| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63447732 by Magick93 | 1 | 2018-10-12 11:00:33 UTC | MikeN | This road is private, has no road signs, and already marked as noname=yes. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63451112 |
| 62311816 by twhims | 1 | 2018-09-05 22:08:51 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for the edit - I noticed that there were some duplicate entries for the park, so I merged them and changed the name back from 'South Carolina' to 'South Carolina Botanical Garden'. |
| 62209005 by MikeN | 1 | 2018-09-02 00:21:25 UTC | MikeN | Also update road geometries per survey |
| 61901852 by RD1 | 1 | 2018-08-23 01:35:23 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Please add a meaningful comment to the changeset that explains the goal of the edit. It seems that some of these edits have lost information such as road name, lanes, etc. |
| 61631661 by TheBestIdea | 1 | 2018-08-13 17:26:21 UTC | jmapb | There are dozens of these around Brooklyn and Queens, all added by homeslice60148 and tagged with #maproulette and #Long_Island_traffic_lights_(Brooklyn,_Queens) Aside from the facts that 1) they're generally not in places where sidewalk mapping makes any difference to pedestrian routing, and 2)... |
| 2 | 2018-08-14 14:52:35 UTC | TheBestIdea | My personal preference is that, in NYC where sidewalks are the norm, if they just follow the geometry of the road, they should be mapped as an attribute of the road with the "sidewalk=" key and not as a separate way. When they're disconnected at the ends so that they actively impede ro... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-14 15:57:10 UTC | bhousel | It would be great if, rather than removing the sidewalks, you would just connect them to the road where crossings exist. It's not a matter of "personal preference" - there are groups working on wheelchair routing that need to map attributes on the sidewalk ways (like smoothness and obstac... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-14 16:14:54 UTC | TheBestIdea | There appears to be a robust debate about whether sidewalks should be separate ways: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way If people want to take to time to do so, I'm not going to stop them, but they should do it in a way that does not impede routing for other users... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-14 16:35:07 UTC | bhousel | Yes, I'm aware of the wiki page. Again, the primary usecase for this style of mapping is for wheelchair users who can not cross the street mid-block. It does not impede routing for other users (I'm not sure why some people think this). | |
| 6 | 2018-08-14 17:01:03 UTC | jmapb | None of these #maproulette #Long_Island_traffic_lights_(Brooklyn,_Queens) sidewalks have any wheelchair or smoothness info. I've actually never seen any such info on sidewalks here. (I have seen sloped_curb=yes on some *road* intersections, but that's obsolete now.) Yes, it might be added someday, b... | |
| 7 | 2018-08-14 17:02:28 UTC | jmapb | Personally I only map sidewalks when I perceive that it would improve routing, but I can easily imagine that at some point in the future mapping every sidewalk will be the norm. I'm not inclined to fight against this -- but I do want people to map responsibly, so that the map isn't less useful after... | |
| 8 | 2018-08-14 17:11:10 UTC | jmapb | BTW here is a very silly example of screwed up pedestrian routing. (Wheelchair routing would have the same problem, I believe.)https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=40.60721%2C-74.01134%3B40.60740%2C-74.01154#map=19/40.60770/-74.01090&layers=N | |
| 9 | 2018-08-14 17:14:17 UTC | bhousel | jmapb, please leave me alone. If you need help adding a crosswalk to fix that routing issue, ask on help.openstreetmap.org | |
| 10 | 2018-08-14 17:18:00 UTC | jmapb | These comments are not a personal attack and your defensiveness is uncalled for. I'm discussing the changeset. If you don't want to part of the changeset discussion, hit the "unsubscribe" button. | |
| 11 | 2018-08-14 19:15:01 UTC | MikeN | I've observed new mappers drawing these types of sidewalks without crossings because they appear to 'stop at the curb'. They're just entering an observation. I'd see it as a work in progress, and not usable for navigation on its own until the network has been fully entered..A community might de... | |
| 12 | 2018-08-14 20:43:39 UTC | jmapb | I don't think these are being mapped this way because they stop at the curb -- there are clearly visible crosswalks at all of the hanging ends. I don't know whether homeslice60148 prefers to map this way or if it's part of the maproulette instructions (? I don't know how maproulette works. You, Mike... | |
| 13 | 2018-08-14 20:45:34 UTC | jmapb | BTW this changset (61631661) has been reverted by changeset 61662763 (restoring the deleted sidewalks), and the loose sidewalk ends have been tied into the street grid by changeset 61662897. This will improve the routing. It will still be a left and two rights to get from 691 Fulton to 239 Ashland P... | |
| 14 | 2018-08-14 20:48:42 UTC | TheBestIdea | I agree that your suggestion would be a big improvement. | |
| 15 | 2018-08-14 21:26:03 UTC | jmapb | Happy to hear it. And MikeN. by the way, I believe I misread what you meant by "end at the curb" -- yes indeed, the sidewalks themselves do literally end at the curb, crosswalks or no, and I can easily imagine a mapper choosing to map them in this literal fashion without realizing that it ... | |
| 16 | 2018-08-15 16:58:26 UTC | jmapb | Well I added my sample "cap" at the Fulton/Ashland place, changeset 61672263. If there's ever a consensus to purge these loose-end sidewalks that survives the edit wars, please feel free to get rid of that too -- it's only useful IMO as a fix to routing problem the loose ends cause.Hom... | |
| 17 | 2018-08-15 19:24:57 UTC | homeslice60148 | Hi everyone! | |
| 18 | 2018-08-15 19:46:49 UTC | homeslice60148 | Whoops, let's try this again. Hi, everyone! I just noticed jmapb's message and I'm jumping into the discussion here to let everyone know what I'm doing and why. I am a very long time mapper on OSM, and it is my general goal to improve the map. I personally follow the "do no harm, delete no cor... | |
| 19 | 2018-08-16 16:46:13 UTC | jmapb | Hi homeslice, thanks for joining us -- I shouldn't have given up so quickly! And thanks for being clear about your goals and MO.As I said, I've admired your sidewalks. But I hope I've also demonstrated the downside this mapping technique has on the pedestrian routing. When sidewalks are fully ma... | |
| 20 | 2018-08-17 20:02:32 UTC | homeslice60148 | J, I think the solution of closing the crosswalks for routing will work. I will do this from now on. | |
| 21 | 2018-08-17 21:02:36 UTC | jmapb | Thanks! (Btw I think I mapped your place today: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1829661485 ) | |
| 60342709 by ashleyannmathew | 1 | 2018-07-30 22:13:33 UTC | MikeN | Why were these driveways reverted to construction state? |
| 2 | 2018-07-31 09:41:45 UTC | ashleyannmathew | Hi Mike,Thanks for your query. I have reverted the highway back to service. I am working on fixing all highway topology errors across the US, where crossing highway is one of them. Crossing highways are highways that cross each other without a common node at its intersection. While fixing it in t... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-31 11:01:43 UTC | MikeN | Thank you - Bing has been updated since that survey and it is clearer that the shopping center is already built and was not mapped from planning document papers. | |
| 4 | 2018-07-31 11:25:58 UTC | ashleyannmathew | Yes, thank you for the update | |
| 60364351 by volatile_ant | 1 | 2018-07-03 05:03:18 UTC | phidauex | Hi, I don't know enough about imports to recommend the right process, but with the new MS building footprint I know there is a lot of discussion going on. The #colorado channel in the OSM slack channel (https://osmus.slack.com/messages/C4WKKHH0V/) might be a good place to start before jumping into t... |
| 2 | 2018-07-03 05:10:17 UTC | phidauex | FYI, found a few odd things that the MS footprint algorithm was doing - it marked some of the airport striping as buildings, and has a problem with circular buildings - it very much wants them to be square. I fixed a few, see this changelog for examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60364... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-03 13:57:15 UTC | volatile_ant | Thanks for the slack link. Both of the changesets associated with this update contain unintended data (I used incorrect filter settings). I attempted to revert them last night, but you were too quick! I'll check out the discussion, and will be reviewing the changesets building-by-building over the n... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-03 14:05:42 UTC | volatile_ant | I've never used slack before, and am having trouble signing in. Is it an invite-only group? | |
| 5 | 2018-07-03 14:48:50 UTC | MikeN | Try this link - https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ | |
| 6 | 2018-07-03 16:08:16 UTC | phidauex | Sorry for jumping the gun on the fixes, I was curious about the dataset quality to so spent a few minutes looking it over. Pretty darn good, really, but with a few odd errors. Feel free to revert me. Lots of discussion going on about the MS import now, on the email list, and the #general and #colora... | |
| 7 | 2018-07-03 16:42:51 UTC | volatile_ant | Thanks Mike, that worked. I'll flip through the discussion.Agreed that the data quality is generally pretty good for simple forms and smaller buildings. There are definitely questionable items, such as a huge amorphous blob of a building placed in the middle of a field, and silos being square or... | |
| 59948539 by SProvost | 1 | 2018-06-22 00:08:30 UTC | Paul Johnson | Doesn't look bad, but lanes shouldn't be used on laneless streets. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539 |
| 2 | 2018-06-26 14:04:20 UTC | SProvost | Thanks for your feedback Paul. It's actually the first time I create new features in OSM, I normally only edit existing ones. So all constructive feedback is welcome. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539 | |
| 3 | 2018-06-30 14:57:14 UTC | Paul Johnson | At least in the US and Canada, there's an understanding that the only time lanes=* should be tagged on a street with no painted lanes is where the lines are missing due to lack of maintenance. These streets, lanes=2 isn't appropriate because there's no lanes nor evidence that lanes were ever painte... | |
| 4 | 2018-06-30 16:14:02 UTC | bhousel | It's totally ok to add lanes tags to laneless streets. | |
| 5 | 2018-06-30 18:06:31 UTC | Paul Johnson | That really seems a lot like just making stuff up at that point, bhousel. | |
| 6 | 2018-07-01 10:37:30 UTC | MikeN | I also don't know of a convention in the US and Canada where it is incorrect to add lanes to stripeless roads. | |
| 7 | 2018-07-01 11:49:29 UTC | Paul Johnson | How is it not geofiction to do so? | |
| 8 | 2018-07-01 18:27:52 UTC | MikeN | It explicitly models the road as 2 traffic flows where normal size vehicles pass each other, as well as differentiating from 1 lane roads where one vehicle would need to back up to an opening to pass. | |
| 9 | 2018-07-01 18:42:55 UTC | Paul Johnson | Except on streets like this, that's not really reliably possible when someone's parked on one or both sides of the street unless you're on something singletrack. You make a strong argument for tagging width=* after measuring it, though. | |
| 59298405 by westsider28 | 1 | 2018-05-27 11:22:46 UTC | MikeN | I was so careful to get the 'e' on Pointe that I didn't proofread the whole name! |
| 59179094 by teodorab_telenav | 1 | 2018-05-22 19:40:04 UTC | MikeN | This edit was correct, in that it matches the new name on the latest TIGER, but the name didn't sound right. I checked the county records and they still show the old name Countryside Circle. So I'm not sure how the wrong name got into TIGER 2017. |
| 59180915 by teodorab_telenav | 1 | 2018-05-22 17:54:56 UTC | MikeN | I'm not sure that the result of this edit is desirable. Although it strictly agrees with the OSM philosophy of separate ways only in the case of physical divider, southbound routing instructions to Edwards Mill Road are "turn right", followed by "turn immediate left", instead o... |
| 2 | 2018-05-24 05:48:29 UTC | teodorab_telenav | Hello Mike,I deleted the link because I coudn't find any physical divider according to sattelite imageries ( Bing, Mapbox, Digital Globe). Anyway, I will reverse the changes. Thank you for letting me know that the edit is not desirable.Best regards,Teodora | |
| 59114846 by itsamap! | 1 | 2018-05-20 10:51:18 UTC | MikeN | The school name appears on the boundary of the school - in most cases with OSM, the building does not have the school name. That allows for multiple buildings, and having the name on the area makes it show sooner when zooming in. |
| 2 | 2018-05-20 13:15:28 UTC | itsamap! | Got it thanks, I just changed it. | |
| 59027356 by markm851003 | 1 | 2018-05-16 19:37:34 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for this edit. What was the source for this change when there were recent edits and notes about this intersection? |
| 2 | 2018-05-16 20:31:10 UTC | markm851003 | Hello, Mike I see that you are correct. These edits were made on a HOT tasking project, I had consulted with a peer and we thought we were making the right changes including the recent notes. In reality the edit made was a misinterpretation of the data. I will update this immediately, thank you for... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-16 20:32:22 UTC | markm851003 | I will also update the source notes on this. | |
| 4 | 2018-05-17 02:26:07 UTC | MikeN | Thank you for correcting this. Feel free to leave a note for someone local to look at any questionable items. (That's the way I learned that there is a wooden covered bridge near me that I had no idea was there). | |
| 58394251 by Union Street Media | 1 | 2018-04-25 15:37:40 UTC | MikeN | Thanks for adding these new roads! A tip to make it easier to see the roads under the trees is to use the NC imagery - select the Layers button on the right side, then for Background select "NC Latest Orthoimagery" |
| 58393641 by Union Street Media | 1 | 2018-04-25 14:55:11 UTC | MikeN | Hi, I see that Long Pond Lane was added as a "motorway". Although this sounds like permission for motor vehicles, it is normally only used on Interstate highways. Small roads like this would normally be Residential or 'Minor/Unclassified' if there are no houses nearby. |
| 2 | 2018-05-11 15:20:26 UTC | Union Street Media | It looks like the feature has been changed from motorway to residential, thank you. Let me know if you see any other corrections. | |
| 58039457 by Union Street Media | 1 | 2018-04-25 02:21:04 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Why was Burl Lane deleted in this changeset? |
| 58115218 by Mizan_CU | 1 | 2018-04-15 21:40:29 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please take care when editing because a node was moved for a long distance by the stadium. That part of the edit was undone. |
| 57868426 by jess0302 | 1 | 2018-04-06 23:20:46 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edits! The ways marked as motorways are not really motorways. The best way to make a private map for events and share them is on UMap https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/This was reverted in #57880411 |
| 57617184 by farmerhen | 1 | 2018-03-29 02:37:07 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please be careful when editing because this edit removed a city boundary so I had to revert it. |
| 57257307 by dmcbride98 | 1 | 2018-03-17 12:24:06 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the work in aligning. There were still some side streets that needed updating. Please be aware that current Bing imagery is shifted - please select the layers / background imagery icon and select the "Esri World Imagery (Clarity)" which has much better agreement with G... |
| 57195404 by Greenville_SC_City_MSImport_1 | 1 | 2018-03-15 06:04:42 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Your import use some unusual values (addr:state="South Carolina", phone numbers missing the + sign, addresses without the combination addr:street and addr:housenumber). Is this import discussed on the import mailing list? |
| 2 | 2018-03-15 10:34:25 UTC | MikeN | This import step only added height to existing buildings; therefore the JOSM validation only checked for geometry conflicts and gross key errors. Phone numbers look as they would if entered by hand and won't conform to a strict format. This import was discussed on Imports - https://lists.openstre... | |
| 56911115 by Gaguy2012 | 1 | 2018-03-05 19:33:46 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to Open Street Map! The empty outline needs to be identified for what type of object it is, such as a building. Also, the "Ellison's Law" point needs to be separated into separate items instead of just being in the description. For an example, see the tags on https://www.opens... |
| 56818627 by boku_3 | 1 | 2018-03-02 19:00:55 UTC | MikeN | Everything looks great, thank you! |
| 56801039 by boku_3 | 1 | 2018-03-01 23:33:02 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Everything looks great but the opening hours syntax is specialized so that Apps can read the opening hours directly. I have updated the opening hours according to the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours |
| 56669410 by Kelfwall | 1 | 2018-02-26 01:06:50 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OSM! I have promoted the primary name of the nearby road to Pocotaligo Road and made the state road number as alternate, since that should help addressing and directions. |
| 2 | 2018-02-26 03:34:42 UTC | Kelfwall | Thank you MikeN!! | |
| 56554717 by Michael Frazier | 1 | 2018-02-21 21:04:38 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thanks for adding these. For buildings, choose a building type (roof, house, office, etc) instead of landuse. I went ahead and updated these.You can also make the outlines look neat by Squaring with the S key after they have been drawn. |
| 56539662 by clay_c | 1 | 2018-02-21 18:20:21 UTC | Paul Johnson | I still have some concerns about this mass attempt at priority creep on the highway=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Secondary_taghttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Tertiary_highways |
| 2 | 2018-02-21 20:37:18 UTC | MikeN | I agree about concerns with mass priority creep. DOT / Government classifications do not directly translate to an OSM classification. Routers will still select a road when it best matches the travel itinerary and mode. | |
| 3 | 2018-02-21 22:56:10 UTC | clay_c | Alright, I'll put a pause to this change for a bit. I want to continue this discussion later, though right now I think I just need to take a break. Thanks for being patient. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-22 01:50:06 UTC | Paul Johnson | No problem, thanks for being open on this. Last time there was someone who went a little too strict with the tagging, we ended up with the entire US highway system tagged trunk nationwide | |
| 5 | 2018-02-26 22:47:53 UTC | clay_c | Alright, I'm back and my head's clear. Thanks for giving me some time.I want to make sure we're on the same page with a few things. I'm avoiding being strict on tagging, and there's a few FM/RM roads I've tagged higher than secondary as well as state/US highways lower than primary. It's still co... | |
| 6 | 2018-02-27 01:51:13 UTC | Paul Johnson | RIght, generally a good idea to weight the local functionality with the classification to kind of rank it out. Like a major thoroughfare through a city (like, say, FM 2786 or CR 150 in Allen) might be underrated even as a secondary. But, say, FM 1885 or FM 920, northwest of Weatherford? Yeah, tha... | |
| 7 | 2018-02-27 01:56:28 UTC | Paul Johnson | Also, yeah, I'd fully agree that Texas makes for especially odd classification owing to it's huge number of auxiliary routes, of various and often nebulous significance, such as, despite signage, there is only one Ranch Road (RM 1), and *all* of the rest are properly FMs, and while the FMs are gener... | |
| 56277479 by jjbalins | 1 | 2018-02-12 13:37:38 UTC | MikeN | Hi, I noticed that others had added Lost Grove Lake Wildlife Mangement Area as both a park and nature reserve and overlapping areas. One of those could probably be deleted, but I wasn't sure whether it should be a park or nature reserve. |
| 56277499 by jjbalins | 1 | 2018-02-12 13:35:25 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for adding the lake. I think I was able to finish it according to the NAIP imagery which was newer than Bing and shows some more water expansion. |
| 2 | 2018-02-13 00:48:15 UTC | jjbalins | thanks! | |
| 55902002 by RigIsMe | 1 | 2018-01-30 17:58:32 UTC | RigIsMe | pokemon |
| 2 | 2018-01-30 18:24:17 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Fell and Chataqua were already marked as a park. Creating overlapping parks causes collisions in Pokemon spawning algorithms and actually reduces the spawning rate. | |
| 55878803 by therealjosh352 | 1 | 2018-01-30 12:20:56 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Miller Park was already marked as a park. Creating overlapping parks causes collisions in Pokemon spawning algorithms and actually reduces the spawning rate. |
| 55865303 by dentistdrpowell | 1 | 2018-01-29 19:50:40 UTC | MikeN | Hello! Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.o... |
| 55683793 by williamsburgsuiteshotel | 1 | 2018-01-23 14:24:08 UTC | MikeN | Why was the building removed? |
| 55579670 by vjeranc | 1 | 2018-01-19 15:45:30 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap - this fix looks great because of the separator between lanes. Thanks for your contribution! |
| 55340301 by pezhead | 1 | 2018-01-11 12:37:36 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The Cleveland Park outline already existed, so I transferred the new tags to the existing park outline. |
| 55288516 by innatusc | 1 | 2018-01-10 03:30:27 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Why was the building outline removed? Also, when specifying an address or street name, the convention is to spell out the name in full - such as "Pendleton Street". |
| 2 | 2018-01-10 22:26:39 UTC | MikeN | Reverted to restore building in changeset 55336454 | |
| 54709267 by itsamap! | 1 | 2017-12-17 23:18:17 UTC | MikeN | South Church Street is set to 1 lane - a single lane usually goes on a oneway street, otherwise a car would need to pull onto a shoulder or driveway when meeting an oncoming car. |
| 2 | 2017-12-17 23:23:02 UTC | itsamap! | Ok that's good to know before I went crazy changing things! I already changed alot of roads to 1 lane. I'll change them back.Thanks! | |
| 54708187 by itsamap! | 1 | 2017-12-17 23:16:41 UTC | MikeN | Congratulations - it looks good from JOSM! |
| 54398192 by Downtownandrew | 1 | 2017-12-06 12:56:04 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OSM! I noticed that there are 3 library nodes added, but they are not on any building. It might be new construction, but the building that looks like a library is to the right of these nodes. |
| 3904994 by MikeNBulk | 1 | 2017-11-23 00:11:22 UTC | HubMiner | Greetings, could you take a look at this note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/675095I am wondering if there a way to reimport river/islands outlines based on something more recent. |
| 2 | 2017-11-23 02:21:31 UTC | MikeN | The latest data still has this shape, so the best way will be a manual update to match the current wetland configuration. I'll make this a project for me in the next week or 2. | |
| 29293728 by JordanKepler | 1 | 2017-11-08 21:12:41 UTC | Mateusz Konieczny | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1200172 ? |
| 2 | 2017-11-08 23:49:06 UTC | MikeN | This area consists of parking lots and building foundations of a former factory site. Although there is no active plan for redevelopment of this site, the OSM tag landuse - 'brownfield' captures the demolished / industrial state of this site. | |
| 53210063 by JasonOsborne | 1 | 2017-10-25 12:21:35 UTC | MikeN | Thank you for the street name updates. It would be interesting to know the street signs around "Palm Street" - there is a section heading north that appears to be an original mistake from TIGER or has been removed. Also there is a section of Palm Street between Independence Avenue and &q... |
| 52894161 by JasonOsborne | 1 | 2017-10-13 21:17:34 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! These street name corrections are great. We do enter the full name without abbreviations, since it is easy to abbreviate names, but difficult to expand all the variations when needed. Happy Mapping! |
| 52017697 by Its_JAC | 1 | 2017-09-14 01:28:47 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Great job in adding this clinic. Thank you for your contributions. |
| 52013163 by practicalmathematics | 1 | 2017-09-13 18:09:43 UTC | MikeN | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Everything added here looks good. The combination public library and technical college is an unusual case. OpenStreetMap is flexible in how to tag these but would normally be added as 2 separate nodes/points so that both the library and school show as expected on a sea... |
| 51761564 by brynnan37 | 1 | 2017-09-06 01:42:10 UTC | MikeN | The residential neighborhood outline looks great! The only other change is that the name should be in a tag called 'name'. So, select the neighborhood outline, then in the "Add Field", select name , then enter the name. After that, the 'Description' entry can be removed. |
| 51760778 by Jacob T | 1 | 2017-09-06 01:33:15 UTC | MikeN | Hi, for an address to be visible to search in OpenStreetMap, the number ( 231 ) should be typed over the light gray 123 below Address, and the street ( Tunnel Road ) should be selected from the dropdown. The full text in 'name' is not required. For the rare cases where it's used, it would be in a... |
| 51739971 by brynnan37 | 1 | 2017-09-05 18:42:34 UTC | MikeN | Hi, the residential area looks good. The lines of a residential area generally do not touch roadways to make future edits easier. If the area has a subdivision name, that can be added to the area also. If the entire subdivision has one name, this residential area can be expanded first to cover ... |
| 51728252 by DHN9 | 1 | 2017-09-05 10:46:33 UTC | MikeN | OpenStreetMap is a database reflecting real world features. Please do not make fictional edits, or they will be reverted. This edit reverted in #51745421 . Also, please add a comment that describes the change(s) |
| 51735786 by nsage | 1 | 2017-09-05 10:40:04 UTC | MikeN | Thanks for the update. Your edit did remove the park attribute, but I also deleted the point since it does not apply any more. |
| 51495965 by DHN9 | 1 | 2017-08-28 20:13:49 UTC | MikeN | The apartments are a residential area, not a park |
| 51495982 by DHN9 | 1 | 2017-08-28 20:06:06 UTC | MikeN | There is no park here among the retail buildings |
| 51393304 by filth | 1 | 2017-08-24 11:44:13 UTC | bbmiller | Nope. These parks do exist in their mapped locations, and if you look at the history of these ways, they existed way before the Pokemon phenomenon. Would you please revert your change set? Or should I? |
| 2 | 2017-08-24 19:49:03 UTC | filth | ahh my apologies. i figured they were there for pokemon purposes. however they are not parks so should be taken out regardless. my dad lives a block away at rose court and i walk by there weekly there's no parks at those locations | |
| 3 | 2017-08-24 19:52:45 UTC | filth | someone probably added them for ingress then and not pokemon i'm guessing? both are residential areas, there's just houses there, no parks | |
| 4 | 2017-08-24 21:19:48 UTC | MikeN | Traverse City still lists those two parks as active http://www.traversecitymi.gov/downloads/boon_street_arbutus_ct_2010.pdf | |
| 5 | 2017-08-25 01:09:34 UTC | bbmiller | Yeah, and they're visible on Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7442222,-85.5970059,3a,90y,3.83h,74.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1st9KpajR0D8L7FSJPwTd9pw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7442259,-85.5988699,3a,75y,343.87h,69.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLyODIlwG5bEai-bSjYJT1Q!2e0!... | |
| 6 | 2017-08-25 12:30:17 UTC | bbmiller | OK, I got curious and swung by Boon St this morning. Sure enough, the parks are there, just as mapped.Boon Street Park: https://flic.kr/p/Xsj2mAArbutus Court Park: https://flic.kr/p/Y4oR8pI'm undeleting these. I'm also going to take advantage of this opportunity to add a few details, so th... | |
| 50853913 by itsamap! | 1 | 2017-08-16 11:14:16 UTC | MikeN | In OSM, I can't find any convention to tag an apartment complex area as an apartments type; we only have landuse=residential and individual buildings are of type building=apartments. The entire area could be place=neighborhood. |
| 50768598 by luca4975 | 1 | 2017-08-02 12:29:54 UTC | MikeN | OpenStreetMap is a collection of facts - social commentary is best done on other types of media.Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50779623 |
| 50012633 by westsider28 | 1 | 2017-07-03 23:08:27 UTC | MikeN | Hi, if the island doesn't show up, the lake might need to be converted to a multipolygon (in the ID editor, select both the island and lake, right click and merge). Hopefully all the tags will come out correctly. |
| 49915146 by carmenhotel | 1 | 2017-06-29 17:39:07 UTC | MikeN | This is actually a retail building and 'Home Improvement' is not a recognized tourism category. I've corrected both. |
| 49772255 by Saucon Support | 1 | 2017-06-25 16:37:03 UTC | MikeN | Hi, is this the current or planned speed limit change? Signs are still up for 55mph. |
| 2 | 2017-06-26 12:48:31 UTC | Saucon Support | Hi Mike, we had received a notice from one of our clients that I 85 Bus had a posted speed limit of 70. Since signs are still up for 55 MPH, I will revert the speed limit to 55 MPH. | |
| 46220398 by Evanavichi | 1 | 2017-06-23 12:10:21 UTC | MikeN | This is not a park, it is a subdivision. Please add only real features to OpenStreetMap. Reverted. |
| 49481996 by westsider28 | 1 | 2017-06-13 00:11:41 UTC | MikeN | You're doing a great job improving Spartanburg! Sidewalks are fine either separately or tagged as part of the road. Tagging will settle in OSM as more apps start to use the data. Open Sidewalks ( https://www.opensidewalks.com/ ) generally makes them separate at the moment so that it is easier to ... |
| 49317899 by DAC Rochester | 1 | 2017-06-07 11:25:53 UTC | MikeN | Node was already merged into building and the tagging standardized. Reverted change. |
| 48625768 by noblevegas | 1 | 2017-05-12 15:14:27 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your valuable updates! In the future when updating a business, it is generally better to remove the previous business information from the node or building outline and then create the new information. This is because some businesses in OpenStreetMap... |
| 48091460 by arizonainn | 1 | 2017-04-24 18:03:24 UTC | MikeN | This node is a duplicate of an existing Blaine's Farm & Fleet node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2813268358 . The new information has been merged into the existing node and this new node was deleted. |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 18:04:18 UTC | MikeN | Please check for existing business nodes before adding new ones. Also update the changeset description to something more descriptive. Thank you, | |
| 48091328 by arizonainn | 1 | 2017-04-24 17:46:20 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for this submission. 1. The name had the HTML Escape characters (%27), but the normal punctuation may be used in names. 2. There was already a business here , but with the local name (locals say "Farm & Fleet", not "Blaine's Farm & Fleet") I added &qu... |
| 47849759 by schulf | 1 | 2017-04-16 22:55:50 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thanks for your submissions! I noticed that Orion's Bar & Grill had already been marked in the building, so the node is a duplicate. |
| 47802351 by HedCheeeeese | 1 | 2017-04-15 17:29:05 UTC | MikeN | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions! A note about the end of Sawblade Ridge - a "Living Street" is normally a pedestrian area that allows cars only at 3-5 MPH. I would expect the end of this street to terminate in a turning circle instead of a living street. ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-15 22:35:28 UTC | HedCheeeeese | Its 25 mph, its an unmarked paved road, wide enough for two cars so I guess it counts as two lanes. Theres no distinction and Everton just drives on whichever side or straight up the middle until the come upon another car. The end is a turning circle but its small and there are homes around it. I'm ... | |
| 46287490 by Riazaku | 1 | 2017-02-22 13:35:38 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for these updates. Was the speed limit for 123 around the Issaqueena trail exit recently changed? |
| 45962171 by alboslaya | 1 | 2017-02-16 00:47:00 UTC | MikeN | Are these real parks, visitor center and country club? |
| 2 | 2017-02-16 06:02:13 UTC | alboslaya | Yes. They are small community parks that join the two sub-neighborhoods of White Oak Cliffs and Lakewood. | |
| 3 | 2017-02-16 13:14:01 UTC | MikeN | Are there signs identifying the parks and visitors center and vending area? | |
| 4 | 2017-02-17 12:02:43 UTC | MikeN | Reverted in changeset 46162481. There is no trace of these parks, trails, or visitor center in an on-site survey. No public amenities for these subdivisions listed in http://www.lakekeoweerealestateexpert.com. Areas are zoned residential by city of Seneca http://www.seneca.sc.us/Portals/0/PDF/Pla... | |
| 45936641 by alboslaya | 1 | 2017-02-09 07:45:46 UTC | Chetan_Gowda | Reverting the changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 22:46:50 UTC | MikeN | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.The previous message from Chetan_Gowda was a bit terse, but if you are trying to manipulate Pokemon then please stop. OSM accepts all edits that are based on reality. Intentional edits based on fiction are considered vandalism and will be removed. | |
| 45962108 by alboslaya | 1 | 2017-02-10 11:50:41 UTC | MikeN | What is the source you used to determine that this is not an administrative boundary? |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 16:40:38 UTC | alboslaya | I have lived in this area for 30+ years and know that this is not an administrative boundary. It was placed on the same nodes that surround Lake Keowee and barred no significance to any real world existing administrative boundaries. OpenStreetMap needs to be more accepting to local mappers that more... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-10 22:44:09 UTC | MikeN | The administrative boundary that was deleted defined the city of Seneca, therefore that city is now undefined in OpenStreetMap. Cities don't place signs or flags around the municipal boundaries, they are legally defined at the regional records office. The city of Seneca is defined by that part ... | |
| 45961595 by alboslaya | 1 | 2017-02-10 02:10:47 UTC | MikeN | Hi thank you for the edits. Why were the roads changed to a type of unclassified? There are mostly residential homes along these streets. |
| 2 | 2017-02-10 02:54:43 UTC | alboslaya | There are some residential homes but this area is also home to three closely located parks and their corresponding maintenance/visitor buildings. These streets also have uniquely denoted walking paths for visitors traveling between the parks. To list these roads as residential is not quite the case ... | |
| 45776793 by anca_mihaela | 1 | 2017-02-03 12:59:13 UTC | MikeN | Hi, just a note about the tag spelling - it should be ' junction ' , not jonction . Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-02-08 06:17:47 UTC | anca_mihaela | thx | |
| 45757784 by Gabriel daniels | 1 | 2017-02-03 00:42:04 UTC | MikeN | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you have added a water body and a number of crossing paths at a location which is really an apartment building.If you are trying to manipulate Pokemon then please stop. OSM accepts all edits that are based on reality. Intentional edits based on fiction are co... |
| 45462466 by Kelly Summerlin | 1 | 2017-01-25 13:00:25 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the edits! Just a note about old railroads - if they're already marked as abandoned, they won't show up on the map view. I'll agree that they technically don't belong if they no longer exist and they clutter the edit view. But some rail fans still use them on their reference m... |
| 45207509 by sospastudio | 1 | 2017-01-16 14:07:06 UTC | MikeN | Hi, I noticed that the original O2 had been deleted and replaced by the new POI. However some information was dropped in the process: the opening hours and business type. Also, the new position was not as accurate as the original position as surveyed. It is best to just modify an existing POI ... |
| 38568749 by Tom Hogan | 1 | 2017-01-15 03:48:20 UTC | MikeN | Hi, has this section of railroad out to San Jon been rebuilt now? It had previously been abandoned. Thanks, |
| 43959909 by miluethi_MassMutation | 1 | 2016-11-26 11:33:24 UTC | MikeN | Hi, has this import been reviewed by the process in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?Thanks, |
| 2 | 2016-12-13 17:56:46 UTC | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_... | |
| 43430344 by bhj867 | 1 | 2016-11-18 14:53:38 UTC | MikeN | Hi - question about the 'Tunnel Hill State Trail'; this was changed from railway=abandoned to railway=rail . Are there actually rails present along this section of trail? |
| 43526330 by Omnific | 1 | 2016-11-10 13:08:59 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edits. I had originally used the "Cook-out" form with a dash because that is used consistently on signage and the web site.I suppose the dash makes it harder to search though; people will search for CookOut or "Cook Out". |
| 2 | 2016-11-10 17:21:59 UTC | Omnific | Hi Mike, I believe they have rebranded as just Cook Out based on their website, which now uses "Cook Out" instead of "Cook-Out." The logo make it a bit questionable, but they have text like "TIME FOR COOK OUT" and "Cook Out cares about the quality of both our food ... | |
| 42333814 by Curtis Beck | 1 | 2016-09-22 00:42:11 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edits! Keep in mind that changing from a pedestrian street to monument will block routing apps from finding a path through the area. I have no strong opinion, but consider 'historic=memorial' together with highway=pedestrian / area=yes |
| 42136374 by jordankothe9 | 1 | 2016-09-14 12:13:45 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Welcome to OSM and thank you for the updates! The best road type for driveway or parking lots is type "Service" , then select driveway, alley , or parking aisle. That will keep routing apps from sending cars across parking lots. Sam Clayton Blvd is fine as 'Unclassified' becau... |
| 40557410 by samely | 1 | 2016-07-08 02:04:30 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki |
| 2 | 2016-07-11 16:14:03 UTC | samely | Hey there!I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback. | |
| 39939813 by piligab | 1 | 2016-06-11 18:02:06 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the fix. It seems that using a blank for the turn lane is not valid. See the normal usages at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes (the word 'none' is fully spelled out for special cases, but does not mean that no text is required ) |
| 2 | 2016-09-27 19:09:47 UTC | piligab | Hi MikeN,Both the none and blank tag is used while tagging turn lanes as can be verified from taginfo. The Lane and road attributes style also takes both the tagging scheme as valid. Since, there is no consensus on the tagging style to be adopted, our team decided to stick with blank instead of ... | |
| 38544388 by smatda | 1 | 2016-04-14 12:06:34 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the corrections. I don't understand the change - neither of these roads were marked as One Way previously. Also, the highway tag for State Highway 56 was removed. |
| 2 | 2016-04-14 14:35:03 UTC | smatda | I appreciate the feedback. I'm new at this so bear with me. I do not know why, but on the current map GPS will not route down Musgrove Street from Smallwood to Willard Rd...it routes down Springdale Drive. If you look on Google maps it shows a small southern portion of Musgrove between E Florida ... | |
| 3 | 2016-04-15 00:59:42 UTC | MikeN | Hi, since there are 3 major map providers, it partly depends on which GPS device you are using. Is it a Garmin, or an app on your smartphone? If it's an app, which one is it? | |
| 4 | 2016-04-15 03:17:34 UTC | smatda | It's MapFactor on an Android. | |
| 5 | 2016-04-15 03:28:00 UTC | smatda | I found a similar issue with the routing between Jesup and Ludowici, GA. It appeared that there's a four lane bridge with all four lanes going the same direction. As a result routing will never use the four lane between the two towns. Instead it uses a 40 or 50 mile loop to go between the two. | |
| 6 | 2016-04-15 11:11:12 UTC | MikeN | Ok, I understand. I believe you have already corrected the Jesup<>Ludowici problem because it works today on the OpenStreetMap site. It should show in the next Mapfactor update.I had coincidentally edited a number of streets near Musgrove St on April 6 for the Corporate Center Drive op... | |
| 7 | 2016-04-16 08:38:40 UTC | smatda | Many thanks. This is our annual routing for vacation between Southwest Virginia and East Coast Florida. Headed to Ormond Beach just north of Daytona next month. If I see any anomalies I'll let you know. | |
| 37966742 by dchiles | 1 | 2016-03-21 11:18:07 UTC | MikeN | What was the reason for this change? The previous relation route=railway (collection of railroad ways) sounds more applicable than the new route=train (train services), since this is an abandoned railway. |
| 2 | 2016-03-22 00:30:35 UTC | dchiles | I'm confused are we talking about this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4661179 because it is route=railway | |
| 3 | 2016-03-22 00:41:40 UTC | MikeN | Sorry, my bad. I confused which was the latest version. I think the new tag you set is the correct one. Thank you. | |
| 35395325 by JordanKepler | 1 | 2015-11-18 13:16:32 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for these improvements. I am a bit confused by some of the edits on Enterprise Boulevard - a section has been 'join'ed to another section that causes a bus route to extend into the new section, and there some new splits on that road. The ID editor has allowed this type of joi... |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 18:52:45 UTC | JordanKepler | Dunoo. I may have been noodling stuff around for the sake of prettifying curves and straightening things, but ill check stuff more carefully now. | |
| 30249051 by samely | 1 | 2015-08-24 20:31:15 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edits. I found some problems -Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn. It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up. It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the ... |
| 2 | 2015-08-24 22:24:31 UTC | MikeN | One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it. | |
| 3 | 2015-08-24 22:46:12 UTC | samely | Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them. | |
| 4 | 2015-08-30 21:34:21 UTC | MikeN | Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you | |
| 5 | 2015-08-31 14:29:57 UTC | samely | Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again. | |
| 33389957 by ramyaragupathy | 1 | 2015-08-27 01:12:03 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the fix for alignment. One new problem with many people editing rail crossings is that some people have changed alignments at their crossing only. So the result is that while some parts of the rail is aligned, other parts are off. It will be best to review the entire length o... |
| 2 | 2015-08-27 14:43:15 UTC | ramyaragupathy | Thanks for highlighting this. Will be mindful of this in my future edits. Also I have corrected the alignment for the indicated ways. | |
| 3 | 2015-08-27 23:44:08 UTC | MikeN | Many thanks - this has happened for several people during the challenge! | |
| 33549289 by karitotp | 1 | 2015-08-24 17:44:29 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the edit. This "Frontage Road" was removed many years ago, and most of it has grass or bushes growing on it. Since there are still traces, I changed it to type Track. |
| 2 | 2015-08-25 14:18:39 UTC | karitotp | "Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. As you told it's possible to see a road, but definitely it's not a highway=track, so I've changed it to a highway=unclassified. | |
| 3 | 2015-08-26 01:46:02 UTC | MikeN | That area does not meet the definition of 'unclassified' in the Wiki, nor its common usage in North America (Roughly equivalent to 'residential' but without residences). Specifically it is no longer a public road, it is all on private land. I researched the public record before deleting it orig... | |
| 4 | 2015-08-26 14:08:47 UTC | karitotp | thanks for the link , you are right according to the images that you sent me and the street classification corresponds more to be a highway = track .I am going to change the tag to a highway=track. | |
| 33555476 by abel801 | 1 | 2015-08-24 21:25:36 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the edits. Claude Collins Road was officially removed as a named street and is now a private driveway. Originally I had just deleted it, but I have changed it from a street to a driveway. |
| 2 | 2015-08-25 22:47:13 UTC | abel801 | Hi, thanks for the feedback, I have been working taking into account TIGER. thanks again for your fixing. | |
| 33235552 by srividya_c | 1 | 2015-08-20 12:43:25 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for your edit! It appears that an entire railroad had been accidentally moved, and was misaligned. Since people had already corrected part of this in spots for the FRA Crossings project, the entire change could not be reverted to correct - I finally had to manually review and correct... |
| 2 | 2015-08-20 12:49:16 UTC | srividya_c | thank you for the feedback. Will review the ways from next time before editing them. Thank you again. | |
| 33310794 by aarthy | 1 | 2015-08-19 20:50:58 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for your edit! It appears that an entire railroad has been accidentally moved, and now seems to be misaligned. I can undo this change; let me know what you wish to do. |
| 2 | 2015-08-20 12:40:03 UTC | MikeN | It looks like someone else had moved the entire rail first in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33235552 . But there was also work since done by several people with local crossing fixes, so moving the entire rail was no longer possible. I manually fixed the entire line. | |
| 3 | 2015-11-16 08:24:22 UTC | aarthy | Thank you so much for doing so and sorry it's taken me so long to reply. | |
| 32523464 by missingspoke | 1 | 2015-07-09 16:46:28 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the contribution to OpenStreetMap. Please clarify what was being added - the additions appear to be untagged. Thank you, |
| 32500295 by samely | 1 | 2015-07-08 19:34:31 UTC | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edit. Both streets were already surveyed on the ground and marked to remove tiger:reviewed=no. McLeod Street does not go through to Lafayette Street and that segment does not exist. TIGER was out of date for that street. |
| 2 | 2015-07-08 22:22:17 UTC | samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. | |
| 30229497 by srividya_c | 1 | 2015-04-15 12:33:04 UTC | MikeN | Hi - thanks for the update. The hill in this construction area has been bulldozed down and the previous streets were completely removed. There is no routable path through this area. It's too early to tell whether the replacement driveways will have any name because the buildings are still under... |
| 2 | 2015-04-15 14:03:28 UTC | srividya_c | thank you for you feedback. So are these roads existing now? I just aligned the nodes and added some roads seeing the imagery. Please remove the roads if they don't exit now. Thank you again. | |
| 3 | 2015-04-15 14:03:50 UTC | srividya_c | Sorry its *exist | |
| 4 | 2015-04-15 14:20:22 UTC | MikeN | These roads don't exist now, so I'll remove them. The Bing imagery was out of date.Best regards | |
| 5 | 2015-04-16 05:05:31 UTC | srividya_c | okay, Thank you. | |
| 29386002 by JordanKepler | 1 | 2015-03-11 02:01:28 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Just checking on Destiny Church - is there a problem specifying the building type instead of building=yes? That building was originally an industrial warehouse but was converted for the church. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 18:49:56 UTC | JordanKepler | I guess I figured that if it was a church, then it wasnt commercial? It might have been commercial in the past, but my understanding is that OSM is more concerned with the present state of things. | |
| 28800297 by Curtis Beck | 1 | 2015-02-13 01:38:10 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Is the University Center moving here from its current location on Pleasantburg? ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40173170 ) |
| 2 | 2015-02-13 16:56:14 UTC | Curtis Beck | Mike, Thanks for pointing this out to me. The University Center is not moving here. The corresponding map I am using pins the center to this location despite having the address listed on Pleasantburg as you do. I will go ahead and fix this | |
| 28742691 by TheKittyGirl | 1 | 2015-02-10 11:52:33 UTC | MikeN | Hi - thank you for this addition. There is an improvement to help map users find Roper Ridge: If it is a hill / mountain, add the tags natural = peak . If it is a ridge line, add a line along the ridge and tag the line as natural = ridge and name = Roper Ridge |
| 2 | 2015-02-11 03:50:33 UTC | TheKittyGirl | Thank you for the help, MikeN! I better understand the tags here, thanks to you! | |
| 27362978 by Lisa Harrington | 1 | 2015-02-01 16:10:25 UTC | MikeN | Please take care when scrolling the map in Potlatch so that the mouse doesn't grab and move a road instead of scrolling. I think I have corrected Houck Mountain Rd which was messing up routing. |
| 28345652 by Ryan112233 | 1 | 2015-01-23 12:24:05 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the edit. Please clarify why ways were removed from the trail relation, and what is meant by removing trail highlighting. |
| 2 | 2015-01-23 13:31:14 UTC | Ryan112233 | Hello. Thank you for your message. I thought taking away the highlighting of Jones Gap and Rainbow Falls trails would better serve to conformity of the rest of the trails in the Mountain Bridge trail system (as none others are highlighted). If you disagree then my apologies. I certainly do not m... | |
| 3 | 2015-01-24 03:09:59 UTC | MikeN | Hi - I like your idea to make the trails in the Mountain Bridge trail system look more similar. Some trails are set as highway=path (dashed line) and others as highway=footway(dotted line). Bicycle permissions are set separately, so either path or footway could be used. The Hiking documentation... | |
| 4 | 2015-01-25 10:33:31 UTC | Ryan112233 | Good morning. Thank you. The map that shows the highlighted Jones Gap Trail and Rainbow Falls Trail is the "Cycle Map". Interestingly the other maps (standard, transport, mapquest, humanitarian) do not. | |
| 5 | 2015-01-29 02:37:33 UTC | MikeN | Hi - We have been adding the relations to all the trails in the area; here is a link to the hiking map. They will appear on the next iteration of the Cycle map in the next 2 weeks. http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=35.11326&lon=-82.59994&hill=0 | |
| 28320042 by HubMiner | 1 | 2015-01-22 13:04:55 UTC | MikeN | Hi, The Rock River was set to landuse=industrial, which doesn't seem to apply to the entire river? |
| 2 | 2015-01-22 23:08:52 UTC | HubMiner | Thank you for catching this, reverted back to "riverbank". | |
| 3 | 2015-01-22 23:14:19 UTC | HubMiner | And fixed again: changed to "river". | |
| 26199248 by JordanKepler | 1 | 2015-01-11 02:47:42 UTC | MikeN | Hi, Please don't combine street segments unless you have carefully studied why they were separated. Streets came in from TIGER as one piece, so any splits were for a reason: name change, speed limit change, lane attribute change, route relations, etc. I spent about 3 hours untangling the bus rout... |
| 2 | 2017-07-26 18:46:26 UTC | JordanKepler | Sorry my edits jangled up your bus routing n things. Ive only just now seen this, but Ill keep it in mind. Cheers. | |
| 26911138 by JordanKepler | 1 | 2014-11-21 12:31:18 UTC | MikeN | Congratulations! |