| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173741082 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-10-25 04:04 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | AkuAnakTimur | Ground truth from May 2023 |
| 173517358 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-10-20 04:37 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | AkuAnakTimur | *T148There's TomTom's street car view but they're from 2017... and not yielding any positive results. |
| 168476372 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-07-04 09:08 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Papan_tanda_Kampung_Baru_Sungai_Gurun.jpg |
| 108963023 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-01 06:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | kucai ♦114 | Bang eh, nama jalan ni Jalan Tok Kenali kalau ikutkan dalam bing streetside. tolong reconfirm. Aku try contact faidz grab sekali. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Yang ni ke?https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/42707889https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/42707889Fuh... berkurun tak pergi Kota Bharu. Bing StreetSide kalau gambar ambil tahun 2019 punya, tukar je terus. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Ohhhh tak, tak. Yang ni rupanya.https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.091186~102.276295&lvl=17&dir=132.401&style=x&v=2&sV=1https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/532431177https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/532431177 | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Memang kena confirm balik... kat Pasir Tumboh tu... takde gambar pulak. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | kucai ♦114 | https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.091186~102.276295&lvl=18.6&pi=-10.9&style=x&mo=om.1&dir=230.3 | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Faham, yang ada gambar tu kat sini: https://osm.org/go/4MDOyfCml--?m= Tapi takde apa-apa gambar pulak kat sini https://osm.org/go/4MDL2teQ9--?m=Tak berapa nak konfiden tapi kalau nak ubah ok je kot... | |
| 161998318 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-02-01 02:05 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Dari bulan 6 tahun lepas lagi... orang putih kata it is what it is... |
| 161965824 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-01-31 07:08 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | *Kuala Perlis town node |
| 161942340 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-01-30 15:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jata_jalan_K518.jpghttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jata_jalan_K504.jpghttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jata_jalan_K537.jpg |
| 161941817 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2025-01-30 15:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AkuAnakTimur/traces/11727008Ew... all those agricultural tracks with too much details... remnants of machine learning outputs eons ago. |
| 158319892 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-10-25 03:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | tolonglah belek email baca changeset discussion... carilah makan cara elok-elok... |
| 157781156 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-10-12 06:29 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hulu Bernam or Ulu Bernam, can someone double check? ;-)(driving is not fun, especially for these) |
| 152655788 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-06-14 02:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | If this edit is incorrect, hikers, it's time to shine though... |
| 152060128 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-05-31 03:08 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.405158~100.226273&lvl=17&dir=72.897&style=x&v=2&sV=1 (2019)https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.404983~100.226344&lvl=17&dir=73.171&style=x&v=2&sV=1 (2017) |
| 150841593 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-05-03 14:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Surprise, surprise... it's probably causing some trouble for a p-hailing/e-hailing driver who unfortunately ended up at an undesirable situation (vehicle too wide to pass through, maybe?) |
| 150841240 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2024-05-03 14:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also, down memory lane, seeing less than ideal Global Logic mass (mind you, paid) edits from the yesteryear. Ahhhhh... so refreshing. |
| 139761007 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-08-11 17:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | kucai ♦114 | betoi ka T169 ni. Kalau ikut peta JKR besut ni T154. nama terbahagi kepada dua. Lampu / Tok SabohTok Saboh / Sem. KelantanT154 yang sedia ada tu maknanya tak betul la jugak |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | @T169Dulu sebab ada orang tag jalan belah Kelantan T169 jugak.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157673951/history/1https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157673951/history/57Split jadi dua. Yang lama dok belah Kelantan. Yang baru ada T169... "terlekat" history. https://www.opens... | |
| 40628264 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-07-10 11:12 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,810 | Hello!You usedcuisine=cakeson https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4294396144/historyHave you maybe meantcuisine=cake?I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).Or have you used this... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hi! I can't recall what it is already but probably this Facebook page could actually reflect the tag which is more accurate.Reference: https://www.facebook.com/people/Inter-cake-Dannok/100057794554058/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | ... which is cuisine=cake | |
| 82400271 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-03-19 17:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | kucai ♦114 | Pada aku masih lagi kategori description - bezanya dia letak papan tanda. Tgh edit mega nih.. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | @kucaihaha on je | |
| 143556184 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-11-03 03:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | AddendumFrom 2021https://kartaview.org/details/3855405/207/track-info |
| 84495750 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-01 22:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | kucai ♦114 | Yang Lorong 5 ni kira driveway ka? banyak rumah lain sepanjang jalan ni, sedangkan kalau driveway (American) defaultnya laluan ke satu rumah sahaja. (sebab tu ada news pasal org kena tembak sbb tersalah masuk driveway, kalau driveway milik org ramai ownernya yg mental takkan defensif camtu) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | highway=service tapi bukan service=driveway rasanya. Rasanya dulu sengaja tagging macam tu sebab nanti dok rasa ada yang menggatal lajak sambung dengan highway=residential atas sikit tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709589365 ... kalau tak pun imagery tak berapa nak clear | |
| 140617222 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-08-31 05:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Not making stuff out but check this out https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.706095~102.515521&lvl=17&dir=304.33&style=x&v=2&sV=1 (I know it's from 21 November 2017) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | It gets better: plain rural roads hardly get destination signs like this https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.705956~102.516262&lvl=17&dir=278.34&style=x&v=2&sV=1 | |
| 140499819 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-08-28 15:03 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | but wait, there's more!https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.805705~102.54383&lvl=17&dir=41.517&style=x&v=2&sV=1also a sign near the Kuala Besut roundabout |
| 139816260 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-08-13 09:53 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Oof... imagery date 11 August 2023 |
| 139139063 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-07-28 14:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | LOL "no comment". I must have missed to fill it in - the usual stuff, really. |
| 137062698 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-06-07 16:03 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Don't interpret my remarks as something disparaging towards (local) Wikipedia contributors (they're awesome in their own way) - but please, there are reasons not to bend OpenStreetMap data to match what had been written on Wikipedia articles. This is not my first time seeing this incident ... |
| 136919190 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-06-04 01:30 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Ong Kai Jin ♦6 | Thanks |
| 135127656 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2023-04-20 02:00 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Dear remote mappers, please do not revert this edit before trying to discuss with someone who actually live nearby... |
| 48719318 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-05-16 05:47 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dary Raihanah IRM-ED ♦28 | Hi, AkuAnakTimur.Thank you for your mapping contribution.I found a note "Will be split into smaller relations" (2017) on this relation object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/493824418). So, I want to ask you, are there any recent updates regarding this relation? If there is... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hi, thanks for looking this up for me. I happen to visit somewhere near https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/6.12032/100.34306 - just this week - indeed there will be some adjustments to this multipolygon soon. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Sorry, that link should be this one instead https://osm.org/go/4GpnmLmZk--?m= | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Dary Raihanah IRM-ED ♦28 | Hi, thank you so much for you response and the information that you provide. Also thank you for the multipolygon adjustments you'll be doing later. Happy mapping! | |
| 108898185 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-07-30 15:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I got suspicions federal route 189 replaces the state route T7... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | One year and three months later: been there and saw it! | |
| 129897066 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-12-09 11:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Should be "Improved previously mapped details and added unmapped details, mostly very minor highways" |
| 127980165 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-10-24 05:45 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Comment should have been " added unmapped or amended existing place names" |
| 127978034 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-10-24 02:53 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | + PCL Maps from TXU |
| 127621430 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-10-16 14:58 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Seehttps://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.713826~101.785872&lvl=17&dir=85.617&style=x&v=2&sV=1https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.714401~101.796171&lvl=17&dir=88.735&style=x&v=2&sV=1 |
| 127136794 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-10-07 07:38 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Found one https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.63161~101.711435&lvl=17&dir=340.983&style=x&v=2&sV=1Tiny correction is definitely needed |
| 127227792 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-10-09 01:58 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | ends near https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.635837~101.689877&lvl=17&dir=75.374&style=x&v=2&sV=1 |
| 125741797 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-09-03 15:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Their listing on said competitor's page also have comment from the previous owner. Just go check it out. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Follow up changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125742138 | |
| 69918242 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-05 23:42 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | angys ♦389 | Persiaran Dedap or Derdap? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | @angysThis one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247521912/Here's what I recorded before May 2019: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JebtemA-s9II_4G2DF5qjanL5gHwQufH/view?usp=sharingThere are few results for places around Malaysia with "Derdap", but if you have been in and... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | angys ♦389 | Ohh i see, actually when cross refer to another big G, it's should be true, sorry for thinking it as a typo | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I refrain to refer to other map providers. Even in Alor Setar, what is shown on the signs sometimes don't match at all with street signs (looking at you Google). Well, pray for someone to actually come around this place and upload photos to make our life... um... easier 😅 | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | what is shown on the signs ➡️ what is shown on the map | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | angys ♦389 | 👍 | |
| 125227199 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-08-22 13:19 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I. should. have. linked. this. one. instead. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kampung_Titi_Akar_1.jpg |
| 125087188 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-08-19 04:09 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fat fingers and I prematurely uploaded my map changes with an incomplete comment. Should read " Amended street name based on user:kucai's on the ground observations" |
| 123585290 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-07-14 01:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Geometry positioning: of course, the midpoint-ish between Kg Kok Bedullah's sign and the adjacent Kg Pgkln Nangka |
| 123585092 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-07-14 00:47 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://kartaview.org/details/3819381/270/track-infohttps://kartaview.org/details/3819381/253/track-info |
| 121925498 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-06-04 05:58 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | ... some are based on KartaView images too! |
| 121589041 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-05-27 18:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also Federal Route 5 is weird... the traffic island is mostly painted and is a nightmare getting it corrected |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | In addition, Jalan Klang - Sabak Bernam is imminent https://kartaview.org/details/2231290/8812 | |
| 120026831 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2022-04-22 04:01 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Whatevs, Microsoft Bing. Here's the link to my reference https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.342034~100.192126&lvl=17&dir=161.49&style=x&v=2&sV=1 |
| 110545134 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-09-01 06:33 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | banban_msm ♦6 | This is an interesting feature of OSM. It is possible to map at least approximate alignments of rails or roads that are still under construction by getting overlays from more recent satellite images than those usual drop down list in JOSM. There is construction going on now to add another Temerloh B... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | @banban_msmI'll get back to you with my secrets (*wink wink*). The changeset discussion section is very basic, and I might have a lot to share. | |
| 113694226 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-11-12 12:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Misleading comment: should be armchair mapping based on imagery |
| 113571269 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-11-09 15:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://kartaview.org/details/2361826/4125/track-info |
| 110647162 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-09-03 03:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | The "Lebuhraya Pantai Timur link to Gebeng" part is misleading, always check your comment before uploading |
| 109688978 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-15 06:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Silly me, this is meant to be commented as Armchair mapping efforts from street level imagery: readjusting position of Kampung Badang, approximated to be in between two highway signs - https://kartaview.org/details/3736157/127/track-info and https://kartaview.org/details/3763425/5/track-infoFor ... |
| 109679098 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-14 18:09 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Reclassified highways and added/updated places |
| 109229207 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-06 02:59 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | While the street names of these locations are purely extrapolation: northbound from Kampung Puteh junction and a bit southbound from Batu 4 junction.The limits of non-local, remote mapping effort is obvious. |
| 109064109 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-03 05:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Can I say that I really hate the extrapolated residential landuse very much? It will overlap everything it went on its way. |
| 109057054 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-08-03 02:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Sorry, I've got to stop that up to Kelantan-Terengganu border. The residential landuse for the whole Kuala Besut town really gets in the way. |
| 108919183 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-07-31 07:10 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I will be happy to change it back, if more route codes are uncovered |
| 107412685 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-07-05 03:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | adiatmad ♦451 | Assalamualaikum. Terima kasih bantuannya Bang. Sehat selalu ya =) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107412685 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Waalaikumussalam. Alhamdulillah. Moga semua sihat-sihat juga di sana. | |
| 107022316 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-06-27 04:57 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Like many other hospitals, in the end the name of it will be after the Royal Family. I'll keep it unnamed for the time being. |
| 105857019 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-06-04 19:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Places north of Federal Route 5 is based on this waypoint marker: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/f1JbeCGmIlnCbP2APZugpbWhile places on the opposite side is based on this: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/rTHQrxXutae9SqrkOPTXaW |
| 105633615 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-05-31 15:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Another instance https://kartaview.org/details/2392106/1523/track-info |
| 78889554 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-26 16:22 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Haris IRM-ED ♦35 | Hi AkuAnakTimuri have modified this waterbody geometric so it doesnt cross the highway/building around. please have a look. thankshttps://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/758745010 |
| 99684755 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-02-21 15:16 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | And some other edits that benefitted from Grab drivers taking OpenStreetCam photo streams |
| 99237472 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-02-14 04:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fun fact: it's so narrow, impassable by cars! Car drivers who might have reached the nearby bridge might be in a very difficult situation, struggling to reverse their cars. My oh my. |
| 99015688 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2021-02-10 05:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | E.g. non-existing "separated highways" which they are not, in reality. Why? I don't know. Some argued it's about "remodelling" and stuff. |
| 93800568 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-11-09 13:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Who introduced them? Of course, absolutely non-local, remote mappers. |
| 92976910 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-10-24 02:29 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | *well, except if roads under construction appear ready to traffic, then it's A-OK |
| 80098170 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-01-26 13:35 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | angys ♦389 | Hi AkuAnakTimur, can you refine the stretch of WCE highway in Kuala Selangor based on latest MAXAR imagery, and you can noticed new uc rest area along the route also, feel free to do it tqvm. |
| 91985956 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-10-05 12:20 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Remote mappers from afar, I'll be delighted to provide ground level proof to show that there are no separate "highway links".Read this for context as well:https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410 |
| 91063032 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-09-17 17:52 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Quote:We only map roads in OSM as dual-carriageway (two ways going in both directions) only if there is a physical barrier or median separating the two directions. If it's just a painted line, just map it as a single way in OSM.Unquote. Such links should not be mapped.https://github... |
| 90782389 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-09-12 02:58 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=military suggests an area for any kind of military-related activities e.g. camps, administrative offices and the likes.Analogue (similar) practices around the world were not mapped like this as well. Still, I'm happy to be corrected.Sure, ... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | > Analogue (similar) practices around the world were not mapped like this as well.This is regarding areas of stricter lockdowns which may be found elsewhere globally. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | One more thing: such areas are not placed under a military control too. | |
| 88816329 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-08-01 14:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also, I've been around Lebuh Armenian/Masjid Kapitan Keling late November 2019. Unless I'm dense, not realising there was a park full of greens, like, oh, wow! in the vicinity. |
| 87513806 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-07-03 17:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | ... and OpenStreetCam to aid observing the width of driveways. They are narrower than the typical residential highways, and usually not paved with asphalt |
| 86068574 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-06-02 02:43 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Ugh, forgot to include "EOx cloudless Sentinel-2 2018" as a very resourceful source. Maxar's went further older than than. |
| 85917379 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-29 04:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) is offset at (0,-5) |
| 85419351 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-19 06:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | This may be the old reference code, but blurry https://openstreetcam.org/details/2234354/113/track-info |
| 85360203 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-18 05:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://openstreetcam.org/details/2233386/1228/track-infohttps://openstreetcam.org/details/2234334/1261/track-infohttps://openstreetcam.org/details/2240306/1567/track-info |
| 85359947 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-18 05:42 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://openstreetcam.org/details/2233386/1029/track-infohttps://openstreetcam.org/details/2234334/1066/track-infohttps://openstreetcam.org/details/2240306/1370/track-info |
| 85358035 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-18 04:59 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | This direction sign -https://openstreetcam.org/details/2183854/243/track-info - suggests https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492212929 is a part of B115.However, milestones on Persiaran Zuhrah apparently carried on counting them down - https://openstreetcam.org/details/2231214/607/track-info |
| 84957743 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-05-10 04:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | These are all distance signs that includes the official name of this certain part of Federal Route 1 from the Works Department themselves.Southbound: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2186054/5447/track-infoNorthbound: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2184878/418/track-info |
| 84162414 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-27 00:28 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Source 1: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2127086/8919/track-infoSource 2: https://openstreetcam.org/details/1947921/2059/track-infoBanting - Dengkil is from: https://openstreetcam.org/details/1947921/2137/track-info |
| 83883579 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-21 13:19 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | That's all folks for today. I've discovered some serious problems (borked import). Would resume fixing some time later. Off to work at home, ta ta! |
| 83857784 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-21 06:23 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | More proof: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2130866/5668/track-info |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://openstreetcam.org/details/2130866/5766/track-info | |
| 83623425 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-16 05:00 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Chinese name was given the priority because the gateway has only the Chinese name plastered all over in bigger typeface. See https://openstreetcam.org/details/2101922/432/track-info. The temple name in Malay is however, is on a signpost. |
| 83622015 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-16 04:26 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | ("Jalan" is omitted) |
| 83415695 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-12 03:24 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Error: 2.50, -7.50 |
| 83237791 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-04-08 07:50 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | This is waaaaaay much better: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2103406/620/track-info |
| 70679422 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-28 02:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | halo bang. i little bit modify (uglue/remove) way/234179851 due error twice segment. but don't be worried. i keep the original one. thank you |
| 82871014 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-03-31 12:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Forgot to include OpenStreetCam as another source |
| 82780581 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-03-29 14:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Persiaran Sultan Abdul Hamid was reclassified. There are so many schools and banks next to this road, so I would assume the traffic is more significant. |
| 82409528 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-03-20 00:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | GlobalLogic bad edits were also refined, at least from a local's POV, rather than blindly tracing off satellite imagery. The cleanup is still ongoing, because there's no use to actually contacting their team members which probably I reckoned, already done with OpenStreetMap (been inactive ... |
| 70383150 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-18 09:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Bang, I restored back this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244842283 tag into your version. thanks :) |
| 27807064 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-12-30 18:53 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319611810 restored back your data on this way and its surrounding area |
| 64400341 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-11-12 10:38 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Bang. I restored your tunnel=building_passage tag on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643345710 |
| 78294926 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-12 05:07 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Done repairs over this area as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=6.11752&mlon=100.36517#map=19/6.11752/100.36517... marking the importance of local knowledge and fitting tags over mapping for the renderer (i.e. because "I want OSM to display data just like what I prefer").\... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Bang. I restored several tags to your local knowledge data on this way area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285476429. We're working hard to review back your survey data that we're messing up. There is no way to replace your survey result. I apologize. | |
| 78274807 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-11 18:00 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | halo mr saidi. i've change residential to unclassified. i think. its more appropriate. terimakasih |
| 81122111 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-02-17 15:01 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | hello mr saidin. i've just change secondary link to primary link. i think it should be appropriate. makasih |
| 78950871 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-28 09:40 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Nope, this one.https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/fuRSxk6hN5DcOheHBwvCDg |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Mr Saidin, just wanna inform you that I have change back my edit to your version on this way. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321830257 thank you | |
| 70680691 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-28 03:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Akuanaktimur/Mr Saidin.Just wanna inform you that I've changed back the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541995049 to your tag version. thank you... |
| 17882054 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2013-09-17 08:46 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Akrimullah IRM-RV ♦114 | Hi Tuan Saidin, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238286904. I combined the K728 road. Before it was split into two segments, one long and one too short. the short one made by our team, so i think it should be 1 segment since it has the same reference code. thank you. |
| 25024866 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-08-26 11:13 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | hi mr saidin. can you give me information. is that possible secondary road dead-end? especially in this area. makasih |
| 27633417 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-12-22 16:21 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Riyadi IRM-ED ♦140 | halo mr saidin. i wonder, is it inconsistent tagging normal in this area? 318391902k509 should be tertiary or secondary road?terimakasih sebelumnya |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hi.Don't really mind - this area is sparsely populated, although the K509 route may act as a more significant feeder route towards the Pendang town. I may inclined to tag it as a secondary road but tagging it as a tertiary road may not totally be completely incorrect.In this Pendang dis... | |
| 81065773 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2020-02-16 09:49 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | This changeset is purely armchair mapping where POIs are added based on Mapillary photos, with Bing background. Edits were made on OsmAnd. |
| 78704935 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-21 05:09 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | angys ♦389 | IMHO, Tg Malim-Slim River section should keep highway=trunk as it is the first highway in Malaysia THO. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanjung_Malim%E2%80%93Slim_River_Highway |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | My tagging practice may not follow historical reasons/background. I mean, following your way of thinking, then the former North South Expressway stretch, now officially a part of the Federal Route 1 (from https://osm.org/go/4Gs4kLL?m= to https://osm.org/go/4Gp9lOq?m=) should be a highway=expressway ... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | To be fair, our sole North South Expressway E1 is not that far away the Federal Route 1, so (faster) traffic flow is more likely on E1 than 1.I've left some (long) stretches of Federal Route 1 as highway=trunk because slightly controlled access - which means, there's a long divider and... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | angys ♦389 | OK, sorry for disturbing. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | No worries. | |
| 78691371 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-20 16:22 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Oops, it should be Seberang Perai... |
| 78614687 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-19 04:49 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | *Some highways were tagged up one hierarchy higher than they ought to beYeah, there would be consequences especially for ride-sharing for-profit organisations, but let me know if routings started not making any kind of sense.It should be a lesson for these organisations to actually perform o... |
| 78612427 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-19 03:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also in this changeset: fixed a poorly mapped highway |
| 77849397 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-12-03 03:15 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | s/Traffic/Drive |
| 50037237 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-07-04 15:31 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | rosh_007 ♦3 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the "way 619486495way 255520054way 484975143"classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Tracks:Way 619486495 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619486495) could be mapped as highway=service + service=driveway from the adjacent primary road up until node 6639966921 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639966921)Way 255520054 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255520054/) is clea... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Unclassified highways:Way 368483382 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368483382/) leads to some residential and a row of shops adjacent to it. I cannot see why it should be downgraded to a residential highway. On top of that, it was surveyed by me a few years ago. (https://www.openstreetmap.org... | |
| 65078491 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-12-01 17:53 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | udaykiran3 ♦4 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the""way 287594160way 706594491way 706594490""classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Alright, fair justification. Please make appropriate changes for these highways. | |
| 35198311 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-11-09 17:56 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mayi007 ♦8 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 379399666 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' until node 3827119678.... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I surveyed this highway myself and collected the GPS track for it. In addition, between 2003 and 2007, I used to pass this highway as well. So, that's why I justified this highway as a highway=unclassified rather than highway=residential. | |
| 21582790 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-04-09 05:50 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 272984982 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into t... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hi. Fair enough, please adjust accordingly. | |
| 43302185 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-10-31 11:57 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | p_kiranmai ♦4 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the"way 450344373way 450344372"classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residen... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | As the one who mapped these highways from collecting my own GPS tracks: best if they are left as they were | |
| 22954983 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-06-16 02:08 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between"node 2918121022node 3401318447node 5921176441node 2918121015"classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and oth... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across""way 288251518way 288251520""classified as 'trunk_link'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'r... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | First comment: assuming you are pointing on this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288251491). Please make suitable change to the higher classification (highway=unclassified) between these nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2918121022 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5921176441. Be... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Second comment: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Zw4uMecbsV8/XTbPQc5-6_I/AAAAAAAAAaY/uosKw8UJKv4C9VUL1XBh5HAs6a01SHWEQCK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-23.pngthose two links should be left as they are: they connect to the adjacent highway=trunk. And they are links connecting to the adjacent highway going... | |
| 51057897 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-08-12 12:55 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | udaykiran3 ♦4 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the""way 380442633way 380540697way 515907527way 515907528way 380442629way 515907529way 380442631way 706542496way 515009756""classified as '... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fair enough, please make appropriate adjustments for only these highways | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | udaykiran3 ♦4 | Hi AkuAnakTimur,Thankful for your valuable time on this concern.Necessary edits have been done.Thank youudaykiran3 | |
| 20797117 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-02-26 19:38 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 244255952 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'unclassified' and way 244255957 that... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fair enough, please adjust them accordingly | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | Hi AkuAnakTimur,Thank you! for spending your valuable time on my concern.Necessary changes have been done.Thanks anu_smita | |
| 24581657 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-08-06 19:00 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between"way 296272249way 264890908way 296272247"classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Feel free to downgrade them as residential highways | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | Hi AkuAnakTimur,Thanks for spending your valuable time on my concern!Necessary changes have been done.Thanksanu_smita | |
| 18758847 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2013-11-07 04:23 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the "way 245017827way 245017847"classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Go ahead and fine tune these ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245017827, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245017847) | |
| 19846101 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-01-06 15:42 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 254989416 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service' .Please look into this ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Go ahead making adjustments for it | |
| 33976786 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-09-12 08:29 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | p_kiranmai ♦4 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 370289700 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .Please look into this an... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 370289700 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .Please look into this an... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Way 370289700 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370289700) is manually surveyed by me back in 2015 (check history in JOSM by CTRL+H).It might appear as a paved residential highway, but usually it might not be the case. This highway is next to a canal, and from imagery, this highway serves only... | |
| 32066048 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-06-19 04:58 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 288251424 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service' .Please look into this... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fair enough. Way 288251424 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288251424) could be tagged as highway=service | |
| 55919468 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-01-31 06:00 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 557212832 classified as 'service driveway'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .Please look i... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Way 557212832 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557212832) could be an alley (service=alley) instead.It's a quite narrow highway passing through some houses which do not belong in a planned housing estate e.g. the one just laying south of these houses.http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/6.17116... | |
| 54242327 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-12-01 16:50 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 543922786 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it is not a navigable path so it can be classified as 'track'.\... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Consider using access tags to indicate no through traffic.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access | |
| 70847530 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-06-02 03:35 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the ""way 160693842way 287331641way 287331661"" classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can b... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | These (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160693842, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287331641 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287331661) are collector highways. I've been there very recently (June 2019). | |
| 58189596 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-04-18 05:57 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 333017415 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' till this node 3401317... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | The way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333017415) beyond the particular node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3401317887) is mapped as unclassified highway because it has higher hierarchy - it carries more traffic in and out across this village.Source - I'm a local mapper | |
| 29014635 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-02-22 07:09 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 329614444 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .As of now correct... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329614444 may act as a collector road from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639581545 to the adjacent unclassified highway.From the same node to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639581541, the highway might serve as a driveway (highway=service, ser... | |
| 55227881 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-01-07 05:43 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the "way 551373827way 493408183" classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'resid... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493408183 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551373827 may act as collector roads for the adjacent villages.Please do not change them. | |
| 36843652 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-01-27 19:18 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways "way 394165932way 394165965way 394165931way 394165955"classified as 'unclassified' and 'service'. However, going by the aerial image... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I will amend the boundary of the residential area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318224761) later. There are only a few houses in the area, but obviously the retail buildings next to the major highway dominates the landuse (retail).The details of the highways of this area may be left untouch... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165932https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165965https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165931https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165955 | |
| 60314637 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-07-01 05:35 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | anu_smita ♦10 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways"way 603932791way 603932790"where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot : https://lh3.goo... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I'm a local, active mapper around this place (Alor Setar town and its surroundings) - so you have my word.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603932790https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603932791Please check the edit dates too. Bing imagery across the city dates from 2014. Maxar imagerie... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Unfortunately I may have not uploaded my own collection of GPS tracks to map details like this, but hopefully your team gets what I'm trying to convey the message. | |
| 32945178 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-07-29 00:35 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 245634672classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | That particular highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245634672) should follow my earlier argument: this stretch of highway is not in an adjacent residential estate. It may carry more significant traffic than the adjacent residential highways because it acts as a collector highway to the adjace... | |
| 47179407 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-03-26 16:37 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | farmal ♦17 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways betweenway 557212832 way 542090842way 542090841way 542090840way 542090823way 542090839 way 542090831way 542090830way 542090829way 542090828way 542090827... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Ways 542090842 and 542090841 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090842, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090841) are believed to be mapped as an unclassified highway because they might carry more traffic in the surrounding residential area. Though I'm fine if it's going to be downgr... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I guess the same might apply tohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090823https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090839https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090831https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090830https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090829https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | On top of that, these may be downgraded as residential highways:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090843https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090837https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090835https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090834https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090833 | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also, maybe this as well:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090840 | |
| 6 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | However, I don't think this should be upgraded into a residential highway. If I recall correctly this leads to a few houses that are not built together as a housing estate.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557212832/ | |
| 7 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | These highways should stay as unclassified because obviously they carry more traffic anywhere across the residential area.Source? Personally surveyed manually this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354789503These are not have been manually surveyed but I think following the above argum... | |
| 8 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Sorry for the delay in responding for your changeset discussions, for I was having other commitments lately. I will try my best to respond to each one. On top of that, I live across this particular area of the world and contributed to OSM for more than 5 years in this same area. | |
| 36302994 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-01-01 18:01 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arav_ind ♦6 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the"way 319363908way 319363904way 319363825way 319363863way 389068810way 389068811way 389068807way 362764590way 362764599way 362764598way 362764592way 36276... |
| 32931161 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-07-28 12:31 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arav_ind ♦6 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come""node 5351338567node 5351338564"" has been tagged with 'turning circle'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, there is no median here... |
| 27846671 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-01-01 18:58 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | udaykiran3 ♦4 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the"way 287594070way 287593907way 287594154way 287593882way 287593866"classified as 'unclassified' and residential. However, going by the aerial imager... |
| 66132424 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-01-08 15:50 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aj_34 ♦15 | Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 706563421way 549002937way 706563420way 549002936way 554525662way 483718419way 379800764 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways ... |
| 55608508 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-01-20 17:14 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aj_34 ♦15 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come""node 5351338567node 5351338564"" has been tagged with 'turning circle'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, there is no median here... |
| 35016359 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-11-01 16:58 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across way 377871470which has been clasified as 'service' (tag= drive-through) and as we have more settlements moving ahead as per the imagery support and other resources we can make... |
| 62819347 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-09-22 08:51 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arivenid ♦21 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across way 627339319which has been tagged as 'link' as per ground reality we don't have any resources supporting a physical median and the configuration can be changed as per:... |
| 19781224 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-01-03 07:13 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 252322909 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please suggest if... |
| 32201965 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-06-25 10:30 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 356256912 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into this ... |
| 58614553 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-05-02 12:58 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 585142110 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into this ... |
| 27770632 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-12-29 08:08 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | arav_ind ♦6 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 319363887 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into this ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | arav_ind ♦6 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 319363909 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into this ... | |
| 19952972 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-01-12 14:09 ~ 12 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the""way 256302374way 256302354""classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as ... |
| 70847812 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-06-02 04:13 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | lavanya1 ♦9 | "Hi AkuAnakTimur,Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 694000824 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.Please look into this ... |
| 71051887 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-06-08 14:12 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | E.g. the famous Lebuhraya Darulaman is tagged with `name=Lebuhraya Darulaman` and `official_name= Jalan Butterworth-Alor Setar`. |
| 70849280 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-06-02 06:36 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Location of the "electric box" is roughlyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/6.093312675162014/100.38392078847623 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=6.09358&mlon=100.38376#map=19/6.09358/100.38376 | |
| 69919520 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-06 01:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | angys ♦389 | Hello, this update is for this right?https://scontent.fkul13-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/59596894_10213237041791044_5338775504344317952_o.jpg?_nc_cat=109&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul13-1.fna&oh=21b10d44c8ad5c970774fb64a68a9795&oe=5D747BAD |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | No actually.Just a small change affecting this junction:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69919520https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69919520/ | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Correcting sharp angle | |
| 69846089 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2019-05-03 14:20 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | So... apparently it's the Setiawangsa Pantai Expressway. Using JOSM and am not a KL local, so I really don't have idea this is somewhere near Setiawangsa. |
| 44848542 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-01-02 16:02 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | angys ♦389 | I think Jalan Sejahtera is wrong name, maybe Jalan Keladi? There are no suh Sejahtera area appear near Keladi ad maybe mistaken from Alma one.. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=5.38345630105871&lng=100.55540574196343&z=17&pKey=iRpXOb-ui7LN1fR3sqTDWw&x=0.8546608805913689&y=0.5919100997120162&zoom=2.1251710429937924 | |
| 63143643 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-10-03 02:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Based on this note:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1548762 |
| 41254586 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-08-05 08:24 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | kucai ♦114 | Bos, waktu hang trace felda kg awah ni memang takde jalan langsung ke? Aku trace banyak gak dah, tapi nampaknya dah hilang habis. Dari Kolej Risda sampai simpang semua lenyap.. Baru minggu lepas aku sedar masa balik kg awah. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Fuh, ni cerita lama ni. Kalau ikut changeset comment dengan source ni, boleh jadi sekadar tambah landuse=residential dengan adjust jalan.Tahun 2016 ni Mapbox pun bukannya clear sangat coverage. Strava heatmap tu pun sekadar nak align, kalau bukan nak trace jalan besar.https://overpass-api.de... | |
| 60582292 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-07-10 15:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | These changesets have been reverted:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60580448https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60580400https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60580346 |
| 60546190 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-07-09 16:30 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Sorry to see your fake lake has to go |
| 47002745 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-03-20 06:26 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | angys ♦389 | I think that was Lagong IC.(From Wikipedia) |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Not open for traffic yet? No connecting roads.https://i.imgur.com/iqQulvA.jpg | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | angys ♦389 | Probably future IC since 2005 https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2005/09/29/open-the-bukit-lagong-access-to-guthrie-corridor/ | |
| 59164649 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-05-21 22:13 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Note for other OSM editors: OSM comes from the UK, so the definition of suburb is based on English (UK). It's a _part_ of a city/town; not an independent dwelling outside a city/town, if it's English (US) |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=suburb | |
| 58759853 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-05-07 14:04 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Mentioned OSM Note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1384065 |
| 58571301 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-04-30 23:43 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Related changesets:http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58557119http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58556825 |
| 57795695 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-04-04 08:43 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | Thank You... |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | It's not 100% complete. The junction for the southbound PLUS highway is not very clear. Need someone that can record GPS track. | |
| 56373446 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-15 05:35 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | rene78 ♦475 | Hi AkuAnakTimur,did you set up a tileserver for the Sentinel-2 images? I quickly went over https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_Sentinel-2_imagery and it sounds like that is what has to be done. Do you mind sharing the URL?ThanksRene |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hi! I don't actually use any tileserver.Actually it's just downloaded files, directly from https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/ - it's in JPEG2000 format (*.jp2). No sign-up needed as well!Then I load these JPEG2000 files into QGIS (or any GIS programs you fancy) to crop ... | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | One more thing, the JOSM plugin is not able to handle big geoTIFF files, hence, the need to crop into smaller segments.If you need any assistance, feel free to contact me! | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | rene78 ♦475 | Thanks for the explanation! Sounds straight forward. Gonna give it a try one day. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 years ago | rene78 ♦475 | Wow, those images are really up-to-date! But unfortunately quite low-res... | |
| 6 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Ah, sorry! Actually it has a resolution of 10m/pixel. Good enough to trace landuses or even highways under construction, but not very, very detailed elements. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | Can it use for iD? thank for your EKVE alignment | |
| 8 | ~ 8 years ago | rene78 ♦475 | Hi Angys, as far as I understand you have to manually import it to JOSM. | |
| 56280726 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-12 03:53 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | Can that imagery used for iD?, I would like to do an update for new LATAR exit at Bandar Tasik Puteri. |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Where? Show me the location first. | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Hit the share button (make sure marker is included) and copy it over here. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/3.2719/101.4747 | |
| 5 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2017/06/239518/persimpangan-bertingkat-bandar-tasik-puteri-dibuka | |
| 6 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Good enough? If this is fine, I will send you a link, tomorrow the earliest. https://i.imgur.com/jzBMFos.jpgClick Custom, and copy & paste the given URL. http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer | |
| 7 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | So if I want to use this in iD, I would need to copy the link and fill it into the Custom bar. | |
| 56373318 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-15 05:25 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | I think this is Central Spine Road |
| 56483352 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-19 07:41 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | Alor Pongsu IC? |
| 56656214 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-25 09:55 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Crossed check this area with Sentinel-2 imagery from early this month and the residential area is still intact. If it is a park, then it should be filled with greenery, rather than blocks of building.If Pokemon Go mappers happen to see this, so, how's your Dratini catches? |
| 55995255 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2018-02-02 12:57 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | And some geometry amendments |
| 51220462 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-08-18 03:40 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also source=survey |
| 44860127 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-01-03 01:42 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | Actually the western road part from terminal to Permatang Pauh I/C is not BKE and it is under Lebuhraya Lingkaran Butterworth.You may check Wikipedia for more info.. |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | That part I used photos from Mapillary. Please check this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=5.407426000000001&lng=100.36888199999999&z=17&pKey=MWYXyBn4VmcNfJH9r4wbzw&focus=photo&x=0.48854063277729726&y=0.5292988892117214&zoom=0I just changed the highway classificati... | |
| 48548217 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-05-10 02:14 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | angys ♦389 | thank you~~~ |
| 47465052 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-04-05 06:34 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Silly me. This time adding data, not reverting vandalism. |
| 46986325 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-03-19 16:01 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | angys ♦389 | I think that place=city is for Majlis Perbandaran or Majlis Bandaraya and Muar can be a little city.. |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I see what you are trying to say. Muar is the royal city of Johor (Bandar Maharani), but Majlis Perbandaran Muar is the "governing local entity" (PBT), not Majlis Bandaraya Muar. See http://www.mpmuar.gov.my/ | |
| 3 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Whoops, local governing entity or Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | In fact, the Wikipedia article explicitly mention Muar is a town. | |
| 5 | ~ 9 years ago | angys ♦389 | My city standard is a local goverment that over 200,000 people and Muar already over this standard that have 247,957 people in 2010 see this https://ms.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senarai_bandar_di_Malaysia_mengikut_pendudukWikipedia say it is a town but maybe now Muar can be consider as a Little c... | |
| 6 | ~ 9 years ago | angys ♦389 | oh same situation on Kulim that have abot 287,694 people | |
| 7 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | If consider your standard, then we have 39 (12+12+12+3) cities across Malaysia. I think better we stick to what's official and easier and clearer: which place got Majlis Bandaraya (that's definitely a city) and which got simply Majlis Perbandaran. | |
| 8 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Kangar is special case, but common knowledge says it is the capital of Perlis. Regardless its status as place=city or place=town, other tag can definitely help saying that Kangar is the capital of Perlis. | |
| 9 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Always remember that we tag data because that's simply it is in real life, not how we are going to show on the map ---> | |
| 10 | ~ 9 years ago | angys ♦389 | Ok so now Cities in Malaysia in OSM give to all capital and urban area as Klang Taiping or BM and other u can just give town as Temerloh Bentong Muar Sitiawan Kulim Dungun Kemaman Nibong Tebal Kuah Jasin Alor Gajah Kuala Kangsar Sepang for West Malaysia and other Just leave City. Just follow your s... | |
| 11 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | I will stick to something simple and official. Which place got Majlis Bandaraya, and which place not have Majlis Bandaraya - got only Majlis Perbandaran.Even Sungai Petani is under Majlis Perbandaran Sungai Petani, not Majlis Bandaraya Sungai Petani. It's official, Sungai Petani is only pla... | |
| 12 | ~ 9 years ago | angys ♦389 | So that mean you only reconize MB/DBs as a city?But the great city status normally is a capital too(only PJ is not a capital).Some place cannot get city status because money tax...So my side is MB/DB absolute a city.MP sometime is a city sometime not. | |
| 47002556 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2017-03-20 06:14 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Definitely needs GPS traces over here to confirm its geometry |
| 44688190 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-12-26 18:26 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | Karthik T ♦1 | Interesting, the Diet: information seems to be missing in my client, Maps.me |
| 43354330 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-11-02 15:13 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | *poor |
| 39831101 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-06-06 06:38 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | * without realising it I guess... |
| 39696623 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-05-31 19:45 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also using EU Copernicus (GMES) - Sentinel-2 data |
| 39541186 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2016-05-24 18:34 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Buang nama "Lebuhraya Persekutuan 1" sebab tiada papan tanda berkenaan. Kalau ada mohon ditunjukkan. |
| 32890807 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-07-26 14:57 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=518973 |
| 32890075 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-07-26 14:18 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=518971 |
| 32442166 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-07-06 07:59 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Also based on the description from local council websitehttp://webjabatan.kedah.gov.my/home4/new.php?jab=pdb&isi=content3&id1=246 |
| 32313209 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-06-30 16:46 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Yala, actually. Bad geography knowledge. Uh-oh. |
| 28223562 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2015-01-18 04:58 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Kalau Langkawi Medical Centre dah tutup, tolong confirmkan, comment sini. Terima kasih daun keladi. |
| 27402343 by AkuAnakTimur @ 2014-12-11 16:49 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | AkuAnakTimur | Sorry, it should be said that: do not put incorrect data into OSM |