OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

49608926 by dudone	1	2017-07-31 12:07:32 UTC	kreuzschnabel	This edit broke the heathland multipolygon http://osm.org/relation/5301123 at several places: * At http://osm.org/node/3606022272, there’s no need to map a gap in the wall (which broke up the MP’s outer way). When a track crosses a wall, just put a shared node of both and tag it barrie...

44525055 by dudone	1	2017-06-19 14:36:30 UTC	SomeoneElse	I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake?
	2	2017-06-20 20:21:48 UTC	dudone	Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag. Dudley

46420842 by dudone	1	2017-05-11 10:58:31 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Hi, I saw you re-tagged some small lanes hw=service + service=driveway. I took the liberty to change them to hw=unclassified since they do not lead to a single destination only. Please keep in mind that service=driveway should be used for small driveways from public roads into private property only ...
	2	2017-05-11 14:12:48 UTC	SomeoneElse	@kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one property, and more tha...
	3	2017-05-11 16:53:27 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Sorry but which qualification does it actually need to be hw=unclassified? In the Wiki, I cannot find anything like "council maintained", I only find that hw=unclassified is the lowest category of public roads, while hw=service are mere access or special roads to particular places and not ...
	4	2017-05-11 19:21:14 UTC	dudone	I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from th...
	5	2017-05-11 19:51:33 UTC	kreuzschnabel	Changed them back to hw=service but would still prefer to leave it that way. The driveway issue needs a general discussion IMHO since it’s interpreted in such different ways: some mappers use it as a default for any small lane, while for most renderers that makes them far less important than u...

47300587 by dudone	1	2017-04-04 15:48:35 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114 The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake. Jan
	2	2017-04-04 19:47:24 UTC	dudone	Hi Jan Many thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added. Regards Dudley

46473607 by dudone	1	2017-03-14 01:17:14 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hi, hope you don't mind me commenting, but if a track allows access to agricultural and forestry vehicles (e.g. way 477728220), rather than using motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry, I suggest using motor_vehicle=forestry and agricultural=yes. This avoids putting two values in a tag - multiple value...
	2	2017-03-15 20:12:49 UTC	dudone	Hi Mike No problem with the feedback. I'm afraid I don't know how to find the specific way you mention to look at the history. I think this tag must have already been on the way or I must have accidentally copied it from another way as this isn't a tag/style of tagging I would currently intenti...

45242536 by dudone	1	2017-01-19 15:02:20 UTC	SK53	Are you sure about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4020491191. Just checking my photos from Feb 2016 & I think this is a stile adjacent to a gate.
	2	2017-01-19 20:14:35 UTC	dudone	Hi Jerry Well spotted. If I'm not sure I will use entrance. I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default. Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this. As you suggest it is a stile and a gate....
	3	2017-01-19 20:29:55 UTC	SK53	Realised that I had not added hedges etc from visit in Feb 2016, so was following that route. I agree entrance is good practice and helps to encourage checking of gates etc in the field. Overall we seem to have made a very satisfactory impact on mapping this area. I'm continuing to add field boun...

43135040 by dudone	1	2017-01-15 14:00:11 UTC	SK53	Slightly complicated one: Raw Head & the hut across the road aren't really residential areas, but can't think what else can be used to mark them. From a purely financial view they're commercial as the climbing clubs have to pay business rates, but that ain't right either. Perhaps some kind of su...

41130893 by dudone	1	2016-08-17 21:03:17 UTC	andygol	There was relation for Great Britain island - http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/6038068. Why did you create one more?
	2	2016-08-20 15:47:23 UTC	dudone	Hi Wasn't aware that I had. It is hopefully now deleted. Regards Dudley
	3	2016-08-21 08:08:41 UTC	SomeoneElse	Thanks. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/thread.html#19100 for discussion about the other one BTW.

40663970 by dudone	1	2016-07-11 20:55:13 UTC	SomeoneElse	Got any thoughts on whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25825505/history should really be an unclassified road? I thought not, and said so on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38625785 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566042 . https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pmailkeey thought ...
	2	2016-07-12 19:07:16 UTC	dudone	Hi I walked along this only this Sunday. I haven't quite got the tagging right as it is a little problematic. I was assuming it would be a BOAT given the motocyles and motorcycle with sidecar! that passed me. However it seems it is an adopted highway. You could therefore argue that this is &q...
	3	2016-07-12 19:13:34 UTC	SomeoneElse	Sounds a bit like one of Lincolnshire's "Unclassified County Roads". "designation=adopted_highway" sounds like a good answer to me (I'll stick a line in at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L151 to deal with it!)
	4	2016-07-12 19:22:53 UTC	dudone	Hi I have now looked at the website!! It seems that there was an order to change this into a bridleway from a "non-classified" highway but this has gone to the planning inspectorate as people have objected and what it classifed as a BOAT. It looks like a decision will be made later ...

22643454 by dudone	1	2016-07-03 17:34:31 UTC	SomeoneElse	I'm guessing http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285292116 is a barrier=fence?
	2	2016-07-04 18:32:06 UTC	dudone	Yes. Corrected. Regard Dudley

33698494 by dudone	1	2016-07-03 17:10:22 UTC	SomeoneElse	http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3722663279 is another "barrier=E".
	2	2016-07-04 18:29:39 UTC	dudone	Corrected to entrance. Dudley

29016364 by dudone	1	2016-07-03 17:09:35 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi Dudley, Any idea what the barrier=E is at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3365452752 ?
	2	2016-07-04 18:27:49 UTC	dudone	Hi Changed to entrance. I generally use this where the is a passage through a collapsed part of wall or a gap that doesn't look like it was every a gate entrance. Regards Dudley

21427367 by dudone	1	2016-07-03 17:05:07 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi Dudley, Any thoughts about the oddly-tagged barrier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270684102 ? It looks like part hedge, part gap and part wall. Cheers, Andy
	2	2016-07-04 18:23:10 UTC	dudone	Hi Andy Looks like a type so I have changed it to hedge. Regards Dudley

27828993 by dudone	1	2016-06-12 22:08:26 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi, I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319762883 isn't all "hampshire gate"?
	2	2016-06-13 18:22:21 UTC	dudone	Hi Auto complete getting the better of me. I have changed it to hedge. Regards Dudley
	3	2016-06-13 22:08:05 UTC	SomeoneElse	Thanks.

38866887 by dudone	1	2016-05-14 22:39:15 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi, I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80537943 should be "sidewalk=both"? Cheers, Andy
	2	2016-05-15 19:04:06 UTC	dudone	Hi Typo due to caps lock. Now fixed, Regards Dudley

37554047 by dudone	1	2016-04-18 21:39:14 UTC	SomeoneElse	Just checking - is Giddy Edge really a public footpath? If so, presumably some connection bits should be too?
	2	2016-04-19 17:06:22 UTC	dudone	Sorry it is rather a big change set so I'm not sure which way. The way named Giddy Edge doesn't seem to have a public footpath designation tag. The way to the North (Changeset 21740279) does but I'm not sure this is a public right of way or the way changset 7337922. Unfortunely the pictures I hav...

37316778 by dudone	1	2016-02-22 14:14:39 UTC	R0bst3r	Hi dudone, can you improve the tag layer=0=gate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398790760?
	2	2016-02-22 20:55:17 UTC	dudone	Deleted. It was a typo. I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road. It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted. Presumably because it is currently closed.

36174069 by dudone	1	2015-12-31 14:58:01 UTC	SK53	Seems unlikely that you meant bare_rock for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387806282!
	2	2015-12-31 17:50:07 UTC	dudone	Should now be fixed. Dudley

28737094 by dudone	1	2015-11-16 14:10:22 UTC	R0bst3r	Hi dudone, can you please review way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327315427? Thanks!
	2	2015-11-16 18:31:24 UTC	dudone	Hi I've removed the "odd tag" i.e. B=stepping_stone. This was a typo. Is there anything else? Dudley

32683399 by dudone	1	2015-09-23 19:01:22 UTC	SomeoneElse	Just checking - did you delete the highway tag from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49164552 deliberately? This was a track when I was last there (but it was a while ago)

31207878 by dudone	1	2015-07-30 18:11:48 UTC	SK53	Any idea why you deleted the PRoW leaving Foolow at S edge of village towards Eyam? Or was this just a mistake?
	2	2015-07-30 18:47:12 UTC	dudone	Thanks for letting me know. This was a mistake. I've redrawn it.

28018995 by dudone	1	2015-01-09 20:26:37 UTC	RobJN	Hi Dudley, In the council data the track from Riddings lane is classed as a public bridleway - are you sure it only had yellow marker posts (i.e. footpath), or could they have been blue?