| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 16545520 | Warin61 | Hi,The LPI Base Map has West Tipla Rd as tertiary ... and the East Tipla Rd as secondary .. any objections to changing this? Note .. have to add East Tipla Rd to OSM! ... |
| cleary | I think it is probably outdated information in LPI map. I haven't driven all the way on the west road but the east road is very average in standard. Central Darling Shire Council rates the west side as a main road (MR) for which it would get State funding (therefore possibly a secondary in OSM) and... |
| Warin61 | P.S A relevant doc http://www.centraldarling.nsw.gov.au/about-the-shire/road-condition-report.aspxNote the 'road description' not road name. |
| Warin61 | Ha crossing info ... both on to the same view though. |
|
| 28155091 | Warin61 | Hi,You have way 322193363 tagged as a private track .. the LPI base map shows this as a tertiary road ... several other roads are shown out here on the LPI Base map too. I'll put those in. Arr came to your way 259154081 - tagged as driveway private yet LPI shows it as tertiary. Similar for way 3... |
| cleary | I have driven on many roads in far west there but not that one, nor the roads to Cymbric Vale and WIlandra. From the Barrier Highway, those roads look like private roads and I think they had gates or cattle grids and there were definitely no signs to suggest public roads. I traced the tracks from Bi... |
| cleary | Further comment. I remember driving on Waterbag Road and I recall that the track to Cymbric Vale was just a track, didn't look anything like Waterbag Road (which I think was graded and reasonable gravel suface,) and there was no sign to indicate public access was permitted to Cymbric Vale. |
|
| 46776851 | Warin61 | Hi,By making a new node and moving the boundary by 0.2 m the OSM inspector error is removed .. very little effect in the real world. It dose create a 'gap' of 0.2 metres. .. cheating I know. |
|
| 46889500 | CloCkWeRX | Ah nice, we did some work to add names, but not so much work to find the ones that were slightly off from data.sa.gov.au info |
| cleary | Thanks for the feedback. |
|
| 44528330 | TheSwavu | Err... by definition unincorporated areas don't need a admin_level=6 boundary. |
| cleary | Hello Swavu. The Pastoral Unincorporated Area of South Australia is a designated area with boundaries published in the South Australian government Local Government Areas dataset. It is administered differently (it has a "designated authority" rather than a council. But then the metropolita... |
| TheSwavu | That may all be true, but this area is not administrated under the Local Government Act so therefore it's not a council and not admin_level 6. |
| tastrax | Given the admin levels are "proposed" in the wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) what level do you suggest TheSwavu? From my understanding of Australia level 6 is the most appropriate. |
| TheSwavu | No level as it not a thing that you need to map. The unincorporated areas of South Australia are the bits inside the admin_level 4 boundary but not inside an admin_level 6 boundary. |
|
| 37033067 | Warin61 | Way 354530546 appears to be a private plantation, Removed relation referring to this single relation and added tags landuse=forest, note=possibly a private plantation possibly Nanagrve Station. |
|
| 29464053 | Warin61 | Tucklan ... while the council and post office may not regard it as a hamlet, I'd not think of it as a neighborhood either. I think in OSM terms .. hamlet. |
|
| 39365285 | gormo | Hi,there already is a boundary for the national park, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56117565 . Please respect existing data while importing, and please tag any new information onto the existing OSM features. And please use established OSM tags, and don't just dump some external data onto ... |
| cleary | I'm sorry for any error. I have been checking administrative boundaries in South Australia and adding relations for those boundaries. In many instances, national park boundaries coincide with administrative boundaries and, where no relation previously existed, I have also created relations for the n... |
|
| 40220219 | R0bst3r | Hi cleary,looks like your coastline is not finished: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5213733 is separated from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5213756. Was it intended?Maybe "is_in:national park" can be changed to "is_in:national_park"?Cheers, R0bst3r |
| cleary | Thanks for this advice. Much appreciated. Now correct, I hope. |
|
| 16109568 | Warin61 | Hi, moved Node: Hillston Post Office (2302362776) to corner - as per LPI Base Map and Austpost website address. Imagery has this as a burnt out shell.. added fixme for survey confirmation (and address information. . |
|
| 36909562 | R0bst3r | manmade changed to man_made=silo. Also building=yes added. |
|
| 36771617 | Jedrzej Pelka | Hello, you broke the boundary relations of Corrong (5740913) and One Tree (5740798). If you're currently improving boundaries in this area, please be so kind and fix it. |