| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59927287 by youandmeboth | 1 | 2018-06-18 06:26:51 UTC | oba510 | Hey, did you see that the church was already on the map? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208161491 ) There's no need to add it twice. |
| 2 | 2018-06-18 20:54:46 UTC | youandmeboth | My bad, it genuinely wasn't showing up. Must have been a fluke, thank you! | |
| 59870366 by istvanv_telenav | 1 | 2018-06-17 07:37:45 UTC | oba510 | Hi. Is there some reason you deleted these turn restrictions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6516712/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6516714/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6189615/history?Two of them were broken when Sansome Street was modified in ano... |
| 2 | 2018-06-18 07:26:54 UTC | istvanv_telenav | Hi, split some of the ways and fixed the broken relations and added the ones that were missing. Thanks for letting me know | |
| 59719681 by AnthonySchoenduby295 | 1 | 2018-06-17 02:00:26 UTC | oba510 | Hi. I can assure you that Broadway is still named "Broadway". I have reverted this changeset. You might want to look through your other changesets to see if you accidentally changed any other names. |
| 57261051 by fluffy_unicorn | 1 | 2018-05-20 04:42:28 UTC | oba510 | Hey, you deleted almost 1600 highway=service tags in just this one changeset. I don't have the time or energy to check every one, but almost all of the ones I looked at seem like perfectly valid parking aisles which should not have been changed. Can you fix this please?. |
| 2 | 2018-05-20 09:38:03 UTC | Adamant1 | Looks like this user ran rickshaw over the whole area for some reason. It seems kind of weird since they are part of a GIS team, whatever that means. Hopefully they are causing havoc now though. If you see them do any more problematic edits id report them to SomeoneElse and I will do the same. Then ... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-20 10:33:04 UTC | fluffy_unicorn | Dear oba510 and Adamant1, thank you for paying your attention to this issue. Please note, that I was not deleting highway=service tags, but rather service=parking_aisle. The reason for this consist in improving road connectivity with the purpose of navigation. First, some of these roads from which t... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-20 11:20:37 UTC | Adamant1 | Fluffy Unicorn, I don't see how deleting the parking_aisle tag would improve navigation. If anything it makes it worse because there are many different kinds of service roads and therefore leaving the general tag without the sub tag makes it impossible to differentiate. Also, although yes some par... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-20 11:46:52 UTC | Adamant1 | Also Id note the definition win highway=service by itself, particularly this part "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc, this is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys" Note the world TO, not TH... | |
| 56892385 by srividya_c | 1 | 2018-03-19 10:11:24 UTC | oba510 | Are you sure about this? I see a street clearly marked for two-way traffic here: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YcpCUJwq7F1hWKiamSUKsg |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 19:18:44 UTC | srividya_c | I added oneway tag after seeing the `oneway` sign board in this image - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=Adn_4z_TZHhlzkXvNm0_JQ&lat=37.7806763&lng=-122.4124943&z=17&x=0.5113072659680779&y=0.49542059748902884&zoom=0. But did not see the two way yellow si... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 06:41:29 UTC | srividya_c | Fixed it this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57410500. Thanks again :) | |
| 56828815 by Irina Karachevtseva | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:28:59 UTC | oba510 | Here also you removed all the tags from the last blocks of Martin Luther King Jr Way and Embarcadero West, and removed service=parking aisle and other valid tags from parking aisles. |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 14:33:03 UTC | Vladimir Ovramenko | This was our mistake and we fixed it. Thank you for letting me know about this. | |
| 56831366 by Irina Karachevtseva | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:22:12 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I see you added a bunch of missing service roads/parking aisles. Good. However, you also removed a bunch of valid-looking service=parking_aisle, service=driveway, and surface tags here. Why? Please be careful not to remove valid info. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 14:32:35 UTC | Vladimir Ovramenko | This was our mistake and we fixed it. Thank you for letting me know about this. | |
| 56834317 by Irina Karachevtseva | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:08:12 UTC | oba510 | Hi, it looks like you accidentally removed all the tags from Rudsdale Street and turned it into an unnamed service road here. I've fixed it. |
| 2 | 2018-05-25 04:29:31 UTC | Irina Karachevtseva | Apologies for the errors and thank you for fixing them. I will be careful about this in the future. | |
| 55840340 by nereocystis | 1 | 2018-02-05 09:23:35 UTC | oba510 | Hey, it looks like something got messed up here. There is a duplicated set of Oakland roads (Broadway, 11th, Park, etc) that got added over the top of Alameda. |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 05:12:44 UTC | nereocystis | I thought that I reverted all of this.I tried to bring back an old AC Transit line in Oakland, from a few months ago, so that I could duplicate the old route to the new route.Somehow, that caused the Oakland streets to be copied to Alameda.I quickly noticed this, then tried to revert.\... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 13:40:00 UTC | freebeer | Hi,I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1287740 that it seems from the surface it should be a simple revert.I'll give it a quick analysis and wipe it off the map for you if my brane feels functional. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-07 13:52:11 UTC | freebeer | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56149740 where the changeset comment is: mistaken v1 copy of existing multi-way/node trail onto somewhere completely different | |
| 5 | 2018-02-08 06:05:23 UTC | nereocystis | Thanks. That looks much nicer. I had a change prepared last night, but I didn't feel like taking a chance with it. | |
| 55821642 by jliaw | 1 | 2018-01-28 07:24:27 UTC | user_5359 | Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. |
| 2 | 2018-01-28 08:12:45 UTC | oba510 | In San Francisco addresses are assigned to the property, not the building/door (and most addresses are actually a range of numbers). This is technically all one building that has been sort of messily mapped, so moving the address from some random building part to the property still seems like an imp... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-28 08:21:05 UTC | user_5359 | Because in OSM there is no mapping of property (you can't see you on the ground) and even a building can have several different addresses (and I'm not talking about different suites), the address belongs to the building or to a node in (or on) the building. You can deviate from that for cleaning up,... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-28 08:43:01 UTC | oba510 | Looking at this more closely, it looks like the building has both Market Street and 10th Street addresses, so I would remove the 10th Street address from the property. I'm guessing that the missing Market St address should go to the (empty?) storefronts along Market. | |
| 55789807 by dizarillo | 1 | 2018-01-27 09:29:46 UTC | oba510 | Are you sure about this? The plans for the north side of the station only include fairly minor changes to the parking lots once construction is complete (mostly different paving and a modified bus area), and the north entrance has definitely not been removed.Also, what's "Bart Way"? |
| 55790003 by dizarillo | 1 | 2018-01-27 08:55:43 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I'm curious where you got those street names from (Bart Way, W Bart Way, E Bart Way, Busway). I can't find any reference to them anywhere. |
| 55740645 by Rajsamand Local Guide | 1 | 2018-01-26 11:19:48 UTC | oba510 | Hi, it looks like you mixed up some footways on different levels here. It might help to add layer=1 and level=[whatever level the footway is on] tags to the upper-floor walkways so it's clearer what is going on, and don't connect walkways at different levels that don't actually connect in reality. |
| 55184512 by Adamant1 | 1 | 2018-01-07 07:45:14 UTC | oba510 | Hi, this seems to be an actual place and not a personal poi (if you look at the history it was imported 10 years ago from the GNIS). I have restored it and converted it to a residential polygon around the condo complex |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 07:50:49 UTC | Adamant1 | Oh cool. My bad. Thanks for doing that. I'll have to look through the history better next time. | |
| 54505839 by oba510 | 1 | 2017-12-10 22:07:07 UTC | IcyMidnight | The change didn't delete Peace Plaza, just changed it to a park.See http://sfrecpark.org/destination/japantown-peace-plaza/Also fixed the multi-poligon that removed the area of the pagoda from the park as that is also part of the area. |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 05:37:15 UTC | oba510 | You deleted the plaza itself, and added a less-detailed park area. The park was fine (it is technically a park), but the park and the pedestrian area represent different things. One represents the administration/landuse (park), while the other is the physical surface (pedestrian area), and can be u... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 08:04:10 UTC | IcyMidnight | I did lose some detail on that polygon. A newbie error made when I got confused about the editing tool. That should be fixed.I would have thought the surface= attribute would cover the surface. Based on a comment on a recent change I made elsewhere, pedestrian areas are actually used for routing... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 07:15:56 UTC | IcyMidnight | I believe I've fixed your concerns in 54505839 | |
| 37813100 by oba510 | 1 | 2017-08-27 06:46:17 UTC | GerdP | Hi!Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574708https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574710Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ? |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 10:49:05 UTC | oba510 | It's not a typo. This is a pair of monumental stone street signs (the kind that have the name of the street on them, not a traffic sign) that were built as a formal gateway to the small subdivision on the east side of College Ave. These kind of stone-column street signs are fairly common on the west... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-31 11:21:10 UTC | GerdP | What do you think about historic=city_gate?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcity_gate | |
| 4 | 2017-08-31 11:27:07 UTC | GerdP | Ah, sorry, there is already a historic tag. I think the highway tag is obsolete here. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-31 11:43:35 UTC | oba510 | The highway=street_sign tag is there because it functions (both historically and currently) as a street sign. Looking at taginfo highway=street_sign is the most common tag for such features (even though it is undocumented). | |
| 6 | 2017-08-31 11:54:25 UTC | GerdP | That is true, the difference is that you have used the tag on a way, not on a node.I also assume that many are mistagged traffic_sign=* or maybe tourism=information.Question is why you want to map the sign,I think the important thing is that the corresponding highway has the correct name tag. | |
| 48412244 by AllyLewis | 1 | 2017-05-05 08:54:53 UTC | oba510 | Why do you keep vandalizing the map like this? Most people would have gotten bored by now. Stop messing things up for everyone else. Please. |
| 48077958 by nvk | 1 | 2017-04-24 05:13:31 UTC | oba510 | There was already an existing relation for the Bay Trail. ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/325779/ ) I've merged these members into that one. |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 06:22:38 UTC | nvk | Thank you! I saw the other one but could never get the two to associate in the same iD editor view. Did you use JOSM? | |
| 48051133 by Crispy9090 | 1 | 2017-04-23 07:48:10 UTC | oba510 | It looks like you've set the default name (name=*) of this restaurant to "Greenburger's", and the English name (name:en=*) to "Nara". This doesn't make much sense. If the name of the restaurant changed you usually only need to change the name=* tag. The name:en=* tag is reall... |
| 47959323 by BillRoss | 1 | 2017-04-20 05:36:32 UTC | oba510 | please stop |
| 47829684 by r_i_c_h | 1 | 2017-04-17 03:41:36 UTC | oba510 | Hey, you deleted the buildings here along with the shops; please don't do that unless the buildings have actually been demolished. You only need to remove the tags that actually apply to the closed businesses (in this case shop=* and name=*) I have undeleted the buildings. |
| 47039074 by andygol | 1 | 2017-03-22 08:37:08 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I noticed that you've been merging place of worship nodes with some of the buildings you've traced. That's probably not a good idea unless it's really obvious they're correct, since most of them were imported from the GNIS and are usually not in exactly the right location. Sometimes they're seve... |
| 46964967 by Josh Rodriguez | 1 | 2017-03-19 06:26:46 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I noticed that you've put quite a bit of effort into adding things to the map of Stockton over the last week. Unfortunately, nearly everything you did was either fictional or broke the map somehow! Your changes have been reverted. (Thanks for mapping Shropshire park, though) |
| 46347819 by emeryradio | 1 | 2017-02-25 06:29:56 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I'm having a hard time figuring out the rationale behind some of the changes here. Clay, Jefferson, Castro, 6th are all fairly important thoroughfares and should not be tagged as highway=residential. It also looks like you merged a number of segments together for some reason, which messed up t... |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 06:44:41 UTC | emeryradio | Ok the merging part is already a problem that does need to be rolled back. Clay and Jefferson priorities were changed because while they are locally important roads, they do not serve a purpose beyond the local area and are only minorly arterial within the downtown area. For example, Market, Gro... | |
| 46348256 by emeryradio | 1 | 2017-02-25 06:08:31 UTC | oba510 | Hi,Why did you add bike lanes to the full length of 5th Ave? Have they been added recently? You also added a three-block long turning lane on E 8th, and merged two blocks of Elmwood Ave together creating an impossible one-way dead end, both of which seem unlikely to be true. |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 06:31:26 UTC | emeryradio | Uh... that shouldn't have happened. Should I try to fix that myself or pass that on to someone else? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-25 06:36:05 UTC | emeryradio | If JOSM works for you then you can roll back my changesets (nothing will download for me regardless of how small an area I select). Sorry for the confusion here. | |
| 46144628 by andygol | 1 | 2017-02-17 05:51:51 UTC | oba510 | Hi,When you delete and redraw buildings as you've done here you are often removing information (usually the building=* tag, but also names, amenities, and other tags). Please be more careful. Also, I see that you've merged several POIs with buildings (such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313... |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 10:46:47 UTC | andygol | Hi,Thank you for your attention to a state of the map at this location. It was my fault. One of the reasons that this could cause is that the POI has address tags, which together with other tags are automatically transferred to the newly created building footprint when the house is plotted over ... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 11:04:58 UTC | andygol | I reverted merging POI and buildings - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46161335 | |
| 45969763 by oini | 1 | 2017-02-11 07:40:30 UTC | oba510 | Hi. The toll plaza was already correctly mapped; there is no toll northbound and the toll booths on that side were removed a while ago (at least a couple of years). Please consult the link in your changeset comment ;) Thanks! I have reverted this changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-15 13:25:41 UTC | oini | Hi oba510! Thank you so much for correcting me. I was using the Bing Satellite Imagery and it showed cars entering the Toll booth from both sides. I didn't realize that the imagery is outdated and hence this mistake. Thanks again! :) | |
| 45538682 by sedit1 | 1 | 2017-01-30 07:15:49 UTC | oba510 | Hi, openstreetmap is a map of the real world that is used by many people for a variety of purposes. Please only add things that actually exist in reality. Thanks! Your changes have been reverted. |
| 45634478 by JackOrman | 1 | 2017-01-30 06:44:21 UTC | oba510 | Why did you delete this school? I have reverted your deletion, since it appears to still exist. |
| 45638278 by Juanitomg | 1 | 2017-01-30 06:33:23 UTC | oba510 | Hi, why are you changing the building=* tags of almost every building you edit to building=yes? Please don't do that unless the building type is actually incorrect, since it removes valid info. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 04:10:29 UTC | Juanitomg | @oba510 Thanks for letting me know about this. I will go over my past edits a fix any building= tag that seems incorrect. | |
| 45611848 by scotsirish | 1 | 2017-01-29 08:28:40 UTC | oba510 | Hi, welcome to openstreetmap. Your house is not a park! I have reverted your changes. Please only add things that actually exist in the real world. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-30 07:34:15 UTC | scotsirish | Of course! My bad I was just playing around with the features trying to get familiar | |
| 45605804 by ToyBoxHunter | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:48:27 UTC | oba510 | Hi, if you would like to scribble on a map you might consider printing out a copy and using a pencil. If you are trying to catch pokemon there is a large park not two blocks from this location you could visit. Thanks! I have reverted your scribbles. |
| 45605780 by ToyBoxHunter | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:44:04 UTC | oba510 | Hi, in this edit you added yet again a park which clearly does not exist. I have reverted your changes. |
| 45605714 by ToyBoxHunter | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:42:15 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I have removed the park you added because it does not exist. |
| 45580569 by ToyBoxHunter | 1 | 2017-01-28 12:04:01 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you have added a bunch of stuff here which obviously doesn't exist. Openstreetmap is a map of the real world, which is used by lots of people for a variety of purposes. Please only map things which exist in the real world. Thanks! Your changes have been reverted. |
| 45553593 by boratestat1 | 1 | 2017-01-28 00:04:08 UTC | pitscheplatsch | Hi boratestat1, welcome to OSM. I think your edits can't be correct. Could you please name your source? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 10:44:23 UTC | oba510 | The chances that a city in California would demolish an entire block of houses to build a park in 2016 are almost zero, and if they did, there is no way at all that they would give it such a generic name... I have reverted this changeset. Please don't add fictional stuff to openstreetmap. Thanks! | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 11:39:47 UTC | pitscheplatsch | @oba510 thanks for reverting! | |
| 45543668 by AscendingC | 1 | 2017-01-27 11:42:43 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I looked through your edits and literally every single thing you added was either fictional or otherwise incorrect. I have reverted your changes. OpenStreetMap is a representation of the real world that people use every day for a variety of purposes, not a fantasy map. Please only add things th... |
| 45540750 by Diverp | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:56:02 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you added a bunch of randomly zig-zagging footpaths through the backyards in the middle of this block. They obviously don't exist, so I have reverted your changes. |
| 45533344 by jsancheza | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:08:02 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you have added several parks and related facilities which do not exist. OpenStreetMap is a map of the real world, please only add real things. Thanks! I have reverted your changes. |
| 45525959 by sturm15 | 1 | 2017-01-27 09:30:31 UTC | oba510 | Hi, dog parks can be tagged as leisure=dog_park. In general, leisure=park should only be used once, on the park outline itself; all of the things inside the park have their own more specific tags. I have fixed the tagging and adjusted the outline slightly to only include the dog runs. Thanks! |
| 45419191 by FrostyTimp | 1 | 2017-01-26 12:24:43 UTC | oba510 | Hi, I have reverted your two recent changesets. Lowell is not a university. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for more info. You also turned a house into a pier, and dragged a crosswalk several blocks over to another street (along with the road it was connected to)... |
| 45488007 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-01-26 09:21:27 UTC | oba510 | Did you mean to remove the name when you deleted and re-drew this building? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348756169 |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 15:06:38 UTC | dannykath | Hi, Thanks for your comment , sorry for my mistake, I have fixed my changeset .http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45514015 | |
| 45142175 by calfarome | 1 | 2017-01-19 11:14:17 UTC | oba510 | Hi, did you notice that you've been re-adding (along with other Mapbox employees) old streets that have previously been deleted from the Dublin Crossing construction site? Are you sure they still exist? |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:15:53 UTC | calfarome | Hi Oba510,Thank you for letting me know about this issue. These streets were added on the basis of Tiger data. However, the JOSM filter was on and I failed to notice the `landuse=construction` tag areas, since they were hidden. From now on, I will make sure to avoid adding any data in the under co... | |
| 45273782 by yurasi | 1 | 2017-01-19 10:55:26 UTC | oba510 | I noticed that you've been adding roads to the national labs here. Did you look at the aerial imagery or the tagging of the other roads that they connect to? There are several different kinds of barriers all over this road and others, and access is very restricted. Please make sure to at least in... |
| 2 | 2017-01-19 14:48:08 UTC | yurasi | Hi Oba510,Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I hadn't realised about restricted access to the roads. I have added the appropriate access tags. Apologies for this slight on my part and thanks again. | |
| 45253752 by karitotp | 1 | 2017-01-19 10:02:39 UTC | oba510 | Hi, the way you added here is actually a narrow mid-block alley, not a typical residential road. Such roads should generally be tagged as highway=service, service=alley. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:53:38 UTC | karitotp | Hi again, oba510!Thank you for bringing this to my notice and pointing out the apt way of labelling of this road. I have fixed the tag in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45298416). Thanks again.Best, | |
| 45273675 by ridixcr | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:44:58 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you have added a parking aisle in a small parking lot, but tagged it as highway=residential. Parking aisles should be tagged as highway=service, service=parking_aisle. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 17:14:56 UTC | ridixcr | Hi again Oba510,Thanks again for letting me know about this and also clarifying what tags are apt. The changes have been done accordingly. They can be found in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299739. | |
| 45274871 by dannykath | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:19:49 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential. In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles) |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 15:18:51 UTC | dannykath | Hey there!Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways. Thanks again! | |
| 45275135 by RichRico | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:16:13 UTC | oba510 | This appears to be a private driveway serving a couple of houses, not a residential road. Are you sure the tagging is correct? |
| 45278290 by ridixcr | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:12:40 UTC | oba510 | Are you sure these service roads you added open to the public? They're on a military base and you can see a gate and concrete barriers visible in the bing aerial. |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 17:15:45 UTC | ridixcr | Hi Oba510,Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I have reverted my changes and the changes can be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299888. I will be more careful with my edits. Thanks again. | |
| 45280231 by karitotp | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:06:43 UTC | oba510 | Hi, why did you extend San Jose Avenue through a building and construction site? |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:51:09 UTC | karitotp | Thank you for the feedback. As the selective filters were on, I didn't spot this building under construction. Reverting this changeset to remove the road added through the building. Thanks again | |
| 44993393 by osmcrc | 1 | 2017-01-08 06:24:27 UTC | oba510 | Hi, you deleted and moved a bunch of speed humps in this changeset. Was that your intention? (In the iD editor they look like tiny circles with a dot in the middle) |
| 2 | 2017-01-08 06:37:44 UTC | osmcrc | Oops, I didn't notice they weren't normal street nodes but I'll fix them. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-08 07:16:44 UTC | osmcrc | Okay I think I fixed them all and added many that weren't there before in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44994685 | |
| 44852838 by Kenji Yamada | 1 | 2017-01-03 02:34:55 UTC | oba510 | HI, did you intend to delete the building here? |
| 2 | 2017-01-03 03:41:34 UTC | Kenji Yamada | Oops, no. I was trying to switch from editing the building to adding a point. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-04 11:33:02 UTC | oba510 | Thanks. I've un-deleted the building. | |
| 44883333 by jacklyn1 | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:26:47 UTC | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM! I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but you accidentally moved a bus stop from Market St to the middle of the Federal Reserve. I have moved it back to it's real location. |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 18:12:54 UTC | jacklyn1 | Sorry about that! Yesterday was my first time using OSM, not sure how that happened but thank you for moving it back! | |
| 44869998 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:21:08 UTC | oba510 | Hi, what is your source for these traffic signals? There are stop signs painted on the road in the bing aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 11:38:11 UTC | poornibadrinath | Hi, Thanks for bringing this to my notice. A few of them were wrongly added by me. I was sorting that out. Will check the ones that were added by mistake and remove it. | |
| 44868800 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:17:37 UTC | oba510 | Hi, what is your source for the traffic signals here? This intersection has stop signs visible in bing aerial imagery. |
| 44868739 by poornibadrinath | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:08:27 UTC | oba510 | Hi, are you sure that there are traffic signals at this intersection? There are "stop" signs painted at all the incoming streets. |
| 44880968 by jacklyn1 | 1 | 2017-01-04 10:05:02 UTC | oba510 | This block of Eureka was one-way southbound a couple of months ago. Has it changed? |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 18:12:08 UTC | jacklyn1 | Ah, I just checked again, I missed it based on the zoom with Google Maps, the part above Market St is still a one way. | |
| 42790526 by clarceneaux | 1 | 2016-10-11 05:25:33 UTC | oba510 | It looks like, over multiple changesets, you've deleted several streets and at least one path in this area that are clearly visible in Bing/USGS imagery. Was that intentional? |
| 39292150 by headwatersolver | 1 | 2016-05-15 05:44:51 UTC | oba510 | HI, it looks like you were trying to add bike lanes to Harrison Street. I deleted the cycleways you added (which implies that there are physically separate bike paths or cycle tracks), since the bike lanes were already correctly tagged on Harrison Street.Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org... |
| 26893244 by takluyver | 1 | 2014-11-19 22:44:34 UTC | oba510 | Are you sure this church has been demolished? The only approved building permit listed by the city is for a re-roofing, and a zoning approval for a remodel. |
| 2 | 2014-11-19 22:56:22 UTC | takluyver | Found the documentation: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/uploadedFiles/Planning_and_Development/Level_3_-_PHN/web_Carleton%201601_UP_2014-06-19.pdf I pass it on my way to work. It's not demolished yet, but they are working on it. It's definitely out of commission as a church, and the plans indica... | |