Wulfmorn have been discussed with 13 replies of this contributorWulfmorn have been discussed with 13 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162981222 by Wulfmorn @ 2025-02-26 17:21 | 1 | 2025-04-24 11:14 | Nar_ach ♦8 | Hello Wulfmorn, Thank you for your contribution. Make sure to edit the data in a complex way - I restored a relation way 1245921693 after you removed duplicated highway. Happy Mapping! |
| 161381045 by Wulfmorn @ 2025-01-15 13:27 | 1 | 2025-02-03 18:45 | synfarer ♦16 | Hei, ser du fjernet motor_vehicle=destination fra way 59377005. Hvorfor det? Ingen gjennomkjøring er det som faktisk er skiltet på stedet. |
| 2 | 2025-02-04 08:42 | Wulfmorn | Det er ingen gjennomkjøring lenger heller, fordi en del av wayen er delt av som footway. Dermed er det ikke mulig å kjøre gjennom. Ekstra tagging er overflødig. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-11 19:47 | synfarer ♦16 | Jeg skjønner at footwayen hindrer gjennomkjøring, men det stemmer ikke med virkeligheten. Veien der er ikke smalere, og nå om vinteren er bilsperren (cycle_barrier) åpen sånn at man faktisk kan kjøre gjennom. Når det faktisk er skiltet med "Forbudt f... | |
| 4 | 2025-02-12 10:56 | balchen ♦27 | Vil legge til at hvis det ikke er skiltet g/s-vei i slike tilfeller, så skal det heller ikke tagges g/s-vei. En ordinær kjørevei som er stengt for enkelte kjøretøy med en bilsperre blir ikke til en g/s-vei. Det er f. eks. fremdeles fullt mulig å kjøre MC... | |
| 5 | 2025-02-18 21:01 | synfarer ♦16 | Jeg endret det tilbake til service road med motor_vehicle=destination | |
| 72575035 by Wulfmorn @ 2019-07-23 20:21 | 1 | 2025-01-12 12:05 | 38446 ♦50 | Hi, did you downgrade Grimmared from hamlet to isolated dwelling accidentally or do you do it like this in Sweden? Thanks! |
| 148933295 by Wulfmorn @ 2024-03-20 20:42 | 1 | 2024-09-23 17:00 | eisa01 ♦34 | Vet du hva som skjedde her? Har ingen historikk, og ser ikke ut til å være noehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264633099/history#map=16/59.99913/10.61645Er en parallellinje til i samme område + to uten tags som krysserFant det når jeg søkte på highway... |
| 129610008 by Wulfmorn @ 2022-12-01 16:02 | 1 | 2024-04-26 10:45 | Oskarst_ ♦77 | Hei, det kan se ut til at way 1118672854 ikke eksisterer. Har du noen kjennskap til stien? |
| 2 | 2024-04-26 10:54 | Wulfmorn | nei jeg bare gjorde en mass-edit for å ha litt sac_scale på stier på fjellet. grove estimat bare. | |
| 132884688 by Wulfmorn @ 2023-02-22 14:25 | 1 | 2023-02-22 17:28 | Ale_Zena_IT ♦173 | Hello,it would be great trying to limit the extension of the changesets: I was monitoring activities in Somalia and came across with this one.Also, I wondering the meaning of some large polygons in different Countries without any tag.Alessandro |
| 2 | 2023-02-22 22:31 | luca sski ♦3 | I'm a bit confused about the untagged ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541379, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541378, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541377, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541376, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541375, https://www.openstree... | |
| 4 | 2023-02-23 13:04 | yasslay ♦93 | @luca sskiThe untagged ways are a part of the relation which you sent, which renders everything inside the untagged ways as a wooded area. I'm not sure as to why Wulfmorn did not use separate ways and areas for this, though. Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for somethi... | |
| 5 | 2023-02-24 20:14 | Wulfmorn | Oh my. I must have downloaded the area in a layer with some nonsense in it. So sorry. Please revert. :OSorry I didn't see the message until now. | |
| 6 | 2023-02-24 20:16 | Wulfmorn | Actually, I may have done some actual stuff in the edit. Those untagged polygons were not meant to be in it. I'll try to clean up now. So sorry - very sloppy of me. | |
| 7 | 2023-02-24 20:38 | Wulfmorn | I've removed the empty polygons.Regarding relation 14442220, I didnt create it that way, but I cleaned it up by separating it into two separate relations.> "Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for something which could be done in multiple areas."The o... | |
| 110818952 by Wulfmorn @ 2021-09-06 19:51 | 1 | 2023-01-25 09:19 | borovac ♦102 | Hi Wulfmorn,Working on adding street names in Sweden I noticed you put on this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980234670 noname=yes tag. On mapillary we can see that the street has a name, but it is not a readable name. While government data (Trafikverket Road Network options (overlay) - Gatunam... |
| 2 | 2023-01-25 10:56 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | I don't remember the case or why I tagged it this way. Based on the other streetnames in the area i dont doubt that "Tallåsvägen" is the correct name. I have no complaint if you override my edit. My concerns have mostly been road geometry, not names. | |
| 3 | 2023-01-25 10:56 | Wulfmorn | Sorry, wrong account ^ :D | |
| 70834105 by Wulfmorn @ 2019-06-01 12:12 | 1 | 2022-07-25 16:37 | turepalsson ♦25 | Nod 4306899834 och nod 5849369401 verkar vara samma vrak. Avsiktligt eller misstag? |
| 109700318 by Wulfmorn @ 2021-08-15 12:58 | 1 | 2021-08-15 12:58 | Wulfmorn | Not Torpavägen, but Åsby an Derome Såg. |
| 109042337 by Wulfmorn @ 2021-08-02 16:06 | 1 | 2021-08-02 17:35 | archie ♦1,299 | Som alltid; perfekta changesets - noggranna, detaljrika och korrekta. En förebild! |
| 88150685 by Wulfmorn @ 2020-07-17 15:42 | 1 | 2020-07-22 04:13 | Taller Don Markes ♦1 | Taller de motos multimarcas Don Markes |
| 2 | 2020-07-25 10:57 | Wulfmorn | Sorry but I don't understand. | |
| 86986024 by Wulfmorn @ 2020-06-22 14:42 | 1 | 2020-06-22 14:43 | Wulfmorn | JOSM stopped working preventing proper comment and source info: Landcover in Hovsten. Source: Lantmäteriet Ortofoto |
| 76240987 by Wulfmorn @ 2019-10-26 11:29 | 1 | 2019-10-27 18:00 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,I found several tags added by you like FIXREF, NEWREF, FIXCLASS or FIXMISSING.These are all new and undocumented and do not show up in any of the QA tools.Could you change them to the common 'fixme' tag - this makes it possible for every other mapper to find them and fix them if... |
| 70824066 by Wulfmorn @ 2019-05-31 22:03 | 1 | 2019-06-03 16:24 | dieterdreist ♦836 | Hi Wulfmorn, I have noticed your edit because it looked like an unannounced mass edit ;-)From what I have seen, there weren't any real problems, but I wonder if we really want to replicate all tags with an additional seamark tag, e.g. historic=wreck as seamark:type=wreck, for example node 531... |
| 70609318 by Wulfmorn @ 2019-05-25 11:31 | 1 | 2019-05-26 22:39 | Noen ♦316 | Har du oppdaget forskjellen mellom en engelsk "wood" og en "forest"?Ellers har det vært tradisjon å bruke wood på "alt" siden vi ikke har den distinksjonen på norsk. |
| 55843664 by Wulfmorn @ 2018-01-28 22:51 | 1 | 2018-01-31 11:34 | mueschel ♦6,564 | Hi,could you check the name tag on this lake?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556586965Thanks, Jan |
| 2 | 2018-02-05 15:36 | Wulfmorn | Oops, thanks. I have fixed it. | |
| 48450495 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-05-06 12:04 | 1 | 2017-05-06 18:05 | Noen ♦316 | Du har rett! Bing er ganske nøyaktig her, det er byggene som er forskjøvet.Bare husk å justere etter grunnflaten på byggene og ikke etter taket.Bildene her skulle gjøre det klart hva jeg mener: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_of_simpl... |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 15:34 | Wulfmorn | Får se om det blir tid til det :) | |
| 47926472 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-04-19 06:26 | 1 | 2017-04-22 05:43 | Tractor ♦40 | Is it really a shelter here? I went here last summer, and the only thing I could see around the junction was the guidepost. |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 12:58 | Wulfmorn | The note claimed there was, you claim there isnt. Probably best to remove it. Better a happy surprise to find a shelter rather than the reverse :) | |
| 3 | 2017-04-22 19:32 | Tractor ♦40 | I just had a look at the Gule sider imagery you linked to in your comment to the note. It does indeed look like some kind of small building structure, but i think that in reality it is only a rock. If you look at the Bing imagery (taken during winter conditions), it appears just like any other bare ... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-22 20:17 | Wulfmorn | What did you have? | |
| 5 | 2017-04-22 20:22 | Tractor ♦40 | Bread with cheese. | |
| 46824352 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-03-13 21:23 | 1 | 2017-03-15 14:11 | EivindWAA ♦14 | Hi, when editing coastline pleas check the tool after 24 hours http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=9.27949&lat=58.72076&zoom=14and fix issues like revers coastlinehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480286623 |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 14:56 | Wulfmorn | God idé! | |
| 46826061 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-03-13 22:55 | 1 | 2017-03-13 22:57 | Wulfmorn | Well crap. That's the wrong description. Straightened corners of "Gullhaugveien 1-3 AS"-building. Moved it a bit (to fit correctly between the roads and added the service road going around to the back. Continued a footpath to a more natural conclusion. Based on Bing aerial. |
| 46119488 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-02-15 21:00 | 1 | 2017-03-12 12:59 | Wulfmorn | This was not a bridge, it's an ice road in winter. |
| 45513848 by Wulfmorn @ 2017-01-26 14:08 | 1 | 2017-01-26 20:03 | Noen ♦316 | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!If you want to add a ski trail, add piste:type=nordic in the "all tags" tab.The sport=* tag is meant for pitches and stadiums. |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 21:22 | Wulfmorn | That turns it into an Area. But its a track for running in the summer and skiing in the winter. I've since changed the track type to "leisure track" with running and skiing as sports. Also i dont know if the hiking tags are appropriate. |