| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175598074 (Comments: 1) | map_improver_xyz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, my changes (work of more than an hour) from just before got lost. I assume they are in the previous version. How can I reverse this here? commented 2025-12-06 19:20:50 UTC by map_improver_xyz ♦5 |
| 141001003 (Comments: 1) | skfd (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11177573877/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 133060280 (Comments: 1) | ti-lo (Discussed changesets: 869) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150402677/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 175462379 (Comments: 4) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi there, I fixed Allen Road according to what the City of Toronto said. I contacted Toronto 311 and was told that it should be classified as a Primary road and not a motorway, as it is not a highway at all and is classified as a municipal major road... commented 2025-12-05 20:00:02 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 164918453 (Comments: 1) | DENelson83 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671676471/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be bet... commented 2025-12-05 08:11:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 170808600 (Comments: 3) | EPMPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | glad to hear that this was useful! commented 2025-12-05 08:08:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 175500459 (Comments: 1) | ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (Discussed changesets: 6) | Before anybody comments, this bus route is PUBLICLY operated by the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc and the Cities of Sarnia & London. I am NOT making any privately operated bus routes in this map (eg: Megabus, Flixbus) as it ruins the ... commented 2025-12-04 15:25:09 UTC by ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist ♦12 |
| 175425092 (Comments: 5) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, this seems to have worked as intended. commented 2025-12-04 15:01:03 UTC by mueschel ♦6,745 |
| 175449372 (Comments: 1) | regulardoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I removed the oneway tag because it is permitted to u-turn from atwater going south to atwater going north. There is no sign prohibiting it, so we must keep the segment two-way. Thanks and have a nice day! commented 2025-12-04 13:38:06 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦448 |
| 175381776 (Comments: 5) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the clarification! : ) commented 2025-12-04 12:53:10 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175462463 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Again, your comment is false. You changed the type and access of roads only. commented 2025-12-04 12:14:48 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175461442 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | You didn't even divide any streets in this changeset. The only change you made was to the access of a road. So your summary comment is completely false! Please do not do that! commented 2025-12-04 12:14:00 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175458122 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads. commented 2025-12-04 12:08:45 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175468484 (Comments: 4) | Alejandra_Sterling (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset also split ways that are administrative boundaries and sidewalks, what is even the point of doing that? commented 2025-12-04 03:05:19 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175420545 (Comments: 2) | DuckMan2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome DuckMan2! Just another minor thing: you missed the + at the start of the phone number for Little Ceasars. You did it correctly for 13th Floor Cannabis, so it was obviously just a minor oversight. Thanks for the great contribution, and k... commented 2025-12-03 23:05:15 UTC by Adam Dunn ♦22 |
| 175376622 (Comments: 2) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrigé commented 2025-12-03 16:17:34 UTC by MoG ♦2 |
| 175414695 (Comments: 1) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 6) | The ESRI imagery seems to have the new updates if you don't zoom in too far, that was enough for me to do some improvements. Take a look and see what you think. commented 2025-12-03 15:19:54 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175384354 (Comments: 1) | fuzzyorange (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ha, I drove past and noticed the "Puffin Palace" vape shop this morning, and was going to add it, but you beat me to the punch! :P commented 2025-12-02 19:23:42 UTC by hoserab ♦212 |
| 144735760 (Comments: 2) | joel56dt (Discussed changesets: 21) | Fixed, thanks. commented 2025-12-02 17:44:16 UTC by joel56dt ♦187 |
| 156159223 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 62) | Just a typo. Fixed in latest CS. Thank you! commented 2025-12-02 17:40:22 UTC by eerib ♦213 |
| 175407718 (Comments: 1) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | this chnageset should not be so big, i only changed the river at the top a little bit commented 2025-12-02 15:22:57 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 169581998 (Comments: 1) | Stephen Hinde (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=paved---- on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256257165/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-02 10:26:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 156203490 (Comments: 2) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 51) | That was added in the previous changeset. My changeset only fixed the typo in the tag name. I see you already opened a discussion in the previous changeset, too. commented 2025-12-02 10:10:36 UTC by mtmail ♦161 |
| 159217987 (Comments: 2) | dalmond (Discussed changesets: 7) | You are correct this is a typo on my part. I have fixed it properly to culvert commented 2025-12-02 04:10:30 UTC by dalmond ♦6 |
| 175374662 (Comments: 2) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I understand, I will provide better mapping next time. commented 2025-12-02 00:49:27 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 174530307 (Comments: 4) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 327) | Thanks for linking me to that conversation! I'm happy for us in Winnipeg to follow any agreed standard, but I want "the docs" to be updated as well to avoid... honestly to avoid this kind of bickering :P I agree that the name f... commented 2025-12-01 22:50:02 UTC by mf8s003j ♦25 |
| 172263252 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 144) | Very nice catch on the incorrectly named street! BTW: Is adding the postal code, town, and / or province to buildings really worth it? This can be found very easily with a spatial search ("building addr:housenumber=... addr:street=... IN ... commented 2025-11-30 16:31:08 UTC by aseigo ♦5 |
| 102359192 (Comments: 1) | Johnwhelan (Discussed changesets: 36) | would you be fine with lamp_type=led tagging? see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poll-led-vs-led/138681/ commented 2025-11-30 14:04:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 141122106 (Comments: 3) | David Trueman (Discussed changesets: 6) | Great! Thanks for a fix! commented 2025-11-30 13:21:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |