| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 181664605 (Comments: 2) | Shre_WD (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi fortera_au, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. commented 2026-04-23 08:54:02 UTC by Shre_WD ♦5 |
| 181697088 (Comments: 1) | ethinious (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. When adding buildings and roads take care to check other (more up to date) aerial imagery sources to see if they still exist. Currently Esri World Imagery is the latest and shows that there ... commented 2026-04-23 08:32:08 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦89 |
| 181210023 (Comments: 4) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 55) | That's incorrect, the changes were temporary and not permanent. commented 2026-04-22 11:27:49 UTC by melbournefan ♦12 |
| 181604995 (Comments: 1) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hi, as I've described before, crossovers are not to be changed to be tagged as branch lines, industrial or spurs. If you have any questions feel free to consult before making changes commented 2026-04-22 11:23:15 UTC by melbournefan ♦12 |
| 179290881 (Comments: 7) | aussiegeek (Discussed changesets: 7) | Completed reverting my changesets using unauthorised dataset PLM25 commented 2026-04-22 00:18:22 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |
| 181589803 (Comments: 4) | vogelfreier (Discussed changesets: 103) | I'm just talking about the change that moved the natural=tree area outside of the landuse=residential area. > but I’d like to see a distinction between the forest way/138280435 , residential area way/218206724 and the park way/81... commented 2026-04-22 00:15:44 UTC by aharvey ♦1,927 |
| 168897332 (Comments: 7) | MobiusModding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there. Thank you for editing the map. I agree with aharvey and fortera_au, especially if you were editing a region that was previously untouched on OpenStreetMap. But it’s important to always look at how things are mapped nearby and try to e... commented 2026-04-20 18:18:07 UTC by wa_wheatbelt ♦8 |
| 181535800 (Comments: 3) | _Sasha_ (Discussed changesets: 7) | I see that you were trying to move Yachties up towards the water. The problem I was trying to solve was that it was accidentally attached to a footpath, so the footpath was crossing a bunch of roads. I disconnected Yachties from that footpath,... commented 2026-04-20 13:14:42 UTC by iandees ♦1,292 |
| 181521163 (Comments: 1) | themistakebythelake (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi, Roundabouts need a junction=roundabout tag. Thanks. commented 2026-04-20 09:20:15 UTC by TheSwavu ♦626 |
| 180344348 (Comments: 1) | patenam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, it appears that you've changed the tags to remove a multistory car park, it's unusual that a carpark would suddenly turn into a hospital building. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OS... commented 2026-04-20 08:29:00 UTC by melbournefan ♦12 |
| 180382836 (Comments: 1) | patenam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, can I ask where you obtained the data from? did you survey the area? Also your tags relating to the Box Hill RSL appear to be incorrect --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2026-04-20 08:25:33 UTC by melbournefan ♦12 |
| 181535149 (Comments: 2) | tigershipping (Discussed changesets: 1) | This has been fixed for you. Can you check if all appears ok. commented 2026-04-20 01:16:30 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |
| 181554622 (Comments: 1) | suebrown1117 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, this is marked as barrier=gate and with nothing indicating it is a path. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181554622 commented 2026-04-19 23:07:50 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,507 |
| 181521734 (Comments: 1) | Warren Huxley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, are there two defibrillators at this building or should I delete the duplicate. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181521733 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181521734 commented 2026-04-19 13:03:35 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |
| 181487542 (Comments: 2) | InfernoOSM (Discussed changesets: 11) | Must've misremembered, thanks! commented 2026-04-19 05:42:48 UTC by InfernoOSM ♦21 |
| 181507004 (Comments: 1) | Grimbles9076 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Again, it is preferable to use https over http for websites, especially when http autoredirects to https anyways. You should be copying the tags from the node to the building rather than doing it what appears to be manually. According to t... commented 2026-04-19 04:10:55 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦89 |
| 181441652 (Comments: 2) | dijitr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, if they're informal and/or private, they should still be mapped but marked as such. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181441652 commented 2026-04-18 05:47:37 UTC by fortera_au ♦1,507 |
| 181442894 (Comments: 1) | patenam (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, these shops are permanently closed and will be demolished in the coming months. commented 2026-04-18 04:31:12 UTC by griffonboi ♦17 |
| 181348361 (Comments: 2) | LachlanTansey2009 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Thanks for the feedback, I changed the tags as it was standard to retain a railway as under construction until it was open to passengers. If a majority wants it, I will revert the tag. commented 2026-04-17 14:41:34 UTC by LachlanTansey2009 ♦36 |
| 181445971 (Comments: 1) | Grimbles9076 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, thanks for contributting to OpenStreetMap. If the website redirects to https from http it's preferable to add that. Also please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history . You are deleting the nodes with history ... commented 2026-04-17 08:59:50 UTC by Alliegaytor ♦89 |
| 140347883 (Comments: 3) | Mel P C (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for taking another look. It certainly is an interesting case! The entry conditional on whether it is a "cruise ship day" seem like it would be difficult to encode in the OSM tagging structure, but I guess it boils down to "wheth... commented 2026-04-17 05:50:04 UTC by Legras_TT ♦1 |
| 181363003 (Comments: 1) | Liizard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I noticed you have a couple of self intersections in the building mapping. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=139.25194&lat=-35.12946&zoom=17 This usually means two points are drawn very close to each other instead ... commented 2026-04-17 01:38:31 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |
| 160971497 (Comments: 3) | ITBeyond-Michelle (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you for your response. Done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434127 commented 2026-04-16 22:44:23 UTC by Luen Warneke ♦25 |
| 181410435 (Comments: 1) | DylaniaCat (Discussed changesets: 14) | Your recent changesets have been reverted in 181418485 and 181418483. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20159 commented 2026-04-16 15:01:59 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,625 |
| 181418483 (Comments: 1) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 91) | The following changesets have been reverted: 181410435, 181410386, 181409774, 181408553, 181408019, 181405795 commented 2026-04-16 15:01:12 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,625 |
| 181418485 (Comments: 1) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 91) | The following changesets have been reverted: 181410435, 181410386, 181409774, 181408553, 181408019, 181405795 commented 2026-04-16 15:01:05 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,625 |
| 181395418 (Comments: 1) | Grimbles9076 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/1012279264 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted. commented 2026-04-16 14:52:03 UTC by iandees ♦1,292 |
| 181398668 (Comments: 1) | OrangeLabel (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you appear to have located Lotus Massage in the service station building instead of the Fitness First building. commented 2026-04-16 12:55:10 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |
| 181401764 (Comments: 2) | OrangeLabel (Discussed changesets: 3) | …corr - wrong street location commented 2026-04-16 12:45:56 UTC by nevw ♦2,199 |