021-01-24 21:46 | Gazer75 | I think maybe Snapchat uses a 3rd party supplier of data. Someone told me it might be Mapbox, and they update their data from OSM very rarely these days as they wanted oversight to avoid bad data.So even if we do a change in the map it might take months or years. I've seen maps in media based... | |
| 13 | 2021-01-24 21:56 | Jarovr ♦1 | Yes, you are right. Mapbox delivers online map solutions for Facebook and Snapchat, which is again based on OSM. So a change in OSM will lead to a change in Mapbox and again to Snapchat. Even if it takes some time, it is worth a try? Would you help me with this? | |
| 14 | 2021-01-24 22:02 | Gazer75 | I'll add a place node at the intersection that uses Austrepollen as main name and Mauranger as alt name. Please contact municipality or and/or kartverket and make a case for name change or something for this. For a name change I believe the municipality has to do it. If you gather more people i... | |
| 15 | 2021-01-24 22:09 | Jarovr ♦1 | Ok, yes thank you. I am going to do that. I am currently working with GISLine and a project with local place names and also I am in the board of Mauranger bygdalag (regional organization), so I will make a case through that. | |
| 96550341 by LMadeleine @ 2020-12-28 17:07 | 1 | 2020-12-28 18:37 | Gazer75 | There is no int_ref for this road as its a country road with number 546. Please remove the int_ref from Fanavegen. |
| 95708663 by dembei @ 2020-12-12 00:12 | 1 | 2020-12-20 21:04 | Gazer75 | You are breaking several land cover relations with your edits. Suggest using JOSM editor that is better at dealing with these. Also try reducing the areas you edit in the beginning. |
| 96094544 by dembei @ 2020-12-19 00:07 | 1 | 2020-12-19 20:13 | Gazer75 | Why keep changing this from official plans? The final road will be imported from NVDB when its done anyway. |
| 95330987 by plasn @ 2020-12-05 11:48 | 1 | 2020-12-08 16:42 | Gazer75 | Why are you setting this as construction? Did they actually start on the last part if the ring road?Haven't heard anything about this on relevant project sites. |
| 2 | 2021-03-10 19:58 | Olav Stornes ♦2 | This has incorrect roads for construction from Stjørdal - Trondheim as well | |
| 94980247 by plasn @ 2020-11-29 11:39 | 1 | 2020-12-03 07:49 | Gazer75 | Why was this changed to construction? |
| 94283822 by plasn @ 2020-11-17 14:13 | 1 | 2020-12-01 23:58 | Gazer75 | Any documentation on changing this to motorway? As far as I know this road is not a motorway yet if it will ever be. The description is also not good. |
| 93438844 by Andre68 @ 2020-11-02 20:00 | 1 | 2020-11-03 14:13 | Gazer75 | Thank you. No idea how I managed to delete the tag on the part 5 of the import work. I'll check the entire municipality for errors with OSM Inspector or similar when its all done. |
| 93126896 by Bjørnardale @ 2020-10-27 14:13 | 1 | 2020-10-27 14:57 | Gazer75 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Please do not attach things to the address nodes as they are updated from Kartverket via scripts. |
| 92857657 by salvapost @ 2020-10-21 23:30 | 1 | 2020-10-22 02:10 | Gazer75 | Welcome to OSM. Please do not modify the address nodes in OSM for Norway. They are added and maintained via official cadastre database. Make a new point with the data for shops. |
| 92670259 by S-Klasse_import @ 2020-10-18 21:34 | 1 | 2020-10-18 22:23 | Gazer75 | Did you check wiki before doing N50 imports? This is not the proper way to do this. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway#Framgangsm.C3.A5te |
| 2 | 2020-10-19 07:25 | NKA ♦247 | Please revert your import. It needs to follow the approved import process.You will need to use the prepared multipolygons which ensures that there will not be overlapping lines between the various natural and landuse features such as wood, wetland, lakes, farmland etc. You also need to run the N... | |
| 92495543 by Rsmall @ 2020-10-14 23:00 | 1 | 2020-10-14 23:05 | Gazer75 | Welcome to OSM. Make sure you do not use Bing in Norway it is inaccurate. Use the preferred imagery Norway Orthophoto |
| 2 | 2020-10-15 06:57 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Also I'm guessing the HOT tags shouldn't be on your changeset in Norway | |
| 3 | 2020-10-15 06:57 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | For clarity, these: " #hotosm-project-5766 #kenya #missingmaps #measles #redcross " | |
| 91171752 by aarfie @ 2020-09-20 10:46 | 1 | 2020-09-22 10:45 | Gazer75 | Data er tatt frå Forsvaret sin database, så om det er feil så bør dette meldast inn til dei. https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/forsvarets-skyte--og-oevingsfelt-land/3d0fe246-ae76-4e88-af1f-c0b0405e83c1 |
| 91249211 by Zo0r @ 2020-09-21 20:44 | 1 | 2020-09-22 00:25 | Gazer75 | This is actually wrong. This spelling was declined in the official name database and "Dalssætra" is the proper spelling. https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/187666 |
| 65915278 by Gazer75 @ 2018-12-31 15:22 | 1 | 2020-09-19 12:02 | Mike Raust ♦81 | Have you checked for consistency or just retagged without manual oversight?If an area was tagged as power=generator this fix introduced new errors. |
| 2 | 2020-09-19 12:07 | Gazer75 | Just fixed the errors of mixing generator and plant in same object. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-19 12:16 | Gazer75 | It's a long time ago so not sure if I went to wikipedia or some other sites to verify, but I do that often to make sure. I never just grab a bunch of elements and retag them. | |
| 91046603 by Sacajawea @ 2020-09-17 12:10 | 1 | 2020-09-19 06:19 | Gazer75 | Please undo this mapping in Norway, it is illegal to do full circuit mapping here. You also deleted the MP relations on several power infrastructures and replaced them with closed polygon destroying my detailed mappings. |
| 91045485 by Bogusmil @ 2020-09-17 11:51 | 1 | 2020-09-18 05:23 | Gazer75 | Stop or you'll get reported for vandalism. This is no joke. And nothing political. |
| 2 | 2020-09-18 05:27 | Gazer75 | And to be fair the guy deleted my mapping first for no reason. | |
| 90997782 by build @ 2020-09-16 16:27 | 1 | 2020-09-17 05:50 | Gazer75 | Why did you edit the landuses and remove the relations? This is not how we map in Norway. Areas are built from multipoly relations and not closed areas sharing ways. |
| 90829673 by npais2706 @ 2020-09-13 19:46 | 1 | 2020-09-14 02:45 | Gazer75 | Pleaase do not attach roads to power infrastructure like wind turbines. |
| 2 | 2020-09-14 13:08 | npais2706 ♦1 | Understood @Gazer75Apologies, I will redo the access roads and be careful not to attach them to the turbines. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-14 13:28 | Gazer75 | Its good practice to not connect items that are usually not related in any way. Like landcover, roads, buildings and so on.Makes it very hard to filter out things when editing dense data areas using more advanced editors, like JOSM, when things are connected.Roads like these will get updated f... | |
| 4 | 2020-09-14 13:32 | npais2706 ♦1 | Understood. I am a newbie here, eager to start contributing in this world. Appreciate the constructive feedback. | |
| 90779824 by Fridus @ 2020-09-11 22:46 | 1 | 2020-09-11 23:09 | Gazer75 | Ver snill å legg in fullstending forklaring på kva du har endra. Å berre sette et lite tegn er ikkje akseptabelt. |
| 90722120 by Alf Jacob Tveit @ 2020-09-10 20:46 | 1 | 2020-09-10 21:15 | Reitstoen ♦43 | Openstreetmap er ingen tulle-side.Vennligst fiks! |
| 2 | 2020-09-10 21:21 | Gazer75 | Reversert edit... | |
| 89814124 by Morten Lange @ 2020-08-23 16:12 | 1 | 2020-09-08 14:42 | Gazer75 | This is not how you map a dam :) |
| 2 | 2020-09-08 16:02 | Morten Lange ♦57 | Takk. Bedre nå? / Tanks. Do you se an improvement? | |
| 3 | 2020-09-08 20:25 | Gazer75 | Tok og fiksa litt meir detaljert ;) | |
| 4 | 2020-09-08 21:48 | Morten Lange ♦57 | Takk skal du ha :- ) | |
| 88351518 by Gazer75 @ 2020-07-22 13:13 | 1 | 2020-08-20 14:59 | gormur ♦119 | Norge i bilder er feil... Bommen ble flyttet en rundkjøring nordover før tunnelen åpnet...https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/qLd1GE/bomstasjon-pa-motorveien-er-flyttetOgså observert i terreng. |
| 2 | 2020-08-21 20:23 | Gazer75 | Ahh, ja ser det holet i bomringen om den står der :)Brukte bilder og NVDB og rekna med det var rett. | |
| 82762549 by gormur @ 2020-03-28 19:41 | 1 | 2020-07-22 13:51 | Gazer75 | Please do not split roads at toll gantries, The tagging of direction=forward or backward is the way to do these. Split roads are only were there is a physical barrier/kerb. |
| 88169443 by 7rst1 @ 2020-07-18 07:46 | 1 | 2020-07-18 11:32 | Gazer75 | Hei, du bør lese deg opp på tagging av slike. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies |
| 2 | 2020-07-18 11:35 | 7rst1 ♦13 | Rart jeg ikke har sett dette tidligere. Takk for tipset. Skal tagge om de jeg har kartlagt i nærområdet. | |
| 3 | 2020-07-18 12:11 | Gazer75 | Hugs også på at NVE sine data er kun i 1:50000 skala, så veldig enkle og ofte feil. Spesielt for gamle data. Ein må ta ein gjetting på kor trykksjakta(penstock) startar sidan desse ikkje er merka spesielt. | |
| 87413730 by daghb @ 2020-07-01 18:11 | 1 | 2020-07-17 13:43 | Gazer75 | Du kan berre fjerne toll taggen. Er overflødig å la den stå som toll=no ;) |
| 2 | 2020-07-18 17:46 | daghb ♦2 | Gjort - ja, det var bare toill :) | |
| 83243090 by Bolleknott @ 2020-04-08 09:13 | 1 | 2020-07-05 13:45 | Gazer75 | Ikkje legg inn desse som farmland. Dei alle fleste kart vil bli feil då dei trur heile området er dyrka mark. Slike historiske områder er lite eigna i OSM. Eg har alt fjerna landuse på dei. |
| 85033553 by Roy Samuelsen @ 2020-05-11 15:35 | 1 | 2020-05-19 18:54 | Gazer75 | Kvifor har du endra vegnummer til gamle verdiar? Alle sekundære fylkesvegar har fått nye nummer. Vi brukar heller ikkje "FV" framfor i ref=* |
| 2 | 2020-05-19 22:34 | Roy Samuelsen ♦2 | Ny veinummer har jeg ikke fått med meg, var overbevist om at det var feil. Har rettet det opp, takk for tilbakemelding :) | |
| 3 | 2020-05-20 03:36 | Gazer75 | Etter samanslåing av fylke og kommunar var eit faktum vart det sett i gang eit arbeid med å ordne opp i vegnummer. No er alle nummer unike for heile landet. Dei gamle opphavlege fylkesvegane fekk fire siffer. Det som var "øvrige riksvegar" før 2010 og som har vore... | |
| 4 | 2020-05-20 03:39 | Gazer75 | Går du inn på vegkart.no så ser du data frå NVDB (Nasjonal Vegdatabank). På https://www.vegvesen.no/fag/teknologi/nasjonal+vegdatabank/vegreferansesystem/nye-vegnummer ser du info om endringar i vegnummer. | |
| 85458054 by Roy Samuelsen @ 2020-05-19 18:53 | 1 | 2020-05-19 19:02 | Gazer75 | Justering av adresser har lite for seg då dette vert oppdatert frå Matrikklen. Er det feil så kan du melde dette på rettikartet.no |
| 2 | 2020-05-19 22:35 | Roy Samuelsen ♦2 | Bra du sier i fra, har bare justert litt på posisjon så de passer med huset, er det også noe som det ikke nytter å justere på? | |
| 3 | 2020-05-20 03:25 | Gazer75 | Litt usikker på korleis scriptet taklar små justeringar. Skal få NKA til å kommentere på dette. Det er han som styrer kontoen for denne importen. | |
| 4 | 2020-05-20 05:21 | NKA ♦247 | Veldig små justeringer blir oversett. Kartverket plasserer nodene i nærheten av inngangsdøren, som en hovedregel. | |
| 83966607 by gormur @ 2020-04-23 00:47 | 1 | 2020-04-23 21:09 | Gazer75 | Huske på at det er highway=toll_gantry for autopass stasjonar. highway=toll_booth er for manuelle ;) |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 09:38 | gormur ♦119 | Ja, var nok annet holde styr på... Har f.eks ikke funnet nye vegnummer på "Motorveien" mellom Madlaveien og Ullandhaugveien.Du er selvfølgelig velkommen til å fikse :) | |
| 3 | 2020-04-24 17:00 | Gazer75 | Viktigaste er at vegnettet er på plass. Resten vil kome etter kvart som NVDB er oppdatert. Stavanger ser ut til å ta nye flyfoto kvart år i april så dei vil nok dukke opp til vinteren ein gong når dei er klare. | |
| 83520399 by KongsdalSan @ 2020-04-14 08:49 | 1 | 2020-04-16 16:43 | Gazer75 | There is no way a solar array like that is capable of 8500 MW. Where did you get those figures? |
| 2 | 2020-04-17 04:39 | osmviborg ♦1,647 | Estimated annual production. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-17 09:25 | KongsdalSan ♦3 | Om solvarmeanlægget i Høng• Anlægsstart: Oktober 2018• Forventet idriftsættelse: Maj 2019• Solfangerareal: 20.034 m2• Beregnet årlig produktion: 8.500 MWh• Antal alm. parcelhuses årlige behov dækket: 470 (standardhuse 18... | |
| 4 | 2020-04-17 10:04 | osmviborg ♦1,647 | @KongsdalSan. 'This value should be the peak rated output capacity'. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:plant:output&uselang=da Derfor er det forkert. | |
| 5 | 2020-04-17 11:31 | Gazer75 | The average production per year do not have a key in OSM, only the peak capacity. There is a difference between energy (MWh) and Power (MW). From reading the article this array is also not producing electricity directly to end user. Its probably providing power to an electrical heater supplementing ... | |
| 6 | 2020-04-17 11:49 | Gazer75 | Some more searches seem to indicate the entire Høng Varmeværk has a peak of 14MW hot water, and this is not changing with the addition of this solar array. Those will only allow for around 20% less biomass burning. | |
| 82451170 by cck @ 2020-03-21 02:39 | 1 | 2020-03-21 07:30 | NKA ♦247 | Slike reverts skal diskuteres først, ikke bare gjennomføres. Importen la inn mange hundre nye veier. Du har ødelagt mange timers arbeid her.Kan du gi eksempler på hva som skulle rettferdiggjøre en slik omfattende revert? |
| 2 | 2020-03-21 07:36 | cck ♦3 | Hei NKA, jeg akkurat skrev en direktemelding til deg. Som jeg skrev, var det dessverre ikke mye å disktuere i dette tilfelle. Importen er i strid med prosjektplanen.Følger opp per direktemelding med eksempler, siden changeset comments tilbyr ikke Markdown. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-21 07:50 | NKA ♦247 | Jeg vil gjerne at denne diskusjonen skal være offentlig. Her er det du skrev:Hei NKA, takk for at du nylig prøvde å kjøre NVDB-import her i Kvinnherad.Jeg var dessverre nødt til å reverte importen. Dette fordi denne importen ødela mange verdifull... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-21 07:55 | NKA ♦247 | Du har ikke gitt ett eneste eksempel, så det er umulig å ta stilling til ditt påståtte grunnlag for å gjøre revert, annet enn at du tydeligvis ikke liker at noen importerer i kommunen din.Importen jeg gjennomførte la til 2600 nye veier som ikke var der... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-21 09:27 | cck ♦3 | Jeg har ingenting imot å være offentlig, men som sagt er disse changeset comments dårlig egnet til kompleks kommunikasjon. La oss tar dette til mailinglisten.https://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2020-March/thread.htmlJeg innser nå at jeg har handlet i feil rekkef&osla... | |
| 6 | 2020-03-21 15:20 | Gazer75 | Det smarte var om du hadde gitt beskjed om at Kvinnherad skulle takast av lokale folk manuelt. Ved å sette nokon som ansvarleg på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)/Progress så ville det ikkje vore problem. | |
| 7 | 2020-03-21 19:03 | cck ♦3 | @Gazer75:Veldig godt poeng. Men tydeligvis var jeg ikke smart nok her :-/Mens jeg i prinsippet var kjent med prosjektet om vegdata-import, har jeg ikke fulgt framgangen i detalj gjennom årene. Jeg hadde faktisk sett på Progress-tabellen av og til etter den ble diskutert på de... | |
| 78116079 by cck @ 2019-12-08 18:43 | 1 | 2020-01-21 08:47 | Gazer75 | Why did you set Dalavegen and parts of Austefjordvegen as tertiary? Do this road have scheduled bus routes? If not then it is not a tertiary. |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 08:48 | Gazer75 | I see you've set several branch roads as tertiary. This is not correct unless it has scheduled bus routes. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-21 09:56 | cck ♦3 | Hei Gazer75. Bus routes are specified using relations in OSM. highway=* is just for the road class. highway=tertiary is used for any kind of local artery.Cities do tend to use such roads for bus routes, but that does *not* mean that all roads without bus service aren't arteries. In fact, ju... | |
| 4 | 2020-01-21 10:02 | cck ♦3 | Sorry, this is the correct cs link for Dalavegen: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64026899> | |
| 5 | 2020-01-21 11:19 | Gazer75 | Please read the wiki for Norway. Tertiary is used for roads with scheduled bus routes.Making local/rural municipal roads tertiary will cause through traffic that should not be there. It is valued quite high in most routing software.These roads are not wide enough to really support large vehicles... | |
| 6 | 2020-01-21 11:43 | cck ♦3 | I did give you the link to the wiki page for Norway, and that's not what it says at all.Have you actually read it?Tagging roads with lower classes than they in fact should have is basically "tagging for the renderer". We try to avoid that in OSM. If routing software doesn'... | |
| 7 | 2020-01-21 12:10 | Gazer75 | What class it should have is a matter of opinion :)The wiki is to vague IMO. To open to what each mapper feels like, which again creates a very inconsistent map.Giving a gravel road with a width of maybe 3m and no sidewalks a tertiary class is to much IMO.Suggest adding max length and weig... | |
| 8 | 2020-01-21 12:18 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Jeg er forsåvidt enig med Gazer om at dette ikke er tertiary, men kanskje unclassified, det er sånn det er blitt gjort i resten av landet. Wikisidene er ikke helt til å stole på og det er sikkert "vi" som har skrevet de. Hopp gjerne inn og slå av en prat p&ari... | |
| 9 | 2020-01-21 13:51 | cck ♦3 | Honestly, I really don't appreciate this comment thread, attached to the wrong changeset, with Gazer75 making false claims and having no local knowledge, which is crucial in making these determinations.Importance as a part of the road network:*That* is what road classification is for.... | |
| 79112258 by silpaul @ 2020-01-02 12:16 | 1 | 2020-01-02 13:58 | Gazer75 | Why was this added when there is already one in the database? |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 14:45 | silpaul ♦1 | Sorry, missed that. Thanks. | |
| 79106997 by gormur @ 2020-01-02 09:53 | 1 | 2020-01-02 11:11 | gormur ♦119 | ... Men NVDB er ikke helt konsistent ennå, så det kan hende at strekket fra Solbakk via Jørpeland til Oanes nå har blitt Fv523 |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 13:48 | Gazer75 | Ville brukt unsigned eller local ref på Ryfylkevegen. | |
| 78941950 by mapper999 @ 2019-12-27 21:19 | 1 | 2019-12-27 22:24 | Gazer75 | Please do not use Bing in Norway to map stuff, it is terrible. There are several sources available with better data quality. |
| 77925879 by Gazer75 @ 2019-12-04 10:05 | 1 | 2019-12-06 01:50 | dgitto ♦934 | what isVERTIKALUT=*? |
| 2 | 2019-12-06 07:07 | Gazer75 | Oops! Didn't change the key on this segment after conflating tower heights. Thank you for pointing that out. The key is from the Norwegian SOSI standard. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-06 07:58 | dgitto ♦934 | Enjoy | |
| 74770566 by Noen @ 2019-09-22 12:09 | 1 | 2019-11-26 18:15 | Gazer75 | Ver snill å ikkje bytte klasse på Hulkavegen. Var alt ein note på den som du ignorerte. Bjørntvedtvegen har heller ingen busstrafikk i dag. Den er rekna som lokalveg med farshumpar. |
| 76712292 by MarlinMr @ 2019-11-06 16:04 | 1 | 2019-11-06 23:52 | Gazer75 | please do not attach roads and buildings to landcover |
| 76564569 by MarlinMr @ 2019-11-03 23:11 | 1 | 2019-11-06 23:38 | Gazer75 | You need to be careful with editing landcover using iD editor. It is not very good at dealing with multipolygon relations. This is more advanced and should be done with JOSM. |
| 75317671 by Peter Bremer @ 2019-10-05 12:51 | 1 | 2019-10-31 16:45 | Gazer75 | Vegane i Nygårdsparker er vel ikkje rekna som gågate? Lurte på kvifor du endra desse til highway=pedestrian |
| 76239156 by gormur @ 2019-10-26 10:03 | 1 | 2019-10-29 07:25 | Gazer75 | Kvifor var dette nødvendig? Du har laga meir rot på grensa en nødvendig og rota til relasjonar etter dette. |
| 2 | 2019-10-29 14:37 | gormur ♦119 | Som nevnt; forberedelser.Har ikke fått gjort meg ferdig her.Bakgrunnen var å bli kvitt "hvite" linjer langs grensene. Det er også en mengde vann og våtområder som var kuttet direkte på grensen. Skoger slutter ikke på kommunegrenser... Skogsgren... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-29 14:43 | Gazer75 | Du er klar over at det vil lage masse ekstra arbeid ved ein eventuell import av N50 i nabokommunane sant? Heile corine bitane burde vore sletta. | |
| 74263686 by NorNorth @ 2019-09-09 13:29 | 1 | 2019-10-26 13:38 | Gazer75 | Please do not add municipality road refs to the normal ref= tag. Use unsigned_ref= instead. |
| 75761011 by x3lm @ 2019-10-16 08:10 | 1 | 2019-10-16 08:25 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Hei, og velkommen til Openstreetmap. Det kan se ut som at dette ikke er en park I Openstreetmap. Det ser mer ut som noe som burde vært tagget landuse=grass. En "park" i Openstreetmap er beskrevet her https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark. Uansett hva det er s&arin... |
| 2 | 2019-10-16 14:35 | Gazer75 | Ser ok ut for meg. Om dette er definert som ein park av kommunen og lokale folk så er det jo ein park. Men name= kan nok bytast ut med description= | |
| 3 | 2019-10-16 17:04 | x3lm ♦1 | Hei, takk for tilbakemeldinga. Eg skal fikse opp i namnet og beskrivelsen | |
| 4 | 2019-10-16 21:26 | Gazer75 | Vi er litt "på tuppa" sidan det er mange Pokemon entusiastar som lagar parkar over alt slik at dei kan finne pokestops? eller noko slikt. | |
| 73206692 by Kvennavika @ 2019-08-09 20:09 | 1 | 2019-08-11 08:14 | Gazer75 | Please describe what you did and not just use a generic "minor mods" for all changes. |
| 73208211 by bjerka @ 2019-08-09 21:21 | 1 | 2019-08-09 21:49 | Gazer75 | Welcome to OSM. Please do not add more tags to the address tags. These are imported from Kartverket. If you want to add a business then make a new node with the relevant tags. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2019-08-09 22:41 | bjerka ♦2 | How do I undo the changes that I did to the Address tag? | |
| 3 | 2019-08-10 00:44 | Gazer75 | I've reverted the edit for you ;) You'd have to simply delete the new tags. The node was probably never moved.There is a script that is run to check for new/updated addresses from Kartverket and a separate user account (add2osm) that basically do the update. For many office buildings the... | |
| 73208770 by bjerka @ 2019-08-09 21:48 | 1 | 2019-08-09 22:01 | Gazer75 | Welcome. Few things. For the road there are some tagging mistakes and some useless ones. Foot and bicycle tags are not needed as "yes" would be default anyway. Motor_vehicle=no would most likely be private instead as the road is used for service personnel going to antenna. The ford tags ar... |
| 2 | 2019-08-09 22:06 | bjerka ♦2 | Hi and thanks for the constructive feedback :) | |
| 3 | 2019-08-09 22:26 | Gazer75 | You're welcome. Did you see my comment on the first change you did adding a business? | |
| 72956219 by Fubian @ 2019-08-02 20:38 | 1 | 2019-08-03 18:20 | Gazer75 | Please do not change the ref number from NSR. It will mess with the matching of the official stop database. |
| 72894061 by birgittemollerplass @ 2019-08-01 11:32 | 1 | 2019-08-01 11:49 | Gazer75 | Hei, velkommen til OpenStreetMap.Ikkje så lurt å endre på adressenodar sidan desse er er automatisk henta frå kartverket. Om du vil legge til ei bedrift så lag eit nytt punkt med office=it |
| 72497034 by Toremann1968 @ 2019-07-22 03:36 | 1 | 2019-07-22 18:50 | Gazer75 | https://seeiendom.kartverket.no/eiendom/1219/19/20/0/0 |
| 2 | 2019-07-22 18:51 | Gazer75 | Vers nill å ikkje slett adresser. Desse kjem rett frå matrikkelen. Om det er feil så meld frå til Kartverket. | |
| 71799347 by hemmop @ 2019-07-01 20:46 | 1 | 2019-07-02 16:52 | Gazer75 | Please don't name houses like that. This is more like a description, not a name. It is also a very personalized thing and that should not be in OSM. |
| 71241160 by peet192 @ 2019-06-14 06:40 | 1 | 2019-06-25 13:31 | Gazer75 | Be careful editing multi polygon relations with iD as it can easily break them. You deleted a segment near Fantoft church and caused a big residential area to disappear :)I've already repaired it btw ;) |
| 71386342 by DanielHagen @ 2019-06-19 04:12 | 1 | 2019-06-20 03:53 | Gazer75 | Please undo this. These are not toll_booths. I am updating all to toll_gantry as that is the proper tagging. |
| 2 | 2019-06-20 03:58 | Gazer75 | I've already reverted this now... Please ask before editing things that have recently been changed due to new tagging.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtoll_gantry | |
| 71290135 by Gazer75 @ 2019-06-15 23:04 | 1 | 2019-06-17 13:59 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Hi,what does the key "fee:duration" mean? This is not used in any other place.ThanksJan |
| 2 | 2019-06-17 22:48 | Gazer75 | Tagging of toll points lack a lot of good documentation on wiki unfortunately. We had to basically pick something that works. Many toll projects have a one hour grace period. If you pass the same or other toll point in the same group you do not pay again. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-17 22:54 | Gazer75 | The tag might be removed as the system is complicated in some areas like Oslo with two groups (inner and outer rings) and Trondheim with 7 toll groups. | |
| 4 | 2019-06-18 14:16 | mueschel ♦6,575 | That's an interesting feature. I also don't see any established scheme to tag this. What confused me was the fact that "duration" is usually how long something takes, so it looked like a fee per hour to me. | |
| 71146837 by CCclover @ 2019-06-11 15:40 | 1 | 2019-06-11 15:44 | Gazer75 | There is a separate tag for playgrounds. Please use it. |
| 2 | 2019-06-11 19:07 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | And also the playgrounds should not be named "playground", that's indicated by the tag. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-11 19:08 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | But other than that, this is great. Needs more details in this area. Keep it up :-D | |
| 71083029 by gunnar22 @ 2019-06-09 23:28 | 1 | 2019-06-10 21:29 | Gazer75 | Road class is not really set based on the quality of the road. County roads are normally secondary or primary if signed with numbers less than 1000 in new system. |
| 71095985 by buzzzy @ 2019-06-10 10:10 | 1 | 2019-06-10 12:28 | Gazer75 | Wrong mapping. Those are river intakes for Kvittingen hydro plant. Generator is in the power plant house/hall and already mapped. |
| 2 | 2019-06-10 14:46 | buzzzy ♦2 | Thanks for the note. I wanted to mark the possible crossover, but wasn't sure how else to do it. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-10 15:19 | Gazer75 | Can you actually walk across on the dam? | |
| 4 | 2019-06-10 15:20 | Gazer75 | I do plan to map all these dams and intakes, but there are over 3800 of them in Norway :) | |
| 5 | 2019-06-10 23:04 | buzzzy ♦2 | :-)As for these two, yes, walking across is fine, was there last summer. I didn't want to make it a bridge as that's not the purpose of the structure. Reason was to be able to identify possible crossings, will be coming back soon... | |
| 68917247 by Visaman @ 2019-04-05 11:08 | 1 | 2019-05-07 23:15 | Gazer75 | This is not a pipeline. These are blasted tunnels down to the headrace.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ausage%3Dheadrace |
| 2 | 2019-05-07 23:16 | Gazer75 | Sorry, not headrace, but down to the penstock | |
| 69748635 by ImMats @ 2019-04-30 19:14 | 1 | 2019-05-05 10:52 | Gazer75 | Just a small heads up. NVE data has a lot of inconsistency. 24kV is the rated voltage. Some companies report this vs nominal. Nominal for minor lines is either 11 or 22kV.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_networks#Voltage_notes |
| 68698681 by st3inar @ 2019-03-30 14:07 | 1 | 2019-04-15 10:29 | Gazer75 | 22kV lines are minor and normally poles. Anything below 45kV really is. There are exceptions for tower on minor line though: https://goo.gl/maps/Nf9amTyPcMxPlease read the wiki page for power infrastructure in Norway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_... |
| 2 | 2022-05-11 21:15 | st3inar ♦1 | Thank you for the comment, I have updated the mapping to minor_line. | |
| 68948406 by TheSebik @ 2019-04-06 10:27 | 1 | 2019-04-15 10:10 | Gazer75 | Please provide a proper description of what is changed. Not just "changing"... |
| 68218183 by Voltologen @ 2019-03-17 02:32 | 1 | 2019-03-17 09:25 | Gazer75 | Hei og velkomen til OSM. Vær forsiktig med å redigere relasjonar når du brukar iD editoren(redigerer rett in nettlesar). Den lagar ofte masse rot. Vil anbefale JOSM til meir avansert redigering. Har fiksa alle feil ;) |
| 66894128 by annakulikowa @ 2019-02-04 06:34 | 1 | 2019-03-01 18:15 | Gazer75 | Please do not change things without local knowledge, or contacting previous mapper. There is a new swimming hall built here now. I have reverted your edit already btw. |
| 2 | 2019-03-02 05:23 | annakulikowa ♦12 | Hey Gazer75 👋In this case it looks like overlapping. It's possible to face outdated imagery from time to time. And if you have the opportunity to share a fresh aerial photo of this area then upload it to https://openaerialmap.org/Thank you for fixing this issue. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-02 12:40 | Gazer75 | Even so, there was a start date on the building that should be a clue. It was set as 2017. Also make sure you use Norwegian Orthophoto as background imagery in Norway. Unless the imagery_used value bugged the changeset is showing Bing. | |
| 4 | 2019-03-03 05:56 | annakulikowa ♦12 | Ok thank you, I will pay attention on it | |
| 67295262 by 7rst1 @ 2019-02-17 23:02 | 1 | 2019-02-27 15:12 | Gazer75 | This is not a minor line. 33kV and below are minor. |
| 2 | 2019-02-27 15:17 | 7rst1 ♦13 | Ok, skal huske på det til neste gang. Takk for info. | |
| 3 | 2019-02-27 15:55 | Gazer75 | Har du lest på på wikien? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_networks | |
| 4 | 2019-02-27 16:56 | 7rst1 ♦13 | Oof, ja den visste jeg ikke eksisterte. Takk, skal se igjennom neste gang. | |
| 5 | 2019-02-27 17:43 | Gazer75 | Er du på IRC? kom innom på irc.oftc.org #osm-no og helse på oss andre som er aktive ;) | |
| 6 | 2019-02-27 17:46 | 7rst1 ♦13 | Har vært der et par ganger, men skal prøve å komme på oftere. :) | |
| 66885959 by Sardoy @ 2019-02-03 20:41 | 1 | 2019-02-04 01:23 | Gazer75 | Om du høgre klikker så får du ein meny som lar deg lage rette kantar på bygningen ;) |
| 54472621 by Oberaffe @ 2017-12-08 23:13 | 1 | 2018-01-13 17:47 | PlaneMad ♦450 | Hello! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54472621 |
| 2 | 2019-01-13 05:06 | Gazer75 | What source was used for this "765kV" line? If it is operating at 400kV then tag it as such, not the design voltage. Leave that in the note. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-13 22:57 | Oberaffe ♦45 | The source is my own knowledge! I learned that we have to tag something how everybody can see it and there are 765kV towers! Furthermore it will be change in some month to 765kV because the transformer will arrive soon! | |
| 4 | 2019-01-14 00:38 | Gazer75 | I see. I could not see the line many places on aerials and there was no source mentioned anywhere. I guess it is ok to tag it as 765kV if the towers are marked with that. I'm used to having official numbers here with actual operating voltage. So I put design voltage in a note for future referen... | |
| 65817630 by scai @ 2018-12-27 16:23 | 1 | 2019-01-04 10:47 | Gazer75 | Please learn how to do relations and multipolygons. This edit broke a big wood relation. Landuse in Norway is not built with closed polygons connected. |
| 2 | 2019-01-04 11:02 | scai ♦267 | Whoops, sorry. Should be fixed now. I wonder why JOSM didn't warn me about breaking the multipolygon. Unsure if it has such a validation check, though.Thanks for the hint. | |
| 3 | 2019-01-04 11:09 | Gazer75 | I applied a bit of a bigger fix now to make them multipolys. Kind of strange that JOSM didn't warn, the wood relation was clearly not closed. | |
| 65506113 by OleJorgen @ 2018-12-15 18:17 | 1 | 2018-12-18 08:35 | Gazer75 | Why did you change road classes around Vinstra? Do you know how the road classification system work for Norway? |
| 61728864 by Gazer75 @ 2018-08-16 22:17 | 1 | 2018-11-16 18:19 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Er dette fortsatt en Best? Kan ikke se den i Best sine data. |
| 2 | 2018-11-16 21:22 | Gazer75 | Kan vere nedlagt eller bytta til eit anna selskap | |
| 64344670 by aytfadc @ 2018-11-10 04:54 | 1 | 2018-11-10 13:57 | Gazer75 | Do not make changes when you have no knowledge. Please read my changeset before. The changes were done cause the E134 is extended to E6 from 11. November 2018. |
| 2 | 2018-11-10 14:01 | Gazer75 | Never revert changes before talking to the person who made the change. I expect you to fix this revert within 24 hours. | |
| 64147325 by Gazer75 @ 2018-11-03 18:07 | 1 | 2018-11-03 18:09 | Gazer75 | Description should be: Updated Lysebotn and Tjodan hydro plants. Update Lysebotn substation and some 132kV lines |
| 63847977 by Xayma @ 2018-10-24 21:39 | 1 | 2018-10-24 21:43 | Gazer75 | Please do NOT use Bing aerial in Norway!Use the Norwegian orthophoto that should be default. |
| 2 | 2018-10-25 01:56 | Xayma ♦1 | Bing aerial was not selected it was only default, so i dont know why it was Bing aerial. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-25 08:03 | Gazer75 | So you're saying it was on the Norwegian orthophoto and it still flagged the changeset imagery_used with Bing? | |
| 4 | 2018-10-25 12:25 | Xayma ♦1 | Yup, Checked it and it was on Norwegian orthophoto when I did the edit. So i dont know why its on Bing instead. | |
| 54530746 by Gazer75 @ 2017-12-11 06:21 | 1 | 2018-09-21 09:14 | InfosReseaux ♦147 | HiThank you to add all those hydropower featuresYou may be interested by usage=headrace for low pressure waterways upstream of power plant. usage=penstock is only suitable for inclined pipes leading to tubine at high pressure.Consider using waterway=pressurised on penstock and maybe on headrac... |
| 2 | 2018-09-21 15:34 | Gazer75 | I had a hard time finding appropriate tags when I mapped this. The wiki is kind of messy when it comes to hydro power and all its components. I didn't map many of these tunnels for the plants as the data is very basic. | |
| 3 | 2018-09-21 23:29 | InfosReseaux ♦147 | I believe you that last December the wiki might have look messy.A proposal regarding hydropower was approved last March.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_suppliesYou should have a look to it, I'm sure it will help you. | |
| 62321193 by Eirikrygg @ 2018-09-05 18:31 | 1 | 2018-09-06 04:00 | Gazer75 | Do not change hamlets. It is not OSMs responsibility to fix geocoding errors. Read about tagging Norwegian places on wiki. |
| 62324473 by Eirikrygg @ 2018-09-05 20:52 | 1 | 2018-09-06 03:50 | Gazer75 | This is not how you add a place. Notsete is already there as a farm. Please read the wiki properly before you continue to edit. |
| 62292629 by Eirikrygg @ 2018-09-04 21:32 | 1 | 2018-09-06 03:45 | Gazer75 | Please dont put addr:* tags on roads they do not belong there. Addr nodes should also be left alone as they are updated from Kartverket. If there is an error please report it at rettikartet.no |
| 62323125 by Reidar Johansen @ 2018-09-05 19:51 | 1 | 2018-09-05 22:23 | Gazer75 | Velkommen til OSM. Lite tips... ikkje gi navn (naust) til bygning på den måten. Name= brukast om bygningen har eit spesielt unikt namn eller når det er ein butikk eller firma som har heile bygningen. Type bygning skal vere i building= verdien så her vil nok kanskje building=b... |
| 2 | 2018-09-06 13:51 | Reidar Johansen ♦1 | Takk for tilbakemeldingen. Da har jeg oppdatert dette slik du beskriver. | |
| 62217006 by gunnar22 @ 2018-09-02 11:24 | 1 | 2018-09-03 17:09 | Gazer75 | Tertiary er typisk brukt for vegar som har bussruter. |
| 61908133 by Gazer75 @ 2018-08-23 04:18 | 1 | 2018-09-02 14:23 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Hi,could you please check this node? It got several foreign tags, which don't seem to belong to OSM:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5850562108Jan |
| 2 | 2018-09-02 15:13 | Gazer75 | Thanks for spotting that one. Somehow a duplicated node got left behind and JOSM validator never warned me. | |
| 58984017 by Larwaa @ 2018-05-15 13:03 | 1 | 2018-08-29 12:36 | Gazer75 | A firing range is not always military area. There are separate tag for firing range. |
| 61972902 by Kelteren @ 2018-08-24 22:29 | 1 | 2018-08-25 13:54 | Gazer75 | Would be nice if you actually added the poles to the power line and changed it to a minor line. Saves a lot of work later ;) |
| 2 | 2018-08-25 20:42 | Kelteren ♦1 | This is coming. Want some more information about the submarine cabled to Bolga before completing the actual power line. | |
| 61533589 by Mathias_ADAV5962 @ 2018-08-10 12:02 | 1 | 2018-08-25 05:40 | Gazer75 | Why did you move the Fortum charger to the middle of a building? Please do not change things if you have no local knowledge. |
| 61343388 by FidoLecosp @ 2018-08-03 22:48 | 1 | 2018-08-04 02:25 | Gazer75 | Would be nice if you could add the socket type and how many for each charging station. |
| 61282166 by do_se @ 2018-08-02 03:44 | 1 | 2018-08-02 05:21 | Gazer75 | Highly doubt there is a car rental in the middle of an intersection between a road and a cycleway... |
| 60690574 by Wilmann @ 2018-07-13 14:43 | 1 | 2018-07-21 05:13 | Gazer75 | This is a router problem not OSM problem. We can't add access tags for every conceivable option. Defaults are here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Norway |
| 2 | 2018-07-26 12:57 | thomfre ♦2 | What's the problem with adding access tags? How does it hurt to make explicit tags, and not just rely on implicit tagging? | |
| 3 | 2018-07-26 16:39 | thomfre ♦2 | Sorry, I was a bit too quick with my previous reply. I also work with GraphHopper, and it is true that GraphHopper needs explicit access tags, but only for barriers. I thought that was what @Wilmann had done (we know each other, so I assumed more than I should have). | |
| 4 | 2018-07-26 18:02 | Gazer75 | So what happen to barriers with no access tags? I hope you ignore them in that case. People may survey a gate and add it, but do not know the access rights for said gate. | |
| 5 | 2018-07-26 18:08 | thomfre ♦2 | To clarify: I work _with_ GraphHopper data. I don't work for them. As far as I know, they treat all barriers as blocking, unless they have access permission set. | |
| 60809955 by daffodilcrayon @ 2018-07-17 18:30 | 1 | 2018-07-18 18:35 | Gazer75 | Please make sure you tag power lines properly. These are minor lines with poles because they are probably 22KV.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_networks |
| 56620844 by gormur @ 2018-02-23 20:44 | 1 | 2018-06-12 00:25 | Gazer75 | Please do not add power lines without doing research. NVE data is outdated. This line was dismantled around two years ago when the new 420kV line through Sogn og Fjordane was completed. |
| 2 | 2018-06-12 00:31 | Gazer75 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563713495 to be clear | |
| 59188428 by oeystein @ 2018-05-22 18:21 | 1 | 2018-06-06 12:13 | Gazer75 | What was the reason for this? One way tags are not used on roads with two way traffic. You've made E39 impossible to route in one direction now. |
| 59019667 by Gazer75 @ 2018-05-16 14:11 | 1 | 2018-05-21 14:37 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Hi,could you check this node, it has many strange tags:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622276584Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-05-21 15:25 | Gazer75 | Oops, looks like one of the nodes I had to import from the aviation obstacle data didn't get retagged properly :) Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-22 00:19 | Gazer75 | How did you spot this error? | |
| 4 | 2018-05-22 09:03 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Using Taginfo I generate a list of keys which newly appear in the database - in most cases it's reporting simple spelling mistakes.http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm | |
| 54101660 by SverigeFan @ 2017-11-26 18:12 | 1 | 2018-05-06 02:35 | Gazer75 | Did you forget to reset imagery offset? The entire riverbank of Tana river is misplaced now. |
| 2 | 2018-05-06 16:23 | SverigeFan ♦9 | The changeset is some month old and looks good for me if I view it on DigitalGlobe aerials: Could you specify which reference you use to judge the data are incorrect ? I think I didn't forget to reset an offset but have used GPS tracks from Strava (users) , which were available für downl... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-06 17:59 | Gazer75 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54101660#map=14/70.2017/28.1963If the riverbank matches your DG imagery then there is something very wrong at your end. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-06 18:03 | Gazer75 | Any roads imported that use "Kartverket" as source will be a perfect source to align imagery to. This road data is the official data for Norway.You even edited the riverbank after the construction of the new bridge at Tana Bru was added making it appear in the river. That should have m... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-06 18:09 | Gazer75 | The DG imagery for area around Tana Bru is only off by about 5-10m at most.Forgot to mention... at least now there should be several options to pick Kartverket data in JOSM when editing in Norway. This should help you align any imagery. | |
| 6 | 2018-05-06 18:10 | SverigeFan ♦9 | Indeed, that is very wrong,I was looking near Tanamunningen where the first obkjects from that changeset are laying.Now I will see how to fix *that* | |
| 7 | 2018-05-06 18:14 | Gazer75 | If you wait a few weeks we might have a server to access official rectified Norwegian imagery that will rarely have an offset of more than 1m. We have the permission to use the imagery, but not permission to use a cache server yet. | |
| 8 | 2018-05-06 18:19 | Gazer75 | Adjusted imagery from DG or Bing are only valid for like 100m or so in many cases. You have to keep adjusting to known good spots.Not many of the active mappers in Norway use them for anything more than basic info because of the bad alignment. | |
| 9 | 2018-05-06 20:45 | SverigeFan ♦9 | Well - for now I made a - maybe rough - fix by hand. Thank you for your hint on the mistake. My first reply of course was irrelevant, since I was disussion imagery offset which wasn't the problem at all here, where someone, I fear me, had shifted the Tana riverbanks multipolygon quite a lot wh... | |
| 10 | 2018-05-06 21:02 | Gazer75 | Keep an eye on the imagery list in JOSM when mapping. It will probably appear there once a host has been found.For now you can view the imagery at norgeibilder.no and drool :) There is a small globe icon in top right corner on the page that will give you English language. | |
| 58509466 by mrbmf @ 2018-04-28 17:37 | 1 | 2018-04-28 19:34 | Gazer75 | Hei, Velkomen til OSM :)Ver snill og ikkje flytt på husnummer om du ikkje veit kva du gjer. Dei er henta frå Kartverket og skal vere plassert ved inngangen. Du må ha ein svært god GPS om du skal rette feil på desse. Om husnummer er feil plassert så kan du rappor... |
| 56829815 by Gresskarpai @ 2018-03-02 19:07 | 1 | 2018-04-13 17:39 | Gazer75 | Ålesund er ikkje place=city, den er maks place=town. Les wiki om korleis vi set place tags i Norge ;) |
| 58053916 by PARATBoilers @ 2018-04-13 05:49 | 1 | 2018-04-13 09:05 | Gazer75 | Please do not to move and edit addr nodes as they are made semi automatic from Kartverket. These nodes are usually placed at the main entrance to the building.Instead make a new node with the company info. |
| 2 | 2018-04-13 09:06 | Gazer75 | Any errors to addr nodes can be reported to Kartverket at https://www.rettikartet.no/ | |
| 57997445 by JensKveli @ 2018-04-11 09:28 | 1 | 2018-04-11 13:12 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Hvorfor tar du bort alltid bort vegnummeret på denne brua? |
| 2 | 2018-04-12 06:27 | JensKveli ♦1 | Jeg var egentlig inne for å endre vegtype på deler av brua så det stemte med restene av veien. Så fjernet jeg vegnummeret for at brusymbolet skulle være synlig i standard kartløsning. Innser nå at det ikke er særlig smart, skal endre det. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-12 07:24 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Flott :) | |
| 4 | 2018-04-12 08:10 | Gazer75 | "Tagging for the renderer" :P Ikkje bra ;) | |
| 5 | 2018-04-12 08:18 | JensKveli ♦1 | Sant! Jeg skal prøve å forholde meg til prinsippene. Bør vel heller komme med inspill om at vegnummer ikke blir vist på bruer før du zoomer inn så mye at ikke hele brua blir borte. | |
| 6 | 2018-04-12 09:58 | Gazer75 | https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto er plassen for det. Faktisk ein god ide at ein avgrensar ref visuelt på svært korte segment som dette. | |
| 57666970 by sindy88 @ 2018-03-30 17:14 | 1 | 2018-03-31 13:46 | Gazer75 | This is wrong edit. You set the plant total output on each generator. Please dont. |
| 57669849 by sindy88 @ 2018-03-30 18:54 | 1 | 2018-03-31 13:43 | Gazer75 | Why did you change this generator to 270MW? Each of the 6 generators output 45MW not 270MW. That is the total output of the entire plant. |
| 56422230 by Øystein Bjørndal_import @ 2018-02-16 18:43 | 1 | 2018-03-15 15:25 | Gazer75 | Kanskje lurt å sjekke om det ligg ei kyrkje inne frå før? Sett dobbelt opp etter import |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 15:31 | Gazer75 | sorry.. feil changeset | |
| 56619789 by Gresskarpai @ 2018-02-23 20:07 | 1 | 2018-03-13 16:00 | Gazer75 | You have added the population for the entire municipality to the city nodes which is wrong.Aso there are a set number of places in Norway that are defined as a city. These are not. Please read the wiki on tagging in Norway |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 16:04 | Gazer75 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder | |
| 54824111 by Danved @ 2017-12-21 19:42 | 1 | 2017-12-21 21:50 | Gazer75 | Did you move roads and buildings to fit the Bing aerial imagery? If so then you need to undo it. |
| 2 | 2017-12-21 21:55 | Gazer75 | You've also connected house nodes to the road nodes and merged a house number node to a building. Address nodes are automatically updated from Kartverket and should be left as a separate node. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-21 21:58 | Gazer75 | We use official road data from Kartverket to position roads so unless you got a gps with 2 meter accuracy, so roads that got a source mentioning Kartverket and/or NVDB should not be moved to fit aerial imagery. The aerials should rather be aligned to fit the roads. | |
| 4 | 2017-12-21 22:43 | Danved ♦1 | Okey, I'm sorry. Is there a way for me to revert my changes or can you do it for me? | |
| 5 | 2017-12-22 01:35 | Gazer75 | Not a big deal as you did a small area. We all start somewhere :)I'll ask for someone to revert the changes as I'm not experienced with that myself.Mapping with aerials as the main source of info is not a good idea. They are often not aligned properly due to poor elevation data when ... | |
| 54631754 by FredrikLindseth @ 2017-12-14 18:06 | 1 | 2017-12-16 10:15 | Gazer75 | Trur linja Samnanger-Fana er 300kV no. Stasjonen i Samnanger konverterer 420kV -> 300kV -> 132kV etter at linja frå Sima kom inn. |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 11:20 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Var det som jeg skrev som stod på NVE sine nettsider. Hvis du har noen annen info er det bare å endre. Regner med det blir retagging av spenninger hvis/når det kommer oppdatert data fra NVE. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-16 11:36 | Gazer75 | Du såg ikkje på linjene i stasjonen i Samnanger altså :PIkkje lett å få 275kV frå 300kV utan ein transformator :P | |
| 49622982 by FredrikLindseth @ 2017-06-17 21:00 | 1 | 2017-12-15 01:55 | Gazer75 | Å legge aerialway= i relasjonen lagar litt rare resultat. Sjå på øvre og nedre stasjonsbygning :) |
| 2 | 2017-12-16 11:32 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | ah :-p.Husker jeg brukte mye tid på å prøve å finne ut hvordan jeg skulle tagge dette og endte ikke opp med noe bra. | |
| 49593357 by SM031 @ 2017-06-16 14:32 | 1 | 2017-11-30 11:11 | Gazer75 | Do not use separate way for turn lanes in OSM. Only lanes physically separated should have its own way. |
| 50433366 by Andreas Köppen @ 2017-07-20 13:31 | 1 | 2017-07-21 10:52 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Is this the streetname on the signs? Official street name from Norwegian map authorty says "Krukeveien". |
| 2 | 2017-07-21 13:41 | Andreas Köppen ♦1 | Hei Johan!Yes, it is the official streetname from norwegian authorty, and it is written on the streetsigns. The name is >>Krugeveien<< from Hvasserveien to Krukeveien!Hilsen Andreas | |
| 3 | 2017-07-21 13:54 | Gazer75 | Sorry Andreas but street signs and official name is not the same. Street signs often use local dialects. Official address name is showin the nodes imported from Kartverket. | |
| 4 | 2017-07-21 14:00 | Gazer75 | If you do not like the official name then send a complaint to Kartverket or local authority and it will be considered there. Municipalities are known to set up street signs with names in dialect in many places. | |
| 5 | 2017-07-21 14:04 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | You should probably change it back or it will mismatch with all other databases (people searching with car navigation etc). | |
| 6 | 2017-07-21 14:06 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | (and you should change your garden from "park" to "garden" with "access=private". Also, naming your house and garden is not common practice in OSM :) - even if its pretty and funny. | |
| 49588420 by Skippern @ 2017-06-16 11:13 | 1 | 2017-07-21 09:02 | Gazer75 | Where did you find info about a ferry between Liabyda and Eidsdal? |
| 2 | 2017-07-21 09:03 | Gazer75 | Emergency routes should not be in the map as it will mess up routing. | |
| 3 | 2017-07-21 09:06 | Skippern ♦280 | The ferry routes was already mapped, I mainly only added the relations. I think the emergency route should be mapped, but maybe use different tagging to avoid routing problems, i.e. route=emergency_ferry | |
| 4 | 2017-07-21 09:10 | Gazer75 | Strange... I did some editing there not long ago and didn't remember seeing this route.Routers do not care about relations they only see the route=ferry and use that (as long as it is connected to a road) | |
| 5 | 2017-07-21 10:28 | Skippern ♦280 | I'm travelling right now, but I can change the route tag on the emergency route to avoid routing mistakes. Didn't check when the different routes was added, I just added relations on the routes. I am spending the summer months in this region, but mostly a little further north. | |
| 6 | 2017-07-21 13:17 | Gazer75 | Found the route in the list of emergency routes. Download pdf at http://frammr.no/Ruter/Ferje and look on page 51. | |
| 47225381 by Tarall @ 2017-03-28 10:17 | 1 | 2017-07-02 03:52 | Gazer75 | Er Ring 2 flytta til Kværnerveien? Litt dårlig klassifisering i området. Bør ikkje hoppe opp og ned slik mellom trunk, tertiary og primary. Om Ring 2 fortsatt går via Bispegata og St. Harvards gate så burde vel den kanskje få secondary? |
| 2 | 2017-07-02 05:01 | Tarall ♦1 | Ring 2 er flytta. Har til og med snakka med Statens vegvesen om dette (som for øvrig ikke har oppdatert veikartet sitt). Hun jeg prata med var helt klar på at Ring 2 er flytta til Kværnerveien. Google-maps er oppdatert, bortsett fra at de ikke har greid å fjerne den utdatert... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-02 07:04 | Gazer75 | Så Kværnerveien skal vere Kv161 + Ring2?Bør vel få fikse samanhengande primary frå E6 og fjerne ref på St. Halvards gate vest for Kværnerveien. Kva med Dyvekes vei? Den står som secondary ned til Bispegata. Virkar litt feil å la secondary ende... | |
| 4 | 2017-07-02 08:43 | Tarall ♦1 | Kværnerveien skal være Ring 2. Ring 2 skal starte/ende i øst i E6 (trafikkmaskina i Lodalen). Sjekk google-maps. Dyvekes vei skal nedgraderes til samme nivå som Bispegata. Krysset Oslo gate / Bispegata heter forøvrig "Oslo torg". Navnsatt i 1997, på gr... | |
| 5 | 2017-07-02 08:53 | Tarall ♦1 | For øvrig skal også Dronning Eufmeias gate og Langkaia nedgraderes (jf. Bispegata). Ser at det er en haug med gamle E18-markeringer som henger igjen i Bjørvika. Litt dumt. E18 går nå via Bjørvikatunnelen (under vannet) og derfra videre via ymse tunneler i begge... | |
| 6 | 2017-07-02 14:53 | Gazer75 | Husk på at det er ingen fylkesvegar i Oslo, så det har vore lagt opp med eit eige system for å få god ruting her. Vi må nok berre vente på data frå SVV og Oslo kommune når det gjeld Bjørvika. Meiner og at eg fekk beskjed ein gong at vegen fr&ari... | |
| 7 | 2017-07-02 18:59 | Tarall ♦1 | Uansett er det uproblematisk å rette opp i området Gamlebyen/Lodalen! Slik google-maps har gjort. Unødig å henge etter her, tykkjer eg! | |
| 8 | 2017-07-02 21:51 | Gazer75 | Har fiksa samanhengande primary og ref for Ring 2 på Kværnerveien. Meldt inn eit feilspørsmål på Dronning Eufemias gate til SVV via http://fiksvegdata.opentns.org/ så får vi sjå kva svaret blir ;) | |
| 9 | 2017-07-03 06:32 | Gazer75 | Fekk svar at Dronning Eufemias gate fortsatt skal vere del av E18 | |
| 10 | 2017-07-03 07:07 | Tarall ♦1 | Ok. Takk. Flott med rensing i Ring 2 /161 Dyvekes vei kan du uansett nedgradere. Det har t.o.m. Vegsvesenet gjort på kartet sitt. | |
| 11 | 2017-07-03 08:10 | NKA ♦247 | Dyvekes vei og Bispegata har samme funksjonelle vegklasse fra Oslo kommune som de andre secondary i byen. | |
| 12 | 2017-07-03 08:17 | Gazer75 | Kan vere at dei blir nedgradert til kl 5, men at det ikkje kjem fram i NVDB endå. Slike ting kan ofte ta lang tid. | |
| 49593397 by SM031 @ 2017-06-16 14:34 | 1 | 2017-07-01 20:24 | Gazer75 | Ikkje del opp vegane slik om det ikkje er fysisk skilje mellom felta. Bruk turn:lanes i staden for. |
| 48029822 by crazyhakim @ 2017-04-22 11:12 | 1 | 2017-06-28 13:46 | Gazer75 | Please do not Bing map in Norway unless you know what you are doing. Placing or moving stuff so that it is over roads and buildings should cause a bell to ring, telling you the aerial might be wrong.If you see anything sourced with Kartverket and/or NVDB then that is official data and will most li... |
| 49211132 by jonarx1 @ 2017-06-03 02:32 | 1 | 2017-06-04 10:06 | Gazer75 | Why add this water here?? There is no such thing. Unless they tore down the house recently to make a big pool or something. |
| 49211120 by jonarx1 @ 2017-06-03 02:29 | 1 | 2017-06-03 12:57 | Gazer75 | Something went wrong with one of your edits. You've moved a node for the residential area and the path you made is really messed up somehow. |
| 48581858 by Nesim @ 2017-05-11 06:50 | 1 | 2017-05-11 21:37 | Gazer75 | No point editing stuff in this area. it will be replaced with official data. Wait until the import is done and then you can improve it if needed. DG Premium is still not properly georectified so it will be offset in many places. |
| 2 | 2017-05-16 11:36 | imagico ♦70 | So you want to ban manual mapping from Norway to make it easier to create and maintain a map based on 'official' data there? That would be an extremely short sighted attitude.If you want to address problems with the alignment of images (which are indeed severe in some parts of Norway)... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-16 12:26 | Gazer75 | Did I say anything about banning? Edits during import will slow it down significantly. Just wanted to notify you of this. It's much better to improve the N50 data after import if needed. I stay away from municipalities with a lot of manual data even it if is badly mapped with offset aerials. Ju... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-16 12:34 | Gazer75 | You can follow the progress of import of N50 data here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway/assignment | |
| 5 | 2017-05-16 12:47 | imagico ♦70 | I was referring to the "No point editing stuff in this area." remark which is pretty unfriendly to someone manually mapping stuff in the area.As far as the "semantic nonsense" is concerned - i pointed out some of the problems in the import discussion - in particular regarding... | |
| 6 | 2017-05-16 12:53 | Gazer75 | Maybe its a language thing. If it came across as unfriendly then that was not my intent. I wanted to be short and to the point.What discussion? Where? | |
| 7 | 2017-05-16 13:48 | imagico ♦70 | I mentioned this primarily inhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2013-October/002300.htmland in subsequent discussion (continuing in June 2014) | |
| 48407731 by Robin van der Vliet @ 2017-05-04 22:16 | 1 | 2017-05-04 22:33 | Gazer75 | You changed the relation to a ferry route... |
| 2 | 2017-05-04 22:38 | Gazer75 | Norway main land that is | |
| 47697254 by ArGeBre @ 2017-04-12 14:56 | 1 | 2017-04-14 06:47 | Gazer75 | Please stop Bing mapping Norway if you have no idea how to. Bing is terribly offset in many places and you're wasting time.You even completely ignored the raw GPS data for roads which would tell you Bing is not good here. |
| 2 | 2017-04-14 19:24 | ArGeBre ♦1 | Alright - sorry bout that! I saw a road going right through a lake. Apparently the lake was mapped from Bing also. Lessons learnt - wont happen again! | |
| 3 | 2017-04-14 20:12 | ArGeBre ♦1 | Changset is undone. Please check if I missed something. And thanks for the hint... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-14 20:27 | Gazer75 | Its all good. Much of the roads are being imported from official free data. Just takes time as we do not have many active mappers and only some know how to do this properly. Automatic import is bad so has to be done fairly manual.Same goes for water, coastline and landuse. Though this data is on... | |
| 5 | 2017-04-14 20:40 | Gazer75 | You can actually look at bing.com/maps and see how poorly aligned the imagery is.https://binged.it/2ofVrlrThe roads in Bing are where they should be as it is official data. | |
| 47329685 by EivindWAA_import @ 2017-03-31 15:32 | 1 | 2017-04-07 06:57 | Gazer75 | Du må passe på primary og secondary når du importerer. Her har du endra fv43 og 461 frå primary til secondary. |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 13:09 | EivindWAA ♦14 | Takk for info, håper det ble rettet medhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47329685 | |
| 46984699 by EivindWAA_import @ 2017-03-19 14:58 | 1 | 2017-04-07 06:52 | Gazer75 | Fv455 og 459 er "primary" då det er skilta fylkesveg. Dette bør ein sjekke under import ;) |
| 2 | 2017-04-07 13:41 | EivindWAA ♦14 | fikset 459 med https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47540017455 med https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47532860 | |
| 34902499 by Papa Schlumpf @ 2015-10-27 12:38 | 1 | 2017-03-31 15:10 | Gazer75 | Please do not alter road class in countries you do not know. All E routes and national roads in Norway are classed as trunk road in OSM. |
| 28919163 by Noen @ 2015-02-17 20:57 | 1 | 2017-03-28 12:28 | Gazer75 | Greit å opne vegen igjen når arbeid er ferdig :) Vegen har vore open sidan desember 2015. |
| 2 | 2017-03-28 12:34 | Gazer75 | Fiksa problemet ;) | |
| 3 | 2017-03-28 21:08 | Noen ♦316 | Lett å glemme når man ikke bor i området. Skal bruke meg på temporary:*=* @ (time range) tagging neste gang!https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional) | |
| 4 | 2017-03-28 23:25 | Gazer75 | Temporary er ikkje i bruk. Er vel conditional som gjeld. Ikkje mange som støttar conditional endå...Brukar ein kalendar her på slike ting.Den minner meg på slike ting ein gong pr mnd. | |
| 47182992 by LKTomren @ 2017-03-26 19:07 | 1 | 2017-03-27 12:14 | Gazer75 | Please do not move house number nodes to buildings. they should be left as separate nodes. Helps verification and updates from official data later. |
| 2 | 2017-03-27 12:16 | Gazer75 | I see you actually added the addr tags to building. This creates duplicates as we use separate nodes in Norway. | |
| 32713435 by Wikilux @ 2015-07-18 08:21 | 1 | 2017-03-22 20:34 | Gazer75 | Stop breaking map with Bing mapping. Bing is not to be used unless you know it is properly georectified. The road was already lined up with official data from the Norwegian Mapping Authority. |
| 37083402 by FredrikLindseth @ 2016-02-08 16:26 | 1 | 2017-03-22 19:30 | Gazer75 | Really not needed in a route going back and forth between A and B. |
| 2 | 2017-03-22 20:16 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | I guess my plan was to make it public_transport:version=2 at some point, but I guess a relation was a bit overkill at this moment :-) | |
| 46700603 by SM031 @ 2017-03-09 06:45 | 1 | 2017-03-18 12:48 | Gazer75 | Vinstra is not a city. A town at best. Cities in are normally 100k people. In Norway this is 50k with exceptions of Tromsø, Bodø, Kristiansand.Please do not mistake the city status some places have given themselves after 1996 as the same. Places with less than 1000 people have city s... |
| 41117814 by ruhn @ 2016-07-29 20:31 | 1 | 2017-02-20 11:07 | Gazer75 | Please do not edit with Bing in Norway unless you know what you're doing.House number nodes should never be moved, these are imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority and have high quality position. They can actually be of great help to see if Bing is bad. |
| 44598307 by SM031 @ 2016-12-22 19:08 | 1 | 2017-01-02 14:51 | Gazer75 | So they have actually signposted this road with the white number signs? |
| 2 | 2017-01-02 20:47 | SM031 ♦2 | https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fylkesvei_312_(Oppland)#/media/File:FV312P.jpg | |
| 3 | 2017-01-02 22:31 | Gazer75 | That's down between fv213 and the "new" connection to E6 and fv255 south of Storhove. If you haven't visually verified signs north of this yourself then please do not alter class.NVDB list no signs outside this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241573731 | |
| 4 | 2017-01-03 07:49 | SM031 ♦2 | Viser også til dette: http://www.dolen.no/nyheter/2016/10/17/Gamal-veg-f%C3%A5r-nytt-namn-13656129.eceBildet fra Wikipedia er ikke tatt i den nye forbindelsen mellom E 6 og fv 312, men rett nord for rundkjøringen mellom fv 213 og fv 312. | |
| 5 | 2017-01-03 12:21 | Gazer75 | Flott! Då er den grei. Om du bur i området så kan du kanskje sjekke 312 mellom Granrudmoen og Tretten også?Ser ut til at SVV går bort frå det normale her. Normalt sett har vegklasse 2 og 3 vore skilta, men no ser det ut til at dei også skiltar 4. Får... | |
| 44729991 by SM031 @ 2016-12-28 12:57 | 1 | 2017-01-02 01:36 | Gazer75 | Tunnelen er ikkje åpna! |
| 44715724 by SM031 @ 2016-12-27 20:56 | 1 | 2016-12-29 12:52 | Gazer75 | Veit ikkje kven som har lagt motortrafikkveg inn der, men det er feil. Teknisk sett så er faktisk "trunk" i OSM det samme som motortrafikkveg her i Norge, men sidan vi brukar den på alle riks- og europavegar, så blir det feil. Vi brukar motorroad=yes på motortrafikk... |
| 2 | 2016-12-29 12:59 | Gazer75 | Kan legge til at litt av grunnen er at vi setter "class" til vegeigar. Fylkesvegar kan og vere motortrafikkveg og kan jo då ikkje taggas som motorveg. Men som "primary/secondary" + motorroad=yes | |
| 43088144 by km2bp @ 2016-10-22 19:37 | 1 | 2016-12-23 13:10 | Gazer75 | Please don't alter roads that have already been improved with data from Kartverket and/or NVDB. Unless you use an industrial grade GPS, or the road have changed significantly, data from Kartverket will always be better quality. |
| 44168333 by SM031 @ 2016-12-04 22:41 | 1 | 2016-12-08 11:36 | Gazer75 | Vaskehallen er ikkje teikna inn på kartet. Det du markerte som vaskehall her faktisk taket på truck diesel pumpene :) |
| 42679735 by peet192 @ 2016-10-06 10:04 | 1 | 2016-11-11 12:27 | Gazer75 | Did they actually close this before completing the new temporary ramp?There is no mention of this on the projects Facebook page. |
| 43068202 by alpesk @ 2016-10-21 20:14 | 1 | 2016-11-07 18:12 | Gazer75 | Short constructions like this do not really warrant a map edit. There will be a lot of tunnels closed at different times due to maintenance. |
| 42236483 by alpesk @ 2016-09-17 22:02 | 1 | 2016-10-18 01:17 | Gazer75 | Is the tunnel closed? Can't find any info about that at http://www.vegvesen.no/trafikkbeta?lat=59.28118&long=10.42620&zoom=12 |
| 2 | 2016-10-18 21:41 | alpesk ♦1 | No, it's not closed. I can't see any info about that on Open Street Map. I changed some info about a month ago that pedestrians and cyclists are not admitted on this road.alpesk | |
| 3 | 2016-10-19 01:50 | Gazer75 | The access=no tag is a blanket one that will not allow anything. Should never be used unless completely closed. Simply use foot=no and bicycle=no | |
| 42287018 by TrulsBekk @ 2016-09-20 00:14 | 1 | 2016-10-17 18:59 | Gazer75 | Du har laga alt for komplisert kryss mellom rv3 rampar og fv215/601. Heilt unødvedig og kan lage rare problem for ruting software.Skal heller ikkje vere eigen "way" for avkøyringsfelt (Haugedalsveien mot rv3) i OSM. Bruk heller turn:lanes= |
| 41837245 by NKA @ 2016-08-31 22:06 | 1 | 2016-09-16 04:03 | Gazer75 | Intersection for fv410 and 420 needs a lot of fixing. Do not use separate ways for lanes at intersections and crossing ways over another like this.Use turn lanes and turn restrictions.Only lanes physically divded by kerbs or similar should have separate ways. |
| 2 | 2016-09-16 04:38 | NKA ♦247 | Agree. This is a problem from the Elveg import data. Will look into it. | |
| 3 | 2016-09-16 06:11 | Gazer75 | I had that intersection perfectly mapped out before you replaced it with Elveg :) | |
| 4 | 2016-09-16 06:13 | Gazer75 | Never replace existing roads unless you have local knowledge of the road and know that what is there is wrong ;) | |
| 5 | 2016-09-16 07:00 | NKA ♦247 | Agree. I know this place very well. | |
| 41640846 by Papalinux @ 2016-08-23 15:25 | 1 | 2016-08-27 08:40 | Gazer75 | Please use english description.From google translate I see you used BIng to map this? I would advice against using Bing in Norway unless you have very good reference gps points or local knowledge. The Bing aerials are often very poorly georectified in Norway. |
| 2 | 2016-09-03 16:39 | Papalinux ♦1 | Hi Gazer75,thanks for your mean. I was in Holidays in Norway and have saw, that OSM is uncomplite. That was my fist try for correct the map. Now I have real GPS-Tracks and will send this in the next days. | |
| 41281860 by Ansgar G Grimsrud @ 2016-08-06 05:30 | 1 | 2016-08-27 08:26 | Gazer75 | Vær snill å ikkje kall "changesets" for Div. Gi meir info om kva som er endra. |
| 41322896 by Styrheim @ 2016-08-08 12:12 | 1 | 2016-08-17 16:34 | Gazer75 | Vegen kunne vel like godt vore fjerna heilt då den ikkje vil sjå ut slik i framtida? Ny veg ligg inne som "construction". |
| 2 | 2016-08-19 17:15 | Styrheim ♦1 | Nå er det ei ukes tid siden jeg forlot Kongsberg. Men da var veien fortsatt der, synlig i terrenget. Og så lenge den er fysisk til stede, tror jeg det kan være en god idé at den er like synlig på kartet som i terrenget?I alle fall - det viktigste er nok at GPS'... | |
| 41293653 by cmeeren_import @ 2016-08-06 20:30 | 1 | 2016-08-13 08:23 | Gazer75 | Your import made duplicate ways along the coastline. Also the coastlines have no dates from Kartverket. And please check existing data before overwriting with an import. I've had to fix all the ferry terminals... |
| 2 | 2016-08-13 09:16 | cmeeren ♦1 | Beklager på det sterkeste! Dette var bare slurv fra min side. De gamle kystlinjene var så håpløst unøyaktige at jeg overhodet ikke tenkte på at linjene rundt fergeterminaler kunne være oppdaterte.De fleste kystlinjene har dato, men ikke alle - jeg slo ... | |
| 3 | 2016-08-13 10:49 | Gazer75 | Import av ein kommune så stor som Gulen ville nok eg brukt noken timar på. Den er ikkje den verste pga lite eksisterande data.Hyllestad rett nord for Gulen brukte eg vel halve dagen på ;) | |
| 41354267 by HelgeO @ 2016-08-09 20:31 | 1 | 2016-08-10 12:41 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | (1) Could you please use a more descriptive changset comment than "fixing the map"(2) What is the purpose of this change, I checked a few of the edits and you seem to be replacing e.g. name="Rema 1000 Lakselv" with "Rema 1000" which I fail to see the advantage of. |
| 2 | 2016-08-10 20:03 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | The names of the shops on their webpage clearly states their names as "Rema 1000 $place" ref https://www.rema.no/butikker/Bergen/rema-1000-kalmarhuset/100909This edit is clearly not correct | |
| 3 | 2016-08-13 08:26 | Gazer75 | Someone need to revert this change. All supermarkets like this should have its location name. Makes it easier to look up in a navigation device. | |
| 4 | 2016-08-13 22:07 | HelgeO ♦2 | I have a backup of the dataset before the change and can revert. It need some time to process it.I have not replied before as I have tried to get in contact with Rema 1000 to get a statement from them regarding this issue.If you look at the shop - at least any shop that I have been in you wi... | |
| 5 | 2016-08-14 05:24 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | Please do the revert. I see no disadvantage of having rema 1000 $place but I see the advantages.In addition to the points mentioned, my guess from looking at the job section of finn.no, is that if you ask an employee he will tell you he works at rema 1000 $place.Feel free to discuss an impor... | |
| 6 | 2016-08-21 09:47 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | Any progress on reverting this? You may find the following proposal of interest as it seems to be accepted: https://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2012-April/003391.html Note also the use of capital letters, which should be REMA 1000 $place. | |
| 7 | 2017-01-03 18:55 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | Since you have not fixed this, I reverted this with changeset 44868733. | |
| 40934441 by docschenk @ 2016-07-21 20:49 | 1 | 2016-07-31 17:55 | Gazer75 | Why change this to construction? |
| 2 | 2016-07-31 18:02 | docschenk ♦12 | Because IT IS construction at the moment. There even is a deviation for cyclists (about + 10km, about + 500 m elevation). I somehow managed to pass the construction site but had to carry my bike some meters and also couldn't ride for another some 100 meters. | |
| 3 | 2016-07-31 18:56 | Gazer75 | The entire stretch of road is still under construction? I thought the road past the residential area at Espavegen 781 is not closed? | |
| 40746367 by ridixcr @ 2016-07-14 17:58 | 1 | 2016-07-30 11:46 | Gazer75 | This change broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5302948If you do not know how to deal with large multipolygons then please ask for help fixing errors.I have fixed the problem. |
| 2 | 2016-08-10 16:47 | ridixcr ♦87 | Hey there! Thanks for notifying me about this change. I will be more careful in future especially when working on large multipolygons and relations.Thank you for your feedback. | |
| 37018285 by tknudsen @ 2016-02-05 12:22 | 1 | 2016-06-03 08:32 | Gazer75 | Please do not edit roads and things you know nothing about. You reverted my edit around Anda. Was tempted to revert the entire changeset, but I have instead fixed your road mistakes.Ask the previous editor if you find data that might not match before editing. |
| 2 | 2016-06-03 11:10 | tknudsen ♦2 | Dear sir, what external source are you using that allow you to indicate that my edits are false? Please answer and do not do any more changes until we figure out what source is more valid. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-03 11:28 | Gazer75 | My own eyes?They altered the area when the runway was made longer.You can check out Google, Bing, Norge i bilder and vegkart.no if you do not believe me. | |
| 4 | 2016-06-03 11:40 | tknudsen ♦2 | Thank you for your answer.. I used statens kartverk for changing this, but will re-check when I get home from work. Do you know when they changed this due to extension of the runway.. Reason why I am asking is that we are making the the airport for x-plane and we are using the map to populate roads ... | |
| 5 | 2016-06-03 12:05 | Gazer75 | Karverket can be slow to update some data. Though "Norge i bilder" is showing the new runway and E39 in a picture taken May 2013. Further back in 2010 it was still under construction. Looks like Google map aerial is from around 2010. Bing however have a more recent one showing the longer r... | |
| 6 | 2016-06-03 12:14 | Gazer75 | Keep in mind that "Norge i bilder" can not be used as a source when editing here. This data is not considered open. | |
| 7 | 2016-06-03 14:19 | tknudsen ♦2 | I have permission to use Norge i Bilder and their wms version is even more detailed within JOSM. But I did check and it seems that Norge i bilder has some older imagery showing the runway not to be updated, so I checked with statkart and it seems to be correct. So for me this is truly ok. Thank you ... | |
| 8 | 2016-06-03 15:03 | Gazer75 | If you have a written permission by Kartverket to use those aerials in OSM then you need to post a copy of the permit on the mailing list and put on the OSM wiki. If this is a permission for only you then you can not use it in OSM.I needs to be reported in as a source we can legally use. | |
| 9 | 2016-06-03 16:08 | tknudsen ♦2 | The permission is for my company and cannot be shared with the community for all to use. | |
| 10 | 2016-06-03 16:33 | Gazer75 | But then you are not allowed to use this in OSM. Data used in OSM need to be open data, not some data that one person have access to. | |
| 11 | 2016-06-03 16:41 | Gazer75 | Only data from Kartverket that can be used in OSM is what you find at http://kartverket.no/Kart/Gratis-kartdata/ which is licensed under CC BY 4.0 | |
| 12 | 2016-06-04 23:52 | tknudsen ♦2 | I use my wms data in JOSM, this works great, I also use data from statkart to check in accordance with OSM, been doing this for years. Have a good one. Case closed. | |
| 13 | 2016-06-05 00:14 | Gazer75 | This is not a closed case. Will take this with the OSM data working group. Can't have OSM end up in a copyright problem.You might end up with account ban and all data reverted. Really hope not, but they are very strict on this. So unless you can show a letter saying they explicitly allow you ... | |
| 14 | 2016-06-05 22:23 | tknudsen ♦2 | Do what you like, I have all in perfect order so I have nothing to worry about,There is not copyright issue here, but do what you feel you need to do :)PS..Norgeibilder has no user restrictions https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/metadata/kartverket/norge-i-bilder-wms/50eaadfc-1f54-4a90-abca-8f3... | |
| 15 | 2016-06-05 23:43 | Gazer75 | Sent a request for clarification on this.From what I can tell the wms data is restricted and not released under NLOD or CC BY.https://kartkatalog.geonorge.no/search?text=bilderSome of the data have no icon under open data column, but that doesn't mean it can be used. Only data with a gree... | |
| 16 | 2016-06-06 08:07 | Gazer75 | Got a reply from Jon Arne Trollvik saying no, the Norge i bilder WMS data can not be used for OSM. It has licensing and is not open. So please stop using your WMS access to edit. | |
| 37352279 by Noen @ 2016-02-21 18:38 | 1 | 2016-03-04 11:17 | Gazer75 | Bør bruke conditional access tags her. Date on/off skal ikkje brukast lenger. |
| 2 | 2016-03-05 17:35 | Noen ♦316 | Jeg følgte taggingen beskrevet i dette forslaget: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporaryMulig forslaget er utdatert? | |
| 3 | 2016-03-05 17:45 | Gazer75 | Var ein gammal draft der der. Ikkje klar over at den eksisterte. | |
| 4 | 2016-03-05 17:48 | Gazer75 | date_on og date_off var satt som utdatert i 2013.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features | |
| 37078620 by sucxces @ 2016-02-08 12:35 | 1 | 2016-02-20 19:47 | Gazer75 | Where is the approval to use these aerials? I have never seen this been discussed on the mailing list. |
| 35238853 by Hjart @ 2015-11-11 12:44 | 1 | 2016-02-19 19:46 | Gazer75 | Her har du laga mykje rot i N50 importen.... |
| 2 | 2016-02-19 19:59 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I think I may have connected a lot of very short similarly tagged coastlines, but other than that? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=35238853 | |
| 3 | 2016-02-19 20:13 | Gazer75 | Ups! Wrong set. You were listed as having changed a relation and a border. Apparently Mr. Lindseth is the one to blame :) | |
| 32830488 by Svein Olav @ 2015-07-23 16:20 | 1 | 2015-07-25 18:05 | Gazer75 | Denne laga veldig mange duplikat. Ver så snill å samle data med eksisterande. |
| 2 | 2015-07-25 18:07 | Gazer75 | Kva source har du brukt? Manuel leiting på nett? | |
| 3 | 2016-02-19 20:07 | Gazer75 | Har du tenkt å rydde opp? | |
| 36557447 by FredrikLindseth_import @ 2016-01-13 19:35 | 1 | 2016-01-16 06:33 | Gazer75 | Ver så snill å ikkje importere blindt. Masse av importen har faktisk laga kartet dårlegare. Ta inn Elveg data der det ikkje er gater fra før. |
| 35392202 by Glenn Andreassen Aksdal @ 2015-11-17 23:05 | 1 | 2015-11-20 20:06 | Gazer75 | Så heile Knappetunnelen er skilta som motorveg?? |
| 34645794 by Emmor @ 2015-10-15 03:47 | 1 | 2015-11-13 08:57 | Gazer75 | Do not move house number nodes if you do not know what you are doing. These are very good quality data from Kartverket. Moving them destroys the accuracy of the map.If the nodes do not match the aerial imagery then assume the aerial is wrong. Bing and other aerials are often misaligned with the re... |
| 33001846 by Øystein Bjørndal @ 2015-07-31 09:31 | 1 | 2015-11-07 07:43 | Gazer75 | Why was Ski upgraded to city? If a place with 10-15000 people is considered a city then we have a lot of them :)Listed population is for the entire municipality and not the town itself. According to SSB the town itself has 12344. Population number set currently includes Ås as well. |
| 2 | 2015-11-07 09:18 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | I used the 'by-status', "I 2004 valgte kommunestyret i Ski å gi tettstedet bystatus." https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ski_(tettsted)Hvis det er feil er det bare å endre tilbake igjen. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-07 09:23 | Gazer75 | Trur vi må ta vurdering etter andre kriterier. Rjukan har også by status men under 1500 innbyggere ;) | |
| 4 | 2015-11-07 09:34 | Øystein Bjørndal ♦13 | det er du som snakker om antall innbyggere, jeg har bare sett på 'by-status'. Hvis det er slik at man skal tagge etter antall innbyggere får du endre tilbake. Jeg har brukt SSR som kilde fordi Ski ligger inne som 'city' i SSR importen. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-07 09:38 | Gazer75 | Om du sjekker wiki så snakkar den faktisk om city for byer over 100k.Ein kan ikkje bruke bystatus i OSM. | |
| 34399704 by MintCondition @ 2015-10-02 23:34 | 1 | 2015-11-04 02:50 | Gazer75 | Please undo this set. Aerials in this area is badly aligned. Its clearly visible when you look at the house numbers. They are from the Norwegian mapping agency and are normally accurate to less than a meter. They are also normally placed at the house main entrance. |
| 2 | 2015-11-04 03:00 | Gazer75 | A Bing offset of 2.35; 13.70 is good for the houses you added. | |
| 34002266 by FredrikLindseth_import @ 2015-09-13 15:36 | 1 | 2015-09-13 20:44 | Gazer75 | Du har sett feil klasse på fv 561. Den skal vere primary. |
| 32844327 by mb_stefan @ 2015-07-24 08:54 | 1 | 2015-08-28 19:23 | Gazer75 | Never use Bing to correct data unless you've surveyed it. Especially house number nodes are never to be moved unless surveyed. Data from the Norwegian Mapping Authority (Kartverket) is usually of better quality. If you notice a large number of number nodes not aligning with Bing then Bing is mo... |
| 33209912 by Christian Madsen @ 2015-08-08 22:45 | 1 | 2015-08-27 17:08 | Gazer75 | Do not move house numbers imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority unless you know it is wrong from gps or local knowledge. And never use Bing over data from "Kartverket". Only reason to do that is if you have local knowledge from survey or GPS that match Bing.I have already corre... |
| 2 | 2015-08-28 08:58 | Christian Madsen ♦13 | Thank you. | |
| 33387657 by Protoni @ 2015-08-17 11:01 | 1 | 2015-08-21 10:59 | Gazer75 | Please do not change road class unless you know how the system works in Norway. This road is a national highway and is therefore a trunk road. Please revert this change. |
| 2 | 2015-08-21 12:02 | Protoni ♦1 | Realy? Then I will revert this change.But I have looked at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Norwegian_roadsThere are written: Streets with three digits are primary roads.I think, in this area the national highway E18 is the Operatunnelen. | |
| 3 | 2015-08-21 17:38 | Gazer75 | The number of digits have nothing to do with it. Its the background of the sign that is important. National roads and E routes use green. Primary county roads use white.Keep in mind the Norwegian Public Roads Administration are sometimes slow to replace signs if they change something. Like the nat... | |
| 33447799 by keepright! ler @ 2015-08-19 19:21 | 1 | 2015-08-21 11:07 | Gazer75 | Please revert the road class changes. They are wrong. E route and national highways in Norway are trunk class. |
| 33446434 by keepright! ler @ 2015-08-19 18:20 | 1 | 2015-08-21 10:39 | Gazer75 | Why did you change this? This road is an E route road and thus should be trunk. All E routes and national highways in Norway will always be trunk or higher class. |
| 32741946 by Wikilux @ 2015-07-19 21:05 | 1 | 2015-07-21 11:50 | Gazer75 | Waste of time to do any coastline edits with Bing in Norway. They are being updated slowly by better data from Norwegian Mapping Authority. Bing is also not adviced to use much in Norway as its often badly georeferenced. |
| 2 | 2015-07-21 13:30 | Hjart ♦4,116 | I agree . In Norway using Bing alone is not a good idea, since it is often 30-100 m off and you can't even expect it to be equally much off anywhere. You really need to consult the gps layers and Strava heatmaps http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava wherever available. | |
| 32460404 by anderfo @ 2015-07-06 22:20 | 1 | 2015-07-07 16:43 | Gazer75 | Hah! Ja Bing er håplaust mange plassar. Ser at fv60 frå Hellesylt til Sykkylven er ganske ille. Skal sjå om eg kan ta den med NVDB/Elveg overlay ein dag.Er nokre tettstader som er mappa med dårleg Bing som vil krevje masse arbeid å rette opp i. |
| 2 | 2015-07-08 07:50 | anderfo ♦111 | Stemmer. Istedet for å aktivt korrigere mye offset har jeg bestemt meg for å lære bort litt om dette til de som har gjort inntegninga. F.eks. å tipse dem om å bruke N50 og Strava heatmap som bakgrunn for å korrigere offset. Jeg har fått tilbakemelding fra fl... | |
| 3 | 2015-07-08 08:13 | Gazer75 | Wikien kan endrast litt. Strava ligg inne alt og treng ikkje leggjast til i JOSM | |
| 4 | 2015-07-08 08:15 | anderfo ♦111 | Fordelen med å legge det inn selv er at man da kan få valgt en passelig farge og opacity på heatmap.I tillegg kan man legge inn sin egen personlige Stravaheatmap (som kan oppdateres på et blunk), men det har jeg ikke beskrevet på wikien. | |
| 31962621 by gormur @ 2015-06-14 13:54 | 1 | 2015-07-03 18:28 | Gazer75 | Kvar har du dette frå? http://www.vegvesen.no/Europaveg/e6halogalandsbrua/Nyhetsarkiv/utsetter-%C3%A5pning-av-e6-e10-tr%C3%A6ldaltunnelen |
| 2 | 2015-07-03 21:33 | gormur ♦119 | Det kan hende jeg var litt rask på labben når jeg leste denne (eller en annen gjengivelse av Vegvesenet si pressemelding).http://www.nordlys.no/steinras-stenger-e6-apner-uferdig-tunnel-for-trafikk/s/5-34-175814 | |
| 3 | 2015-07-03 21:39 | Gazer75 | Stemmer. Det var vel ledebil gjennom der ei stund. | |
| 30492546 by Baudy @ 2015-04-26 06:45 | 1 | 2015-06-30 18:20 | Gazer75 | 651 Volda-Nordfjordeid is still a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change. |
| 30410338 by Baudy @ 2015-04-22 17:35 | 1 | 2015-06-30 18:17 | Gazer75 | This is a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change.All national roads and E roads are trunks in Norway. |
| 30413308 by frokor_import @ 2015-04-22 19:25 | 1 | 2015-04-22 22:30 | Gazer75 | Eit par ting her. Myr området ved dagens IKEA er jo ikkje myr så der burde du ha fjerna litt og laga nye linjer. Altså "merge". Er difor Bergen kan blir ei utfordring med å ta høgde for eksisterande data.Når du la inn vatn så brukte du kun N50 o... |
| 2 | 2015-04-23 16:07 | frokor ♦3 | Ja, det har du heilt rett i. Har prøvd å retta det opp att så godt som rå. Har sjølvsagt prøvd å la det som er gjort bra være i fred. Spesielt i Åsane-området, og i sentrumsområdet er det veldig mykje data. Mange nodar på sm&... | |
| 3 | 2015-04-23 23:40 | Gazer75 | Er difor eg utsette Bergen :) Rekna med å bruke over ei veke total arbeidstid på den kommunen åleine pga alle eksisterande data. | |
| 30417568 by Andre68 @ 2015-04-22 22:26 | 1 | 2015-04-23 13:26 | Gazer75 | What kind of fixes were these? If you altered the segments then you need to update the source and remove the date from Kartverket import. This is important for future updates of Kartverket N50 data. |
| 30390454 by frokor_import @ 2015-04-21 20:57 | 1 | 2015-04-22 14:10 | Gazer75 | Er det noko feil med data her? Lange rette kutt i skogen rundt Trengereid? |
| 2 | 2015-04-22 17:07 | frokor ♦3 | Det er ein veg som ikkje vart lasta opp, truleg fordi JOSM slutta å svare under opplastinga. Driv og går over området på ny, og lastar opp i mindre bolkar, så reknar med det snart er på plass. | |
| 3 | 2015-04-22 17:20 | frokor ♦3 | Nei, han var ikkje lukka. Er i orden no når eg får lasta opp endringa. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-22 22:15 | Gazer75 | ja såg neste ut som du hadde byta om på kva poly som var outer og inner :) | |
| 30347900 by anderfo_import @ 2015-04-20 07:24 | 1 | 2015-04-22 13:26 | Gazer75 | Problemene med Nore Uvdal kan fiksast med å slette data. Det som er lagt inn er av dårlegare kvalitet enn Karverkets N50, så vi må ta den kommunen på nytt uansett. |
| 2 | 2015-04-22 13:46 | anderfo ♦111 | Jepp, men litt sketchy å slette data - dette gjelder både denne importen og corine-importen. Men vi kan kanskje slette dersom det er uendret etter import? | |
| 3 | 2015-04-22 14:01 | Gazer75 | Ja klart det. Tenkte meir på at ein ikkje bruka tid på og fikse på data som bør bytast ut seinare. Duplicate nodes fiksar JOSM "automatisk" så det går jo greit.Blir bra med litt N50 ;) Norge ser ganske trist og øde ut i dag. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-22 14:11 | anderfo ♦111 | Problemet var egentlig at JOSM ikke ville la meg laste opp data med valideringsfeil i - og feilene i nabokommunen gjorde det dessuten vanskeligere enn vanlig å detektere feil i mitt eget datasett (bruker jo JOSM validering for å finne bl.a. duplikatnoder der) siden de få duplikatno... | |
| 5 | 2015-04-22 14:18 | Gazer75 | Var det så ille!? hmm... Eg kjem nok til å ta litt etter kvart som eg gidd å arbeide med det. Tenker å fullføre Hordaland så lenge eg ikkje går lei :) | |
| 6 | 2015-04-24 15:17 | anderfo ♦111 | Det var ille, ja ;) Sjekk OSM Inspector for Nore og Uvdal: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=9.12224&lat=60.26192&zoom=10&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touc... | |
| 30306515 by frokor_import @ 2015-04-18 12:43 | 1 | 2015-04-18 15:24 | Gazer75 | Pass på at det ikkje blir doble kystlinjer. JOSM validator vil gi beskjed om dette |
| 2 | 2015-04-18 15:28 | Gazer75 | Er og eit par plassar kor desse doble øyane har feil retning på kystlinje | |
| 3 | 2015-04-18 15:38 | frokor ♦3 | Ja, eg er klar over det. Det er i dette området eg har arbeidd mest tidlegare, så det vart meir plukk her enn i dei andre områda. Eg held på å rette opp i det, men kom ikkje i mål, før eg måtte eit æren. Skal ta det om litt. | |
| 4 | 2015-04-18 15:55 | Gazer75 | Då er det betre om du ventar med å laste opp til alt er ok. Andre som brukar OSM Inspector og diverse verktøy kan få beskjed om feil og vil då prøve å rette opp. Det kan lage meir arbeid for deg i ettertid. Snakkar av erfaring her ;) | |
| 26449923 by gormur @ 2014-10-30 22:08 | 1 | 2015-03-29 22:05 | Gazer75 | If you use special letters in names then make sure the streets match. No idea what the special sign is, but it's not available on any keyboard. |
| 2 | 2015-03-29 22:55 | gormur ♦119 | Example? | |
| 3 | 2015-03-30 05:29 | Gazer75 | All names with an apostrophe. You can find them using OSM Inspector. Using this apostrophe is creating problems imo. Only way to type it in Windows is by using ALT+0146 on the numpad. No GPS unit I have seen is capable of typing this as well. Yes, there is a difference between ’ and ' Fir... | |
| 4 | 2015-03-30 08:56 | gormur ♦119 | This changeset only touched the addr:postcode, as the comment clearly says. Please comment on the original changeset. | |
| 28770372 by Honning @ 2015-02-11 10:53 | 1 | 2015-02-20 16:09 | Gazer75 | Uskilta fylkesvegar skal vere "secondary" |
| 28867354 by Noen @ 2015-02-15 16:55 | 1 | 2015-02-19 17:51 | Gazer75 | Å legge til "oneways" framfor alle rundkøyringar som har den vetle triangel øya er unødvendig etter mi meining. Lagar berre støy i kartet. Eg la dei inn når eg starta med OSM, men har heilt slutta med dette. Så lenge vengen ikkje er delt over e... |
| 2 | 2015-02-19 18:40 | Noen ♦316 | Først må jeg si at hovedpoenget med dette endringsettet var legge inn gang og sykkelveiene. Du har rett i at det ikke har noen betydning for ruting, om veien foran en rundkjøring er splittet opp eller ikke, men for å "representere virkeligheten" er det en releva... | |
| 3 | 2015-02-19 21:21 | Gazer75 | Ser det at du la til gang- og sykkelveg. Bra det.Merka meg berre at du hadde lagt til alle desse stubbane også. For meg så er dette unødvendige detaljar som ikkje har praktisk betydning. Mange av desse små trekantane er vel maks 2x5 meter. "Mappe" to einvegsk&osl... | |
| 28699720 by gormur @ 2015-02-08 10:54 | 1 | 2015-02-14 16:28 | Gazer75 | Wouldnt use Bing in this area, it is terribly misaligned along all axis. |
| 2 | 2015-02-14 18:28 | gormur ♦119 | I know. Bing wasn't much used, just left it in the source field by default... |