OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

63206426 by ndm	1	2018-10-18 16:17:18 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hi, pedestrian exclusion on a road requires a specific no pedestrians sign. I'm not local, so can't be sure whether there is a red no pedestrians sign, but if it only has a blue sign indicating certain vehicle types, this does not exclude pedestrians. It seems unlikely that this road would need a no...
	2	2018-10-18 20:26:38 UTC	ndm	Pedestrian crossing is on the adjacent separated footpath as marked on the map.

63556054 by ndm	1	2018-10-16 15:13:07 UTC	DaveF	Does the tagging, as is, excludes taxis?
	2	2018-10-16 20:32:02 UTC	ndm	yep, only guided PSVs.

56802379 by ndm	1	2018-09-03 10:17:58 UTC	spark	The highway=construction between the M5 junction and highwood lane looks odd, was this intended?
	2	2018-09-03 22:26:44 UTC	ndm	Yes. At the time it was added there was a general linear track with construction vehicles on it. Don't know what was being constructed -- needs a survey :-)

59583986 by ndm	1	2018-06-06 09:35:57 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil You've split/duplicated the YMCA https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594364550 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39275886 Was this to add the shops as polygons on Broad St?.
	2	2018-06-06 20:43:32 UTC	ndm	Yep, but I didn't have good enough photos to confirm - have stuck the pieces back together.

59565716 by ndm	1	2018-06-05 14:00:07 UTC	DaveF	Isn't Sacco hair above Found? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/De7sEgAXkAAwjHo.jpg
	2	2018-06-05 17:16:26 UTC	ndm	Don't know -- I had this https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/28717108048/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/ -- seems to show "Found" on the left (or at least a display window). Can swap it back if needs be.
	3	2018-06-05 17:25:07 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil It also shows Found on the right window. Video from Sacco's rear window: https://www.instagram.com/p/BiO0h7ZgXPM/
	4	2018-06-05 21:38:04 UTC	ndm	Cheers. Let me know if you think current version needs modifying.

57646779 by ndm	1	2018-03-29 21:38:33 UTC	DaveF	Hi The building is a part of the railway any more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Mills_railway_station#History
	2	2018-03-29 22:49:52 UTC	ndm	Still has Network Rail signage on it :-) https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/27230255338/in/dateposted-public/

57255047 by ndm	1	2018-03-17 16:47:40 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this node? The tag 'sheno' looks like a mistake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/485403860 Jan
	2	2018-03-17 20:20:32 UTC	ndm	shelter=no

56426254 by ndm	1	2018-02-17 00:39:55 UTC	DaveF	Very disappointed you deleted my amendments to Cargo 1. If you look at the images on the business's websites you'll notice the Cider Shop & WokyKo are clearly 2 units wide (out of a total of 11). Using Bing imagery (the most up to date) you'll see it can't be that close to the centre line ...
	2	2018-02-17 09:51:28 UTC	ndm	Well, I was a bit disappointed too -- as I counted all the units very carefully on the ground. Anyway, I'm going past today -- so will have a look at how many units each shop really has -- I'll stick a couple of photos on flickr / mapilliary so we can all see. Have used latest Bing imagery for...
	3	2018-02-17 09:53:19 UTC	ndm	Anyway rest of the realignment was a distinct improvement -- glad you deleted all the construction lines :-)
	4	2018-02-17 19:14:59 UTC	ndm	Ok, you're right there are 11 front units, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/39424835715/in/dateposted-public/ Looking a bit closer I think that the front of yours is probably correct, but units are too large and back extends too far (back of mine is correct). Also first and last un...

55426549 by ndm	1	2018-01-14 12:40:56 UTC	DaveF	Hi Adding layer does work as Garden & Park are rendered with the same colour. This needs to be noted on OSM Carto's github page. Also, I don't think the ruin should have amenity tag as that implies it's a working church. ruins=church, maybe?
	2	2018-01-14 13:16:52 UTC	DaveF	https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3022#issuecomment-357510876

54745484 by ndm	1	2017-12-19 00:02:22 UTC	ndm	Modified so buildings aren't grown incorrectly by including the front walls.

53934518 by ndm	1	2017-12-06 09:31:18 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hi, are pedestrians and cycles allowed on any parts of this road? If so, can you change access=no to vehicle=no or motor_vehicle=no as appropriate? Thanks, Mike
	2	2017-12-06 22:50:58 UTC	ndm	If there were pedestrian access it would have a sidewalk tag.

52873600 by ndm	1	2017-10-12 23:04:57 UTC	DaveF	This is a relocated pharmacy. The FHRS was for it's previous location. I'm in discussion with BANES about the inaccuracy of their database.
	2	2017-10-13 11:21:52 UTC	ndm	Sorry about that -- looked like a good match!

52459779 by ndm	1	2017-09-29 09:22:15 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil I think you've used old imagery for the Lamplighters garden: http://tinyurl.com/y73kkgqj
	2	2017-09-29 19:30:22 UTC	ndm	Well obviously I can't use that link :-) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52487166 -- is based on more sober reflection and the Digital World Standard Imagery -- which is the only imagery with the overlooking flats in Cottonwick Close. May have to do another survey when it's lighter -- s...

52370157 by ndm	1	2017-09-26 10:30:41 UTC	DaveF	Hi Neil Do you think these city based places for amendment? I'm struggling to see Aztec West as a village.
	2	2017-09-27 17:54:13 UTC	ndm	Well, have relabelled the commercial area instead -- but it has a church, doctors, cafes, etc., etc. so village prob' wasn't too far off.
	3	2017-09-27 18:27:23 UTC	DaveF	Sorry, I for got add the Overpass link: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s1d +Cadbury Heath. Personally I think they should be suburbs, what do you think?

48805860 by ndm	1	2017-05-19 12:39:18 UTC	DaveF	Is it steps only to the North bank? Seems strange as it was meant to be a shared path.
	2	2017-05-19 22:39:02 UTC	ndm	Hopefully, I have some photos so I can disambiguate it -- I got keen yesterday to see how the GPS track looked compared to my original "by eye" sketch. More importantly I should have info on the south side to connect it to Finzel's reach and get better map routing -- and map a rather nice ...

42136443 by ndm	1	2016-09-14 12:03:24 UTC	DaveF	Is this recycling centre open to the public or just for the authority to sort household waste? would it benefit from a 'recycling_type=centre' tag?
	2	2016-09-14 19:09:54 UTC	ndm	Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a comp...
	3	2016-09-15 22:11:19 UTC	DaveF	Yes, i saw what was edited before you, but he tagged it as Bristol Waste Company & if you google it: http://www.bristolwastecompany.co.uk/ It appears it's recycling, nut unsure if it's for the public to drop stuff off. Note they use OSM in their small map.

41500020 by ndm	1	2016-08-16 22:21:12 UTC	southglos	applause

40350206 by ndm	1	2016-06-28 18:42:39 UTC	ndm	Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing).

38131673 by ndm	1	2016-03-29 08:13:15 UTC	txlaparta	Thanks. The validator didn't tell me I was creating a duplicate

14581473 by ndm	1	2016-03-05 19:39:33 UTC	SomeoneElse	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200232398/history has "boat=yes;no" on it. Presumably that's as a result of a previous merge (probably before you edited it) but do you know what is correct here?
	2	2016-03-06 22:01:26 UTC	ndm	I'm guessing it should be no, but that's looking at the adjacent river segments -- it's been ~3 years, probably due a survey?
	3	2016-03-06 22:06:08 UTC	SomeoneElse	Yes - makes sense to me. I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/524167 .

37491450 by ndm	1	2016-02-27 23:32:31 UTC	ndm	Changeset comment should be postboxes.

34399867 by ndm	1	2016-01-29 23:35:20 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hope you don't mind - I've changed "Flavour Vapour" here from "shop=vaping" to "e-cigarette", on the assumption that they're equivalent tags. Let me know if you think that's wrong.

25849135 by ndm	1	2015-12-10 10:34:10 UTC	SK53	Aztec West is not a village in any usual sense of the word. I think it would be better just to name the area of the Aztec West business park.
	2	2015-12-10 20:37:27 UTC	ndm	>1000 people, church, doctor, newsagent, 2 different coffee chains, Hotel, pub, ponds... Not entirely clear where Hempton Court, The Quadrant and the rest of the part split. Signage is "Aztec West" not "Aztec West business park". It's the same as "Cribbs Causeway...
	3	2015-12-10 21:33:56 UTC	SK53	Yes I know its called Aztec West, I have worked there over the years, but unless it's changed a lot it is not a residential area. Lots of industrial/business areas have churches: I can think of over 10 in Nottingham, but it doesnt make them villages.

26558508 by ndm	1	2015-11-22 21:49:51 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - some buildings here have been added as "building=y#" - I'm guessing that that should be building=yes? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311168535 is one example - the two to the south are too.
	2	2015-11-24 00:29:15 UTC	ndm	Well spotted -- definitely not intended -- will modify asap.

34997463 by ndm	1	2015-11-20 21:12:30 UTC	RobJN	Hi ndm, Thanks for resolving these one-ways. Please don't forget to mark any that you complete as "fixed" using the Traffic Flow Direction plugin so that others don't have to go over the same place. I've marked these fixed now :-) Cheers, Rob
	2	2015-11-21 20:14:00 UTC	ndm	For these I just used the website and JOSM (no plugin) -- couldn't see any way to mark it as done (even now I have the plugin installed).