| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 47800046 | TheOutpost | Hi Dave, the rendering in OSM around these islands looks very odd. You know what's up? |
| AlaskaDave | It's a rendering issue of some sort. I added Shuyak Island State Park using rough boundaries back in January. Coastllnes seem to be invisible with the current tagging using leisure=park although I can see them fine in my custom maps.Just now I altered the tagging a bit to use boundary=protected_ar... |
| AlaskaDave | I have spent the morning fixing errors in multipolygons and guess what? I redrew a portion of the coastline of Shuyak Island when I fixed up the Perevalnie Islands but forgot to add that new section to the coastline multipolygon. Rendering looks right now. |
| TheOutpost | Hmm, still looks odd, though I wonder if the tiles are stale. Looks ok at certain zooms. |
| AlaskaDave | It's most likely some sort of caching or currency problem with the OSM server. I'm sure it will render okay eventually. |
|
| 45152994 | TheOutpost | Hi Dave,After putting in the state park with an area covering the islands and a lot of water, the islands don't render right. Is this an official boundary of the state park? |
|
| 47936694 | AlaskaDave | 2017-04-19 The original CanVec imports used many individual nodes labeled name=Kaskawulsh Glacier and natural=glacier. I removed those and added the name to several existing natural=glacier multipolygons. Recently reported changes in this glacier mean its present outline is not the same as shown.on ... |
|
| 47058312 | Taniaak | In case you're searching for some online networking apparatuses to help make your procedure run all the more easily, then look at this article offers numerous proposals 16 Social Media Tools The Experts Swear By.see more http://www.latestdatabase.com/ |
|
| 46519875 | muralito | Hi AlaskaDave:Some tags of the elements you added doesn't have any meaning in OSM. It's probably an import that you did it unadvertedly, and could be improved to be more useful. |
| AlaskaDave | Yep, you're right. I used a list from the USFWS website and didn't bother to clean up the old tagging. It's on my todo list. |
| AlaskaDave | Done. |
|
| 42930943 | AlaskaDave | This changeset actually included many edits to the streets in Dillingham. Reworked and relocated, simplified horrible existing Tiger data. This is a work in progress. I saved it but forgot to change the comment to reflect what was done. |
|
| 33363018 | GerdP | please review way 365943695:the tag highway=junction is rarely used.Consider using nodes with highway=motorway_junction, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction |
| AlaskaDave | No problem. I was looking for a way to record the name of this historical junction and came up with highway=junction, admittedly a bad idea. The two ways no longer cross - consequently there is no longer a junction - 1317 now crosses 11 on bridges. I'll just leave its name on the area and remove the... |
| GerdP | okay, thanks |
|
| 26248111 | stephankn | regarding mini hydro: I think the main reservoir is a bit upstream. It it a pump storage plant? so maybe the empty reservoir is the lower basin? |
| AlaskaDave | I don't know. I merely moved an existing reservoir to where I thought it might be when more water is present. I think the reservoir you tagged is probably the actual location.I think the original reservoir should be deleted. By the way, are you sure the name is spelled Meatian? I think it is Mae... |
| stephankn | It is a wrong spelling on their sign. I put in both spellings and removed the riverbank. |
| AlaskaDave | Sounds good. |
|
| 27389799 | AlaskaDave | This comment is from the one I saved previously. It should read: Adding some POIs in my neighborhood of Chang Phuak. source=Bing, survey, GPS |