| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46529893 by dudone | 1 | 2018-03-30 00:27:20 UTC | kreuzschnabel | I took the liberty to remove the service=driveway tag from http://osm.org/way/60178133. In my point of view, that tag is meant exclusively for highways leading to nothing else than a private property, having even no branching tracks or paths at all, while this road is used by a public footpath. Furt... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 14:05:16 UTC | dudone | Many thanks for correcting the road classification. Are we allowed to use the data provided by councils with regard to road/prow designation? I assumed this wasn’t allowed due to OS copyright issues. It would be useful if we could as byways, BOATs etc. are quite often not identified on the ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-02 17:50:31 UTC | kreuzschnabel | The OS has the copyright for the base map of course, and we must not copy this. But I don’t see why they should have anything to do with the public access data provided by the CC. | |
| 55837968 by dudone | 1 | 2018-01-28 20:21:20 UTC | gurglypipe | Did you know you don't need to add the source=bing tag to each object you create? JOSM adds it to the changeset itself. (So does ID.) |
| 2 | 2018-01-29 20:21:37 UTC | dudone | Many thanks for the comment. I started doing this as my changesets can be quite large and the source for individual objects within this can be quite different. The internet connection I have can be a bit unreliable so it has been easier to not use lots of smaller changesets. I built some JOSM pre... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-29 20:57:36 UTC | gurglypipe | The approach of adding source= to each element is not quite deprecated, but is definitely not the recommended approach now. You can list multiple sources for the entire changeset by semicolon-separating them (as it looks like you have done). The details are here (in case you haven’t seen them ... | |
| 45252527 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-15 11:09:00 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466732976 - looks a bit long for a horse_stile? Also there's another just to the southeast. |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 19:42:35 UTC | dudone | Looks like JOSM's autocomplete has got the better of me. Corrected.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2017-12-15 19:58:09 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks! | |
| 33868784 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-14 12:58:10 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369596182#map=19/53.23763/-1.70266 really a stile? It looks like it's on a small road from the imagery suggesting perhaps gate or cattle grid? |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 20:02:47 UTC | dudone | Hi AndyI've changed it to gate.RegardsDudley | |
| 44965506 by dudone | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:49:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464186215 perhaps a hedge?Cheers,Andy |
| 53348284 by dudone | 1 | 2017-11-12 21:31:51 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing that the spelling of "Mandale Enginer House" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198601990 is possibly a typo? |
| 2 | 2017-11-13 16:51:56 UTC | dudone | Corrected to "Engine". ThanksDudley | |
| 49608926 by dudone | 1 | 2017-07-31 12:07:32 UTC | kreuzschnabel | This edit broke the heathland multipolygon http://osm.org/relation/5301123 at several places: * At http://osm.org/node/3606022272, there’s no need to map a gap in the wall (which broke up the MP’s outer way). When a track crosses a wall, just put a shared node of both and tag it barrie... |
| 44525055 by dudone | 1 | 2017-06-19 14:36:30 UTC | SomeoneElse | I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake? |
| 2 | 2017-06-20 20:21:48 UTC | dudone | Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.Dudley | |
| 46420842 by dudone | 1 | 2017-05-11 10:58:31 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Hi, I saw you re-tagged some small lanes hw=service + service=driveway. I took the liberty to change them to hw=unclassified since they do not lead to a single destination only. Please keep in mind that service=driveway should be used for small driveways from public roads into private property only ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-11 14:12:48 UTC | SomeoneElse | @kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one property, and more tha... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-11 16:53:27 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Sorry but which qualification does it actually need to be hw=unclassified? In the Wiki, I cannot find anything like "council maintained", I only find that hw=unclassified is the lowest category of public roads, while hw=service are mere access or special roads to particular places and not ... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-11 19:21:14 UTC | dudone | I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from th... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-11 19:51:33 UTC | kreuzschnabel | Changed them back to hw=service but would still prefer to leave it that way. The driveway issue needs a general discussion IMHO since it’s interpreted in such different ways: some mappers use it as a default for any small lane, while for most renderers that makes them far less important than u... | |
| 47300587 by dudone | 1 | 2017-04-04 15:48:35 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 19:47:24 UTC | dudone | Hi JanMany thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.RegardsDudley | |
| 46473607 by dudone | 1 | 2017-03-14 01:17:14 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, hope you don't mind me commenting, but if a track allows access to agricultural and forestry vehicles (e.g. way 477728220), rather than using motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry, I suggest using motor_vehicle=forestry and agricultural=yes. This avoids putting two values in a tag - multiple value... |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 20:12:49 UTC | dudone | Hi MikeNo problem with the feedback. I'm afraid I don't know how to find the specific way you mention to look at the history. I think this tag must have already been on the way or I must have accidentally copied it from another way as this isn't a tag/style of tagging I would currently intenti... | |
| 45242536 by dudone | 1 | 2017-01-19 15:02:20 UTC | SK53 | Are you sure about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4020491191. Just checking my photos from Feb 2016 & I think this is a stile adjacent to a gate. |
| 2 | 2017-01-19 20:14:35 UTC | dudone | Hi JerryWell spotted. If I'm not sure I will use entrance. I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default. Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this. As you suggest it is a stile and a gate.... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-19 20:29:55 UTC | SK53 | Realised that I had not added hedges etc from visit in Feb 2016, so was following that route. I agree entrance is good practice and helps to encourage checking of gates etc in the field.Overall we seem to have made a very satisfactory impact on mapping this area. I'm continuing to add field boun... | |
| 43135040 by dudone | 1 | 2017-01-15 14:00:11 UTC | SK53 | Slightly complicated one: Raw Head & the hut across the road aren't really residential areas, but can't think what else can be used to mark them. From a purely financial view they're commercial as the climbing clubs have to pay business rates, but that ain't right either. Perhaps some kind of su... |
| 41130893 by dudone | 1 | 2016-08-17 21:03:17 UTC | andygol | There was relation for Great Britain island - http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/6038068. Why did you create one more? |
| 2 | 2016-08-20 15:47:23 UTC | dudone | HiWasn't aware that I had. It is hopefully now deleted.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2016-08-21 08:08:41 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/thread.html#19100 for discussion about the other one BTW. | |
| 40663970 by dudone | 1 | 2016-07-11 20:55:13 UTC | SomeoneElse | Got any thoughts on whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25825505/history should really be an unclassified road? I thought not, and said so on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38625785 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566042 . https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pmailkeey thought ... |
| 2 | 2016-07-12 19:07:16 UTC | dudone | HiI walked along this only this Sunday. I haven't quite got the tagging right as it is a little problematic. I was assuming it would be a BOAT given the motocyles and motorcycle with sidecar! that passed me. However it seems it is an adopted highway. You could therefore argue that this is &q... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-12 19:13:34 UTC | SomeoneElse | Sounds a bit like one of Lincolnshire's "Unclassified County Roads". "designation=adopted_highway" sounds like a good answer to me (I'll stick a line in at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L151 to deal with it!) | |
| 4 | 2016-07-12 19:22:53 UTC | dudone | HiI have now looked at the website!!It seems that there was an order to change this into a bridleway from a "non-classified" highway but this has gone to the planning inspectorate as people have objected and what it classifed as a BOAT. It looks like a decision will be made later ... | |
| 22643454 by dudone | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:34:31 UTC | SomeoneElse | I'm guessing http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285292116 is a barrier=fence? |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:32:06 UTC | dudone | Yes. Corrected.RegardDudley | |
| 33698494 by dudone | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:10:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3722663279 is another "barrier=E". |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:29:39 UTC | dudone | Corrected to entrance.Dudley | |
| 29016364 by dudone | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:09:35 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Dudley,Any idea what the barrier=E is at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3365452752 ? |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:27:49 UTC | dudone | HiChanged to entrance. I generally use this where the is a passage through a collapsed part of wall or a gap that doesn't look like it was every a gate entrance.RegardsDudley | |
| 21427367 by dudone | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:05:07 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi Dudley,Any thoughts about the oddly-tagged barrier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270684102 ? It looks like part hedge, part gap and part wall.Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:23:10 UTC | dudone | Hi AndyLooks like a type so I have changed it to hedge.RegardsDudley | |
| 27828993 by dudone | 1 | 2016-06-12 22:08:26 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319762883 isn't all "hampshire gate"? |
| 2 | 2016-06-13 18:22:21 UTC | dudone | HiAuto complete getting the better of me. I have changed it to hedge.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2016-06-13 22:08:05 UTC | SomeoneElse | Thanks. | |
| 38866887 by dudone | 1 | 2016-05-14 22:39:15 UTC | SomeoneElse | Hi,I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80537943 should be "sidewalk=both"?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2016-05-15 19:04:06 UTC | dudone | Hi Typo due to caps lock. Now fixed,RegardsDudley | |
| 37554047 by dudone | 1 | 2016-04-18 21:39:14 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - is Giddy Edge really a public footpath? If so, presumably some connection bits should be too? |
| 2 | 2016-04-19 17:06:22 UTC | dudone | Sorry it is rather a big change set so I'm not sure which way. The way named Giddy Edge doesn't seem to have a public footpath designation tag. The way to the North (Changeset 21740279) does but I'm not sure this is a public right of way or the way changset 7337922. Unfortunely the pictures I hav... | |
| 37316778 by dudone | 1 | 2016-02-22 14:14:39 UTC | R0bst3r | Hi dudone,can you improve the tag layer=0=gate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398790760? |
| 2 | 2016-02-22 20:55:17 UTC | dudone | Deleted. It was a typo. I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road. It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted. Presumably because it is currently closed. | |
| 36174069 by dudone | 1 | 2015-12-31 14:58:01 UTC | SK53 | Seems unlikely that you meant bare_rock for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387806282! |
| 2 | 2015-12-31 17:50:07 UTC | dudone | Should now be fixed.Dudley | |
| 28737094 by dudone | 1 | 2015-11-16 14:10:22 UTC | R0bst3r | Hi dudone, can you please review way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327315427? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 18:31:24 UTC | dudone | HiI've removed the "odd tag" i.e. B=stepping_stone. This was a typo. Is there anything else?Dudley | |
| 32683399 by dudone | 1 | 2015-09-23 19:01:22 UTC | SomeoneElse | Just checking - did you delete the highway tag from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49164552 deliberately? This was a track when I was last there (but it was a while ago) |
| 31207878 by dudone | 1 | 2015-07-30 18:11:48 UTC | SK53 | Any idea why you deleted the PRoW leaving Foolow at S edge of village towards Eyam? Or was this just a mistake? |
| 2 | 2015-07-30 18:47:12 UTC | dudone | Thanks for letting me know. This was a mistake. I've redrawn it. | |
| 28018995 by dudone | 1 | 2015-01-09 20:26:37 UTC | RobJN | Hi Dudley,In the council data the track from Riddings lane is classed as a public bridleway - are you sure it only had yellow marker posts (i.e. footpath), or could they have been blue? |