gormur participated in the following changeset discussionsgormur participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121609911 by Kartred @ 2022-05-28 10:11 | 1 | 2025-06-03 11:14 | gormur | Then Norgeskart is wrong in this matter. The tram track continues in a perfectly straight line onto the funicular tracks . The lengths are no longer correct and the angle of the approach to the top is no longer a straight angle to the exit tunnel. Reverted. |
| 166504911 by Gazer75 @ 2025-05-20 04:57 | 1 | 2025-06-01 21:00 | gormur | Men det er vel bare ét av løpene som skal bygges nå i første byggetrinn?https://www.vegvesen.no/vegprosjekter/europaveg/e134vagsliseljestad/ |
| 2 | 2025-06-03 00:45 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Var ikkje tydeleg kva løp i så fall. Alle planar visar to. Blir uansett oppdatert når anlegget dukkar opp i NVDB. | |
| 165649714 by gormur @ 2025-04-30 19:46 | 1 | 2025-05-10 18:05 | balchen ♦27 | Hei. Hva er hensikten med https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834187607? Den ser ut til å også ha feil utstrekning. |
| 2 | 2025-05-15 07:32 | gormur | Bare at det fortsatt var litt arbeid som gjensto med påkoblingen når jeg "åpnet" veien. Og som påminning om å stikke innom etter en stund for å sjekke alle detaljer. Men om du mener alt er fint, så er det bare til å slette :) | |
| 3 | 2025-05-15 08:30 | balchen ♦27 | OK. Det pågår fremdeles arbeid på ridestien, så det er fremdeles maskiner og gjerder på stedet. Men det pågår jo ikke arbeid på Sykkelstamveien, slik det arealet antyder. Likevel, jeg var mest nysgjerrig. Tror ikke noen bruker dette til noe :) | |
| 165711250 by gormur @ 2025-05-02 09:58 | 1 | 2025-05-02 10:13 | gormur | Oh. My bad totally the wrong source...https://www.nve.no/konsesjon/konsesjonssaker/konsesjonssak?id=4594&type=V-1 andhttps://www.nve.no/konsesjon/konsesjonssaker/konsesjonssak?id=7665&type=V-1 |
| 156038838 by Odiz @ 2024-09-01 05:00 | 1 | 2025-04-28 14:34 | gormur | Fint om du rydder opp der importen ble lagt oppå eksisterende data...Her er et eksempel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312547636 |
| 161330660 by gormur @ 2025-01-14 02:54 | 1 | 2025-03-05 06:40 | balchen ♦27 | Hei. Lenge siden sist. Har vært ute og kikket på de nye sykkelveiene til nye SUS. På en liten del av strekningen er de rampet ned til ordinære, oppmalte sykkelfelt. Lurer på om du har noen innspill til hvordan dette kan tagges? |
| 2 | 2025-03-14 23:34 | gormur | Jeg tenker det er fint med noen små korte "link" veier. Slik som denne, f.eks? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953504657 eller https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086550171 ? | |
| 3 | 2025-03-17 06:36 | balchen ♦27 | Du tenker å avslutte de tegnede sykkelveiene og bytte til cycleway=lane på denne strekningen? | |
| 4 | 2025-04-03 16:03 | gormur | Jeg funderte på det samme da jeg var innom dagen før bussene begynte å kjøre der. Jeg tegnet det litt "forenklet" da, så kan det raffineres litt når vi får flyfoto, tenker jeg... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-04 07:20 | balchen ♦27 | Blir komplisert, men korrekt, tagging. Ikke så komplisert i dette tilfellet, for det er bare ett segment hvor de gjør om til sykkelfelt, men Oalsgata i Sandnes skal ha dette i hvert kryss, så da blir det mer omfattende. | |
| 6 | 2025-04-04 07:22 | balchen ♦27 | Tror det er planlagt 16 skifter mellom sykkelfelt og enveis-sykkelve i Oalsgata.... på hver side.... | |
| 135556987 by gormur @ 2023-05-01 01:01 | 1 | 2025-02-22 09:28 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10859170854/history has shop = farm_produce that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=farm_produce ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=farm_produce used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fa... |
| 2 | 2025-02-25 12:43 | gormur | I've changed it to shop=farm witch is indeed better. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-25 20:17 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Thanks for review! | |
| 157958356 by Виктория Сергеевна @ 2024-10-16 10:40 | 1 | 2025-02-09 20:44 | gormur | You added natural=8-495-495-91-10 on a lot of objects in this city. Could you explain what it means? |
| 135379420 by D_i_m @ 2023-04-26 10:31 | 1 | 2025-02-01 16:38 | gormur | What do you mean by ыскг on a few ways here? One of them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165613032 |
| 143952553 by Enzyklopädix @ 2023-11-13 01:00 | 1 | 2025-01-06 02:16 | gormur | No need to add foot=yes on highway=pedestrian as it is implied. bicycle=yes is also implied in Norway, at least |
| 150593098 by gormur @ 2024-04-27 19:03 | 1 | 2024-11-04 16:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5030891237/history - have you wanted to map it as an empty vacant space? |
| 2 | 2024-11-05 18:18 | gormur | Yeah. There were no shops there at the time. Vacant is correct tag. | |
| 139987575 by izikpodar @ 2023-08-16 22:36 | 1 | 2024-08-04 22:49 | gormur | Hi! and welcome to OSM.Thank you for your first contribution :)OSM tags aren't always easy to learn. If you could try to explain what you mean by name=champ and natural=HERVE, maybe I can guide you to some better tags? |
| 142363625 by Edo01_ @ 2023-10-09 19:23 | 1 | 2024-08-04 12:50 | gormur | Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap. :)What does "Busa dai Cavai" mean? |
| 151842173 by gileri @ 2024-05-26 09:20 | 1 | 2024-08-04 12:45 | gormur | Hi!What do you mean by "natural=Boucherie les 2 Thomas" ? Doesn't seem to fit into the natural tag :D |
| 2 | 2024-08-04 13:00 | gileri ♦1,003 | Hi Gormur, that was a typo (autocomplete did not suggest name, as it was already set). Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154811471 | |
| 151126596 by JLOSM @ 2024-05-10 04:54 | 1 | 2024-08-04 11:41 | gormur | HiSeems like you attempted to name a few streams (Quebrada?) but unfortunatley you put the name in the "natural" tag instead. Have a look here f.ex: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/natural#valuesWould you mind fixing it? Thanks! :) |
| 2 | 2024-08-04 15:15 | JLOSM ♦35 | Hola,Gracias por avisar. Ya quedaron corregidos. | |
| 145718308 by Snurre86 @ 2023-12-31 01:53 | 1 | 2024-05-12 00:21 | gormur | Litt vanskelig å lese historien her, men det kan se ut til at du her har tegnet en paralell "way" med den eksisterende i et forsøk på å legge til et felt? Normalt blir det fikset med å legge på lanes=2 på eksisterende vei. Det synes allerede &arin... |
| 148220471 by gormur @ 2024-03-04 18:27 | 1 | 2024-03-30 17:59 | balchen ♦27 | Hei. Jeg var gjennom her for to uker siden og merket at det er stengt ved jernbaneundergangen lenger nord, men ikke i sør ved Felleskjøpet der du har tegnet inn en bom. Er det en virtuell bom? |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 13:23 | gormur | Det var en midlertidig, fysisk, in real life, "cycle barrier" der, ved Hinna brygge, da jeg var der, litt før denne edit. Kanskje den er fjernet igjen? | |
| 3 | 2024-04-03 13:26 | balchen ♦27 | Ved Consulens brygge er det sperre. Det er i nord i endringsområdet. Du har tegnet en bom i sør ved Felleskjøpet/Hillevåg båtforening, men der så jeg ingen bom. | |
| 4 | 2024-04-04 08:07 | gormur | Jeg forstod deg første gangen. Og svaret mitt står: Den var der, men kanskje ikke lenger... Jeg kan ta en tur for å dobbeltsjekke. | |
| 5 | 2024-04-04 08:10 | balchen ♦27 | Ikke stress med det. Jeg sitter 300 m unna akkurat nå, så jeg kan ta det på vei hjem fra jobb. Grunnen til at jeg presiserte/gjentok var at du skrev "Hinna brygge", og det er 5 km herfra, så jeg ble usikker på hva du mente :) | |
| 6 | 2024-04-04 10:23 | gormur | Så sannelig, nå ser jeg forvirringen :). Aner ikke hvorfor denne, som jeg uheldigvis brukte som referanse, har blitt "Hinna brygge": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35926767Hva skal vi kalle den i stedet?Men ja, det er https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11691547681 jeg ... | |
| 7 | 2024-04-04 10:26 | balchen ♦27 | Ser den heter Hetlandskaien andre steder. Men uten eget navn skal den vel veien ned til brygga bare hete Sandviksveien? Jeg kan se på det også når jeg sykler forbi senere. | |
| 8 | 2024-04-04 12:07 | balchen ♦27 | Jepp, det er definitivt en bom i sør ved Felleskjøpet! Vet ikke hvordan jeg kan ha unngått å legge merke til den da jeg var forbi der, eller om de har byttet ut den du så med en mer permanent en. Denne var med betongklosser og bom.Så ingen navneskilt på ... | |
| 9 | 2024-04-04 13:04 | gormur | *tommel oppHar fjernet "Hinna brygge" som åpenbart er feil. Hetlandskaien sto som alt_name, så da ble det det.Synes ikke den lille veien ned til kaien trenger noe navn... | |
| 149184866 by gormur @ 2024-03-26 16:04 | 1 | 2024-04-03 12:51 | balchen ♦27 | Hei. Er det noen grunn til at du har merket g/s-veien langs Smeaheia (parallelt med Sykkelstamveien) som footway med bicycle=yes? |
| 2 | 2024-04-03 13:00 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027497771/Denne du tenker på?Tja. Det er en gang- og sykkelvei. Da synes jeg det passer bra med nettopp footway og bicycle=yes... Spesielt når det er en dedikert sykkelvei vedsidenav som da vil få høyere prioritering i routing ? | |
| 3 | 2024-04-03 13:13 | balchen ♦27 | Gang- og sykkelvei skal i norsk standard tagges highway=cycleway foot=designated.Dette er fremdeles en g/s-vei som skal gi tilgang til lokalområdet. Jeg vil håpe at rutere tar den korteste veien eller mest sykkevennlige veien hvis man skal forbi, og hvis ikke, så må man j... | |
| 4 | 2024-04-03 13:27 | gormur | Javelda :) | |
| 5 | 2024-04-03 13:40 | balchen ♦27 | :) | |
| 149000570 by Ole Morten @ 2024-03-22 08:30 | 1 | 2024-03-28 22:58 | gormur | Hei Ole MortenTakk for bidraget med fartsgrenser til OSM!Desverre har du nok vært litt uheldig og slettet noen tagger noen steder.På disse to forsvant highway=trunk:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32454336/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880702143/historyJeg har ... |
| 138945589 by gormur @ 2023-07-24 15:10 | 1 | 2023-07-28 09:00 | gormur | Janei, det var den altså ikke. Jeg må ha sett feil når jeg kjørte forbi :D |
| 123908613 by Marcus Parra Nygård @ 2022-07-21 20:14 | 1 | 2023-07-13 10:44 | gormur | Du tagget denne noden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308242764med motor_vehicle=yes og foot=no Var det noen spesifikk mening med det eller var det et uhell? Jeg kan ikke se noe annet enn at det er tillatt å gå forbi denne sperringen? |
| 2 | 2023-07-15 01:31 | Marcus Parra Nygård ♦1 | Ja, dette er eit uhell. Godt at du la merke til det. | |
| 137580591 by gormur @ 2023-06-20 22:03 | 1 | 2023-07-01 14:30 | balchen ♦27 | Den delen av g/s-veien som har en liten grussti på siden er da ikke segregated? Det er ingen anvisning om separasjon av gående og syklende og gående f. eks. på rulleskøyter eller med barnevogn vil fritt benytte den asfalterte delen. |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 07:44 | gormur | Vet ikke helt hvilken du mener... Kanskje en glipp? | |
| 3 | 2023-07-04 08:03 | balchen ♦27 | Tenkte på denne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087780536#map=18/58.92048/5.72828 | |
| 4 | 2023-07-07 14:31 | gormur | Du har nok rett. Bedre nå :) | |
| 133042728 by NKA @ 2023-02-26 13:31 | 1 | 2023-05-03 21:14 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28040517Her ble access=no selvom det også var fixme som sa hvorfor. Har du vært i terrenget å sjekket? Vegen er fortsatt stengt... |
| 134136364 by NKA @ 2023-03-26 13:24 | 1 | 2023-04-19 14:41 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1912770323Her er shelter=yes slettet, selvom det ganske tydelig er et skur der. Og noden er flyttet 15 meter uten at veier som henger på er oppdatert; dermed er det nå 2x 90grader sving der... |
| 134024675 by UFeldmaus @ 2023-03-23 14:03 | 1 | 2023-04-18 09:04 | gormur | Hi! This way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156623209 seems to go straight through a building, is not connected on the beach end and has an unusual highway=stairs tag. Could you look into it? |
| 134644585 by Gyeltshen Traveller @ 2023-04-08 09:28 | 1 | 2023-04-16 22:09 | gormur | Thank you for your contribution. However, there was a few issues with this and nearby edits. You seem to have replaced the important highway keywords (unclassified, service, path, etc) with something more like a description (Farm Road etc). See f.ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344363925/histor... |
| 133183855 by NKA @ 2023-03-01 18:46 | 1 | 2023-04-13 22:55 | gormur | NVDB er en god kilde, men desverrre ikke alltid "on the ground truth". Pass på i områder med omfattende ombygninger på gang. Rundkjøringen du slettet kjørte jeg gjennom nå i kveld. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128003100 |
| 2 | 2023-04-14 15:14 | NKA ♦247 | Bra du oppdaget. Og lurt å legge på en note slik du gjorde nå på veien. | |
| 132491499 by Rogaland fylkeskommune Jørn Sigurd Vathne @ 2023-02-13 13:49 | 1 | 2023-04-13 20:09 | gormur | An error message does not justify outright deleting the restriction. The restriction is still in place. I saw the sign just a couple of days ago: "Innkjøring forbudt, gjelder gjennomkjøring til Madlaveien" . Reverting. |
| 130804909 by gormur @ 2023-01-02 21:59 | 1 | 2023-01-02 22:00 | gormur | A temporary ramp has been opened during construction |
| 117601941 by gormur @ 2022-02-19 12:28 | 1 | 2022-10-23 09:33 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | What exactly are you trying to show here on the map?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9519091113 |
| 2 | 2022-10-25 08:22 | gormur | I was just indicating that there is a sign there, but I didn't have enough information to properly tag the restriction. I have now edited in a restriction that will work for routing purposes, tho. | |
| 3 | 2022-10-25 09:02 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Thanks for fixing it! | |
| 125914194 by oiaeqrifs @ 2022-09-07 18:55 | 1 | 2022-09-19 18:52 | gormur | Hei :)Ser du har lagt til en del relasjoner med usving forbudt i forbindelse med rundkjøringer. Dette er generelt ikke nødvendig. Geometrien gjør at routere typisk ikke vil foreslå en slik rute uansett. Så du kan spare deg det arbeidet :)Unntaket er selvsagt der ... |
| 117202990 by FennecusZerda @ 2022-02-09 13:36 | 1 | 2022-08-24 14:34 | gormur | Heisann! Er ikke helt enig med taggingen på noen barriers i denne og noen changesets i nærheten.Du har tagget med barrier=stile og stile=squeeze Eksempelet som vises i wiki om stiles type squeeze tror jeg aldri jeg har sett i Norge :DJeg pleier å tagge slike med barrier=cycle... |
| 125024042 by gormur @ 2022-08-17 15:51 | 1 | 2022-08-18 19:55 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9899465659 (one of three nodes). What is the meaning of the tag deleted = yes? |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 08:50 | gormur | It was just an some temporary tags while editing. I just forgot to delete the tags before upload. Thanks. | |
| 67147806 by gormur @ 2019-02-13 00:45 | 1 | 2022-07-30 20:30 | balchen ♦27 | Det er forbudt for gående og syklende på "Motorveien" mellom Madlaveien og E39/Ullandhaugveien. "Fortauene" er ikke fortau i den forstand og kan altså ikke brukes av gående. Ser ikke helt poenget med å ha dem tegnet inn slik sett. |
| 2 | 2022-08-01 14:52 | gormur | Takk for kommentar.Du har nok helt rett.I begynnelsen var det rett nok ikke skiltet slik (det var også en sak i media om det).Men enkelte detaljer synes jeg passer å ha fortsatt. F.eks porten i gjæret og https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658000912 | |
| 3 | 2022-08-01 15:07 | balchen ♦27 | Ser ut til å være en port, ikke et hull? Vet ikke hva slags begrensning det er på å bruke den.... https://goo.gl/maps/pXFyoPBoqPmWiMLo7 | |
| 4 | 2022-08-01 18:18 | gormur | En liten port med kode-hengelås. Var tilsvarende åpen i begynnelsen, rett etter åpning av anlegget. | |
| 118639620 by NKA @ 2022-03-18 16:26 | 1 | 2022-07-20 10:14 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041473444 ble "lagt oppå" korrekt tagget revet bygning (brownfield) |
| 115172685 by NKA @ 2021-12-20 16:04 | 1 | 2022-07-15 19:06 | gormur | Minst et par av husene i denne importen kolliderer med hus som er revet for lenge siden og tagget med brownfield. |
| 2 | 2022-07-15 19:09 | gormur | F. eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013790745 | |
| 119531916 by Mathias Haugsbø @ 2022-04-10 11:29 | 1 | 2022-07-04 14:24 | gormur | Dette changesettet overskrev "on the ground" observasjoner.Se f.eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115664331 Bygget er revet |
| 122153565 by gormur @ 2022-06-09 08:57 | 1 | 2022-06-09 09:14 | dominikschwind ♦3 | Hi, you might want to fix the typo - it's Reisezug, not Reizezug |
| 2 | 2022-06-10 11:30 | gormur | Thanks for doing the correction for me. | |
| 39295077 by gormur @ 2016-05-13 15:33 | 1 | 2021-11-04 04:59 | bob3bob3 ♦52 | Just checking with you here on the way 417908370. Was it meant to be a path? I drove past the "farm gate" at the eastern end yesterday and so changed to driveway. Thoughts please. |
| 2 | 2021-11-04 17:20 | gormur | You, having been on the ground and most recent, clearly have the best position to judge that. | |
| 26618347 by Turleder'n @ 2014-11-07 16:20 | 1 | 2021-09-24 11:12 | gormur | Lenge siden, men husker du hva du mente med å tagge Problemveien med note=two separate lanes ? |
| 2 | 2021-09-28 20:07 | Turleder'n ♦10 | Regner med at dette allerede sto der da jeg gjorde endringer. Mulig at dette gjalt i første omgang kun den delen av veien ved Gaustadalléen. Problemveien ble jo forandret flere ganger ila. de siste årene. Kommentaren kan fjernes. | |
| 108327432 by gormur @ 2021-07-20 15:34 | 1 | 2021-07-20 15:35 | gormur | To close https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1783473. Norway Orthophoto |
| 90336294 by CC_Simon @ 2020-09-03 05:30 | 1 | 2021-03-12 16:53 | gormur | Hi ZSeems like some of the ways in this changeset is tagged with "highway=ccontrution" |
| 2 | 2021-03-12 16:55 | gormur | . (sorry, pressed comment to quick)To me, those ways look like they should be steps? | |
| 3 | 2021-03-15 12:40 | Kovoschiz ♦2,537 | @gormur Some of them look like elevator connections being constructed. | |
| 100476136 by Reitu @ 2021-03-05 08:55 | 1 | 2021-03-11 14:37 | gormur | Hi ReituWelcome as a contributor to OpenStreetMap.You have been very active since you signed up!A few comments: You have sometimes put the name of a road in the "highway" tag. An example is way 913769485 in this changeset.The name should go into the "name" tag instead. ... |
| 2 | 2021-06-13 17:41 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-... | |
| 89867110 by Roald Håkon Vatne @ 2020-08-24 15:44 | 1 | 2020-08-27 21:43 | gormur | Det står allerede layer=-1 på tunnelen, så det har ingen effekt å tagge bygningen med layer=1.Objekter som ikke har en layer-tagg blir regnet som layer=0 og der er dermed akkurat like mye "ikke-i-tunnelen" som layer=1... |
| 88351518 by Gazer75 @ 2020-07-22 13:13 | 1 | 2020-08-20 14:59 | gormur | Norge i bilder er feil... Bommen ble flyttet en rundkjøring nordover før tunnelen åpnet...https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/qLd1GE/bomstasjon-pa-motorveien-er-flyttetOgså observert i terreng. |
| 2 | 2020-08-21 20:23 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Ahh, ja ser det holet i bomringen om den står der :)Brukte bilder og NVDB og rekna med det var rett. | |
| 40301508 by Odiz @ 2016-06-26 14:04 | 1 | 2020-06-23 20:17 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427392272 Did you walk this? Was there a path? I haven't been there, but I can't see anything on orthophoto, and then there is https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2105019 |
| 2 | 2020-06-24 15:49 | Odiz ♦10 | Yes, I walked this(I think, has been a few years now). I believe the issue has more to do with this path being unofficial yet marked by paint by someone who is not permitted to do so(supposedly, I wouldn't know). To the best of my knowledge people are still allowed to walk there. | |
| 81857873 by Kol Jørn Engedal @ 2020-03-06 08:13 | 1 | 2020-05-10 12:02 | gormur | Hei Kol Jørn :)Ser du har tegnet inn masse båtruter...Men litt usikker på hensikten med noen av dem. F.eks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778781089 og de tre andre ved siden av. De er tagget helt likt og går samme plass. Er det noe tanke med det? Eller bare kopiert fr... |
| 83966607 by gormur @ 2020-04-23 00:47 | 1 | 2020-04-23 21:09 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Huske på at det er highway=toll_gantry for autopass stasjonar. highway=toll_booth er for manuelle ;) |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 09:38 | gormur | Ja, var nok annet holde styr på... Har f.eks ikke funnet nye vegnummer på "Motorveien" mellom Madlaveien og Ullandhaugveien.Du er selvfølgelig velkommen til å fikse :) | |
| 3 | 2020-04-24 17:00 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Viktigaste er at vegnettet er på plass. Resten vil kome etter kvart som NVDB er oppdatert. Stavanger ser ut til å ta nye flyfoto kvart år i april så dei vil nok dukke opp til vinteren ein gong når dei er klare. | |
| 51391938 by gormur @ 2017-08-24 00:21 | 1 | 2020-04-02 20:35 | chnuessli ♦104 | Macht das Sinn das Teilstück so zu taggen? Das Gleis ist nicht mehr da, es ist auch nichts mehr davon sichtbar? |
| 2 | 2020-04-14 14:56 | gormur | Did you have a particular way or relation in mind?Perhaps you are talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7503548 ?I (and many others) find it interesting to have data about old and removed train and tramlines in OSM.I did not know about this particular line when I traveled throug... | |
| 81619579 by peet192 @ 2020-02-29 12:58 | 1 | 2020-03-09 23:49 | gormur | Hei peet192Ser du har slettet det midlertidige bybane-depotet. Men kan det hende at deler av gamle vossebanen også forsvant i dragsuget? Er skinnene fjernet fullstendig? De er mange som ville foretrukket å beholde litt jernbanehistorie og dermed heller byttet tagging til railway=disuse... |
| 60938435 by gormur @ 2018-07-21 20:04 | 1 | 2020-03-01 12:34 | mueschel ♦6,567 | Hi,could you check this node, it has just a 'triple' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5775653178Thanks! |
| 2 | 2020-03-04 00:07 | gormur | Fixed, thanks. | |
| 45001510 by gormur @ 2017-01-08 14:04 | 1 | 2020-02-25 05:22 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | Hi,Wickman Road, that you added, looks to be a track added by a remote mapper a little to the north? |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 00:45 | gormur | You might very well be right. You are of course free to edit as you see fit. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-26 04:37 | Warin61 ♦2,664 | I think you know far more about the area than me. So i think it is up to you to decide what to do. | |
| 62576836 by Entur AS | Angie Torres @ 2018-09-14 09:24 | 1 | 2020-02-18 14:17 | gormur | Her har det sneket seg inn en duplikat på fergestrekningen Halhjem-Sandvikvåg.... Way 625520455 |
| 2 | 2020-03-06 08:57 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81859795 | |
| 67290944 by Omnific @ 2019-02-17 20:00 | 1 | 2020-02-08 23:06 | gormur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20039839/ Somehow a name ended up in the highway tag. Perhaps you know witch name is correct? |
| 31860146 by albertoq @ 2015-06-10 04:00 | 1 | 2020-02-05 12:51 | gormur | Hi! On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3584842493/ what does gauge=① mean? The gauge tag is usually only used for the railways themselves. Perhaps you are thinking of platform number? |
| 20710812 by north79 @ 2014-02-22 10:40 | 1 | 2020-02-05 10:47 | gormur | You tagged one of the sidings here with electrified=no and gauge=electrifiedWhat did you mean by that?I suspect it should be gauge=1435 ? |
| 2 | 2020-02-05 11:05 | north79 ♦3 | You are right. It should be gauge=1435.I will correct that. Thank you for notifying me. | |
| 79106997 by gormur @ 2020-01-02 09:53 | 1 | 2020-01-02 11:11 | gormur | ... Men NVDB er ikke helt konsistent ennå, så det kan hende at strekket fra Solbakk via Jørpeland til Oanes nå har blitt Fv523 |
| 2 | 2020-01-02 13:48 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Ville brukt unsigned eller local ref på Ryfylkevegen. | |
| 77844827 by gormur @ 2019-12-02 22:43 | 1 | 2019-12-03 00:50 | gormur | Also proposed new road to ENGK airport. Should have been two changesets :/ |
| 76239156 by gormur @ 2019-10-26 10:03 | 1 | 2019-10-29 07:25 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Kvifor var dette nødvendig? Du har laga meir rot på grensa en nødvendig og rota til relasjonar etter dette. |
| 2 | 2019-10-29 14:37 | gormur | Som nevnt; forberedelser.Har ikke fått gjort meg ferdig her.Bakgrunnen var å bli kvitt "hvite" linjer langs grensene. Det er også en mengde vann og våtområder som var kuttet direkte på grensen. Skoger slutter ikke på kommunegrenser... Skogsgren... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-29 14:43 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Du er klar over at det vil lage masse ekstra arbeid ved ein eventuell import av N50 i nabokommunane sant? Heile corine bitane burde vore sletta. | |
| 74979319 by Kristoffer Stevenson @ 2019-09-26 19:50 | 1 | 2019-09-29 23:37 | gormur | Hei KristofferVelkommen til OSM :)Litt feedback til dette og liknende endringssett.Det ser ut til at du har forvekslet "residential" og "driveway".highway=residential brukes om det som vi på norsk gjerne kaller gater og veier (oftest kommunale).Det som vi gjerne p... |
| 2 | 2019-09-30 13:31 | Kristoffer Stevenson ♦1 | HeiTakk for tilbakemelding:)Bare så jeg har forstått dette riktig. Det du mener er at jeg har merket veiene inn til hus med "Residential Road" mens den skulle ha vært merket "service road/ Driveway"? Fikser opp etter meg:) | |
| 3 | 2019-09-30 19:09 | gormur | Ja, nå ser det mye bedre ut :) | |
| 73713976 by Jan Olieslagers @ 2019-08-25 10:15 | 1 | 2019-08-25 12:23 | gormur | You need to relax a bit.Having some duplicates is not a big problem. A bigger problem is that you keep deleting true information. Last time you did this to one of my contributions, the multipolygon got deleted by someone else "because it was empty", making investigation even harder.If ... |
| 71615843 by niikoo @ 2019-06-25 21:54 | 1 | 2019-07-30 20:56 | gormur | Fixing misalignment, you say. Yet at least some nodes have moved about 10 m out of place in this changeset: One example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2411503427There is an upper limit for the size of changesets. It's currently set to 10,000 objects per changeset. This changeset contains... |
| 2 | 2019-07-30 21:08 | gormur | And changeset 71615846 is probably the tail end of this changeset after it failed at 10000 objects. | |
| 3 | 2019-08-01 08:47 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | I support a revert. I notice all bus stops have been incorrectly moved. | |
| 4 | 2019-08-01 09:54 | niikoo ♦2 | Sorry for the random moving of objects. I have installed a plugin to warn me of this now. I was new to JOSM at the time, and it's not the easiest tool for a beginner. I will revert it and manually cherry-pick changes. | |
| 5 | 2019-08-01 11:20 | ENTUR Johan Wiklund ♦93 | JOSM is tough to break into yes :) I fully understand. | |
| 6 | 2019-08-01 17:55 | gormur | nikooHow are you planning to revert? We are talking 11000 objects. I looked into using the reverter plugin, but that still left 8-900 objects with conflicts. The more manual work done to fix it, the harder it will get to do a full revert of the two changesets. So I strongly recommend we cooperate... | |
| 68718548 by sebastic @ 2019-03-31 08:46 | 1 | 2019-05-23 10:37 | gormur | What was wrong this multipolygon? Did it warrant outright deleting it? |
| 2 | 2019-05-23 10:46 | sebastic ♦105 | It had no tags after the duplicate tags were removed in the changeset before mine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9349785/history | |
| 3 | 2019-05-23 10:56 | gormur | I see. It was that edit was in the wrong. Don't know if you looked into this before you deleted the relation? Reverted. | |
| 4 | 2019-05-23 11:04 | sebastic ♦105 | I did, and the change looked sensible, it should have deleted the relation instead of just removing the tags.With your revert you risk the duplicate information being removed from the relation again. | |
| 5 | 2019-05-23 11:39 | gormur | Sensible? I disagree.There were two aerodrome objects:* A multipolygon with several correct tags and outline of the aerodrome.* A node with fewer tags than the MP.They both represent the same object but are not exact duplicates. The MP had significantly more information in it.Then some... | |
| 6 | 2019-05-23 11:43 | sebastic ♦105 | You're wrong, removing the relation _is_ a fix for old-style multipolygons. The object won't be detected as an old-style multipolygon again.Instead of arguing in this changeset, you should have inspected the history yourself and taken the actions you see fit. | |
| 7 | 2019-05-23 12:07 | gormur | It was _not_ an old scool multipolygon... | |
| 8 | 2019-05-23 12:29 | sebastic ♦105 | In the context of the area project every relation with only type=multipolygon is old-style.http://area.jochentopf.com/ | |
| 67175646 by jan_olieslagers @ 2019-02-13 21:28 | 1 | 2019-05-23 11:49 | gormur | Then why didn't you do as you suggested yourself? Now there is no rendering of the outer perimeter of the aerodrome... |
| 2 | 2019-05-23 13:31 | Jan Olieslagers ♦201 | :) because I do not care very much about the rendering. Especially as the rendering of aerodromes is very poor anyway, sadly.I am already content if the database is more or less ok.Kind regards!Karel ADAMSkarlchen9@skynet.be | |
| 68694115 by Jan Olieslagers @ 2019-03-30 11:16 | 1 | 2019-05-23 10:49 | gormur | The nightmare is certainly you deleting information from the more complete relation. If only you had copied the tags from the aerodrome node... Sometimes duplicate information is accepted. The world is not black and white. :/ |
| 2 | 2019-05-23 10:53 | gormur | reverted | |
| 64621411 by NKA @ 2018-11-18 14:09 | 1 | 2019-03-25 17:39 | gormur | Hei. Ser at en rundkjøring (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645963847/history) ble tagget som oneway=yes i heller enn junction=roundabout. Kanskje dette var noe som kom fra nvdb via et script el.l? |
| 2 | 2019-03-25 19:21 | NKA ♦247 | Det kan godt tenkes at rundkjøringer under arbeid ikke er korrekt/fullstendig kodet i NVDB ja | |
| 66229512 by gormur @ 2019-01-11 15:10 | 1 | 2019-01-11 15:14 | gormur | Also added some flares to roundabouts. |
| 64090503 by FredrikLindseth @ 2018-11-01 19:08 | 1 | 2018-11-02 14:46 | gormur | Flott med import, men kanskje normalisere adressetaggene litt?ADDRESS=PLOGFABRIKKVEGEN 2, 4353 KLEPP STASJONEr ikke https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema bedre? |
| 2 | 2018-11-02 14:50 | gormur | ADDRESS var brukt 88 ganger før dette og 125 ganger i dette changesettet. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-02 15:01 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Dette er rent sløvhet av meg. Consider them fjernet | |
| 60231504 by gormur @ 2018-06-28 00:11 | 1 | 2018-11-01 17:52 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Den Coop Expressen der. Finnes den? Jeg kan ikke se den i coop sine egne butikkdata. Den har ikke byttet kjede til noe annet? |
| 2 | 2018-11-02 09:20 | gormur | Det er nok bare en 'søndags-filial' til Extra Øksnevad som ligger i samme bygg. Inngang i hver sin ende av bygget. Bygget er ganske nytt og ble bygget for Coop, så det ville overraske om de allerede er rebrandet.Men kan ta en sving innom en dag og dobbeltsjekke. | |
| 63547146 by Paerox @ 2018-10-15 15:51 | 1 | 2018-10-15 22:58 | gormur | Hei J :)Så lenge det er mulig å kjøre eller gå igjennom, er det best å beholde den gjennomgående veien. Det holder med barrier=block på noden.traffic_calming er det ikke nødvendig å ha på ways, hvis de enkelte humpene er tagget p&arin... |
| 2 | 2018-10-15 22:59 | gormur | Veldig bra kommentert! Da er det lett å forstå hva du tenkte og kan få konstruktiv tilbakemelding. | |
| 58171791 by gormur @ 2018-04-17 15:33 | 1 | 2018-09-28 09:12 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!The unusual tag highway="abandonded bridge" is confusing. Is the road still in use as a track? Maybe with ford=yes?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580900428 |
| 2 | 2018-10-02 20:54 | gormur | Better now? | |
| 3 | 2018-10-04 06:52 | GerdP ♦2,751 | I hope. My understanding of the current data is that there is no longer a way to cross the water here. | |
| 59444433 by Haaolto @ 2018-05-31 21:44 | 1 | 2018-07-08 11:16 | gormur | Svantebroen har jeg ikke hørt om før. Hva er det? |
| 48690688 by Odiz @ 2017-05-15 05:54 | 1 | 2018-05-07 21:30 | gormur | Hvorfor? Hvis jeg husker rett står er det "innkjøring forbudt for motorkjøretøy" og "gjelder ikke buss i rute".Dette er _ikke_ en boliggate og det er få eller ingen oppkjørsler til bolighus fra denne bussveien. |
| 2 | 2018-05-27 14:04 | Odiz ♦10 | There is an exception for some houses on Myklebustvegen. However, probably it shouldn't be tagged as Residential as this is is mainly intended for bus trafic. | |
| 53704346 by gormur @ 2017-11-12 04:34 | 1 | 2017-12-18 18:19 | blincoln ♦6 | Is construction=trunk really correct here? I rely on OSRM in my site https://abetterrouteplanner.com and it refuses to route anything via Ryfylkevegen. |
| 2 | 2017-12-19 13:17 | Thyregod ♦1 | I also have problems with this road. I'm not from that region, but local people tell that the road has been there for many years and it is open. I am new to openstreetmap. I don't know what to do about it. Is it maybe because the raod is marked as being under construction ?I got the pr... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-24 17:46 | gormur | Yes. The road is open. construction=trunk is wrong.Thanks to Thyregod for fixing this a few days ago.But please note that this is an issue with OSRM. The routing engine shoult should not take the construction=* tag into consideration when highway!=construction.Also note that the tag in que... | |
| 46849784 by Semtex72 @ 2017-03-14 18:49 | 1 | 2017-03-20 13:49 | gormur | Hei Semtex72!Velkommen som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap.Ser du har lagt til en park i Holteveien 1. Sikker på at det ikke er et hus eller hage der? |
| 2 | 2017-12-21 13:25 | gormur | Har gjenbrukt nodene og wayen og tegnet huset som står der i stedet. | |
| 40016618 by vjyblauw @ 2016-06-14 12:43 | 1 | 2017-11-14 21:27 | gormur | HiSeems like you have added higway="incline (1)" to a number of nodes in this area.As nodes does not have a direction, putting an incline does not make much sense. It's much better to put incline=up/down on the way itself.You can find them here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sZB... |
| 51485094 by Reitstoen_import @ 2017-08-27 15:35 | 1 | 2017-09-10 22:55 | gormur | Hei!Ta en titt på https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7513926 Her ser det ut som at navn har kommet inn i natural-taggen. Er det noe i kildedataene, eller noe feil i importen? |
| 2 | 2017-09-11 22:34 | Reitstoen ♦43 | Hei! Bra observert! Takk! :) Fikset.Er nok bare en glipp ved tagging av meg. Autocomplete som har gått litt fort.Øyene er ikke en del av kildedata. De er kun et hull i sjøen, og way'en er tagget med kilde og dato. | |
| 51837979 by Joeysven @ 2017-09-08 09:34 | 1 | 2017-09-08 10:21 | gormur | Welcome to openstreetmap :)You requested a review on your change, so here it is:To start, your changeset comment is very good :)You changed a building=yes to building=Schuur. I guess Schuur is the dutch word for shed?I think then maybe building=shed would be a better choice as most tags shou... |
| 2 | 2017-09-08 11:43 | eggie ♦40,705 | PB gestuurd met welkom.. Lees je goed in.Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.Probeer te reageren op opmerkingen in de changesets. | |
| 3 | 2017-09-08 11:47 | Joeysven ♦1 | Hartelijk dank voor de info! Ik heb al een paar wijzigingen bij mij in de buurt gemaakt die niet klopten. Ik zal zeer zorgvuldig te werk gaan. | |
| 4 | 2017-09-08 11:52 | eggie ♦40,705 | 'k Ben er een paar doorgelopen. Je bent serieus bezig. Goede zaak. Verander nog even die schuur in yes of shed.Verder alleen de adresnodes gebruiken voor shops e.d. Kijk ook op het forum.. daar kun je ook vragen kwijt.Je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje welkom. | |
| 5 | 2017-09-08 11:56 | Joeysven ♦1 | Ok, heb schuur veranderd in shed. Ik zal zeker gaan kijken op het forum. Dank voor je hulp! | |
| 6 | 2017-09-08 11:59 | Joeysven ♦1 | Nog even een snel vraagje. Ik zie een paar winkels die niet meer bestaan. Kan ik die dan verwijderen e/o veranderen? | |
| 7 | 2017-09-08 12:08 | eggie ♦40,705 | Je kunt de winkelgegevens verwijderen en dan laat je de adresgegevens gewoon staan op de BAG adresnode. | |
| 8 | 2017-09-08 12:11 | eggie ♦40,705 | Winkels zonder adresnode kun je gewoon verwijderen als je niet meer bestaan. | |
| 9 | 2017-09-08 12:12 | Joeysven ♦1 | Ok, thnx! | |
| 50727653 by gormur @ 2017-07-31 16:50 | 1 | 2017-09-02 08:35 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please review unusual highway=slide on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511792382Did you mean piste:type=sled ? |
| 2 | 2017-09-04 06:28 | gormur | Thanks.Better now? | |
| 3 | 2017-09-04 06:36 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Yes, If children use it as a playground.I don't know the place and can't say from the sat images. | |
| 49697145 by geri-oc @ 2017-06-20 15:38 | 1 | 2017-07-03 14:51 | gormur | Any particular reason why you changed one out of over 30 ways of "Smalspåret" railway=preserved to railway=narrow_gauge?(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25580533).I would argue that railway=narrow_gauge should not be used at all... |
| 2 | 2017-07-04 06:43 | geri-oc ♦497 | Hello gormur, I have directed to railway = *:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways (Narrow-gauge passenger or freight trains, often tourist / scenic routes. -> gauge = 891)http://www.smalsparet.se/http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1643603#map=14/58.3712/15.3034 is a control track... | |
| 3 | 2017-07-05 11:33 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | Småspåret is a Railway wich is preserved by a local action group, but the Main reason is not the Heritage but the possiblity to reaktive it sometimes in the futur. Their transport service is saisonal but in this periode regulary and they are inkluderat in the normal public transport syst... | |
| 4 | 2017-07-08 10:17 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | Hör dom se deal with this issue now? It is for me totaly Clearwater that we shall have one solution from Jenny to Hultsfred. From Jenny to Västervik the rail is verry special (tre rails in one track i order to make it possible for normal and narrow gauge trains to use it) | |
| 5 | 2017-07-08 10:18 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | Sorry for My phones stupid correction ideas :) | |
| 6 | 2017-07-08 13:22 | geri-oc ♦497 | http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016_Kombinationsgleis_der_ehemaligen_Schmalspurbahn_in_Potschappel.jpghttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186070587/history | |
| 7 | 2017-07-08 13:23 | gormur | I think tagging narrow gauge railways as railway=narrow_gauge is just as silly as tagging a way with highway=steep just because it is steep (yes that was a thing in the early osm days). Such things as steepness and gauge has its own tags and should not interfere with the main tag (this case railway=... | |
| 8 | 2017-07-17 06:10 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | i tried to clean upp. look att https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50340555#map=10/57.4449/15.9211 The question is how to make clear that the usesage=branch is saisonal. I put same informationen (like wegsite and so on) away from the track and addet it instead in the relation för the wh... | |
| 9 | 2017-07-17 06:12 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | gromur i tried to use the information in the wiki. i see your point but att forum.openstreetmap.org are discussions about this topic. It seems to be importend for same services like routeplanning for trains based on openstreetmap :) | |
| 10 | 2017-07-17 10:52 | gormur | What do you think is the most important property of this railway? The fact that it is a museum railway with sporadic traffic, or that it is 891mm rather than 1435mm wide?Regarding route planning: There are better mechanisms for route planning for railways than changing its tagging (The operator ... | |
| 11 | 2017-07-17 13:52 | Skinfaxi ♦53 | Gomur IF you för what you wan't it games to a best solution. I just tried to fix samething that an other person has started. I personaluthyrning think that usage=Link describes the actuell situation best because the railway has more trafik than the "inlandsbanan". But i am verry ... | |
| 47265808 by gormur @ 2017-03-29 16:45 | 1 | 2017-03-29 16:47 | gormur | Changeset comment incorrectly says 1211, Jondal is 1227 |
| 46845344 by Jonadahl @ 2017-03-14 15:52 | 1 | 2017-03-20 14:05 | gormur | Hei Jonadahl!Velkommen som bidragsyter i OpenStreetMap!Ser du ønsket å legge til m.o.h på en adresse. Men det ser ut til at det bare var navnet (Vidsyn Lodge) du også la til som kom med.Den korrekte taggen for å angi m.o.h i osm er "ele" (for elevat... |
| 46984262 by bilde2910 @ 2017-03-19 14:41 | 1 | 2017-03-20 14:00 | gormur | Hei bilde2910!Velkommen som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap!Ser du er godt i gang med gode bidrag.Spør meg gjerne om det er noe du lurer på!-gorm |
| 46893056 by Jens Løkling @ 2017-03-16 10:05 | 1 | 2017-03-20 13:56 | gormur | Hei Jens!Velkommen til som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap!Det ser ut til at du er godt i gang med gode bidrag. :)Spør meg gjerne om det er noe du lurer på. |
| 47005649 by 3s4d @ 2017-03-20 08:51 | 1 | 2017-03-20 13:52 | gormur | Hei 3s4d!Velkommen som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap!Ser du har "test-tegnet" en skog midt i Valevatn i Sirdal.Du fikk det til! :)Men nå kan du kanskje ta bort testen din igjen, siden det dukker opp på kartet for alle...vennlig hilsen gormur |
| 44967508 by gormur @ 2017-01-06 21:41 | 1 | 2017-01-13 05:21 | TheSwavu ♦544 | Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464199650really have quotation marks in it's name? |
| 2 | 2017-01-13 09:26 | gormur | No. But it isn't an official name either. Added a note. | |
| 22697221 by rubund @ 2014-06-02 16:07 | 1 | 2016-07-27 14:56 | gormur | Kraftverk og rørgate ble duplisert med dette changeset-et. |
| 37156744 by jtotton @ 2016-02-11 21:47 | 1 | 2016-07-07 16:48 | gormur | Most, if not all, of these houses are not closed ways. They have duplicated nodes in one of the corners. Import gone wrong? Or did you draw them by hand? |
| 40127827 by Verec @ 2016-06-19 05:23 | 1 | 2016-06-22 13:18 | gormur | The peak is named "Gråkallen", and has nothing to do with the tram system in Trondheim... |
| 2 | 2016-06-22 22:30 | anderfo ♦111 | I have resolved the issue. As gormur correctly wrote, the peak Gråkallen is not a tram line. | |
| 38508543 by gormur @ 2016-04-12 19:25 | 1 | 2016-04-13 06:14 | nammala ♦517 | Hi gormur,Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great and the modifications you have done was awesome but the buildings are merged to one another please resolve them.Happy mappingcheers,krishna |
| 2 | 2016-04-13 12:29 | gormur | Can you please link to one example building with a problem? | |
| 3 | 2016-04-13 13:10 | nammala ♦517 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100863996#map=19/63.41575/10.44675you can see here the buildings are connecting with each other | |
| 4 | 2016-04-13 15:24 | gormur | They look totally fine to me. They do touch eachother in real life too.And by the way: I only updated the addresses in this changeset. Someone else drew the houses before me. | |
| 5 | 2016-04-14 05:03 | nammala ♦517 | okay fine | |
| 37024141 by GerdP @ 2016-02-05 17:04 | 1 | 2016-02-05 18:05 | gormur | But why change to a node?If anything, it could have been expanded to a circular way, roughly the size and shape of the bay. Now there is no information about the size of the bay... |
| 2 | 2016-02-05 19:38 | GerdP ♦2,751 | I don't know where the bay starts, and the wiki recommends to use either a node or an area, while JOSM complains about a way with this tag, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay | |
| 22731193 by gormur @ 2014-06-04 09:50 | 1 | 2015-12-10 12:25 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!Please, can you explain why you need a highway=water ? If I got that right, you added this way to calm down OSM inspector? That looks not like a good idea to me. |
| 2 | 2015-12-10 12:26 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Sorry, forgot the link to the way:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286236733 | |
| 3 | 2016-02-05 10:32 | GerdP ♦2,751 | If there is no real road named Vågavågen,I guess the addr:street=Vågavågen is simply wrong. Maybe it is better to use addr:place=Vågavågen or remove it ? | |
| 4 | 2016-02-05 16:09 | gormur | Yeah.There is no road named Vågavågen, perhaps a path at best, but certainly no named street.Vågavågen is the name of the bay next to the adresses.But the adresses are correct. They come from the official (very accurate) norwegian adress register (legal source, imported... | |
| 5 | 2016-02-05 17:05 | GerdP ♦2,751 | OK, did that, seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37024141 | |
| 30207742 by gormur @ 2015-04-14 10:06 | 1 | 2015-12-10 06:32 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi there!highway=x-cycleway is rarely used.Are these ways closed (disused) now? See e.g.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32132176 |
| 2 | 2015-12-10 13:25 | gormur | It is being reconstructed. I will eventually get to reuse it, but do whatever you want to with it. | |
| 3 | 2015-12-10 17:31 | GerdP ♦2,751 | OK, I've changed them to disused:highway.If I got you right the new cycleways will probably not be in the same place? | |
| 34102938 by gormur @ 2015-09-18 13:19 | 1 | 2015-11-11 14:37 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:oneway=priority is only used here. It seems to means the same like oneway=alternating which is also not documented but used 21 times, see for example this tagging which uses an additional note to explain the details:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5009690 |
| 2 | 2015-11-11 15:50 | gormur | No, it is not the same as w5009690. There is not a oneway restriction here, just a priority for those who come from NW.It might be misuse of the oneway tag for this, so I'd be happy to change to a better alternative, but I have not found one yet. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-11 15:53 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Maybe like in this proposal?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/alternate_oneway | |
| 4 | 2015-11-11 16:15 | gormur | Done. | |
| 5 | 2015-11-11 16:23 | GerdP ♦2,751 | :-) | |
| 32830348 by Svein Olav @ 2015-07-23 16:13 | 1 | 2015-11-05 15:57 | gormur | Noen spesiell grunn til at du slettet Ålgårdsslåtten (Way 40585137)? Har undeleted den nå. |
| 11437361 by gormur @ 2012-04-28 00:39 | 1 | 2015-11-02 11:03 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please reviewhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12068267Bing shows a nice way close to it.Was that build after you tagged it highway=x-residential or is Bing out-dated now? |
| 2 | 2015-11-02 16:19 | gormur | No idea. Fixed it now. Just fix it if you find more. | |
| 3 | 2021-01-21 23:16 | DUGA ♦548 | Please do not add unmarked foot path across railroad. It is very dangerous! I've deleted that segment you added near 40.50166, -78.40996. Moreover, the no trespassing sign has been there for years! | |
| 31112788 by gormur @ 2015-05-13 19:42 | 1 | 2015-11-01 20:52 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review:is it okay to replace highway=bus_stop_inactiveby disused:highway=bus_stop ?It is only used in this changeset, see e.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31112788 |
| 2 | 2015-11-01 23:54 | gormur | Sure! You don't need to ask me for such small changes. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-02 05:48 | GerdP ♦2,751 | done, next time I just change and post a linkto the changesetto let you know, okay? | |
| 6673223 by gormur @ 2010-12-16 01:22 | 1 | 2015-10-21 15:48 | GerdP ♦2,751 | please review way 89763181:would it be okay to change highway=racetrack to highway=raceway so that it is rendered in the map? |
| 2 | 2015-10-21 17:06 | gormur | Go ahead | |
| 31962621 by gormur @ 2015-06-14 13:54 | 1 | 2015-07-03 18:28 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Kvar har du dette frå? http://www.vegvesen.no/Europaveg/e6halogalandsbrua/Nyhetsarkiv/utsetter-%C3%A5pning-av-e6-e10-tr%C3%A6ldaltunnelen |
| 2 | 2015-07-03 21:33 | gormur | Det kan hende jeg var litt rask på labben når jeg leste denne (eller en annen gjengivelse av Vegvesenet si pressemelding).http://www.nordlys.no/steinras-stenger-e6-apner-uferdig-tunnel-for-trafikk/s/5-34-175814 | |
| 3 | 2015-07-03 21:39 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Stemmer. Det var vel ledebil gjennom der ei stund. | |
| 30219313 by TheKnightWho @ 2015-04-14 18:44 | 1 | 2015-05-25 23:48 | gormur | Why did you change Rogfast project from proposed to construction? No construction has been started. The project hasn't even been finally approved. |
| 30423573 by Karabas Mapper @ 2015-04-23 08:16 | 1 | 2015-05-13 21:12 | gormur | There are some strange tags on ways in this changeset, please review your edit. Examplres: way 340066493, way 340068419, way 340068418 |
| 31061881 by gormur @ 2015-05-12 18:30 | 1 | 2015-05-12 18:57 | gormur | Correcting changeset comment: Reusing redundant addr interpolating ways |
| 31062783 by gormur @ 2015-05-12 18:55 | 1 | 2015-05-12 18:56 | gormur | Correcting changeset comment: Reusing interpolation ways |
| 26484939 by gormur @ 2014-11-01 16:07 | 1 | 2014-11-02 20:40 | gormur | To dagers arbeid... |
| 2 | 2015-05-04 15:44 | Noen ♦316 | Hvorfor har 93 gamle adressenoder havnet i en rekke på Sankthanshaugen?http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2790246684 | |
| 3 | 2015-05-04 18:30 | gormur | Uffda. Det er nok jeg som har glemt dem. Pleier å gjenbruke noder, i stedet for å slette, i hvert changeset. Gjør som du vil :-) Eller så tar jeg det senere. | |
| 8848117 by gormur @ 2011-07-27 19:14 | 1 | 2015-04-07 21:40 | ethelmermaid ♦3 | Shouldn't these closures be rendered with temporary tags (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary), since the Østensjøbanen is coming back within a year? |
| 2 | 2015-04-08 10:26 | gormur | Are you thinking about http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30013005 ? Please comment on the relevant changeset. | |
| 26198055 by gormur @ 2014-10-19 17:57 | 1 | 2015-03-30 08:59 | gormur | Discussion about what symbol to use posessive where name ends in s, z and x: http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-October/004976.html |
| 26449923 by gormur @ 2014-10-30 22:08 | 1 | 2015-03-29 22:05 | Gazer75 ♦284 | If you use special letters in names then make sure the streets match. No idea what the special sign is, but it's not available on any keyboard. |
| 2 | 2015-03-29 22:55 | gormur | Example? | |
| 3 | 2015-03-30 05:29 | Gazer75 ♦284 | All names with an apostrophe. You can find them using OSM Inspector. Using this apostrophe is creating problems imo. Only way to type it in Windows is by using ALT+0146 on the numpad. No GPS unit I have seen is capable of typing this as well. Yes, there is a difference between ’ and ' Fir... | |
| 4 | 2015-03-30 08:56 | gormur | This changeset only touched the addr:postcode, as the comment clearly says. Please comment on the original changeset. | |
| 29604069 by gormur @ 2015-03-19 23:53 | 1 | 2015-03-25 00:53 | gormur | Ouch. This was an unfortunate slip. Was working to manually merge in an external data set, and the whole thing got sucked up. Sorry. This is a legal source, and I will commit to clean it up by merging into existing data. |
| 25960623 by WoGraSo @ 2014-10-09 13:07 | 1 | 2015-03-24 19:55 | gormur | The tags on many of the buildings in this changeset seems have come from a failed import of some sort. Please review. |
| 26389938 by xtianetkti @ 2014-10-28 15:27 | 1 | 2015-03-19 19:57 | gormur | Please note that 33 ways in this changeset had an empty key ("") with value "26871". I have put a fixme on those roads. Please review. |
| 2 | 2015-03-22 09:37 | xtianetkti ♦4 | I don't know how this can append. This may came from previous map entries relocate by my way. | |
| 26300087 by Stephen_Co_Antrim @ 2014-10-24 13:47 | 1 | 2015-03-07 23:08 | gormur | There are three relations in this changeset that has no members. Please review. |
| 26123772 by WoGraSo @ 2014-10-16 16:45 | 1 | 2015-03-07 19:38 | gormur | Please be advised that some of the buildings in this changeset seems to have got has some strange tags. Looks like some xml parsing error or something. Please revise. Example: way/309416762 |
| 2 | 2015-03-08 10:08 | WoGraSo ♦5 | I fixt ist | |
| 29070653 by Luis36995 @ 2015-02-24 16:14 | 1 | 2015-03-06 11:44 | gormur | Be aware that your changeset replaced a few "name" tags with "oneway". |
| 2 | 2015-09-24 22:47 | Luis36995 ♦64 | Hello gormur:It was my mistake to add oneway instead of name. However I saw you fixed them. Thank you,Luis, | |
| 28772615 by kikkawamitsuru @ 2015-02-11 12:45 | 1 | 2015-03-06 02:49 | gormur | Please review your import. There is a lot of character set issues with it.F. ex this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327597331 |
| 2 | 2015-03-14 19:27 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | This import appears to be spam, not just a bad import. | |
| 3 | 2015-03-14 19:28 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | The entire changest should be reverted! | |
| 4 | 2015-03-15 02:00 | kikkawamitsuru ♦1 | Deleted bad data, already discussed on Talk-ja. | |
| 5 | 2015-03-15 06:11 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | The bad data is not deleted, please check. Please revert this changeset. | |
| 6 | 2015-03-15 06:14 | Bryce C Nesbitt ♦159 | For example this way still has bad keys https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327597028 and is not deleted. | |
| 28699720 by gormur @ 2015-02-08 10:54 | 1 | 2015-02-14 16:28 | Gazer75 ♦284 | Wouldnt use Bing in this area, it is terribly misaligned along all axis. |
| 2 | 2015-02-14 18:28 | gormur | I know. Bing wasn't much used, just left it in the source field by default... | |
| 19879159 by Dabbi @ 2014-01-08 10:14 | 1 | 2015-02-04 05:46 | gormur | Can http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/21016 be closed then? And remove fixme=geometry ? |
| 26944825 by Brokenpike @ 2014-11-22 04:09 | 1 | 2014-11-25 01:00 | gormur | Hi!Welcome to openstreetmap :)You tagged a node as "rr". I don't know exactly what that means. Perhaps you can explain in words? |
| 26914289 by BlakeSchneebly @ 2014-11-20 18:59 | 1 | 2014-11-25 00:52 | gormur | Velcome to openstreetmap :)Perhaps you can describe with words what is on the "SITE" you just edited? That way I can perhaps suggest a few more tags? best regards -gormur |
| 22320532 by Noen @ 2014-05-13 20:00 | 1 | 2014-11-04 19:38 | gormur | På ruters kart og https://ruter.no/nyhetsarkiv/traseendring-for-trikken/ står det at tidligere Vikatorvet nå heter "Ruseløkka" og ikke "Ruseløkka skole". Ta en dobbelsjekk? |