| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136767562 by dchiles @ 2023-05-31 01:32 | 1 | 2024-02-07 22:55 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,044 | FYI, your changeset was reverted without duscussion by a different user...https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145718903I agree with you. Based on lifecycle tags, they either shouldn't be mapped or should be tagged as razed since abandoned only applies to locations where the rails s... |
| 138912290 by dchiles @ 2023-07-23 22:02 | 1 | 2023-07-24 09:39 | user_5359 ♦19,415 | Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/16122291. What is the mean of the foreign tagsACRESGL \t35.14AOEGL_HS \t0AOEGL_NR \t0CAT \tMiscellaneousCITYGL \tMONTPELIERCRHOUSPCT \t0DESCPROP \tSTATE CAMP PARKE911ADDR \t214 NORTH RDEDITDATE \tUNKNOWNEDITMETHOD \tUNKNOW... |
| 7934843 by dchiles @ 2011-04-22 14:28 | 1 | 2023-02-15 14:17 | zin7 ♦1 | This airport has been closed for years. Runway no longer exists. |
| 128367504 by dchiles @ 2022-11-02 00:28 | 1 | 2022-12-18 16:04 | Adam Franco ♦162 | I drove through the newly opened roundabout a few times over the past week and just wanted to say thanks for the prompt updates! |
| 122979709 by dchiles @ 2022-06-29 02:27 | 1 | 2022-06-30 02:06 | ezekielf ♦84 | Hi dchiles,I believe this change should be reverted. Although "Vermont Route 108" is the correct name for the full route, within the town of Cambridge there are two local road names used for addressing. North of Jeffersonville the suffix "North" is added and south of Jefferson... |
| 2 | 2022-07-08 03:16 | ezekielf ♦84 | Since I got no response, I've gone ahead and reverted the name back to "Vermont Route 108 South". Feel free to reach out if you want to discuss. | |
| 122395981 by dchiles @ 2022-06-15 04:13 | 1 | 2022-06-23 04:51 | ezekielf ♦84 | Thanks for updating this. Since its not clear if this an extended, but still temporary, closure or if it is permanent, I restored the deleted way but changed the tag to disused:route=ferry. This way it won't show up on maps, but it can easily be re-activated if starts operating again in the n... |
| 98079414 by dchiles @ 2021-01-25 00:21 | 1 | 2022-05-23 07:35 | Minh Nguyen ♦567 | This relation were somehow broken in changeset 93689318, but the correct fix would’ve been to revert that changeset rather than delete the relations, which represented California State Route 1. The relation has been restored in changeset 121350189 and was unrepurposed in changeset 121351794. |
| 98079317 by dchiles @ 2021-01-25 00:17 | 1 | 2021-07-17 22:37 | Minh Nguyen ♦567 | These relations were somehow broken in changeset 93689318, but the correct fix would’ve been to revert that changeset rather than delete the relations, which represented U.S. Route 101. The relations have been restored in changeset 108175328 and were unrepurposed in changeset 108175438. |
| 98196717 by dchiles @ 2021-01-27 04:52 | 1 | 2021-05-26 02:08 | clay_c ♦489 | Hi dchiles,Looks like you merged the train station node onto the station building outline. Stations encompass more than just the buildings, so they should be kept separate. I went ahead and reverted this changeset.-Clay |
| 104683393 by dchiles @ 2021-05-14 12:04 | 1 | 2021-05-19 12:24 | dolphinling ♦57 | Hi, I've changed Essex Junction back to place=suburb in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104960743.Vermont terms don't match OSM terms - while we call Essex Junction a village, in OSM village means "A smaller distinct settlement, smaller than a town with few facilities avai... |
| 100119177 by dchiles @ 2021-02-27 23:12 | 1 | 2021-03-02 02:05 | DUGA ♦549 | Please don't forget NAIP or ESRI. The map you see from ESRI Clarity could be from 6 or 8 years ago. |
| 22553795 by dchiles @ 2014-05-26 01:26 | 1 | 2021-03-02 01:57 | DUGA ♦549 | Please do not use TIGER at any time to add new roads.If you are not a local, better leaving the name blank. |
| 89882494 by dchiles @ 2020-08-25 01:47 | 1 | 2020-09-06 01:31 | btwhite92 ♦99 | Hello,Is this closure to motor vehicles a permanent change? Any information a quick google search turns up for me suggests that it is temporary, at least until the end of the lockdown order. Generally, what should be in OSM is the 'normal' state of things and not temporary closures (http... |
| 5061863 by dchiles @ 2010-06-23 20:41 | 1 | 2019-12-01 15:10 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Hi,I found this really old area added by you:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63378557Could you check what these tags mean and maybe remove them if they are not needed? |
| 42257244 by dchiles @ 2016-09-18 21:51 | 1 | 2019-06-20 17:51 | SpencerJaquish ♦14 | Hey dchiles,I noticed that you added a speed limit of 25 MPH to this link road, but I wasn't able to find a sign or painted road marking indicating that this is the speed. I was hoping that you could share the resource that you used to support adding this speed. Thanks! |
| 51494131 by dchiles @ 2017-08-27 23:03 | 1 | 2017-08-28 11:20 | mueschel ♦6,575 | Hi,could you have a look to these edits? There are 89 ways with the key 'cyclway' instead of 'cycleway'.Cheers, Jan |
| 5063360 by dchiles @ 2010-06-24 04:22 | 1 | 2017-03-20 06:03 | nyuriks ♦145 | Hi, I deleted Monocacy Creek Area - that way is clearly broken, and I don't see it on satelight. Please restore and fix if possible: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63521337 |
| 40325980 by dchiles @ 2016-06-27 17:08 | 1 | 2016-11-28 08:09 | mjb_Flsmmap ♦1 | Track on the Aerojext property, south of the Folsom-South canal, has been removed for several years. All track on the Aerojet property is gone. Track remains north of the canal but is not presently in use. |
| 2 | 2016-11-28 08:12 | mjb_Flsmmap ♦1 | Edit: Source is Google satellite view photos. Can be verified from bike trail along the canal. Google's map is in error showing the rail to still be present. | |
| 37966742 by dchiles @ 2016-03-21 01:08 | 1 | 2016-03-21 11:18 | MikeN ♦354 | What was the reason for this change? The previous relation route=railway (collection of railroad ways) sounds more applicable than the new route=train (train services), since this is an abandoned railway. |
| 2 | 2016-03-22 00:30 | dchiles | I'm confused are we talking about this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4661179 because it is route=railway | |
| 3 | 2016-03-22 00:41 | MikeN ♦354 | Sorry, my bad. I confused which was the latest version. I think the new tag you set is the correct one. Thank you. | |
| 35539930 by dchiles @ 2015-11-23 21:55 | 1 | 2015-12-21 15:38 | reswert ♦1 | Should be railway=rail (not narrow_gauge) gauge=1435 |
| 2 | 2015-12-21 19:54 | dchiles | Ok I'll fix that. Thanks! |