| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134428083 by dudone @ 2023-04-02 19:58 | 1 | 2025-06-14 12:03 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805484 ? |
| 131155036 by dudone @ 2023-01-11 17:08 | 1 | 2025-06-06 12:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792583 ? |
| 166691136 by dudone @ 2025-05-24 10:57 | 1 | 2025-05-24 11:14 | user_5359 ♦19,376 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1189987234/history. What is the common meaning of the two keys highway and barrier on one line? |
| 2 | 2025-05-24 16:40 | dudone | Many thanks for spotting this error. JOSM auto fill gets the better of me sometimes. Should not be fixed. | |
| 143909688 by dudone @ 2023-11-11 17:57 | 1 | 2024-08-13 09:52 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Dud, I don't think landuse=retail is appropriate for the Pottery. The house and business are owned by people I've known all my life, and it's always been a private house and garden, historically with much of the ground floor dedicated to craft workshops and only one room for sales.... |
| 2 | 2024-08-16 15:05 | dudone | Hi JerryI've changed it to residential. RegardsDudley | |
| 133103215 by dudone @ 2023-02-27 20:34 | 1 | 2024-05-01 08:33 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1188336712/history has barrier = g that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier? |
| 2 | 2024-05-01 19:04 | dudone | Hi. Many thanks for pointing this out. I have changed to "gate". Dudley | |
| 148833850 by dudone @ 2024-03-18 20:29 | 1 | 2024-03-20 18:08 | SomeoneElse2 ♦455 | Hello,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11742283562 seems a bit odd - there's a gate in the middle of a stream and then a bit of a gap until this node?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2024-03-20 18:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | (oops - sorry for commenting from wrong userid) | |
| 3 | 2024-03-20 21:12 | dudone | Hi AndyThis should not be fixed. I’ve raised the issue of the rights of way with Cumbria Council as I tried walking one of these. They are on their rights of way map as drawn in OSM. It will be interesting to see if I get any response. Dudley | |
| 133374717 by dudone @ 2023-03-06 18:17 | 1 | 2023-03-07 09:46 | etgg ♦14 | Hi dudone, you appear to have deleted the relation for the Cotswold AONB boundary in this changeset (relation 166570, v832). Would you mind reinstating please? Many thanks. |
| 2 | 2023-03-07 13:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | I've undeleted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133402160 (got an email this morning that it had disappeared from a database multipolygons table) - it validates OK, hope all is OK now.Cheers,Andy | |
| 3 | 2023-03-07 13:17 | etgg ♦14 | Perfect, thanks Andy! | |
| 4 | 2023-03-07 19:34 | dudone | Apologies. No idea how I managed to delete this. Also, no idea how I would have put it back. Many Thanks Dudley | |
| 5 | 2023-12-05 17:39 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4016237 ? Look like it was supposed to be gate (and autocomplete failed) but maybe you meant something else | |
| 141434642 by dudone @ 2023-09-18 17:15 | 1 | 2023-10-06 12:59 | Sandal man ♦391 | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208851385#map=19/39.76509/2.65481Is this a wall maybe?Regards Jan |
| 2 | 2023-10-10 18:48 | dudone | Yes. I have added the tag.Thank you.Dudley | |
| 114000922 by dudone @ 2021-11-19 17:36 | 1 | 2023-04-22 20:47 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,Any idea what the "maxheight=b" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004438011/history might have been intended to be?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2023-04-24 16:40 | dudone | Deleted this tag. It was probably for the car park to the north but not sure what happened. I now try and put on "default" if there is not height barrier now. It should help with eventually searching to see which car parks have been tagged/surveyed for height barriers.Dudley | |
| 132982889 by dudone @ 2023-02-24 20:05 | 1 | 2023-03-08 22:58 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, I assume https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317749709 is mistakenly tagged as building=yes |
| 2 | 2023-03-10 11:02 | dudone | Hi Many thanks for spotting this. Must have had this still selected when tagging another building. Now fixed.Dudley | |
| 37067677 by dudone @ 2016-02-07 20:33 | 1 | 2022-11-05 13:10 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3428780 ? |
| 128305068 by dudone @ 2022-10-31 15:30 | 1 | 2022-11-01 14:09 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, thank you yet again for improving the map! There's a lot of useful work in this change, but there's also a lot of detail to review.At a quick glance, the changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2798492005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2798492011 seem odd to me. The... |
| 2 | 2022-11-01 19:54 | dudone | Hi Yes it wasn't intended. I'd put a number of nodes in for trees and then used a JOSM search for nodes without tags and not part of a way. I don't know why these were selected. Presumably a note tag isn't considered to be a tag. If they look like a mine entrance then surely... | |
| 117958478 by dudone @ 2022-02-28 20:36 | 1 | 2022-08-27 07:25 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Sorry, there's another batch today, but hopefully, we'll be done then. |
| 2 | 2022-08-29 16:05 | dudone | Sorry. Can you tell me what I'm looking for as I have been using the JOSM search to find the stile=?? having downloaded the area highlighted.The same applies to the other comments. | |
| 3 | 2022-08-29 19:43 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Maybe somebody else has looked for them already. I used this: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stile#values, then you click on the suspicious tags like "stst" and then on overpass-turbo on the very top right. The table is rendered every day, so today's changes aren't reflec... | |
| 22323125 by dudone @ 2014-05-13 22:45 | 1 | 2022-08-27 07:27 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Squeezer or stepover? |
| 29357327 by dudone @ 2015-03-09 13:30 | 1 | 2022-08-27 07:27 | b-unicycling ♦242 | I presume it's squeezer... |
| 38271857 by dudone @ 2016-04-03 17:40 | 1 | 2021-10-11 17:21 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3631506067/historyI removed steps tag here based on object history - it seems that it was missed when it become tagged as kissing gatefeel free to revert me if my guess is wrong |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 10:15 | b-unicycling ♦242 | stile=stw?(If it helps, I found one where I had mistyped, too, but at least I had taken mapillary at the time, so I could check what I meant. I'm just going through this https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stile#values to find all the strange ones.) | |
| 3 | 2022-08-26 19:48 | dudone | Changed to stepover. I think that is the last. Unfortunately JOSM doesn't highlight these types of typos and there is just too much basic stuff to map. I do take lots of pictures. 20K short of 1M on file. No good for Mapillary as I'd need to check everyone. Someday, I will find time ... | |
| 4 | 2022-08-26 21:31 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Using JOSM explains it. I have mapped a lot of houses as building=h+some muddle, because of the autocomplete in JOSM. Sometimes, people point it out.It's a good thing I dive in and out of topics, so the QC is random, but at least it gets done sometimes. Thanks for fixing them all! | |
| 33698494 by dudone @ 2015-08-31 09:05 | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3722663279 is another "barrier=E". |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:29 | dudone | Corrected to entrance.Dudley | |
| 3 | 2022-08-26 10:10 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=L" refers to - possibly "ladder", could you specify or delete the "stile=L"? | |
| 4 | 2022-08-26 19:39 | dudone | Deleted as no evidence. | |
| 54037027 by dudone @ 2017-11-23 21:56 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:08 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=b" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=b"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:35 | dudone | Deleted as this is a gate. | |
| 36922365 by dudone @ 2016-01-31 18:22 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:08 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=dq" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=dq"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:30 | dudone | Changed to squeezer. | |
| 36093523 by dudone @ 2015-12-21 19:46 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:07 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=se" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=se"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:20 | dudone | Changed to stepover. | |
| 34619597 by dudone @ 2015-10-13 19:19 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:06 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=e" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=e"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:17 | dudone | Deleted as don't have image. | |
| 20861605 by dudone @ 2014-03-02 10:36 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:05 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=g" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=g"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 10:05 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=g" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=g"? | |
| 3 | 2022-08-26 19:13 | dudone | Cant find this so may already be fixed. | |
| 27760329 by dudone @ 2014-12-28 18:34 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:06 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=e" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=e"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:11 | dudone | e=entrance. So changed to barrier=entrance. Collapsed wall on the ground. | |
| 25274805 by dudone @ 2014-09-06 20:12 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:05 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=g" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=g"? You seem to have done a lot of hiking, good on you! |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 19:00 | dudone | Changed to gate. Seem to have got my fingers in a muddle so most of these stile=g should be barrier=gate. | |
| 22196052 by dudone @ 2014-05-07 19:47 | 1 | 2022-08-26 10:05 | b-unicycling ♦242 | If you remember, what "stile=g" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=g"? |
| 2 | 2022-08-26 18:54 | dudone | Changed to barrier=gate upon review of photo. | |
| 37132084 by dudone @ 2016-02-10 19:04 | 1 | 2022-08-23 20:53 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Hi, if you added "stile=g", would you mind specifying what type of stile it is actually? I know it's a long time ago, but maybe you remember. If not, please remove "stile=g", as it is not documented. |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:49 | dudone | Removed. To old for me to remember. | |
| 21577157 by dudone @ 2014-04-08 19:24 | 1 | 2022-08-23 20:55 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Hi, another instance of "stile=g" which needs addressing, because that is not a documented tag. Could you run an overpass-turbo yourself, so I don't have to contact you for the remaining 6 instances, pls. |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:44 | dudone | Removed as typo. Will need a survey. I have never used overpass-turbo. | |
| 37102123 by dudone @ 2016-02-09 13:57 | 1 | 2022-08-23 20:54 | b-unicycling ♦242 | Here's another "stile=g" that needs addressing. |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:42 | dudone | Removed. | |
| 104981988 by dudone @ 2021-05-19 19:40 | 1 | 2022-08-25 20:20 | b-unicycling ♦242 | could you specify what stile=dy means and possibly correct the tag, pls? |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:39 | dudone | Fixed | |
| 42588507 by dudone @ 2016-10-02 18:15 | 1 | 2022-08-25 20:20 | b-unicycling ♦242 | could you specify what stile=dy means and possibly correct the tag, pls? |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:37 | dudone | Fixed | |
| 29663467 by dudone @ 2015-03-22 18:46 | 1 | 2022-08-25 20:14 | b-unicycling ♦242 | could you specify what stile=sts is? |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:35 | dudone | Fixed | |
| 105909606 by dudone @ 2021-06-06 09:43 | 1 | 2022-08-25 20:14 | b-unicycling ♦242 | could you specify what stile=sts is? |
| 2 | 2022-08-25 20:33 | dudone | Fixed. | |
| 123333397 by dudone @ 2022-07-07 19:26 | 1 | 2022-07-29 16:11 | Sandal man ♦391 | Still a lot of ways without tagshttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076671354See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=4.30630&lat=39.81196&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k%2Cways_with_empty_k%2Cnodes_with_empty_v%... |
| 2 | 2022-07-30 15:46 | dudone | With luck these are all now fixed.Dudley | |
| 123247483 by dudone @ 2022-07-05 18:58 | 1 | 2022-07-10 11:05 | Sandal man ♦391 | Hi you anly draw the line and forget them to give a tag.Regards Jan |
| 39864021 by dudone @ 2016-06-07 15:23 | 1 | 2022-06-22 17:48 | aTarom ♦772 | Hi dudone I know it was 6 long years ago, just for curiosity the wayhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423431246/historywall=e :Dcould be something like wall=""earth"" or "dry_stone"or a simple mistake.Cheers. |
| 2 | 2022-07-05 17:31 | dudone | Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have changed this to "dry_stone" which is the most likely tag.Dudley | |
| 109709910 by dudone @ 2021-08-15 17:33 | 1 | 2022-07-05 11:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,Just wondered - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973303758/history really a castle wall?I don't think I've ever got that close to it, but it seems a bit unlikely?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2022-07-05 17:28 | dudone | Hi AndyNot sure what happened. I have changed the NE end to "dry_stone" and the SE end to a fence as it looks more like a fence on bing.RegardsDudley | |
| 118779953 by dudone @ 2022-03-22 13:52 | 1 | 2022-03-23 11:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Re the relation membership of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042639943 - good spot! It looks like the "named" section to the southeast also should be added to the relations too. |
| 2 | 2022-03-24 20:34 | dudone | I only walked a short section. I try my best to update the relation if I'm modifying sections but sometimes forget. Unfortunately with many of these ways they are well sign posted when put in place but after than no ongoing maintenance is done. The grants people get for developing these nev... | |
| 21293077 by dudone @ 2014-03-24 20:37 | 1 | 2022-01-23 23:28 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,I know it was 8 years ago, but just on the off change, any idea what "stile=g" might be on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2164688539 might be?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2022-01-24 19:43 | dudone | Hi AndyMany thanks for spotting this.Fortunately I have some geotagged images so I have managed to update this. I assume it hasn't changed since 2014! There are two gates that relate to the track. One small another larger one. The smaller one is that one that is in general use. I d... | |
| 3 | 2022-01-24 19:50 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Thanks - re the gates as lines, any suggestion about how to render them better than https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=53.2683976&lon=-1.6100976 would be gratefully received! | |
| 4 | 2022-01-26 20:47 | dudone | Not an easy one. My suggestion would be a line for the gate with a circle at each end for the posts. It would however depend on how, walls, fences and hedges are rendered, although I guess you could use distinct colour. I guess the other issue is, can you have a way with a circle at each end with... | |
| 111551840 by dudone @ 2021-09-22 16:30 | 1 | 2022-01-06 10:51 | tomhukins ♦217 | I'm puzzled by this change: there's a noticeboard here, but nothing that I'd consider an office that you can go inside for tourist information. |
| 2 | 2022-01-06 20:21 | dudone | Sorry. I was trying out streetcomplete for the first time am clearly failed to use it correctly. I have fixed this using JOSM.Dudely.== | |
| 3 | 2022-01-06 20:21 | dudone | Dudley. | |
| 4 | 2022-01-10 16:33 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thanks for that: I've not got round to using Streetcomplete yet, but if I do I'll look out for surprises like this. | |
| 92965975 by dudone @ 2020-10-23 18:40 | 1 | 2021-11-30 10:59 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | What do you want to get on the map with: landuse=landuse and source=grass?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863106603 |
| 2 | 2021-11-30 19:27 | dudone | Many thanks for bringing this to my attention. It should have been landuse=residential, source=bing. It has now been fixed.Dudley | |
| 112665542 by dudone @ 2021-10-18 18:43 | 1 | 2021-10-19 13:21 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Could you check this area? It got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523280448 |
| 2 | 2021-10-19 18:41 | dudone | Fixed.ThanksDudley | |
| 106175054 by dudone @ 2021-06-10 19:42 | 1 | 2021-10-14 11:54 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | I changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8822120473/history to barrier-stile what seemed intended |
| 2 | 2021-10-15 18:13 | dudone | Many thanks for fixing this typo.Dudley | |
| 21716716 by dudone @ 2014-04-15 19:55 | 1 | 2021-10-11 17:20 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | I removed steps tag here based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/898166793/history - it seems that it was missed when it become tagged as kissing gatefeel free to revert me if my guess is wrong |
| 104453560 by dudone @ 2021-05-10 12:52 | 1 | 2021-08-18 08:26 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,I think that something a bit unfortunate happened to part of the Derwent Aqueduct in here, as can be seen at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1aoI - it changed to a big right-angle rather than following-the-slope down from Bamford. I've undone the node moves in this changeset on it and ... |
| 2 | 2021-08-18 18:29 | dudone | Hi AndyApologies and many thanks for fixing. For some reason I must have had this also selected when I was using orthogonalise in JOSM and didn't notice. RegardsDudley | |
| 98825519 by dudone @ 2021-02-06 18:49 | 1 | 2021-08-06 13:19 | tomhukins ♦217 | I notice that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124110233 has both "access=private" and "designation=public_footpath" on it. Having walked near here, I don't think it's a public footpath. |
| 2 | 2021-08-06 18:18 | dudone | Thank you for letting me know about this.Looking at the history I'm not sure I added this tag but I have added others since and should have noted this. It's not a footpath as far as I am aware so I have remove this tag.Dudley | |
| 3 | 2021-08-08 17:52 | tomhukins ♦217 | Good point: I didn't check the way's history carefully enough. Thank you for fixing the tags. | |
| 98528611 by dudone @ 2021-02-01 18:23 | 1 | 2021-07-13 13:51 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243780744 was accidentally tagged as a tree in the middle of Moor Lane. I've removed the tree tags from it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107914696 |
| 98725960 by dudone @ 2021-02-04 20:28 | 1 | 2021-06-25 13:02 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, thank you as ever for your improvements to the map. This changeset contains a few nodes that have no tags on them. I discovered this from https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&error=144134398&zoom=15&lat=53.05254&lon=-1.57892&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C70&show_ig... |
| 2 | 2021-06-25 18:24 | dudone | Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have been adding quite a few trees but it seems that for some reason JOSM hasn't shown up the lack of missing tags within its validation results or I haven't noticed this. If you know of anyway of highlighting these untagged nodes within JOS... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-25 18:35 | tomhukins ♦217 | Yeah, it's annoying we didn't spot this sooner. I'm far from an expert user of JOSM and I don't know how to make it highlight untagged nodes, but this seems like a useful thing for it to do: I've only ever spotted problems like this with KeepRight. | |
| 49303174 by dudone @ 2017-06-06 11:59 | 1 | 2021-06-03 12:23 | SK53 ♦864 | Firefishy has changed the access on the ford. I dont know if you know any more. See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-57335740 |
| 2 | 2021-06-03 18:47 | dudone | I would have walked through the farmyard via the footpaths most likely. I guess it will need a survey to confirm signage. If it is "closed" I would assume some sign as such. Unfortunately these crossing can change from a small stream to a major torrent in a short period of time. If the... | |
| 3 | 2021-06-03 19:43 | SK53 ♦864 | Sounds like Andy did pretty much the same. Richard has suggested using motor_vehicle=discouraged to capture the info from your original note.When I first looked at this I hadn't appreciated that the stream was the one through Ashbourne. This must be on the cusp of being a river in OSM terms... | |
| 98072409 by dudone @ 2021-01-24 19:49 | 1 | 2021-04-24 11:13 | tomhukins ♦217 | I notice the changeset adds https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8358514831 which looks like it might duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7008337368 and probably relates to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1475413 |
| 2 | 2021-04-26 15:54 | dudone | Thank you for letting me know about this. I have deleted the new node I put in and have copied across the tags of the existing node to a new area to define this site and deleted this node. I have also added a track and gate as per Bing imagery. | |
| 98820230 by dudone @ 2021-02-06 16:21 | 1 | 2021-03-11 20:47 | tomhukins ♦217 | The name of "b" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904464087 looks like a mistake |
| 2 | 2021-03-18 18:35 | dudone | Removed.ThanksDudley | |
| 97190789 by dudone @ 2021-01-08 21:13 | 1 | 2021-01-12 18:07 | tomhukins ♦217 | Hi, what does "#hotosm-project-24" in the changeset description refer to? I'd assume https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/24 but this doesn't exist. |
| 2 | 2021-01-12 19:27 | dudone | Apologies. I am using the ".ch" instance of the task manager listed on the wiki to carry out a methodical review of the peak district. It was the default setting and I assumed it was unique to the setup of this task manager. I have now deleted so hopefully it wont appear again. Dud... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-12 19:39 | tomhukins ♦217 | Ah, thank you for explaining as well as for your continued excellent, detailed mapping :) | |
| 34208543 by dudone @ 2015-09-23 15:40 | 1 | 2021-01-10 18:41 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Do you maybe remember how you were selecting tags for shops in this ancient edit?Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2492984 ? |
| 2 | 2021-01-11 20:50 | dudone | Sorry no. I suspect I would have searched using google "openstreetmap wiki photography" and found this tag. Now I would look for the shop within JOSM which would have given me shop=photo. It may not have been available at the time or I may not have found it. Having looked at the wiki i... | |
| 3 | 2021-01-11 20:58 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,632 | Thanks for a reply! I will change it. | |
| 97005342 by dudone @ 2021-01-05 21:02 | 1 | 2021-01-07 11:29 | BCNorwich ♦4,852 | Hi, I just wanted to let you know that residential area Way: 892436777 has been inadvertently squared off.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2021-01-07 19:53 | dudone | Many thanks for letting me know. I have now fixed it.RegardsDudley | |
| 69995514 by dudone @ 2019-05-07 18:57 | 1 | 2020-05-10 14:55 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thanks for adding the note: I walked along here yesterday and noticed the path is on the other side of the hedge, so I've fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84974694 |
| 41810237 by dudone @ 2016-08-30 19:09 | 1 | 2020-02-23 12:58 | tomhukins ♦217 | I suspect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77428973 should be highway=service rather than highway=secondary - does this seem reasonable? |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 20:10 | dudone | Many thanks for bringing this to my attention. Autofill on JOSM has got the better of me. I have now changed this to service.Dudley | |
| 3 | 2020-02-27 11:26 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thanks, I didn't want to change it myself just in case it was intentional. | |
| 51486916 by dudone @ 2017-08-27 16:49 | 1 | 2020-02-24 00:08 | DaveF ♦1,563 | Hiis this definitely a public footpath with a prow_ref?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519116935/history |
| 2 | 2020-02-26 20:15 | dudone | It is at the north end but it looks like I got carried away. I have changed the low section to permissive.Dudley | |
| 80966248 by dudone @ 2020-02-13 16:02 | 1 | 2020-02-15 13:05 | BCNorwich ♦4,852 | Hi,Sorry to trouble you but I think this changeset has somehow orthogonalised Way: Lonsdale (697650023) (a natural=valley). Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/uzkv2y8I can usually work out how to revert this situation but this one has me baffled, reverting the whole changeset does not revert ... |
| 2 | 2020-02-15 13:25 | dudone | HiOh Dear. It looks like I must have had this selected when I was orthogonalising a building. I have also tried downloading a reverted changeset but it remains the same.I must admit I wasn't looking for this feature as there aren't many valleys mapped in the Peak District. I canno... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-15 15:31 | BCNorwich ♦4,852 | Hello Dudley,I've just spent an hour or so trying to get the original way displayed, then getting it into JOSM, then working it into a layer to upload.It's not reverted but drawn again from the original data. A drawn out process that I now don't know exactly how I did it.Regards... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-15 18:21 | dudone | Hi BernardMany thanks for correcting this mistake. I will try and be more careful in future.Kind RegardsDudley | |
| 50182715 by dudone @ 2017-07-10 17:48 | 1 | 2019-08-07 07:28 | tomhukins ♦217 | Several of the "barrier=wall" ways added here have "wall=D" tags which seems odd, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506516048 - is the meant to be "wall=dry_stone" or something else? |
| 2 | 2019-08-12 19:53 | dudone | Yes. JOSM's auto compete and the shift lock sometimes gets the better of me.Please feel free to correct.Dudley | |
| 3 | 2019-08-12 20:02 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thank you for confirming. I've found a few more of these: I'll fix them as I encounter them. | |
| 32662441 by dudone @ 2015-07-15 21:05 | 1 | 2019-08-04 14:13 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thank you for these improvements. Your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114913956 here looks sensible so I see no reason to keep the "fixme". If you agree that removing it seems sensible, I'm happy to do so (and fix the typo in the "note"). |
| 2 | 2019-08-04 18:52 | dudone | Please make the changes.Dudley | |
| 3 | 2019-08-05 06:12 | tomhukins ♦217 | Thanks for checking. I've made these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73006233 | |
| 50195639 by dudone @ 2017-07-11 08:50 | 1 | 2019-06-03 19:54 | tomhukins ♦217 | In this changeset, you tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506649385 as a reservoir. This seems unlikely. Was it accidental? |
| 2 | 2019-06-06 15:46 | dudone | Yes. JOSM autocomplete has the better of me. I have changed it to residential.Many ThanksDudley | |
| 55735288 by dudone @ 2018-01-25 09:53 | 1 | 2019-04-24 21:17 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Hi dudeone, I took the liberty to remove the service=driveway on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492649366. Generally, a hw=service gets "smaller" by adding this tag. According to the wiki, hw=driveway marks private roads, usually very short ones, leading off a public road to a single pr... |
| 2 | 2019-04-28 19:45 | SK53 ♦864 | But it is not a public road so highway=unclassified is wrong. Personally I'd trust dudone to know if something is a driveway or not, and I would also agree with him - it is not unusual for farms to share a driveway in this way (or for houses too). | |
| 3 | 2019-04-28 20:34 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | In my understanding, service=driveway (maybe differently from the colloquial meaning of "driveway") marks a small way with no traffic importance at all, except access to the property it leads to. So as soon as there’s a public right of way using it or branching off it, the traffi... | |
| 52395644 by dudone @ 2017-09-26 19:39 | 1 | 2019-04-04 23:35 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | Hello,about :https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131573975https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131573974horse=* is an acces key, so it's better to avoid horse=mounting blockmaybe it's better to change it into man_made=mounting_blockRegards,Marc |
| 2 | 2019-04-07 17:52 | dudone | Hi MarcThere is actually a proposal at the moment for this tag. One of the options is horse=mounting_block but as you suggest it would seem horse is an access tag.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mounting_blockI have changed it to man_made=mounting_block but it migh... | |
| 3 | 2019-04-07 18:51 | marc__marc ♦1,265 | yes, we are talking about this propal on the tagging mailing. it's why I have checked and write to the few mapper who have used horse=* to have one less problem in the proposal :-)Thanks for the change !Regards,Marc | |
| 58438403 by dudone @ 2018-04-26 10:27 | 1 | 2018-12-23 11:34 | MapperTwo ♦7 | Hi, on this change set, you have an untagged line surrounding Coniston. Dunno if that was intentional, or a mistake, or got lost in the mix somehow. Was going to delete it, but thought I'd ask first. |
| 2 | 2018-12-24 11:07 | dudone | Hi Looking at the history this appears to have been created by others and I think I have just adjusted it when adding other features that share nodes with this.For some reason the JOSM history suggests it hasn't every had a tag. Looking at it I'm fairly sure this is for residential l... | |
| 3 | 2018-12-24 15:14 | MapperTwo ♦7 | Yeah, sounds fine to me.J | |
| 46990500 by dudone @ 2017-03-19 18:49 | 1 | 2018-12-03 10:45 | SK53 ♦864 | Hi Dudley, You mapped this area as a school https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331977095, but I'm pretty sure its the village hall (and mapped it as such because I used iD & didn't notice the school polygon). FHRS do have a playgroup based there. Cheers,Jerry |
| 2 | 2018-12-03 18:51 | dudone | Hi JerryThanks for spotting this. I've checked my images an you are correct. I've changed this to community_centre which seems to be the right tag.RegardDudley | |
| 64627403 by dudone @ 2018-11-18 17:59 | 1 | 2018-11-19 13:47 | GerdP ♦2,751 | Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=ruins. Did you mean historic=ruins? |
| 2 | 2018-11-19 18:18 | dudone | Many thanks for spotting this. JOSM auto complete seems to have got the better of me.It should now be fixed. | |
| 3 | 2018-11-19 18:59 | BCNorwich ♦4,852 | Hi another problem, could you please have a look at these untagged ways added in this changeset, Way: 646044347, Way: 646044382, Way: 174197043, Way: 610891962, Way: 646044410.Regards Bernard | |
| 4 | 2018-11-19 20:56 | dudone | Hi BernardFor some reason JOSM isn't identifying these within the validation results.I've found a couple of these by just looking for them. Is their a method to searching for the way number directly. Within JOSM would be good?RegardsDudley | |
| 5 | 2018-11-19 21:22 | GerdP ♦2,751 | JOSM produces a warning for untagged ways. If you don't see that warning you may have pressed the ignore button. You can reset these settings when you remove the file %AppData%\\\\JOSM\\validator\\ignorederrors | |
| 6 | 2018-11-20 07:15 | BCNorwich ♦4,852 | Hello dudone, to load an object within JOSM :- file menu dropdown list, select/click download object. A download box opens, insert type of object (Way), object ID (646044410), then download object. If that item still exists then it opens for editing.Regards Bernard | |
| 7 | 2018-11-20 07:22 | GerdP ♦2,751 | You can search for an id in JOSM using id: as prefix, e.g. id:646044410 | |
| 8 | 2018-11-20 20:41 | dudone | HiThanks for the information on searching/downloading. I've added tags to the ones that I can.Way 174197043. I tried to draw a wall along part of this so may have changed the positions of some points but ended up drawing another way. I don't actually know what this is supposed ... | |
| 57296717 by dudone @ 2018-03-18 17:35 | 1 | 2018-09-22 19:55 | messpert ♦65 | You are joking about the "heath"s, surely? You surely cannot have visited the area.I know and have repeatedly surveyed much of this area, and if there was any heath, I would probably have tagged it.There are no obvious tags for the sort of mixed vegetation and low woodland typical ... |
| 46529893 by dudone @ 2017-03-02 18:39 | 1 | 2018-03-30 00:27 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | I took the liberty to remove the service=driveway tag from http://osm.org/way/60178133. In my point of view, that tag is meant exclusively for highways leading to nothing else than a private property, having even no branching tracks or paths at all, while this road is used by a public footpath. Furt... |
| 2 | 2018-04-02 14:05 | dudone | Many thanks for correcting the road classification. Are we allowed to use the data provided by councils with regard to road/prow designation? I assumed this wasn’t allowed due to OS copyright issues. It would be useful if we could as byways, BOATs etc. are quite often not identified on the ... | |
| 3 | 2018-04-02 17:50 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | The OS has the copyright for the base map of course, and we must not copy this. But I don’t see why they should have anything to do with the public access data provided by the CC. | |
| 55837968 by dudone @ 2018-01-28 18:57 | 1 | 2018-01-28 20:21 | gurglypipe ♦872 | Did you know you don't need to add the source=bing tag to each object you create? JOSM adds it to the changeset itself. (So does ID.) |
| 2 | 2018-01-29 20:21 | dudone | Many thanks for the comment. I started doing this as my changesets can be quite large and the source for individual objects within this can be quite different. The internet connection I have can be a bit unreliable so it has been easier to not use lots of smaller changesets. I built some JOSM pre... | |
| 3 | 2018-01-29 20:57 | gurglypipe ♦872 | The approach of adding source= to each element is not quite deprecated, but is definitely not the recommended approach now. You can list multiple sources for the entire changeset by semicolon-separating them (as it looks like you have done). The details are here (in case you haven’t seen them ... | |
| 45252527 by dudone @ 2017-01-17 19:53 | 1 | 2017-12-15 11:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466732976 - looks a bit long for a horse_stile? Also there's another just to the southeast. |
| 2 | 2017-12-15 19:42 | dudone | Looks like JOSM's autocomplete has got the better of me. Corrected.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2017-12-15 19:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Thanks! | |
| 33868784 by dudone @ 2015-09-07 21:43 | 1 | 2017-12-14 12:58 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Just checking - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369596182#map=19/53.23763/-1.70266 really a stile? It looks like it's on a small road from the imagery suggesting perhaps gate or cattle grid? |
| 2 | 2017-12-14 20:02 | dudone | Hi AndyI've changed it to gate.RegardsDudley | |
| 44965506 by dudone @ 2017-01-06 20:36 | 1 | 2017-12-12 18:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464186215 perhaps a hedge?Cheers,Andy |
| 53348284 by dudone @ 2017-10-29 17:43 | 1 | 2017-11-12 21:31 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | I'm guessing that the spelling of "Mandale Enginer House" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198601990 is possibly a typo? |
| 2 | 2017-11-13 16:51 | dudone | Corrected to "Engine". ThanksDudley | |
| 49608926 by dudone @ 2017-06-17 08:02 | 1 | 2017-07-31 12:07 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | This edit broke the heathland multipolygon http://osm.org/relation/5301123 at several places: * At http://osm.org/node/3606022272, there’s no need to map a gap in the wall (which broke up the MP’s outer way). When a track crosses a wall, just put a shared node of both and tag it barrie... |
| 44525055 by dudone @ 2016-12-19 20:29 | 1 | 2017-06-19 14:36 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake? |
| 2 | 2017-06-20 20:21 | dudone | Thanks for spotting this. I've removed the tag.Dudley | |
| 46420842 by dudone @ 2017-02-26 17:18 | 1 | 2017-05-11 10:58 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Hi, I saw you re-tagged some small lanes hw=service + service=driveway. I took the liberty to change them to hw=unclassified since they do not lead to a single destination only. Please keep in mind that service=driveway should be used for small driveways from public roads into private property only ... |
| 2 | 2017-05-11 14:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | @kreuzschnabel Please don't change service to unclassified unless you've surveyed on the ground and can see that it's council maintained or otherwise obviously qualifies as an unclassified road. I can think of plenty of highway=service roads near me that lead to more that one propert... | |
| 3 | 2017-05-11 16:53 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Sorry but which qualification does it actually need to be hw=unclassified? In the Wiki, I cannot find anything like "council maintained", I only find that hw=unclassified is the lowest category of public roads, while hw=service are mere access or special roads to particular places and not ... | |
| 4 | 2017-05-11 19:21 | dudone | I think you will find that Brownber is an old estate which has now been broken up into a number of old and new residences. This was my impression when I walked through it. I cannot be 100% sure but it looked very much like a driveway and not a unclassified highway. I walked along the path from th... | |
| 5 | 2017-05-11 19:51 | kreuzschnabel ♦801 | Changed them back to hw=service but would still prefer to leave it that way. The driveway issue needs a general discussion IMHO since it’s interpreted in such different ways: some mappers use it as a default for any small lane, while for most renderers that makes them far less important than u... | |
| 47300587 by dudone @ 2017-03-30 17:55 | 1 | 2017-04-04 15:48 | mueschel ♦6,568 | Hi,could you check this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377910114The key 'ch]' looks like a mistake.Jan |
| 2 | 2017-04-04 19:47 | dudone | Hi JanMany thanks for spotting this. I have removed the tag. There was also a highway=track tag missing for the way above this which I have now added.RegardsDudley | |
| 46473607 by dudone @ 2017-02-28 17:46 | 1 | 2017-03-14 01:17 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, hope you don't mind me commenting, but if a track allows access to agricultural and forestry vehicles (e.g. way 477728220), rather than using motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry, I suggest using motor_vehicle=forestry and agricultural=yes. This avoids putting two values in a tag - multiple ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-15 20:12 | dudone | Hi MikeNo problem with the feedback. I'm afraid I don't know how to find the specific way you mention to look at the history. I think this tag must have already been on the way or I must have accidentally copied it from another way as this isn't a tag/style of tagging I would cu... | |
| 45242536 by dudone @ 2017-01-17 13:12 | 1 | 2017-01-19 15:02 | SK53 ♦864 | Are you sure about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4020491191. Just checking my photos from Feb 2016 & I think this is a stile adjacent to a gate. |
| 2 | 2017-01-19 20:14 | dudone | Hi JerryWell spotted. If I'm not sure I will use entrance. I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default. Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this. As you suggest it is a stile a... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-19 20:29 | SK53 ♦864 | Realised that I had not added hedges etc from visit in Feb 2016, so was following that route. I agree entrance is good practice and helps to encourage checking of gates etc in the field.Overall we seem to have made a very satisfactory impact on mapping this area. I'm continuing to add field... | |
| 43135040 by dudone @ 2016-10-24 19:19 | 1 | 2017-01-15 14:00 | SK53 ♦864 | Slightly complicated one: Raw Head & the hut across the road aren't really residential areas, but can't think what else can be used to mark them. From a purely financial view they're commercial as the climbing clubs have to pay business rates, but that ain't right either. Per... |
| 41130893 by dudone @ 2016-07-30 17:03 | 1 | 2016-08-17 21:03 | andygol ♦488 | There was relation for Great Britain island - http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/6038068. Why did you create one more? |
| 2 | 2016-08-20 15:47 | dudone | HiWasn't aware that I had. It is hopefully now deleted.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2016-08-21 08:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Thanks. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/thread.html#19100 for discussion about the other one BTW. | |
| 40663970 by dudone @ 2016-07-11 19:49 | 1 | 2016-07-11 20:55 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Got any thoughts on whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25825505/history should really be an unclassified road? I thought not, and said so on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38625785 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566042 . https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pmailkeey thought ... |
| 2 | 2016-07-12 19:07 | dudone | HiI walked along this only this Sunday. I haven't quite got the tagging right as it is a little problematic. I was assuming it would be a BOAT given the motocyles and motorcycle with sidecar! that passed me. However it seems it is an adopted highway. You could therefore argue that this ... | |
| 3 | 2016-07-12 19:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Sounds a bit like one of Lincolnshire's "Unclassified County Roads". "designation=adopted_highway" sounds like a good answer to me (I'll stick a line in at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L151 to deal with it!) | |
| 4 | 2016-07-12 19:22 | dudone | HiI have now looked at the website!!It seems that there was an order to change this into a bridleway from a "non-classified" highway but this has gone to the planning inspectorate as people have objected and what it classifed as a BOAT. It looks like a decision will be made later ... | |
| 22643454 by dudone @ 2014-05-30 18:25 | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:34 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | I'm guessing http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285292116 is a barrier=fence? |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:32 | dudone | Yes. Corrected.RegardDudley | |
| 29016364 by dudone @ 2015-02-22 09:35 | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:09 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,Any idea what the barrier=E is at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3365452752 ? |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:27 | dudone | HiChanged to entrance. I generally use this where the is a passage through a collapsed part of wall or a gap that doesn't look like it was every a gate entrance.RegardsDudley | |
| 21427367 by dudone @ 2014-03-31 19:58 | 1 | 2016-07-03 17:05 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi Dudley,Any thoughts about the oddly-tagged barrier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270684102 ? It looks like part hedge, part gap and part wall.Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 18:23 | dudone | Hi AndyLooks like a type so I have changed it to hedge.RegardsDudley | |
| 27828993 by dudone @ 2014-12-31 18:34 | 1 | 2016-06-12 22:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi,I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319762883 isn't all "hampshire gate"? |
| 2 | 2016-06-13 18:22 | dudone | HiAuto complete getting the better of me. I have changed it to hedge.RegardsDudley | |
| 3 | 2016-06-13 22:08 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Thanks. | |
| 38866887 by dudone @ 2016-04-25 20:19 | 1 | 2016-05-14 22:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Hi,I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80537943 should be "sidewalk=both"?Cheers,Andy |
| 2 | 2016-05-15 19:04 | dudone | Hi Typo due to caps lock. Now fixed,RegardsDudley | |
| 37554047 by dudone @ 2016-03-01 20:26 | 1 | 2016-04-18 21:39 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Just checking - is Giddy Edge really a public footpath? If so, presumably some connection bits should be too? |
| 2 | 2016-04-19 17:06 | dudone | Sorry it is rather a big change set so I'm not sure which way. The way named Giddy Edge doesn't seem to have a public footpath designation tag. The way to the North (Changeset 21740279) does but I'm not sure this is a public right of way or the way changset 7337922. Unfortunely the... | |
| 37316778 by dudone @ 2016-02-19 20:07 | 1 | 2016-02-22 14:14 | R0bst3r ♦1,094 | Hi dudone,can you improve the tag layer=0=gate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398790760? |
| 2 | 2016-02-22 20:55 | dudone | Deleted. It was a typo. I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road. It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted. Presumably because it is currently closed. | |
| 36174069 by dudone @ 2015-12-26 10:47 | 1 | 2015-12-31 14:58 | SK53 ♦864 | Seems unlikely that you meant bare_rock for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387806282! |
| 2 | 2015-12-31 17:50 | dudone | Should now be fixed.Dudley | |
| 28737094 by dudone @ 2015-02-09 20:32 | 1 | 2015-11-16 14:10 | R0bst3r ♦1,094 | Hi dudone, can you please review way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327315427? Thanks! |
| 2 | 2015-11-16 18:31 | dudone | HiI've removed the "odd tag" i.e. B=stepping_stone. This was a typo. Is there anything else?Dudley | |
| 32683399 by dudone @ 2015-07-16 19:59 | 1 | 2015-09-23 19:01 | SomeoneElse ♦13,368 | Just checking - did you delete the highway tag from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49164552 deliberately? This was a track when I was last there (but it was a while ago) |
| 31207878 by dudone @ 2015-05-16 17:44 | 1 | 2015-07-30 18:11 | SK53 ♦864 | Any idea why you deleted the PRoW leaving Foolow at S edge of village towards Eyam? Or was this just a mistake? |
| 2 | 2015-07-30 18:47 | dudone | Thanks for letting me know. This was a mistake. I've redrawn it. | |
| 28018995 by dudone @ 2015-01-09 13:30 | 1 | 2015-01-09 20:26 | RobJN ♦77 | Hi Dudley,In the council data the track from Riddings lane is classed as a public bridleway - are you sure it only had yellow marker posts (i.e. footpath), or could they have been blue? |