| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 167199532 (Comments: 3) | Hassan Arara (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello. Check this way history 514860434 You can see that you indeed tagged the outline as landuse=residential. but added also place=village to it. The place tag should be placed on a single node. (in the centre) I hope this is clear n... commented 2025-07-05 09:25:02 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168399252 (Comments: 1) | JBBrun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for the mapping. I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions. You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet. The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate ... commented 2025-07-04 14:40:44 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168400143 (Comments: 1) | Victor TENN (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for the mapping. I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions. You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet. The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate ... commented 2025-07-04 13:34:42 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168400853 (Comments: 1) | paul_dec (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. A single building is not to be mapped. Please check the instructions. I adjusted it. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-07-04 13:15:38 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168401105 (Comments: 1) | Aya Thamri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for the mapping. I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions. You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet. The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate ... commented 2025-07-04 13:03:55 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168399253 (Comments: 1) | SofianeHamlat1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello. Thanks for the mapping. I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions. You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet. The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate ... commented 2025-07-04 12:53:43 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168399987 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello. Thanks for mapping. The area where a group of buildings is situated need to be surrounded by an area, tagged landuse=residential. See the instructions. Best regards and keep mapping commented 2025-07-03 15:21:40 UTC by Frans S ♦9,811 |
| 168396405 (Comments: 1) | Vinuson Ramanathan (Discussed changesets: 4) | The buildings here are close enough to be considered one settlement; only one area is required to envelope them. The two smaller areas use the correct tag of landuse=residential but the larger one does not. Populations can be estimated but to get the... commented 2025-07-03 01:13:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396225 (Comments: 1) | Vinuson Ramanathan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you know how many people live here? Just becasue a tag can be applied doesn't mean it should.--- this area should not have been added and is incorrectly tagged. It should be yellow when correct. Please keep this feedback in mind when contribu... commented 2025-07-03 01:08:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396986 (Comments: 1) | Vinuson Ramanathan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do not delete local information like this unless you're sure it should be removed. Unlike most other features which should be deleted if there is evidence of their non-existence. Place names can still be useful even if the settlement they were n... commented 2025-07-03 01:01:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397388 (Comments: 1) | Guillaume KERGREIS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! This residential area does not envelope a settlement and is incorrectly tagged. There is no accompanying place POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experie... commented 2025-07-03 00:00:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397384 (Comments: 1) | Jay Rhume (Discussed changesets: 1) | You correctly identified and tagged both the POI and Residential area. If the residential area were more accurate that'd be excellent. I find that adding an extra node on some corners can make the areas easier to draw accurately. ... commented 2025-07-02 23:55:02 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168398423 (Comments: 1) | Václav Šilpoch (Discussed changesets: 3) | An improvement over the previously crude geometry and an appropriate tag change. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You ca... commented 2025-07-02 17:58:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396369 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Check Changeset: 168411254 to see how I replaced these with the footprints of individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get ... commented 2025-07-02 17:50:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397498 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | You mapped individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that... commented 2025-07-02 15:57:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397751 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | These are not hamlets. Though there are buildings at the two sites I flagged, they are likely communication infrastructure so the landuse wouldn't be residential. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your ... commented 2025-07-02 15:37:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397838 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Crude geomerty, incorrect tagging, and no place POI. See my project comment. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from ot... commented 2025-07-02 15:26:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397860 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Don't tag individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend ... commented 2025-07-02 15:22:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168404468 (Comments: 1) | ILBZH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ILBZH, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Thi... commented 2025-07-02 15:17:02 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,233 |
| 168399880 (Comments: 1) | JEROME Olivi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi JEROME Olivi, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment fie... commented 2025-07-02 15:16:51 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,233 |
| 168398203 (Comments: 1) | Laaauraaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Laaauraaa, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field.... commented 2025-07-02 15:16:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,233 |
| 168397761 (Comments: 1) | NicolasKo (Discussed changesets: 1) | You are envelping settlements with areas but they should be tagged as landuse=residential and have a Place=* POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM commun... commented 2025-07-02 15:08:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168403390 (Comments: 1) | Anthony_Fagart (Discussed changesets: 1) | See my project comment and reference the project insructions. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I ... commented 2025-07-02 14:58:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168398004 (Comments: 1) | Cla CH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Place tag looks correctly mapped but the area should be tagged as landuse=residential. See my project comment. commented 2025-07-02 14:55:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168400974 (Comments: 1) | Pierre Bou (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like 2 tasks were overlapping in seperate projects here. If you see that something is already mapped then modify the existing data. Thanks for trynig to accurately map the area, but it was tagged incorrectly and should instead be landuse=reside... commented 2025-07-02 14:20:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397984 (Comments: 1) | Vinuson Ramanathan (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi welcome to OSM. You correctly identified a settlement here and I agree that is it can be mapped as a hamlet. There should be a central point tagged as place=hamlet; the area should be tagges as landuse=residential. Take care to ensure that buildin... commented 2025-07-02 14:09:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396593 (Comments: 1) | NaïmCh (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly updated the value of the place POIs here but the residential areas should be tagged as landuse=residential and traced more accurately. The area of the northern settlement is around 2/3 of what you mapped it as: this affects population e... commented 2025-07-02 13:56:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397517 (Comments: 1) | NaïmCh (Discussed changesets: 2) | You correctly identified this settlement as a village but the POI tagging should have been updated; not the residential areas. I chose to delete one of the residential areas and envelope the settlement with just one. See how I mapped it in Changeset:... commented 2025-07-02 13:46:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397913 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | This is almost correct. You correctly placed a node at the centre of a settlement. I would considet this a hamlet and not a village. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397913 ... commented 2025-07-02 13:31:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396313 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | The features enveloped by the likely hedge here appear to be trees and not buildings so this is not a settlement. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM commu... commented 2025-07-02 13:14:07 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168396268 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Individual buildings like this should not be mapped as hamlets. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; ... commented 2025-07-02 13:12:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168397283 (Comments: 1) | Valentin Foray (Discussed changesets: 10) | Welcome to OSM! The residential areas should not be tagged with place=, a central point in the settlement should be tagged with place=. You correctly identified residential areas in the imagery but drew them quite qrudely, please map them more accura... commented 2025-07-02 13:03:09 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168378109 (Comments: 1) | Ona78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not think that the footprints you added in the East likely represent buildings. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168378109 commented 2025-07-02 05:41:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168375498 (Comments: 1) | Ollie_C (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi Ollie, welcome to OSM. The footprint you mapped here does represent a building visible in the imagery, but it is oversized and has not been appropriately squared (q). You should not include a buildings shdow in a footprint when aquiring its shape ... commented 2025-07-02 00:20:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168367590 (Comments: 1) | AngeliVigo (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footprint in the north is valid, accurate and appropriately squared. I do not think that the two footprints in the south represent buildings, becasue the vegetation adjacent to them appears to be too short to explain the lack of shadow visible in... commented 2025-07-02 00:07:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 167450594 (Comments: 1) | camille_chmtn15 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Camille, I am not able to view the imagery source that you used to originally map these footprints, so I'm going based on what I see in other sources. I wanted to give you some feedback, since this is the only changset you uploaded, and I not... commented 2025-07-01 23:44:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168370870 (Comments: 1) | gjwaecht (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for attending the mapathon today! I think that all of the footprints you added here represent buildings, and virtually all of them are accurate and appropriately shaped. I only made minor modifications to a few of them. A high quality c... commented 2025-07-01 21:43:56 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |
| 168366910 (Comments: 1) | KateBartels (Discussed changesets: 1) | You correctly identified buildings in imagery, but I think they should be square not round. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168366910 commented 2025-07-01 19:36:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦556 |