| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 168559459 (Comments: 4) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | OK, ik zie het. Norbert Fonteynestraat is zo'n voorbeeld in dit gebied. commented 2025-07-14 20:09:04 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 151824328 (Comments: 1) | riopradipto (Discussed changesets: 1) | not generally accessible anymore, it's a business now commented 2025-07-14 11:50:48 UTC by cumbrekumpel ♦1 |
| 168847433 (Comments: 1) | Anthuil (Discussed changesets: 7) | Your edit unfortunately damaged some building outlines. Please do not trace buildings from (distorted) aerial imagery. In Belgium, buildings should follow numerical imagery provided by governments. For Wallonia, the available layer is ... commented 2025-07-14 10:39:57 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 88873897 (Comments: 3) | AhmadHB (Discussed changesets: 31) | Let that Persian-speaking <1% exist peacefully. They just want to know the name of that store. commented 2025-07-13 19:55:06 UTC by KlopanRin ♦27 |
| 168880741 (Comments: 1) | NewChest (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, Thanks for adding missing houses. However, I want to inform you that we never trace building structures from aerial imagery in Belgium. Governments provide detailed numerical imagery showing the correct outline of every bu... commented 2025-07-13 18:38:30 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 168680768 (Comments: 2) | Jhowie_Nitnek (Discussed changesets: 182) | Hi, I don't know what you mean, I added on the Princes Elisabeth Island not the North Sea commented 2025-07-13 16:03:21 UTC by Jhowie_Nitnek ♦181 |
| 167779514 (Comments: 1) | Moinsdix (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Moinsdix, You added "F25" to new cycleways that make part of the new cycle highway F25. However, these cycle paths don't have a name. They are linked to each other via a cycle route relation > https://www.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-07-13 01:29:54 UTC by Thierry1030 ♦245 |
| 168085594 (Comments: 1) | StijnRR (Discussed changesets: 40) | Beste Stijn, betreft de beek Hoevewijerloop. In GRB zie ik dat de naam Hoeverwijerloop is. Ook in de inventaris van de waterwegen van GIS Limburg is het Hoeverwijerloop. Idem in Loket Onroerend Erfgoed, Vlaamse Landmaatschappij,... commented 2025-07-12 17:03:34 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168833858 (Comments: 2) | rmammouth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, you're correct, I made the change by mistake. I just reverted it. commented 2025-07-12 13:59:35 UTC by rmammouth ♦1 |
| 145856498 (Comments: 1) | lorenzs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dag Lorenz, bent u zeker dat het nieuwe gebouw nr 77 is? Dit bestaat niet op lara/GRB. Het gebouw aan de overkant is blijkbaae 77. commented 2025-07-12 01:50:46 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168811343 (Comments: 1) | kabelhaai (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4686334 commented 2025-07-11 19:18:28 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 168791888 (Comments: 1) | 666L CHURROS (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the information. I had planned to relocate the venue in September but let’s do it now, then. Just one thing, please never add fake addresses to places, that just corrupts the addressing system. If the point is located in A... commented 2025-07-11 12:35:32 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 163769386 (Comments: 1) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 33) | houthakkersstraat: was 1-richting. Nu gesloten voor iedereen behalve buurtbewoners. access=no ? commented 2025-07-10 23:40:24 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 110004266 (Comments: 2) | VincentVE (Discussed changesets: 23) | Beste Vincent, ik merk op dat de 3 lvl10's die nu bestaan eigenlijk deelgemeenten zijn. Het zouden dus lvl9's moeten zijn. Ze werden toegevoegd na 1961 dus vanaf dan bestond het concept deelgemeente. De deelgemeente Gent zou ... commented 2025-07-10 21:28:01 UTC by kabelhaai ♦22 |
| 161472424 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Excuseer, mijn emailadres is niet meer up to date. Daardoor kon ik geen berichten lezen. Ik wijzig hier dus niks meer. commented 2025-07-10 20:42:55 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 167921241 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ik zal contact opnemen in het Matrixkanaal. commented 2025-07-10 20:40:27 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 143263943 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Mijn emailadres voor OSM is buiten gebruik en daardoor kon ik geen berichten meer lezen. Ik ben dan ook geblokkeerd omdat ik mijn berichten nu moet inhalen en beantwoorden. Ik kan dus nu geen details bekijken. commented 2025-07-10 20:36:07 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 140384976 (Comments: 3) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Dit is 8 maanden geleden bewerkt en aangepast door gebruiker Eebie. commented 2025-07-10 20:32:39 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 106506670 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sorry, I don't know. It could be. At the moment I can't check the "luchtfoto". commented 2025-07-10 20:30:26 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 126983447 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Hello Woodpeck, I remember that there were a lot of problems with this software MapComplete at that time. These problems have been resolved since this year 2025. commented 2025-07-10 20:27:03 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 118527759 (Comments: 2) | jozin-belgium (Discussed changesets: 44) | Ik lees dit bericht nu pas omdat mijn emailadres gewijzigd is. MapComplete heeft deze fouten gemaakt. Tegenwoordig vergelijk ik MapComplete met OSM recente luchtfoto en OSM GRB. commented 2025-07-10 20:24:19 UTC by jozin-belgium ♦28 |
| 168754354 (Comments: 1) | ptr_here (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, This is a small house and there is already an active restaurant here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2403723652 Are there 2 restaurants in this building? I suspect the one you tried to add today replaces the existing one. |
| 168731478 (Comments: 2) | Mysteriarch (Discussed changesets: 4) | Geen probleem - ik dacht dat ik mogelijk iets gemist had ofzo ha. Meestal vul ik zo geen belangrijke straten in op OSM commented 2025-07-10 11:54:35 UTC by Mysteriarch ♦4 |
| 150759626 (Comments: 1) | Le_Sharkoïste (Discussed changesets: 31) | All of these have been reverted meanwhile. I agree in the sence that these are not railway=station. One of them was retagged as railway=yard; maybe it is worth adding the ones that were deleted as that kind of object. commented 2025-07-10 08:49:57 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,178 |
| 100211115 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 220) | vermoed foute klik aangepast commented 2025-07-10 06:26:00 UTC by Jakka ♦1,815 |
| 119296440 (Comments: 3) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 109) | Ok top, merci de ta réponse rapide :D commented 2025-07-09 16:54:28 UTC by Arflha ♦15 |
| 168653991 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 357) | Thanks, that's indeed a better way to tag this situation. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168653991 commented 2025-07-09 10:28:20 UTC by s8evq ♦188 |
| 149773937 (Comments: 6) | Eebie (Discussed changesets: 109) | > Tussenpunten op rechte wegen zijn onnodige punten. Dat klopt wel, en het is inderdaad niet nuttig om te veel punten te zetten. Maar in dit geval hier zijn de punten toch wel echt een meerwaarde op hoge zoomniveaus, dus ik heb deze ... commented 2025-07-08 21:23:10 UTC by M!dgard ♦784 |
| 168661087 (Comments: 2) | WWMapper101 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Of course, thank you for your comment and thanks for fixing it. Will keep this in mind now when I'll do some more commented 2025-07-08 19:35:50 UTC by WWMapper101 ♦31 |
| 168058289 (Comments: 6) | Arflha (Discussed changesets: 24) | For the F thing, for example in iD: - create a new object - click a node on an existing node of a nearby way (the tool now which line you want to follow) - click on a consecutive point of that way (now it know in what direction to follow) |
| 147498567 (Comments: 2) | Pieter Vander Vennet (Discussed changesets: 161) | 't is ook niet mijn gewente om een fietspomp pal in het midden van de weg te zetten, meestal zet ik ze mbv luchtfoto's exact juist... Vreemd, geen idee wat er hier is gebeurd. Ik heb de POI verwijderd commented 2025-07-08 10:52:04 UTC by Pieter Vander Vennet ♦445 |
| 168637944 (Comments: 1) | ouchdinw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for drawing new cycle tracks—which we will assume have been built very recently. Please try to spend some time learning how to edit OSM properly before engaging in massive redrawings of infrastructure. I am afraid you are doing i... commented 2025-07-08 08:49:10 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 168637386 (Comments: 1) | ouchdinw (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Thanks and welcome to OSM. We have two questions about this: 1. You claim that the one-way street was introduced in 2022. On this picture taken in July 2024, there is no indication about one-way signs here: https://www... commented 2025-07-08 08:45:26 UTC by bxl-forever ♦2,489 |
| 167997847 (Comments: 8) | GR-menneke (Discussed changesets: 33) | En bedankt om er nog eens langs te fietsen ;-) commented 2025-07-08 06:26:22 UTC by GR-menneke ♦25 |