| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 177223630 (Comments: 4) | BAT_SBB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für diese Infos. Genau wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177223262 wird das am besten mit einem Lifecycle-Prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:proposed:*) bis im August gelöst, danach mit einem weiteren ... commented 2026-01-26 15:41:48 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177223262 (Comments: 4) | BAT_SBB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Danke für diese Informationen. In diesem Fall sollte der Publikumszugang und die Nebenpasserelle als 'im Bau' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Präfix) erfasst werden, und ab 25. August erst dann als Fussweg/... commented 2026-01-26 15:39:35 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 169975385 (Comments: 5) | dafadllyn (Discussed changesets: 27) | Ich hatte mal eine Mailkommunikation mit dem 'Leiter GIS-Kompetenzzentrum' der 'Geoinformation Stadt Bern', die ist hier zitiert: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/commit/1c60aadbf9fdd085aa2ada9a97dd26144e3e5624 zum Ka... commented 2026-01-26 15:20:58 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177697076 (Comments: 1) | Piagno (Discussed changesets: 128) | Thank you for your help. commented 2026-01-26 12:24:30 UTC by mcg1878 ♦3 |
| 164724962 (Comments: 1) | Voonosm (Discussed changesets: 34) | 😍 Bin da durchgefahren, göttlich perfekt gemappt, danke! commented 2026-01-25 19:06:02 UTC by stillhart ♦175 |
| 174087311 (Comments: 3) | North14 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Es ging um den Radweg zwischen der Alten Thurbrücke und der Flawilerstrasse. Ich habe das bereits wieder angepasst. commented 2026-01-25 09:12:53 UTC by tf66 ♦6 |
| 158068986 (Comments: 2) | tf66 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Ich habe die Karte "Nationalstrassenachsen" unter Map Admin (https://map.geo.admin.ch) als Quelle verwendet. Dort, wo ich die Signale im Orthofoto (SwissIMAGE) sah, habe ich diese Position gesetzt. Insbesondere in Tunnels kann diese aber au... commented 2026-01-25 09:06:54 UTC by tf66 ♦6 |
| 144383094 (Comments: 1) | PierreRouv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cette route est NON déneigée ! commented 2026-01-25 09:00:16 UTC by Mich-Mich ♦1 |
| 177071857 (Comments: 2) | Metti777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177670891 (No visible changes after review) commented 2026-01-25 07:25:52 UTC by NeisRevert ♦580 |
| 177612350 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 412) | AnpassunG :) commented 2026-01-23 14:44:03 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177537747 (Comments: 3) | shiverinthedark (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pascal, yes, the store at this location is a branch of that brand. Why wouldn't you enter the name? Best, shiver commented 2026-01-22 20:11:45 UTC by shiverinthedark ♦1 |
| 177288660 (Comments: 2) | Mattia Pastore (Discussed changesets: 2) | Stimmt. Sorry! Gerne ändern. commented 2026-01-21 21:27:27 UTC by Mattia Pastore ♦1 |
| 177500898 (Comments: 7) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 55) | I open forum discussion on the national border question: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/border-in-lake-constance-bodensee/140844 commented 2026-01-21 19:43:41 UTC by 99_tabazan ♦8 |
| 177510979 (Comments: 1) | nokingsinswitzerland (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177521912 commented 2026-01-21 13:13:48 UTC by captain_slow ♦73 |
| 177510876 (Comments: 1) | nokingsinswitzerland (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177521912 commented 2026-01-21 13:13:42 UTC by captain_slow ♦73 |
| 177454566 (Comments: 2) | welzheimerwald (Discussed changesets: 55) | Habe die entsprechenden tags (start_date) wieder gelöscht. Die Gleisgeometrien stammen aus dem Orthophoto (swisstopo/LGL BW). Danke für den Hinweis! commented 2026-01-21 10:40:01 UTC by welzheimerwald ♦88 |
| 166391159 (Comments: 1) | habi (Discussed changesets: 412) | Steinblöcken, nicht Steinböcken :) commented 2026-01-21 10:20:13 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177507853 (Comments: 1) | Yarpenn (Kraina Yarpenna) (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342553663 with `access=private` doesn't really improve the data in my opinion. The way goes through the gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3493236998 which is already limiting the access. commented 2026-01-21 10:16:41 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177507633 (Comments: 1) | Yarpenn (Kraina Yarpenna) (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ciao Yarpenn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It's great that you're participating and helping to maintain the map and map data. I wonder about your additions though. As all tracks where you've added `access=private` here end ... commented 2026-01-21 10:15:08 UTC by habi ♦2,012 |
| 177484990 (Comments: 1) | rembur (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-01-21 07:26:01 UTC by NeisBot ♦4,591 |
| 125224876 (Comments: 2) | DavidL308 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Must be a copy/paste error, thank you for your review. :) commented 2026-01-20 20:22:31 UTC by DavidL308 ♦1 |
| 177441447 (Comments: 5) | RandomMappppist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, I did see that I needed to provide attribution, but didn't really know where and how. I thought it was only when used in an application. commented 2026-01-20 17:40:47 UTC by RandomMappppist ♦6 |
| 177484520 (Comments: 1) | mottiger (Discussed changesets: 22) | added lanes=* and/or lane_markings=* not highway=street_lamp commented 2026-01-20 16:44:53 UTC by mottiger ♦42 |