| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167957073 by hwierzbicki @ 2025-06-22 13:04 | 1 | 2025-06-23 07:34 | oba510 | Hi, Please don't change the crossing=traffic_signals and similar tags to the less-specific crossing=marked tag. Thank you. |
| 167979095 by siggy_sf @ 2025-06-22 23:50 | 1 | 2025-06-23 06:00 | oba510 | The traffic restrictions are already covered by the motor_vehicle:conditional tag. "Designated" is used more in the sense of "this is a designated ____ route". |
| 2 | 2025-06-23 16:10 | siggy_sf ♦1 | @oba510 Thanks for the heads up, that makes sense. Am I able to undo or back out my change? Apologies I'm relatively inexperienced with OSM. | |
| 163319307 by anaranar @ 2025-03-07 09:40 | 1 | 2025-03-07 11:26 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to openstreetmap, but please don't make test edits like this directly to the database. Thank you. |
| 157676690 by RedSkies @ 2024-10-09 15:01 | 1 | 2024-12-26 12:21 | oba510 | Hi, has https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17369701/history been repaired? When I was there earlier this year I remember there being a sign saying something like "tracks out of service", and the northern end near E Washington Street was in pretty bad condition. |
| 159793764 by Ruthless78 @ 2024-12-01 03:24 | 1 | 2024-12-01 05:39 | oba510 | Don't you need a permit to use EBMUD trails? |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 20:42 | Ruthless78 ♦5 | Yes there is an EBMUD permit to use the trails but it's so loosely enforced that effectively access=yes because anyone from the public who wishes to hike these trails can. Access=permit suggests that there's a restriction but in this case anyone who wants the permit can get one (there... | |
| 154866311 by RoadGum @ 2024-08-05 19:46 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-06 10:58 | oba510 | This isn't correct. The Alameda/MLK changes names when it crosses Codornices Creek; there's a street sign at the exact spot with both names. It was fine before.You should really be discussing major classification changes first, especially when you only have 17 edits. The idea is gene... |
| 2 | 2024-08-07 19:32 | RoadGum Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 154866653 by RoadGum @ 2024-08-05 19:57 Active block | 1 | 2024-08-06 10:44 | oba510 | Hi. What is this "BWA map" you're basing these classification changes on? Why did you introduce this jog in the highway classification at Masonic Ave? It looks strange, doesn't reflect actual traffic patterns, and is very similar to some undiscussed classification changes made... |
| 2 | 2024-08-07 19:14 | RoadGum Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2024-08-07 19:15 | RoadGum Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 152674664 by Sureshraj G @ 2024-06-14 12:04 | 1 | 2024-06-15 08:00 | oba510 | Hi,The oneway/oneway:foot tags that were removed here are important; you can't enter the secured areas through the exit (you can't even turn around half-way since the doors close automatically behind you), nor can you go backwards through customs/immigration. The escalators only go one d... |
| 2 | 2024-06-19 06:09 | Sureshraj G ♦15 | Hi,Thanks for your concerns. If we are assigning Oneway Directionality for the segment that will mean, there will be only one Exit possible for routing that is from "Departure to Arrival levels". But Arrival to Departure level (to concourse) routing will not be possible. So we assigned i... | |
| 3 | 2024-06-19 10:47 | oba510 | Thank you for your response. Each terminal currently has a single exit path from the airside area (inside security) to landside (outside security). For example, in Terminal 2 someone leaving the airport passes a sign stating "Beyond this point you must be rescreened" with a security o... | |
| 4 | 2024-06-20 06:33 | Sureshraj G ♦15 | Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in the future as well.Regards,Suresh G | |
| 152521762 by mookie_the_cat @ 2024-06-11 03:12 | 1 | 2024-06-15 08:13 | oba510 | Were all the "Private Property No Trespassing", "Private Street Not For Public Use", and "Private Property No Trespassing No Soliciting" signs taken down around these three complexes?If so, these streets would still be access=permissive at best since they're pr... |
| 152602577 by Gangadi Anusha @ 2024-06-12 19:16 | 1 | 2024-06-15 07:52 | oba510 | Hi,Please note that highway=corridor is an entirely appropriate tag to use on indoor corridors inside buildings. Please don't change it to highway=footway. Also, you moved one of the terminal 2 entrances to line-up with the covered walkway, which would make sense, but that's not how it&... |
| 2 | 2024-06-19 09:28 | Gangadi Anusha ♦8 | Thanks for your concerns, If we are assigning "Highway=Corridor" then routing won't be possible OSm.org map because of the "Corridor" attribute on a segment, which is not visible in osm.org map in Non-Edit mode. | |
| 3 | 2025-04-13 03:58 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown sourcehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878528 | |
| 149584616 by kahrens @ 2024-04-04 19:25 | 1 | 2024-04-05 07:44 | oba510 | Hi, just a heads up: it looks like some bus route relations got broken here near the Martinez Amtrak station. |
| 2 | 2024-04-06 17:08 | kahrens ♦1 | Oh thank you! I will look to fix these. | |
| 147950149 by mufutu mcnugget @ 2024-02-26 21:33 | 1 | 2024-02-29 07:26 | oba510 | Hi,Thank you for your interest in adding bicycle infrastructure to the map. Unfortunately, this is not the way that on-street bike lanes are mapped in osm. They are generally mapped by adding the tag cycleway=lane (for bike lanes), or cycleway:right=lane / cycleway:left=lane / cycleway:both=lane... |
| 147511777 by mufutu mcnugget @ 2024-02-16 00:08 | 1 | 2024-02-22 10:33 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM.It looks like the 2-way bikeway /cycle track along Battery has already been mapped as a property of the street itself (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks for more info), and the way you drew is basically duplicating what's already on the map... |
| 2 | 2024-03-22 09:52 | graue ♦3 | Yeah, this should be removed unless there's a reason for the bike lane to be mapped separately - and I don't see one. The tags for Battery Street itself cover it. | |
| 3 | 2024-05-03 06:23 | kevinchen1 ♦28 | Since there is no response I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150821257 | |
| 147673840 by Bike 2 End @ 2024-02-20 03:10 | 1 | 2024-02-22 10:13 | oba510 | Hi, this track (and others like it) are already mapped as a multipolygon ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7718577 in this case). It's not necessary to add leisure=track tags to the inner and outer ways as well. |
| 146738825 by Claudius Henrichs @ 2024-01-27 10:33 | 1 | 2024-01-28 02:20 | oba510 | For the denomination here I was going off of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eritrean_Orthodox_Tewahedo_ChurchIs it actually correct to change this to "eritrean_orthodox"? I'm not an expert here, but these denomination names can sometimes be kind of sensitive. |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 20:00 | Claudius Henrichs ♦214 | Hi, yes there is only one Eritrean (and Ethiopian) orthodox church, the addition of "tewahedo" is not necessary and not established in OSM therefor. Just have a look at the currently used denomination values at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/denomination#values that contain "o... | |
| 142757658 by NastassiaKalesnikava @ 2023-10-18 11:13 | 1 | 2023-10-22 09:32 | oba510 | "El Cerrito Plaza" is the name of the shopping center. The internal access roads and parking aisles don't have names. highway=residential is also not an appropriate tag for these kinds of roads, which were already correctly tagged as highway=service. |
| 2 | 2023-10-23 11:50 | NastassiaKalesnikava ♦61 | Hi! Thank you a lot for your comment to my changeset and right correction! | |
| 142652050 by oba510 @ 2023-10-16 08:30 | 1 | 2023-10-16 08:34 | oba510 | Josm suddenly uploaded while I was typing the description. It should say:Fixed inconsistent classification: Marin traffic doesn't divert onto Masonic, which is a fairly minor local street, whereas Marin is a major through route. |
| 141825362 by jsaxon @ 2023-09-27 15:24 | 1 | 2023-09-28 08:50 | oba510 | The tag you removed here and in the other changesets doesn't actually mean "motor vehicles are not allowed in the HOV lane", because it's modified by the other more specific hov=designated tag. Before this edit the tagging really meant that the only motor vehicles allowed are HO... |
| 2 | 2023-09-28 13:50 | jsaxon ♦1 | Hi @oba510, thanks for the reviewing the change & your expertise. I'm happy to revert, but want to make sure I understand fully before doing so.The tag hierarchy that you refer to is not included in the wiki for motor_vehicle:motor_vehicle=no – prohibited for motor vehicles o... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-28 13:51 | jsaxon ♦1 | Would really appreciate any documentation you can point me to, for the overall tag hierarchy. | |
| 4 | 2023-09-28 13:59 | jsaxon ♦1 | Ah, found this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation | |
| 5 | 2023-09-28 14:06 | jsaxon ♦1 | And, for any future mappers, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:accessKey:access: Land-based_transportationAt the lowest level of hierarchy: hov=*- high-occupancy vehicle/carpool, varies by location; e.g., at least one passengerKey:access: List_of_possible_values designated:... | |
| 6 | 2023-09-28 15:17 | jsaxon ♦1 | Reverted based on discussion.New changeset: 141869179 | |
| 141617744 by joeeeew @ 2023-09-22 18:48 | 1 | 2023-09-24 05:16 | oba510 | Hi joeeeew, What's the deal with these two hardware stores you added on what look like ordinary houses? One of them is tagged as a Home Depot... |
| 2 | 2023-09-25 16:17 | joeeeew ♦1 | Hello, I was trying to update to match google maps. they are design and contractor stores. If you look on google maps, they are there. I wasn't sure what tag to use , so I copied over the store tag from other locations to make the edits. If you think there are better tags, you can make the upda... | |
| 3 | 2023-09-25 21:14 | Allison P ♦1,136 | You cannot copy from other maps unless you have permission or copyright.Even if Google Maps were an acceptable source, it is of poor quality. It has many spam and fake entries in addition to inaccurate information. | |
| 141480338 by BorjaMeep @ 2023-09-19 18:03 | 1 | 2023-09-20 06:24 | oba510 | Hi BorjaMeep,I've been to this station a few times, and don't recall there being a long corridor here. |
| 2 | 2023-09-20 06:46 | BorjaMeep ♦1 | Thanks. I have removed the path and left as it was before. | |
| 141404025 by Alee11 @ 2023-09-18 03:51 | 1 | 2023-09-18 04:31 | oba510 | Hi Alee11,The campus has already been mapped at a much higher level of accuracy/detail than what you added. Unfortunately I had to revert your changeset. I would encourage you to look at what has already been mapped and add details to the existing data rather than trying to draw on top of it. |
| 141107177 by Ganesh Bhardwaj @ 2023-09-11 11:28 | 1 | 2023-09-13 08:43 | oba510 | Hi Ganesh, none of the toll=yes tags you added around the Bay Area across several changesets were correct, as far as I can tell. You might want to double-check your other edits.(Fyi, the bridges across San Francisco Bay are only tolled in one direction; there's no eastbound toll.) |
| 2 | 2023-09-15 05:45 | Maneesh-Mahlawat ♦5 | Yes, it is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change | |
| 141036009 by asphalteric @ 2023-09-09 18:46 | 1 | 2023-09-10 05:52 | oba510 | It *is* specifically designed for pedestrians. |
| 140833763 by mpatsevich_lyft @ 2023-09-05 06:37 | 1 | 2023-09-05 06:50 | oba510 | This was still here about 5 hours ago... |
| 2 | 2023-09-05 10:20 | mpatsevich_lyft ♦12 | Hi, oba510My name is Marina, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. When removing the barrier, we used Lyft-owned sources: Nearmap background, telemetry data, and street-level images. The road is drivable according to our telemetry data - http... | |
| 140657181 by AdamDang@Telenav @ 2023-09-01 00:31 | 1 | 2023-09-04 06:33 | oba510 | This seems wrong. Access=no means nobody can use it; these roads are obviously accessible to and being used by ground crew, etc., which would be access=private. |
| 140252940 by Srikanth_Berkeley @ 2023-08-23 02:06 | 1 | 2023-08-23 08:58 | oba510 | Please don't make test edits directly to OSM, thanks. |
| 139877601 by Squilk @ 2023-08-14 15:39 Active block | 1 | 2023-08-15 09:04 | oba510 | Hi,Fyi, route=road relations are for things like numbered highway routes (such as Interstate 80, CA 123, etc) or the "49 Mile Scenic Drive" in SF. It's not necessary to create them for ordinary city streets. |
| 127747459 by Ruthless78 @ 2022-10-18 20:50 | 1 | 2023-08-14 04:21 | oba510 | Hi,If this is private access only, it's much better to add access=private rather than deleting it entirely. If you delete it someone else will eventually notice it and re-add it, probably with less info than you could have provided. Also, if you know which part is a fire road and not just a... |
| 2 | 2023-08-14 15:01 | Ruthless78 ♦5 | Ok thanks for the feedback. I have relabeled access to private on some recent edits. | |
| 139605157 by somaswap @ 2023-08-08 10:05 | 1 | 2023-08-08 10:32 | oba510 | This is not the correct way to map a street crossing a dual-carriageway road. It should have the same classification as the rest of the street, which in the case of West Street here would be highway=residential. |
| 2 | 2023-08-11 10:54 | somaswap ♦3 | Hello oba510,Thank you for looking into my changeset and flagging the issue. I mistakenly changed the residential road to a primary link road due to the dual carriage way, but following your input, I have reversed those changes. You can find the details in changeset 139744879.We apologize for... | |
| 139393607 by Olga_Kovalevskaya @ 2023-08-03 13:07 | 1 | 2023-08-04 05:20 | oba510 | Hi,This is not correct, and has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139422263 |
| 2 | 2023-08-04 07:04 | Olga_Kovalevskaya ♦27 | Hi!Thank you for paying attention to this edit. | |
| 139324425 by secondaryhighway @ 2023-08-02 02:38 | 1 | 2023-08-02 05:58 | oba510 | Hi,I didn't look through all of the ways you edited here, but most of the ones I checked appeared to be legitimate alleys that were probably mistagged as highway=residential at some point, or were missing the highway=*tag for whatever reason. |
| 2 | 2023-08-02 06:40 | secondaryhighway ♦40 | Hey, I went through some of the ways again and it does appear you are right.A decent amount of them are paths, not residentials, so I assume they shouldn’t have service tags.For the residentials, someone appeared to have changed highway=service, service=alley to highway=residential and h... | |
| 3 | 2023-08-02 21:03 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139360855 as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conductin addition, note that service=* may be applicable also on non-service roads (highway=living_street service=driveway for an example)Al... | |
| 4 | 2023-08-03 16:52 | James20PR ♦3 | Thanks you for the input | |
| 5 | 2023-08-06 15:34 | edvac ♦221 | Dear secondaryhighway,You've been warned by several users worldwide about mass changes of highway tagging, mainly related with the service=* tag, but not only.First of all, mechanical edits must be discussed following the automated edits code of conduct [1]. This means you have to discu... | |
| 139152723 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-28 21:13 | 1 | 2023-07-29 07:31 | oba510 | There are steps and a wheelchair ramp... IIrc there's normally also access through the indoor food court. |
| 139152610 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-28 21:09 | 1 | 2023-07-29 07:28 | oba510 | This looks like an unpaved road built mainly as an access route for service vehicles to access the water tank. Generally, either highway=service or highway=track would be appropriate here.I can't find any evidence that horses are even allowed on UCSF's Mt Sutro property. Can you please... |
| 139152650 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-28 21:11 | 1 | 2023-07-29 07:06 | oba510 | This Parade Ground? https://www.nps.gov/places/000/alcatraz-parade-ground.htmSorry, but which branch of the military is using this decaying concrete surface in a National Park that's described as "...an excellent spot for a selfie...", "...host[ing] annual sunrise ceremonies... |
| 138964044 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-25 01:20 | 1 | 2023-07-27 02:37 | oba510 | Please familiarize yourself with the meaning of highway=pedestrian and area=yes before continuing to remove the tags from pedestrian plazas. Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas highway=pedestrian is entirely appropriate for this ... |
| 138475803 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-13 18:43 | 1 | 2023-07-24 09:06 | oba510 | I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, so I walked through here this weekend. Bostonship Plaza has not been turned into a grass park. There is no grass. Nothing has changed. |
| 138475920 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-13 18:47 | 1 | 2023-07-16 07:52 | oba510 | The two are not mutually exclusive. It's actually fairly common for pedestrian plazas to have some form of seating.The seating area only occupies part of the plaza, btw, and is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979811982 |
| 138037131 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:56 | 1 | 2023-07-03 11:58 | oba510 | Rather than mapping Nike Road as tree-lined here, you turned the road itself into a tree row.Can you explain what you were trying to do here? It's unclear what "...not suitable for usage to cross over" means or how it relates to a way being tree lined. |
| 138036885 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:47 | 1 | 2023-07-03 11:35 | oba510 | The Ferry Plaza is a pedestrian plaza. Please do not make edits like this. |
| 138036834 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:46 | 1 | 2023-07-03 11:25 | oba510 | In this edit you turned the entire road into a long gate, which is obviously not what you intended. If there's a gate somewhere along the road you need to add a node at the actual location, and put the relevant tags on that node.(It also seems highly unlikely that this is closed, given tha... |
| 138036634 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:40 | 1 | 2023-07-03 11:16 | oba510 | This is in fact a rooftop pedestrian area. It is not an area for shopping, nor for businesses to sell items. |
| 138036398 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:33 | 1 | 2023-07-03 10:38 | oba510 | Alcatraz Wharf is obviously not closed to pedestrians. What were you trying to fix here? |
| 138036349 by asphalteric @ 2023-07-02 19:32 | 1 | 2023-07-03 10:34 | oba510 | Is this a recent change? It still shows up as mostly concrete/asphalt in very recent aerial imagery. |
| 138043880 by ahecht415 @ 2023-07-03 01:56 Active block | 1 | 2023-07-03 09:35 | oba510 | Greenbrae is not a golf course. Please do not add fictional golf courses to OSM. |
| 2 | 2023-07-04 01:36 | Fizzie-DWG ♦32,122 | Hello ahecht415. Please seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7250. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group | |
| 138012992 by EliotHertenstein @ 2023-07-02 07:09 | 1 | 2023-07-02 09:40 | oba510 | This is listed in the city's open data as Delmar Path (see https://data.cityofberkeley.info/dataset/Trail-map/r3zb-4nu7 for example), and you can see the existing right of way in the parcel data. It looks like the BPWA was raising money to build this path as recently as 2019 ( https://www.berk... |
| 2 | 2023-07-02 15:22 | EliotHertenstein ♦2 | I was under the impression that the plans for this path (among others) fell through after the pandemic. I’m not against the proposed tag, it just seems like there might be a better way to represent the current status.For reference, here’s the current status of the land (from this mor... | |
| 138013118 by EliotHertenstein @ 2023-07-02 07:18 | 1 | 2023-07-02 09:15 | oba510 | When sidewalks have been mapped as separate ways, as they have here, it's important to include all the crosswalks so that pedestrian routing can still work. Legally, there is an unmarked crosswalk here, and this is one of the places where people who need to cross Cedar St need to cross to avoi... |
| 2 | 2023-07-02 15:09 | EliotHertenstein ♦2 | Got it, I think I missed those tags in the edit, apologies. | |
| 137310752 by trianomediation @ 2023-06-14 05:51 | 1 | 2023-06-26 11:08 | oba510 | Hi, This address looks like a P.O. box. Does your company have an actual physical office somewhere that can be added to the map? Otherwise, this is likely to be removed. |
| 137781277 by A_Prokopova_lyft @ 2023-06-26 08:46 | 1 | 2023-06-26 09:42 | oba510 | This doesn't seem quite right. Colby doesn't directly intersect with Forest Street, but instead intersects with Claremont and requires crossing the northeast crosswalk to reach the main intersection. This edit places the crosswalk on the wrong side of Colby. It also obscures the fact th... |
| 2 | 2023-06-26 12:14 | A_Prokopova_lyft ♦47 | Hi, oba510!I’m Anastasia, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to this, you’re absolutely right, current geometry looks more accurate.While making this edit I relied on the way it looks like from Colby Street in the south direction. I really ... | |
| 136669054 by Mingwei @ 2023-05-28 19:11 | 1 | 2023-05-29 04:11 | oba510 | Note: when you put the barrier=kerb tags right on the intersection between two perpendicular sidewalks (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9811659110 for example) it implies that someone walking along the sidewalk and turning directly onto the other has to step off the curb. In reality they ... |
| 136189293 by stevea @ 2023-05-17 00:11 | 1 | 2023-05-17 01:06 | oba510 | https://www.ucsc.edu/about/address.htmlI see a comma here? I would be surprised if UCSC formatted their name differently from the other UC campuses, which follow the "University of California, [Place]" format. |
| 2 | 2023-05-17 01:18 | stevea ♦304 | I'm an alumnus and local, though specifically remember this from decades ago. It is entirely possible this got changed in 40+ years and the comma is truly present. If all other campuses include a comma, that is hefty support UCSC should, too.Though, your link points to the mailing address... | |
| 3 | 2023-05-17 01:21 | stevea ♦304 | Putting the comma back, you are correct. I found https://policy.ucop.edu/_files/da/2-26-99name.html which says there were changes in the late '50s and '60s and a clarification in 1999 that says all campuses use the comma. | |
| 4 | 2023-05-17 01:37 | stevea ♦304 | Thanks oba510, been to Berkeley many times, you do great work in OSM. I recall Y2K and how in 1999 people (especially software and data-oriented people) were dotting Is and crossing Ts. UCSC having a comma seems to have slipped right passed me as the Regents published that letter via UCOP. Good ca... | |
| 136072809 by Aqute Intelligence @ 2023-05-14 05:44 | 1 | 2023-05-14 06:09 | oba510 | Your company is not located in a big triangular building in the middle of Folsom Street. If it's a real company, with a actual physical office, please feel free to add it at it's actual location (without the ad copy please). |
| 135919034 by krishgsh @ 2023-05-10 05:37 | 1 | 2023-05-10 10:29 | oba510 | Hi, The weight limit on Marin was already covered by the existing "maxweight=3 st" tag (note the units - these are not metric tons). |
| 2 | 2023-05-12 15:38 | rababdul ♦26 | Hello oba510,Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for adding duplicate maxweight tag. Going forward, we will ensure to not duplicate any existing tag. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,rababdul | |
| 115792351 by oba510 @ 2022-01-05 11:08 | 1 | 2023-03-18 19:26 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018498113What are you trying to say with "surface=2"That is a non recognised value for the surface tag. |
| 2 | 2023-03-19 00:22 | oba510 | Thank you for catching this. It looks like it was added by BogDan_Olegovich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57300396I would assume that something like this is simply a typo. The actual surface looks like asphalt to me. | |
| 132827453 by Dogman15 @ 2023-02-21 10:01 | 1 | 2023-02-22 00:03 | oba510 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4972855030/history doesn't appear to have any connection to the british chain you changed it to.The official_name tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414033713/history looks more like an operator name? official_name=* would be the full official ... |
| 2 | 2023-02-22 05:29 | Dogman15 ♦7 | With the huge population of San Francisco and Oakland, any edits I make in this area are leagues more likely to get noticed than edits I made in less-populated areas. With more dense content, however, also comes more errors that exist because of other people who don't set tags correctly to begi... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-22 21:24 | Allison P ♦1,136 | This is not an answer. Please fix the obvious issues with your edits. | |
| 4 | 2023-02-22 23:13 | Dogman15 ♦7 | Maybe I'll just avoid editing things in the big cities. | |
| 5 | 2023-02-23 01:57 | Allison P ♦1,136 | Then your intentionally poor edits will be referred to the DWG. | |
| 132425137 by andykmccoy @ 2023-02-11 22:40 | 1 | 2023-02-12 03:03 | oba510 | Hi. You're deleting the building=* tag from buildings here. I don't know if it's caused by an error in your software or something else, but it shouldn't be happening. |
| 2 | 2023-02-12 03:30 | andykmccoy ♦1 | oh no, thanks for pointing this out. I didn't realize the app I was using to edit was doing that. I'll fix this. | |
| 3 | 2023-02-12 03:49 | andykmccoy ♦1 | I think I fixed them all. thanks for reviewing/catching it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132429879 | |
| 132249359 by asphalteric @ 2023-02-08 10:58 | 1 | 2023-02-08 11:34 | oba510 | "highway=pedestrian" combined with "area=yes" is the normal way to tag a pedestrian plaza; it does not mean that the way is a road. It means that the way is a large open pedestrian area, like a plaza. By removing the tag you've essentially just removed the plaza here.Pl... |
| 130404706 by asphalteric @ 2022-12-23 06:56 | 1 | 2023-02-08 11:20 | oba510 | Hi,In this edit it looks like you were trying to add a lift gate somewhere along Nike Rd. However, you changed a long segment of the road itself into a very long gate instead... The normal way to add a gate (or other kinds of barrier) is to tag a node with "barrier=gate" at the point t... |
| 131618695 by Graptemys @ 2023-01-23 18:04 | 1 | 2023-01-24 07:45 | oba510 | Hi,Please note that California cuisine and Californian cuisine are not quite the same thing ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/314115443/history for example). "California cuisine" a specific thing, while I guess "Californian cuisine" would just be whatever Californian'... |
| 2 | 2023-01-26 17:36 | Graptemys ♦31 | I didn't know about the difference between California and Californian cuisine. You're right that they should be tagged separately. This affects 26 restaurants in the US (40 worldwide), that are currently tagged with california or californian. I checked the 16 US restaurants with websites, ... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-26 21:05 | willkmis ♦173 | I disagree with this assessment: even if it's sometimes called "California cuisine", phrasing the tag as a noun and not an adjective goes against OSM practice for other cuisines from certain localities, e.g. cuisine=chinese, mexican, french, southern vs. china, mexico, france, south. | |
| 4 | 2023-01-27 02:23 | Graptemys ♦31 | I did the mongolian grill work. At the end, my changeset had 156 mongolian_grill restaurants and only 3 true mongolian cuisine restaurants. This was for US+Canada. | |
| 5 | 2023-01-27 04:17 | Graptemys ♦31 | @willkmis the name of it is pretty clearly "California cuisine", the Wikipedia article is titled that and the restaurants say it like that on their websites. So I think that's what the tag should be. IMO it's less important that the cuisine titles all look the same and more impor... | |
| 6 | 2023-01-27 06:04 | willkmis ♦173 | I personally think it's more important that the cuisine titles all look the same, so that future mappers will use standard forms and not have to learn that California is the singular exception in the world. | |
| 7 | 2023-01-27 06:07 | willkmis ♦173 | On a different matter, it looks like you've, in an automated fashion, standardized all variants of Salvadoran, Salvadorian, and Salvadorean to "cuisine=salvadoran". What was your rationale? I looked into this tagging a little while ago and found that there wasn't much consensus, ... | |
| 8 | 2023-01-27 06:11 | willkmis ♦173 | In general, for bulk edits like this, it'd be nice if you documented all the changes you were making, as such large edits are very hard to check via most quality assurance tools. I saw your diary post, but it didn't list any of the examples that have proven worth discussing here, for examp... | |
| 9 | 2023-01-27 06:45 | willkmis ♦173 | Looking through https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=131618695, which is the best way I could figure out how to look at this, a few things stood out:-Was this an error? Probably should stay pupuseria, maybe +salvadoran/ian/ean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939355534-As with @oba... | |
| 10 | 2023-01-27 16:45 | Graptemys ♦31 | For almost all of these choices between spellings I changed them to the most common spelling at the time. For example:salvadorian(16), salvadorean(14), Salvadoran(10) -> salvadoran(69)taco(152) -> tacos(972)hot_pot(198) -> hotpot(687)sandwiches(566) -> sandwich(60440)For some... | |
| 130278901 by CurlingMan13 @ 2022-12-20 08:28 | 1 | 2023-01-04 01:25 | oba510 | Fyi I passed by here today and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24221450 isn't actually a Wells Fargo. It's always a good idea to verify notes left by others. |
| 129386067 by hcourt @ 2022-11-26 00:04 | 1 | 2022-11-26 01:40 | oba510 | Hi, you deleted a big chunk of Capistrano/Middle Creek here. I have personally surveyed most of this (I live nearby, and have done work on a couple of portions of these creeks as part of my job.) We had to send a camera down into the culvert to figure out where part of the Middle Creek culvert was... |
| 2 | 2022-11-26 02:37 | oba510 | To get an idea of how unreliable these public records are take a look at the City of Berkeley's creek data and compare it to the county's: https://data.cityofberkeley.info/browse?q=creek&sortBy=relevance I wouldn't really consider either of these datasets reliable enough to i... | |
| 3 | 2022-11-29 18:30 | hcourt ♦3 | This is really informative and awesome that you did all this work! Apologies for the delete -- I will put your changes back. I have been using the ACFC data to put culvert/creek info especially where those creeks don't exist at all on OSM, but yours was the first case where the survey was alrea... | |
| 4 | 2022-11-29 19:29 | hcourt ♦3 | I believe I restored all the surveyed data I had deleted, sorry about this; I'll be sure to double check history in the future and not delete things generally, my mistake. | |
| 129355433 by hcourt @ 2022-11-25 07:48 | 1 | 2022-11-25 08:07 | oba510 | Hi, I'm wondering where you got the name "Behrens Way" from? As far as I can tell this is just part of Spokane Ave. south of the county line and Behrens Ave. north of it. |
| 127661559 by Adamant1 @ 2022-10-17 09:59 | 1 | 2022-11-13 07:45 | oba510 | Hi, do you know anything more about this place? Dubbelju closed and was replaced by a rocket engine company, but that company didn't stick around for very long and this location is filled with motorcycles again. The signage for Dubbelju is still up alongside the signs for a motorcycle repair b... |
| 128711402 by Ariepshtein @ 2022-11-10 03:00 | 1 | 2022-11-13 02:47 | oba510 | Unfortunately I had to revert this changeset; please don't add nonsense to the map. Thank you. |
| 128711377 by Ariepshtein @ 2022-11-10 02:58 | 1 | 2022-11-13 02:45 | oba510 | No it isn't. You also removed the place=neighborhood tag from the neighborhood name here. I have reverted this changeset; please only map things that actually exist. |
| 128711305 by Ariepshtein @ 2022-11-10 02:52 | 1 | 2022-11-13 02:42 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM!Fyi, Little Gem is already mapped here, in the correct location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6448583485 |
| 128583826 by Dogman15 @ 2022-11-07 07:33 | 1 | 2022-11-07 09:29 | oba510 | Hi,Please take a look at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5207488821/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/371251496/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/440106745/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4614040399/historythe branch name added for https://www.openstreetm... |
| 128049928 by marczoutendijk @ 2022-10-25 17:27 | 1 | 2022-10-26 05:58 | oba510 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150963254/history appears to be a valid place name. |
| 2 | 2022-10-26 06:52 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Thanks for notifying me. Restored.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128067101 | |
| 127855414 by NMAD @ 2022-10-20 20:57 | 1 | 2022-10-25 08:32 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM!In this changeset you removed the office=* tag from the old library building on Solano and changed it to building=school. Can you explain why? According to the sign out front it's currently being used as the district's enrollment office. The building was origi... |
| 128016902 by OrdinaryScarlett @ 2022-10-24 22:50 | 1 | 2022-10-25 08:19 | oba510 | Hi, I'm wondering what the source you're using for these maxspeeds is? I tried looking for a reliable source for the speeds a while ago and couldn't find anything useful. Some of the ones you added here don't look right (like through stations, where it should be closer to 30-so... |
| 2 | 2022-10-25 08:45 | OrdinaryScarlett ♦12 | Hi! Thanks for the comment! My sincere apologies for the mistakes and unsourced edits. Please feel free to revert/change them. | |
| 127591486 by tbo47 @ 2022-10-15 22:38 | 1 | 2022-10-16 01:30 | oba510 | board_type=notice would be for one of those boards where people can post event flyers, help-wanted ads, missing cat posters, and other things like that. |
| 2 | 2022-10-16 16:56 | tbo47 ♦17 | ok, I can revert this change. Thanks for letting me know! | |
| 127563929 by spughetti @ 2022-10-15 10:32 | 1 | 2022-10-15 14:11 | oba510 | Hi, I had added area=yes because this cage is a three-dimensional object, not a simple linear fence. It extends over the top of home plate. |
| 2 | 2022-10-15 16:31 | spughetti ♦107 | Hi oba510,I see, I assumed someone drew an area instead of a line by accident haha. I've restored the tag.I've never seen the tag used like this before and will check with the OSM Discord if there's a dedicated tag for this. | |
| 127269476 by tbo47 @ 2022-10-09 21:32 | 1 | 2022-10-10 04:15 | oba510 | Were the sharrows removed from San Pablo Ave recently? ie: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=792229924757717 |
| 2 | 2022-10-11 16:37 | tbo47 ♦17 | Yep, you are correct. My bad.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127370204 | |
| 125581215 by spughetti @ 2022-08-30 17:47 | 1 | 2022-10-09 04:09 | oba510 | Hi,Normally the leisure=pitch area goes around the entire field, the way I had drawn it previously, not just the infield. There doesn't seem to be a standard way to map just the infield yet, but it looks like some people have used baseball=infield. |
| 2 | 2022-10-09 08:52 | spughetti ♦107 | Hey Oba,Thank you for your comment, I've re-mapped the entire baseball field. I've also removed the soccer field because there don't seem to be any markings or goalposts. 😸 | |
| 126914513 by Michelle_4111 @ 2022-10-03 02:50 | 1 | 2022-10-03 12:21 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM!On-street parking is one of the more complicated things to map. If you want to map a parking lane there are a couple of ways to do it. You can add parking:lane:left and/or parking:lane:right tags (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane ) to the existing way... |
| 126637333 by katnguyen @ 2022-09-26 05:51 | 1 | 2022-09-26 08:02 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM.Is this part of an assignment for GEOG 80 by any chance? There have been a number of very similar edits in the last few days around the campus adding random paths and things that have already been mapped on top of existing objects. Unfortunately I had to revert this chan... |
| 126523929 by ClaireEm500 @ 2022-09-22 22:44 | 1 | 2022-09-22 23:01 | oba510 | Hi, can you explain what you're trying to do here? McCone Hall has already been mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24025437If you were trying to add more detail to the building you might be looking for the building:part=* tag instead of building=* See https://wiki.openstreetma... |
| 126441549 by lincrt @ 2022-09-20 22:58 | 1 | 2022-09-21 01:46 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is this part of a class assignment? Most of what you have added in your recent changesets has already been mapped, and much more accurately than what you added. Unfortunately I had to revert all of your changes. Please check to make sure that what you're adding doesn... |
| 126442569 by rahw_maps @ 2022-09-21 00:18 | 1 | 2022-09-21 01:44 | oba510 | Hi, is this part of a class assignment? Most of what you have added in your recent changesets has already been mapped, and much more accurately than what you added. Unfortunately I had to revert all of your changes. Please check to make sure that what you're adding doesn't already e... |
| 125396653 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 09:10 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:55 | oba510 | At a glance https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3992975568/history doesn't seem to have any connection to the brand you changed it to here. The branch name doesn't make sense. |
| 125395969 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 08:58 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:52 | oba510 | I had intentionally not tagged the Tempo stops with amenity=bus_station since they don't seem substantial enough to be considered proper bus stations. They don't fit within the description at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station . They're really just upgraded... |
| 125395289 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 08:43 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:50 | oba510 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8042605/history doesn't look like an allotment at all. I'm not sure what the best way to tag a building courtyard would be though.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338429760/history doesn't look right. A building podium is part of the build... |
| 2 | 2022-09-03 03:00 | user4816003805 ♦65 | I passed by Lee's Deli (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4468299590/history) earlier today. It's definitely not a chain that sells chicken, it sells dim sum and other Chinese food. You can see some pictures I took in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3343088.Would you mind fixing th... | |
| 3 | 2022-09-05 17:55 | user4816003805 ♦65 | Dogman15 mostly fixed Lee's Deli in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125724010.I've fixed the other errors mentioned here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125757505.Thanks again, Dogman15, for resolving some of my fixmes (https://osm.org/node/9968860003/history)! | |
| 125394848 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 08:33 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:49 | oba510 | More comments (sorry!):barrier=wall looks odd on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377918799/history . Underground structures aren't usually mapped as walls. Maybe the train box could be represented with some kind of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part or https://wiki.op... |
| 125393227 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 07:55 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:45 | oba510 | Hi, a couple of things:Did https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2335908268/history get turned into a Crate & Barrel?What's up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6582417968/history ? Did the name really get changed?The operator for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/587067431... |
| 2 | 2022-09-05 17:36 | user4816003805 ♦65 | I've reverted a few changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125824604.CB2 is a division of Crate & Barrel, but isn't a Crate & Barrel itself. There also used to be a Crate & Barrel near Union Square, but it recently went out of business.Trailblazer Cafe in Sa... | |
| 125392726 by Dogman15 @ 2022-08-26 07:42 | 1 | 2022-08-28 07:40 | oba510 | Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13997987/history looks more like a motel than a hotel? |
| 125344933 by smikhnouski_lyft @ 2022-08-25 07:17 | 1 | 2022-08-25 21:53 | oba510 | Hi, please check for the presence of landuse=construction areas before adding what appear to be missing streets.Also, take a look at the ESRI World Imagery and Maxar Premium Imagery layers, which are currently slightly more up to date than Bing in the Bay Area. They show the parking lots closed... |
| 2 | 2022-08-29 08:46 | smikhnouski_lyft ♦23 | Hi, oba510!My name is Stepan and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. I'm so sorry for missing the construction here and adding these service roads according to outdated satellite imagery. Thank you so much for noticing and correcting the mistake.Best regards, Stepan | |
| 124954852 by jagapola @ 2022-08-16 06:22 | 1 | 2022-08-16 09:03 | oba510 | Hi. What is maxspeed_explicit? And why did you delete the maxspeed keys? |
| 122567518 by PoultryPants @ 2022-06-19 05:44 | 1 | 2022-08-06 10:41 | oba510 | Hi, I noticed that you added a couple of screen captures from Google Maps in the image=* field in this changeset and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/12252748Are you aware that we cannot use google maps as a source as it would be a copyright violation (and against google's license... |
| 2 | 2022-08-08 04:19 | PoultryPants ♦1 | Sorry, I was not aware that we can't use images from Google Earth. I will remove them immediately. | |
| 124421912 by dusaipra @ 2022-08-03 07:31 | 1 | 2022-08-04 09:22 | oba510 | Hi, please don't delete the service=driveway tag from driveways. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2022-11-01 07:35 | silakshm ♦21 | Hi, I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies, for incorrect road modification and highway tag. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again. T... | |
| 124466659 by arivarsh @ 2022-08-04 07:44 | 1 | 2022-08-04 09:20 | oba510 | Hi, please don't delete the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2022-08-05 10:00 | arivarsh ♦1 | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect road classification and deleting the parking aisle tag. Going forward, i'll ensure to tag such roads as service=parking_aisle in such scenarios.I appreciate the feedback provided and thanks ... | |
| 124251296 by user4816003805 @ 2022-07-30 00:03 | 1 | 2022-07-31 01:26 | oba510 | Why did you change outdoor_seating=parklet to outdoor_seating=no? Zachary's has had a parklet for years and it's still there. |
| 2 | 2022-08-01 06:16 | user4816003805 ♦65 | Hi oba510,Sorry about that! I've restored the "outdoor_seating=parklet" tag in https://osm.org/changeset/124327369Here's a post-mortem of what happened though. I visited Zachary's on Friday.When I answered the StreetComplete quest, there wasn't any indication ... | |
| 3 | 2022-08-01 09:40 | oba510 | Yea, that was part of the original pre-covid public parklet program so I don't think they're supposed to serve customers directly there. The idea was that people would get pizza to-go and be able to sit outside. It doesn't get much use and I've only seen people out there around... | |
| 124173659 by oba510 @ 2022-07-28 08:37 | 1 | 2022-07-29 12:03 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello!Just a quick tip: something like "source:name:University_House_Way=street sign" is not really usable when it comes to working with the data.In general the source of something you map should preferably be added to the changeset itself (when uploading) and not on the object any... |
| 2 | 2022-07-31 01:20 | oba510 | Hi,I agree that the source should go on the changeset and not the object. Every time someone edits something the source potentially changes/expands. 99.99% of the time I don't add a source tag to objects I edit.In this case, I didn't change the name at all, just added a source fo... | |
| 124027582 by bebischof @ 2022-07-25 00:15 | 1 | 2022-07-25 10:47 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM. I'm the person who originally mapped the sidewalks on Shattuck and Adeline.Please don't do this. The access tags generally apply to the entire street, not just the vehicle lanes in the roadway. The vast majority of sidewalks in Berkeley have been mapped as an... |
| 123993602 by EddieRoqueStudioArt @ 2022-07-24 00:33 Active block | 1 | 2022-07-24 01:20 | oba510 | Hi, I don't believe these are accessible to the public; according to the bside article linked this is inside a private home. Nothing is visible from the street. Pauline Kael obviously doesn't live here anymore; do you know if there's anything outside identifying this house as the... |
| 2 | 2022-07-24 14:28 | EddieRoqueStudioArt Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-06 12:27 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details. | |
| 123617510 by CatRBLX @ 2022-07-14 16:40 Active block | 1 | 2022-07-14 20:42 | oba510 | Hi,Please don't add nonsense to OSM. This is a map of the real world used by tons of people. I have reverted your changeset.Thank you. |
| 2 | 2022-07-21 08:51 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6149 | |
| 123141024 by m2gbike @ 2022-07-03 07:20 | 1 | 2022-07-03 08:31 | oba510 | Are you sure about this? The city website ( https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/3334/Bay-Meadows-Community-Park ) specifically describes this park as having a "walking path" and mentions nothing about bikes, and these don't really look like bike paths at all. |
| 120735983 by akuksouski_lyft @ 2022-05-09 08:44 | 1 | 2022-05-10 08:05 | oba510 | This edit doesn't make much sense to me. Even if there are no explicit signs, anyone wanting to turn left from Oberlin would have to drive the wrong way down the northbound lane of Arlington then make a sharp s-turn in the crosswalk to cut over to the southbound lane where the median disappear... |
| 2 | 2022-05-10 13:16 | akuksouski_lyft ♦15 | Hi, oba510!My name is Alexander and I am a mapper of the OSM Team at Lyft. Thank you for your attention to our edits and your great contribution to OSM!In the discussed changeset oneway tag was removed from the segment of Arlington Ave according to the absence of left turn restriction sign at ... | |
| 120750919 by Maria Papa @ 2022-05-09 14:08 | 1 | 2022-05-10 07:55 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM. I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but the boundaries of San Francisco have already been mapped and are very close to being accurate. |
| 111082334 by oba510 @ 2021-09-12 04:29 | 1 | 2022-04-07 18:00 | jmilot ♦54 | > changed ferry terminal access from customers->permit to fix the AC Transit Trip Planner,Please, don't do that. The `permit` access tag doesn't describe correctly the true access to those ways. This 1) breaks the purpose of OpenStreetMap of being an independent platform and 2) a... |
| 2 | 2022-04-07 21:30 | oba510 | Hi jmilot,This was discussed briefly here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#Access_only_for_ticketed_passengers.3F and here: https://old.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/pg4mxq/need_help_fixing_san_francisco_map/access=customers has all of the same problems as access=pe... | |
| 118943671 by fatal69100 @ 2022-03-26 11:34 | 1 | 2022-03-26 11:57 | oba510 | Is Michelin rating small bends in rural road now? Roadkill? Something went wrong here. |
| 2 | 2022-03-26 14:06 | fatal69100 ♦2 | sorry I take the wrong type of element. It was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86606025 intead. My bad. I revert it right away | |
| 117370252 by Dogman15 @ 2022-02-13 21:34 | 1 | 2022-02-14 05:41 | oba510 | It looks like a cricket pitch.See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket_pitch |
| 2 | 2022-02-14 11:28 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | The amount of brown earth behind the "wickets" on the Maxar imagery doesn't really fit with a cricket pitch, but I've no idea what it might be. | |
| 116886996 by Note Control @ 2022-02-01 21:42 | 1 | 2022-02-02 02:03 | oba510 | Are you sure about all of these changes? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1755584570/history for example doesn't appear to have anything to do with the brand you added. |
| 2 | 2022-02-02 12:59 | Note Control ♦9 | Removed wrong wikidata. Added website + details. Added website and details POi around 4th street. | |
| 116873043 by dangerdane @ 2022-02-01 15:17 | 1 | 2022-02-02 01:33 | oba510 | Hi, instead of deleting places outright can you leave the address information and just remove the tags relevant to the restaurant? That way we don't lose the address info, which doesn't usually change when a business closes. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2022-02-02 16:33 | dangerdane ♦2 | Sorry about that! As you probably noticed, I'm a new contributor and still learning best practices. I'll keep this in mind and fix my other recent edits.I also opened an OsmAnd issue to prevent this from happening again: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/13669Thanks for th... | |
| 116483841 by Duck1e @ 2022-01-22 23:22 | 1 | 2022-01-23 01:21 | user4816003805 ♦65 | What's the source of this change? I don't see a castle on this island on Bing aerial. |
| 2 | 2022-01-23 03:15 | oba510 | There is no castle here.Duck1e, please don't add fictional objects to OSM; this is a map of the real world that people actually use. I have reverted your changes and removed all of Hailey's many imaginary castles. | |
| 115153455 by CurlingMan13 @ 2021-12-20 08:17 | 1 | 2021-12-20 09:12 | oba510 | You sure about this name change? It looks odd. |
| 2 | 2021-12-20 09:27 | CurlingMan13 ♦2,042 | You are correct. Good catch. Thanks. I reverted it to the old name, but added other details for the business. | |
| 113171163 by pancakedrawer001 @ 2021-10-30 18:44 | 1 | 2021-10-31 02:17 | oba510 | Do you know anything more about this? I can't find any evidence that the alley has actually been abandoned by the city. There's nothing in the permit/planning/parcel history for the adjacent properties about adding a gate or closing the alley - the gate just appeared a year or two ago. ... |
| 2 | 2021-10-31 05:12 | pancakedrawer001 ♦4 | I walked by it this morning and they’ve built a storefront where the alley used to be. I looked for a gate but there wasn’t one. Matbe there’s some back door to the alley through one of the shops but it’s definitely not a street anymore. | |
| 3 | 2021-10-31 15:55 | pancakedrawer001 ♦4 | I went back just now. You’re totally right. I’ll undo my change later today. Thanks for your help! | |
| 4 | 2021-10-31 21:44 | pancakedrawer001 ♦4 | @oba510 - I think I did this correctly, but would you mind taking a look if you can? Many thanks!https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113209896 | |
| 5 | 2021-11-01 05:59 | oba510 | Looks good. I re-tagged it as a footway since it's so narrow and added the gate. | |
| 112607080 by phd0 @ 2021-10-17 11:09 | 1 | 2021-10-17 12:47 | oba510 | Are you sure about these buffer stops? It's not uncommon for tracks to just end without any buffer, and I don't see any here on bing streetside. |
| 2 | 2021-10-18 07:29 | phd0 ♦54 | hi, i'm french and you are right!I correct it. I'm just shocked, because of my French habits, not to find it everywhere.My job yesterday was just to correct the designation inconsistencies on railway elementshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dswitch --> way=0 ... | |
| 110224657 by yasponam @ 2021-08-25 11:11 | 1 | 2021-08-26 02:46 | oba510 | This is not accurate. Hilgard Avenue doesn't bend 90 degrees to the south like this; that's just some random private residential driveway serving the last two houses at the end of the street. |
| 2 | 2021-10-26 10:49 | yasponam ♦3 | Hi, Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback.Apologies for the incorrect road digitization, I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #112987336.Going ahead, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thank you once again for the information, I'm loo... | |
| 109937777 by Mamma li Turchi @ 2021-08-19 14:15 | 1 | 2021-08-20 03:14 | oba510 | Hi. The bay is not named "Frisco Bay". The airfield at the Alameda NAS has been closed for a while now - those runways are not active runways and have been abandoned for years. Saildrone's website is still showing them in the same location. I have reverted this changeset. Please ... |
| 90702211 by tbo47 @ 2020-09-10 12:23 | 1 | 2020-09-10 12:58 | oba510 | Hi, why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2371176901/history ?Did it get damaged? Usually that's not the kind of thing that would go away. |
| 2 | 2020-09-10 13:54 | tbo47 ♦17 | Hey. I passed by it yesterday and didn't see it. I will double check today or tomorrow.t. | |
| 3 | 2020-09-10 19:21 | tbo47 ♦17 | Hey. I double checked. And i don't see a board there. | |
| 87545275 by Mike Schaffer @ 2020-07-05 03:02 | 1 | 2020-07-05 11:05 | oba510 | Hey, a bunch of things seem to have gotten messed up in your recent edits to Tilden; I see a number of wooded areas being deleted and at least one road, a large chunk of the golf course outline disappeared, and a bunch of other random deletions. I'm tempted to just revert everything but it loo... |
| 2 | 2020-07-05 12:55 | oba510 | Ok, I did a partial revert, trying to fix the things that were broken while retaining the golf course features you added. | |
| 87541381 by tbo47 @ 2020-07-04 21:05 | 1 | 2020-07-05 11:28 | oba510 | Hey, you deleted the address node here along with the shop. It's better to just remove the relevant amenity/shop,etc tag(s) and leave the address, so that the info isn't lost. |
| 87002450 by Anu_Zade @ 2020-06-23 00:18 | 1 | 2020-06-23 05:27 | Glassman ♦5,222 | I believe that barrier=kerb is needed when kerb=* is tagged. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87002450 |
| 2 | 2020-06-23 08:03 | oba510 | "kerb=lowered" is sometimes used to indicate that a crosswalk has curb cuts. It's being used here to describe a feature of the crossing rather than a type of curb.In this case it doesn't make sense to add barrier=kerb, which would imply that there was a curb on the street tha... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-23 22:31 | Anu_Zade ♦8 | Hi Glassman,My name is Anu and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Per OSMwiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier it doesn’t make sense to add barrier=kerb, as it would imply that there is a curb on the street that had to be driv... | |
| 4 | 2020-06-23 22:35 | Anu_Zade ♦8 | Dear Oba510,Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your context in this matter, and I agree with what you said. This tag was added previously by wvdp (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/5674203236) on June 14, 2019. I removed this tag per OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... | |
| 86898927 by Iowa Kid @ 2020-06-20 03:21 | 1 | 2020-06-20 03:41 | oba510 | Hey, I'm not familiar with this shopping center bur those ways had different level tags. Are you sure they're not actually two different footways on different levels? |
| 84009243 by cvo_lyft @ 2020-04-23 14:59 | 1 | 2020-04-24 03:29 | oba510 | Hi, see the comments at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82892963 |
| 2 | 2020-04-24 19:31 | cvo_lyft ♦9 | Hello Oba510, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I mistakenly made the edit without checking the way history first. I will make sure to do so in the future. Thank you for correcting my previous changeset. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused on your part. Thank You,\... | |
| 84009103 by cvo_lyft @ 2020-04-23 14:56 | 1 | 2020-04-24 03:29 | oba510 | Hi, see the comments at:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82892963#map=18/37.87076/-122.26812 |
| 82892963 by kli_lyft @ 2020-03-31 22:47 | 1 | 2020-04-14 04:35 | oba510 | Hey, this is not correct - the street was reconfigured a few months ago. |
| 2 | 2020-04-14 20:37 | lrw2 ♦8 | Hello oba510, Thanks for letting us know that there have been recent changes in this area. We apologize for making this change without first checking on city resources. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.Thank you,Lisa | |
| 80979434 by clay_c @ 2020-02-14 00:22 | 1 | 2020-02-14 10:11 | oba510 | I'm not sure it makes sense to tag the stations themselves as "level=-2". I would consider the entire facility (the concourse level, platform level, elevators, etc. to be the station. It would make sense for the individual elements inside the station to get a level tag though. |
| 2 | 2020-02-14 17:18 | clay_c ♦489 | I see what you're saying. I would consider the platform level to be the relevant level to assign to the station, the rest being just indoor pedestrian circulation. Either way, I guess it's unclear whether the level tag belongs on the station node in the first place.I want to think thro... | |
| 80815708 by Anu_Zade @ 2020-02-10 21:18 | 1 | 2020-02-11 09:08 | oba510 | I'm not seeing a no left turn sign from westbound University to Milvia (see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ELBrZmLvibPctJ40T1OAHz from Sep 2019). Is it new? |
| 2 | 2020-02-11 17:40 | lrw2 ♦8 | Hi Ob510,Thank you for bringing this to our attention. It looks like our editor clicked the wrong turn restriction in error. This changeset has since been fixed please see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80861177. We will be sure to be more careful in the future. Thank you,Lis... | |
| 80705221 by Fluffy89502 @ 2020-02-07 18:47 | 1 | 2020-02-08 07:42 | oba510 | You've made a significant shift in the position of Red Rock here, so that it no longer aligns at all with any of the available imagery or the boundaries (which are supposed to converge on the island). This doesn't make a lot of sense. |
| 2 | 2020-02-08 08:07 | Fluffy89502 ♦34 | Thats what the definition may say but official state maps show otherwise. See https://postmile.dot.ca.gov/PMQT/PostmileQueryTool.html? (Make sure to check the "View County Boundaries, Routes, and Calibration Postmiles" box in the top left corner). This goes back to the founding of Californ... | |
| 80641052 by Pitartal @ 2020-02-06 12:25 | 1 | 2020-02-07 05:39 | oba510 | Did the bricks get removed? |
| 2 | 2020-02-08 15:38 | Pitartal ♦2 | According to the bing cards, it seemed that there was asphalt all over the street (a shadow was falling, it was hard to see). The maxbox shows that I was wrong. Fixed. | |
| 79943245 by Grist @ 2020-01-23 01:30 | 1 | 2020-01-23 08:03 | oba510 | Is there a purpose behind these edits? At first glance there doesn't seem to be any difference between these tiny segments you're creating. Usually the only reason to split things up is if there's something that needs to be tagged differently. (different lane counts, surfaces, bus ro... |
| 2 | 2020-01-23 14:14 | Grist ♦1 | I'm making these edits to change how the roads are exported for a project I'm working on. If you'd like to, please feel free to undo the changes. | |
| 3 | 2020-02-03 04:23 | oba510 | Thanks. Can't you just trim/crop the lines after you've exported them? I'm not sure what exactly you're working on, but illustrator, inkscape, autocad, etc all have similar tools that can trim the excess lines. | |
| 4 | 2020-02-03 14:17 | Grist ♦1 | I'm not able to trim them in the software that I'm working with, so I need to edit the map data prior to exporting it. Thank you for the suggestions. | |
| 79834570 by mirelal_telenav @ 2020-01-21 06:34 | 1 | 2020-01-21 08:59 | oba510 | These are gated private driveways, not residential roads(see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/iZphuNiEbpaXh0pQa1QFqg ) |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 09:49 | mirelal_telenav ♦4 | Thank you for your comment and because you fixed this issue, I will take this in consideration in my future edits. | |
| 79835378 by mirelal_telenav @ 2020-01-21 06:49 | 1 | 2020-01-21 08:52 | oba510 | This looks like an alley (highway=service, service=alley), not a residential street. |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 09:41 | mirelal_telenav ♦4 | Thank you for your comment and because you fixed this issue, I will take this in consideration in my future edits. | |
| 79835694 by mirelal_telenav @ 2020-01-21 06:54 | 1 | 2020-01-21 08:33 | oba510 | This is a small driveway leading to the back of a dentist office, not a residential street.See: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-9XJDEFrimI-B-OB026spA |
| 2 | 2020-01-21 09:33 | mirelal_telenav ♦4 | Thank you for your comment and because you fixed this issue, I will take this in consideration in my future edits. | |
| 79664699 by stevea @ 2020-01-16 20:12 | 1 | 2020-01-20 12:10 | oba510 | Looking at this more closely, some more things went wrong in this changeset. The old_railway_operator tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323745114/history and other places around Sacramento got changed to "Abandoned Railroad"... The Iron Horse Trail, 105th Ave in San Leandro, The M... |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 15:57 | stevea ♦304 | I have reverted this changeset. It seems like a JOSM editing error on my part, although I'm not entirely clear what I did wrong. I will certainly be more careful here and try to keep such edits "more local" rather than statewide.I apologize for the disruption(s). -stevea | |
| 79664489 by stevea @ 2020-01-16 20:07 | 1 | 2020-01-20 12:02 | oba510 | Can you take a look at nodes 6571769713 and 6571769714? Something went a little wrong in Alameda. The old_railway_operator=[name of the street] tag also got added to Blanding and Clement in another changeset, which seems a little odd. Isn't that part of the old Alameda Beltline? I'm no... |
| 2 | 2020-01-20 15:37 | stevea ♦304 | Wow, weird. I did not knowingly edit in this area, either in this changeset or another. i did delete the oro tag on ..13 and ..14. But I couldn't find "Blanding and Clement" (they don't intersect?), nor a stop_position node for them, so I didn't delete what I couldn'... | |
| 79438019 by gen2020 @ 2020-01-10 22:53 | 1 | 2020-01-13 04:00 | oba510 | In this changeset you actually deleted Mcdonalds completely when you moved the building (while leaving the building and address info). Was that your intention? |
| 2 | 2020-01-13 17:46 | gen2020 ♦1 | Ah, sorry, that was not my intention. I have added name, McDonald's. Please feel free to correct my change if there are still any problems. Thanks! | |
| 79170853 by jaffatalism @ 2020-01-03 19:38 | 1 | 2020-01-05 12:52 | oba510 | Unfortunately there were some problems here. For example, most of the tags were deleted from Caffe Strada (including amenity=cafe...), the temporary bus platform at Shattuck & University was deleted, some completely unrelated/wrong brand/cuisine tags were added to Cafe Rio, the Golden Bear Cafe... |
| 2 | 2020-01-05 17:58 | jaffatalism ♦2 | Thank you, I will try to be cognizant of iD's error checker in the future. | |
| 79200736 by aneleutheroi @ 2020-01-04 22:14 | 1 | 2020-01-05 03:24 | oba510 | access=private isn't the right tag to use here (it would be used where, for example, only employees or tenants could park). This is probably access=customers or access=permissive. |
| 2 | 2020-01-05 03:25 | aneleutheroi ♦2 | True, my bad! | |
| 79200957 by tbo47 @ 2020-01-04 22:26 | 1 | 2020-01-05 03:05 | oba510 | Is there a reason you deleted the East Bay Vivarium? I haven't heard anything about it closing. |
| 2 | 2020-01-08 18:09 | tbo47 ♦17 | I might have done a mistake but I don't think so. I didn't see a Vivarium at that location. | |
| 79203724 by aneleutheroi @ 2020-01-05 02:12 | 1 | 2020-01-05 02:38 | oba510 | Sprouts is in fact on university land, along with the rest of the shopping center, the senior housing complex, and University Village. I think the current outline was drawn before any of the new construction happened and should be updated. I haven't bothered with it yet since the term "G... |
| 78296531 by mohapd @ 2019-12-12 05:43 | 1 | 2019-12-13 08:39 | oba510 | This looks like a private driveway rather than an actual street. |
| 2 | 2019-12-16 05:26 | mohapd ♦4 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under Changeset #78296531 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.Regards,mohapd. | |
| 3 | 2019-12-16 05:27 | mohapd ♦4 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under Changeset 78452103 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.Regards,mohapd. | |
| 77506804 by simonah_telenav @ 2019-11-25 08:07 | 1 | 2019-11-29 08:50 | oba510 | The name here was correct. Please be more careful before deleting things. |
| 73160430 by sinreeya @ 2019-08-08 15:13 | 1 | 2019-08-09 06:43 | oba510 | Are you sure about this? This block is clearly striped for two-way traffic (with a yellow line down the middle) in the most recent aerial imagery layers. |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 14:02 | sinreeya ♦7 | Hi Oba510,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for missing to split and add the direction. I've corrected the segment directions now. regards,sinreeya | |
| 73086318 by tbo47 @ 2019-08-06 22:12 | 1 | 2019-08-07 06:45 | oba510 | Instead of deleting the businesses completely, would you mind just removing the tags relevant to the business and leaving the node intact? That way we won't lose the address information, which doesn't change when a store closes. |
| 2 | 2019-08-08 22:37 | tbo47 ♦17 | yep. My bad. | |
| 72999472 by andeux @ 2019-08-04 21:41 | 1 | 2019-08-05 03:29 | oba510 | Are you sure about the current name? When I passed here on Friday the new sign said "Tasty Wok". A week before there was a hand-written sign in the window that said "[something] Bowl" with the word Bowl crossed out and replaced with "Wok". |
| 2 | 2019-08-10 17:53 | andeux ♦1 | I walked by this week. The website says MalaZui Tasty Bowl, there is a sign in the window that says Tasty Pot, and the big sign above the door says Tasty Wok. So no, I'm not sure. | |
| 72796951 by Delta 6 @ 2019-07-30 06:54 | 1 | 2019-07-30 08:12 | oba510 | Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tags from parking aisles. |
| 72538745 by jholland4134 @ 2019-07-23 05:03 | 1 | 2019-07-23 07:43 | oba510 | Can you explain what you're trying to do here? There's no point in breaking things into lots of little segments when all the tags are the same. It just bloats the database. |
| 2 | 2019-07-23 16:13 | jholland4134 ♦5 | By breaking up long segments, I can then export the smaller area that I'm wanting. Without the segments broken up, there's unnecessary segments exported with it. | |
| 72537137 by Timothy Smith @ 2019-07-23 03:27 | 1 | 2019-07-23 07:00 | oba510 | The Berkeley Travelodge ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401048831 ) is almost a textbook example of a motel, are you sure about changing it to tourism=hotel? Also, I'm not sure if Cafe Rio ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354703480/ ) has anything to do with that brand you added (it�... |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 01:10 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79270027 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical edits that included Cafe Rio, where the mechanically added values may be incorrect, where other mappers haven't touched the objects since. See https://www.openstree... | |
| 72275084 by Timothy Smith @ 2019-07-15 17:32 | 1 | 2019-07-20 08:32 | oba510 | Hi, you re-added highway=service tags to some now-demolished parking aisles in a construction site. That doesn't make any sense. They had been tagged as disused:highway specifically to prevent armchair mappers from re-adding them... |
| 72191036 by e pt @ 2019-07-12 17:15 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-14 06:12 | oba510 | I don't think it's really accurate to call the tracks south of Warm Springs service=yard. They're part of the mainline and currently undergoing active train testing. Also, every single BART station has the stop position at the front of the train. An argument could be made that the... |
| 72193577 by e pt @ 2019-07-12 18:26 Active block | 1 | 2019-07-14 05:54 | oba510 | It looks like your recent edits here created some gaps in at least a couple of routes, and broke at least one of the Pittsburg-Bay Point route relations through Downtown Oakland (It was shown running on two parallel tracks(?) That's not accurate). Please be more careful; public transport routes... |
| 71463295 by clay_c @ 2019-06-20 23:07 | 1 | 2019-06-21 05:03 | oba510 | I see a number of stops here (and a few in other changesets) where you have removed the shelter=no tag. Please don't do that. It's just as valuable to know which bus stops *don't* have a shelter as it is to know which ones do, and people (ie, me) have spent time surveying these thing... |
| 2 | 2019-06-21 16:09 | clay_c ♦489 | I'm honestly sorry for removing shelter=no. I think a JOSM plugin I'm using might be assuming it's equivalent to a missing shelter tag. I'll spend time today undoing that and figuring out what happened.Sorry as well about moving the bus stop, I'll go ahead and revert tha... | |
| 71043245 by mapman44 @ 2019-06-08 05:14 | 1 | 2019-06-14 10:52 | oba510 | Hi, some things went wrong here.You added barrier=kerb to several crossing nodes which are not curbs. Added highway=footway to a number of piers, including large buildings on piers, piers which can not be walked upon, and piers that already had footways mapped separately.You added highway=foo... |
| 2 | 2019-06-14 12:39 | mapman44 ♦526 | Sorry my edits caused a problem. I don't know anything about the Peet's shops being changed. I didn't add anything but some tags were changed because they were deprecated. Thanks for your patience. | |
| 3 | 2019-06-14 15:30 | freebeer ♦1,598 | are these changed tags actually presented as deprecated? on the wiki i can find nothing to back this up, with shop=boutique presented as status de facto.only landuse=farm is documented as actually being deprecated with that word, of what i looked up, being discussed long enough to bore into the... | |
| 4 | 2019-06-14 19:29 | mapman44 ♦526 | freebeer, it would probably best to do some tests with the validation in iD and see what results you get. I'm getting too much negative feedback about my use of it - some deserved and some not - so I'm going to take a different route. | |
| 5 | 2019-06-14 19:52 | mapman44 ♦526 | oba510 As for the changes to Peet's Coffee, that is the standardized name for use in OSM, and that is the name used on the websites of Peet's Coffee locations in San Francisco. Although there may be a banner saying Peet's Coffee & Tea hanging outside, Peet's has chosen not ... | |
| 6 | 2019-06-14 20:44 | mapman44 ♦526 | @oba510 There have been some discussions in the Wiki pages regarding "boutique." It is somewhat ambiguous because it refers primarily to the size and configuration of the shop, not what is being sold in it. Some in this changeset area are indeed selling clothing but there is also boutiques... | |
| 7 | 2019-06-15 08:45 | oba510 | Regarding Peet's, which I'm very familiar with: their newer stores are generally signed as Peet's Coffee, while most of the older stores are still signed as Peet's Coffee & Tea, unless they've been renovated recently. One of the basic rules of OSM is to map what is on t... | |
| 71269814 by Timothy Smith @ 2019-06-15 02:02 | 1 | 2019-06-15 06:30 | oba510 | These stores are commonly known as "Cost Plus" or "Cost Plus World Market" in this area (where the chain started, as simply "Cost Plus"), and named (and advertised as) "Cost Plus World Market". It's unlikely anyone would know what you were talking about ... |
| 71240973 by TaniaEikhman @ 2019-06-14 06:32 Active block | 1 | 2019-06-14 07:32 | oba510 | Is this some kind of organized mass import? I've seen several very similar edits by yourself, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dariaa_P , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Elinorzag , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AnnaTai , and possibly others, often with odd artificial-sounding names ... |
| 71035427 by clay_c @ 2019-06-07 19:01 | 1 | 2019-06-09 02:33 | canardanonyme ♦1 | It may be better to exclude the description of the bus routes from their names (e.g. "County Connection 7: Shadelands => Pleasant Hill BART" instead of "County Connection 7-Shadelands/Pleasant Hill: Shadelands => Pleasant Hill BART".) The areas served by a route should be c... |
| 2 | 2019-06-09 16:38 | clay_c ♦489 | I guess that's fair. I'll go ahead and clean it up | |
| 3 | 2019-06-12 10:16 | oba510 | Isn't the County Connection route 4 a continuous loop? In this rare instance it might make more sense to only have a single route relation, with the start and end at the BART station. | |
| 4 | 2019-06-12 15:37 | clay_c ♦489 | Oof, you're right. My mistake. I'll change routes 4 and 7 back to a single route=bus with roundtrip=yes | |
| 71089358 by FoggySunsets @ 2019-06-10 06:34 | 1 | 2019-06-12 09:39 | oba510 | Hi, just a heads up:motor_vehicle=designated doesn't mean what I think you think it means. Instead of "designated vehicles only" like you might expect, it means something more along the lines of "this is a designated motor vehicle route". For example, a street with ... |
| 71124846 by Timothy Smith @ 2019-06-11 04:03 | 1 | 2019-06-12 08:23 | oba510 | You turned a closed Burger King tagged as disused:amenity=fast_food into a non-disused Burger King. I walked past this place today (twice!) and can assure you that it has been completely boarded up for a while, and is not in any way an active Burger King restaurant. Please pay more attention to wha... |
| 70904355 by joeybab3 @ 2019-06-04 01:08 | 1 | 2019-06-04 05:10 | oba510 | Careful - by adding "barrier=kerb" to the crossing node, you are indicating that there is a curb in the street where it meets the crosswalk, and everyone has to drive or walk over it. Surely that's not what you intended. |
| 2 | 2019-06-04 05:12 | joeybab3 ♦24 | Absolutely correct, I was suggested to add that by iD, but I should have read more into what it means. I will undo it when I get the chance or if you are able could you correctly tag it? | |
| 3 | 2019-06-04 05:49 | oba510 | I think I've taken care of it. Unfortunately the iD validator seems to have a couple of issues. | |
| 70884936 by Les Pétards @ 2019-06-03 12:44 | 1 | 2019-06-04 04:54 | oba510 | Again, there is no bus stop inside either of the buildings here. |
| 70901973 by Fikadu Balcha @ 2019-06-03 22:00 | 1 | 2019-06-04 03:55 | oba510 | Are you sure this is one-way? I see at least one lane in each direction in the most recent aerial imagery layers. |
| 2 | 2019-06-04 14:46 | Fikadu Balcha ♦1 | Thanks for catching this! After reviewing the area again I have finished correcting the incorrect one-way ways. Please feel free to review my recent update, in changeset 70923806. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70923806 Happy Mapping!-Fikadu | |
| 70729396 by jambamkin @ 2019-05-29 11:09 | 1 | 2019-06-02 05:49 | oba510 | Hi, in this changeset you added barrier=kerb to several crossings. That is not accurate; there are no curbs in the middle of the street at any of them. You also renamed a few Starbucks as you said; but I did a quick check and like most Starbucks shops around here they're all named "Starbuc... |
| 2 | 2019-06-02 09:37 | jambamkin ♦81 | Thanks for the corrections, the kerb one stood out to me as something that would need to be surveyed so I quickly stopped using that one. Surprised about the Starbucks Coffee's, I'll try contacting the person who started the Maproullette challenge. | |
| 70832188 by Gowing @ 2019-06-01 10:20 | 1 | 2019-06-02 03:54 | oba510 | Is "Arthur's House" the actual name of this house (ie., is there a sign or something with that name} or is this just a house where someone named Arthur lives? In the case of the latter, it's generally not a good idea to add personal info like that to the map. |
| 70833225 by dhaird @ 2019-06-01 11:23 | 1 | 2019-06-02 03:46 | oba510 | Acton Crescent is an ordinary public street; I have removed the access=destination tag you added. |
| 2 | 2019-06-04 14:05 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor might have got confused with "Not a through street" sign board. There is no need to add destination tag here. Thanks for correcting it. We will take care of these kind of edits going forward.We are always happy to engage with the OMS ... | |
| 70824491 by Les Pétards @ 2019-05-31 22:33 | 1 | 2019-06-01 06:15 | oba510 | Hey, you added a bus stop inside a building... What were you trying to map? |
| 70749923 by PelleB @ 2019-05-29 22:10 | 1 | 2019-05-31 05:46 | oba510 | Are you sure about some of these changes you're making all over the country? It's still common to find older Peet's shops (like the one in the Potrero Center) named "Peet's Coffee & Tea". You also added barrier=kerb to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6329652921 ... |
| 70656503 by AnnaTai @ 2019-05-27 10:30 | 1 | 2019-05-27 12:16 | oba510 | This shopping center was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582343640I have reverted this changeset |
| 70648272 by dhogan @ 2019-05-27 05:43 | 1 | 2019-05-27 08:58 | oba510 | It looks like you added barrier=kerb to a number of crossing nodes here. That would literally mean that there is a curb in the middle of the street (and crosswalk) that everyone has to drive and walk over, which seems unlikely. |
| 2 | 2019-05-27 10:34 | dhogan ♦2 | Previously, the intersection between the sidewalk and the road was tagged with kerb=lowered. The (kerb=lowered) to (barrier=kerb, kerb=lowered) change is an automatic issue correction suggestion provided by iD. This seemed reasonable and was suggested by the editor, so I didn't check the wiki, ... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-27 11:13 | dhogan ♦2 | I used Overpass to obtain a list of nodes where barrier=kerb, highway=crossing, last modified by me in the previous 24 hours. The list had 1407 nodes.Relevant part of the Overpass query: node["barrier"="kerb"]["highway"="crossing"](user:"dhogan")... | |
| 70482986 by Jaypep1 @ 2019-05-21 15:27 | 1 | 2019-05-22 04:44 | oba510 | This is really not the way to tag a Starbucks, or any other coffee shop (try amenity=cafe + cuisine=coffee_shop, plus shop=coffee if they sell beans) |
| 2 | 2019-05-22 06:02 | freebeer ♦1,598 | oba, your change lost the #5646 info, would this be something useful for a ref tagging, or is it pointless for osm? | |
| 3 | 2019-05-26 05:31 | oba510 | I don't know. We don't usually show the internal store numbers for businesses. It seems like a fairly low value piece of info to me, but maybe it might be useful if you are applying for a job there or want to sue them? | |
| 70505107 by AnnaTai @ 2019-05-22 08:25 | 1 | 2019-05-26 05:24 | oba510 | Golden Gate Fields was already on the map, with a lot more detail than the area you drew. (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1709346 ). If you were trying to draw an area encompassing the entire complex, it covers a much larger area and wouldn't be tagged as a track; that would only ap... |
| 70515950 by Jaypep1 @ 2019-05-22 13:40 | 1 | 2019-05-26 04:44 | oba510 | Again, Decathlon was already on the map. |
| 70491309 by Benoreilly98 @ 2019-05-21 19:50 | 1 | 2019-05-22 06:14 | oba510 | The Golden Gate Bridge is already tagged as a tourist attraction; there's no need to add a duplicate node with the same info:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370672707 |
| 70488774 by zoopzoop @ 2019-05-21 18:12 | 1 | 2019-05-22 06:06 | oba510 | The thing you removed doesn't literally mean that this is a house. It's just a different way of mapping the address instead of typing out the same street, city, state, etc on every address along Mission St.see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet |
| 70487502 by Jaypep1 @ 2019-05-21 17:33 | 1 | 2019-05-22 05:06 | oba510 | This was already on the map.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23014325 |
| 69140157 by ioanam_telenav @ 2019-04-12 07:28 | 1 | 2019-04-12 07:44 | oba510 | Please don't arbitrarily delete names from roads just because they're tagged as *_link. Many of these are part of named streets, especially in urban areas where there are buildings and sidewalks fronting on them. |
| 2 | 2019-04-12 07:58 | ioanam_telenav ♦21 | I understand your point but I have removed the name from the _link according to the existing rules on the wiki page. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Tagging | |
| 3 | 2019-04-12 08:10 | oba510 | That's really more of a general guideline than a rule. It makes sense when you're dealing with standard, short slip lanes/ramps where there's no way to determine which street it belongs to. It doesn't make sense in cases like this where it's perpendicular to on one of the tw... | |
| 69138704 by benpri @ 2019-04-12 05:49 | 1 | 2019-04-12 06:33 | oba510 | I hope you're not changing the name of all these Starbucks shops all over the world just because of that maproulette challenge (and that you've actually verified that the name has changed)? Most seem to be named "Starbucks Coffee" around here, including this one the last time I ... |
| 68859571 by sdelgerbayar @ 2019-04-03 22:15 | 1 | 2019-04-06 12:56 | oba510 | Hi, did you notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27369520 ? Those parking aisles had been changed to disused:highway for a reason... |
| 68946643 by e pt @ 2019-04-06 08:43 Active block | 1 | 2019-04-06 12:41 | oba510 | Hey, you broke a couple of BART routes here. What were you trying to do? It looks like a segment of the wye was deleted and re-drawn, but connected to the wrong track... |
| 68688320 by shushmit @ 2019-03-30 07:18 | 1 | 2019-03-31 09:43 | oba510 | It doesn't make sense to delete the entire 2-1/2 block long alley when only a small section is impassible. It can be seen clearly in the aerial imagery and on mapillary. |
| 2 | 2019-04-02 12:16 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi oba510,Thanks for looking into this edit. The editor has made this edit as per aerial imagery but by mistake forgot to split the road and deleted the entire segment. Ideally it should have been caught in our review system but since OSMCha is not working, we missed to identify the deleted segm... | |
| 68319842 by ericrw_ @ 2019-03-20 05:46 | 1 | 2019-03-24 02:31 | oba510 | The ellipses are actually part of the official name (it's a nod to Herb Caen's writing style). |
| 2 | 2019-03-24 05:40 | ericrw_ ♦3 | TIL! Thanks for reverting the changes. | |
| 68104802 by Nodestrawaymus @ 2019-03-13 15:50 | 1 | 2019-03-14 06:29 | oba510 | This was already on the map, drawn as a separate cycleway (because there's a fence between it and the rest of the street. |
| 2 | 2019-03-14 15:20 | Nodestrawaymus ♦12 | Hello oba510! Thank you very much for the information and making the correction for me. I understand your reasoning and agree it should not have been applied. Thanks again! | |
| 67751400 by clay_c @ 2019-03-04 01:43 | 1 | 2019-03-04 04:59 | oba510 | Why are you changing all the railway=tram_stop nodes to railway=stop? It seems like a less-specific way of tagging the stops, and causes them to stop rendering on most maps. |
| 2 | 2019-03-04 20:59 | clay_c ♦489 | See this section in the [OSM Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trams#Tram_stops). Following the updated public transport schema, `public_transport=stop_position` with `tram=yes` is semantically the same as `railway=tram_stop`, and it is up to the renderers to begin supporting that. In fact, ... | |
| 3 | 2019-03-04 21:07 | clay_c ♦489 | So to be clear, each tram stop will still end up having a `railway=tram_stop` once my work is finished. This is just part of a process to add more fine-grained, quasi-standardized details to the public transport systems here. What I've done in this situation before is to retag the nodes on the ... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-05 09:57 | oba510 | About a year(?) ago I systematically went through all of the Muni Metro lines (but not the cable cars, and didn't finish the F line) and added every stop and platform in the city, and tried to standardize it as best as I could, given that it's an odd system where modern light rail trains o... | |
| 5 | 2019-03-05 18:37 | clay_c ♦489 | Thank you for your work! I don't think any of the details you've added to the map conflict with an additional center/label node tagged railway=tram_stop. I'll admit the wiki article on that tag is pretty unhelpful and needs to be updated. It mentions the new schema, as you pointed out... | |
| 6 | 2019-03-05 20:26 | clay_c ♦489 | As for distinguishing railway=* for stops on Muni trackage, I think it seems fit to use railway=tram_stop for flag stops and railway=station for the wheelchair-accessible stops where trains always call (in other words, all the labeled stations on the official Muni Metro map). | |
| 7 | 2019-03-06 08:26 | oba510 | That had been my first thought, but some of the surface-level wheelchair accessible stops are actually a separate ramp that can be a block or more away from the normal stop. In practice they are hardly ever used unless someone specifically needs them, since the steps on the train need to be raised a... | |
| 8 | 2019-03-06 23:17 | clay_c ♦489 | Yeah. We can map wheelchair support with wheelchair=yes or wheelchair=designated. I think what's important is that the non-flag stops are one level up from the flag stops in the railway=station vs. railway=tram_stop hierarchy. | |
| 67294493 by jaffatalism @ 2019-02-17 22:26 | 1 | 2019-02-18 05:15 | oba510 | HI, it looks like you merged some ways here along Dyer Street, which messed up the lane count/type tagging, It's usually a bad idea (and unnecessary) to merge ways unless you are certain that the tags, relation memberships etc are identical, since the ways were usually split for a reason. |
| 2 | 2019-02-18 05:37 | jaffatalism ♦2 | Sorry, I apologize for the mistake. I will be cognizant of this in future edits. Any tips for editing streets like these? Could you also explain the difference between a marked and unmarked crosswalks. The wiki was not very helpful with this. | |
| 67076437 by Delta 6 @ 2019-02-10 16:38 | 1 | 2019-02-11 04:26 | oba510 | You have removed an an awful lot of service=* tags from parking aisles and driveways here and in other changesets recently. What are you trying to do? I don't understand, it seems counterproductive.(A couple of turn restrictions also got somewhat messed up here when ways were merged that p... |
| 65625358 by kida001 @ 2018-12-19 22:37 | 1 | 2019-01-02 03:32 | oba510 | I'm curious what your source for this name is. I can't find any reliable references to it. |
| 65821641 by sdelgerbayar @ 2018-12-27 18:41 | 1 | 2019-01-02 02:28 | oba510 | This was changed back to a 2-way street about 3 months ago. |
| 65893658 by jnstahl @ 2018-12-30 18:12 | 1 | 2019-01-02 02:20 | oba510 | It looks like these ways were intentionally split because the Bay Area Ridge Trail passes through a small segment here; merging them made the entire street part of the relation for the trail. |
| 64680028 by anilredd @ 2018-11-20 04:21 | 1 | 2018-11-25 02:53 | oba510 | Please don't remove the service=* tags from parking aisles and driveways. |
| 2 | 2019-07-11 06:35 | anilredd ♦9 | Hi, Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for the updates. We will follow the suggestion going forward while editing parking aisles.Regards,Anil. | |
| 63533550 by mohapd @ 2018-10-15 09:47 | 1 | 2018-10-17 06:23 | oba510 | This could reasonably be considered either a driveway or a parking aisle, but it's certainly one of them. The service=driveway tag should not have been removed. |
| 2 | 2018-10-18 13:04 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Oba510,Thanks for your update. The latest imagery from bing shows that it is probably used as a dumpyard - https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=37.819572~-122.283719&lvl=17&dir=14.76&style=x&v=2&sV=1Would it not not be better to use this as a service road rather than a driveway?... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-24 08:59 | oba510 | If it was really a junkyard than it probably shouldn't be mapped as a service way at all, I would think, since there wouldn't actually be a "way".Bing is several years old around here. If you look at one of the more recent layers (the Mapbox and DigitalGlobe layers tend to b... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-24 10:21 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Oba510,Thanks for the update. Makes sense. Just an add on query - OSM WIKI for driveway - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway states that "The main ways on the parking lot, connecting multiple service=parking_aisle should be mapped with highway=service, only. "... | |
| 5 | 2018-10-24 11:44 | oba510 | That's referring to the main (often 2 or more lane) roads that you would typically find between individual parking lots in places like shopping centers or airports that have large complex parking arrangements. It is not really relevant to small driveways in a city. | |
| 6 | 2018-10-24 11:59 | gseethar ♦67 | Got it. Thanks for taking time to clarify.We will keep this in mind going forward.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 63624372 by Iowa Kid @ 2018-10-17 20:21 | 1 | 2018-10-18 06:22 | oba510 | This change doesn't seem quite correct. The intersection is so wide that vehicles turning right from Posen onto Ordway never actually enter the roundabout - the ways were connected at the same node intentionally to reflect that fact. The sidewalk tags also got (very slightly) messed up here. |
| 63376690 by shushmit @ 2018-10-10 11:12 | 1 | 2018-10-15 06:07 | oba510 | If you're going to map random small residential driveways, it would be helpful to add the service=driveway (and usually access=private) tags so that they don't look like publicly-accessible full-size service roads and completely clutter up the map. |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 15:06 | shushmit ♦4 | Hi,Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I will follow your suggestion going forward and add driveways for the roads where it cant be publicly accessible.Thanks for the updates.Regards,shushmit. | |
| 62962906 by belmemes @ 2018-09-27 02:25 | 1 | 2018-09-28 05:29 | oba510 | Hi, it looks like a bunch of lane tagging got messed up here (lane counts, turn lanes). It's generally a bad idea to merge road segments that have been split without checking to be absolutely sure that they are identical. In this case they had been split where the lane tags changed, and had dif... |
| 2 | 2018-09-29 16:40 | belmemes ♦5 | Sorry about that. I fixed those issues just now. | |
| 62921828 by riteshaw @ 2018-09-25 17:41 | 1 | 2018-09-26 07:56 | oba510 | Please don't delete the service=* tags from service ways. |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 10:23 | riteshaw ♦7 | Hi,We apologize for the late response. The edit was made as per the OSM wiki. Please check wiki link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle) It was mentioned "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, ... | |
| 62918321 by mrfa @ 2018-09-25 15:55 | 1 | 2018-09-26 07:49 | oba510 | Please don't delete the service=parking_aisle and service=driveway tags from parking aisles and driveways. |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 09:23 | mrfa ♦5 | Hi, Thanks for the update and we apologize for the delayed response. As per the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle it was mentioned that "The main way(s) on the parking lot, for entering and connecting multiple parking_aisle, should be mapped with highw... | |
| 62868509 by vvrddy @ 2018-09-24 06:12 | 1 | 2018-09-24 07:36 | oba510 | Since the street is only temporarily closed for construction you could have changed it to highway=construction instead of deleting it outright. |
| 2 | 2019-07-11 10:52 | vvrddy ♦1 | Hi oba510, Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a misake from my end. Shouldn't have deleted the road. Thanks for reverting the changes. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community.Regards,vvrddy | |
| 62685825 by tmadhuli @ 2018-09-18 06:48 | 1 | 2018-09-18 06:55 | oba510 | Please don't delete random pieces of streets for no reason. Thank you. |
| 2 | 2019-07-11 06:23 | tmadhuli ♦4 | Hi, Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. There was a bollard/block in one of the streetside and the width is too less for a car to go through. But still its a mistake from myside. Should've just added a block/bollard. We value local edits over remote sources. T... | |
| 62649531 by Sphinxiro @ 2018-09-17 01:21 | 1 | 2018-09-17 04:31 | oba510 | Both of these were already on the map. |
| 62449264 by yaswap @ 2018-09-10 10:51 | 1 | 2018-09-10 11:22 | oba510 | Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles. |
| 2 | 2019-07-10 06:53 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi, Thanks for reviewing the changeset. I will follow your suggestions going forward while adding parking aisles.Regards,yaswap | |
| 62262103 by Jaypep1 @ 2018-09-04 00:42 | 1 | 2018-09-04 04:00 | oba510 | This is obviously not a 1-story building - see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jje8RFHY_DogqyaWrwTWjA |
| 61968343 by njtbusfan @ 2018-08-24 19:07 | 1 | 2018-08-25 07:05 | oba510 | Why did you add oneway=yes to part of Sansome St (which as far as I can tell was already tagged correctly as only being one-way for private vehicles, for only part of the day)?Also, fyi, these recent changesets are massive (you edited at least 100 bus route relations here...) and "bus route... |
| 61923940 by shushmit @ 2018-08-23 14:38 | 1 | 2018-08-24 05:58 | oba510 | Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tag from parking aisles. |
| 2 | 2019-07-08 15:06 | shushmit ♦4 | Hi,Thanks for the comments. I will follow the same as per your suggestion.Regards,shushmit | |
| 61767978 by oba510 @ 2018-08-18 11:25 | 1 | 2018-08-18 14:40 | nereocystis ♦17 | Did you change the bus stop position on purpose due to the Berkeley construction updates?I'm currently trying to update all AC Transit bus stops to match the AC Transit published GTFS info. Next step, add the route info.If the GTFS data is reasonable, I would like to keep it, since it mak... |
| 2 | 2018-08-18 14:56 | nereocystis ♦17 | Oops. I just saw your note, I missed it earlier. Let me answer there. | |
| 3 | 2018-08-19 05:58 | oba510 | All of the AC Transit stops on the northeast side of Shattuck/Center have been closed and the buses have been moved back to the stop on the southeast corner. I'm assuming it's related to the impending construction there, but I'm not sure. I couldn't find anything on the website ... | |
| 4 | 2018-08-19 15:23 | nereocystis ♦17 | That sounds good.For now, the updated stops all have route_ref, which should mention the routes which serve the stop.In the next day or so, I will go through the last of the the potential matches, and then upload about 4500 new AC Transit stops. My city of Oakland is much more sparse on OSM ... | |
| 5 | 2018-08-21 04:05 | nereocystis ♦17 | 4500 new bus stops uploaded. Here's hoping that they are close enough to correct.And I'm trying not to revert your changes. | |
| 61762539 by nereocystis @ 2018-08-18 05:44 | 1 | 2018-08-18 09:59 | oba510 | (this is in relation to these changesets in general rather than this specific one)I've noticed a few places where things didn't go quite right, mostly minor things like a few stops getting moved slightly to less accurate/old locations which usually doesn't matter much. I came acr... |
| 2 | 2018-08-18 15:07 | nereocystis ♦17 | Thanks for checking.I am assuming that AC Transit info is correct, which may not be correct. There is some risk of picking the wrong stop when I am trying to add the AC Transit data to existing stop info.However, as you stated, the AC Transit info may not always be correct. If it is wrong, I... | |
| 61711926 by marthaleena @ 2018-08-16 11:03 | 1 | 2018-08-17 09:52 | oba510 | Hi, you connected the walkways on the roof of the terminal, several stories in the air, with the bus bays underneath the terminal at ground level. If only it were that easy... I have reverted this changeset |
| 45395176 by oba510 @ 2017-01-23 10:15 | 1 | 2018-06-30 16:30 | nereocystis ♦17 | You reverted my change to Fallon StreetFallon Street (308000810, v3)Changing it back to an alley from a secondary link.It's definitely not an alley, but a real, one way streetIt probably should be a tertiary road, as should the rest of Fallon in this area.The rest is marked residentia... |
| 2 | 2018-07-01 02:53 | oba510 | Hmm. It's a very narrow, straight street with no sidewalks, that can't be more than 15 feet wide at the widest point. It looks like an alley to me. I would expect a link road to look more like an offramp or slip lane. There are plenty of public streets classified as alleys. (It also looks ... | |
| 3 | 2018-07-01 04:37 | nereocystis ♦17 | As I review my notes, I'm not sure about the name. I don't think that it shows up on the assessor's map. This street is north of the railroad, in real life. Embarcadero, both on the assessor's map and in real life, is south of the railroad.I don't remember whether there ... | |
| 4 | 2018-07-01 05:09 | nereocystis ♦17 | On the other hand, there is a second abandoned railroad which ends behind the San Francisco BART Oakland place, on 25 4th Street. Maybe that is the first railroad. That explains the location of Victory Court.Embarcadero West is south of the railroad, in the current real life, but perhaps the old... | |
| 5 | 2018-07-31 21:19 | nereocystis ♦17 | Still investigating the name of the street.Oakland DOT suggested that I request a street sign via SeeClickFix, and that will force the city to find out the correct name of the street.I have done so, and here is the request:https://seeclickfix.com/issues/4738434-no-street-sign-at-oak-st-a... | |
| 6 | 2018-09-06 03:23 | nereocystis ♦17 | Keith Schuerholz, of the city of Oakland confirms:It's Fallon Street. | |
| 59927287 by youandmeboth @ 2018-06-18 02:27 | 1 | 2018-06-18 06:26 | oba510 | Hey, did you see that the church was already on the map? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208161491 ) There's no need to add it twice. |
| 2 | 2018-06-18 20:54 | youandmeboth ♦1 | My bad, it genuinely wasn't showing up. Must have been a fluke, thank you! | |
| 59870366 by istvanv_telenav @ 2018-06-15 10:12 | 1 | 2018-06-17 07:37 | oba510 | Hi. Is there some reason you deleted these turn restrictions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6516712/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6516714/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6189615/history?Two of them were broken when Sansome Street was modified in ano... |
| 2 | 2018-06-18 07:26 | istvanv_telenav ♦4 | Hi, split some of the ways and fixed the broken relations and added the ones that were missing. Thanks for letting me know | |
| 59719681 by AnthonySchoenduby295 @ 2018-06-10 19:07 | 1 | 2018-06-17 02:00 | oba510 | Hi. I can assure you that Broadway is still named "Broadway". I have reverted this changeset. You might want to look through your other changesets to see if you accidentally changed any other names. |
| 57261051 by fluffy_unicorn @ 2018-03-17 07:31 | 1 | 2018-05-20 04:42 | oba510 | Hey, you deleted almost 1600 highway=service tags in just this one changeset. I don't have the time or energy to check every one, but almost all of the ones I looked at seem like perfectly valid parking aisles which should not have been changed. Can you fix this please?. |
| 2 | 2018-05-20 09:38 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Looks like this user ran rickshaw over the whole area for some reason. It seems kind of weird since they are part of a GIS team, whatever that means. Hopefully they are causing havoc now though. If you see them do any more problematic edits id report them to SomeoneElse and I will do the same. Then ... | |
| 3 | 2018-05-20 10:33 | fluffy_unicorn ♦3 | Dear oba510 and Adamant1, thank you for paying your attention to this issue. Please note, that I was not deleting highway=service tags, but rather service=parking_aisle. The reason for this consist in improving road connectivity with the purpose of navigation. First, some of these roads from which t... | |
| 4 | 2018-05-20 11:20 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Fluffy Unicorn, I don't see how deleting the parking_aisle tag would improve navigation. If anything it makes it worse because there are many different kinds of service roads and therefore leaving the general tag without the sub tag makes it impossible to differentiate. Also, although yes som... | |
| 5 | 2018-05-20 11:46 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Also Id note the definition win highway=service by itself, particularly this part "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc, this is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys" Note the world TO, not TH... | |
| 56892385 by srividya_c @ 2018-03-05 07:11 | 1 | 2018-03-19 10:11 | oba510 | Are you sure about this? I see a street clearly marked for two-way traffic here: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YcpCUJwq7F1hWKiamSUKsg |
| 2 | 2018-03-19 19:18 | srividya_c ♦57 | I added oneway tag after seeing the `oneway` sign board in this image - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=Adn_4z_TZHhlzkXvNm0_JQ&lat=37.7806763&lng=-122.4124943&z=17&x=0.5113072659680779&y=0.49542059748902884&zoom=0. But did not see the two way yellow si... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-22 06:41 | srividya_c ♦57 | Fixed it this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57410500. Thanks again :) | |
| 56828815 by Irina Karachevtseva @ 2018-03-02 18:32 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:28 | oba510 | Here also you removed all the tags from the last blocks of Martin Luther King Jr Way and Embarcadero West, and removed service=parking aisle and other valid tags from parking aisles. |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 14:33 | Vladimir Ovramenko ♦3 | This was our mistake and we fixed it. Thank you for letting me know about this. | |
| 56831366 by Irina Karachevtseva @ 2018-03-02 20:08 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:22 | oba510 | Hi, I see you added a bunch of missing service roads/parking aisles. Good. However, you also removed a bunch of valid-looking service=parking_aisle, service=driveway, and surface tags here. Why? Please be careful not to remove valid info. Thanks. |
| 2 | 2018-06-03 14:32 | Vladimir Ovramenko ♦3 | This was our mistake and we fixed it. Thank you for letting me know about this. | |
| 56834317 by Irina Karachevtseva @ 2018-03-02 22:23 | 1 | 2018-03-03 09:08 | oba510 | Hi, it looks like you accidentally removed all the tags from Rudsdale Street and turned it into an unnamed service road here. I've fixed it. |
| 2 | 2018-05-25 04:29 | Irina Karachevtseva ♦8 | Apologies for the errors and thank you for fixing them. I will be careful about this in the future. | |
| 55840340 by nereocystis @ 2018-01-28 20:24 | 1 | 2018-02-05 09:23 | oba510 | Hey, it looks like something got messed up here. There is a duplicated set of Oakland roads (Broadway, 11th, Park, etc) that got added over the top of Alameda. |
| 2 | 2018-02-07 05:12 | nereocystis ♦17 | I thought that I reverted all of this.I tried to bring back an old AC Transit line in Oakland, from a few months ago, so that I could duplicate the old route to the new route.Somehow, that caused the Oakland streets to be copied to Alameda.I quickly noticed this, then tried to revert.\... | |
| 3 | 2018-02-07 13:40 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Hi,I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1287740 that it seems from the surface it should be a simple revert.I'll give it a quick analysis and wipe it off the map for you if my brane feels functional. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-07 13:52 | freebeer ♦1,598 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56149740 where the changeset comment is: mistaken v1 copy of existing multi-way/node trail onto somewhere completely different | |
| 5 | 2018-02-08 06:05 | nereocystis ♦17 | Thanks. That looks much nicer. I had a change prepared last night, but I didn't feel like taking a chance with it. | |
| 55821642 by jliaw @ 2018-01-28 06:30 | 1 | 2018-01-28 07:24 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. |
| 2 | 2018-01-28 08:12 | oba510 | In San Francisco addresses are assigned to the property, not the building/door (and most addresses are actually a range of numbers). This is technically all one building that has been sort of messily mapped, so moving the address from some random building part to the property still seems like an imp... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-28 08:21 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Because in OSM there is no mapping of property (you can't see you on the ground) and even a building can have several different addresses (and I'm not talking about different suites), the address belongs to the building or to a node in (or on) the building. You can deviate from that for cl... | |
| 4 | 2018-01-28 08:43 | oba510 | Looking at this more closely, it looks like the building has both Market Street and 10th Street addresses, so I would remove the 10th Street address from the property. I'm guessing that the missing Market St address should go to the (empty?) storefronts along Market. | |
| 55789807 by dizarillo @ 2018-01-26 23:33 | 1 | 2018-01-27 09:29 | oba510 | Are you sure about this? The plans for the north side of the station only include fairly minor changes to the parking lots once construction is complete (mostly different paving and a modified bus area), and the north entrance has definitely not been removed.Also, what's "Bart Way"... |
| 55790003 by dizarillo @ 2018-01-26 23:46 | 1 | 2018-01-27 08:55 | oba510 | Hi, I'm curious where you got those street names from (Bart Way, W Bart Way, E Bart Way, Busway). I can't find any reference to them anywhere. |
| 55740645 by Rajsamand Local Guide @ 2018-01-25 13:23 | 1 | 2018-01-26 11:19 | oba510 | Hi, it looks like you mixed up some footways on different levels here. It might help to add layer=1 and level=[whatever level the footway is on] tags to the upper-floor walkways so it's clearer what is going on, and don't connect walkways at different levels that don't actually connec... |
| 55184512 by Adamant1 @ 2018-01-05 11:40 | 1 | 2018-01-07 07:45 | oba510 | Hi, this seems to be an actual place and not a personal poi (if you look at the history it was imported 10 years ago from the GNIS). I have restored it and converted it to a residential polygon around the condo complex |
| 2 | 2018-01-07 07:50 | Adamant1 ♦222 | Oh cool. My bad. Thanks for doing that. I'll have to look through the history better next time. | |
| 54505839 by oba510 @ 2017-12-10 09:58 | 1 | 2017-12-10 22:07 | IcyMidnight ♦4 | The change didn't delete Peace Plaza, just changed it to a park.See http://sfrecpark.org/destination/japantown-peace-plaza/Also fixed the multi-poligon that removed the area of the pagoda from the park as that is also part of the area. |
| 2 | 2017-12-11 05:37 | oba510 | You deleted the plaza itself, and added a less-detailed park area. The park was fine (it is technically a park), but the park and the pedestrian area represent different things. One represents the administration/landuse (park), while the other is the physical surface (pedestrian area), and can be u... | |
| 3 | 2017-12-11 08:04 | IcyMidnight ♦4 | I did lose some detail on that polygon. A newbie error made when I got confused about the editing tool. That should be fixed.I would have thought the surface= attribute would cover the surface. Based on a comment on a recent change I made elsewhere, pedestrian areas are actually used for routing... | |
| 4 | 2017-12-13 07:15 | IcyMidnight ♦4 | I believe I've fixed your concerns in 54505839 | |
| 37813100 by oba510 @ 2016-03-14 06:34 | 1 | 2017-08-27 06:46 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi!Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574708https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574710Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ? |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 10:49 | oba510 | It's not a typo. This is a pair of monumental stone street signs (the kind that have the name of the street on them, not a traffic sign) that were built as a formal gateway to the small subdivision on the east side of College Ave. These kind of stone-column street signs are fairly common on the... | |
| 3 | 2017-08-31 11:21 | GerdP ♦2,751 | What do you think about historic=city_gate?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcity_gate | |
| 4 | 2017-08-31 11:27 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Ah, sorry, there is already a historic tag. I think the highway tag is obsolete here. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-31 11:43 | oba510 | The highway=street_sign tag is there because it functions (both historically and currently) as a street sign. Looking at taginfo highway=street_sign is the most common tag for such features (even though it is undocumented). | |
| 6 | 2017-08-31 11:54 | GerdP ♦2,751 | That is true, the difference is that you have used the tag on a way, not on a node.I also assume that many are mistagged traffic_sign=* or maybe tourism=information.Question is why you want to map the sign,I think the important thing is that the corresponding highway has the correct name tag. | |
| 48412244 by AllyLewis @ 2017-05-05 03:27 | 1 | 2017-05-05 08:54 | oba510 | Why do you keep vandalizing the map like this? Most people would have gotten bored by now. Stop messing things up for everyone else. Please. |
| 48077958 by nvk @ 2017-04-24 04:21 | 1 | 2017-04-24 05:13 | oba510 | There was already an existing relation for the Bay Trail. ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/325779/ ) I've merged these members into that one. |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 06:22 | nvk ♦13 | Thank you! I saw the other one but could never get the two to associate in the same iD editor view. Did you use JOSM? | |
| 48051133 by Crispy9090 @ 2017-04-23 06:09 | 1 | 2017-04-23 07:48 | oba510 | It looks like you've set the default name (name=*) of this restaurant to "Greenburger's", and the English name (name:en=*) to "Nara". This doesn't make much sense. If the name of the restaurant changed you usually only need to change the name=* tag. The name:en... |
| 47959323 by BillRoss @ 2017-04-20 05:29 | 1 | 2017-04-20 05:36 | oba510 | please stop |
| 47829684 by r_i_c_h @ 2017-04-16 04:58 | 1 | 2017-04-17 03:41 | oba510 | Hey, you deleted the buildings here along with the shops; please don't do that unless the buildings have actually been demolished. You only need to remove the tags that actually apply to the closed businesses (in this case shop=* and name=*) I have undeleted the buildings. |
| 47039074 by andygol @ 2017-03-21 12:38 | 1 | 2017-03-22 08:37 | oba510 | Hi, I noticed that you've been merging place of worship nodes with some of the buildings you've traced. That's probably not a good idea unless it's really obvious they're correct, since most of them were imported from the GNIS and are usually not in exactly the right locatio... |
| 46964967 by Josh Rodriguez @ 2017-03-18 19:52 | 1 | 2017-03-19 06:26 | oba510 | Hi, I noticed that you've put quite a bit of effort into adding things to the map of Stockton over the last week. Unfortunately, nearly everything you did was either fictional or broke the map somehow! Your changes have been reverted. (Thanks for mapping Shropshire park, though) |
| 46347819 by emeryradio @ 2017-02-23 19:59 | 1 | 2017-02-25 06:29 | oba510 | Hi, I'm having a hard time figuring out the rationale behind some of the changes here. Clay, Jefferson, Castro, 6th are all fairly important thoroughfares and should not be tagged as highway=residential. It also looks like you merged a number of segments together for some reason, which messed... |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 06:44 | emeryradio ♦2 | Ok the merging part is already a problem that does need to be rolled back. Clay and Jefferson priorities were changed because while they are locally important roads, they do not serve a purpose beyond the local area and are only minorly arterial within the downtown area. For example, Market, Gro... | |
| 46348256 by emeryradio @ 2017-02-23 20:20 | 1 | 2017-02-25 06:08 | oba510 | Hi,Why did you add bike lanes to the full length of 5th Ave? Have they been added recently? You also added a three-block long turning lane on E 8th, and merged two blocks of Elmwood Ave together creating an impossible one-way dead end, both of which seem unlikely to be true. |
| 2 | 2017-02-25 06:31 | emeryradio ♦2 | Uh... that shouldn't have happened. Should I try to fix that myself or pass that on to someone else? | |
| 3 | 2017-02-25 06:36 | emeryradio ♦2 | If JOSM works for you then you can roll back my changesets (nothing will download for me regardless of how small an area I select). Sorry for the confusion here. | |
| 46144628 by andygol @ 2017-02-16 18:28 | 1 | 2017-02-17 05:51 | oba510 | Hi,When you delete and redraw buildings as you've done here you are often removing information (usually the building=* tag, but also names, amenities, and other tags). Please be more careful. Also, I see that you've merged several POIs with buildings (such as http://www.openstreetmap.o... |
| 2 | 2017-02-17 10:46 | andygol ♦488 | Hi,Thank you for your attention to a state of the map at this location. It was my fault. One of the reasons that this could cause is that the POI has address tags, which together with other tags are automatically transferred to the newly created building footprint when the house is plotted over ... | |
| 3 | 2017-02-17 11:04 | andygol ♦488 | I reverted merging POI and buildings - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46161335 | |
| 45969763 by oini @ 2017-02-10 10:33 | 1 | 2017-02-11 07:40 | oba510 | Hi. The toll plaza was already correctly mapped; there is no toll northbound and the toll booths on that side were removed a while ago (at least a couple of years). Please consult the link in your changeset comment ;) Thanks! I have reverted this changeset. |
| 2 | 2017-02-15 13:25 | oini ♦24 | Hi oba510! Thank you so much for correcting me. I was using the Bing Satellite Imagery and it showed cars entering the Toll booth from both sides. I didn't realize that the imagery is outdated and hence this mistake. Thanks again! :) | |
| 45538682 by sedit1 @ 2017-01-27 02:13 | 1 | 2017-01-30 07:15 | oba510 | Hi, openstreetmap is a map of the real world that is used by many people for a variety of purposes. Please only add things that actually exist in reality. Thanks! Your changes have been reverted. |
| 45634478 by JackOrman @ 2017-01-29 22:44 | 1 | 2017-01-30 06:44 | oba510 | Why did you delete this school? I have reverted your deletion, since it appears to still exist. |
| 45638278 by Juanitomg @ 2017-01-30 03:24 | 1 | 2017-01-30 06:33 | oba510 | Hi, why are you changing the building=* tags of almost every building you edit to building=yes? Please don't do that unless the building type is actually incorrect, since it removes valid info. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building |
| 2 | 2017-01-31 04:10 | Juanitomg ♦2 | @oba510 Thanks for letting me know about this. I will go over my past edits a fix any building= tag that seems incorrect. | |
| 45611848 by scotsirish @ 2017-01-29 06:13 | 1 | 2017-01-29 08:28 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to openstreetmap. Your house is not a park! I have reverted your changes. Please only add things that actually exist in the real world. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-30 07:34 | scotsirish ♦1 | Of course! My bad I was just playing around with the features trying to get familiar | |
| 45605804 by ToyBoxHunter @ 2017-01-28 22:25 | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:48 | oba510 | Hi, if you would like to scribble on a map you might consider printing out a copy and using a pencil. If you are trying to catch pokemon there is a large park not two blocks from this location you could visit. Thanks! I have reverted your scribbles. |
| 45605780 by ToyBoxHunter @ 2017-01-28 22:24 | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:44 | oba510 | Hi, in this edit you added yet again a park which clearly does not exist. I have reverted your changes. |
| 45605714 by ToyBoxHunter @ 2017-01-28 22:22 | 1 | 2017-01-29 06:42 | oba510 | Hi, I have removed the park you added because it does not exist. |
| 45580569 by ToyBoxHunter @ 2017-01-28 02:52 | 1 | 2017-01-28 12:04 | oba510 | Hi, you have added a bunch of stuff here which obviously doesn't exist. Openstreetmap is a map of the real world, which is used by lots of people for a variety of purposes. Please only map things which exist in the real world. Thanks! Your changes have been reverted. |
| 45553593 by boratestat1 @ 2017-01-27 10:56 | 1 | 2017-01-28 00:04 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi boratestat1, welcome to OSM. I think your edits can't be correct. Could you please name your source? Thanks. |
| 2 | 2017-01-28 10:44 | oba510 | The chances that a city in California would demolish an entire block of houses to build a park in 2016 are almost zero, and if they did, there is no way at all that they would give it such a generic name... I have reverted this changeset. Please don't add fictional stuff to openstreetmap. Tha... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-28 11:39 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | @oba510 thanks for reverting! | |
| 45543668 by AscendingC @ 2017-01-27 05:45 | 1 | 2017-01-27 11:42 | oba510 | Hi, I looked through your edits and literally every single thing you added was either fictional or otherwise incorrect. I have reverted your changes. OpenStreetMap is a representation of the real world that people use every day for a variety of purposes, not a fantasy map. Please only add things th... |
| 45540750 by Diverp @ 2017-01-27 03:42 | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:56 | oba510 | Hi, you added a bunch of randomly zig-zagging footpaths through the backyards in the middle of this block. They obviously don't exist, so I have reverted your changes. |
| 45533344 by jsancheza @ 2017-01-26 22:39 | 1 | 2017-01-27 10:08 | oba510 | Hi, you have added several parks and related facilities which do not exist. OpenStreetMap is a map of the real world, please only add real things. Thanks! I have reverted your changes. |
| 45525959 by sturm15 @ 2017-01-26 19:59 | 1 | 2017-01-27 09:30 | oba510 | Hi, dog parks can be tagged as leisure=dog_park. In general, leisure=park should only be used once, on the park outline itself; all of the things inside the park have their own more specific tags. I have fixed the tagging and adjusted the outline slightly to only include the dog runs. Thanks! |
| 45419191 by FrostyTimp @ 2017-01-24 03:09 | 1 | 2017-01-26 12:24 | oba510 | Hi, I have reverted your two recent changesets. Lowell is not a university. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for more info. You also turned a house into a pier, and dragged a crosswalk several blocks over to another street (along with the road it was connected to)... |
| 45488007 by DannyAiquipa @ 2017-01-25 19:43 | 1 | 2017-01-26 09:21 | oba510 | Did you mean to remove the name when you deleted and re-drew this building? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348756169 |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 15:06 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Hi, Thanks for your comment , sorry for my mistake, I have fixed my changeset .http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45514015 | |
| 45142175 by calfarome @ 2017-01-13 18:32 | 1 | 2017-01-19 11:14 | oba510 | Hi, did you notice that you've been re-adding (along with other Mapbox employees) old streets that have previously been deleted from the Dublin Crossing construction site? Are you sure they still exist? |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:15 | calfarome ♦78 | Hi Oba510,Thank you for letting me know about this issue. These streets were added on the basis of Tiger data. However, the JOSM filter was on and I failed to notice the `landuse=construction` tag areas, since they were hidden. From now on, I will make sure to avoid adding any data in the under co... | |
| 45273782 by yurasi @ 2017-01-18 16:16 | 1 | 2017-01-19 10:55 | oba510 | I noticed that you've been adding roads to the national labs here. Did you look at the aerial imagery or the tagging of the other roads that they connect to? There are several different kinds of barriers all over this road and others, and access is very restricted. Please make sure to at lea... |
| 2 | 2017-01-19 14:48 | yurasi ♦87 | Hi Oba510,Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I hadn't realised about restricted access to the roads. I have added the appropriate access tags. Apologies for this slight on my part and thanks again. | |
| 45253752 by karitotp @ 2017-01-17 20:34 | 1 | 2017-01-19 10:02 | oba510 | Hi, the way you added here is actually a narrow mid-block alley, not a typical residential road. Such roads should generally be tagged as highway=service, service=alley. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:53 | karitotp ♦123 | Hi again, oba510!Thank you for bringing this to my notice and pointing out the apt way of labelling of this road. I have fixed the tag in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45298416). Thanks again.Best, | |
| 45273675 by ridixcr @ 2017-01-18 16:12 | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:44 | oba510 | Hi, you have added a parking aisle in a small parking lot, but tagged it as highway=residential. Parking aisles should be tagged as highway=service, service=parking_aisle. Thanks! |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 17:14 | ridixcr ♦87 | Hi again Oba510,Thanks again for letting me know about this and also clarifying what tags are apt. The changes have been done accordingly. They can be found in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299739. | |
| 45274871 by DannyAiquipa @ 2017-01-18 16:53 | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:19 | oba510 | Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential. In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles) |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 15:18 | DannyAiquipa ♦100 | Hey there!Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways. Thanks again! | |
| 45275135 by RichRico @ 2017-01-18 17:02 | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:16 | oba510 | This appears to be a private driveway serving a couple of houses, not a residential road. Are you sure the tagging is correct? |
| 45278290 by ridixcr @ 2017-01-18 18:59 | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:12 | oba510 | Are you sure these service roads you added open to the public? They're on a military base and you can see a gate and concrete barriers visible in the bing aerial. |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 17:15 | ridixcr ♦87 | Hi Oba510,Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I have reverted my changes and the changes can be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299888. I will be more careful with my edits. Thanks again. | |
| 45280231 by karitotp @ 2017-01-18 20:03 | 1 | 2017-01-19 09:06 | oba510 | Hi, why did you extend San Jose Avenue through a building and construction site? |
| 2 | 2017-01-20 22:51 | karitotp ♦123 | Thank you for the feedback. As the selective filters were on, I didn't spot this building under construction. Reverting this changeset to remove the road added through the building. Thanks again | |
| 44993393 by osmcrc @ 2017-01-08 04:21 | 1 | 2017-01-08 06:24 | oba510 | Hi, you deleted and moved a bunch of speed humps in this changeset. Was that your intention? (In the iD editor they look like tiny circles with a dot in the middle) |
| 2 | 2017-01-08 06:37 | osmcrc ♦1 | Oops, I didn't notice they weren't normal street nodes but I'll fix them. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-08 07:16 | osmcrc ♦1 | Okay I think I fixed them all and added many that weren't there before in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44994685 | |
| 44852838 by Kenji Yamada @ 2017-01-02 18:59 | 1 | 2017-01-03 02:34 | oba510 | HI, did you intend to delete the building here? |
| 2 | 2017-01-03 03:41 | Kenji Yamada ♦1 | Oops, no. I was trying to switch from editing the building to adding a point. | |
| 3 | 2017-01-04 11:33 | oba510 | Thanks. I've un-deleted the building. | |
| 44883333 by jacklyn1 @ 2017-01-03 21:28 | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:26 | oba510 | Hi, welcome to OSM! I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but you accidentally moved a bus stop from Market St to the middle of the Federal Reserve. I have moved it back to it's real location. |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 18:12 | jacklyn1 ♦2 | Sorry about that! Yesterday was my first time using OSM, not sure how that happened but thank you for moving it back! | |
| 44869998 by poornibadrinath @ 2017-01-03 12:28 | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:21 | oba510 | Hi, what is your source for these traffic signals? There are stop signs painted on the road in the bing aerial imagery. |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 11:38 | poornibadrinath ♦176 | Hi, Thanks for bringing this to my notice. A few of them were wrongly added by me. I was sorting that out. Will check the ones that were added by mistake and remove it. | |
| 44868800 by poornibadrinath @ 2017-01-03 11:40 | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:17 | oba510 | Hi, what is your source for the traffic signals here? This intersection has stop signs visible in bing aerial imagery. |
| 44868739 by poornibadrinath @ 2017-01-03 11:38 | 1 | 2017-01-04 11:08 | oba510 | Hi, are you sure that there are traffic signals at this intersection? There are "stop" signs painted at all the incoming streets. |
| 44880968 by jacklyn1 @ 2017-01-03 20:01 | 1 | 2017-01-04 10:05 | oba510 | This block of Eureka was one-way southbound a couple of months ago. Has it changed? |
| 2 | 2017-01-04 18:12 | jacklyn1 ♦2 | Ah, I just checked again, I missed it based on the zoom with Google Maps, the part above Market St is still a one way. | |
| 42790526 by clarceneaux @ 2016-10-11 01:39 | 1 | 2016-10-11 05:25 | oba510 | It looks like, over multiple changesets, you've deleted several streets and at least one path in this area that are clearly visible in Bing/USGS imagery. Was that intentional? |
| 39292150 by headwatersolver @ 2016-05-13 13:43 | 1 | 2016-05-15 05:44 | oba510 | HI, it looks like you were trying to add bike lanes to Harrison Street. I deleted the cycleways you added (which implies that there are physically separate bike paths or cycle tracks), since the bike lanes were already correctly tagged on Harrison Street.Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org... |
| 26893244 by takluyver @ 2014-11-19 19:02 | 1 | 2014-11-19 22:44 | oba510 | Are you sure this church has been demolished? The only approved building permit listed by the city is for a re-roofing, and a zoning approval for a remodel. |
| 2 | 2014-11-19 22:56 | takluyver ♦1 | Found the documentation: http://www.cityofberkeley.info/uploadedFiles/Planning_and_Development/Level_3_-_PHN/web_Carleton%201601_UP_2014-06-19.pdf I pass it on my way to work. It's not demolished yet, but they are working on it. It's definitely out of commission as a church, and the pl... |