GOwin have been discussed with 57 replies of this contributorGOwin have been discussed with 57 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 149973199 by GOwin @ 2024-04-14 00:03 | 1 | 2025-07-02 13:25 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,627 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11815626675/history would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dgate - right? |
| 2 | 2025-07-02 23:54 | GOwin | Yeah, thanks! | |
| 47828532 by GOwin @ 2017-04-16 02:22 | 1 | 2025-02-12 04:50 | Totor ♦62 | Hi Gowin,Is this a historical name ?see note:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/843202 |
| 2 | 2025-02-12 04:55 | GOwin | I suspect it's just somebody trying to map their own house. | |
| 3 | 2025-02-12 05:16 | Totor ♦62 | OK, I'll remove, saw that the user with same name made it as a castle, you just edited the shape :-D | |
| 162378316 by GOwin @ 2025-02-11 07:10 | 1 | 2025-02-12 04:35 | Totor ♦62 | Hi Gowin,Your tag is correct, but I usually use shop=agrarianIt is simpler and seems more commonly used:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=agrarianAlso mentioned in the trade tag page:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3DtradeSomeone also suggested shop=animal_feed. Th... |
| 152785376 by GOwin @ 2024-06-17 05:26 | 1 | 2024-07-29 12:14 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Hi GOwin, the wikimedia commons file linked here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11980858326does not exist on Wikimedia Commons. Maybe there's a typo somewhere in the file name? Could you take a look?thanks and good mapping! |
| 2 | 2024-07-29 12:17 | ivanbranco ♦2,695 | Oh nevermind, I think I found the reason here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?page=File%3A%22Bike_Parade%22_mural_at_Atria_Park_District%2C_Mandurriao%2C_Iloilo_City.jpg&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslistThe file was deleted with the following reason: "Copyright violation: N... | |
| 136438694 by GOwin @ 2023-05-23 05:43 | 1 | 2024-06-30 14:49 | JoshuaOrais ♦3 | Removed "Vasquez Compound" as road name as it is the name of the compound area. Placed the name in the gate instead |
| 150735338 by GOwin @ 2024-05-01 06:30 | 1 | 2024-05-01 11:10 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | There is already a FamilyMart there. I have removed the duplicated one --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735338 |
| 2 | 2024-05-02 00:37 | GOwin | https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735338 🙏 | |
| 150519631 by GOwin @ 2024-04-26 03:57 | 1 | 2024-04-27 03:05 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | 邱外科醫院 院址：高雄市苓雅區成功一路137號 總機：(07)336-4131https://www.chiuhospital.com.tw/ |
| 150525517 by GOwin @ 2024-04-26 07:57 | 1 | 2024-04-26 11:47 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | 郵政博物館高雄館https://museum.post.gov.tw/post/Postal_Museum/museum_en/index.jsp?ID=1648774404373 |
| 2 | 2024-04-26 11:56 | GOwin | Thank you for that! It is a small, but very informative museum. And the staff was friendly and helpful. :)I used to collect stamps when I was a kid. ;) | |
| 122887734 by GOwin @ 2022-06-27 04:38 | 1 | 2024-03-10 12:22 | os-emmer ♦337 | Hi GOwin,you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851549880https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaste... |
| 2 | 2024-03-10 23:56 | GOwin | Yes. | |
| 3 | 2024-03-11 16:39 | os-emmer ♦337 | Thanks a lot for your help. | |
| 148033219 by GOwin @ 2024-02-29 00:55 | 1 | 2024-02-29 01:43 | CactiStaccingCrane ♦60 | thank you so much! |
| 2 | 2024-02-29 03:39 | GOwin | Good luck with the initiative!Thankfully, there's Mapillary imagery available. I checked a few POIs in the area, and added fixmes. The names are descriptive, rather than the actual shop name -- but I didn't add them because I don't have the proper diacritics for the characters. | |
| 124122163 by GOwin @ 2022-07-27 06:08 | 1 | 2024-02-20 10:30 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,627 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29020459/history has 2=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand? |
| 133234751 by GOwin @ 2023-03-03 03:47 | 1 | 2024-01-07 21:21 | osmuser63783 ♦62 | Hi I am reviewing objects tagged amenity=lounge. The tag is mostly used for airport lounges and similar objects. Is it the best fitting tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10705735527 or is there maybe a better one? :-) |
| 2 | 2024-01-08 00:09 | GOwin | I did have some doubts about that tag, but its wiki page describe it for **or elsewhere**: https://osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3DloungeMore importantly, the original proposal describes it as "a comfortable waiting/recreational area" for customers and **not limited to airports**, which doe... | |
| 3 | 2024-01-08 19:28 | osmuser63783 ♦62 | Thanks! I wrote that page yesterday and it could certainly be improved. I also think if it's similar to an airport lounge it's fine. I just saw some objects where the mapper probably meant lounger or hookah_lounge or it was just a bar that had lounge in the name, so I thought it was a goo... | |
| 4 | 2024-01-09 01:08 | GOwin | Ah, thanks for adding the wiki then. I definitely mapped these before you created the page. :DI updated the wiki page to reflect the concepts of the original proposal page, because it was looking too much like it's just an "airport lounge" when that wasn't the intent. | |
| 5 | 2024-01-09 18:26 | osmuser63783 ♦62 | Thanks! That looks great. | |
| 144039925 by GOwin @ 2023-11-15 08:14 | 1 | 2023-11-16 16:16 | Anim Mouse ♦10 | Hello, the "Doña Helen Avenue" you edited is a road that is shared by the two subdivisions named Doña Helen Subdivision and North Matrix Ville I that forms a boundary between them. On the Doña side, it is named "Doña Helen Avenue" while on the Matrix s... |
| 2 | 2023-11-17 05:36 | GOwin | Hello @Anim Mouse.Thank you for checking this out. I noticed that tags already had name:left and name:right, but remembered the wiki convention for this incorrectly. The former street name has been restored. | |
| 3 | 2023-11-17 07:30 | Anim Mouse ♦10 | Thanks! | |
| 137397598 by GOwin @ 2023-06-16 05:48 | 1 | 2023-07-05 22:29 | HikeAndMap ♦104 | Same question - why is it invalid? There's a road sign that says no right turn.So I added it to the map - this restriction - because that's what the sign says.As with the other comment - I can see that it's unnecessary but to claim a legal sign by the LGU of Baguio to be "... |
| 2 | 2023-07-05 23:07 | GOwin | Let's agree to calling it "unnecessary", for the routers then. Maybe, just map the signage then? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137397598 | |
| 3 | 2023-07-06 05:52 | HikeAndMap ♦104 | yes I'm totally fine with just adding the traffic sign..I was aware we can skip the relationship..But I figured:"well it doesn't hurt if I add it "but if it's unnecessary we skip it I'm good with that.. now I know :)at least it keeps the database minimal... | |
| 137397537 by GOwin @ 2023-06-16 05:45 | 1 | 2023-07-05 22:27 | HikeAndMap ♦104 | Why is that turn restriction "invalid?"There's a sign at the road for no left turn - that's why I added the restriction.I can accept the "unnecessary" turn restriction but it's definitely and most certainly not invalid. --- ... |
| 2 | 2023-07-05 22:58 | GOwin | Right. I suppose that's a better term. You can map the signage separately then. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137397537 | |
| 137397353 by GOwin @ 2023-06-16 05:40 | 1 | 2023-07-05 22:20 | HikeAndMap ♦104 | I keep forgetting the en: in front of the wiki values *sighs* --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137397353 |
| 136147656 by GOwin @ 2023-05-16 02:14 | 1 | 2023-05-16 10:43 | DP24PH ♦418 | Wait... You may tag with "place=city_block" for the residential blocks.DP24 |
| 51633647 by GOwin @ 2017-09-01 06:10 | 1 | 2023-05-14 09:42 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217435399addr:complete : it seems it's addr:fullRegards,Marc |
| 134557705 by GOwin @ 2023-04-06 01:01 | 1 | 2023-04-07 17:32 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please have a look on the religion value. Did you mean religion=christian? |
| 2 | 2023-04-07 22:41 | GOwin | Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up | |
| 126567780 by GOwin @ 2022-09-24 02:40 | 1 | 2022-09-25 14:56 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please have alook on http://www.osm.org/way/168525284? What is the meaning of the tag D. Muñoz Street = Pisces Street ? |
| 2 | 2022-09-26 06:14 | GOwin | Good catch! It's been fixed. Thanks. | |
| 125204892 by GOwin @ 2022-08-22 02:34 | 1 | 2022-08-23 12:39 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi!Same question as for the two other nodes, the mapillary value seems to be wrong. Please check!Kai |
| 2 | 2022-08-24 00:44 | GOwin | Fixed! Thanks for the heads-up. | |
| 122487918 by GOwin @ 2022-06-17 03:45 | 1 | 2022-08-23 12:33 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi!You entered a value into the mapillary key ("both") that doesn't seem to make sense in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9824061746 as it's not a valid mapillary ID.Please check if you wanted to enter somethin else there.Thank you!Kai |
| 2 | 2022-08-24 00:14 | GOwin | Thanks for the heads-up! It's been fixed now.You're right, it doesn' t make sense on that key because I meant to map it for something else key:sidewalk. | |
| 122312787 by GOwin @ 2022-06-13 08:24 | 1 | 2022-08-23 12:33 | kmpoppe ♦97 | Hi!You entered a value into the mapillary key ("no") that doesn't seem to make sense in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8658309502 as it's not a valid mapillary ID.Please check if you wanted to enter somethin else there.Thank you!Kai |
| 2 | 2022-08-23 22:26 | GOwin | Thank you for catching this oversight. The mapillary id has been fixed now. | |
| 98809499 by GOwin @ 2021-02-06 11:42 | 1 | 2022-08-15 03:52 | Totor ♦62 | Hi GOwin,The bike lanes markings on the road have been mostly erased now on AS Fortuna (2022-08-15) , and cars are not keeping the "invisible" lane free anymore.The signboards indicating the Bike Lane are still there, but have been turned parallel to the road and are nearly invisible.\... |
| 2 | 2022-08-15 04:40 | GOwin | Hello Totor. I'm sorry to hear about this unfortunate change in the local bike infrastructure.If there are sharrow markings on the road, then cycleway=shared_lane is appropriate.Otherwisee, a bicycle=yes on the highway element is probably more appropriate. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-17 04:37 | Totor ♦62 | Hi GOwin,Thanks for the feed-back.I'll just leave the shared for the moment.(originally the bike lanes were actually exclusive bordered by a continuous line)I also want to clarify that the markings on the road have been erased by wear and not because of a decision to remove the bike lan... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-17 05:11 | GOwin | Let us hope for that, Totor. 🤞I'm curious, do you bike, or maybe use a personal mobility device? | |
| 102083394 by GOwin @ 2021-04-01 00:11 | 1 | 2022-07-01 23:34 | mikkolukas Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | 2022-07-02 00:03 | GOwin | I definitely agree. Your comment is noted!If you're keen to meet fellow OSM mappers in the Philippines, check out our channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH | |
| 121872596 by GOwin @ 2022-06-03 01:42 | 1 | 2022-06-18 16:48 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Please check this way, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894590023 |
| 2 | 2022-06-19 00:00 | GOwin | Thanks for heads-up! | |
| 120403069 by GOwin @ 2022-05-01 00:21 | 1 | 2022-05-02 05:39 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | Good afternoon Erwin,The locally spoken languages in Tagakpan are Bisaya and Klata. Anyone conversing in either of them uses the term Barangay Hall. This is also the name that is written on the facade of the building. Adding additional non-local translations seems fine, but please don't... |
| 2 | 2022-05-02 06:06 | GOwin | Thank you for the reminder, and updating the feature.Do remember the Filipino and English are two of the official languages in the country, so I don't see any reason why the English version should have precedence over the Filipino name. Of course, the best value for name=* is whatever name... | |
| 3 | 2022-05-02 08:32 | Timmy_Tesseract ♦150 | I agree that English should not have any default precedence. It is my impression that there is almost always a name that is more predominantly used than the other, but I like the idea to use the language with the most native speakers in a given area for the primary name tag if an object truly has e... | |
| 119059188 by GOwin @ 2022-03-29 09:21 | 1 | 2022-03-29 12:23 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9620446050only a platform which is possibly used for fishing is visible. I've found something which is possibly a tower at10.1628518, 124.1605926(white object casting a shadow)Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | 2022-03-29 23:18 | GOwin | Thank you! It indeed looks like a match.I was relying on a secondary description that said lighthouse was "on a sea platform" of some kind, but this seems to be an accurate match. | |
| 3 | 2022-03-30 00:32 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | For one on a sea platform, there is a possible match at10.1546217, 124.1940983(at the center of an island at the end of a large pier); is however on Bohol side. no lighthouse listed (unless its elsewhere on the MR map..); otherwise, this could behttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9620485882/hi... | |
| 4 | 2022-03-30 01:12 | GOwin | Thanks! I checked those coordinates, but they look doubtful, and doesn't appear to be a sea platform, though it looks like a small jetty.The latter is a different lighthouse altogether.Hey, if you're keen on mapping lighthouses, too, extra 👀 and more 👐 are welcome: https://... | |
| 118968858 by GOwin @ 2022-03-27 05:40 | 1 | 2022-03-28 12:46 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9610261496. What is the meaning of /youtu.be/zf1f9oOGO4A?t = 180? |
| 2 | 2022-03-28 23:44 | GOwin | Looks like a stray paste operation. Thanks for catching. | |
| 117546303 by GOwin @ 2022-02-18 05:11 | 1 | 2022-03-05 19:41 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Why did you use note:2022 instead note? Should this note delete in year 2023? |
| 2 | 2022-03-06 00:15 | GOwin | The year in the namespace is meant to indicate when a note was made: e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/930617110 | |
| 3 | 2022-03-06 11:49 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | I think it is a very bad idea to add a timestamp to a relevant key that is specially marked in all editors as a note for editing. If necessary, the creation date can be included in the text. The example mentioned is also more a case for the description key. | |
| 4 | 2022-03-06 23:20 | GOwin | Thanks! Your opinion is noted. | |
| 116764072 by GOwin @ 2022-01-30 00:50 | 1 | 2022-01-30 14:25 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please have a llok on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289077548? What is the correct address? You have only listed three streets that enclose the area covered by the building. Please correct at least your spelling mistake (see addr2:street:). |
| 2 | 2022-01-31 03:14 | GOwin | Thank you for taking the time to check this out.We don't have any expectations about address completeness in OSM, although many consider the street name as the minimum. Unfortunately, that's the only information on-hand, so I'd rather add them, than lose them.addr2:street or a... | |
| 115353686 by GOwin @ 2021-12-25 08:27 | 1 | 2021-12-26 16:56 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please check my correction of this change set , see https://www.osm.org/changeset/115393061 |
| 113645386 by GOwin @ 2021-11-11 10:32 | 1 | 2021-12-21 17:42 | danieldegroot2 ♦673 | Hey GOwin,It is possible the following area is a cemetery.They're usually a short distance away from a residential area and not attached to farmland etc.. Graves(or memorials) may be misinterpreted as small, undefined buildings or (industrial) activities. Actual buildings can also be pres... |
| 2 | 2021-12-22 00:19 | GOwin | I agree. Thanks for the feedback. | |
| 114765755 by GOwin @ 2021-12-10 02:34 | 1 | 2021-12-14 09:37 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5360022060/history! The value 1 for the key admin_level means a political object larger than a state (admin_level=2). Please correct this value! |
| 2 | 2021-12-15 01:26 | GOwin | Thanks for catching this typo! 👍 | |
| 77298584 by GOwin @ 2019-11-20 03:14 | 1 | 2021-11-26 08:47 | seav ♦163 | GOwin, you converted MC Home Depot from a building to a landuse and added parking lanes. I am quite sure that this is a rooftop parking area, and the whole polygon 39723791 is still a building. |
| 2 | 2021-11-26 08:51 | seav ♦163 | Same with polygon 27788686 for S&R | |
| 3 | 2021-11-27 00:52 | GOwin | Thanks for catching this, @seav. Feature confirmed with Mapillary imagery. | |
| 108226332 by GOwin @ 2021-07-19 07:08 | 1 | 2021-10-31 10:15 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Please check this node, it got a strange 'name:' tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8932193614 |
| 2 | 2021-11-01 00:38 | GOwin | Thank you for catching this. It's been fixed. | |
| 109244786 by GOwin @ 2021-08-06 08:38 | 1 | 2021-08-18 02:54 | DP24PH ♦418 | ERRATUM on comment: [Tiaong, QUE] |
| 107130566 by GOwin @ 2021-06-29 07:53 | 1 | 2021-06-30 06:01 | rthik007 ♦273 | Hi GOwin,I have changed the classification of roads based on the surrounding area way 667815176way 667815177way 669183470way 669183471way 667799810way 668930954way 668930952way 48734804Kindly check withhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107183928.Thank you. ... |
| 106377952 by GOwin @ 2021-06-15 06:58 | 1 | 2021-06-16 07:43 | ravali_78 ♦282 | Hi GOwin,I have fixed incorrect classification.Kindly check with way 337354099,way 334852825,way 334852822,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106446169.Thank you. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106377952... |
| 106242075 by GOwin @ 2021-06-12 06:52 | 1 | 2021-06-14 20:38 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! Please notice isced_level isn't equal admin_level |
| 2 | 2021-06-14 23:58 | GOwin | Actually, it's "isced:level" and not "isced_level", and and yes, we know how it's not the same as admin_level.If you're keen to know how we use isced:level in the OSMaPaaralan project, please refer to this wiki page: https://osm.org/wiki/Philippines/OSMaPaarala... | |
| 103454229 by GOwin @ 2021-04-23 06:07 | 1 | 2021-05-18 11:48 | seav ♦163 | Question: Do you hide non-road features or only download roads? For example: when you split Loyola Street to add road-related tags in this changeset, you inadvertently broke two boundary relations. |
| 2 | 2021-05-19 23:43 | GOwin | The issue should've been caught by the JOSM validator, whether or not I filter the data. I wonder why that was missed.I'll look into this issue, and check those boundaries again. Thanks for the heads-up! | |
| 104754580 by GOwin @ 2021-05-16 05:25 | 1 | 2021-05-17 02:05 | DP24PH ♦418 | ADDENDUM: [Quezon City, NCR, and Naic, Cavite] Add Convenience, Fuel, Fire hydrant; Edit Fast food. |
| 99150102 by GOwin @ 2021-02-12 06:02 | 1 | 2021-05-08 15:56 | seav ♦163 | Tip: When splitting a closed coastline that also has a place=island/islet tag, don't forget to create a multipolygon relation for the island and transfer the island-related tags from the split coastline ways to the relation.See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12688075 |
| 2 | 2021-05-08 23:46 | GOwin | Thanks for catching it ! It seems that I missed JOSM's validation warning for that. | |
| 103021816 by GOwin @ 2021-04-16 00:57 | 1 | 2021-04-21 12:37 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Reminder: please fix the spelling of your presets. It's "message", not "messsage". |
| 2 | 2021-04-21 14:34 | GOwin | Thank you for the reminder. I know I already fixed this after the first comment from you, but apparently there's a bug in the plugin I use that retains and restores earlier versions. | |
| 102472270 by GOwin @ 2021-04-07 10:14 | 1 | 2021-04-11 10:41 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Please watch out for the correct spelling. I fixed many "messsage" tags in the past days/weeks. |
| 2 | 2021-04-11 11:30 | GOwin | Thank you for helping me fix what I missed. | |
| 101893545 by GOwin @ 2021-03-29 00:40 | 1 | 2021-04-04 09:45 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Please watch out for the auto-completion in the editor - I fixed several 'messsage' instead of 'message' keys. |
| 92733351 by GOwin @ 2020-10-20 01:38 | 1 | 2021-04-02 06:49 | ianlopez1115 ♦365 | More appropriate tags were used for most items modified in this changeset since they aren't exactly memorials but artworks commissioned by the local parish. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92733351 ... |
| 2 | 2021-04-02 09:08 | GOwin | Thank you for elaborating, @ianlopez1115. 👌 | |
| 71747552 by GOwin @ 2019-06-30 03:44 | 1 | 2021-02-27 23:46 | seav ♦163 | This changeset turned a long waterway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27663262) into a culvert. Probably around 98% of this waterway is not actually covered or underground. |
| 2 | 2021-02-28 00:05 | GOwin | I must've missed a split along the way. Will re-check. Thanks! | |
| 98219661 by GOwin @ 2021-01-27 10:05 | 1 | 2021-02-18 21:51 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Just noticed this lately, this edit removed a lot of street name suffixes I added (while keeping it on the others). I think we should move toward using full street names (official street name signs might drop them, but they are included in the name used in addresses) |
| 2 | 2021-02-18 23:58 | GOwin | Yes, they were removed. 1. That's the accepted convention. 2. The street signs from the Mapillary imagery doesn't indicate "street" as a suffix. | |
| 3 | 2021-02-19 01:19 | seav ♦163 | Should this be discussed with the wider community? Personally I prefer leaving out any "Street" suffixes. And consumers can use heuristics to assume that any road name without a street-like suffix like "Avenue" or "Boulevard" to have "Street" as the implied su... | |
| 4 | 2021-02-19 01:41 | GOwin | Like I mentioned earlier, the names I changed was based on what's on the street signs in the area. As is visible in the Mapillary imagery.My practice is, if I find any "St." in street names, I spell them out. If I have information or imagery that shows that they're not on str... | |
| 5 | 2021-02-19 03:12 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | This has been discussed back in 2020 on talk-ph, but the talk to officially adopt use of full street names regardless of what official signs say (with possible exceptions, such as EDSA, STAR Tollway) seems to have stalled. I think we shouldn't set OSM Philippines apart in terms of road naming c... | |
| 6 | 2021-02-19 03:19 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | In addition, having address using the common short names used in common speech that commonly drops stuff like suffixes (for brevity's sake) as against those posted in road or business signage, posters/ads, calling cards, documents, etc., looks weird, to be frank, except for the possible excepti... | |
| 59357921 by GOwin @ 2018-05-29 06:30 | 1 | 2021-02-11 07:04 | ruthikdhoni ♦11 | Hi Gowin I hope you are doing goodway 591728788 for this you have give amenity I think this not correct that way should get any classification based on the aerial imagery . |
| 2 | 2021-02-11 07:53 | GOwin | You're right, thank you for catching this. Obviously, I tagged this by mistake.I'll fix it now. | |
| 96357343 by GOwin @ 2020-12-24 04:35 | 1 | 2020-12-25 17:06 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | Hello! What is the meaning of the key covid19:phl:trace_ref |
| 2 | 2020-12-27 02:42 | GOwin | It's meant to be a temporary tag to keep the info the original contributor used. Originally they were using addr:housenumber to make it render, which is not appropriate | |
| 3 | 2020-12-27 08:54 | user_5359 ♦19,362 | I ask because covid19 is usually at the end of the key name. But if this key disappears at the end of the edit, renaming it again does not make sense. | |
| 85051464 by GOwin @ 2020-05-12 01:09 | 1 | 2020-11-10 09:16 | DP24PH ♦418 | It seems that the Dasmarinas East National High School is now Dasmarinas East Integrated High School (based on DepED Dasmarinas source). Official name will be validated thru ground survey once it is permitted by the IATF-MEID. |
| 86705894 by GOwin @ 2020-06-16 07:45 | 1 | 2020-10-01 00:00 | seav ♦163 | This changeset duplicated an amenity=school, several school buildings, and a road. I wonder what happened? Unsaved JOSM changes + internet problems? |
| 2 | 2020-10-01 00:44 | GOwin | Thank you for fixing. | |
| 83907899 by GOwin @ 2020-04-22 02:53 | 1 | 2020-04-22 14:36 | Scubababe ♦1 | Dive point dive center is still listed, its closed |
| 2 | 2020-04-23 01:09 | GOwin | Are you checking that from OpenStreetMap? The status has been changed in OpenStreetMap, but other apps downstream could be delayed with updating their databases. | |
| 3 | 2020-04-23 19:10 | Scubababe ♦1 | I am looking on maps.me Thank you for your help! | |
| 4 | 2020-04-23 22:53 | GOwin | If you're interested in offline mapping app that uses OpenStreetMap that updates more frequently, try OsmAnd.Personally, I recommend the community-maintained version in F-Droid.org.Thank you for your feedback. | |
| 5 | 2020-04-24 11:43 | Scubababe ♦1 | Well, I was actually requested by my employer to have it removed from maps.me bc the location closed. I could not edit it on maps.me and the instructions told me to manage it on OSM and it would update on maps.me shortly after. Have I gone about this incorrectly? | |
| 6 | 2020-04-25 00:42 | GOwin | The data that your app uses comes from OpenStreetMap, and the said establishment has been deleted from the database.For now, tell your employer to check OpenStreetMap, or use OsmAnd. There's nothing you can do with maps.me until their next update.In the future, you can edit and update t... | |
| 77447718 by GOwin @ 2019-11-22 22:53 | 1 | 2019-11-24 05:25 | ianlopez1115 ♦365 | The place is used as a chapel where wakes are held, amenity=mortuary may not be the right tag for this feature. |
| 70974109 by GOwin @ 2019-06-06 04:09 | 1 | 2019-06-07 02:17 | GOwin | Barangay townhall moved to next block. Earlier location on the map was incorrect, as can be seem from Mapillary imagery. |
| 70942002 by GOwin @ 2019-06-05 01:38 | 1 | 2019-06-05 18:20 | seav ♦163 | (Note: When the multipolygon relation was created, the cemetery-related tags remained on one of the outer ways. I've fixed this.) |
| 2 | 2019-06-05 22:19 | GOwin | Thanks @seav! | |
| 67840296 by GOwin @ 2019-03-06 11:31 | 1 | 2019-03-12 15:22 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi, what does 'unsupervised=no' mean? Did you want to write 'crossing=supervised'https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6320609811 |
| 2 | 2019-03-12 22:08 | GOwin | Good catch! Thanks. It a typo and should've been `supervised=no`, and it's been fixed | |
| 63997414 by GOwin @ 2018-10-30 03:13 | 1 | 2019-02-18 15:09 | SK53 ♦864 | Are you sure this is a Seventh Day Adventist Church? Usually Kingdom Hall signifies Jehovahs Witnesses. |
| 22501326 by GOwin @ 2014-05-23 09:22 | 1 | 2019-01-23 04:49 | seav ♦163 | @GOwin, I see that this changeset is over 4 years old, but is there any reason why you deleted node 945582522 which is the place=suburb node for Betis, Guagua? Betis is a significant district of Guagua anchored by Betis Church, a designated National Cultural Treasure. Note that Betis is not a barang... |
| 2 | 2019-01-23 05:55 | GOwin | I don't recall doing so. It may have been deleted by accident.Thanks for catching it. Node is restored now. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66558773 | |
| 3 | 2019-01-23 06:20 | seav ♦163 | Great! Thanks! | |
| 58220989 by GOwin @ 2018-04-19 03:48 | 1 | 2018-11-06 07:10 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi! Please don't use the tag highway=traffic_calming. I've removed it here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64220325The tag traffic_calming=island is normally only used on nodes. I think you may use landuse=grass for these two. Or maybe remove them because of the natural=tree_row ... |
| 63940069 by GOwin @ 2018-10-28 01:18 | 1 | 2018-10-28 10:13 | DP24PH ♦418 | Thank you for validating these information, @GOwin. Hopefully, more women and children will be protected by these temporary shelters. |
| 61675064 by GOwin @ 2018-08-15 04:34 | 1 | 2018-08-22 19:46 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Are you sure about this edit? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5507447193 just looks like a spam node added by a now-deleted user. Are you sure you meant to edit it? |
| 2 | 2018-08-22 19:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Likewise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5479219881 | |
| 3 | 2018-08-22 19:48 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Likewise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5492964485 | |
| 61020725 by GOwin @ 2018-07-24 12:08 | 1 | 2018-08-22 19:48 | SomeoneElse ♦13,362 | Are you sure about this edit? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5479289032 just looks like a spam node added by a now-deleted user. Are you sure you meant to edit it? |
| 57991152 by GOwin @ 2018-04-11 04:11 | 1 | 2018-04-20 21:28 | seav ♦163 | OK. This node's position now looks really weird:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/734948145What imagery offset did you use for Bing? |
| 2 | 2018-04-21 09:35 | GOwin | I'm using the refreshed Bing imagery here, and the odd angle was due to a segment I missed. It's been fixed. Thanks for the catch. | |
| 58100616 by GOwin @ 2018-04-15 01:18 | 1 | 2018-04-15 03:57 | TagaSanPedroAko ♦524 | Molino Road and Bacoor Boulevards are very-high importance tertiary national roads (these are major thoroughfares of the city), and why would you downgrade them to secondary? Secondary classification is rather best for the minor ones (city roads, low-importance tertiary national roads). |
| 2 | 2018-04-15 06:04 | GOwin | Hi @TagaSanPedroAko.I agree with you about the importance of this road, hence DPWH's "national tertiary" designation, which makes it an important local road.However, I disagree that a "secondary" OSM tag makes this a "minor" road, but that's how the ... | |
| 57594016 by GOwin @ 2018-03-28 09:36 | 1 | 2018-03-28 09:38 | GOwin | Changeset comment error. This is a fix of this papercut fix ticket: https://git.io/vHOPC |
| 55158682 by GOwin @ 2018-01-04 13:56 | 1 | 2018-01-06 14:50 | mueschel ♦6,565 | Hi,could you check these ways?Tags like these look like a mistake:normalized_volume=0.80101144priority =0.93589884Jan |
| 2 | 2018-01-06 16:46 | GOwin | Indeed! Thanks for minding. | |
| 54448804 by GOwin @ 2017-12-08 04:19 | 1 | 2017-12-08 04:20 | GOwin | Note: trying out OSM Streak, https://github.com/Zverik/osmstreak |
| 54234667 by GOwin @ 2017-12-01 12:50 | 1 | 2017-12-02 03:32 | Supaplex ♦10,426 | What is this one?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5257603925 |
| 2 | 2017-12-02 03:46 | GOwin | A failed experiment. I thought it didn't publish the edit. I'll revert, thank you for the heads-up. | |
| 3 | 2017-12-02 03:48 | GOwin | I specifically set it up not to add any data to OSM. I'll look into it further. | |
| 53497821 by GOwin @ 2017-11-04 08:27 | 1 | 2017-11-04 14:24 | GOwin | Area covered by this changeset is all of PH, and not just Pasig, although that's where I started the clean-up effort. |
| 51923662 by GOwin @ 2017-09-11 00:26 | 1 | 2017-09-11 15:23 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello GOwin. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523233221 what's the meaning of `added=a`, `but=areas`, `few=buildings,`, `has=been`? #newkey |
| 2 | 2017-09-12 01:02 | GOwin | Good catch! Definitely not tags, but it seems that I've inadvertently posted the task comment into the object. I'm revising it now. Thanks! | |
| 43480591 by GOwin @ 2016-11-08 07:29 | 1 | 2016-11-08 07:51 | GOwin | changeset revert after user SJDRRMO moved the building to the sea for "testing". see object history. |
| 40939830 by GOwin @ 2016-07-22 01:38 | 1 | 2016-07-22 01:38 | GOwin | These "viewpoints" are redundant. The street names are already on the map. |
| 39654955 by GOwin @ 2016-05-30 04:18 | 1 | 2016-06-03 10:13 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hello there!Is the _stn=* Key required, as it does not really fit into the OSM tagging scheme? If yes, you could use ref=* for example. If no, it could be deleted...All the best! |
| 2 | 2016-06-04 01:49 | GOwin | It's not required, but I suggest you don't modify it because we're using them in some hydrants as an example for the exercises. I am familiar with the ref tag. Thank you. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-04 08:13 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | You are welcome! Although inventing new keys is not forbidden, it is generally encouraged to use the well established keys primarily to make best use of the database. Happy mapping! | |
| 37644478 by GOwin @ 2016-03-06 12:48 | 1 | 2016-03-06 12:50 | GOwin | This particular user has been noted to have made similar edits in the past. See result of the edits before the revert: http://i.imgur.com/Uc4RvtI.png |
| 21883669 by GOwin @ 2014-04-23 11:09 | 1 | 2016-02-09 14:59 | maning ♦41 | Lots of untagged nodes here like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2810776120/history |
| 2 | 2016-02-09 15:45 | maning ♦41 | Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37104116 | |
| 35883465 by GOwin @ 2015-12-11 12:21 | 1 | 2015-12-14 13:28 | GOwin | Asdfghjk |
| 33586485 by GOwin @ 2015-08-26 02:07 | 1 | 2015-08-30 15:04 | ianlopez1115 ♦365 | Persistent routing error fixed in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33684368 |
| 33059627 by GOwin @ 2015-08-03 03:02 | 1 | 2015-08-06 06:01 | Totor ♦62 | Hi GOWinI added the missing parts from GPS traces.Happy Mapping,Totor |
| 2 | 2015-08-06 06:36 | GOwin | Thanks Totor! | |
| 32174927 by GOwin @ 2015-06-24 05:21 | 1 | 2015-06-24 05:25 | GOwin | "Jollibee" not "Jollibee's" |
| 28885188 by GOwin @ 2015-02-16 13:04 | 1 | 2015-02-16 13:16 | GOwin | Sorry about the large bbox. Made a correction in another area, while doing another from somewhere else. |