Latest OSM Changeset Discussions/Comments (7 days) - Total: 45 - Australia - Feed
Filter for Country selection: (Not displayed: woodpeck_repair,Nakaner-repair,SomeoneElse_Revert,Peda_repair,Stereo_repair)! See all discussions
Country Link Changeset Contributor Comment/Discussion
(Discussed changesets: 27)
You're wrong, all renders support natural=bay. This is the approved tag by the community for mapping a bay area. Here you can see an example of a successful rendering:
Obviously, to obtain a correct render, the polygon...
commented 2017-03-27 18:57:16 UTC by jptolosa87
(Discussed changesets: 15)
Not all data is equal. Different types of features like roads vs lookouts could dramatically vary in accuracy, even within the same feature types, the accuracy in the LPI Base Map can and does vary.

Since we don't know the where each feature in th...
commented 2017-03-27 07:50:21 UTC by aharvey
muh abdi
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Welcome to Open Street map. You have made map edits near Gosford. Its unclear to me what you were intending. If you need help just ask.
commented 2017-03-27 07:26:01 UTC by tonyf1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Can't get to this right now. Can fix in a week or so, however feel free to amend.
commented 2017-03-26 23:38:10 UTC by GavinX
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi. You seem to have created a duplicate to Way: 91850128 but of lesser detail. Any reason for the edit?
commented 2017-03-26 22:45:23 UTC by tonyf1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
I think some of these buildings are double mapped; its a bit hard to tell which is the more accurate changeset
commented 2017-03-26 12:14:09 UTC by CloCkWeRX
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Ah thanks for fixing that up, and welcome to OSM!
commented 2017-03-26 09:59:42 UTC by CloCkWeRX
(Discussed changesets: 2)
It is very easy to miss things that have uses in multiple relationships. I think that is what happened here.
This particular relationship is puzzling .. I have left a note on their changeset.
As for the forest .. possibly that is obsolete? Howeve...
commented 2017-03-26 07:37:15 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi cebby. Welcome to Open Street Map. Lots of people depend on the map. It looks like you have added stuff that's not there, maybe for Pokemon Go. Am I right? Please keep contributing, but only real things
commented 2017-03-26 06:49:51 UTC by tonyf1
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Hi cebby. Welcome to Open Street Map. Lots of people depend on the map. It looks like you have added stuff that's not there, maybe for Pokemon Go. Am I right? Please keep contributing, but only real things
commented 2017-03-26 06:48:01 UTC by tonyf1
Ewen Hill
(Discussed changesets: 10)
This Relationship 6026831 - multipolygon does not have any tags that will make it render ...
I think it would be safe to delete, the outer way has been removed by someone else so restoring it will take some work .. and as it has no effect on the ma...
commented 2017-03-26 06:01:13 UTC by Warin61
Ewen Hill
(Discussed changesets: 10)
Relation 5748513 has no outer way .. one inner way .. but no outer boundary.
commented 2017-03-26 03:43:40 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Relationship 6794412 taged breakwater;

only has inners. It should have at least one outer.

Ways touch one another .. not good in a multipolygon!

I have made this into a simple way.
commented 2017-03-26 03:41:32 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 3)
No roles on Goodna either .. could you check the rest?
commented 2017-03-26 03:27:27 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 3)
You forgot to add roles for the members of Redbank...
commented 2017-03-26 03:25:13 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 3)
You forgot to add roles to the members of relationship for Brookwater.
commented 2017-03-26 03:23:25 UTC by Warin61
Leon K
(Discussed changesets: 14)
Thanks Leon. I'll have a look at it later .. There should be a method of tagging the roof too so that they don't clash.
commented 2017-03-26 00:41:27 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Relation 2420705 contains a way 181488836 with the same tags - adding nothing to the map. I have removed it from the relationship.
commented 2017-03-25 23:08:47 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 1)
In removing way 238014906 you have made relation 3207606 (a beach area) into a simple way .. so it is no longer an area .. so the beach is effectively no longer there.

Did you really mean to do this?

commented 2017-03-25 22:57:47 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 20)
The current mapbox imagery seems to be blank, which is weird. Non free imagery suggests they do exist though.
commented 2017-03-25 10:43:19 UTC by CloCkWeRX
(Discussed changesets: 4)
Way 482161878 (wood) crosses itself .. a figure 8.
commented 2017-03-25 03:33:37 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 28)
TheSwavu :)
commented 2017-03-25 00:10:14 UTC by poornibadrinath
(Discussed changesets: 7)
I have made some changes to Camp Coutts Scout Camp. You have a number of nodes inside the area with similar tags. I assume the nodes are individual pitches so have retagged them camp_site=pitch as per a proposed tagging scheme. I have also add an alt...
commented 2017-03-25 00:08:41 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi Maci5741,
I came across your edits and noticed you have added leisure=park tags for all the nodes and also natural=water for swimming pools. Please refer to the correct way of tagging features on OSM before you map. Here's a guide to help you:...
commented 2017-03-24 19:22:41 UTC by poornibadrinath
(Discussed changesets: 4)
👍 fixed, cheers.
commented 2017-03-24 01:39:15 UTC by WoodWoseWulf
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Relation \t5607069 has no tags...
the inner looks like a residential area (bing)

But has the same tags as the outer - protected area ...

Possibly the relationship should have the protected tags, and the inner should be landuse=residential?...
commented 2017-03-24 00:24:55 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 64)
OK. I'm using OSM Inspector to try and get the errors down.. easier than using the error files from making a map. Once those are down I'll try using the error files again.
commented 2017-03-23 23:53:10 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 10)
By making a new node and moving the boundary by 0.2 m the OSM inspector error is removed .. very little effect in the real world. It dose create a 'gap' of 0.2 metres. .. cheating I know.
commented 2017-03-23 23:13:35 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 6)
Thanks to TheOldMiner
These are the main areas

commented 2017-03-23 11:21:41 UTC by nevw
(Discussed changesets: 11)
For is it really named "Unmarked track"? There is a tag for unmarked tracks, trail_visibility=no.
commented 2017-03-23 10:59:51 UTC by aharvey
Roel Verhoeven
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hi boundary=national_park is the correct tag to use

Undoing your change since the park is now off the map :)
commented 2017-03-23 09:37:13 UTC by PlaneMad
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Please ignore, I see you have corrected it.
commented 2017-03-23 05:42:38 UTC by nevw
(Discussed changesets: 2)
ok. good
commented 2017-03-23 03:00:12 UTC by Glenhope1
(Discussed changesets: 1)
This 'meadow' incorporates buildings, and structures and trees .. not all a meadow. And the relationship is not closed now ... relationship 6287756. So I have deleted the relation.
commented 2017-03-23 00:20:46 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Hey! Thank you for the confirmation and prompt reply!

Happy Mapping! :)
commented 2017-03-22 10:30:05 UTC by jinalfoflia
Ewen Hill
(Discussed changesets: 10)
added 'turn restrictions' at Hill Street to reflect this.
commented 2017-03-22 06:20:05 UTC by Ozzorro
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Incorrect name - should read: Updated turn restrictions to show northbound traffic on Victoria Street stopped at Hill Street.
commented 2017-03-22 06:18:48 UTC by Ozzorro
The Trail Hobbit
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Ok. Corrections made -
removed highway=cycleway.
added relations for mtb routes.

Added paths from strava.
Added catch all for strava heat map trails - no names but a generic for the park as a whole.

These now display on
commented 2017-03-22 05:31:43 UTC by Warin61
Ewen Hill
(Discussed changesets: 10)
You just added building=yes tag to
commented 2017-03-21 10:49:14 UTC by manoharuss
(Discussed changesets: 6)
As a NSWelshman I find the idea of an area being both a National Park and a State Forest strange in this country. However if that is the case then it should remain so in OSM. I have updated the web links for the Goodedulla_National_Park. Oh and the t...
commented 2017-03-21 06:59:41 UTC by Warin61
(Discussed changesets: 3)
Its probably better to map the individual cafes/restaurants as points
commented 2017-03-21 06:11:03 UTC by CloCkWeRX
(Discussed changesets: 6)
With I dropped it to landuse=commercial only, so that the individual buildings inside of it wouldn't overlap.
commented 2017-03-21 05:30:07 UTC by CloCkWeRX
cameror lhpq
(Discussed changesets: 2)
This area might need a bit of cleanup to match the bing imagery available - its close, but not quite right.

You might be interested to find the 'square' tool, or shortcut key = S in ID; which makes it a lot easy to get neat looking buildings.

commented 2017-03-21 05:19:57 UTC by CloCkWeRX
(Discussed changesets: 2)
Apologies, changeset name should say: 'Added extra details on 103 bus route'
commented 2017-03-21 03:05:07 UTC by smithmatt261
(Discussed changesets: 1)
Way 481460629 was crossing it self. I have removed the crossing and added detail from the LPI Imagery and added the source tag.
commented 2017-03-20 23:18:24 UTC by Warin61