| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57075852 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2018-03-13 08:45:24 UTC | highflyer74 | Hi Dave!Can you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568646627 please? There are still some non-OSM tags on it.Greetings from across the pond! |
| 2 | 2018-03-13 14:02:57 UTC | AlaskaDave | Got it, extra tags removed. Thanks! | |
| 57071996 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2018-03-12 12:04:34 UTC | mueschel | Hi,could you please check the rivers? It looks like they overlap with previously mapped rivers. And I guess these tags shouldn't have been uploaded:AGENCY = FWS MANAGING_E = FWS RIVERCATEG = Federally Administered RIVER_ID = 40 SHAPE_LEN = 5.50073159877 STATE = Alaska WEBLINK =... |
| 2 | 2018-03-12 14:23:42 UTC | AlaskaDave | Thank you for the note. I forgot to clean up the original tags and left some extra tags on one section. I removed those. But I don't see any "overlap" with previously mapped rivers. Can you explain more fully what you mean? | |
| 3 | 2018-03-12 14:37:24 UTC | mueschel | Looking more closely, it's just a glitch of the rendering server - when I checked both the new and the old (coarse) river way were shown simultaneously. The database is clean though. | |
| 55399627 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2018-01-13 07:13:09 UTC | AlaskaDave | Somehow, portions of 1211 including this one, got renamed Den Ha (1211). Mapper did not give source. I renamed it to what it was previously, Sunwichai Road, which is a translation of the Thai name tag. |
| 2 | 2018-01-13 07:45:34 UTC | AlaskaDave | I checked Google, and it gives Den Ha Dong Mada Road as the name. Thai street names are notoriously hard to map properly because signs bearing the name are rare. Many times the name is just a best guess and might be based on one road sign many km distant. | |
| 52319563 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-10-23 15:13:10 UTC | imagico | Hello Dave,i would advise against trying to map features where you have nothing even close to verifiable position data for.The location of node 5125769091 is a highly unlikely position for an islet or even a gravel bar based on the sea ice movement in the area - ice would not be able to move... |
| 2 | 2017-10-23 23:58:03 UTC | AlaskaDave | Ordinarily, I would agree with you. I came across Shea's description through a newspaper article I read that mentioned Stray Dog West. When I searched for it on OSM, nothing came up and I wanted to at least put a findable entry into Nominatum. The uncertainty of the position is why I added the fixme... | |
| 3 | 2017-10-24 08:29:42 UTC | imagico | This is just my assessment of the situation - i won't insist on changing anything here. But i am pretty sure the position is wrong, not wrong by a few hundred meters but wrong by likely many kilometers - either much closer to the shore or much further to the east (that is the problem with secondary... | |
| 51995833 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-09-14 15:18:02 UTC | Harald Hartmann | Hello AlaskaDave. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4423273617 you have tagged `l=0`. Sould it be `level`? #newkey |
| 2 | 2017-09-14 22:23:18 UTC | AlaskaDave | Definitely. It was purely accidental. Working with OSMAnd on a phone can be tricky for a person with big fingers. I'm at a loss to explain just how it happened but I'll fix it pronto. | |
| 51898529 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-09-13 05:43:21 UTC | AlaskaDave | Source should be ESRI World |
| 38311736 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-08-23 13:06:58 UTC | GerdP | Hi!I found 3 ways with hihway=fof , one created in this CS, all created by you. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407895354What does it mean?Just a typo for footway? |
| 2 | 2017-08-23 14:44:25 UTC | AlaskaDave | Sorry, It is a typo, caused by JOSM "remembering" a bad value. I cannot locate any place in JOSM that contains the text "fof" that I used by mistake over a year ago but JOSM insert it sometimes still. It's supposed to be "footway". | |
| 3 | 2017-08-23 14:50:55 UTC | GerdP | Maybe search for key=properties.recent-tagsin your preferences.xml and check if you find "fof" | |
| 4 | 2017-08-23 15:05:15 UTC | AlaskaDave | Tried that already. It's not there. This is an annoying issue but one I cani' seem to rid myself of. | |
| 5 | 2017-08-24 05:24:36 UTC | GerdP | OK. Strange. Please check also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9001118Can't see much on sat images and the way crosses a river. | |
| 6 | 2017-08-24 12:20:12 UTC | AlaskaDave | I changed that one to highway=path - it is much more visible on the new DigitalGlobe imagery. I have no way to tell what the "trail" actually looks like and because of its remoteness I never will, so that's only a guess. I'll work on it again and check the stream crossings when I have more... | |
| 47800046 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-04-22 02:02:14 UTC | TheOutpost | Hi Dave, the rendering in OSM around these islands looks very odd. You know what's up? |
| 2 | 2017-04-22 10:14:26 UTC | AlaskaDave | It's a rendering issue of some sort. I added Shuyak Island State Park using rough boundaries back in January. Coastllnes seem to be invisible with the current tagging using leisure=park although I can see them fine in my custom maps.Just now I altered the tagging a bit to use boundary=protected_ar... | |
| 3 | 2017-04-25 19:42:55 UTC | AlaskaDave | I have spent the morning fixing errors in multipolygons and guess what? I redrew a portion of the coastline of Shuyak Island when I fixed up the Perevalnie Islands but forgot to add that new section to the coastline multipolygon. Rendering looks right now. | |
| 4 | 2017-05-01 20:17:08 UTC | TheOutpost | Hmm, still looks odd, though I wonder if the tiles are stale. Looks ok at certain zooms. | |
| 5 | 2017-05-02 01:33:21 UTC | AlaskaDave | It's most likely some sort of caching or currency problem with the OSM server. I'm sure it will render okay eventually. | |
| 45152994 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-04-22 02:03:45 UTC | TheOutpost | Hi Dave,After putting in the state park with an area covering the islands and a lot of water, the islands don't render right. Is this an official boundary of the state park? |
| 47936694 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-04-19 14:01:24 UTC | AlaskaDave | 2017-04-19 The original CanVec imports used many individual nodes labeled name=Kaskawulsh Glacier and natural=glacier. I removed those and added the name to several existing natural=glacier multipolygons. Recently reported changes in this glacier mean its present outline is not the same as shown.on ... |
| 47058312 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-03-22 05:44:06 UTC | Taniaak | In case you're searching for some online networking apparatuses to help make your procedure run all the more easily, then look at this article offers numerous proposals 16 Social Media Tools The Experts Swear By.see more http://www.latestdatabase.com/ |
| 46519875 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2017-03-07 03:10:28 UTC | muralito | Hi AlaskaDave:Some tags of the elements you added doesn't have any meaning in OSM. It's probably an import that you did it unadvertedly, and could be improved to be more useful. |
| 2 | 2017-03-07 04:53:20 UTC | AlaskaDave | Yep, you're right. I used a list from the USFWS website and didn't bother to clean up the old tagging. It's on my todo list. | |
| 3 | 2017-03-07 05:22:32 UTC | AlaskaDave | Done. | |
| 42930943 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2016-10-16 10:55:45 UTC | AlaskaDave | This changeset actually included many edits to the streets in Dillingham. Reworked and relocated, simplified horrible existing Tiger data. This is a work in progress. I saved it but forgot to change the comment to reflect what was done. |
| 33363018 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2015-10-31 11:11:22 UTC | GerdP | please review way 365943695:the tag highway=junction is rarely used.Consider using nodes with highway=motorway_junction, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction |
| 2 | 2015-10-31 12:40:53 UTC | AlaskaDave | No problem. I was looking for a way to record the name of this historical junction and came up with highway=junction, admittedly a bad idea. The two ways no longer cross - consequently there is no longer a junction - 1317 now crosses 11 on bridges. I'll just leave its name on the area and remove the... | |
| 3 | 2015-10-31 12:45:12 UTC | GerdP | okay, thanks | |
| 26248111 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2015-01-31 03:20:51 UTC | stephankn | regarding mini hydro: I think the main reservoir is a bit upstream. It it a pump storage plant? so maybe the empty reservoir is the lower basin? |
| 2 | 2015-01-31 06:00:52 UTC | AlaskaDave | I don't know. I merely moved an existing reservoir to where I thought it might be when more water is present. I think the reservoir you tagged is probably the actual location.I think the original reservoir should be deleted. By the way, are you sure the name is spelled Meatian? I think it is Mae... | |
| 3 | 2015-01-31 08:34:12 UTC | stephankn | It is a wrong spelling on their sign. I put in both spellings and removed the riverbank. | |
| 4 | 2015-01-31 09:07:55 UTC | AlaskaDave | Sounds good. | |
| 27389799 by AlaskaDave | 1 | 2014-12-11 03:06:23 UTC | AlaskaDave | This comment is from the one I saved previously. It should read: Adding some POIs in my neighborhood of Chang Phuak. source=Bing, survey, GPS |