Wulfmorn participated in the following changeset discussionsWulfmorn participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163062657 by sef43 @ 2025-02-28 17:26 | 1 | 2025-05-02 12:22 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,630 | Hello!You usedmooring=noneon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18765488/historyHave you maybe meantmooring=no?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used this ... |
| 2 | 2025-06-04 10:34 | sef43 ♦6 | I only saw this today.I had wanted to express that this was a ruin of a watermill sawing wood, that at a later date had been used without the waterwheel. I don't quite know how to tag this correctly. However the sawmill tag should not get out of use.The mooring tag is good as 'no... | |
| 3 | 2025-06-04 13:25 | Wulfmorn | The sawmill is just historic data and isnt relevant to whether you can go there by boat or not. The question of mooring is current situation. mooring=no is probably the correct tag and sufficient to express the situation. However, it is already tagged "access=no" which probably covers the ... | |
| 4 | 2025-06-12 18:44 | sef43 ♦6 | Should key:mooring be removed then? | |
| 166988463 by Hidoo00 @ 2025-05-30 19:53 | 1 | 2025-06-02 08:08 | Wulfmorn | Path moved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167079819 |
| 2 | 2025-06-02 08:23 | Hidoo00 ♦70 | Tack! | |
| 165589273 by sef43 @ 2025-04-29 12:08 | 1 | 2025-04-29 21:24 | Wulfmorn | This is not Morokulien. It's Morast. Morokulien is at the border. |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 21:52 | Wulfmorn | I fixed it for you. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-31 16:22 | sef43 ♦6 | I have a pdf-file with the route, not all stops are mentioned there. I did go with that bus a couple of times, where I saw this stop mentioned on the display. No signs in the field, but it's closest. | |
| 165588704 by sef43 @ 2025-04-29 11:53 | 1 | 2025-04-29 21:32 | Wulfmorn | Before adding or editing stops in Norway, please read this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stops-in-norway-guide-for-understanding-current-data-and-reporting-problems/9560However, it looks like this warrants an edit. I'll report this moved stop to Innlandstrafikk. The southbound s... |
| 2 | 2025-05-31 16:18 | sef43 ♦6 | The southbound stop here is on the south side of Matrandvegen, the Northbound on the norh side. Some schoolbusses seem to stop on the service road (not sure though).Access to the forum is often problematic for me since I usually am offline. Wiki info I use is of 2023: offline available. | |
| 3 | 2025-05-31 17:44 | sef43 ♦6 | Also the location of the marker might need some adjusting before it is put into the database, I know the side of the road is correct as well as the general position, but there is a fault of 100m (meaning the position on the street should be within 100m of the marker). | |
| 164618607 by gmc3000 @ 2025-04-07 06:47 | 1 | 2025-04-07 09:06 | Wulfmorn | If its in the same location, i would suggest just editing the POI, rather than deleting the old and creating the new. It makes it easier to see the history of the location. Not a huge problem, but its my suggestion :) |
| 2 | 2025-04-07 11:04 | gmc3000 ♦2 | Well, the old POI was just a point that was part of the road, not a real POI. But good point, I should probably have extracted the point to a POI of itself (not part of the road), and then changed it. Will keep that in mind for next time, thanks for the suggestion! | |
| 162462992 by omszi @ 2025-02-13 11:30 | 1 | 2025-02-14 00:57 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,068 | Please don't vandalize the map.Revertedhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162485769 |
| 2 | 2025-02-14 09:31 | Wulfmorn | Not sure what was done here. Short term road closures should not result in map changes. For long term changes, the road (highway) should be retagged from, example: highway=primary to highway=construction;construction=primary. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-14 09:40 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,068 | Edits can be seen athttps://osmcha.org/changesets/162462992 | |
| 161381045 by Wulfmorn @ 2025-01-15 13:27 | 1 | 2025-02-03 18:45 | synfarer ♦16 | Hei, ser du fjernet motor_vehicle=destination fra way 59377005. Hvorfor det? Ingen gjennomkjøring er det som faktisk er skiltet på stedet. |
| 2 | 2025-02-04 08:42 | Wulfmorn | Det er ingen gjennomkjøring lenger heller, fordi en del av wayen er delt av som footway. Dermed er det ikke mulig å kjøre gjennom. Ekstra tagging er overflødig. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 19:47 | synfarer ♦16 | Jeg skjønner at footwayen hindrer gjennomkjøring, men det stemmer ikke med virkeligheten. Veien der er ikke smalere, og nå om vinteren er bilsperren (cycle_barrier) åpen sånn at man faktisk kan kjøre gjennom. Når det faktisk er skiltet med "Forbudt f... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-12 10:56 | balchen ♦27 | Vil legge til at hvis det ikke er skiltet g/s-vei i slike tilfeller, så skal det heller ikke tagges g/s-vei. En ordinær kjørevei som er stengt for enkelte kjøretøy med en bilsperre blir ikke til en g/s-vei. Det er f. eks. fremdeles fullt mulig å kjøre MC... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-18 21:01 | synfarer ♦16 | Jeg endret det tilbake til service road med motor_vehicle=destination | |
| 115433340 by NikoAam @ 2021-12-27 16:05 | 1 | 2024-07-18 09:24 | Wulfmorn | This looks like an odd access tagging. Why is it not permitted to use this road? Is there a sign? |
| 152429117 by OSM-UK-History @ 2024-06-08 19:24 Active block | 1 | 2024-06-08 19:27 | NeisBot ♦2,209 | Hi OSM-UK-History, welcome to OSM!Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:- 1 natural(s)- 58 waterway(s)Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if t... |
| 2 | 2024-06-08 20:27 | Wulfmorn | Very strange edit. Definitely not a correct edit. Looks like this edit reverts an old landcover import, but is botched. The lakes are removed, but its nodes are still there.It seems too nonsensical to be malicious. I suspect the user has tried to revert something but entered the wrong changeset ... | |
| 3 | 2024-06-09 12:06 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits. See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123 | |
| 128803925 by Jørgen Kirkelund @ 2022-11-12 08:34 | 1 | 2024-06-03 12:14 | Carl-Christian Salvesen ♦1 | Er dette offisielle navn, finnes det i såfall en kilde?Dette endringssettet bør vel reverteres? |
| 2 | 2024-06-03 12:33 | Jørgen Kirkelund ♦1 | Hei,dette er jo hva vi kaller stiene når vi bruker de i mtb map. kilden er jeg usikker på her.skal vi gå tilbake til å ikke kalle det noenting? | |
| 3 | 2024-06-03 13:04 | Wulfmorn | Det er i seg ikke feil å navn på løypene, men spørsmålet er om andre kaller dem noe annet :) Er disse navnene etablert? | |
| 4 | 2024-06-03 13:40 | Jørgen Kirkelund ♦1 | de jeg sykle med bruker disse, om det er noen andre som har andre navn aner jeg ikke men det stod ikke noe på de fra før av, så jeg tenkte det var greit. | |
| 5 | 2024-06-03 13:49 | Carl-Christian Salvesen ♦1 | Jeg tror nok dette er navn som bare er kjent for MTB-miljøet i området. Navnene er ikke å se på noen skilt eller andre kart i området, så jeg stemmer for å ta dem vekk fra OSM-kartet da kartet brukes i såpass mange andre settinger enn MTB. Kanskje det... | |
| 6 | 2024-06-03 14:03 | Jørgen Kirkelund ♦1 | ok, har forsåvidt bare lagt til de navnene som jeg vet brukes.bare å endre til mtb om det gjør det lettere. | |
| 7 | 2024-06-03 14:48 | Wulfmorn | Få kommunen til å vedta deres navn og sette opp skilter. | |
| 151811334 by Jochen Topf @ 2024-05-25 13:18 | 1 | 2024-05-29 10:56 | Wulfmorn | It was apperantly meant to be some sort of "hole" in the pier where you can see the ocean. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3822872#map=19/62.73655/7.16243 |
| 129610008 by Wulfmorn @ 2022-12-01 16:02 | 1 | 2024-04-26 10:45 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Hei, det kan se ut til at way 1118672854 ikke eksisterer. Har du noen kjennskap til stien? |
| 2 | 2024-04-26 10:54 | Wulfmorn | nei jeg bare gjorde en mass-edit for å ha litt sac_scale på stier på fjellet. grove estimat bare. | |
| 143794334 by Patrickvw @ 2023-11-08 19:07 | 1 | 2024-03-08 11:53 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Hi, I can't really find any info confirming that this path's name is actually Blauwe route. Can you confirm whether this is correct or not? |
| 2 | 2024-03-08 12:21 | Wulfmorn | Sounds rather dutch. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-08 13:04 | Patrickvw ♦2 | You are right. I change it in "blue walking route" | |
| 4 | 2024-03-08 13:13 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Is this the actual name of the trail? | |
| 5 | 2024-03-08 13:37 | Patrickvw ♦2 | The route is indicated with blue route signs! Or is it better to just leave this out? | |
| 6 | 2024-03-08 13:44 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Blue way markings are quite normal in Norway, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trailblazed | |
| 7 | 2024-03-08 14:12 | Patrickvw ♦2 | Do you recommend removing it then? | |
| 8 | 2024-03-08 14:14 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | If the trail is marked you can add the tag trailblazed=yes. | |
| 9 | 2024-03-08 14:37 | Patrickvw ♦2 | Ok! Changed. | |
| 146256359 by SwedenMapEditor @ 2024-01-14 19:24 | 1 | 2024-03-04 13:46 | Wulfmorn | Hej (gissar att du är svensk). Jag la till några fler byggnader och korrigerade placering av allt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148207620Vägnätet ligger rätt placerat så om du använder Bing eller andra flygfoton - justera först bilderna s&arin... |
| 146689054 by TRXTNF @ 2024-01-25 21:30 | 1 | 2024-02-09 00:54 | ablevi202 ♦41 | Why did you delete this path? it seems to still exist |
| 2 | 2024-02-09 16:49 | Tractor ♦40 | I've reverted the changeset. That the path is on private property, is no good reason to delete it. | |
| 3 | 2024-02-09 17:29 | TRXTNF ♦1 | It is because it is a private property path, and by someone mapping it on a map leads to motorized traffic in the wilderness which is illegal in Norway. Thank you in advance for helping to remove this again. | |
| 4 | 2024-02-09 17:34 | ablevi202 ♦41 | Yeah something being on privilate property does not mean it should be deleted. Just put access=private. Here's a wiki page with more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property | |
| 5 | 2024-02-09 17:40 | Tractor ♦40 | Marking it with access=private would mean that all transport modes were illegal, including walking. | |
| 6 | 2024-02-09 17:53 | Wulfmorn | sounds like a case for motor_vehicle=private | |
| 147183110 by Vorondil @ 2024-02-07 16:13 | 1 | 2024-02-07 20:15 | Wulfmorn | Det är ju inget berg där så peak kan den inte ha. Alla element kan ha ele därimot. Utifrån namnet så bör ju den här vara natural=ridge. |
| 144527808 by Tómas Ingi @ 2023-11-28 00:19 | 1 | 2023-11-28 09:51 | Wulfmorn | Are you mapping the landcover for the whole of Iceland? :D (I'm impressed) |
| 2 | 2023-11-30 08:13 | Tómas Ingi ♦79 | Hi,That's the hope! We'll see if it works out :)Thankfully there have been others who have contributed significantly to the landcover (see Ben97 for example), and it's always motivating to see the progress when the map updates! | |
| 3 | 2023-11-30 11:58 | Wulfmorn | I agree. Visual result matters for motivation. Let's hope you dont have to re-map too much after the recent (latest) volcanic activity. Keep up the awesome work. | |
| 137929457 by christianfosli @ 2023-06-29 18:15 | 1 | 2023-06-29 18:20 | christianfosli ♦2 | Note that the imagery is still showing the road the way it used to look. A more up-to-date image is available on Google Street View https://www.google.com/maps/@58.883323,5.6782146,3a,75y,115.37h,79.5t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGg2DYlgsa993KVPM5GiwVw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2F... |
| 2 | 2023-11-18 20:06 | Wulfmorn | However, you are not allowed to use Google as a source for OpenStreetMap :) | |
| 96846014 by Nakaner @ 2021-01-03 13:15 | 1 | 2023-11-18 00:51 | Wulfmorn | Some footways at Berg (Pfalz) station have gotten the tag "lit=surface", which I guess is a misclick. Since its impossible to guess the intended value, I'm hoping you still have access to on-the-ground information here.way 891493037way 228155015way 891493035way 228155018 |
| 2 | 2023-11-19 10:49 | Nakaner ♦3,147 | Thank you for pointing out this mistake. I fixed it. | |
| 143593474 by Willisjo @ 2023-11-03 22:24 | 1 | 2023-11-04 00:14 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,121 | Thanks for your work, & welcome to OSM. Two points to mention though. Please don't have your changesets covering such a big area, as it makes it very difficult for other mappers to work out what you've done. & it would also be quite rare for driveways to have a name, especially the... |
| 2 | 2023-11-05 11:36 | Wulfmorn | Thats actually not so rare, Fizzie. There is quite an overlap between named roads and driveways in Norway - often because of the road imports. In this case however, the name and the driveway was introduced many years ago by other users. | |
| 142934664 by Turid Nordbye @ 2023-10-21 17:44 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-24 10:27 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Dear Turid Nordbye, in this changeset you have (again) removed a path that you would prefer not to exist (the one that connects Sprengsneset to the path network in the West); extensive community discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-assistance-from-the-norwegian-community-i... |
| 2 | 2023-10-24 16:44 | Turid Nordbye Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-24 22:21 | Wulfmorn | Som sagt, dette er en kamp du må ta i kommune eller rett, ikke i OSM. | |
| 4 | 2023-10-25 10:22 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Blocked user Turid Nordbye in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15263 as advertised. | |
| 30789301 by Ansgar G Grimsrud @ 2015-05-04 19:40 | 1 | 2023-10-05 08:18 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Er way 342813124 en skogsvei? Den ligger inne med en turvei-relation. Ser ikke ut til å finnes i satellittbilde eller DTM. Den har heller ingen bruk i Strava Heatmap. |
| 2 | 2023-10-05 08:48 | Wulfmorn | Ser ut som veldig "finger i været-stier" der. Kanskje den faktiske turstien går et annet sted og relasjonen bare har kommet på villespor. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-05 08:54 | Wulfmorn | Jeg gjorde noen forbedringen fra flyfoto så det er litt lettere å vurdere hvor selve turstien skal være :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142178936 | |
| 142102915 by qwertet @ 2023-10-03 14:02 Active block | 1 | 2023-10-03 14:56 | harahu ♦51 | Hei igjen qwertet,Du er nødt å slutte å slette nevnte sti. Det er ikke OK å holde på slik du gjør nå. Du har blitt bedt om å slutte allerede en gang.Om du er uenig med en annen bruker, dvs meg, er svaret ikke å slette innhold. Du kan le... |
| 2 | 2023-10-03 18:07 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2023-10-03 20:26 | harahu ♦51 | "Men hvis en bruker har lagt inn feil så må det kunne rettes opp i uten at du/brukeren har full anarki."Det stemmer, men ved en konflikt som denne er det ikke opp til den andre brukeren å rydde opp. Første instans er å ta kontakt med den norske OSM-bruker... | |
| 4 | 2023-10-04 08:01 | Wulfmorn | Jeg foreslår at denne saken oppklares i retten/kommunen isteden for å endre frem og tilbake i OSM. Dette er en kjent nabofeid som aldri kan løses i comments eller forum.OSM kan ha stier som eksisterer, men det betyr ikke at man skal tvinge inn stier der man ikke har lov å... | |
| 5 | 2023-10-04 08:22 | qwertet Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2023-10-04 10:52 | Wulfmorn | Du sier det, men jeg ser ingen dokumentasjon. Vennligst benytt forumet. Det er samme brukerpålogging som her i OSM. | |
| 122041313 by Christian Madsen @ 2022-06-06 19:47 | 1 | 2023-09-28 18:11 | Oskarst_ ♦78 | Hei, ser at way 1067293597 ligger helt for seg sjøl uten at den vises i N50 eller har nevneverdig aktivitet i Strava Heatmap. Kan den fjernes? |
| 2 | 2023-09-28 19:59 | Wulfmorn | Kanskje er en gammel sti av noe slag. Sikkert ingen som blir veldig lei seg hvis den forsvinner. | |
| 3 | 2023-09-28 21:24 | Christian Madsen ♦13 | Har fjernet den. Det er etablert nye stier i området. | |
| 141675895 by Johan Jönsson @ 2023-09-24 10:24 | 1 | 2023-09-25 10:14 | Wulfmorn | Nu är det två landside-områden:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210520745https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210510999 |
| 2 | 2023-09-25 17:00 | Johan Jönsson ♦1 | Jag tror 1210510999 också lärt sig av taggningnen av Gjerdrum: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12119561dvs att landslide inte rendreras på kartan, så därför används natural=mud.Jag gör så att jag minskar mud till den övre rutschkan... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-25 17:28 | Wulfmorn | Att data inte rendras bjuder upp till missbruk. Jag är dock inte imot någon av dom två - jag bara uppmärksammar om att samma sak har lagts in två gånger - och förvisso med olika tagging :) | |
| 141678239 by Morten Lange @ 2023-09-24 11:30 | 1 | 2023-09-25 10:15 | Wulfmorn | Nu är det två landslides:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210520745https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210510999 |
| 140703269 by Ansgar G Grimsrud @ 2023-09-02 04:27 | 1 | 2023-09-20 10:03 | Wulfmorn | Skogspolygonet her på Gran har blitt ødelagt. Ser ut som natural=wood er fjernet fra way (source gjenstår), og det er ingen relasjoner som tar over. |
| 141002106 by Ansgar G Grimsrud @ 2023-09-08 20:39 | 1 | 2023-09-18 09:59 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Please check these nodes. They all got a HOVEDGRUPPE tag that looks like it shouldn't be in OSM. And: what is the source of this data "Norway Orthophoto" can't be right. |
| 2 | 2023-09-18 11:10 | Wulfmorn | Just as a note, this user has a recent history of importing things in a reckless way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141177811)The capital keys are present in the original datasets to help the user adjust the "place"-tag, but should be removed before upload.The correct sou... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-18 12:38 | NKA ♦247 | The user has stated that he will fix these place name imports. | |
| 4 | 2023-09-18 13:39 | Ansgar G Grimsrud ♦6 | I do believe I have fixed them now. | |
| 141053679 by traveleditor @ 2023-09-10 09:22 | 1 | 2023-09-10 10:01 | leojth ♦30 | Multiple outers has benefits and is valid mapping. If your only goal is to replace these, please stop. But if you are improving the map, you are, of course, free to use single/overlapping outers. |
| 2 | 2023-09-10 10:25 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Hello,Andy from the DWG here. Generally speaking, whenever it's been discussed, most people have preferred using multipolygons only when necessary (because an inner and and outer is needed, or because of way node limits).If I am mapping in an area and adding new features I definitely would... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-10 13:23 | Wulfmorn | Yet you did start an edit war when you condemned another user's work as "useless" and decided yours was just excellent and worthy of an edit war.It is perfectly valid for several areas to share a tag (multiple outer), especially if there is an area of sameness with interruptions (... | |
| 140328270 by DoubleA @ 2023-08-24 14:57 | 1 | 2023-08-24 18:31 | NKA ♦247 | I have reverted this changeset since it violates how the local community has decided to map bus stops in Norway.Please stop deleting the tag highway=bus_stop.https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stops-in-norway-guide-for-understanding-current-data-and-reporting-problems/9560/18 |
| 2 | 2023-08-24 18:43 | Wulfmorn | Completely pointless changes. Surely there is something better to do than create problems with the Norwegian bus stops? | |
| 139574230 by DoubleA @ 2023-08-07 16:37 | 1 | 2023-08-21 05:52 | NKA ♦247 | Please do not remove highway=bus_stop in Norway. It is messing up the regular bus stop updates we are running, creating hundreds of duplicates.Also, do not use Bing or other satellite imagery in Norway. They have large offsets.Just stay away from public transport in Norway. |
| 2 | 2023-08-21 07:53 | Wulfmorn | Bus stops situation explained: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stops-in-norway-guide-for-understanding-current-data-and-reporting-problems/9560/9 | |
| 137683014 by Roy Høgstad @ 2023-06-23 10:40 | 1 | 2023-06-23 13:22 | Wulfmorn | Hei,Om en vei tegnes eller ikke har ingen kobling til om veien er privat eller ikke. OSM oppbevarer kart over hva som fysisk eksisterer.Data brukes til mange forskjellige formål, i dette tilfelle f.eks. bilruting opp til husene.Du bør derfor ikke gjøre denne typen end... |
| 2 | 2023-06-23 16:49 | Roy Høgstad ♦1 | Godt poeng, tas selvsagt til etterretning :) | |
| 137407942 by kartogr @ 2023-06-16 10:26 | 1 | 2023-06-16 12:07 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Dear Anders Wiig, there is a clearly visible road here on aerial imagery. Your deletion of valid data amounts to vandalism. Please do not do this again or your account will have to be blocked. If using the road is illegal for some reason (and this is obvious from on-the-ground signage) then you can ... |
| 2 | 2023-06-16 12:47 | kartogr ♦3 | I'm not at liberty to edit the map as everyone else? Of course I am. That means removing things as well as adding things. | |
| 3 | 2023-06-16 12:52 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Everyone will get blocked for vandalism when they remove things that actually exist. Just like you. | |
| 4 | 2023-06-16 13:11 | kartogr ♦3 | This is not vandalism. And who decides what must be included? And no one can remove things? | |
| 5 | 2023-06-16 13:21 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | OSM wants to record what is there on the ground. That is our mission. If you delete something from OSM that is there on the ground, then you are acting against our mission.Of course deletions are possible, and even desired, if something in OSM is wrong, or if something that was there on the grou... | |
| 6 | 2023-06-16 13:26 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Account blocked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7216 | |
| 7 | 2023-06-16 13:50 | Wulfmorn | Additional info to note: The source of the road was initially the official road network database (Elveg) https://vegkart.atlas.vegvesen.no/#kartlag:geodata/@300547,6619615,14 | |
| 8 | 2023-06-16 18:09 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | The land owners claim that this road is permanently closed for renaturation, that nobody, not even the land owners, may use this road, that the buildings at the north end of the road may only be reached from the water and have no vehicular access by land. If that is indeed correct, then (and only th... | |
| 9 | 2023-06-17 02:26 | Wulfmorn | I don't know. It's pretty rural. Given the rather aggressive deletion, I sense a neighbor feud going on.It would be good to have a neutral party, preferably a known mapper check the status - but, alas, this is rather rural. If there is a barrier or similar, a recent photo would probabl... | |
| 112682428 by Msiipola @ 2021-10-19 07:15 | 1 | 2023-03-20 14:25 | Wulfmorn | Kan du kolla på https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993831184. Ser ut som vägen blivit tunnel under ett dike eller nåt :D Den kom upp här https://maproulette.org/challenge/38460/task/155315059 |
| 2 | 2023-03-20 18:30 | Msiipola ♦245 | Fixat! | |
| 133407238 by sylte70 @ 2023-03-07 15:14 | 1 | 2023-03-08 10:11 | Wulfmorn | I was just about to make this change myself :)However, I have now removed the foot-tags altogether since this road is not intended for walking, even if it is legal. Better to leave it out. The rules for routing are determined based on road class. |
| 132884688 by Wulfmorn @ 2023-02-22 14:25 | 1 | 2023-02-22 17:28 | Ale_Zena_IT ♦173 | Hello,it would be great trying to limit the extension of the changesets: I was monitoring activities in Somalia and came across with this one.Also, I wondering the meaning of some large polygons in different Countries without any tag.Alessandro |
| 2 | 2023-02-22 22:31 | luca sski ♦3 | I'm a bit confused about the untagged ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541379, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541378, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541377, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541376, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541375, https://www.openstree... | |
| 4 | 2023-02-23 13:04 | yasslay ♦93 | @luca sskiThe untagged ways are a part of the relation which you sent, which renders everything inside the untagged ways as a wooded area. I'm not sure as to why Wulfmorn did not use separate ways and areas for this, though. Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for somethi... | |
| 5 | 2023-02-24 20:14 | Wulfmorn | Oh my. I must have downloaded the area in a layer with some nonsense in it. So sorry. Please revert. :OSorry I didn't see the message until now. | |
| 6 | 2023-02-24 20:16 | Wulfmorn | Actually, I may have done some actual stuff in the edit. Those untagged polygons were not meant to be in it. I'll try to clean up now. So sorry - very sloppy of me. | |
| 7 | 2023-02-24 20:38 | Wulfmorn | I've removed the empty polygons.Regarding relation 14442220, I didnt create it that way, but I cleaned it up by separating it into two separate relations.> "Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for something which could be done in multiple areas."The o... | |
| 132643909 by Approksimator @ 2023-02-16 19:04 | 1 | 2023-02-17 11:37 | Wulfmorn | Actually these are supposed to be separated. The old camping site has been demolished and for some time the roads there we just cut off. I'll try to get rid of the demolished roads. |
| 110818952 by Wulfmorn @ 2021-09-06 19:51 | 1 | 2023-01-25 09:19 | borovac ♦102 | Hi Wulfmorn,Working on adding street names in Sweden I noticed you put on this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980234670 noname=yes tag. On mapillary we can see that the street has a name, but it is not a readable name. While government data (Trafikverket Road Network options (overlay) - Gatunam... |
| 2 | 2023-01-25 10:56 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | I don't remember the case or why I tagged it this way. Based on the other streetnames in the area i dont doubt that "Tallåsvägen" is the correct name. I have no complaint if you override my edit. My concerns have mostly been road geometry, not names. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-25 10:56 | Wulfmorn | Sorry, wrong account ^ :D | |
| 120453016 by Hanna Gyh @ 2022-05-02 09:51 | 1 | 2022-07-25 16:19 | archie ♦1,301 | Varför har du gjort om dessa vägar till bilvägar (residential): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24699076 och https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24699067?Tycks mig vara en gc-väg (https://www.google.com/maps/@59.0568922,12.6759234,3a,75y,287.37h,69.63t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sh3e2f... |
| 2 | 2022-07-25 16:40 | archie ♦1,301 | Du har även taggat om varenda väg i det här kvarteret och i grannkvarteret från path till residential (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514866096).Varför? Det här är inne i ett bostadskvarter. Varför tyckte du det passar bättre med bilväg hä... | |
| 3 | 2022-09-24 15:16 | archie ♦1,301 | Påminnelse om ditt svar. | |
| 4 | 2022-10-16 13:56 | Hanna Gyh ♦4 | Ok. Ändrat. | |
| 5 | 2022-12-06 13:07 | Wulfmorn | Det var inte alls ordnat. Jag har gått in och fixat lite nu. | |
| 127085929 by archie @ 2022-10-06 07:29 | 1 | 2022-10-06 12:02 | Wulfmorn | finns väl inget namn mitt på vägen :) |
| 2 | 2022-10-06 12:50 | archie ♦1,301 | nejj | |
| 3 | 2022-10-06 14:02 | Wulfmorn | :D | |
| 126929360 by MichaelHJ @ 2022-10-03 10:38 | 1 | 2022-10-04 07:42 | Wulfmorn | Denne vil komme tilbake igjen da adressene importeres fra Kartverket. Du bør heller melde adresseendring til folkeregisteret. |
| 125248312 by archie @ 2022-08-23 00:21 | 1 | 2022-08-23 09:55 | Wulfmorn | allegedly :) |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 11:11 | archie ♦1,301 | Japp. https://www.google.com/maps/@59.6474559,12.6173021,3a,62.7y,17.47h,94.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGQSIXVLlT8ph4na5CcOmgQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=sv | |
| 3 | 2022-08-23 11:18 | Wulfmorn | nope! :D https://www.st1.no/stasjoner/st1-arvikaDet beror bara på vart du tittar och vilka åsikter du har. Det finns ingen sanning.det är dock inte ändringen jag klagar på. bara comment på changeset ;) för det kändes nödvändigt att vara n... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-23 12:08 | archie ♦1,301 | korrekt! Logotype! | |
| 124392885 by archie @ 2022-08-02 13:36 | 1 | 2022-08-10 08:41 | Wulfmorn | yep :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3031741569 |
| 2 | 2022-08-10 15:02 | archie ♦1,301 | ännu ett futtigt memorial. Säg till mig när du hittar något likt Lincoln memorial (lägg märke till att det sistnämnda är helt klart ett monument trots namntillägget) :-) | |
| 123414506 by Tolline @ 2022-07-09 21:27 | 1 | 2022-07-10 00:29 | Wulfmorn | Så ut som du hadde litt trøbbel med skogen her, så jeg lagde et ordentlig hull for bebygget område i Grue Finnskog. Vær forsiktig med å endre på elementer som er medlemmer i "skogen". Det er lett at hele skogen går i stykker. =) |
| 123076149 by gunnar1m @ 2022-07-01 08:51 | 1 | 2022-07-01 10:16 | Wulfmorn | Again, this makes no sense at all. Is it another Wikipedia/SCB-sourced edit? |
| 113192033 by 9ix @ 2021-10-31 13:03 | 1 | 2022-06-27 10:01 | Wulfmorn | Were these road segments meant to be "noname=yes"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391476281/history (and surrounding ways) |
| 2 | 2022-07-02 20:00 | 9ix ♦18 | Yes, indeed. Thank you for the hint. Corrected it. | |
| 115533538 by WlaDeQ @ 2021-12-29 18:47 | 1 | 2022-06-27 09:58 | Wulfmorn | Was this supposed to be "noname=yes"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016649128/ |
| 115110036 by Nakaner @ 2021-12-18 21:51 | 1 | 2022-06-27 09:48 | Wulfmorn | These were probably meant to be "note", not "noname": https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/noname=Haltestelle%20aufgehoben%20wegen%20Inbetriebnahme%20der%20Stra%C3%9Fenbahn%20in%20der%20Kriegsstra%C3%9Fe |
| 2 | 2022-06-27 13:02 | Nakaner ♦3,147 | Hi,thank you for your comment. I improved the tagging.Best regardsMichael | |
| 121165853 by memento_avenae @ 2022-05-18 21:54 | 1 | 2022-06-27 09:43 | Wulfmorn | Hi,I found this node with unusual tagging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9753026587. Maybe it was meant to be something else. |
| 121805365 by mtbboy1993 @ 2022-06-01 10:31 | 1 | 2022-06-13 09:35 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Det blir veldig ofte feil i skog-relasjonene når du redigerer de store skogflatene med "iD"-editoren. Dette fører til at store områder blir blanke i kartet. Jeg har prøvd å rette opp alt i etterkant nå.Jeg anbefaler at du ikke bruker iD for &a... |
| 122111275 by gunnar1m @ 2022-06-08 10:29 | 1 | 2022-06-08 12:38 | Wulfmorn | Hi, I'm afraid this makes no sense at all, unless you are in the medieval period. This place is called Hammar and Sjögervål, Eda is the municipality/historic name for the farmland area - but it has no contemporary use as a village here. |
| 2 | 2022-06-08 12:40 | gunnar1m ♦19 | https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eda | |
| 3 | 2022-06-08 12:47 | Wulfmorn | Still doesnt make sense. Wikipedia uses the term "Småort", so its a statistical area. Ask locals for directions to "Eda" and you'll end up in https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eda_glasbrukThere is no cohesion between the houses here and it can not be called a single vi... | |
| 4 | 2022-06-08 12:56 | gunnar1m ♦19 | Somewhere the småort must be. And there he should also be on the map. | |
| 5 | 2022-06-08 14:16 | Wulfmorn | It doesn't, and it shouldn't. As I said, this is a statistical datapoint, not a real place. It would have been real before the 1800's. | |
| 6 | 2022-06-08 14:24 | gunnar1m ♦19 | Maybe someone else has an opinion on it. | |
| 7 | 2022-06-08 14:33 | Wulfmorn | Maybe, but you can't convince me that a statistical data point should be represented as an actual "village" on the map - which has not existed for 200 years. Maybe "historic:place=village" at best, but likely not even that.This is my local knowledge area and nobody calls... | |
| 8 | 2022-06-10 09:25 | gunnar1m ♦19 | https://wego.here.com/?map=59.84387,12.3609,12,normal | |
| 9 | 2022-06-10 11:48 | Wulfmorn | Yes, they are making the same mistake. | |
| 122070791 by MapChan @ 2022-06-07 12:31 | 1 | 2022-06-07 13:13 | Wulfmorn | Perfekt. Jag slängde på ett namn och website också. |
| 122032621 by MapChan @ 2022-06-06 15:50 | 1 | 2022-06-07 08:20 | Wulfmorn | Är vägen borttagen? Jag ser den på flygfotona. Kanske skulle varit "track". |
| 2 | 2022-06-07 09:13 | MapChan ♦1 | Är placerat stora stenar för den tidigare infarten närmast bron och numera är det placerat en serveringsvagn där. | |
| 3 | 2022-06-07 11:19 | Wulfmorn | Aha, nice. Du kan tagga in stenarna (natural=stone) så kan man undvika att nån annan är där och ritar in vägen igen. Serveringen kan väl mappas som ett kafé eller nåt? | |
| 49329325 by ENTUR Johan Wiklund @ 2017-06-07 08:48 | 1 | 2022-04-16 07:02 | user_5359 ♦19,369 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498810816/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498810817. What is the meaning of the tag religion = 365? Did you mean ref=365? |
| 2 | 2022-04-19 09:07 | Wulfmorn | Yes, some kind of misclick. 365 was the old ref, but not for that road. I've removed these tags now. Thank you for noticing. | |
| 3 | 2022-04-19 09:08 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | ^ aaaand wrong account :) | |
| 117361552 by NKA @ 2022-02-13 16:44 | 1 | 2022-02-13 17:34 | riiga ♦90 | Hej!Skulle du kunna förklara vad som behövde fixas på t.ex. Linköpings supercharger? Det ser ut som att du har tagit bort adressen till den och en del andra användbara taggar. |
| 2 | 2022-02-13 18:11 | NKA ♦247 | Dette endringssettet retter opp mange feil som en nederlandsk bruker gjorde for en tid tilbake:* Taggen socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs er ikke "godkjent" - Teslas socket for V3 ladestasjoer er den samme som socket:type2_combo* Det var mange feil i fordelingen mellom socket:type2_com... | |
| 3 | 2022-02-13 18:20 | riiga ♦90 | Vi har duplikat av adresser i Sverige eftersom vi inte har en nationell import. Alla affärer i samma byggnad får t.ex. samma adress så att de blir sökbara.Sen vänder jag mig också mot namngivningen. Det finns ingen skylt på platsen som säger "Tesl... | |
| 4 | 2022-02-13 18:44 | archie ♦1,301 | Det verkar som att name-taggen har fyllts på ganska oreflekterat med uppgifterna från Teslas databas/katalog. Det verkar vara ett rakt övertagande/kopiering av databas/katalog-uppgifterna. I en textbaserad databas har uppgiften "Tesla Uddevalla - Hogstorp Supercharger" (ht... | |
| 5 | 2022-02-13 19:21 | NKA ♦247 | Navnene er de samme som brukes på Tesla's websider. Jeg bruker formatet <brand>+<branch> for name-taggen, f.eks. slik som for "ICA Supermarket Lammhult". Samme diskusjon kunne man ha om alle kjeder (supermarkeder, bensinstasjoner, osv).Det er viktig at navnet kan... | |
| 6 | 2022-02-13 20:37 | archie ♦1,301 | Osm är i första hand en databas och det gäller att iformationen ligger i rätt fält. Du har rätt name-taggen är den mest missbrukade taggen i osm och den här diskussionen har även relevans för andra objekt.Om vi för ett ögonblick analysera... | |
| 7 | 2022-02-13 21:22 | riiga ♦90 | @NKA:Att använda exemplet med ICA är nog det sämst tänkbara. De flesta ICA-butiker har ju faktiskt en skylt utanför där hela namnet står vilket gör det ganska korrekt att använda det i name-fältet.Det är inte OSMs uppgift att presentera e... | |
| 8 | 2022-02-13 22:29 | NKA ♦247 | Jo, jeg og mange med meg synes det er viktig for OSM å tagge slik at OSM-databasen kan brukes til mange ulike formål, inklusive apper, ellers blir bare OSM et vanlig kart.Jeg antar dere ikke mener at brandet "Tesla" skal fjernes fra name. Da må vi jo fjerne mange ICA,... | |
| 9 | 2022-02-14 01:23 | archie ♦1,301 | Nej så lätt går det inte.Vi - och jag kan försäkrar dig många andra med oss - menar att osm är en databas för geografiska objekt. Olika objekt har skilda dignitet. En ICA affär har oftast ett namn. Den behöver marknadsföra sig med hjäl... | |
| 10 | 2022-02-14 07:46 | NKA ♦247 | Godt at det er interesse for temaet :)>> en laddningsstolpe har inget namn. Dessa objekt har inte nyss nämnda marknadsföringsbehov.En enslig ladestolpe må ikke ha et navn nei, men her snakker vi om de store brandede ladestasjonene (sitene) med hurtigladere. Kjedeeierne ... | |
| 11 | 2022-02-14 09:02 | archie ♦1,301 | Stilisera inte det här som en principiell fråga. Det gäller det här - misslyckade - changeset. I wikin nämns INTE name som en "usefull combination". Sedan kan du lätt se dig omkring hur det handhas. Här lite statistik (för enkelhetens skull bara poi... | |
| 12 | 2022-02-14 09:56 | NKA ♦247 | Alle disse ladestasjonene har hatt name=* i tidligere versjoner, gitt av mange forskjellige brukere. Det er bare du, archie, som tidligere har slettet name=* på flere av dem.Selvfølgelig skal disse store anleggene ha name, akkurat som bensinstasjoner. Om du ønsker å fje... | |
| 13 | 2022-02-14 10:07 | archie ♦1,301 | laddstolpar - "store anleggene"? Vad snackar du om? | |
| 14 | 2022-02-14 11:43 | Mathias Haugsbø ♦18 | @archie , Selvfølgelig skal POI ha name tag. eneste grunnen til å ikke ha name tag er at man ikke vet hva name er, som er tilfellet mange steder når man bare mapper tilfeldig. Ta en titt på NSI https://nsi.guide/ for å se hvilke tags som man så å si er enig... | |
| 15 | 2022-02-14 19:33 | riiga ♦90 | NSI föreslår name="Tesla Supercharger" vilket var hur jag taggade från början. Om nu namn ska användas för laddstationer så är det en rimlig kompromiss och i linje med vad både NSI föreslår och vad som är praxis för buti... | |
| 16 | 2022-02-14 19:51 | NKA ♦247 | Det er ok å beholde adressene selvfølgelig. | |
| 17 | 2022-02-14 23:27 | Wulfmorn | :D | |
| 18 | 2022-02-15 10:05 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | The DWG won't interfere if the community has a consensus here, but generally, when asked, what we say is (i) objects that you cannot deliver a letter to do not get addr:* tags; (ii) the name tag is what it says on the thing (you wouldn't tag a street lamp with name=Street Lamp); (iii) unle... | |
| 19 | 2022-02-15 17:08 | SimonPoole ♦339 | @Mathias Haugsbø that is clearly wrong. The name tag is only for facilities that commonly have a name and clearly not for ATMs, vending machines and, charging stations (all for which the NSI mistakenly suggests name tags). | |
| 20 | 2022-02-15 19:12 | NKA ♦247 | We are not discussing individual chargers/sockets here, similar in size to an ATM, but larger high capacity stations/sites, similar to a fuel station. Some of them have dozens of chargers.https://www.tocn.no/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/DJI_0003-2-Rygge-Supercharger-front-senk-korr.jpgThe Tesla ... | |
| 21 | 2022-02-16 06:44 | archie ♦1,301 | @NKA please notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117461674 | |
| 22 | 2022-02-16 07:40 | archie ♦1,301 | se again: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117461674 | |
| 23 | 2022-02-17 08:06 | archie ♦1,301 | Why did you delete "brand:wikipedia=*" and "brand:wikidata=*" in this cs? | |
| 116289682 by Vorondil @ 2022-01-18 09:44 | 1 | 2022-01-18 12:41 | Wulfmorn | I concur. It has a small population but its a prominent "area". |
| 114760798 by lauritz stolpe @ 2021-12-09 21:35 | 1 | 2021-12-10 00:16 | Wulfmorn | Hei og velkommen til OSM. Ser du endret på en rekke data i Skotterud (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=114760798)Så noe tips og råd:1. Stedspunktet bør ikke knyttes inn i veinettet. Jeg ser du la det i veikrysset ved biblioteket.2. Det er ikke vits &arin... |
| 103864926 by efutjuh @ 2021-04-29 18:59 | 1 | 2021-11-08 14:34 | Wulfmorn | Looks like you set a surface tag to "no" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723568972/history. Probably a mistake. |
| 112422185 by km2bp @ 2021-10-12 15:04 | 1 | 2021-10-12 23:44 | Wulfmorn | I'm just wondering how you justify adding photos of random peoples private homes to "Open POI map". Your album says "OpenPoiMap - Tourist map with pictures is the best (Km2bp)". What do they have to do with tourism? Did you ask their permission? It's one thing to be swe... |
| 112316021 by Holtern @ 2021-10-09 21:42 | 1 | 2021-10-11 12:24 | Wulfmorn | dog=yes :D |
| 109956063 by mikkolukas @ 2021-08-19 22:14 Active block | 1 | 2021-10-05 18:51 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Please revert the Bergen light rail back to its original tag. It is not a tram as it is fully signaled and on dedicated track for most of the line. |
| 2 | 2021-10-05 19:51 | Gazer75 ♦284 | And please do not mess with access tags if you do not know how they work in Norway. Agnes Mowinckels gate has a sign forbidding general motor vehicles except buses. the access=no tag is not used here unless its forbidden for all traffic modes. You effectively blocked walking and biking on the road. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-08 14:49 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2021-10-08 14:55 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 5 | 2021-10-08 15:19 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 6 | 2021-10-08 15:26 | Gazer75 ♦284 | People tag for the renderer by using the banket tags. Its only access= values that show up on the map. So you end up with a bunch of overrides making the tag list unnecessary long.Norwegian sign 306.1 should be tagged a motor_vehicle=noIf i left some tags stating use sidepath, then that is an ... | |
| 7 | 2021-10-09 07:56 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | The Bergen Light Rail is surely a light rail. I'm sure this discussion is in another changeset some years ago and it was agreed.Parts of the rail can be on thing and parts cant be another, it should all be the same | |
| 8 | 2021-10-09 10:15 | Wulfmorn | "I assume the law states that foot and bicycle MUST use the provided cycleways/sidewalks, when they are available, right?"No, it does not. Not in Norway. | |
| 9 | 2021-10-09 10:31 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 10 | 2021-10-09 19:46 | Wulfmorn | That's hardly the case here though. I don't see why you would insist on different rail-types for different parts of the Bybanen-network. It's a closed system. | |
| 11 | 2021-10-10 10:54 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 12 | 2021-10-10 11:20 | Wulfmorn | I'm saying nothing is connected. | |
| 13 | 2022-05-15 02:09 | voiden ♦16 | I det siste har EnTur hatt problemer med å vise Bybanestrekningen skikkelig. Om et reiseforslag inneholder bybanen, er det store deler av strekningen kun rette linjer i stedet for en kurve som følger sporet. Det kan godt være at inndeling av sporet i tram og light rail er år... | |
| 14 | 2022-05-15 09:15 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Det er Skyss sitt ansvar å levere slike data, men de bruker OSM i sitt planverktøy, så ja, det kan være problemer. Jeg skal sjekke med Skyss om de opplever utfordringer. | |
| 111171604 by NahomeJo @ 2021-09-14 03:36 | 1 | 2021-09-15 13:09 | Wulfmorn | amenity, name and position is usually enough, so what is enough is up to you.Here is all the stuff you can add... if you really want to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=restaurant?uselang=en |
| 111122035 by NahomeJo @ 2021-09-13 05:25 | 1 | 2021-09-13 09:59 | Wulfmorn | Det jag skulle ändrat var:- Ta bort "brand" (det är för kedjor)- Ta bort länken till 'image'. Google bör inte blandas in på copyrightregler.- Lägg till öppettider |
| 102629084 by FennecusZerda @ 2021-04-09 09:36 | 1 | 2021-08-17 17:14 | Peter Bremer ♦42 | Hi Fennecus, could you inform me what the reasoning is for removing drawn sidewalks (which offer a higher level of detail) and replace them with sidewalk attributes (a lower level of detail)? |
| 2 | 2021-08-24 10:08 | Wulfmorn | I took a look at the case of Tordenskiolds gate and it is my opinion that a separate sidewalk-way does not offer any particular benefits in this case. Sometimes more data does not mean more quality. Sidewalk mapping is one of the grayest zones of OSM-mapping and my preference is local uniformity. Al... | |
| 3 | 2021-08-29 21:44 | FennecusZerda ♦17 | Thanks Wulfman. I'm still learning here, and I've had a separate discussion with Peter over OSM messages. I see both sides of the argument here. Separately, I've raised a general question about this with Entur, who are actively contributing to and using OTP for routing suggestions for... | |
| 109700318 by Wulfmorn @ 2021-08-15 12:58 | 1 | 2021-08-15 12:58 | Wulfmorn | Not Torpavägen, but Åsby an Derome Såg. |
| 109249786 by hros @ 2021-08-06 09:52 | 1 | 2021-08-06 11:38 | NKA ♦247 | Jeg tror ikke vi kan ha wikidata-tags på veier/gatenavn. Det blir mange tusen tags og i praksis umulig å vedlikeholde. Gatene er enkle å søke opp via name i stedet. |
| 2 | 2021-08-07 12:47 | hros ♦3 | Verdiene på disse taggene er svært stabile | |
| 3 | 2021-08-07 12:58 | NKA ♦247 | Tviler ikke, men veiene (ways) er ofte svært ustabile. Dvs. de blir ofte splittet opp og endret på andre måter, og jeg tviler på om noen vil orke å holde wikidata-taggen ajour når veien endres. Vi har samme utfordring med route-relasjoner, som etter hvert ender op... | |
| 4 | 2021-08-07 15:51 | Wulfmorn | og så blir det bare stort omfang i veldig små områder (der noen gidder). resten av Norge (og verden) vil mangle infoen og hvis noen skal nyttegjøre seg wikidatainfo om veier så må man ha et veldig lokalt prosjekt. | |
| 5 | 2021-08-08 09:41 | hros ♦3 | Hadde jeg hatt en annen måte å knytte en wikipediaartikkel sammen med dets representasjon på kartet, hadde jeg brukt det, men enn så lenge har jeg ikke det, og da er taggene nyttige. Jeg mener at å opprette en relasjon mellom to beskrivelser av noe, er å øk... | |
| 105649837 by clever @ 2021-06-01 02:24 | 1 | 2021-06-01 09:43 | Wulfmorn | Navy Island should be role 'inner' for the Saint Andrews Parish relation. |
| 2 | 2021-06-01 09:46 | Wulfmorn | Sorry no, the island is weird. Its outer for both itself and for Town of Saint Andrews, but inner for the parish. :) | |
| 102921768 by mueschel @ 2021-04-14 10:15 | 1 | 2021-04-14 13:19 | Wulfmorn | Oh dear, that was an unfortunate mistake. Thank you :) |
| 102073320 by MIGRO19 @ 2021-03-31 18:25 | 1 | 2021-03-31 18:31 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Ser at du slettet en del av veien på Myrabakken. Kan du utdype litt hvorfor denne veien ble slettet? |
| 92308801 by Tractor @ 2020-10-11 17:25 | 1 | 2021-02-28 15:26 | km2bp ♦285 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158242976#map=19/59.92039/10.82436 This is a fairly recent map change made by you On Norway Orthophoto This building doesn't look like that. Has it been rebuilt? Greetings |
| 2 | 2021-02-28 16:08 | Tractor ♦40 | Indeed, it doesn't look like that.I think I only changed the tagging from building=yes + building:type=industrial to building=industrial.The building has probably been demolished since it was mapped 9 years ago. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-28 16:17 | km2bp ♦285 | Yes, you are right https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158242798/history You can draw it againIf you want to | |
| 4 | 2021-02-28 16:45 | Wulfmorn | I re-traced it because Tractor is too slow off the mark! ;) Also, I changed it from industrial to commercial. It's a car-dealership. | |
| 5 | 2021-02-28 16:54 | km2bp ♦285 | Good job. I didn't expect it to be fixed so quickly :-) | |
| 6 | 2021-03-01 05:08 | Tractor ♦40 | Excellent. | |
| 100103925 by km2bp @ 2021-02-27 15:56 | 1 | 2021-02-27 17:07 | NKA ♦247 | You promised not to split ways again for your photos. Please stop doing so.Just put the photo on a node, or stop adding them altogether. |
| 2 | 2021-02-27 17:48 | km2bp ♦285 | Which particular place do you not like? Note that I no longer take the road for parts and even correct my own previous editions. I added photos to the area. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-27 22:05 | Tractor ♦40 | Seems like you are still splitting ways just to add Mapillary photos, for example <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911547682#map=19/59.92298/10.82358< or <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911547687#map=19/59.92285/10.82353>. | |
| 4 | 2021-02-27 22:11 | Tractor ♦40 | On closer inspection, I see that you didn't split thew highway, but rather added an area:highway, duplicating all the highway tags, in order to add the Mapilary photos. Seems rather meaningless. | |
| 5 | 2021-02-27 22:16 | NKA ♦247 | The E6 tagging is just absurd and should be reverted as soon as possible.Anyway, we all want you to stop adding images! | |
| 6 | 2021-02-27 22:33 | Wulfmorn | These images can be viewed directly in Mapillary. No need to add them as permanent tags in OSM as well. | |
| 7 | 2021-02-28 00:11 | km2bp ♦285 | I think adding indirect tags to objects is better. What's wrong with that?I do it in many countries and it doesn't bother anyone.All churches in Norway have photos on OSM. I already said that some photos are taken with zoom.How will you guess which building is without a satellite vie... | |
| 8 | 2021-02-28 00:22 | km2bp ♦285 | This map will not work properly if the photos are not assigned using the Image tag http://openpoimap.org/?map=tourism&zoom=15&lat=59.91284&lon=10.74824&layers=B00FTFFFFFFTTFFFTFFFFFFF | |
| 9 | 2021-02-28 07:32 | NKA ♦247 | You are currently doing a large scale import from Mapillary. You need to follow the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), which among other things require that you obtain local community buy-in, that you draft an import plan and that you submit your plan for a re... | |
| 10 | 2021-02-28 09:08 | km2bp ♦285 | This is not an import Make all changes manually Mapillary is only the server where the image file resides. It can also be, for example, Wikimedia. See http://openpoimap.org/?map=tourism&zoom=18&lat=51.18048&lon=4.41417&layers=B00FTFFFFFFTTFFFTFFFFFFF Don't stress yourself unn... | |
| 11 | 2021-02-28 14:34 | Tractor ♦40 | Why do you use two tags for each image? | |
| 12 | 2021-02-28 14:48 | km2bp ♦285 | One photo shows the object and the other the shooting location. Exempel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711959205#map=18/59.06165/6.68152But be calm. I thought it over and for the objects that I photographed up close I don't do it anymore. It's just more work for me. In addition, I ... | |
| 13 | 2021-02-28 14:52 | km2bp ♦285 | And one more photo directly on Mapillary is the original large size. And the source is given | |
| 14 | 2021-02-28 15:03 | km2bp ♦285 | The text on this board cannot be read from the photo. But when you open the same photo in Mapillary, you can easily read the letters https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6693422084 | |
| 99592063 by Libro Stålteknik AB @ 2021-02-19 12:01 | 1 | 2021-02-19 13:23 | Wulfmorn | Ok, men nu tog du bort halva byggnaden :) Var det meningen? |
| 97988970 by landfahrer @ 2021-01-22 17:24 | 1 | 2021-01-23 01:07 | Wulfmorn | Hi. Please do not move buildings in this municipality. They are rectified to national map authority maps. Bing/Maxar/Esri etc. are no good here :) |
| 2 | 2021-01-23 09:11 | landfahrer ♦8 | Sorry for this misstake | |
| 3 | 2021-01-23 13:06 | Wulfmorn | No problem. I fixed it. | |
| 97417429 by Dan Roslund @ 2021-01-13 07:01 | 1 | 2021-01-13 08:40 | Wulfmorn | Det är meningslöst att ta bort "place=*" från noden med namnet Värpeshult. Det gör att den inte längre används, men att namnet ligger kvar utan att veta vad det hänvisar till. Heter inte platsen Värpeshult? |
| 2 | 2021-01-13 08:50 | Dan Roslund ♦1 | Hej,Namnet stämmer. Jag ber om ursäkt, avsikten var bara att öka tomtarean. Inte ta bort något. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-13 10:34 | Wulfmorn | Ok, då bör du lägga tillbaks "place=hamlet" på den noden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7465303293/historyDen måste inte ligga på huset. Den kan ligga lite neutralt mitt i området (men bör ligga fritt och inte kopplas ihop med nån... | |
| 93407157 by petterSta @ 2020-11-02 09:15 | 1 | 2020-12-21 10:29 | Wulfmorn | Hei Petter. Har denne stranda/badeplassen et navn? Jeg har utbedret opptegningen litt basert på flyfoto og din beskrivelse. |
| 2 | 2020-12-21 10:38 | petterSta ♦1 | Hei, ja glemte navnet da jeg registrerte den - men kom på det nå! takk for påminnelsen! | |
| 3 | 2020-12-21 13:57 | Wulfmorn | Flott! Jeg skal se om jeg får pyntet enda litt mere etterpå. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Swimming_and_bathing | |
| 93171377 by Jens Rantala VVS @ 2020-10-28 10:08 | 1 | 2020-10-28 10:12 | Wulfmorn | Hej Jens. Du har lagt informationen på en plats-punkt (antagligen bygdens namn). Du bör istället skapa en helt ny punkt med adress, namn och indikation att det är en rörmokartjänst. Den nya punkten placerar du på din exakta position. |
| 92657924 by Walkeren @ 2020-10-18 14:01 | 1 | 2020-10-18 16:50 | Wulfmorn | Please stop incorrectly adding parks. |
| 92656509 by Walkeren @ 2020-10-18 13:12 | 1 | 2020-10-18 13:54 | Wulfmorn | Still wrong usage for park. Park is generally used for pedestrian areas in residential zones. You are using it for all kinds of things. Please study the wiki before proceeding with edits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark |
| 92654210 by Walkeren @ 2020-10-18 11:42 | 1 | 2020-10-18 11:45 | Wulfmorn | This is the incorrect use of "park". I would advise you add fewer things per changeset in the beginning. Risk of changesets being reverted means your good additions will also be removed along with your more controversial ones. |
| 92258084 by Amiga6 @ 2020-10-09 22:32 | 1 | 2020-10-10 09:48 | Wulfmorn | Kan man gå på den då? Vägen ska bara tas bort om den inte finns kvar. Om fordon inte har tillträde så ska den göras om till gång- eller cykelväg. |
| 2 | 2020-10-11 07:48 | Amiga6 ♦1 | Ok, lagt dit vägen som gång och cyckelväg. | |
| 92130408 by SveinM @ 2020-10-07 19:53 | 1 | 2020-10-07 21:34 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Hei. Ser at du fjerner busstopp. Dette er uheldigvis forgjeves da disse importeres fra det nasjonale stoppestedsregisteret. Der administreres stoppene av Ruter og de vil altså komme tilbake i neste importrunde så lenge Ruter ikke deaktiverer/legger ned dem i det nasjonale registeret. Det... |
| 2 | 2020-10-08 09:59 | SveinM ♦2 | Hei og takk for info. Var ikkje klar over at det var linka rett mot Entur. Jobbar sjølv i Ruter. Fleire av stoppa eg fjerna i OpenStreetMap er haldeplassar som er nedlagt i seinare tid, men data på linjenivå er ikkje låst endå og då kan vi ikkje fjerne kordinatan... | |
| 3 | 2020-10-08 10:25 | Wulfmorn | Yes. Jeg har meldt dette videre til Tone Bakke . Regner med hun tar det videre. | |
| 4 | 2020-10-08 10:47 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | Se der, blander sammen kontoene mine også :) | |
| 91865827 by ZV26 @ 2020-10-02 12:17 | 1 | 2020-10-02 20:18 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Please remove your edits as your are vandalising the OSM map. This is not a map for testing, everybody can see your edits.Best regards,Marc ZoutendijkOpenStreetMap FoundationData Working Group |
| 2 | 2020-10-02 20:36 | ZV26 ♦1 | Dear Marc ZoutendijkSorry for the trouble I made. I have removed the road I made. Please let me know if there's anything else I should do.BRZheng | |
| 3 | 2020-10-03 01:54 | Wulfmorn | Thank you for removing the "test", Zheng. Everything looks fine now. | |
| 89874500 by Mapperbox @ 2020-08-24 19:13 | 1 | 2020-08-24 19:19 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Du kan uheldigvis ikke linke til eller referere fra Google da de ikke tilbyr åpne data (påkrevd for OpenStreetMap). |
| 85514164 by Rick Sanchez C-137 @ 2020-05-20 18:36 | 1 | 2020-07-31 16:06 | Wulfmorn | This intersection has a weird tagging. I was unable to guess the intended tagging so you'd better take a look yourself.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1775594762/history |
| 79983552 by Supaplex @ 2020-01-23 14:49 | 1 | 2020-07-31 15:51 | Wulfmorn | Hi. This road has an unusual value: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766003491/history "highway=subway". Perhaps it was supposed to be service? |
| 88150685 by Wulfmorn @ 2020-07-17 15:42 | 1 | 2020-07-22 04:13 | Taller Don Markes ♦1 | Taller de motos multimarcas Don Markes |
| 2 | 2020-07-25 10:57 | Wulfmorn | Sorry but I don't understand. | |
| 74560973 by cquest @ 2019-09-17 07:08 | 1 | 2020-07-17 15:34 | Wulfmorn | Hi. This street seems to have either incorrect name value or incorrect oneway-value. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407744013/history |
| 2 | 2020-07-20 08:43 | cquest ♦270 | Oups... fixed !Merci :) | |
| 84684616 by KikeTM @ 2020-05-05 10:10 | 1 | 2020-07-17 15:28 | Wulfmorn | This street has a strange oneway-tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48774742 |
| 87528036 by gilbert Aeschelmann @ 2020-07-04 10:45 | 1 | 2020-07-17 15:26 | Wulfmorn | Hi. This street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822825914/ has the tag "oneway=yd". I presume it was meant to be "yes". |
| 87503975 by Orniallt @ 2020-07-03 12:31 | 1 | 2020-07-03 12:45 | Wulfmorn | Hi. Just one remark. There is little point to moving or editing the address markers. These are part of an automated import from Kartverket-data and manual changes will be overwritten. The advantage of this being a very complete and up to date dataset of addresses. |
| 86986024 by Wulfmorn @ 2020-06-22 14:42 | 1 | 2020-06-22 14:43 | Wulfmorn | JOSM stopped working preventing proper comment and source info: Landcover in Hovsten. Source: Lantmäteriet Ortofoto |
| 84028907 by livbogdan @ 2020-04-24 01:53 | 1 | 2020-04-24 05:56 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | Hello and welcome to OSM!What is this forest named Grååsvägen?The name doesnt sound like a forest and the forest covers a lot of houses and open areas. |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 13:03 | Wulfmorn | Yeah that looks very strange indeed. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-26 17:02 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | I removed the wood. If you think that is wrong, please let me know.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84150481 | |
| 82663335 by AndersAndersson @ 2020-03-26 12:49 | 1 | 2020-03-27 08:29 | Wulfmorn | Hej. Jag skulle rekommendera att du använder taggen "natural=hill" istället för peak. Jag låter bara de allra mest synliga höjderna (pr. kommun) få vara "peak" (t.ex. Hugnsåsen som förvisso inte är så värst hög, men ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-27 10:30 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | Hej!Man ska inte mappa för renderaren och det blir konstigt med sådana diffusa saker som när en hill övergår till en peak.Jag har lagt in alla bergstoppar med namn i detta område. Jag tycker inte att det är oöverskådligt. Man ser sjöar, skoga... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-27 19:04 | Wulfmorn | Helt ok :) Du verkar ha kontroll. Verkar som Borlänge ligger i Himalaya. Jag hade dock det samma borta i mitt hörn där nån mappade 50 peaks på 5 km, så jag blir alltid nervös det det mappas peaks runt mig :D | |
| 4 | 2020-03-27 19:09 | Wulfmorn | Förresten så kollade jag inte så noga på din profil. Jag blandade ihop notifications för nya users med edits i mitt bevakade område ^_^ Carry on, nothing to see here, lol | |
| 5 | 2020-03-27 21:45 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | Hehe.Borlänge i Himalaya, tusen sjöars land eller skogsriket beror nog på vilka glasögon man har på sig. :)Jag uppskattar din kommentar. Det är alltid nyttigt att bli ifrågasatt och tvingas tänka en vända till på det man gör av gammal ... | |
| 6 | 2020-03-28 12:45 | Wulfmorn | river-stream-ditch, lake-pond och peak-eller-ingenting är alla lika dåliga OSM-hemskheter. Wetland är en mardröm. Det slutar oftast med att jag bara mappar geometrin och taggar efter bästa förmåga, så får hellre nån ändra senare, om dom har... | |
| 81910764 by SverigeFan @ 2020-03-07 22:18 | 1 | 2020-03-09 08:45 | Wulfmorn | De ändringar du har gjort i Ås, Eda kommun måste reverteras. Du har flyttat vägar och byggnader från Lantmäteriets position till Bings position, vilket är fel. Jag har korrigerat hela vägnätet och alla byggnader i Eda efter LM's ortofoto. |
| 80764711 by opendcc @ 2020-02-09 21:24 | 1 | 2020-02-10 09:35 | Wulfmorn | Thanks :) |
| 79596968 by asberg @ 2020-01-15 07:52 | 1 | 2020-01-15 08:50 | Wulfmorn | 👍 |
| 78105191 by FvGordon @ 2019-12-08 10:06 | 1 | 2019-12-08 10:39 | Wulfmorn | No no no, don't move the roads :) Its the buildings that are offset. I'm fixing all the roads first - then I'm gonna do all the buildings and all the other things as well. Long project. |
| 2 | 2019-12-10 22:28 | FvGordon ♦217 | Thanks for this note. Ways and the background image can be aligned with GPS traces first, then the buildings. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-10 22:43 | Wulfmorn | No, I am using highly reliable official orthophotos. The goal is to remove all the Bing/Digital Globe offsets (which are significant in this part of the world) on all elements in the municipality. Currently working hard on the road network. | |
| 74652948 by asberg @ 2019-09-19 05:27 | 1 | 2019-09-19 08:19 | Wulfmorn | Tänk på att platsnamn lagt på hus syns väldigt dåligt i kartan i förhållande til place-noder. När du lägger namnet på huset betyder det också att det är själva huset som heter t.ex. Västby - inte gården. Om du vill ha ... |
| 2 | 2019-09-19 08:20 | Wulfmorn | Jag la för övrigt in en massa namn från Ekonomiska kartan. Väldigt bra om du korrigerar placering och sånt eftersom du verkar ha rätt bra koll på Ås-strôke'. :) | |
| 74613471 by asberg @ 2019-09-18 08:54 | 1 | 2019-09-18 11:06 | Wulfmorn | Äng, (landuse=meadow) är mark som används för slåtter eller oanvänd åker etc. Det är förmodligen mer rätt om du använder "gräs" (landuse=grass) runt husknutarna. |
| 73594749 by Segratus @ 2019-08-21 19:40 | 1 | 2019-08-21 19:57 | Wulfmorn | Hi. Use "landuse=grass" instead of "natural=grassland". The difference is landuse means its managed, natural means its wild. You can however use natural=wood instead of landuse=forest - for the same reasons. You also seem to have added some random triangular residential area poly... |
| 73162226 by Vikertorpet @ 2019-08-08 16:01 | 1 | 2019-08-09 12:00 | Wulfmorn | Opening hours har en egen syntaks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hoursFor Vinger u.klubb skal du altså ha "Tu-Th 15:00-21:00".Operator bør også være en bedrift eller organisasjon - ikke en person (det er veldig uvanlig, og har ogs implikasjone... |
| 72913677 by EZPEN @ 2019-08-01 20:09 | 1 | 2019-08-08 19:55 | Wulfmorn | It seems you changed Mjøsa from natural=water to natural=lake. This is incorrect and it caused the lake to no longer render. The tagging should be "natural=water" AND "water=lake". |
| 2 | 2019-08-08 20:31 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | ☝️ | |
| 70597892 by imilicevic7 @ 2019-05-24 19:55 | 1 | 2019-05-25 22:02 | Wulfmorn | Remember that cycleways and footways that cross roads should also be connected to them, provided they are at the same level. |
| 70203663 by edathy @ 2019-05-13 17:56 Active block | 1 | 2019-05-13 21:42 | Wulfmorn | Hi, I am currently working on resolving the issues in this area, which I caused, somehow. |
| 2 | 2019-05-13 22:09 | Wulfmorn | I dont know what you did, but its taking me hours to fix. Please do not dissolve the multipolygons! | |
| 66835849 by assalea @ 2019-02-01 15:08 | 1 | 2019-02-01 21:37 | Wulfmorn | The name is wrong (its Knapstad), and it has been tagged on the wrong feature (landuse=residential, should be on place=*). The name already exists on the correct feature. I will upload a fix. |
| 64788240 by der modelierer @ 2018-11-22 16:39 | 1 | 2018-11-22 18:48 | Wulfmorn | you really should use the 's' key to give the houses perfect angles. |
| 56646940 by kdkeller @ 2018-02-24 21:56 | 1 | 2018-11-17 01:31 | Wulfmorn | I think something went wrong here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5434229474highway=place_of_worship, maxspeed=60 |
| 2 | 2018-11-18 20:10 | kdkeller ♦29 | Oops, thank you. I deleted it. | |
| 38102029 by SK53 @ 2016-03-27 15:45 | 1 | 2018-11-17 01:17 | Wulfmorn | are you sure you want this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4081403321 to be highway=step? its a one of a kind tagging globally. :) |
| 58823793 by tom_konda @ 2018-05-09 15:59 | 1 | 2018-11-17 01:01 | Wulfmorn | This node is a bit strange. Is it supposed to be that way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5607484650 |
| 2 | 2018-11-24 11:59 | tom_konda ♦13 | Thank you for your reviewing.This node is incorrect by my copy and paste mistake on iD editor.I will remove this node soon. | |
| 55281055 by silvIasdw @ 2018-01-09 03:29 | 1 | 2018-11-17 00:55 | Wulfmorn | Hello. This node has a strange highway tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2061384809. |
| 2 | 2018-11-22 03:29 | Adiatma IRM-RV ♦109 | Hello Wulfmorn. You are correct. "Jalan" mean highway/road. That's incomplete name so I deleted tag, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64760757.Thank you. | |
| 39836274 by newils @ 2016-06-06 11:20 | 1 | 2018-11-17 00:53 | Wulfmorn | Hello. This node has a strange highway tag. It should probably be "place" instead of highway, but i dont want to guess: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4228121825 |
| 61600006 by voltairovicz @ 2018-08-12 20:48 | 1 | 2018-09-23 00:13 | RicoElectrico ♦1,770 | Witaj,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5827897594To chyba miało być highway=street_lamp, prawda? |
| 2 | 2018-11-17 00:33 | Wulfmorn | Bump^.highway=stree_ -> highway=street_lamp? | |
| 48047538 by blakviper @ 2017-04-22 23:35 | 1 | 2018-11-12 21:39 | Wulfmorn | Hello. You seem to have added the street name as the maxspeed value on this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488773996 |
| 29808104 by Константин Гам @ 2015-03-28 16:10 | 1 | 2018-10-13 10:04 | Wulfmorn | Hello. In this old changeset you added the unusual value "lit=yes" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35536364. Hopefully you are able to fix this. |
| 2 | 2018-10-26 11:18 | Константин Гам ♦715 | , | |
| 3 | 2018-10-26 11:18 | Константин Гам ♦715 | What? | |
| 4 | 2018-10-31 15:55 | Wulfmorn | Yeah, sorry, i meant "lit=1". I see you fixed it. | |
| 64044533 by SAJensen @ 2018-10-31 12:25 | 1 | 2018-10-31 13:00 | Wulfmorn | Anbefaler ikke at du prøver fikse multipolygonproblemer med web-editoren. Det er et høyriskprosjekt som sannsynligvis vil føre til mer problemer enn hva du begynte med. |
| 2 | 2018-10-31 14:08 | SAJensen ♦8 | Ok. Takk for tipset. Det er bare så håpløst å jobbe med JOSM på en liten laptop. Skal sørge for å skaffe meg hjelp av en mer erfaren bruker. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-31 14:09 | Wulfmorn | Jeg kan sikkert få ting til i kveld hvis det er behov, og du forteller meg hvordan du vil ha det. | |
| 63702714 by pangoSE @ 2018-10-20 12:38 | 1 | 2018-10-20 15:23 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | Hej!Någonting verkar ha gått snett här. Automatiska editeringar är bra att diskutera med andra först.Ett exempel på fel:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5351018580 |
| 2 | 2018-10-22 08:11 | Wulfmorn | Yep, jättemånga fel. Ser att archie har rättat en del, men inte alla. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-22 08:19 | Wulfmorn | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5839723585/history :O | |
| 4 | 2018-10-22 17:10 | archie ♦1,301 | Småländska höglandet är numera översållat med natural=cape. Här i Göteborg blev mudderdeponin en natural=cape (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3692592250/history#map=14/57.6946/11.8276). + + + Even this automatic-mass changeset was not discussed beforehan... | |
| 5 | 2018-10-22 17:52 | pangoSE ♦409 | Haha! Som jag skrev på telegram så blev det tokigt. @archie Varför inte reverta hela rasket i stället för att endast rätta några när det så uppenbart blev fel? | |
| 6 | 2018-10-22 18:15 | pangoSE ♦409 | @AndersAndersson Var föredrar du? epostlistan här https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se? | |
| 7 | 2018-10-22 19:58 | AndersAndersson ♦600 | Ja, epostlistan eller Facebook-gruppen "Openstreetmap Sverige".I detta fallet blev det fel, men du verkar både öppen för att lära, skriver changesets comments och är inte otrevlig. Något för Archie att ta efter kanske :) | |
| 8 | 2018-10-26 08:36 | pangoSE ♦409 | Jag har återställt hela detta ändringssätt, se https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63768107.Tack för förtroendet Anders. Jag ska försöka förvalta det väl även framöver. Jag har precis börjat dyka ner i overpass API och den &au... | |
| 35630661 by Stadtbahnfan1985 @ 2015-11-28 15:52 | 1 | 2018-10-13 10:21 | Wulfmorn | Hello. Multiple ways in Lüdenscheid have the unusual value "lit=1" which should be "yes" or "no". It seems you have been the principal editor for most of these ways. Hopefully you will be able to repair this mapping. Here is an Overpass query to show the unusual va... |
| 27456220 by Reclus @ 2014-12-14 12:02 | 1 | 2018-10-13 10:13 | Wulfmorn | Hello. In this changeset you added the unusual value "lit=1" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26730538. Hopefully you will be able to fix this. |
| 2 | 2018-10-13 11:01 | Reclus ♦90 | Thank you! It should have been lit=yes of course. I fixed it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63482390#map=17/51.44599/7.40100 | |
| 28296041 by abc26324 @ 2015-01-20 22:50 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:52 | Wulfmorn | Hello. It seems you added the unusual value "lit=1" to the way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51964097. I have "reverted" this edit as all the surrounding roads have lit=no, but after more careful study of the edits it seems you may have attempted to change this part of the r... |
| 61201814 by Natura @ 2018-07-30 16:54 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:44 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The road between Rampitz and Thalschütz has the unusual value "lit=1". https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.29898/12.12931. |
| 44237694 by Andrzej3345 @ 2016-12-07 15:17 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:38 | Wulfmorn | Hello. It seems you have added the unusual value "lit=1" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244468018. I hope you can fix this. |
| 2 | 2018-10-15 11:21 | Andrzej3345 ♦12 | Thanks for comment. Should be =yes of course. Already fixed | |
| 61626978 by voschix @ 2018-08-13 13:22 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:30 | Wulfmorn | Hello. It seems you have added an unusual tag value (lit=1) to the roundabout at Via Jacopo Facciolati. |
| 2 | 2018-10-13 20:49 | voschix ♦178 | Thanks - corrected | |
| 61799267 by Rodrigo Rega @ 2018-08-19 17:19 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:24 | Wulfmorn | Hi. It seems you have added an unusual value "lit=1" to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23618630. |
| 15822972 by ClaudiaMocci @ 2013-04-22 11:10 | 1 | 2018-10-13 09:17 | Wulfmorn | Hello Claudia. I have noticed an incorrect tag used in the refugee camp in Gonje where you have mapped extensively. The problem is that you have used the tag "lit=1". The correct tagging for "lit" is "yes" or "no". If you could confirm that the "1" v... |
| 63359449 by Maria Lindqvist @ 2018-10-09 20:25 | 1 | 2018-10-09 20:56 | Wulfmorn | Hej Maria. Använd aldrig Bings bildlager när du ritar av saker i Norge. Använd endast bildlagret "Norway Orthophoto". Det är det enda som håller hög kvalitet. (Det står "imagery_used: Bing aerial imagery" i din ändring). Fortsätt g&a... |
| 55684867 by François Pellet @ 2018-01-23 13:59 | 1 | 2018-10-09 19:25 | Wulfmorn | Hello. Way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555202687 has the unusual value "lit=on". This should be either "yes" or "no". |
| 60525197 by bohnenstange @ 2018-07-09 06:20 | 1 | 2018-10-07 15:32 | Wulfmorn | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606247711 seems to have a tagging mistake: "oneway=Calle Matías Servando Canales" |
| 61160392 by bxl-forever @ 2018-07-29 10:00 | 1 | 2018-10-07 15:31 | Wulfmorn | Hi. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30724767 has a very unusual "oneway" value, as you can see :). I assume this was supposed to be "note", but I will let you fix it. |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 16:06 | bxl-forever ♦2,480 | Hello,Thanks, it was a mistake indeed (the note came from a former edit, I must have slipped a C-v command here). I’ve fixed it. | |
| 54245956 by hecktor @ 2017-12-01 18:48 | 1 | 2018-10-07 15:26 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1183472 has an unusual value "oneway=Montagne Diesse/Châtillon - La Praye". Hopefully will be able to fix this. |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 17:32 | hecktor ♦29 | Hello,Sorry this was an error by excuse during updating some lwn relation with the correcct needet tags. See also here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork.I have already fixed | |
| 61553884 by Andrea Del Sarto @ 2018-08-10 22:10 | 1 | 2018-10-07 15:24 | Wulfmorn | Hello, the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615995222 has the unusual value "oneway=te". I presume this is a mistake. Hopefully you can fix it. |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 19:32 | Andrea Del Sarto ♦65 | hi, absolutely it's mistake; already correct.thanks for report | |
| 63208883 by The Mapgician @ 2018-10-04 20:13 | 1 | 2018-10-07 14:53 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163793645 seems to have a mapping mistake. (name=Rua Jose Coelho Ribeiro; oneway=Rua Luiz de Araujo). |
| 2 | 2018-10-08 14:11 | The Mapgician ♦7 | Thanks, I have made the necessary changes. | |
| 60531821 by bohnenstange @ 2018-07-09 09:20 | 1 | 2018-10-07 14:51 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606247713 has an incorrect key value (oneway=Calle General Carlos Osuna). I assume they key should be "name" here, but I dont know if there should be a oneway-value as well. Perhaps you can fix this. |
| 61706605 by ryra6453 @ 2018-08-16 07:50 | 1 | 2018-10-07 14:44 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The way "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420576629" has the unusual value "oneway=bicycle". Assuming this is a mistake, you might be able to fix it. |
| 56453916 by MacLondon @ 2018-02-18 03:29 | 1 | 2018-10-06 22:27 | Wulfmorn | Hello. You seem to have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5119020 with "lit=dirt" :) Looked like an obvious misclick that you might want to revisit. |
| 2 | 2018-10-06 22:46 | MacLondon ♦215 | Thanks. Not sure how that happened, but I've now reverted it back to lit=no. | |
| 3 | 2018-10-06 23:17 | Wulfmorn | After going through weird "lit=*" values in world, this one was not so bad. Sometimes people have fat fingers and things end up in the wrong field. Good that you were able to fix it. Have a good night. | |
| 58773974 by maripogoda @ 2018-05-08 01:11 | 1 | 2018-10-06 23:14 | Wulfmorn | Hello. Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544170369 has the unusual value "lit=大伸". Perhaps this is wrong. |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 13:24 | maripogoda ♦6 | I just fixed it. Thank you. | |
| 52734372 by AdVerburg @ 2017-10-08 15:46 | 1 | 2018-10-06 23:10 | Wulfmorn | Hello. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531057993. It has unusual tag: "lit=backward" (1 use in the world). I guess it could be interpreted as being lit only in one direction, but that doesnt sound like a normal thing for a road - anywhere. :) |
| 2 | 2018-10-07 06:18 | AdVerburg ♦144 | Thanks…Indeed, an odd value for this tag. My error. This value was earlier used for the city_limit sign. It is now corrected. | |
| 34203039 by Marcos Medeiros @ 2015-09-23 11:01 | 1 | 2018-10-06 23:04 | Wulfmorn | Hi. It looks like there might have been a slight mistake on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371824744 where what I assume to be the correct street name has ended up in the "lit=*" tag instead of in the name value. |
| 60710767 by Niels Elgaard Larsen @ 2018-07-14 12:10 | 1 | 2018-10-06 22:59 | Wulfmorn | You have given a way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4296417) the unusual value "lit=bump". Possibly an error you might wish to revisit. |
| 2 | 2018-10-06 23:15 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | Fixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63267934 | |
| 3 | 2018-10-07 10:03 | Niels Elgaard Larsen ♦596 | tak | |
| 4 | 2018-10-07 11:05 | LeifRasmussen ♦88 | Det var ingenting. :) | |
| 31852502 by tms13 @ 2015-06-09 18:50 | 1 | 2018-09-05 20:39 | Wulfmorn | Hi! Two roads here have the value "lit=<empty string>. Perhaps you can attach the correct values, if you remember your survey 3 years ago :)https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59454506https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65811035 |
| 2 | 2018-10-01 20:42 | tms13 ♦77 | Thanks. I do keep my photo notes - just needed to find the right ones! | |
| 3 | 2018-10-06 09:34 | Wulfmorn | Sweet :) | |
| 62482923 by hedd2 @ 2018-09-11 10:33 | 1 | 2018-09-21 15:25 | Wulfmorn | It seems the forest multipolygon has been broken again. I highly discourage editing the forest multipolygons with the "iD" editor. iD does not have the appropriate tools to handle the relations. I will try to sort out the multipolygon issues later today. I recommend you learn the better ed... |
| 2 | 2018-09-21 16:32 | Wulfmorn | Oh, this was an older changeset. But even so, the wood polygon is back on track now. | |
| 62544931 by hedd2 @ 2018-09-13 08:53 | 1 | 2018-09-16 21:19 | Wulfmorn | Hei igjen. Jeg syns ikke man skal mappe ALLE høydemarkeringer i economic maps som peak. Dette er jo ikke fjell, heier eller åser. Noen plasser har du plassert ut peaks hvert 100. meter med en høydeforskjell på 10 m, dvs på nesten flat bakke. Jeg ville ikke brydd meg m... |
| 2 | 2018-09-16 21:53 | hedd2 ♦10 | Hej,for meg som syklist fra flatt Nordtyskland alle åser ser ut som ekte topper :-)Jeg var på utkikk etter en bedre markør for fjell, men "peak" synes å være den eneste.Hvis du sykler, er "peak" -merket veldig hjelpsomt. Kanskje det er en anne... | |
| 3 | 2018-09-17 12:32 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | ok sorry, english is ok (my german is worse than your norwegian). there are no actual "peaks" in this part of Norway, so i would only use it for the most prominent elevations (~300m+), which is not very many. natural=hill is tag we can use, even though it is not as well used as peak in OSM... | |
| 4 | 2018-09-17 12:50 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | sorry ^different account | |
| 5 | 2018-09-20 08:47 | hedd2 ♦10 | ok, I'll have a look at the peaks and re-mark those as hills that don't look prominent. The problem is, at some places in the OSM documentation "natural=hill" is marked as not-to-use, while in the Norsk wiki it is recommendedhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-20 09:12 | Wulfmorn | I think the best way to look at the use of "peak" is to mark out important and prominent features. For example, as you say the highest, or most well known (Süllberg) elevation point in a region. True elevation data is added from secondary sources.When it comes to named places, if go... | |
| 62516467 by hedd2 @ 2018-09-12 11:02 | 1 | 2018-09-12 12:25 | Wulfmorn | Jeg ville nok anbefalt "place=farm" eller "place=isolated_dwelling" eller kanskje til og med "place=locality" på de små plassene du har merket ut langs Perkerudtjennet og Holmsjön. Blir litt voldsomt med hamlet. Ref: "Use place=hamlet for an isolat... |
| 62390272 by hedd2 @ 2018-09-07 22:45 | 1 | 2018-09-10 07:46 | Wulfmorn | I fixed it. |
| 2 | 2018-09-10 21:02 | hedd2 ♦10 | thanks a lot | |
| 58184660 by tms13 @ 2018-04-17 22:41 | 1 | 2018-09-05 20:41 | Wulfmorn | Here is one more way with "lit=" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241333764 |
| 39690804 by Hendrikklaas @ 2016-05-31 15:00 Active block | 1 | 2018-09-05 20:15 | Wulfmorn | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4217522961 has the value "lit"="lit". |
| 58713689 by Abstracter @ 2018-05-05 18:40 | 1 | 2018-05-05 21:28 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Du skal helst ikke skrive beskrivelser av ting i navnfeltet. Hvis ikke stien heter "Tursti" (lite sannsynlig) så bør du ta vekk navnfeltene. Taggen "highway=path" indikerer at det er en tursti allerede, spesielt med vanskelighetsgrad-taggene. |
| 58710893 by Christopher Iversen @ 2018-05-05 16:23 | 1 | 2018-05-05 17:20 | Wulfmorn | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520556141 <- kan du sjekke denne veien også? er det sykkelvei der eller bare et eller annet forbud mot kjøretøy? |
| 58706729 by trotol @ 2018-05-05 12:39 | 1 | 2018-05-05 12:47 | Wulfmorn | Er dette virkelig en park? Ser mer ut som en plen (landuse=grass). |
| 2 | 2018-05-05 12:53 | trotol ♦1 | Nybegynner i dette, takk for påpekningen. Endret nå. | |
| 3 | 2018-05-05 13:01 | Wulfmorn | flott :) det er også noe som heter recreational area som ofte forveksel med park også. i editoren har du i "i"-knapp (infoknapp) til høyre for der du velger hva du skal merke ting med som slår opp en forklaring/definisjon. veldig nyttig. | |
| 57615444 by Feyrin @ 2018-03-28 22:19 | 1 | 2018-03-29 00:26 | Wulfmorn | No need to add addresses. They are already present as nodes in the map. Also you shouldn't add address to the school AREA, just the buildings - if anything. As it was the same address was present three times in the map. Also, don't tag the school buildings with the school name - the name b... |
| 57468595 by Fredrik Bore @ 2018-03-23 20:07 | 1 | 2018-03-23 20:43 | Wulfmorn | use the S key to make the corners perfect angles. |
| 2 | 2018-03-24 12:55 | Fredrik Bore ♦1 | Thanks, will use this in the future :) | |
| 57384907 by jansson99 @ 2018-03-21 13:21 | 1 | 2018-03-21 14:02 | Wulfmorn | Tack. Jag hade bara foton. |
| 56996009 by archie @ 2018-03-08 11:24 | 1 | 2018-03-08 11:43 | Wulfmorn | Skulle varit en outer ring för farmland. |
| 2 | 2018-03-08 15:00 | archie ♦1,301 | ok. Sorry | |
| 38360968 by Turleder'n @ 2016-04-06 19:21 | 1 | 2018-02-16 20:07 | Wulfmorn | Der ble det en kollisjon. Fikk en conflict på en node i Sør-Aurdal. Jeg har akkuratt lagt inn masse Elveg der, også har jeg kjørt en full validering på hele området og fjernet masse tull. Jeg beholdt din versjon i conflicten. |
| 2 | 2018-02-16 20:07 | Wulfmorn | wow, 2 år gammel changeset, hvordan kom jeg inn på den? :D | |
| 55843664 by Wulfmorn @ 2018-01-28 22:51 | 1 | 2018-01-31 11:34 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,could you check the name tag on this lake?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556586965Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 15:36 | Wulfmorn | Oops, thanks. I have fixed it. | |
| 54547156 by g00dlad @ 2017-12-11 18:24 | 1 | 2017-12-11 18:37 | Wulfmorn | Hei, velkomment til OSM. Ser at du la inn adresser i bygningenes navnfelt. Adressene er allerede i kartet, så du trenger ikke legge dem inn :). Jeg har fjernet dem fra bygningene dine. |
| 53988570 by OneSimpleD @ 2017-11-21 23:39 | 1 | 2017-11-22 00:07 | Wulfmorn | Are they really parks? They look like peoples gardens, and why do they all have the same name? Also "Gårdsmotell" has been drawn as one single large building. Remember to read the definitions of the tags. Keep going though. Practice makes perfect! |
| 50110237 by LarsChristianGamborg @ 2017-07-07 14:27 | 1 | 2017-10-10 14:48 | Wulfmorn | Var det meningen at skogen skulle hete LL og farmlanden HH? Ser litt rart ut :) http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/59.7967/9.6862 |
| 52782872 by Børre Bamle @ 2017-10-10 08:15 | 1 | 2017-10-10 08:35 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Mente du å opprette kontoret for "Hjelpetelefonen til Mental Helse"? Det du har lagd nå er en telefon dit folk kan gå og ringe: her er eksemplet i wikien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File%3AEmergencyPhone.jpg |
| 52519302 by mulov_mul @ 2017-09-30 19:02 | 1 | 2017-09-30 20:19 | Wulfmorn | Howcome you copied Mauritius to the North sea? |
| 2 | 2017-09-30 20:23 | Hjart ♦4,116 | HiYou just made a copy of Mauritius over Denmark. I'm reverting immediately | |
| 52274240 by GSvenningsen @ 2017-09-22 12:00 | 1 | 2017-09-24 14:01 | Wulfmorn | Du har fått dobbel leaf_type på skogen din:leaf_type\tmixedleef_type\tneedleleaved |
| 52097021 by Bolleknott @ 2017-09-16 14:37 | 1 | 2017-09-17 11:29 | Wulfmorn | Du tagget parkeringen som parking_space. Det skulle vært bare "parking" (amenity=parking). Parkin space er noe veldig spesielt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space |
| 52052039 by eivsol @ 2017-09-14 21:19 | 1 | 2017-09-14 21:41 | Wulfmorn | Litt uvanlig å ha sykkelveier sånn ute i skogen. Vurder å sette til "Path". Den bør også kobles til veien i vestre enden. |
| 2 | 2017-09-15 11:40 | eivsol ♦1 | Hei ja skal se på det. Planen var å få dette inn i mtbmap som sykkelkart. Men har ikke fått det til. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-17 12:18 | EivindWAA ♦14 | Hei, slik jeg kan se har du kun taget 1 node langs denne strekningen med mtb:scale=3prøv og tagge veien i stede for nodene.videre kan det være lurt og sette seg inn i hvordan klasefiseringene er.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scaleEivind | |
| 51752558 by Michael2017 @ 2017-09-05 14:22 | 1 | 2017-09-05 15:31 | Wulfmorn | Heter adressen "Jenta mi"? Høres veldig rart ut. |
| 49864166 by DagGL @ 2017-06-27 14:38 | 1 | 2017-06-27 14:45 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Det er ikke lagt opp til å skrive navn på privatperson på adressene. Generelt sett skal du ikke endre på adressene i det hele tatt da de er importert fra offisiell kilde. Du kan gjerne tegne inn masse annet moro, som bygninger, treer og veier - men også der skal &q... |
| 49842712 by ImMats @ 2017-06-26 18:04 | 1 | 2017-06-26 18:13 | Wulfmorn | Excellent. An address was accidentally dragged along with it. I've moved it back now. |
| 49705456 by Johnarg @ 2017-06-20 21:35 | 1 | 2017-06-20 22:04 | Wulfmorn | The road should not be tagged as "Drive through" - unless there is a McDonalds here :)Just plain service road is fine. |
| 49381647 by TrondG @ 2017-06-08 22:27 | 1 | 2017-06-08 22:50 | Wulfmorn | Så at du hadde Lundsgutua som "street crossing". Endret til Path da street crossing blir feil å bruke her. |
| 49381447 by TrondG @ 2017-06-08 22:14 | 1 | 2017-06-08 22:46 | Wulfmorn | Regner med at du har lagt huset ditt her. Man skal ikke sette navn på bygninger som ikke har et faktisk navn. I steden for å sette navn "Bod" kan du bruke taggen "building=shed". Det er heller ikke nødvendig å skrive adresser på bygninger. Alle adre... |
| 49381827 by TrondG @ 2017-06-08 22:40 | 1 | 2017-06-08 22:43 | Wulfmorn | Husk å skriv hva du gjør i hver edit. Nå står det bare "Car park extended" på alle endringene dine. |
| 20998139 by ringe @ 2014-03-09 01:28 | 1 | 2017-05-25 10:57 | Wulfmorn | You shouldn't use GuleSider as a source unless they have given you specific permission to do so. Or Google or anyone else that doesnt offer up free data - or has not given permission. In the case of the editor, Bing, Digital Globe and Mapbox has given OSM permission to use their images - thats ... |
| 2 | 2017-06-01 21:56 | ringe ♦1 | Noted. Thanks | |
| 48955601 by Dominika Dziwota @ 2017-05-24 19:45 | 1 | 2017-05-24 19:48 | Wulfmorn | But why did you create two new Opera house tags when there already is one? :) |
| 48771351 by Helar @ 2017-05-17 19:22 | 1 | 2017-05-17 19:31 | Wulfmorn | There are now 3 points on the map refering to a kindergarten. All three are called Rasta, and one is called "Eventyrstua Barnehage" in the english language field. What is going on here? :) What is it really called? |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 19:47 | Helar ♦1 | Gamleveien 46 is Eventyrstua barnehage. This kindergarden was open in may 2013. Gamleveien 44 is Rasta barnehage. | |
| 48737749 by Costel Claudiu Darjan @ 2017-05-16 17:27 | 1 | 2017-05-16 19:23 | Wulfmorn | Please be aware, "mail boxes" in the map are not private mail boxes but post office mail boxes. :) |
| 48696767 by einargangso @ 2017-05-15 09:56 | 1 | 2017-05-15 10:02 | Wulfmorn | You can use the "S" key to give your buildings straight corners (or right click and find the square icon). |
| 2 | 2017-05-15 10:18 | einargangso ♦1 | Thanks! | |
| 48354782 by Ice25T @ 2017-05-03 06:11 | 1 | 2017-05-12 19:22 | Wulfmorn | Can you be more specific about your sources on this. Nobody has ever heard of this "airport". |
| 48450495 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-05-06 12:04 | 1 | 2017-05-06 18:05 | Noen ♦316 | Du har rett! Bing er ganske nøyaktig her, det er byggene som er forskjøvet.Bare husk å justere etter grunnflaten på byggene og ikke etter taket.Bildene her skulle gjøre det klart hva jeg mener: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_of_simpl... |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 15:34 | Wulfmorn | Får se om det blir tid til det :) | |
| 48261806 by Guillaume Garrigos @ 2017-04-29 17:36 | 1 | 2017-04-29 18:08 | Wulfmorn | You might want to consider using the tags "office=educational_institution" or "office=research". The "School grounds" tag is usually used for the area surrounding a school. |
| 47926472 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-04-19 06:26 | 1 | 2017-04-22 05:43 | Tractor ♦40 | Is it really a shelter here? I went here last summer, and the only thing I could see around the junction was the guidepost. |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 12:58 | Wulfmorn | The note claimed there was, you claim there isnt. Probably best to remove it. Better a happy surprise to find a shelter rather than the reverse :) | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 19:32 | Tractor ♦40 | I just had a look at the Gule sider imagery you linked to in your comment to the note. It does indeed look like some kind of small building structure, but i think that in reality it is only a rock. If you look at the Bing imagery (taken during winter conditions), it appears just like any other bare ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-22 20:17 | Wulfmorn | What did you have? | |
| 5 | 2017-04-22 20:22 | Tractor ♦40 | Bread with cheese. | |
| 48029218 by crazyhakim @ 2017-04-22 10:48 | 1 | 2017-04-22 12:55 | Wulfmorn | Hi. Footpaths dont work unless they connect in both ends. Ive added a bunch just now. You can check if they seem right to you. |
| 47950170 by baoish @ 2017-04-19 19:39 | 1 | 2017-04-19 19:41 | Wulfmorn | Its a good start. Keep adding! :) |
| 47946003 by Lars Hermansen @ 2017-04-19 17:12 | 1 | 2017-04-19 18:20 | Wulfmorn | Nice! |
| 47343556 by lisjhpia @ 2017-04-01 00:27 | 1 | 2017-04-01 09:44 | Wulfmorn | Du kan trykke på 'S' så blir ikke bygningene så skeive :) |
| 46794413 by Per @ 2017-03-12 20:14 | 1 | 2017-03-25 12:19 | Wulfmorn | Klarälvsbanan saknar massor av kopplingar till korsande vägar. |
| 2 | 2017-03-26 07:28 | Per ♦2 | Bra iakttagelse! Banan dök upp för många år sedan och jag har inte tänkt så mycket på detta mer än justerat noder. Skall ta ett ryck någon kväll och gå igenom i vart fall hela norra sträckningen. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-26 17:11 | Wulfmorn | säg till om du vill ha hjälp. kan ta allt som är synligt i Bing. | |
| 47138818 by Cybban @ 2017-03-25 02:22 | 1 | 2017-03-25 02:35 | Wulfmorn | Your field was just an untagged line. No content. I changed it to "grass" for now. |
| 2 | 2017-03-25 02:42 | Cybban ♦4 | Thanks, couldn't get "soccerfield" (like the other 3 around this area) up for some reason. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-25 03:11 | Wulfmorn | Find Sports Pitch - then pick "soccer" in the sport field :) | |
| 47024732 by Gerald Smith @ 2017-03-20 21:36 | 1 | 2017-03-20 21:43 | Wulfmorn | tiny islands should be islets :)anything under 1 sq km |
| 2 | 2017-03-21 00:28 | Gerald Smith ♦1 | Made the change, thanks for the info :) | |
| 46910956 by Thomas Engebakken @ 2017-03-16 21:22 | 1 | 2017-03-16 21:54 | Wulfmorn | Hei. Takk for ditt bidrag. Jeg ser at det går et par sykkelveier tvers over jernbanen ved stasjonen. Eksisterer begge disse, og i sånne fall, er de tunneler? |
| 2 | 2017-03-16 22:01 | Thomas Engebakken ♦1 | Den nærmest parken stemmer, den andre er vel mer en undergang for å komme til sporene | |
| 3 | 2017-03-16 22:31 | Wulfmorn | Da har jeg endret begge to. Begge er nå tunneler og den søndre stikker nå opp i et hull og kobler seg via trapper på plattformen. Kan du sikre kvaliteten og endre hvis det ser feil ut? | |
| 46824352 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-03-13 21:23 | 1 | 2017-03-15 14:11 | EivindWAA ♦14 | Hi, when editing coastline pleas check the tool after 24 hours http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=9.27949&lat=58.72076&zoom=14and fix issues like revers coastlinehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480286623 |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 14:56 | Wulfmorn | God idé! | |
| 46826061 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-03-13 22:55 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:57 | Wulfmorn | Well crap. That's the wrong description. Straightened corners of "Gullhaugveien 1-3 AS"-building. Moved it a bit (to fit correctly between the roads and added the service road going around to the back. Continued a footpath to a more natural conclusion. Based on Bing aerial. |
| 46119488 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-02-15 21:00 | 1 | 2017-03-12 12:59 | Wulfmorn | This was not a bridge, it's an ice road in winter. |
| 46717455 by Atle Midtbø @ 2017-03-09 18:11 | 1 | 2017-03-10 00:09 | Wulfmorn | You can press the 'S' key (or the button in the circular menu) to "straighten out" buildings. Good way to get perfect rectangles and corners. Also, you've added all the rådhuset tags to both a free standing point and the building itself. Now it shows up twice on the ma... |
| 2 | 2017-03-12 10:28 | Atle Midtbø ♦1 | Thanks for the advice! I will try out the "S" key function when i got time to edit more. I have removed the unnecessary tags for Rådhuset, so it should only show up once now. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-12 12:54 | Wulfmorn | Jeg endret litt til. Du hadde skrevet rådhus på adressepinnen. Som du ser har alle bygninger adressepins som er lest inn fra Kartverket. Disse bør du ikke endre på. Nå flyttet jeg all info om rådhuset til selve bygningen (og trykket S) sånn at adressen st&a... | |
| 46241171 by sebramsten @ 2017-02-20 11:23 | 1 | 2017-03-11 21:16 | Wulfmorn | You should probably refer to what you are solving. I assume its this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/433934 |
| 46644447 by caamodt @ 2017-03-07 08:26 | 1 | 2017-03-07 18:08 | Wulfmorn | Hi. You seem to have used a little bit over the top mapping here, with a multi-polygon for this simple building. You should draw it as a simple closed path area. Furthermore, it shouldn't be tagged as "house". Use "building" or "garage". |
| 2 | 2017-03-08 06:28 | caamodt ♦1 | Hi. Thank you for feedback. Tagged as garage now. How do I draw it as a simple closed path area? I did not see a lot of options. I just chose "area" and started drawing... | |
| 3 | 2017-03-08 17:04 | Wulfmorn | I don't know what you've done to accomplish it, but you have created it as a multipolygon. You can see two corners have large round nodes and if you click the sides you only select half the building. This is of course not necessary for such a simple building. Easiest way to fix is to delet... | |
| 4 | 2017-03-09 06:42 | caamodt ♦1 | Thanks. I deleted it and made it again. Hopefully I got it right this time :-) | |
| 5 | 2017-03-09 16:01 | Wulfmorn | Perfect! :D | |
| 6 | 2017-03-10 08:46 | caamodt ♦1 | just one question :-)When I added a few new houses as 'House' with an address, the street number shows up on the actual house in addition to the point number that was already there. Should the point be deleted? Or should the building be a 'Building' without address, as most of ... | |
| 7 | 2017-03-10 16:34 | Wulfmorn | The points are loaded directly from Kartverket databases. Consider them the addresses. Dont bother moving them much either. Just add the buildings (without address information) | |
| 8 | 2017-03-10 16:39 | Wulfmorn | You can add all kind of other things too. I have added driveways to your garage (with motor_vehice=private). Dont be afraid to add trees, walk paths and other useful information. Just make sure that roads that intersect are connected with a node. You can also use things like http://tools.geofabrik.d... | |
| 9 | 2017-03-10 16:43 | caamodt ♦1 | thank you :-) | |
| 45513848 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-01-26 14:08 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:03 | Noen ♦316 | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you want to add a ski trail, add piste:type=nordic in the "all tags" tab.The sport=* tag is meant for pitches and stadiums. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 21:22 | Wulfmorn | That turns it into an Area. But its a track for running in the summer and skiing in the winter. I've since changed the track type to "leisure track" with running and skiing as sports. Also i dont know if the hiking tags are appropriate. |