Latest OSM Changeset Discussions/Comments - - Total: 14 - Canada - Feed
Filter for Country selection: (Not displayed: woodpeck_repair,Nakaner-repair,SomeoneElse_Revert,Peda_repair,Stereo_repair)! See all discussions
Country Link Changeset Contributor Comment/Discussion
(Discussed changesets: 37)
Pretending that sidewalks that allow use by cyclists are bike ways does not help cyclists, it just obfuscates the reality of the infrastructure. Also footways are visible on most (all?) renderings, but if they didn't that'd be no reason to use inaccu...
commented 2017-06-25 00:51:15 UTC by keithonearth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! I'm glad you're enjoying it!

It's a bit unusual to add address tags to a landuse feature, but I suppose it's not necessarily wrong. However, in this case it sounds like you might want to use boundary=prot...
commented 2017-06-23 15:19:35 UTC by Alan
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi. Thanks for the observation. I didn't know that osmand doesn't interpret correctly the via nodes. I split the ways where the links started, hope this will fix the problem. However shouldn't that be also revolved on the routing side? maybe there ...
commented 2017-06-23 12:09:51 UTC by marinad_telenav
(Discussed changesets: 2)
I'm not aware of this shipwreck, and am fairly familiar with this part of town. Does this represent a wreck that is still present at the site? Or was a pleasure craft that was briefly stranded here?
commented 2017-06-23 08:07:00 UTC by keithonearth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
That may be true, but that doesn't necessarily make it a park. If it's a park, what is its name? What government entity administers it? If it's a true park, it should be possible to answer these questions. If you can't answer them, then it's not a pa...
commented 2017-06-22 17:00:59 UTC by Alan
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Are all of the places actually cities? Town seems more appropriate for a place <100,000 inhabitants.
commented 2017-06-22 05:48:25 UTC by PlaneMad
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! You can also describe what kind of store this is by using the "shop" tag. Perhaps "shop=convenience" or "shop=supermarket". See fo...
commented 2017-06-21 20:58:44 UTC by Alan
(Discussed changesets: 37)
Oops, I forgot to update the source tag on this changeset. It should have been BC Mosaic, and no Survey.
commented 2017-06-21 17:27:01 UTC by keithonearth
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Residential area will be replaced when more data is in place, no worries!

commented 2017-06-21 16:52:44 UTC by Medic33
April Herman
(Discussed changesets: 3)
That back alley isn't part of Cameron Crescent. The following map should be considered an official reference, not Google:
commented 2017-06-21 01:56:37 UTC by gecho111
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi there! Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

In this case, you shouldn't add name=Home, because that's not the proper name for this place. Instead you could add something like building=house.
commented 2017-06-20 23:27:36 UTC by Alan
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I've deleted one campsite that was added in this edit, as it was clearly inaccurate. I'm not sure if there are other objects added to North Van with this changeset that should be removed.
commented 2017-06-20 16:50:56 UTC by keithonearth
Gurjot Singh Bhatti
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I'm confused, you say "updating leaf type", but this doesn't seem to be a tree. It's an address node, and there is a confusing building tag, too. Can you clarify what you intended to map with this feature?
commented 2017-06-20 16:03:14 UTC by Alan
(Discussed changesets: 2)
jOSM, 3 heures à perdre, le plan annexé au règlement sur la réserve faunique des Laurentides (RLRQ c. C-61.1, r. 60)
commented 2017-06-20 01:20:09 UTC by webfil